Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "Exploring Hyperloop - The Future of Renewable Public Transport?" video.

@Taoquitok "mag lev vacuum train" to "wheeled cars in a normal tunnel" I think you're confusing the hyperloop with the Boring tunnel ( this is what you're describing here). The boring tunnel was never about "mag lev vacuum train" .
6
@DarktitanX2 "You do know electric car were created back in 1890" Yes, and it takes more than 100 years of development since 1890 for an EV to finally be able to compete and even outclass an an equivalent ICE vehicle. Technology doesn't stay stagnant, the same is true for the Hyperloop.
5
@DarktitanX2 Nothing about the hyperloop break the laws of physics. It may not ending up being competitive with existing transport tech or even economical, but the concept itself is physically and technologically possible.
4
@DarktitanX2 The fact that they have succeeded (at varying stage) at this point proves that they are both physically and technologically (even with our level of tech possible ,. hence why you are still wrong in your OP.
3
@DarktitanX2 Good that you finally accepted/admitted that you're wrong.
3
@DarktitanX2 That not what you wee trying to insinuate in your OP. You were trying to claim that they were physically impossible when the fact is it is not the case.
2
@DarktitanX2 You should've said "Okay boomers" or what ever you kids these day says when an older gentleman tries to correct/educate you, boy. And you're welcome.
2
@Taoquitok To be fair, Musk haven't really done anything with Hyperloop ever since he brought up the idea so he didn't really reneged on anything . Pretty much all developments for Hyperloop are being conducted by other unrelated companies and organisation while Musk seeming focussed on projects other than hyperloop (Tesla , Boring tunnel etc) . Surprisingly ,Musk himself didn't have a team on the project.
1
@solutionrebellion To be fair ,Thunderf00t isn't exactly a credible source for analysing hyperloop. To say that his methodology (misrepresenting the safety issues of hyperloop eg) he used in is some of his video are flawed (as well as the conclusion he tried to push by using them) is an understatement .
1
@Taoquitok That is pure speculation on your part. You could be right or you could be wrong (or somewhere in between), it's not something we can know.
1
@DBZHGWgamer There are multiple misrepresentation in Tghundrf00t's videos ( another user listed rebuttal to Thhunderf00ts videos in the comment section ). Once example of this is him misrepresenting the danger of sudden breach (no, a small hole would not resulted in a catastrophic explosive decompression), even going so far to rigging experiment with cherry picked variables to illustrate his point .He pushed the false conclusion that the hyperloop is more dangerous than it is because of this . Again, if you watch his video you would notice many of his problematic approach in his works such as contradictory statement (his videos gains batteries in EV eg), misrepresenting /cherry picking ( his anti Space X videos eg ) as well as completely missing the point in an otherwise slam duck topic ( EmDrive and Chernobyl miniseries eg).
1
@DBZHGWgamer ", he said a small hole would make maintaining a vacuum impossible, and he literally showed the math of the rate at which air enters a hole and showed that a total hole volume of like 5mm across multiple or a single hole would make maintaining a significant vacuum impossible" That assuming that such hole would be left unchecked and no one who monitor the hyperloop to even notice the sudden change in the air pressure within the loop. That is a rather unreasonable assumption to make but an necessary assumption needed to support the narrative of the loop being more dangerous than it really would be. "The only thing he ever implied would be "explosive" is the hyper loop imploding at the slightest structural failure assuming you actually managed to maintain any real vacuum in the first place. Which is not decompression, it's normal compression." You precisely repeated that misinformation he said: A) no model of the hyperloop were ever designed nor was going to have real vacuum in any way B) she amount of effort needed to cause such breach to happens On order for such catastrophic implosion to occur would require something very sudden , akin to a terrorist action such as using explosive (an d only explosive , even something like an anti material rifle would not produce such results) to detonate segment of the hyperloop . Even then he's assuming there were no safety measure designed to limit the extent of destruction
1