Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "Bad Celebrities Tier List" video.

@snapshotinhistory1367 Correction: they attacked him, no one have any proof that they tried to kill him. That is like bringing a knife to fistfight. Only a psychopaths think they have no reasons to be remorseful for taking a life. Decent people have doubts and question if they was any chance such acts could be prevented (even in profession where their dusty require them taking lives if needed, like police) , nothing I saw from Rittenhouse's post trial actions (statements, interviews etc) shows he's decent.
5
@snapshotinhistory1367 That was because Rittenhouse raised his rifle at him. If he shot Rittenhouse dead you could argues he was right to kill that vigilante wannabe in self defense, expect he did fire his weapon at Rittenhouse at all. Merely aiming a weapon at someone don't ' count as "attacking" them. Face it, Rittenhouse purposely placed himself in dangerous situation he was never supposed to be in in the first place , panicked and shot three people and wasn't even remorseful for that. None of these point to hem bein good person.
5
@snapshotinhistory1367 As I said, he unnecessarily puts himself in that situation. It was a split second decisions that would have never needed to be made in the first place. On top of that he wasn't even remorseful for his mistake. Imagine an alleged reckless (who killed someone due to his driving) driver having the same attitude as him after winning in court ?
5
@snapshotinhistory1367 Again, he and his friends purposely came into the state (that was not his hometown nor was he called there) looking for trouble. This some negligent driver that killed someone . His remorseless attitude is most galling, even drunk drivers would express some guilt over their deeds.
4
@snapshotinhistory1367 The two men he killed weren't. That only armed person Rittenhouse shot at was the witness who didn't even attacked him in the first place.
4
@snapshotinhistory1367 Kyle did plenty of wrong. For starters he wasn't supposed to be there nor was he supposed to armed. His conduct after he won the case also showed he wasn't remorseful for taking lives.
3
@snapshotinhistory1367 He shouldn't be there in the first place nor was he supposed to be armed. He came out of state lookin for trouble and he found it.
3
@Tommyboy6426 The protesters were local, he wasn't . Again, he came out of state fully armed with a weapon he wasn't supposed to have. The so called "relative" doesn't have property in the vicinity of the incident.
2
@Tommyboy6426 I'm sure the family and friends of the people he killed and injured cared. His right ended the moment he decided to instigate a confrontation and fired his weapon in a crowd. By cleaning u you man killing 2 people and wounding other , casualties that could be avoided had he used common sense and not play vigilante games.
2
@holly6703 Yes, there was MUTUAL psychological and emotional abuse form both side of that disaster of marriage . Heard however took it a step too far by being physically abusive and lying about Depp physically and sexually assaulting her. The fact that she was so sanctimonious about it while bein so much of a hypocrite (it was revealed on stand that Heard too had been abusing substance) on the is another shit up her records. That is before you counting her lying under oath during the UK trial.
1
@snapshotinhistory1367 What I would have done is not cross state lines armed with a weapon I do not supposed to have just to antagonise some random strangers. You're right you should have been scared for your life after makin so many stupid unforced decisions. YOU also should fell remorseful for killing people who would be alive HAD you not been there.
1
@skylerk126 How is Depp worse? While both of them mentally/emotionally abuse each other, Depp didn't physically abuse Heard nor did he falsely accuses her of sexually assaulting him, Amber Heard dis both to Depp. Furthermore, unlike Dep, Heard was caught lying about what happened several time, even while on stand.
1
@Tommyboy6426 Do Kyle know the person was a convicted SO when he killed him? No? So I guess by your book it would be fine to randomly murder several people you don't know if only one of them turned out to be heinous criminal .
1