Comments by "remliqa" (@remliqa) on "" video.

  1.  @grahamstevenson1740  Everything I said about Mason (Thunderf00t real name) is my previous post is correct and corroborated by experts in those fields , fields in which Mason have little knowledge himself and is nowhere an expert on. For example :If you actually do know science than you would know that solid state hydrogen (metal hydride to be exacts) solved many of the problems faced with storing hydrogen. It even have leg up of liquid hydrogen in terms of efficiency and energy density per volume. Something Mason conveniently missed , as he wont to do when talking about science and tech that he have little understanding of.
    2
  2. Philip E. Mason is ridiculously overrated. He tend to cherry pick data and presents false information and rigged experiments to "debunk " what he doesn't like on . Even his maths of certain thing like Hyperloop and Spin Launch is wrong. Even on slam dunks subject like EM drive and Chernobyl series accuracy he tend the miss the point such as why NASA needed to conduct multiple test on EM Drive and how Chernobyl was historically accurate is it depiction what people think of nuclear risk at that time. And then there are cases where he just embarrassingly wrong like his opinions of battery (especially for EV) , solid state storage for hydrogen and even NASA and Space X. the guys is like Jordan Petersons when he gave confident opinion on subject ways beyond his expertise
    1