Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "GBNews" channel.

  1. 14
  2. 12
  3. 9
  4. 8
  5. 8
  6. 6
  7.  @abcxyz2927  I grew up with an neighbour with gender dysphoria. Not 10 years ago, or even 20. I met the guy in 1958, when i was 6 years old and he was 4. He looked like a boy, had the bowl cut all of boys had, wore boys clothes and everything, but he acted like a girl. The way that he talked and walked, the way that he moved, everything about him was girlish. He really freaked us out. His brother told me that he was always like that. His parents were embarrassed with the way he was. When he was 16, he took off to the big city and started to live as a cross dresser. Why was he like that? It wasn't his parents who dressed him as a boy and gave him a boy's name and haircut and were at a loss on what to do with him. There were no activist teachers or doctors trying to convince him that he was a girl. We were country folk, many of us religious, including his family. He did it all on his own, right from the time that he started to walk and talk. How could a 3 year old dream all this up and then keep it up his entire life? It's a mental condition, just like Tourette's and any other mental affliction. It's been well studied and it's been a part of humanity for thousands of years. It's NOTHING like the stuff that's going on now. Not even close. From what I can see, Buck Angel is the same and he's speaking out against the insanity that's going on now. If we can't even be reasonable and admit that this could be a medical problem and that the cutting and pasting of body parts isn't going to solve anything, we'll be ruining the lives of children for years....all at the behest of socialist activists. Their role is to disrupt the concept of reality and they're using children to do it. That's what socialists do. They take a real problem, that's extremely rare, and distort it to their own ends. If you don't understand it, you're falling right into their hands. Don't let them do that. You're a sucker if you do.
    5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44.  @SkageXL5  Ok....here we go. S Kage first comment. "LOL, go cry about it!" My reply "LOL. They CRIED about those who they claim were in power, who laughed and exerted power over them for years. Now they're in power, just as the comment stated, and now they're crying because the pride movement is leaving them behind and the NEW power is mocking them. You're either totally self unaware or you ARE aware and you just don't care." S Kage "@Jack Haveman You're the second person who's made the error of assuming I know what "they's" you're talking about. Reading your response to me you use "They" or "them" 6 times, and appear to switch who "they" are at least once. This is clearly a Transphobe/Bigot problem and speaks to the type of person that holds those positions Can you rewrite what you're trying to say so it makes sense and defines who you're talking about at any point so I can consider a response? I assume you'll either not respond, or respond with some vague imagined personal attacks and other things to cast yourself as a victim, because that's all you people ever do. Either way, thanks in advance!" My reply. "First, you told the original commentor, King Arthur" to cry about it. I would assume that you're were mocking him and his take on the modern Pride movement. When I was using the "they" and "them" pronouns, I was referring to those in the Pride movement, the collective, as "they" or "them" because they are a group. That's been a staple of the English language for hundreds of years. It should be quite obvious who I'm referring to if you have any basic knowledge of the English language. 30 years ago, gays and lesbians claimed to be marginalised and victimised and started the Pride movement. Now the Pride symbol is everywhere and try to criticise anything about the movement. It could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Now YOU, the singular, to help you with the English language, are mocking those who are feeling marginalised, who are afraid to say what they think, by mocking King Arthur, the singular, as a representative of the group, the "they" and "them" that's used to signify group members. It's really rather easy if you know the English language." Then you say... " LOL, you left a trail of dust when you ran away :D" So I reply.... "I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away??" So you say this.... "Just gonna put a copy of your lie here, because you're probably going to delete it and to try and hide your failure. "Jack Haveman Jack Haveman 20 minutes ago @S Kage I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away?? " That's a little perplexing but you respond.... "Here goes @Jack Haveman again, just running away, shouting lies over their shoulder. LOL" So I finish up with this... "Never mind. An adult discussion is beyond your capabilities. Rather sad, really. When you grow up, we'll talk like adults. Until then, eat your veggies." I don't know what's going on but this is what I see in my comment section. If you're not seeing this, I don't know what to tell you. I've responded every time.
    1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1