Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "GBNews" channel.

  1.  @sonyso1235  She does care whether her constituents vote for her in the next election. She wants the power behind being an MP. It could well be that her constituents are forcing her into this position. She may not like it but she'll do whatever's necessary to hold onto power. Making your voice heard to your MP does have an effect.
    14
  2. @samirdoncic6395 I care. That's my daughter, my grand daughters, my sisters. I'm a man. Part of being a man is protecting those who are important to my life and that includes the women in my life. By the sounds of it, to protect them from people like you.
    12
  3.  @TheHeninhardenne  The predator would accept her invitation. It's what a predator does. They will take advantage of their victim, who may be suffering from social, familial or mental issues and then cry that THEY were the ones lured by the victim. No responsible adult would have accepted her invitation. The temptation to commit immoral and illegal acts are always present. Those who try to live within the bounds of morality, always resist the temptations, no matter what that temptation should happen to be. You don't clean out someone else's wallet just because it was left unattended on a coffee table, no matter how tempting in might be. You don't sexually assault as 12 year old, even if that 12 year old initiates the contact. When you do wrong it's ALWAYS you're fault.
    9
  4.  @bigglyguy8429  It would take one generation. In 1960, the pill came onto the market. The generation, that were the parents at the time, had large families. However, their children, who were already born and later became adults, they had much smaller families. In fact, were it not for immigrants, most of those countries would be seeing their populations go down. As long as those poor starving people remain poor and starving, they won't have access to the information or the tools to make the choices to have small families. We have to raise their standard of living, out of abject poverty, which is 1.90 American per day. When that's done, their children will have smaller families and the impact will be felt when those, who were once starving, become senior citizens. In other words, it will happen in their lifetime. Instead, Covid, according to UN numbers, has seen people go back into abject poverty. Over 250,000,000 of them. Bill Gates supported the lock downs, which was the reason for this surge in poverty, yet he knows that this poverty will increase birth rates in 3rd world countries. For a smart guy, its amazing how he doesn't see the contradiction here.
    8
  5.  @danielbaxter3713  Ok. Answer this question. Has anyone born with XY chromosomes ever given birth to a baby? Just one example that can be verified. Not someone who's transitioned from a woman to a man, but a person who has XY chromosomes and who has given birth. I will wait for the answer. If you don't have an example, don't ignore me. Admit it, although I don't expect to hear from you.
    8
  6.  @jamesclarkmaxwell-v2n  Why should they build more schools and hospitals? I'm not following what you mean.
    6
  7.  @abcxyz2927  I grew up with an neighbour with gender dysphoria. Not 10 years ago, or even 20. I met the guy in 1958, when i was 6 years old and he was 4. He looked like a boy, had the bowl cut all of boys had, wore boys clothes and everything, but he acted like a girl. The way that he talked and walked, the way that he moved, everything about him was girlish. He really freaked us out. His brother told me that he was always like that. His parents were embarrassed with the way he was. When he was 16, he took off to the big city and started to live as a cross dresser. Why was he like that? It wasn't his parents who dressed him as a boy and gave him a boy's name and haircut and were at a loss on what to do with him. There were no activist teachers or doctors trying to convince him that he was a girl. We were country folk, many of us religious, including his family. He did it all on his own, right from the time that he started to walk and talk. How could a 3 year old dream all this up and then keep it up his entire life? It's a mental condition, just like Tourette's and any other mental affliction. It's been well studied and it's been a part of humanity for thousands of years. It's NOTHING like the stuff that's going on now. Not even close. From what I can see, Buck Angel is the same and he's speaking out against the insanity that's going on now. If we can't even be reasonable and admit that this could be a medical problem and that the cutting and pasting of body parts isn't going to solve anything, we'll be ruining the lives of children for years....all at the behest of socialist activists. Their role is to disrupt the concept of reality and they're using children to do it. That's what socialists do. They take a real problem, that's extremely rare, and distort it to their own ends. If you don't understand it, you're falling right into their hands. Don't let them do that. You're a sucker if you do.
    5
  8.  @AwakenedRaveN  Good for you. A pillar of the community. Salt of the earth. 😀
    5
  9. Sure. Let's deflect the blame away from those who are actually abusing those kids. I grew up with 4 sisters, back in the sixties. My sisters didn't have to stay indoors. They were as free to go out and play as me and my 2 brothers were. Just another way to blame the victims. Take away their freedoms so abusers won't have the opportunity to abuse.....what a great idea. I have a better idea. Let's stop looking the other way and get those abusers off the streets so they can't abuse or form these gangs. Let's take away THEIR freedom instead of the freedom of innocent children. Let's stop pretending that not holding those men to account PROVES that we're not racist. It's a very shallow form of virtue signaling that only those who aren't directly impacted can afford to demonstrate to the world.
    4
  10.  @AwakenedRaveN  I like "Bus". They're useful and it doesn't have that "Karen" association that the "Chads" do. "Hey Bus. How's it going?" It even rolls off the tongue pleasantly.
    4
  11. It depends on the private school. If it's a religious school, you can be a little more comfortable with what's being taught. However, even then, a teacher can say things in line with their own beliefs or a student can claim bias, at the school, for the schools's stance against some LGBTQ ideas, to political leaders. Secular schools can be just as bad or worse than public schools.
    3
  12.  @MegaWillow18  The truth is that you can't hardly grow a thing on those empty lands. I live in Canada and we're a major agricultural producer but, even still, most of Canada is impossible to farm. That's a fact. I fly over those empty regions all the time and I know for a fact that most of Canada is near bare rock with trees clinging on to this rock for dear life. These empty spaces don't just apply to the Canadian north. It stretches into Alaska and on into Siberia all the way into northern Europe. It's terrible farmland. Same as the large deserts in the world. If you want to make deserts liveable, you have to import large quantities of water. California is suffering from farming and population pressures to the point that all lakes and rivers, in the immediate vicinity, are drying up. The Colorado River doesn't even flow into the Pacific anymore. I do agree though that the WEF is an horrific institution and we should fight them without quarter.
    3
  13.  Thomas Daley  I'd say that it takes a lot of guts for someone to stand up, in front of their own community, and say that maybe they've been looking at their situation in a false manner. She stands up to the vitriol that people fire at her, that she's a race traitor, a sell out, a grifter and the rest. That takes guts and I don't care who you are. Why don't you try this for a change. Instead of attacking her, try assessing her message. When I was young, a long time ago, the worst thing a parent or adult figures could tell someone is that they're losers, that they'll never amount to anything. That's the message that's been thrown at the black community for years, from white liberals and blacks, themselves. She's saying that it doesn't have to be that way and you can do good for yourself if you work hard, make good decisions and persevere. I will add that all one has to do is look to the Americans of Asian heritage. They work their talebones off and have a higher income, per family unit, than white Americans. It can be done but it will never happen if you don't believe in yourself first.
    3
  14.  @tonyhoban6600  The "I don't know what you mean" defence. You know exactly who "they" are and I know this by your deflection when you criticised another one of your constructed collectives and one that you don't appear to like. Your only pretending to be stupid. I think the correct word is disingenuous.
    3
  15.  @PaxAlotin-x2s  And these were all authors from very limited regions. Their reach didn't spread out over the world because quite often their homelands were isolated. Most people in Nigeria have no idea what the Ge'ez script is. Besides, the Shakespeare exhibit is in his home town and celebrating his work. What does African languages have to do with that? If I was in Ethiopia and at an exhibit of the royal family, I'd want to see things pertaining to that dynasty. The same with Shakespeare. I don't care about colonisation when seeing an exhibit of Shakespeare. I want to see things that pertain to the life of Shakespeare.
    3
  16. China should never have been granted the Olympics, in the first place.
    2
  17. Islam is a religious ideology. Fascism is also an ideology, but a political ideology. Fascism is considered HORRIBLE by the left. However, Islam is protected by the far left. The left defends it by saying that criticising Islam is racist. Islam is NOT a race or ethnic group. It's a religious ideology. One can be of any race or ethnicity and be a Muslim. One can be of any race or ethnicity and be Fascist. Why is it that the radical left can't see this simple fact?
    2
  18. She inserts the word "identifies" as a rationalisation for using these new terms. I can identify as anything I want that doesn't make it so. Funny, how it seems to be only the word "woman" that we can't define, anymore. I have yet to hear a term that covers all men. I have a feeling it's because if we stop using the word "men" they can't complain about the patriarchy anymore. That would be a disaster for the wokesters.
    2
  19.  @abcxyz2927  Buck is NOT the problem. It's those who are going into the schools and telling children, who have serious problems in their personal life, that their problems stem from gender dysphoria. That's not trying to safeguard their own status quo. That's recruiting and using the most vulnerable members of society. It's trying to distort the perception of reality of others. Buck KNOWS that he's not a man and he says so. He's saying that there's something wrong with HIM and he's trying to cope with it as best he can. He's not telling anyone else what their problem is and he's definitely not a teacher, who's using their position to dispense medical information to children and telling them NOT to tell their parents. That's against the law.
    2
  20.  @SkageXL5  First, you told the original commentor, King Arthur" to cry about it. I would assume that you're were mocking him and his take on the modern Pride movement. When I was using the "they" and "them" pronouns, I was referring to those in the Pride movement, the collective, as "they" or "them" because they are a group. That's been a staple of the English language for hundreds of years. It should be quite obvious who I'm referring to if you have any basic knowledge of the English language. 30 years ago, gays and lesbians claimed to be marginalised and victimised and started the Pride movement. Now the Pride symbol is everywhere and try to criticise anything about the movement. It could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Now YOU, the singular, to help you with the English language, are mocking those who are feeling marginalised, who are afraid to say what they think, by mocking King Arthur, the singular, as a representative of the group, the "they" and "them" that's used to signify group members. It's really rather easy if you know the English language.
    2
  21.  @SkageXL5  I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away??
    2
  22.  @SkageXL5  Never mind. An adult discussion is beyond your capabilities. Rather sad, really. When you grow up, we'll talk like adults. Until then, eat your veggies.
    2
  23. Decolonisation of math....have you ever heard anything so ridiculous. Their brains are made of mush.
    2
  24. No 9 year old has a firm concept of what pronouns are or means. They have to be told. That's how we all found out them at the peril of our English grades. Now, they ALL know because it's being drummed into them and that they get to choose their pronouns. It's a manufactured situation.
    1
  25.  @Thepoweroftheriffcompelsme  These are academics, people who are teaching our children. They didn't even lose their jobs for saying the things that they did. First they gaslight us by claiming that WE are intolerant and we need to understand paedophiles. That implies normalisation. Then they claim "marginalised" status, as if they're the victims NOT abusers. They won't even accept the idea that children don't have the agency to understand sexuality or the psychological implications that could go with it. The "normalisation" process. Now, YOU'RE making excuses for them. The normalisation process is already working on you. Either that or you're....one of them? Let's hope not.
    1
  26.  @ypatel1070  It's the Muslim attitude towards infidels and Kaffirs that's at the heart of the problem. They're thought of as less than human. That translates into Muslims, who aren't as moral or pious as they should be, feeling justified into doing as they want with infidels, which includes plying young girls with alcohol and drugs. It's the same attitude that created ISIS and the Taliban. They hide behind your religion. I'd be outraged at this if I were you. It would be in the best interest of all good Muslims to fight this attitude along side the rest of us. No more excuses for those Muslims who pervert the words of your Holy Book, just like Christians have been quite vocal of their disapproval of sexually abuse Catholic priests.
    1
  27.  @bigglyguy8429  I'm not sure that I agree with that. I think Gates is worse than just greedy. I think that he's an ideologue and that he's part of a movement to "save" the world. Part of that is to reduce human population. Vaccines do save lives and sickness does a lot to keep people in poverty. The west has shown that if people have the financial resources, those people will have smaller families as a life decision. Every economically rich nation is losing population numbers and to maintain those numbers they encourage immigration. The thing is, Gates the ideologue, would be tempted to use vaccines in highly unethical ways. After all, he's saving the world and he believes, as ideologues are prone to, that this is his cause allows him to do those unethical acts. “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." C.S. Lewis. This fits Bill Gates to a tee.
    1
  28.  @bigglyguy8429  I agree with the "spiteful peevish child" description. I think that you'll find every socialist minded zealot and authoritarian to fit that description. The fact that he's had extreme financial success hasn't cured that childish viewpoint of life. It's only provided him with an arrogance to follow his belief system even more. His mission becomes even more sacrosanct. It gives him a sense that he's better than the rest of us and that gives him the ethical justification to lord it over us. A "spiteful peevish child" in a man's body, believing in his mission to save the world, is exactly the kind of despot that C. S. Lewis was talking about. He's the moral busybody and, to him, the rest of us are just "dumb" plebeians, who can't be trusted to run their own lives. He'll do it for us. Your comment, in a lot of ways, backs up what I've been trying to say.
    1
  29.  @grazynkatodisco4916  I have no problem with that. However, if imagination isn't grounded in reality, it's only value is in entertainment. To accomplish things, one must be able to gain the knowledge to fulfil your imagination and dreams. That's what Einstein did. He didn't just imagine it. He then tried to see if his imagination was grounded in reality. His fame and success came from the work to turn imagination into knowledge. Imagination without knowledge is just "pie in the sky" mental meandering. You have to come down from the clouds and then work towards those dreams.
    1
  30. We don't live in a tyrannical state, at least that's the claim. Our leaders didn't stage a violent coup and forced their way into becoming "those in charge". WE voted them in. It was OUR choice. So...yes, as a society we failed. It isn't as if the grooming gang phenomenon is something new. This has been known about for years. We can't choose the same leaders over and over and then blame THEM for doing what they've always been doing. We have to take responsibility for our choices or these miscreants will always be in charge.
    1
  31. If you can't define the word "woman", then you can't define the world "man", either. If you can't define what a man or woman is, then that would be the end of the patriarchy, as a target of disdain, as well. The entire left wing ideology and the claims that go with it becomes so convoluted that it becomes pointless.
    1
  32. This comes from the idea that only white people can be bigoted. The truth is that many of these migrants are extremely bigoted towards those who are different than them.
    1
  33.  @thetransagender2866  You're not presenting much of a case. Instead of ad hominem attacks, give a rational response that explains your position. Making sneering remarks validates what people say about transgenders, that being that they can't hold a civil conversation. Unless you're a troll. Then go away.
    1
  34. @ThisIsLanaBanana. The guy's a troll. Pay no attention to him. A lonely pissant.
    1
  35. They don't care if that baby dies. They know full well that millions will die if they stop oil completely, today. It doesn't matter to them. As far as they're concerned, people are a cancer on this earth.....except them of course. They rest of us are disposable. We're collateral damage in the war on oil and their noble cause to save the planet.....NOT humanity but the planet.
    1
  36.  @abcxyz2927  What does that have to do with Buck Angel? She's said NUMEROUS times that she has a mental disorder. He/she admits it. Buck, a true transsexual, is saying that the APA is WRONG....just like we are. Are you responsible for what the APA is claiming? You're saying the EXACT same thing that Buck is saying. Canadian gender researcher, Kenneth Zucker, studied gender dysphoria for decades and came to the conclusion, from all the data collected, that it is a very rare disorder and that most people grow out of it during and after puberty and many are actually gay. Only a very rare amount keep the disorder for the rest of their lives. Zucker has been cancelled and fired from his job for this, even though he was recognised as a leading expert on the disorder. Buck Angel is one of the very rare individuals, just like the guy I grew up with, who have had the disorder persist through their entire life. Don't react out of anger. React to the facts.
    1
  37. It's even easier for an athlete to ignore the human rights abuses and genocides for personal gain. Money and fame always trump integrity, ethics and principles. "Better they lose their lives than I lose my fame and fortune."
    1
  38.  @solarisxyz3405  LMAO. If only you could see me in real life. LOL. I'm a 70 year old teenager, who's spent a lifetime working in factories and construction and who grew up on a farm. Am I idealistic?? Yes, I am. I have a set of ideals that I try my best to stand for. Money's great but it's NOT my prime directive and I've quit jobs, on principle, to go to a lesser paying job. So, instead of creating a straw man Jack, talk about the ideas that I've presented, instead of the pretend "Jack" that you've created in your mind.
    1
  39.  @lordcharfield  He won't answer. Trolls never do. They slip in their catchphrases and then hide in the bushes, waiting to see how many people will respond. The sneaks of the internet.
    1
  40. The league will eventually compromise. Christians will be forced to wear the rainbow jerseys but Muslims will be exempt.
    1
  41.  @Kenny-sx4gl  He's in jail for saying this. The contempt of court was just their way of getting him off the streets and they hoped that this would be the end of it. Had Tommy never said a word about this, he'd still be a free man and you and I would never had heard of him. Back then, if you made too much trouble about this issue, you'd find yourself under arrest for any one of a dozen reasons....contempt of court being one of them. It's how corrupt governments operate. Lavrentiy Beria, the head of Stalin's secret police put it best. "Show me the man and I will show you his crime." When they want you, they will get you.
    1
  42.  @michellelewis3063  Then why don't you enlighten us.
    1
  43.  @SkageXL5  LOL. They CRIED about those who they claim were in power, who laughed and exerted power over them for years. Now they're in power, just as the comment stated, and now they're crying because the pride movement is leaving them behind and the NEW power is mocking them. You're either totally self unaware or you ARE aware and you just don't care.
    1
  44.  @SkageXL5  Ok....here we go. S Kage first comment. "LOL, go cry about it!" My reply "LOL. They CRIED about those who they claim were in power, who laughed and exerted power over them for years. Now they're in power, just as the comment stated, and now they're crying because the pride movement is leaving them behind and the NEW power is mocking them. You're either totally self unaware or you ARE aware and you just don't care." S Kage "@Jack Haveman You're the second person who's made the error of assuming I know what "they's" you're talking about. Reading your response to me you use "They" or "them" 6 times, and appear to switch who "they" are at least once. This is clearly a Transphobe/Bigot problem and speaks to the type of person that holds those positions Can you rewrite what you're trying to say so it makes sense and defines who you're talking about at any point so I can consider a response? I assume you'll either not respond, or respond with some vague imagined personal attacks and other things to cast yourself as a victim, because that's all you people ever do. Either way, thanks in advance!" My reply. "First, you told the original commentor, King Arthur" to cry about it. I would assume that you're were mocking him and his take on the modern Pride movement. When I was using the "they" and "them" pronouns, I was referring to those in the Pride movement, the collective, as "they" or "them" because they are a group. That's been a staple of the English language for hundreds of years. It should be quite obvious who I'm referring to if you have any basic knowledge of the English language. 30 years ago, gays and lesbians claimed to be marginalised and victimised and started the Pride movement. Now the Pride symbol is everywhere and try to criticise anything about the movement. It could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Now YOU, the singular, to help you with the English language, are mocking those who are feeling marginalised, who are afraid to say what they think, by mocking King Arthur, the singular, as a representative of the group, the "they" and "them" that's used to signify group members. It's really rather easy if you know the English language." Then you say... " LOL, you left a trail of dust when you ran away :D" So I reply.... "I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away??" So you say this.... "Just gonna put a copy of your lie here, because you're probably going to delete it and to try and hide your failure. "Jack Haveman Jack Haveman 20 minutes ago @S Kage I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away?? " That's a little perplexing but you respond.... "Here goes @Jack Haveman again, just running away, shouting lies over their shoulder. LOL" So I finish up with this... "Never mind. An adult discussion is beyond your capabilities. Rather sad, really. When you grow up, we'll talk like adults. Until then, eat your veggies." I don't know what's going on but this is what I see in my comment section. If you're not seeing this, I don't know what to tell you. I've responded every time.
    1
  45.  T Z  I think that you're missing the problem here. The school's are indoctrinating our kids into accepting a new, Marxist influenced ideology. That means that, not only the trans problem, but all the problems that you mentioned will become even more deeply entrenched in the future. That's the goal of the entire thing. Make so many of the students become separated from their families and leaning on the government that they will accept anything that the state dictates. Education is how this movement grew. It's at the very heart of how they advance their agenda.
    1
  46.  @philc1773  So the answer is to assume that the parents are ALWAYS guilty. Guilty until proven innocent. I'd have to see the evidence that says that 95% of all LGBTQ are victims of parental abuse. That's a pretty bold claim.
    1
  47.  @hardlines2635  I had been celibate for almost 7 years. Not because I wanted that way due to a lack of interest in sex, but because I'd become very selective about you I share my affections with. I've just started a relationship with a great woman and it seems to be going well and I couldn't be happier. We took our time getting to the place where we made our commitment but it was worth it. Just because one has sexual urges, that doesn't mean they should be followed up on, no matter what. Also, we don't need to give tacit approval whose urges are directed at children. That's harmful to children and abhorrent. If you can't control your sexual feelings, you degenerated into the realm of animal behaviour, reacting to primal needs instead of acting out of caring and responsibility.
    1
  48.  @PaxAlotin-x2s  When did I denigrate anyone's culture? Calling me racist doesn't legitimise your point.....not one bit. It's intellectually lazy and doesn't mean a thing. Also, my point has nothing to do with the languages being African in itself. My point was that Africa's regions were isolated for reasons of geography not because of race. I never mentioned race, ethnicity, skin colour, intelligence of anything of that nature. It was YOU that did that. Most of my comment was about Shakespeare and his home town. When you have an exhibit about someone, ANYONE, the exhibit should be about them, not how it relates to your favourite cause. When you do that, you make their life all about YOU and I'd call that rather narcissistic.
    1
  49.  @NCStreaming2025  I have the right to judge the behaviour and claims of anyone, no matter who they are or what they believe. It's called freedom. I've just judged your response. It's abhorrent...even if you're trolling but especially if you actually believe the shit that's spewing out of your brain.
    1
  50.  Tim Foster  Blame China for actually doing those experiments and then not taking the precautions to ensure safety for the rest of the world. Fauci allowed money to go there but China was doing that research whether he sent money or not. China has to accept the brunt of the criticism with Fauci and the NIH being criticised as accomplices.
    1