Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered" channel.

  1. 202
  2. 41
  3.  @raystory7059  Empty weight of a B-25 bomber is about 10 tons. The empty weight of a 737 is about 45 tons. The bomber was flying slowly, around 200 mph, because of the fog and he didn't want to hit anything. The planes on 9/11 were travelling twice as fast and wanted to hit those buildings as hard as they could. The Empire State Building had a different basic support structure and facade than the Twin Towers. These factors could easily account for the differences in the final result. Do you know what other buildings weren't hit by planes on 9/11? WTC3, 4, 5 and 6, yet these buildings were also demolished that day. Do you know why? Tens of thousands of tons of debris crashing into them from the falling towers. Building 7 also suffered massive damage from thousands of tons of debris. Check out this picture of the damage at one corner of WTC7. http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/images/articles/911-images/wtc7-side-damage1.jpg A huge cut, into the bottom of the building, 10 stories high, that's 1/3 of the height, and 1/4 of the way into the building......GONE. I'll bet money that you wouldn't live or work in that building if it didn't fall. Do you know why? You'd be afraid that it wasn't structurally safe or secure and you'd be correct. Only a fool would have taken residence there. It was only a matter of time before it did fall. How do I know that it was hit by debris from the falling North Tower? Video of the collapse shows it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEgPNNcdtu4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 Watch these videos. They show how much debris hit building 7 and how it didn't need to be hit by a plane to be structurally compromised. Listen to this fireman talking about the burning building 7 BEFORE the collapse and how it was leaning and there was nothing they could do to stop it from collapsing. He even said that this was because they couldn't put the fires out and the flames added to the structural damage of the building. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 You're making a superficial argument with no real evidence except for your incredulity. "You can't tell me" isn't evidence. It's a defence for a statement of conjecture and that's all you've done.
    16
  4. 13
  5. 13
  6. 9
  7. 6
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1