Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Daniel D." channel.

Same as me. We were relatively poor, coming out of WW2, no birth control so our family was large. No modern conveniences, no fast food and our parents worked long hours. It was a part of our job, not just to do household chores but to make sure that we weren't a burden on our parents who had enough work to do looking after 7 kids. Cause a disruption to their already heavy burden and there was hell to pay. It was more important to eat, have decent clothes and a warm bed than to be coddled 24/7 and we felt shame if we were continuously pampered.
13
@Spiritof_76 All I know is that the day that Matt Taibbi was to give testimony, on the Twitter files, the IRS showed up at his door. That's the height of villainy if you ask me. It's against the law to intimidate official witnesses. Yet, no Democrat called out that move.....NOT one. When a ruling party can't define what a woman is and mandates that men, who claim to be women(even though they don't know what a woman is), can take part in women's sports, I'm thinking that they've lost their grip on reality. How can I trust the judgement of any person or group who are that illogical? I can't.
9
@Spiritof_76 I don't have to take stock in Taibbi. All I have to do is look at what he showed us in the Twitter files concerning the Hunter Biden laptop. When you have evidence, the person with the evidence is irrelevant. It's the evidence that counts. Metaphorically shooting the messenger, in this case Taibbi, doesn't change the message. Twitter banned any mention of the Hunter laptop story, even the links to the New York post article that exposed the laptop. They went so far as to prevent sharing of this story through private messaging, a measure that was only reserved in the sharing of child pornography. The NY post is the oldest daily newspaper in the US and the 4th largest in the US. Taibbi, Bari Weiss and Michael Shellenberger all said the same thing about the laptop. They said that there was communication between the FBI and Twitter through a special one-way channel that had been setup between these 2 entities. It's also telling that one time FBI special counsel was working for Twitter at this time as well as other former FBI personnel. If the suppression, of a major news story, that the FBI KNEW was true doesn't bother you, I have to wonder what you're agenda is. Is it to support your party or to support the truth? I'm about the facts and truth and I find it appalling that Twitter would suppress, what is known as "censorship" news that might be damaging to one specific party and be helpful to another. That's not just the news of the laptop but also and dissension concerning government Covid policies and mandates. It's a violation of the 1st Amendment and if allowed to stand, that could impact X, now that it's owned by Musk, who could just censor or suppress stories that might damage Trump. I would bet that you'd find that quite upsetting.....yet we weren't even allowed to send a link to that laptop article through Twitter's private messaging service. Clearly a political move.
1
Lee didn't look for it. She had it and used it to get preferential treatment. There was racism involved, in this incident, but it wasn't from the school teacher. It was from Sheila Jackson Lee. She knew that what she was doing was wrong but she thought that she could use her privilege to browbeat that teacher and make her the bad guy. A disgusting display of the arrogance of the elites.
1