Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "The Rubin Report" channel.

  1. 1200
  2. 411
  3. 370
  4. 290
  5. 205
  6. 200
  7. 180
  8. 179
  9. 160
  10. 158
  11. 151
  12. 123
  13. 102
  14. 100
  15. 80
  16. 77
  17. 70
  18. 66
  19. 59
  20. 57
  21. 51
  22. 49
  23. 47
  24. 46
  25. 46
  26. 46
  27. 45
  28. 44
  29. 43
  30. 43
  31. 41
  32. 41
  33. 41
  34. 41
  35. 41
  36. 40
  37. 37
  38. 36
  39. 36
  40. 35
  41. 34
  42. 32
  43. 31
  44. 30
  45. 29
  46. 28
  47. 28
  48. 28
  49. 27
  50. 25
  51. 25
  52. 24
  53. 24
  54. 23
  55. 23
  56. 23
  57. 22
  58. 22
  59. 22
  60. 21
  61. 21
  62. 21
  63. 21
  64. 20
  65. 19
  66. 19
  67. 19
  68. 18
  69. 18
  70. 18
  71. 18
  72. 17
  73. 17
  74. 17
  75. 16
  76. 16
  77. 16
  78. 16
  79.  Jack Richardson  You're just unbelievable. Beyond it. How is it possible that a person could be that intentionally obtuse as to call Andy Ngo a Fascist. You don't even know what it is. Antifa stages riots, in Portland, for over 120 days in a row....that's FOUR MONTHS of continuous rioting. Patriot Prayer shows up for one day and it's the end of the world for people. You really don't have a clue. Now, before you accuse ME of being Fascist, I'm not a big fan of either Patriot Prayer or the Proud Boys. They're playing silly games. However to equate them with Antifa and their violence is so stupid that you have to be lying about it. I have to add that REAL Fascists nearly starved my mother to death during WW2 and put my uncle in a Jewish detention camp, until they found out he wasn't Jewish and put him in a POW camp until the war ended. I have no love for Fascists. Also, do you know what the East German government called the Berlin Wall? They called it the "Antifaschistischer Schutzwall" which translate to English as the "Anti-Fascist Protection Rampart". Antifa is short for "Anti-Fascist". The East Germans would stand on that "Rampart" and shoot to kill any East German that tried to leave East Germany. You see, they thought that EVERYONE in the west was a Fascist, exactly what the members of Antifa in the US believe. Everyone, that's not them or doesn't believe in their Marxist agenda, is a Fascist. That's almost EVERY American. You're either a Marxist or you're as delusional as they get.
    16
  80. 16
  81. 16
  82. 16
  83. 16
  84. 16
  85. 16
  86. 15
  87. 15
  88. 15
  89. 14
  90. 14
  91. 14
  92. 14
  93. 14
  94. 14
  95. 14
  96. 14
  97. 14
  98. 13
  99. 13
  100. 13
  101. 13
  102. 13
  103. 13
  104. 13
  105. 12
  106. 12
  107. 12
  108. 12
  109. 12
  110. 12
  111. 12
  112. 12
  113. 12
  114. 12
  115. 12
  116. 12
  117. 12
  118. 12
  119. 11
  120. 11
  121. 11
  122. 11
  123. 11
  124. 11
  125. 11
  126. 11
  127. 11
  128. 11
  129. 11
  130. 11
  131. 11
  132. 11
  133. 11
  134. 11
  135. msc14111990 You're now resorting to gossip, huh. Well, this historian you speak of, Niall Ferguson, separated from his wife in 2010. He then started dating Ali. One year later, they got married and they have a son that was born in December of 2011, long after Ferguson had split up with his wife. If you're a Muslim, divorce is perfectly acceptable and allowed as well as getting remarried. So, all you're doing is engaging in gossip, the activity of the small and mean minded. As for being a coward. She spent years under threat of murder from Muslim radicals. She had to go into hiding and still has to be careful about making her whereabouts known to the general public. If she ever went back to Somalia, she'd be killed and YOU know it. That's not being a coward. That's being smart. As for helping people, she's wrote books showing that a religion, culture, skin colour and gender shouldn't stop a person from becoming their own person, an individual with freedom of thought and expression. When she took an aptitude test in the Netherlands to see what she was best suited to work at, she was told that she should become an office worker. She didn't want that and said that she wanted to study political science. She was told that she would only get funding if she studied secretarial type jobs and if she wanted to study political science, she'd have to pay for it herself. So she did just that. She worked and studied and attained a degree in Political Science. Then she became a member of parliament in the Dutch government. Your problem is rather obvious to see through. You're a Muslim and you're one of those who think that any criticism of Islam is blasphemy and should be punished, even killed. If not a Muslim, one of the extreme liberal left, who isn't much different. The kind that thinks that anyone who doesn't agree with them 100 percent is a despicable person and shouldn't be allowed to speak and you'll use any means possible to denigrate including childish gossip.
    10
  136. 10
  137. 10
  138. 10
  139. 10
  140. 10
  141. 10
  142. 10
  143. 10
  144. 10
  145. 9
  146. 9
  147. 9
  148. 9
  149. 9
  150. 9
  151. 9
  152. 9
  153. 9
  154. 9
  155. 9
  156. 9
  157. 9
  158. 9
  159. 9
  160. 8
  161. 8
  162. 8
  163. 8
  164. 8
  165. 8
  166. 8
  167. 8
  168. 8
  169. 8
  170. 8
  171. 8
  172. 8
  173. 8
  174. 8
  175. 8
  176. 8
  177. 8
  178. 8
  179. 8
  180. 8
  181. 8
  182. 8
  183. 8
  184. 8
  185. 8
  186. 8
  187. 8
  188. 8
  189. 8
  190. 8
  191. 7
  192. 7
  193. 7
  194. 7
  195. 7
  196. 7
  197. 7
  198. 7
  199. 7
  200. 7
  201. 7
  202. 7
  203. 7
  204. 7
  205. 7
  206. 7
  207. 7
  208. 7
  209. 7
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 7
  213. 7
  214. 7
  215. 7
  216. 7
  217. 7
  218. 7
  219. 7
  220. 7
  221. 7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 6
  228. 6
  229. 6
  230. 6
  231. 6
  232. 6
  233. 6
  234. 6
  235. 6
  236. 6
  237. 6
  238. 6
  239. 6
  240. 6
  241. 6
  242. Dick Toles You really don't get it, do you? They're all Americans and she is an individual, a single entity that happens to be an Asian woman, just as you're a single entity that happens to be a white male. Affirmative action says that an Asian individual shouldn't have the same opportunity as another group of individuals and has assigned an hierarchy of opportunity based on group identity. It may be fair to the group (maybe) but definitely not fair for the individual. Her argument INCLUDES you because you, as a white man, are also at the bottom of the opportunity hierarchy. If she proves that Affirmative Action is discriminatory, she is also speaking for you, because it is also discriminates AGAINST YOU. She is advocating against this type of discrimination and that we should be judged as individuals, not as Asian woman or white male. It's like two people trying out for a baseball team. Do you take the one who's the best baseball player or do you take the black guy because there are already too many white guys on the team. I take the best ball player because I want the team to be the best it can be. When you apply for university, you take the application that shows the strongest potential, that manifests itself in previous achievements of scholarship and effort. You do that to prepare for the future of your society in the best possible manner. That the top minds are the ones doing the most complex tasks that are needed for a functioning society. I don't care what ethnicity my surgeon is, so long as he's the best, not because he's Latino and there isn't enough Latino surgeons. That's not only colossally stupid, it's just plain crazy.
    6
  243. 6
  244. 6
  245. 6
  246.  @minkman99  I'm afraid that you're not following this very well. The SJW stuff, the safe spaces and such, has been around for quite a few years. It was in the universities and any student who said things that establishment deemed inappropriate was called onto the carpet. It always seemed to be conservatives that were being censored and belittled. They weren't allowed to have their own speakers or their own conservative clubs. There were protests, sometimes even violent, directed against anyone that would say anything that went against the leftist dogma. This was going on before Trump became president. Books were beginning to be cancelled but they couldn't outright ban them. Not yet anyway, but some would love to do it. The rhetoric was always about race, gender, sexual preference and accusations were becoming more and more rampant. Every dissenting conversation ended with "You're racist" or "You're homophobic" or something to that effect. Now, it's in the media. Critical race theory is the new thing. People, in the work place, are called to meetings and white employees have been required to "acknowledge their white privilege". Kids, starting schools, are taught that they may belong to the race that represents racism, colonialism and sexism, that there's something inherently evil in them. Everything has become racist. Mathematics, getting up on time, working hard, street lights, milk, camping, skiing, the list goes on and on and on. University professors have longed for the demise of the white race and done so publicly, without any sanctions from the MSM. BLM have rioted, burned, looted, injured and even killed people but the MSM says their protests are "mostly peaceful". Antifa, in Portland, rioted for over 120 days in a row, last summer, all chronicled by Andy Ngo, but to Nadler, a Democrat Congressman, it's all a myth and Biden says Antifa is an idea. You should google "Evergreen College" and read about the craziness there, a few years ago. Strangely, completely ignored by the MSM. Had a bunch of conservative students done this, they'd still be talking about it. If you haven't noticed any of this, you really haven't been paying attention. The left have been taken over by a bunch of overt Marxists. A woman, who wore Chairman Mao's picture on her clothing almost won the election to become Mayor of Portland recently. You really have to start finding out what is going on with the left and how they're infiltrating the education system, the media, human resources of big corporations and the Democrat party. They will completely destroy the western world as we know it and we'll be left with a place where we won't have to worry about illegal immigrants or refugees. They won't want to come here.
    6
  247. 6
  248. 6
  249. 6
  250. 6
  251. 6
  252. 6
  253.  @babajaiy8246  The Muslims can practise their faith any way they wish. They have complete religious freedom. In fact, even though the Jews believe that Solomon's Temple, a very sacred Jewish site, stood where the Dome of the Rock is now, they allow Muslims to still use that site as a Mosque. The Israelis still allow it to be a place for Muslims. That's a concession that has been allowed Israeli Muslims. However, in Gaza, there is not ONE Jew....not a one and there's good reason for that. If someone didn't kill them, their life would be pure hell. Jews can't live in Gaza. Why would they want to live as they did before? That area was extremely poor until the Jews came and started to turn it into an oasis in the desert. It was nothing but dirt and rock 100 years ago. If Hamas cared so much for the people of Gaza, maybe they'd do the same thing there....but they won't. Hamas is too filled with hatred for Israel to care about their own people. You're asking me to explain the mind of those filled with hate? Why did Hitler want to kill all the Jews? Hatred....that's why. Why did Rome kill everyone in Carthage and then sow the fields with salt? Hatred...blind hatred. Why did the Hutu try to kill all the Tutsi in Rwanda? Same thing. Why would Hamas, the leadership of the Palestinians, want to drive the Israelis into the sea? Because they refuse to live with them. They hate them because they're not Muslim. "The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them, till the stone says: ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’” 2 This Hadith was reported by Ahmad and Al-Tirmidhy who said that it is a Hasan, Sahih Hadith. This is a part of the Muslim faith. Islam says that they are a religion of peace but no one who values peace would attack innocent unarmed civilians. They defend themselves when attacked but they don't start shooting at people at a music festival and they would NEVER parade the naked body of a girl, that they killed and desecrated, so the people could spit on her. That's NOT the way of peace. If anything, those Palestinians are going against the will of Allah is Islam is indeed the religion of peace. Hamas could take the money, that they've received over the last 70 years, and use it to make life better for the Palestinians. They could do that but they don't. They use it to buy guns and rockets so they could kill as many Jews as possible. There is NO excuse for what just happened and you can't spin it to make it sound justified. It's not.
    6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 5
  273. 5
  274. 5
  275. 5
  276. 5
  277. 5
  278. 5
  279. 5
  280. 5
  281. 5
  282. 5
  283. 5
  284. 5
  285. 5
  286. 5
  287. 5
  288. 5
  289. 5
  290. 5
  291. 5
  292. 5
  293. 5
  294. 5
  295. 5
  296. 5
  297. 5
  298. 5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312.  @AllAboutMusicMovies  I never ONCE wrote a narrative. I said that this person could have made a good point and he MAY have, that's not a narrative, just a possibility, said this because it was a concern. He may have been screaming at people about it or he MAY have said something along the lines of "I've said this lots of time but I think...." I DON'T KNOW.....but apparently you know enough about this person to call him and extremist. I'm saying that you don't have enough information to do that. Also, you've assumed that this person is American. It doesn't state where this person is from. You just assumed it for no real reason. Another narrative that you've wrote for yourself. Then I said that I don't like to live in fear and then, somehow and incomprehensibly, you asked me if I was afraid and then made an assumption that I was American. Now 2 of us are American...or even possibly 3 of us and you did this without knowing any of us. The commenter was responding to an original point about the psychological effects being worse than the disease. She says that she has a friend that says the same thing and this friend has said it multiple times. Then you come up with how afraid Americans are and how Sweden didn't have those crazy lockdowns, which kind of validates what she was talking about. That this fear CAN be psychologically worse than the disease like it is in the US. I didn't say that, YOU did. It seems as if you agree with him but I don't know. However, your statement does suggest that. Then you go on about Trump letting it spread. So I asked a rhetorical question. Does Trump rule the world......meaning does he have that much influence that the entire world is gripped with Covid and it's all his fault? The disease was spreading in Italy before it started to spread in the US...like I've mentioned and I'm sure that Trump wasn't responsible for that. Also, you're the one that brought up Sweden and Europe and there's been some severe lockdowns in Europe and some awful riots in protest in England, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany. So the US isn't the only place that's living in fear. As a matter of fact, we are here in Canada, too. Now the economy is hurting. I know people that have lost their businesses. The US is in even worse shape. Another area of our lives where the fear of Covid might have consequences that may make things worse than the disease. The point made is not exactly without merit. I've not wrote any narrative about anyone else. I've laid out possibilities by using myself as an example. A possibility is NOT a narrative. It's laying out an idea. Yet, that prompted you to suggest that I must be an extremist as well. Nice leap of logic there. I'm not the one that started calling people names. That's all I can say about the subject.
    5
  313. 5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323.  @wickedwood04  Where did I say "election fraud". I mentioned an article about Hunter Biden's laptop in which his father, who is on the ticket, was implicated in some crooked dealings in China and Ukraine. That does have implications in an election. And do you really want Big Tech to curtail that information. To have the government, like Jen Psaki said, to work with Facebook to flag "misinformation"? Do we now have a governmental department called the "Ministry of Truth"? Since when is it up to anyone to tell me what is true or not? I'm not like you. I don't want to be TOLD what's true. I want to see the evidence, good and bad, even fake, so I can assess it for myself, like a free thinking adult. Also, how is asking for ID making it harder to vote? Every western country requires ID to vote. Even a corrupt country like Mexico does. I know that Canada, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Japan....I could go on and on, require voter ID when voting. It's so people can't jump from voting precinct to voting precinct to vote repeatedly. Funny how voter ID is racist but vaccine passports, that require ID isn't. Are we going to exempt certain people from showing vaccine passports because it's racist? Also, anyone can request a mail in ballot. That would give that ballot a chain of possession which is completely different than sending ballots, en masse, through the mail. If you can explain how the Republicans are making voting harder, with EVIDENCE, I'll look at it but I have to warn you. I read the entire Georgia voting bill, the "Jim Crow 2.0" bill and found nothing. That entire claim was bogus.
    5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 4
  335. 4
  336. 4
  337. 4
  338. 4
  339. 4
  340. 4
  341. 4
  342. 4
  343. 4
  344. 4
  345. 4
  346. 4
  347. 4
  348. 4
  349. 4
  350. 4
  351. 4
  352. 4
  353. 4
  354.  @solveigvan808  First, Chloe was a teenager. She wasn't old enough to understand what was really going on. Then, the medical establishment ganged up on her parents and scared the bejesus out of them by showing them all these statistics about trans kids committing suicide because they didn't get the support that they needed from their parents. They're ordinary people. They depend on the expertise of those who have saved the lives of countless people over the years. They were told that it wasn't safe but necessary to SAVE the life of their little girl and then they trot out those who had gone through it and seemed to be quite happy that they did it. Even Chloe admitted that there was a honeymoon period after surgery but it didn't take long for the shine to wear off. This is something brand new. Ten years ago, no teenager was getting this type of surgery. Now, it's on the mainstream news and they're telling you that it's safe and you're a bigot if you hold your child back. They'll take your kid away if you fight too hard. Custody battles are being fought over it and the parent that's against this surgery can lose all parental rights. There's no one available to support you if you push back. You're treated like some kind of Nazi if you even have doubts on it. It's all a scam and they fell for it. Now, you want them to suffer the consequences and those greedy SOBs will continue on, KNOWING that there's nothing that anyone can do because....."choices have consequences." You're taking every weapon available away from those kids and their parents to fight back after they've been taken in so badly. Those quacks have to be stopped but you don't want to do a thing about it. I have to even question your motives.
    4
  355.  @shanecorning5222  Now you're just spouting talking points. They just didn't come in and start killing and raping. That would have been impossible as they were vastly outnumbered. What did happen was that tribes made alliances with the Europeans to help them in their wars with each other. For example, Cortez would never have defeated the Aztecs if it hadn't been for the help of their Tlaxcaltec allies. Many tribes hated the Aztec because they were the local powerhouse. It's the same in North America. Champlain encountered the Huron and upon seeing the French weapons, the Huron thought that they should try them out on their arch enemies, the Iroquois. This set the tone for the history of North East America for 150 years. Also, the blanket thing is also a myth. There is only one verifiable time that it was used and that was at Fort Pitt, now Pittsburgh and they're not even sure if it worked or not as there was a smallpox outbreak already among the local settlers. If smallpox was already there, Natives could have gotten it from the settlers NOT from the blankets. These are just points of contention that modern day identity politics play. It's not just with the natives either. Everything is about finding grievance and being offended. I have a good friend, who is native and he was taken, as a 6 year old, an placed in a government school. However, his family lived in a remote area and they were living in extreme poverty. As bad as this practise seemed, he may not have survived had they not taken him out of the area due to the changing environment. He also told me that his great great grandparents were cannibals and not too well liked by the other tribes in the area. You see, the natives are people, just like us. No better and no worse. When you demonise a group of people, you engender hatred and that NEVER leads to anything good.
    4
  356. 4
  357. 4
  358. 4
  359. 4
  360. 4
  361. 4
  362. 4
  363. 4
  364. 4
  365. 4
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. 4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 4
  373. 4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377.  Kenny Bugh  How did Trump fail us? This was a new disease that no one had ever dealt with before. He called on the CDC, even formed a medical task force to deal with it. They were supposed to be the experts and these "experts" were all over the place with their recommendations and ideas. How could Trump make medical recommendations. He's NOT a doctor. Had the CDC and Fauci been more forthright and explained things as they knew them instead of playing games with the facts, we'd be better off. They were too proud to stand up and say that, in spite of being experts, they had no clue. That's why they failed us. They taught us not to trust them....the worst thing a doctor could do to their patients. It was Trump that initiated Project Warp Speed, got ventilators built that were never used, sent hospital ships to LA and NY which were never used and it wasn't Trump that put Covid patients in old folks homes. Trump restricted travel, first from China which resulted in being called xenophobic and then from Europe which Biden, himself criticized, saying travel bans don't work. It was Pelosi and Mayor De Blasio that kept telling people to go to their favourite restaurants, take the subways and go to parades. Pelosi went to Chinatown and was hugging everyone urging people to come on down and it was Pelosi that ripped up the SOTU address, in which Trump talked about trying to work with China to fight this new disease. Do you know what else failed us? China and their Gain of Function research....that's who and those in the American medical establishment that helped fund it....like Dr. Fauci.
    4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410.  @moestietabarnak  Where did I say that an unlawful shooting by a police officer isn't a problem? I never said that once. I can object to it but that does NOT give me the right to burn down YOUR business of home, steal YOUR stuff, because that's what looting is, or shoot your 9 year old daughter, like what happened in Atlanta. Why can't I be outraged about those things? That was a little black girl in Atlanta. I was in tears when I heard about that and it was a BLM supporter who shot her. As long as there are criminals, committing major crimes in the world, and specifically in the US, and we want the police to stop them, there will be deaths. It's inevitable. In other words, you will always have reason to burn, loot and kill. It'll NEVER go away. It will be a perpetuating rage. Also, if you really thought that HUNDREDS of riots, over 3 months, being justified by the media and certain politicians, wasn't going to finally get some pushback out of fear and frustration, you're still delusional. Also, if you can't see that burning and looting is wrong, always and is NEVER justified, then you have no moral centre to guide you. Also, I made it perfectly clear that I DID NOT ENDORSE what happened in Washington. It was wrong and they should be prosecuted. Also, the looters should be prosecuted and we shouldn't have politicians, like Kamala Harris, donating to a fund for their legal fees. That a politician, that would do that, is going to become the Vice President, scares people and they will be angry that this is happening. If you can't see that then YOU are the problem. You don't want a middle ground nor would you accept an olive branch. You want YOUR ground and will take it by any means necessary.
    4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 3
  419. 3
  420. 3
  421. 3
  422. 3
  423. 3
  424. 3
  425. 3
  426. 3
  427. 3
  428. 3
  429. 3
  430. 3
  431. 3
  432. 3
  433. 3
  434. 3
  435. 3
  436. 3
  437. 3
  438. 3
  439. 3
  440. 3
  441. 3
  442. 3
  443. 3
  444. 3
  445. 3
  446. 3
  447. 3
  448. 3
  449. 3
  450. 3
  451. 3
  452. 3
  453. 3
  454. 3
  455. If you have a racist purity test which amounts to a witch trial, of course Trump is racist. So are you. So am I. There's no way anyone will pass that test. It's designed so that everyone tested will fail. I'm not sure what your problem with herd immunity is all about. If we become immune once exposed to it, eventually, we'll all be immune. Pure logic. What some people just don't get is that no matter what we do, there will be surges in the cases. It's highly contagious and it's the nature of the disease. If we lockdown until it's completely gone, we'll be locked down for good....for the rest of your life. Not a pleasant prospect. What's important is the death rate in relationship to the case rate. At the end of April, the case rate was around 30,000 new cases per day. The death rate was around 2000 cases a day. Now, the case rate is close to 70,000 new cases per day, yet the death rate is under 800 per day. Almost 2 1/2 cases more and yet a 60% DROP in deaths. That says that we're learning how to treat it and I'm going to assume that we'll get better at it in the future. Already, we have plenty respirators and fewer and fewer cases end up in the hospital in relationship to the number of cases. Even now, the new case load per day seems to be a the peak. That means, we should start to see another dropping off in the next couple of weeks. Not a guarantee but that's the pattern of all infectious diseases. The south didn't peak back in April like NY York did. Now it's their turn. That'll be the pattern in most populated areas. You can't stop it. It will happen. All you can do is try to protect the most vulnerable. I'm 68, considered to vulnerable. I take precautions. My dad is 88. I haven't seen him since late February.....to keep him safe. That should be the priority....everywhere and It seems as if we get it now. At least they're not putting Covid patients in nursing homes, anymore......a ridiculous move no matter how you look at it.
    3
  456. 3
  457. 3
  458. 3
  459. 3
  460. 3
  461. 3
  462. 3
  463. 3
  464. 3
  465. 3
  466. 3
  467. 3
  468. 3
  469. 3
  470. 3
  471. 3
  472. 3
  473. 3
  474. 3
  475. 3
  476. 3
  477. 3
  478. 3
  479. 3
  480. 3
  481. 3
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493. 3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571.  @sthubbins4038  NO ONE invalidated this election. He was just as sure that there was fraud as Hillary was and he told that crowd to march "peacefully and patriotically", HIS words, to let the members of Congress know how he felt. He then told the audience to GO HOME and "primary" those Republicans that didn't question the integrity of the election. "Primary them"...that means for them to get ready for the NEXT election. It means to get Republican candidates that will support the president, no matter who it is. Does that REALLY sound like "storm the Capital Building" to you? Also, Trump was over a mile away, when he gave that speech. It was impossible for him to "watch" them storm the building. That's pure hyperbole on your part. I gave TWO examples of VERY questionable events around this election...TWO examples that should have been investigated and ONE WAS and the person was charged. This woman bragged that she had control of over 7 thousand mail in ballots. MAIL IN BALLOTS....the very thing that Trump was worried about all along and this woman was charged for doing it. Hillary had NO evidence....AT ALL. The Mueller report turned up nothing and it cost the American taxpayers MILLIONS to do it. YOUR taxpayer money. Now the Democrats are spending even more. Thousands of troops around the Capital. Barbed wire fencing. Investigating military personnel for questionable tweets and reassigning them. Investigating government offices and purging all Republican supporters by going through their internet accounts. Do you know who else did that? Who did it right after the "Night of the Long Knives"? They have NO right to investigate people that weren't even there or to question the loyalty of military personnel because a few jerks, out of tens of thousands that were in Washington that day, acted foolishly. Security even LET some of them in, if they promised not to damage anything. Then the Democrats had a state funeral for officer Sicknick, claiming he was killed fighting rioters, when he died the following day from a stroke which had nothing to do with the riots. Now they have some of them in solitary confinement, even though it was months ago. Yet, when Antifa barricaded the doors of a Federal Courthouse, in Portland, and tried to burn the place down with people inside it, they just let them go. Over 120 nights in a row of rioting in Portland and they're STILL rioting. They had violent protests AGAIN last night and over 2 dozen gunshots at the one year Memorial for George Floyd at the "autonomous" zone in Minneapolis. In the middle of the day, caught on video. It's all political theatre and it's 2 sets of rules. And to top it all off....I've already said that those who broke in should be arrested and charged. They're a bunch of idiots. The difference is....I want to apply the law equally to rioters. YOU only want to apply it to those you don't like.
    2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. So, we need a BAD economy? What kind of logic is that? If you want to get away from the national credit card, you must have a strong economy. No matter what, you have to be working and the country has to be creating wealth. Also, credits cards aren't necessarily bad. It's when you use them irresponsibly, that's when you get into trouble. The last recession showed us that. Granting huge mortgages to people that didn't have the means to pay and the customer not realising his own credit capabilities. That's what conservatism is about. Personal responsibility and having a realistic approach to your own life and future. Almost everyone that I know that has attained a level of financial success has done so prudently and cautiously.....a conservative attitude towards life. Hard work and strong decision making skills. The left seems to think that this is somehow immoral. Now, I'll use myself as an example. I've been a blue collar worker all my life. I live on a yearly fixed income now that I'm retired and that income puts me far below the poverty level. Yet, I have managed to put together a small nest egg and I travel every year. I have a son-in-law that I works at exactly the same job that I did before I retired and makes more money at it than I ever did. Yet all he does is complain and says he has nothing. When I show him how well I've done with it, he's amazed but then starts into how it's impossible these days. I then show him this young guy who's younger than he is and who owns his own home. That's when he stops talking. He's a socialist and wants the government to do it all for him. Not going to happen.
    2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607.  @wekurtz72  What does Donald Trump have to do with whether the Hollywood elites are corrupt or not? "Bob is bad, therefore Ted isn't" is a basically what you're doing. One has NOTHING to do with the other. I never SAID that Hollywood was in charge of anything. I SAID that they were corrupt. I made a long comment about a specific example and you don't mention a WORD about it. Also, Trump has been a part of the entertainment business over his career. Therefore his "pussy" statement might just reflect that same attitude that Hollywood had when they employed the casting couch for generations. I never ONCE mentioned Trump either and your assumption that I approve of that "pussy" statement is just that.....an assumption. As for Ghislaine, another one of the elites that, not just Trump but Clinton and others were good friends of as well. Clinton more so than Trump....flying all over the country in Epstein's plane rather says that they're better friends than Trump EVER was. Also, Trump never once said Nazis are good people. That's that stupid "good people on both sides" nonsense that some people take out of context ALL the time and I can prove it. Not that you'd listen. People like you don't seem to understand what "I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally." means. When you assess information, use your brain instead of your emotions. You might come off looking a little smarter. Also, if you think that Trump saying that "pussy" remark lets Biden off the hook for doing just that to Tara Reade, you've one weird sense of integrity.
    2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618.  @lilbarry1212  What you don't get is that those weapons have been within reach of Russia for decades. France and Britain have them. Germany, Italy and Turkey have American nukes installed in case of war. Turkey is only about 500 miles from Russia. How long do you think it would take to put nukes in Latvia or Estonia, NATO nations that are right on the border of Russia. It would be nothing for a nuclear armed sub to leave a German or Turkish port and approach Russia. Besides, who said that they wanted to put nukes in Ukraine, anyway? Where did you get that? Ukraine isn't even a part of NATO yet and you're already putting nukes there. You're getting way ahead of yourself. Weird that you don't think all of Europe isn't upset that Russia has nukes that could be pointed at them. That's where NATO is. Russia should be terrified but the European NATO nations aren't allowed to be? Kind of a double standard isn't it. This nuclear rhetoric is just a rationalisation to justify the carnage in Ukraine. No one is putting nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine had the 3rd largest nuclear arsenal in the world after they were independent. They destroyed them. That was only 30 years ago. They did this after a 90% affirmative vote for independence. I wonder how much that loss sticks in the craw of Putin, a one time communist and KGB agent. Putin, at 69 years of age, spent more time as a Soviet citizen than he has a Russian. That has to influence his attitude and his paranoia. So, who should be more afraid of the other. Ukraine, the smaller country with NO nukes or Russia, a MUCH larger country with all kinds of nukes and a leader who was a part of the very aggressively expansive USSR. Remember Putin was in his thirties when Russia was trying to hold onto Afghanistan. Old habits die hard.
    2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671.  @spindoctor6385  The last election really exposed the media and big tech for what they are. They've become agents for for the political party that controls the government, not just elected officials but the bureaucracy as well. It's the bureaucrats that need the right party in power and they used the media and especially big tech to their advantage. My dad is 89 years old and living on a fixed income. He's too proud to accept help from his kids. Over the last 10 years, all his friends are gone, except a few that live miles away. Phone costs are prohibitive, to keep in touch, so he joined Facebook, for free, and is now able to talk to his friends, some who live thousands of miles away, for nothing. This is how they control us. They lure us in with great deals and then use their platforms to control information. I've had to show him things, news items, that facebook won't allow him to see and the MSM won't cover. When a monopoly becomes the government, they'll create conditions under which we feel forced to use them. Once they have that in place, they can advance their own agendas for financial gain and power. They go hand in hand. What we'll have, and it's happening quite rapidly, a political system run by corporate autocrats instead of elected representatives. They'll do it through the guise of a free market that's NOT free at all but controlled by a powerful few. It's like religion. We took away the power of religious groups by limiting their influence on government. We have to do the same with the corporations or any other political group.
    2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699.  @cesaradrianarreola7266  Your history lesson is all well and good but how does that apply to today? People have always migrated and the people who originally lived there would quite often fight back. The Germanic tribes, Gauls and others fought the Romans when the Romans expanded northward. The Romans fought back when the Germanic tribes migrated into the Roman Empire. The Mongols migrated west and were met with resistance from those who lived in the west. The Muslim Arabs expanded and met with resistance from the people there, including the resistance in Spain and southern France. The Turks fought the Armenians, Byzantines and others as they expanded into modern Turkey and into the Balkans. I could go on and on. People have always fought over land and they had recognised borders. Quite often the indigenous people were beaten by the migrating groups and many were slaughtered, assimilated into the conquering victors or migrated themselves into new territories and conquered those indigenous groups. And here we are today. Europeans migrated into the Americas and met with resistance from the indigenous people there. The Europeans won and are no different than the Turks, Arabs, Vandals, Goths and hosts of other groups that migrated and conquered. Now, we're seeing another migration into the United States. Many American are resisting and want to control the migration. How is that any different than the Balkan states fighting the invading armies of the Turks? I'm not even sure what your point could be. All I can gather is that people migrated for different reasons just like people are migrating into the US for their own reasons. My question is this. Do Americans have the right to determine who can come and resist those who force their way into their country?
    2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. So, you're saying that in a road rage situation, the guy will find a way to kill the guy he's angry at no matter what? He won't react in a fit a rage by shooting the guy.....ever? You seriously believe that if he doesn't have a gun, he'll not stop until the guy is dead, that his fists will have the same result on a guy's head that 6 bullets will on that same head? You've never heard of a person, in a drunken row, shooting an adversary in a fight? Never heard of gangs, inadvertently running into one another and start blasting away? You're talking about pre-meditated murder. I'm talking about pulling a gun out of your pocket for a perceived slight, out of anger or fear and shooting someone as a reaction. I'd say that you're making that up. Not all killings are pre-meditated and people have and do shoot each other in a fit of rage over something stupid all the time. That big reason that it happens is that the gun is right there, in his pocket, on the dresser and the blind rage is happening right now and it's all due to the availability of the weapon and the ease of use of the gun. What's even more telling is that there is only one real use for a hand gun. That is to shoot human beings. To be able to carry it or store for ease of use to kill someone else. Even you know that this is true. It explains the huge disparity in numbers for gun violence between the US and Canada. The number one reason is the availability and the attitude that comes with that availability that we don't see in Canada or any other Western country. Murder rates and gun violence is through the roof if you compare it to any other western country and most of it is due to the ease of acquiring a handgun.
    2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715.  @jonnylaw13  So what if it exists. That's a given. We ALL have privilege and once you make a contest of it, you've crippled yourself. The biggest privilege a person can have is the realisation that it doesn't have to be that way. David Webb demonstrated that beautifully, albeit unintentionally when he was accused of "white privilege". Webb "suffers" from the privilege of knowing that he can still succeed, as an individual, and the success of others has NOTHING to do with him. You succeed when you take your lot in life and make the best of it you can. That's success. It isn't a comparison to others or a contest. It's personal improvement. That's how you succeed. If every white man in the world is better off than Webb, he's still a bigger success than the white guy who lives off his mommy's bank account and he deserves more respect. You bring up white supremacy as a racist trope but isn't Aveva Martin a racist woman? She assumed qualities about Webb under one assumption. He's white or so she thought. That's the very definition, the very heart of racism. In fact, she's using racism to further her own professional goals and line her pockets. She might as well be a slave owner. She building her life on a hate for others. She'd rather see people believe that there is no hope than to build them up as individuals. I've no use for that type of person. Don't think that I'm arguing with you. I'm not. The entire racist trope these days is extremely destructive and does no one any advantage except for those who make a living selling it. That is the point that I'm trying to make.
    2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904.  @jhlfsc  Where did I say that minorities can't be bigots? I never said that ONCE. In fact, my entire message was that the idea that the original poster can't be black or gay and think this way is BIGOTED. That we're all individuals and that to assign characteristics based on race or minority status is as bigoted as it gets. That's why they had to act as if Larry Elder was the black face of white supremacy. They want to imply that he was bought off to say the things that he did and that, as a black man, he would NEVER believe these things on his own. That is as bigoted as it gets. It's saying that all I have to do is look at you, check off what demographic you belong to and I'll know everything about you. That's what they did to Larry Elder and it was the LEFT that did that, NOT the right. Also, Fascists are Socialists. Even that painter from Austria was a socialist. "We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan" Adolf Hitler , August 15, 1920, speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. " In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people.” – Adolf Hitler , February 24, 1941, speech on the 21st anniversary of the Nazi Party That was 21 years AFTER he made that first quote I wrote. “All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community.” – Adolf Hitler, March 21, 1943, speech for Heroes’ Memorial Day So don't give me this BS about right wing Fascists. It's complete nonsense.
    1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908.  @renaissancestatesman  First of all, look at my comments closely. I never ONCE mentioned the possibility of voter fraud. Why? Because it's pointless now. What we have to concentrate on NOW, is the next election and there are problems if Trump runs again. First...it's his age. The next election is 4 years away which means that he'll be 8 years older when he's finally done. That'll make him 82. He's healthy right now, but that can change SO quickly. It may not change. My dad is 89 and he's 4 times as sharp as Biden....but that his health could change overnight is a consideration. Trump's age is a factor. Also, we have to find a way to mitigate the outright hate that so many have for Trump. One way is to find a candidate, who has a similar outlook but is so articulate and presents such strong arguments, without being too combative, and has the charisma to win people over, that it's difficult to hate him. Difficult to hate him in spite of the manipulations of the press. Third, we have to work on the highly suspect election process. Trump can't be that guy. Too many people will recoil when they here about "stealing the election" from him. We need someone that didn't have an issue in the last election. Someone who they can't claim is still whining about losing last election. We need someone who can lay out the case for reform and can make it appear as if he is standing up for this without bias. The past is OVER. Accept that we lost and start up with a new strategy. ......And I repeat.....I didn't swallow any hook, line or sinker. I just think that there's no point in crying about the past. We can't change it but we can change the future if we go at it right. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening. Too many Rinos and swamp creatures in the Republican Party.
    1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932.  @caseinpoint4823  Did you not watch this video? Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary said that they were working WITH Facebook to flag misinformation. Is the White House a business? Are they advertisers? When did the White House or Facebook become the arbiters of truth? You're one of those people that have no idea why the big corporations and the most of the press HATED Trump. You're just not getting it. Trump wanted to even the playing field in trade with China and that cut into the cash flow for corporate bigwigs. China is a country with poor wages and no labour laws, no environmental restrictions, no quality control and a government that has complete control over the economy. They're getting rich by operating without restrictions and then selling the products to countries in the west who have those laws that incur HUGE expenditures. So the big corporations make their products in China and then sell them in the US at enormous profits. They give corporate executives big payoffs, which are placed in offshore accounts where they can't be traced of taxed in the US, to manufacture their products in China. That means the loss of manufacturing in the US and the loss of employment for tens of millions of Americans. Those corporations are the advertisers that you're talking about. Their corporate board members don't want to lose all their big perks from operating in China and that's why their working with the Democrats and the big tech companies to flag "misinformation". They want and love the control that they have and are NOT about to give it up. You don't even realise that you're believing exactly what those international corporations want you to believe and that's why they are the big advertisers that make all this money for big tech. They want to control the information and you're saying to the marriage of these corporations and big tech that you approve of this control (censoring) of information.
    1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941.  @solveigvan808  In 2015, if I'd have told you that, by 2022, there would be members of Congress who were going to claim that men could get pregnant, you'd have told me that I'm nuts. That our president would even name a trans person to his cabinet. That men would claim to be women and insist on going to women's prisons and be allowed into women's sports. That's how quickly this nonsense took over. There was no such thing as affirmative gender care back then. We didn't even know that these TikTok teachers existed. Remember, this started for Chloe in 2017. Her parents didn't know any of this and the most trusted people in society, our doctors, were telling them that this was SO serious that if the medical establishment did nothing, Chloe would die. They're just ordinary people....probably not even that bright. They believed those doctors....actually BELIEVED them. If a doctor tells you that you have cancer and that you need surgery, you believe them. We ALL know people that have died of cancer so we know how dangerous cancer can be. These doctors told them that their little girl was going to die because of this condition that was "rare" and it was back then. That terrified her parents. Her parents weren't going to ask YOU, some random guy on the internet, what YOU thought. They had nowhere to turn. The doctors lied to them and they believed them. For that alone, those doctors should pay. They took a confused little girl, convinced her parents that their little girl was going to commit suicide and it would be THEIR fault and then made a fortune off it. Remember, even though it's foolish for people to fall for the Nigerian Prince scam, that doesn't absolve those crook of their guilt. If her parents can show that they didn't know or understand what was happening and that this wasn't something that they wanted or pushed for, then they were being foolish and didn't act out of malice. Foolish mistakes shouldn't be punished through the courts. Malicious intent however, should be and this was as malicious as it comes by the medical establishment. They made money off of it and lots of it.
    1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975.  @isoakkfgy4462  You single out FOX? Have you ever listened to the other networks? They make up stuff ALL the time. Why did the other networks completely ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story before the elections? Why would Big Tech, like Facebook and Twitter censor all references to the NY Post story surrounding that laptop? How is it that they ignored Biden, telling Ukraine that they would NOT get one billion dollars if they didn't fire a certain prosecutor? Why did they make up the entire story about the Covington kids? It took me, an old guy, living in a basement apartment, 15 minutes to find out the truth about that story. Billions of dollars worth of property damage, over 25 people dead and hundreds injured in the BLM riots last summer and all the MSM could say was that they were "mostly peaceful". An 8 year old little black girl was shot by BLM supporters and it was "by the way" story for them. Had that little girl been shot by a Republican, it would have news 24/7 on CNN and MSNBC and you know it. A BLM supporter and crickets. As for Tucker, he obviously thinks getting vaccinated is a good idea or he wouldn't have done it. However, he has the right, no OBLIGATION, to talk about vaccines from all angles, all the information that is available. If he doesn't, if ANY news outlet doesn't, they're lying by omission. We, as free citizens, have the right to hear all the news, get all the information available and not just what some bureaucrat or corporate news executive thinks we should be allowed to hear. If they tell us something that's not true, then go after the truth. However, when most of the news outlets only relay partisan news then we'll get pablum, their version of what the truth should be because, in their arrogance, they think that we're not mature or smart enough to handle conflicting news stories.
    1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012.  @jaimhaas5170  I don't have a dog in this fight, either but I know hatred when I see it. There are almost 2 million Muslims living in Israel. I'm not talking about Gaza or the West Bank, but Israel itself. They have full citizenship, can vote, run for office, own property and a business. They are police officers and are in the Israeli military. In fact, a Muslim judge sentenced ex-Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to 6 years in jail for breach of trust and he went to jail. A Muslim man, one of the Palestinians, did this. It doesn't matter in Israel what religion you follow. Most Jews are secular. However, in Gaza especially, it's ALL about Islam. Had the Jews, that migrated to this region, been Muslims, we wouldn't be having any issue in the Levant. It's because Hamas is a radical Islamist group, that will brook no other religion to be dominant, that's why there's a war going on. Hamas could have turned their country into a thriving community but they chose to prepare for war and crossed the border and did it. The Levant has been ruled by outside powers for over 2000 years. In that time, people from all races and religions lived in the region. Now, the Israelis are dominating, another race and religion, but they've been willing to settle on a 2 state solution but it's the Palestinians who've turned it down, at least 5 times. They could have their own country, actually they have in Gaza, but they want it all. By that, I'm claiming Palestinianism, is MORE warlike and exclusive of others than Zionism is.
    1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161.  @spindoctor6385  Do you really believe that a company, once it has grown extremely large, will use their market and financial power for goodness and niceness? Really? Maybe you should look into the history of monopolies. Once a company corners a market, they will do anything to undermine any competition. Just as an example, they'll undercut prices so their competition can't compete price wise. They'll offer increased prices for raw materials so their competition can't afford to buy the things that they need. They'll invest in the companies that supply raw materials and control who can buy and who can't. They'll get exclusive rights to machinery and technology so the competition is squeezed out that way. Throughout history, when any group, be it political, ideological, religious or financial, gets too much power, they'll wield it against the people to ensure and increase that power. It's human nature. It's why the American Constitution has attempted to put checks and balances on how it governs. It's also why it's enshrined religious freedoms AND restrictions, such as "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust" They even require that elected officials to give up any business connections so as to not give favour to their own business interests. I don't believe, for one minute, that any large corporation will freely and cheerfully allow competition to exist. Look at the new Parler platform. It was a conservative platform and the Amazon computer server division, kicked them off their servers as soon as it appeared to have too much influence. A great way to manipulate the last election. Speaking of which, have you read the Time magazine article which outlines how Big Tech, the MSM, large corporations and the Democrats worked to "fortify the election to ensure a proper outcome". That's what happens when there's too much power in the hands of too few. Give big tech the freedom and you'll NEVER have competition. They'll make it impossible for the little guy to operate. Don't trust them for a minute. Actually, I'm astounded that anyone would trust corporations as big as the Big Tech 5.
    1
  1162.  @spindoctor6385  You're still not getting it. Facebook already owns 72 internet companies including Instagram, Oculus and Whatsapp. Twitter is one of the most prominent sites in the world. Amazon is huge and Alphabet, one of the most valuable companies in the world, owns Google, of which YouTube is a subsidiary. These companies make money selling their data and it is next to impossible for companies to make money through only advertising and membership fees. Advertisers will want to target their audiences so they'll insist on data collection, so that just leaves the fees to make money on. These companies will just grow and grow, leaving those little companies to operate in obscurity or go bankrupt. WORSE, they'll become part of the political process as they grow. The Democrats LOVE that these big companies will run propaganda for them and won't allow them to lose their influence and will enact policies that will help the big ones and suppress the little ones. It's happening in Canada right now. The Canadian communications regulatory body, the CRTC, is trying to enact policies that favour Canadian media and squelch the little guys. The CRTC head was once an employee of Bell Canada, the the biggest communications corporation in the country. The Democrats will do the same for their big tech companies. They're WAY ahead of the Republicans in this. Yet, you want to give these guys, including Facebook, the power to grow until nothing can touch them. Why would you want to do that? If you don't have regulations, they'll take advantage of their position to gain more power. It's how every monopoly has ever operated yet, for some reason you believe that Facebook will be good. They're censoring discussion now if it doesn't meet their political stance. EVERY one of those tech giants support the Democrats and censored stories that might help the Republicans. All I can think is that you approved of all the censorship and allowing big corporations to become even bigger than the government. Once private companies can pick and choose the political leaders, we're living in an autocratic society. It will be the new age Feudal system.
    1
  1163.  @spindoctor6385  I just explained it to you. Facebook has gotten so big that advertisers will cater to the advantages of data collections. They'll insist on it with new and smaller platforms and refuse advertising dollars unless those smaller platforms comply with data collecting policies. So, without advertising dollars, they can only rely on membership fees and as other small platforms acquiesce to the big advertisers, they'll lose out because they just can't compete with all the little extras that the other platforms can afford to provide with all the extra revenue. Then there's the pressure of conformity, especially among the young. How do you tell your 15 year old that you won't allow Facebook in your home because you have moral and ethical qualms about data collecting. All their friends have it and they don't see the danger or problems involved. That will only create pressures to give in because most kids can't fend off peer pressure. These are the kinds of things that Facebook and advertisers depend on and encourage. On top of all that, data collections has hidden traps for unsuspecting users. It can be used for political purposes, like I've already said. That's what happened in the last election. I've given you ALL kinds of reasons why it's wrong and why it shouldn't be allowed and, go back to the first paragraph. That answers your question on why it's harder for new players. It gives Big Tech an advantage that new players will find difficult to compete with. The playing field will never be equal. I'll add one more thing. Facebook understands that their type of platform is useless in small markets. It depends on being able to reach the biggest market possible. Why join a platform where you don't have any friends or relatives? How does a new player break into that market when Facebook has a lock on it? People will agree to data collections just because they want to be a part of an internet community that reaches everyone, not just a couple of people. Everything about the industry favours Facebook and the other big tech corporations and puts new players at a HUGE disadvantage. In other words, you'll end up on a platform that will collect data or you don't have a viable platform to join. It's either them or nothing.
    1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207.  @csmidt2885  Homelessness has been a problem, forever. However, it has increased in population and in percentage of the population over the last 10 years. California is in the top five in homelessness, percentage of homelessness, and in the increase of the homeless in the US. Also, California has mandated that any theft under 900 dollars is now considered a misdemeanour, which is NOT a felony and means that it's NOT a crime. A cute way to reduce crime on paper but not in reality. So many stores have closed due to crime and businesses have left the state for that same reason, also citing high taxes, high energy costs, high rents, recurring brownouts and too much red tape. You may not want to face these facts but a simple google search will validate those problems. Also, state populations do NOT go down, even a little bit, if things are going well. You may not like it but that's the facts. Migrants aren't flocking to the border because their home countries are great places to live. Californians aren't leaving for Arizona, Texas, Florida and Tennessee because they love California. They're having issues in their home state and see a better future in those growing states. This has been the way of human migration throughout history. That doesn't mean that California is the worst place ever. It means that they're facing severe problems which should be examined and solved before it really gets out of hand. Your head-in-the-sand approach isn't going to solve those problems. You have to face them, no matter how big or small, to find ways to improve. Things never improve by doing nothing.
    1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214.  Kenny Bugh  Explain to us why the MSM refused to follow up on the Hunter Biden laptop story or why Big Tech companies would strike down any reference to the NY Post article. This HEAVILY implicated Joe Biden in crooked business deals, deals that would have been HUGE news had it been the Trump family, blanketing the news 24/7. Why was Steven Crowder given a YouTube strike for pointing out irregularities in addresses in Las Vegas? Why were mail in ballots allowed, for the FIRST time in American history, by executive command, bypassing the legislative process as demanded by law? Why wasn't the arrest of Rachel Rodriguez for election fraud, illegal voting, unlawfully assisting people voting by mail, and unlawfully possessing an official ballot a part of the MSM news cycle, proving that mail in voting could be manipulated? Why did the Democrats and the MSM do everything possible to refute and denigrate the Project Veritas revelation of mail in voter fraud in Minneapolis? Why isn't the Time magazine article about how the Democrats, Rinos, big tech, multinational corporations and the MSM worked together to "fortify" the elections a bigger story? This is unprecedented in American election history. All you keep doing is repeating the same thing about recounts and ignoring all the other weirdness surrounding the elections. And WHAT THE HELL IS THIS RACIST NONSENSE ABOUT BLACKS BEING SO INEPT AS NOT BEING ABLE TO GET IDS ABOUT? Do you really think that blacks Americans are that incapable?
    1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269.  @bluejay9235  People, like you, just don't get it. You go after the symptom, NOT the problem. The cop arrests a rioter and 3 hours later, he's right back on the street, throwing bricks. You arrest him AGAIN and he's back out again the following night. How many times are you going to risk injury, to arrest someone, who's going to be let out by the Democrat establishment. YOU would even say "eff them if they're not going to prosecute". The rioter is applauded and the cop is vilified for doing his job....that's the way its handled on the MSM. ONE thing goes wrong and you're charged, your face is all over the news, you're vilified, your family is harassed, you lose EVERYTHING that you own, might see jail time and have to go into hiding to protect yourself and your family. THAT'S why these officers are doing as instructed. It's pointless. You take a brick to the side of your face and the guy that does it gets off scot-free. See how "noble" you'd be after experiencing that or watching your fellow officers do the same. The REAL problem are the left leaning politicians, their judges and District Attorneys. They're the generals in this phenomena, to use an analogy. You're going after the grunt instead of the general who's giving the orders. You ask the police to maintain order and then beat them submission when they do. It's no wonder that morale in the police departments are so low. No wonder so many are quitting and moving to places like Florida where they get the support they need to do their jobs. If your bosses treated you that way, you'd quit too, or go to a work to rule attitude because it's just not worth doing your best. It's human nature. You're treating them the same way that the left wing over seers and the media treats them. If I were a cop I'd tell you to get lost when surrounded by a group of armed rioters. YOU got a gun...figure it out for yourself. You think that I'm a jerk anyway. Why would I help someone who feels that way?
    1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382.  @perihelion7798  As an ordinary guy, it sometimes seems as if there's not a lot that I can do. However, what I feel I can do, in my small way, is to do 2 things. /First.....stay informed. That means listening to ALL the information that's offered and not the stuff I like. I can't refute something that I don't know about so it's important to know what they're thinking, saying and doing. Nothing they hate more than facts but it will sway the guy who sits in the centre.....like I used to. Second.....vote. Vote local. This may be the most important of them all. The leftist Marxists are infiltrating our municipal governments and our schools. We have to take back our cities. The biggest reason for the BLM riots is that the left is controlling big city politics and they set the policies that allowed for the conditions to blow up. It has to stop. Vote state for the same reason. There was a lot of chicanery going on in the last Federal election. We have to make the politicians feel that it's in their own best interest to ensure election integrity by voting against ANYONE that isn't firm on secure elections. Vote federal. Know who your candidates are and hold them to account. Vote Federal for the obvious reasons. The establishment hates it when the people stand up for themselves. You can see it by the reaction to the angry parents at school board meetings. Domestic terrorists...indeed. They just want them to go away so they can go on with their socialist agendas. That's what this is all about so....don't go away. The main thing is to insist that our representatives live up to the standards set by the Constitution. If they don't, let them know that they're putting their political career in real jeopardy. It seems simplistic but once the people stand up for themselves, the establishment is in real trouble...and they know it.
    1
  1383.  @perihelion7798  It might work for the indigenous but they don't carry a lot of weight as far as economics and power goes. They can still control them because they're so small. However, I doubt they're going to allow the rest of us to form our own autonomous zones. Like you've already implied, they own the military. The foot soldiers may not be aware of it but that's who's giving them their orders. They're already going through their private social media to see if they're supporting the right people and if they're not, they have dismissed some of them. It would be great if the constitutional zones worked but I'm afraid that it might be the tool that they want to finally take full power over the country. In fact, it might well what they've been working towards. That's why the school board fiasco is such a help to stop the authoritarians. Suddenly, the average person is actually running into that brick wall called the establishment. That a soccer mom could be labelled a domestic terrorist, because she doesn't like the sexually graphic material in her kid's school library, has to be opening a few eyes. This is the type of thing that will defeat them. Most people don't know the depth of what is happening to our institutions. They're busy trying to make a living and it all sounds a little crazy to them....until they run into it first hand. It won't be easy and it will frustrating but it's the best way to reverse the coarse and not destroy the country, completely. At least, that's my opinion, anyway. All I do know is that Civil war is a destroyer and the results might take decades or longer to fix....if ever.
    1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389.  @spencerchudyk3390  Maybe he should have asked why there has been poor people in all of human history. Why the overwhelming majority of people were dirt poor, for thousands of years. It's that old conundrum. Why aren't things perfect? If only things could always be EXACTLY as we want them to be. When you look and expect perfection, you're going to be disappointed....very disappointed. The poorest American, right now, has access to better health care than royalty did 200 years ago. As imperfect as the American health system, royalty of those times couldn't even begin to get the kind of medical attention that the poor, of America, get today. In 1935, Americans were living on bread lines and in shanty towns. Poverty didn't just exist, it was the norm for most Americans.....in fact around the world. My parents grew up without electricity or running water as did everyone of their neighbours, in the 20s and 30s. Did he really expect that within 25, every person in America would be affluent? The rise in the standard of living, in Canada and the United States, after the war, was the biggest gain in life styles, for the common man, in human history, up to that point. Some people only dwell on the failures and refuse to see the successes. My parents, the same people without electricity or running water, in 1945, without a nickel in their pocket and not a square inch of property, managed to buy and pay off a small farm by 1967. My dad raised cash crops during the day, worked as a labourer, in a shoe factory, from 4:30 in the afternoon till 1:00 the next morning, 5 days a week. On weekends, he would play in local pubs and dance halls, as a musician. He worked his butt off and now he's in his nineties and has had a great retirement. Why? Because the capitalist system allowed him the opportunity to make something of himself. He didn't cry that "Joe" down the road had more than him. He put his head down and went for it. Now, he's got young folk, that are wailing that he's got white privilege and that he should share the wealth. They refuse to see that he worked 60 to 80 hours a week to find his success. They're too lazy and feel entitled to what he had to work so hard for. So spare me the negative platitudes about capitalism. When I hear that negativity, I hear the ramblings of one that doesn't want to do what has to be done, that has no pride or self esteem. If you want it bad enough, in America, it's there for you if you're willing to sacrifice and work hard for it. If you wait for the state to do it for you, for that's what socialism is, you'll wait a lifetime.
    1
  1390.  @spencerchudyk3390  It was capitalism that built the US in the 50s and 60s and into the 70s. It was international socialism that slowly destroyed it ever since. Then came the free trade deals and the beginnings of the world economy, a sort of international socialism. Suddenly, the rule of law, that governed the capitalist system here, no longer applied. Any autocratic country, which exploited workers, and they did, was allowed to dump their products in our country, wiping out our manufacturing facilities. Countries that allowed child labour, near slave labour with no labour laws, environmental standards or quality control requirements popped up all over the 3rd world. Workers, locked up in sweat shops with suicide nets around the buildings, allowed us to buy cheap products and those products filled our stores and we happily and greedily allowed it. Unscrupulous nations, some even communist like China, cajoled and bribed multinational executives, lobbyists and our state bureaucrats, to encourage them to shut down factories here and rebuild them in their nations, promising cheap labour and non-existent manufacturing standards. Our oligarchs grabbed that cash with both hands. It's not Capitalism that eroded the middle class. It's the exploitation of the elites, who circumvented the rule of law, an implicit requirement of capitalism, that did it. The elites were forced to follow the rule of law, in this country, so they went elsewhere, where it no longer was an essential part of the system. That's not capitalism at all. Capitalism requires a free market, FREE being the operative word. A free market system has one basic requirement. It requires that all within that system be free and that means a rule of law that is equally applied. When you allow child labour and lock workers in the place of employment, you're not applying the rule of law and freedom is thrown into the waste basket. You may think the it's capitalism that did it, but it was actually the cooperation of state and the multinationals that did it, an evolved form of Fascism.
    1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414.  @KingFillip  I would bet that you'd be singing another tune if YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon were telling Democrat supporting uploaders to kick rocks. Youtube invites, as its business platform, people to upload their videos on their platforms, EXCEPT those whose political views differ from theirs. What's next. Muslim Imams have to go because they Islam believes that homosexuality is a sin? The other 4 big tech companies do the same. When people say that there's only one political view point allowed on social media, they say "Start your own". So someone started Parler and guess what....Amazon won't let them use their server until recently. The left, to the everlasting joy and approval of the Democrats, control social media and the MSM. There is only ONE major conservative news network and NO big tech conservative platforms. It's a near monopoly. This is EXACTLY how authoritarians take over a government. They control the media and then guys, like YOU, hide behind dubious interpretations of business laws to squelch all dissenting voices. YouTube calls itself a platform, a bulletin board, but it's colluding, just like Time Magazine said, with other big tech companies, big corporations, the Democrats and the MSM to make sure that ONLY their voice is heard...and you're good with that because it lines up with your voice. YouTube is NOT the voice. It's customers and uploaders are. Their standards are that you don't break the law and that's all it should be. Having conservative views is NOT illegal. Just be grateful that they weren't all lining up to squelch left wing voices. Then YOU'D be the one complaining. It's easy to applaud when you're in the choir.
    1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422.  @alondramojico6838  That's true and Florida had a much greater case per million count, as well. However, New York had EXACTLY the same death rate as Florida and a HIGHER case per million count than Florida. New York had just as strict a mandates as California. This means that there are more at play here than just mandates. That strict mandates are not the only factor in the spread and death rates. It also means that we can play with statistics any way that we want so they end up to suit what we want to see. One thing that has happened since Covid started is that for the first time in Californian history, its population went DOWN. People are leaving California and New York state is going through the same thing. Florida, however, is seeing an upsurge in population. The economy is growing. People are so happy with the situation that they voted, overwhelmingly, for the current administration, in the last election, an election that they barely won in the previous election. People, in Florida, are experiencing greater life satisfaction in Florida than in either California or New York. Isn't that the point in life? Instead of living in perpetual fear, for the future, they live with an atmosphere of optimism and real personal and economic growth. That's what makes life worth living. Living to be safe is mere existence. Grabbing life by both horns and facing it with courage and determination is what makes life worth living. Hiding in your homes and viewing those around you as threats to your life is an awful way to live. I've had Covid, in spite of 3 vaccines and living in a place where mandates were strict. It was no fun and I'm over 70 years old and should be afraid....but I'm not. I'd never want to go back to the mandates. It was a miserable time and Covid rates in my area are the highest, now, that they've ever been. I still go out, mask free, where ever and whenever I want and I am enjoying my life much more now than 2 years ago. If I catch it again, so be it. I'll deal with it but I refuse to live my life as in fear.....especially in fear of the people around me. I will NOT treat people that way.
    1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1