Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "The Hill"
channel.
-
42
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
12
-
10
-
5
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump was only mentioned once but that's not Taibbi's fault, or the fault of Shellenberger or Musk. Those Democrat congressmen had EVERY opportunity to ask about Trump's role but they didn't. Why? If I wanted to get Trump, I'd have went after it. I'm going to suggest that it's because they were afraid any questioning would inevitably lead to the FBI's role in trying to censor speech. Trump's attempts validates the possibility that the FBI could do it as well
That one guy, from Texas, just gave a speech, accusing them of wearing tinfoil hats. He never asked ONE question. Shellenberger even ran for California governor....AS A DEMOCRAT.
Also, the data dump doesn't matter. What matters is the content of the emails, whether they're authentic and if they were followed up on to censor legitimate news stories. THAT'S what's important. Those emails are there for every member of Congress to see but the Democrats spent little time asking about them. Instead they went after and tried to smear Taibbi and Shellenberger, who, up until this time, the Democrats had no issue with. Everything you said is a partisan plea to ignore what might be the worst government attempt at censorship in American history. You might as well tell us that Stalin censorship was a good thing because you don't seem to care whether it happened or not....unless you could prove that Trump was the only one guilty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joeterzio7175
Is "Joe Terzio" a pseudonym? Is your name really Stacey Plaskett? It might as well be. Taibbi wrote for Rolling Stone. He's won Journalism awards. That's more than some guy with a blog and you KNOW IT.
Also, everyone at that hearing, has the emails that that Taibbi and Shellenberger are referring to. It's not some written article in their personal blogs. It's Twitter e-mails and some of them were attempts by Trump, to affect censorship, but most were from government agencies to Twitter wanting news stories suppressed and in-house emails encouraging it to be done. That includes emails from form FBI lawyer, Jim Baker, who left his job at the FBI and went to work for Twitter, and who wanted Twitter to censor Trump and the suppress the Hunter laptop story.
This is ALL available to every one of those who were taking part at that hearing. So Stacey, or whoever you are, stop with the "misinformation" to use a hack word to justify censorship. We don't believe you because, at best, it makes no sense, and at worst, it's a lie.
1
-
1
-
1