Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "[un]Divided with Brandi Kruse" channel.

  1. 128
  2. 38
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 4
  6.  @walkinlight3380  Not directly you didn't vote for it, if that's true. However, part of being a republic means that you vote for your officials to serve as your reps in government. If they force a raise in car insurance rates, the people voted for the guy. If there's another election and the people vote him in again, then....YES....you voted for it. He did it and you approved by allowing him another term as your rep. It may have bothered the voters that the insurance rates went up but obviously not enough to vote for a candidate that would strike down that legislation. You could claim that this legislation is Unconstitutional and I'd say you would have a strong case, but if you don't do any more than complain about it, you voted for it again with your actions. That's how a Constitutional Republic works. The democracy allows the people to vote for their reps and the Constitution limits what that rep can do. If you don't use the Constitution to do it's job, either by voting that rep out or by using the power of the constitution to show that it's unconstitutional, then you voted for it and are agreeing to it by not using the power of the Constitution. YOU are the one that allowing the Democracy to become mob rule with your inaction. You're not allowing the Democracy to run the way that it's supposed to run by not allowing the Constitutional to protect you from the bad reps who do things that are wrong or unwanted. You may not have voted for the rep to do those things but you voted with your actions to allow those things to stand and become permanent.
    3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1