Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Sydney Watson" channel.

  1. 832
  2. 107
  3. 87
  4. 67
  5. 62
  6. 33
  7. 31
  8. 23
  9. 19
  10. 19
  11. 16
  12.  @skknireeker9073  And that's the logic that's can't be argued against. I say that the transgender has biological advantages and you say "But they're women". I say that they weren't women a year ago so their bodies still have male qualities that give them advantages and you say "But they're women". I point out that it's telling that a transgender absolutely SMASHES the women's weightlifting record in their first year of eligibility and you say "But he's a woman". I say 2 transgenders, who couldn't make the boy's high school track team last year, break the girl's state high school track records and you say "But they're women". They're are no facts, no anomalies, no sudden amount of women's records being broken by transgender athletes that will ever make you stop and think about the implications. All you'll keep repeating, like a demented parrot, is...."BUT THEY'RE WOMEN" This is unbelievably lacking in intellectual discourse or logic or any consideration for fairness. No human being, with even a modicum of integrity, would EVER claim bragging rights, by wearing an Olympic medal, when they've went form a category of sports where they were mediocre at best, to one where they're now the superstar. Integrity would demand that this should be a source of shame. We have weight classes in sports for a reason. We don't just say "But they're all women" and call that a reason to do away with weight classes. Calling them women does not negate the fact that they're also transgenders, something that a lot of the women's athletes cannot claim. To your mind, all transwomen are women. You'll never admit that not all women are transwomen and that this could be where the REAL problem lies. You only want to examine YOUR side of the coin.
    14
  13. 13
  14. 11
  15. 11
  16. 9
  17. 8
  18. 8
  19. 7
  20. 7
  21. 7
  22. 6
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69.  @AndrewFishman  Existential fear. A fear that our existence, today, would threaten our existence sometime in the future. Like climate change. 13 years ago, Al Gore released his movie. In it, he predicted that sections of Manhattan would be underwater, including the base of the Twin Towers. Instead, ocean levels have only risen 3 millimetres. 3 millimetres. I don't even know how you'd measure that on the scale of an ocean. Now, it's the 12 year till doomsday prophecy. It might be 11 years now, since it's been almost a year since AOC's dire prediction. Of course, there's truth to this climate change issue. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and it does affect temperatures, but using timelines to predict the end is counter productive. Already, people are doubting because of Gore's movie and his water level predictions. The "scare them to death" tactic isn't the way to go about pollution problems and I'm afraid it might backfire on us. Reacting out of panic is never a great idea. Worse, it takes control out of the hands of ordinary people and places it directly in the hands of politicians. They'll tell us what to do and if you don't listen, you will pay the price. I'm afraid that if we allow the government to take control, we could destroy our country in our efforts to save it. It will become the never ending battle, the government our eternal saviour, but we must always be on guard against those who would do environmental harm. Sort of like the Orwellian enemies against the free state of Oceania in 1984. If we don't do as the government says, environmental disaster will overcome us all. It is rather Orwellian.
    1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1