Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Truthstream Media" channel.

Unbelievable. If they sent everyone to jail for being in possession of a counterfeit bill, most of us will end up in jail at some time in our lives.
35
If part of the question is to use common core to get the answer, then the pupil did not follow the instructions given him. It may seem inefficient but that's his instructions. If he didn't follow the instructions, he did it wrong.
5
Elhardt Contrails don't disappear if the humidity is high. They are made up of water vapour and if the atmosphere is reaching a point of saturation, it will take a long time for the contrail to dissipate. The one thing that none of these videos do is check the humidity rates or whether a low pressure system is moving in. The day following a storm and the humidity rates are low, you will hardly see any contrails. Try it, yourself. Every day go out and see how prevalent the contrails (chemtrails) are. Then go to the weather channel and check to see what the humid-ex factor is. Contrails will last longer as the humidity goes up. This could be your own little experiment that will either verify what you already believe or dispel those ideas.
4
StratMatt777 I gave him the tools to validate his chemtrail theories but I won't hear from him, again, or he will not acknowledge my suggestion made in my post. The reason he won't is simple. He is afraid of what he will find if he follows up on my suggestions. They will never do the things necessary to prove their nonsense because it's too much work and it will invalidate their claims. It's easier to look up at the sky and go "Look. They're spraying us." and then pat each other on the backs for their brilliant observational skills. Throw in a few anecdotes about weird cloud formations and Monsanto and they now have, in their minds, irrifutable proof of chemtrails. The rules of evidence means nothing to them as they view this concept as a sort of psycho-babble to detract from their "truth". I have yet to see one verifiable fact presented in this video or the comment section that validates the chemtrail accusations. If they are confronted by evidence that disproves their ideas, such as the point made about weight on the planes, they respond with accusations of shills and disinformation agents. Their minds are made up and they will not let facts get in the way of their beliefs. I can only hope that some chemtrail believer doesn't do something rash, like blowing up a plane, in an "heroic" attempt to thwart those who they believe are guilty.
2
Ganymede Skooling The rules of evidence do not work that way. It is not up to anyone to prove they are a hoax. It is up to those who accuse of a chemtrail conspiracy to prove the guilt and the reality of the crime. Innocent until proven guilty. You've declared their guilt and believe that verdict should stand on the accusation alone. Would you want to face a justice system that was that stacked against you? Your claim that we're not supposed to figure out a good conspiracy theory makes no sense. That's exactly what this video and others are claiming to have done. They claim to have uncovered a plot and are now revealing it to the rest of us. What's scary is that there are people who believe it true and are starting to threaten violence.
1
Ganymede Skooling It's not about my rules for conspiracy theories. It is about critical thinking, the rules of evidence and the burden of proof. Those are established rules in science, law and academia. It is the best way to establish fact from fiction. Show me where the government admits to this chemtrail program. What document or politician or video that shows, without doubt, that this is happening. I'll examine whatever proof you have and if it's reliable, I'll believe it and admit I'm wrong. Be prepared though. I do not except anything without a thorough investigation, no matter what the claim. If there is a hole in your proof, I'll find it. Not because I refuse to believe it, but because for evidence to have value it must be unassailable. The entire chemtrail theory is about violence. The accusation is that the powers are spraying the general population to kill them/us. De-population programs, that's means indiscriminate killing which is violence. How else is one to counter an attack like this without the use of violence?
1
A contrail is a man made cloud, inadvertently forming from the exhaust of carbon fired plane engines. If clouds can fill the sky, why can't the clouds that form around the exhaust of planes fill the sky? Clouds form when water vapour condenses and freezes around particulates in the air. Dust, smoke, pollen....tiny particulates that are blown into the atmosphere. Clouds cannot form unless those particulates are present. There are days that those particulates aren't there. This means that the water vapour has nothing to condense around and clouds will not form. A plane comes along, burning fuel and ejecting gases and particulates out of its exhaust. Just like a car does. Your car exhaust ejects all kinds of pollutants. The difference being that a plane ejects its exhaust into a much colder atmosphere, where air pressure is much lower. This concentrated source of particulates now give the water vapour, that is present, something to condense around. The result is a contrail. Sometimes it dissipates within minutes. Sometimes it will last for hours. It all depends on how much water vapour is present up there. That's the same way with clouds. Sometimes they will dissipate and the skies will remain clear. However, when there is a lot of water vapour present, clouds will continue to form and grow until it falls as rain. There is no way a plane has the payload capacity to leave a trail that would stretch for hundreds of miles across the sky. It's physically impossible.
1
You're right, of course. There are days when the particulate and condensation nuclei are higher than others, just like days when the humidity is higher than others. There is always a humidity index, no matter how dry the air is. There is also a particulate count at all times even in the cleanest of air. Those days of clear blue skies and contrails being formed are the days when the particulate count is very low and moisture content is high. Maybe I should have said that there are days when the particulate count is that low that there isn't enough for the water vapour to condense around for it to be noticeable. Would that be accurate enough?
1
It's actually a combination of the two. Without particulates and moisture, contrails will not form. However, since jet engines always give off exhaust, those particulates are always present trailing behind the plane. You can only see them if there is enough moisture in the atmosphere to condense around the particulates being expelled by the plane's engines. A plane's passing can also cause vortexes that will create condensation trails or contribute to conditions for those trails that form from the plane's exhaust. If there was such a thing as electric engines in those high altitude planes, the only trails would be from the vortexes that form and those trails which are coming from the exhausts of carbon fuelled planes would not exist. Contrails would be almost non-existent if electric engines were used as the number one source for the contrails we see are from the exhaust of carbon based engines.
1
Planes never fly at the same altitude in the same airspace. This is for safety reasons. 1000 feet difference in altitude can make a huge difference in atmospheric conditions. When you see 2 planes in the sky, you can bet that they are miles apart, even if they seem close. The distances involved only cause to make them appear very close when in reality they're not close at all. Don't think so? Go to this site which tracks almost all commercial flights around the world. You'll never see 2 planes at the same altitude unless they're dozens of miles apart. https://planefinder.net/
1
According to the National Weather Service, water vapour needs some sort of nuclei in order to condense. If jet exhaust contained no CCN, the long contrails that we see could not form, unless the passing of the planes change conditions enough for the moisture to condense on nuclei already present. I'd think it would become very rare to see those long contrails is jet exhaust didn't expel the nuclei necessary for condensation. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/jetstream/clouds/cloudwise/learn.html
1
I'm not a shill or a disinfo agent. I, simply, know a little about the science of weather and the precipitation cycle. This is the only reason that I know that contrails are naturally occurring, the result of burning fuel in the upper atmosphere and that they form for the same reasons clouds form. Since clouds can form, expand and linger, so can the artificial clouds caused by plane exhaust. No one has ever given me reason to believe otherwise. The statement that contrails cannot linger is just plain false. Science supports that statement. Now, show me the science that refutes it.
1
Incredibly, air and ground crew members of commercial flights, never seem to mention all these rogue planes flying about. You'd think these planes would scare the crap out of a flight crew. Planes appearing out of nowhere with no known flight plan or registration would sure scare me. Scare them enough that it would be the talk of aviation. That's a lot of rogue planes to ignore.
1