Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Warren Smith - Secret Scholar Society" channel.

@narcodium Hatred will never be gone. It's built into the very fabric of all humans. What we must strive for is a culture the reviles hatred, no matter who is the target or why. I'm not even Christian but the adage "Love thy neighbour as thyself" is what we should ALL follow. There are no qualifications, no exceptions....only caring for ourselves and those around us. If you read his comment, he said it was ALMOST gone. That meant that American culture, at that time, was more accepting and we had greater caring for each other. That was his point. However, the socialist manipulators had to create unrest in order to realise their socialist revolution which would eventually lead us to a socialist Utopia.
25
@Anne_Onymous No, it's not. Most people want to be themselves and not be forced to be a stereotype of their identity group. I believe and do what I want to do and not because of my skin colour, or gender, sexual preference or ethnicity. No one wants to forced to toe the identity line under the threat of being kicked out of the "group". That might work for a teenager but I'm adult and I've put away childish things. I'm hoping that you'd want to do that, as well.
12
If he said that Rowling was transphobic, to a great many of university teachers, they'd pat him on the head, tell him what a good student he was and give him an A on his next assignment. No one would ever state why they think that because they don't have to. Dogma is to be repeated not to be discussed or induce thought.
11
I said it out loud and I'm sitting here alone. "Look at the expression on his face" I said to myself and then I started to laugh, while shaking my head. I wonder how many journalists feel the same way and are only saying what they're told to say. They can't ALL be that dense that they support Kamala.
9
@lolwtnick4362 What about Uvalde? These officers wanted in to do their job. The police at Uvalde did nothing but cordon off the section where the shooter was and wouldn't allow parents in to see if their children were safe. The police didn't confront the shooter for 1 hour and 14 minutes. THIS time, it was the principal and the secretary, who wouldn't allow the police in to go in.....the EXACT opposite. They wanted to do their job and she wouldn't let them in. Your Uvalde comparison makes no sense.
9
@kpal2946 That's how they operate. They make up some nonsense theory. When the rest of us can't follow their logic, they smile knowingly at one another, sending their silent message that they're ideas are SO brilliant, so sublime, that only the super-intelligent can follow their brilliance. They all get together in buildings called "universities" and tell each other how incredibly gifted they are.....and we agree because that's what universities are for. Smart people and these academics are teaching the smart people. How could that NOT be brilliant?
7
He looked into it. I'm going to say that he lied. The 10 kilometre Olympic swimming record is 25 minutes faster in the men's division over the women's. Had Tyson looked into it, he'd know that. That leads me to believe that he lied. That's really sciency, Neil.
5
It's only starting. Don't start celebrating yet. We've a long way to go before things get back to some semblance of normality. We may never get there.
5
@KevDuke-l6v What does Uvalde have to do with this? There was a bomb threat. That's illegal even if it's fake. The police have to deal with it quickly, especially if it's real, but even when it's not, they need to resolve it so they're free to handle other safety issues in the community. These women could care less about the safety of students or anyone else in their community. They only care about themselves and their ability to exercise power.
5
@KevDuke-l6v Were these the same cops? Wow. They must of been fired out of Uvalde and found another cop gig in Columbus. Imagine the odds. Now that I'm done being a smart ass, you do realise just how ridiculous you sound. Not all police officers are the same. Neither are all firemen, mailmen, roofers and cowboys. I can't believe I have to explain that to you.
3
@angellopez163 You scared me for a minute. When you said that you hoped Pierre would be elected, a picture of Pierre Trudeau jumped into my mind. That was scary. LOL. I hope Pierre does get elected though. I don't see how he won't but the voters in Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal make the decisions for us. However, Justin has been such a disaster that maybe they'll wise up this time.
3
@AXharoth No....there is not truth in what he said. Men and women had roles in life because their biology had forced in on them. Those roles were important to the survival of the human species. That there is now, in humans alone, the chance for male/female roles to overlap, doesn't mean that this very short time is the norm. It isn't the norm for countless species on the planet and which was not the norm for thousands of generations. That short space of time is just an anecdote in biological development.
3
@thevikinghermit7151 Let's hope.
2
@theWebWizrd He sounds normal. It's not scripted and contrived like so many politicians who come off as used car salesmen. He speaks as if he's in a conversation.
2
@slappy8941 Mussolini said this about Fascism. "Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." Not one word about the individual and the reason for that is quite obvious. The individual is insignificant. It's all about the state. Mussolini should know. He was the very first Fascist leader. It's YOU that doesn't understand Fascism.
2
Ana Kasparian, of the Young Turks, decided to watch the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. She was shocked when it was revealed, in court, that all the people that were shot, weren't black. She had always been under the impression that Kyle had randomly shot Black Americans because the MSM had allowed people to believe that. Then, she was surprised to learn that Kyle did NOT carry a weapon across state lines. She'd heard, once again on the MSM, that Kyle broke the law by doing this. Another misconception that was the MSM refused to counter. She didn't know that the people shot, were chasing Kyle, threatening to kill him the first chance they could. She didn't know that Kyle did NOT fire the first shot and that there were 3 guns involved in this event, NOT just the one carried by young Rittenhouse. She didn't know that the first person shot had been in an institution for crimes committed and had been let out that day and travelled over 100 miles to take part in the riots in Kenosha and that he had threatened to kill Kyle and was trying to take his rifle away from him and that Kyle had every right to believe that he would shoot him if he won that battle. All because the media failed to fully inform the public. Our media is a major part of why things are going so wrong in this country.
2
@chanceneck8072 I'd say that it's for the best.
2
@jaanushiiemae2164 Because there is money involved....and careers, athletic scholarships and opportunities. If you discount the differences in physical differences, you've just excluded a whole demographic from life opportunities and given them to men only. Why would you do that? Do you dislike women that much that you wouldn't allow them those opportunities by eliminating a system that is inclusive? Why would you want to do that?
1
@realwickedbrew My 1986 Webster's Dictionary give identical definitions for both sex and gender. Somewhere, since then, someone decided that they're different and then started to FORCE us to agree with him. It's an updated version of 2 plus 2 equals 5. It all depends on how you look at it, meaning that it's biological not mathematical.
1
@rtyria So, explain how that allows for men to get pregnant.
1
Adam would rather be seen as stupid, than admit that he's wrong. That "Duh" look on his face is intentional. It's all he has.
1
@itsreallyhardtospell No such thing as a Utopia. Tell that to the radical Socialists. They believe that this road to Utopia is an ongoing struggle. The Hegelian Dialectic. From each struggle, they come a little closer but they have to engage in another struggle to get there. Then another struggle, each time facing new challenges and from there they learn how to advance even closer. They see the casualties of those struggles as necessary to the cause. There is no such thing as failure to these fanatics. There's only new struggles to learn from. That's where Critical Theory comes from. It's an ideology of the negative, never being intrinsically comfortable of where one is but always "critical" of the current paradigm. No matter how good things are, there are always problems. That's how we get to micro-aggressions and systemic racism in CRT. However, they believe that this is the way to the Utopia. It sounds frightening to me.
1
@adrianl7147 So you're saying that Trump's manner doesn't show that he's unqualified. Basically what I was saying.
1
@adrianl7147 But there is no content. They don't tell us what they did to survive except to tell us how they lived with nature. Well...DUH. That's how all of humanity survived. There's nothing special about that. They did what they learned from their parents who learned from their parents, from their parents before that, all the way back to the savannahs of Africa. I didn't learn a thing from this video.
1
@adrianl7147 LMAO. You're right. I was going to respond to another comment when someone knocked on my door. I dealt with that, which took about 15 minutes andcame back to my computer and gave my answer, meant for that person, to you. It was a totally different subject, about how native Americans survived when they came to the Americas. No wonder it sounded so weird. LOL Sorry about that.
1
@adrianl7147 Rogan is not a news guy. He interviews people so we see them as they are in the ways that 2 people talk over coffee or beers or playing a round of golf. He doesn't invite people on to interrogate them, to beat them down. He wants to show people as they are when they're not in front of a camera, when you see them in their raw form. Instead of a contest, it's getting to know them. He would've done the same with Kamala but she was having none of it. It would have been interesting to see her as a person and not a politician. What interests her? What does she do to relax? Sort of what he did with Trump and it was a big success for both of them. I didn't see that interview with Jonathan Swan so I can't even begin to comment on it but I'll look it up and see.
1
@StoneCoolds Yes, I guess that might well be true. Those were the good old days weren't they? When we all knew our places and deferred to those who could wield power over our speech and actions. "Pick faster and call me Master".
1
@bg11696 This is a published paper. All you have to do is google "roland fryer pdf on police shootings". It will take you to the Harvard site that carries his study. It's interesting that you haven't done the requisite search for yourself to see who is actually telling the truth. Instead you make a back handed suggestion that Warren is likely lying because of an "emotional attachment to a story". Now....go and read the paper and tell me that his "discovery" isn't correct....like you should have done in the first place.
1
@Mackaygolf Fascists are national socialists. Socialists don't merge with capital interests. They either own them or control them and capital interests have no choice but to go along with the fascist state which is indistinguishable from a socialist state. In Nazi Germany, companies were told what to produce and what suppliers to use. The Party would place party members in each large factories to ensure production quotas and party loyalty. No union because the Nazi party represented the people, the German worker. Any union would be redundant as the People were the Party and the Party is the people. Fascism had full control of capital interests. No merge....no choice in fact.
1
@TrueNimrod You're missing the point by a mile in this video. Gavin is saying that there's a problem but can't tell you why this problem is happening. He's the governor and he's had YEARS to address, assess and study this problem and all he can say is "lots of reasons". He can't give you one reason even though he claims that there are lots of them. This is a logic exercise that Gavin is losing. You'll never solve a problem if you can't or refuse to tell us why those reasons exist. I can tell you one thing for sure. There are "lots of reasons" why Gavin won't answer that question. I can't give you any but I can assure you that it's so. See how ridiculous my claim is. That's what Warren is pointing out. Gavin is just dodging and deflecting. You don't have to be an expert on any subject to see when someone behaves that way.
1
@harrymills2770 Pretty good. I have my own way of saying it. 1. It's good to be alive. 2. I'm not perfect.
1
@Censored_Truth_Addict You left out one key element. At the time he couldn't be deported to El Salvador because an active, rival gang would try to kill him. That gang, Barrio-18, no longer exists in El Salvador. They've all been arrested and jailed in a RICO type program that incarcerates all crime gang members. The element that kept Garcia from being sent to El Salvador no longer exists and negates the ruling. All SCOTUS did, after he was in El Salvador, is say that the US government must facilitate his return, IF the government of El Salvador releases him. The government of El Salvador has said that they're NOT releasing him. Bukele, the elected president of El Salvador, said exactly that in a press briefing in Washington with Donald Trump. He hasn't released Garcia so the US government can't facilitate his return. Even if he was released, they'd help him return to the US and then the US government would arrest him, tell him that he's being deported BACK to El Salvador because there's an outstanding order of deportation and away he'd go. In other words, it would all be a giant waste of time and money. He's going back to El Salvador.
1
It's just another control trap. The more that they can control speech, they can control what you and others think. That type revels in that kind of control. Just look at the student who dared him to read that passage. The teacher takes on the dare, thinking that it's a teaching moment and the student rats him out. It sounds a lot like the struggle sessions in Mao's China.
1
@ Triggered??? LOL. I was being a smart ass because I was laughing at him. After mocking him, I explained why I thought he was being ridiculous and why I was laughing at him. Not everyone makes comments because they're triggered unless you're triggered because I said that I was being a smart ass. If so, don't assume that we all react in the same manner.....or, in layman's terms, don't be triggered. It's really not that important.
1
@stevendouglas3781 Evil is stupid. It's the stupidity of destruction. Practice evil and you will always suffer negative consequences. That's stupid. If you practice morality, you will make wise decisions, the antithesis of making stupid decisions.
1
If they really want to be equitable, they should give the job to the one who gets the least votes. It's not fair to them that no one likes them so, in compensation, which is another word for reparations, it's only fitting that the loser wins. The position goes to the black, Latino, no-binary and vertically challenged individual with Zero votes. And the crowd goes all jazzy hands.
1
If every business or political acted with complete honesty and in a responsible way, we'd never need an audit. It's why the IRS audits the citizens and businesses of this country. They want to know if we, as citizens and businesses, were responsible and honest in our dealings. If every audit that they ever did showed that nothing untoward ever happened, eventually we'd have to decide that audits are a waste of time. I would bet that Kathleen Hicks would argue that the IRS should audit our tax returns, except for her. I know I felt that way when I was audited. Why audit me? I'm as honest as they come. Everything was good but I was still nervous. Now, we're looking at a nervous bureaucracy and establishment. They're no different than I was but they have ways to try and prevent being audited themselves. I just had to bear it as I had no way to prevent it.
1
@rcmysm9123 Then why is it that Islam, in the 100 years after Mohammed's death, did Islam forcefully expand into the entire Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia and into Spain and Portugal? Why did the invade Sicily, sack Rome TWICE and only stopped expanding into Europe because they were defeated at Tours by Charles Martel, the French monarch? Those Muslim warlords put together an empire that matched the Roman Empire in it's size and scope. Doesn't sound peaceful at all. Could it be that Mohammed was also a warlord, who took part in hundreds of battles and wars and, in ten years, used his armies to take over all of the Arabian Peninsula? That Muslims are encouraged to follow the example of Mohammed and expansionist wars are the example that he set? You can repeat the "religion of peace" all you want but the proof is in the actions that the followers of Islam took part in right from the very start of that religion. They went to war. I'd say that the belief is that there will be peace when Islam rules the world. Until then, they must fight for Allah or perish trying, in order to enter into Paradise.
1
@tabinekoman The left doesn't use the word "phobia" to describe irrational fear. Just criticise the doctrines of Islam and the left will call you Islamophobic and refuse to talk to you. No one calls you Christophobic when you criticise Christianity and it's a religion just like Islam. No one is called Hinduphobic or Shintophobic, if they criticise the teachings of those religions. ONLY Islam. The left uses the word "phobic" to smear and denigrate, like an 8 year old calling another kid "stupid" on a schoolyard to bully and force their will on fellow students. It's the manipulation of words in order to use them against you. Accuracy and truth are irrelevant.
1
What an insufferable little brat.
1
I'm hoping so. Our PM has destroyed this country.
1
It wouldn't surprise me that some of your subscribers are so terrified of the new "Hitler" that they're erasing all signs of their existence so "Hitler" won't be able to find them or find any evidence of things said that "Hitler" might use against them in the future. They're living in a delusional state of terror.....a true phobia. Kind of like that girl friend who was terrified of moths. Terrified of something that won't hurt them.
1
@ What I want? Do you want to be a cog of your identity group? Do you want to be told what to do, think or say, based on the pigeon hole assigned to you? I would hope not but if you do want that, I will assume your personality and by that how will behave based only on your name. You're a woman. You do and say "woman" things. Your name is Anne same as my ex-wife. Do you really want me to think of you in the same way that I do her? It won't be flattering. I doubt it that you do. I think that you'd want to be who you are and not my be judged based on an assumption, on what you are, based on some arbitrary classification. I think that you'd prefer to be you, not your classification.
1
This guy seems to think that we should all be perfect in every thing that we say and do. It's an impossible standard. A person's life's legacy isn't determined by only the bad thing that they've done in life. It's the totality and whether, in the end, their lives have made the lives of others better.
1
@JohnKobaRuddy It was based only for Mao and his minions. If you deviated ever so slightly from Mao's beliefs, their based reality would destroy you.
1
@mikeydflyingtoaster That's the answer to everything. If you don't like their views.....they're very sympathetic to Russia. Tulsi Gabbard...Russian asset. Jill Stein....another Russian asset. Donald Trump....Russian stooge. It spills over into Canada, as well with your accusation of Lauren Southern along with a truck load of YouTubers. If they lean right, or it appears that they lean that way....they have to be Russian assets. All I see, when I read your comment, is one in the pay of the CCP. China has been a traditional enemy of Russia for centuries and you're trying to smear Russia because it helps China. See....anyone can play that stupid game.
1
@3MrNiceGuy15 Language is an agreement on how we communicate. it's why a dictionary is so important. It defines words so that we all know what those words mean. Sure, Bob and I can agree that a specific word has special meaning to us, but we still have to use it with others in the way that everyone else understands it. I can't insist that they must use it our way or they're negating the way that we see the world and that denying our unique perspective is an indication of a phobia. Words have an accepted meaning for a reason.
1
@troonkiller What's even MORE ironic is that this teacher would support the Democrats who allowed crime cartels to engage in human trafficking, including child trafficking for sexual purposes. Over 30% of the female migrants are abused but this teacher isn't worried about the ones, who are doing the abusing, are entering this country. That many are carrying in Fentanyl that have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans over the last decade. None of that poses a threat to his daughter and nieces. Only the one man named Trump.
1
How are you going to solve a problem when you don't know why a problem is occurring?
1