Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "'The Five' compares US and UK media treatment of Trump" video.

H Smith As far as I've heard, he's not been convicted of anything. You see, US law states that one is innocent until proven guilty. In fact, that's how one show treat any story about anyone. Without proof, you're engaging in gossip.....the painful meanderings of a weak mind. I know all that is a difficult concept for some but the minute you're assumed guilty and have to prove your innocence, that's the same minute that you'll begin to understand what I'm talking about.
4
H Smith They never said that he'd be locked up by now if he wasn't the president. What they said and Mueller said, was that they went into the investigation with the idea that a sitting president could NOT be prosecuted. That's a subtle difference that people do not want to understand or admit to. I have repeatedly asked people to show me exactly how he obstructed justice. I have yet to hear or see any definitive evidence given. The closest they've come is conspiracy to obstruct justice and even that would be difficult to prove in court. In fact, Trump allowed the release of over 1 million documents, allowed hundreds of witnesses to testify and never, ONCE, used executive privilege to stop any testimony or block any document to not be examined by the Mueller team. More than that, why is it that impeachment proceedings haven't been brought up a long time ago. Adam Schiff has stated that he has definitive proof of Russian collusion.....proof that he's never given that I've ever heard. So, my challenge to you is for you to reference actual proof that show obstruction. The proof that these prosecutors have that would prompt them to write that Trump would be in jail if he wasn't president. You see, until that is done, until he is prosecuted in a court of law, Trump is innocent.....innocent until proven guilty. According to you, that should happen in 2020 or 2024. What are you going to say, then, if it doesn't happen.
1