Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Rudy Giuliani joins Tucker for first TV interview since FBI raid" video.

@paulxx11 I've seen the pictures of Hunter and the crack pipe. I'll bet you have too. My question is....why wouldn't the FBI take ALL the electronics? That's what they should have done. I'm thinking that there may be lies on both parts. However, he may not want to release the evidence until the right time. If he's correct, then he wouldn't want tip his hand to those that might be guilty so they don't have all kinds of time to know the exact evidence and find ways to counter it. That's basic lawyering.
1
@tpc3062 How did they know that it was Hunter's hard drive? I can't tell what's on a hard drive just by looking at it. How could they know? Maybe the stuff the Giuliani wanted to keep hidden, the stuff that could get him in trouble, is on those hard drives and he bluffed them into not taking them. It makes no sense.
1
@1133saginaw No.....Hunter left it at a repair shop. If, after numerous times of contacting Hunter, it isn't picked up, it eventually becomes the property of the repair shop in lieu of payment. Also, if there is evidence of illegal activity on that hard drive, it's the responsibility, of the repair shop, to report it, which he obviously did because we all know about it and we've all seen the pictures of Hunter and the crack pipe. There's more to this than we know.
1
@jrprogrammer I doubt it. The repair shop owner has the receipt that shows that Hunter Biden left a hard drive at his shop. Hunter's signature is on that receipt. Then the repair shop owner gave the hard drive to Giuliani and he will swear to it and identify that hard drive as the one that he gave to him. That's a chain of command. That, plus the data on the hard drive, will validate the authenticity of the receipt and the claims of the repair shop owner. No matter how you slice it, if the proper investigation is done and this is all legit, there will be no problem with the chain of custody.
1
@Farm Jedi For sure.....that makes no sense. That's my point. Why wouldn't they take All the electronics, as stated on the warrant, and why would they take Giuliani's word that this was Hunter's laptop. Also, why wouldn't they take it before Giuliani questioned them on it? It's as if they knew beforehand that the hard drives were not to be taken and what to look out for. That's a few unanswered questions. I'm sure there are a lot more.
1
@Farm Jedi Something is really off. It's hard to figure out what's exactly going on but the US is in big trouble. What's unfortunate is that too many Americans are too vested in their hatred of Trump to even consider that something could be wrong. I'm not a big Trump fan but I won't let emotion control my ability to reason logically. There's something seriously wrong, in the US, and it's coming from the left and it's finding it's way into the Democrat party and the media. When the media is screaming about white supremacy while the left is rioting, looting and burning down cities (notice it's the poorer minority neighbourhoods) you can be sure that there's an agenda there.
1
@daisysfield5456 Already the NY Times, Wapo and NBC had to make retractions concerning this story. Also, why isn't the media telling us that this part of the laptop is a lie? That Giuliani is lying about the laptop is something that you've concocted, from no evidence, because you don't like Giuliani or the implications of what it might mean if the story is true. And it hasn't been years. The story came out last summer about the laptop being found. Ever since last summer, most of big tech has been censoring this article from the New York Post so no one could even talk about it, especially Facebook and Twitter. Imagine censoring the story about Nixon and Watergate. That would've been an outrage and rightfully so. This NY Post article, about the laptop, comes out and within days the story is being suppressed by big tech oligarchs. No real curiosity, no intrepid journalist trying to find out the truth of the matter. They all just ignored it. Also there were more than just the crack pipe. There were also pictures of underage girls on the laptop. Hunter was living the life of an addict, something that he admitted to on national television. Then he lied on a firearms form about BEING an addict and then the gun that he bought, illegally, was disposed of in a public dumpster, another illegal act. Are you starting to get the picture? Of the two, Giuliani is the more believable, by far....unless you're that dogmatically vested that you wouldn't believe it no matter what.
1