Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Timcast" channel.

  1. 1300
  2. 533
  3. 242
  4. 174
  5. 129
  6. 126
  7. 107
  8. 100
  9. 74
  10. 58
  11. 56
  12. 55
  13. 48
  14. 47
  15. 44
  16. 42
  17. 41
  18. 40
  19. 39
  20. 39
  21. 38
  22. 37
  23. 37
  24. 36
  25. 36
  26. 36
  27. 36
  28. 35
  29. 34
  30. 33
  31. 32
  32. 32
  33. 32
  34. 31
  35. 29
  36. 29
  37. 28
  38. 28
  39. 27
  40. 27
  41. 27
  42. 27
  43. 26
  44. 26
  45. 25
  46. 24
  47. 24
  48. 24
  49. 24
  50. 24
  51. 24
  52. 22
  53. 22
  54. 22
  55. 22
  56. 22
  57. 22
  58. 21
  59. 21
  60. 21
  61.  @gabepizza  The media is, by proxy, slamming all those who are fighting the virus. Jim Acosta, going on about lack of PPE's and masks and that he heard if from "un-named" administrators is slamming FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers, all the top medical people like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brix. It's not only asking why Trump didn't act sooner. It's asking why the good Doctors didn't use their influence and expertise to expose the lack of caring from Trump. Why didn't Acosta frame his questions differently. He could have NAMED an administrator that was having problems getting needed material and asked what this guy should do to help in acquiring things that is needed. Challenge the president to offer solutions. Trump said that they had the needed equipment. Have him show the chain of procurement and how it works. Ask the president, POLITELY, what department this administrator should contact. Instead, he leaves the impression that he never did talk to any administrator and this entire dialogue was engineered by Jim Acosta as vehicle of denigration, bereft of facts and unfounded allegations. If Trump would have come through, Acosta would have done a good turn by helping people in dire need. If Trump had failed in any capacity, Acosta would have shown where Trump was failing. No conjecture. No vague allegations but a real time line of events. However, Acosta would NEVER do that because if Trump came through, THAT would counter the news picture that Acosta was trying to paint. It's not about the news or the facts, it's political theatre and that has nothing to do with being a Trump supporter or not. Acosta is a journalist...not the opposition party. You can apply that same weakness to almost all the MSM.
    21
  62. 21
  63. 21
  64. 20
  65. 20
  66. 19
  67. 19
  68. 19
  69. 19
  70. 19
  71. 19
  72. 19
  73. 18
  74. 18
  75. 18
  76. 18
  77. 18
  78. 18
  79. 17
  80. 16
  81. 16
  82. 16
  83. 16
  84. 16
  85. 16
  86. 15
  87. 15
  88. 15
  89. 15
  90. 15
  91. 15
  92. 15
  93. 15
  94. 14
  95. 14
  96. 14
  97. 14
  98. 14
  99. 14
  100. 14
  101. 14
  102. 14
  103. 14
  104. 14
  105. 13
  106. 13
  107. 13
  108. 13
  109. 13
  110. 13
  111. 13
  112. 13
  113. 13
  114. 13
  115. 13
  116. 13
  117. 12
  118. 12
  119. 12
  120. 12
  121. 12
  122. 12
  123. 12
  124. 12
  125. 12
  126. 11
  127. 11
  128. 11
  129. 11
  130. 11
  131. 11
  132. 11
  133. 11
  134. 11
  135. 11
  136. 11
  137. 11
  138. 11
  139. 10
  140. 10
  141. 10
  142. 10
  143. 10
  144. 10
  145. 10
  146. 10
  147. 10
  148. 10
  149. 10
  150. 10
  151. 10
  152. 10
  153. 10
  154. 10
  155. 10
  156. 10
  157. 10
  158. 10
  159. 10
  160. 10
  161. 10
  162. 10
  163. 9
  164. 9
  165. 9
  166. 9
  167. 9
  168. 9
  169. 9
  170. 9
  171. 9
  172. 9
  173. 9
  174. 9
  175. 9
  176. Cyden One As was pointed out, he was not the one that asked the customer to leave. Also, we have no idea what the customer said, if she threatened him or how serious the threats were. We have no idea of how much experience this manager has and whether this was his first confrontation of this type. You're basing an assessment on a very, VERY short video clip. Since, you're engaging in personal experience as a call to authority, I'll do the same. I worked for 14 years as a bartender and though I'm in my late sixties and retired, I still get requests for my services on a part time level. This would indicate that my abilities, as a bartender, are respected. I'll tell you one thing, though. I hope that there's no video clip of my first confrontation with an irate customer. I know that it wasn't all that flattering on my part. I got over it and not all people do. It was a new experience in my professional life and it's not easy. That doesn't mean that your unease can't be overcome. I guarantee you that if you watched a clip of my first encounter and decided that this indicated a pushover, you'd be sorely mistaken. I mean that in both a figurative and physical manner. I've even had a customer claim that I had declined service because he was black. He didn't get far with that claim. Even if that manager isn't suited for that job, and that's quite possible, that doesn't have a thing to do with the behaviour of the customer and how this is being turned into a racial incident. No dispute should be settled using the colour of a person's skin as the deciding factor, alone. The facts are the issue here and that's all that counts. Worse, I'd hate to think that a business should ALWAYS acquiesce to a customer's demands. That sounds like a recipe for fraud without consequence to me.
    9
  177. 9
  178. 9
  179. 9
  180. 9
  181. 9
  182. 9
  183. 9
  184. 9
  185. 9
  186. 9
  187. 9
  188. 8
  189. 8
  190. 8
  191.  @Alex-pt5no  Yet, Grosskreutz carried a weapon, in a riot, that he was in support of. He approached Kyle, with that weapon drawn, and pointed it at Kyle. That's when Grosskreutz was shot....ONLY then. Also, Kyle was NOT a vigilante. He was there to PROTECT businesses and to offer medical aid to ANYONE that needed it. He put out a fire and this brought on the ire of the rioters, particularly Rosenbaum, who said he would kill Kyle if he caught him alone. He was on his way to help put out another fire when Rosenbaum chased him down and tried to grab his gun. A man, who threatened to kill him, was grabbing at his gun. What would any reasonable person assume would happen if Rosenbaum had actually succeeded taking that gun away from him? Any reasonable person would assume that Rosenbaum would use that gun to carry out his previous threats. Kyle, among others, should not have had to be there that night, but their town was being burned by rioters and looters and the elected officials were doing NOTHING to protect the community. So, what do you do when criminals are destroying everything that you own and the people that you've elected to protect you, turn their backs on you? Do you turn tail and run? That's exactly what the German people did when the Brownshirts smashed windows, set fires and threatened people. Their government did nothing and they acquiesced to one of the most murderous groups of ideologues in human history. In Kenosha, they smashed windows, set fires and threatened people. The local governments, city, state and even Federal governments did NOTHING and you want the people of the Kenosha area to back down and let the rioters destroy their town. That strategy worked really well in Germany. (deep sarcasm) Had only the people of Germany stood against the Brownshirts....but they were cowards. Their cowardice ended in over 50 million deaths before that ideological base was finished.
    8
  192. 8
  193. 8
  194. 8
  195. 8
  196. 8
  197. 8
  198. 8
  199. 8
  200. 8
  201. 8
  202. 8
  203. 8
  204. 8
  205. 8
  206. 8
  207. 8
  208. 8
  209. 8
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 7
  213. 7
  214. 7
  215. 7
  216. 7
  217. 7
  218. 7
  219. 7
  220. 7
  221. 7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238.  @DM-dk7js  You don't get it? I'll explain it to you. The Capitol Building is HUGE. People can't even SEE the people on the other side of the building. So, the violence took place on ONE side and the people on the other side didn't KNOW that it was happening. For some reason, the security on the other side of the building of the violence, opened doors and let people in. They just LET THEM IN. Other people, like Ray Epps, were telling to attack the building and was THERE when it started. For some reason, he was not arrested, even though he spent one day on the FBI wanted list. However, Alex Jones, who was never went into the building and was telling people to not go in, was arrested. One video showed a cop saying that he didn't approve but supported their right to protest. One person's charges were dropped because video evidence showed that a police officer opened the door for him. If security allows you into a building, you can't be charged with trespassing. Anyone that took part in actual violence or was inciting violence, they should be charged. I repeat....anyone who took part in violence or incited violence, they should, most definitely, be charged. If they just walked in, through doors that were opened by security and no violence evident, they should be dismissed on a case by case basis. Those doors should never have been opened by security and why they would open them is truly mystifying. I'll agree with you on this. If those cops did what is alleged, they should be charged. We also have to find out why they did this. Did they do it because they agreed with the protesters or did they get orders TELLING them to open the doors. If so, who was it that told them to do that and what was their intent. No matter whether your Republican or Democrat, we have to know what went on, FULLY and not just to punish or exonerate people. If this was a partial set up by a group who were supposed to be in charge of security, we must find out about it.....because next time, it could be YOU that is arrested for something you didn't do at the machinations of a corrupt government.
    7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 7
  244. 7
  245. 7
  246. 7
  247. 7
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 7
  251. 7
  252. I'm going to argue against Tim on his claim that social media is the cause of the woke culture. Socialism has been growing for decades in our universities. Those academic socialists didn't call themselves woke, of course. However, they cultivated a culture that would lead to what we now call progressive woke. The socialist academics would only appoint those to academic posts who were avowed radical socialists. They would recommend them to educational positions in primary schools, who in turn, when they got the power, would only hire fellow socialists to teach or become part of the administration. That's when they had the ability to shape the minds of the young into their socialist philosophy. It's how Hitler shaped the minds of the youth of Germany. Get them when they're young so when they become adults, they become fervent foot soldiers for the cause. Who are the most constant and influential users of social media? The young. They're on it all the time and when they use social media, they're drawn to those who share the values that they've been taught in school. The same ones that were taught by these socialist academics for over a generation. The academics know that to control the populace they have to control the media. They've done it in the legacy media, in Hollywood and in the personnel departments of our large businesses, changing the name to "Human Resources" It all started in the hallowed halls of higher education. Had these people not existed, there would be no woke culture. Social media is there new propaganda tool and it's been very effective.
    6
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261.  @jerrybumstead2654  Drugs for kids, when I was in school was unheard of. They just didn't exist. As for the authority part, culturally, life was so much different back then. Right from early childhood, we were exposed to a much stricter set of rules and a more regimented lifestyle. This was the norm, no matter where you went. Prayer before and after each meal. If you're sitting in a highchair, mom reached over and held your hands down while the prayer was being said. This was expected. Everyone did it. The little ones were actually proud to do the things that the older ones were doing. At evening meal, there was also a Bible reading and you were expected to sit still, quietly and listen. This wasn't just at my home, either. It happened everywhere I went. By the time a kid went to school, sitting still and standing in line was nothing. Our classes were quiet. If you stepped out of line, you got the strap. I got it lots of times. No big deal. In spite of this strictness, we had way more freedom that kids do now. We were out, at the neighbours, riding bikes, we never told our parents what we were up to. No helicoptering parents. We played hockey, soccer and baseball with no supervision. Fishing and swimming, building forts...but be home in time for meals or you didn't eat. I remember being blocks away and hearing my mother yelling my name to come home at 7 and 8 years old. You had the freedom but don't screw up. You got in trouble with the a neighbouring adult and he cuffed you across the head, you don't tell your dad. He'd cuff you a couple more times and tell you to stop being a troublemaker. I was talking about this with my siblings a couple of weeks ago. We all agreed that life was a LOT more fun for us than for kids these days. Not even a close comparison.
    6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 6
  274. 6
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. 6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. @Gary Miller Why would Americans vote against a president who is at the helm of the best economic climate in decades? That doesn't even make sense. He negotiated a stop to nuclear and missile testing in North Korea. That's great news. He initiated prison reform and the first step program. Something that's been needed for a long time. He instituted an economic plan for depressed zones and it's been great for those who'd take advantage of it. Black unemployment, right now, is at its lowest in history. IN HISTORY!!! Also, the gap between white and black unemployment is at its lowest in history. He's the first president that has taken on the Chinese juggernaut, who've been flooding western stores with cheap products using production methods which include worker abuse, no quality control, no pollution standards, theft of intellectual property and just plain bullying of vulnerable markets. Finally, some one has had the man parts to do something about it. So the man isn't the most sophisticated man around. He's boorish and a braggart and has a penchant for saying the wrong things but he's getting things done. If only the Democrats would try to cooperate, even a little bit, the US would be even be in a better position economically and socially. Trump's biggest hurdle has been his fellow Americans, the Democrats, the far left and the MSM. They've fought him every step of the way and it's the worst treatment of a sitting president in history. And you're not helping. Get rid of the Democrats and convince them that they'd better reform and become a party that cares for the citizens of the US and their country.
    6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308.  @Arctc-zh6rg  Almost everyone of those black schools are in the inner city and in cities that have been controlled by a Democrat governments for YEARS. It's the Republicans, the right wing, that are advocating for school choice and the left, the Democrats that are solidly against school choice. They're telling those black parents that they MUST go to the school that has been built for them, no matter how bad that school could be. So it's Democrats that are telling those parents to shut up and do as you're told. Also, have you listened to Candace Owens? She's a bad role model, for the black community, of someone who's supposed to shut up. Beside, that's not what she's saying. You're putting words in her mouth that aren't there. She's saying to quit thinking like a victim. Quit being silent and demanding things from others because the record shows that they're NOT GOING TO GIVE IT TO YOU. Most of the impoverished inner city have been Democrat run for decades.....the party that supposed to help them and nothing ever changes. The reason is simple. NO ONE is going to help you. You have to help yourself. The capability is there. What's needed is the desire and the left keeps sucking that desire out of the black community with their promises of "hope and change". It's a false promise. I've already said it. Asians have the most affluent demographic house hold wealth. They do it through hard work. It can be done. Black doctors, nurses, truck drives, tradesmen, lawyers, lab techs, writers, police officers are doing it all the time. They work hard and they make a good life for themselves. They don't feel sorry for themselves about how much harder it is for them. They're going to do it in SPITE of the difficulty. One thing is certain, it's not going to happen, waiting in front of TV set for the government to do it for you. It didn't work 50 years ago, or 40 years ago or 25 years ago and it's not going to work today.
    6
  309. 6
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. 5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 4
  373. 4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. 4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413. 4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428. 4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450.  @avery5415  In some ways, we all are. However, I was a strange little kid. By the time I was 10, I'd read every one of the Encyclopedia Americana, at the back of my class, cover to cover, multiple times. I went to a Christian primary school, so I had learned early that there were conflicting ideas in the world so I had to reconcile between what I was being taught and what I was learning on my own. Incredibly, those Christian teachers encouraged my reading and even allowed me to leave the schoolyard twice a week to go to our local library to check out books. Most people didn't have that voracious appetite to learn things like I did and I think that it has a lot to do with wanting to know all the information available before arriving at any decisions on a topic. I found it frustrating, back then, that my friends and siblings, didn't care to do the same and would support ideas without any real knowledge of the topic that they were talking about. Still, I do find that I can get stuck in a rut about some things, so I guess it's understandable that others would as well. No one likes to hear that they may be wrong and some will never admit it, no matter what the evidence. Once you realise how information should be processed, as it appears that you have, it's difficult to turn back. Human weakness does get in the way, I know. That's the one thing the left will not realise. It's not the weakness in others that should be your prime concern....It's the weaknesses that lie within you.
    4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 3
  468. 3
  469. 3
  470. 3
  471. 3
  472. 3
  473. 3
  474. 3
  475. 3
  476. 3
  477. 3
  478. 3
  479. 3
  480. 3
  481. 3
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493.  @asherif3893  Venezuela is worse. Does that automatically mean that Cuba has a good system? I rather doubt it. It's nice that they can all read but if the material that they're ALLOWED to read is limited, of what use is it? Reading has value only if you have the freedom to follow that gift where ever it might take you, to develop your interests and passions to enhance the quality of your life. If Cuba is SO wonderful, how come there aren't there hundreds of makeshift boats, overcrowded with "dreamers" heading TOWARDS Cuba, instead of leaving it? Why are there 1.5 million Cubans living in Florida and hardly, if any, American living in Cuba? Why aren't Venezuelans leaving the horrors of their country and flocking to Cuba? It's because they all know that there are lots of places where the freedom and quality of life is much higher in other, democratic and capitalist countries. That's the one thing that socialist apologists will not respond to. Why is the tide of immigrants always flowing towards the Capitalist countries and NOT the other way around? Socialists are always saying how horrible capitalists countries are but they're not migrating, in droves or by the millions, towards these socialist countries. That, in itself, has to show that maybe socialism isn't as great as claimed. That those who live under the safety net of capitalism, will only complain about capitalism but aren't passionate enough to actually go to their "Utopian" promised land. I think it's the complaining that drives them. Pessimistic people who bitch about everything but know, deep down, that they're not going to change even if they went to the socialist paradise.
    3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543.  @LucasCanDrum  I've been following a YouTuber name Patricia Dickson. She grew up in an all Black neighbourhood, I think in Tennessee and knew very few white folk. She did alright in high school but didn't know what to do after graduating. She announced to her family that she was joining the Air Force. Did that drive them crazy. They told her that white folk hated blacks and that they'd torment and discriminate against her. That they'd make her life SO miserable that she'd come crawling home first chance she got. She didn't listen and joined anyway. After that, every time she went home for a visit, they'd grill her and she'd tell them she really like it. They called her a liar. When her nephew started asking her about life in the military, her sister told her to quit lying to him before she ruined the nephew's life. She finally decided not to talk about her life in the Air Force at home anymore. She took classes and when she finally got out of the service, she went to college on a GI Bill. She found a good job and eventually went to England for a year to work because she loved English history and wanted to see it firsthand. She then moved to California until she got sick of the politics and went to Texas and she's made a good life for herself. Nothing spectacular but something to be proud of. You see, she didn't buy into the "everyone hates us" mentality. Even they did, that wouldn't have stopped her because she believed in herself. Yet, her own family and friends fought her every step of the way. How many of them stayed right where they were because of this same pressure. "Oreo" and "Uncle Tom" aren't just insults. They're a way to excuse your own failures and to blame it on others. There's a reason that Asian families have the highest household earnings in the US. It's their culture and work ethic and determination, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the imagined "inequality" that you're talking about. They do it and those who treat them badly can get lost. You can't do anything about what others feel about you. However, you can do something about how you feel about yourself. Don't let the naysayers hold you down. If you do.....that's YOUR fault.
    3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577.  @galiyam1  Do you know what's hurting his presidency? The Democrat hatred of him and their reaction to losing the last election. The country was doing great until Covid hit and, true to form, the worst hit places were Democrat run states, both by the disease and economically. Texas and Florida have 30 million MORE people, combined, than New York, yet have over 10,000 more deaths. This is the state where Covid patients were put in nursing homes and Cuomo refuses to talk about it when asked. NY City has checkpoints at city exits. 500,000 people have left, most of them for good, eroding the tax base and it would appear that NY will have a 30 billion dollar shortfall this year. Mayor DeBlasio has threatened to increase taxes on those who remain, ensuring even more people leaving and is now talking about wealth redistribution. They've had riots, excuse me, "peaceful protests" where stores were looted and property damaged. The streets are empty, businesses boarded up and covered in graffiti. The Mayor took the homeless, out of shelters and have put them up in high end hotels at 175 bucks a night....13,000 of them. These addicts and mentally impaired people are wandering the streets, threatening people, urinating in public, passing out where ever they happen to be, even though they have rooms that you and I can't afford to live in. 1 billion dollars in funding have been taken away from the police force and even though 1/2 billion people have left the city, violent crime has doubled. Even so, the mayor has seen fit to assign 27 police officers to protect a BLM street painting, which he had commissioned at tax payer expense. ......and Trump is a bad president? Democrat city Portland has had 100 days of continuous riots. LA and San Francisco are in a dystopian mess, with homelessness, exorbitant rents and taxes, electrical blackouts and have even talked about taxing people that have left the state for ten years, AFTER they've left. They've just voted to repeal the state Civil Right's Act, their state version of the Federal Act that Martin Luther King worked so hard to put in place. Downtown Minneapolis has been destroyed. Their Democrat city council has voted to abolish the police force and then hired a private security firm to protect themselves. Kenosha has 3 days of intense riots, refusing help, from Trump, until people were killed. Chicago has had ongoing riots. Louisville has had BLM extorting money from small businesses demanding they buy 1/3 of their supplies from Black owned businesses or pay them 1.5% of their revenue. Do you know what the common thread here is? They're ALL Democrat led cities....yet Trump is a bad president. I can go on if you like. These aren't the only cities in a dystopian nightmare but you're going to vote for the Democrats and expand this chaos to a national level. GREAT THINKING!!!!!!!
    3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584.  @A_Jeff  You're contradicting yourself. If Canada needed the pipeline to get their products to a better port, they've lost out. The pipeline, to a better port, doesn't exist, Biden stopped it. That means that they're not drilling for more because they can't get it to markets. Thousands of oil workers, in Alberta and Saskatchewan, are now sitting at home because the Keystone project was scrapped. These are workers that would have had high paying jobs but no pipeline so no point in drilling for oil. That also impacts all the peripheral workers. Truck drivers to get products to drilling sites. Secondary manufacturing to build the trucks and products needed to drill for the oil. Service industries lose high paying oil riggers as customers. This is a huge industry in western Canada. Then there's the oil refineries in Louisiana which would directly employ hundreds of people of high paying jobs. Then the dock workers who load the oil tankards and all those who service the refineries and docks. The pipeline will also need servicing which will keep more skilled workers in jobs. The oil industry is a labour intensive business which needs highly skilled workers who make great money. This isn't like a guy whittling whistles to sell at a fair. This is a big industry. There's a reason why the Arab states are so rich. We, in Canada and the US, could grab a piece of their pie but Biden and company don't want it. They just decide that they don't want it and with a stroke of the pen, thousands are out of work. It doesn't cost Biden or the Democrats one red cent but the ordinary worker, as usual, pays the price. That's what blows me away. The Democrats just don't care about the little guy.
    3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615.  @bLackmarketRadio  Of course they're paying me. Now you're starting to sound exactly like the flat earthers that I've talked to online. I never ONCE said that they weren't including non Covids as Covids. I said that we have NO idea how prevalent that it is. There is no way for you or me to know this. This might work just great in a country like the US, where hospitals are private and run like businesses and they see an opportunity to get government funds. However, in the countries that have socialised health care, like EVERY country in Europe, it makes no difference. They already get that money from the government because it's government owned and run and no one makes a profit off it. Yet, their numbers, per capita, are HIGHER than the US numbers. Italy, France, Spain and the UK are all in that category. So, to say that this is a big factor, worldwide, is looking at it through a myopic American lens. There are also countries where healthcare is poor and people don't have access to medical care. How many of them are getting the disease and can't get to a doctor and never get counted. What about countries that deflate the numbers to look good? The US situation is just one facet of this crisis. The disease exists. Instead of going off on a suspicion that you can't prove in a substantial way, start pressuring your local politician to start easing off on the restrictions. Don't go all squirrelly with accusations and overt threats. Just let it be known that if they don't start to ease off, you won't vote for them come election time. Politicians want votes, especially Democrats. Saying that some guy on the internet is getting paid to say things puts you in the category of people to laugh at. Don't be that guy. We're on the same side. I WANT the restrictions eased. I want it badly. I just don't go off all half cocked with theories. I see it as a political ploy by Democrats, in an attempt to make Republicans look like greedy capitalists and they'd love nothing more than a total economic collapse and a huge death count so to pin the blame on Republicans. I repeat. I WANT TO END THE LOCKDOWN. It's what I've been saying all along. The curve has been flattened. Let's acknowledge it and let's GET BACK TO WORK.
    2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629.  @ericlazenby5984  You want them to show BEFORE the crime? Are you seriously that foolish? And they don't ALL laugh in your face, either. That's your own bigotry coming through which says all people, in a specific group, are exactly the same. Identity politics....the bane of modern society. My ex-wife, and my kids, went away for the evening and while she was gone, someone broke in and robbed them. Not only her stuff, but the kids bicycles, laptops, cameras and other valuable. The police didn't laugh at them. They went to pawnshops in all the surrounding towns and even got some of the stuff back and a person was arrested. I worked as a bartender for years. Every time I needed the police because of violent patrons, they were always helpful. They even had a police car parked outside a waitresses home because an extremely violent patron threatened her. They didn't laugh. Years later my son was killed in a tragic accident. 2 officers came to my door to inform me of the tragedy and one of them stayed with me and talked for almost 2 hours until I was ready to meet with family and friends. Then he gave me a ride to where I had to go. They didn't laugh. They showed nothing but sympathy and understanding. You're making broad statements to suit your own bitterness and hatred. It's unfair and shows a weak mind. If there are cops who do behave inappropriately, complain about them so they either forced to change their ways or are fired. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. They're defunding police in big cities all over the US and violent crime has increased by leaps and bounds. Over 200% in New York alone. Violent crime has been on the way down until this new police hatred started. Now it's returning. Everyone one of those 200% more, in New York, thank you for making that violent altercation possible by your lack of support of the police.
    2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645.  @madmisobroth1361  I see all the people slaughtered EVERY year by drunk drivers. Yet, we still allow the sale of alcohol. Broken families, abuse, bankruptcies, fetal alcohol syndrome, homelessness.....and they still sell the poison. I don't get it. You see....you can apply your logic to everything. I started shooting when I was 14 years old. I'm 69 today and I still go hunting for duck, deer, rabbit, partridge and more. I'm involved in different environmental groups and gun safety programs. I've never known ANYONE who ever went of a shooting spree. I grew up in the country, miles from any police station. It would take at least half an hour for any police officer to arrive in case of an emergency. What were we to do, my neighbours included, if we were faced with a crazed individual who wanted to do us harm? Are we to just wait for help from the police, through no fault of their own, who may not get there for 40 minutes or longer? We have to rely on ourselves and now YOU want to take that away from us. And now, with the defund the police initiatives and some even wanting to abolish the police, who's going to protect YOU. Time for YOU to step up and take care of yourself, if it's necessary....or would you rather die than protect yourself. Our guns are our tools, for protection and recreation. Don't lump me with those nutbars that lose their minds. It's no different than those who destroy and kill others due to irresponsible alcohol use. In fact, MORE people have their lives destroyed by alcohol. We accept that it's the fault of the individual when he kills someone driving while intoxicated, yet for some reason, when it's a gun, it's the fault of the collective. You can't have it both ways.
    2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777.  @LetsReinharder  " Who said I advocated for giving up?" YOU did. "If you still believe that America is worth saving, you yourself are equally lost." You're telling me that the Titanic is sinking and it's time to abandon ship and stop rearranging deck chairs. Do you know who else thinks that the US is lost? Antifa, BLM, the "intellectuals" in our universities.....that's who. They want to burn the entire nation down and build their Utopia from our ashes. The answer is simple. STOP VOTING FOR THE SAME LAMEBRAINS THAT YOU'VE ALWAYS VOTED FOR!!! That includes both Democrats and Republicans. If they don't ascribe to the things that made the country great, tell them you're not voting for them and the DON'T VOTE FOR THEM. In my lifetime, I've watched the US go from a strong nation, that fought for equal rights for its citizens to a nation, that allowed Marxist ideologues take over our schools and media....basically our entire culture, even our churches. It's time to take BACK that culture. If they can do it....so can we. We can beat them at their own game and we can do it through determination, hard work and strong moral courage. Strong moral beliefs are the one thing that the left doesn't have. If we want to beat them, we have to stick by our convictions and advocate for truth and individual rights, as outlined in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If they were worth fighting for 50 years ago, they're still worth fighting for today. All you're doing is advocating for more chaos and we don't need that...AT ALL.
    2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781.  @tabbyreed8925  Think about this. Trump has taken on China and wants the manufacturing to come back to the US. China has hardly ANY environmental laws. Their air is among the worst in the world. There are no labour laws, quality control is near non-existent and human rights are horrific, think Muslim re-education camps. What would be better? Making all our goods in a country that has NO real environmental standards or in the US, where we have them and can control them. If Trump loses, the manufacturing will go back to China and there goes the environment, especially the air quality. Also, in spite of pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord, the US has made the best progress in emissions of all industrial countries over the last 2 years. He may have ended some of the EPA rules but most companies, that operate in the US are still doing their best to do it right because it is good marketing strategy and good for business. He's and anti-immigrant that's married to an immigrant. A little contradictory. Also, the US is STILL the number one destination for legal immigrants. He has no problem with it but he does want a better control system so not just anyone can come and it's nowhere NEAR as stringent as immigration laws in countries like Japan or South Korea and you NEVER hear complaints about those 2 countries. Funny how Trump isn't a good man because he cheats on his wife but Biden is just fine even though he's cheated on his wife, even been accused of forcible sexual assault. They kind of cancel each other out on that metric, if you ask me. The only thing that I don't like about him is his tendency to be a loudmouth and a braggart but we all can't be perfect.
    2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910.  @illbeyourmonster3591  You've completely misinterpreted what I've said. I'm saying that their personality type is such that they don't even understand how this could be happening. The cows have to be milked, that roof has to be shingled, that customer is looking for a new home, that's what they're doing and thinking about every waking moment. When they get together, they talk about their jobs, their businesses and how one's line of work leads into someone else's line of work. They're surprised and a little disdainful of those who don't look at a productive life the same way they do. When left wingers get together, the topic will always regress into complaining about the productive people, the conservatives. However, they don't see the products that the conservative types are producing. They see the fruits of their labour, the money that they're earning as a reward. That reward is the source of envy for the leftie. They sit and commiserate with one another and then plot how to fight the right wing, after all, they have the time to do just that, not like the right winger, who's too busy producing to sit around and be envious of others. It's not that they can't be bothered. It's that they're too busy to fully comprehend the danger until it could be too late. The individualistic drive is their greatest strength but can also be a weakness in that this drive leaves them with no time to see what is going on outside of the immediate problems of everyday life. The left becomes a part of the collective because they're too lazy to be an individual. The individualist is too busy with life to even think about collective ideologies. It's the nature of the conservative. However, threaten the success of their personal goals and achievements and they'll be quite the formidable opponent.
    1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920.  @CD-vb9fi  If dirty politicians are all that you have and the media doesn't report the dirt of their favoured side, then what does the average citizen do? Sit back and do nothing? Start a riot? Maybe even a revolution? Or do you decide on the issues? I'm too old to be out on the streets so I do what I can. There's been war in the Middle East for almost 20 years and I think it's time it's over. Trump wants to do that and so I support it. I'm not about to say that Trump is dirty so I won't support that effort and allow the our participation to continue. I have to deal with what I have NOT with what I wish was there. Right now it's Trump and Biden. That's what I have to choose from so I look at the issues. One is the war. Another is that the UN and WHO have said that strict international lockdowns may cause severe poverty and the deaths of millions through starvation. I believe that they are correct so I don't support the Democrat obsessions with lockdowns. Again, I don't say let the people starve because I don't like Trump. I work with what I have as a voter and citizen. I don't like the Defund the police movement. Once again, I have to support Trump on this one. I don't care for Critical Race theory, another movement that's coming from the left. I have to support Trump's call to ban it from all government agencies. I will not give up because I don't like either side. Things still have to be done and I'm not going to wait until we have a saintly figure in the White House. I'll be waiting a long time before that happens.
    1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962.  YouTubeDweller8008  That's exactly it. We have to live in a free country in order to be successful and that's where I'm talking from. This video is from the US and I will bet you that a lot of those who are attacking Ivanka Trump live in the US. That's the myth that they want us to believe....that we can't do it on our own. Our education system is filled with those types and our governments, both here in Canada and the US are ever rapidly taking those freedoms away from us. That's why I'm so insistent that we can do it in our 2 countries. It's because of the socialist types, and there's a lot of them in both our countries, who deny that it's possible. They want everything to be run by the government and the more that happens, the more our freedoms erode away. Lose that freedom, the freedom that we had through our recent history, the worse it will become for those who want to work for our success. There's one thing that I know. We live in the greatest countries that this planet has ever seen and we're destroying them with our "there outta be a law" mentality and it's all in the name of a false sense of safety and security. I've been to Cuba. I know how impossible it is for those unfortunate people and there's only one reason for it. It's government control of every aspect of their lives. We will end up that way, just like Venezuela did. The once great state of California is being led down that path by the elites of big tech, celebrities, academics and bureaucrats. It's happening here in Canada, too but we can't give up. It's becoming harder and harder to do but we can still turn it around. However, if we quit working for personal success and insist that our government has to look after us, we will lose it all.
    1
  963.  @Aim54Delta  You make some good points but it doesn't deter from the fact that anyone can become a millionaire. In fact, I think that you've proved it. However, financial success isn't just about a bloated bank account. I'm retired, fairly well off but nowhere near a millionaire. It took hard work and recognising opportunities and making wise decisions. I don't count myself as being anywhere close to being a failure. In fact, I've made bad decisions, lost everything and then built it back up. Had I averted those bad decisions, I might well be a millionaire but that was never important to me. However, we do have a culture that's conducive to failure. The worst is the victim mentality but there are others. We seem to be in times where success must be instant. The brand new car, the big house, great vacations, a pool in the back yard, all the best toys. Those things didn't matter to me. I bought a small house, used cars, put off those great vacations till I retired, didn't bother with a pool or buy any of the nice toys that so many that I worked with wanted so badly. I stayed away from excess drinking, the drugs, all the vices that people seem to live for. I'm not saint but I know where to draw the line and I would not give up my future for a great time today. Sacrifice when you're young and the odds are that you won't be a millionaire but you will have a good life. I see those who had the same opportunities that I had and are now senior citizens with not a cent to their names. They're now living for their government pension and spend the last 2 weeks of every month looking forward to pension day. I didn't want to live that way and all it took was the will to not have it happen. Could it happen? Of course. Our economy could collapse but that's out of my hands. I can only do what I can.
    1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997.  @mosaif_mudawi  First of all, Mohammed the Prophet, was a military leader. That doesn't exactly say "peace" as the military is used as a violent arm for many purposes, including imposing peace. Mohammed took his military and used them to spread Islam all through the Arabian Peninsula. After he died, the new leaders took that army and expanded into the greater Middle East. First the Sassanid Empire, which they defeated and then onto the Byzantine Empire in which they weren't quite as successful. But they turned towards Egypt and then North Africa. When the were done that, they jumped into Spain, winning numerous battles until they controlled the entire Iberian Peninsula. However, that wasn't enough. They crossed the Pyrenees, into France, and were defeated at Tours by Charles Martel and retreated into Spain. They also attacked Malta and Sicily and even sacked Rome. Muslim armies then went into Central Asia, where the nations of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Takikistan and others now exist and headed east into Pakistan. They eventually made it into India, Afghanistan and western China, defeating the rulers there. The Mogul invasion of India was particularly brutal. Still that wasn't enough. The Ottoman Turks took on the Byzantine Empire and eventually defeated them and transformed the entire region to Islam. However, that wasn't enough. They took on the Austrians and made it all the way into southern Poland and to the gates of Vienna before being turned back. I doubt that I'm being overly hyperbolic when I say that any religion that depends of wars, to expand their faith, isn't was I would call peaceful. Even today, the Middle East has been a trouble spot for wars, with Islamic nations calling for the destruction of Israel and Islamic factions fighting in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, a proxy war between Shia and Sunni Islamic sects led by Saudi Arabia and Iran. If you think that this is peaceful, I'd hate to see what your definition of warlike would mean.
    1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028.  @sleepisthecousinofdeath7395  I've never stated my stance on abortion so you shouldn't be assigning my position for me without having any indication on where I stand. I didn't realise that I was supposed to give my position. I just thought that you're playing word games in an attempt to baffle brains with BS. Pro life advocates place a high value on life, even in the womb. They stand for life, except in extreme circumstances, killing only when necessary, like in a war, for self protection or in the womb when extreme circumstances threatens the life of the mother. It doesn't mean that they're "pro killing" in those extreme circumstances. It, especially, means that they strongly disapprove of abortion as a means of contraception or so the mother can rid themselves of an inconvenient child. Pro life doesn't see a child as inconvenient or unwanted....EVER. Only pro abortion advocates see a child in that manner Now, you can assume that I'm anti abortion. I refuse to kill anyone out of convenience, to maintain a lifestyle, for financial gain or a hatred of others, including a child who's still residing in the womb because I don't like children. If one is responsible for their actions, they will accept what comes their way and make the best of it. If you don't like to take responsibility for your actions, you do whatever's necessary to rid yourself of the results of irresponsible actions and then tell yourself that you did nothing wrong. One loves their neighbour or their child. The other feels that this neighbour, this life growing in their womb, will never feel any love from their mother...that they're incapable of sacrificing to express love of their own child. It's an admission that unconditional love is NOT a part of their lives and they will not allow that child to live if it gets in their way. If they hate their own progeny that much, who else could they rationalise their hate against.
    1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042.  @beejcarson  Actually, I was just going to say that the taxes of Roman times were set by those in power. Today, to an extent, we set our taxes through decisions made through our elected officials. That means that I can advocate for taxation, through representation, in one way and you can advocate in another. The biggest reason that I'm against those taxes is due to the unprecedented spending by the government. No business or household could survive on the spending habits of our present government. Ever increasing deficit spending is a recipe for disaster. Any household that has faced bankruptcy is a testament to that reality. We seen it just recently with the way that Venezuela handled its finances. We're spending our way to disaster and we're blaming the rich instead of ourselves and our expectations that the money supply will last forever if only they'd do their part. Also, I realise the difference between personal and business spending. The rich will just move their assets offshore and you still won't be able to collect their taxes. Their business holdings will become lost in a dizzying array of paper companies that will cost a fortune in bureaucratic spending and the money will become lost, unless the rich guy behaves like Hunter Biden and loses his focus due to self destructive, abusive lifestyles. Increasing taxes won't do a thing to help the situation unless we solve this compulsion to spend our way out of trouble. 'A fool and his money are soon parted'. Our government is acting the fool and since we're all a part of that government, we're ALL acting the fool.
    1
  1043. 1
  1044.  @beejcarson  European nations tried the heavy taxation route in the sixties and seventies. My family is originally from the Netherlands and I remember some of the tax stories that they told me about. Great Britain was in dire financial straits until Margaret Thatcher led with some draconian measures to get it under control. "I'll tax the street (If you try to sit, sit) I'll tax your seat (If you get too cold, cold) I'll tax the heat (If you take a walk, walk) I'll tax your feet" It sums up how the public felt about the taxes in Britain at the time. Also, I reject the idea that because the Republicans don't act responsibly with our tax money, that automatically means that the Democrats will do so. I'm saying that they've BOTH done it and I've said it in my last comment when I said that we have to primary our candidates so we get the ones in place to that we need come election time. That's what I meant when I said that people check the familiar name instead of taking the time to see what they're all about. It's the overblown bureaucracy and politicians of BOTH stripes are a party to it and taking advantage of it. California has the highest taxes by far of all the states. Yet, homelessness is a HUGE problem, real estate and rents are skyrocketing, they have rolling brown outs, the public schools are in terrible shape and for the first time in California history, the population has gone down. Their answer? More taxes. Over taxation was a major contributor to the downfall of the Roman Empire. It handcuffs the individual so what little money he does have must go to life basics. Go back and read the words to the ditty I gave in the first paragraph. It's debilitating to the very soul of a nation. The Democrats aren't solving anything when by increasing spending exponentially they increase taxes the same way. The spending will go the way of spending in California. Nowhere. It'll lines the pockets of bureaucrats, who are the unelected of government and their cronies. California cannot go on like this and the country will face the same problems if they follow their lead.
    1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047.  @kjkitty777  In this case it does matter. The entire case depends on acknowledging that these transgender athletes are biologically male. For that judge to tell the lawyers of those girls, I mean the REAL girls (see how easily it can become confusing), to not use the correct biological terms in their gender description, is to tacitly ignore the reality of the biology. Once the biology is ignored, the science ignored, what are you left with. It certainly isn't logic or science. It's an ideology, no different than any other ideology that refuses to accept the reality of demonstrable facts. This isn't about misgendering. That just muddies up the water. We need basic facts and these 2 are biologically male and should, during this trial, be identified as such in deference to biological fact. It's unfortunate that some find that fact offensive but offense doesn't change those facts. If words are to have any meaning, it must be clearly defined in a court of law in ways that is clear to all, both traditionally and in fact. Also, had you seen the pictures of those two transgender males, while running that race, you'd see why they, most definitely, had the advantage of the other girls. It's no accident that they came in 1/2 in that race and set state records. If you'd watched your daughter lose a chance at a scholarship and see the look of pain on her face because she felt cheated out of that chance, you might see this a little differently. That any of this is taking up precious court time is ridiculous. It, most definitely, has become Bizarro world.
    1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227.  @TheJeffL  Check this out from The Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture. It talks about "whiteness" and the things that indicate white culture. It's one of the most racist things that I've ever seen. Beer ads? People were upset because a beer company was using an influencer, whose followers average 16 years old, to sell beer. People to young to drink and they even admitted that they were looking for a future customer base. To make it worse, it was an influencer who was encouraging minors to undergo drug treatment and surgery to validate their transgender existence.....pandering to the big pharma medical industrial complex. Actually aiming at kids. Yeah....normal people find this appalling. Complaining about the president? You've GOTTA be kidding. I've never heard complaining about the president like I did in my 75 years of life, in the years that Trump was president. It was non-stop on EVERY DAMN NETWORK AND NEWSPAPER. He was Hitler, the anti-Christ, a racist, a crook, was going to start WW3, was a broke billionaire, grabbing women by the hoo-hoo and on and on. He threw fish food in the water.....what a disgrace he was. "Good people on both sides" manipulated and lied about that. He call immigrants "animals" another BS story. It was nuts. Christmas? Who cares. Boohooing about everything? THAT'S YOU. You're here everyday complaining about EVERYTHING that's being said. How can anyone be so self unaware? You are what you're accusing others of being. You're on multiple comment threads, always bitching about something and you use multiple names, thinking that no one is catching on. You have to be the worst troll on the internet.
    1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235.  @GM6.7  The very first vaccine was on December the 14th. Operation Warp Speed was announced on May 15th. It took 9 months to get a vaccine in place from that date. When Trump said, in Sept and Oct. that he was sure that the vaccination program would be underway by the end of the year, Democrats and the media laughed at him, saying it was impossible. Yet Pfizer was ready by Dec. 11th. Moderna announced that they were ready on Dec 18th. I can post links to verify if you wish. If Biden was inaugurated on January 20 of this year, and both Pfizer and Moderna announced that they were ready in December of LAST year, it's rather obvious that they didn't wait until Biden's presidency to look good. They announced it during Trump's presidency and those companies didn't care because there was an opportunity to make a lot of money and the sooner they got the vaccine out, the sooner that money would be coming in. In fact, this vaccine was ready for distribution in record time. The Dems might be trying to take credit for it but only the most irrational ideologue and tribalist would give credit to the Biden administration for the speed of the vaccine development. In fact, if those companies wanted to make Trump look bad, they would have waited till this year to make the announcement instead of proving Trump correct when he said the vaccine would be ready before the end of the year. It makes the Dems look bad for laughing at Trump when he made that announcement and it makes them look even worse for taking any credit for it now.
    1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. My parents came to this country with nothing. No bank account, no property.....nothing. They didn't own the cot that they slept on, the table they had breakfast on, even the plates they ate off didn't belong to them. They lived in a one room shack with no running water. They worked hard, my dad working 3 jobs at the same time and my mom raising 7 kids and worked a large garden and small orchard so we'd have inexpensive but decent food. Now, my dad has some money and he's enjoying the fruits of his hard work. Anyone of those blacks could have done that and many did just that. Larry Elder talks about how hard his father worked and Candace Owens talks about her grandparents and their work ethic. The left and those who want handouts HATE them. They hate them because they have pride and a strong sense of ethics. The ones that want reparations have no pride or work ethic and reparations won't help them one bit. They don't know how to live responsibly and many will end up in bankruptcy. What really galls me is that my dad, who's now 89, will have his tax money paying 25 year old children who've never worked a day in their pathetic lives. I'll never forget my dad's reaction when told, for religious reasons, to quit a job and if he had financial problems, they'd help him out. My dad told him that, as long as he was able bodied, he'd eat the grass out on the lawn before he'd take a handout. These parasites would NEVER understand that. I suppose this comment will be deleted but I had to get this off my chest.
    1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338.  @SHrepairs  I'm Canadian and we have a socialised healthcare system and we flattened the curve by doing EXACTLY the same things as the Americans did. What we don't have, and that's what the controversy is now in the US, is a polarised political atmosphere where progressive and Democrat controlled state governments are imposing Draconian rules, under threat of arrest, on the average citizen. We don't have snitch lines, we can mow our lawns, buy grass seed and paint and we don't have drones flying around telling us to disperse and go inside. That's what Democrat state governments are doing and Republican state governments are NOT doing. In fact, socialised health care is the dream of Democrats. Also, there are health care worker laid off in areas where the virus hasn't been a big problem due to lockdowns is their state that won't allow medical activity other than extreme emergencies and Covid related cases. I have friends and relatives in the US and they're the ones telling me this, online. You're obviously being driven by a hatred of free economies. I don't know where you're from but I will tell you that Canada, in spite of it's socialised health care system has a free economy. I've even ran a small business and have many friends and family members who own their own business and love it. That's capitalism....and it's the freedom to be the person that you want to be instead of being controlled from above. I'm perplexed by anyone that would want control to come from anywhere but within. I don't like a big government, the ultimate corporation, controlling everything that I do.
    1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474.  @justinkirschenman2232  First of all, that war is over. Obama pulled out all the troops in 2011 and there was a big press conference is Washington about it. The next day, the VERY NEXT DAY, the Iraqi president flies home and starts arresting Sunni leaders. That's not the fault of anyone but that president, Nouri al-Maliki. He didn't have to do that but the hatred the Shia and Sunni have for one another is what started the conflict in both Syria and Iraq right now. ISIS, Sunni Muslims, are fighting against the Shia president, Assad, because they believe that the Shias are heretics and they've felt that way for a thousand years. Then Obama got them right back into it and ISIS has been behaving horrifically ever since. Would you seriously expect Trump to get out, right away, when ISIS was there murdering innocent people? He had to finish them off. Now, they're pretty well defeated and their leader is gone. Trump said it again when he announced his death. He want's the troops out. It doesn't happen overnight and thank God that it didn't. That murderous ISIS leader would still be torturing and killing innocents, like the Mueller girl, who was kidnapped in front of refugee hospital and horrifically abused by ISIS. She was there to help refugees and those butchers did that to her and all you can do is dredge up something that happened 17 years ago...the WMD lead to that earlier war. You're too angry and bitter to assess this rationally. If the troops are out in 6 months, are you going to come back to this thread and admit that maybe you were wrong? I'd be surprised if you do. I don't know if it will happen but if Trump says he wants to do it, then I'll support that intention. He says that he's ready to do it now and we'll see what happens. I'm not about to lose my mind over it because of the way things happened. In fact, his earlier announcement about leaving, might have induced Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to think that he was safe and wasn't as careful as he had been. Lighten up a little.
    1
  1475.  @justinkirschenman2232  The war was essentially over in 2011. Here is that announcement when Obama was preparing to pull the last of the troops out of Iraq, some 5000 troops, way down from the some 150,000 a few years earlier. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/22/world/middleeast/president-obama-announces-end-of-war-in-iraq.html https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40682.pdf However, that's when the Iraqi president amped up his assault on Sunni and it looked as if Al Qaeda was going to resurface and ISIS started to form. That war in Iraq was over and Obama even stated that the US would be leaving a stable country. He didn't screw it up. The Iraqis did that themselves. Now Trump is going to leave but he wasn't just going to dump and run before the job was done. Also, your statement on how the US was helping ISIS, against Russia, makes no sense. How is killing their leader helping ISIS? That's as illogical as it come. The situation in Iraq and Syria is complex with Al Qaeda, Al-Nusra, Syrian rebels, Syrian loyalists to Assad, Kurds, Turks, Shia Iraqis, ISIS all fighting one another. I'm sure I missed a few. The original invasion was a mistake but to leave when Obama wanted would have been a mistake as well. The Iraqis could have settled into making a stable country back then, but they didn't want to. Sunni and Shia hate each other. That's what's behind the war in Syria, Yemen and Iraq. It's behind all the posturing between Iran and Saudi Arabia as well. It looks as if ISIS is defeated and now is the time to get out. Not in 2011, not in 2016, but now when ISIS is gone. The fact is, if the fighting continues in those countries, it won't be because that's what Trump wants. It'll be because of Shia/Sunni hatred of one another.....a hatred that's been there for over 1000 years. Shia have pilgrimaged to Karbala for all that time, some 10 million a year and rivals Mecca as a holy site. This is the shrine that ISIS had vowed to destroy because they see it as a sacrilege. Karbala was the site of a huge battle between Shia and Sunni in 680. That's how long they've been at each other. Please understand the hatred these people have for one another. Shia even believe that the final battle will be between those 2 factions and it will be the defeat of the Sunni and the beginning of their Caliphate. That's how deep this rivalry runs.
    1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504.  @mochithepooh5368  I get what you're saying about the science. It's just that I've seen people who say "follow the science" and all they're doing is regurgitating political talking points without actually looking at the data. That was my point. I realise that celebrities don't impose laws but they influence people to think that there's only one way to view an issue. If you view it any other way, like the celebrities who influence them, they start to feel that this gives them the right to impose their views on others. It's a cultural thing that's become quite normal, these days. I may not give a damn what a celebrity says but that's me. Others do and use them as a life guide on how to live. Foolish....very foolish. It's not just the celebrity types either. It's the melding of celebrities, media types and politicians, who feel superior to the rest of us, who are influencing the populace. One of my closest friends is completely saturated with this idea. He thought that Kyle Rittenhouse had to be guilty because he's white and he had a gun. He's allowing the identity politics of those elites to influence how he looks at things. A snapshot of a white guy with a gun inspires a pre-written response. He'd be outraged if I said the same about an American with African heritage. It's all about the narrative that Hollywood, the news media and politicians have planted in their heads. It's why they supported the violence of the BLM riots. It was the popular thing to do...and they don't realise that they're allowing these influencers to control the way that they think.
    1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584.  @tabbyreed8925  You missed the point entirely. Trump was putting tariffs on the products made in China. That evened up the price difference and it was working. The steel industry was coming back, among others. That's why the economy was doing so well, before Covid. China HATED what Trump was doing and so did a lot of the big multinationals. What with the bad wages, bad environmental, quality and labour standards and the opportunity for graft for multinational executives, Washington bureaucrats and politicians, it's no wonder they HATE Trump. They've got the major news networks on board because they're ALSO owned by big multinationals. The minute Trump announced his bid for presidency, the racism allegations started. They HAD to beat him. If he was successful at bringing the trade deficit to a positive state for the US, they would lose their gravy train. The elimination of tariffs is what started the trade deficit in the first place. Now, the big companies could produce offshore and sell here, until the country was bled dry, but the elites would be just fine. They don't care about you and me. Trump has been against it for YEARS now. 25 years ago, he was complaining about it. The reason why he does it is simple. He's in the hotel and casino business and was doing a national TV show. He's not dependent on cheap labour like the multinationals are. The elites have done a great job convincing everyone that they're socialists and that they care for us. They don't. They want money, power and control and Trump, even though he's a class jerk, is spoiling their plans. Worse, he now trying to get troops out of the Middle East and brokering peace deals there. That's a big hit for the military industrial complex. Another reason to hate him. The Democrats were hating on Bush when he went into Iraq but as soon as they got into power, they supported the Arab Spring and the Middle East conflicts really expanded. Right now they're opposing withdrawal. The same party, the same PEOPLE, that called the Bush Iraq war illegal, now want to stay there. There are American soldiers in Afghanistan that weren't even born yet on 9/11, yet the Democrats want to stay on. They're pulling the wool over your eyes, over all our eyes and too many are letting them do it.
    1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. Protesters are like members of a deck of cards. Each protester has the Constitutional right to peacefully assemble to bring their grievances to bear. However, when someone, who is a part of that assembly, throws a brick at a window, your assembly is no longer peaceful. Like the 5 of Clubs. It's a part of a deck of cards that's useful in a game of poker. However, if 1 or 2 of the cards have a big "X" painted on the back, that deck of cards is no longer useful. It doesn't matter that the 5 of Clubs wasn't marked, the deck has been rendered useless. It's the same with a peaceful assembly. Once violence is used, your assembly is no longer peaceful. Your personal intentions are irrelevant to the assembly's peacefulness just like the 5 of Clubs is now irrelevant to the usefulness of the deck of cards. The mature person realises that the assembly is no longer peaceful and goes home to show their objection to the use of force in a good cause. The leaders of the protests do the same and then tell everyone that these assemblies were no longer peaceful and they don't approve of the violence. They announce that they will go out again the following day and anyone, who wants to peacefully protest, is welcome to join. However, if you start trouble, all peaceful protesters will, once again, go home and leave you to deal with the authorities by yourself. That's how these "peaceful" assemblies should be organised. Until they are, they're NOT peaceful assemblies. They're just a marked deck of cards.
    1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644.  @DM-dk7js  Did you even watch the video? Maybe you should. They're a loosely organised group with cells all over North America and Europe. They originated in the early thirties, in Germany, as the German Communist Party's answer to the Nazi Brown Shirts. They dispersed after Hitler took power, going underground or leaving the country. Antifa is short for the German “Antifascistischer" which is Antifascist in English. In fact, East Germany called the Berlin Wall the “Antifascistischer Schutzwall,” or “antifascist bulwark,” meaning that they believed everyone on the other side of that wall is a fascist. That was in 1961, over thirty years after Antifascistischer was formed. Read, Antifa member's Mark Bray's, book "Antifa. The Antifa Handbook". They're a Marxist revolutionary group, cleverly hiding behind their name by claiming that their against Fascists and white supremacists yet they're one of the most violent groups in America, attacking ordinary citizens, setting fires to buildings and vehicles, throwing Molotov Cocktails and even killing people. They've openly declared their aim to destroy the system and begin a new Marxist type order. They were behind over 120 consecutive days of demonstrations, firebombings, attacks on citizens and police and even killings in Portland Oregon in 2020. They're definitely a domestic terrorist group. It's just that they have the protection of the Democrat Party, even though Antifa has rejected the Democrat party as a viable way to power. That's how they've been able to carry on their violent antics. The Democrats are using them as pawns and they don't mind because they know if the Democrats turned on them, most would be in jail.
    1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677.  @kv1293  They didn't take it away. They all agreed to not have an election till the proper time. Canadian elections aren't like American elections. American elections are rigid...every 4 years. In Canada, it's every 5 years but there are conditions under which it could happen earlier. Everyone voted to not have an early election and it was almost unanimous. It's up to the minority party of the coalition that makes up a minority government. In every minority government, that minority party makes the decision whether or not to have an election. If they decide that they like the status quo....there is NO election and it happens all the time. They have basically decided not to have an early election, just like so many other minority parties have over 100 years of politics. Trudeau couldn't form a government in 2019 because his party didn't win enough seats. He had to get the Bloc Quebecois and the NDP to agree to form the government with him so he would have enough votes to hold a government. Do you get that? THEY AGREED TO FORM A GOVERNMENT. All they did was agree to continue to form that government until the 5 year term was up or Covid wasn't as big an issue. They did the same thing during WW1 and 2. As long as the agreeing parties agree not to have a vote of non-confidence, you don't have an election. In fact, had Trudeau not been able to form a coalition to form a government in 2019, there would have been another election back then....before Covid. Enough parties agreed to not do that and to form the government. You're just not getting how Canadian elections work. The odds were that there wasn't going to be an election anyway till 2024. They're too afraid that there's a growing conservative movement and that they'd lose their power. Saying it was for Covid allows them to say that the conservative movement doesn't scare them and that they're good people because they don't want to kill grandma with Covid. It's just political rhetoric.
    1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701.  @mikehardy2712  What did you expect to happen when Trump took over? Did you expect that within 2 years that we'd ALL have yachts and private jets? Or just the opposite? What he did was open the economy so everyone had a chance to improve their lives. Giving people money is useless. It devalues what you have. Your wealth only has value if it's built on creating it. For me, as a relatively poor person if compared to the "oligarchs, to be able to create wealth, I need the opportunity and freedom to work and create a life that brings value and it has to apply to everyone. My dad came to this country with nothing, no job and unable to speak the language. Now, he's a millionaire. It didn't happen overnight. It took hard work, being smart with what he had and having the freedom to do, financially, the things that brought him that success. He's not an oligarch, but he's a success. I'm doing the same. I don't think I'll be as successful as my dad was, but I'm not as driven as he was, either. That's MY doing. I don't care if someone is rich. What I care about is having the freedom, which gives me the opportunity, to make my own fortune, even if it doesn't compare with the fortune an oligarch might have. The minute I start looking at the piles of others with envy, that's the day my own success stops. That's why the commandment "thou shalt not covet" is so important to personal and social success. Be concerned with freedom.....that's it. Everything else will fall into place, if you have the freedom to make your own way in life. That's what Trump is trying to bring to the table. The government doesn't DO FOR the working class. It ensures that every worker has the freedom to make the decision that can bring personal and financial success their way. My dad did it working as a labourer in a shoe factory while operating a small farm. A worker. It wasn't easy but looking back, he'd have it no other way.
    1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724.  @jiveturkey2875  Tim does reference Newsguard, frequently but he's also said that they may not always correct in their assessments. Tim covers a variety of topics every day and I would imagine it takes long hours to find something of interest, read it, find other sources, assess everything he's read and then give a conclusion. The problem with MSM is that they've allowed their "news" to become opinion pieces. "60 Minutes" type programming, the cutting edge stuff of 40 years ago, doesn't exist anymore. Tim will give alternative insights to what they're saying and gives you a way to check for yourself if you're so inclined and you should be. Never, trust one source. That's been something I've believed for years but these days, it's a put down if you questioned the left leaning MSM news. "Sounds like Fox" or "Breitbart news....PFFFT" and their ears turn off. It doesn't matter that your information may have come from elsewhere. I've had people call me a "Trumpster" and then dismiss everything I say based on their slur, even though I'm not a supporter of Trump. That's the battle we're fighting these days and it's causing a horrible divide in society. Tim is fighting it as well, the best he can. He's growing but he started as a single person, no money or real influence. He's done well because he offers something the big guys don't, including Fox, in case that's an issue. He trying to show objectivity and that you don't have to regurgitate what you're being told. He's telling us to figure it out for ourselves. Is he right all the time on specific issues? Of course not. Who is? However, the tools to find out the facts should always remain the same. A healthy scepticism is indispensable to a free society. Without it, we become bots.
    1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759.  @PvtFlowers  Yes, I have. It was called "The Children of God" at the time although they've re-invented themselves many times over the years. This was in Daytona Beach in 1972. They tried to recruit me and when I resisted, using the Bible as evidence against their claims they stopped the conversation, instantly. They all took on a very stubborn and angry expression, gathered their stuff and left. As the weeks went by, they were on the beach and boardwalk, looking for new recruits all the time. However, if I approached the group, because I knew the person that they were talking to, they would automatically gather their stuff and leave. I found out later, from a guy who they did recruit but left, that they were all instructed NOT to talk to me. I thought it was hilarious at the time....I was only 19.....the cult phenomenon was just starting to hit the news at the time, culminating in the Jimmy Jones killings and I wasn't familiar with it at the time. The one thing in common with "The Children of God" and guys like the one shown in the video, is their anger and the impossibility of discussing disagreements with them. Both groups refuse to discuss, investigate or fact check. If someone proves them wrong, they get angry and leave and will refuse to accept the evidence that shows their errors. The next time you hear from them, they'll still be using the same arguments that were proven wrong. I've found the same thing with flat earthers, birthers, chemtrail believers, truthers and more. They don't care about the facts. All they know is their fear, their hatred and their loyalty to their cause. If that's not a cult, then it's as close to being one as it can get.
    1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838.  @diomedes7971  Had I landed on the beaches of Normandy, there would have been nothing fearless about it. I would have been terrified. However, I'm not conflating any sacrifices that I might have made with those landing at Normandy. What I'm saying is that if those guys could sacrifice their lives and body parts, I should be able to sacrifice a paltry scholarship or anything else that isn't life threatening. Those soldiers set the benchmark, paid the ultimate sacrifice, so we could have the right to stand for our rights in other and more mundane matters. If anything, it's disrespectful to the memory of those lost lives, if you're too afraid of losing a job or a scholarship for standing up for what's right. That's true disrespect. It's like saying that their sacrifice doesn't matter. You're going to bend the knee to authoritarianism, anyway, so eff their sacrifice. The female athletes have 2 choices. Either stand up and say that this isn't fair and they won't take it......OR.....keep their mouth shut, do what they're told and, in the process, ruin women's college and high school sports. And if they lose their scholarship because the coach is filling his team with trans athletes, it's their own doing. Most scholarships are on a yearly basis and they could be kicked off the team and out of school the following year anyway. Keeping our mouths shut is how we got into this mess in the first place and this is only the start. Authoritarians will force you to do their bidding because that's what they do. If you don't stand up for yourself, no one else will and you'll reap exactly what you've sown.
    1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. I don't see any point in dwelling on the mistakes of the past. I'd rather make plans on what I'm going to do in the future. I can't change the past but I can change the future. I always have extra supplies on hand. Not prepper, years of stuff type of supplies, but enough to last at least 4 to 6 weeks. When it looked as if this COULD be serious, the first week of February or so, I started to buy extra stuff every time I went shopping. Not bags and bags of it, but a couple of cans of beans, a couple bags of pasta or rice, cans of soup and tomatoes, dried soup mix and other sundries. Just 5 or 6 items extra every time I was at the store. Didn't take long and my larder had plenty, enough to last well into a 3rd month. Now, all I do is replace what I've eaten or used. No panic buying, no fighting in the stores, no worrying, because I've prepared myself and I took it seriously enough to see the possibility of a crisis. That's what a doer does. The complainer whines about the past, blames others, waits until the last minute and then is in a panic because he/she is doing what they've always done. NOTHING......and then they gaze into the past to look for someone to blame and complain about. They don't realise that their attitude is the problem, not politicians, whether they be liberals or conservatives, but their own shortsightedness. I can't imagine being in a panic over toilet paper. It's the dumbest thing that I've heard.....yet it's real and the ones in a panic are supposed to be adults.
    1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1