Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Judge Orders Lawyers Not To Call Trans Athletes \"Male\" Saying its Bullying, Attorneys Demand Recusal" video.

@kjkitty777 I'm starting to get it. Sex is biological and gender is ideological.....or is it the other way around? Whatever it is.....we've arrived in Bizarro world. It took longer than I thought it would.
1
@kjkitty777 What's bizarre is that a biological male can claim to be a female and then force HIS way into a female competition, taking away a young teenage females right to compete on an equal footing with her peers. There is a reason why men and women, as they begin to reach adulthood have been placed into male and female designated sporting events. The male of our species has a physical advantage, which is biologically driven, over the female, in athletics. If this wasn't so, females would be breaking all kinds of sports records even if they weren't competing directly against the males. That's NOT happening. That's why I'm saying that this is ideological and that when this ends up in a court of law, we have entered Bizzaro world. That has NOTHING to do with normal transgenders. This has to do with reality and the only reason that this is even in court is due to an ideological segment of society that is wilfully distorting reality. There are transgenders who do not adhere to this nonsense, Blaire White just to name one. I find it appalling that these young teenage girls are being cheated in this way. Any human being in possession of a sense of integrity would feel that way. These young men should be ashamed of themselves....and I say men because, in this case, we are dealing with young men. Their feelings of gender identity does not change the reality of their biology no matter how much they want it to.
1
@kjkitty777 In this case it does matter. The entire case depends on acknowledging that these transgender athletes are biologically male. For that judge to tell the lawyers of those girls, I mean the REAL girls (see how easily it can become confusing), to not use the correct biological terms in their gender description, is to tacitly ignore the reality of the biology. Once the biology is ignored, the science ignored, what are you left with. It certainly isn't logic or science. It's an ideology, no different than any other ideology that refuses to accept the reality of demonstrable facts. This isn't about misgendering. That just muddies up the water. We need basic facts and these 2 are biologically male and should, during this trial, be identified as such in deference to biological fact. It's unfortunate that some find that fact offensive but offense doesn't change those facts. If words are to have any meaning, it must be clearly defined in a court of law in ways that is clear to all, both traditionally and in fact. Also, had you seen the pictures of those two transgender males, while running that race, you'd see why they, most definitely, had the advantage of the other girls. It's no accident that they came in 1/2 in that race and set state records. If you'd watched your daughter lose a chance at a scholarship and see the look of pain on her face because she felt cheated out of that chance, you might see this a little differently. That any of this is taking up precious court time is ridiculous. It, most definitely, has become Bizarro world.
1
@kjkitty777 Those female athletes are human beings, too and their being cheated by biological males. Those biological males are human beings, but they are cheating. Period. The lawyers, of those girls, cannot concede that gender designation, because it is at the heart of the entire suit. They MUST refer to those transgenders as male, to not only augment their argument, but to emphasise that argument as a matter of law. This isn't about pronouns. It's about the biological identity of those transgenders. It's the ENTIRE premise of their case. To concede, even a little bit, is to concede that maybe they don't have a case. They CAN'T do that. It wouldn't be fair to their clients and could even be seen as legal malpractice.
1