General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Jack Haveman
Timcast
comments
Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Netflix INDICTED By Texas Grand Jury, Faces CRIMINAL CHARGES Over 'Cuties' Film Exploitation" video.
Wu Beach Boy I don't care if it is a political stunt. The film is exploitative. Your "whataboutism" doesn't fly with me.
1
Wu Beach Boy A strong suggestion, spammed all through the comment section, that it's a political stunt, isn't a strong endorsement for what these legislators are doing. In fact, to question their motives leaves a strong impression that you may NOT support their actions. Even your response to me isn't a ringing endorsement of their actions and might appear to be closer to a sleight of hand tactic, in which you don't actually commit to a criticism or an endorsement of the film. I can't know, one way or the other, what you think of the film. I can show that you may disapprove of the character of those who have taken the film and Netflix to task. That leads me to question YOUR motives.
1
Wu Beach Boy I couldn't tell whether the "GOOD WORK" was meant sarcastically or as a compliment. It was a contextual impression. You start out with, what appears to be a compliment, and then you ride them about motives. That was kind of a balancing act that isn't readily detectable in print. I'm not about to judge their motives. I take the victories where I find them. I want this flick taken down. Period. I'm not about to question the morality of those who are determined to do it. They're doing what is the right thing. That's good enough for me.
1
Wu Beach Boy Spam much? Your message just isn't that important that it warrants being splattered all over the comment section.
1
Wu Beach Boy Wow.....more assumptions. First you go after those in Texas and now you're making allegations about me. Like I said in the other thread, your comments bring into question your motives. I'm not about to allow you to deflect to child pageants to justify your criticism of those in Texas that would go after that film and its distributors. I would get it, if you had something along that lines of that now that they're going after this film, maybe they should look into child pageants but you didn't do that. All you did was impugn their integrity.
1
@dementare "NOT "Cuties". Cuties was just BALLSY enough to ACTUALLY SHOW YOU what's ACTUALLY BEEN GOING ON" I'll show the world how violence is wrong and what is going on in our inner cities by beating you senseless and the robbing you. In this, I'll be performing a public service in showing just what goes on within our big cities. That's your logic. They commission young girls to perform highly sexualised acts, film them doing it and then sell the film to the public under the guise of "education". It's a lot of BS. I don't need to see your bloody and beaten face to know how wrong it is.
1