Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "TheDC Shorts" channel.

  1. 43
  2. 16
  3. 10
  4. 8
  5. 7
  6. 6
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52.  @johnpeterson2391  Don't tell me about Hitler. He invaded the Netherlands, even though they declared neutrality and ground the Dutch under the Nazi boot. My mother almost starved to death because of that bastard and my uncle spent 3 years in a Nazi POW camp. What Candace said was that if his only concern was to make Germany great, that wouldn't have been a problem. Becoming great doesn't mean you must kill people, at all. It means becoming the best that one could be. Killing people isn't great and YOU know damn well Candace wasn't saying that he had to kill people to make Germany great. She made it quite clear that his desire to expand and force everything to subjugate to the Germans, in essence to become German, was the problem. German expansion couldn't happen without killing. German superiority was all about killing. She's basically saying that Hitler distorted the meaning of the word "Great". She made it quite clear that there was a problem with Hitler's version of "great". No one was talking about Americans of the past. That's what YOU introduced to the conversation. We're talking about today and what Candace meant when she was talking about Hitler. Her intent was quite obviously distorted and YOU know it. Why would a black woman endorse white supremacy. It's ridiculous. This is the same left wing attitude that calls Ben Shapiro and Dave Ruben Nazis. It's illogical and ridiculous. One doesn't have to become dishonest to call out white supremacy. That's what Lieu was doing and it's a disgrace.
    1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57.  @grahamyates2490  Columbus set into motion a defining moment in human history.....arguably one of the most defining moments in history. The fact the he went through all the work, the pleading of his case to different governments, the privations and enemies he made in Europe, his dogged determination to go to eastern Asia by sailing west was a momentous undertaking. That he even got the ships to do what he was proposing was quite a feat. When he found the islands in the Caribbean, that was the beginning of a new era for all mankind. Everyone of us has been affected by what was set in motion that day. We can quibble about his motives but the fact that he had the courage, determination and fore sight to accomplish this is why he is being elevated to a hero's status. However, he was human, as well. That means that he had faults, like you, like me, like everyone else on this planet. He had to fight the inner demons just like the rest of us do. In spite of that, he was still one of the most important people that has ever lived. I can't speak for the young guy's motives, either, but what I do know is that his questioning is always the first step to vilification. It's not the questions in themselves but the tone of those questions. He clearly doesn't see Columbus as a hero and can't understand why we'd honour his great accomplishment.....because it IS a great accomplishment. When describing Columbus to someone who has never heard of him before, it's that accomplishment that you describe. You don't start off by talking about his faults. He's remembered by his great discovery. The rest is details that describes the humanity that was in him. If you ignore the discovery, you're erasing this aspect of history because without his voyages, Columbus would just be another forgotten individual, like the rest of us.
    1
  58.  @grahamyates2490  John Cabot acted in response to what Columbus had done. It was Columbus that had formulated the idea the one could get to Eastern Asia by sailing West. He was the one that went looking for sponsors and finally convinced the Spanish to back him up. The entire trip was the brainchild of Columbus and no one else. Without that, there would have been no Cabot or Henry Hudson or any of the other men who sailed west. It was the vision of Columbus that set everything in motion and changed the world. It's not just the courage. A suicide bomber doesn't change the direction of history. Every single man that landed in Normandy on D-Day is a hero due to their courage but we don't honour each individual soldier because individually they didn't change WW2 but they did collectively. Columbus changed the course of history due to his vision and courage and determination. Not ONE sailor on those 3 ships would have sailed had it not been for Columbus. That's what makes him unique. This was his voyage, his plan, his battle to fund the voyage, his determination to get support and then to see the entire enterprise to its fruition. That's the type of fortitude that very few people display in life and is the hallmark of success. Was he a saint? Of course not. No more than those men that landed in Normandy. I'll wager some them were deplorable human beings but they faced something horrible and did it. Columbus opened up to the rest of Europe to fantastic new opportunities. Cabot was just one on many that responded to what Columbus had shown possible.
    1
  59. 1