Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. 783
  2. 165
  3. 62
  4. 55
  5. 52
  6. 50
  7. 50
  8. 41
  9. 31
  10. 30
  11. 30
  12. 30
  13. 29
  14. 23
  15. 21
  16. 19
  17. 19
  18. 18
  19. 17
  20. 16
  21. 16
  22. 16
  23. 15
  24. 15
  25. 15
  26. 15
  27. 15
  28. 14
  29. 14
  30. 14
  31. 13
  32. 13
  33. 12
  34. 12
  35. 10
  36. 10
  37. 10
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 9
  42. 9
  43. 9
  44. 9
  45. 9
  46. 9
  47. 9
  48. 9
  49. 8
  50. 8
  51. 8
  52. 8
  53. 7
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64.  @jimmcloughlin  Estimates for the deaths of the famine, brought on by collectivisation in China, put in motion by Mao, run as high as 55 million. That's in the fifties, NOT WW2. Then there was the cultural revolution that started in the mid sixties and lasted 10 years. Add that to the famines, and it may be as high as 70 million. These are deaths, not due to wars, but to the disastrous policies of the Chairman Mao and his associates. Then there were the disasters of Stalin and Lenin. Once again, not due to WW2, but to the famines caused by collectivisation of farms and the horrors of their police state. These are deaths brought down on their OWN people. Then the famines of the Soviet Union, brought on by the same communist policies under Lenin and Stalin. Around 5 million in 1923 and maybe as many as 7 million in 1933, including around 3.5 million Ukrainians. Then another 1.7 in the Gulags. Who knows how many millions have died in North Korea in the 20th century. Another 2 million in the killing fields of Cambodia by the communists there. Around 1 in 4 Cambodians died because of Pol Pots great agrarian society. These are just the numbers from the main communist powers. We have no idea on the numbers in the Iron Curtain countries of those times, or Cuba, Zimbabwe and other socialist regimes. These are all deaths NOT through foreign invasions or wars. These are deaths caused directly from the policies of the communist governments. I have references for all of it. All you gotta do is ask.
    6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73.  @queent3343  Haven't you seen any of the school board meetings where parents were reading from books that were recommended reading for primary school children. Some of it so explicit that the school board members told the parents that it was too offensive to read at this meeting, yet those books were in the classroom and school library. Maybe you should see the TikTok videos about the teachers of kindergarten to grade 3, talking about their sexuality, holding pride parades for the little tykes, drag queen story time and more. Besides, even if none of this was true (which it isn't), why not make sure that teachers don't talk about sexually explicit material to little kids whether it be LGBTQ or STRAIGHT. It's just not necessary. What's really strange is that Dave Rubin and his husband have been guests of Desantis and he even congratulated them on the adoption of their little babies. Why would a man, who supposedly hates gays, do that? You're the one that so filled with hate that you won't dig deeper into the topic. You WANT the divide. It makes you feel superior somehow that you're better than those "bigots". Watch "The Quartering" here on YouTube. He's got all kinds of videos showing teachers who brag about how they've come out to their students of a very young age and how good it makes them feel. What kind of narcissism, must a person have, to find validation from 6 year olds? Why would a teacher even talk about their personal life let alone their sexual preferences to little kids? It's just plain weird.
    5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80.  @almosthuman1398  " I allowed you to get there under your own steam." How magnanimous of you. You "allowed" me to do it. Sounds condescending to me. The roles of procreation has been the defining factor on how we defined men and women throughout all of human history. To carry out those roles depends on the plumbing. If you don't have the plumbing, you can't get pregnant. That means that you're NOT a woman. Our survival depends on this binary relationship. One carries the sperm. The other the egg. We need it to ensure genetic diversity to survive. So how do we describe the binaries that take part in procreation? The one that carries the sperm is the man. The one that carries the egg is the woman. Beattie became pregnant using donated sperm. That implies that he carried the egg which means that biologically he's a woman. You can dress him anyway you want, surgically remove body parts, give him drugs but his body still functioned as a woman. He carried the egg and then had full female capabilities that enabled him to carry a child to birth. That will NEVER happen to me. I'm NOT a woman. I do not and will NEVER have those capabilities. I am a man. Not because I wish it or feel it or passionately want it. I'm a man because that's what my body developed me to be. Neither the doctor or my parents assigned my manhood to me at birth. NATURE did. Biology. My role was clearly defined by how my body was designed and it defines its role in the perpetuation of my species. That's been the clear designation of gender all through history. In fact, 20 years ago people would have laughed at the ideas of multiple gender roles. The entire Beattie thing is a game of sleight of hand.
    5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 3
  104.  @garyjackson3531  Transgenderism is a mental condition. That's what a runaway social contagion is. It's the minds of children, going through mental issues, being manipulated. There are some forms of it, due to genetic conditions but this is quite rare. Like my neighbour. His female characteristics started at about a year old. This was in the late fifties. It was so weird to see the kid. He dressed like a boy, his parents insisted on it, and he had a boy's haircut and in 1960 that meant a real short haircut. But when I first saw him, I thought that this was one strange guy. He acted too much like a girl...even more of a girl than my 3 sisters. There was something going on here that was more than just a mental disorder. How did he know to act like a girl at 2? No one did that back then. This type of dysphoria does happen but it's extremely rare. Like I said, what's happening now is a social contagion, an "interpersonal process, such as imitation, conformity, universality, and mimicry." APA Dictionary of Psychology That's exactly what's happening. They're introduced to it at a young age, in the schools, and then it's spread through social media. They form a bond that includes imitation and conformity. I don't see why you think that this is some kind of junk science. If it wasn't for the schools, woke parents and social media, no one would even think about this stuff. It's something that was rarely encountered in real life but the socialists have grabbed onto it for their own agenda. My 16 year old granddaughter claims to be transgender. I looked into it. I've yet to see one woke transgender advocate who isn't a socialist.....not one. They're the ones spreading the contagion so that it's a 4000% increase in England over the last 10 years. That means that if there was 1, just ONE, new transgender sufferer in 2010, there would be 4000 new ones this year. That's impossibly ridiculous even if it was just a singular mental condition. It's MORE than that. It's the spread of an ideology using the strength of social contagions to push them in that direction. These socialists want to break the system down, to destroy it and to do that they need good socialist soldiers. They're doing it by creating a transgender class, CREATING it, as a part of the androgynous class the radical socialists have talked about for over a century. Radical socialism was all creating an androgynous society but they just couldn't get it implemented. This is just another shot at it by the radical socialists.
    3
  105.  @jimmcloughlin  First of all, Lysenko had no influence on the 1923 famine that killed millions. That happened because government forces took all the crops, including the seeds for next years crops, to feed the army and people living in the cities. So, those millions came as a result of authoritarian over reach and the idea that all products belonged to the state. Lysenko was starting to gain influence in the early thirties but that had very little to do with Holodomor. This was caused by the collectivisation policies, in which the farms were taken away from the farmers and farm collectives were organised. People were put to work on these farms who had no idea on how to farm. Many others were angry about losing their farms and basically refused to work. Many farmers were displaced and had nowhere to go and nothing to eat. They starved to death because the Socialist government insisted on farming collectives. Lysenko only made things worse. Yes, it was bad science but no farmer would have followed his ideas because they would know that it didn't work. It was the socialist government that forced it on the collective farms, which caused the crop failures. In fact, anyone that spoke out against Lysenko, would be arrested and sent to the Gulag or worse. It was bad science forced on the people by socialist politicians. Farmers, in a free country, would never have followed his ideas. The only reason that they were followed in the Soviet Union and China is due to the political might of the communist governments. ...and yes, China tried the same methods and those methods were FORCED on those who were supposed to grow the crops. They had no choice and the crops failed miserably. No sensible Chinese farmer would have used the Lysenko methods but the small farms were all gone, replaced by the collectives. The collectives were run by the government who mandated that the collective farms used the Lysenko farming methods. So, I'll say it again. It was bad science and that bad science was forced on the people by the communist governments. Politics forced it. That's where you've got it all backwards....and wrong.
    3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134.  @garyjackson3531  I know that they're all genetic conditions. However, sometimes they don't manifest themselves so you'd know right away that there's a problem. That's when the dysphoria can surface and in this case it might be real. I repeat....that's when the dysphoria CAN surface, not WILL surface. However, dysphoria can also be a mental condition that can be quite serious. The reasons for TRUE dysphoria are unknown. But what does that have to do with what's happening, now? I went through great pains to explain how this was likely a social contagion, brought on by social media, our education system and the medical establishment. That STRONGLY implies that it's induced from the outside and NOT a dysphoria from within. Vulnerable children are told, by their teachers and social media, that they're problems are caused by gender confusion and the way to good mental health is to find out what their REAL gender is. So that's what they do and the pressure placed on them pushes them in the direction towards declaring themselves a different gender. "Oh, look at how brave little Susie is. She even wants to be called Joshua now. Everyone clap for Joshua." And the kid LOVES it. She's finally the centre of attention in a good way. What kid would't fall for it. In fact, it'll encourage other kids to do the same. They want to be brave, too. I agree that it is a socialist agenda. Mengele was a National Socialist, the ideology of the Nazis. Margaret Sanger was a socialist as well, although she'd never admit to be a National Socialist. Planned Parenthood started long before National Socialism became a thing. National Socialism is just another form of Marxism trimmed down to include only one of the same ethnicity but it's still socialism. In fact, the China of today is the closest thing that we have presently to Nazi Germany and they devolved down from full Marxism down to National Socialism. Guess where a lot of this transgender stuff is being spread among the young? That Chinese media company app called TikTok. This is a lot deeper than people would think.
    2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205.  @spqrveteran  Every where I went, they were called migrants. Nowhere have I read that they were undergoing a legal immigration process. They came to the border, according to every report that I've seen, and then claimed refugee status. If you have information to the contrary, present it. So what did DeSantis do? Did he send his henchmen to Texas and place them under arrest? Did he FORCE them on those 2 planes under threat? If so....that's a major crime and all those involved should be facing charges. SERIOUS charges. I'm just curious on how they rounded them up. Maybe you could fill us in on how exactly it was done. Of course they're human beings. These same "human beings" were forced to sleep under bridges because there were so many of them, that there was no where else to put them, as they were being processed. That was under the Biden watch. He didn't increase border security even though we were in the midst of a pandemic. A lot of American citizens were forced to stay in their homes, lost their jobs due to mandates, yet these migrants were allowed in because the border is so porous. The inhabitants of Martha's Vineyard aren't the only ones complaining about bused migrants. Mayor Eric Adams, of New York, has been quite vocal in his dismay that 36,000 migrants have been sent to his city. Let's see....a little of 50 migrants sent to a resort for the elites....BIG ruckus. 36,000 sent to New York....oh well. They have to go somewhere. But then, the officials in New York transport them to northern New York and drop them off so they can use the entry point at Roxham Road to enter into Quebec, Canada. These are "human beings". 50 migrants were found in a trailer, DEAD, because they were locked inside. They were human beings too, yet I've heard more about the 50 migrants that were sent to the playground of our elites than I have these unfortunates who died a horrible death at the hands of those who took their money to get them into the United States. I'm seeing some extremely selective outrage, based more on politics than a true empathy for human suffering.
    1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345.  @peterstafford4426  If Trump's team was contacting Twitter, we should find out what was going on. If they were just complaining about material being censored, that's not a problem. If they were TELLING Twitter what to censor, that's wrong and goes against the Constitution of the United States. However, none of this has been brought to light to the release of the Twitter files. The pipeline to the FBI has been and its shown that it ALWAYS seemed to favour the Democrats. The NY Post's website WAS always there. That's not the issue. The issue was that if I wanted to post the specific NY Post article, revealing the Hunter Biden laptop, it was suppressed and the post was quite often taken down. THAT'S the issue. It was a new story that Twitter and Facebook suppressed, so the story would have limited public access. It wasn't an active attempt to ban it across the internet from all platforms, just the suppression of the story on the more popular ones, like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Also, a lot of us are upset about how the last elections were held. Ballots sent out to everyone, with no chain of possession possible. My dad has dementia and received a ballot. I could have filled it in for him and voted for Trump. Is that a good idea? Who would have known? Homeless shelters were getting dozens of ballots, addressed to homeless individuals, who had listed the shelter as their home because they slept there for a couple of nights and were never seen again. The opportunities for election fraud is wide open. The insistence that forcing IDs to be shown, for voting purposes, is racist is another idea that will bring up suspicions. Until the Democrats commit themselves to solving these issues, like the new elections act in Georgia, elections will be questioned and stuff like what Trump was doing will happen again. The elections were questioned in 2004 and 2016 by Democrats and then again in 2020 by Republicans. It's now being challenged again in Arizona by Republicans. We have to fix this but the Democrats refuse to cooperate. Questioning the elections isn't just a GOP phenomena. It's being done on both sides and only a biased individual would insist otherwise.
    1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359.  @Havanorange  What do you need an outline for if you know what you're talking about? Of course he blows up at the stupid questions of reporters. He's trying to organise help for the tens of thousands of people who need it after the hurricane and the idiot reporters want to talk about climate change. How does that get fresh water, food, medical help and electricity to those who need it? How does that get information for what to do to get help? It would piss me off too when reporters are only caring about their own political agenda. It's the same when the reporter asked about the "Don't say gay" bill. It doesn't say that ANYWHERE in the bill and he called that reporter out on it. The MSM were determined to carry that message and it was a baldfaced lie. That the media would intentionally lie about a bill that wants for keep teachers from talking about sexually explicit topics to kids between the ages of 5 and 8, straight or gay but the media just wanted to cloud the issue with their lies. That would piss anyone off. Even you if they intentionally lied about something that you said. When I studied public speaking in college, I never used notes either. I would study my topic thoroughly so when I was asked question during the question period, I could answer them quickly and succinctly. That meant that I was organised enough to know that material and didn't NEED notes to refer to and I got an A as a final mark. You're the one that said that he was unorganised and that's why he doesn't use notes. I beg to differ. He doesn't use notes because he knows his stuff and that takes a great deal of hard work and organisation.
    1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377.  @TheBelegur  The Fascist system in Italy was different than the one in Spain, which was different than the one in Nazi Germany. Just because it doesn't EXACTLY match the one in China, doesn't mean that it's not a form of Fascism. If the CCP has half interest in business, that it implies that the other half is privately owned. That goes against everything that Marxism or communism stands for. communism definition: a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. If part ownership of a business is allowed, then it's NOT communism. Fascism definition: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism. The Party and particularly, Xi Jinping, is the leader or dictator, as it were. He's officially the Paramount Leader, the Communist Party Leader, the Head of State and the Commander in Chief. He has a firm hand on his power. China is also VERY nationalistic. Look at the Uighur camps, in which they are being re-educated into learning Chinese, getting away from Islam and then integrating them around China so they can be assimilated into the Chinese culture. Not quite as aggressive as Nazi Germany but definitely leaning that way. From this, I'd say that China is closer to be a Fascist country than a communist one. Marx would NOT approve of what is going on in China, right now.
    1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382.  @scottfarner5100  She crossed 6 years ago and was a Canadian citizen. She went to live with an American in hopes of marriage that she met when he was in Canada. However, none of that matters. Refugee status has to do with those who come from a nation embroiled in wars and are displaced citizens due to the effects of that war. Asylum seekers are those who are faced with imminent threats of torture of persecution in their home countries. There is no WAY that everyone coming across the southern or northern borders, including my sister, meet or met those requirements. They're coming because they're having economic difficulties (they're poor) at home and they know that the current US administration won't question or enforce those asylum requirements. Also, separating children from the adults that are accompanying them, has NOTHING to do with asylum or refugee status. Having a child with you isn't an automatic indication of lawful refugee or asylum status and has NOTHING to do with those immigration laws. They're either running from wars, torture or persecution at home. If they can't show that they're facing such dangers at home, they can't seek asylum as refugees. That's the law. You can't show up with a child and say that you're a refugee and then say that this proves that you're a refugee or seeking asylum. It's an illogical claim. It's NOT the questions that determine refugee or asylum status. It's the answers. Can they show the requisite determination for legal immigration status as refugees or asylum seekers or not. That's the question. Rubber stamping requests and letting them come in to disappear into the country is a TERRIBLE policy. Also, if you're from Nicaragua, and you're being persecuted, you go to the nearest country (Honduras) to seek asylum. If they don't allow your case, you go to the next country, Guatemala and do the same. If refused, go to Mexico. There is NO evidence that this is happening. People are coming from all over the world, going to Mexico (not Canada) and then seeking asylum at the US border. They're doing it because the US is seen as a rich country and that's why they want to go there. It's also why, they're not going to Canada and heading south. Canada is already seen as a rich country and no one would come from there to seek asylum, which is why my sister was sent home and threatened with jail if she ever returned. You don't just claim to be a refugee. You have to prove it and this isn't happening at the southern border.
    1
  383. 1
  384.  @debbieassini8934  No, he said the "peacefully and patriotically" phrase shortly after 12:00. He finished his speech at 1:10 just as the rioters started throwing metal poles at security. At 1:45, the rioters surged past security. At 3:13 Trump tweeted asking people to remain peaceful. Trump was at the Ellipse, close to the White House, when he gave that speech. That's a 1.8 mile walk to the Capitol Building. The "peaceful and patriotic march" would have taken around 40 minutes according to Google Maps and that's on a normal day, not when there were tens of thousands marching. Trump was in the limo "grabbing the steering wheel away from the driver" a nonsensical claim. Everyone knew that there was going to be a large protest long before that day. Why was there more security in place? People asked for it. Even Trump did. Another thing, why wasn't there the outrage when BLM rioters threw Molotov cocktail and other projectiles at the White House and security? They even tried to set fire to the Church of the presidents, at the edge of the White House lawn. Trump and family had to go to a secure bunker for their safety. That's sure sounds like an insurrection where the president had to hide from a mob for his own safety. Yet, the media mocked and called him "Bunker Boy". There were fires all over Washington that day. I suppose that's a good insurrection as opposed to the bad one on J6. I say that BOTH were bad but there's no evidence that Trump planned the riot. It was supposed to be a protest and that's legal in the United States. According to Democrat supporters, burning, looting and attacking police is okay, depending on who does it. Violence should be called out, EVERY time, not just when it done by people that you don't like.
    1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1