General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Jack Haveman
Forbes Breaking News
comments
Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "'You Can Throw Him Out!': Trump Reacts To Heckler During New Hampshire Rally" video.
@dh5380 Free speech also involves not imposing your speech on others.
50
@CalebTrask Try it yourself. Go to your local theatre and when the movie starts playing, pull out a bullhorn and start screaming into it about the right to free speech and refuse to stop. Just keep repeating it. Let's see what happens.
7
@dh5380 I'll repeat my reply to someone else. "Try it yourself. Go to your local theatre and when the movie starts playing, pull out a bullhorn and start screaming into it about the right to free speech and refuse to stop. Just keep repeating it. Let's see what happens." Let me know the outcome. Our authority will be the judge's ruling in your court case.
4
@CalebTrask "Free speech also involves not imposing your speech on others." That was my original comment. So, you replied with a mocking remark about being home-schooled, implying that I didn't know what I was talking about. So, I suggested that you try it out for yourself. Try and see if your right to free speech is absolute and that you have the right, in a public setting to disrupt a scheduled event by giving a speech, just like the guy in this video. See how that works out for you. As a matter of fact, if you were attending an event and someone started to disrupt proceedings with his "free speech" rights, you'd be upset with him, especially if you paid good cash to be there and be part of the audience....like at a movie theatre. I'm going to suggest that your "blathering" comment is fake. That you know damn well what I'm talking about but you know damn well that what I'm saying is true but you can't admit that. You're being intellectually dishonest.
4
@CalebTrask What do you think that guy at that Trump rally was doing? People were there to hear Trump speak and he interrupts him and then refuses to shut-up, even after it was clear that no one wanted to hear him. He refused to be quiet. He was trying to impose his views on Trump and the audience, just like a guy in a theatre who starts screaming away and disturbing the audience. You can't impose yourself in that way. If Trump had graciously said "Let him speak. What are you trying to say?" That would be different but no one wanted him there. Just like that missionary at your door. If you ask him to leave and he refuses, he's imposing himself into your space. You would have the right to ask him and then compel him to leave. You do NOT have to listen to him. The right of free speech does not include FORCING people to listen to you. That's what ALL three of them have in common, the guy at the Trump rally, the one at the theatre and the missionary at your door. They're weren't invited to speak at an event or private home, yet they're insisting to be heard, in spite of the fact that people don't want to hear it and that's their right. No non sequitur, at all.
3
@CalebTrask Then, why don't you tell me what was so wrong about what I said. I said that a person can't FORCE you to listen to them at a special event. Everyone, at that rally, went there for a reason and that was to listen to a specific speaker. This guy started yelling, disrupting the event and violating the rights of all of the people who took time and money to attend that event. He has no right to do that, just like the guy in the theatre that I used as an example. If you have a counter argument, let's hear it. Don't just tell me that I'm wrong and then leave. That's a sure sign that you don't have anything of value to say that would refute my point. What you're basically saying is this. "You're wrong and I'm not going to tell you why". What I hear is that you have no idea why I'm wrong. Until you do, I have no reason to believe otherwise.
3
@CalebTrask It's still an event where people took the time and spent good money to go to. This guy had no right to disrupt what these people expected to see and laid down their valuable time and money for. If Trump was taking on questions, wait for the question period, get in line like everyone else and ask your question. This guy isn't anyone who is THAT special that his rant supersedes the rights of all the others in that auditorium.
3
@CalebTrask Yes. I said that you do not have the right to impose your speech on others. You can't impose your views on others. I said it in the context of what this video is about. This guy forced his way up front and started his rant. He had no right to do that.
2
@PhillMetal What? It's a political event at which he's the speaker. No one is forced to show up and listen. They came of their own free will because they wanted to hear him speak. That's why they're there. YOU may not want to hear him and that's your right. Just don't go to the event. You don't go to an event, in which the marquee says that Trump is the speaker, and then complain that he's speaking. Don't go. That really is the silliest comment yet.
2
@jman6214 To each their own. If everyone liked the same thing, we'd be like robots, assembly line people. That would be the Orwellian dystopian world that we read about in the book "1984".
2
@ascgazz He's probably sitting in his easy chair, sipping on a hot chocolate, looking out the window at the deep freeze outside, as he types his "shit" on a keyboard. I'd say there's a lot of difference.
2
@ascgazz I'm not sure what you're talking about. I've made numerous comments on this thread and I need specifics before I respond. Copy and paste what I said and I'll know and able to respond to it with clarity. I want to fully understand what you mean.
2
@ascgazz First, I didn't know that it was an inch away. It could have been right in the middle of the comment section. All you had to do is copy and paste what I said and ask me to clarify and I would have done it. Maybe you don't know how but that's not my fault. So, here I go. I'm going to scroll through 266 comments because YOU want a reply. Alright, I've just scrolled through the 266 comments, stopping every 10 or so comments to hit the "show more comment's" button, just to answer your question. I was responding to this comment "Well… you same on here just to talk shit about it, so..? 😂😂😂." You're equating standing in line in the freezing cold for hours to making a comment on a telephone that takes around a minute to make, at most. I'm saying that there is a big difference. He could have sent that message from anywhere, including the scenario that I mentioned. I was mocking the idea that the effort involved is exactly the same.
2
@Rick62153 You can turn it off. If we kick off the media every person that "imposes" on someone, there'd be no one on the news. Everyone pisses off someone. What you're talking about is preference and we all have our preferences. If you went to an event, with the express purpose of hearing someone speak or perform and some lunkhead starts yelling over the speaker or performer, you'd want him gone, too. In fact, you'd insist on it. That would be normal. Trump is running for the presidency. Of COURSE, he's going to speak and if enough people want to listen to him, he may even become president. What you're implying is that ONLY people that you like have the right to speak at all. Another ridiculous comment.
1
@user-yw4xl3mg8x They are going after him. It's the only option that the Dems have. They can't win on the issues so they'll just jail their opposition....if they can. Mar-a-Lago is only worth 18 million dollars. My gawd. What a joke.
1