Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Breitbart News" channel.

Did she ever meet with them? I'd liked to have seen that. 2 people don't like this video. 2 people don't like these unfortunate women who have lost loved ones to illegal criminal migrants, who sneaked into the country because they knew that no one would want them as neighbours.....except the naive left wing Democrats in California.
28
Sinjinbin 64 Here, I'll tell you this again, in case you missed it the first time. Bravery because they're standing up to those who won't help the president prevent a future where even MORE women would be crowding into that room. They've faced their loss and now their fighting those who don't want a wall, support sanctuary cities and think that vetting immigrants is racist. I've lost a son, not to this, and I know how hard it would be to do what they're doing. So yes.....they are brave and tough.
15
White woman: "Why don't you start?" Have you not been listening? She's doing it at that moment, she has started. The absolute lack of self awareness is astounding.
12
Sinjinbin 64 Bravery because they're standing up to those who won't help the president prevent a future where even MORE women would be crowding into that room. They've faced their loss and now their fighting those who don't want a wall, support sanctuary cities and think that vetting immigrants is racist. I've lost a son, not to this, and I know how hard it would be to do what they're doing. So yes.....they are brave and tough.
10
@crabbypapa3862 However, the ONLY reason she hit the first lady because she was angry at a woman with brown skin who was openly conservative. She didn't go after the other conservatives. She specifically targeted the woman who had the dark skin. By left wing logic, it's a hate crime and I think that's what she should be charged with. It would be the perfect way to get her to look deep inside her heart to understand why her thinking is so badly twisted.
7
@samm9017 People have been taking it for SEVENTY YEARS. I'll say it again....SEVENTY YEARS!!!! Without ill effects. If you take it and it doesn't work......nothing bad happens. If you take it and it does work.....IT COULD SAVE YOUR LIFE!!!! Do you get it, NOW. I'm guessing, no you don't. Optimism is a bad thing....right?
5
@eazye5293 How do you know that she's an idiot, referring to that doctor that made the speech. Did any ONE of those journalist look over the medical records that she kept for her patients? Was anything she said verified? Did they even ask to speak to any of her patients? NOOOO!!! It was dismissed out of hand....and don't give me this stuff about another study. Her drug regimen may have been completely different than any study done thus far. We wouldn't know that because not ONE of those "journalists" have the integrity to see if her figures are correct. Your hatred is blinding you.
4
@4gma59 I think that you're correct but I know people who didn't know that left leaning women can act this way. When they realised how crazy they can get, they started to actually look into the ideas that drives us. When they heard the truth of us, they changed how they thought. So, for guys like you and I, it's in spite of them. For the guys who changed, quite often it's BECAUSE of those nuts.
4
I'm 73 and I don't subscribe to cable tv. It's too expensive and I've worked too hard, to earn it, to give it to those crooks. My 92 year old father thinks the same way.
4
@enjoyitbro Or the attack on the White House when Trump and his family had to go to a bunker for their protection. They laughed and called him "Bunker Boy".
3
So, since Trump is dishonest, CNN is should proudly display its dishonest tendencies to the world as well. As long as Trump is president we can lie, cheat, throw things, smash windows and threaten people. I see that you've set extremely high standards for yourself.
3
@leewhite6425 What does that have to do with these Angel Moms? They've lost loved ones to illegal aliens and you show your condolences by babbling on about Putin. Why couldn't Pelosi come out and talk to these unfortunate women? Could it be because no matter what she said, she'd end up looking just as heartless as you do right now. Putin and Trump's shenanigans are irrelevant to the concerns of these women. Whether Trump and Putin fixed the election or not, their loved ones are still dead and they're still grieving. Is that what you'd tell them? "Would you quit your whining and wake up!!!!! Putin fixed the election". That doesn't even make sense. Their issue is border security and safety.....and you think it appropriate to make it about Trump and Putin. No wonder people are getting sick of the left.
3
@eazye5293 If this doctor is treating Covid and has treated a lot of them, how long will it take for them to be a doctor. I know that I don't have personal access to an expert. I do have access to a doctor though and if that doctor tells me to take that HCQ regimen, I'm doing it because that doctor is the only expert I have.
3
@darkdan3379 Sounds as if you're one of those racists that justifies beating and harassing anyone of a different ethnic background than you.
3
@FriendlyCroock Candice Owens is not a race baiter. She's a conservative that happens to be black and that flies in the face of all leftist logic. So, they call her an Aunt Jemima, a race traitor, so she's always defending her status as a black woman. Then the intersectionality clan claim that she's also a traitor to women because conservatives are anti-woman. If it wasn't for the obsession with identity, her skin colour would not be an issue. It isn't with conservatives, only with the left, who believe she must think and act as they say she must and will not allow her to take her status as an independent human being. She must join the collective that her skin colour has assigned her or she's a race traitor or as you say, a race baiter.
3
@ionutbalta6607 You're a liar who accepts Soros money.
3
@ionutbalta6607 Let's just say the he does. Why would that make him a liar? Instead of wild accusations and name calling, discuss his ideas and show how then may not be true. That's how you prove a falsehood. Show us, precisely, what is wrong with what Rubin is saying. If you have a legit point, then you're on your way to proving that he is mistaken or even lying in his allegations.
3
@joshlewis575 The old "look over there, nothing to see here" gambit. I love the defence....LOL. This looks like voter fraud in a specific case. If "the Donald" has abused women, in the past....terrible. Can't say a good thing about it. However, that has NOTHING to do with what's happened in Delaware county. Jeffrey Dahmer is not innocent because Ted Bundy killed people and the police would never refuse to investigate Dahmer because of Bundy's criminal record. You would think that the Party, that claims to care for the people, would want to ensure the integrity of their actions. Instead, people like you, refuse to even discuss it. "the donald".....give it a rest. You can't excuse all possible corrupt actions, for the entire nation, because of the existence of ONE MAN. That's what people that lack integrity always do. They deflect from themselves.
3
@enriquetorres911 Trump never told anyone to drink bleach. EVER and YOU KNOW IT. However, to clarify, Trump asked Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci is there was any research done using disinfectants to combats internal diseases. He also asked about UV light research and in fact there is such research. He was turned facing the two doctors after which Dr. Birx turned and asked Dr. Fauci is he'd heard of any such research. Only the most childish of minds would interpret that verbal exchange as "Drink bleach!!!". People like you are actually driving people away from the Democrats and over to the Trump camp. You come off as being a delusional whackjob.
2
@darkdan3379 You're a troll....the lowest form of life on the internet.
2
@Traitorman.ArticleIII-Section3 His actions? Which ones exactly? You're great at making vague accusations. Lets become specific.
2
If CNN supported honest journalism, they'd send their medical "experts" to examine that doctor's patient records and get permission to talk to those patients. They'd verify her claims. As far as I know, not one of them did. Not one of them cares if her claims are true or not. They're allowing their hatred to rule the narrative.
2
@FriendlyCroock Blexit is politics. Political parties try to get elected and to do that they go after votes. It's how they come to power. The Black community have voted Democrat for decades but they didn't always vote that way. There once was a huge switch, a "Blexit" if you will, from the Republican Party to the Democrats. Remember, the Republicans are the party of Lincoln, who freed the slaves and the party that fought the Jim Crow laws of the fifties and sixties, with Republican Martin Luther King as the leader. It was the Republicans that spoke out against the KKK who were almost exclusively Democrats. The "Blexit" started during the Great Depression and then was completed as a result of LBJ's "War on Poverty", which hasn't really worked out that well. They didn't call it "Blexit" but that's what it was. Now Candace is trying to get blacks to vote Republican, again. She's using the failure Democratic policies to show that segment of the voters that maybe those policies weren't as good for them as they hoped they would be. Some of the worst regions in the US are the black communities that are almost always the strongholds of the Democrats. She's pointing out that maybe voting Republican might not be as bad as they think it is and that it may not be as bad as it is right now. It's politics....not race baiting. Race baiting is when you use race to denigrate individuals of a race to shame them into falling into the group think. Sharpeton is a race baiter. So is Michael Dyson. They use the worst of tragedies to divide and tell one group that they should hold another accountable as a monolith. They foment racial divide, throwing gasoline on a fire that already exists. Candace is asking blacks to join her in her political beliefs. People like Sharpeton are saying that blacks can't think on their own and only he can knows what is good for them and if you deviate from what you're told to do, you're a race traitor.
2
@FriendlyCroock One could see it that way, but she has been vilified by the left and she has been told, not just by blacks, but by white leftists, that she is acting against her own best interests. This implies that they believe that her endorsement of the Republicans is one that is, in fact, endorsing the white supremacist party. That's their accusation against her and in fact, that has been at the heart of the entire campaign against the Republicans, especially Trump, for the last few years. There has been a huge fixation on the left on white privilege, the white patriarchy and even Hillary said, during her presidential campaign, that white women only voted for Republicans because of their husbands as if they don't have minds of their own. How would you think Candace would respond to continuous claims that she's supporting a racist party and president when she doesn't experience racism from the right but it's the left that use racism to denigrate her conservative views. Is she not allowed to point out that it's the left that is using racism to try to cajole and shame her to rethink her politics? It's what is happening to her and it's not from the right. It's from the left. The Republicans welcome her into their fold and race is NOT an issue. The left use racism to get her back and it is an issue. Maybe she's just sick and tired of the relentless racist comments and shaming. Strange how a white "racist a-hole" (me), is defending a black woman (Candace). I gotta say the definition of racism has sure expanded over the last while. Actually, that's just another left wing tactic, one that Candace has been criticising. That tactic being, if you don't agree with someone, call them a racist and now you've just won your point. What a shallow position.
2
@quovadis7119 I'm no Christian and I support these mothers. Immigration laws are too lax in the US and a wall would help to prevent those with criminal records and associations from coming into the country. Mexico is going through a drug war right now. Last year, there were almost 28,000 casualties to that war, more than what died in Iraq, Syria or Yemen. In fact, the only war that had more losses was Afghanistan. This is a war over bringing drugs into the US, the main market for their illicit drugs. So yeah, they need a wall....badly and they need new policies that will prevent criminal illegals from going to sanctuary cities and hiding there to carry on with their criminal activities.
2
@zymx2569 I don't get how you would arrive at that conclusion, unless you're kidding.
1
@j.thomas7128 I have no idea what I'm blind to. Trumps lies or the fact that his perceived lies to give CNN and the left some kind of licence to do the same and worse. I believe that one should set their standards higher than just pointing a finger and whining "See....Donnie's doing it, too".
1
@j.thomas7128 Whether Trump lies or not, isn't the point that I'm trying to make. The original comment seems to suggest that since Trump lies, we're to accept and overlook CNN's lies. "Well...Donnie lies, too." is the plea of a six year old. It's childish. If we were to wait for the person who never lies to call out obvious BS, it would never be called out. Everyone lies. A person is using a stupid and illogical claim when they use that to excuse another's falsehoods.
1
@heavierthanlight7173 Maybe we should investigate the 2016 elections? Really? Have you not heard of the Mueller Report? 2 years of investigations and millions of tax dollars spent and they couldn't even impeach on what they found. Give it up on that. I only have one question. This guy has just claim that forensic evidence has gone missing. Is he correct? If that forensic evidence can be produced, then he's wrong and we can ALL go home. However, if it can't be produced, we should ALL be concerned, both Democrat and Republican. What happened to it and why?
1
@heavierthanlight7173 The Mueller report had NOTHING to do with the quid pro quo and the Ukraine. It had to do with Russian Collusion in the 2016 election and possible Trump interference in the investigation surrounding that collusion. https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/full-mueller-report-pdf/index.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2019/politics/read-the-mueller-report/ https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf That last one is the official report that was handed in by Robert Mueller, himself. It says right at the top of page 1 as its title... "Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election" If you don't even know this, how am I going to take seriously anything that you say.
1
Did this guy ever nail it. I'm Canadian and we have the same mindset from the left as the US does. They want to put additives to the nationality. French Canadian, Black Canadian, Native Canadian......well, I say, we're all Canadians and we should put Canadians first. That includes everyone, even those who want to put that little qualifier to their nationality. I'm Canadian with Dutch heritage but Canadian first. Not Dutch Canadian.....CANADIAN. Just like the guy in this video. He's American. That's it. It should be Americans first from his perspective just like it's Canadians first from my perspective.
1
Apparently the rules are that they get to browbeat Barr and he gets to take it. Yup....sounds like great rules to me.
1
A great way to avoid dealing with the "manufactured crisis" at the border. Change the subject. My car mechanic does the same thing. When he can't figure out why my car won't start, he rotates the tires and then gives me a hard time about how important tire care is in overall car maintenance. He's a really good mechanic.
1
@NetiNeti-gm5bz We are born to discriminate though. When you pick a significant other, you've discriminated against all others who might want to be with you. Survival is impossible without discrimination. When an ancient man watched another die of snake bite, he assumes All snakes are dangerous, just to be on the safe side. That's human nature. As for hate, that comes out of ideology. Like Nadler, who has such open disdain for Candace that he wasn't even listening to her. He heard the word stupid and then made a decision based on his hatred for Candace and her cause. A completely erroneous decision. Also, humans aren't pure from the beginning. I've been around the very young all my life. Two year olds are all about their own needs and for the first few years of their lives show very little empathy for others. They'll take, bully, hit or kick anyone that keeps them for the things they want. In fact, good parents discourage those traits right from the beginning so when the capability for empathy begins, they've already been exposed to the idea of sharing. Bad parents indulge their children their every whim. We have colleges and universities full of the products of that parenting. Overgrown children who can't bear to be contradicted or even hear things that they might disagree with. Their basest instincts have never been challenged and it show in their hatred for everyone.
1
@Earthdweller1958 NO.....I didn't forget about those people. I don't know ANYONE that thinks that they shouldn't be charged if they took part in violence or property damage. That's YOUR projection onto those of us conservatives who think that political violence isn't okay. One thing that I've noticed is that every time something like this happens, people like you, go to the ONE incident that the conservatives have done. They don't want to talk about the hundreds of riots in 2020, in which over 30 people were killed and billions of dollars in damages, the fires, the looting and on and on. None of the attacks on conservative students in universities, the attacks on people wearing MAGA hats, the things like that CHAZ zone in Seattle, the attacks on people going to see conservative speakers like Ben Shapiro or Michael Knowles, the attempted assassination of Trump and the death of the man standing behind Trump. How many people went on line, ANGRY, because he missed Trump. When we mention how terrible these things are, we know that you will go. "WHAT ABOUT JAN 6TH!!!!!" and you do it, EVERY time. OVER AND OVER. it's the ONLY thing that you have. Get over it.
1
@ionutbalta6607 The right is pissing on the Constitution? It's the left that is trying to suppress free speech. The left is trying to control what we read and listen to. "Baby, it's cold outside" is being banned not by the right but by the left, who've become more prudish than a Victorian grandmother. If it wasn't for the Constitution the left would have outlawed such films like "The Red Pill". If they don't like it, they want it banned. Don't like what a person says, fire him, dox him, protest him, mob them in restaurants when they're with their families. It's the left that want to do away with the right to bear arms, which is in the Constitution. You've said that Republicans piss on the Constitution but you haven't said how or given an example of it. As for the David Pakman thing, here he is in an interview with Dave Rubin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EipJoOJrqgU He appears quite willing to engage in a discussion in that video. He didn't say that he was left, either. He says that he has never changed the things he believed and that these were once the same as the left. It's the left that has changed and the right that has become more accepting and has moved to the same positions that he has always had. Rubin claims that he's never changed any of his core beliefs but his left friends have become more radicalised to the left and many refuse to even talk to him anymore. Also, there is a new surge in Socialism in the Democratic Party and it has had a profound affect on how they form policies and ideas. That cannot be denied. A man like Bernie Sanders would never have been considered to run for the presidency by the Democrats in the sixties and seventies. He is too far left and has embraced many Marxist ideas. As for the European socialism, those countries still embrace a capitalist economy. Business is privately owned and market driven. They have social safety nets but it is paid for by the taxes paid by the citizens who are getting their money through a capitalist economic system. The US does the same and has for decades now. The US has a capitalist system but there is welfare, rent control, subsidised housing, Medicare, social security and more. That isn't part of the capitalist economy. I don't know how Trump being the laughing stock that he is makes Rubin a liar. That's illogical. Trump is a bit of a jackass but he isn't completely incompetent, either. North Korea was launching unarmed missiles over South Korea and Japan, setting of air raid alarms and scaring the crap out of people there. Trump comes along and brokers a deal with the "dear leader" and no more missile launches. The people in that region aren't laughing. Most are quite happy that it isn't happening anymore. Trump signs an executive order, identifying depressed areas as opportunity zones so those poor neighbourhoods have a chance to improve and the people there to rise out of poverty. Who cares how stupid Trump is if he's enacting people to rise out of poverty. He also set in motion policies that will encourage the poor to not cash in their retirement packages and 401ks so when retirement comes, they won't live in abject poverty. Who cares that a stupid man is responsible for the elderly living a better life than they do now? I know I don't. Also, the radical left is more dangerous than the right. There are right wing nutjobs that have done terrorist acts, but the radical left want to to tear down the entire system and build a Marxist state. Now that's dangerous. They already are so powerful in the universities that a lot of students are afraid to say what they think due to harassment by the left wing students and professors. Berkeley has just lost a court case where that have to stop harassing student Republican groups and allow right wing guest speaker on campus. They've also been told that their free speech zone is unconstitutional. Free speech should never be zoned or cordoned off. It should be open to everyone, no matter where they are.
1
@danielvincent1153 He was a young man and influenced by ideas in a way a young man does. As he grew older, as we all do, our life experiences and ideas change. I know mine did as I got older. Also, you don't know if he left the Young Turks due to ideological differences and that his funding came because it was seen as a good investment and potential money maker. You have no idea why anyone funded the start of his show. One thing is certain, Rubin needs no funding now. He has a money making enterprise and doesn't need a nickel from Koch or anyone else.
1
@danielvincent1153 I'm 67 and I think of under 30 as being young. I have changed a lot since I was 40, reaching a maturity that I thought I had at the time but realise now that it actually wasn't as mature as I liked to think I was. Rubin left the Young Turks because he wasn't comfortable with their "gotcha" style interviewing and how they would twist what people said to fit their own agenda. I don't believe Cenk or Ana. His debate with Sam Harris was filled with obfuscations and misrepresentations and then after the Charlie Hebdo murders in Paris, Cenk thought that they brought it on themselves by printing those cartoons. That was when Rubin left. He just wasn't comfortable with the doublespeak there. TYT got mad at him and then decided to vilify him with these accusations. Also, you have no evidence whether Koch controls content on his show or not or if that show is self sufficient right now. The Rubin Report has had a lot of success and has nearly a million subscribers. That's pretty good no matter how you slice it. With those numbers he could run that show without Koch or anyone else.
1
@danielvincent1153 The one reason I like his show is because he isn't badgering his guests. He lets them talk and then you can see what they're all about. Almost every other program has interviewers who are trying to trip their guests up and they'll centre on the irrelevant just to show up that guest. It becomes an argument and almost nothing is ever said. The guest is continuously being interrupted and they can never finish a thought unless the interviewer likes what he's saying. I want to know the guest, to talk and finish his thoughts without ending up saying things like "I am not a racist. Why would you say that?" I'm so sick of this kind of interview. They're not interviews. They're ambushes.
1
What? The Democratic Party has been infiltrated by far left wing activists. They refuse to denounce Antifa, who've caused violence all over the country. They tacitly supported the MeToo movement by declaring Kavanaugh a rapist, even though there is no evidence to say that he ever raped anyone. Due process suddenly meant nothing to them because it no longer serves their political goals. They have avowed Socialists in their ranks, like Bernie Sanders, who heavily endorsed the Socialism in Venezuela which has become a political and economic disaster. The universities are bereft with Democrats who are attempting to quell anything to do with Republican or conservative politics. Berkeley just lost a court case in which they were forced to abandon their policies of discouraging conservative speakers on their campus, discouraging student Republican groups and told that "free speech zones" are unconstitutional. These were all policies by a faculty and students that support the Democratic Party. That's extremism, no matter how you look at it.
1
@fromthehaven94 The Garland thing was rotten to the core, as well. However, they didn't go after him to smear him and accuse him of heinous acts with no evidence. McConnell was just being an ass and he conned some of the other Republicans into supporting him. Garland should have been confirmed, there's no doubt of that. Republicans aren't perfect by a long shot. I've even leaned more to the Democrats over the years but they've become a disgrace over the last few years. Some of what they're saying and doing shows a complete lack of integrity. I'm not going to call Ford a liar because ultimately I don't know if she is or not, but since she can't offer one iota of corroborating evidence, I cannot call Kavanaugh a rapist. That's my objective call and I'd say a reasonable one. No one should be pronounced guilty without any evidence to support it. No one.
1