Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Breitbart News" channel.

  1. 28
  2. 15
  3. 12
  4. 10
  5. 7
  6. 5
  7. 4
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23.  @FriendlyCroock  Blexit is politics. Political parties try to get elected and to do that they go after votes. It's how they come to power. The Black community have voted Democrat for decades but they didn't always vote that way. There once was a huge switch, a "Blexit" if you will, from the Republican Party to the Democrats. Remember, the Republicans are the party of Lincoln, who freed the slaves and the party that fought the Jim Crow laws of the fifties and sixties, with Republican Martin Luther King as the leader. It was the Republicans that spoke out against the KKK who were almost exclusively Democrats. The "Blexit" started during the Great Depression and then was completed as a result of LBJ's "War on Poverty", which hasn't really worked out that well. They didn't call it "Blexit" but that's what it was. Now Candace is trying to get blacks to vote Republican, again. She's using the failure Democratic policies to show that segment of the voters that maybe those policies weren't as good for them as they hoped they would be. Some of the worst regions in the US are the black communities that are almost always the strongholds of the Democrats. She's pointing out that maybe voting Republican might not be as bad as they think it is and that it may not be as bad as it is right now. It's politics....not race baiting. Race baiting is when you use race to denigrate individuals of a race to shame them into falling into the group think. Sharpeton is a race baiter. So is Michael Dyson. They use the worst of tragedies to divide and tell one group that they should hold another accountable as a monolith. They foment racial divide, throwing gasoline on a fire that already exists. Candace is asking blacks to join her in her political beliefs. People like Sharpeton are saying that blacks can't think on their own and only he can knows what is good for them and if you deviate from what you're told to do, you're a race traitor.
    2
  24.  @FriendlyCroock  One could see it that way, but she has been vilified by the left and she has been told, not just by blacks, but by white leftists, that she is acting against her own best interests. This implies that they believe that her endorsement of the Republicans is one that is, in fact, endorsing the white supremacist party. That's their accusation against her and in fact, that has been at the heart of the entire campaign against the Republicans, especially Trump, for the last few years. There has been a huge fixation on the left on white privilege, the white patriarchy and even Hillary said, during her presidential campaign, that white women only voted for Republicans because of their husbands as if they don't have minds of their own. How would you think Candace would respond to continuous claims that she's supporting a racist party and president when she doesn't experience racism from the right but it's the left that use racism to denigrate her conservative views. Is she not allowed to point out that it's the left that is using racism to try to cajole and shame her to rethink her politics? It's what is happening to her and it's not from the right. It's from the left. The Republicans welcome her into their fold and race is NOT an issue. The left use racism to get her back and it is an issue. Maybe she's just sick and tired of the relentless racist comments and shaming. Strange how a white "racist a-hole" (me), is defending a black woman (Candace). I gotta say the definition of racism has sure expanded over the last while. Actually, that's just another left wing tactic, one that Candace has been criticising. That tactic being, if you don't agree with someone, call them a racist and now you've just won your point. What a shallow position.
    2
  25. 2
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36.  @ionutbalta6607  The right is pissing on the Constitution? It's the left that is trying to suppress free speech. The left is trying to control what we read and listen to. "Baby, it's cold outside" is being banned not by the right but by the left, who've become more prudish than a Victorian grandmother. If it wasn't for the Constitution the left would have outlawed such films like "The Red Pill". If they don't like it, they want it banned. Don't like what a person says, fire him, dox him, protest him, mob them in restaurants when they're with their families. It's the left that want to do away with the right to bear arms, which is in the Constitution. You've said that Republicans piss on the Constitution but you haven't said how or given an example of it. As for the David Pakman thing, here he is in an interview with Dave Rubin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EipJoOJrqgU He appears quite willing to engage in a discussion in that video. He didn't say that he was left, either. He says that he has never changed the things he believed and that these were once the same as the left. It's the left that has changed and the right that has become more accepting and has moved to the same positions that he has always had. Rubin claims that he's never changed any of his core beliefs but his left friends have become more radicalised to the left and many refuse to even talk to him anymore. Also, there is a new surge in Socialism in the Democratic Party and it has had a profound affect on how they form policies and ideas. That cannot be denied. A man like Bernie Sanders would never have been considered to run for the presidency by the Democrats in the sixties and seventies. He is too far left and has embraced many Marxist ideas. As for the European socialism, those countries still embrace a capitalist economy. Business is privately owned and market driven. They have social safety nets but it is paid for by the taxes paid by the citizens who are getting their money through a capitalist economic system. The US does the same and has for decades now. The US has a capitalist system but there is welfare, rent control, subsidised housing, Medicare, social security and more. That isn't part of the capitalist economy. I don't know how Trump being the laughing stock that he is makes Rubin a liar. That's illogical. Trump is a bit of a jackass but he isn't completely incompetent, either. North Korea was launching unarmed missiles over South Korea and Japan, setting of air raid alarms and scaring the crap out of people there. Trump comes along and brokers a deal with the "dear leader" and no more missile launches. The people in that region aren't laughing. Most are quite happy that it isn't happening anymore. Trump signs an executive order, identifying depressed areas as opportunity zones so those poor neighbourhoods have a chance to improve and the people there to rise out of poverty. Who cares how stupid Trump is if he's enacting people to rise out of poverty. He also set in motion policies that will encourage the poor to not cash in their retirement packages and 401ks so when retirement comes, they won't live in abject poverty. Who cares that a stupid man is responsible for the elderly living a better life than they do now? I know I don't. Also, the radical left is more dangerous than the right. There are right wing nutjobs that have done terrorist acts, but the radical left want to to tear down the entire system and build a Marxist state. Now that's dangerous. They already are so powerful in the universities that a lot of students are afraid to say what they think due to harassment by the left wing students and professors. Berkeley has just lost a court case where that have to stop harassing student Republican groups and allow right wing guest speaker on campus. They've also been told that their free speech zone is unconstitutional. Free speech should never be zoned or cordoned off. It should be open to everyone, no matter where they are.
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1