Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Joe Rogan - Neil deGrasse Tyson on Eric Dubay u0026 Flat Earth" video.

  1. Why do I always have to show you nobs this picture. This is the southwest corner of Building 7. Notice that this corner has a huge chunk missing out of it, starting at about the 18th floor and running diagonally down to about 1/4 of the way into the building. It's completely gone. That's only one corner of the building. You can see char marks near the top as well, facing west, which indicates there must be damage on the south side, the side facing the north tower, as well. In fact, that entire south face was damaged that badly when it was struck by the thousands of tons of debris from the North Tower. Then the fires burned for hours after this damage was done. LOOK AT IT. I guarantee that you wouldn't rent a room in that building at no price. http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/images/articles/911-images/wtc7-side-damage1.jpg
    1
  2. Deckard Oh yeah, the no jets theory. That one really makes sense. At least 3 million people within eye-shot of the burning North Tower and you're trying to tell me that no one watching it burn. Not one person. There are more live witnesses to the plane hitting the South Tower than almost any event in history. Literally hundreds of thousands of people with their eyes glued to one of the biggest events of New York history, watch the second plane come from the south to hit the tower. Not TV audiences either. Actual eye witnesses. That has to be the most ludicrous of all the conspiracy theories involving 9/11 and it makes NO SENSE, at all. Add to that, 2 missing planes with passengers and crews that no longer exist. They got on a plane and were never heard from again. I'll bet in this "great" film, they never even attempted to talk to anyone who had friends and relatives on those planes, who dropped them off to fly away or who were expecting them to land. No talks with travel agents, airport staff or families of crew members. Absolute nonsense.
    1
  3. Deckard "Jack Haveman Oof" That makes sense too. LOL.
    1
  4. Deckard A great way to never have to address points being made. Assert bias on the part of the other person and then commit to never engaging with biased people. That way, you make the discussion about the other person and not points being made of facts being presented. You do realise that's bias, don't you. But at least you don't have to explain the ostriches with their heads buried in the sidewalks of New York on 9/11. I wouldn't want to have to explain that one, either.
    1
  5. John Fashanu Another "Oof" response. Maybe he has some kind of disorder. A literary form of Tourette's.
    1
  6. John Fashanu It would be like claiming that 50,000 people were at the Super Bowl and they all watched CGI players. A family friend that I've known since 72 watched the second plane hit live. He was in his office in New Jersey, watching the smoke from the North Tower from his office window, when a plane flew by overhead and flew straight into the South Tower. He said he heard people yell and scream all through the building when it happened. It must have been quite the experience to see it.
    1
  7. Deckard You'll talk about people but not about issues. Not that deep are you? What the heck does "oof" mean, anyway?
    1