Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "The National Desk" channel.

  1.  @PROVOCATEURSK  It's been over a day and you've not expanded on your logic. Nice trolling, I guess.
    6
  2.  @brainlet99  Then you'd have a league of all men, transitioning to women. The women transitioning to men don't stand a chance against men. It's STILL the same result and why the sports events were divided in the first place.
    3
  3. No evidence? Except for this. For some reason, it's only XY athletes in XX events who are winning medals and breaking records. I've yet to hear of one, JUST ONE, XX athlete setting records in XY events, even though transition from XX to XY is the more common transition at this time. If it's an even playing field it should be happening both way and it's just not.
    1
  4. It's the socialist war of reality. As Voltaire once said "Those who can convince you to believe in absurdities, will also be able to convince you to commit atrocities". Atrocities are the absolute form of absurdity.
    1
  5. To repeat what's already been said in this comment section. "That would be affirming their delusion". Also, biological women, transitioning into men, wouldn't stand a chance. In reality, it's what's happening now. If a woman is good enough, she can play in the NBA, NHL, MLB or the NFL but it's not happening. All you'd be doing is forming a league which excludes those with XX markers from playing sports. All those women transitioning to males could only compete, fairly, in women's sports and they can't do that. If they did, it's an admission that they're still women.
    1
  6.  @brainlet99  You'd be throwing good money after bad. They've haven't been able to make money in the WNBA or other women's team sports. Golf and tennis are the exceptions. Even men's leagues have trouble making money. There's no way a "trans" league can pay for itself.
    1