Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Megyn Kelly" channel.

  1. 37
  2. 33
  3.  @jberrocalucf  He's NOT intersex. He has XY chromosomes, which means that he's male. He may have a condition in which his genitals don't appear like it should. However, the rest of his body is a male body. Also, testosterone isn't the only difference. The genetics of having XY chromosomes would give that person greater bone density. Their stance would be different due to a woman's need to have a pelvic region that would safely accommodate child birth. That would add extra leverage to throw a punch. The shoulders are different as well which means 50% greater shoulder strength to the male, according to the National Institute of Health. This has been programmed into the very genetic differences between men and women. The testosterone may add muscle strength but the physicality of the male, denser bones, pelvic and shoulder differences, greater lung capacity, bigger hearts.....all add to the advantages of one that is born with XY chromosomes. To add, Ali had greater boxing skills than Foreman but Ali also had the advantage of having the bone density, the shoulder strength to counter punch, the leverage of his male stance, male lung capacity and the strength of his larger male heart to offset the muscle size of Foreman. The Italian boxer doesn't have any of those advantages over her XY opponent to offset the testosterone advantage. Genetics is exceptionally important and as for the outrage? I have 2 grand daughters who play rugby. This scares me and I have every right to be afraid and outraged if this happened to the girls that I love.
    24
  4. 24
  5. 22
  6. 20
  7. 20
  8. 19
  9. 15
  10. 13
  11. 13
  12. 10
  13. 8
  14. 8
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 6
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56.  @Aaajjjjjjjjj  So you really think that the Italian boxer hadn't heard of this stuff before? That it hadn't been discussed over the last 7 or 8 years as she was working towards this goal? That she hadn't been told that if she didn't go along with it, she'd be a bigot and a transphobe? That doubting it may cause a person to end herself? That this pressure may even have caused her to believe it? Then, when she does face it personally, it's on the biggest stage of her life. What does she do? Protest, get blasted on the world media and be kicked out of the Olympics? Or go along with it and hope for the best? So she goes along with it and then finds out the reality. There's no way she can beat this man and it breaks her heart.....but that's not all, now the years of manipulation will have it's effect. She gets called onto the carpet, and the implications are everywhere. She is a bigot and transphobe and she may even believe it because if she strongly believes that it wasn't fair, she wouldn't apologise. Everything has cornered her and she admits she's wrong. She is now an adherent of the ideology. This is the same type of manipulation that one, who ends up Stockholm Syndrome, has gone through. One is manipulation by a hostage taker. The other is manipulation through social and authoritarian pressure that has been ongoing for a number of years. They both end up in the same place and they've both been changed forever. That's the end result for this boxer. There's no name for it, not like the person suffering from Stockholm Syndrome has their condition named. She's a pariah to this segment of the population, just like the other would be if they betrayed the hostage taker. She's been manipulated for years so when she has to deal with it, she responds in the way her manipulators want. That's the comparison. That's why they're somewhat similar.
    1
  57.  @Aaajjjjjjjjj  I outlined a complete scenario where a kidnapper will treat their hostage to manipulate them to behave themselves and you don't think that this isn't just a ploy. That the kidnapper is just lucky that it happens and that he never does it on purpose. All just a fortunate turn of events for him. Yeah, right. It's how narcissists operate. The entire gender thing is about narcissism. Manipulating others to believe what you believe. 2 plus 2 equals 5 and it isn't good enough that one says it. Like O'Brian says to Winston Smith..."You must believe it". That is the ultimate goal here. A man can become a woman. A man can become pregnant. You must believe it. That's the ultimate goal. It's manipulate and they use threats....like the Orwellian threat of releasing rats to eat your face or in this case, we'll destroy you career and it's not manipulation. It's just a different manipulation than a kidnapper uses but you'll NEVER be convinced that they're both manipulation and the victim isn't manipulated into acquiescing to the manipulator in both cases. In the end, you're not getting the point of the original comparison. That they're both the result of psychological trauma. 20 years ago, the IOC would never get away with it. Now they can because the gender crew has prepared them, psychologically, to accept that edict. 20 years ago, the IOC couldn't have done it because the mindset wasn't indoctrinated yet. The boxer would have been shocked at even the suggestion just like, initially, the hostage would have been shocked to think that they'd feel badly for the kidnapper. it's all indoctrination. Under different circumstances but still manipulation of how a person thinks.
    1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1