Comments by "Jack Haveman" (@JackHaveman52) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.

Read the books of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali, who was appalled at how Somali and other Islamic groups, behaved in her new country, the Netherlands. When she tried to expose it, she went into hiding for years, due to death threats. The Dutch government financed a body guard and the money that would enable her to be constantly on the move to avoid detection by the Muslims who would do her harm. She finally had to leave the Netherlands and moved to the United States. The threats started in 2003 and she's still very careful to not let her exact whereabouts to be known. That's what that ideology does to those they don't like and they don't like anyone but fellow Muslims.
14
@henrytep8884 When you expand the parameters for what constitutes a hate crime, yes....hate crime will expand. A stupid sign saying "It's ok to be white" is now a hate crime. Smart ass kids with a spray can drawing swastikas proves hate and is deemed a hate crime. A lot of those kids don't even know what it stands for. They're just being provocative like kids have always been. My highschool son came home with a swastika drawn of his binder and I sat him down and explained the significance of this symbol and how it had affected our family. He just didn't fully understand it. He thought it was a cool looking symbol. He was the third generation removed from those times. I didn't tell him to remove it. He did it on his own. That's not to say that there are no hate crimes but I'll bet you that they didn't call this harassment of a MAGA hat wearer a hate crime. They are very selective about what that is. I'll bet a bunch of black guys shouting racial and homophobic slurs at a bunch of kids wearing MAGA hats isn't a hate crime, either. However, had it been the other way around.....you guessed it. Hate crime. Expand the definition to suit an agenda and you'll get the desired results. More hate crimes. It's a self fulfilling agenda.
11
@larrydanadavid2435 "Excellent weather, great culture and delicious food everywhere." I have a feeling that you make great money. High taxes, high energy costs, high housing costs, homelessness and the crime that goes with it, all these things don't affect you because you have the money so these won't affect you. All you see is "Excellent weather, great culture and delicious food everywhere." You don't care about the little people who are struggling to keep up. Either that, or you're a troll.
8
@Campzzyzx Apparently, you don't know the difference between state and Federal politics. Californians, who are leaving their state, are upset about state taxes and regulations, NOT Federal ones. California has state income tax, as an example, and Florida and Texas has none. California has high energy costs due to taxes. Other states don't have as high a costs because they don't charge as big a tax on energy. I can give even more examples. The death penalty is a state responsibility NOT a Federal law. Understand civics before you talk about state and federal levels of responsibilities.
3
@robertlowe5697 I never said that voting didn't work. It does. Voting got those socialists into power in the first place and that worked really well for the left wing voters, who got exactly what they wanted. However, when things started to go south, a lot of voters saw what their votes did to their community and they voted out or recalled those left wing politicians. However, is that going to be enough? San Francisco's and California's problems are huge and it will take a lot more work to fix what's wrong.
3
I heard a California politician call it "subsistence" theft. As if theft to maintain a drug habit is the same thing as subsistence farming in third world countries. These progressives are completely out of touch with reality.
2
@SIKE01 "If".....that's one hell of a big word. It says nothing about this small business owner or who he voted for because you have NO idea who he voted for. Small business owners are a very small percentage of the population and can easily be outvoted in an election. You'd be better off saying that those who voted for this should never complain about the results. They should be happy since they got what they voted for. However, those who didn't vote for it, deserve our support. Your single vote can't defeat the delusions of the army of radical socialists. They're getting what they want and that's the total destruction of the capitalist system.
2
@anfran7262 Could well be. His comment sure does sound like computer generated word salad. I can't say for sure. There are people who love California and most of them make a lot of money and don't have to live the lives that most of us have to live. Either way, I have no use for trolls and bots and also for those who, because they have the money, won't see or don't care about the reality of life for those not as fortunate as them. It's the "I'm okay, Jack. Everything's fine" attitude of a lot of the elites.
2
@MakerInMotion He stood up against America till the country went into bankruptcy and the people were starving. Sounds like a wonderful leader.
1
@MakerInMotion I'm sorry. I'm not always on the ball, LOL. However, standing up to America wasn't the way for him to go. He should have ignored America, worked on improving the oil infrastructure, which was in bad shape, and stop nationalising everything in sight. Instead, he created an outside enemy, America, so to distract the people of Venezuela from figuring out who the REAL enemy was. It was the radical socialists, including Chavez, who were the real enemies.
1
It's a 3rd world country with an elitist upper class. California is becoming like the land in "The Hunger Games". Starving and struggling masses and elitists running the show.
1
@Scaley_Reptile I have no problem with the rich. I have a problem with a rich, elitist class who have all kinds of ideas that negatively affect ordinary people. You don't need money to enjoy life. You need hope and a meaning to life. California elitist are robbing the people of both.
1
Cenk's nephew is the perfect bot....a walking, talking, cliche generator and he looks so real. The wonders of modern technology.
1
I've connected the dots and Jussie is a liar.
1
@gwuengr2 Let's ignore the elephant in the room. People are leaving California in droves. The population has been going down since 2020 and it's the first time in California history. They're taking their money, their skills and their jobs with them. Companies that have left California since 2020.....Chevron, SpaceX, Oracle, Hewlett Packard, Tesla, Neutrogena, Unical Aviation, Kelly-Moore Paints, Boingo Wireless, Hyperion, First Foundation Bank....and that's not even CLOSE to all of them. I'll name even more if you want. Tens of thousands of jobs...GONE. Billions of dollars.....gone and it's only going to get worse. "He's getting a big pension". That should explain the problems in California. LOL. Get your head out of the sand.
1
@matthewhopkins666 It's what he was aiming for. He WANTED this to be a national scandal and he knew that he had the criteria, black and gay, that would fit the media hysteria surrounding MAGA. Had the Chicago PD not made this a priority, he would have been crying on the media, just like he did in those exclusive videos, that no one cares if a black gay guy was assaulted by white supremacists. Jussie knew and hoped that it was going to be front page news and he ran with it.
1
@matthewhopkins666 Of course they overreacted. We all know that and Jussie knew that they would. They overreacted because the political climate was such that it was inevitable. Jussie played to that climate. His problem was that his story was ridiculous and it didn't take much for the police to figure out that it was a hoax. It's the fault of the media that wanted this to be true. This goes far beyond the PD. The media didn't have to cover it the way that they did but it fit their narrative and Jussie used them AND the PD to serve his own agenda. This isn't about the police. It's about a twisted political narrative that's looking for trouble and then blowing it all out of proportion. It's a good thing it was winter and bitter cold. This could have sparked riots and the media would have LOVED that.
1
@matthewhopkins666 It was Jussie that reported a fake assault and then LIED to the police. That's a crime. It's not a crime for the police to overreact. It's stupid but not a crime.
1
@Emil.H No....they allowed fellow Nazis to run private businesses and put Party agents into the factories to make sure that the workers were falling in line with Party ideas. That made the unions redundant and besides, you couldn't have unions opposing government interests. The party told the owners what to produce, how much and where to get their raw material and equipment. They provided the workers for them, including near slave labour so the factories could operate with lower labour costs. Don't do it and you lost your business. It was a complete takeover of the business except for the letterhead but the Nazi Party ran the business by controlling the owner, management, unions and workers. A different style of socialism but not a lot different than communism. The company worked on the direction of the Party, not on the direction of a free market economy. The latter is Capitalism. The former is not.
1