Youtube comments of Jack Haveman (@JackHaveman52).

  1. 3000
  2. 2100
  3. 1300
  4. 1200
  5. 1000
  6. 832
  7. 783
  8. 677
  9. 667
  10. 545
  11. 533
  12. 523
  13. 472
  14. 460
  15. 426
  16. 411
  17. 402
  18. 375
  19. 370
  20. 290
  21. 245
  22. 242
  23. 218
  24. 205
  25. 202
  26. 200
  27. 195
  28. 194
  29. 180
  30. 179
  31. 174
  32. 165
  33. 160
  34. 158
  35. 151
  36. 147
  37. 131
  38. 129
  39. 128
  40. 127
  41. 126
  42. 124
  43. 123
  44. 121
  45. 118
  46. 116
  47. 108
  48. 108
  49. 107
  50. 107
  51. 102
  52. 100
  53. 100
  54. 93
  55. 92
  56. 87
  57. 82
  58. 80
  59. 79
  60. 77
  61. 77
  62. 76
  63. 75
  64. 74
  65. 72
  66. 71
  67. 70
  68. 69
  69. 69
  70. 68
  71. 68
  72. 68
  73. 68
  74. 67
  75. 67
  76. 66
  77. 66
  78. 63
  79. 62
  80. 62
  81. 61
  82. 61
  83. 60
  84. 60
  85. 59
  86. 59
  87. 58
  88. 57
  89. 56
  90. 56
  91. 55
  92. 55
  93. 55
  94. 55
  95. 55
  96. 53
  97. 53
  98. 52
  99. 52
  100. 52
  101. 51
  102. 51
  103. 51
  104. 50
  105. 50
  106. 50
  107. 49
  108. 49
  109. 48
  110. 48
  111. 47
  112. 47
  113. 47
  114. 47
  115. 47
  116. 46
  117. 46
  118. 46
  119. 46
  120. 45
  121. 45
  122. 45
  123. 44
  124. 44
  125. 44
  126. 44
  127. 44
  128. 44
  129. 44
  130. 44
  131. 43
  132. 43
  133. 43
  134. 43
  135. 43
  136. 43
  137. 42
  138. 42
  139. 42
  140. 41
  141. 41
  142. 41
  143. 41
  144. 41
  145. 41
  146. 41
  147. 41
  148. 41
  149. 41
  150. 41
  151. 40
  152. 40
  153. 40
  154. 40
  155. 39
  156. 39
  157. 39
  158. 39
  159. 38
  160. 38
  161. 38
  162. 38
  163. 38
  164. 37
  165. 37
  166. 37
  167. 37
  168. 37
  169. 37
  170. 37
  171. 37
  172. 36
  173. 36
  174. 36
  175. 36
  176. 36
  177. 36
  178. 36
  179. 36
  180. 35
  181. 35
  182. 35
  183. 35
  184. 35
  185. 35
  186. 35
  187. 35
  188. 35
  189. 35
  190. 34
  191. 34
  192. 34
  193. 34
  194. 34
  195. 34
  196. 33
  197. 33
  198. 33
  199. 33
  200. 33
  201. 33
  202. 32
  203. 32
  204. 32
  205. 32
  206. 32
  207. 32
  208. 32
  209. 32
  210. 32
  211. 32
  212. 31
  213. 31
  214. 31
  215. 31
  216. 31
  217. 31
  218. 31
  219. 31
  220. 31
  221. 30
  222. 30
  223. 30
  224. 30
  225. 30
  226. 30
  227. 30
  228. 30
  229. 29
  230. 29
  231. 29
  232. 29
  233. 29
  234. 29
  235. 28
  236. 28
  237. 28
  238. 28
  239. 28
  240. 28
  241. 28
  242. 28
  243. 28
  244. 28
  245. Boris B That's not an example. That's an observation on how some people draw conclusions from little to no real evidence. You just slotted Peterson into that group of people and not assert that it must be true because Feynman is a high profile source. It's an appeal to authority. Human behaviour is not an exact science. Ten different people can respond in different ways to the exact same stimuli and, unless one has previous information on the personality traits of each individual, one can't know what their response will be. Instead, you make observations and try to establish trends in behaviour and try to find why these behaviours are the same and different. That's all that social sciences can do. Peterson has talked about male and female traits and has referred to statistics that show trends in their respective behaviours which overlap and differ. It's not an exact science because one can't accurately predict how a specific person will behave. One can make assumptions on statistical traits that have been extensively observed, but that's as far as one can go. That's not pseudo-science if you declare the inaccuracy rates and acknowledge the limitations of you data. Another example is how a doctor can predict death rates of an outbreak of a disease by saying the approximate percentage of those who will die. They'll base it on data gathered from previous outbreaks. It gives a ballpark figure, but one can't really know for sure. There is always room for error when your only source is data and variables are so varied that all can't be accounted for in a prediction. Now, back to a solid example of Peterson's preaching. One that refers to Peterson.
    28
  246. 27
  247. 27
  248. 27
  249. 27
  250. 27
  251. 27
  252. 27
  253. 27
  254. 27
  255. 27
  256. 27
  257. 27
  258. 27
  259. 26
  260. 26
  261. 26
  262. 26
  263. 26
  264. 25
  265. 25
  266. 25
  267. 25
  268. 25
  269. 25
  270. 25
  271. 25
  272. 25
  273. 25
  274.  @bernardjameswilson  He didn't just wake up and said "This country now sucks". This was a process that started about 30 years, or so, ago. Where, at one time, life was free and you could work and reap the rewards, more and more restrictions were placed on our lives. It became harder and harder to get good medical care, in spite of the advances in medicine. Laws and more laws became the norm. Insurance and government regulations became more and more intrusive. People expected more and more from the government and that meant more taxes and more laws. If you didn't live the change, you can't understand it. As an example. We live in a small town of 1800 people. We had 3 doctors and they were all available at any time of day. Now there's none. 7 service stations. Now there's 1. He operated a small farm and he did maintenance on his own equipment. Now it's impossible because it's all electronics and you could lose your warranty if you even tried to work on it. We had a landing at the back door, made of cement that replaced a wooden landing back in 1966. 7 years ago, his insurance company told him that he would no longer be covered if he didn't put a railing on it, so my brother and I did it. This rule was mandated by a government agency. We didn't lose our freedom to a marching army, like he saw from invading Nazis. Instead it was a slow encroachment of government controls, regulations and mandates and EVERY time it was an assault on his wallet and freedom. He's now 92 and it doesn't matter as much to him because he's at the end of his days but he's not blind, either. We're losing our freedoms, one law and regulation at a time and the slow relentless of it doesn't hit like tsunami. We're more like frogs in boiling water. I've seen it because I'm 70 years old. My daughter hasn't seen the change but she knows something is wrong. The way things are going, my grandchildren will never be able to afford their own homes. I feel so bad for their futures....even their present but the regulations keep coming, tying our hands in a tighter and tighter grip. They will never live the lives that my dad or even I've had. That freedom has slowly evaporated away. It isn't that we had it so good. It's that the good that we had is being lost and the ability to work hard that allowed to build good lives from nothing, has been taken away from those who have to live today.
    25
  275. 25
  276. 25
  277. 25
  278. 24
  279. 24
  280. 24
  281. 24
  282. 24
  283. 24
  284.  @jberrocalucf  He's NOT intersex. He has XY chromosomes, which means that he's male. He may have a condition in which his genitals don't appear like it should. However, the rest of his body is a male body. Also, testosterone isn't the only difference. The genetics of having XY chromosomes would give that person greater bone density. Their stance would be different due to a woman's need to have a pelvic region that would safely accommodate child birth. That would add extra leverage to throw a punch. The shoulders are different as well which means 50% greater shoulder strength to the male, according to the National Institute of Health. This has been programmed into the very genetic differences between men and women. The testosterone may add muscle strength but the physicality of the male, denser bones, pelvic and shoulder differences, greater lung capacity, bigger hearts.....all add to the advantages of one that is born with XY chromosomes. To add, Ali had greater boxing skills than Foreman but Ali also had the advantage of having the bone density, the shoulder strength to counter punch, the leverage of his male stance, male lung capacity and the strength of his larger male heart to offset the muscle size of Foreman. The Italian boxer doesn't have any of those advantages over her XY opponent to offset the testosterone advantage. Genetics is exceptionally important and as for the outrage? I have 2 grand daughters who play rugby. This scares me and I have every right to be afraid and outraged if this happened to the girls that I love.
    24
  285. 24
  286. 24
  287. 24
  288. 24
  289. 24
  290. 24
  291. 24
  292. 24
  293. 24
  294. 24
  295. 24
  296. 24
  297. 24
  298. 24
  299. 24
  300. 24
  301. 24
  302. 24
  303. 23
  304. 23
  305.  @erichufnagel3474  They didn't go broke. They are being FORCED to stop farming. The Netherlands was one of the most productive farming nations in the world and farmers were prospering and were 2nd, in terms of finances, in food exports. It's ideology that shutting those farms down. Also, for the rest of the farms to remain profitable, food prices will have to go up, affecting the poorest people of the nation. As this "food" ideology spreads around the world, food production will go down and prices will go up. It's basic economics. That will have a HUGE impact on the 3rd world. Sri Lanka tried the same thing as the Netherlands are now and their food production went down around 30%. That's devastating for a poor nation. Inflation went from around 5% to over 130% in 2 years. You're doing what you're doing on your own choice and at your own pace. If it doesn't work, you can slow it down or reverse those choices where it hurt you, financially, the most. Dutch farmers aren't given that option. As a world wide practice, this could spark outright starvation. The Covid epidemic lockdowns have forced over 250 million people BACK into abject poverty. Abject poverty is earning less than $1.90 A DAY, American. Not an hour....A DAY. They make LESS in a week than the minimum wage per hour in California or where I live, in Ontario, Canada. If you force food production down...how many MORE people are going to be facing that kind of oppressive poverty and starvation. These are UN numbers. All this to appease the idea of "responsible eating" as described by Klaus Schwab of the WEF.....a millionaire elitist who believes that he knows how to "reset" the world in his own image. He's convinced all his fellow elitists and industrialists that this is the way to go and it's going to destroy the most prosperous economies this planet has ever seen. The prospects are horrific.
    23
  306. 23
  307. 23
  308. 23
  309. 23
  310. 23
  311. 23
  312. 23
  313. 23
  314. 23
  315. 23
  316. 22
  317. 22
  318. 22
  319. 22
  320. 22
  321. 22
  322. 22
  323. 22
  324. 22
  325. 22
  326. 22
  327. 22
  328. 22
  329. 22
  330. 22
  331. 22
  332. 22
  333. 22
  334. 22
  335. 22
  336. 22
  337. 22
  338. 22
  339. 21
  340. 21
  341. 21
  342. 21
  343. 21
  344. 21
  345. 21
  346. 21
  347.  @gabepizza  The media is, by proxy, slamming all those who are fighting the virus. Jim Acosta, going on about lack of PPE's and masks and that he heard if from "un-named" administrators is slamming FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers, all the top medical people like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brix. It's not only asking why Trump didn't act sooner. It's asking why the good Doctors didn't use their influence and expertise to expose the lack of caring from Trump. Why didn't Acosta frame his questions differently. He could have NAMED an administrator that was having problems getting needed material and asked what this guy should do to help in acquiring things that is needed. Challenge the president to offer solutions. Trump said that they had the needed equipment. Have him show the chain of procurement and how it works. Ask the president, POLITELY, what department this administrator should contact. Instead, he leaves the impression that he never did talk to any administrator and this entire dialogue was engineered by Jim Acosta as vehicle of denigration, bereft of facts and unfounded allegations. If Trump would have come through, Acosta would have done a good turn by helping people in dire need. If Trump had failed in any capacity, Acosta would have shown where Trump was failing. No conjecture. No vague allegations but a real time line of events. However, Acosta would NEVER do that because if Trump came through, THAT would counter the news picture that Acosta was trying to paint. It's not about the news or the facts, it's political theatre and that has nothing to do with being a Trump supporter or not. Acosta is a journalist...not the opposition party. You can apply that same weakness to almost all the MSM.
    21
  348. 21
  349. 21
  350. 21
  351. 21
  352. 21
  353. 21
  354. 21
  355. 21
  356. 21
  357. 21
  358. 21
  359. 21
  360. 21
  361. 21
  362. 21
  363. 21
  364. 20
  365. 20
  366. 20
  367. 20
  368. 20
  369. 20
  370. 20
  371. 20
  372. 20
  373. 20
  374. 20
  375. 20
  376. 20
  377. 20
  378. 20
  379. 20
  380. 20
  381. 20
  382. 20
  383. 20
  384. 20
  385. 20
  386. 19
  387. 19
  388. 19
  389. 19
  390. 19
  391. 19
  392. 19
  393. 19
  394. 19
  395. 19
  396. 19
  397. 19
  398. 19
  399. 19
  400. 19
  401. 19
  402. 19
  403. 19
  404. 19
  405. 19
  406. 19
  407. 19
  408. 19
  409. 19
  410. 19
  411. 19
  412. 19
  413. 19
  414. 19
  415. 19
  416. 19
  417. 19
  418. 18
  419. 18
  420. 18
  421. 18
  422. 18
  423. 18
  424. 18
  425. 18
  426. 18
  427. 18
  428. 18
  429. 18
  430. 18
  431. 18
  432. 18
  433. 18
  434. 18
  435. 18
  436. 18
  437. 18
  438. 18
  439. 18
  440. 18
  441. 18
  442. 18
  443. 18
  444. 18
  445. 18
  446. 18
  447. 18
  448. 18
  449. 18
  450. 18
  451. 18
  452. 18
  453. 18
  454. 17
  455. 17
  456. 17
  457. 17
  458. 17
  459. 17
  460. 17
  461. 17
  462. 17
  463. 17
  464. 17
  465. 17
  466. 17
  467. 17
  468. 17
  469. 17
  470. 17
  471. 17
  472. 17
  473. 17
  474. 17
  475. 17
  476. 17
  477. 17
  478. 17
  479. 17
  480. 16
  481. 16
  482. 16
  483. 16
  484. 16
  485. 16
  486. 16
  487. 16
  488. 16
  489. 16
  490. 16
  491. 16
  492. 16
  493. 16
  494. 16
  495. 16
  496. 16
  497. 16
  498. 16
  499. 16
  500. 16
  501. 16
  502. 16
  503. 16
  504. 16
  505. 16
  506. 16
  507. 16
  508. 16
  509. 16
  510.  Jack Richardson  You're just unbelievable. Beyond it. How is it possible that a person could be that intentionally obtuse as to call Andy Ngo a Fascist. You don't even know what it is. Antifa stages riots, in Portland, for over 120 days in a row....that's FOUR MONTHS of continuous rioting. Patriot Prayer shows up for one day and it's the end of the world for people. You really don't have a clue. Now, before you accuse ME of being Fascist, I'm not a big fan of either Patriot Prayer or the Proud Boys. They're playing silly games. However to equate them with Antifa and their violence is so stupid that you have to be lying about it. I have to add that REAL Fascists nearly starved my mother to death during WW2 and put my uncle in a Jewish detention camp, until they found out he wasn't Jewish and put him in a POW camp until the war ended. I have no love for Fascists. Also, do you know what the East German government called the Berlin Wall? They called it the "Antifaschistischer Schutzwall" which translate to English as the "Anti-Fascist Protection Rampart". Antifa is short for "Anti-Fascist". The East Germans would stand on that "Rampart" and shoot to kill any East German that tried to leave East Germany. You see, they thought that EVERYONE in the west was a Fascist, exactly what the members of Antifa in the US believe. Everyone, that's not them or doesn't believe in their Marxist agenda, is a Fascist. That's almost EVERY American. You're either a Marxist or you're as delusional as they get.
    16
  511.  @raystory7059  Empty weight of a B-25 bomber is about 10 tons. The empty weight of a 737 is about 45 tons. The bomber was flying slowly, around 200 mph, because of the fog and he didn't want to hit anything. The planes on 9/11 were travelling twice as fast and wanted to hit those buildings as hard as they could. The Empire State Building had a different basic support structure and facade than the Twin Towers. These factors could easily account for the differences in the final result. Do you know what other buildings weren't hit by planes on 9/11? WTC3, 4, 5 and 6, yet these buildings were also demolished that day. Do you know why? Tens of thousands of tons of debris crashing into them from the falling towers. Building 7 also suffered massive damage from thousands of tons of debris. Check out this picture of the damage at one corner of WTC7. http://conspiracies.skepticproject.com/images/articles/911-images/wtc7-side-damage1.jpg A huge cut, into the bottom of the building, 10 stories high, that's 1/3 of the height, and 1/4 of the way into the building......GONE. I'll bet money that you wouldn't live or work in that building if it didn't fall. Do you know why? You'd be afraid that it wasn't structurally safe or secure and you'd be correct. Only a fool would have taken residence there. It was only a matter of time before it did fall. How do I know that it was hit by debris from the falling North Tower? Video of the collapse shows it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEgPNNcdtu4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 Watch these videos. They show how much debris hit building 7 and how it didn't need to be hit by a plane to be structurally compromised. Listen to this fireman talking about the burning building 7 BEFORE the collapse and how it was leaning and there was nothing they could do to stop it from collapsing. He even said that this was because they couldn't put the fires out and the flames added to the structural damage of the building. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8 You're making a superficial argument with no real evidence except for your incredulity. "You can't tell me" isn't evidence. It's a defence for a statement of conjecture and that's all you've done.
    16
  512. 16
  513. 16
  514. 16
  515. 16
  516. 16
  517. 16
  518. 16
  519. 16
  520. 16
  521. 16
  522. 16
  523. 16
  524. 16
  525. 16
  526. Boris B Your reference to Feynman was an appeal to authority. He's a very high profile scientific figure and his opinions carry weight. It's not as if you used Joe Blow down at the hardware store. You went to a Nobel Prize physicist who gave an opinion, then you placed Peterson into the category that this physicist talked about. That's the very definition of an appeal to authority. "I've thought about this for many years, and, though it's very hard to explain, I really believe it's true" What's this? A professor is NEVER allowed to give an opinion? He even implies that it's an idea that he's formulated. "I really believe it's true." That's not declaring it as fact. That's admitting that it's only him that believes it to be true. He does use statistics but he uses them as they should be. He has used them to show how personality trends differ in men and women. For example, he talked about asking, about a random woman and random man, which of the two would be the more aggressive and if you picked the man, you'd be correct 60 percent of the time. Then he added that 40 percent of the time, you'd be wrong. Why? Because that aligns with the statistical data. He didn't definitely say that men are more aggressive, period and end of story. He said that an assertion could only be applied correctly, 60 percent of the time. He then uses it to say that it means that the outliers of aggressiveness would tend to be overwhelmingly male and says that the facts do bear this out, for example, the predominance of the male population in prison. Peterson has declared himself to be a nominal Christian but he doesn't use those Christian beliefs as absolutes in his lectures. He uses them to show religious archetypes and tries to show how archetypes are developed in literature and religion to reflect and explain how humans have developed emotionally. He uses Christianity the most because that's what he's most familiar with, but he also uses other religious idea in his attempt to understand human psychological development. He presents it in such a way that a belief in a specific religion is necessary to understand how religious thought was a big part of human evolution of cognitive thought. Religious beliefs are not necessary to understand his ideas of archetypes in religion and it's not an exact science because he does use the phrase "I've thought about it a long time" continuously in his lectures. Psychology is a work in progress at all times and those in the field are trying to grapple with things that are difficult to nail down. Peterson is grappling with the psychology of religion and morality. There are no "Eureka!!!" moments in these disciplines. No definitive test tube results. There are indicators, like the Miller-Urey experiments that show that certain processes in the formation of life CAN happen naturally. It may not be the correct process but it does show the possibility to be true. You still haven't shown me an example of his preaching. Just because he became emotional when remembered some of the horrific cases that he's dealt with from his clinical practice, doesn't mean he's a preacher. It could just mean that he's human and has typical human emotions. It's an assertion that you have no way of proving but you like it because you've decided that you don't like the guy. Understandable maybe, but not exactly a valid assertion. A real example of his preaching. I like Michael Shermer and his ideas, a lot, but you're not showing me how they apply to Peterson. You see, that's where an actual example of what you're claiming would come in. That's how you show that you have something that might indicate what you say has a least some merit. It may not eliminate ALL that he's said but then again, no one is correct 100 percent of the time. One incorrect idea doesn't NOT invalidate everything a person says. We'd have to dismiss every assertion made using that as a criteria. Even Einstein made mistakes and offered claims that proved to be incorrect.
    16
  527. 16
  528. 16
  529. 16
  530. 16
  531. Connor Barnes As what was mentioned earlier, by your comment you have shown that you do NOT understand the meaning of the word "theory" as it is used in science. In science, a theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world which is substantiated by a set of numerous facts from different areas of science. All these facts are examined and a logical model is created that explains why a phenomenon, such as speciation, is being observed. From there, new tests are devised to test certain aspects of the theory to see if that theory will continue to stand. Thus far, for over 150 years, tests from numerous disciplines of science have shown the theory of evolution to still be a viable explanation. These are tests involving chemistry, biology, physics, genetics, geology, embryology and more and after all the tests that have been completed, there still are no tests that have shown the theory of evolution to be a false explanation. This video is just a part of the tests and experiments that have been done. You say that this is your opinion. That is not how science works....at all. Science works on a body of evidence. If all the evidence supports a theory, the theory will stand as a viable explanation. Until tests or experiments are done that arrive at conclusions that would show that evolution to be impossible, then that theory will fall. It hasn't happened yet, in spite of what some hardcore creationists like to claim. There are still aspects of the evolutionary process that are still not understood. That doesn't make evolution wrong. It just means it's not understood. 30 years ago, science had no idea if the genetic code would support evolution. The code had not been mapped yet. Since then, it has been mapped and everything that they predicted that must be true in genetics for it prove evolution to be correct has turned out to validate evolution. They'll keep searching, just like they have for 150 years, to understand it better and if history is to be an indication of what to expect, the search will continue to validate evolution. I know you won't change your mind. You've decided that your OPINION is the arbiter of science. I'm afraid it's not. No one's opinion is.
    16
  532. 15
  533. 15
  534. 15
  535. 15
  536. 15
  537. 15
  538. 15
  539. 15
  540. 15
  541. 15
  542. 15
  543. 15
  544. 15
  545. 15
  546. 15
  547. 15
  548. 15
  549. 15
  550. 15
  551. 15
  552. 15
  553. 15
  554.  @viktorkc1154  You can't have socialism without authoritarianism. He may have believed in socialism but he didn't have the political experience to see that socialism will always end in tyranny. Stalin himself declared the Soviet Union as socialist and that it was an intermediary to a full communist state. Capitalism is defined as " an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state". Online dictionary. This will be verified by any other source that you could name. There is no way the Soviet Union's economy way held and controlled by the private sector. The economy was centrally planned and the goal was to abolish all private property. Socialism requires the co-operation of all. It is the rule of tyranny as every citizen is compelled to make sure no other citizen isn't taking advantage of the system. Capitalism allows the individual to make his own decision on his economic life and financial future. Socialism doesn't. This is Socialism as defined by the online dictionary. "a political and economic theory of social organisation which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." The community being the state. No private sector. The community controls the economic system and is regulated by the state. An individual cannot build his own business or make decisions on how that business should grow. That is authoritarianism and it is the default position for socialism.
    15
  555. 15
  556. 15
  557. 15
  558. 15
  559. 15
  560. 15
  561. 15
  562. 15
  563. 15
  564. 15
  565. 15
  566. 15
  567. 15
  568.  @holthogan5562  Yes it was an emergency. How the media reacted though was appalling. Florida, with the largest elderly population in the US, didn't have the casualties that New York did. Why? Because the governor of Florida understood who was the most vulnerable and then made a concerted effort to protect that demographic. And it worked. Not New York though. First, it told everyone that this was nothing, go out, have a good time, go to the Chinese New Year's Parade, because the Chinese travel ban was racist. Then, when everything went south, they panicked and locked EVERYTHING up, but refused help from a religious group, told Trump they didn't have ventilators, hardly used the facilities set up or the medic ship and then put Covid patients in nursing homes. All this and the media pretended that Cuomo might be a good candidate for the presidency. Then, only 5 days after calling people insane for going to a pool, they called the BLM protesters, good Americans, even after it led to tens of millions of dollars damage, destroyed lives and businesses, people ended up dead and injured and buildings burned to the ground. Hey, but those protesters, that "stormed" the Michigan legislature were thugs and white supremacists and just plain detestable people even though not one punch was thrown, one shot was fired, no windows smashed, no stores looted, no buildings burned and they cleaned up the legislature before they left. Like one store owner said. There were thousands of protesters walking shoulder to shoulder past his store but he wasn't allowed to sell anyone of them a t-shirt because the Covid threat was too dangerous. That's what we're upset about. The insanity of how it was dealt with. "Shame and blame" just like Chris Cuomo said. That's what you got from the media and the left and he was proud of it.
    15
  569. 15
  570. 15
  571. 15
  572. 15
  573. 15
  574. 15
  575. 15
  576. 15
  577. 14
  578. 14
  579. 14
  580. 14
  581. 14
  582. 14
  583. 14
  584. 14
  585. 14
  586. 14
  587. 14
  588.  @skknireeker9073  And that's the logic that's can't be argued against. I say that the transgender has biological advantages and you say "But they're women". I say that they weren't women a year ago so their bodies still have male qualities that give them advantages and you say "But they're women". I point out that it's telling that a transgender absolutely SMASHES the women's weightlifting record in their first year of eligibility and you say "But he's a woman". I say 2 transgenders, who couldn't make the boy's high school track team last year, break the girl's state high school track records and you say "But they're women". They're are no facts, no anomalies, no sudden amount of women's records being broken by transgender athletes that will ever make you stop and think about the implications. All you'll keep repeating, like a demented parrot, is...."BUT THEY'RE WOMEN" This is unbelievably lacking in intellectual discourse or logic or any consideration for fairness. No human being, with even a modicum of integrity, would EVER claim bragging rights, by wearing an Olympic medal, when they've went form a category of sports where they were mediocre at best, to one where they're now the superstar. Integrity would demand that this should be a source of shame. We have weight classes in sports for a reason. We don't just say "But they're all women" and call that a reason to do away with weight classes. Calling them women does not negate the fact that they're also transgenders, something that a lot of the women's athletes cannot claim. To your mind, all transwomen are women. You'll never admit that not all women are transwomen and that this could be where the REAL problem lies. You only want to examine YOUR side of the coin.
    14
  589. 14
  590. 14
  591. 14
  592.  @makeytgreatagain6256  Do I have to show you the definition of "chattel" AGAIN. Here you go. I'll make it as it pertain to slavery. From the Merriam-Webster dictionary: an enslaved person held as the legal property of another. If you SELL someone, as a slave, they're chattel. It's what the word means. There's NO such thing as NICE slavery. You're either a slave or you're NOT as slave, free to leave or FORCED to stay. When Bulgarians sold Slavic captives to the Turks, they were chattel. The Turks, in turn, sold them all over the Middle East...as chattel. It wasn't nice. It wasn't friendly and NOT ONE SLAV went willingly. Slavery was legal, in some Middle Eastern countries till very recently. In fact, the slave trade was held quite open in Constantinople until 1908. It was then that the trade of Zanj women, who came from the coast of Eastern Africa, and the Circassian women, from north of the Caucasus, was abolished. These women were forced to travel thousands of miles to be sold. Oman abolished slavery in 1970. In MY lifetime. I remember it being in the news. Slavery in Saudi Arabia and Yemen was abolished in 1962, due to pressure from the British government. Not "nice" slavery, either. REAL slavery. In China, it was finally abolished in 1910 after thousands of years of legality. You think that somehow being FORCED to work in the salt mines of Mali was much better than picking cotton in Alabama. Both were awful. While I think that slavery is appalling no matter where it is, YOU seem to think only certain types of slavery should be demonised. If you're held against your will, forced to labour with no pay or used for sex against your will....YOU are a slave. It doesn't matter if you're the only one in town or if there are hundreds of slaves there, it's appalling when the state or ruling class allows it under the law and that has happened all over the world for thousands of years. You want to use the slave trade, of the past, as a rationalisation for your hatred. I want to use that history to show that we're ALL human, given to the excesses that is a part of all humanity. Also, my family originated in Poland. We weren't known for engaging in the trans-Atlantic slave trade although we were likely to trade our fellow citizens to the Turks and other middle easterners. A terrible time in our past but there it is. It was a terrible time in human history....unless you find it important to hate certain demographics. Then we'll just keep pointing fingers at one another till we finally destroy each other.
    14
  593. 14
  594. 14
  595. 14
  596. 14
  597. 14
  598. 14
  599. 14
  600. 14
  601. 14
  602. 14
  603. 14
  604. 14
  605. 14
  606. 14
  607. 14
  608. 14
  609. 14
  610. 14
  611. 14
  612. 14
  613. 14
  614. 14
  615. 14
  616. 14
  617. 14
  618. 14
  619. 14
  620. 14
  621. 14
  622. 14
  623. 14
  624. 14
  625. 14
  626. 14
  627. 14
  628. 14
  629. 14
  630. 14
  631. 14
  632. 14
  633. 14
  634. 13
  635. 13
  636. 13
  637. 13
  638. 13
  639. 13
  640. 13
  641. 13
  642. 13
  643. 13
  644. 13
  645. 13
  646. 13
  647. 13
  648. 13
  649. 13
  650. 13
  651. 13
  652. 13
  653. 13
  654. 13
  655. 13
  656. 13
  657. 13
  658. 13
  659. 13
  660. 13
  661. 13
  662. 13
  663. 13
  664. 13
  665. 13
  666. 13
  667. 13
  668.  @pavango3812  I know that this is going to sound redundant but.....a BIG BUT......you need ID to work. You need a social security number. If you don't have one, you can't file your income taxes. You could have thousands of dollars owing to you and you can't get it because YOU DON'T HAVE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. What kind of an idiot would do that? If you're working and you don't have a SS#, you're working illegally. You can't pay taxes. A drug dealer or a pimp doesn't need an SS#. A clerk at a 7/11 has one. If you want a drink, just one, you need ID. You need it to buy cigarettes. You need ID to open a bank account. To pick up a package at the Post Office, YOU NEED ID. If, for some weird reason, like you've never worked, had a bank account, have never smoked or drank alcohol, never travelled so you don't have a passport, don't have a driver's licence, never had a student card, never applied for welfare, have never needed to see a doctor, never had a Credit Card, never used food stamps or have NEVER, in your life, had to prove who you are....you can STILL get an ID, FREE of charge, from the Georgia government. If you can't get a FREE ID before the 2022 election, then I'm sorry to accuse you of not wanting to vote all that badly. This idea that needing to show ID suppresses voting is the most spurious argument that I've heard in a long time and deep down you know it. This is all about tribal politics. In fact, the claim that showing ID to vote is the real racist claim. Black people aren't little children. They do the same things that everyone else does. They're cops, doctors, teachers, mailmen, nurses, store clerks, government workers, carpenters and accountants.....JUST LIKE WHITE PEOPLE. They're adults. Quit treating them like children.
    13
  669.  @11kravitzn  You are sorely misinformed about the histories of the Democrat and Republican parties. The Republican Party formed in 1854 to fight against slavery, specifically the Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854. The act was to create the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and would repeal the Missouri Compromise, allowing slavery to part of those 2 territories. This act was drafted by Stephan Douglas, a Democrat Senator. This started a series of conflicts against that act and the idea of allowing slaves in the new territories. The Republican Party was formed to fight against that act that allowed slavery. When the Civil War started, there was no Republican representation in the Southern states. None. After the Civil war, segregation was enforced by the Klu Klux Klan, an arm of the Democrat party. It was a Democrat, George Wallace, that delivered the famous line "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" in 1963. Wallace ran, in the presidential primaries, through the 70s, as a Democrat and as a staunch supporter of segregation. He fought against Civil Rights and against the integration of blacks and whites students in public schools. I don't know where you got your information but a simple google search will confirm everything that I told you. Blacks started to vote Democrat in the 1930s because of Roosevelt's "New Deal", for the first time in American history. Before that, they'd always voted Republican and the Republican Party had grown in the south after the Civil War because of the Black Republicans. The New Deal was the big shift in black politics, yet it was mostly Democrats that fought against the repealing of the Jim Crow laws thirty years later. Don't believe me. Learn about American political history. These are facts that Democrats like to keep hidden and one can hardly blame them for that. It might be time to stop pointing fingers and to take responsibility for ourselves as individual human beings instead of aligning ourselves into groups who will say anything to malign their opposition.
    13
  670. 13
  671. 13
  672. 13
  673. 13
  674. 13
  675. 13
  676. 13
  677. 13
  678. 13
  679. 13
  680. 13
  681. 13
  682.  @randylachance  Trump was being sarcastic when he wished her well. He was saying that she didn't end up like Epstein. Dark humour. That's why Fox didn't report on it. It's not newsworthy. If Trump was as corrupt as you say, you'd think he'd get the Feds, Bill Barr and company, to back off Maxwell. Instead, it's full steam ahead and now there's even more Clinton involvement. If the Democrats were so concerned with the Covid crisis, you'd think they'd discourage tens of thousands of people, in every city across the US, from marching arm in arm for weeks on end. Instead, they encourage it and then tell others they can't open their small businesses. You can march, throw bottles and bricks, fight with police officers, but go to the gym....that's dangerous. The biggest problem concerning Covid is the absolute refusal to work together. That's not the fault of Trump. It's the Democrats who take the opposite stance no matter what. They brag about their border barrier in 2015 and when Trump says he want to build a wall, that's racist. It's how they approach everything concerning Trump. He bans travel to China, that's xenophobic. He puts together a task force....they're just old white men. He mentions it in the State of the Union Address, Pelosi tears it up. He restricts travel to Europe.....that's not going to work. He says the HCQ might be useful in fighting Covid, it's now poison and some governors tried to outlaw it. The media even made a big deal of a couple that took fish tank cleaner because it had a form of HCQ in it. Fish tank cleaner ffs. Trump calls for a lockdown and New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California lock down Covid patients in nursing homes. The Commissioner of Health for Pennsylvania made that decision and promptly took her 95 year old mother OUT of a nursing home and put her up in a hotel. If the Democrats weren't so busy hating on Trump and would just sit down with him to find a solution, the country wouldn't be in the mess it is in now.....but they refuse. No matter what Trump does, they do the opposite. On everything. I'm not saying that Trump made good moves all the time but with a pandemic raging, you'd think the Democrats would reach out to try and solve this crisis together. NOT A CHANCE IN HELL. They'll fight him no matter what he does.
    13
  683. 13
  684. 13
  685. 13
  686. 13
  687. 13
  688. 13
  689. 13
  690. 13
  691. 13
  692. 13
  693. 13
  694. 13
  695. 13
  696. 13
  697. 13
  698. 12
  699. 12
  700. 12
  701. 12
  702. 12
  703. 12
  704. 12
  705. 12
  706. 12
  707. 12
  708. 12
  709. 12
  710. 12
  711. 12
  712.  @MrKGatl  It was the company that Biden's son was working for that was being investigated. Specifically the founder of the company, Mykola Zlochevsky, who had fled the company in 2014 and was living in London. He was Hunter Biden's boss. This guy had 23 MILLION dollars frozen, in lieu of the results of investigations into his activities. Strangely, shortly after this prosecutor was fired, that 23 millions dollars was released. The following year Zlockevsky was cleared of all charges and he returned to the Ukraine. Next thing you know, he was accused of graft, the result of telephone conversations he had with the current president of the Ukraine at the time. He was also accused of giving out bogus licenses to his own companies when he was Ecology Minister back in 2012. He's left the country again and is now living in Monaco. You have to ask yourself why Hunter Biden was working for an energy company in the Ukraine. He had zero experience in energy, was drummed out of the American military for testing positive for drugs, he couldn't speak the language and his boss benefited from the firing of the prosecutor by his father. That final point might be the only reason he was worth the 63,000 dollars he was making a month as an executive there. Even Marie Yovanovitch was briefed on the poor image of Hunter Biden working for a man who was suspected of corruption. That was revealed in her testimony. It was also mentioned by George Kent in his testimony and was reported on by Politico 3 years ago. The Obama administration wasn't comfortable about this situation, at all, so why wouldn't Trump want to look into it. Especially, with the video available where Joe Biden brags about telling the Ukraines that he was taking his money home with him if they didn't fire this specific prosecutor. Maybe it WAS all innocent but if it had been Donald Trump Jr. working for Burisma and a corrupt owner, would you be so forgiving? I doubt it.
    12
  713. 12
  714. 12
  715. 12
  716. 12
  717. 12
  718. 12
  719. 12
  720. 12
  721. 12
  722. 12
  723. 12
  724. 12
  725. 12
  726. 12
  727. 12
  728. 12
  729. 12
  730. 12
  731. 12
  732. 12
  733. 12
  734. 12
  735. 12
  736. 12
  737. 12
  738. 12
  739. 12
  740. 12
  741. 12
  742. 12
  743. 12
  744. 12
  745. 12
  746. 12
  747. 12
  748. 12
  749. 12
  750. 12
  751. 12
  752. 12
  753. 12
  754. 12
  755. 12
  756. 12
  757. 12
  758. 12
  759.  @bobshuwab1988  All those things you cited, medical care, schools, libraries.....are not part of the economy. The economy has to do with the means of production. If I go to a financial counsellor and we asses my financial position, he will never ask my health or education or whether I have a library card. That has nothing to do with economics or how wealth is created or distributed. That's where you're making your mistake. You have to have a strong and free economy in order to support strong social programs. As soon as you take away the ability for the individual to build their own economic portfolio, you take away innovation and advancement. You force the individual to adhere to someone else's vision of how their economic situation should develop and stunt their growth and innovation. Without that strong and innovative economy, you have no social contract, either. You take the freedom of the individual to buy and sell at their own behest and leave it to a centralised body who tells you what it is you want or produce. It is the economy of permission, of the bureaucrat who tells you what it is should have. That's why the first Soviet athletes that travelled to the west were astounded by the incredible array of products in our stores available to the average person. Each product produced by and through the desires and decisions of the individual. Each product taxed so that tax money could be used to support medical care, education, roads and so forth. That's why the capitalist countries were the richest and the socialist countries the poorest.
    12
  760. 12
  761. 12
  762. 12
  763. 12
  764. 12
  765. 12
  766. 12
  767. 12
  768. 12
  769. 12
  770. 12
  771. 12
  772. 12
  773. 12
  774.  GoldenState  The thing is that there are those who criticise Trump as a knee jerk reaction. The same ones that bragged about providing money to build a fence for border security at the Mexican border are calling him "racist" for wanting to build a wall for security. The inconsistency has reached the point of being ridiculous. Trump has just signed a prison reform bill with support from a great many Democrats but the MSM hardly reports on it. Trump signs into place an initiative to get involved in a UN effort to help women entrepreneurs around the world and MSM say nothing because it doesn't fit their "misogynist" narrative of the guy. MSM has hardly even mentioned his 800 million dollar economic opportunity zone initiative because that flies in the face of their "racist" claims. However, he gives the college football champs pizza and hamburgers, they act as if he poisoned them. They refuse to give him any credit for stopping the nuclear testing by the North Koreans and either ignore it or spin it so as to denigrate the guy. That's why the strong defence that his defenders are showing him. If they don't MSM would drown him in their hate. That doesn't mean he's always right, though. He has made proposals to cut SS and Medicare. I don't like that. I'm nervous about his support of the new government claims in Venezuela, as well, and worry that he may get involved militarily in their political mess. I don't like that idea at all. Trump shoots off at the mouth and will say the most embarrassing things. We all know that but we also know that he's been the most accessible president in modern history so we put up with his bombastic rhetoric. Guys like Acosta and Lemon just criticise continuously and can't even formulate a question to ask the president that isn't couched in a criticism or an attempt to trap him in some kind of inconsistency. Acosta could have the president's ear but he wastes his time attacking instead of asking. MSM wants to demonise the man and don't care about the issues and will use anyone to tear the guy apart. The prime example of this are how they treated the Covington kids. They could care less about what really happened. They saw an opportunity to use them against Trump and the consequences to those boys didn't matter. MSM has disgraced itself in how they report the news around Trump. A little honesty is all we ask for and they refuse to provide it.
    12
  775. 12
  776. 12
  777. 11
  778. 11
  779. 11
  780. 11
  781. 11
  782. 11
  783. 11
  784. 11
  785.  @Max-jm6md  My point is that when you believe that life is hard and then you die, is that you're not looking at the good things in life or that things can get better. The religious believe that implicitly but the secular have to believe it through their own nature and personality. The secular that believe the life is hard aren't feeling any gratitude for the good things in life. There are secular folk, ME INCLUDED, that love life and see hardship as a normal part of our good life and prospects but it's not integrated into a social belief system. It comes from within. That's the one thing that Christians do and Muslims do it too. They express gratitude for their lives, no matter how hard, through prayer. Gratitude is the big difference and the secular can have it, too. "Life is hard and then you die" is nihilistic and it offers nothing. To say "Life is hard but it's good" that's what allows one to work towards prosperity. Every person that I ever worked with that carried a negative attitude were always unhappy and quite often mired in debt. Be grateful, whether religious or not and you'll find that you're life will be happier. Also, the squeaky wheel gets the grease. The complainers are the ones that are heard and it's unacceptable to complain in a religious setting. However, the secular complainers are encouraged. That's what's happening now with all this talk about oppression and privilege. It's complaining that's actually being propagated in a lot of our schools. It's a complex topic and it needs a lot more attention than I can give in a YouTube comment section. I was only hoping to start people to thinking about why they're so upset about their lives so maybe they could work towards fixing it.
    11
  786. 11
  787. 11
  788. 11
  789. 11
  790. 11
  791. 11
  792. 11
  793. 11
  794. 11
  795. 11
  796. 11
  797. 11
  798. 11
  799. 11
  800. 11
  801. 11
  802. 11
  803. 11
  804. 11
  805. 11
  806. 11
  807. 11
  808. 11
  809. 11
  810. 11
  811. 11
  812. 11
  813. 11
  814. 11
  815. 11
  816. 11
  817. 11
  818. 11
  819. 11
  820. 11
  821. 11
  822. 11
  823. 11
  824. 11
  825. 11
  826. 11
  827. 11
  828. 11
  829. 11
  830. 11
  831. 11
  832. 11
  833. 11
  834. 11
  835. 11
  836. 11
  837. 11
  838. 11
  839. 11
  840. 11
  841. 11
  842. 11
  843. 11
  844. 11
  845. 11
  846. 11
  847. 11
  848. 11
  849. 11
  850. 11
  851. 11
  852. 11
  853. 11
  854. 11
  855. 11
  856. 11
  857. 11
  858. 11
  859. 11
  860. 11
  861. 11
  862. 11
  863. 11
  864. 11
  865. 11
  866. msc14111990 You're now resorting to gossip, huh. Well, this historian you speak of, Niall Ferguson, separated from his wife in 2010. He then started dating Ali. One year later, they got married and they have a son that was born in December of 2011, long after Ferguson had split up with his wife. If you're a Muslim, divorce is perfectly acceptable and allowed as well as getting remarried. So, all you're doing is engaging in gossip, the activity of the small and mean minded. As for being a coward. She spent years under threat of murder from Muslim radicals. She had to go into hiding and still has to be careful about making her whereabouts known to the general public. If she ever went back to Somalia, she'd be killed and YOU know it. That's not being a coward. That's being smart. As for helping people, she's wrote books showing that a religion, culture, skin colour and gender shouldn't stop a person from becoming their own person, an individual with freedom of thought and expression. When she took an aptitude test in the Netherlands to see what she was best suited to work at, she was told that she should become an office worker. She didn't want that and said that she wanted to study political science. She was told that she would only get funding if she studied secretarial type jobs and if she wanted to study political science, she'd have to pay for it herself. So she did just that. She worked and studied and attained a degree in Political Science. Then she became a member of parliament in the Dutch government. Your problem is rather obvious to see through. You're a Muslim and you're one of those who think that any criticism of Islam is blasphemy and should be punished, even killed. If not a Muslim, one of the extreme liberal left, who isn't much different. The kind that thinks that anyone who doesn't agree with them 100 percent is a despicable person and shouldn't be allowed to speak and you'll use any means possible to denigrate including childish gossip.
    10
  867. 10
  868. 10
  869. 10
  870. 10
  871. 10
  872. 10
  873. 10
  874.  @popweaselcrunch  The point is, there should be no secrets kept between children and ANYONE that's directed at the parents of those teachers. Also, that song, by Dolly Parton, that was banned was NOT at the insistence of parents. It was the principle of the school that told the kids that they couldn't sing it in a pageant. Not parent motivated at all and that's what this video and discussion is about. Keeping information from parents. I can also counter with a school board that told their marching band that they couldn't sing the hymn "How Great Thou Art" So banning doesn't just come from "conservatives" There are standards that they try to maintain because they are dealing with CHILDREN. Have you seen the pictures in the book "Gender Queer"? If I showed those pictures to a kid at the local splash pad, they'd arrest me. I won't even describe what those pictures showed. It's not appropriate for minor children. Another book meant for 7 and 8 year old kids is called "Not My Idea". This book shows a contract that implies that white people made a pact with the Devil to gain land, riches and power. It's being held by a being that has a cloven hoof and a tail. It's in the schools. It's CLEARLY a divisive idea, meant to make white kids feel guilty and defensive and any minority children react with resentment and anger. There is also a part where a 7 year old calls her mother a liar. Why is it necessary to tell 7 year old kids that their parents could be liars? Could that not cause a rift between a child and their parents? I don't want this being read to my children and I'M NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL. I repeat. I'm NOT religious. So quit assuming what people think or believe based on your narrative of a certain demographic. That's an assumption built on your own biases and it sucks. Once again......I'm NOT religious.
    10
  875. 10
  876. 10
  877. 10
  878. 10
  879. 10
  880. 10
  881. 10
  882. 10
  883. 10
  884.  @kulturfreund6631  "Well, spend a thought on the fact that the wealth/gains on one side are the poverty /losses on the other side." No...it's not. In fact, the reality is just the opposite. The US has more millionaires than all of Africa and South America combined and I can guarantee you one thing. There are no American refugees heading to those 2 continents looking for a better life. Refugees are all going the other way. I can also guarantee you that most people don't want to live the way they do in those 2 continents and their dream is to live as we do in the industrialised west. The statement you just made highlights one huge fallacy. It's the fallacy that suggests that there is a big pile of money that's available and we're all in a game of "grab the cash" that's sitting in the middle of the table. It's not how accruing wealth works. Wealth is accrued through the creation of end products of value, from raw materials that have no initial value. This is converted into a cash value, a system that makes exchange a much simpler way of distributing the wealth that has been created. The more produce that one can create that has value to others, the more wealth that he can accrue, but he has to be able to sell it. People have to want it. That makes is a free exchange. The customer looking for a product and a producer providing him with the product that he wants. A free and open market. From that system, some will do better than others and some will fail but those that fail, miserably, those drug addicts and mentally challenged street people of LA, as an example, have removed themselves from that open market. Not through any fault of their own, but they're no longer contributing to society and they're not reaping the rewards that the others do. Even the simplest cave dweller has to go out to hunt in order to eat. It's a reality of life.
    10
  885. 10
  886. 10
  887. 10
  888. 10
  889. 10
  890. 10
  891. 10
  892. 10
  893. 10
  894. 10
  895. 10
  896. 10
  897. 10
  898. 10
  899. 10
  900. 10
  901. 10
  902. 10
  903. 10
  904. 10
  905. 10
  906. 10
  907. 10
  908. 10
  909. 10
  910. 10
  911. 10
  912. 10
  913. 10
  914. 10
  915. 10
  916. 10
  917. 10
  918. 10
  919. 10
  920. 10
  921. 10
  922. 10
  923. 10
  924. 10
  925. 10
  926. 10
  927. 10
  928. 10
  929. 10
  930. 10
  931. 10
  932. 10
  933. 10
  934. 10
  935. 10
  936. 10
  937. 10
  938. 10
  939. 10
  940. 10
  941. 10
  942. 10
  943. 10
  944. 10
  945. 10
  946. 10
  947. 10
  948. 10
  949. 10
  950. 10
  951. 10
  952. 10
  953. 10
  954. 10
  955. 10
  956. 10
  957. 10
  958. 10
  959. 10
  960. 9
  961. 9
  962. 9
  963. 9
  964. 9
  965. 9
  966. 9
  967. 9
  968. 9
  969. 9
  970. 9
  971. 9
  972. 9
  973. 9
  974. 9
  975. 9
  976. 9
  977. 9
  978. 9
  979. 9
  980. 9
  981. 9
  982. 9
  983. 9
  984. 9
  985. 9
  986. 9
  987. 9
  988. 9
  989. 9
  990. 9
  991. 9
  992. 9
  993. 9
  994. 9
  995. 9
  996. 9
  997. 9
  998. 9
  999. 9
  1000. 9
  1001. 9
  1002. 9
  1003. 9
  1004. 9
  1005. 9
  1006. 9
  1007. 9
  1008. 9
  1009. 9
  1010. 9
  1011. 9
  1012. 9
  1013. 9
  1014. 9
  1015. 9
  1016. 9
  1017. 9
  1018. 9
  1019. 9
  1020. 9
  1021. 9
  1022. 9
  1023. 9
  1024. 9
  1025. 9
  1026. 9
  1027. 9
  1028. 9
  1029. 9
  1030. 9
  1031. 9
  1032. 9
  1033. 9
  1034. 9
  1035. 9
  1036. 9
  1037. 9
  1038. 9
  1039. 9
  1040. 9
  1041. 9
  1042. 9
  1043. 9
  1044.  @monsieurdorgat6864  He did NOT start out saying that Marxism is inherently anti-Semitic. He said that people claimed that Fascism was anti-Semitic and then showed how 1/3 of all Italian Jews were members of the Fascist party, which kind of proved that this wasn't true. The first time that Marxism was mentioned was to say that Fascist Italy wasn't as deadly towards its own people like the Nazis in Germany were OR the Marxists in the Soviet Union. To their own people, NOT Jews. Socialism definition: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." This is from the online dictionary and it's defining socialism TODAY not some socially constructed evolution of the word. "owned or regulated by the community as a whole." That indicates that it's NOT owned or regulated through capitalist or market pressures. It's regulated by the state and something that both Mussolini and Hitler both advocated for and were central policies of their regimes. Companies in Nazi Germany had party representatives present within the company to ensure that ALL employees followed Party protocols. A company owner could NOT refuse that party presence. Companies even used the government to procure slave labour and businesses earmarked as essential were closely run and monitored by the Party. No one goes against the Party. The party rules everything, that's something held in common in Fascism, Marxism or the Nazism of Germany. It's an inconvenient truth that socialist sympathizers don't like to admit. They don't want to admit that Fascism is just another form of Socialist ideology. You don't have to take it with a grain of salt. Just fact check what he's saying. If there are erroneous facts, point them out and give references to validate your findings. A lot of people support Fascist ideas and don't know it.
    9
  1045. 9
  1046. 9
  1047. 9
  1048. 9
  1049. 9
  1050. 9
  1051. 9
  1052. 9
  1053. 9
  1054. 9
  1055. 9
  1056. 9
  1057. 9
  1058. 9
  1059. 9
  1060. 9
  1061. 9
  1062. 9
  1063. 9
  1064. Cyden One As was pointed out, he was not the one that asked the customer to leave. Also, we have no idea what the customer said, if she threatened him or how serious the threats were. We have no idea of how much experience this manager has and whether this was his first confrontation of this type. You're basing an assessment on a very, VERY short video clip. Since, you're engaging in personal experience as a call to authority, I'll do the same. I worked for 14 years as a bartender and though I'm in my late sixties and retired, I still get requests for my services on a part time level. This would indicate that my abilities, as a bartender, are respected. I'll tell you one thing, though. I hope that there's no video clip of my first confrontation with an irate customer. I know that it wasn't all that flattering on my part. I got over it and not all people do. It was a new experience in my professional life and it's not easy. That doesn't mean that your unease can't be overcome. I guarantee you that if you watched a clip of my first encounter and decided that this indicated a pushover, you'd be sorely mistaken. I mean that in both a figurative and physical manner. I've even had a customer claim that I had declined service because he was black. He didn't get far with that claim. Even if that manager isn't suited for that job, and that's quite possible, that doesn't have a thing to do with the behaviour of the customer and how this is being turned into a racial incident. No dispute should be settled using the colour of a person's skin as the deciding factor, alone. The facts are the issue here and that's all that counts. Worse, I'd hate to think that a business should ALWAYS acquiesce to a customer's demands. That sounds like a recipe for fraud without consequence to me.
    9
  1065. 9
  1066. 9
  1067. 9
  1068. 9
  1069. 9
  1070. 9
  1071.  @manifesting.inner.g  True history, huh? l learned all about slavery in school. About Jim Crow, the drinking fountains, the Poll Tax, Dredd Scott, the KKK....learned it all in school. That's history and it's true history. I learned it in the sixties. I also learned about the abolitionist movement, Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War that finally abolished slavery and I know the Civil Rights movement and Dr. Martin Luther King are also taught in school. So your comment is all just plain nonsense. Also, it's DEMOCRATS that are supporting CRT and Republicans that are against it. Why would Republicans be against "true history". The Republican Party was formed specifically to end slavery. Abraham Lincoln was a Republican and Jefferson Davis was a Democrat. It was Democrat president, Andrew Johnson, that ended Reconstruction after the Civil War and the first black Americans elected to office, were also Republicans. Democrats fought to save slavery, voted against allowing blacks to become American citizens, didn't want blacks to vote and when blacks were able to vote, the Democrats were the beneficiaries of the thugish behaviour of the KKK who used fear to discourage the blacks from voting. The Democrats initiated Jim Crow, the Poll Tax and fought against the Civil Rights Movement. In fact, LAST YEAR, California Democrats wanted to repeal the California Civil Rights Act. Democrats did this. If anyone wants "true history" betrayed, it would be the Republicans. Yet they oppose CRT. Do you know why? Because, what the Democrats want taught and what CRT teaches, works to minimise the Democrats negative contributions to the history of black Americans. In other words, CRT is NOT "true history". It's an ideology, that's borne out of Marxism, that teaches perpetual division and it leads to the hatred and vitriol of the guy that's threatening that audience with a 1000 man army. That would seek to divide the family, of that woman, into racial camps....THAT'S your CRT. We don't want that division. That's why Republicans are against CRT.
    9
  1072. 9
  1073. 9
  1074. 9
  1075. 9
  1076. 9
  1077. 9
  1078. 9
  1079. 9
  1080. 9
  1081. 9
  1082. 9
  1083. 9
  1084. 9
  1085. Fknmando ! Wow. Since you obviously have trouble comprehending the situation, I'll repeat it for you. There was a drive by shooting. That's where a citizen drives by in a car and shoots people on the street or in their front yard. Apparently, this is against the law. This time 2 people were shot. Salvas's friend, the police officer, was called to the scene and was involved in a police chase involving the alleged car that took part in the shooting. The occupant of that car, a person strongly implicated in that ILLEGAL drive by shooting, tried to get away and was shot. You see, the police officer was pretty sure the guy had a gun in his possession. It's difficult to commit a drive by shooting without a gun....maybe even impossible so I'd say it was a pretty safe assumption. If the person was willing to shoot people on the street, he would likely be willing to shoot a police officer, as well. I don't know that for sure, of course, but....you know. I'd still go with it for safety reasons. Salvas knew the police officer and knew him as an honourable guy. He may not be but when you couple that with the circumstances of the shooting, I'd say he has a right to feel that way and to express how he feels. So....lets tie that in with the standing for the flag. I'm sure you've heard of Colin Kaepernick and the big kerfuffle over kneeling for the flag. This had to do with the police shooting of black youths and the belief in systemic racism in the legal system. Salvas said that he made that statement a year earlier, when this was big headlines. Now, I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. One year after saying that he stands for the flag, Salvas defends a police officer, a family friend, who was involved in a police shooting of an man allegedly resisting arrest. Maybe his Democrat "friends" might have let him off the hook for defending his friend but I don't know. However, his saying that he stands for the flag, might indicate that he sides with police officers in a police shooting. Defending the police officer in a real shooting validates his stance of police shooting. That is what prompted the "that's insensitive" criticism. I've tied this up in a neat little package for you so you can fully understand what is happening here. Sorry if I'm seeming a little sarcastic (a lot, actually) but I have a feeling that you're being intentionally obtuse about the whole thing. You've implied that the alleged shooter in the drive by deserves to be declared innocent until proven guilty but the police officer shouldn't be given that right, given your statement that you don't know what a person is capable of when referring to the police officer. I'd say that's correct, to a degree. That police officer didn't know what that alleged shooter was capable of but he definitely had reason to believe that he could be extremely dangerous and that his own life was at stake. I guess the only way to know just how bad this guy actually was is to allow him to shoot the cop. Then we'd know for sure he was a bad guy. Makes being a cop rather hazardous though, don't you think?
    9
  1086. 9
  1087. 9
  1088. 9
  1089. 9
  1090. 9
  1091. 9
  1092. Strawberry 93 It's a "huge problem" because there may be over 60 cities across England affected by Pakistani grooming gangs. In the city of Rotherham, alone, there are up to 1400 girls that have been abused by a Pakistani gang in the last 25 years. The "huge problem" is that it is almost exclusively Muslim Pakistani and the authorities looked the other way due to a fear that they would be accused of racism and that they were centring on Muslims. It was the fear of the backlash from the left wing that protected the grooming gangs. I'll give you an example just how biased the left media has been concerning Muslims. In Toronto, a young girl claimed a man tried to pull off her hijab on the way to school, one morning. By noon, all the press were at the school. It was the leading story on TV news and on the front page of the daily newspapers. By 2 o'clock, the Prime Minister publicly said that "racism is alive and well in Canada". Now, compare this with Rotherham. 1400 underage girls were sexually abused by Pakistani men and for 25 years NO ONE said a word. NOT A DAMN WORD!!!!! Now it's out in the open, more and more cities have been found with these gangs, almost exclusively Muslim with victims that were exclusively white and Sikh. Telford has almost 1000 cases......AND IT HAD BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE AND SOCIAL SERVICES IN MOST OF THOSE CITIES. Thousands of young girls sexually abused for years and there are still people accusing those who are outraged by it of being racist. Yet, one girl, ONE MUSLIM GIRL, says someone tried to take her hijab and it's news across the country......and do you know what. SHE MADE IT UP!!!!!! It wasn't true. Hollywood stars are crying about MeToo and the trauma they had to live through to make millions but do you hear them speaking out about those poor white and Sikh girls in England? I'll bet you every cent I've ever made that if 10 members of the EDL had raped a couple of Muslim girls over a weekend, it would have been headlines everywhere and I say this with confidence. Remember the little girl in Toronto. That's how I know that the left wing are only being selectively compassionate. It's disgusting.
    9
  1093. 9
  1094. 9
  1095. 9
  1096. 9
  1097. 9
  1098. 9
  1099. 9
  1100. 9
  1101. 9
  1102. 9
  1103. 9
  1104. 9
  1105. 8
  1106. 8
  1107. 8
  1108. 8
  1109. 8
  1110. 8
  1111. 8
  1112. 8
  1113. 8
  1114. 8
  1115. 8
  1116. 8
  1117. 8
  1118. 8
  1119. 8
  1120. 8
  1121. 8
  1122. 8
  1123. 8
  1124. 8
  1125. 8
  1126. 8
  1127. 8
  1128. 8
  1129. 8
  1130. 8
  1131. 8
  1132. 8
  1133. 8
  1134. 8
  1135. 8
  1136. 8
  1137. 8
  1138. 8
  1139. 8
  1140. 8
  1141. 8
  1142. 8
  1143.  @kulturfreund6631  You can't destabilise a country if that country hasn't the mindset that allows destabilisation. The hatred has to be in them to be used against each other. It's a weakness of the nations that you say are prey to the destabilisation and all it does is lay blame upon blame upon blame and it's ALWAYS the other guys fault. For once, it would be nice if one of those countries would just say that they're not going to fall for these machinations. Just say that they're responsible for their own actions and not everything is someone else's fault. Until they look within themselves and say "We can change our future" they will always be prey to dictators and outside interference. It's like an abused child. It's the fault of the abuser that he's abused but it's his own doing if he can't rise above it as an adult. Also, the Middle East was held for only a short time by European interests. It was the Ottoman Empire that controlled the area for almost 400 years until they lost WW1 in 1918. Most of the area was held for only 30 years by Europe before they all became independent. That includes Iraq. Also, if corrupt governments allow corporate interests to break the law, that's not the fault of Capitalism. It's the fault of corruption and the lack of respect for the rule of law. The US is NOT a fascist state. Fascist states are rooted in nationalist socialist ideas and a one party system, ruled by dictators and supported by his henchmen. That's NOT the US. There are problems but there's not a nation yet conceived that hasn't had it's issues. It's a problem of humanity. Overall, the people living in the Capitalist west, the US, Canada, western Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong have the best living standards in human history. A standard that is the envy of the world and we should be encouraging other nations to follow the same work ethic and ideas of free markets and the rule of law. It's NOT perfect but nothing ever will be. It's the best that we've ever had, though and the only way to improve on it is to encourage the respect for the law and hard work that brought us the living standard that we have now. Isn't it strange that the only country in Central America, where things are half decent, is a country that has had stable government and there is a strong commitment to the law and free enterprise. That's Costa Rica and they're very proud of how they've avoided the pitfalls of the countries around them. Like I said, you don't have to fall prey to corrupt corporations and politicians if there is a social mindset that rejects it. It only flourishes when you allow others to tell you who they should blame.
    8
  1144. 8
  1145. 8
  1146. 8
  1147. 8
  1148. 8
  1149. 8
  1150. 8
  1151. 8
  1152. 8
  1153. 8
  1154. 8
  1155. 8
  1156. 8
  1157.  @Alex-pt5no  Yet, Grosskreutz carried a weapon, in a riot, that he was in support of. He approached Kyle, with that weapon drawn, and pointed it at Kyle. That's when Grosskreutz was shot....ONLY then. Also, Kyle was NOT a vigilante. He was there to PROTECT businesses and to offer medical aid to ANYONE that needed it. He put out a fire and this brought on the ire of the rioters, particularly Rosenbaum, who said he would kill Kyle if he caught him alone. He was on his way to help put out another fire when Rosenbaum chased him down and tried to grab his gun. A man, who threatened to kill him, was grabbing at his gun. What would any reasonable person assume would happen if Rosenbaum had actually succeeded taking that gun away from him? Any reasonable person would assume that Rosenbaum would use that gun to carry out his previous threats. Kyle, among others, should not have had to be there that night, but their town was being burned by rioters and looters and the elected officials were doing NOTHING to protect the community. So, what do you do when criminals are destroying everything that you own and the people that you've elected to protect you, turn their backs on you? Do you turn tail and run? That's exactly what the German people did when the Brownshirts smashed windows, set fires and threatened people. Their government did nothing and they acquiesced to one of the most murderous groups of ideologues in human history. In Kenosha, they smashed windows, set fires and threatened people. The local governments, city, state and even Federal governments did NOTHING and you want the people of the Kenosha area to back down and let the rioters destroy their town. That strategy worked really well in Germany. (deep sarcasm) Had only the people of Germany stood against the Brownshirts....but they were cowards. Their cowardice ended in over 50 million deaths before that ideological base was finished.
    8
  1158. 8
  1159. 8
  1160. 8
  1161. 8
  1162. 8
  1163. 8
  1164. 8
  1165. 8
  1166. 8
  1167. 8
  1168. 8
  1169. 8
  1170. 8
  1171. 8
  1172. 8
  1173. 8
  1174. 8
  1175. 8
  1176. 8
  1177. 8
  1178. 8
  1179. 8
  1180. 8
  1181. 8
  1182. 8
  1183. 8
  1184. 8
  1185. 8
  1186. 8
  1187. 8
  1188. 8
  1189. 8
  1190.  @jillionairess  I'm NOT talking about ALL teachers. It's like crime. I'm not talking about all citizens when I say that there should be laws against crime. This law is put into place to protect against that small percentage that are abusing their positions. MORE than that, it codifies when it is age appropriate to begin sex education as part of the curriculum. That's it. Most parents are uncomfortable with strangers talking about sex to their 5 and 6 year old. This assures them that this can't happen until the time is right. Now they know. The NEC, America's top teacher's union, voted to keep teaching CRT, even if it's against the law to teach it. First they deny that it's being taught. Then they vote to continue teaching it. If you want to understand the perils of CRT, listen to James Lindsay's "New Discourses" lectures on YouTube. More so, if you want to hear about how far left ideas have permeated into schools, watch Karlyn Borysenko here on Youtube. It will introduce you to some of the things that this law is supposed to cover. I doubt very much that you'll bother though. You prefer your happy cosy little world where ALL teachers are wonderful. Don't, for one minute, think that I'm against teachers. That's being hyperbolic and intentionally blind. My brother and his wife are teachers and some of my teachers have been absolutely wonderful. However, there has been an influx of far left ideologues into our schools, media and governments that no one should ignore. If you want to ignore what could be happening...that's up to you but don't expect the rest of us to put our heads in the sand with you. The information is out there and if you're not lazy you can find it. I've given you 3 sources to start with but it takes work and a curiosity to find out what it is that we're concerned with. I can lead a horse to water but I can't make it drink. You have to be thirsty enough to find out what the concern is. You don't want to find out the hard way.
    8
  1191. 8
  1192. 8
  1193.  @garethjordan840  Fortunately, "peaceful" protests are the new vaccine. It's a good thing that DeBlasio told NY citizens that they should go out on the town, that the subways were safe and they should ALL go to the big Parade in the middle of February, AFTER we all knew that Covid was so contagious. He kept this rhetoric up until the middle of March, when his own staff told him they'd resign if he didn't stop. Good thing that New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in nursing homes. That kept the most vulnerable safe, didn't it? It was really a good thing that the Democrats were telling us how racist Trump was when he restricted travel to China. Kinda of strongly suggested that the travel ban was stupid and that Covid was wasn't much of a threat. Then, on Feb. 4th, in the State of the Union Address, Trump told us how they were attempting to work with the Chinese government in studying this new virus, Pelosi did the only thing that could help the new threat. She tore up the speech, telling everyone that everything that Trump had said, in that speech, was a lie.....which would INCLUDE the part about the coronavirus. When the virus was raging in Europe, it was a smart move for Biden to tell us all how a travel ban to Europe wasn't going to work. That sure made it seem that social distancing was important. What better social distancing than the Atlantic Ocean, huh. It sure kept the Indigenous people of the Americas safe from European diseases like smallpox for thousands of years. Not for Biden and all the Dem supporters though. They said it was dumb. Funny how the Europeans don't think it's dumb now. See how easy the blame game is? I can keep it up if you want. I have LOTS more. Like how it would take the total populations of Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, the UK, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden and Norway to equal the population of the United States YET....they have a total of 164,166 deaths.....23,000 MORE than the US. SAME POPULATIONS.....23,000 MORE DEATHS THAN THE US. Wow....numbers can sure be used to make a case can't they? Just about for anything you want to prove.
    8
  1194. 8
  1195. 8
  1196. 8
  1197. 8
  1198. 8
  1199. 8
  1200. 8
  1201. 8
  1202. 8
  1203. 8
  1204. 8
  1205. 8
  1206. 8
  1207. 8
  1208. 8
  1209. 8
  1210. 8
  1211. 8
  1212. 8
  1213. 8
  1214. 8
  1215. 8
  1216. 8
  1217. 8
  1218. 8
  1219. 8
  1220. 8
  1221. 8
  1222. 8
  1223. 8
  1224. 8
  1225. 8
  1226. 8
  1227. 8
  1228. 8
  1229. 8
  1230. 8
  1231. 8
  1232. 8
  1233. 8
  1234. 8
  1235. 8
  1236. 8
  1237. 8
  1238. 8
  1239. 8
  1240. 8
  1241. 8
  1242. 8
  1243. 8
  1244. 8
  1245. 8
  1246. 8
  1247. 8
  1248. 8
  1249. 8
  1250. 8
  1251. 8
  1252. 8
  1253. 8
  1254. 8
  1255. 8
  1256. 8
  1257. 8
  1258. 8
  1259. 8
  1260. 8
  1261. 8
  1262. 8
  1263. 8
  1264. 8
  1265. 8
  1266. 8
  1267. 7
  1268. 7
  1269. 7
  1270. 7
  1271. 7
  1272. 7
  1273. 7
  1274. 7
  1275. 7
  1276. 7
  1277. 7
  1278. 7
  1279. 7
  1280. 7
  1281. 7
  1282. 7
  1283. 7
  1284. 7
  1285. 7
  1286. 7
  1287. 7
  1288. 7
  1289. 7
  1290. 7
  1291. 7
  1292. 7
  1293. 7
  1294. 7
  1295. You've completely distorted what Peterson means by equality of outcome. He's talking about the Marxist principle that does not allow one to have more, as a reward for hard work and ability, than a fellow citizen. He's saying that we don't know where that line is drawn where we will say that you're going to far and your forcing your country to the point that the Soviet Union, Mao's China, Pol Pot's Cambodia or present day Venezuela reached. Peterson is Canadian and he comes from a country that has a state funded medical program. He doesn't disapprove of that at all and has never said that. Same as making sure no citizen starves. You're making an argument that was never made by Peterson and is definitely not what he means at all. One equality of outcome that he has spoken against is the idea that people must be categorised in the specific groups and that it is imperative that the demographics of any social entity must reflect, equally, the demographics of the public at large. As an example, a company must have 50 percent female mechanical engineers because that is the demographic of society. He believes, and he's right, that this deflates the value of merit and ability and it would hurt the future success of a business. It takes the right of a business to set its own standards of excellence and may force them to accept, as employees, those who may not have the ability they need or want. Not all people are equal in ability and he thinks that employees should be judged as individuals and NOT on their belonging to a demographic. That is inequality of outcome. Not your claim that he doesn't like feeding the hungry or providing health care for all citizens. That is being so intentionally obtuse that it would almost seem intentional.
    7
  1296. 7
  1297. 7
  1298. 7
  1299. 7
  1300. 7
  1301. 7
  1302. 7
  1303. 7
  1304. 7
  1305. 7
  1306. 7
  1307. 7
  1308. 7
  1309. 7
  1310. 7
  1311.  @Molari  So....taking a man from Africa, and selling him/her in the slave markets of the Middle East is "nice" slavery. WAY different than taking him/her to the Americas and selling them in the slave markets there. I can't see the preference but maybe I would after being castrated in Egypt or Yemen. Those slaves, that had their hearts ripped out in religious ceremonies in the Aztec Empire, sure had it good. I'm sure that we'd both prefer that over picking sugar cane in Jamaica. You're turning it into a contest, a totally unproductive exercise. The truth is that Mauritania was the last country to abolish slavery, in 1981. An African country. However, they didn't pass a law to prosecute slave owners until 2007. I'm sure it was the "nice" slavery that you're alluding to, though. (big time sarcasm) Most debt slaves involved people from the same group or nationality. Slaves of Roman citizenry could be debt slaves and would have rules in which they could work their way out of slavery. Captured slaves, from northern Europe and Africa were not accorded that privilege. That was common with almost ALL slaves within countries or Kingdoms. Maybe you should check out the timeline of slavery, around the world, on Wikepedia. Even the Hawaiians had a slave culture, known as the ancient Hawaiian kapu. This isn't a contest to see which one is the worst. Be grateful to those who sacrificed to end slavery and quit the blame game. All it does is beget resentment, anger and retribution. It, not only doesn't solve anything, it tears us apart.
    7
  1312. 7
  1313. 7
  1314. 7
  1315. 7
  1316. 7
  1317. 7
  1318. 7
  1319. 7
  1320. 7
  1321. 7
  1322. 7
  1323. 7
  1324. 7
  1325. 7
  1326. 7
  1327. 7
  1328. 7
  1329. 7
  1330. 7
  1331. 7
  1332. 7
  1333. 7
  1334. 7
  1335. 7
  1336. 7
  1337. 7
  1338. 7
  1339.  @davids.2703  Who is forever talking about racism? Who supports identity politics? Who supports employment based on skin colour, sexuality, claimed gender and other equity based criteria? It's not Trump. These are programs that separate, segregate and make your identity a defining principle on who you are, whether a job is open to you, takes away educational programs if you don't have the correct racial or identity appearance and may even decide who your political candidate should be, once again based on their preferred identity. Could even tell you where you must live. Must have even representation in all neighbourhoods so if your identity group is under represented in a poor neighbourhood, you may be the one chosen to provide identity equity, whether you like it or not. School choice? Not if you're poor. Trump doesn't think that being poor should take away your choice but Biden, and his supporters, don't want you to have a choice. You go where they tell you and if the school is violent, the teachers are incompetent and your child is bullied and unhappy, too bad for them. That should make the poor feel a division between haves and have-nots, shouldn't it? I have never, in all my seventy years, heard so much about race and other identity group profiling and it's all from the left and hardly any from Trump. His "Garden of Heroes" include people like Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Booker T. Washington, Frederick Douglas, Susan B. Anthony and Jackie Robinson. Sounds real divisive doesn't it? As divisive as tearing down the statue of Frederick Douglas in Rochester NY. It's Democrats that support tearing down statues so tearing down the statue of a great American statesman like a man, who was once a slave, must be Trump's fault. But why would he want that same man, Frederick Douglas, in his "Garden of Heroes"? Your logic is baffling.
    7
  1340. 7
  1341. 7
  1342. 7
  1343. 7
  1344. 7
  1345. 7
  1346. 7
  1347. 7
  1348. 7
  1349. 7
  1350. 7
  1351. 7
  1352. 7
  1353. 7
  1354.  @viktorkc1154  He supported democratic socialism and at the time there was no real example on how that would actually fare if applied. What history has shown is that if the economy is controlled by the state in a democracy, political candidates will use the revenue garnered by the state run enterprises as a carrot to get votes. Businesses need that revenue to maintain equipment, train employees, invest in research and innovation. Without it, they stagnate and the economy runs into difficulty and eventually the state will be forced into tyranny in their attempt to stop the bleeding or their economy. No true socialist state has avoided it and when reading Orwell, the signs that this is inevitable are all there and that's how Peterson came to his conclusions on Socialism. Orwell showed him, inadvertently, that it couldn't work. Orwell said he was a democratic socialist but his books told a different story. In fact, he was a great supporter of British traditions and those traditions don't reflect socialism, either. Yes....the owner or CEO of a company can move his business elsewhere and dismiss his employees if he chooses. It's his company. It's my choice, as an individual to work for him and I can leave if I want, as well. That's freedom of the economy. If I force him to hire me and tell him that he can never fire me, I'm placing my authority over his. The owner of a business's first priority is to the survival of his business. If he doesn't do that, he's given up his responsibility to the company, his buyers, suppliers and his employees. If I build a better mousetrap, I have every right to profit from that mousetrap. It was my idea, my effort, my money and my risk to go into business. Any employee I hire, doesn't take the risks that I did and he has no right to the things that I purchased with my money in order to produce my product. There is no way that anyone would allow a person to walk in off the street and then claim that property as his own and that the owner is now subservient to him. That's theft and if you'd ever owned a business, you'd see that right away. What entrepreneur, in his right mind, would ever start a business under those conditions. A healthy economy depends on the freedom of it's entrepreneurs to have full autonomy of their own enterprise. If not, I might as well walk into your house right now and take what I want. You've just claimed that ownership is irrelevant and you have no right to ownership of anything. That takes us to the authority of the law. That's NOT authoritarianism. That's a societal agreement that we will abide by certain rules and laws which are limited by a Constitution which specifically lay out the rights of all citizens as individual, autonomous beings. You either stop me from taking your stuff, by force or authority, or we devise a civilised way to handle it through a system of laws and protection. The rule of anarchy will only result in the rule of the guy with the biggest fist, club or gun. It's still authority driven but rather uncivilised.
    7
  1355. 7
  1356. 7
  1357. 7
  1358. 7
  1359. 7
  1360. 7
  1361. 7
  1362. 7
  1363. 7
  1364. 7
  1365. 7
  1366. 7
  1367. 7
  1368. 7
  1369. 7
  1370. 7
  1371. 7
  1372. 7
  1373. 7
  1374. 7
  1375. 7
  1376. 7
  1377. 7
  1378. 7
  1379. 7
  1380. 7
  1381. 7
  1382. 7
  1383. 7
  1384.  @jillionairess  My 10 year old granddaughter announced that she was bisexual. Her 7 year old sister teased her by calling her trans. She became indignant and said that she was proud of being a woman. Indoctrinate.....I don't know. Bizarre....without a doubt. They were taught this in school. A year later, there was a controversy about teaching Indigenous Studies in school. I asked her what 8X7 was. She didn't know and said that she didn't like math. I told her that maybe she should learn basic mathematics before she went onto such a specific area of study. Once again, she got all indignant. She asked me if I knew that they put Indigenous kids into schools and beat them. White people did that. I told her a friend of mine attended one of those schools. Apparently, her teacher told her class all about that too. I asked her if she knew about Indigenous religions, the foods that they developed, the wars and how the Iroquois completely wiped out the Huron nation. Did she know that the American founding fathers borrowed ideas of forming a union from the Iroquois Federation and that the Iroquois outlawed cannibalism after they formed their union. Apparently, these were never discussed. I told her that what she was talking about was known as "Grievance Studies" Of course, she had no idea what that meant. She was only 11 at the time. Indoctrinated....I still don't know. However, this is stuff that is rather inappropriate in a primary school setting, being taught by a person that her parents barely knew. None of this was taught to my kids when they were in school but that was in the 80s and 90s. I'm not going to say that your experiences didn't happen but just because it hasn't been your experience, it doesn't happen at all. I've never been sexually abused but I'm willing to bet it happens. By the way, my granddaughter is now 16, she's shaved her head bald and wears the most bizarre makeup in some kind of androgynous display of self identity. Was it because she was indoctrinated in school? I can't say but I know her older brother just shakes his head and rolls her eyes at her and says that this specific teacher, that he also had, is a kook. Does that ever set her off.
    7
  1385. 7
  1386. 7
  1387. 7
  1388. 7
  1389. 7
  1390. 7
  1391. 7
  1392. 7
  1393. 7
  1394. 7
  1395. 7
  1396. 7
  1397. 7
  1398. 7
  1399. 7
  1400. 7
  1401. 7
  1402. 7
  1403. 7
  1404. 7
  1405. 7
  1406. 7
  1407. 7
  1408. 7
  1409. 7
  1410. 7
  1411. 7
  1412. 7
  1413. 7
  1414. 7
  1415. 7
  1416. 7
  1417. 7
  1418. 7
  1419. 7
  1420. 7
  1421. 7
  1422. 7
  1423. 7
  1424. 7
  1425. 7
  1426. 7
  1427. 7
  1428. 7
  1429. 7
  1430. 7
  1431. 7
  1432. 7
  1433. 7
  1434. 7
  1435. 7
  1436. 7
  1437. 7
  1438. 7
  1439. 7
  1440. 7
  1441. 7
  1442. 7
  1443. 7
  1444. 7
  1445. 7
  1446. 7
  1447. 7
  1448. 7
  1449.  @DM-dk7js  You don't get it? I'll explain it to you. The Capitol Building is HUGE. People can't even SEE the people on the other side of the building. So, the violence took place on ONE side and the people on the other side didn't KNOW that it was happening. For some reason, the security on the other side of the building of the violence, opened doors and let people in. They just LET THEM IN. Other people, like Ray Epps, were telling to attack the building and was THERE when it started. For some reason, he was not arrested, even though he spent one day on the FBI wanted list. However, Alex Jones, who was never went into the building and was telling people to not go in, was arrested. One video showed a cop saying that he didn't approve but supported their right to protest. One person's charges were dropped because video evidence showed that a police officer opened the door for him. If security allows you into a building, you can't be charged with trespassing. Anyone that took part in actual violence or was inciting violence, they should be charged. I repeat....anyone who took part in violence or incited violence, they should, most definitely, be charged. If they just walked in, through doors that were opened by security and no violence evident, they should be dismissed on a case by case basis. Those doors should never have been opened by security and why they would open them is truly mystifying. I'll agree with you on this. If those cops did what is alleged, they should be charged. We also have to find out why they did this. Did they do it because they agreed with the protesters or did they get orders TELLING them to open the doors. If so, who was it that told them to do that and what was their intent. No matter whether your Republican or Democrat, we have to know what went on, FULLY and not just to punish or exonerate people. If this was a partial set up by a group who were supposed to be in charge of security, we must find out about it.....because next time, it could be YOU that is arrested for something you didn't do at the machinations of a corrupt government.
    7
  1450. 7
  1451. 7
  1452. 7
  1453. 7
  1454. 7
  1455. 7
  1456. 7
  1457. 7
  1458. 7
  1459. 7
  1460. 7
  1461. 7
  1462. 7
  1463. 7
  1464. 7
  1465. 7
  1466. 7
  1467. 7
  1468. 7
  1469. 7
  1470. 7
  1471. 7
  1472. 7
  1473. 7
  1474. 7
  1475. 7
  1476. 7
  1477. 7
  1478. 7
  1479. 7
  1480. 7
  1481. 7
  1482. 7
  1483. 7
  1484. 7
  1485. 7
  1486. 7
  1487. 7
  1488. 7
  1489. 7
  1490. 7
  1491. 7
  1492. 7
  1493.  @bobshenix  And those character flaws are spilling into their everyday lives and making them extremely unhappy. Telling them that if they start small by "cleaning their rooms" they will find purpose in their lives, something that is a positive. It's small and simple, one that can easily be accomplished...but it's just a start. Some of those lazy, unmotivated and unhappy individuals have taken him up on it and found that it wasn't all that difficult. So they expanded that initial mandate by doing a little more. So many have changed their lives by starting small and simple, because they didn't see the value in it, until JP pointed out how it could have some value. If these people are grateful to JP for pointing it out to them, why would you crap all over it. It obviously has value to some people....the ones who've grown up never having to do anything for themselves, thanks to their helicopter parents. This is something that their parents SHOULD have shown them when they were preschoolers but had to wait until a guy like JP told them that a good way to get out of their miserable existence was to take some responsibility for their own lives. Like cleaning their own room instead of waiting for the maid or their mother to do it. If a person can do that one simple task, they should be able to handle 2 simple tasks and then 3, expanding outward until their lives take on a semblance of order. It's too bad some adults have to be told the value in this but that's the way it is. Some folk just don't get it.
    7
  1494. 7
  1495. 7
  1496. 7
  1497. 7
  1498. 7
  1499. 7
  1500. 7
  1501. 7
  1502. 7
  1503. 7
  1504. 7
  1505. 7
  1506. 7
  1507. 7
  1508. 7
  1509. 6
  1510. 6
  1511. I'm going to argue against Tim on his claim that social media is the cause of the woke culture. Socialism has been growing for decades in our universities. Those academic socialists didn't call themselves woke, of course. However, they cultivated a culture that would lead to what we now call progressive woke. The socialist academics would only appoint those to academic posts who were avowed radical socialists. They would recommend them to educational positions in primary schools, who in turn, when they got the power, would only hire fellow socialists to teach or become part of the administration. That's when they had the ability to shape the minds of the young into their socialist philosophy. It's how Hitler shaped the minds of the youth of Germany. Get them when they're young so when they become adults, they become fervent foot soldiers for the cause. Who are the most constant and influential users of social media? The young. They're on it all the time and when they use social media, they're drawn to those who share the values that they've been taught in school. The same ones that were taught by these socialist academics for over a generation. The academics know that to control the populace they have to control the media. They've done it in the legacy media, in Hollywood and in the personnel departments of our large businesses, changing the name to "Human Resources" It all started in the hallowed halls of higher education. Had these people not existed, there would be no woke culture. Social media is there new propaganda tool and it's been very effective.
    6
  1512. 6
  1513. 6
  1514. 6
  1515. 6
  1516. 6
  1517.  @Kefka2010  I'm Canadian. There are a little over 35 million of us. We have a tacit agreement that we will work together under certain principles and guidelines to build for ourselves a better life. Part of that is setting policy for immigration that would best suit our Canadian association so that it benefits all within that association. Without guidelines, immigration could run amok and a country could be overwhelmed socially and economically. Worse, we'd lose control over you would enter and if their intentions were good or bad. That's why we insist on applications to immigrate here, a resume, if you will. That's all we ask. That's all the American government asks. However, illegals don't want to apply. They just want to enter. It'd be like a new employee insisting that he doesn't have to submit a resume. Just start working and get paid, whether qualified or not. They want to come and we have to provide them with the means to survive until they get on their feet.....if ever. What a great idea. Also, I have been to the States and have had to show my ID, a number of times. I had to show my passport and once I left it behind and my dad (he had his) had to go to the place we were staying and get it for me, before they'd let me go. Why were we detained? Ontario plates. I had my Canadian driver licence but that wasn't good enough. It was inconvenient but it wasn't the end of the world. Half hour later I was on my way. It wasn't the end of the world for these ladies either. All they had to do was show their ID and away they went. Not that horrible. They just made a big deal about nothing.
    6
  1518. 6
  1519. 6
  1520. 6
  1521.  @jimmcloughlin  Estimates for the deaths of the famine, brought on by collectivisation in China, put in motion by Mao, run as high as 55 million. That's in the fifties, NOT WW2. Then there was the cultural revolution that started in the mid sixties and lasted 10 years. Add that to the famines, and it may be as high as 70 million. These are deaths, not due to wars, but to the disastrous policies of the Chairman Mao and his associates. Then there were the disasters of Stalin and Lenin. Once again, not due to WW2, but to the famines caused by collectivisation of farms and the horrors of their police state. These are deaths brought down on their OWN people. Then the famines of the Soviet Union, brought on by the same communist policies under Lenin and Stalin. Around 5 million in 1923 and maybe as many as 7 million in 1933, including around 3.5 million Ukrainians. Then another 1.7 in the Gulags. Who knows how many millions have died in North Korea in the 20th century. Another 2 million in the killing fields of Cambodia by the communists there. Around 1 in 4 Cambodians died because of Pol Pots great agrarian society. These are just the numbers from the main communist powers. We have no idea on the numbers in the Iron Curtain countries of those times, or Cuba, Zimbabwe and other socialist regimes. These are all deaths NOT through foreign invasions or wars. These are deaths caused directly from the policies of the communist governments. I have references for all of it. All you gotta do is ask.
    6
  1522. 6
  1523. 6
  1524. 6
  1525. 6
  1526. 6
  1527. 6
  1528. 6
  1529. 6
  1530. 6
  1531. 6
  1532. 6
  1533. 6
  1534. 6
  1535. 6
  1536.  @jerrybumstead2654  Drugs for kids, when I was in school was unheard of. They just didn't exist. As for the authority part, culturally, life was so much different back then. Right from early childhood, we were exposed to a much stricter set of rules and a more regimented lifestyle. This was the norm, no matter where you went. Prayer before and after each meal. If you're sitting in a highchair, mom reached over and held your hands down while the prayer was being said. This was expected. Everyone did it. The little ones were actually proud to do the things that the older ones were doing. At evening meal, there was also a Bible reading and you were expected to sit still, quietly and listen. This wasn't just at my home, either. It happened everywhere I went. By the time a kid went to school, sitting still and standing in line was nothing. Our classes were quiet. If you stepped out of line, you got the strap. I got it lots of times. No big deal. In spite of this strictness, we had way more freedom that kids do now. We were out, at the neighbours, riding bikes, we never told our parents what we were up to. No helicoptering parents. We played hockey, soccer and baseball with no supervision. Fishing and swimming, building forts...but be home in time for meals or you didn't eat. I remember being blocks away and hearing my mother yelling my name to come home at 7 and 8 years old. You had the freedom but don't screw up. You got in trouble with the a neighbouring adult and he cuffed you across the head, you don't tell your dad. He'd cuff you a couple more times and tell you to stop being a troublemaker. I was talking about this with my siblings a couple of weeks ago. We all agreed that life was a LOT more fun for us than for kids these days. Not even a close comparison.
    6
  1537. 6
  1538. 6
  1539. 6
  1540. 6
  1541. 6
  1542. 6
  1543. 6
  1544. 6
  1545. 6
  1546. 6
  1547. 6
  1548. 6
  1549. 6
  1550. 6
  1551. 6
  1552. 6
  1553. 6
  1554. 6
  1555. 6
  1556. 6
  1557. 6
  1558. 6
  1559. 6
  1560. 6
  1561. 6
  1562. 6
  1563. 6
  1564. 6
  1565. 6
  1566. 6
  1567. 6
  1568. 6
  1569. 6
  1570. 6
  1571. 6
  1572. 6
  1573. 6
  1574. 6
  1575.  @diamondsfurez7456  I'm a bartender right now and I'm going to Costa Rica in January. I'm being accompanied 3 other waiting staff. I don't own my own home but they all do. I worked with a guy that bought a beautiful waterfront home which was paid off when he retired. If you work at a moderately successful business and get in 30 hours a week, you'll do just fine and as well as any factory worker. I've worked a 7 hour Friday night shift and have taken home almost 400 dollars in tips. Right now, I make minimum wage. If you upped my hourly to minimum wage, I wouldn't make 1 cent more and if that were to take the place of tips, I would take a huge cut in pay. The biggest issue waiting staff have isn't how much they make while working but how owners won't give them enough hours. Most waiting staff are always moving around in attempts to get more hours. I could get by on a 25 hr workweek but anything over 30 is great. I don't think I know any waiting staff that get 40 hours a week which is the norm in manufacturing and construction. Hours are a constant complaint and owners use them to discipline workers or give them shifts that aren't as busy. Exchanging 8 hours of good hours for 8 hours of bad ones could cost you well over 100 dollars. This whole tip thing is just another way for champagne liberals to feel good about themselves without even having to talk to staff any more than they have to. There's a saying among waiting staff. "The size of the tip is directly proportional to the cut of the customer's clothes". What they mean is that the more expensive their clothes, the worse the tip you can expect to receive. Blue collar workers tip the best. Business types are stingy and rude.
    6
  1576. 6
  1577. 6
  1578. 6
  1579. 6
  1580.  @eoin8450  China started out communist. Communism cannot exist without authoritarianism. However, central planning of an economy, is just too complicated for a small elitist authority. So, they allowed a decentralisation of small businesses and small market gardens. It seemed to work but it was still at the behest of the central planning authority. Since it did work, they allowed it to expand but the key word is "ALLOWED". It's expanded to the point that it is now, but it's still only allowed.....it's at the permission of centrally planned government. It's why Huawei is involved in all kinds of espionage. They exist at the behest of the central authoritarian government. If Huawei refuses, that could spell the end of the top executives of that company. That's illegal in a free capitalist country. The government cannot force you to do something you don't want to do. That's an infringement of their rights. China is somewhere between a free capitalist society and communism and it's a lot closer to communism than it is to a western style government and economy. That's why early 20th century economic pundits called Fascism, National Socialism. It's somewhere between our western style government and economy and communism.....Fascism to be precise. I came to this conclusion after reading memoirs of Soviet and Nazi era writers and realised that the only difference between the 2 was that the communist Soviets micro managed and the socialist Nazis allowed the companies to micro manage. However, both were in full control of the big picture.
    6
  1581. 6
  1582. 6
  1583. 6
  1584. 6
  1585. 6
  1586. 6
  1587. 6
  1588. 6
  1589. 6
  1590. 6
  1591. 6
  1592. 6
  1593. 6
  1594. 6
  1595. 6
  1596. 6
  1597. 6
  1598. 6
  1599. 6
  1600. 6
  1601. 6
  1602. 6
  1603. 6
  1604. 6
  1605. 6
  1606. 6
  1607. 6
  1608. 6
  1609. 6
  1610. 6
  1611. 6
  1612. 6
  1613.  @michaelpalmieri7335  When Obama was first elected, I did think that this was a turning point for race relations in the US. Was I right but not in the way I thought. Obama was in the unique position of being the one person who could have brought some sense to the discord after the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson. Instead, he basically said nothing and let that city burn, even though it was found that the "hands up, don't shoot" was false. By the time it was done not only Ferguson was burning, so were parts of Milwaukee, Baltimore, Minneapolis and Dallas. People were marching in the streets, some even calling for the killing of ordinary and random police officers and 5 officers in Dallas and 2 in New York were brutally murdered in response to the anti-police rhetoric of the press and certain leaders. One was a young black officer, mother of 2, who was waiting in her police vehicle and was executed with a bullet to the back of the head. Obama did nothing and the reason for that was simple. There was an election coming and he didn't want to upset the black voters. Race relations have been at their worst since the sixties. That was Obama's legacy and not one that he should be proud of. I would agree that Trump should never have praised Gianforte for body slamming that reporter however he did NOT mock that reporter for his handicap. The media gave the impression that the reporter Serge Kovaleski had cerebral palsy, a disease in which the sufferer loses body control. Kovaleski does NOT have cerebral palsy so he does NOT suffer from the lose of body control that one would see if he were afflicted by that disease. He speaks quite normally. Trump was mocking his fluster at being caught in an awkward stance on a claim he made. This is Kovaleski and how he normally talks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ45EsD2Gc0 These are examples of how Trump mocks people who get caught in a lie and acting flustered. He has done it many times in the past. No one is going to claim the Ted Cruz is handicapped or even himself, years before. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AedzsWd-ME Maybe Trump could have handled it better when he did find out the guy did have a bad arm but he wasn't mocking him for that. He was mocking him for getting caught in saying something that wasn't true by using exaggerated antics that a flustered person might use. To say that he was mocking his handicap is being disingenuous, at best, dishonest at worst.
    6
  1614. 6
  1615. 6
  1616. 6
  1617. 6
  1618. 6
  1619. 6
  1620. 6
  1621. 6
  1622. 6
  1623. Dick Toles You really don't get it, do you? They're all Americans and she is an individual, a single entity that happens to be an Asian woman, just as you're a single entity that happens to be a white male. Affirmative action says that an Asian individual shouldn't have the same opportunity as another group of individuals and has assigned an hierarchy of opportunity based on group identity. It may be fair to the group (maybe) but definitely not fair for the individual. Her argument INCLUDES you because you, as a white man, are also at the bottom of the opportunity hierarchy. If she proves that Affirmative Action is discriminatory, she is also speaking for you, because it is also discriminates AGAINST YOU. She is advocating against this type of discrimination and that we should be judged as individuals, not as Asian woman or white male. It's like two people trying out for a baseball team. Do you take the one who's the best baseball player or do you take the black guy because there are already too many white guys on the team. I take the best ball player because I want the team to be the best it can be. When you apply for university, you take the application that shows the strongest potential, that manifests itself in previous achievements of scholarship and effort. You do that to prepare for the future of your society in the best possible manner. That the top minds are the ones doing the most complex tasks that are needed for a functioning society. I don't care what ethnicity my surgeon is, so long as he's the best, not because he's Latino and there isn't enough Latino surgeons. That's not only colossally stupid, it's just plain crazy.
    6
  1624. 6
  1625. 6
  1626. 6
  1627. 6
  1628. 6
  1629. 6
  1630.  @dubnation5824  What incredible nonsense. Not one person in the NFL is a slave. Not one. They can leave the game any time they want and some have. They're not forced to play. Ever. They're doing what kids do in high school for fun in parks and empty lots and getting paid huge money for it so they can spend their lives in a life of ease and freedom. I see your problem. You are filled with envy. You're one of those guys that is continuously looking at everyone else's pile and hating them for having more. You're a Marxist, whose goal is to make sure that everyone has the exact same size pile and every assessment you make involves that comparison of assets. The one with the biggest pile, is automatically the bad guy. It's ideological obsession inspired by envy. You don't care about mitigating suffering, you want EVERYONE to suffer like you believe you're suffering. It's a rot that comes from within, a rot that inspires hate to the point that you believe that working hard and being of value to society is pointless because society is against you. You have no concept of the realities of life. You only see that others are better off than you and that pisses you off. It's a sad way to live and it wouldn't be so bad except it's people who live that way that have caused a great deal of suffering in the last 100 years. It's what drove the Soviet Union, Red China, Cambodia, Venezuela and the horror of what is now North Korea. Strangely, it drives you in such a powerful way that you can't even begin to see that the poor in the Western, Capitalist countries live better than people have ever lived in human history. All you know is that someone has more than you do.
    6
  1631. 6
  1632.  @minkman99  I'm afraid that you're not following this very well. The SJW stuff, the safe spaces and such, has been around for quite a few years. It was in the universities and any student who said things that establishment deemed inappropriate was called onto the carpet. It always seemed to be conservatives that were being censored and belittled. They weren't allowed to have their own speakers or their own conservative clubs. There were protests, sometimes even violent, directed against anyone that would say anything that went against the leftist dogma. This was going on before Trump became president. Books were beginning to be cancelled but they couldn't outright ban them. Not yet anyway, but some would love to do it. The rhetoric was always about race, gender, sexual preference and accusations were becoming more and more rampant. Every dissenting conversation ended with "You're racist" or "You're homophobic" or something to that effect. Now, it's in the media. Critical race theory is the new thing. People, in the work place, are called to meetings and white employees have been required to "acknowledge their white privilege". Kids, starting schools, are taught that they may belong to the race that represents racism, colonialism and sexism, that there's something inherently evil in them. Everything has become racist. Mathematics, getting up on time, working hard, street lights, milk, camping, skiing, the list goes on and on and on. University professors have longed for the demise of the white race and done so publicly, without any sanctions from the MSM. BLM have rioted, burned, looted, injured and even killed people but the MSM says their protests are "mostly peaceful". Antifa, in Portland, rioted for over 120 days in a row, last summer, all chronicled by Andy Ngo, but to Nadler, a Democrat Congressman, it's all a myth and Biden says Antifa is an idea. You should google "Evergreen College" and read about the craziness there, a few years ago. Strangely, completely ignored by the MSM. Had a bunch of conservative students done this, they'd still be talking about it. If you haven't noticed any of this, you really haven't been paying attention. The left have been taken over by a bunch of overt Marxists. A woman, who wore Chairman Mao's picture on her clothing almost won the election to become Mayor of Portland recently. You really have to start finding out what is going on with the left and how they're infiltrating the education system, the media, human resources of big corporations and the Democrat party. They will completely destroy the western world as we know it and we'll be left with a place where we won't have to worry about illegal immigrants or refugees. They won't want to come here.
    6
  1633. 6
  1634. 6
  1635. 6
  1636. 6
  1637. 6
  1638. 6
  1639. 6
  1640. 6
  1641. 6
  1642. 6
  1643. 6
  1644. 6
  1645. 6
  1646. 6
  1647. 6
  1648. 6
  1649. 6
  1650. 6
  1651. 6
  1652. 6
  1653. 6
  1654. 6
  1655. 6
  1656. 6
  1657. 6
  1658. 6
  1659. 6
  1660. 6
  1661. 6
  1662. 6
  1663. 6
  1664. 6
  1665. 6
  1666. 6
  1667. 6
  1668. 6
  1669.  @babajaiy8246  The Muslims can practise their faith any way they wish. They have complete religious freedom. In fact, even though the Jews believe that Solomon's Temple, a very sacred Jewish site, stood where the Dome of the Rock is now, they allow Muslims to still use that site as a Mosque. The Israelis still allow it to be a place for Muslims. That's a concession that has been allowed Israeli Muslims. However, in Gaza, there is not ONE Jew....not a one and there's good reason for that. If someone didn't kill them, their life would be pure hell. Jews can't live in Gaza. Why would they want to live as they did before? That area was extremely poor until the Jews came and started to turn it into an oasis in the desert. It was nothing but dirt and rock 100 years ago. If Hamas cared so much for the people of Gaza, maybe they'd do the same thing there....but they won't. Hamas is too filled with hatred for Israel to care about their own people. You're asking me to explain the mind of those filled with hate? Why did Hitler want to kill all the Jews? Hatred....that's why. Why did Rome kill everyone in Carthage and then sow the fields with salt? Hatred...blind hatred. Why did the Hutu try to kill all the Tutsi in Rwanda? Same thing. Why would Hamas, the leadership of the Palestinians, want to drive the Israelis into the sea? Because they refuse to live with them. They hate them because they're not Muslim. "The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them, till the stone says: ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’” 2 This Hadith was reported by Ahmad and Al-Tirmidhy who said that it is a Hasan, Sahih Hadith. This is a part of the Muslim faith. Islam says that they are a religion of peace but no one who values peace would attack innocent unarmed civilians. They defend themselves when attacked but they don't start shooting at people at a music festival and they would NEVER parade the naked body of a girl, that they killed and desecrated, so the people could spit on her. That's NOT the way of peace. If anything, those Palestinians are going against the will of Allah is Islam is indeed the religion of peace. Hamas could take the money, that they've received over the last 70 years, and use it to make life better for the Palestinians. They could do that but they don't. They use it to buy guns and rockets so they could kill as many Jews as possible. There is NO excuse for what just happened and you can't spin it to make it sound justified. It's not.
    6
  1670. 6
  1671. 6
  1672. 6
  1673. 6
  1674. 6
  1675. 6
  1676. 6
  1677. 6
  1678. 6
  1679. 6
  1680. 6
  1681. 6
  1682. 6
  1683. 6
  1684. 6
  1685. 6
  1686. 6
  1687. 6
  1688. 6
  1689. 6
  1690. 6
  1691. 6
  1692. 6
  1693. 6
  1694. 6
  1695. 6
  1696. 6
  1697. 6
  1698. billythedog Peterson did not lie about that law. The law was Bill C-16 and it was to follow the guidelines set in the Ontario Human Rights Act. This was to be a guide, not a law, and as such was open to interpretation. There was wording in that Act that could have been interpreted in such a way that a refusal to use gender based pronoun could be interpreted as discriminatory against transgender people. Peterson said that the wording of the legislation was against a person right to not use speech that they didn't want to and if, IF, in capital letters, anyone tried to force him to use any speech, he would refuse. He then said that they could try to force him to use compelled speech by citing this law and the Ontario Human Rights Act by saying that refusal to use that speech was an act of discrimination. If, the word "if" is important here, this was used against him, he would refuse to pay any fines levied against him if that law was interpreted against him. Hundreds signed petitions against him. He never said he wouldn't use them if negotiated on a one to one basis, but he would refuse if compelled using any legislation but in particular, this one. That was enough to spark the outrage of the masses. One year later, Lindsey Shepherd was told she may have broken a law just showing a clip of a debate Peterson was involved with on an Ontario public TV station. They actually believed that was against the law. Where did they get this idea? From the very legislation that Peterson had argued was wrong. So, then......who DID lie? Obviously, it wasn't Peterson. If he lied, then why would someone think that Shepherd had broken the law by just showing a debate on gender based pronouns? It was because the Ontario Human Rights Act suggested that she was being discriminatory by even suggesting that it may be a human rights problem to compel speech. It was being interpreted in that way. He didn't lie at all and if you're really interested, I will even find the sections that deal with it and show them to you.
    6
  1699. 6
  1700. 6
  1701. 6
  1702. 6
  1703. 6
  1704. 6
  1705. 6
  1706. 6
  1707. 6
  1708. 6
  1709. 6
  1710. 6
  1711. 6
  1712. 6
  1713. 6
  1714. 6
  1715. 6
  1716. 6
  1717. 6
  1718. 6
  1719. 6
  1720. 6
  1721. 6
  1722. 6
  1723. 6
  1724. 6
  1725. 6
  1726. 6
  1727. 6
  1728. 6
  1729. 6
  1730. 6
  1731. 6
  1732. 6
  1733. 6
  1734. 6
  1735. 6
  1736. 6
  1737. 6
  1738. 6
  1739. 6
  1740. 6
  1741. 6
  1742. 6
  1743. 6
  1744. 6
  1745. 6
  1746. 6
  1747. 6
  1748. 6
  1749.  Roger King  First of all, it's NOT my country. The world doesn't revolve around the US. Neither did the Atlantic slave trade. More Africans were brought to the Caribbean, Central America, Brazil, Venezuela, and other Southern Nations than the US. So, your 70 million does not apply to the country that you so mistakenly call "my country". It applies to the entire New World. The US is only a part of the New World. Everyone was involved in the slave trade. Europeans, Africans, even Arabs were involved. European mostly traded for slaves but it was the Africans that went into the interior, raided villages and captured slaves for the Atlantic slave trade. So there was fighting but I was not referring to that specific trade when I made that statement. Countries have gone to war for thousands of years and quite often the losers were carried away as slaves. The Romans did this for centuries when they went to northern Europe and after defeating people there, captured them to sell off as slaves back in Rome, some going into the gladiator pits. Even in the Americas, indigenous people would do the same, the most famous being the Aztecs, who would use the slaves for ritualistic human sacrifices. America became independent in 1783. Before that it was a British colony. 20 years later, the Atlantic slave trade to the US was stopped, in 1807, to be specific. The slave trade was slowly dying in the US, with strong abolitionist movements in the North and the Republican Party was a very strong Abolitionist party formed to fight slavery. It was a slow progression but it DID happen, yet you refuse to give any credit to the hundreds of thousands of European Americans that worked hard and sacrificed it all to end slavery, and 600,000 people did die in that Civil War. It was white American Abolitionists that drew the ire of the south and caused the Civil War, a war that ended slavery. No kudos from you, though for the sacrifice of the Abolitionists or the Government of the US for supporting them. You'd rather draw the line in the sand and keep up the hate. Over 90 percent of the slaves went to the Caribbean, Brazil and Latin America. Only 6 percent went to British North America. Plantations in the Caribbean were huge compared to American plantations and death rates were much higher due for the slaves there than it was in the US. Like it or not, "my country" was not the main recipient of the African slave trade. https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-now/historical-context-facts-about-slave-trade-and-slavery Read this and read it all. It gives a rounded description of the African slave trade, without the emotionalism and anger that people like you want to inject into the conversation. Also the numbers weren't 70 million slaves brought to the New World. It was closer to 10 to 12 million and 600,000 of those went to the US. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/how-many-slaves-landed-in-the-us/ Read this. It confirms the numbers given in the other reference I've given. Slavery didn't start with the African slave trade but it was the greatest in numbers and scope. Slavery had been in existence for thousands of years even mentioned in the Bible. That was long before the European settling of the Americas and even any kind of real knowledge of Northern Europe. I'm not defending slavery either. Another fallacy people like you want to make in your attempt to show moral superiority and maintain the hate in your hearts. I'm saying that slavery is a part of HUMAN history and has been for thousands of years. Pointing fingers and laying blame solves nothing. Anger and hate solves nothing. You'd think that someone who would quote the Bible would know that. "Love the neighbour". It doesn't say to "Love the neighbour except for those who's ancestors might have had slaves." There is no qualification in that admonishment.
    6
  1750. 6
  1751. 6
  1752. 6
  1753. 6
  1754. 6
  1755. 6
  1756. 6
  1757. 6
  1758. 6
  1759. 6
  1760. 6
  1761. 6
  1762. 6
  1763. 6
  1764. 6
  1765. 6
  1766. 6
  1767. 6
  1768. 6
  1769. 6
  1770. 6
  1771. 6
  1772. 6
  1773. 6
  1774. 6
  1775. 6
  1776. 6
  1777. 6
  1778. 6
  1779. 6
  1780. 6
  1781. 6
  1782. 6
  1783. 6
  1784. @Gary Miller Why would Americans vote against a president who is at the helm of the best economic climate in decades? That doesn't even make sense. He negotiated a stop to nuclear and missile testing in North Korea. That's great news. He initiated prison reform and the first step program. Something that's been needed for a long time. He instituted an economic plan for depressed zones and it's been great for those who'd take advantage of it. Black unemployment, right now, is at its lowest in history. IN HISTORY!!! Also, the gap between white and black unemployment is at its lowest in history. He's the first president that has taken on the Chinese juggernaut, who've been flooding western stores with cheap products using production methods which include worker abuse, no quality control, no pollution standards, theft of intellectual property and just plain bullying of vulnerable markets. Finally, some one has had the man parts to do something about it. So the man isn't the most sophisticated man around. He's boorish and a braggart and has a penchant for saying the wrong things but he's getting things done. If only the Democrats would try to cooperate, even a little bit, the US would be even be in a better position economically and socially. Trump's biggest hurdle has been his fellow Americans, the Democrats, the far left and the MSM. They've fought him every step of the way and it's the worst treatment of a sitting president in history. And you're not helping. Get rid of the Democrats and convince them that they'd better reform and become a party that cares for the citizens of the US and their country.
    6
  1785. 6
  1786. 6
  1787. 6
  1788. 6
  1789. 6
  1790. 6
  1791. 6
  1792. 6
  1793. 6
  1794. 6
  1795. 6
  1796.  @Arctc-zh6rg  Almost everyone of those black schools are in the inner city and in cities that have been controlled by a Democrat governments for YEARS. It's the Republicans, the right wing, that are advocating for school choice and the left, the Democrats that are solidly against school choice. They're telling those black parents that they MUST go to the school that has been built for them, no matter how bad that school could be. So it's Democrats that are telling those parents to shut up and do as you're told. Also, have you listened to Candace Owens? She's a bad role model, for the black community, of someone who's supposed to shut up. Beside, that's not what she's saying. You're putting words in her mouth that aren't there. She's saying to quit thinking like a victim. Quit being silent and demanding things from others because the record shows that they're NOT GOING TO GIVE IT TO YOU. Most of the impoverished inner city have been Democrat run for decades.....the party that supposed to help them and nothing ever changes. The reason is simple. NO ONE is going to help you. You have to help yourself. The capability is there. What's needed is the desire and the left keeps sucking that desire out of the black community with their promises of "hope and change". It's a false promise. I've already said it. Asians have the most affluent demographic house hold wealth. They do it through hard work. It can be done. Black doctors, nurses, truck drives, tradesmen, lawyers, lab techs, writers, police officers are doing it all the time. They work hard and they make a good life for themselves. They don't feel sorry for themselves about how much harder it is for them. They're going to do it in SPITE of the difficulty. One thing is certain, it's not going to happen, waiting in front of TV set for the government to do it for you. It didn't work 50 years ago, or 40 years ago or 25 years ago and it's not going to work today.
    6
  1797. 6
  1798. 6
  1799. 5
  1800. 5
  1801. 5
  1802. 5
  1803. 5
  1804. 5
  1805. 5
  1806. 5
  1807. 5
  1808. 5
  1809. chris daren Columbus reached the Caribbean. That's right and it's a part of North America but he didn't know that. He thought that he'd reached some islands off the coast of eastern Asia or India. He thought that because he knew that the earth was round. What he didn't know was that North and South America lay between Europe and Asia if you sailed west. No one did. There was a lucrative spice trade with India and the other eastern Asian areas in 14th and 15th century. This was monopolised by the Arabs in the middle east, so the Portuguese tried to find a route around Africa so they could go directly to eastern Asia and cut out the middle man in the middle east. Columbus thought there might be a better way if a person sailed west, not realising that the Americas were in the way. That's because no one knew that, otherwise it would have been a good way. He wasn't after gold at all. He only went after it when he was some of the natives in the Caribbean with some gold. He was after the Asian spice trade. Pizarro was the first European to reach Peru, where the Incas had all the gold and silver. He conquered Peru in 1530, 16 years after Columbus died. So how could Columbus have depleted all the gold in a decade if it took 30 years for Pizarro to reach Peru after Columbus first reached the Caribbean. In fact, Peru is 6th in gold production today. The United States is 4th and Canada is 5th. As for silver, Mexico is STILL the number one producing country, with Peru 3rd and Bolivia 6th. That doesn't sound like a depleted gold and silver resources to me. You're not very well informed on the subject at all. You're entire post is based on a dislike for white people and is nothing more that a personal bias. A simple google search could have gotten all this information, but it would appear that you like your version better because it backs up your own personal prejudices. Before you make these comments a little fact checking might help you a lot because you come off as a 12 year old and it does you no credit.
    5
  1810. 5
  1811. 5
  1812. 5
  1813. 5
  1814. 5
  1815. 5
  1816. 5
  1817. 5
  1818. 5
  1819. 5
  1820. 5
  1821. 5
  1822. 5
  1823. 5
  1824. 5
  1825. 5
  1826. 5
  1827. 5
  1828. 5
  1829. 5
  1830. 5
  1831. 5
  1832. 5
  1833. 5
  1834. 5
  1835. 5
  1836. 5
  1837.  @johanvanderpants9363  You're trying to sugarcoat it and you know it. I'm not talking about 2A and you know that as well. He KNEW that he was in a dangerous situation and it wasn't his home. No, one that I know of, sleeps with a gun so readily available while sleeping and most of my friends support the 2A. You're doing everything possible to make it seem as if he was just an innocent. That meme about how he fed the poor, wanted to be minister, was turning his life around and nonsense like that. You're using the "He was within his 2A rights" as a defence, thinking that this is such a clever argument. It's not. It's pure gaslighting. They went with a no-knock warrant because they knew just how dangerous these guys were. It was all outlined in the warrant. They did it this way to prevent a neighbourhood standoff that could have killed a lot more people. They had every reason to believe that possibility and within seconds of entering the home, a gun was pulled. The officers had no time to ask who he was or why he was pointing a gun at them. They issued a no-knock warrant because they believed the situation could be extremely volatile and the first person they encountered upon entering the home did exactly what they feared would happen. However, they were prepared and the death count was held at one. Had his cousins been forewarned it could have been FAR worse. That's why the no-knock warrant. It was to overwhelm the occupants before it got to far out of control because they knew that they were dealing with people who were already out of control.
    5
  1838.  @johanvanderpants9363  The fact that this was a volatile situation and that the police knew it, is validated by the 16 page warrant, outlining why they felt that it was necessary. However, the police can not carry out that warrant on their own say so. They had to present that warrant to a judge, who evaluates the evidence presented and decides on whether the no-knock warrant is necessary. This is some knee jerk action by the police. It took thought, the collection of evidence, the presentation of the credentials of the police officer involved and the signing off by a judge. The police don't want to have more people involved in the arrest than is necessary. It just makes it all more dangerous for themselves and for others. He was there. The police had no way of knowing that he was there and they weren't going to tip off the suspects by placing surveillance officers in the neighbourhood. This guy had to have known what his cousins were up to. They posted a lot of it all over social media. If the police had waited until the PERFECT situation that guaranteed no problems whatsoever, who knows how many those cousins would have killed in the interim. They're in a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" situation and the best thing to do is to nip it quickly in the bud before the suspects kill even more people. You're living in dreamland if you think that the perfect time exists at all times. Instead of moaning about how he was so innocent, you should be telling people to be careful about who they associate with if they don't want to find themselves at the wrong side of a police altercation or even a gang retribution situation.
    5
  1839. 5
  1840. 5
  1841. 5
  1842. 5
  1843. 5
  1844. 5
  1845. 5
  1846. 5
  1847. 5
  1848. 5
  1849.  @queent3343  Haven't you seen any of the school board meetings where parents were reading from books that were recommended reading for primary school children. Some of it so explicit that the school board members told the parents that it was too offensive to read at this meeting, yet those books were in the classroom and school library. Maybe you should see the TikTok videos about the teachers of kindergarten to grade 3, talking about their sexuality, holding pride parades for the little tykes, drag queen story time and more. Besides, even if none of this was true (which it isn't), why not make sure that teachers don't talk about sexually explicit material to little kids whether it be LGBTQ or STRAIGHT. It's just not necessary. What's really strange is that Dave Rubin and his husband have been guests of Desantis and he even congratulated them on the adoption of their little babies. Why would a man, who supposedly hates gays, do that? You're the one that so filled with hate that you won't dig deeper into the topic. You WANT the divide. It makes you feel superior somehow that you're better than those "bigots". Watch "The Quartering" here on YouTube. He's got all kinds of videos showing teachers who brag about how they've come out to their students of a very young age and how good it makes them feel. What kind of narcissism, must a person have, to find validation from 6 year olds? Why would a teacher even talk about their personal life let alone their sexual preferences to little kids? It's just plain weird.
    5
  1850. 5
  1851.  @emmawillard1832  Years ago, my dog made onto the voting list. Don't ask me how. My wife had painted his name on his doghouse and that's the only way anyone could have gotten his name. It was weird. Fortunately, we live in a small town and when I went to vote, one of the poll workers asked me who "George" was. I knew most of them and apparently they'd already been asking who George was when my dad came in to vote. He had no idea. I told them that my dog was named "George" and as we were the only family with our last name in that VERY small town, it was easy for the poll workers to spot. Of course, my dog didn't vote. It was a stupid mistake made by election workers under a bad system. The American voting system is shot. Why don't we fix it so these things don't happen. NO WAY. We'd rather argue over the ridiculous things than just fix it so it doesn't happen. Foreigners on voting lists in Virginia. Problems in Lancaster, Penn. Likely charges in Colorado and Arizona. Allegations of ballot harvesting in Detroit. A man torching a drop box. Another trying to steal a drop box. None of this should be happening but let's not fix it. It's racist to show ID to vote. Accusations of fraud in 2000, 2004, 2016, 2020 and now it's already starting in 2024....but we don't need to fix it. Let's just keep it so our elections are disputed, FOREVER. Other countries are laughing at us. They don't have those problems. In a lot of countries you get a voting registration card that's specific to you, like a bank card. No card.....no vote. However, people would start crying in America because that's too difficult for some people. It's a joke.
    5
  1852. 5
  1853. 5
  1854. 5
  1855. 5
  1856. 5
  1857. 5
  1858. 5
  1859. 5
  1860. 5
  1861. 5
  1862. 5
  1863. 5
  1864. 5
  1865. 5
  1866. 5
  1867. 5
  1868. 5
  1869.  @shaniajackson7864  You can't even tell which brand of Christianity is the correct one. Is it the Roman Catholic Church? The Presbyterian Church? How about Calvinism or the Amish? Millions died and were persecuted trying to sort that out. Furthermore, it's the belief in God that matters, not the ideology. Ideology is the man made construct and Christianity has splintered into all kinds of factions. We, as humans, don't have the wisdom to distinguish each facet of the teachings of the Bible and 2 people could read the same passage in their Bible and come to different conclusions to its meaning. That's was a major reason why the founding fathers of the US allowed freedoms. They wanted to avoid the endless wars and deaths that plagued Europe for centuries. Freedom of speech, of religion, of assembly, all the basic principles of the Constitution, that will allow us all our own path to live our life the way that God granted us. The Apostles never once advocated that Christians force anyone to believe in Jesus. The only thing important was faith and that was something that was lost in the Middle Ages and was slowly brought back, starting with the Reformation and culminating in the American Constitution. Also, the Kingdom of Heaven will never be attained on earth. Jesus told us that, explicitly. Any attempt to force it or say that Christianity is the only way, negates the fact that we're still human and as such we will pervert his way. That's a guarantee. The realisation will come with the Kingdom of Heaven, not by the Evangelicals, who believe that they have the right to tell me how to believe or what to believe.
    5
  1870. 5
  1871. 5
  1872. 5
  1873. 5
  1874. 5
  1875. 5
  1876. 5
  1877. 5
  1878. 5
  1879. 5
  1880. 5
  1881. 5
  1882. 5
  1883. 5
  1884. 5
  1885. 5
  1886. 5
  1887. 5
  1888. 5
  1889. 5
  1890. 5
  1891. 5
  1892. 5
  1893. 5
  1894. 5
  1895. 5
  1896. 5
  1897. 5
  1898. 5
  1899. 5
  1900. 5
  1901. 5
  1902. 5
  1903. 5
  1904. 5
  1905. 5
  1906. 5
  1907. 5
  1908. 5
  1909. 5
  1910. 5
  1911. 5
  1912. 5
  1913. 5
  1914. 5
  1915. 5
  1916. 5
  1917. 5
  1918. 5
  1919. 5
  1920. 5
  1921. 5
  1922. 5
  1923. 5
  1924. 5
  1925. 5
  1926. 5
  1927. 5
  1928. 5
  1929.  @matthewcurry3565  Ok. Here it goes 30 years ago, I found out my wife was having an affair. It devastated me and I left her for obvious reasons. 7 months later, my son was killed in an accident and my mother was diagnosed with terminal cancer 2 months later. I was a mess. I quit working, drank too much and was heading down a terrible road. After 3 years, I started a job at a scrap yard, which may seem like something but it wasn't that big a deal at the time. In reality, it was a place to go and drink. There was beer in the fridge at all times and if I took a day or week off, no big deal. They weren't going to fire me and they said so. I even got paid for days I took off. However, I slowly started to go to work when I was there. I got out of the office and started to do things that had to be done, much to the chagrin of my alcoholic boss. It was then that the yard was sold and things changed. I started to do the work that I was expected and supposed to do. It fell right into the pattern that I'd been slowly immersing myself into. They fired everyone, except me, and I worked alone for 2 years, rebuilding a clientele that had been lost when the old owner had it. It was a long struggle, a lot of days, in the beginning, where I never saw a soul, but it was the best thing in the world for me. I was showing up every day. I stayed later when needed. I was metaphorically cleaning my room. The drinking slowed down. I was finding peace in my life and all it took was doing the things that I should be doing. When I heard him explain his "Clean your room" trope, it spoke to me. I was lucky, though. I came from a farming background where the virtues of hard work were extolled as a virtue. It was something that I had been accustomed to. However, if a person had grown up in suburbia and the toughest thing that they did growing up was take out the garbage once a week, that idea would never occur to them, UNLESS it was outlined by someone who had the power to communicate ideas in a powerful manner and Peterson is just that. A lot of young people would never have worked their way out of severe depression because they'd have never, metaphorically cleaned their room. I reconnected with my daughter, have 3 wonderful grandchildren. I have a closer relationship with my ageing father than what I've ever had my entire life. Things aren't perfect, that's a life's impossibility but I'm contented. All it took was for me to take care of business, slowly at first, just like his "clean your room" suggested but I made my life worth living. That translated into making things better for those around me. It's small. It's simple. It's trite but it's real.
    5
  1930. 5
  1931. 5
  1932. 5
  1933. 5
  1934. 5
  1935. 5
  1936. 5
  1937. 5
  1938. 5
  1939. 5
  1940. 5
  1941. 5
  1942. 5
  1943. 5
  1944. 5
  1945. 5
  1946. 5
  1947. 5
  1948. 5
  1949. 5
  1950. 5
  1951. 5
  1952. 5
  1953. 5
  1954.  Steven Sweeden  There is a lot of hatred out there. It started the moment Trump announced his plans to run for the presidency. There is no way anyone can deny that. People actually say it. "I hate Trump". There have been numerous attacks on people wearing MAGA hats. The entire Covington fiasco was due to the fact that some of those kids were wearing those hats. The media intentionally distorted that story. Anyone that watched the original film in an unbiased way could see that those kids did nothing so why would the media portray that incident the way they did. That doesn't mean that Trump is great guy but when people refuse to even acknowledge something that he did that might be good because of the way they feel about him, that's intense dislike....or hate. When a so-called comedienne's reaction to a picture of his daughter holding her baby is to call her a feckless c---, that's due to hatred. When someone posts a picture of themselves holding Trump's severed head or say that they fantasise about blowing up the White House, it's gone way beyond disapproval. It wasn't that long ago, that I was in a bar when a guy casually mentioned that he voted for Trump in 16, and he was called an idiot and then asked to leave. That's not just disapproval.....that's hatred. When a member of Congress tells people to confront those she doesn't like when they're in public and tell them that they're not welcome....that's hatred. These people may feel justified but it's still hatred, plain and simple.
    5
  1955. 5
  1956. 5
  1957. 5
  1958. 5
  1959.  @middlegroundparty9436  Yeah.....you're right. We want the guy hiding in his basement. We want the guy that's been in politics for 47 years and still has no platform. We want the guy that Pelosi doesn't want to get involved in a presidential debate. We want the guy that's represents the party that said that Jacob Blake was breaking up a fight, trying everything in their power to start racial tension.....and they succeeded. A small city, burned and looted, people killed....WHY? Because the party of the guy, hiding in his basement, didn't care to wait for the truth. That Jacob Blake was wanted for sexual assault, had a restraining order against him and was in violation on that order. Who took a woman's keys and then resisted arrest. Millions of dollars in damages, lives ruined, that's that guy we want for president. We want the guy, that represents the party, that said that the riots and looting were a myth. Riots in Portland, Seattle, Oakland, New York, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Richmond, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Austen, Louisville, Chicago, Rochester......must I go on and that party ignores it or calls it all a myth. People killed...at least 30 of them in those riots or "peaceful protests" as the Democrats and their media likes to call them. You want the guy that wants to raise taxes, denies inner city people the right to school choice while they send their own children to the best private schools in the country. The party of Mayor Lightfoot, who wouldn't send the police to quell the looting in downtown Chicago but then threatened to arrest any "protesters" peaceful or not, around her house. You want the party that put Covid patients in nursing homes. Democrat governors from New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California. Yeah......you sure want the good ones, don't you. TDS is a serious ailment. You may want to get it looked after.
    5
  1960. 5
  1961. 5
  1962. 5
  1963. 5
  1964. 5
  1965. 5
  1966. 5
  1967. 5
  1968. 5
  1969. 5
  1970. 5
  1971. 5
  1972. 5
  1973. 5
  1974. 5
  1975. 5
  1976. 5
  1977. 5
  1978. 5
  1979. 5
  1980. 5
  1981. 5
  1982. 5
  1983. 5
  1984. 5
  1985. 5
  1986. 5
  1987. 5
  1988. 5
  1989. 5
  1990. 5
  1991. 5
  1992. 5
  1993. 5
  1994.  @abcxyz2927  I grew up with an neighbour with gender dysphoria. Not 10 years ago, or even 20. I met the guy in 1958, when i was 6 years old and he was 4. He looked like a boy, had the bowl cut all of boys had, wore boys clothes and everything, but he acted like a girl. The way that he talked and walked, the way that he moved, everything about him was girlish. He really freaked us out. His brother told me that he was always like that. His parents were embarrassed with the way he was. When he was 16, he took off to the big city and started to live as a cross dresser. Why was he like that? It wasn't his parents who dressed him as a boy and gave him a boy's name and haircut and were at a loss on what to do with him. There were no activist teachers or doctors trying to convince him that he was a girl. We were country folk, many of us religious, including his family. He did it all on his own, right from the time that he started to walk and talk. How could a 3 year old dream all this up and then keep it up his entire life? It's a mental condition, just like Tourette's and any other mental affliction. It's been well studied and it's been a part of humanity for thousands of years. It's NOTHING like the stuff that's going on now. Not even close. From what I can see, Buck Angel is the same and he's speaking out against the insanity that's going on now. If we can't even be reasonable and admit that this could be a medical problem and that the cutting and pasting of body parts isn't going to solve anything, we'll be ruining the lives of children for years....all at the behest of socialist activists. Their role is to disrupt the concept of reality and they're using children to do it. That's what socialists do. They take a real problem, that's extremely rare, and distort it to their own ends. If you don't understand it, you're falling right into their hands. Don't let them do that. You're a sucker if you do.
    5
  1995. 5
  1996. 5
  1997. 5
  1998. 5
  1999. 5
  2000. 5
  2001. 5
  2002. 5
  2003.  @almosthuman1398  " I allowed you to get there under your own steam." How magnanimous of you. You "allowed" me to do it. Sounds condescending to me. The roles of procreation has been the defining factor on how we defined men and women throughout all of human history. To carry out those roles depends on the plumbing. If you don't have the plumbing, you can't get pregnant. That means that you're NOT a woman. Our survival depends on this binary relationship. One carries the sperm. The other the egg. We need it to ensure genetic diversity to survive. So how do we describe the binaries that take part in procreation? The one that carries the sperm is the man. The one that carries the egg is the woman. Beattie became pregnant using donated sperm. That implies that he carried the egg which means that biologically he's a woman. You can dress him anyway you want, surgically remove body parts, give him drugs but his body still functioned as a woman. He carried the egg and then had full female capabilities that enabled him to carry a child to birth. That will NEVER happen to me. I'm NOT a woman. I do not and will NEVER have those capabilities. I am a man. Not because I wish it or feel it or passionately want it. I'm a man because that's what my body developed me to be. Neither the doctor or my parents assigned my manhood to me at birth. NATURE did. Biology. My role was clearly defined by how my body was designed and it defines its role in the perpetuation of my species. That's been the clear designation of gender all through history. In fact, 20 years ago people would have laughed at the ideas of multiple gender roles. The entire Beattie thing is a game of sleight of hand.
    5
  2004. 5
  2005. 5
  2006. 5
  2007. 5
  2008. 5
  2009. 5
  2010. 5
  2011. 5
  2012. 5
  2013. 5
  2014. 5
  2015.  Network Search  Unfortunately, it's not just Biden. It's the entire Democrat Party. Look at the devastation in Minneapolis. The Democrats have been in power for decades and yet they haven't done anything to improve their own city police force. However, worse than that, Democrat Ellison had possession of the body cam that showed that the police officers weren't being at all too harsh on George Floyd and refused to show it. Now they want to abolish that police force but that Democrat city council did vote themselves a personal security detail. Wow. Then the fiasco in Portland. 74 nights in a row....IN A ROW, of violence and destruction. The Democrat mayor stood right next to rioters as the shot high grade fireworks at the court house and watched them try to tear down the barrier that was put up around that building. Yet, somehow that's Trump's fault. Then, Nadler just blithely says that it's all a myth. New York, now there's another mess. Almost 500,000 people have left. They're talking a 30 billion dollar shortfall this year. 13,000 homeless people put up in high end hotels at 175 bucks a pop at the Upper East Side. Now they have people passing out on the streets, urinating and masturbating in public, yelling at people walking by. They're not wearing masks like everyone else in New York is supposed to. Crime is up in the area by almost 250% with murders more than double in the City over last year. Louisville, Kentucky city council wants to name racism as a public health threat. At the same time BLM reps are going from store to store demanding hiring quotas and forcing businesses to buy from black owned businesses or else give BLM 1.5% of the business revenue. Legalised extortion....but the Democrat leaders don't do a thing. I could go on about this for hours....non stop. So no, it isn't just Biden. Biden just represents the incredible blindness of the entire Democrat party. It's like Trump hired the entire bunch of them to make him look good and that's not an easy thing to do.
    5
  2016.  @AllAboutMusicMovies  I never ONCE wrote a narrative. I said that this person could have made a good point and he MAY have, that's not a narrative, just a possibility, said this because it was a concern. He may have been screaming at people about it or he MAY have said something along the lines of "I've said this lots of time but I think...." I DON'T KNOW.....but apparently you know enough about this person to call him and extremist. I'm saying that you don't have enough information to do that. Also, you've assumed that this person is American. It doesn't state where this person is from. You just assumed it for no real reason. Another narrative that you've wrote for yourself. Then I said that I don't like to live in fear and then, somehow and incomprehensibly, you asked me if I was afraid and then made an assumption that I was American. Now 2 of us are American...or even possibly 3 of us and you did this without knowing any of us. The commenter was responding to an original point about the psychological effects being worse than the disease. She says that she has a friend that says the same thing and this friend has said it multiple times. Then you come up with how afraid Americans are and how Sweden didn't have those crazy lockdowns, which kind of validates what she was talking about. That this fear CAN be psychologically worse than the disease like it is in the US. I didn't say that, YOU did. It seems as if you agree with him but I don't know. However, your statement does suggest that. Then you go on about Trump letting it spread. So I asked a rhetorical question. Does Trump rule the world......meaning does he have that much influence that the entire world is gripped with Covid and it's all his fault? The disease was spreading in Italy before it started to spread in the US...like I've mentioned and I'm sure that Trump wasn't responsible for that. Also, you're the one that brought up Sweden and Europe and there's been some severe lockdowns in Europe and some awful riots in protest in England, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany. So the US isn't the only place that's living in fear. As a matter of fact, we are here in Canada, too. Now the economy is hurting. I know people that have lost their businesses. The US is in even worse shape. Another area of our lives where the fear of Covid might have consequences that may make things worse than the disease. The point made is not exactly without merit. I've not wrote any narrative about anyone else. I've laid out possibilities by using myself as an example. A possibility is NOT a narrative. It's laying out an idea. Yet, that prompted you to suggest that I must be an extremist as well. Nice leap of logic there. I'm not the one that started calling people names. That's all I can say about the subject.
    5
  2017. 5
  2018. 5
  2019. 5
  2020. 5
  2021. 5
  2022. 5
  2023. 5
  2024. 5
  2025. 5
  2026. 5
  2027. 5
  2028. 5
  2029. 5
  2030. 5
  2031. 5
  2032. 5
  2033. 5
  2034. 5
  2035. 5
  2036. 5
  2037. 5
  2038. 5
  2039. 5
  2040. 5
  2041. 5
  2042. 5
  2043. 5
  2044. 5
  2045. 5
  2046. 5
  2047. 5
  2048. 5
  2049. 5
  2050. 5
  2051. 5
  2052. 5
  2053. 5
  2054. 5
  2055. 5
  2056. 5
  2057. 5
  2058. 5
  2059. 5
  2060. 5
  2061. 5
  2062. 5
  2063. 5
  2064. 5
  2065. 5
  2066. 5
  2067. 5
  2068. 5
  2069. 5
  2070. 5
  2071. 5
  2072. 5
  2073. 5
  2074. 5
  2075. 5
  2076. 5
  2077. 5
  2078. 5
  2079. 5
  2080. 5
  2081. 5
  2082. 5
  2083. 5
  2084. 5
  2085. 5
  2086. 5
  2087. 5
  2088. 5
  2089. 5
  2090. 5
  2091. 5
  2092. 5
  2093.  @wickedwood04  Where did I say "election fraud". I mentioned an article about Hunter Biden's laptop in which his father, who is on the ticket, was implicated in some crooked dealings in China and Ukraine. That does have implications in an election. And do you really want Big Tech to curtail that information. To have the government, like Jen Psaki said, to work with Facebook to flag "misinformation"? Do we now have a governmental department called the "Ministry of Truth"? Since when is it up to anyone to tell me what is true or not? I'm not like you. I don't want to be TOLD what's true. I want to see the evidence, good and bad, even fake, so I can assess it for myself, like a free thinking adult. Also, how is asking for ID making it harder to vote? Every western country requires ID to vote. Even a corrupt country like Mexico does. I know that Canada, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Japan....I could go on and on, require voter ID when voting. It's so people can't jump from voting precinct to voting precinct to vote repeatedly. Funny how voter ID is racist but vaccine passports, that require ID isn't. Are we going to exempt certain people from showing vaccine passports because it's racist? Also, anyone can request a mail in ballot. That would give that ballot a chain of possession which is completely different than sending ballots, en masse, through the mail. If you can explain how the Republicans are making voting harder, with EVIDENCE, I'll look at it but I have to warn you. I read the entire Georgia voting bill, the "Jim Crow 2.0" bill and found nothing. That entire claim was bogus.
    5
  2094. 5
  2095. 5
  2096. 5
  2097. 5
  2098. 5
  2099. 5
  2100. 5
  2101. 5
  2102. 5
  2103. 5
  2104. 5
  2105. 5
  2106. 5
  2107. 5
  2108. 5
  2109. 5
  2110. 5
  2111. 5
  2112. 5
  2113. 5
  2114. 5
  2115. 5
  2116. 5
  2117. 5
  2118. 5
  2119. 5
  2120. 5
  2121. 5
  2122. 5
  2123. 5
  2124. 5
  2125. 5
  2126. 5
  2127. 5
  2128. 5
  2129. 5
  2130. 5
  2131. 5
  2132. 5
  2133. 5
  2134. 5
  2135. 5
  2136. 5
  2137. 5
  2138. 5
  2139. 5
  2140. 5
  2141. 5
  2142. 5
  2143. 5
  2144. 5
  2145. 5
  2146. 5
  2147. 5
  2148. 5
  2149. 5
  2150. 5
  2151. 5
  2152. 5
  2153. 5
  2154. 5
  2155. 5
  2156. 5
  2157. 5
  2158. 5
  2159. 5
  2160. 5
  2161. 5
  2162. 5
  2163. 5
  2164. 5
  2165. 5
  2166. 5
  2167. 5
  2168. 5
  2169. 5
  2170. 5
  2171. 5
  2172. 5
  2173. 5
  2174. 5
  2175. 5
  2176. 5
  2177. 5
  2178. 5
  2179. 5
  2180. 5
  2181. 5
  2182. 5
  2183. 5
  2184. 5
  2185. 5
  2186. 5
  2187. 5
  2188. 5
  2189. 5
  2190. 5
  2191. 5
  2192. 5
  2193. 5
  2194. 5
  2195. 5
  2196. 4
  2197. 4
  2198. 4
  2199. 4
  2200. 4
  2201. 4
  2202. 4
  2203. 4
  2204. 4
  2205. 4
  2206. 4
  2207. 4
  2208. 4
  2209. 4
  2210. 4
  2211. 4
  2212. 4
  2213. 4
  2214. 4
  2215. 4
  2216.  @ShnoogleMan  There were NO peaceful conservatives at the events at Charlottesville? You know this how? All those who were in favour of keeping the statue of Lee standing were all violent Nazis. That's quite an assumption and you have no way of proving that. Statues can bring about conversations and spark an interest in the time or the statue and the struggles involved. Not everyone is a reader and I've spent hours, in museums, staring at paintings and sculptures of people and events of the past, some of which I hadn't heard of before and I'm an avid reader. It brings into context history, human frailty, struggle and pain. It also helps to bring understanding instead of a pervasive atmosphere of fault and blame. History, the world and humans are complex and we need to see it from ALL angles, not just the preferred narratives of those with agendas. It's why freedom is so important. Lastly, Trump explicitly denounced Nazism and white supremacy. Whether there were good people on both sides are irrelevant if he believed that not all people on the 2 sides were there for violence and hatred. Basically saying that just because you believe that the statue must go or stay, doesn't automatically make you an evil person. Then you bring up the Nazi statue argument. My family suffered greatly under the heel of Nazi occupation. My mother nearly starved to death over the winter of 45, eating only pencil sized eel for days at a time. I went, with my uncle, to the Jewish detention camp at Westerbork, a camp he was imprisoned in for almost 6 weeks and he told me of the horrors that he endured and witnessed. He wasn't Jewish so he went to a POW camp and was forced to work in the kitchens for 2 years. However, I had to work with a man who was in the SS as did others who were wounded fighting the Nazis and lost family to them. Was it our duty to hate this guy until the day he died? The war was over and we had to lay down our arms, in reality and metaphorically. We had to work together, sit together and talk to one another and try to understand why it all had to happen. Either that or we become the executioners, open our own death camps and or maybe just stew in our hate till the day we die. The victims of those times chose to forgive and live on. Of course not all of them but the large percentage of them did. What's really ironic is that those who were the direct victims of Nazi actions are more willing to forgive than those who've never had a Nazi hand raised to them. Also, it isn't as if America invented slavery. Slavery has been an accepted part of humanity for thousands of years and endured through that millennia. The 19th century saw the end to slavery as being culturally and socially accepted. It was a terrible struggle, not just in the US, but in many other places. It might be more advantageous to offer an olive branch towards one another instead of fighting that war into eternity. Let's try to remember those that lived in those times with understanding, instead of hatred and anger. Not one of us lived their lives or experienced those times and have no right to judge them as our inferiors. Do I like Nazi ideology? No, emphatically.....NO. However, I would never show up at a Nazi rally, today, armed with clubs, mace and or any weapons, ready to fight. I might decry what they're trying to accomplish, but, right now, we're not a war and I would hope that we, as civilised humans, have progressed enough to fight them with logic and reason and not with brute strength. Reserve that as the last option. Antifa tactics are not the way to defeat ideology and I stand against them as strongly as I do Nazism.
    4
  2217. 4
  2218. 4
  2219. 4
  2220. 4
  2221. 4
  2222. 4
  2223. 4
  2224. 4
  2225. 4
  2226. 4
  2227. 4
  2228. 4
  2229. 4
  2230. 4
  2231. 4
  2232. 4
  2233. 4
  2234. 4
  2235. 4
  2236. 4
  2237. 4
  2238. 4
  2239. 4
  2240. 4
  2241. 4
  2242. 4
  2243. 4
  2244. 4
  2245. 4
  2246. 4
  2247. 4
  2248. 4
  2249. 4
  2250. 4
  2251. 4
  2252. 4
  2253. 4
  2254. 4
  2255. 4
  2256. 4
  2257. 4
  2258. 4
  2259. 4
  2260. 4
  2261. 4
  2262. 4
  2263. 4
  2264. 4
  2265. 4
  2266. 4
  2267. 4
  2268. 4
  2269. 4
  2270. 4
  2271. 4
  2272. 4
  2273. 4
  2274. 4
  2275. 4
  2276. 4
  2277. 4
  2278. 4
  2279. 4
  2280. 4
  2281. 4
  2282. 4
  2283. 4
  2284. 4
  2285. 4
  2286. 4
  2287. 4
  2288. 4
  2289. 4
  2290. 4
  2291. @Leo Weisberger Socialism definition: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." An economy owned or regulated by the community. That's socialism. What I described was a social program. No nation can exist without social programs. The military, transportation, a court system and more, are programs that are not best to the whims of powerful individuals but as the purview of elected officials, chosen by people as their representatives. However, the economy, should be at the direction of those same people, based on the will of a free market and those who would answer the needs of those individuals, in the market, who choose how those needs are met. Socialism, as stated in the definition that I copied from a dictionary, does not meet the standards that I just set. When Bernie Sanders said the he wanted to change the US into a socialist state, similar to that of the Scandinavian countries, the Prime Minister of Denmark informed him that Denmark was NOT a socialist country. He said it was a free market system with strong social safety nets. In Canada, we have a social medical system, as it is felt that our health has no market value. I cannot use my health as collateral to get a loan and a country does not assess its financial status using the health of its citizens as a financial asset. Assets are judged on production of market goods. If the market is controlled by the people, ostensibly, by the government as their representative, it is a socialist system. If it's a free market system, beholden only to the market itself and the rule of law, then it is NOT socialism. I advocate for a free market economy. I also acknowledge that a community must also pool together to support the areas that cannot be at the whims of a free market, the areas not involved in the production of goods that accrue wealth. I paid into my pension. It's mine, NOT the government's. I'm owed it because I paid into it, just like any other pension.
    4
  2292. 4
  2293. 4
  2294. 4
  2295. 4
  2296. 4
  2297. 4
  2298. 4
  2299. 4
  2300. 4
  2301. 4
  2302. 4
  2303.  @solveigvan808  First, Chloe was a teenager. She wasn't old enough to understand what was really going on. Then, the medical establishment ganged up on her parents and scared the bejesus out of them by showing them all these statistics about trans kids committing suicide because they didn't get the support that they needed from their parents. They're ordinary people. They depend on the expertise of those who have saved the lives of countless people over the years. They were told that it wasn't safe but necessary to SAVE the life of their little girl and then they trot out those who had gone through it and seemed to be quite happy that they did it. Even Chloe admitted that there was a honeymoon period after surgery but it didn't take long for the shine to wear off. This is something brand new. Ten years ago, no teenager was getting this type of surgery. Now, it's on the mainstream news and they're telling you that it's safe and you're a bigot if you hold your child back. They'll take your kid away if you fight too hard. Custody battles are being fought over it and the parent that's against this surgery can lose all parental rights. There's no one available to support you if you push back. You're treated like some kind of Nazi if you even have doubts on it. It's all a scam and they fell for it. Now, you want them to suffer the consequences and those greedy SOBs will continue on, KNOWING that there's nothing that anyone can do because....."choices have consequences." You're taking every weapon available away from those kids and their parents to fight back after they've been taken in so badly. Those quacks have to be stopped but you don't want to do a thing about it. I have to even question your motives.
    4
  2304. 4
  2305. 4
  2306. 4
  2307. 4
  2308. 4
  2309. 4
  2310. 4
  2311. 4
  2312. 4
  2313. 4
  2314.  @shanecorning5222  Now you're just spouting talking points. They just didn't come in and start killing and raping. That would have been impossible as they were vastly outnumbered. What did happen was that tribes made alliances with the Europeans to help them in their wars with each other. For example, Cortez would never have defeated the Aztecs if it hadn't been for the help of their Tlaxcaltec allies. Many tribes hated the Aztec because they were the local powerhouse. It's the same in North America. Champlain encountered the Huron and upon seeing the French weapons, the Huron thought that they should try them out on their arch enemies, the Iroquois. This set the tone for the history of North East America for 150 years. Also, the blanket thing is also a myth. There is only one verifiable time that it was used and that was at Fort Pitt, now Pittsburgh and they're not even sure if it worked or not as there was a smallpox outbreak already among the local settlers. If smallpox was already there, Natives could have gotten it from the settlers NOT from the blankets. These are just points of contention that modern day identity politics play. It's not just with the natives either. Everything is about finding grievance and being offended. I have a good friend, who is native and he was taken, as a 6 year old, an placed in a government school. However, his family lived in a remote area and they were living in extreme poverty. As bad as this practise seemed, he may not have survived had they not taken him out of the area due to the changing environment. He also told me that his great great grandparents were cannibals and not too well liked by the other tribes in the area. You see, the natives are people, just like us. No better and no worse. When you demonise a group of people, you engender hatred and that NEVER leads to anything good.
    4
  2315. 4
  2316. 4
  2317. 4
  2318. 4
  2319. 4
  2320. 4
  2321. 4
  2322. 4
  2323. 4
  2324. 4
  2325. 4
  2326. 4
  2327. 4
  2328. 4
  2329. 4
  2330. 4
  2331. 4
  2332. 4
  2333. 4
  2334. 4
  2335. 4
  2336. 4
  2337. 4
  2338. 4
  2339. 4
  2340. 4
  2341. 4
  2342. 4
  2343. 4
  2344. 4
  2345. 4
  2346. 4
  2347. 4
  2348. 4
  2349. 4
  2350. 4
  2351. 4
  2352. 4
  2353. 4
  2354. 4
  2355. 4
  2356. 4
  2357. 4
  2358. 4
  2359. 4
  2360. 4
  2361. 4
  2362. 4
  2363. 4
  2364. 4
  2365. 4
  2366. 4
  2367. 4
  2368. 4
  2369. 4
  2370. 4
  2371. 4
  2372. 4
  2373. 4
  2374. 4
  2375. 4
  2376. 4
  2377. 4
  2378. 4
  2379. 4
  2380. 4
  2381. 4
  2382.  Andy Mann  Another gaslight. Trying to get me to believe that I'm gullible, that I've fallen for his latest strawman. Peterson sees how the use of coloured emojis has the potential to be used as a trap. That's why he went with the black emoji. He's owning it. So you have to change your tactic. You have to convince others that what he says isn't so even though this has happened time and time again over the last 6 or 7 years. It's happening again to Joe Rogan. He had the nerve to have Dr. Robert Malone on his show, a man with top notch credentials and he was outspoken on his stance on mandates. Can't have that. Rogan is getting too dangerous. So they dig deep and they find a time, years ago, when he used the N-word in a quote. The verbal trap. Now they think that they have him. Trudeau is doing the same thing. He doesn't address what the truckers are protesting about. He just calls them all racists because of a couple of dubious pictures of a swastika. He took it so far as to insult a Jewish member of Parliament. Why did he think he could do that? The trap. He has the picture of a swastika and now he's painting them all as Nazis. Now, we have the coloured emojis. Hell, I may have already fallen into the trap by my use of the word "coloured". Amy Comey Barrett fell into the trap in the Supreme Court hearings. She said that she would support anyone's sexual preference. The trap. She said "sexual preference" and that's become offensive. What a surprise. Now, you're trying to tell me that the use of a coloured emoji doesn't hold that potential. You're trying to gaslight me with your sneering insults, trying to get me to think that I must be crazy to think these things. I'm not buying it. I've seen it way too often.
    4
  2383. 4
  2384. 4
  2385. 4
  2386. 4
  2387. 4
  2388. 4
  2389. 4
  2390. 4
  2391. 4
  2392. 4
  2393. 4
  2394. 4
  2395. 4
  2396. 4
  2397. 4
  2398. 4
  2399. 4
  2400. 4
  2401. 4
  2402. 4
  2403. 4
  2404. 4
  2405. 4
  2406. 4
  2407. 4
  2408. 4
  2409. 4
  2410. 4
  2411. 4
  2412. 4
  2413. 4
  2414. 4
  2415.  Kenny Bugh  How did Trump fail us? This was a new disease that no one had ever dealt with before. He called on the CDC, even formed a medical task force to deal with it. They were supposed to be the experts and these "experts" were all over the place with their recommendations and ideas. How could Trump make medical recommendations. He's NOT a doctor. Had the CDC and Fauci been more forthright and explained things as they knew them instead of playing games with the facts, we'd be better off. They were too proud to stand up and say that, in spite of being experts, they had no clue. That's why they failed us. They taught us not to trust them....the worst thing a doctor could do to their patients. It was Trump that initiated Project Warp Speed, got ventilators built that were never used, sent hospital ships to LA and NY which were never used and it wasn't Trump that put Covid patients in old folks homes. Trump restricted travel, first from China which resulted in being called xenophobic and then from Europe which Biden, himself criticized, saying travel bans don't work. It was Pelosi and Mayor De Blasio that kept telling people to go to their favourite restaurants, take the subways and go to parades. Pelosi went to Chinatown and was hugging everyone urging people to come on down and it was Pelosi that ripped up the SOTU address, in which Trump talked about trying to work with China to fight this new disease. Do you know what else failed us? China and their Gain of Function research....that's who and those in the American medical establishment that helped fund it....like Dr. Fauci.
    4
  2416. 4
  2417. 4
  2418. 4
  2419. 4
  2420. 4
  2421. 4
  2422. 4
  2423. 4
  2424. 4
  2425. 4
  2426. 4
  2427. 4
  2428. 4
  2429. 4
  2430. 4
  2431. 4
  2432. 4
  2433. 4
  2434. 4
  2435. 4
  2436. 4
  2437. 4
  2438. 4
  2439. 4
  2440. 4
  2441. 4
  2442. 4
  2443. 4
  2444. 4
  2445. 4
  2446. 4
  2447. 4
  2448. 4
  2449. 4
  2450. 4
  2451. 4
  2452. 4
  2453. 4
  2454. 4
  2455. 4
  2456. 4
  2457. 4
  2458. 4
  2459. 4
  2460. 4
  2461. 4
  2462. 4
  2463. 4
  2464. 4
  2465. 4
  2466. 4
  2467. 4
  2468. 4
  2469. 4
  2470. 4
  2471. 4
  2472. 4
  2473. 4
  2474. 4
  2475. 4
  2476. 4
  2477. 4
  2478. 4
  2479. 4
  2480. 4
  2481. 4
  2482. 4
  2483. 4
  2484. 4
  2485. 4
  2486. 4
  2487. 4
  2488. 4
  2489. 4
  2490. 4
  2491. 4
  2492. 4
  2493. 4
  2494. 4
  2495. 4
  2496. 4
  2497. 4
  2498. 4
  2499. 4
  2500. 4
  2501. 4
  2502. 4
  2503. 4
  2504. 4
  2505. 4
  2506. 4
  2507. 4
  2508. 4
  2509. 4
  2510. 4
  2511. 4
  2512. 4
  2513. 4
  2514. 4
  2515. 4
  2516. 4
  2517. 4
  2518. 4
  2519. 4
  2520. 4
  2521. 4
  2522. 4
  2523. 4
  2524. 4
  2525. 4
  2526. 4
  2527. 4
  2528. 4
  2529. 4
  2530. gwanael34 I know of places where they get no wages at all and people would do anything to work there but no one ever quits. I work as a bartender right now and get paid 12.50 and hour and that's not bad but it's not a living wage where I live. I more than double that most nights and would't be able to live if it weren't for the tips. What small business owner is going to pay 30 bucks an hour for help. These aren't all big conglomerates. I work for a small, hole in the wall pub, owned by a married couple, and it's not a gold mine by any stretch of the imagination. Even at 3 bucks an hour wage, I'd still be approaching at least 18 to 20 bucks an hour on average. Not great but not bad. Like it or not, take away tipping and we WOULD be making sweat shop wages. Anyone that would guilt trip to get tips is a lousy server. A busy establishment attracts customers and we will make up your decision to not tip over the evening. I tip cabbies quite generously as well. I live on a long driveway and this one cabbie would drop me off on the street, even when it was raining. I never tipped him. He told his fellow cabbies I was a cheap SOB and they all laughed at him and told him that it was him that was the lazy SOB and I always tipped them. Next time I drew him as a cabbie, he drove me to my door and I tipped him. I didn't know that he'd been told yet and was informed a couple of weeks later. You get what you pay for and you pay for what you get. You just don't like parting with your money.
    4
  2531. 4
  2532. 4
  2533. 4
  2534. 4
  2535. 4
  2536. 4
  2537. 4
  2538. 4
  2539. 4
  2540. 4
  2541. 4
  2542. 4
  2543. 4
  2544. 4
  2545. 4
  2546. 4
  2547. 4
  2548. 4
  2549. 4
  2550. 4
  2551. 4
  2552. 4
  2553. 4
  2554. 4
  2555. 4
  2556. 4
  2557. 4
  2558. 4
  2559. 4
  2560. 4
  2561. 4
  2562. 4
  2563. 4
  2564. 4
  2565. 4
  2566. 4
  2567. 4
  2568. 4
  2569. 4
  2570. 4
  2571. 4
  2572. 4
  2573. 4
  2574. 4
  2575. 4
  2576. 4
  2577. 4
  2578. 4
  2579. 4
  2580. 4
  2581. 4
  2582. 4
  2583. 4
  2584. 4
  2585. 4
  2586. 4
  2587. 4
  2588. 4
  2589. 4
  2590. 4
  2591. 4
  2592. 4
  2593. 4
  2594. 4
  2595. 4
  2596. 4
  2597. 4
  2598. 4
  2599. 4
  2600. 4
  2601. 4
  2602. 4
  2603. 4
  2604. 4
  2605. 4
  2606. 4
  2607. 4
  2608. 4
  2609. 4
  2610. 4
  2611. 4
  2612. 4
  2613. 4
  2614. 4
  2615. 4
  2616. 4
  2617. 4
  2618. 4
  2619. 4
  2620. 4
  2621. 4
  2622. 4
  2623. 4
  2624. 4
  2625. 4
  2626. 4
  2627. 4
  2628. 4
  2629.  @avery5415  In some ways, we all are. However, I was a strange little kid. By the time I was 10, I'd read every one of the Encyclopedia Americana, at the back of my class, cover to cover, multiple times. I went to a Christian primary school, so I had learned early that there were conflicting ideas in the world so I had to reconcile between what I was being taught and what I was learning on my own. Incredibly, those Christian teachers encouraged my reading and even allowed me to leave the schoolyard twice a week to go to our local library to check out books. Most people didn't have that voracious appetite to learn things like I did and I think that it has a lot to do with wanting to know all the information available before arriving at any decisions on a topic. I found it frustrating, back then, that my friends and siblings, didn't care to do the same and would support ideas without any real knowledge of the topic that they were talking about. Still, I do find that I can get stuck in a rut about some things, so I guess it's understandable that others would as well. No one likes to hear that they may be wrong and some will never admit it, no matter what the evidence. Once you realise how information should be processed, as it appears that you have, it's difficult to turn back. Human weakness does get in the way, I know. That's the one thing the left will not realise. It's not the weakness in others that should be your prime concern....It's the weaknesses that lie within you.
    4
  2630.  @moestietabarnak  Where did I say that an unlawful shooting by a police officer isn't a problem? I never said that once. I can object to it but that does NOT give me the right to burn down YOUR business of home, steal YOUR stuff, because that's what looting is, or shoot your 9 year old daughter, like what happened in Atlanta. Why can't I be outraged about those things? That was a little black girl in Atlanta. I was in tears when I heard about that and it was a BLM supporter who shot her. As long as there are criminals, committing major crimes in the world, and specifically in the US, and we want the police to stop them, there will be deaths. It's inevitable. In other words, you will always have reason to burn, loot and kill. It'll NEVER go away. It will be a perpetuating rage. Also, if you really thought that HUNDREDS of riots, over 3 months, being justified by the media and certain politicians, wasn't going to finally get some pushback out of fear and frustration, you're still delusional. Also, if you can't see that burning and looting is wrong, always and is NEVER justified, then you have no moral centre to guide you. Also, I made it perfectly clear that I DID NOT ENDORSE what happened in Washington. It was wrong and they should be prosecuted. Also, the looters should be prosecuted and we shouldn't have politicians, like Kamala Harris, donating to a fund for their legal fees. That a politician, that would do that, is going to become the Vice President, scares people and they will be angry that this is happening. If you can't see that then YOU are the problem. You don't want a middle ground nor would you accept an olive branch. You want YOUR ground and will take it by any means necessary.
    4
  2631. 4
  2632. 4
  2633. 4
  2634. 4
  2635. 4
  2636. 4
  2637. 4
  2638. 4
  2639. 4
  2640. 4
  2641. 4
  2642. 4
  2643. 4
  2644. 4
  2645. 4
  2646. 4
  2647. 4
  2648. 4
  2649. 4
  2650. 4
  2651. 4
  2652. 4
  2653. 4
  2654. 4
  2655. 4
  2656. 4
  2657. 4
  2658. 4
  2659. 4
  2660. 4
  2661. 4
  2662. 4
  2663. 4
  2664. 4
  2665. 4
  2666. 4
  2667. 4
  2668. 4
  2669. 4
  2670. 4
  2671. 4
  2672. 4
  2673. 4
  2674. 4
  2675. 4
  2676. 4
  2677. 4
  2678. 4
  2679. 4
  2680. 4
  2681. 4
  2682. 4
  2683. 4
  2684. 4
  2685. 4
  2686. 4
  2687. 4
  2688. 4
  2689. 4
  2690. 4
  2691. 4
  2692. 4
  2693. 4
  2694. 4
  2695. 4
  2696. 4
  2697. 4
  2698. 4
  2699. 3
  2700. 3
  2701. 3
  2702. 3
  2703. 3
  2704. 3
  2705. 3
  2706. 3
  2707. 3
  2708. 3
  2709. 3
  2710. Dobro Doggie You honestly believe that if you walked into an airport and displayed a digital clock inside a case like the one this kid had, you wouldn't have airport security all over you. You're just being intentionally obtuse. He unscrewed 5 or 6 screws to loosen up the insides of a digital clock and then screwed it back into the insides of enlarged pencil and notebook leather type case. Now that took some read genius. That's not a science project and normally he wouldn't get anymore than a C for his efforts. You know as well as anyone and don't pretend that you don't that students have been bringing weapons into American schools and killing kids. There have been talks of pipe bombs in Columbine and he made something that resembled a countdown clock for a bomb. Kids are being expelled for pretending to shoot others with their fingers and this kid makes what could be mistaken for a bomb. I don't know why he did it but I don't really know why Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris killed 13 people and wounded 24 more, either. People get nervous when kids start pretending to have guns and if a kid brings a contraption that might be mistaken for a bomb to school, someone will get upset, rightly or wrongly. It happens all over the US and students are dealt with harshly when they do stupid stunts like that. Klebold and Harris were one 1 year older that this kid. One year....so don't pretend that it's impossible. I'm not sure what you're rambling on about concerning public and private schools. I showed you this link to show you what kinds of real projects high school kids were doing and they are in a different stratosphere of ability and effort over some kid moving the guts of a clock from one container to another. He was told to put it away and he wouldn't. Why....who knows but he finally got called on it and it was because the teachers felt that it strongly resembled a clock mechanism for a bomb. It was the media that made a big deal of it and they're as much to blame for this stupidity, actually a lot more, as this kid is. And Obama actually added to the foolishness by pretending that this was an outstanding science project. It was a joke and the projects that I showed that other high school kids did proves it.
    3
  2711. 3
  2712. 3
  2713. 3
  2714. 3
  2715. 3
  2716. 3
  2717. 3
  2718. 3
  2719. 3
  2720. 3
  2721. 3
  2722. 3
  2723. 3
  2724. 3
  2725. 3
  2726. 3
  2727. 3
  2728. 3
  2729. 3
  2730. 3
  2731. 3
  2732. 3
  2733. 3
  2734. 3
  2735. 3
  2736. 3
  2737. 3
  2738. 3
  2739. 3
  2740. 3
  2741. 3
  2742. 3
  2743. 3
  2744. 3
  2745. 3
  2746. 3
  2747. 3
  2748. 3
  2749. 3
  2750. 3
  2751. 3
  2752. 3
  2753.  @garyjackson3531  Transgenderism is a mental condition. That's what a runaway social contagion is. It's the minds of children, going through mental issues, being manipulated. There are some forms of it, due to genetic conditions but this is quite rare. Like my neighbour. His female characteristics started at about a year old. This was in the late fifties. It was so weird to see the kid. He dressed like a boy, his parents insisted on it, and he had a boy's haircut and in 1960 that meant a real short haircut. But when I first saw him, I thought that this was one strange guy. He acted too much like a girl...even more of a girl than my 3 sisters. There was something going on here that was more than just a mental disorder. How did he know to act like a girl at 2? No one did that back then. This type of dysphoria does happen but it's extremely rare. Like I said, what's happening now is a social contagion, an "interpersonal process, such as imitation, conformity, universality, and mimicry." APA Dictionary of Psychology That's exactly what's happening. They're introduced to it at a young age, in the schools, and then it's spread through social media. They form a bond that includes imitation and conformity. I don't see why you think that this is some kind of junk science. If it wasn't for the schools, woke parents and social media, no one would even think about this stuff. It's something that was rarely encountered in real life but the socialists have grabbed onto it for their own agenda. My 16 year old granddaughter claims to be transgender. I looked into it. I've yet to see one woke transgender advocate who isn't a socialist.....not one. They're the ones spreading the contagion so that it's a 4000% increase in England over the last 10 years. That means that if there was 1, just ONE, new transgender sufferer in 2010, there would be 4000 new ones this year. That's impossibly ridiculous even if it was just a singular mental condition. It's MORE than that. It's the spread of an ideology using the strength of social contagions to push them in that direction. These socialists want to break the system down, to destroy it and to do that they need good socialist soldiers. They're doing it by creating a transgender class, CREATING it, as a part of the androgynous class the radical socialists have talked about for over a century. Radical socialism was all creating an androgynous society but they just couldn't get it implemented. This is just another shot at it by the radical socialists.
    3
  2754. 3
  2755. 3
  2756. 3
  2757. 3
  2758. 3
  2759. 3
  2760.  @jimmcloughlin  First of all, Lysenko had no influence on the 1923 famine that killed millions. That happened because government forces took all the crops, including the seeds for next years crops, to feed the army and people living in the cities. So, those millions came as a result of authoritarian over reach and the idea that all products belonged to the state. Lysenko was starting to gain influence in the early thirties but that had very little to do with Holodomor. This was caused by the collectivisation policies, in which the farms were taken away from the farmers and farm collectives were organised. People were put to work on these farms who had no idea on how to farm. Many others were angry about losing their farms and basically refused to work. Many farmers were displaced and had nowhere to go and nothing to eat. They starved to death because the Socialist government insisted on farming collectives. Lysenko only made things worse. Yes, it was bad science but no farmer would have followed his ideas because they would know that it didn't work. It was the socialist government that forced it on the collective farms, which caused the crop failures. In fact, anyone that spoke out against Lysenko, would be arrested and sent to the Gulag or worse. It was bad science forced on the people by socialist politicians. Farmers, in a free country, would never have followed his ideas. The only reason that they were followed in the Soviet Union and China is due to the political might of the communist governments. ...and yes, China tried the same methods and those methods were FORCED on those who were supposed to grow the crops. They had no choice and the crops failed miserably. No sensible Chinese farmer would have used the Lysenko methods but the small farms were all gone, replaced by the collectives. The collectives were run by the government who mandated that the collective farms used the Lysenko farming methods. So, I'll say it again. It was bad science and that bad science was forced on the people by the communist governments. Politics forced it. That's where you've got it all backwards....and wrong.
    3
  2761. 3
  2762. 3
  2763. 3
  2764. 3
  2765. 3
  2766. 3
  2767. 3
  2768. 3
  2769. 3
  2770. 3
  2771. 3
  2772. 3
  2773. 3
  2774. 3
  2775. 3
  2776. 3
  2777. 3
  2778. 3
  2779. 3
  2780. 3
  2781. 3
  2782. 3
  2783. 3
  2784. 3
  2785. 3
  2786. 3
  2787. 3
  2788. 3
  2789. 3
  2790. 3
  2791.  @lrod8692  Mnuchin has already agreed to oversight in dispensing that 500 billion dollars. If a company doesn't need it, they won't get it. It's a loan and they're expected to pay it back. Also, it's against the law to give government money to a company owned by a politician. AGAINST THE LAW. Trump couldn't do it even if he wanted to. Your 1200 bucks is a give away. You don't have to pay it back. Millions work for these bit corporations. What a great idea to let some of them go bankrupt because you don't think that they should get a loan. I'm astounded that you don't want free money, on top of unemployment insurance because you're worried that someone might get more than you. Head shakingly stupid. Also, tell me something. Do you really think it's important, right now, in the worst pandemic and economic threat in our lives, to make sure that corporations have the right amount of women on their boards? Is THAT your priority right now? "I don't want that money unless women are guaranteed a seat on the board of some unnamed corporation". Genius move, that. The Democrats are using you and every other American to get through all their top SJW ideas. They're turning the government into universities and colleges with safe spaces and equity departments. What's even worse, from your perspective, you've just supported a democrat move that will give Trump the next election with a landslide. Then he'll do all the stuff that you're so afraid of. Families are sitting at home praying for the money to get them through until their UI is straightened out. Do you really think that they're going to vote for the party that said NO. No money until we get tax cuts for solar panels. The stupidest political move in American history.
    3
  2792. 3
  2793. 3
  2794. 3
  2795.  @alexocasio-gomez5267  I don't know about the US but here in Canada, immigrants come to this country after applying to allowed to live and work here. After a time and if they fulfil certain obligations, they can apply for citizenship. Almost EVERY immigrant eventually will take this step and become a citizen. Once a citizen, you're no longer an immigrant. You have the same rights as every other Canadian that was born in the country. My parents were immigrants and became citizens. I was born here. I was NEVER an immigrant. I was born in Canada and am a citizen by virtue of being born here. I have a friend, who was born in France, of parents, who were Canadian and were serving in the Canadian military at the time. The birth took place in a French hospital. He's having a hell of a time getting a passport because he wasn't born in Canada and hasn't been able to prove where he was born. In fact, if he broke the law in any overt way, he could be deported back to France. I know of an incident of a guy, who was born in Germany, under the same circumstances. His parents returned to Canada, after completing a tour at the Canadian Forces base at Lahr, Germany when he was 2 years old. Years later, he was charged multiple times with criminal offences and was deported to Germany as a result and died there a few years later. Germany had to accept him as he was born in a German hospital, even though his parents were Canadian, on assignment with the Canadian military. An immigrant and a citizen are 2 different entities under the law, at least here in Canada and I'd warrant it's the same in the Us.
    3
  2796. 3
  2797. 3
  2798. 3
  2799. 3
  2800. 3
  2801. 3
  2802. 3
  2803. 3
  2804. 3
  2805. 3
  2806. 3
  2807. 3
  2808. 3
  2809. 3
  2810. 3
  2811. 3
  2812. 3
  2813. 3
  2814. 3
  2815. 3
  2816. 3
  2817. 3
  2818. 3
  2819. 3
  2820. 3
  2821. 3
  2822. 3
  2823. 3
  2824. 3
  2825. 3
  2826. 3
  2827. 3
  2828. 3
  2829. 3
  2830. 3
  2831. 3
  2832. 3
  2833. 3
  2834. 3
  2835. 3
  2836. 3
  2837. 3
  2838. 3
  2839. 3
  2840. 3
  2841.  @asherif3893  Venezuela is worse. Does that automatically mean that Cuba has a good system? I rather doubt it. It's nice that they can all read but if the material that they're ALLOWED to read is limited, of what use is it? Reading has value only if you have the freedom to follow that gift where ever it might take you, to develop your interests and passions to enhance the quality of your life. If Cuba is SO wonderful, how come there aren't there hundreds of makeshift boats, overcrowded with "dreamers" heading TOWARDS Cuba, instead of leaving it? Why are there 1.5 million Cubans living in Florida and hardly, if any, American living in Cuba? Why aren't Venezuelans leaving the horrors of their country and flocking to Cuba? It's because they all know that there are lots of places where the freedom and quality of life is much higher in other, democratic and capitalist countries. That's the one thing that socialist apologists will not respond to. Why is the tide of immigrants always flowing towards the Capitalist countries and NOT the other way around? Socialists are always saying how horrible capitalists countries are but they're not migrating, in droves or by the millions, towards these socialist countries. That, in itself, has to show that maybe socialism isn't as great as claimed. That those who live under the safety net of capitalism, will only complain about capitalism but aren't passionate enough to actually go to their "Utopian" promised land. I think it's the complaining that drives them. Pessimistic people who bitch about everything but know, deep down, that they're not going to change even if they went to the socialist paradise.
    3
  2842. 3
  2843. 3
  2844. 3
  2845. 3
  2846. 3
  2847. 3
  2848. 3
  2849. 3
  2850. 3
  2851. 3
  2852. 3
  2853. 3
  2854. 3
  2855. 3
  2856. 3
  2857. 3
  2858. 3
  2859. 3
  2860. 3
  2861. 3
  2862. 3
  2863. 3
  2864. 3
  2865. 3
  2866. 3
  2867. 3
  2868. 3
  2869. 3
  2870. 3
  2871. 3
  2872. 3
  2873. 3
  2874. 3
  2875. 3
  2876. 3
  2877. 3
  2878. 3
  2879. 3
  2880. 3
  2881. 3
  2882. 3
  2883. 3
  2884. 3
  2885. 3
  2886. 3
  2887. 3
  2888. 3
  2889. 3
  2890. 3
  2891. 3
  2892. 3
  2893. 3
  2894. 3
  2895. 3
  2896. 3
  2897. 3
  2898. 3
  2899. 3
  2900. 3
  2901. 3
  2902. 3
  2903. 3
  2904. 3
  2905. 3
  2906. 3
  2907. 3
  2908. 3
  2909. 3
  2910. 3
  2911. 3
  2912. 3
  2913. 3
  2914. 3
  2915. 3
  2916. 3
  2917. 3
  2918. 3
  2919. 3
  2920. 3
  2921. 3
  2922. @J C First of all, Trump didn't dump this on the states. The Constitution did that. He was following the dictates of the Constitution, the law of the land. If you think the Constitution shouldn't be followed, you should say that but every President has taken an oath of office to uphold the Constitution. The articles of the Constitution are interpretive and this was the way that it was interpreted. Had Trump enforced a mandate on the states, he would have faced stiff resistance from the states, especially the Democrat states. Leaving it up to the states is the best way to seek cooperation and it worked to a degree. Cuomo and Newsom, both Democrat governors, have been supportive and praised Federal action. The reopening guidelines are just that.....GUIDELINES. Guidelines are not laws and cannot be enforced, legally. If Georgia doesn't want to follow the guidelines, it's their right. If it's smart to not follow the guidelines, that's another question. The guidelines are a list of suggestions for the states to follow. Trump thinks that they're a good idea. If Georgia, or any other state, doesn't follow them, there will be people that disagree with them, including Trump. In fact, if you think that Georgia is opening too quickly, then YOU'RE agreeing with Trump. If you think that Trump should FORCE Georgia to comply, then you oppose state rights, something that the Confederates fought FOR in the Civil War. Are you beginning to see how complex this is? No matter what Trump did or how he handled the enforcement of the guidelines, he would be wrong and you'd have grounds to criticise. It's a win/win scenario for the chronic critics and I'm going to assume that you're a chronic critic of Donald Trump.
    3
  2923. 3
  2924. 3
  2925. 3
  2926. 3
  2927. 3
  2928. 3
  2929. 3
  2930. 3
  2931. 3
  2932. 3
  2933.  @ouimetco  Immigration is good for the country if the country is in a strong economic boom. This isn't the case at the moment. Canada is letting in more immigrants than there are housing starts. That's means that we have a lot of buyers and renters competing for fewer vacancies. One can say to increase building starts but we also have a shortage of skilled builders to handle the demand. Canada also demands that immigrants bring the means to support themselves if they come. That means that either they have high skills which will bring high incomes or they have the money to support themselves. Since most immigrants come from poorer countries, the immigrants that are let in are the wealthiest that those nations can offer. They go straight to the major cities and use their wealth to buy real estate at premium prices. Since market availability is low, the competition drives up the price. Canadians, who are retiring, in those big cities like Toronto, Ottawa and Vancouver, get a top dollar for their homes and then move to the rural areas and will buy for much less. They sell for 1.2 million and then buy their rural home for 3 to 4 hundred thousand, putting almost a million in their pockets. That competition is now transferred to those rural areas and those trying to buy their first homes are forced out of the market because they can't afford to compete with those coming in from the city. Rents are then forced up, as well. If we could get our immigration numbers down to under housing starts, that would go along way to reducing the cost of buying homes. However, it doesn't appear that our government is willing to do that. It benefits those who've bought homes over 15 years ago and they like the increasing equity of their property.
    3
  2934. 3
  2935. 3
  2936. 3
  2937. 3
  2938. 3
  2939. 3
  2940. 3
  2941. 3
  2942. 3
  2943. 3
  2944. 3
  2945. 3
  2946. 3
  2947. 3
  2948. 3
  2949. 3
  2950. 3
  2951. 3
  2952. 3
  2953. 3
  2954. 3
  2955. 3
  2956. 3
  2957. 3
  2958. 3
  2959. 3
  2960. 3
  2961. 3
  2962. 3
  2963. 3
  2964. 3
  2965. 3
  2966. 3
  2967. 3
  2968. 3
  2969. 3
  2970. 3
  2971. 3
  2972. 3
  2973. 3
  2974. 3
  2975. 3
  2976. 3
  2977. 3
  2978. 3
  2979. 3
  2980. 3
  2981. 3
  2982. 3
  2983. 3
  2984. 3
  2985. 3
  2986. 3
  2987. 3
  2988. 3
  2989. 3
  2990. 3
  2991. 3
  2992. 3
  2993. 3
  2994. 3
  2995. If you have a racist purity test which amounts to a witch trial, of course Trump is racist. So are you. So am I. There's no way anyone will pass that test. It's designed so that everyone tested will fail. I'm not sure what your problem with herd immunity is all about. If we become immune once exposed to it, eventually, we'll all be immune. Pure logic. What some people just don't get is that no matter what we do, there will be surges in the cases. It's highly contagious and it's the nature of the disease. If we lockdown until it's completely gone, we'll be locked down for good....for the rest of your life. Not a pleasant prospect. What's important is the death rate in relationship to the case rate. At the end of April, the case rate was around 30,000 new cases per day. The death rate was around 2000 cases a day. Now, the case rate is close to 70,000 new cases per day, yet the death rate is under 800 per day. Almost 2 1/2 cases more and yet a 60% DROP in deaths. That says that we're learning how to treat it and I'm going to assume that we'll get better at it in the future. Already, we have plenty respirators and fewer and fewer cases end up in the hospital in relationship to the number of cases. Even now, the new case load per day seems to be a the peak. That means, we should start to see another dropping off in the next couple of weeks. Not a guarantee but that's the pattern of all infectious diseases. The south didn't peak back in April like NY York did. Now it's their turn. That'll be the pattern in most populated areas. You can't stop it. It will happen. All you can do is try to protect the most vulnerable. I'm 68, considered to vulnerable. I take precautions. My dad is 88. I haven't seen him since late February.....to keep him safe. That should be the priority....everywhere and It seems as if we get it now. At least they're not putting Covid patients in nursing homes, anymore......a ridiculous move no matter how you look at it.
    3
  2996. 3
  2997. 3
  2998. 3
  2999. 3
  3000. 3
  3001. 3
  3002. 3
  3003. 3
  3004. 3
  3005. 3
  3006. 3
  3007. 3
  3008. 3
  3009. 3
  3010. 3
  3011. 3
  3012. 3
  3013. 3
  3014. 3
  3015. 3
  3016. 3
  3017. 3
  3018. 3
  3019. 3
  3020. 3
  3021. 3
  3022. 3
  3023. 3
  3024. 3
  3025. 3
  3026. 3
  3027. 3
  3028. 3
  3029. 3
  3030. 3
  3031. 3
  3032. 3
  3033. 3
  3034. 3
  3035. 3
  3036. 3
  3037. 3
  3038. 3
  3039. 3
  3040. 3
  3041. 3
  3042. 3
  3043. 3
  3044. 3
  3045. 3
  3046. 3
  3047. 3
  3048. 3
  3049. 3
  3050. 3
  3051. 3
  3052. 3
  3053. 3
  3054. 3
  3055. 3
  3056. 3
  3057. 3
  3058. 3
  3059. 3
  3060.  spacedog101  No substance? Are you saying that only because she's a conservative or because you know her personally or have went through the rigorous process of learning what she's about? I'd say that it's because she's running as a Republican and that's ALL you need to know. The divisiveness that she was alluding to lives in your comment. You'll have nothing good to say about her or to do with her for only one reason and no other reason. That's true divisiveness. In fact, that's the very definition of bigotry. You don't even have the self awareness to realise that you're contradicting yourself. Trump is the first president to fight the "Made in China" only products in our stores. Yet, she's a strong Trump supporter. So, is she wrong to wear "Made in China" spandex or is Trump wrong to take on the Chinese and work out a new deal so the "Made in China" label isn't on almost every product in our stores? That entire weather map thing was a tempest in a teapot. CNN made a much bigger thing of this than what it warranted. They weren't even smart enough to see what really happened. "Hey...look at this map. Big hurricane in Alabama". Meanwhile, while everyone is obsessing over this stupid map, Trump appropriates more money, from another source, to finance the building of the wall. MSM is as much a clown show as Trump. Worse, because he's using those clown world antics against the DNC and the media and they're too obsessed with their hatred for him to not fall for it. Stop hating so much and start using your brain. That hatred lost the last election and will, quite likely, lose the next election as well.
    3
  3061. 3
  3062.  @Viewaholicinfinity  What are you talking about? I just said that it was one of the dumbest things that Trump supporters could ever have done. Over 50,000 people were in Washington to take part in that protest march. Had they wanted to they could have ripped that building apart with their bare hands. That wasn't the plan for that day...at all. Think about it. Trump's followers are 2nd Amendment supporters. They're the "gun nuts" the open/carry advocates, "from my cold dead hands"...that's the favourite saying. Yet, NOT one of them thought to take their guns with them? They left them at home? What kind of insurrectionist revolutionaries don't bring guns along? They were just a bunch that were pissed off and got carried away. About 300 of them out of tens of thousands. One guy arrested was even an Antifa supporter who had been arrested at a BLM riot in Utah....but most were just the dummies of the huge crowd and you'll get them anywhere. Some of them were let in the side doors by security. I don't know WHAT that was about. You could see little old ladies wandering around inside, even honouring the velvet ropes for the tourists. They sure looked like scary insurrectionists....LOL. It was stupid move but the Democrats are blowing it all out of proportion....and deep down you know that's true. Look at how they went on about Brian Sicknick, claiming he was killed by the rioters with a fire extinguisher and giving him a heroes funeral. He sounded like a good guy but he died of a stroke....and you believed all their nonsense. Come on, man!!!!
    3
  3063. 3
  3064. 3
  3065. 3
  3066. 3
  3067. 3
  3068. 3
  3069. 3
  3070. 3
  3071. 3
  3072. 3
  3073. 3
  3074. 3
  3075. 3
  3076. 3
  3077. 3
  3078. 3
  3079. 3
  3080. 3
  3081. 3
  3082. 3
  3083. 3
  3084. 3
  3085. 3
  3086. 3
  3087. 3
  3088. 3
  3089. 3
  3090. 3
  3091. 3
  3092. 3
  3093. 3
  3094. 3
  3095. 3
  3096. 3
  3097. 3
  3098. 3
  3099. 3
  3100. 3
  3101. 3
  3102. 3
  3103.  @LucasCanDrum  I've been following a YouTuber name Patricia Dickson. She grew up in an all Black neighbourhood, I think in Tennessee and knew very few white folk. She did alright in high school but didn't know what to do after graduating. She announced to her family that she was joining the Air Force. Did that drive them crazy. They told her that white folk hated blacks and that they'd torment and discriminate against her. That they'd make her life SO miserable that she'd come crawling home first chance she got. She didn't listen and joined anyway. After that, every time she went home for a visit, they'd grill her and she'd tell them she really like it. They called her a liar. When her nephew started asking her about life in the military, her sister told her to quit lying to him before she ruined the nephew's life. She finally decided not to talk about her life in the Air Force at home anymore. She took classes and when she finally got out of the service, she went to college on a GI Bill. She found a good job and eventually went to England for a year to work because she loved English history and wanted to see it firsthand. She then moved to California until she got sick of the politics and went to Texas and she's made a good life for herself. Nothing spectacular but something to be proud of. You see, she didn't buy into the "everyone hates us" mentality. Even they did, that wouldn't have stopped her because she believed in herself. Yet, her own family and friends fought her every step of the way. How many of them stayed right where they were because of this same pressure. "Oreo" and "Uncle Tom" aren't just insults. They're a way to excuse your own failures and to blame it on others. There's a reason that Asian families have the highest household earnings in the US. It's their culture and work ethic and determination, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the imagined "inequality" that you're talking about. They do it and those who treat them badly can get lost. You can't do anything about what others feel about you. However, you can do something about how you feel about yourself. Don't let the naysayers hold you down. If you do.....that's YOUR fault.
    3
  3104. 3
  3105. 3
  3106. 3
  3107. 3
  3108. 3
  3109. 3
  3110. 3
  3111. 3
  3112. 3
  3113. 3
  3114. 3
  3115. 3
  3116. 3
  3117. 3
  3118. 3
  3119. 3
  3120. 3
  3121. 3
  3122. 3
  3123. 3
  3124. 3
  3125. 3
  3126. 3
  3127. 3
  3128. 3
  3129. 3
  3130. 3
  3131. 3
  3132. 3
  3133. 3
  3134. 3
  3135. 3
  3136. 3
  3137. 3
  3138. 3
  3139. 3
  3140. 3
  3141. 3
  3142. 3
  3143. 3
  3144. 3
  3145. 3
  3146. 3
  3147. @Dillon Duncan Way to go with the demonisation of one side. Just to emphasise how "horrible" the Israelis are, you throw in the "murder children" phrase, insinuating that killing Palestinian children is an Israeli tactic. Hyperbole like that should really help negotiations and understanding. Israel isn't going deeper into Palestine at all. They fought a war against outsiders, Jordan, Egypt and Syria with help from various other Arab countries and eventually took this land over. Israel actually gave Egypt back the Sinai Peninsula and voluntarily allowed the Gaza strip to become solely under the control of Palestinians. Did they take advantage of it? NO. Instead, the Palestinians there, Hamas and the PLO, took money, given from outside sources, and bought military goods with it and lined the pockets of top Palestinian leaders. If you would EVER get into all the times that the Palestinians were offered an independent state of their own, you'd know that they refused EVERY time. Yet, they don't need to have it. There are nearly 2,000,000 Muslims, called Palestinians, living in Israel proper. Not in Gaza or the West Bank, but in Israel. They have full citizenship, able to vote, have sat in the Knesset, joined that Israeli military and police, own land and businesses. They have every right that an Jewish Israeli has. However, the Palestinians don't want that. They want to RULE the Levant and have said so repeatedly. In other words, the Dimmi state, where Muslim rule supreme and others live there under conditions set by the Muslim leaders, the clerics. There has NEVER been an independent Palestinian state in the Levant. It has always been controlled from outside. The British, the Ottoman Empire, the Egyptian Mamluks, the Mongols, the Kurds, the Crusaders, the Arabs, the Byzantines, the Romans. The last time the area was independent was under the rule of the Maccabees, over 2000 years ago. They led a Jewish rebellion against a Greek ruler, Antiochus IV. The inhabitants of the Levant have always been diverse, including local Muslims, Jews, Christians and pilgrims from various religious orders. The Jews didn't start to dominate till after they migrated there due to persecution in Europe and other countries, starting when the Ottomans controlled the region and growing when the British had it for a short time. Under the British, the local Muslims, were offered a homeland, TWICE, but the Muslims turned the offers down both times. In spite of the fact that Jews and Christians had always lived there, the Muslims wanted complete control for themselves. This is history and the facts. Also, it seems that you've conveniently forgotten all the rocket attacks by Palestinians. Forgotten the 25,000 dollars, American, the Saddam Hussein, would give to the families of suicide bombers, who would strap bombs to themselves and blow themselves up in busy shopping malls and markets. None of that counts for you or you've ignored it. I don't think that Israel should be expanding into the West Bank. They should have done with that area the same as they did the Gaza strip and allowed the Palestinians to live there, independently. However, that was a decision they made after Palestinian leaders REJECTED the offer of a Palestinian state in the region. So what do the Israelis do now? Leave the area in limbo or every Jew in Israel, all 6 million plus, get out because that's the only thing that would satisfy Palestinian leadership.
    3
  3148. 3
  3149. 3
  3150. 3
  3151. 3
  3152. 3
  3153. 3
  3154. 3
  3155. 3
  3156. 3
  3157. 3
  3158. 3
  3159. 3
  3160. 3
  3161. 3
  3162. 3
  3163. 3
  3164. 3
  3165. 3
  3166. 3
  3167. 3
  3168. 3
  3169. 3
  3170. 3
  3171.    ONCE AGAIN...."REGULATIONS ARE NECESSARY" That is directly from my last comment. Who do you think regulates necessary regulations. THE GOVERNMENT. I NEVER said that governments aren't necessary. You're putting that in my mouth. I'm talking about un-necessary regulations, not un-necessary government. Are you really trying to say that EVERY regulation that a government makes is absolutely necessary? REALLY? Here's a good law. In New Jersey, it's illegal to wear a bullet proof vest while committing a crime. Another one. It's illegal to have a pet rat in Montana. Or this. It's illegal in Anchorage to bring your pet flamingo into a barber shop. Yup.....we're paying politician's to sit around and come up with these laws. However, you don't think we should ever question them because.....I'm not sure why. It looks like I'll have to say this one more time. REGULATIONS ARE NECESSARY. They're necessary when they make sense. It appears that you just don't want to see this statement for a reason that I can't comprehend. Governments pass good laws and stupid laws. They're made up of human beings and people do have that tendency to act foolish at times. Let's try to keep the stupid laws to a minimum. Unless you welcome stupid laws and you believe that the government in NEVER wrong. If that's the case, I don't know what to say other than that the next time you feel the urge to criticise Donald Trump, don't. He's the government and the government is infallible. If you don't like his regulations, move to Mexico.
    3
  3172. 3
  3173. 3
  3174. 3
  3175. 3
  3176. 3
  3177. 3
  3178. 3
  3179. 3
  3180. 3
  3181. 3
  3182. 3
  3183. 3
  3184. 3
  3185. 3
  3186. 3
  3187. 3
  3188. 3
  3189. 3
  3190. 3
  3191. 3
  3192. 3
  3193. 3
  3194. 3
  3195. 3
  3196. 3
  3197. 3
  3198. 3
  3199. 3
  3200. 3
  3201. 3
  3202. 3
  3203. 3
  3204. 3
  3205. 3
  3206. 3
  3207. 3
  3208. 3
  3209. 3
  3210. 3
  3211. 3
  3212. 3
  3213. 3
  3214. @Fennerex V How is ANYONE going to learn all the pronouns? It's impossible, especially when dealing with the gender fluid. The use of pronouns has be the norm for hundreds of years. Then, just recently, a certain demographic just changes the rules and if you don't go along, they will FORCE you to change. Tell you what you MUST believe. If you're Muslim, you MUST adapt Your belief system because our Islamophobia is not as bad as your transphobia. We must ALL believe the same or we're ALL bigots and as such must be dealt with.....and you hide behind the guise of harassment. This IS how the Fascists gained and held onto power. It's how Stalin did it and Mao through the cultural revolution. You don't want to believe it because YOU are the fascist who wants to tell me what to believe. As for Schuyler Bailar, being in the top 15%.... YES...that's entirely plausible. If you look at the athletic record holders for men and women, you'll find that men's records are consistently more than 10 percent higher than the women's records. It's exactly what you'd expect. It ALSO demonstrates why it's unfair for men to compete with women as equals. Men will beat them by 10% or MORE. It's a specious argument. Most of us aren't mad at trans people. We're angry that it's being used to influence vulnerable children and may coerce them into doing things that they will regret for the rest of their lives. It's how Christianity spread. "Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it." (Prov. 22:6.) This is why Christianity isn't integrated into the public school curriculum. It's because it may influence the children for the rest of their lives and it's NOT the job of the state to teach ideology or beliefs on pain of legal repercussions. Repercussions to the demand of if you don't say the Lord's Prayer, you could be suspended from school. That's what you're advocating for. You're no different than the Christian or Maoist who is SO certain that they're correct, that they will legislate against your right to believe as you will. You're just too deeply ingrained into your belief system that you're blind to it.
    3
  3215. 3
  3216. 3
  3217. 3
  3218. 3
  3219. 3
  3220. 3
  3221. 3
  3222. 3
  3223. 3
  3224. 3
  3225. 3
  3226. 3
  3227. 3
  3228. 3
  3229. 3
  3230. 3
  3231. 3
  3232. 3
  3233. 3
  3234. 3
  3235. 3
  3236. 3
  3237. 3
  3238. 3
  3239.  @july6949  I'm truly sorry for your loss but I strongly disagree with your assessment of capitalism and how it killed your friend. Capitalism is an economic system. It's a means of production, a way to create value through labour and creativity by allowing the individual the freedom to operate their economy within bounds. Those bounds being the rule of law. Capitalism is implemented by people and those people are bound by that rule of law. It doesn't matter under what system of production that is being used. If you do something that contravenes that law, you are now acting outside the acceptable behaviour of your political entity as enshrined in your legal code. Columbia is a western country but when I used that term, I was referring to the first world countries that pattern themselves after the type of government the US has. This would be Canada, Britain, Japan, South Korea, western Europe, etc.... Columbia is NOT included in this group. They are a developing country with a mid range economy at best. You may ask why I stress the importance of the rule of law and the reason is this. Capitalism, indeed any society, will only reach success if their set of laws are fully respected, understood and implemented. That clearly didn't happen in the case of your friend. Every person is bound by the legal code of their country. The central theme being that everyone has the right to their personal freedom as long as it doesn't impose on the freedom of others. That has NOTHING to do with capitalism, except the freedom to conduct personal economy as one sees fit.....as long as it doesn't contravene the law and principles of human rights. Owning my own company does NOT release me from any obligation to the law or the freedom of others. Your friend died, not because of capitalism, but because there were those who believed themselves free of the obligations of the law or the preservation of human rights. They killed him for personal interests, no different than had I entered my neighbour's home and killed him to obtain his property. If the government, in effect, those who are a part of the government, allows it to happen, indeed sanctions my actions, then they too are violating the personal right of my neighbour to own his property, legally attained and to his life. If the Columbian government, the individuals the run that government, allowed and sanctioned the murder of your friend, they violated his human rights. They did it for self interest. That's not capitalism. It wouldn't matter what economic system they believed in. They broke the law. Had they been socialist, they still broke the law. Had it been a huge company that sanctioned it, the law is still broken. Had they been a religious faction, Catholics, Muslims, Zoroastrians or whatever, they broke the law. This is why, in the United States, an incoming president swears to uphold the Constitution. It is vital to the freedom of individual rights. He doesn't swear to protect capitalism because capitalism is an expression of those individual rights, the freedom of the individual to create value. If the president acts against that Constitution, he breaks the law. We have laws because we understand that humans are flawed and will act in their own self interest, even if it means violating the self interests of others. Everyone, operating in a capitalist economy, is still bound by those laws. The economy doesn't rule. It is still subservient to a Constitution and the guidelines that allow human rights for all. To finish, Capitalism did not kill your friend. People, working outside the law with no regard for human rights, killed your friend.
    3
  3240. 3
  3241. 3
  3242.  @chrisbayridge23  Venezuela nationalised it's oil industry way back in the mid seventies. No more private ownership. All revenue made from oil sales went into government coffers. Do you know what that meant to the people and those that were trying to get elected to power? It meant that the politicians had a cash cow to entice voters to vote for them. Money that a capitalist company would have used for innovation, training, refurbishing machinery and hiring the best people, was used as capital to finance the politicians promises to the people. The oil industry became less and less competitive as privately owned oil companies were able to use their profits to bolster up their ability to produce cheaply and effectively. When the oil prices dropped, it was Venezuela's national oil company that tanked because it never even tried to stay competitive. Chavez was the ultimate socialist. He used oil revenue as if there was no end to it and he fixed prices when inflation was starting to erode at the value of the people's money. That made things even worse. Also, the US didn't place any embargoes on Venezuelan products until 2015. By that time things were out of control in that country. Even I was affected by the ever spiralling inflation in that country and I live in Canada. In 2013, Venezuela ran out of toilet paper and Chavez promised to bring 5 million cases of toilet paper to Venezuela to appease the outrage. He used oil profits to get that toilet paper. I worked in a factory that made toilet paper and we couldn't get raw paper because it was all suddenly going to Venezuela at inflated prices. Some of us were laid off. Hardship in Venezuela actually brought hardship to my fellow workers here in Canada. As for the IMF and the World Bank, why would they give or lend money to a country where the value of that money would become valueless within 24 hours? They'd never be able to pay it back and it wouldn't buy a thing the following day. That's how high the rate of inflation was. There is only one reason for their troubles and that's the socialist idea that money exists on of itself. It doesn't. It's representative of tangible wealth or products that a country can produce and if you don't use the capital that these products generate wisely, you'll fail and fail horribly. It can happen anywhere and it will happen in the US if you allow socialism to take over the economy. That's not fear mongering but fact. Socialism is a recipe for disaster.
    3
  3243. 3
  3244. 3
  3245. 3
  3246. 3
  3247. 3
  3248. 3
  3249. 3
  3250. 3
  3251. 3
  3252. 3
  3253. 3
  3254. 3
  3255. 3
  3256. 3
  3257. 3
  3258. 3
  3259. 3
  3260. 3
  3261. 3
  3262. 3
  3263. 3
  3264. 3
  3265. 3
  3266. 3
  3267. 3
  3268. 3
  3269. 3
  3270. 3
  3271. 3
  3272. 3
  3273. 3
  3274. 3
  3275. 3
  3276. 3
  3277. 3
  3278. 3
  3279. 3
  3280. 3
  3281. 3
  3282. 3
  3283. 3
  3284. 3
  3285. 3
  3286. 3
  3287. 3
  3288. 3
  3289. 3
  3290. 3
  3291. 3
  3292. 3
  3293. 3
  3294. 3
  3295. 3
  3296. 3
  3297. 3
  3298. 3
  3299. 3
  3300. 3
  3301. 3
  3302. 3
  3303. 3
  3304. 3
  3305. 3
  3306. 3
  3307. 3
  3308. 3
  3309. 3
  3310. 3
  3311. 3
  3312. 3
  3313. 3
  3314. 3
  3315. 3
  3316. 3
  3317. 3
  3318. 3
  3319. 3
  3320. 3
  3321. 3
  3322. 3
  3323. 3
  3324. 3
  3325. 3
  3326. 3
  3327.  @galiyam1  Do you know what's hurting his presidency? The Democrat hatred of him and their reaction to losing the last election. The country was doing great until Covid hit and, true to form, the worst hit places were Democrat run states, both by the disease and economically. Texas and Florida have 30 million MORE people, combined, than New York, yet have over 10,000 more deaths. This is the state where Covid patients were put in nursing homes and Cuomo refuses to talk about it when asked. NY City has checkpoints at city exits. 500,000 people have left, most of them for good, eroding the tax base and it would appear that NY will have a 30 billion dollar shortfall this year. Mayor DeBlasio has threatened to increase taxes on those who remain, ensuring even more people leaving and is now talking about wealth redistribution. They've had riots, excuse me, "peaceful protests" where stores were looted and property damaged. The streets are empty, businesses boarded up and covered in graffiti. The Mayor took the homeless, out of shelters and have put them up in high end hotels at 175 bucks a night....13,000 of them. These addicts and mentally impaired people are wandering the streets, threatening people, urinating in public, passing out where ever they happen to be, even though they have rooms that you and I can't afford to live in. 1 billion dollars in funding have been taken away from the police force and even though 1/2 billion people have left the city, violent crime has doubled. Even so, the mayor has seen fit to assign 27 police officers to protect a BLM street painting, which he had commissioned at tax payer expense. ......and Trump is a bad president? Democrat city Portland has had 100 days of continuous riots. LA and San Francisco are in a dystopian mess, with homelessness, exorbitant rents and taxes, electrical blackouts and have even talked about taxing people that have left the state for ten years, AFTER they've left. They've just voted to repeal the state Civil Right's Act, their state version of the Federal Act that Martin Luther King worked so hard to put in place. Downtown Minneapolis has been destroyed. Their Democrat city council has voted to abolish the police force and then hired a private security firm to protect themselves. Kenosha has 3 days of intense riots, refusing help, from Trump, until people were killed. Chicago has had ongoing riots. Louisville has had BLM extorting money from small businesses demanding they buy 1/3 of their supplies from Black owned businesses or pay them 1.5% of their revenue. Do you know what the common thread here is? They're ALL Democrat led cities....yet Trump is a bad president. I can go on if you like. These aren't the only cities in a dystopian nightmare but you're going to vote for the Democrats and expand this chaos to a national level. GREAT THINKING!!!!!!!
    3
  3328. 3
  3329. 3
  3330. 3
  3331. 3
  3332. 3
  3333. 3
  3334. 3
  3335. 3
  3336. 3
  3337. 3
  3338. 3
  3339. 3
  3340. 3
  3341. 3
  3342. 3
  3343. 3
  3344. 3
  3345. 3
  3346. 3
  3347. 3
  3348. 3
  3349. 3
  3350. 3
  3351. 3
  3352. 3
  3353. 3
  3354. 3
  3355. 3
  3356. 3
  3357. 3
  3358. 3
  3359.  @E_Ten  Which brings me to this point. Covid was a brand new disease. No vaccine. No treatment. Nothing was known about it. A couple of studies said that HCQ worked, most known the study in France. One question I have is this. Why would anyone just pick HCQ out of a hat to use as a treatment for Covid? Why that particular drug? Was there something in the symptoms and pathology of Covid that suggested that it was a logical drug to investigate? I'd say there must have been. A doctor just wouldn't choose it over so many other drugs to choose from. There had to be a reason. Which brings me to the safety question. It's been used for over 50 years as a treatment for malaria. It's known that malaria causes respiratory distress and I'd say that this was the connection that prompted doctors to try it on Covid. With over 200 million cases a year, the dangers of HCQ would be reliably documented. It would seem to me that in April, when nothing was known about the disease and I mean nothing, why wouldn't you prescribe it? It's been quite safely used and like any other drug, you don't prescribe it to those who have conditions that are known to react badly with it. There are all kinds of drugs like that. We can get aspirin over the counter, yet I know people with allergies that this aspirin will kill. I can buy peanuts at the 7/11, which is deadly for some people, but, for some reason, when you have a deadly disease, you're not even allowed to try HCQ. I find the logic baffling. At the time there was no known treatment but, if contracted, a doctor isn't allowed to even try it, in some places, just wait it out and hope that it doesn't get worse. Yet, if you had rheumatoid arthritis, a terrible disease but not nearly as immediately deadly as Covid, not a problem. Maybe it wasn't going to work but it seems that a drug that has such widespread use shouldn't be as controversial as it has been. That, to me, is baffling. It's like it was better to do nothing, than to use a drug who's side effects are well known. Then we'd have data, REAL data, instead of a political football.
    3
  3360.  @E_Ten  When there's 140,000 dead, we KNOW what the harmful effects of Covid is. In January, 6 months ago, we didn't know. HCQ was deemed safe for use, just like aspirin and aspirin has killed people in allergic reactions, yet I can take aspirin for Covid, but not HCQ. Of course it hasn't been tested on Covid before. How could it have been? I find it rather ironic that if I have rheumatoid arthritis and I have HCQ in my medicine cabinet, I could take it if I'm diagnosed with it. I try it too. I'm 68 and it could kill me within a week, and I'm not ready to go yet and if I've used it all along, I'll use it now. However, my neighbour doesn't even have the opportunity to try it, if he can't find a doctor who will prescribed it, off label, or like in Michigan where the governor refused to allow its use. In fact, there was a politician, in Michigan who was quite ill with Covid and had taken HCQ for Lyme disease, in the past, got her doctor to prescribe it because he felt it perfectly safe. She was vilified by the state governor when she said it helped her almost immediately. I realise that it may be coincidental that she recovered but the point is, why is aspirin, with it's record ok but HCQ not ok. That's what is baffling to me and why it's become political. Had people been allowed to use it, since its safety is understood, we'd know by now whether it would be a waste of time or not. But we won't know because the politics of it clouds everything. It's beyond ridiculous, to the point of being a tragedy more than anything. Worse, the media has conflated untested for Covid with untested for safety which is being quite disingenuous.
    3
  3361. 3
  3362. 3
  3363. 3
  3364. 3
  3365.  @A_Jeff  You're contradicting yourself. If Canada needed the pipeline to get their products to a better port, they've lost out. The pipeline, to a better port, doesn't exist, Biden stopped it. That means that they're not drilling for more because they can't get it to markets. Thousands of oil workers, in Alberta and Saskatchewan, are now sitting at home because the Keystone project was scrapped. These are workers that would have had high paying jobs but no pipeline so no point in drilling for oil. That also impacts all the peripheral workers. Truck drivers to get products to drilling sites. Secondary manufacturing to build the trucks and products needed to drill for the oil. Service industries lose high paying oil riggers as customers. This is a huge industry in western Canada. Then there's the oil refineries in Louisiana which would directly employ hundreds of people of high paying jobs. Then the dock workers who load the oil tankards and all those who service the refineries and docks. The pipeline will also need servicing which will keep more skilled workers in jobs. The oil industry is a labour intensive business which needs highly skilled workers who make great money. This isn't like a guy whittling whistles to sell at a fair. This is a big industry. There's a reason why the Arab states are so rich. We, in Canada and the US, could grab a piece of their pie but Biden and company don't want it. They just decide that they don't want it and with a stroke of the pen, thousands are out of work. It doesn't cost Biden or the Democrats one red cent but the ordinary worker, as usual, pays the price. That's what blows me away. The Democrats just don't care about the little guy.
    3
  3366. 3
  3367. 3
  3368.  @walkinlight3380  Not directly you didn't vote for it, if that's true. However, part of being a republic means that you vote for your officials to serve as your reps in government. If they force a raise in car insurance rates, the people voted for the guy. If there's another election and the people vote him in again, then....YES....you voted for it. He did it and you approved by allowing him another term as your rep. It may have bothered the voters that the insurance rates went up but obviously not enough to vote for a candidate that would strike down that legislation. You could claim that this legislation is Unconstitutional and I'd say you would have a strong case, but if you don't do any more than complain about it, you voted for it again with your actions. That's how a Constitutional Republic works. The democracy allows the people to vote for their reps and the Constitution limits what that rep can do. If you don't use the Constitution to do it's job, either by voting that rep out or by using the power of the constitution to show that it's unconstitutional, then you voted for it and are agreeing to it by not using the power of the Constitution. YOU are the one that allowing the Democracy to become mob rule with your inaction. You're not allowing the Democracy to run the way that it's supposed to run by not allowing the Constitutional to protect you from the bad reps who do things that are wrong or unwanted. You may not have voted for the rep to do those things but you voted with your actions to allow those things to stand and become permanent.
    3
  3369. 3
  3370. 3
  3371. 3
  3372. 3
  3373. 3
  3374. 3
  3375. 3
  3376. 3
  3377. 3
  3378. 3
  3379. 3
  3380. 3
  3381. 3
  3382. 3
  3383. 3
  3384. 3
  3385. 3
  3386. 3
  3387. 3
  3388. 3
  3389. 3
  3390. 3
  3391. 3
  3392. 3
  3393. 3
  3394. 3
  3395. 3
  3396. 3
  3397. 3
  3398. 3
  3399. 3
  3400. 3
  3401. 3
  3402. 3
  3403. 3
  3404. 3
  3405. 3
  3406. 3
  3407. 3
  3408. 3
  3409. 3
  3410. 3
  3411. 3
  3412. 3
  3413. 3
  3414. 3
  3415. 3
  3416. 3
  3417. 3
  3418. 3
  3419. 3
  3420. 3
  3421. 3
  3422. 3
  3423. 3
  3424. 3
  3425. 3
  3426. 3
  3427. 3
  3428. 3
  3429. 3
  3430. 3
  3431. 3
  3432. 3
  3433. 3
  3434. 3
  3435.  @vmusatov  Everything WASN'T easy, though. They had to work hard because they had nothing except the freedom to be able to make a plan for their future and then be able to follow up on it. It was all there for you but you had to work for it, not just the standard 40 hour week but 60 or 70 or even more. They were able to sacrifice and see the rewards before they were too old to enjoy it. That's all in the past. Ask someone to work overtime and most will refuse and they'll come up with all kinds of reasons why they can't. The entire culture has changed and our government uses it to take away our freedoms and most will gladly allow it in exchange for the promise of safety and security. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin Of course the Russians look back at Soviet times as the good old days. Their country has left communism and embraced Fascism, another branch of socialism which can be more brutal than what the Soviets gave them. At least the Soviets tried to provide everything for the people.....except freedom. Now, they still don't have freedom, they don't have a government that provides for them and they've been embroiled in one war after another on their own soil or in the old Soviet bloc countries. They have neither liberty OR safety and security, not like when they didn't have freedom but at least they had security or believed they had. This isn't about how good or bad the times are as it is about being free.
    3
  3436. 3
  3437. 3
  3438. 3
  3439. 3
  3440. 3
  3441. 3
  3442. 3
  3443. 3
  3444. 3
  3445. 3
  3446. 3
  3447. 3
  3448. 3
  3449. 3
  3450. 3
  3451. 3
  3452. 3
  3453. 3
  3454. 3
  3455. 3
  3456. 3
  3457. 3
  3458. 3
  3459. 3
  3460. 3
  3461. 3
  3462. 3
  3463. 3
  3464. 3
  3465. 3
  3466. 3
  3467. 3
  3468. 3
  3469. 3
  3470. 3
  3471. 3
  3472. 3
  3473. 3
  3474. 3
  3475. 3
  3476. 3
  3477. 3
  3478. 3
  3479. 3
  3480. 3
  3481. 3
  3482. 3
  3483. 3
  3484. 3
  3485. 3
  3486. 3
  3487. 3
  3488. 3
  3489. 3
  3490. 3
  3491. 3
  3492. 3
  3493. 3
  3494. 3
  3495. 3
  3496. 3
  3497. 3
  3498. 3
  3499. 3
  3500. 3
  3501. 3
  3502. 3
  3503. 3
  3504. 3
  3505. 3
  3506.  @outermarker5801  Are you kidding me. All the right does is wave American flags, sing the American anthem and get upset when people won't stand for that anthem or refuse to recite the pledge of allegiance. Burning the American flag is a grievous sin to the conservative. That's what I mean by patriotism and loyalty. It's directed at the union of states that we call the United States. To show patriotism and loyalty to America is paramount to the right wing conservatives. So, they had different ideas on who the speaker should be. What does that have to do with patriotism? That has to do with competence and who individuals believed would be better suited to be the speaker. Sometimes a question, like that is quite clear and sometimes it isn't. What that has to do with patriotism is beyond me. Republicans embarrassing themselves. They're not the ones who are claiming that men can get pregnant and called the killing of a black man by 5 black police officers "white supremacy". They're not the ones supporting the placement of books like "Gender Queer" in school libraries....books that have illustrations and depictions of explicit sexual acts in them. They're not the ones who supported the BLM and Antifa riots and who didn't say a WORD when 8 year old Secoriea Turner was shot and killed by "peaceful protests" in Atlanta. A little black girl MURDERED by a group that they supported and they feel NO embarrassment over it. Even the term "peaceful protests" should embarrass them. Over 25 people dead, thousands wounded, billions of dollars in damage in cities all across the United States and they just kept repeating the "mostly peaceful protests" mantra. Then they kept on repeating the phrase by Trump of "good people on both sides" and intentionally ignoring what he said in the SAME sentence about white supremacists. You don't find those things embarrassing? I'm not going to say that the Republicans don't EVER embarrass themselves. They most surely do but to make it all about one party is not only naive. It's almost being intentionally obtuse. Don't trust ANY politicians. NONE!!!! That means Republicans too as well as Democrats. If you don't you'll find yourself being unable or unwilling to even define what a woman is. Now, THAT'S embarrassing.
    3
  3507. 3
  3508. 3
  3509. 3
  3510. 3
  3511. 3
  3512. 3
  3513. 3
  3514. 3
  3515. 3
  3516. 2
  3517. 2
  3518. 2
  3519. 2
  3520. 2
  3521. 2
  3522. 2
  3523. 2
  3524. 2
  3525. 2
  3526. 2
  3527. 2
  3528. 2
  3529. 2
  3530. 2
  3531. 2
  3532. StigmataBob2 I'm not American,  so I can't really say what your medical people say.  Here in Canada,  cancer is a terrible disease and I've lost my mother and friends to it.  Our survival rate is a little better than the United States, but believe me, the word cancer carries with it a real sense of dread here, as it does all over the world.  Right now there is no definitive cure.  Some cancers, pancreatic and brain cancer, are a near death sentence.  Others, testicular and skin cancer have very good survival rates.  There are lifestyle habits that can stave off the disease,  smoking, alcohol abuse, diet for example, but the idea that there is something out there that will cure all cancer, all the time, is a myth. When I was young, a person with heart problems had a death sentence hanging over them.  A person that had undergone heart surgery was looked on as one of the walking dead, waiting for the ticker to quit.  Now, quadruple bypass is routine.  People are living normal lives after surgery, for years.  Unheard of, when I was young.  The strides made in heart care have been fantastic.  Unfortunately, it hasn't been the same for cancer.  Cancer attacks all parts of the body and attacks them all differently.  They have different causes, different pathologies, even different cures.  What works for testicular cancer doesn't seem to matter with pancreatic cancer.  Yes, there are those who get rich treating cancer.  There are those who get rich treating heart problems.  Why can the heart patients live normal healthy lives after treatment but cancer patients have so many more problems.   Are heart doctors more competent, more compassionate than the cancer doctors?  Why would that be? Anyone,  no matter who he is or where he lives, that can cure cancer, every time will become a billionaire and there is no way the pharmaceutical companies can stop it, even if they wanted to.  You see, even drug company executives get cancer,  they die from it, lose loved ones to it, are afraid of it...just like we are.   There is a surface logic to the idea that people get rich off cancer but dig underneath and you'll find the same frightened people in the pharma boardrooms that you find on the street.
    2
  3533. 2
  3534. 2
  3535. 2
  3536. 2
  3537. 2
  3538. 2
  3539. 2
  3540. 2
  3541. 2
  3542. 2
  3543. 2
  3544. 2
  3545. 2
  3546. 2
  3547. 2
  3548. 2
  3549. 2
  3550. 2
  3551. 2
  3552. 2
  3553. 2
  3554. 2
  3555. 2
  3556. 2
  3557. 2
  3558. 2
  3559. 2
  3560. 2
  3561. 2
  3562.  @billpracells8876  I've watched this video before. This doesn't prove that Trump supports the alt-right at all. It's trying to prove that PragerU is mistaken about how the MSM didn't report Trump's condemnation of Neo-Nazis and advance the insinuation that everyone that went there to protest the removal of the statue had to be alt-right and Nazi sympathisers. You've already been shown that General Lee did NOT support slavery. So why did he fight on the Confederate side? He did it because he was loyal to the state of North Carolina and because the Civil War was more than a fight over slavery. It was a fight over state's rights, as well. In fact, the slaves weren't set free until AFTER the war had started, almost 2 years later and Lee opposed the war but reluctantly joined because he felt a loyalty to his home and his state. People fought for the south for various reasons, NOT just to fight for slavery. In fact, most Confederate soldiers never owned a slave. Why would they fight and die for something that they would never have? Why would Lee fight for a cause that he had openly opposed for years? That's why that statue shouldn't be removed. People, like you, want everything to be simple. "He's evil and he's good" and there's always that implication that you're good, as well, because you support the "good" guy. The world is more complex than that and so are people. That's the discussion that we should be having. We should be trying to understand the world of the time and the motivations of all the combatants, on both sides, and not turn it into a proxy war today of "good vs evil". That's a childish view of the world. Worse.....it implies that you'd never be on the side of evil...EVER. Nietzsche once wrote "Whoever fights with monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster in the process. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." You could become that monster in a zealous rage. That's why the statue shouldn't be torn down. It's to remind us that this conflict was more complex than we can know and that we have to discuss the frailty of the human heart. It's to prevent us from vilifying one another through full understanding. The protests about the statue had been ongoing. The neo-Nazis and white supremacists went there to advance their own agenda and because of a disagreement, over that statue, that was already in progress and had been for a long time. I know this is a long comment but life and people are more complex than. "They're EVIL!!!!". That simplistic AND dangerous.
    2
  3563.  @billpracells8876  I never ONCE said that I supported slavery. What I said is that history and the people that lived it are complex and we should try to understand them, instead of categorising them into good and evil. It's how we understand ourselves. In fact, that's what you're doing to me, right now. You're not making any points on the complexities of history. You're just trying to win an argument by vilifying me. It's not a discussion, it's just more accusations. My father grew up 30 miles east of the German border, in the Netherlands, during the war. How much different his life would have been had he been born, 35 miles east of where he grew up. He's have been in Germany. Why did that line on the map destine him to be one of the good guys, yet his counterpart, 35 miles away, was marching with the Hitler youth? Would YOU, living in central Germany, in 1935, refused to join the Hitler youth? Would you have been that special that you would have went against your family, your friends, teachers, neighbours and community and defied them all by tacitly rejecting the Nazis? I doubt it. I'd like to think that I would and so do you, but the reality is that we'd have both been proudly goose stepping beside one another, proudly carrying the Nazi flag in our Hitler youth uniforms. To not admit that, is a refusal to understand yourself and how the human mind works and it's a discussion we should all have about ourselves and human history. Also, you don't know what your feelings would have been about slavery had you not the luxury of 20/20 hindsight. It's easy to be virtuous when you don't have to live it.
    2
  3564. 2
  3565. 2
  3566. 2
  3567. 2
  3568. 2
  3569. 2
  3570. 2
  3571. 2
  3572. 2
  3573. 2
  3574. 2
  3575. 2
  3576. 2
  3577. 2
  3578. 2
  3579. 2
  3580. 2
  3581. 2
  3582. 2
  3583. 2
  3584. 2
  3585. 2
  3586. 2
  3587.  @kateofone  It took YEARS for you to go through this. YEARS. Do you actually believe that every person, going through puberty and having difficulties with it, are going through gender dysphoria? There are countless examples where this has become a social contagion, that the solution for their discomfort with puberty has only ONE solution. Tavistock, a gender clinic in England, reported that there has been a 4000% increase of gender dysphoria referrals over 10 years. What's worse, most of it has been girls when throughout history, it's been a male problem The entire thing is beyond plausible. They also have close to a thousand lawsuits against them for treatments that they've done. I'm NOT disputing that dysphoria exists or that it even helped you. What I'm disputing is that there is only ONE solution to feeling uncomfortable in one's body and that there may be other psychological issues at play here. I'm disputing that if a person, who's experiencing emotional difficulties, may have the capacity to understand that this could be a multi-faceted problem and that the "you must have gender dysphoria" is the ONLY solution possible. That we MUST affirm the diagnoses of the patient and no other exploration into the psyche is necessary. Chloe Cole went through the drug therapies at 13. At 15, she had her breasts removed. At 17, she realised that this was all a mistake and she has the evidence, the paperwork to PROVE that the entire transformation process was pushed and rubber stamped by a medical profession whose only interest was in making money. That there is NO way that this could be open to abuse, just because it was good for you, is appalling. EVERYTHING is open to abuse. I have friends who are DEAD because the medical establishment prescribed opioids to ease pain and they became addicted. It KILLED them and it went on until we finally forced them to stop. I'm glad it worked out for you but this isn't just all about YOU. Everyone of those kids are individuals, with different psychologies, environmental factors, health issues and social pressures. To pretend that this doesn't exist because of YOUR experience implies that they are ALL the same and that underlying condition can't exist isn't only myopic...it's as narcissistic as it gets.
    2
  3588. 2
  3589.  @aleisterbroley900  Individual responsibility....that's what every person should believe in. To know and understand oneself, to learn all he can and try to do the right thing. No one should ever think that he knows it all and that self reflection is never necessary. What got us into this mess is the human propensity to envy. It's the socialist mantra. "If he has it and I don't, then he doesn't deserve it". Every child believes that. "How come Johnny can have one and I can't". They never look to themselves to improve their life. It's always someone else's responsibility. Envy is one of the seven deadly sins for a reason and the call against coveting is one of the Ten Commandments, one of the Big Ten. It's that serious. My willingness to look at all the facts, led me that conclusion, even though I'm not a Christian. Had I not been a classical liberal, I wouldn't look at all facts and ideas and I'd be one of the left wing ideologues who refuses to listen and wants to shut the mouths of those who disagree with them. If I wasn't a liberal, I'd never understand that it's my responsibility to see that I do more than assert my rights because I'd never have taken the time to think these things through. I'd accept what I was told by a world that obsessed with equity. Also, I make sure that I deserve those rights by trying to be honest, hard working and responsible and always ready to improve myself by honest self introspection. Most people, these days, try to change the world by some crusade against the evil in others. I try to change the world by realising that the evil is within me and that I have to be in a continuous battle for self improvement. If you think that's wrong, so be it.
    2
  3590. 2
  3591. 2
  3592. 2
  3593. 2
  3594.  @garyjackson3531  I know that they're all genetic conditions. However, sometimes they don't manifest themselves so you'd know right away that there's a problem. That's when the dysphoria can surface and in this case it might be real. I repeat....that's when the dysphoria CAN surface, not WILL surface. However, dysphoria can also be a mental condition that can be quite serious. The reasons for TRUE dysphoria are unknown. But what does that have to do with what's happening, now? I went through great pains to explain how this was likely a social contagion, brought on by social media, our education system and the medical establishment. That STRONGLY implies that it's induced from the outside and NOT a dysphoria from within. Vulnerable children are told, by their teachers and social media, that they're problems are caused by gender confusion and the way to good mental health is to find out what their REAL gender is. So that's what they do and the pressure placed on them pushes them in the direction towards declaring themselves a different gender. "Oh, look at how brave little Susie is. She even wants to be called Joshua now. Everyone clap for Joshua." And the kid LOVES it. She's finally the centre of attention in a good way. What kid would't fall for it. In fact, it'll encourage other kids to do the same. They want to be brave, too. I agree that it is a socialist agenda. Mengele was a National Socialist, the ideology of the Nazis. Margaret Sanger was a socialist as well, although she'd never admit to be a National Socialist. Planned Parenthood started long before National Socialism became a thing. National Socialism is just another form of Marxism trimmed down to include only one of the same ethnicity but it's still socialism. In fact, the China of today is the closest thing that we have presently to Nazi Germany and they devolved down from full Marxism down to National Socialism. Guess where a lot of this transgender stuff is being spread among the young? That Chinese media company app called TikTok. This is a lot deeper than people would think.
    2
  3595. 2
  3596. 2
  3597. 2
  3598. 2
  3599. 2
  3600. 2
  3601. 2
  3602. 2
  3603. 2
  3604. 2
  3605. 2
  3606.  @bLackmarketRadio  Of course they're paying me. Now you're starting to sound exactly like the flat earthers that I've talked to online. I never ONCE said that they weren't including non Covids as Covids. I said that we have NO idea how prevalent that it is. There is no way for you or me to know this. This might work just great in a country like the US, where hospitals are private and run like businesses and they see an opportunity to get government funds. However, in the countries that have socialised health care, like EVERY country in Europe, it makes no difference. They already get that money from the government because it's government owned and run and no one makes a profit off it. Yet, their numbers, per capita, are HIGHER than the US numbers. Italy, France, Spain and the UK are all in that category. So, to say that this is a big factor, worldwide, is looking at it through a myopic American lens. There are also countries where healthcare is poor and people don't have access to medical care. How many of them are getting the disease and can't get to a doctor and never get counted. What about countries that deflate the numbers to look good? The US situation is just one facet of this crisis. The disease exists. Instead of going off on a suspicion that you can't prove in a substantial way, start pressuring your local politician to start easing off on the restrictions. Don't go all squirrelly with accusations and overt threats. Just let it be known that if they don't start to ease off, you won't vote for them come election time. Politicians want votes, especially Democrats. Saying that some guy on the internet is getting paid to say things puts you in the category of people to laugh at. Don't be that guy. We're on the same side. I WANT the restrictions eased. I want it badly. I just don't go off all half cocked with theories. I see it as a political ploy by Democrats, in an attempt to make Republicans look like greedy capitalists and they'd love nothing more than a total economic collapse and a huge death count so to pin the blame on Republicans. I repeat. I WANT TO END THE LOCKDOWN. It's what I've been saying all along. The curve has been flattened. Let's acknowledge it and let's GET BACK TO WORK.
    2
  3607. 2
  3608. 2
  3609. 2
  3610. 2
  3611. 2
  3612. 2
  3613. 2
  3614. 2
  3615. 2
  3616. 2
  3617. 2
  3618. 2
  3619. 2
  3620. 2
  3621. 2
  3622. 2
  3623. 2
  3624. 2
  3625. 2
  3626. 2
  3627. 2
  3628. 2
  3629. 2
  3630. 2
  3631. 2
  3632. 2
  3633. 2
  3634. 2
  3635. 2
  3636. 2
  3637. 2
  3638. 2
  3639. 2
  3640. 2
  3641. 2
  3642. 2
  3643. 2
  3644.  Terry Tater  Being a country guy, I can tell you how frustrating it is to see these city folk move into our neighbourhoods. They come in and are surprised that the country isn't what they expected and then try to change it to the image they have in their heads....meaning, they try to change us. Yes, I'm conservative. I'm about self reliance, personal responsibility, individual rights and sovereignty, hard work, and judging others on their character and integrity. I don't decry the actions of others when I'm guilty of those things myself. I try to say what I mean and conversely, mean what I say. It's how people of integrity should try to live their lives. I don't always succeed, in fact, I'm a failure a good part of the time but I recognise the weaknesses the reside in me. That's why I take umbrage in the defensive stance of this woman. She won't take responsibility for her part in what she sees as a problem. She wants it to be about everyone else BUT her. Had she admitted her role in this perceived problem and how difficult it will be to change the mindset of the average person, the conversation could have went in a more positive direction. But she wouldn't do that. All she wanted to do was identify the bad guy and then exert control. My ego isn't so grand that I think I can change the world but I do know that I can try to control my own actions. Worse, I don't have the right to control them anyway. Change, positive change, comes through a cultural renaissance, led by consciences of individuals, acting on their own free will. It's no different that the cultural change that the internet brought about. Individual decisions to use the new technology, no one being forced into it but a silent, yet overwhelming force of personal choices.
    2
  3645. 2
  3646. 2
  3647. 2
  3648. 2
  3649. 2
  3650. 2
  3651. 2
  3652. 2
  3653. 2
  3654. 2
  3655. 2
  3656. 2
  3657. 2
  3658. 2
  3659. 2
  3660. 2
  3661. 2
  3662. 2
  3663. 2
  3664. 2
  3665. 2
  3666. 2
  3667. 2
  3668. 2
  3669. 2
  3670. 2
  3671. 2
  3672. 2
  3673. 2
  3674. 2
  3675. 2
  3676. 2
  3677. 2
  3678. 2
  3679. 2
  3680. 2
  3681. 2
  3682.  @ericlazenby5984  You want them to show BEFORE the crime? Are you seriously that foolish? And they don't ALL laugh in your face, either. That's your own bigotry coming through which says all people, in a specific group, are exactly the same. Identity politics....the bane of modern society. My ex-wife, and my kids, went away for the evening and while she was gone, someone broke in and robbed them. Not only her stuff, but the kids bicycles, laptops, cameras and other valuable. The police didn't laugh at them. They went to pawnshops in all the surrounding towns and even got some of the stuff back and a person was arrested. I worked as a bartender for years. Every time I needed the police because of violent patrons, they were always helpful. They even had a police car parked outside a waitresses home because an extremely violent patron threatened her. They didn't laugh. Years later my son was killed in a tragic accident. 2 officers came to my door to inform me of the tragedy and one of them stayed with me and talked for almost 2 hours until I was ready to meet with family and friends. Then he gave me a ride to where I had to go. They didn't laugh. They showed nothing but sympathy and understanding. You're making broad statements to suit your own bitterness and hatred. It's unfair and shows a weak mind. If there are cops who do behave inappropriately, complain about them so they either forced to change their ways or are fired. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. They're defunding police in big cities all over the US and violent crime has increased by leaps and bounds. Over 200% in New York alone. Violent crime has been on the way down until this new police hatred started. Now it's returning. Everyone one of those 200% more, in New York, thank you for making that violent altercation possible by your lack of support of the police.
    2
  3683. 2
  3684. 2
  3685. 2
  3686. 2
  3687. 2
  3688. 2
  3689. 2
  3690. 2
  3691. 2
  3692. 2
  3693. 2
  3694. 2
  3695. 2
  3696. 2
  3697.  @sthubbins4038  NO ONE invalidated this election. He was just as sure that there was fraud as Hillary was and he told that crowd to march "peacefully and patriotically", HIS words, to let the members of Congress know how he felt. He then told the audience to GO HOME and "primary" those Republicans that didn't question the integrity of the election. "Primary them"...that means for them to get ready for the NEXT election. It means to get Republican candidates that will support the president, no matter who it is. Does that REALLY sound like "storm the Capital Building" to you? Also, Trump was over a mile away, when he gave that speech. It was impossible for him to "watch" them storm the building. That's pure hyperbole on your part. I gave TWO examples of VERY questionable events around this election...TWO examples that should have been investigated and ONE WAS and the person was charged. This woman bragged that she had control of over 7 thousand mail in ballots. MAIL IN BALLOTS....the very thing that Trump was worried about all along and this woman was charged for doing it. Hillary had NO evidence....AT ALL. The Mueller report turned up nothing and it cost the American taxpayers MILLIONS to do it. YOUR taxpayer money. Now the Democrats are spending even more. Thousands of troops around the Capital. Barbed wire fencing. Investigating military personnel for questionable tweets and reassigning them. Investigating government offices and purging all Republican supporters by going through their internet accounts. Do you know who else did that? Who did it right after the "Night of the Long Knives"? They have NO right to investigate people that weren't even there or to question the loyalty of military personnel because a few jerks, out of tens of thousands that were in Washington that day, acted foolishly. Security even LET some of them in, if they promised not to damage anything. Then the Democrats had a state funeral for officer Sicknick, claiming he was killed fighting rioters, when he died the following day from a stroke which had nothing to do with the riots. Now they have some of them in solitary confinement, even though it was months ago. Yet, when Antifa barricaded the doors of a Federal Courthouse, in Portland, and tried to burn the place down with people inside it, they just let them go. Over 120 nights in a row of rioting in Portland and they're STILL rioting. They had violent protests AGAIN last night and over 2 dozen gunshots at the one year Memorial for George Floyd at the "autonomous" zone in Minneapolis. In the middle of the day, caught on video. It's all political theatre and it's 2 sets of rules. And to top it all off....I've already said that those who broke in should be arrested and charged. They're a bunch of idiots. The difference is....I want to apply the law equally to rioters. YOU only want to apply it to those you don't like.
    2
  3698. 2
  3699. 2
  3700. 2
  3701. 2
  3702. 2
  3703. 2
  3704. 2
  3705. 2
  3706. 2
  3707. 2
  3708. 2
  3709. 2
  3710. 2
  3711. 2
  3712. 2
  3713. 2
  3714. 2
  3715. 2
  3716. 2
  3717. 2
  3718. 2
  3719. 2
  3720. 2
  3721. 2
  3722. 2
  3723. 2
  3724. 2
  3725. 2
  3726. 2
  3727. 2
  3728. 2
  3729. 2
  3730. 2
  3731. 2
  3732. 2
  3733. 2
  3734. 2
  3735. 2
  3736. 2
  3737. 2
  3738. 2
  3739. 2
  3740. 2
  3741. 2
  3742. 2
  3743. 2
  3744. 2
  3745. 2
  3746. 2
  3747. Bartleby Oregon How does it benefit the team to share the ball with me if I refuse to develop my individual skills to be of any help to the teams. A team of individuals who do not hone their individual skills will be a losing team, no matter how much they're willing to share the ball. I am of no use to the basketball team if I do not, first and foremost, develop my ability to play the game. The team is only as good as the total of the abilities of each individual. Peterson is not telling you not to share. He is saying that if you're of little value to yourself, you'll never be of value to anyone else or society in general. When one builds a house, quite often that person brings in a team of people with specialised skills to complete the job. An architect, concrete finishers, block layers and brick layers, carpenters, electricians, drywallers, roofers and decorators. They each use their skills to form a team that will complete the building of the house. However, if the block layer lacks the skill and the foundation that he builds starts to crack and the foundation is in danger of crumbling, the best carpenters and electricians in the world cannot prevent the house from deteriorating long before its time. To build a decent house, each individual must be develop their personal skills to do their part in the construction. A poor tradesman drags down the entire team of builders. That's the emphasis on the individual that Peterson is advocating. A socially and poorly developed individual is a handicap, not an asset, to society as a whole.
    2
  3748. 2
  3749. 2
  3750.  @madmisobroth1361  I see all the people slaughtered EVERY year by drunk drivers. Yet, we still allow the sale of alcohol. Broken families, abuse, bankruptcies, fetal alcohol syndrome, homelessness.....and they still sell the poison. I don't get it. You see....you can apply your logic to everything. I started shooting when I was 14 years old. I'm 69 today and I still go hunting for duck, deer, rabbit, partridge and more. I'm involved in different environmental groups and gun safety programs. I've never known ANYONE who ever went of a shooting spree. I grew up in the country, miles from any police station. It would take at least half an hour for any police officer to arrive in case of an emergency. What were we to do, my neighbours included, if we were faced with a crazed individual who wanted to do us harm? Are we to just wait for help from the police, through no fault of their own, who may not get there for 40 minutes or longer? We have to rely on ourselves and now YOU want to take that away from us. And now, with the defund the police initiatives and some even wanting to abolish the police, who's going to protect YOU. Time for YOU to step up and take care of yourself, if it's necessary....or would you rather die than protect yourself. Our guns are our tools, for protection and recreation. Don't lump me with those nutbars that lose their minds. It's no different than those who destroy and kill others due to irresponsible alcohol use. In fact, MORE people have their lives destroyed by alcohol. We accept that it's the fault of the individual when he kills someone driving while intoxicated, yet for some reason, when it's a gun, it's the fault of the collective. You can't have it both ways.
    2
  3751. 2
  3752. 2
  3753. 2
  3754. 2
  3755. 2
  3756. 2
  3757. 2
  3758. 2
  3759. 2
  3760. 2
  3761. 2
  3762. 2
  3763. 2
  3764. 2
  3765. 2
  3766. 2
  3767. 2
  3768. 2
  3769. 2
  3770. 2
  3771. 2
  3772. 2
  3773. 2
  3774. 2
  3775. 2
  3776. 2
  3777. 2
  3778. 2
  3779. 2
  3780. 2
  3781. 2
  3782. 2
  3783. 2
  3784. 2
  3785. 2
  3786. 2
  3787. 2
  3788. 2
  3789. 2
  3790. 2
  3791. 2
  3792. 2
  3793. 2
  3794. 2
  3795. 2
  3796. 2
  3797. 2
  3798. 2
  3799. 2
  3800. 2
  3801. 2
  3802. 2
  3803. 2
  3804. 2
  3805. 2
  3806. 2
  3807. 2
  3808. 2
  3809. 2
  3810. 2
  3811. 2
  3812. 2
  3813.  @bobbykiefer4306  The free market can't regulate itself no more than a free society. Both are run by human beings and if history has taught us anything...people are corrupt. The market has to operate under the rule of law just like everyone else. You can't be free without the law and the law has to be based on certain guideline which are enshrined in the Constitution. Freedom isn't just being free of the tyranny of the government. It's also being free of the tyranny of your fellow citizens. That includes your neighbour, your spouse, fellow workers, your boss, the bankers and corporate bigwigs. Everyone of them is beholden to the Constitution. That means we can live our lives under the auspices of that Constitution, the way that we want to live. That means you cannot deprive anyone of their rights, not just by allowing them free speech and the rest but also by not stealing what belongs to them or intentionally causing them any type of harm be it physical or otherwise. The free market system still insists that you operate under the law. The banks were taking part in scheme that had to fail and they all knew it. That's the harm that I referred to and it infringed on the freedom of the average American. They stole from ordinary people. They corrupted the free market system. Corruption always infringes on human rights. That's why a government should never be involved in business...like socialists advocate for. The government is made up of people and history shows that people are notoriously corrupt. Just like we have separation of church and state, we also should have separation of the economy and state. That doesn't mean that there's no regulation. That means that we allow both the church and the market to operate within the confines of the higher power...the Constitution, so the rights of individuals aren't trampled.
    2
  3814. 2
  3815. 2
  3816. 2
  3817. 2
  3818. 2
  3819. 2
  3820. 2
  3821. So, we need a BAD economy? What kind of logic is that? If you want to get away from the national credit card, you must have a strong economy. No matter what, you have to be working and the country has to be creating wealth. Also, credits cards aren't necessarily bad. It's when you use them irresponsibly, that's when you get into trouble. The last recession showed us that. Granting huge mortgages to people that didn't have the means to pay and the customer not realising his own credit capabilities. That's what conservatism is about. Personal responsibility and having a realistic approach to your own life and future. Almost everyone that I know that has attained a level of financial success has done so prudently and cautiously.....a conservative attitude towards life. Hard work and strong decision making skills. The left seems to think that this is somehow immoral. Now, I'll use myself as an example. I've been a blue collar worker all my life. I live on a yearly fixed income now that I'm retired and that income puts me far below the poverty level. Yet, I have managed to put together a small nest egg and I travel every year. I have a son-in-law that I works at exactly the same job that I did before I retired and makes more money at it than I ever did. Yet all he does is complain and says he has nothing. When I show him how well I've done with it, he's amazed but then starts into how it's impossible these days. I then show him this young guy who's younger than he is and who owns his own home. That's when he stops talking. He's a socialist and wants the government to do it all for him. Not going to happen.
    2
  3822. 2
  3823. 2
  3824. 2
  3825. 2
  3826. 2
  3827. 2
  3828. 2
  3829. 2
  3830. 2
  3831. 2
  3832. 2
  3833. 2
  3834.  @christopherparks4342  Actually, it's Democrats that are saying that are saying that Trump was looking for dirt on Biden, a political opponent and this is wrong. The Republicans are responding to it. Also, I have no idea what Joe Biden was doing or why. That's what some of us would like to know. What is known that soon after that prosecutor was fired, Zlochevsky's criminal position improved. The following year, all charges were dropped against him and he returned to Ukraine. Strange how Hunter Biden's legal problems took a turn for the better right after that prosecutor was fired. Maybe it was fine but let's find out. What's wrong with that? Trump asked for a favour but that had to do with Crowdstrike. It wasn't till later Biden was mentioned but it wasn't discussed as much as the earlier favour. Not once was the aid discussed. You can read that transcript all day, and the aid just never comes up. Logic would imply that if you don't tell someone that he's being bribed, chances are good that he isn't being bribed. It could be that Trump didn't want to give aid to a new president of a country that was rated the 3rd most corrupt country in the world. At least until he found out if that president was sincere in his desire to clean up corruption. I'd say almost every American taxpayer would like to see that. Why would any American want their government to give away money that would line the pockets of corrupt foreign politicians? But that is of little consequence if Trump never overtly held up the money and said "Do the favour or you DON'T get this". It's a lot of assumptions and in the wet dreams of some who are determined to impeach Trump and have from the day of his inauguration.
    2
  3835. 2
  3836. 2
  3837. 2
  3838. 2
  3839. 2
  3840. 2
  3841. 2
  3842. 2
  3843. 2
  3844. 2
  3845. 2
  3846. 2
  3847. 2
  3848. 2
  3849. 2
  3850. 2
  3851. 2
  3852. 2
  3853.  @youaake  Sanctions didn't start until 2015, only 4 years ago. The country was already spiralling out of control. A cursory google search will tell confirm this. It would also confirm that the US is still Venezuela's biggest trading partner. However, you'd rather advance your cause against the US than find out what is truly going on in that country. Read my previous comment on the toilet paper shortage in 2013. It wasn't lack of trade that caused it. It was the government policy of fixing prices that was the issue and that product was being purchased by merchants at a higher price than what they could sell it for. Anyone with any degree of math skills will tell you that this isn't going to work for very long. In fact, Chavez appeased the anger of the people by buying toilet paper at inflated prices and then sold it to the people at the fixed price that caused the problem in the first place. Where did he get the money? From the oil revenue that the nationalised oil company generated. He solved the immediate problem through the use of world trade. This is only one example of what that government was doing that destroyed their economy. Now, they're in serious trouble. There is no way out but through drastic measures and that has to be done whether the US is involved or not. A country, just like a private household, cannot survive if it spends more than it makes. Mike Tyson is a prime example of this. The man had millions....but he's broke. Venezuela did the exact same thing the Tyson did, except at a larger scale.
    2
  3854. 2
  3855. 2
  3856. 2
  3857. 2
  3858. 2
  3859. 2
  3860. 2
  3861. 2
  3862. 2
  3863. 2
  3864. 2
  3865. 2
  3866. 2
  3867. 2
  3868. 2
  3869. 2
  3870. 2
  3871. 2
  3872. 2
  3873. 2
  3874. 2
  3875. 2
  3876. 2
  3877. 2
  3878. 2
  3879. 2
  3880. 2
  3881. 2
  3882. 2
  3883. 2
  3884. 2
  3885. 2
  3886. 2
  3887. 2
  3888. 2
  3889. 2
  3890. 2
  3891. 2
  3892. 2
  3893. 2
  3894. 2
  3895. 2
  3896.  @eoin8450  Socialism has never been owned by the workers. It's something they say but every socialist system has been a top down system. The state, who CLAIM that they represent the workers, or that they are in fact the workers (never true, though) controls it all. The only difference, I've said it before, between the communist state and the fascist state is that communism tries to manage it all, from the macro to the micro. Fascism controls the macro, each industry and lets them deal with the micro management, the day to day stuff. Fascism realises that the details are too complex to deal with it all so they give a little more freedom to make the micro decisions but they still control it all, in the name of the state, which is the people. That's why it's National Socialism, state Socialism or, as in Germany, National Socialist German Workers' Party. They still claim to be representing the Workers. The workers are the backbone of the Fascist state. Unions are disbanded and replaced by party representatives who monitor productivity, loyalty and worker grievances. No one, from the owners, top management to the guy pushing a broom is safe from that Party rep. It's the same in the Soviet state, except their is no ownership, just top management, but they are just as much beholden to the Party reps as their counterparts, the ownership and management, as Fascist workplaces. Fascist owners are allowed more leeway in market place markets, as long as it doesn't interfere with national goals.
    2
  3897. 2
  3898. 2
  3899. 2
  3900. 2
  3901. 2
  3902. 2
  3903. 2
  3904. 2
  3905. 2
  3906. 2
  3907. 2
  3908. 2
  3909. 2
  3910. 2
  3911. 2
  3912. 2
  3913. 2
  3914. 2
  3915. 2
  3916. 2
  3917. @Ethan Hobigant Roche Chris Cuomo....."Since when to protests have to be peaceful?" A rather poor attitude. Especially when the very first Amendment of the Constitution says that we have the right to peacefully assemble to bring our grievances to bear. If a protest is called, I'm going to assume it's going to be peaceful. It would be a peaceful assembly and it would be lawful. I'm an individual but so is the assembly. A group making a singularity, just like the Jack of Clubs is one card of the singularity called a Deck of Cards. Lose that Jack of Clubs and the Deck of Cards becomes unusable. When someone in that assembly throws a brick, that singularity, called an assembly, is no longer peaceful. As an individual, protesting, I have 2 choices. I can stay, and quite likely watch that assembly escalate the violence or go home, thereby tacitly expressing my disapproval for how that peaceful assembly did NOT hold up to its promise. I go home and tell anyone, who asks why I left, that I left because the assembly was no longer peaceful. When the union, at a company that I worked at, went on strike, I stood on the picket lines with my fellow union members. When they started throwing rocks and smashing car windows, I went home. The strike, like those who assembled to protest, was peaceful and I took part. The moment it became violent, I left because that strike was no longer peaceful. Many people stayed and claimed that they didn't throw anything or didn't approve of the violence. I say that the inflated numbers by the presence the peaceful strikers gave the violent ones the courage to do their foul deeds. I say the same thing about the "peaceful" protesters. When the violence starts, go home. The protest is no longer peaceful. "could be white supremacists"? A rather weak statement. Sounds more hopeful that factual.
    2
  3918. 2
  3919. 2
  3920. 2
  3921. 2
  3922. 2
  3923. 2
  3924. 2
  3925. 2
  3926. 2
  3927. 2
  3928. 2
  3929. 2
  3930. 2
  3931. 2
  3932. 2
  3933. 2
  3934. 2
  3935. 2
  3936. 2
  3937. 2
  3938. 2
  3939.  @burny6666  I'm not trying to start a debate. You said she was a liar. You must have a reason for saying this and I'm assuming that you know what that reason is. All I'm doing is asking for an example. You must have one or else why would you call her a liar. Hiding behind the current consensus argument shows me that you're just parroting what what others have claimed and you've never questioned it. You're suffering from a logical fallacy. I could go through one hundred things that she said and prove everyone of them to be true and I've still not proved that she's not a liar. The reason for that is quite simple. It could be the 101st thing that was said that was the lie or the 110th or the 150th. I could never be satisfied that I looked deep enough. I'd have to examine EVERYTHING that she's ever said to prove that she's not a liar and that's impossible. That's why one is assumed innocent until proven guilty. You don't and quite often can never prove innocence. You can only prove guilt. I would say that to claim that she's a liar, you have the evidence. That's logical and the correct way to prove allegations. If you can't do it or refuse to do it, I have to question why and one possibility is that you don't have the evidence. Also, I'd lay money on it that everyone on the planet has lied at one point so your claim is one that carries no value. It could only carry real value if she openly and brazenly said something that she knew was false and then double down on that falsehood. Has she ever done that? If yes, show me how it's a lie and that she knew that it was a lie. If you can't prove it to me, you can't prove it to yourself and your claim is invalid.
    2
  3940. 2
  3941. 2
  3942. 2
  3943. 2
  3944. 2
  3945. 2
  3946. 2
  3947. 2
  3948. 2
  3949. 2
  3950. 2
  3951. 2
  3952. 2
  3953.  @wekurtz72  What does Donald Trump have to do with whether the Hollywood elites are corrupt or not? "Bob is bad, therefore Ted isn't" is a basically what you're doing. One has NOTHING to do with the other. I never SAID that Hollywood was in charge of anything. I SAID that they were corrupt. I made a long comment about a specific example and you don't mention a WORD about it. Also, Trump has been a part of the entertainment business over his career. Therefore his "pussy" statement might just reflect that same attitude that Hollywood had when they employed the casting couch for generations. I never ONCE mentioned Trump either and your assumption that I approve of that "pussy" statement is just that.....an assumption. As for Ghislaine, another one of the elites that, not just Trump but Clinton and others were good friends of as well. Clinton more so than Trump....flying all over the country in Epstein's plane rather says that they're better friends than Trump EVER was. Also, Trump never once said Nazis are good people. That's that stupid "good people on both sides" nonsense that some people take out of context ALL the time and I can prove it. Not that you'd listen. People like you don't seem to understand what "I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally." means. When you assess information, use your brain instead of your emotions. You might come off looking a little smarter. Also, if you think that Trump saying that "pussy" remark lets Biden off the hook for doing just that to Tara Reade, you've one weird sense of integrity.
    2
  3954. 2
  3955. 2
  3956. 2
  3957. 2
  3958. 2
  3959. 2
  3960. 2
  3961. 2
  3962. 2
  3963. 2
  3964. 2
  3965. 2
  3966. 2
  3967. 2
  3968. 2
  3969. 2
  3970. 2
  3971. 2
  3972. 2
  3973. 2
  3974. 2
  3975. 2
  3976. 2
  3977. 2
  3978. 2
  3979. 2
  3980. 2
  3981. 2
  3982.  @lilbarry1212  What you don't get is that those weapons have been within reach of Russia for decades. France and Britain have them. Germany, Italy and Turkey have American nukes installed in case of war. Turkey is only about 500 miles from Russia. How long do you think it would take to put nukes in Latvia or Estonia, NATO nations that are right on the border of Russia. It would be nothing for a nuclear armed sub to leave a German or Turkish port and approach Russia. Besides, who said that they wanted to put nukes in Ukraine, anyway? Where did you get that? Ukraine isn't even a part of NATO yet and you're already putting nukes there. You're getting way ahead of yourself. Weird that you don't think all of Europe isn't upset that Russia has nukes that could be pointed at them. That's where NATO is. Russia should be terrified but the European NATO nations aren't allowed to be? Kind of a double standard isn't it. This nuclear rhetoric is just a rationalisation to justify the carnage in Ukraine. No one is putting nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine had the 3rd largest nuclear arsenal in the world after they were independent. They destroyed them. That was only 30 years ago. They did this after a 90% affirmative vote for independence. I wonder how much that loss sticks in the craw of Putin, a one time communist and KGB agent. Putin, at 69 years of age, spent more time as a Soviet citizen than he has a Russian. That has to influence his attitude and his paranoia. So, who should be more afraid of the other. Ukraine, the smaller country with NO nukes or Russia, a MUCH larger country with all kinds of nukes and a leader who was a part of the very aggressively expansive USSR. Remember Putin was in his thirties when Russia was trying to hold onto Afghanistan. Old habits die hard.
    2
  3983. 2
  3984. 2
  3985. 2
  3986. 2
  3987. 2
  3988. 2
  3989. 2
  3990. 2
  3991. 2
  3992. 2
  3993. 2
  3994. 2
  3995.  food  Before he said those things, he restricted all trips to China. I heard what he said and at the time, the virus had NOT been that serious, YET. He was right about that. He did say it would be over by spring, but no one could EVER know that, so I took it as wishful thinking and optimism. However, he did stop travel to China. So, I invoked one of the maxims I like to use in times like that. I not only listened to what he said, I payed attention to what he did. I figured that he had more information on the situation than most people. He had shut down travel to China. He offered members of the CDC to China to help them study this new virus. He even mentioned it during that speech. The only conclusion that I could come to was this. He was being very optimistic but he wasn't taking any chances and was hedging his bets. To use another maxim "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst". Biden called him a xenophobe but he did it anyway and didn't retract. So, I thought to myself, if Trump isn't hedging his bets, I'm not going to either. Normally, I keep a well stocked pantry, enough to last a couple of months, but I'm not a fanatic about it. I did a quick inventory, made a note of the things I needed and, over the next couple of weeks, I bought the few extra items I needed when I did my regular shopping. No panic, no rush. I was good long before March came around and when the shut down came and everyone was panic buying, I was sitting on my couch watching movies. So, who was the smarter? Me, all ready in case of the worst because I was prepared or all those crazy people, fighting and buying in a big panic. Instead of screeching about what he said, try to interpret it using logic and reason. All the information was there, just by listening carefully to what Trump was saying. Your problem was your intense hatred for Trump only allowed you to hear the negatives that you wanted to hear. I heard what was actually there because I didn't allow my emotions to control me. Logic and reason trumps (play on words) hatred and emotion every time. I'm not saying that you have to like Trump or vote for him but don't let your hatred rule you.
    2
  3996. 2
  3997. 2
  3998. 2
  3999. 2
  4000. 2
  4001. 2
  4002. 2
  4003. 2
  4004. 2
  4005. 2
  4006. 2
  4007. 2
  4008. 2
  4009. 2
  4010. 2
  4011. 2
  4012. 2
  4013. 2
  4014.  @cjgt77  BS again. I made 15,000 dollars last year and a little more the year before. In spite of that I've been to Mexico, the Dominican Republic and the Netherlands over the last 3 years and I'm planning on a trip to Costa Rica this winter. Incredibly, I have more money in the bank than I did 3 years ago. It CAN be done. The problem is that people don't realise the benefits of financial planning. They don't think that they should put in the extra hours or time to make things better for themselves. Look at that mess in Baltimore that those outsiders are cleaning up. Are you trying to tell me that the locals couldn't put in 2 to 3 hours a week into cleaning it up? That they can't tell those that are dumping that garbage to stop doing it? That place looks like that because the local residents don't have the will or ambition to clean it. Anyone that did has already left....like Elijah Cummings. The rest are like you are. Complaining how there isn't work and that their problems aren't solved overnight. I say do like Cummings did, even though I think he's corrupt. Get the hell out. Join the military. Go to night school. Spend your free time filling out resumes and pounding the pavement looking for jobs. The jobs and the life isn't going to come to you. You have to do it yourself. Put a little bit away a week, even if it's only 10 bucks and DON'T touch it. It's the little things that help. If you can't do the little things, the big things will NEVER come. That's how they did it in the fifties and sixties. It as baby steps for them and it paid off over the long term.
    2
  4015. 2
  4016. 2
  4017. 2
  4018. 2
  4019. 2
  4020. 2
  4021. 2
  4022. 2
  4023.  @Caitgreenham  This was all new to her. She had nowhere to turn. The school was against her. Her team mate, who went crying to administrators, suddenly changed her mind. They gaslit her by telling them all that if they couldn't accept it, they could go for counselling, insinuating that SHE was the crazy one. That caused her to question herself, wondering is she was, INDEED, the one with the problem. In fact, this is why the radical left are so active in schools. They're conditioning the most vulnerable to accept this stuff. I'm seeing it in my own grandchildren and even my 20 year old is still in a maturing stage of life. Just like I said, you should support her and the only reason that I can come up with why you're so insistent on smearing her, is too shut her up....to gaslight her into thinking that she's too weak to keep the up the struggle against this insanity. If you REALLY believe that this is wrong, get behind and support her. This is prevalent in a lot of schools and we have to show support for those who can break away from their propaganda and overt bullying. Instead, you're just throwing hate at her. That's why I don't trust your motives. NO one is going to understand our point of view if they think that we're only going to treat her the way that you're doing. To end the insanity, we will start small and build up our numbers from those that we can show how terrible this is. We're not going to that by smearing them and calling them weak. You're HURTING our cause more than your helping. That's why I think that you're just as bad as those who like this aberration and could even be one of them. You're not doing ONE thing to help them. NOT ONE THING.
    2
  4024. 2
  4025. 2
  4026. 2
  4027. 2
  4028. 2
  4029. 2
  4030. 2
  4031. 2
  4032. 2
  4033. 2
  4034. 2
  4035. 2
  4036. 2
  4037. 2
  4038. 2
  4039. 2
  4040. 2
  4041. 2
  4042. 2
  4043. 2
  4044. 2
  4045. 2
  4046. 2
  4047. 2
  4048. 2
  4049. 2
  4050. 2
  4051. 2
  4052. 2
  4053. 2
  4054. 2
  4055. 2
  4056. 2
  4057. 2
  4058. 2
  4059. 2
  4060. 2
  4061. 2
  4062. 2
  4063. 2
  4064. 2
  4065. 2
  4066. 2
  4067. 2
  4068. 2
  4069. 2
  4070. 2
  4071. 2
  4072. 2
  4073. 2
  4074. 2
  4075. 2
  4076. 2
  4077. 2
  4078. 2
  4079. 2
  4080. 2
  4081. 2
  4082. 2
  4083. 2
  4084. 2
  4085. 2
  4086. 2
  4087. 2
  4088. 2
  4089. 2
  4090. 2
  4091. 2
  4092. 2
  4093. 2
  4094. 2
  4095. 2
  4096. 2
  4097. 2
  4098. 2
  4099. 2
  4100. 2
  4101. 2
  4102. 2
  4103. 2
  4104. 2
  4105. 2
  4106. 2
  4107. 2
  4108. 2
  4109. 2
  4110. 2
  4111. 2
  4112. 2
  4113. 2
  4114. 2
  4115. 2
  4116. 2
  4117. 2
  4118.  Andy Mann  POTENTIAL. Do you not understand the meaning of the word? I'll give it to you. Potential: having or showing the capacity to become or develop into something in the future. (The online dictionary.) I've given MULTIPLE examples of how words and symbols have been used on the unwary. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." He's not going to dragged into a "potential" trap. It's happened to him before and to lots of others. I never said that there was anything wrong with coloured emojis or that it was racist. What I said was that there was a potential for some to use them, in some manner, to browbeat others for using them in what they could claim to be offensive. I don't know how many times I've used the word "potential" but it's doesn't seem to be sinking in. How can I give you an example of something in the future? All I can do is to give examples of similar incidents in the past, but you keep ignoring those examples. It's as if you don't understand what examples even mean. "You have convinced everyone that what YOU say is not true." Another example of gaslighting. basically telling me that everyone thinks that I'm wrong so smarten up. I don't care what others think so it won't work. I've seen how people react to some of the most mundane things and I can see the potential here, as well. Governor Newsom, when asked why people are leaving California. "They're racists". Asking to show IDs at elections. That's racist. You want to see MORE examples of crazy claim of racism? Here you go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-mV2pANrmk&ab_channel=TimcastIRL If all these stupid things can be used to prove racism, are you still going to tell me that this doesn't have that same potential? I don't know how they'd do if they do but I'd never have predicted that stupidity of what is shown in this video, either. I'm not good at bad logic.
    2
  4119. 2
  4120. 2
  4121. 2
  4122. 2
  4123. 2
  4124. 2
  4125. 2
  4126. 2
  4127. 2
  4128. 2
  4129. 2
  4130. 2
  4131. 2
  4132. 2
  4133. 2
  4134. 2
  4135. 2
  4136. 2
  4137. 2
  4138. 2
  4139. 2
  4140. 2
  4141. 2
  4142. 2
  4143. 2
  4144. 2
  4145. 2
  4146. 2
  4147. 2
  4148. 2
  4149. 2
  4150. 2
  4151.  @motoxray  There is no such thing as a Nirvana. Not in this universe, anyway. Nothing is perfect and every system is due to failure as it inevitably leads to stagnation, tyranny and failure. This idea that capitalism is harmful to the average person just isn't true. Every TRUE capitalist state that is based on the rule of law has the most affluent citizens on the planet. The US, Canada, western Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand.....these are the countries that the people of 3rd world, and even developing countries, aspire to migrate to. There has NEVER been a more affluent average citizen in the history of the humanity, than those who live in those Capitalist countries. NEVER. These are the countries that practise a capitalist economy and have strong social programs. That doesn't make them socialist. Social programs are the result of a strong economy and the revenue gathered through tax programs pay for health, education, the military and police protection, transportation and safety nets for the more vulnerable of the citizens. It is an expense of human survival and the more wealth that a nation accrues as a whole, the better the social programs. It's why I, as a retired person and living below the poverty line, as set for my Capitalist country, has still been able to travel to the Dominican Republic, Mexico, the Netherlands and am planning a trip to Costa Rica in a couple of months over the last 2 years and still have more money in the bank than I did 2 years ago. All the countries that I've mentioned all have economies that are overwhelmingly driven through market forces and the private sector. It's why these countries are the primary destinations for migrants and asylum seekers. Hardly any other country has huge issues with people trying to enter legally and illegally...especially 3rd world countries. All of their governments are corrupt and led by tyrannical leaders who keep power by enforcement of the military. The people there live a dystopian life, deep in REAL poverty, where the basics of life, food, clean water and shelter are basic struggle to find every day. That isn't capitalism.
    2
  4152. 2
  4153. 2
  4154. 2
  4155. 2
  4156. 2
  4157. 2
  4158. 2
  4159. 2
  4160. 2
  4161. 2
  4162. 2
  4163. 2
  4164. 2
  4165. 2
  4166. 2
  4167. 2
  4168. 2
  4169. 2
  4170. 2
  4171. 2
  4172. 2
  4173. 2
  4174. 2
  4175. 2
  4176. 2
  4177. 2
  4178. 2
  4179. 2
  4180. 2
  4181. 2
  4182. 2
  4183. 2
  4184. 2
  4185. 2
  4186. 2
  4187. 2
  4188. 2
  4189. 2
  4190. 2
  4191. 2
  4192. 2
  4193. 2
  4194. 2
  4195. 2
  4196. 2
  4197. 2
  4198. 2
  4199. 2
  4200. 2
  4201. 2
  4202. 2
  4203. 2
  4204. 2
  4205. 2
  4206. 2
  4207. 2
  4208. 2
  4209. 2
  4210. 2
  4211. 2
  4212. 2
  4213. 2
  4214. 2
  4215. 2
  4216. 2
  4217. 2
  4218. 2
  4219. 2
  4220. 2
  4221. 2
  4222. 2
  4223. 2
  4224. 2
  4225. 2
  4226. 2
  4227. 2
  4228. 2
  4229. 2
  4230. 2
  4231. 2
  4232. 2
  4233. 2
  4234. 2
  4235. 2
  4236. 2
  4237. 2
  4238. 2
  4239. 2
  4240. 2
  4241. 2
  4242. 2
  4243. 2
  4244. 2
  4245. 2
  4246. 2
  4247. 2
  4248. 2
  4249. 2
  4250. 2
  4251. 2
  4252. 2
  4253. 2
  4254. 2
  4255. 2
  4256.  @jonathanp1884  I find that both FOX and CNN, actually all the big ones, interpret the news. They don't inform, they manage the information. The most egregious example is when they reported on the Covington Kids. I watched it on CNN and then went on a search for more information. It took me about 15 minutes to find the extended video that was condensed into the one on CNN. It showed that what I'd seen on CNN was total BS. Think of it. I'm a guy, who lives in a one bedroom apartment, ALONE, in a different country, with no connections or staff and and an average cobbled together computer that my son-in-law built for me and I had this information before CNN, with all the resources that they have. Oh yeah...I'm a boomer too. You know...the generation that doesn't know much about computers or social media. How was that possible? Either CNN and the rest of the MSM is totally incompetent or they lied. Everyone of them reported the same thing. Yet, one hour after the first news report, I was on Facebook arguing that it was all BS. Their response? How would I know. Do I think that I'm smarter than the press and media? Funny thing was....I was found to be correct. You are correct about CNN not always being wrong. If it fits the narrative that they want, they'll be as honest as a Sunday school teacher. I double check everything and the internet has made that possible. The truth is quite obvious. Too many of us are too vested in our beliefs to allow them to be challenged. We won't even challenge ourselves even if it's in private. I find it a struggle myself. It's what the biased media depends on.
    2
  4257. 2
  4258. 2
  4259. 2
  4260. 2
  4261. 2
  4262. 2
  4263. 2
  4264. 2
  4265. 2
  4266. 2
  4267. 2
  4268. 2
  4269. 2
  4270. 2
  4271. 2
  4272. 2
  4273. 2
  4274. 2
  4275. 2
  4276. 2
  4277. 2
  4278. 2
  4279. 2
  4280. 2
  4281. 2
  4282. 2
  4283. 2
  4284. 2
  4285. 2
  4286. 2
  4287. 2
  4288. 2
  4289. 2
  4290. 2
  4291. 2
  4292. 2
  4293. 2
  4294. 2
  4295. 2
  4296. 2
  4297. 2
  4298. 2
  4299. 2
  4300. 2
  4301. 2
  4302. 2
  4303. 2
  4304. 2
  4305. 2
  4306. 2
  4307. 2
  4308. 2
  4309. 2
  4310. 2
  4311. 2
  4312. 2
  4313. 2
  4314. 2
  4315. 2
  4316. 2
  4317. 2
  4318. 2
  4319. 2
  4320. 2
  4321. 2
  4322. 2
  4323. 2
  4324. 2
  4325. 2
  4326. 2
  4327. 2
  4328. 2
  4329. 2
  4330. 2
  4331. 2
  4332. 2
  4333.  @lindajohanson9131  He didn't say that he fired the locals unless they weren't doing their jobs. Also, we don't know if the Haitians are getting lower wages or not. What he DID say is that they show up everyday and they do their job. They're productive. The company makes NOTHING if their worker doesn't show. It's why the company that I worked at payed higher wages. They hoped that they could attract the best in town that way and it worked, somewhat. It also caused a lot of workers to take time off because they now could afford to take it off because they could make enough in 4 days to get by. Do you know how one gets people to listen to you? STOP complaining. People don't take complainers seriously. The only reaction you'll get is a big eye-roll and a "here we go again" response. If you're not known as a complainer and a hard worker, who shows up everyday and on time, they will listen because you DO have something to say. That you're just not whining because that's what you do. I used to hear them complaining everyday. Besides, you don't get respect just because you exist. You earn it by your actions and attitude. I can't speak to what's going on in Iowa but if immigration is a problem, then talk to your political reps. If you don't hear what you want to hear, TELL them that you'll not vote for them next election. They listen to that, every time. I hate the mass immigration, that we're seeing now and it's hurting us in ways that we can't even imagine. But, to whine that the company isn't giving you stuff, you'd better realise that it's as much your own fault as it is theirs. I've worked in factories since the early seventies and the people that I worked with back then, the men and women from my parent's generation, didn't complain like everyone does today. They showed up, didn't shirk and many worked 2 jobs because they saw a chance to get ahead and took it. That's what the Mexicans are doing and they're getting the jobs that the locals complain about.
    2
  4334. 2
  4335. 2
  4336. 2
  4337. 2
  4338. 2
  4339. 2
  4340. 2
  4341. 2
  4342. 2
  4343. 2
  4344. 2
  4345. 2
  4346. 2
  4347. 2
  4348. 2
  4349. 2
  4350. 2
  4351. 2
  4352. 2
  4353. 2
  4354. 2
  4355. 2
  4356. 2
  4357. 2
  4358. 2
  4359. 2
  4360. 2
  4361. 2
  4362. 2
  4363. 2
  4364. 2
  4365. 2
  4366. 2
  4367. 2
  4368. 2
  4369. 2
  4370. 2
  4371. 2
  4372. 2
  4373. 2
  4374. 2
  4375. 2
  4376. 2
  4377. 2
  4378. 2
  4379. 2
  4380. 2
  4381.  @KeepItReal33  No drug war in Mexico? Really? Then why all these news stories. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/03/31/mexico-tourist-fears-violence-cancun-los-cabos/471115002/ https://nypost.com/2018/12/15/behind-the-american-tourist-tragedies-in-violence-plagued-mexico/ https://www.cnn.com/2013/09/02/world/americas/mexico-drug-war-fast-facts/index.html https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/the-cancun-that-tourists-dont-often-see-soaring-murders-amid-a-bloody-drug-war I got a lot more if you want to see them. I was in Playa Del Carmen in January. 36 people were gunned down nearby in a gun battle between rival drug gangs, mostly innocent bystanders. It has been one of the bloodiest wars on the planet over the last 15 years, almost rivalling that of Syria and Iraq. People are leaving those countries because of the corruption and the lack of opportunity......not because there are wars in those countries. They're not war refugees at all and that's why after they're apprehended at the border and told to come to their refugee status hearings on a given date, they don't show up. They know they won't qualify as asylum seekers and they'll have to go home. Once again, just like the mother of that crying little girl featured on the cover of Time magazine with a pasted picture of Trump looking down at her. Her husband had a good business going. She just wanted to get away from him and even had 6000 bucks to spend on a trafficker to get her and her child into the US. Divorce won't qualify you as a war refugee.
    2
  4382. 2
  4383. 2
  4384. 2
  4385. 2
  4386. NoneOfTheAbove My parents were immigrants. As a matter of fact, I was conceived in the old country and born here. I spoke Dutch till I was around 4 and a mixture of Dutch and English till I went to school. It was a little more difficult for us because we lived on a farm and only had one neighbour who didn't like foreigners. Dad still lives there and has been there 64 years and that same neighbour does, too, except it's the kid that I grew up with and they still don't get along that well. Ironically, that kid was the one that, initially, taught me how to speak English. My mom had only a grade 6 education in Holland and never worked except on the farm and she taught herself to read and write in English. You can throw water in my face all you want. Come to this country and become a part of the fabric of society. Your heritage is a part of who you are and can't be taken from you but when you immigrate, you've accepted that you're carving a new heritage for yourself as well, one that includes the old and that's melded with the new. I've seen what maintaining a position of isolation due to culture and religion can do, firsthand, from other Dutch immigrants, who looked at the local Canadians with disdain. It's not pretty. Fortunately, their children have blended in very well and that attitude has gone. We're still known as the Dutch because it's a small town but we're accepted as a part of the community because we have eventually integrated. That's important. Of all the Dutch people that immigrated to this area, only one was forced to go back, and that was for insurance fraud. Become a part of the greater community. The only reason one would refuse is due to a sense of superiority. It happened in the Dutch community that I grew up in and it was not right what some of those people said and did.
    2
  4387. 2
  4388. 2
  4389. 2
  4390. 2
  4391. 2
  4392. 2
  4393. 2
  4394. 2
  4395. 2
  4396. 2
  4397. 2
  4398.  @jefftaylor2547  It's difficult to get the picture of what's going on from my couch but I don't deny the possibility of the organisation of this violence. I can relate something that I am familiar with to use as an example. In Canada, in the sixties, there was a French separatist group known as the FLQ. They were communist sympathisers and wanted Quebec to separate from Canada and form a new socialist nation. What's important here is how they were organised. They formed small cells of 5 to 8 people and they only knew the fellow sympathisers that were in their own group. Only one person, within the group, would be in contact with another group, would be the contact with a third group. It made it extremely difficult, for the Canadian authorities to get any information on them or their objectives. That's how, it would seem, that Antifa is organised. Not quite as secretive, but no formal apparent structure or chain of command. However, I'd say that it was a facade. I'd say that every group has a leader that acts as a liaison to other groups and that the average Antifa member is unaware of this loose association or is out of the loop. That's why, as you say, it's difficult to pin them down. This guy, that you say is getting paid, knows that there's something going on within the organisation but I'm sure he has no idea where the money is coming from or how. He's out of the loop. He has his handler, that pays him but where that handler got the money, he couldn't tell you. It's how these socialists underground groups operate.
    2
  4399. 2
  4400. 2
  4401. 2
  4402. 2
  4403. 2
  4404. 2
  4405. 2
  4406. 2
  4407. 2
  4408.  @Frank71  Read the Georgia bill. This is where ALL the controversy is taking place. The baseball All-Star game is leaving Georgia because of this new bill and it's going to another state that has stricter voting laws than the ones that Georgia will use in the next election. Remember again, that they're calling Georgia's new voting laws oppressive.....NOT American voting laws. It has provisions in it that says that if a precinct, a voting region, has more then 1 hour wait times, they are to increase the number of voting booths or machines and increase polling workers. If the voter's list, in that precinct, goes over 2000 voters, voting precincts will be changed to bring that number back down to 2000 voters. There must be 1 voting booth or machine for every 250 voters plus one extra for the remainder. That means that if there are 1100 voters in that precinct, there will be 5 booths.....4 for the 1000 and another for the remaining 100, equaling 5 booths. There will also be 1 mail-in drop box for every precinct. There will be 17 early election days which will include Saturdays and Sundays and anyone can request a mail-in vote and will NOT required to give a reason for that request. Mail in drop boxes are a new thing in Georgia, only used last year because of the pandemic. Now it's coded into law. This cap on voters, per precinct, isn't based on how many actually vote but on how many eligible voters that there are in a precinct. The reason that you have IDs is so if you do share the same name as someone else, your ID number will identify you, NOT the name. That only makes sense. You're confusing the concept of American voting laws with state laws. Georgia is a state and each state decides its own voting procedures. The big reason that there's an outcry against the bill is that there are those that don't want ANY IDs required at ANY time during the voting process. They say it's racist. In Europe, according to you use your national ID card. That's an ID. In some countries, like Belgium, the law says that you MUST vote. Not so in the US and specifically Georgia. They want you to register, so they can determine your status and the precinct size and number of polling stations needed and then when you vote, they want to see that same ID to prove, just like your wife does with her national card, that you're the person that is registered to vote. I've read the bill....all 97 pages of it. The controversy is fabricated and there is no voter suppression intended in Georgia by the initiating this bill. It's pure politics. The controversy is voter ID. You just told me that they need it in Europe. Why is it so bad when Georgia requires you to show ID, then? I don't get it. Is it because "conservatives" are asking for it? That's seems like a very poor reason to me, especially since you seem to think that it's just fine in Europe.
    2
  4409.  @Frank71  So, the Republicans of Georgia, pass a bill, that requires ID to vote, in an effort to lesson the suspicions in a close race, and you object. You don't even have to get special ID. Your Social Security Card will do and all those who have ever worked have it. You need it to pay income tax and when you file your yearly taxes, you have to give that Social Security Number that is on your card. You have to file income taxes. It's the LAW. If you don't do it, you may face tax evasion charges and you have to have a Social Security Card and number to file your annual income taxes. If you've ever worked....YOU ALREADY HAVE ID. You have the ID that will allow you to vote. All you have to do is make sure that you're registered to vote. You can do that online or go to the local precinct and see if you're on the voter's list. If you don't have a Social Security Number, which means that you've never worked, you can use your driver's licence. Once again, you don't have to do anything. You've got the ID already. If you're on welfare, you had to show ID to get it. Same as food stamps so those people already have the ID. See how I'm narrowing down the numbers of people that are being inconvenienced. If you open a bank account, you need ID. If you want to buy smokes....ID. If you want to buy beer....ID. Buy a gun....ID for the background check. A credit card....ID to prevent identity theft and fraud. Almost everyone already has the ID that they need to vote. The very few that don't have any ID, will get it FREE in Georgia. Yet, the Democrats are still complaining. All you have to do is register. Once registered, unless you move, you can vote. If you're unsure of your voting status, you go online and see if you're registered. Almost everyone has a cell phone so it's easy. if you don't have a cell phone, get a friend to see for you. It's not that hard. You can register at any time. You don't have to wait for an election. Register today, RIGHT NOW, so you can vote in mid terms in November 2022. You've got lots of time Just take the ID, that you used to register, and take it to the polling station, when election day comes. It's NOT rocket science.
    2
  4410. 2
  4411. 2
  4412. 2
  4413.  @eddypdeb  And it's STILL and ID system. You just don't show up and say "I'm here to vote. Give me a ballot". You have a national ID card. I don't have one for your country. I can't show up on election day, in your town and vote. Why? I don't have a national ID card for YOUR country. Do you really want every foreign tourist, in your country, on voting day, to head down to the polls and to vote in YOUR elections? The American registration system might be different but all they're saying is show ID when you vote. They don't want every foreigner, who happens to be in the US, on voting day, to vote in their elections. The Georgia law, the voting laws for THAT state, requires that you show ID when you vote. So does your country. You just said as much. You have a National ID card. I don't. You can vote in your country and I can't. As for the purges, if you move to Canada and become a Canadian citizen, are you still allowed to vote in the country that you came from? I'm saying that you won't be. Maybe I'm wrong but I'll bet that you won't be. Also, the US sends a regional representative to the Congress. If you move from Georgia to Montana, you should vote for the representative from Montana NOT the one in Georgia, thousands of miles away. That's why they purge the voting records in Georgia. They don't want your name in Georgia and in Montana on their voting register. That's also why you need to show ID, so that someone can't show up and pretend to be someone that's on the register who happens to be living in Montana. The election system is completely different in the US because the US is organised differently than YOUR country. Each state has its own election laws because each state sends its own representatives to Congress. In a way it's like the EU, each country has its own representatives that is sent to Brussels. Would you want someone, living in a different country, voting in YOUR election? The US is the same. The people of Texas don't want the people of Michigan voting for their representatives. All the law in Georgia is asking for is to show ID. ID.....just like your national ID. If you lose your ID card, you get another one. If a person in Georgia doesn't have ID, he can get one, from the government of Georgia, FREE. How is that different than your country? I'm NOT getting it.
    2
  4414. 2
  4415. 2
  4416. 2
  4417. 2
  4418. 2
  4419. 2
  4420. 2
  4421. 2
  4422. 2
  4423. 2
  4424. 2
  4425. 2
  4426. 2
  4427.  @spindoctor6385  The last election really exposed the media and big tech for what they are. They've become agents for for the political party that controls the government, not just elected officials but the bureaucracy as well. It's the bureaucrats that need the right party in power and they used the media and especially big tech to their advantage. My dad is 89 years old and living on a fixed income. He's too proud to accept help from his kids. Over the last 10 years, all his friends are gone, except a few that live miles away. Phone costs are prohibitive, to keep in touch, so he joined Facebook, for free, and is now able to talk to his friends, some who live thousands of miles away, for nothing. This is how they control us. They lure us in with great deals and then use their platforms to control information. I've had to show him things, news items, that facebook won't allow him to see and the MSM won't cover. When a monopoly becomes the government, they'll create conditions under which we feel forced to use them. Once they have that in place, they can advance their own agendas for financial gain and power. They go hand in hand. What we'll have, and it's happening quite rapidly, a political system run by corporate autocrats instead of elected representatives. They'll do it through the guise of a free market that's NOT free at all but controlled by a powerful few. It's like religion. We took away the power of religious groups by limiting their influence on government. We have to do the same with the corporations or any other political group.
    2
  4428. 2
  4429.  @paulmitcheson2905  He didn't say to try injecting disinfectant. He asked if there was any research involving disinfectant and he asked 2 doctors. Only an idiot would actually think that he said that we should try it or someone so consumed with TDS that he can't think rationally. The "Mexico will pay for it" was, foremost, a political slogan but he also threatened Mexico with tariffs if they didn't do something about illegals at the border. Those tariffs would have helped to pay for it. So, Mexico started a program of helping to detect illegals on their side of the border. So, in a way, they're helping to pay for border security, freeing money to pay for the wall. Anyone, who actually thought that he was going to get the president of Mexico to write Trump a check to pay for the wall is either delusional or so consumed with TDS that he can't think rationally. You know why there is 10% unemployment? It's because Democrat controlled states have had such Draconian lockdowns that jobless rates were over 20%. Michigan actually reached 31%, at one time. Before Covid, the jobless rates were the best in US history. Can he get 10 million jobs back in the next 4 years? I don't know but I'm glad that he's setting goals for the country. Even if he gets half of that, it would be amazing. I hope he succeeds but, of course, that's not going to be good for the TDS. His failure to reach that goal would stroke that obsession in a satisfying way, though, wouldn't it? While he was hoping that Covid would go away, he'd already stopped travel to China and Europe. He'd formed a task force to fight the disease and even offered to send a team of virology experts to China, which they refused. He talked about it in the State of the Union Address, as well....the one that Pelosi tore up and not one Democrat mentioned that it was in that address. I realised that Trump was an optimist but I also saw that he was doing those things so I thought that it might be a good idea to prepare myself, in case of the worst did happen. When the toilet paper scare did come, I had enough to eat and wipe my butt for at least 3 months. You see, I didn't have TDS and that allowed me to think rationally. In spite of the numbers, the US is not the worst in cases or deaths per capita. In cases per million, the US ranks 9th. In deaths per million, the US ranks 10th. That means that there are 9 countries that if they had the same population as the US, they'd have more than 184,000 deaths. It surely didn't help matters when Democrat states like New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in nursing homes. Republican states Florida and Texas have 30 million people MORE than New York but NY has over 10 thousand MORE deaths. Those are facts that you probably don't want to hear but I can back this up. TDS has a way of not liking facts. Sort of like the fact that there are Democrats that like to hold to the narrative of "peaceful protests" as buildings are burning. What kind of TDS delusional thinking does one need to have to think that the ordinary voter is going to believe that to be true. I'll bet the voters in Kenosha are all talking about how "peaceful" the "protests" were in their small city. You don't have to like Trump or even vote for him but at least be rational about it.
    2
  4430. 2
  4431. 2
  4432. 2
  4433. 2
  4434. 2
  4435. 2
  4436. 2
  4437. 2
  4438. 2
  4439. 2
  4440. 2
  4441. 2
  4442. 2
  4443. 2
  4444. 2
  4445. 2
  4446. 2
  4447. 2
  4448. 2
  4449. 2
  4450. 2
  4451. 2
  4452. 2
  4453. 2
  4454. 2
  4455. 2
  4456. 2
  4457. 2
  4458. 2
  4459. 2
  4460. 2
  4461. 2
  4462. 2
  4463. 2
  4464. 2
  4465. 2
  4466. 2
  4467. 2
  4468. 2
  4469. 2
  4470. 2
  4471. 2
  4472. 2
  4473. 2
  4474. 2
  4475. 2
  4476.  @brianchampney7077  Yes, there are natural barriers that are nearly impossible to cross. Barriers like deep canyons and sheer cliffs. They made better barriers than any wall that we could build. These barriers have always been a major concern to invading armies. It stops them almost dead in their tracks unless they can find an passage through them and that's exactly where defending armies will be waiting for them. But that's not where they are trying to cross. There are large areas of open desert that are secluded enough that migrants can avoid detection. The border there are barely detectable and it's basically a stroll into the US or a jump over a page wire fence of the type that used on a typical farm. However, these deserts are dangerous and people are dying of exposure trying to cross them. These are the areas that need a barrier to discourage these migrants. They need a wall so as to halt the migrants long enough for the border agents to arrive after they've been informed by the drones and the cameras placed on the top of the wall. It's not just the wall....it's all of it working together. What's easier to cross? An open field or an open field with an 18 foot wall in the middle. Only the most obtuse would say it makes no difference. So you truly believe that there are only pot mules? One gram of high end heroin is worth 200 dollars or more. There are 1000 grams to a kilo and anyone can easily carry 5 kilo. That's about 25 pounds. Get out your calculator and you'll see that 100 mules can carry a lot heroin or cocaine. Just because they use trucks now, that may not be the case in the future, especially if they devise newer and better equipment to stop it and the risks become too high. Back packing mules will always be a possibility and it's naive to think that it isn't being used right now. Find better and more effective ways to stop the big shipments and they'll surely revert to the small ways.
    2
  4477. 2
  4478. 2
  4479. 2
  4480. 2
  4481. 2
  4482. 2
  4483. 2
  4484. 2
  4485. 2
  4486. 2
  4487. 2
  4488. 2
  4489. 2
  4490. 2
  4491. 2
  4492. 2
  4493. 2
  4494. 2
  4495. 2
  4496. 2
  4497. 2
  4498. 2
  4499. 2
  4500. 2
  4501. 2
  4502. 2
  4503. 2
  4504. 2
  4505. 2
  4506. 2
  4507. 2
  4508. 2
  4509. 2
  4510. 2
  4511. 2
  4512. 2
  4513. 2
  4514. 2
  4515. 2
  4516. 2
  4517. 2
  4518. 2
  4519. 2
  4520. 2
  4521. 2
  4522. 2
  4523. 2
  4524. 2
  4525. 2
  4526. 2
  4527. 2
  4528. 2
  4529. 2
  4530. 2
  4531. 2
  4532.  @MegaBanne  "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". So you gets to decide what my needs are? I'll bet it's not me. I'm thinking the this decision is made for me. It's the same as the "from each" rhetoric. What does that mean? If my ability outstrips yours, do I have to use my ability to upgrade your "happiness" What if my ability isn't actual ability but just a willingness to work harder and longer hours. Do you sit and watch me go and then tell the democratic state that I'm doing too well and it has to be evened out? Why would those with ability work longer hours and harder when it has no personal benefit to them. It only benefits those who are lazy. A strong work ethic is a great leveler and can make up for a lot of unrealised potential or ability. Socialism robs from those who have a strong work ethic and who use that ethic to maximise their abilities no matter how low or high those abilities are. It takes the rewards of those abilities from those who are productive and gives it to those who refuse to use their talents at all or just to the minimum. It's why socialism will always be doomed to failure. Socialism can't HELP but being authoritarian. The same with democracy. A Democracy, without a governing set of rights, that are afforded to every citizen.....like the American Constitution, will inevitably lead to an authoritarian regime. It would be 2 wolves and a sheep voting over what's for supper. Socialism always robs us of our freedom. There's no point in designing a better mousetrap because that design doesn't belong to me. It belongs to all who feel that they have the need. It's intellectual theft. If socialism is a "value system", as you have said, that makes it no different than a religion. It's a religion that we must ALL take part in or we become the enemies of the state. My values must be EXACTLY the same as your values and everyone else's. We must all believe the same or socialism.....AGAIN....must fail. You see, a socialist can live and thrive in a capitalist society but a capitalist can NOT be allowed to function in a socialist system. Socialist millionaire Bernie Sanders is proof of that. Socialism has destroyed every nation that it has touched and it will destroy America if given the chance. It's heading down that road, right now.
    2
  4533.  @MegaBanne  I didn't say that you don't value hard work. I'm saying that the system, that you're recommending, encourages those who do NOT value hard work, to do what they really want to do and that's is nothing. They want the hard work that I do and maybe even you, to benefit them. It encourages envy and resentment and discourages those who would normally want to be the best and see some reward for their efforts but all they get is a pat on the head and thanks for what can be taken from them. Also, Karl Marx didn't invent socialism, only his own brand of that ideology. There's been different iterations of it and EVERY one of them has failed. Why? Because it looks for the failures, the victims of the systems and then uses more and more of the over all resources to fill the needs of those who either can't or refuse to fill their own needs. My neighbour was born with enormous physical difficulties. Yet he never let that keep him down. I know who can do a lot more work than what he can in a day the do SQUAT, yet my neighbour worked everyday at a supermarket doing odd jobs that needed to be done. One arm was shorter than the other, his hand was all twisted and nearly useless except as a stabilizer. He had a severe limp that he was born with and his parents were told, when he was born, that he'd be better off in a home, that he'd never be able to look after himself. Yet, I'd see him when I went shopping struggling with the shopping carts, never complaining, or trying to sweep up the mess on aisle 3 even though it was really difficult to hold a broom. Yet, this guy REFUSED handouts. He had children, bought a home and refused to allow himself to be treated as a victim. To me, he's one of the toughest guys that I've ever known. Yet, there are fully grown men, who couldn't hold down a job to save their lives. They're always looking for ways to beat the system and there are more and more of them everyday because the system tells them that they can't get ahead because of bigotry, or unfairness or high prices or something. They rob from all of us who value hard work, even from handicapped men, like my neighbour who has a REAL work ethic, to placate their own lack of motivation or ambition. This is why socialism doesn't work. It rewards those with little to no integrity. It robs from those who do and gives to those who don't. It's a recipe for failure and will only result in more and more people giving up and trying to find the same loopholes so they can do little or nothing as well. It's a race to the bottom.
    2
  4534. 2
  4535. 2
  4536. 2
  4537.  @gamera3d324  After you do your taxes, do you take the tax returns down to the local pub, church or to all your friends, neighbours, work associates and family and show them what you did? If I asked you, would you send a copy to me? I'm betting that you wouldn't. Your tax returns are private. If your accountant posted your returns in the local papers and on the internet, you'd sue him and he'd lose his licence as an accountant. Why? BECAUSE IT'S PRIVATE!!!!!! That's the law. Why does a sitting President lose his rights? Is he no longer a citizen? Over 30 years ago, he was losing money and he didn't have to pay taxes. Since then, he's been doing a lot better and guess what? He has been paying taxes. A lot of taxes. His employees have been taxes as well. You see, there's a reason that you're allowed to write business losses off. Businesses go through ups and downs over their existence. The government allows you those exemptions to allow you to recover from the downturn in a business and they do happen to every business. It's not illegal. It's not unethical. It's an agreement between the government and a business, a set of rules that, not only help the rich, but also the small privately owned business. The roofing company, the small bake shop, a machine shop, a shoe company, everyone benefits from those tax breaks. Why? Because, in the end, allowing downturns to happen you're giving the owner a chance to recover and that benefits everyone......including you. Almost every business suffers loses, especially starting out. If you didn't give those tax breaks, who, in their right mind, would even start a business? That would cripple the economy and we'd all languish in abject poverty. If Trump had never paid taxes in his entire life and he's worth billions, you'd have a point. However, during those times, he wasn't worth billions. In fact he was billions in dept. His assets, when counted, were less than zero dollars. Now, he is worth billions. His assets are in the multi-billions and he's paying taxes. That's how it works. It works for Trump and it works for you as well.
    2
  4538. 2
  4539. 2
  4540. 2
  4541.  @LetsReinharder  " Who said I advocated for giving up?" YOU did. "If you still believe that America is worth saving, you yourself are equally lost." You're telling me that the Titanic is sinking and it's time to abandon ship and stop rearranging deck chairs. Do you know who else thinks that the US is lost? Antifa, BLM, the "intellectuals" in our universities.....that's who. They want to burn the entire nation down and build their Utopia from our ashes. The answer is simple. STOP VOTING FOR THE SAME LAMEBRAINS THAT YOU'VE ALWAYS VOTED FOR!!! That includes both Democrats and Republicans. If they don't ascribe to the things that made the country great, tell them you're not voting for them and the DON'T VOTE FOR THEM. In my lifetime, I've watched the US go from a strong nation, that fought for equal rights for its citizens to a nation, that allowed Marxist ideologues take over our schools and media....basically our entire culture, even our churches. It's time to take BACK that culture. If they can do it....so can we. We can beat them at their own game and we can do it through determination, hard work and strong moral courage. Strong moral beliefs are the one thing that the left doesn't have. If we want to beat them, we have to stick by our convictions and advocate for truth and individual rights, as outlined in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If they were worth fighting for 50 years ago, they're still worth fighting for today. All you're doing is advocating for more chaos and we don't need that...AT ALL.
    2
  4542. 2
  4543. 2
  4544. 2
  4545. 2
  4546. 2
  4547. 2
  4548. 2
  4549. 2
  4550. 2
  4551. 2
  4552. 2
  4553. 2
  4554. 2
  4555. 2
  4556. 2
  4557. 2
  4558. 2
  4559. 2
  4560. 2
  4561. 2
  4562. 2
  4563. 2
  4564. 2
  4565. 2
  4566. 2
  4567. 2
  4568. 2
  4569. 2
  4570. 2
  4571. 2
  4572. 2
  4573. 2
  4574. 2
  4575. 2
  4576. 2
  4577. 2
  4578.  @tabbyreed8925  Think about this. Trump has taken on China and wants the manufacturing to come back to the US. China has hardly ANY environmental laws. Their air is among the worst in the world. There are no labour laws, quality control is near non-existent and human rights are horrific, think Muslim re-education camps. What would be better? Making all our goods in a country that has NO real environmental standards or in the US, where we have them and can control them. If Trump loses, the manufacturing will go back to China and there goes the environment, especially the air quality. Also, in spite of pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord, the US has made the best progress in emissions of all industrial countries over the last 2 years. He may have ended some of the EPA rules but most companies, that operate in the US are still doing their best to do it right because it is good marketing strategy and good for business. He's and anti-immigrant that's married to an immigrant. A little contradictory. Also, the US is STILL the number one destination for legal immigrants. He has no problem with it but he does want a better control system so not just anyone can come and it's nowhere NEAR as stringent as immigration laws in countries like Japan or South Korea and you NEVER hear complaints about those 2 countries. Funny how Trump isn't a good man because he cheats on his wife but Biden is just fine even though he's cheated on his wife, even been accused of forcible sexual assault. They kind of cancel each other out on that metric, if you ask me. The only thing that I don't like about him is his tendency to be a loudmouth and a braggart but we all can't be perfect.
    2
  4579.  @cesaradrianarreola7266  Your history lesson is all well and good but how does that apply to today? People have always migrated and the people who originally lived there would quite often fight back. The Germanic tribes, Gauls and others fought the Romans when the Romans expanded northward. The Romans fought back when the Germanic tribes migrated into the Roman Empire. The Mongols migrated west and were met with resistance from those who lived in the west. The Muslim Arabs expanded and met with resistance from the people there, including the resistance in Spain and southern France. The Turks fought the Armenians, Byzantines and others as they expanded into modern Turkey and into the Balkans. I could go on and on. People have always fought over land and they had recognised borders. Quite often the indigenous people were beaten by the migrating groups and many were slaughtered, assimilated into the conquering victors or migrated themselves into new territories and conquered those indigenous groups. And here we are today. Europeans migrated into the Americas and met with resistance from the indigenous people there. The Europeans won and are no different than the Turks, Arabs, Vandals, Goths and hosts of other groups that migrated and conquered. Now, we're seeing another migration into the United States. Many American are resisting and want to control the migration. How is that any different than the Balkan states fighting the invading armies of the Turks? I'm not even sure what your point could be. All I can gather is that people migrated for different reasons just like people are migrating into the US for their own reasons. My question is this. Do Americans have the right to determine who can come and resist those who force their way into their country?
    2
  4580. 2
  4581. 2
  4582. 2
  4583. 2
  4584. 2
  4585. 2
  4586. 2
  4587. 2
  4588. 2
  4589. 2
  4590. 2
  4591. 2
  4592. 2
  4593. 2
  4594. 2
  4595. 2
  4596. 2
  4597. 2
  4598. 2
  4599. 2
  4600. 2
  4601. 2
  4602. 2
  4603.  @richardthomas1531  This is one of those comments that shows a complete lack of understanding of history and the human psyche. At the time of the writing of the American Constitution, all 13 colonies had slavery. Slavery had been a part of the human condition for thousands of years but people like you think that it was going to end in one day. It's not. It was a long process of education, thought, debate, in-fighting and more debate. Right after the Revolutionary war was over, some of the Northern States started to end slavery. 20 years after that war, all the Northern States abolished it and the non-slave states was about half the number of states. By the time of the Civil War, more than half the states were free states and it had come to a head. Over 600,000 people died in that war to end slavery, but you and people like you won't even give the American government and the people the credit of officially ending slavery in the United States. It was the US government that ended it and it was that American Constitution, that was behind the ideals that ended slavery. The US has been slave free for most of its existence and it was the US government and its citizens that fought HARD to end it. They wrote that ALL MEN were created equal with the understanding that this was AND IS a work in progress. Instead, it's become of work of hate....of self righteous hypocrites pointing fingers and laying blame. That's not what the Constitution was meant to be. It's a document that was supposed to be a method of working our differences out without violence and hate.
    2
  4604. 2
  4605. 2
  4606. 2
  4607. 2
  4608. 2
  4609. 2
  4610. 2
  4611. 2
  4612. 2
  4613. 2
  4614. 2
  4615. 2
  4616. 2
  4617. 2
  4618. 2
  4619. 2
  4620. 2
  4621. 2
  4622. 2
  4623. 2
  4624. 2
  4625. 2
  4626.  @gerrywhelan5761  You're still obsessed with other people's money. It's their money and it belongs to them. Worry about your own position and try to enhance your own life and future. If you give up because of "rich people" you'll never get anywhere. Back in seventies, when I was a young man, I didn't care about how rich my boss was and he was super rich. I agreed to work for him and earn a wage. I bought a house from those wages and over the next 20 years, I paid for it, like millions of others did with their wages. This is was when, as you've confirmed, the economy was on a downturn. Now it's improving. Now's the time to take stock in your own situation, financially and career wise. Figure out how you're spending your money and if you're wasting some of it. The simplest of things can start you on a road to financial stability. I use my debit card to save money. Every time I use it, the total rounds up to the nearest 5. For example $21.95 rounds up to $25.00 and the $3.05 goes to a special savings account. Doesn't seem like a lot but you'll be amazed how much is there after 2 years. Spare change always goes into a jar and it's rolled up and cashed in when the jar is full. That change goes into that savings account. Just small things. Quit smoking and the money that was once used for that should go into that account. Get a savings deduction plan at work. 10 bucks a week, gets you 500 in a year. I know that you're going to say that this is all small potatoes and it is but that's how ordinary people reach financial success. It doesn't happen over night. It's a life long journey and incredibly satisfying as you go through that journey and watch things slowly grow and seem to grow faster as you get older. However, if you never start, you'll never get anywhere and that's the big problem with obsessing with the money of others. It's a sign that you give up. Surrender guarantees defeat and failure. In fact, it's the very definition of losing.
    2
  4627. @Atrid Money doesn't belong to everybody. It's not as if there's a big pile of cash somewhere and we're all deserving of an equal bite of the cash pie. Money is representative of wealth and is worth nothing without the things of value that we create. I have a big maple tree in my back yard. As it sits, it has no real monetary value. However, if I cut it down, run it through a saw and make planks, it now has value as long as there are people that want it and are willing to exchange something of value for it. If that something of value is cash, it becomes MY cash, not your's, nor the neighbour's or anyone else's. It's mine. It was my time and effort that bought the tree and my time and effort that cut it down and made something of value of it. YOU have no right to the proceeds of my effort. That's how wealth in a country is created. It isn't just money in a bank. It's the cumulative value of the domestic product created. Without those products, money is worthless. That's why Venezuela went belly up. No idea of economics. Eventually, they started printing money even though they didn't have the goods of value to back it up. The money became worthless. Also, you seem to have a skewed view of equality. There is, in reality, no such thing. What we try to do, in a capitalist and democratic nation, is give everyone an equal opportunity to do as they wish in life, including financial gain. That doesn't include the guarantee of success or the equality of outcome. That's up to the individual and the choices that he makes along with some luck. The more you keep looking at the piles of others, you more you neglect your own pile and the less success financially and professionally you will have. Every nation that has tried the financial equality ideology, the one that says money belongs to us all equally, has failed miserable. There's not one that has brought it to any kind of success unless they accepted the idea that we need to allow people to seek their own kind of success. China is a prime example of that. As a communist country, they starved. When they allowed greater economic freedom, people started to prosper, each one at their own individual pace. That's because there is no such thing as true equality. It's an impossibility.
    2
  4628.  @gerrywhelan5761  In reality, more people have been lifted from abject poverty, around the world, over the last 20 years, than at any time in human history. https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty There have always been the super rich. Rockefeller, Carnegie, the Vanderbilts have always been a part of the social fabric of America. In fact, a greater percentage of Americans were living in real abject poverty 150 years ago than they do today. They lived on the brink of starvation all the time and there were no safety nets like there are today. In the west, we live better lives than at any time in human history. The poorest of us have better health care than the richest person did 500 years ago. The problem that you're exhibiting isn't that your life is terrible. It's the fact that you have a resentment against the rich, and yes, there are corrupt people in Washington. They aren't just the rich. He was talking about a complacent corrupt bureaucracy that support each other by corrupt means. That's been a reality of life forever. It isn't much different today and the fight against human nature has been ongoing all through our history. If it hadn't been a reality in history, the Bible would never had been written. Also, you don't have to rich to be greedy. I know of a lot of drug dealers and thieves that like to make the easy money without the effort and they don't have any money. I call that greed. Again, there is no such thing as a piece of the pie. There's no pile of cash sitting somewhere that we all have access to and that some are hoarding. Wealth is created. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. The wealthy have created their own wealth through the creation of products that they can sell. We all do it. You do it through investments in pension funds, savings accounts and investment plans at your bank. I live below the proscribed poverty line in my country. Yet, over the last 4 years, I've been to the Dominican Republic, Mexico and the Netherlands and I've just paid for a vacation to Costa Rica. Yet, if I told you how much I make a month, you'd think it was impossible. My dad came to this country penniless, yet today, after hard work (working 3 jobs at times) and making smart decisions, he's worth at least 1/2 a million dollars Anyone can make life work for them financially. All it takes is determination and using your head. I've said it before, if you dwell on what others have instead and complaining about disparities, you'll be the one with nothing in life. It's your attitude NOT the lack of opportunity. Pessimism is the worst enemy of so many people, not the rich or the corrupt. It's themselves. If you don't enter a race, you'll never ever finish it or even compete.
    2
  4629. 2
  4630. 2
  4631. 2
  4632. 2
  4633. 2
  4634. 2
  4635. 2
  4636. 2
  4637. 2
  4638. 2
  4639. 2
  4640. 2
  4641. 2
  4642. 2
  4643. 2
  4644. 2
  4645. 2
  4646. 2
  4647. 2
  4648. So, you're saying that in a road rage situation, the guy will find a way to kill the guy he's angry at no matter what? He won't react in a fit a rage by shooting the guy.....ever? You seriously believe that if he doesn't have a gun, he'll not stop until the guy is dead, that his fists will have the same result on a guy's head that 6 bullets will on that same head? You've never heard of a person, in a drunken row, shooting an adversary in a fight? Never heard of gangs, inadvertently running into one another and start blasting away? You're talking about pre-meditated murder. I'm talking about pulling a gun out of your pocket for a perceived slight, out of anger or fear and shooting someone as a reaction. I'd say that you're making that up. Not all killings are pre-meditated and people have and do shoot each other in a fit of rage over something stupid all the time. That big reason that it happens is that the gun is right there, in his pocket, on the dresser and the blind rage is happening right now and it's all due to the availability of the weapon and the ease of use of the gun. What's even more telling is that there is only one real use for a hand gun. That is to shoot human beings. To be able to carry it or store for ease of use to kill someone else. Even you know that this is true. It explains the huge disparity in numbers for gun violence between the US and Canada. The number one reason is the availability and the attitude that comes with that availability that we don't see in Canada or any other Western country. Murder rates and gun violence is through the roof if you compare it to any other western country and most of it is due to the ease of acquiring a handgun.
    2
  4649. 2
  4650. 2
  4651. 2
  4652. 2
  4653. 2
  4654. 2
  4655. 2
  4656. 2
  4657. 2
  4658. 2
  4659. 2
  4660. 2
  4661. 2
  4662. 2
  4663. 2
  4664. 2
  4665. 2
  4666. 2
  4667. 2
  4668. 2
  4669. 2
  4670. 2
  4671. 2
  4672. 2
  4673. 2
  4674. 2
  4675. 2
  4676. 2
  4677. 2
  4678. 2
  4679. 2
  4680. 2
  4681. 2
  4682. 2
  4683. 2
  4684. 2
  4685. 2
  4686. 2
  4687. 2
  4688. 2
  4689. 2
  4690. 2
  4691. 2
  4692. 2
  4693. 2
  4694. 2
  4695. 2
  4696. 2
  4697.  @jonnylaw13  So what if it exists. That's a given. We ALL have privilege and once you make a contest of it, you've crippled yourself. The biggest privilege a person can have is the realisation that it doesn't have to be that way. David Webb demonstrated that beautifully, albeit unintentionally when he was accused of "white privilege". Webb "suffers" from the privilege of knowing that he can still succeed, as an individual, and the success of others has NOTHING to do with him. You succeed when you take your lot in life and make the best of it you can. That's success. It isn't a comparison to others or a contest. It's personal improvement. That's how you succeed. If every white man in the world is better off than Webb, he's still a bigger success than the white guy who lives off his mommy's bank account and he deserves more respect. You bring up white supremacy as a racist trope but isn't Aveva Martin a racist woman? She assumed qualities about Webb under one assumption. He's white or so she thought. That's the very definition, the very heart of racism. In fact, she's using racism to further her own professional goals and line her pockets. She might as well be a slave owner. She building her life on a hate for others. She'd rather see people believe that there is no hope than to build them up as individuals. I've no use for that type of person. Don't think that I'm arguing with you. I'm not. The entire racist trope these days is extremely destructive and does no one any advantage except for those who make a living selling it. That is the point that I'm trying to make.
    2
  4698. 2
  4699. 2
  4700. 2
  4701. 2
  4702. 2
  4703. 2
  4704. 2
  4705. 2
  4706. 2
  4707. 2
  4708. 2
  4709. 2
  4710. 2
  4711. 2
  4712. 2
  4713. 2
  4714. 2
  4715. 2
  4716. 2
  4717. 2
  4718. 2
  4719.  @trh-bee4383  This thing started out when you said that a person would be refused medical aid if they didn't follow the guidelines set out by the government. I laid out a case against it. I'll say one more thing. Since when is the government the arbiter of all things right and wrong? Every war, genocide, forced labour, overt bigoted actions and suppression of freedom has been initiated, sanctioned or violently supported by governments. It's the main theme of human history. How did they do it? They did it by promising special benefits to certain segments of their societies. A little more land. Better food allotments, better access to fuel, little things, seemingly but essential for the survival of the average citizen. Men would join the militias just to get regular meals. YOU, are supporting the same kind of government pressure. "Do as I say or face the consequences." Loss of job. Loss of social contact through social marginalisation. Loss of medical assistance. Where's it coming from? Our government. With the history of abuse and human misery left by governments, throughout history, I'm astounded that anyone would still support their edicts. Yet they do. They do it through fear. "Do as we say or you shall surely die". That's the very heart of your argument. FEAR....so total that you'll allow them to do as they will and threaten us by any means necessary. I'm a grown man. I'd rather leave my safety in my own hands than is some strangers, who lives on a hill, in a distant capital city. I'm either their equal or I'm not and when they FORCE me to do things, against my will, I'm NOT their equal.
    2
  4720. 2
  4721. 2
  4722. 2
  4723. 2
  4724. 2
  4725. 2
  4726. 2
  4727. 2
  4728. 2
  4729. 2
  4730. 2
  4731. 2
  4732. 2
  4733. 2
  4734. 2
  4735. 2
  4736. 2
  4737. 2
  4738. 2
  4739. 2
  4740. 2
  4741. 2
  4742. 2
  4743. 2
  4744. 2
  4745. 2
  4746. 2
  4747. 2
  4748. 2
  4749. 2
  4750. 2
  4751. 2
  4752. 2
  4753. 2
  4754. 2
  4755. 2
  4756. 2
  4757. 2
  4758. 2
  4759. 2
  4760. 2
  4761. 2
  4762. 2
  4763. 2
  4764. AUmapathi1 I don't want to lesson the impact the loss of the Arawak people or others had on them or even begin to suggest that it's a good thing. However, as an impact on world history, it's not that big a deal. Peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years and they include in the Americas. These are people that were already gone when the Europeans arrived there and whose existence will likely be forever lost in human memory. This has happened all over the earth. Their extinction had a huge impact on them at the time, but to us it's barely a footnote if anything at all. It's just a continuous pattern of human existence which ends with us. Columbus was one of those rare men who really changed the course of history. There are very few of those. Mohammed, Jesus (if he existed) or those that wrote the Gospels, Confucius, Guttenberg, Pasteur and Newton are others. They all had impacts on human life that had lasting effects and whose life's work will always have the distinction of changing the world. That doesn't mean that they were always good people. They weren't, just like the rest of us. The capacity for good and evil lies within us all. That's a given, like it or not and Columbus is no different. One of the biggest lessons we learn from men like that is not just the big contributions that they made but also in the realisation that they are ordinary men who did things that were out of the ordinary and that potential is in all of us, just like the potential to commit horrendous acts. Too many people want to vilify instead of learn. It's as if they're really saying how good they believe themselves to be and that is one of the biggest mistakes any person can make.
    2
  4765. 2
  4766. 2
  4767.  @FriendlyCroock  Blexit is politics. Political parties try to get elected and to do that they go after votes. It's how they come to power. The Black community have voted Democrat for decades but they didn't always vote that way. There once was a huge switch, a "Blexit" if you will, from the Republican Party to the Democrats. Remember, the Republicans are the party of Lincoln, who freed the slaves and the party that fought the Jim Crow laws of the fifties and sixties, with Republican Martin Luther King as the leader. It was the Republicans that spoke out against the KKK who were almost exclusively Democrats. The "Blexit" started during the Great Depression and then was completed as a result of LBJ's "War on Poverty", which hasn't really worked out that well. They didn't call it "Blexit" but that's what it was. Now Candace is trying to get blacks to vote Republican, again. She's using the failure Democratic policies to show that segment of the voters that maybe those policies weren't as good for them as they hoped they would be. Some of the worst regions in the US are the black communities that are almost always the strongholds of the Democrats. She's pointing out that maybe voting Republican might not be as bad as they think it is and that it may not be as bad as it is right now. It's politics....not race baiting. Race baiting is when you use race to denigrate individuals of a race to shame them into falling into the group think. Sharpeton is a race baiter. So is Michael Dyson. They use the worst of tragedies to divide and tell one group that they should hold another accountable as a monolith. They foment racial divide, throwing gasoline on a fire that already exists. Candace is asking blacks to join her in her political beliefs. People like Sharpeton are saying that blacks can't think on their own and only he can knows what is good for them and if you deviate from what you're told to do, you're a race traitor.
    2
  4768.  @FriendlyCroock  One could see it that way, but she has been vilified by the left and she has been told, not just by blacks, but by white leftists, that she is acting against her own best interests. This implies that they believe that her endorsement of the Republicans is one that is, in fact, endorsing the white supremacist party. That's their accusation against her and in fact, that has been at the heart of the entire campaign against the Republicans, especially Trump, for the last few years. There has been a huge fixation on the left on white privilege, the white patriarchy and even Hillary said, during her presidential campaign, that white women only voted for Republicans because of their husbands as if they don't have minds of their own. How would you think Candace would respond to continuous claims that she's supporting a racist party and president when she doesn't experience racism from the right but it's the left that use racism to denigrate her conservative views. Is she not allowed to point out that it's the left that is using racism to try to cajole and shame her to rethink her politics? It's what is happening to her and it's not from the right. It's from the left. The Republicans welcome her into their fold and race is NOT an issue. The left use racism to get her back and it is an issue. Maybe she's just sick and tired of the relentless racist comments and shaming. Strange how a white "racist a-hole" (me), is defending a black woman (Candace). I gotta say the definition of racism has sure expanded over the last while. Actually, that's just another left wing tactic, one that Candace has been criticising. That tactic being, if you don't agree with someone, call them a racist and now you've just won your point. What a shallow position.
    2
  4769. 2
  4770. 2
  4771. 2
  4772. 2
  4773. 2
  4774. 2
  4775. 2
  4776. 2
  4777. 2
  4778. 2
  4779. 2
  4780. 2
  4781. 2
  4782. 2
  4783. 2
  4784.  @mmhmm9271  First of all, I was searching for your boundaries. Your original question provided none so I asked where those boundaries are. Jainism is an ideology that is extreme in their belief of the value of non-human life. All I wanted to know is where you stood on the subject to flesh out a rather vague statement of morality. Also, where did I say, or even imply, that wanting to preserve an ecosystem means that you hate humanity? That's a conclusion that you arrived at on your own because I never said anything even close to that. The last "point" that I made had to do with the way you said "even a shred of moral value". That sounded rather confrontational to me, as if questioning the ethics of the person that you were responding to. You don't know that person well enough (not at all really) to be bringing his morality into question. That's why I stated that you should be more concerned about your own morality before asking someone else about "even a shred of moral value" and even admitted that I was doing the same to you. However, that "shred" statement seemed judgemental and that you were poised on "attack mode" and that's what elicited my response. It appeared that I was correct in that assumption. Instead of just clarifying your question, you did exactly what I felt you would. You attacked me, calling me laughable and saying that I was lacking in intelligence. "Intellectually bereft drivel" sure does imply a belief in your moral and intellectual superiority over others.
    2
  4785.  @mmhmm9271  Actually, I wasn't upset that you called me unintelligent. I feel that name calling and insults is an extremely poor way to have a discussion or present an argument. (argument not being understood in the negative sense) I question my own intelligence all the time and that doesn't upset me. It challenges me to try to learn more. If I can't up my intelligence, at least I can up my information levels. I grew up on a farm and there was a symbiosis that involved both the keeping of animals and the raising of plant crops that's reflects what happens in nature. Humans have transformed our environment that disrupts the normally symbiosis between plants and animals and solid farming practices tries to mimic that relationship, which includes the predator/prey bond. Both are essential to the other in nature. Take away the predator and the prey, over the long run, will suffer and vice versa. We can't fully duplicate that bond in our agricultural practices but we can do the best that we can. We become the predator, in this new humanised world, displacing the role of the other large predators, and we allow the livestock to take on the roles, in nature, that the prey takes on. It's FAR from perfect and it's a progression of trial and error and we're starting to see that the factory method of farming, the specialisation methods, may not be the best way to raise our food. However, with a world population approaching 8 billion, we're forced into this new way of feeding ourselves, whether we like it or not. By the way the one thing that we learned, on the farm, is that flies can be a severe health hazard, to humans and to animals, although they are important to the environment. There is a balance in nature that you can't ignore. Maoist China found that out the hard way with their 4 pest program. It ended in crop failures. This is a very complex topic and I can't even begin to comment on it fully or give it justice. It would be best to allow us to live our lives the best that we can, as individuals, as long as we're not being overtly destructive. We should be willing to see each other viewpoints as part of the way we're trying to cope with the world and our place in it. I appreciate that you've responded in a conciliatory manner and didn't take on a defensive stance. I don't like the idea of sitting on opposite hills taking potshots at each other. Walking down the hill so we can speak civilly is a great deal more productive.
    2
  4786. 2
  4787. 2
  4788. 2
  4789. 2
  4790. 2
  4791. 2
  4792. 2
  4793. 2
  4794. 2
  4795. @JRG2733 First....NO evidence that the Russians helped Trump. NONE. I thought that it might have been true at one time but I wanted to see the evidence. There has been NONE shown. Innocent until proven guilty. Guilt is proven with evidence. No evidence....no guilt. So that part of your argument is getting to be just plain dumb. Second.....Trump won through the electoral college vote. The electoral college was put in place over 200 years ago and the reason for it was quite simply why the United States rebelled against Britain in the first place. Taxation without representation. The 13 colonies were being taxed, without any input from the colonies, by the more powerful British government. The forefathers believed that each region should have a say in how they are governed and devised a system of regional representation. They didn't want the more populous regions to dictate to the more rural and distant regions. Why would states like Alaska, Hawaii, Montana and others like it even bother to stay in the union if New York, California, Texas and Illinois control the votes and the country. They'd separate from the US, just like the 13 colonies did from Britain. A simple civics course would have helped Hillary, immensely. They she would have realised that fly over America was important and wouldn't have had the arrogance to not bother to campaign in those states. She lost because of her arrogance and disdain for a certain demographic of America. The very demographic that voted for Obama, voted for Trump. Calling them a basket of deplorables may well have been part of the worst campaign strategy in American history. It showcased an elitist attitude that a lot of Americans hated. Actually, a civics course might do YOU some good as well.
    2
  4796.  @loudharley6926  The claim is that the Russians had dirt of Hillary and Trump Jr. went to find out what it was. So what was this dirt? The fact is that no one really knows what went on at that meeting and whatever it was, we don't know if there was a deal struck or not. What we know is one thing. They had a meeting. The Mueller Report turned up nothing. So, the entire thing was let go.....except by those who insist that they DO know. As for Flynn? Yeah, he was in a mess but there's more to it than we know. Wait till the Durham report comes out. This is beating a dead horse. It's no different than the media going on about the Covington Kids, in spite of the video footage that shows that those kids did nothing. Their only crime was that some of them were wearing MAGA hats. Wear that hat and you MUST be guilty. They still haven't proved a thing about Russian collusion. Adam Schiff said over and over that he had proof but nothing. The released transcripts showed that not one of them had any proof, in spite of what they said on TV. This is all about one thing. This is the Democrat dismay that Trump actually beat them. They can't believe it happened. They blame the Russians. They blame the electoral college system. They blame racism. They blame the gullibility of the hillbillies of "fly over" America. They blame everything but where the fault really lies. The Democrat party. They ran a terrible campaign and it's their arrogance that was their undoing. You'd think that 3 years of investigations they'd be able to remove Trump from office and they still can't do it.
    2
  4797. 2
  4798. 2
  4799. 2
  4800. 2
  4801. 2
  4802. 2
  4803. 2
  4804. 2
  4805.  @JhutaNabi  Of course Columbus was controversial in his time. He was an Italian, getting exclusive licences to operate in the New World, in Spain. The members of the Spanish Court were envious of a foreigner getting these potentially lucrative deals. Also, Columbus was bull headed and ambitious and that would add to the bad feelings about him. Another factor was the tendency for other Europeans to vilify the Spaniards, including Columbus as he worked for the Spanish crown, in a movement known as the "Black Legend". This was a strong bigotry against anything that was Spanish. I think that it's laughable when I say that the anti-slavery movement started in the late 1700s and then you prove it with your reference to a paper wrote in 1836, when the abolitionist movement was starting to gain traction in the US. It uses new interpretations of the Bible to refute slavery. That's what the Reformation was all about....new interpretations of the Bible that forced people to question the dogma of the church and it all started AFTER Columbus died. I will give you another short example. My father was born 10 miles west of the German border, in the Netherlands. He was 8 years old when the Nazis invaded and him and his brother hid in a ditch, terrified, as the German army marched passed them. Yet, had he been born 20 miles to the east of where he had hidden, he'd be German and marching proudly, pretending that he was off to fight for the fatherland and dreaming of the day that he would be one of those soldiers. He's told me that many times. The difference between him hating the Nazis and being a good guy and loving them and being thought of as a monster, was defined by a line on a map. That's it. He knows that he'd have been just as susceptible to the lure of Hitler that all his school mates had been. What's really strange is that you hardly ever hear about the atrocities of the Aztecs and how they'd capture slaves to sacrifice to their Gods. These were blood baths and Cortez and his men were horrified at the carnage. Why aren't we talking about that? All people are doing is congratulating themselves on how moral they are by comparing themselves to those of the past who we now see as taking part in things that we feel are now wrong. Telling ourselves that we're better than they are when in reality we're not. We just live in a time and place in which we were taught to vilify these things because our ancestors started to question their beliefs....a product of our times. We're like my dad was, born on the right side of boundary that was set by others.
    2
  4806. 2
  4807. 2
  4808. 2
  4809. 2
  4810. 2
  4811. 2
  4812. 2
  4813. 2
  4814. 2
  4815. 2
  4816. 2
  4817. 2
  4818. 2
  4819. 2
  4820. 2
  4821. 2
  4822. 2
  4823. 2
  4824. 2
  4825. 2
  4826. 2
  4827. 2
  4828. 2
  4829. 2
  4830. Sylvertaco Had Columbus not gone west, it would never had given those scientists, diplomats and leaders the affluence and the ability to impact the world through their work and perseverance. The new world brought trade and a new diet that changed the way the ordinary person lived and gave those people a lifestyle of privilege and power that allowed for their ideas and discoveries to have an impact on the world. Most of those advances would not have been possible without the discovery of a brand new world that was unknown. History doesn't happen in a vacuum. Had the affluence that the New World brought back to Europe had never happened, a lot of those people that you mentioned would still be concerned about survival in a much poorer existence. The results of that is still impacting all of humanity today. Columbus and Gutenberg's printing press are 2 of the biggest events in human history. Nothing would be the same had those 2 events had never occurred. Human existence is a struggle. Life is a mish mash of the angelic and the horrific. Columbus embodied both, just like the rest of us. However, he did something that almost no one has ever done in history. He introduced us to a new world which opened new possibilities never contemplated before. It allowed all the changes that you talked about. It may have happened do to other innovations but we can't know that because we can't comment of things that never happened. Besides, there is no scientist, diplomat or leader that has lived spotless lives. They're human and as such they are flawed. We celebrate the ability to overcome those flaws and still achieve great things. That's what Columbus did. It was a momentous discovery he made and when he returned to Spain and told everyone about it, the world was never the same.
    2
  4831. 2
  4832. Sylvertaco Because you can't have an Einstein day and an Aristotle day, Darwin day, Pasteur day, Newton day, Copernicus day, Martin Luther King day (ok, you can have that one), Aquinas Day, Thomas Payne day, Adam Smith day and on and on, because it is unworkable. Columbus was one of the biggest and for some reason, through a kind of social evolution, people thought his accomplishment was bit enough to remember. It became a tradition. Suddenly, some people think traditions aren't worth having or they've decided that this person isn't perfect so that day should be eliminated. As a matter of fact, that's exactly why some KKK members fought the idea of a Martin Luther King day. They pointed out that he made mistakes and that eliminates his ideas as worthy. I wasn't around when Columbus Day was celebrated. People had their traditions back then. We still celebrate those traditions today. It's the same with Christmas. They are the result of tradition and heritage. They don't just pop out of the air like someone waved a magic wand. It's a remembrance of something worth remembering. You're making too big a deal out of it. You're telling people that their traditions are bogus because you don't get it. The answer is this. YOU don't celebrate it. Let others do as they will. I have no more right to tell others what is important to them than anyone else has to tell me what is important to me. If people want to celebrate Columbus, have at er. Now, I'm going to celebrate Thanksgiving....another day some people are now criticising. Also, a day that took place because a group of people heard about a land that lay to the west, across the ocean, and decided to got there. A land discovered by Columbus. See how that works.
    2
  4833. 2
  4834. 2
  4835. Explain to me why it is only certain speakers that aren't allowed to speak at universities? If I have the nerve to suggest, in some blogs, that BLM may not be the correct way to go to solve racial difficulties, I get creamed for it. If I say Serena Williams acted like a spoiled child at that tennis match, even though I also McEnroe also behaved like a spoiled brat in his time, I'm a racist and sexist. This is the group that has infiltrated the Democratic party and allowed Hillary to say that white people have to learn (fill in the blank) and that white men have to do (again, fill in the blank) and the party that suggested that the right are nothing but a bunch of bigoted hillbillies. I've always supported left wing ideas, until the end of the Obama era. It was then the left started to support violence, doxing commenters on social media, vilifying the male patriarchy, protesting speakers and smashing private property and threatening people they don't like. Wear a MAGA hat on campus at many colleges and you risk being attacked. Show a small segment of a debate on public TV, like Lindsey Shepherd did, and be reprimanded before a tribunal and told that you may have broken the law. Comedians don't even do colleges anymore because of the reactions of left wing students who shut up anyone that displeases them. I'm now a centrist, hoping that someone starts a movement of a group that allows freedom of expression and won't tell me that I have no right to free speech and doesn't carry the victim mentality that has permeated left wing thinking. I'm not even sure what strawman points I've made. Maybe you should be a little specific when you make those accusations.
    2
  4836. 2
  4837. Sylvertaco My views haven't changed a bit. It's the basic views and principles of the groups and political parties that I once sympathised with that have changed. This is a common point made by scores of people who all say that same thing and I'll paraphrase. "I didn't leave the left, I feel as if the left has left me". As an example, the left that I was a part of 40 years ago, would NEVER have taken part in the Kavanaugh witch hunt. They still believed in the rule of law and all the protocols that go with it. Not the left of today and not the Democratic party. Everyone would have been appalled at the craziness that went on outside the Supreme Court when he was being confirmed. The leftist of when I was young would have disavowed all that action and would have agreed with the idea of "innocent until proven guilty", the cornerstone our the western judicial system. We have all kinds of holidays that are devoted to non-Americans. Christmas and Easter celebrate the life of Christ, a Jewish man. Thanksgiving celebrate the coming together of British and native people, neither of which were American, although I will not be surprised to see the crazy left go after that some time in the future. I've already seen facebook memes that mock the idea of celebrating how white settlers give thanks to God and the Indigenous people and then proceed to slaughter those very people. I don't know if it will go any further but the seeds of dissent are there. Without the voyages of Columbus, there would be no America. That's exactly why the far left hate him. They believe America to be corrupt and should be destroyed and be rebuilt in a model that they've created. Some college equity groups now insist that meetings begin with the acknowledgement that we all live on land stolen from the "original people". Listen to the rhetoric from the Evergreen College protests of a year ago. That's exactly what they do. Do you believe that these ideologues would support anything Columbus did? Not a chance. The entire thing has its roots in a new ideology and it has been so deeply ingrained into the new left that many don't even know that it has been happening to them. It's a new way of thinking that has been taught to the children who have grown and has now become a part of the academic lexicon.
    2
  4838. Sylvertaco Would the theory of evolution always be a mystery had Darwin not put it out as a theory. I doubt that very much....but he was the one that did it. Similarly, I'm sure eventually someone else would have crossed the ocean and discovered the new lands.....but that didn't happen. We're not talking about the hypothetical here. We're talking about what DID happen. I've shown you all kinds of sources of why people don't want to celebrate Columbus or have a day for him, all of which are ideological. This is the source of these changes. Now, maybe you have another reason, like thinking that celebrating the life of a non-American is weird. I don't know but that would seem a little shallow and elitist, as if to say non-Americans should have nothing to offer Americans and should not be celebrated. I can't help but wonder though that it is an attempt to cover up the ideological and try to impress with reasons outside of the ideological to prove that it has no effect on you. I'm also putting out the idea that things don't happen in a vacuum and that if the only argument was that it's weird, you wouldn't be so deeply vested in getting rid of this holiday. It's like the feminist who's trying to say that we should get rid of father's day and then saying it has nothing to do with her ideology but more to do with some other vague reason.....like, it's weird. My issues with the left is that it has become ideological and rigid and that if you don't meet their standards of perfection, you must be vilified. That standard is completely arbitrary and anyone could be victims of its application. Find the flaw in the individual and then attack him/her for it. If you can't find the flaw, go to the one sure way to tear him down. Accuse him of a sex crime which must be believed. The flaws of Columbus were easy. The flaws of others might be a little harder to find but we still have the MeToo thing. You can always defeat the enemy that way. The new left has adopted a method to ensure compliance with their ways. The Columbus Day debate is only a small manifestation of how they think. Dare to step out of line and they will destroy you. It's a type of authoritarian rule that is based on group identity (celebrating the life of a non-American is weird, as an example) that is so powerful that there is no one immune to it's far reaching tentacles, including the most ardent left leaning ideologue. Just say the wrong thing and you could be their next victim.
    2
  4839. 2
  4840. 2
  4841. 2
  4842. 2
  4843. 2
  4844. 2
  4845. 2
  4846. 2
  4847. 2
  4848. 2
  4849.  @MariaMartinez-researcher  Do you know what's rude. Claiming that you're a minority so you can get ahead professionally. That's not just rude.....that's racist. Trump mocking her might be crude but she has it coming to her. She pulled a dirty stunt. Seemingly giving approval to affirmative action so she could use it to her own advantage. For almost 70 years, North Korea has been threatening the US, South Korea and Japan. Japan has had air raid sirens go off due to Kim's missile tests. All the former presidents did was add more sanctions which only hurt the regular North Korean but it didn't affect Kim one bit. Trump thought he'd try a different approach. Communication....this was once prized as a way of settling differences. Instead of amplifying differences, try to find common ground and it has shown some results. There's still a long way to go but at least the tensions have eased over what it was. That's good, unless you want to be locked into perpetual sabre rattling. Then you'd support the lack of communications strategy. Anyone that thought that Mexico was going to give the US 5 billion dollars on Trump's say so, is either delusional or just using it as political fodder. Most Trump supporters knew what he was doing when he said it. Use your head....a little bit, anyway. Also, the Greenland thing was an offer. There was nothing forcible about it. I could offer you money for your car. That doesn't mean I'm forcing you to take it. It was an idea, that's all. I know Trump is brash and abrasive but you have to try to understand what it is he's trying to do. He's doing what no other president has ever tried. He's listening to the average American, no matter who they are. That's why he is the populist president. As long as the Democrats refuse to understand him, he's going to beat them. "Know your enemy" an abridged quote from the great Sun Tzu, would be exceedingly helpful for Democratic supporters. Instead, they just attack without ever getting into his head. It's why Trump won the last election and why he has a good chance of winning the next one.
    2
  4850. 2
  4851. 2
  4852. 2
  4853. 2
  4854. 2
  4855. 2
  4856. 2
  4857. 2
  4858. 2
  4859. 2
  4860. 2
  4861. 2
  4862. 2
  4863. 2
  4864. 2
  4865. 2
  4866. 2
  4867. 2
  4868. 2
  4869. 2
  4870. 2
  4871. 2
  4872. 2
  4873. 2
  4874. 2
  4875. 2
  4876.  @teeanahera8949  Yet, every civilisation, every tribe, in every part of the world had their version of the "sky fairy". Why is that? Can you explain it? Can ANYONE fully explain it. Also, it's very easy to claim that religion caused most of the world's conflicts. Every tribe, group, country, what have you, had religious beliefs. If they went to war, they called on their gods to help them. Does that mean that the belief in those gods was the cause of the war? Or is it just human conflict, the need for better hunting, fishing or agricultural lands because they're starving. Maybe they wanted the riches of their opponents. Maybe they wanted women because they'd just been decimated by disease or hunger and they had to rebuild their numbers. Primatologist, Jane Goodall, was shocked to be a witness to a group of chimpanzees crossing their boundary into the land of another troupe of chimps and slaughtering every one of them. Was that religion, too? Chimps aren't even capable of that kind of thought, yet they acted just like humans, invading the lands of others, slaughtering them and assuming control of that land. How is that even possible? People go to war and give all kinds of reasons but what is the real reason behind it? I think that "religion caused it" is a very weak argument to explain the human condition. It's also another way to assign a moral superiority to oneself. "I'm the advanced one. Better than THOSE guys" We have to look deeper into why we behave the way that we do.
    2
  4877. 2
  4878. 2
  4879. 2
  4880. 2
  4881. 2
  4882. 2
  4883. 2
  4884. 2
  4885. 2
  4886. 2
  4887. 2
  4888. 2
  4889. 2
  4890. 2
  4891. 2
  4892. 2
  4893. 2
  4894. 2
  4895. 2
  4896. 2
  4897. 2
  4898. 2
  4899. 2
  4900. 2
  4901. 2
  4902. 2
  4903. 2
  4904. 2
  4905. 2
  4906. 2
  4907. 2
  4908. 2
  4909. 2
  4910. 2
  4911. 2
  4912. 2
  4913. 2
  4914. 2
  4915.  faultroy  My grandfather? You act as if you know me. My one grandfather died when I was a year old. He didn't get to teach me a lot. My other grandfather suffered a severe stroke when he was 29 years old. He wasn't found for almost 5 hours and had severe brain trauma from which he never recovered. He spent his entire life in an institution unable to even feed himself. He lived in Europe and although I never met him, he wouldn't have been able to say anything to me, anyway. So, there goes you theory about me being that moronic that I wouldn't even listen to my grandfather. You're a rather presumptuous jerk, do you know that? Also, I wasn't talking about a work ethic. I grew up on a farm and I know all about working hard. My dad used to tell me and my brother to be grateful that we were Christian folk because it were up to him, we'd work Sundays, too. Another example of you being a presumptuous jerk. Also, when I was young, I did enjoy reading a lot but my dad didn't see much worth to it and quite actively discouraged me from it....and I mean actively. I still read but I didn't do it so people knew that I was deeply involved so I never was able to encounter anyone that could inspire me in the way that others were. I had work to do and I rather enjoyed working anyway. However, I wish I had developed that side of my personality as well. I did when I was in public school but ran into that brick wall called dad and responsibility when I was older. Another example of you being a presumptuous jerk.
    2
  4916. 2
  4917. 2
  4918. 2
  4919. 2
  4920. 2
  4921. 2
  4922. 2
  4923. 2
  4924. 2
  4925. 2
  4926. 2
  4927. 2
  4928. 2
  4929. 2
  4930. 2
  4931. 2
  4932. 2
  4933. 2
  4934. 2
  4935. 2
  4936. 2
  4937. 2
  4938. 2
  4939. 2
  4940. 2
  4941. 2
  4942. 2
  4943. 2
  4944. 2
  4945. 2
  4946. 2
  4947. 2
  4948. 2
  4949. 2
  4950. 2
  4951. 2
  4952. 2
  4953. 2
  4954. 2
  4955. 2
  4956. 2
  4957. 2
  4958. 2
  4959. 2
  4960. 2
  4961. 2
  4962. 2
  4963. 2
  4964. 2
  4965. 2
  4966. 2
  4967. 2
  4968. 2
  4969. 2
  4970. 2
  4971. 2
  4972. 2
  4973. 2
  4974. 2
  4975. 2
  4976. 2
  4977. 2
  4978. 2
  4979. 2
  4980. 2
  4981. 2
  4982. 2
  4983. 2
  4984. 2
  4985. 2
  4986. 2
  4987. 2
  4988. 2
  4989. 2
  4990. 2
  4991. 2
  4992. 2
  4993. 2
  4994. 2
  4995. 2
  4996. 2
  4997. 2
  4998. 2
  4999. 2
  5000. 2
  5001. 2
  5002. 2
  5003. 2
  5004. irishque halim It was never a Palestinian state, either. In 1516, the Ottoman Turks conquered the region and it belonged the Ottoman Empire until the end of WW1. It was overtaken by Egypt in 1832 and land was given to Egyptian Arabs and soldiers in what is now coastal Gaza and Israel, the first of many migrations into the area including Jews. In 1840, Britain intervened and gave the land back to the Turks. The late 19th century saw the immigration of many Arabs and Jews into the region. The Arabs didn't mind if the immigrants were Muslim but they didn't want Jewish immigrants, but they came anyway. That is the crux of this entire problem. It's the religious problem. If the Jews would embrace Islam, there would be no issues in that region. After the WW1, Britain took over the region and held it for almost thirty years. That's when they offered the 2 state solution. Many of the citizens of the area had only had a history in the region for less than 100 years, yet the Arab immigrants were considered to be full Palestinians while Jews were not. That's why the 2 state solution was rejected by the Arabs, including Arabs from Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Syria, who really have no interest in the area except their rejection of anything Jewish. Once again, only Muslims were wanted by the local Arabs. What's troubling is that the same people that support Muslim immigration to Western countries, particularly Europe, reject Jewish immigration to the Levant. I'm seeing a double standard here. If there has never been a country in the area, ran by the locals, how could one segment of the locals feel that they only have the right to rule the area and to set immigration policies. Right now there are 1.8 million Muslims in what we now call Israel. They have been offered full citizenship and many have accepted the offer. They can vote, hold office, own land and businesses, have even joined the Israeli army and been elected to the Israeli Knesset. They enjoy a better life standard than the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and what's even more perplexing is that the Palestinian leadership, Hamas, has received huge amounts of cash from oil rich Muslim countries, yet these countries have never even offered to take in Palestinians to live in their country. Strangely, places like the US has allowed them into their country. Activist, Linda Sarcour is Palestinian and living in New York. Where are the Palestinians that could be in Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Egypt, Jordan and other Muslim countries? This has everything to do with the religion of Islam and nothing to do with cooperation or understanding. The Muslims of the region must win. Calling them Palestinians is a red herring. It has nothing to do with Palestinians. It's about Islam....that's all.
    2
  5005. 2
  5006. 2
  5007. 2
  5008. 2
  5009. 2
  5010. 2
  5011. 2
  5012. 2
  5013.  @Control_alt_delete  I don't have to talk to your 70 year old grandmother. I'm 71 and I've lost a lot of friends, relatives and work associates. Just because people die that doesn't mean that every death is now an innocent demise and we're not to question it. "PBD most likely sold the interview in such a manner then surprised him with nut job stuff." Yeah.....most likely....or most likely not. You don't get points for a "most likely". So, PBD passed on a bunch of questions. That's his choice. It's his show. He can ask or NOT ask whatever he wants. Surely he didn't expect questions like "What's your favourite colour?" or "Do you like ice hockey?". Weiner was in politics. Politicians should be ready for the tough questions especially when he has the record that Weiner has. Then you want to bet that Trump Jr. would react in the same way and used a conspiracy, a well worn out conspiracy about Trump to illustrate your point. Placing a wager isn't evidence either. It's conjecture and means nothing. Besides, this isn't about Trump. It's about the Clintons. Finally, you missed my point, entirely. Weiner's reaction will only lead to a deeper entrenchment of that conspiracy theory. Read all the comments on how people think that he reacted in an hysterical manner which they'll interpret as being highly suspicious. That was my point and those comments lends credence to that point. He should have answered in a calm and rational manner. He could have answered by saying, calmly and rationally, that he feels that this conspiracy is no different than the ones that he didn't ask about. He should have said, in a matter of fact tone, that people die and it doesn't prove or disprove any accusations made. It's an accusation...that's all. Then he should have asked if PBD can show a direct link between those deaths and any real action that the Clintons took that would have caused those deaths, besides knowing the deceased. Knowing the deceased in not evidence of Clinton responsibility for those deaths. Instead, he reacts in anger, so as to intimidate PBD into abandoning this line of questioning, even suggesting that there are questions that shouldn't be asked. Wouldn't politicians love that. Don't ask any tough questions. Make it all a big love fest. You wouldn't want interviewers to treat Trump that way but boy don't you DARE do that to a Democrat. If a person wants to be taken seriously, don't act so totally unhinged. It only validates what people already think.
    2
  5014.  @Control_alt_delete  You're STILL not getting it. I never said that his emotional state was evidence. Never said that at all. I never said that he should start laughed it off, either. I said that he should have replied calmly and rationally. I even listed points that he could have made but you ignore it all. People are going to believe as they believe. He shouldn't give them ammunition by losing his temper, interrupting and shouting the way that he did. Weiner already has credibility issues with his criminal record. It didn't help his argument one bit to behave so irrationally, in fact it hurt him. The bottom line is that I was trying to help him with his credibility issues but you won't have it. If he'd have kept his cool, he would have given the perception that he had he was familiar with topic and had points that he'd thought through to the point that he could articulate those thoughts carefully and in a lucid manner. Critical thinkers don't shout and interrupt and that's why he damaged his credibility. For better or worse, people believe that when you have right on your side, you don't have to lose your temper. You let logic and a sense of purpose give you an air of confidence and believability. Any lawyer, in a court of law, knows better than to rant uncontrollably, especially in front of a jury. Perception can be just as important as facts, at times. It may not be right but it's human nature. Weiner didn't offer any facts, logical argument and didn't exactly leave an image of a person who has it together. He who shouts the loudest isn't correct.
    2
  5015.  @dejuanrobert  You've just put on display EXACTLY why Trump has been doing so well. You're full of hate. You can't even mention his name without losing control of all emotion and going into a vitriolic tirade against him and anyone associated with him. The left and Democrats are always the ones going on about hate and "isms" but, in the end, they're just as much the haters, maybe more, than anyone else. Ask about the US ecomomy? People like you will go negative and then call Trump names. Ask about N. Korea and nuclear testing. More negativity, even though the testing has stopped (WOW) and then some more calling Trump names. This is the pattern, no matter the topic. You can't accept that things are going well in the US because you're hatred clouds everything you see and hear. LIke Bill Maher who wanted to see a recession just so Trump wouldn't be re-elected. It didn't matter to him that it meant the loss of jobs for millions of ordinary blue collar Americans so long as his hate was vented and the object of his hate defeated. Just once, I'd like to hear one of you Trump haters admit that, in spite of your dislike of Trump as a person, you approve of the fact that he halted the testing by North Korea, for the last 2 years. I knew that Trump was going to win when she turned her nose up and called his supporters a basket of deplorables. The smelling "Walmart" crowds that live in "flyover America". It's that disdain and hatred for ordinary people, and the president that has helped them, that will win him the next election and the Democrats are too filled with their own venom to get it. You're exactly that type of Democrat. You've already shown you disdain for Trump and billionaires. I'm sure you feel the same for his supporters, as well.....and you wonder why this is turning off so many American voters.
    2
  5016. 2
  5017. 2
  5018. 2
  5019. 2
  5020. 2
  5021. 2
  5022. 2
  5023. 2
  5024. 2
  5025. 2
  5026. 2
  5027. 2
  5028. 2
  5029. 2
  5030. 2
  5031. 2
  5032. 2
  5033. 2
  5034. 2
  5035. 2
  5036. 2
  5037. 2
  5038. 2
  5039. 2
  5040. 2
  5041. 2
  5042. 2
  5043. 2
  5044. 2
  5045. 2
  5046. 2
  5047. 2
  5048. 2
  5049. 2
  5050. 2
  5051. 2
  5052. 2
  5053. 2
  5054. 2
  5055. 2
  5056.  Gerry Swaim  "trump's a LYING CHEATING STEALING NARCISSISTIC BRAGGING BLOWHARD BULLY of a president. Anyone that treats people the way he does is capable of anything." This is exactly the problem. You don't start from there, capable of anything, and then start to go looking for that anything to make the name calling justified. The accusation of collusion has been investigated, scrutinised and combed over and there has been no solid evidence provided. If there had been, he would have been impeached already and these Ukraine hearings wouldn't be taking place as they would be redundant. No evidence and the law, American law, has to declare him innocent of those charges. That's how you treat gossip about people you don't like, as well. You don't spread rumours and innuendo until you have the evidence to prove those rumours correct. They didn't do that with collusion. THAT'S BASIC AMERICAN LAW AND BASIC HUMAN DECENCY. All the bankruptcies? Trump is worth close to 3 billion dollars. That's his net worth. Rachel Maddow showed his income return for 2006 and he made 156 MILLION dollars that year and paid 36 million in taxes. He's doing very well for a bankrupt business man. He's had some of his businesses go bankrupt, like his Atlanta casino, but he own's all kinds of businesses. Moguls like that always have some failures. That's par for the course when you have multiple business ventures. You've just show how little you understand business or economics. So far there is no evidence of any wrong doing with Trump and Ukraine. "Do me a favour" isn't bribery. There was no caveat at the end of that phrase. No "or we'll do that to you" to follow. It's "Do me a favour". That's all. Anything else is reading into it what you want to read into it. The Ukraine president has said, repeatedly, that there was no pressure. He's the victim of this. The victim of bribery or extortion or pressure....whatever you want to call it and he's saying there was none. Not only him but members of his government are saying the same. Taylor just testified today that the first 2 times that he talked to Velensky, the guy never even knew that money was being with held. What kind of extortion is that? HE DIDN'T KNOW THE MONEY WAS BEING WITH HELD. That was after he talked to Trump. That's quite the extortion attempt by the American president. Extortion with no information or ultimatum. Then Taylor says that one of his staff members heard a conversation on a phone. What? That's hearsay. Why didn't Schiff have the staff member giving testimony? That's the first hand information. That's what could really sink Trump. You're hating too much and letting that make decisions for you. Me....I'm waiting till I see ALL the information, then I'll tell you if Trump extorted Ukraine or not. So far, Schiff has shown next to nothing. That's being fair. That's how you asses information in a judicious manner. You don't root for an outcome and then dismiss what doesn't give you the outcome you wish for.
    2
  5057. 2
  5058. 2
  5059. 2
  5060. 2
  5061. 2
  5062. 2
  5063. 2
  5064. 2
  5065. 2
  5066. 2
  5067. 2
  5068. 2
  5069. 2
  5070. 2
  5071. 2
  5072. 2
  5073. 2
  5074. 2
  5075. 2
  5076. 2
  5077. 2
  5078. 2
  5079. 2
  5080. 2
  5081. 2
  5082. 2
  5083. 2
  5084. 2
  5085. 2
  5086. 2
  5087. 2
  5088. 2
  5089. 2
  5090. 2
  5091. 2
  5092. 2
  5093. 2
  5094. 2
  5095. 2
  5096. 2
  5097. 2
  5098. 2
  5099. 2
  5100. 2
  5101. 2
  5102.  @sleazyneezy  I see you didn't ask for the data. Not surprised. You're cherry picking data, just like I did and I did it for a reason. You can make data work for you anyway you want. I said that there may be other factors that you're not looking at. Like this one. Could it be that because the Japanese aren't obsessed with racial virtue signaling that when they closed the border, no one was calling their government xenophobic? Could it be that they didn't have mayors like DeBlasio telling everyone, in February, to go out, have a good time, ride the subway and to go to the Chinese New's Years Parade to prove they weren't racist against the Chinese. Could that be why New York was the US hot spot? Could it be that the governors of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in Nursing homes, putting the most vulnerable people in the US in danger? Could it be because Biden said it was xenophobic to restrict travel to and from China? Could it be because Japan doesn't have this element of political hate that automatically rebels against anything the president says? If this was such a concern, why didn't the Democrats forego impeachment and concentrate on the virus and sit down with the president and come up with a plan, TOGETHER, to fight this thing? Could it be the hate they felt towards the president? Trump even talked about the virus it in the State of the Union address, the one the Pelosi ripped up, because she said it was ALL lies. Not one Democrat mentioned that this was one item that they should be concerned with. And if you don't think hate is involved, don't YOU hate Donald Trump? I don't like Donald Trump, either, but I don't HATE him to the point of trying to blame him for everything. It's too simplistic and it solves nothing.
    2
  5103. 2
  5104. 2
  5105. 2
  5106. 2
  5107. 2
  5108. 2
  5109. 2
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. efc toffee I'll use a bar room brawl to illustrate how alliances are made in a war.  Buddy has too much to drink and starts becoming abusive.  He is asked to leave.  Someone makes a snide remark.  Buddy reacts and punches him in the mouth.  The doorman grabs the guy and tries to throw him out but the guy is too strong.  Another patron, a friend of the guy who was punched, helps him out and together they get the guy out.  The doorman thanks the guy for his help.   This guy feels good about his role in establishing order in the joint.  Later, that night, the doorman goes home, gets into a fight with his girlfriend and puts her in the hospital.  Should the guy still have helped the doorman?  The doorman's obviously a douche and of course the answer is yes.  It was under the circumstances.   Hitler posed the greater threat to the allies.  They had to deal with the bigger threat, first and the circumstances of the moment, just like the bar brawl I just described. As for the dropping of the two bombs on Japan, one has to take into consideration what was happening at that moment.  The allies had been involved in six years of the most devastating war in history.  They had to fight Hitler until they were a couple of blocks from his bunker.  It was a fight to the bitter end.  Japan was showing that they were going to do the same.  Kamikaze fighters was a strong indication of their determination.  The allies had no idea on how long a ground war in Japan would take and how many lives would be lost.  A war weary world wanted it over with and almost everyone in the allied world reacted with joy when those bombs prompted Japan's surrender.  Had you been a part of the allies at the time, you'd quite likely, have felt the great relief that the vast majority felt.  Was it right?  War never is.  It did, however, prompt the Japanese emperor to over ride his generals and declare a surrender.  It is arrogant and unfair to judge what they did when you didn't live in the times they had to live through. 
    1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. Of course those images showing an oblate earth are images and not the real thing. They're done that way as an exaggeration to show how the earth is not a perfect sphere. In reality, those difference only amount to 42 miles out of 25,000 miles, a difference so small in its relationship that it's not detectable with the naked eye when looking at the composite images of the earth or the pictures taken during the moon landings. It isn't nearly as oblate as depicted in those images. It's done that way for educational purposes to show exactly where the shapes are actually different. The reality isn't nearly as exaggerated. I've already explained that to you once. It's not that hard a concept to understand. I watched that video, or most of it, that you recommended. It's full of inaccuracies and fallacies. He has no idea on the properties of gravity and how it works on falling objects or a plane. A carpenter's level always works to the gravitational centre of the earth and that's exactly how a plane works. It's engines maintain a constant speed to maintain altitude because gravity will keep it at the exact same distance to the gravitational centre. Decrease that speed an gravity will pull it down and the flaps will have to be moved to maintain altitude. A plane does not have to correct itself to follow the curve of the earth. Gravity does that for the plane as long as it maintains a certain speed and no steering mechanisms are changed. I do not see the sun getting smaller until it reaches a vanishing point in the far north. What the sun does is reach its highest point a little lower every day until it is so low it no longer clears the horizon. Everyone of us that has ever been to the Arctic will tell you that's what happens. The sun does not get to the size of a star before vanishing completely. That has never been observed. There are a lot of good Christians that know the earth is round. Believing in God and a round earth isn't mutually exclusive and saying that denying a flat earth is an attempt to discredit a God is ridiculous. You can get a decent telescope and point it at Jupiter and watch that planet rotate on its' axis and see moons orbiting around it. Why is this planet different than the earth. The crescent moon doesn't work if the moon is flat either. Also, it seems a little disingenuous to call all evidence of a round earth lies and CGIs and accept any prove of a flat earth as fact. That's a little self serving and no way to prove a point.
    1
  5136. Are you really that thick that you can't understand the difference between a perfect sphere and one that's just a little imperfect? 42 miles difference out of 25,000 miles. That's 0.168 percent of the size. Not a big deal. That's all they're saying. It's not quite a perfect sphere. So to demonstrate the imperfection they sometimes have an exaggerated illustration to show where that imperfection lies. However, when looking at a composite image of the earth, that slight difference is undetectable. They're making a statement of accuracy. Wow....how can this seem so baffling? Once again, I'm going to have to explain this to you. The satellites, in spite of being in space, are too close to take a full shot of the earth. Remember my example of taking a single complete picture of a house standing 5 feet away from it? Have you even tried to visualize what this entails? It cannot be done because you're to close to the house. A satellite in space cannot take a full picture of the earth because the earth is too close. The only way they can show a picture is a composite, a CGI. You're being deliberately obtuse in repeating this "how come it's a CGI image?" question. There is no satellite far enough away to take a full picture of the earth. You don't have to believe it but at least quit pretending that you don't get this simple concept. No one was around to see how the moon was formed. Maybe God did create it. Who really knows? However, they have designed computer simulations and found a scenario that works and can explain how it could have happened. Science knows that it may not be that way but thus far, it has been the most likely scenario to explain its existence. They will leave this as the most likely explanation unless someone can show, using math and science, a more likely explanation. Once again, you don't have to believe it but your incredulity isn't enough to refute it and you must be intelligent enough to understand how and why this theory is being presented. They have observed all the planets in our solar system along with their moons and they're all basically spherical. They have discovered 715 exoplanets, planets outside our solar system, and they're also round. Yet, for some inexplicable reason, earth, isn't a sphere. It's flat. Every other celestial body observed is a sphere but not earth. Well, isn't that odd. A flat earth doesn't explain gravity or any of its properties. It doesn't explain why all those moons keep going around Saturn, Jupiter, Mars Neptune or Uranus. You don't have to believe that it happens but a half decent telescope in your back yard and you can watch it happen for yourself. But of course, the natural rules of nature don't apply to earth, just everything else cause the earth is so special. Of course, the government and NASA and the Illuminati and the elite don't want us to know that the earth is flat because if we knew that we'd all revolt and worship God and quit our jobs and refuse to pay our bills and....I'm not really sure why it's so important that we believe the earth to be round. It's all some kind of ruse for some nefarious purpose. Satan has to be behind it all. Another question I have is about my TV satellite dish. Why is it I have to make sure it's pointed to an exact location in the sky to pick up a TV image? My neighbour has to have his pointed at the exact same location. One of those imaginary satellites that NASA is lying about putting up there? Is that what I'm trying to locate when I'm zeroing in on that exact spot in the sky? I'm going to have to reiterate my explanation of why all images from NASA, the European space agency, the Russian space program, the Chinese,Indian and Japanese space satellites can't show a complete picture of the earth. All those satellites, from all those countries are too close to the earth to take a full picture of the earth. The only way they can show the entire planet is to form a composite picture, a CGI. It's either that or every country that has a satellite and every university in the world, every book, science magazine in every library have all conspired to fool us because they all worship Satan or the lizard people or something. All pilots and co-pilots, shipping companies, surveyors....all in on it. And you, the smart guy that you are, can spot how they are lying. I'm still not sure why they would do all this lying. Perhaps you could explain it to me. How is it to their advantage that some dumb factory worker, like me, believes that the earth is round? How does that benefit anyone? If nothing else, explain that to me.
    1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. +veganath When, in all of human history, in all of the history of every living thing, has anyone or thing escaped the inevitability of their death? Ever. I can't think of one The one thing doctors and pharma companies know for a fact is that there will always be lots of customers. Cure them of one thing, they'll be back for another reason. If you don't cure them and they die, they're not coming back. They've lost a customer. If you live, you'll be back. There's no escape. I've got nothing against people smoking pot. However, what does this Rick Simpson have to lose with his claims. He's not forced to do any tests, has no requirements that he must meet, no meetings with the FDA or drug administrations in other countries, has no set dosage requirements, has no idea what component of marijuana is the deciding factor in curing cancer, no idea of the pathology of specific cancers and how that agent acts on it. He's got nothing except some anecdotes about how buddy got cancer and started a pot treatment and is now cured. I've got mine, too. A good friend has been smoking pot for over 30 years now and he's dying....dying of cancer. How is it going to cure what it even couldn't prevent? I'm not saying that pot isn't useful in alleviating the horrible symptoms of cancer which could have a positive effect on stopping its progress. I'm pretty sure it does. However, to advise some one to not see his doctor and follow Simpson's "cure" is irresponsible and self serving. Use yourself as a guinea pig if you want but don't sacrifice others because of a personal opinion.
    1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191. 1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272.  @JohnEusebioToronto  Slavery existed for THOUSANDS OF YEARS. People act as if this was so new phenomena that just happened to occur in the US about 200 years ago and Americans embraced it as the rest of the world looked on in complete disbelief at a brand new idea called "slavery". In fact, the idea the slavery was wrong, THAT was the brand new idea. That slavery should be abolished was something that had never been entertained before and Lee, like so many others, were wrestling with a new concept. That's what you and so many others fail to consider. You could have fought for the Confederacy, had you lived in those times and had your up bringing and life experiences been different. You're taking the you of today and pretending that the virtuous "you" was the one that would transcend all time and circumstance and that you would have been on the side of goodness and righteousness no matter when or where you existed. What I'm trying to tell you is that just the fact that you're so filled with animosity shows that your virtuousness isn't from your heart but from your own narcissistic view on how wonderful you are. You would never consider putting yourself in Robert E. Lee's shoes and see life from his perspective. Your entire comment thread participation is more about yourself than it is about understanding and forgiveness. You NEED Lee to be that villain because you NEED yourself to be the hero, the kind one who's only objective is love and understanding. Yet, you display none of this. The only reason that you don't put yourself in Lee's shoes because you can't do that without having to shed some of the high opinions you have of yourself and you won't EVER do that.
    1
  5273.  @JohnEusebioToronto  And if you'd have fought for the Confederacy, it might be YOU that would be vilified today. "That General John Eusebio was nothing but a disgusting racist" would be the cry.....but life is much more complex than that. You may have even doubted why you're doing what you're doing but who doesn't do that? What I think is important is not just what you did, but how you got to be in that place to where you ended up at. History isn't just about knowing how to spot the bad guys and to "learn from history", as they say. It's a mirror that you hold in front of you to see that reflection of all that came before you that made you who you are today. That's both the good and the ugly. Not only are you Lee but you're Grant. You're the man looking for the witch and you're the witch being burnt at the stake. You have to know that the potential to be either one is there within you. If you only view it as "This guy good" and "That guy bad", you learn nothing about yourself and humanity. People are so much more than that and I find the idea of vilification extremely dangerous, just as I find the idea of sanctification of heroes to be dangerous. That's why I want to remember Lee as a human being, not just as a Confederate General and a racist, white supremacist and just plain awful. People cared about him. He had family, maybe a dog, neighbours that looked up to him and people that couldn't stand him. We NEED to know him as a man....NOT just as that General that was fought for the wrong side. I learned that from my father who grew up a short distance from the German border during the war. That stupid line in the map, allowed him to be one of the "Good guys". That's it. Had he been born that short distance, to the east of his home town, he would have marched with the Hitler Youth and be forever be stigmatised with the Nazi label. It was that easy. Please try to understand that history is about people....REAL people, who need to be understood. Those people that are tearing down his statues aren't interested in understanding. They're possessed by a hatred, a sanctimonious hatred that may, in the end, may have more casualties than General Lee ever even thought of. It's the evil of good intentions and it's frightening.
    1
  5274.  @JohnEusebioToronto  If you take down the statues and only speak of their evils, you'll never hear about the humanity within them, either. It's the "hate the sin but love the sinner" ideal put forward by some religious leaders. What I'm seeing is hatred and it's coming from those who are obsessed with racism, white privilege, colonialism, sexism and how THEY are the ones combating evil. I know someone else who thought they were combating evil. They were the Inquisition, who saw evil and were going to fix it and became evil themselves. They were the communists, who saw the Bourgeoisie as the evil oppressors and killed women and children, in their belief that once they were gone, the world would be better. What I see, right now, are self righteous do gooders, knowing deep in their hearts, that if only those evil doers were gone, destroyed and controlled, the world would be a better place and they're tearing the country apart. My nephew, a factory worker, had to go to a meeting, that told him and his co-workers that they were part of an oppressive system and that they had to change who they were to make for a better workplace and world. It reminded me of going to church and the preacher telling us how evil we were and how we must repent to be saved. He told me that a lot of his co-workers were resentful and felt as if this guy had no right to make assumptions about their character or intentions. This is what all this is doing and is about. "White fragility". How we're all guilty and you'd better follow the rules, say the right things, don't use the intersectional swear words or the "God" of Equity will get you fired or worse. They're fixing the world through vilification and hatred and it's not going to work. In fact, it's killing people as we speak.
    1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278.  @JohnEusebioToronto  You really DO want to fight, don't you. All right then. What party supported the KKK. THE DEMOCRATS. They were against the black vote and many of the KKK leadership were also high in the Democrat party. The KKK formed to prevent blacks from voting Republican in the south. Blacks voted Republican because they were the ones that freed them, gave them full citizenship and then gave them the vote. The first 30 plus black Congressman were all Republicans. When Republican Teddy Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington to the White House for supper, it was Democrats who were enraged. The KKK didn't rise in the twenties....they re-emerged. The KKK started after the Civil War. Then, in the fifties in sixties, when blacks were fighting for Civil Rights, it was Democrats that fought against it. It was a Democrat governor that refused to integrate schools in Little Rock, Arkansas. It was Democrat Governor, George Wallace, who cried "Segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" in the sixties. I remember it like it was yesterday. 80% Republicans supported Civil Rights, 70% Democrats opposed it. Guess who wants to repeal the State Civil Right's Act in California? The Democrats. Guess who supports Blacks only graduations at Harvard....the new segregation? The Democrats. Guess who supports blacks only dorms at universities.....the Dems. Who's against school choice for inner city kids....you know who. Yet they send their kids to the best schools in the country. Who lied about Nick Sandman and ignored the slanders of the Black Jewish Israelites? Who lied about Jussie Smollett and his MAGA country story? Who lied about about "hands up, don't shoot"? Who withheld the body cam footage of George Floyd? Who said that Antifa and the riots are a myth? Who couldn't wait to use the incident in Kenosha to their advantage? Who holds the "deporter-in-chief" to near sainthood? Who refuses to acknowledge the horrific crime rates in the inner city? Who wants to defund the police and then pretends the burgeoning crime rates aren't happening? You want to see all the negatives and I've held off. I want to see healing...you want to fight, vilify, use hate when it suits you, deflect and ignore when it doesn't. I want to promote healing. You just want to fight some more. The riots, the destruction, the anger, the hate....you want to perpetuate it. You won't reach out in friendship. NOOO. HATE. MORE HATE. "Them deplorables" don't deserve your time. You're so filled with self righteousness that you can't see the destructive forces that are being unleashed in the name of your hatred. Worse.....you can't see that Trump will be re-elected because the peace relative peace that was descending on the country 20 years ago is being disrupted by left wing rhetoric calling everything that walks racist and white supremacists. Who would even call conservative black people the most vile names. Names that I wouldn't even repeat on this comment thread. What's happening in the US right now makes me sick to me stomach and you're displaying a symptom of what's causing the violence. I'm almost 70 years old and I've never seen hate like I'm seeing now, as I am from those who act like you do. Oh yeah.....the Democrat Convention, in 1924, was called the "Klanbake" as KKK supporters fought Catholics and Jews for control of the Democrat party. It all culminated in a cross burning. You wanted truth....here you go.
    1
  5279. 1
  5280. @Winterhold Guard This is confusing. She can't answer because it isn't a biology question but biology has nothing to do with gender even though a woman is an adult female. This, to me, is exactly how the left obscures language and even reality. No one talked like this 30 years ago. I don't even remember it 10 years ago. It's a socially constructed reality where how a person feel becomes the THEIR reality. It's all subjective, dependent on their feelings at the moment and if I don't allow them their reality, I'm a bigot, a horrible person and must be silenced. To question it is violence, but silence is violence also because I'm refusing to validate their personal reality. It's exactly how I felt when I was a teenager and my pastor was pressuring me to take my "Confession of Faith". Say the words or you're not one of us, he insisted. The members of the church backed him up so I left the church. Now, I have different words that that I have to say. I have to acknowledge my white privilege. I have to change the concept of what a woman is even though it was the concept held by all for most of my life. Gender meant one of 2 options....male or female but now it's basically limitless and, like I said, if I don't believe it, I'm a bigot, a horrible person, right wing and must verbally agree or I will be ostracised, cancelled and yelled at. This is a free country and if you want to believe something......fine. That's what freedom is about. Just don't TELL me that I have to regurgitate what someone says, whether they want me to say that they're some obscure gender or to repeat the Lord's Prayer. It's my right to question your beliefs without being socially pressured to comply.
    1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291.  HMR B  He didn't say the issue was solved. He said that there has been a negotiated halt to missile and nuclear testing and there was. There was no claim that all issues between them were now resolved. That's simply not true. Trump is a bombastic character and says a lot of stupid things. That doesn't negate the fact that he's gotten further with the North Koreans than any American president in over 65 years. Things are far from perfect and he basically said that in this interview but things are better now than they were a year ago. That's what is important. Like it or not, Trump is a large part of the easing of tensions in that area and both South Korea and Japan are breathing a lot easier now than a year ago when missiles were setting off air raid sirens in Japan and S. Korea. His saying that he'd own the shutdown wasn't the end of the deal or that he'd lost. He shut the government down, just like he said he would and they negotiated further after he reopened the government. So, he wasn't defeated in that discussion. If he'd been defeated, there would not have been a shutdown and subsequent negotiations. He still building sections of the wall where the border patrols feel it's most needed. After discussion with the patrol leaders and engineers, he found that there are natural barriers that wouldn't need to have walls. This is wild country that a person from a country like the Netherlands couldn't even imagine. It's that wild that there are people dying trying to cross into the US from exposure and lack of water. It's not like a hike in the countryside of Drenthe or Friesland, where my family is originally from.
    1
  5292.  @istvanglock7445  No other president has EVER sat in a talk with any of the three Kims. Singapore was the very first time that happened. Trump now has sat down in face to fact talks, twice now. Unprecedented, no matter how one wants to look at it. We don't know what the North Koreans will do, but only a war hawk would be against negotiating for a peaceful resolution between North Korea and the US. Anyone who expected Mexico to sign a check to Trump in order to build a wall is just plain delusional. I just told my wife that I'm buying her a new car and that you, Istvan Glock, is going to pay for it. Does that make you obligated to pay for it? Of course not and neither is Mexico. It was just a nonsensical election campaign game and the only ones who took it seriously were people like you. It's easy to say that the deal with Canada and Mexico are bad deals for the US. It's another to prove it. I can say the moon is made of cheddar cheese. Claims are useless. Try giving a few facts. Also, there have been huge trade deficits with China for years. Only the most obtuse would say that this is a good thing and nothing should be done about it. The only reason you're saying anything is that you don't like Trump. You wouldn't support any initiative he suggests only for the reason that you don't like him. It doesn't matter how good or bad it is. You deal in the politics of personality......not in the politics of what is helpful to the people. It's not the issues you care about. It's your hatred of Trump. She was a part of the US participation on that fund. The point being this. Is this a good idea or not? Once again, you're not asking that question. Why? Because, apparently, for you, that's not the issue. You'll criticise it because Ivanka Trump was involved and her husband signed the bill pledging US support. You'd stand against it for one reason only. You hate Trump. The politics of personality being, once again, the driving force.
    1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321. 1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324. 1
  5325. 1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328. 1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336. 1
  5337. 1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. 1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368. 1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. 1
  5372. 1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384. 1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388. 1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408.  @illbeyourmonster3591  You've completely misinterpreted what I've said. I'm saying that their personality type is such that they don't even understand how this could be happening. The cows have to be milked, that roof has to be shingled, that customer is looking for a new home, that's what they're doing and thinking about every waking moment. When they get together, they talk about their jobs, their businesses and how one's line of work leads into someone else's line of work. They're surprised and a little disdainful of those who don't look at a productive life the same way they do. When left wingers get together, the topic will always regress into complaining about the productive people, the conservatives. However, they don't see the products that the conservative types are producing. They see the fruits of their labour, the money that they're earning as a reward. That reward is the source of envy for the leftie. They sit and commiserate with one another and then plot how to fight the right wing, after all, they have the time to do just that, not like the right winger, who's too busy producing to sit around and be envious of others. It's not that they can't be bothered. It's that they're too busy to fully comprehend the danger until it could be too late. The individualistic drive is their greatest strength but can also be a weakness in that this drive leaves them with no time to see what is going on outside of the immediate problems of everyday life. The left becomes a part of the collective because they're too lazy to be an individual. The individualist is too busy with life to even think about collective ideologies. It's the nature of the conservative. However, threaten the success of their personal goals and achievements and they'll be quite the formidable opponent.
    1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415.  @jmswillow5969  Every where I went, they were called migrants. Nowhere have I read that they were undergoing a legal immigration process. They came to the border, according to every report that I've seen, and then claimed refugee status. If you have information to the contrary, present it. So what did DeSantis do? Did he send his henchmen to Texas and place them under arrest? Did he FORCE them on those 2 planes under threat? If so....that's a major crime and all those involved should be facing charges. SERIOUS charges. I'm just curious on how they rounded them up. Maybe you could fill us in on how exactly it was done. Of course they're human beings. These same "human beings" were forced to sleep under bridges because there were so many of them, that there was no where else to put them, as they were being processed. That was under the Biden watch. He didn't increase border security even though we were in the midst of a pandemic. A lot of American citizens were forced to stay in their homes, lost their jobs due to mandates, yet these migrants were allowed in because the border is so porous. The inhabitants of Martha's Vineyard aren't the only ones complaining about bused migrants. Mayor Eric Adams, of New York, has been quite vocal in his dismay that 36,000 migrants have been sent to his city. Let's see....a little of 50 migrants sent to a resort for the elites....BIG ruckus. 36,000 sent to New York....oh well. They have to go somewhere. But then, the officials in New York transport them to northern New York and drop them off so they can use the entry point at Roxham Road to enter into Quebec, Canada. These are "human beings". 50 migrants were found in a trailer, DEAD, because they were locked inside. They were human beings too, yet I've heard more about the 50 migrants that were sent to the playground of our elites than I have these unfortunates who died a horrible death at the hands of those who took their money to get them into the United States. I'm seeing some extremely selective outrage, based more on politics than a true empathy for human suffering.
    1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435.  @sbor2020  We did the same to the Nazis and allies in WW2. They started a war, and the Allies destroyed Germany because the leaders, especially Hitler, refused to surrender. On Oct 7/23, you know what happened. Hamas instigated a surprise attack on innocent civilians, killing over 1200 of them and kidnapping more. Women, children and even babies were targeted. Then they scurried back to Gaza to wait for the Israelis to retaliate. If you start a fight, don't start whining when you start to lose. Hamas and the people of Gaza celebrated the brutality of Oct 7/23 with pride and glee. Israel had no choice to believe that if they did nothing, this type of attack would happen again. It says a lot about those who defend Hamas when they absolutely REFUSE to acknowledge that brutal attack on Oct 7/23. Hamas started it. Gazans chanted "From the river to the sea" Why wouldn't Israelis believe that, if they could, Hamas would do the same to everyone in Israel? To use YOUR description, the military conquest of the 7th century was driven by religious ideals. The conquered lost their cultures and forced to submit to Islam, not necessarily convert but to accept Islamic rule over them. That is a dramatic shift in culture and it was forced through military strength. However, in Israel, the 1.7 million Muslims are free to go to Mosque and worship. Even the Dome of the Rock was set aside as an Islamic holy site even though it's also the site of the ancient Temples of the Jews. So how does that suppress the culture of the Israeli Muslims? Gaza, as of 2005, didn't have ONE single Jew living there. The Gazans could have celebrated their culture to their hearts content but it's not enough for them. Israel must submit to Islam and accept Islamic rule or else. Unfortunately for them, they don't have the military might to enforce it.
    1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445.  @CD-vb9fi  If dirty politicians are all that you have and the media doesn't report the dirt of their favoured side, then what does the average citizen do? Sit back and do nothing? Start a riot? Maybe even a revolution? Or do you decide on the issues? I'm too old to be out on the streets so I do what I can. There's been war in the Middle East for almost 20 years and I think it's time it's over. Trump wants to do that and so I support it. I'm not about to say that Trump is dirty so I won't support that effort and allow the our participation to continue. I have to deal with what I have NOT with what I wish was there. Right now it's Trump and Biden. That's what I have to choose from so I look at the issues. One is the war. Another is that the UN and WHO have said that strict international lockdowns may cause severe poverty and the deaths of millions through starvation. I believe that they are correct so I don't support the Democrat obsessions with lockdowns. Again, I don't say let the people starve because I don't like Trump. I work with what I have as a voter and citizen. I don't like the Defund the police movement. Once again, I have to support Trump on this one. I don't care for Critical Race theory, another movement that's coming from the left. I have to support Trump's call to ban it from all government agencies. I will not give up because I don't like either side. Things still have to be done and I'm not going to wait until we have a saintly figure in the White House. I'll be waiting a long time before that happens.
    1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. 1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537.  @VioletDeathRei  The thing is, my family suffered as a result of the Nazi ideology. My parents grew up in wartime Netherlands and my mother nearly starved to death because of the callousness of the Nazi occupation. My uncle spent time at the Jewish detention camp in Westerbork and then was sent to a POW camp to sit out the war. The only reason he was sent there is because he lived a few kilometres away and was spared the fate of the Jewish detainees that were there because he wasn't Jewish. However, he saw them being packed into tiny railway cars so they couldn't even sit. It bothered him all his life. However, that was from the perspective of growing up in Holland. What if my dad had been born 100 kilometres to the west in Germany. Then he'd have been old enough to be in the Hitler youth. One could say that his righteousness was just a luck of geography. Without a doubt, the Nazis did some horrific things. That's not what I've been contemplating. It's my contention that the wrong things done is not a German thing but part of the human condition. That if we don't understand that about ourselves, that we will repeat the atrocities in the future. You don't stop evil by pointing fingers. You stop it by knowing yourself and what you're capable of under the right circumstances. That's why I'm against the posturing of the left that accuses everyone of fascism and evil even while they're quite enthusiastically committing their own violence and excusing it in the name of the common good. Nazis did that. They believed that what they were doing was the right thing for their people and that they stood above the rest. Antifa believes the same of themselves and in so doing are quite willing to commit violence for the "good" cause. No self reflection on what they're doing. In fact, they refuse to talk to anyone that might point out the flaws in their behaviour and will only live within their own little bubble or echo chamber.
    1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548.  Terry Tater  He isn't blaming her. He's saying that we all have to change our ways to affect change and she won't address that. Everyone has to change and it's not going be easy. Polluting may not be a status thing but the accoutrements to status do pollute. Why are so many still buying gas powered cars instead of electric cars? Why are our homes so huge, with rec rooms and added bars and bathrooms for every bedroom? A TV in every room, every electrical gadget imaginable? Why do we insist that our lawns be immaculate and if it isn't we face fines? Why the trips to the tropics in the winter and the weekend jaunts into the mountains or the cottage. These are status symbols and a huge percentage of us in the west make it a part of our lifestyle. Once again, instead of blaming others, why don't we look into ourselves and take responsibility for our own actions. Everyone of those things I mentioned aren't necessary and I'm only touching the tip of the iceberg. The average person won't even cut back 10 percent in their lifestyle. That would be monstrous and would be the impetus for a new economic base that would be directed at this new way of living. Nope. Blame someone else as you turn up the air conditioner and watch a sporting event on your BIG screen TV and listen to the kid next door earn a few bucks by mowing your lawn on your new fancy riding lawn mower. Don't forget the weed whipper. Need one of those too. That's the life he's referring to. You can't blame those 50 companies if the people insist of this as their lifestyle.
    1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. 1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1
  5590. 1
  5591. 1
  5592. 1
  5593. 1
  5594. 1
  5595. 1
  5596. 1
  5597. 1
  5598. 1
  5599. 1
  5600. 1
  5601. 1
  5602. 1
  5603. 1
  5604. 1
  5605. 1
  5606. 1
  5607. 1
  5608. 1
  5609. 1
  5610. 1
  5611. 1
  5612. 1
  5613. 1
  5614. 1
  5615. 1
  5616. 1
  5617. 1
  5618. 1
  5619.  @amyh9512  We're concerned that kids are being fooled into becoming part of an ideology that may convince them to take harmful drugs and want to surgeries to be performed that would amputate perfectly healthy body parts. YOUNG kids.....under the age of 16. Tavistock, England's largest gender clinic, reported a 4000% increase in referrals in 10 years. That's a 4 THOUSAND percent increase. That would be an impossible number, especially when the vast majority of them are teenage girls. Transgender girls had been extremely rare before 2010, now the vast majority of them are girls seeking to become male. Tavistock, a publicly financed clinic as been forced to close, by the government, due to almost 1000 lawsuits being filed against them. Sweden is now questioning their own policies when a 15 year transitioner was diagnosed with severe osteoporosis, due to the puberty blockers that she had been prescribed. There are lawsuits now being litigated in the United States. as well. Chloe Cole, who went through the surgery at 15, is now suing, because her teachers and medical advisors, all told her about the benefits of transgender surgery and never ONCE mentioned the side effects. These medical "professionals" even told her parents that she likely commit suicide if they didn't affirm her gender claims....outright emotional blackmail. I went to a high school that had around 1200 kids. There was no talk of trans kids back then. Yet, I never heard of ONE suicide in all the 4 years I attended that school. NOT ONE. According to the "experts" suicide is a real danger if their gender is affirmed....yet no suicides in my entire school that I attended. However, people like YOU, don't want to err on the side of caution. Get out the saw and scalpel and hacking away. It'll be fine, they say, while they keep experimenting like some 21st century Mengele. These are children. Leave them be until they're old enough to make decisions on their own. Bigotry isn't the answer to EVERY issue, in spite of what you wish it to be. It's just a cheap way to avoid having a REAL conversation on the issue.
    1
  5620. 1
  5621. 1
  5622. 1
  5623. 1
  5624. 1
  5625. 1
  5626. 1
  5627. 1
  5628. 1
  5629. 1
  5630. 1
  5631. 1
  5632. 1
  5633. 1
  5634. 1
  5635. 1
  5636. 1
  5637. 1
  5638. 1
  5639. 1
  5640. 1
  5641.  YouTubeDweller8008  That's exactly it. We have to live in a free country in order to be successful and that's where I'm talking from. This video is from the US and I will bet you that a lot of those who are attacking Ivanka Trump live in the US. That's the myth that they want us to believe....that we can't do it on our own. Our education system is filled with those types and our governments, both here in Canada and the US are ever rapidly taking those freedoms away from us. That's why I'm so insistent that we can do it in our 2 countries. It's because of the socialist types, and there's a lot of them in both our countries, who deny that it's possible. They want everything to be run by the government and the more that happens, the more our freedoms erode away. Lose that freedom, the freedom that we had through our recent history, the worse it will become for those who want to work for our success. There's one thing that I know. We live in the greatest countries that this planet has ever seen and we're destroying them with our "there outta be a law" mentality and it's all in the name of a false sense of safety and security. I've been to Cuba. I know how impossible it is for those unfortunate people and there's only one reason for it. It's government control of every aspect of their lives. We will end up that way, just like Venezuela did. The once great state of California is being led down that path by the elites of big tech, celebrities, academics and bureaucrats. It's happening here in Canada, too but we can't give up. It's becoming harder and harder to do but we can still turn it around. However, if we quit working for personal success and insist that our government has to look after us, we will lose it all.
    1
  5642.  @Aim54Delta  You make some good points but it doesn't deter from the fact that anyone can become a millionaire. In fact, I think that you've proved it. However, financial success isn't just about a bloated bank account. I'm retired, fairly well off but nowhere near a millionaire. It took hard work and recognising opportunities and making wise decisions. I don't count myself as being anywhere close to being a failure. In fact, I've made bad decisions, lost everything and then built it back up. Had I averted those bad decisions, I might well be a millionaire but that was never important to me. However, we do have a culture that's conducive to failure. The worst is the victim mentality but there are others. We seem to be in times where success must be instant. The brand new car, the big house, great vacations, a pool in the back yard, all the best toys. Those things didn't matter to me. I bought a small house, used cars, put off those great vacations till I retired, didn't bother with a pool or buy any of the nice toys that so many that I worked with wanted so badly. I stayed away from excess drinking, the drugs, all the vices that people seem to live for. I'm not saint but I know where to draw the line and I would not give up my future for a great time today. Sacrifice when you're young and the odds are that you won't be a millionaire but you will have a good life. I see those who had the same opportunities that I had and are now senior citizens with not a cent to their names. They're now living for their government pension and spend the last 2 weeks of every month looking forward to pension day. I didn't want to live that way and all it took was the will to not have it happen. Could it happen? Of course. Our economy could collapse but that's out of my hands. I can only do what I can.
    1
  5643. 1
  5644. 1
  5645. 1
  5646. 1
  5647. 1
  5648. 1
  5649. 1
  5650. 1
  5651. 1
  5652. 1
  5653. 1
  5654. 1
  5655. 1
  5656. 1
  5657. 1
  5658. 1
  5659. 1
  5660. 1
  5661. 1
  5662. 1
  5663. 1
  5664. 1
  5665. 1
  5666. 1
  5667. 1
  5668. 1
  5669. 1
  5670. 1
  5671. 1
  5672. 1
  5673. 1
  5674. 1
  5675. 1
  5676. 1
  5677. 1
  5678. 1
  5679. 1
  5680. 1
  5681. 1
  5682. 1
  5683. 1
  5684. 1
  5685. 1
  5686. 1
  5687. 1
  5688. 1
  5689. 1
  5690. 1
  5691. 1
  5692. 1
  5693. 1
  5694. 1
  5695. 1
  5696. 1
  5697. 1
  5698. 1
  5699. 1
  5700. 1
  5701. 1
  5702. 1
  5703. 1
  5704. 1
  5705. 1
  5706. 1
  5707. 1
  5708. 1
  5709. 1
  5710. 1
  5711. 1
  5712. 1
  5713. 1
  5714. 1
  5715. 1
  5716. 1
  5717. 1
  5718. 1
  5719. 1
  5720. 1
  5721. 1
  5722. 1
  5723. 1
  5724. 1
  5725. 1
  5726. 1
  5727. 1
  5728. 1
  5729. 1
  5730. 1
  5731. 1
  5732. 1
  5733. 1
  5734. 1
  5735. 1
  5736. 1
  5737. 1
  5738. 1
  5739. 1
  5740. 1
  5741. 1
  5742. 1
  5743. 1
  5744. 1
  5745. 1
  5746. 1
  5747. 1
  5748. 1
  5749. 1
  5750. 1
  5751. 1
  5752. 1
  5753. 1
  5754. 1
  5755. 1
  5756. 1
  5757. 1
  5758. 1
  5759. 1
  5760. 1
  5761. 1
  5762. 1
  5763. 1
  5764. 1
  5765. 1
  5766. 1
  5767. 1
  5768. 1
  5769. 1
  5770. 1
  5771. 1
  5772. 1
  5773. 1
  5774. 1
  5775. 1
  5776. 1
  5777.  @mosaif_mudawi  First of all, Mohammed the Prophet, was a military leader. That doesn't exactly say "peace" as the military is used as a violent arm for many purposes, including imposing peace. Mohammed took his military and used them to spread Islam all through the Arabian Peninsula. After he died, the new leaders took that army and expanded into the greater Middle East. First the Sassanid Empire, which they defeated and then onto the Byzantine Empire in which they weren't quite as successful. But they turned towards Egypt and then North Africa. When the were done that, they jumped into Spain, winning numerous battles until they controlled the entire Iberian Peninsula. However, that wasn't enough. They crossed the Pyrenees, into France, and were defeated at Tours by Charles Martel and retreated into Spain. They also attacked Malta and Sicily and even sacked Rome. Muslim armies then went into Central Asia, where the nations of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Takikistan and others now exist and headed east into Pakistan. They eventually made it into India, Afghanistan and western China, defeating the rulers there. The Mogul invasion of India was particularly brutal. Still that wasn't enough. The Ottoman Turks took on the Byzantine Empire and eventually defeated them and transformed the entire region to Islam. However, that wasn't enough. They took on the Austrians and made it all the way into southern Poland and to the gates of Vienna before being turned back. I doubt that I'm being overly hyperbolic when I say that any religion that depends of wars, to expand their faith, isn't was I would call peaceful. Even today, the Middle East has been a trouble spot for wars, with Islamic nations calling for the destruction of Israel and Islamic factions fighting in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, a proxy war between Shia and Sunni Islamic sects led by Saudi Arabia and Iran. If you think that this is peaceful, I'd hate to see what your definition of warlike would mean.
    1
  5778. 1
  5779. 1
  5780. 1
  5781.  @CreekyGuy  Don't start trying to tell me what prayer is all about. I've spent a lifetime in the church. 8 years in a private Christian school that was sponsored by our very fundamentalist Christian church. 5 years of Catechism. Calvinist Cadets for 5 years. Young People's society for 4 years, as a teenager. Prayer before and after every meal and Bible readings after noon and dinner meals. I've read the Bible, cover to cover, TWICE and have read the works of many of the Christian thinkers of the last 1500 years. I understand what prayer is about and why it's important. It's YOU that missing the point. When I said that I can't pray my car to start, when it doesn't, I meant that we can't just leave everything to God. WE have to take action for ourselves, too. God gave us 2 hands and a brain for a reason and it's not just to praise him. It's so we can use our physical assets to better the world around us, the one that He created for us. Yet, I've read over and over, in this comment thread, that we need prayer or that "I'm praying for this country". You can work on some assumption that maybe God wants the car to start and he quite likely does. Do you know how I know that? He gave me the hands and brain to take action, find out why the car didn't start and then use my brain to fix it. It's a 2 way relationship and a big part of it is to go to work and do the best I can to solve it myself. I've already got the help from God that I need. Part of thanking him is to use the gifts that he's already given me to make things better. The biggest part of thanking anyone is the action of using what that person has given me to solve my problem. I can thank my neighbour profusely and repeatedly for lending me his tools but it's false gratitude if I never use them and sit on my couch watching TV all day. That's the same thing with thanking God. It's lame gratitude if all I do is pray. I have to show my gratitude my DOING something with the gifts that He's given me. If I don't, he might just as well made me a turnip. Prayer without action means nothing. Now....how do we go about solving the issues that this country is facing. That's our job and we have to use the tools that God gave us to solve it.
    1
  5782. 1
  5783. 1
  5784. 1
  5785. 1
  5786. 1
  5787. 1
  5788. 1
  5789. 1
  5790. 1
  5791. 1
  5792. 1
  5793. 1
  5794. 1
  5795. 1
  5796. 1
  5797. 1
  5798. 1
  5799. 1
  5800. 1
  5801. 1
  5802. 1
  5803. 1
  5804. 1
  5805. 1
  5806. 1
  5807. 1
  5808. 1
  5809. 1
  5810. 1
  5811. 1
  5812. 1
  5813. 1
  5814. 1
  5815. 1
  5816. 1
  5817. 1
  5818. 1
  5819. 1
  5820. 1
  5821. 1
  5822. 1
  5823. 1
  5824. 1
  5825.  @inigo4937  All I will say is that the coronavirus pandemic, in the way it has manifested itself around the world, is a brand new phenomenon. It's unprecedented in its scope and response. When dealing with the unknown, you're going to see mistakes. Party politics didn't have to be an issue in the US. Unfortunately, it was the Democrats who started to lay the blame on Trump. "He called it a hoax". "He's xenophobic". That was a Democrat call. Then, when a stimulus package was presented, it was the Democrats that wanted to add items that had NOTHING to do with the virus. Equity in corporate boards? That's going to solve the Covid economic problems? Increased emission standards for airlines? Money for PBS? That's politics and nothing else. Had the Democrats shown more concern for beating the Covid crisis instead of using it as a platform for societal change, maybe they'd have greater support from the people. Instead of yelling "Trump's fault", they stood beside him, offering support and suggestions, they'd have shown themselves to be the advocate of the people, instead of trying to argue every word, phrase and utterance out of the president's mouth. I've been saying this since 2016. The Democrats are the architects of their own political problems. I don't like it but it's the facts. Anyone, not willing to sit down and ask where they could have gone wrong, will NEVER solve their problems. Admitting that there is a problem is the first step to solving it. The simplest of axioms that the Democrats refuse to face.
    1
  5826. 1
  5827. 1
  5828. 1
  5829. 1
  5830. 1
  5831. 1
  5832. 1
  5833. 1
  5834. 1
  5835. 1
  5836. 1
  5837. 1
  5838. 1
  5839. 1
  5840. 1
  5841. 1
  5842. 1
  5843. 1
  5844. 1
  5845. 1
  5846. 1
  5847. 1
  5848. 1
  5849. 1
  5850. 1
  5851. 1
  5852. 1
  5853. 1
  5854. 1
  5855. 1
  5856. 1
  5857. 1
  5858. 1
  5859. 1
  5860. 1
  5861. 1
  5862. 1
  5863. 1
  5864. 1
  5865. 1
  5866. 1
  5867. 1
  5868. 1
  5869. 1
  5870. 1
  5871. 1
  5872. 1
  5873. 1
  5874. 1
  5875. 1
  5876. 1
  5877. 1
  5878. 1
  5879. 1
  5880. 1
  5881. 1
  5882. 1
  5883. 1
  5884. 1
  5885. 1
  5886. 1
  5887. 1
  5888. 1
  5889. 1
  5890. 1
  5891. 1
  5892. 1
  5893. 1
  5894. 1
  5895. 1
  5896. 1
  5897. 1
  5898. 1
  5899. 1
  5900. 1
  5901. 1
  5902. 1
  5903. 1
  5904. 1
  5905. 1
  5906. 1
  5907. 1
  5908. 1
  5909. 1
  5910. 1
  5911. 1
  5912. 1
  5913. 1
  5914. 1
  5915. 1
  5916. 1
  5917. 1
  5918. 1
  5919. 1
  5920.  @sleepisthecousinofdeath7395  I've never stated my stance on abortion so you shouldn't be assigning my position for me without having any indication on where I stand. I didn't realise that I was supposed to give my position. I just thought that you're playing word games in an attempt to baffle brains with BS. Pro life advocates place a high value on life, even in the womb. They stand for life, except in extreme circumstances, killing only when necessary, like in a war, for self protection or in the womb when extreme circumstances threatens the life of the mother. It doesn't mean that they're "pro killing" in those extreme circumstances. It, especially, means that they strongly disapprove of abortion as a means of contraception or so the mother can rid themselves of an inconvenient child. Pro life doesn't see a child as inconvenient or unwanted....EVER. Only pro abortion advocates see a child in that manner Now, you can assume that I'm anti abortion. I refuse to kill anyone out of convenience, to maintain a lifestyle, for financial gain or a hatred of others, including a child who's still residing in the womb because I don't like children. If one is responsible for their actions, they will accept what comes their way and make the best of it. If you don't like to take responsibility for your actions, you do whatever's necessary to rid yourself of the results of irresponsible actions and then tell yourself that you did nothing wrong. One loves their neighbour or their child. The other feels that this neighbour, this life growing in their womb, will never feel any love from their mother...that they're incapable of sacrificing to express love of their own child. It's an admission that unconditional love is NOT a part of their lives and they will not allow that child to live if it gets in their way. If they hate their own progeny that much, who else could they rationalise their hate against.
    1
  5921. 1
  5922. 1
  5923. 1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. 1
  5928. 1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933. 1
  5934. 1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. Batosai11489 Who says that logic and reason is the path to Paradise? I don't recall anyone ever saying that. I'm laughing at the idea that a "tribe" of people dedicated to the principles of logic and reason would arrive at the illogical conclusion that to rid the world of illogical and unreasonable people is to kill them all off. Logic dictates that this would be an illogical use of resources and humanity. It also goes against any logic that says that those who do not always use logic are of no use as humans to society. That these people cannot work, love, learn, achieve or contribute to the whole of humanity. That's illogical in itself. In other words, you're asserting that the "logical tribe" will abandon all logic and begin a genocide of the illogical. Everyone uses logic. We abandon logic when they allow emotions to dictate a belief system or a trauma in our lives and we all do it to a certain extent. What would be a logical response to sustained illogical thought is to cultivate a culture of thinking things through, to use the inherent logic we all possess to control our emotional responses in a positive manner. There is no such thing a "logical tribe". There is only logic and reason and how much we choose to use it and where we use it. What you're proposing is an Orwellian attempt to control thought. Logic and reason encourages thought in a free and expressive manner because logic dictates that mistakes are also an inherent human trait and a new train of thought could come from anyone or anywhere because we all think and our thoughts are always trying to assume some sort of order, which again implies logic. If logic and reason are an inherent part of individual human personality, inherently flawed but still present, then we'd be attempting to eliminate those with flawed logic, but it could only manifest itself on specific topics. A person could logically solve a difficult mathematical equation and then illogically stick a needle in his arm that evening with heroin in it. Logical and illogical are within us all. That's why I'm laughing. We'd be killing the entire human race and that's illogical.
    1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957. 1
  5958. 1
  5959. 1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. 1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971. 1
  5972. 1
  5973. 1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. 1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. 1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. 1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. 1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006.  @beejcarson  Actually, I was just going to say that the taxes of Roman times were set by those in power. Today, to an extent, we set our taxes through decisions made through our elected officials. That means that I can advocate for taxation, through representation, in one way and you can advocate in another. The biggest reason that I'm against those taxes is due to the unprecedented spending by the government. No business or household could survive on the spending habits of our present government. Ever increasing deficit spending is a recipe for disaster. Any household that has faced bankruptcy is a testament to that reality. We seen it just recently with the way that Venezuela handled its finances. We're spending our way to disaster and we're blaming the rich instead of ourselves and our expectations that the money supply will last forever if only they'd do their part. Also, I realise the difference between personal and business spending. The rich will just move their assets offshore and you still won't be able to collect their taxes. Their business holdings will become lost in a dizzying array of paper companies that will cost a fortune in bureaucratic spending and the money will become lost, unless the rich guy behaves like Hunter Biden and loses his focus due to self destructive, abusive lifestyles. Increasing taxes won't do a thing to help the situation unless we solve this compulsion to spend our way out of trouble. 'A fool and his money are soon parted'. Our government is acting the fool and since we're all a part of that government, we're ALL acting the fool.
    1
  6007. 1
  6008.  @beejcarson  European nations tried the heavy taxation route in the sixties and seventies. My family is originally from the Netherlands and I remember some of the tax stories that they told me about. Great Britain was in dire financial straits until Margaret Thatcher led with some draconian measures to get it under control. "I'll tax the street (If you try to sit, sit) I'll tax your seat (If you get too cold, cold) I'll tax the heat (If you take a walk, walk) I'll tax your feet" It sums up how the public felt about the taxes in Britain at the time. Also, I reject the idea that because the Republicans don't act responsibly with our tax money, that automatically means that the Democrats will do so. I'm saying that they've BOTH done it and I've said it in my last comment when I said that we have to primary our candidates so we get the ones in place to that we need come election time. That's what I meant when I said that people check the familiar name instead of taking the time to see what they're all about. It's the overblown bureaucracy and politicians of BOTH stripes are a party to it and taking advantage of it. California has the highest taxes by far of all the states. Yet, homelessness is a HUGE problem, real estate and rents are skyrocketing, they have rolling brown outs, the public schools are in terrible shape and for the first time in California history, the population has gone down. Their answer? More taxes. Over taxation was a major contributor to the downfall of the Roman Empire. It handcuffs the individual so what little money he does have must go to life basics. Go back and read the words to the ditty I gave in the first paragraph. It's debilitating to the very soul of a nation. The Democrats aren't solving anything when by increasing spending exponentially they increase taxes the same way. The spending will go the way of spending in California. Nowhere. It'll lines the pockets of bureaucrats, who are the unelected of government and their cronies. California cannot go on like this and the country will face the same problems if they follow their lead.
    1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016.  @kjkitty777  In this case it does matter. The entire case depends on acknowledging that these transgender athletes are biologically male. For that judge to tell the lawyers of those girls, I mean the REAL girls (see how easily it can become confusing), to not use the correct biological terms in their gender description, is to tacitly ignore the reality of the biology. Once the biology is ignored, the science ignored, what are you left with. It certainly isn't logic or science. It's an ideology, no different than any other ideology that refuses to accept the reality of demonstrable facts. This isn't about misgendering. That just muddies up the water. We need basic facts and these 2 are biologically male and should, during this trial, be identified as such in deference to biological fact. It's unfortunate that some find that fact offensive but offense doesn't change those facts. If words are to have any meaning, it must be clearly defined in a court of law in ways that is clear to all, both traditionally and in fact. Also, had you seen the pictures of those two transgender males, while running that race, you'd see why they, most definitely, had the advantage of the other girls. It's no accident that they came in 1/2 in that race and set state records. If you'd watched your daughter lose a chance at a scholarship and see the look of pain on her face because she felt cheated out of that chance, you might see this a little differently. That any of this is taking up precious court time is ridiculous. It, most definitely, has become Bizarro world.
    1
  6017. 1
  6018. 1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024.  @APirateNamedJohn  It's not that argument at all. The argument is this. The Democrats have enacted policies with all kinds of housing and property and environmental restrictions. This has increased housing and energy costs to the point that the average person can barely cope. Small businesses started to lose money and left causing unemployment and an even larger population living under the poverty line. Liberal drug enforcement and needle exchange programs and the good weather attracted addicts and the lack of care for those with mental issues filled the streets with homeless people. Then, with all those issues, they decided that California should now become a sanctuary state. With rents averaging over 2000 bucks a month, they've invited people, with no money, no skills and no prospects to come live in their state. Since the millions that have come aren't going to find work in small towns, they go to the larger cities where housing costs are the highest. This puts even more pressure on housing, increasing rents and putting even more people on the streets. High welfare rates burden the tax base to the bursting point so more small businesses and even big ones feel the pinch and are deciding to leave the state. It's a spiralling situation and the state is doing nothing to stop it. And the California billionaires sit in their mansions and blame everyone else for the policies that they support and shame others into voting for. People are dying on the streets and they vote for a no-straw ban. They believe that they're showing empathy but what they're really doing is placating the guilt they feel for their own good fortune by their displays of virtue and concern....and it's helping no one. Go for a virtual drive through the big cities and see the failures. It's sad that a state that is so rich, squanders it on feel good policies.
    1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. 1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041.  @russk8091  A lack of empathy huh? It isn't the Trump supporters who are promising free health care and education, housing and welfare. It isn't Trump supporters that are offering sanctuary cities and states. These are the promises that are luring these migrants to the US, promises made by Trump detractors, all the while knowing that if those people that they've lured to the US get caught, they will be subject to being detained. They know full well that this has been the law and the policy for decades, even under Obama, but they don't care. Offer more promises, more bait to catch them so they can use them to make political points against Trump. If they're lucky, maybe one of them will even die. That's a real coup in their fight against Trump. Not one of them will ever say to those migrants, please don't make that trip. It's too dangerous for you and especially for the women and children, who are in the greater danger of physical and sexual abuse. Stay home until we can sort out what our new policies will be. Nope, they just increase the bait to lure the migrants to cross the borders and into those detainment camps. That's what I call lack of empathy. I'd never take my child through the perils of a desert and expose them to potential predators and then confined in detentions centres. I'd never encourage anyone to put their children through that. Not the left though. We'll give you more free stuff and if you get caught, we'll express our outrage against a president we don't like. They'll sacrifice their hardship to score political points. That's as cold hearted as it gets.
    1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047.  @Sylvertaco  The enlightenment period took place in the 18th Century, the same century as the writing of the Constitution. It was, in fact, a part of that enlightenment. The enlightenment wasn't a collective slap on the forehead with a "Now, I get it" It was through a long process of which the drafting of the Constitution was a part of. Some might even say the culmination of that enlightenment. "We the People of the United States" That's the preamble to the Constitution. Either those slaves were people or they were not. Nowhere, in the Bible, could the slavers find that justification that the slaves were primitive and it was all a part of God's plan. That was their own rationalisation. The contradiction was that in that argument, they still acknowledged that the slaves were people and the first sentence in the Constitution does not distinguish the race, religion, ethnicity or gender of the "we the people". Those Amendments were added to ensure that the slaves, women and all were included in that preamble, that all were included when it was said "we the people" and it does give equal footing for all. Those Amendments are an assurance of that very first sentence. In reality, they are redundant if you acknowledge the humanity and equality of all. The early Constitution doesn't mention slavery at all so it neither legitimises it or condemns it. For many it was the inconvenient truth that slavery contradicted the very essence of the Constitution and when the Amendments against slavery were made, it was to clarify what they had ignored when the Constitution was written. Many of the founding fathers knew that slavery contradicted what the constitution said but were powerless to enforce it because they needed the support of all 13 colonies to succeed in the rebellion against Britain. The Constitution put the wheels of Abolition in motion and was the very first step towards the freedom of the slaves. Slavery was to old and complex and issue for it to disappear in an afternoon. Ben Franklin wasn't just going to stand up and say. "Slavery is wrong" and all Americans would collectively say "Why hasn't anyone told us this before? It all makes sense now". The seeds were sown in the Constitution and it became more and more apparent from the Constitution and from the religious beliefs of the time that slavery was an affront to the idea of "We the people" or human dignity.
    1
  6048. 1
  6049.  @Sylvertaco  You seem so critical of the Constitution yet you haven't cited one thing of the original text that you would heartily criticise. Not what it doesn't say but what it does say. This was the first attempt at a document to set standards of rule to make a better society and you're disappointed that it wasn't perfect yet you have yet to offer ONE thing that is says that is overtly wrong. Also, most people were illiterate in the year 1500 and the first English Bibles were not in any kind of circulation for over 100 years after that. Before that, the Bibles were in Latin and Greek. Literacy rates were rising as printing presses became more efficient but it still wasn't as if millions of Bibles were being printed every year. It wasn't until 1800 that literate people started to become the majority, in the west and it was at that time slavery was ending, one nation at a time. Yes, the Roman slaves valued the idea of life after death but if God values their lives that much in heaven, how could anyone, as a man, devalue that life on earth. That was the primary idea behind the abolition of slavery. The dignity of human life in heaven and on earth. It wasn't just that the majority were illiterate 300 years ago. It was also the fact that transportation put limits on the circulation of new ideas. A letter could take weeks, even months to be delivered. You're taking the conditions of today and wondering why those people couldn't get it right 300 years ago under conditions that you or I can hardly imagine today. We have better health care, you and I, not the elites, but just average guys in the west, than King George the Third of England had when the American colonies revolted. That is just the tip of the iceberg. They had everyday survival concerns that we never think about today. It's so easy to sit in judgement, lazing on our comfy couch in front of our computer. Maybe a little less moral superiority and a little more humbleness and appreciation of the hardships our ancestors had to live through so we can prattle on about our beloved ideas. Point out, at least one thing in the first Constitution that is blatantly wrong and I'll discuss it. You haven't done it yet.
    1
  6050. 1
  6051.  @Sylvertaco  And yet, you still refuse to mention what was wrong with it without the Amendments. If you took the original Constitution and applied it today, would it legitimise slavery? I say no. The only reason slavery held on was because it existed at the time. Today, that original document has enough to deem slavery unconstitutional. There is nothing in it that allows it. Had slavery not existed in 1776 or ever in American history, no one could institute it today as a new social norm. That original Constitution would be the strongest argument against the idea of creating slavery. The only reason that slavery endured at that time was because it had existed in human history for thousands of years.....not because that original Constitution allowed it. The only reason that the 13th Amendment was necessary was to reinforce what the preamble had already said but in a more specific manner. It stands alone in it's power but it had enormous pressure not to be followed in the spirit in which it was written. However, even if I concede that it wasn't complete, you'd have to honour it as the first real attempt to the concept of human rights. Only the most naive would expect such a revolutionary document or ideals to arrive, fully formed, in perfection, right from the beginning. That original document is the foundation of all that came after. Think of it. Those ideals have never been put to paper in the thousands of years of human civilisation. Thousands of years of human history and you're upset that it took 80 some years to specifically mention slavery. Like I said earlier, so easy to judge from the perspective of today. I'm sure that you wouldn't have been so fully enlightened in those days. To give an example. My dad grew up in the Netherlands, 30 kilometres west of the German border. He had to live through the Nazi occupation and it wasn't easy for him or my family. Yet, he has wondered what his attitude towards those Nazis would have been had he been born 50 km. east of where he was born. Would he have joined the Hitler youth, raised is arm in salute to the Fuhrer and marched to the glory of the Fatherland? He says he likely would have, just as he hated the Nazis because he was born on the other side of that border. You're judging the founding fathers from a vantage point that they didn't have and then vilifying them for the flawed people that they were. No nuance, no understanding, no appreciation on what it took to write that revolutionary document. We're not as good as we like to think we are. At least try to admire what they were trying to accomplish and give them and there work the admiration it deserves instead of finding fault with what you perceive as imperfections.
    1
  6052. 1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061.  @rebjiii  At least I've used actual quotes from Jesus. All you've done is make accusations and demonstrated your own feelings of superiority over another human being. As much as you think differently, we're no better than Trump and no more worthy of heaven or redemption than he is. Get over yourself. You can realise that specific things that he does might be wrong but you're dismissing anything that he might do that is good for the country. Now I'll give another example from the Bible. King David was chosen, by God, to be the King of Israel. Yet, he arranged to have Uriah, one of his own elite soldiers, killed so he could have his wife Bathsheba. Could you imagine a president doing that? God sent Samuel, the Prophet, to chastise him for it, yet he still allowed David to continue on as the King. Think about it. David murders to get a woman and God still allows him to stay on as the leader of his nation. There has to be a lesson in this. Donald Trump is a flawed individual and there are things that he does that I would like to believe that I wouldn't do. However, I have to admit that I'm a flawed individual as well. Moreover, if you look a little deeper into the life of Trump, he's done some things that are amazing compassionate. He's a complex individual and, unlike so many of us, he is very outspoken and blunt and allows his faults to lay wide open for all to see. Most of us hide them but they're still there, hidden away. Instead of your anger and hate towards him, try to show compassion. That's something else Jesus taught. It doesn't say to "love thy neighbour that is perfect or that you like". It says to "love the neighbour" without qualification or distinction. Your last comment isn't one of love but of anger, superiority and intense hatred of someone. Are you sure that this is how you're supposed to love your neighbour. Maybe should love the sinner and hate the sin. A fine distinction but one that is demanded by Jesus.
    1
  6062. 1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. 1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. 1
  6095. 1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. 1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. 1
  6130. 1
  6131. 1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. 1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. 1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151. 1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. 1
  6156.  @jhlfsc  Where did I say that minorities can't be bigots? I never said that ONCE. In fact, my entire message was that the idea that the original poster can't be black or gay and think this way is BIGOTED. That we're all individuals and that to assign characteristics based on race or minority status is as bigoted as it gets. That's why they had to act as if Larry Elder was the black face of white supremacy. They want to imply that he was bought off to say the things that he did and that, as a black man, he would NEVER believe these things on his own. That is as bigoted as it gets. It's saying that all I have to do is look at you, check off what demographic you belong to and I'll know everything about you. That's what they did to Larry Elder and it was the LEFT that did that, NOT the right. Also, Fascists are Socialists. Even that painter from Austria was a socialist. "We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan" Adolf Hitler , August 15, 1920, speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. " In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people.” – Adolf Hitler , February 24, 1941, speech on the 21st anniversary of the Nazi Party That was 21 years AFTER he made that first quote I wrote. “All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community.” – Adolf Hitler, March 21, 1943, speech for Heroes’ Memorial Day So don't give me this BS about right wing Fascists. It's complete nonsense.
    1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. 1
  6170. 1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173.  @slipstreammonkey  It's cute but a diversion. They're 2 separate topics. Identity isn't a feeling. It's biological fact and deeply ingrained into our very being, right down to our DNA. It's what compels our maturation as human beings. That's why puberty is so important. It's a biological development, no different than any other stage of our development. It's compelled by everything that we're built from. An adolescent has no idea where the changes of puberty are going to take him/her because it is out of their control, no different than your eye colour or the freckles on your face, except it runs even deeper than that. Our existence depends on the binary that is gender. Without it, we'd be no better than one celled creatures because that binary allows us the genetic diversity to stay alive. There is no other system of procreation in all the so called advanced life forms. It's that vital to our survival. Our "feelings" can't change that. A dog can hump my leg, but that doesn't mean that it's found a new gender. It's responding to a primal urge that's within all of us, that is beyond our feelings. It's a call to life itself. We accept that a person could be attracted to the same sex but that's a lot different than claiming to be another gender or one that they've just made up. That's a feeling and has nothing to do with biology, no matter what the egghead intellectuals or a Supreme Court Justice says. Claiming to be Jesus Christ or Napoleon doesn't make it so, no matter who much you wish it or feel it. Cutting off body parts and attempting to fashion new ones doesn't change your gender, no different that sticking a sow's ear on a horse won't change that sow into a pony.
    1
  6174.  @VelaiciaCreator  Show us the biological markers that indicates that a person is transgender. Not about how they feel but actual biology that can be recognised using objective science not discussion. Explain how being trans operates as a biological function to human survival. And speaking of survival, trans activists insist that we must affirm a person's gender claims or we put their lives in extreme danger. Britain has seen a 4000% increase in transgender claims and the suicide rates have gone UP since we've been affirming the condition in schools, medicine and even through our governments. If not affirming their claim to gender, which was the situation in the past, why wasn't the suicide rate way higher, due to the despair of not living the lives that they were "meant" to live. Suicide rates should be going down not up. For thousands of years people have claimed to feel the Holy Spirit coursing through their bodies, compelling them to praise God and Jesus. I'm sure they felt something but was it a real phenomenon? Is it really the work of a real living God or is it a psychological condition. People have changed their lives due to this religious rebirth so its effects have real consequences. Is this proof that God exists? This is a complex psychological phenomenon that isn't as understood as you claim it is. It's definitely not understood well enough that placing young adolescents on puberty blockers is the ONLY option and neither is performing surgery on demand. This instances of regret and the anger expressed when one does voice their regret is highly suggestive that the idea means more than the reality.
    1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177.  @VelaiciaCreator  Are you EVER misunderstanding the point that I'm making. I hope that you're not doing this intentionally. I will try one more time. The claim is that lack of gender affirmation is causing suicides. There was no such thing as gender affirmation 50 years ago. In Britain, transgender cases have skyrocketed, in the last 10 years by 4000 percent and most of them are girls. Intersex cases were almost exclusively boys in the past and now it's girls. If that is the TRUE number of transgender population, how is it that the suicide rates for girls are on the rise, among those who are transgender, when 50 years ago they couldn't even get the affirmation they claim that they so badly need. No affirmation and no chance of surgery, either yet suicide rates are on the rise. Were those girls so much tougher back then? Also, you're claim that people have is tough today, doesn't past the muster either. 90 years ago there was the great Depression. Ordinary people, even in America, were scrounging for food and living in abject poverty. Then came the WW2. Not exactly a time of wealth for average people and then they had to contend with the new spectre of nuclear war which extended through the Cold War. When I was a kid, in the sixties, every large explosive sound would compel the search for a mushroom cloud on the horizon. Blacks in America were living under Jim Crow. Gays were reviled and transgenders lived an underground existence. The last 30 years were the best in human history, with more people coming out of abject poverty than at any time in history only blunted by the advent of Covid and the world reaction to it. Covid and the Covid response resulted in over 250 million people falling BACK into abject poverty, abject poverty being less than 1.90 in US dollars a day. So don't give me this "times are tough" nonsense. 95% of all humans lived in abject poverty 150 years ago, no welfare, socialised medicine, retirement pension plans or the means to access affordable food. Being gay is widely accepted and anyone claiming to be trans is being affirmed by their schools, medical practitioners, the law and businesses. The rainbow flag is everywhere. Even the crosswalks in my small town are painted to reflect the acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community. Your assertions are bogus and the facts don't bear them out.
    1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. 1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188. 1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191.  @renaissancestatesman  First of all, look at my comments closely. I never ONCE mentioned the possibility of voter fraud. Why? Because it's pointless now. What we have to concentrate on NOW, is the next election and there are problems if Trump runs again. First...it's his age. The next election is 4 years away which means that he'll be 8 years older when he's finally done. That'll make him 82. He's healthy right now, but that can change SO quickly. It may not change. My dad is 89 and he's 4 times as sharp as Biden....but that his health could change overnight is a consideration. Trump's age is a factor. Also, we have to find a way to mitigate the outright hate that so many have for Trump. One way is to find a candidate, who has a similar outlook but is so articulate and presents such strong arguments, without being too combative, and has the charisma to win people over, that it's difficult to hate him. Difficult to hate him in spite of the manipulations of the press. Third, we have to work on the highly suspect election process. Trump can't be that guy. Too many people will recoil when they here about "stealing the election" from him. We need someone that didn't have an issue in the last election. Someone who they can't claim is still whining about losing last election. We need someone who can lay out the case for reform and can make it appear as if he is standing up for this without bias. The past is OVER. Accept that we lost and start up with a new strategy. ......And I repeat.....I didn't swallow any hook, line or sinker. I just think that there's no point in crying about the past. We can't change it but we can change the future if we go at it right. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening. Too many Rinos and swamp creatures in the Republican Party.
    1
  6192. 1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. 1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. 1
  6204. 1
  6205. 1
  6206. 1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216. 1
  6217. 1
  6218. 1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235.  @reptard6833  The Mensheviks and Bolsheviks were rival Marxists groups in the Soviet Union. They were both communists but still had philosophical differences. Socialism definition: "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." Fascism allows for private ownership but the owners are under control of the Party. The Party is, who they call the people. Any citizen can join the Party and you can work your way up, even to become supreme leader. In fact, China is now the closest country to a Fascist country there is. An authoritarian government, with privately owned businesses, under the control of their government. Their companies act as arms of the state just like the companies of Nazi Germany did. Germany abolished unions. They were redundant once Party members took the place of union stewards. They'd hold regular meetings with ALL levels of management in attendance, ensuring full loyalty to the Party, even owners and management. Not much different than China. Just look at how Huawei and other companies have been involved in industrial and political espionage. It's a BRAND of socialism, a step down from communism. Mussolini started out as a Marxist and reshaped his thinking into Fascism after he became disillusioned with the ineptness of his fellow Marxists. It's nothing like right wing American thinking or Conservatives. They believe in the Constitution, individual freedom and that all men are created equal and little to no interference in the affairs of private business. Any company tries to follow those principles in China or in Nazi Germany would see it's owners and management system replaced and likely arrested. Also, I came to this conclusion on my own, after reading extensively on Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. The similarities were striking other than the way they treated private property. When China started to relax their rules on private property, they slowly morphed into a Fascist state, akin to Nazi Germany. A nationalist state that's trying to dominate the world economically and politically. They couldn't be more alike had China used Nazi Germany as a blueprint to economic power. The only difference is that China doesn't emphasise, as a propaganda tool, the glory of the state like Germany did. It's still there but not as overt. Next time try discussing this topic, instead of reacting in anger and with insults. It makes it seem as if you have an agenda and that you hate to have your agenda challenged, sort of like a religious fanatic.
    1
  6236.  @reptard6833  If the American right, represented by the Republican Party, is so similar to Fascists, why do they support limited government, less government control over the lives of the people and a free, market drive economy? Also, why aren't the Republicans sending Party members to our places of businesses to ensure loyalty to the state and maintain the purity of Party values in our corporations and businesses? That's what Fascists did. Why is there no call to control education. In fact, the right wing Republicans support school vouchers, separate schools and homeschooling. Fascists took over the schools and amalgamated youth groups into Party machines like Hitler youth. In fact, it's the American left that doesn't like school independence and supports the idea that ALL schools be government controlled with no choice for parents or students. Also you've not mentioned one word on how the definition of socialism doesn't line up with the way the Fascists controlled the economy. Instead you advance the horseshoe model of political systems but you ignore my example how China has changed from a Marxist state into a Fascist state without going through the full Capitalist economy of the west industrialised nations. It seemed to have skipped right over it. Most of your argument isn't built on the discussion of ideas but on mockery and put downs. This idea isn't new and even if it wasn't that doesn't devalue the efficacy of the idea. Ideas are to be discussed, not sneered at. The search for truth isn't about finding a consensus but an examination of ideas and thoughts through the lens of facts and perspectives. Mussolini must a Marxist, whose ideas devolved into Fascism. The Chinese Marxist government has changed it's ideas to devolve into a Fascist type state. I don't see the horseshoe model here. I see a straight line evolution. Maybe I'm wrong but I'd prefer to be shown how that's wrong instead of your mocking tone. I learn through discussion. All mocking accomplishes is resentment.
    1
  6237.  @reptard6833  The right doesn't believe that the state should be mandated to teach morality standards to their children. They believe that this is a personal matter and should be up to the parents and those who they know have the same beliefs systems as they do. Teachers are virtual strangers and they don't want stranger teaching value codes to their children. That's not a belief in state control. That's a belief in individual choices in how sexual morality should be taught to their children. Individual responsibility over state responsibility. Individual sovereignty over state homogeneous sovereignty. Free and diverse ideas concerning morality and ethics over a state mandated morality or one belief to rule all. That's NOT control. One can still teach their children the way they want under the right wing ideology of freedom including the state sanctioned principles of sexual beliefs or practices if that what's they choose. The right does NOT want basic beliefs systems to be mandated by the state. That's against state control NOT in favour of it. In fact, it's the left that does NOT approve of private education and who believe that every child should be taught only state approved curriculum, including morality even if it contravenes the religious beliefs of the families of their pupils. The left, for a group that won't stop talking about diversity, they sure hate the diversity of ideas. So, again.....who wants TOTAL control? The "one education that must fit all" group or the "it should be the individual choice of each family" group, on how their children are raised and educated?
    1
  6238.  @reptard6833  Morality is everything to those who are religious. They believe that abortion is wrong and they're afraid that a teacher, an extremely powerful influence on children, would use that influence to teach their children that abortion is an acceptable solution to a problem that, quite often, occurs when who is engaging in another, to them, immoral and irresponsible act of sex before marriage. It's a matter of perspective to them. It matters, to them, if it is taught in a manner of acceptance or whether or a manner of choice and responsibility to their faith, their partner, the child that is an inevitable outcome. It matters to them because they don't want that person of influence to be the arbiter of how the morality of sexual behaviour is taught to their children. They don't like the idea that the state is a "co-parent" to their children. Faceless state reps, labeled as teachers, who come into the children's lives for a semester or 2 and disappear from their lives, forever. The claim that you've sat on education boards in no more than an appeal to authority, which is a logical fallacy. It means nothing. If you can't see how sexual behaviour and morality is intricately woven, to people of religious faith, then you don't understand religion, AT ALL.....and it's not just Christianity, either. Muslims are even more concerned with the morality of sexual practices than Christians and Hindus have their own traditions regarding sex and the marriage bond. They don't want it reduced to a "one size fits all" type of ideology. To then sex and the family bond is the cornerstone of society and teaching it as a generic practise is not only wrong but damaging to the young. I'm saying this as an atheist. I'm saying this as one who believes that parents are the most important factors in a child's life and that the most important ideas of the family should be taught by the family. It's the diversity of thought and lifestyle that parents possess and they believe should be taught to their children....not in school but in the home. That's the morality of sexual behaviour they believe in and they don't want strangers influencing the morality of sex to their children.
    1
  6239.  @reptard6833  Just because abortion is legal, that doesn't mean it's moral or right. I don't need the government to tell me what I should believe or think. Remember, slavery was once legal, too. Legal does NOT mean moral. Also, it's not that some conservatives don't want their children to know about sex before marriage. It's the context in how sex is portrayed. They don't want 8 year olds to be influenced to view sex as recreational, that it has no consequences and there is no responsibility to your sexual partner or to any consequences that may result from unconsidered sexual behaviour. Another fallacy is that just because one believes a practise is wrong, that doesn't automatically imply hatred of the person who commits that practise. Which is something else that is a popular belief in popular culture and encouraged in schools. Conservative beliefs are so vilified in the education system that students feel quite comfortable suppressing any ideas expressed that don't line up with their own and will even resort to violence to shut down any ideas that they don't like, behaviour fully supported by the school, itself. Evergreen College is the most egregious example of this type of indoctrination but not nearly the only one. Also, you're ascribing the behaviour of some conservative types to the ALL conservatives. No nuance, no diversity of thought, all EXACTLY the same. That's the major objection of conservatives. The Westboro Baptist Church is considered a whacked fringe group by almost ALL conservatives, even those that are religious and disapprove of premarital sex, including that of homosexuals. And Chick-fil-A wasn't donating to anti-gay organisations. They were donating to groups that thought that they could change gays into straight people if that's what an individual wanted for their life. A naive idea but not necessarily hateful. In fact, Chick-fil-A has gay employees and has never discriminated against any gay customers. A trans person can go, any time they want, and buy a chicken sandwich. I'll tell you what's really strange. It's strange that when the conservative is Christian, there is all kinds of vitriol thrown at him but when that person is Muslim and espouses the same ideas, the left make excuses for them. Which brings me to another point. No school should EVER, as an official stance, support left or right causes or ideals. They are there to teach the young how to read, write, understand mathematics and the facts of history, science and the world. If they teach evolution of the species, they should NEVER tell the children that the religious beliefs of their parents is wrong whether they're Christian, Muslim or whatever, although many teachers would never dare to say that to a Muslim child due to the prevalence of identity politics in the education system. That's another ideology that shouldn't be taught in school. Beliefs systems are personal and shouldn't be supported or discouraged by the state.
    1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242.  @christopherparks4342  Right after Shoken was fired, Zlochevsky felt that it was now safe to go back to Ukraine. Then he got himself into trouble over a phone call and new investigations started over wrong doing when he was the Minister of Ecology. Besides, Zlochevsky's corruption was an internal affair. Biden's action wasn't. It involved American taxpayer money. It may well be on the up and up but if it wasn't, it's rather difficult to investigate Biden, when the centre of that corruption took place in Ukraine. This prosecutor, Shokin, was he really that much a kingpin of corruption that it warranted withholding 1 billion dollars in aid? That seems rather excessive. Why wouldn't Biden insist that the Ukraine president, Poroshenko, resign as well? He was known to be corrupt. Biden might be completely innocent but it does look bad and it would have been prudent for the American president to insist that Biden recluse himself from doing representing the US in a country where his son worked for a man who was known to be corrupt. I'd think that it would nice to know if this was dirty or not. This hasn't anything to do with party politics. This has to do with being transparent and apparently, asking that the facts of the case be uncovered is a terrible thing. If Biden is found innocent of wrong doing, it doesn't help Trump one bit. If he's found guilty of using American taxpayer money to help his son, it doesn't just help Trump, it helps EVERY American. It's good for the country to root out ALL corruption, not just the corruption of people we don't like.
    1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. 1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. 1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. 1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. 1
  6293. 1
  6294. 1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302.  @PeacockPoverty  As a person I find Trump a very unlikable guy. However, that's not the point, at all. If fences or barriers have been an integral part of border security, then an even better barrier should be more effective. He made a promise of building an effective wall between the two countries that would stem the number of future illegal immigrants. He's doing everything he can to keep that promise and he's being opposed, tooth and nail, by the Democrats, not because it's a bad idea, but because they don't like the idea of him keeping a big election promise. Also, the idea that he was going to get the Mexicans to pay for that wall was just election rhetoric and no one took him seriously...at least non of his supporters did. They knew it was just tongue in cheek election banter of a windbag. It's like promising my wife a new car and saying that YOU, PeacockPoverty, was going to pay for it. She'd know that it was nonsense but she'd still expect that car. The point is this. Would an 15 foot high wall be more effective than the fence that is in place now? Having grown up on a farm and climbed over fences most of my life, I know for a fact that it is. Not even a maybe about it. The only problem that the Democrats have with it is that it's Trump's election promise. Nothing else. It's why they call the wall immoral, even though they supported a barrier 5 years ago. It's why Pelosi wouldn't meet with the "Angel Moms". That would be an admission that there were criminal elements crossing the wall, as well. It's why Democrats are tacitly supporting sanctuary cities, something that the Obama government would NEVER have accepted 5 years ago. It's all about derailing Trump. It's never been about what's right or effective. They're determined that Trump cannot succeed in the one thing that is obviously concrete and real. His other programs, like the initiative to set up opportunity zones or to help women succeed in business in 3rd world countries are abstract and can be ignored. A wall can be pointed at and its existence could not be denied. That's why they oppose it. A concrete reminder that Trump came good on a promise cannot be allowed....EVER.
    1
  6303.  @PeacockPoverty  Trump has already allowed that there are areas which won't need the fence due to natural barriers. He's not even trying for a complete wall from sea to sea. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/13/mexico-border-wall-trump-plan-wont-need-full-border Hurd is the only Republican, on the border, that has opposed a cross country wall and Trump has already agreed that it's impractical to do it. However, Hurd is still strong on border security but some of the land owners don't want their land appropriated to build a wall and he supports that. However, if a lot of his district is impassable due to terrain, it would also appear that these landowners don't have the hundreds of migrants crossing their land all the time. The natural barrier is stopping them so their argument makes sense, especially since they're the ones that would give up the land to put the unnecessary part of the wall up. Also, Ted Cruz does support the wall. He said so many times in this interview on Fox. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOEQjQMyOBA Build that wall. He said it more than once. Trump has agreed to a limited wall, wants other security measures, more border patrol agents and more judges to process those that seek asylum. Everything that you've just wrote in your comment....yet you still oppose it. Saying that they oppose the wall because they don't like Trump isn't ridiculous spin, either. I know that for the simple reason that the MAGA hats, the ones carrying the Trump election slogan, will set people off in a rage. A bunch of Catholic kids wearing them, invoked the rage of a bunch of Black Israelites and then the nation and that story was spun viciously out of control. Why? It's those hats and their link to Trump. People have even admitted it to be true. When Whoopi Goldberg asked why they would fall prey to these types of stories, Joy Behar replied "because we're so desperate to get rid of Trump".....and she's right. The Democrats, especially the MSM, has been spinning so many stories in an effort to denigrate Trump, that some people aren't trusting them anymore and their ratings have been falling. Democrat opposition to Trump has become a series of knee jerk reactions. I don't see why the wall issue would be any different.
    1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. 1
  6308. 1
  6309.  @PeacockPoverty  You've just proved my point again. How is a fence, designed to keep out "brown people" not racist, but a wall, designed to keep out "brown people" is racist? How is a border agent, who's job it is to keep out "brown people" not racist but a wall, designed to do the same thing, is racist? What is the distinguishing factor here? Answer that question without once bringing up Trump's name or any allusion to his existence. Try that for once. As for that assertion that the KKK is now cool again, even the SPLC says that it has been in a steady decline. Richard Spencer is hardly to be found on a google search except for year old news and for the fact that he's now in trouble for domestic abuse. Spencer first supported Trump but once again, the SPLC and said that his white nationalist movement is dissatisfied with Trump's presidency. He no longer supports Trump because he's decided that Trump doesn't follow his white supremacy ideals at all. As for your claim about the horror Trump has wreaked on "brown" children, the facts show differently. Those famous pictures that showed children sleeping in cages, were taken in 2014, during Obama's administration. https://qz.com/1291470/photos-immigrant-children-detained-at-the-placement-center-in-2014/ https://www.apnews.com/a98f26f7c9424b44b7fa927ea1acd4d4 Trump was still running a reality TV show back then. In fact, Trump signed an executive order stopping the separation of families last June. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/20/politics/trump-separation-action-immigration/index.html This is from CNN, a news network that makes no secret of their hatred of Donald Trump. These are facts and easily verifiable. In fact, your entire tirade really doesn't prove that a wall is racist. Make that argument that the wall is racist without any references to Trump. If a wall is racist, that fact should stand on its own and there should be no need to invoke his name. To make this argument even more ridiculous, I don't like Trump, either. He's a loud mouthed blowhard, given to bouts of boasting and exaggerations to the point of full out BS. However, that has nothing to do with the wall or the facts. As a matter of fact, I think the distortion of facts around Trump might be a major factor in his being re-elected. The Democrats under estimated him and then alienated the entire centre of the country by calling them deplorables who lived in the "fly over" centre of America. That was a grave mistake and they'd better learn from it or they will lose again.
    1
  6310.  @PeacockPoverty  There are only 2 known sightings in the US of jaguars and one was shot last year. Not a big issue as yet. As for the ocelots, that may have an impact although most of the ocelots in Texas are in the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge on the coast and are too far away to migrate to Mexico. There are other pockets along the border and you're right about those. As for the butterflies, they have a unique capability. They know how to fly. I'm thousands of miles from Mexico and the Monarch is common around here and has to migrate to all the way to Mexico. Apparently they can do it and they have to cross the Mississippi River. It's miles across. A wall would appear to be a puny deterrent to that. But yes, it would impact some wildlife. How much is hard to say. It's one of those cost benefits analysis that must be made. However, the growth of major cities has had a much greater impact on wildlife that any wall could ever have. Phoenix, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, just to name a few, and all the suburban areas involved have disrupted wildlife habitat exponentially more than a wall would. The diversion of water to California from the Colorado has had a major impact on the environment along that river. Most of the illegal immigrants are going to California, so more water will be needed to supply them. So it takes from one to add to another. Nothing that we do as modern humans doesn't have its cost. Emptying Lake Mead to supply a growing California, partially due to added illegals, is a very high cost as well. A decent consideration but not a deal breaker. Especially when you include the word "could". "Could" isn't a word used to describe a definitive problem.
    1
  6311.  @PeacockPoverty  What a wild-eyed crazed rant that was. You didn't actually read a thing I wrote and neither did you even bother to read the references I gave. You just blathered the same nonsense you did before even though I proved to you that you were wrong. This "fence good" "wall bad" argument is pure nonsense, nothing else. I've given you all kinds of opportunities to offer up a cogent and logical case but all I've seen are head exploding angry rhetoric and repetition. If you're any indication of what is the best that the Democrats can offer up as a platform, they're screwed. You'll have Trump till 2024. By the way, I'm not even American. I'm Canadian so Trump is NOT my master. As a matter he's screwed us in the NAFTA deal, although I attribute a good part of the blame to that to Trudeau, the nut who negotiates with a gender's studies adviser. I wanted to see if I could get a reasonable reason why a wall shouldn't be built and all I got was a rant about a wall being a symbol of racism and a lot of nothing. You've done a lot to convince me that us Canadians are going to be stuck negotiating with Trump for the next 6 years instead of 2. Another thing....my sister was deported from the US and she's a red headed, blue eyed white woman. She jumped the fence into the US because she has a criminal record. You see, the US will not allow the most blond haired, blue eyed, MAGA hat wearing, white Canadian into the US, if they have DUI conviction. That's because it has nothing to do with race....but you're to crazed with anger to be able to digest any information anyway. Good luck, you lunatic. You're going to need it with Trump as your master for the next 6 years.
    1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. 1
  6354. 1
  6355. 1
  6356. 1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360. 1
  6361. 1
  6362. 1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365. 1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. 1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374. 1
  6375. 1
  6376. 1
  6377. 1
  6378. 1
  6379. 1
  6380. 1
  6381. 1
  6382. 1
  6383. 1
  6384. 1
  6385. 1
  6386. 1
  6387.  @caseinpoint4823  Did you not watch this video? Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary said that they were working WITH Facebook to flag misinformation. Is the White House a business? Are they advertisers? When did the White House or Facebook become the arbiters of truth? You're one of those people that have no idea why the big corporations and the most of the press HATED Trump. You're just not getting it. Trump wanted to even the playing field in trade with China and that cut into the cash flow for corporate bigwigs. China is a country with poor wages and no labour laws, no environmental restrictions, no quality control and a government that has complete control over the economy. They're getting rich by operating without restrictions and then selling the products to countries in the west who have those laws that incur HUGE expenditures. So the big corporations make their products in China and then sell them in the US at enormous profits. They give corporate executives big payoffs, which are placed in offshore accounts where they can't be traced of taxed in the US, to manufacture their products in China. That means the loss of manufacturing in the US and the loss of employment for tens of millions of Americans. Those corporations are the advertisers that you're talking about. Their corporate board members don't want to lose all their big perks from operating in China and that's why their working with the Democrats and the big tech companies to flag "misinformation". They want and love the control that they have and are NOT about to give it up. You don't even realise that you're believing exactly what those international corporations want you to believe and that's why they are the big advertisers that make all this money for big tech. They want to control the information and you're saying to the marriage of these corporations and big tech that you approve of this control (censoring) of information.
    1
  6388. 1
  6389. 1
  6390. 1
  6391. 1
  6392. 1
  6393. 1
  6394. 1
  6395. 1
  6396. 1
  6397. 1
  6398. 1
  6399. 1
  6400. 1
  6401. 1
  6402. 1
  6403. 1
  6404. 1
  6405. 1
  6406. 1
  6407. 1
  6408. 1
  6409. 1
  6410. 1
  6411. 1
  6412. 1
  6413. 1
  6414. 1
  6415. 1
  6416. 1
  6417. 1
  6418. 1
  6419. 1
  6420. 1
  6421. 1
  6422. 1
  6423.  getawaycar  It's because those who want to tear down the statues are also the ones that want to educate you. They want the ONLY source of information to be the state run educational system. No questions because you've been educated and that statue might cause a question that they don't want you to ask. What do you think re-education camps are? They're camps to send those who have the audacity to question what they were taught the first time around. It's a do over, a try again. We're seeing them now, in a limited way, in our human resources departments where they're teaching you the dogmas of "inclusivity" and "equity". It's to make sure everyone gets that message and is programmed to believe it without question. If you question it after their "seminars" you're fired. No individualism. No thoughts of your own. It's the beginning of the Orwellian society. If you didn't see it before, here's that warning again. 'Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.' George Orwell You might as well read this, as well, from 1984. “Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered…History has stopped. Nothing exists except the endless present in which the party is always right” If you don't see this as the path to become a mindless drone, there's nothing I can say. It's the path to a dystopian future where destruction is seen road to enlightenment and we're all worker bees, obedient to the state, where revolutionaries like Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln are reviled. It's imperative that they are because we can't have revolutionaries or anyone who would believe in the rights of man.
    1
  6424. 1
  6425. 1
  6426. 1
  6427. 1
  6428. 1
  6429. 1
  6430. 1
  6431. 1
  6432. 1
  6433. 1
  6434. 1
  6435. 1
  6436. 1
  6437.  @solveigvan808  In 2015, if I'd have told you that, by 2022, there would be members of Congress who were going to claim that men could get pregnant, you'd have told me that I'm nuts. That our president would even name a trans person to his cabinet. That men would claim to be women and insist on going to women's prisons and be allowed into women's sports. That's how quickly this nonsense took over. There was no such thing as affirmative gender care back then. We didn't even know that these TikTok teachers existed. Remember, this started for Chloe in 2017. Her parents didn't know any of this and the most trusted people in society, our doctors, were telling them that this was SO serious that if the medical establishment did nothing, Chloe would die. They're just ordinary people....probably not even that bright. They believed those doctors....actually BELIEVED them. If a doctor tells you that you have cancer and that you need surgery, you believe them. We ALL know people that have died of cancer so we know how dangerous cancer can be. These doctors told them that their little girl was going to die because of this condition that was "rare" and it was back then. That terrified her parents. Her parents weren't going to ask YOU, some random guy on the internet, what YOU thought. They had nowhere to turn. The doctors lied to them and they believed them. For that alone, those doctors should pay. They took a confused little girl, convinced her parents that their little girl was going to commit suicide and it would be THEIR fault and then made a fortune off it. Remember, even though it's foolish for people to fall for the Nigerian Prince scam, that doesn't absolve those crook of their guilt. If her parents can show that they didn't know or understand what was happening and that this wasn't something that they wanted or pushed for, then they were being foolish and didn't act out of malice. Foolish mistakes shouldn't be punished through the courts. Malicious intent however, should be and this was as malicious as it comes by the medical establishment. They made money off of it and lots of it.
    1
  6438. 1
  6439. 1
  6440. 1
  6441. 1
  6442. 1
  6443. 1
  6444. 1
  6445. 1
  6446. 1
  6447. 1
  6448. 1
  6449. 1
  6450. 1
  6451. 1
  6452. 1
  6453. 1
  6454. 1
  6455. 1
  6456. 1
  6457. 1
  6458. 1
  6459. 1
  6460. 1
  6461. 1
  6462.  @edwardamos6462  Your experiences have nothing to do with this. I'm talking about evidence that has been brought out in his trial and the police body cam videos. If a person says that he can't breathe while he's lying on his back, in the car, kicking and screaming, and there's no one around him, you tend to think that he's making it up. If he's repeated the same thing, LONG before he's on the ground but standing up and the police are just talking to him, you wonder what he's talking about. He said it 6 or 7 times, maybe even more, before he was on the ground. What made those claims more urgent when he WAS on the ground, the place that he asked to be? You're not addressing any of those facts. And if you think anecdotal evidence carries water, here's one for YOU. I worked with a guy who was constantly complaining how he couldn't breathe, every time it got a little hot out. That was 20 years ago. He's still alive. People say all kinds of things to jerk police officers around. He didn't die in ALL the time he was standing up. In fact, he became extremely violent. The only reason that he could have difficulty breathing, when he was still standing, is that the Fentanyl was starting to impair his breathing and he was already starting to die of a drug overdose. Hypoxia is the primary danger of Fentanyl misuse. The autopsy report says he died of hypoxia. They're police officers, not doctors or even paramedics. They're not as liable to recognise the signs. By the way, they did call for Emergency Services. I'm thinking they did it just to cover all the bases. One of the most ridiculous ideas is that Chauvin, intentionally murdered Floyd, in broad daylight, in front of an openly hostile crowd, who were videotaping him. Who would be that stupid. It's like leaving your name and address at a bank robbery. It makes no sense.
    1
  6463. 1
  6464. 1
  6465. 1
  6466. 1
  6467. 1
  6468. 1
  6469. 1
  6470. 1
  6471. 1
  6472. 1
  6473. 1
  6474. 1
  6475. 1
  6476. 1
  6477. 1
  6478. 1
  6479. 1
  6480. 1
  6481. 1
  6482. 1
  6483. 1
  6484. 1
  6485. 1
  6486. 1
  6487. 1
  6488. 1
  6489. 1
  6490. 1
  6491. 1
  6492. 1
  6493.  @okay5938  They called that interference of the Russians, collusion, because they wanted to show that Trump had a part in it. That's what everyone called it, repeatedly and incessantly. Let's get over the semantics of it, shall we? Mueller mandate was to find if there was any interference by the Russians. What it found was that there was no evidence to link Trump or his team with that interference and that there was no collusion. The media treated the interference as a forgone conclusion. It was the media (CNN, MSNBC, WaPo and the rest) that wanted it about collusion and a lot of the Democrats hooked their wagon to their claims of collusion. They were all sure that when the report was finished that if would prove that Trump actively helped the Russians to interfere in his favour. It wasn't till Mueller said "NO collusion" that the obstruction stuff started. Russian interference in the US election does not make Trump guilty of any crime, even if he benefits from that interference. It begins to be a crime, for Trump, if he "colluded" with the Russians to interfere in the elections to his own benefit. Trump is only guilty if he actively sought their help and there is NO evidence that he did. Trump firing Comey isn't obstruction. Whether Comey was fired or not, he was still obligated, by law, to testify before the Mueller team. In fact, firing Comey would hurt Trump as it would have had the effect of turning Comey against Trump more than he already was against him. Firing Comey did nothing to stop his from testifying. Nothing at all. I can't for the life of me see how firing Comey would stop him from testifying. It's illogical. I don't see how firing Comey would stop him from telling the truth. Since that's all you have, that's all I can comment on. You've not convinced me of a thing.
    1
  6494.  @okay5938  Sorry, I meant to get back to you sooner but I've had some health issues and was kind of laid up and busy with doctor's. Things are better now and I've a little more time. Comey didn't testify. However, he was the prime investigator into the Clinton e-mail scandal and he decided that there wasn't enough to build a case against her. Then, just before the election, new material was revealed and he re-opened the e-mail case. That upset a lot of Democrats, who felt that this strongly affected the outcome of that election. When Trump was calling for Russia to "find Hillary's e-mails", that's what he was referring to. He was talking about sensitive security material on Hillary's private computer that could easily have been hacked into by anyone, including Russia. In effect, he was asking Russia to admit that they had illegally accessed Hillary's private account and spied on sensitive security material. I don't see how that is obstruction. That's what the entire Comey investigation was about. However, it was found that Comey had drafted a letter of exoneration long before the that investigation was over. Republicans were now upset. How can anyone draft such a letter before an investigation was complete? This was a major reason why Trump fired Comey. He felt that Comey had a greater interest in his personal politics than doing what was good for the country. If any president feels that way about the head of such an important group, he should fire that person. That had nothing to do with the Mueller investigation which was inevitable, since there was a great interest in the leadership of the FBI to investigate alleged Russian interference. Interference, by a foreign power of agency in an American election, is illegal. Anyone that is involved in that interference is guilty of a crime. Adam Schiff said, repeatedly, that he had definitive proof that Trump aided and likely influenced Russian interference. That would have been an illegal act as helping a foreign power try to rig an election is illegal. That is what Schiff and others called collusion. The Russians tried to influence the election and Schiff and others were claiming they did so on an agreement they made with Trump. They called that agreement "collusion". They also claimed that this agreement, called collusion, was illegal and it became a major focus of the Mueller investigation. That investigation found no Trump involvement but it did point at Russian agents who are now open to charges in the US which they will never have to face, unless they enter the US. I still don't see any case for obstruction.
    1
  6495. 1
  6496. 1
  6497. 1
  6498. 1
  6499. 1
  6500. 1
  6501. 1
  6502. 1
  6503. 1
  6504. 1
  6505. 1
  6506. 1
  6507. 1
  6508. 1
  6509. 1
  6510. 1
  6511. 1
  6512. 1
  6513. 1
  6514. 1
  6515. 1
  6516. 1
  6517. 1
  6518. 1
  6519. 1
  6520. 1
  6521. 1
  6522. 1
  6523. 1
  6524. 1
  6525. 1
  6526. 1
  6527. 1
  6528. 1
  6529. 1
  6530. 1
  6531. 1
  6532. 1
  6533. 1
  6534. 1
  6535. 1
  6536. 1
  6537. 1
  6538. 1
  6539. 1
  6540. 1
  6541. 1
  6542. 1
  6543. 1
  6544. 1
  6545. 1
  6546. 1
  6547. 1
  6548.  @veradark5066  You're putting words in my mouth. Here's one of the things that I said "I have no problem with someone discussing their ideas but I will not put up with unwarranted rudeness or bullying and I will tell the bully what I think of them. It's gotten me a fat lip," First, I said that I have no problem with discussing Ideas. There goes your "flame thrower at libraries" trope. Why would I burn down a library when I have no problems with ideas? It's illogical and you're only saying this to smear me, in hopes to invalidate what I'm saying. Then I said, quite explicitly, that I will TELL, get that TELL, a bully what I think and that has gotten me a fat lip. I'm getting the fat lip because I'm saying words the the bully doesn't like. YOU have it backwards. I even said that I would take a beating for defending the bullied, a beating from the guy who I told what I think of him for being a bully. If I have to take a beating for telling him to stop bullying those who can't defend themselves, so be it. A bully deserves to be told just what he is. If that bully becomes angry and takes a swing...THAT'S ON HIM, not me. If more people would stand up to these bullies, their victims wouldn't have to live with the fear that they're being forced to contend with. However, if you turn a blind eye because you're afraid of how them might react, at least you can comfort yourself with the knowledge that the victim of the bully is taking the abuse, NOT you. Your safety comes first....right?
    1
  6549. 1
  6550. 1
  6551. 1
  6552. 1
  6553. 1
  6554. 1
  6555. 1
  6556. 1
  6557.  @DdotRay86  The desire for a secure border isn't racist. Right now, we're going through a crisis, that was brought into the country because of a border that wasn't secure to the point of being able to stop the disease from entering. This is only one reason why any sovereign nation has the right to monitor those who would enter their borders. Until Donald Trump became the president, that was the consensus of most American politicians, including Obama. Why wasn't Obama berated as a racist for HIS stance on illegal immigration? Why only Trump and by proxy, Tucker Carlson? Chuck Schumer bragged about the barrier the Obama administration erected to halt the illegal crossing of the border, yet called Trump's barrier racist. How anyone can't see the political manipulation and fraud in this is absolutely astounding. To add, this isn't about Mexicans at all. It's about people, illegally crossing the border and it doesn't matter where it is they come from. The truth is that the largest percentage by far, come illegally from Mexico. That's why the focus on that border. It is also fact, that, by far, the greatest number of LEGAL immigrants, come from Mexico. In fact, of the top ten nations, where legal immigrants originate, not ONE is a predominately white nation. Nations like China, Dominican Republic, the Philippines, Vietnam, South Korea, Honduras are in this group. This isn't about racism. This is about ideology. Big pictures are made up of little pictures, pixels united to make a whole. Without the pixels, there is no whole. That's why we discuss the issues that Tucker is presenting so that the individual, doesn't get lost, in the big picture, so that you and I and everyone has a say, no matter how trivial it may seem. All you're doing is getting us lost in the big picture so it's impossible to discuss the specifics of our situation. It's a justification for the egregious behaviour that Tucker was talking about because it hasn't impacted you, as yet, and you can feel the power of moral superiority over others when they make the "small" transgression against the "BIG" picture. It's how tyrants rule the insignificant citizen and you've acquiesced, to the state, your position as an individual of significance to the big picture called the state. That's why you don't want to discuss the issues. You're no longer you. You're the BIG PICTURE.
    1
  6558. 1
  6559. 1
  6560. 1
  6561. 1
  6562. 1
  6563. 1
  6564. 1
  6565. 1
  6566. 1
  6567.  @thomasg4324  What did you think would happen? Trump would snap his fingers and a wall would appear? First he had to get funding and the Democrats fought him on that. He had to move funds about to get that money and Democrats were outraged about that. Then he had to work out the specific design of how that wall would look, then put out tenders and accept bids. Then contractors had to build the manufacturing infrastructure to build the wall itself and to get them to the construction site. Hundreds of miles worth, basically from scratch. There are over 400 miles of wall in existence right now. You can see pictures of it. However, Joe Biden stopped construction the minute he took office. Had Trump won that election, he'd have completed the wall by now. You're blaming Trump for something that Biden did. Trump didn't deport illegals. I wonder why that was. Have you ever heard of sanctuary cities and states? Even if the illegal had committed a serious crime, the authorities in those sanctuary places wouldn't turn them over to ice. They just let them go. That was a Democrat policy that they're still doing. Look at the illegal that murdered Laken Riley. He'd been detained numerous times for committing crimes and wasn't deported. Our president mispronounces her name but doesn't apologise for that. He apologises for calling him an illegal immigrant. That's what's wrong. Democrats don't think of the illegal immigrants as doing anything wrong. They WANT them to stay. The Democrats want them to stay yet you're after Trump over the immigrant issue. Please make sense.
    1
  6568. 1
  6569. 1
  6570. 1
  6571. 1
  6572.  @evanwest4751  You really can't see that the person that is about to throw a tomato is the violent one? Honestly? Are you also going to try and tell me that if he does throw a tomato at someone, that the security team that forcibly escorts him out and off to jail are also the violent ones, not the tomato thrower. If I had a tomato and was about to throw it at your mother, would you be the violent one if you tried to stop me? REALLY? You have a funny way at looking at violence. The guy throwing the tomato is the victim and the person that tries to prevent it from happening is the violent one. That's a brand new form of justice. There is no law that says she has to have a given amount of press conferences per year. That's totally up to the president and his press secretary. Besides, who'd want to hold a press conference these days. Most of the reporters aren't asking questions. They're making accusations. Many of them are just variations of "Have you stopped beating your wife?" type of questions. It gets rather tiring after awhile. As for Trump being accessible, try twitter. He's on there all the time. She lied about Comey and she admitted it. In the history of mankind, I've never heard of a person that was perfect. I doubt that Sanders will be the first one. I know that our leaders are going to things that aren't right. I don't judge on that alone. I judge the body of work. Judging with perfection as a standard, would mean that I could demonise everyone. It would be an impossible standard.
    1
  6573. 1
  6574. 1
  6575.  @MrKGatl  The vast majority are from the extreme right. Almost all those who lean conservative don't belong with the White Supremacists or Nazis. They're a very law and order crowd. These extreme right winger are more apt to commit the more violent crimes because they generally support gun ownership more than the left. Therefore the more extreme violence comes from the right. Another thing the left does is that anything that appears to be a little off is called violence. "It's ok to be white" signs are hate crimes. A 12 year old kid draws a swastika, on a school yard with chalk, is also deemed a hate crime. The extreme left sees this as violence, which is ridiculous, especially in the case of the sign. Now, even the OK gesture is a hate crime.....more violence. Yet it's the left, that commit physical attacks that aren't as deadly. Punching those in MAGA hats. Using pepper and bear spray, disrupting traffic and banging on cars, setting fires, stealing property, blocking entry to right wing speaking events and so on. It's pointless, however, to turn it into a contest. No matter what extremist is doing the violence, right or left, it should be called out. NO exceptions. We both should be calling out that type of political violence and stop turning it into a game of "who's the worst". Most people are left leaning or right leaning and aren't into the violence. It's the extremists that are the problem and they live on both sides of the political spectrum. Even you believe that when you said "most" violence comes from the right. That implies it comes from the left as well.
    1
  6576. 1
  6577. 1
  6578. 1
  6579. 1
  6580. 1
  6581. 1
  6582. 1
  6583. 1
  6584. 1
  6585. 1
  6586. 1
  6587. 1
  6588. 1
  6589. 1
  6590. 1
  6591. 1
  6592. 1
  6593. 1
  6594. 1
  6595. 1
  6596. 1
  6597. 1
  6598. 1
  6599. 1
  6600. 1
  6601. 1
  6602. 1
  6603. 1
  6604. 1
  6605. 1
  6606. 1
  6607. 1
  6608. 1
  6609. 1
  6610. 1
  6611. 1
  6612. 1
  6613. 1
  6614. 1
  6615. 1
  6616. 1
  6617.  @eljisprincess1131  I don't have to wait a week to get back to you. I have a sister who, suddenly, starting saying that those trails were chemtrails a few years ago (new boyfriend influence. Happens all the time with her). I knew that they were contrails but I looked into it anyway. I found nothing that would indicate that someone was spraying us. In fact, it didn't make sense. This kind of project would be one of the biggest industries in the world. Where are the factories making the millions of tons of spray? I've been online and asked till I was blue in the face. No answer. I asked why we never seen the thousands of tankers heading toward airports. No one seems to know how they get the stuff to the airports. If this were true, you'd know people that were working on this, somewhere in the supply chain. Hundreds of thousands of people, making spray, sprayers, installing them on planes, maintenance crews would be involved, pilots, ground crews, a chain of command in the government, hundreds of millions, likely billions of dollars allocated, weather specialists, scientists studying the soils and waters, people in agriculture, even hobby gardeners, who get their soil tested would end up with weird samples. Nothing from any of them. Just your assertion that they last and look weird. Of course they last. They're man made clouds. Clouds last. Hell, we had 3 days of cloud last week. If natural clouds last, so will man made clouds. Also, people, around the world, fly a lot more than in the past, especially over the last 20 years. When I was a kid, it was rare to go to the Caribbean or Europe. Now, everyone goes to the Caribbean every winter. Tourism is HUGE down there, now, growing spectacularly over the last few years. Speaking of Europe, my dad grew up in war time Holland. Towards the end of the war, Allied planes flew overhead everyday loaded up to bomb German targets. Dad told me that the skies were filled with contrails somedays, not always but sometimes they would cloud the sky with their contrails and they would last for hours. The Dutch loved to see them because it meant that the Germans were getting pounded and that the war would soon be over. However, Allied pilots didn't like them. It made their planes visible. The contrails were like huge fingers in the sky, pointing out the planes to German gunners on the ground. You see.....I've looked into it. It makes no sense and there's no real evidence of it. None. That they look weird sometimes isn't evidence. It's an observation that begs a question to be answered and the most logical way to get an answer is to find the science behind it. I could go on but, unless you're interested, it's not going to change things much. People tend to believe what they want to believe and ignore what contradicts it. Not a lot of interest in facts.
    1
  6618. 1
  6619. 1
  6620. 1
  6621.  @isoakkfgy4462  You single out FOX? Have you ever listened to the other networks? They make up stuff ALL the time. Why did the other networks completely ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story before the elections? Why would Big Tech, like Facebook and Twitter censor all references to the NY Post story surrounding that laptop? How is it that they ignored Biden, telling Ukraine that they would NOT get one billion dollars if they didn't fire a certain prosecutor? Why did they make up the entire story about the Covington kids? It took me, an old guy, living in a basement apartment, 15 minutes to find out the truth about that story. Billions of dollars worth of property damage, over 25 people dead and hundreds injured in the BLM riots last summer and all the MSM could say was that they were "mostly peaceful". An 8 year old little black girl was shot by BLM supporters and it was "by the way" story for them. Had that little girl been shot by a Republican, it would have news 24/7 on CNN and MSNBC and you know it. A BLM supporter and crickets. As for Tucker, he obviously thinks getting vaccinated is a good idea or he wouldn't have done it. However, he has the right, no OBLIGATION, to talk about vaccines from all angles, all the information that is available. If he doesn't, if ANY news outlet doesn't, they're lying by omission. We, as free citizens, have the right to hear all the news, get all the information available and not just what some bureaucrat or corporate news executive thinks we should be allowed to hear. If they tell us something that's not true, then go after the truth. However, when most of the news outlets only relay partisan news then we'll get pablum, their version of what the truth should be because, in their arrogance, they think that we're not mature or smart enough to handle conflicting news stories.
    1
  6622. 1
  6623. 1
  6624. 1
  6625. 1
  6626. 1
  6627. 1
  6628. 1
  6629. 1
  6630. 1
  6631. 1
  6632. 1
  6633. 1
  6634. 1
  6635. 1
  6636. 1
  6637. 1
  6638. 1
  6639. 1
  6640. 1
  6641. 1
  6642. 1
  6643. 1
  6644. 1
  6645.  @Aaajjjjjjjjj  So you really think that the Italian boxer hadn't heard of this stuff before? That it hadn't been discussed over the last 7 or 8 years as she was working towards this goal? That she hadn't been told that if she didn't go along with it, she'd be a bigot and a transphobe? That doubting it may cause a person to end herself? That this pressure may even have caused her to believe it? Then, when she does face it personally, it's on the biggest stage of her life. What does she do? Protest, get blasted on the world media and be kicked out of the Olympics? Or go along with it and hope for the best? So she goes along with it and then finds out the reality. There's no way she can beat this man and it breaks her heart.....but that's not all, now the years of manipulation will have it's effect. She gets called onto the carpet, and the implications are everywhere. She is a bigot and transphobe and she may even believe it because if she strongly believes that it wasn't fair, she wouldn't apologise. Everything has cornered her and she admits she's wrong. She is now an adherent of the ideology. This is the same type of manipulation that one, who ends up Stockholm Syndrome, has gone through. One is manipulation by a hostage taker. The other is manipulation through social and authoritarian pressure that has been ongoing for a number of years. They both end up in the same place and they've both been changed forever. That's the end result for this boxer. There's no name for it, not like the person suffering from Stockholm Syndrome has their condition named. She's a pariah to this segment of the population, just like the other would be if they betrayed the hostage taker. She's been manipulated for years so when she has to deal with it, she responds in the way her manipulators want. That's the comparison. That's why they're somewhat similar.
    1
  6646.  @Aaajjjjjjjjj  I outlined a complete scenario where a kidnapper will treat their hostage to manipulate them to behave themselves and you don't think that this isn't just a ploy. That the kidnapper is just lucky that it happens and that he never does it on purpose. All just a fortunate turn of events for him. Yeah, right. It's how narcissists operate. The entire gender thing is about narcissism. Manipulating others to believe what you believe. 2 plus 2 equals 5 and it isn't good enough that one says it. Like O'Brian says to Winston Smith..."You must believe it". That is the ultimate goal here. A man can become a woman. A man can become pregnant. You must believe it. That's the ultimate goal. It's manipulate and they use threats....like the Orwellian threat of releasing rats to eat your face or in this case, we'll destroy you career and it's not manipulation. It's just a different manipulation than a kidnapper uses but you'll NEVER be convinced that they're both manipulation and the victim isn't manipulated into acquiescing to the manipulator in both cases. In the end, you're not getting the point of the original comparison. That they're both the result of psychological trauma. 20 years ago, the IOC would never get away with it. Now they can because the gender crew has prepared them, psychologically, to accept that edict. 20 years ago, the IOC couldn't have done it because the mindset wasn't indoctrinated yet. The boxer would have been shocked at even the suggestion just like, initially, the hostage would have been shocked to think that they'd feel badly for the kidnapper. it's all indoctrination. Under different circumstances but still manipulation of how a person thinks.
    1
  6647. 1
  6648. 1
  6649. 1
  6650. 1
  6651. 1
  6652. 1
  6653. 1
  6654. 1
  6655. 1
  6656. 1
  6657. 1
  6658. 1
  6659. 1
  6660. 1
  6661. 1
  6662. 1
  6663. 1
  6664. 1
  6665. 1
  6666. 1
  6667. 1
  6668. 1
  6669. 1
  6670. 1
  6671. 1
  6672. 1
  6673. 1
  6674. 1
  6675. 1
  6676. 1
  6677. 1
  6678. 1
  6679. 1
  6680. 1
  6681. 1
  6682. 1
  6683. 1
  6684. 1
  6685. 1
  6686. 1
  6687. 1
  6688. 1
  6689. 1
  6690. 1
  6691. 1
  6692. 1
  6693. 1
  6694. 1
  6695. 1
  6696. 1
  6697. 1
  6698. 1
  6699. 1
  6700. 1
  6701. 1
  6702. 1
  6703. 1
  6704. 1
  6705. 1
  6706. 1
  6707. 1
  6708. 1
  6709. 1
  6710. 1
  6711. 1
  6712. 1
  6713. 1
  6714. 1
  6715. 1
  6716. 1
  6717. 1
  6718. 1
  6719. 1
  6720. 1
  6721. 1
  6722. @SportySP Look assess it as if it's just an ordinary person, a layman, asking a doctor and a researcher about something. It's not Trump, it's you, asking about something you don't know about. Then, when you find out that it's might be rather naive, people start hounding you over it, telling you how STUPID you are, how ridiculous, telling you to shut-up, that you're an idiot. Do you agree with them? If you do and they keep it up, do you agree with them again? Will there ever be a point where you start to lose your patience and say something to get them OFF your back about it. A simple question and they just NEVER STOP!!!! Would you take it with a smile and a nod, FOREVER? People are making it about who asked the question, not the context and content of the exchange. Also, it's too late to question on who the right person is, right now. Trump is the guy. He's what we have to work with. Instead of battling him, EVERY STEP of the way, maybe the press and the Democrat party would be of more service to the people by helping him, giving suggestions, asking questions that would help the American people. Maybe cooperation and working with him, all of us working together and showing a willingness to compromise would be a better way to handle this crisis than continuous sniping and whining about EVERY word the president says. It solves nothing. Also, it wasn't a Republican or Trump that forced Covid patients into nursing homes, housing them with healthy and susceptible elderly people. It was the Democratic administrations of New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Michigan that did that. If you want to express outrage, do it over that instead of a STUPID and NAIVE question by a person that admitted that he wasn't a doctor and that he DIDN'T KNOW in the context of that question.
    1
  6723. 1
  6724. 1
  6725. 1
  6726. 1
  6727. 1
  6728. 1
  6729. 1
  6730. 1
  6731. 1
  6732. 1
  6733. 1
  6734. 1
  6735. 1
  6736. 1
  6737.  @stuffthetunic  In other words, collusion is so vague that you can't prove a conspiracy but we have to believe that it exists. Also, this idea they were guilty but too smart to get caught isn't evidence. It's almost like saying that their ability to cover up collusion is proof that collusion happened. Trump never removed sanctions that Obama set in place over the Crimean invasion. He allowed weapons sales to the Ukraine that Russia didn't want and Trump bombed Russian sites in Syria, something Obama refused to do. He also expelled 60 Russian diplomats in March 2017. So it hasn't all been rosy between Trump and Putin. Simply saying that Trump benefited from Russian meddling in the election, isn't proof of some sort of deal. There is no way to know how much Trump meddled or whether he even benefited at all. They may have meddled but how can you measure its effectiveness. I believed that Trump was going to win the presidency for reasons that would have had nothing to do with meddling. Hillary was a bad candidate. People were angry at her for seemingly cheating Bernie out of becoming the Democrat candidate and she would consistently call a large segment of the country deplorables and that white men have to do this and white people have to do that. There was an obvious bias against middle America and people knew it and felt it. Whites make up nearly 65 percent of the American population and you don't win votes by calling a large segment of the population names. It doesn't work. She alienated a lot of people. The people in the "flyover" states didn't like to be characterised as uneducated hillbillies. Presidents have different methods when dealing with other countries. Obama appeared to be less favourable to Israel than most presidents. It was just his way. Trump also tried a different way of dealing with North Korea. Until very recently, it seemed to be working. Changes in policies from one president to another is expected. It's why new parties are elected and it doesn't mean that they were in collusion. For 2 years, all we heard about was how Trump was a traitor and how the evidence of collusion with Russia would put him in jail. Now, collusion isn't a crime. If it wasn't a crime, what were they investigating. Obstruction? Why would Trump obstruct an investigation into a non crime? In fact, Barr repeatedly said that Trump had been fully cooperative throughout the entire investigation. He was frustrated but who wouldn't be. You would have been frustrated had you been called a traitor 24/7 by the major networks and the opposition. That's human nature.
    1
  6738. 1
  6739. 1
  6740. 1
  6741. 1
  6742. 1
  6743. 1
  6744. 1
  6745. 1
  6746. 1
  6747. 1
  6748. 1
  6749. 1
  6750. 1
  6751. 1
  6752. 1
  6753. 1
  6754. 1
  6755. 1
  6756. 1
  6757. 1
  6758. 1
  6759. 1
  6760. 1
  6761. 1
  6762. 1
  6763. 1
  6764. 1
  6765. 1
  6766. 1
  6767. 1
  6768. 1
  6769. 1
  6770. 1
  6771. 1
  6772. 1
  6773. 1
  6774. 1
  6775. 1
  6776. 1
  6777. 1
  6778. 1
  6779. 1
  6780. 1
  6781. 1
  6782. 1
  6783. 1
  6784. 1
  6785. 1
  6786. 1
  6787. 1
  6788. 1
  6789. 1
  6790. 1
  6791. 1
  6792. 1
  6793. 1
  6794. 1
  6795. 1
  6796. 1
  6797. 1
  6798. 1
  6799. 1
  6800. 1
  6801. 1
  6802. 1
  6803. 1
  6804. 1
  6805. 1
  6806. 1
  6807. 1
  6808. 1
  6809. 1
  6810. 1
  6811. 1
  6812. 1
  6813. 1
  6814. 1
  6815. 1
  6816. 1
  6817. 1
  6818. 1
  6819. 1
  6820. 1
  6821. 1
  6822. 1
  6823. 1
  6824. 1
  6825. 1
  6826. 1
  6827. 1
  6828. 1
  6829. 1
  6830. 1
  6831. 1
  6832. 1
  6833. 1
  6834. 1
  6835. 1
  6836. 1
  6837. 1
  6838. 1
  6839. 1
  6840. 1
  6841. 1
  6842. 1
  6843. 1
  6844. 1
  6845.  @hughmatthias7279  How do YOU know what Trump is hankering for? Can you see his inner thoughts and ambitions? I can't. However, one thing I do know is that the one over arching similarity between the Soviets, like Lenin and Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro and the Kim family is their original adherence to Marxism. They all had Marxist roots. Trump is no Marxist. He cut personal and business taxes which will increase personal autonomy, NOT greater ties to the state. Even through all the violence, Trump has hardly interfered or tried to use this as a method to increase a grip onto power. Do you think Stalin would have allowed this lawlessness in his country? Trump has criticised it but what person, in his right mind, likes to see people being killed? BLM matter leaders aren't pleading for the killings, like that of an 8 year old little black girl in Atlanta, to stop. In fact, it was BLM supporters that shot and killed her while demonstrating their support for their cause....BLM. It isn't Trump who wants to tear down statues like that of Frederick Douglas in Rochester NY. He wants his statue placed in his proposed "Garden of Heroes" along with other great Black luminaries like Jackie Robinson, Rosa Parks, Susan B, Anthony, Booker T. Washington, Martin Luther King, and Harriet Tubman. BLM aren't the ones wanting to honour these great black Americans....Trump is. Trump wants to include Harriet Beecher Stowe, the writer of Uncle Tom's Cabin, the book that was the single greatest inspiration to the Abolitionist movement of its time. BLM types use the hero of that book as a racial slur. To them, the fictional hero, that inspired millions, to insist of the abolition of slavery, is one to be mocked and ridiculed. It's beyond ridiculous. It's as Orwellian as it gets. In fact, it's the Marxist inspired despots like Stalin and Mao who did everything possible to erase their own history, not Trump who wants to honour the American past, all of it, the good and the bad, so we know that we're not perfect, that we must struggle to improve the wrongs that lie within all of us. Did you know that the city of Seattle is forcing its white employees to undergo "White fragility" classes. ONLY whites and they MUST attend. There goes Martin Luther Kings contention about the content of ones character over the colour of your skin as criteria of judgement. Skin colour, in Seattle, is proof of guilt. Skin colour, in this entire movement is the definitive essential quality that separates us. Time to tear down Dr. Kings statue and cancel him out of history as well, it would appear. You can't even see the bigotry in your own heart because you're too busy looking for it in others. Also, I don't expect any response to any point that I've made...only more generic "Trump bad.....Marxist BLM good."
    1
  6846. 1
  6847. 1
  6848. 1
  6849. 1
  6850. 1
  6851. 1
  6852. 1
  6853. 1
  6854. 1
  6855. 1
  6856. 1
  6857. 1
  6858. 1
  6859. 1
  6860. 1
  6861. 1
  6862. 1
  6863. 1
  6864. 1
  6865. 1
  6866. 1
  6867. 1
  6868. 1
  6869. 1
  6870. 1
  6871. 1
  6872. 1
  6873. 1
  6874. 1
  6875. 1
  6876. 1
  6877. 1
  6878. 1
  6879. 1
  6880. 1
  6881. 1
  6882. 1
  6883. 1
  6884. 1
  6885. 1
  6886. 1
  6887. 1
  6888. 1
  6889.  @jaimhaas5170  I don't have a dog in this fight, either but I know hatred when I see it. There are almost 2 million Muslims living in Israel. I'm not talking about Gaza or the West Bank, but Israel itself. They have full citizenship, can vote, run for office, own property and a business. They are police officers and are in the Israeli military. In fact, a Muslim judge sentenced ex-Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to 6 years in jail for breach of trust and he went to jail. A Muslim man, one of the Palestinians, did this. It doesn't matter in Israel what religion you follow. Most Jews are secular. However, in Gaza especially, it's ALL about Islam. Had the Jews, that migrated to this region, been Muslims, we wouldn't be having any issue in the Levant. It's because Hamas is a radical Islamist group, that will brook no other religion to be dominant, that's why there's a war going on. Hamas could have turned their country into a thriving community but they chose to prepare for war and crossed the border and did it. The Levant has been ruled by outside powers for over 2000 years. In that time, people from all races and religions lived in the region. Now, the Israelis are dominating, another race and religion, but they've been willing to settle on a 2 state solution but it's the Palestinians who've turned it down, at least 5 times. They could have their own country, actually they have in Gaza, but they want it all. By that, I'm claiming Palestinianism, is MORE warlike and exclusive of others than Zionism is.
    1
  6890. 1
  6891. 1
  6892. 1
  6893. 1
  6894. 1
  6895. 1
  6896. 1
  6897. 1
  6898. 1
  6899. 1
  6900. 1
  6901. 1
  6902. 1
  6903. 1
  6904. 1
  6905. 1
  6906. 1
  6907. 1
  6908. 1
  6909. 1
  6910. 1
  6911. 1
  6912. 1
  6913. 1
  6914. 1
  6915. 1
  6916. 1
  6917. 1
  6918. 1
  6919. 1
  6920. 1
  6921. 1
  6922. 1
  6923. 1
  6924. 1
  6925. 1
  6926. 1
  6927. 1
  6928. 1
  6929. 1
  6930. 1
  6931. 1
  6932. 1
  6933.  @TheJeffL  Check this out from The Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture. It talks about "whiteness" and the things that indicate white culture. It's one of the most racist things that I've ever seen. Beer ads? People were upset because a beer company was using an influencer, whose followers average 16 years old, to sell beer. People to young to drink and they even admitted that they were looking for a future customer base. To make it worse, it was an influencer who was encouraging minors to undergo drug treatment and surgery to validate their transgender existence.....pandering to the big pharma medical industrial complex. Actually aiming at kids. Yeah....normal people find this appalling. Complaining about the president? You've GOTTA be kidding. I've never heard complaining about the president like I did in my 75 years of life, in the years that Trump was president. It was non-stop on EVERY DAMN NETWORK AND NEWSPAPER. He was Hitler, the anti-Christ, a racist, a crook, was going to start WW3, was a broke billionaire, grabbing women by the hoo-hoo and on and on. He threw fish food in the water.....what a disgrace he was. "Good people on both sides" manipulated and lied about that. He call immigrants "animals" another BS story. It was nuts. Christmas? Who cares. Boohooing about everything? THAT'S YOU. You're here everyday complaining about EVERYTHING that's being said. How can anyone be so self unaware? You are what you're accusing others of being. You're on multiple comment threads, always bitching about something and you use multiple names, thinking that no one is catching on. You have to be the worst troll on the internet.
    1
  6934. 1
  6935. 1
  6936. 1
  6937. 1
  6938. 1
  6939. 1
  6940. 1
  6941. 1
  6942. 1
  6943. 1
  6944. 1
  6945. 1
  6946. 1
  6947. 1
  6948. 1
  6949. 1
  6950. 1
  6951. 1
  6952. 1
  6953. 1
  6954. 1
  6955. 1
  6956. 1
  6957. 1
  6958.  @GM6.7  The very first vaccine was on December the 14th. Operation Warp Speed was announced on May 15th. It took 9 months to get a vaccine in place from that date. When Trump said, in Sept and Oct. that he was sure that the vaccination program would be underway by the end of the year, Democrats and the media laughed at him, saying it was impossible. Yet Pfizer was ready by Dec. 11th. Moderna announced that they were ready on Dec 18th. I can post links to verify if you wish. If Biden was inaugurated on January 20 of this year, and both Pfizer and Moderna announced that they were ready in December of LAST year, it's rather obvious that they didn't wait until Biden's presidency to look good. They announced it during Trump's presidency and those companies didn't care because there was an opportunity to make a lot of money and the sooner they got the vaccine out, the sooner that money would be coming in. In fact, this vaccine was ready for distribution in record time. The Dems might be trying to take credit for it but only the most irrational ideologue and tribalist would give credit to the Biden administration for the speed of the vaccine development. In fact, if those companies wanted to make Trump look bad, they would have waited till this year to make the announcement instead of proving Trump correct when he said the vaccine would be ready before the end of the year. It makes the Dems look bad for laughing at Trump when he made that announcement and it makes them look even worse for taking any credit for it now.
    1
  6959. 1
  6960. 1
  6961. 1
  6962. 1
  6963. 1
  6964. 1
  6965.  @richarddefortune1329  You talk about a good investigator, yet you don't seem to know a thing about the corruption of Zlochensky, Hunter Biden's boss. What if Joe Biden pressured to get rid of a prosecutor to take the heat off of his son? Had Donald Sr. done that for Donald Jr. wouldn't that bother you? Or is this just selective outrage? If this was indeed a corrupt act, shouldn't it be investigated? I'd think so. I know you'd want it investigated if it was Donald Sr. doing it. I know this because you're insisting on his guilt right now for what is basically the same thing except Trump is wondering why a person could use American taxpayer money to pressure a foreign government that might be an advantage to his own son. This investigation wouldn't just help the American people but also the Ukrainian people, with a new president who ran on an anti-corruption platform. I would also ask you this. Do you really think that we should be giving aid to a country that we know is the most corrupt country in Europe? You'd think you'd be reluctant to do that. It seems that Trump was. However, the aid was given and if you could show me what the Ukrainians did to get it, that would be evidence to prove quid pro quo. As far as I've seen, the Ukraines did nothing. No investigation into Burisma, no information on Crowdstrike. They just got the aid after the American president was sure that the new Ukraine president was sincere in fighting corruption. That was for is own peace of mind. He never even mentioned it to Zelensky. They didn't even know that the money was being held back. Ambassador Taylor testified to it. How can you have any bribery when the person being bribed doesn't know he's being bribed. You have to tell your victim. This isn't about being for or against Trump. It's about facts. If Taylor says Zelensky didn't know and Zelensky and his Minister of Foreign Affairs didn't know, how is there bribery or quid pro quo. That's something that you're ignoring. Also the fact that the head of Burisma, at the time Biden withheld money, had fled to London and had 23,000,000 dollars of assets frozen due to an investigation. Hunter Biden's boss was avoiding prosecutors in the Ukraine and he is to this day. Once again, this isn't about being a Trump supporter. If you can't show whether Zelensky knew he was being bribed or not, you have no crime.
    1
  6966. 1
  6967. 1
  6968. 1
  6969. 1
  6970. 1
  6971. 1
  6972. 1
  6973. 1
  6974. 1
  6975. 1
  6976.  @davidkramp1829  I think that you're saying that an adult should have the right to transition to the opposite sex if they want to. However, what if I'm a doctor and I believe that my patient may NOT be transgender but suffering from other mental health issues, like autism or emotional issues stemming from sexual or violent trauma? Should I be FORCED to perform the surgery, anyway, or to even affirm that my patient's ONLY problem is his gender identity and that surgery is the ONLY solution? That's what's happening now. If a doctor or medical professional does NOT affirm a patient's self diagnosis or gender dysphoria, he could lose his medical licence and face other disciplinary measures. How is FORCED diagnosis, from a medical board, who hasn't even SEEN the patient, giving doctors the freedom to practise medicine using science and conscience as their guide? Sometimes the worst person to give medical freedom to is the patient. That's where a doctor of conscience should be able to say, to his/her patient, that they need deeper psychoanalytical therapy. Transgenderism is the ONLY medical field in which the patient pronounces their own diagnosis. Every other medical requires the relating of symptoms to the doctor, a barrage of medical tests and professional therapy if required. ONLY transgender medicine allows the patient to be the doctor. If I can't diagnosis myself with a brain tumour and demand surgery, how can I diagnosis myself with gender dysphoria and demand surgery. It doesn't make sense.
    1
  6977.  @davidkramp1829  So, you start out asking about freedom, nothing else and I'm supposed to know what it is you're talking about. However, you want to talk about hypotheticals and forget about the reality of the moment. Well, you're not going to get a definitive yes or no because it's too complex an issue to address it a monosyllabic response. I addressed some of the issues in my previous response. I think that the patient has the right to the best medical advice and treatment possible. That's NOT affirming their gender dysphoria on demand and then being forced to perform surgery when it may not be the best medical option for the individual. Surgery should be the last resort, not mandated as a knee jerk solution to ALL gender diagnosis offered. That's the reality of what's happening now. A person, with severe emotional problems, can demand surgery when it's not the best course for them to take. To acquiesce to those demands might even constitute malpractice if the patient's problems are multiple. We'd better sort that out before so we understand better what we're doing and what consequences are involved when surgery is a customer demand and not medically required. When it's cut one and cut all, that's a dangerous route to take. If it is the best way, then we'd better ensure that we have solid criteria in which to formulate such a life altering decision. I will say that there should be no transgender surgery for minors. The young are just too uncertain of their place in life to do that.
    1
  6978. 1
  6979. 1
  6980. 1
  6981. 1
  6982. 1
  6983. 1
  6984. 1
  6985. 1
  6986. 1
  6987. 1
  6988. 1
  6989. 1
  6990. 1
  6991. 1
  6992. 1
  6993. 1
  6994. 1
  6995. 1
  6996. 1
  6997. 1
  6998. 1
  6999. 1
  7000. 1
  7001. 1
  7002. 1
  7003. 1
  7004. 1
  7005. 1
  7006. 1
  7007. 1
  7008. 1
  7009. 1
  7010. 1
  7011. 1
  7012. 1
  7013. 1
  7014. 1
  7015. 1
  7016. 1
  7017. 1
  7018. 1
  7019. 1
  7020. 1
  7021. 1
  7022. 1
  7023. 1
  7024. 1
  7025. 1
  7026. 1
  7027. 1
  7028. 1
  7029. 1
  7030. 1
  7031. 1
  7032. 1
  7033. 1
  7034. 1
  7035. 1
  7036. 1
  7037. 1
  7038. 1
  7039. 1
  7040. 1
  7041. 1
  7042. 1
  7043. 1
  7044. 1
  7045. 1
  7046. 1
  7047. 1
  7048. 1
  7049. 1
  7050. 1
  7051. 1
  7052. 1
  7053. 1
  7054. 1
  7055. 1
  7056. 1
  7057. 1
  7058. 1
  7059. 1
  7060. 1
  7061. 1
  7062. 1
  7063. 1
  7064. 1
  7065. 1
  7066. 1
  7067. 1
  7068. 1
  7069. 1
  7070. 1
  7071. 1
  7072. 1
  7073. 1
  7074. 1
  7075. 1
  7076. 1
  7077. 1
  7078. 1
  7079. 1
  7080. 1
  7081. 1
  7082. 1
  7083. 1
  7084. 1
  7085. 1
  7086. 1
  7087. 1
  7088. 1
  7089. 1
  7090. 1
  7091. 1
  7092. 1
  7093. 1
  7094. 1
  7095. 1
  7096. 1
  7097. 1
  7098. 1
  7099. 1
  7100. 1
  7101.  @CCPLord  I'm not blaming the kid for the police actions. I'm blaming her for how she behaved, ON THAT DAY. That's doesn't excuse what the police did. Once again, I'm talking about MY responsibility if that was MY child. MY child. It is my job to teach her how to behave in these circumstances, to teach her to try to maintain self control, no matter what. That she could have represented herself, as a human being, in a much better way. For you to inject murdered family members....and WORSE, things that didn't happen, is illogical. I have a responsibility to my child, to ensure her well being, her survival even, by teaching her that she must always try to maintain self control, as much as possible. If she believes that this kind of behaviour is normal, then she'll accept it of others and she'll take up with others who lose control and react in horrific ways, to her detriment and it could be a LOT worse than just a little pepper spray. It's my responsibility to show her that you cannot control how others act, but you can control how you behave. I can't do that with police officers. I can't go down to the local precinct and start teaching the officers how adults should behave. They're not my responsibility, but MY daughter is. Get this. If she was MY daughter. Not if that was MY police force. Then I have to deal with their behaviour, but I didn't come from that angle. I've said, right from the start, "If that was my daughter". I have a job, as a parent. Someone has failed her, big time, long before this horrific incident happened.
    1
  7102. 1
  7103. 1
  7104. 1
  7105. 1
  7106. 1
  7107. 1
  7108. 1
  7109. 1
  7110. 1
  7111. 1
  7112. 1
  7113. 1
  7114. 1
  7115. 1
  7116. 1
  7117. 1
  7118. 1
  7119. 1
  7120. 1
  7121. 1
  7122. 1
  7123. 1
  7124. 1
  7125. 1
  7126. 1
  7127. 1
  7128. 1
  7129. 1
  7130. 1
  7131. 1
  7132. 1
  7133. 1
  7134. 1
  7135. 1
  7136. 1
  7137. 1
  7138. 1
  7139. 1
  7140. 1
  7141. 1
  7142. 1
  7143. 1
  7144. 1
  7145. 1
  7146. 1
  7147. 1
  7148. 1
  7149. 1
  7150. 1
  7151. 1
  7152. 1
  7153. 1
  7154. 1
  7155. 1
  7156. 1
  7157. 1
  7158. 1
  7159. 1
  7160. 1
  7161. 1
  7162. 1
  7163. 1
  7164. 1
  7165. 1
  7166. 1
  7167. 1
  7168. 1
  7169. 1
  7170. 1
  7171. 1
  7172. 1
  7173. 1
  7174. 1
  7175. 1
  7176. 1
  7177. 1
  7178. 1
  7179. 1
  7180. 1
  7181. 1
  7182. 1
  7183. 1
  7184. 1
  7185. 1
  7186. 1
  7187. 1
  7188. 1
  7189. 1
  7190. 1
  7191. 1
  7192. 1
  7193. 1
  7194. 1
  7195. 1
  7196. 1
  7197. 1
  7198. 1
  7199. 1
  7200. 1
  7201. 1
  7202. 1
  7203. 1
  7204. 1
  7205. 1
  7206. 1
  7207. 1
  7208. 1
  7209. 1
  7210. 1
  7211. 1
  7212. 1
  7213. 1
  7214. 1
  7215. 1
  7216. 1
  7217. 1
  7218. 1
  7219.  @chickenlover657  One of the things about socialist thinking is that socialism is an evolving phenomenon based on the idea of the dialectic. Marx's brand of socialism is the product of the socialist ideas that came before him. To be socialist does NOT mean that you're Marxist. Socialism comes in various guises. Mussolini was a socialist but had different socialist ideas than Lenin and Lenin, the Bolshevik, had different ideas than the rival socialist Mensheviks. Today's socialist are different again than Marxists, who emphasised class as the great divider of society. American socialists don't do that due to the fact that socialists 50 to 60 years ago concluded that the western workers were not about to foster revolution because things were going to well for them. So they changed their emphasis to identity, namely race, gender or sexuality. Same claims of oppression and inequality but from a different viewpoint. "We have nothing to lose but our chains" has been a slogan of the radical socialist for over 150 years among others. Orwell spoke about Party slogans in his writings, especially in his books "Animal Farm" and "1984". That was over 70 years ago. They're still using them. In Lenin's time it was the "class struggle", and "workers taking over the means of production". Now it's "white supremacy", "white fragility", "Diversity, equity and inclusion". Different slogans for different times. Thoughtlessly repeated with no need to think about it. The slogan is the truth, until a "new truth" is revealed. No need to talk further than that. The truth, their truth, is self evident until we need a "new truth". That's the sloganeering. They didn't have the communication apparatus like we do today so they don't have the number of slogans and catch-phrases that we do now. However, it doesn't negate the mindset of the simplistic summation to be explanation enough for complex socialist ideas. It's enough to repeat the slogan. The rest, to their mind, is just window dressing.
    1
  7220. 1
  7221. 1
  7222. 1
  7223. 1
  7224. 1
  7225. 1
  7226. 1
  7227. 1
  7228. 1
  7229. 1
  7230. 1
  7231. 1
  7232. 1
  7233. 1
  7234. 1
  7235. 1
  7236. 1
  7237. 1
  7238. 1
  7239. 1
  7240. 1
  7241. 1
  7242. 1
  7243.  @Lawrence_Talbot  Cain and all his descendants were NOT black. Years after Cain died, the world was wiped out by a flood. The only people left were Noah and his family. If Cain's descendants were black, that lineage would have died out with the flood. That's according to the Bible. Also, Lilith is only mentioned once in the Bible and only in certain versions. She's referred to as a night demon or monster. Nowhere else in the Bible is she mentioned. The Israelites did have folk tales surrounding Lilith which came from their time in Babylon but Lilith is NOT a figure that is a part of Christianity, at least not in the context that you've given. Also, Matt doesn't see anything wrong with this kid. He said so explicitly. He feels that the kid is making a mistake and he may be getting harmful information. Matt is encouraging him to love the person that he was born as and that there's nothing wrong enough with that person to warrant such radical medical treatment. Love yourself as you are and work within that framework to better yourself. People have been at war with one another as long as there's been recorded history. Even the indigenous, of the Americas, went Empire building and used war to gain their power. It's that way all over the world, throughout all of history. Just about everything that you said is based on an enmity of Christianity and your manipulation of facts to rationalise that deep dislike. That's called bigotry and it shows that you may well have become the monster that you're seeking to destroy. (Nietzsche)
    1
  7244. 1
  7245. 1
  7246. 1
  7247. 1
  7248. 1
  7249. 1
  7250. 1
  7251. 1
  7252. 1
  7253. 1
  7254. 1
  7255. "Leftism makes you indecent". On the surface, that sounds as hateful as what Biden said in his speech, but you have to look at it a little closer. What makes this statement true is the leftist idea that they are striving for that socialist Utopia on earth. This means that anyone that disagrees with that path to Utopia, is striving to prevent that Utopia, probably for personal gain. In effect, their enemies are willing to destroy the planet, to stop their Utopia from ever coming to fruition. Case in point....climate change and environmental catastrophes. Conservatives have a difficult time falling in line with the view that the socialists have on those subjects. Conservatives believe, for the most part, that Utopia is unachievable, in this life. "My Kingdom is not of this earth" which describes the religious Utopia, that we know as heaven, will never be a part of human existence as we know it. Instead, being the flawed creatures that we are, we are to find redemption, in order to find achieve that Utopia, in the spiritual realm and after we die. We have to hope, through our faith and how we live, that we can find the grace that gets us to that Utopian perfection after our life is over. That makes it a personal journey which smacks of selfishness and greed to the socialist which, to them, negates their socialist Utopia on earth. We're both striving for the same thing but the socialists have a deeper commitment to a heaven on earth and any deviation from that goal must be met with force and hostility. Of course it's a lot more complex than that but that's how I see it, anyway.
    1
  7256. 1
  7257. 1
  7258. 1
  7259. 1
  7260. 1
  7261. 1
  7262. 1
  7263. 1
  7264. 1
  7265. 1
  7266. 1
  7267. 1
  7268. 1
  7269. 1
  7270. 1
  7271. 1
  7272. 1
  7273. 1
  7274. 1
  7275. 1
  7276. 1
  7277. 1
  7278. 1
  7279. 1
  7280. 1
  7281. 1
  7282. 1
  7283. 1
  7284. 1
  7285. 1
  7286. 1
  7287. 1
  7288. 1
  7289. 1
  7290. 1
  7291.  @shannontower2176  It's not just my families life story. It's the story of the entire North American continent. I still see the odd person working and living that way today. They're doing just fine. These are people that look for solutions to their problems, not people to blame. In fact, my brother in law, works a 60 to 70 hour week even though he's done well over the last 25 years. His son is following in his footsteps, doing his own thing, started from scratch and at 31 years old, already owns his own home. So don't tell me about life being so "great" in the fifties. People were a lot poorer than they are now. The big difference is their attitude over the attitudes so prevalent today. Back then, NO ONE, that I knew, went on vacation in the Caribbean in the winter. Now, it seems as if everyone is going. Waitresses, factory workers, cab drivers, just ordinary people. My dad didn't go on a vacation for 17 years when he was young. That's the way people lived back then. This "do your research" is one of the cheapest and meaningless comments that people throw around these days. It's dismissive, vague and arrogant, as if the person using that admonition is the only one that could possibly know anything about the subject due to their extensive knowledge and education. Instead of accusing and blaming and making vague remarks, try looking for solutions for yourself. I've heard this all before as a bartender. People whining about how their life sucks and how they have nothing, all the while swilling back up to 30 bucks worth of beer nearly every day. They're clueless.
    1
  7292. 1
  7293. 1
  7294. 1
  7295. 1
  7296. 1
  7297. 1
  7298. 1
  7299.  Your Worst Nightmare - Facts  In 1960, I was 9 years old. I WAS one of those hippies. I lived through Vietnam, remember the the repeal of Jim Crow and saw the whites only signs that had yet to be taken down in 1969. So don't give me this superior attitude. Where did you get the idea that I don't believe that global warming isn't man made? I never said that at all. I said that if you force change without thought, that it could be a disaster worse than what climate change could bring. If you take too much of our resources and the wealth that we've created to transform the world overnight, you might find that we'll end up with nothing.....like Venezuela. Also, you've not even addressed one point that I've made, including the big one about population growth. It's a fact that affluence has brought birth rates down and that most of the Western countries would be experiencing population declines were it not for immigration. That's a fact. Also, outcomes from global warming are still speculative. Global warming is real but there are other factors in play that may be overlooked or even considered. You're doom and gloom. I'm saying that if we work hard, make the changes as they make sense and don't force it, we will likely stand the best chance of survival. Have you ever heard of Thomas Malthus? He predicted over 200 years ago that the population will reach a point that we will not be able to feed the world. Well, that hasn't happened. Yes, there are hungry people in the world, but that's not because of an inability to grow enough food. It's political or more to the point, political strife and corruption. These are always the poor countries where corrupt leaders prevent freedom and the economic growth of the average citizen. There may yet be solutions to those problems of climate change that haven't even occurred to us, just like solutions were found that Malthus, and those that followed, couldn't imagine. Besides, no matter how much I worry, those things are going to happen, anyway. My worrying isn't going to change a thing except make MY life pessimistic and miserable. I'm not living the last few years I have left unhappy. That doesn't help anyone one bit.
    1
  7300. 1
  7301. 1
  7302. 1
  7303. 1
  7304. 1
  7305. 1
  7306. 1
  7307. 1
  7308. 1
  7309. 1
  7310. 1
  7311. 1
  7312. 1
  7313. 1
  7314. 1
  7315. 1
  7316. 1
  7317. 1
  7318. 1
  7319. 1
  7320. 1
  7321. 1
  7322. 1
  7323. 1
  7324. 1
  7325. 1
  7326. 1
  7327. 1
  7328. 1
  7329. 1
  7330. 1
  7331. 1
  7332. 1
  7333. 1
  7334. 1
  7335. 1
  7336. 1
  7337. 1
  7338. 1
  7339. 1
  7340. 1
  7341. 1
  7342. 1
  7343. 1
  7344. 1
  7345. 1
  7346. 1
  7347. 1
  7348. 1
  7349. 1
  7350. 1
  7351. 1
  7352. 1
  7353. 1
  7354. 1
  7355. 1
  7356. 1
  7357. 1
  7358. 1
  7359. 1
  7360. 1
  7361. 1
  7362. 1
  7363. 1
  7364. 1
  7365. 1
  7366. 1
  7367.  @markbishopiii1577  Actually, it goes even DEEPER that what Donalds was talking about. CRT comes out of Critical Theory, an idea conceived by Max Horkheimer, part of the Frankfurt group, who are self proclaimed Marxists. He came to the US in the early thirties and decided that the traditional Marxism, the class struggle, may not be as effective in the US and other western nations so he came up with the idea that power was at the root of all struggles in history. Years later, in the 1980s, a group of Marxists gathered together in an old nunnery in Madison Wisconsin, to discuss how race was a big part of this power struggle. A member of that group, Kimberly Crenshaw, proposed the name "Critical Race Theory", paying homage to Max Horkheimer's ideas.....but it doesn't stop there. There's a guy by the name of Paolo Friere, a Brazilian educator and a Marxist, who believed that social change could be achieved through an integration of education and activist ideas through an proposal called "Praxis" or practical application. He outlined it in his writings, one of which is the book "Education for Critical Consciousness". Notice how the word "critical" is a part of that title, pointing Horkheimer's philosophy. This book is required reading in many education programs for teachers. It's integrating critical thought into the education system in a way that the things being taught are through the lens of this new way of this new look Marxism. Reid is correct. It's not being taught as subject matter. It's even more insidious than that. It's become a part of how history, geography, literature and even math and science is taught to primary, secondary and university level students. This is done in the same way Christian schools teach religion, integrating it in all subject manner in a covert manner. The receipts are there. Reid cut Donalds off before he could do any meaningful explanation of what he meant. She didn't want to hear it. In a way it's how the press presents Critical Theory. You might call it "Critical Media Theory".
    1
  7368.  @davidluong8370  You may not believe it but I'm not talking about you and those who go after specialised trades or careers. I'm talking about those who go to the top schools and study the humanities, social arts and some of the other specialities, like women's studies, philosophy or social work. They are jobs that have no future and either have little to no demand or command very little pay. They take on the same debt that you did and make a lot less money than what I do. My statements weren't overall generalities, but you can get degrees in nursing, engineering or computer sciences and do quite well for yourself with little debt. Also, my entire point isn't about what you spend on education but more about understanding value for your buck. I will lay odds that you're not the one complaining that you'll never be able to pay back your student loans because you're not making much more being a social worker than minimum wage. Why would you go to a prestigious university, spend all that money on a Bachelor's degree, when you could have spend WAY less on a diploma, in the same field, and worked right alongside the person from the fancy university. That's the common sense way of looking at it. I understand that if you want to be a doctor or lawyer or even a top notch engineering degree, that it'll cost, but they have high potential. Gender studies isn't something that's in high demand. One other thing, I don't care about how much money you have or what anyone else has. What gets me is that they feel entitled to that big degree in activism and then want me to pay for it. Then when I suggest that there are other ways to get to where you want, people get all defensive and act like I'm showing them up or something. Also, not everyone can be a lawyer or doctor. You don't want to be like Cuba where there are so many doctors that there are doctors driving cab or growing vegetables to make a living. There's such a thing as realistic goals and finding the best and most efficient ways to get there. Getting rich isn't the goal. It's more about feeling good about what you do and how it affects the things that matter most....your family for one thing.
    1
  7369. 1
  7370. 1
  7371. 1
  7372. 1
  7373. My parents came to this country with nothing. No bank account, no property.....nothing. They didn't own the cot that they slept on, the table they had breakfast on, even the plates they ate off didn't belong to them. They lived in a one room shack with no running water. They worked hard, my dad working 3 jobs at the same time and my mom raising 7 kids and worked a large garden and small orchard so we'd have inexpensive but decent food. Now, my dad has some money and he's enjoying the fruits of his hard work. Anyone of those blacks could have done that and many did just that. Larry Elder talks about how hard his father worked and Candace Owens talks about her grandparents and their work ethic. The left and those who want handouts HATE them. They hate them because they have pride and a strong sense of ethics. The ones that want reparations have no pride or work ethic and reparations won't help them one bit. They don't know how to live responsibly and many will end up in bankruptcy. What really galls me is that my dad, who's now 89, will have his tax money paying 25 year old children who've never worked a day in their pathetic lives. I'll never forget my dad's reaction when told, for religious reasons, to quit a job and if he had financial problems, they'd help him out. My dad told him that, as long as he was able bodied, he'd eat the grass out on the lawn before he'd take a handout. These parasites would NEVER understand that. I suppose this comment will be deleted but I had to get this off my chest.
    1
  7374. 1
  7375. 1
  7376. 1
  7377. 1
  7378. 1
  7379. 1
  7380. 1
  7381. 1
  7382. 1
  7383. 1
  7384. 1
  7385. 1
  7386. 1
  7387. 1
  7388. 1
  7389. 1
  7390. 1
  7391. 1
  7392. 1
  7393. 1
  7394. 1
  7395. 1
  7396. 1
  7397. 1
  7398. 1
  7399. 1
  7400. 1
  7401. 1
  7402. 1
  7403. 1
  7404. 1
  7405. 1
  7406. 1
  7407. 1
  7408. 1
  7409. 1
  7410. 1
  7411. 1
  7412. 1
  7413. 1
  7414. 1
  7415. 1
  7416. 1
  7417. 1
  7418. 1
  7419. 1
  7420. 1
  7421. 1
  7422. 1
  7423. 1
  7424. 1
  7425. 1
  7426. 1
  7427. 1
  7428. 1
  7429. 1
  7430. 1
  7431. 1
  7432. 1
  7433. 1
  7434. 1
  7435. 1
  7436. 1
  7437.  @SHrepairs  I'm Canadian and we have a socialised healthcare system and we flattened the curve by doing EXACTLY the same things as the Americans did. What we don't have, and that's what the controversy is now in the US, is a polarised political atmosphere where progressive and Democrat controlled state governments are imposing Draconian rules, under threat of arrest, on the average citizen. We don't have snitch lines, we can mow our lawns, buy grass seed and paint and we don't have drones flying around telling us to disperse and go inside. That's what Democrat state governments are doing and Republican state governments are NOT doing. In fact, socialised health care is the dream of Democrats. Also, there are health care worker laid off in areas where the virus hasn't been a big problem due to lockdowns is their state that won't allow medical activity other than extreme emergencies and Covid related cases. I have friends and relatives in the US and they're the ones telling me this, online. You're obviously being driven by a hatred of free economies. I don't know where you're from but I will tell you that Canada, in spite of it's socialised health care system has a free economy. I've even ran a small business and have many friends and family members who own their own business and love it. That's capitalism....and it's the freedom to be the person that you want to be instead of being controlled from above. I'm perplexed by anyone that would want control to come from anywhere but within. I don't like a big government, the ultimate corporation, controlling everything that I do.
    1
  7438. 1
  7439. 1
  7440.  @davidmays8974  And if you'd sailed with Columbus, you'd have been complicit with Columbus. People LOVE to think that they're SO good but it's damned easy when you don't live in a time or situation where these things were happening. My parents grew up in Nazi occupied Netherlands. Do you know who the Nazi soldiers were? They were ordinary people, just like you and me. One time farmers, shop keepers, factory workers, living ordinary lives and they found themselves doing some of the most atrocious acts in our recent history. These same ordinary Germans went into my mother's home when she was 11 years old and took ALL their food. They almost starved to death. Had you or I been one of those soldiers, we'd have done the same. We're just not in that situation. The Spanish had no problem with slavery. No one did at the time. It was a part of life all over the planet. The Aztecs were taking slaves and them brutally murdering them in religious ceremonies and doing it by the hundreds. Funny how NO one calls that brutal. Columbus wrote that the native Tainos had told him about the fierce and warlike Caribs, who used to raid the Tainos for cannibalistic rituals and capture and enslave their women. Once again, I don't hear you complaining about THEIR brutality. No one is perfect and that includes you. If you think that you wouldn't have been goose stepping in the Nazi ranks had you been born in Germany in 1925, you're only kidding yourself. Any honest person has to admit that they'd have done the same. It's the dishonest ones who puff out their chest and point fingers at everyone else thinking that they're better than others. Once you believe that, and it appears that you do, you'll find that you'd be quite ready and willing to do horrific things to those who you believe are worse than what you are. It's the way of humanity all through history. You haven't learned a thing except to believe that you're superior to "those people" over there.
    1
  7441.  @micahlucero8123  That's a great appeal to emotion. My parents grew up in the war in the Netherlands. My grandfather had to be institutionalised due to severe mental illness and left 4 small children alone with my grandmother. They had little to nothing to eat, yet Nazi soldiers would take half of the little food that they had left for the war effort. They would live on eels, caught in the canal across the road, for weeks at a time. She hated fish till the day she died. My mother left home at 12 to work for food and lodging at another couple's home about 30 miles away. If she didn't, she may have starved to death. Human history sucks. We have to know about it, learn about the mindset that brought it about. Your rant is why people build the resentment that keeps them locked within themselves and when they find the power, to react viciously. My mother experienced the wrath of the German people, who resented those who kept them poor and struggling for centuries. My parents didn't let their experience turn them into resentful and vengeful people. They immigrated to Canada, worked their butts off to provide a good life for me and my siblings. That's how you defeat "oppression". I know indigenous Canadians who went to those schools. They've done well for themselves. Built their own families, homes, had good careers and aren't railing on about how tough they had it. They talk about the schools.....the good, the friends they made but also the bad. They don't let it define them. They're strong, living their lives in dignity and appropriate pride. Others don't and I see them living lives of resentment and addiction. You can blame others but others aren't going to fix life for you. My parents and my native friends, who've been successful and lived full lives, prove that. Resentment can bring as much misery as any "oppressor" Don't become your own subjugator. You may find that oppressor the most difficult one to escape from.
    1
  7442. 1
  7443. 1
  7444. 1
  7445. 1
  7446. 1
  7447.  @cortical1  I did give you facts. I told you they made a big deal about Trump throwing fish food into the coy pond. That actually happened. it was the stupidest news story that I'd ever heard and the media edited footage just to make up the narrative. This was NEWS to them. I told you about Nick Sandman, a kid that was doing nothing and the press went berserk about it. Also with a made up narrative, with edited footage and everything. Trump took an extra scoop of ice cream, and THAT was news to them. A SCOOP OF ICE CREAM!!!!! And they made a big deal of it. Was it illegal? NO. It was a scoop of ice cream. If you think that the MSM wouldn't have taken a story about Don Jr. lying on a gun application and made it a big story, then YOU'RE delusional. The thing is, they'd have been right to do so. Get that!!!!! I'll repeat it. Had this been Don Jr., they would have been RIGHT about reporting it as a big story. It would have been the RIGHT THING TO DO!!!! It's shows corruption. Not 2 scoops of ice cream corruption but using the power of the presidency to cover up an illegal act. Once more, had Don Jr. done this, the media would have been right to report it in a big way. I don't care who it is. If the son of a president, vice president or someone running for the president does something like this, it's BIG news...whether it was Biden, Trump, Obama or even Abraham Lincoln. YOU want to pick and choose based on whether you like them or not. I choose it based on whether the DEED was right or wrong. YOU base it on your feelings.
    1
  7448. 1
  7449. 1
  7450. 1
  7451. 1
  7452. 1
  7453. 1
  7454. 1
  7455. 1
  7456. 1
  7457. 1
  7458. 1
  7459. 1
  7460. 1
  7461. 1
  7462. 1
  7463. 1
  7464. 1
  7465. 1
  7466. 1
  7467. 1
  7468. 1
  7469. 1
  7470. 1
  7471. 1
  7472. 1
  7473. 1
  7474. 1
  7475. 1
  7476. 1
  7477. 1
  7478. 1
  7479. 1
  7480. 1
  7481. 1
  7482. 1
  7483. 1
  7484. 1
  7485. 1
  7486. 1
  7487. 1
  7488. 1
  7489.  @bean-spiller  First, the wall isn't finished. Biden stopped it. It's like saying that you started building your home, you sadly passed away and you're kids didn't finish it and that's YOUR fault, somehow. Biden stopped construction almost immediately, when he took office and when Trump was metaphorically dead. There are huge sections of the wall that are just lying there, waiting to go up and if Trump had won the election would be up and standing. What I find ironic is that Clinton, Bush and Obama had barriers put up and even bragged about it but when Trump wanted to put up a wall, it suddenly became racist. That's just politics and nothing else. The part about Mexico paying for it, wasn't about Mexico just cutting a check. It was a warning to Mexico that if they didn't help, he was going to impose trade tariffs. That's how he was going to get Mexico to pay for it. It was a threat, not a promise and most reasonable people knew that. Right now, illegal immigration is at its highest, ever. That's a fact and pointing the finger at Trump doesn't change that. The separation of children was happening during the Obama administration as well. Why? Because the cartels are using children for all kinds of reasons. It's as if no one wants to admit that child trafficking exists for all kinds of nefarious reasons. Migrants cross the border, with kids, with no ID but that's just fine? Why would ANYONE allow a man, with a child to cross the border and not expect that man to prove that this child is his? That's as irresponsible as it gets. I don't know if Trump's policies would be working better than Biden's right now because I can't see the results of something that didn't happen. What I do know is that in the Congressional hearings is that the Democrats are reluctant to admit that there is a problem. If they had any integrity and courage, they'd say, with regret, that the problem is immense and look for ways to mitigate the numbers coming in. They just won't do that. I've not heard any new ideas from the Biden administration and if there is I'd like for you to enlighten me so I can evaluate its effectiveness. Right now, it is a disaster and us babbling about Trump does nothing to improve the situation.
    1
  7490. 1
  7491. 1
  7492. 1
  7493. 1
  7494. 1
  7495. 1
  7496. 1
  7497. 1
  7498. 1
  7499. 1
  7500. 1
  7501. 1
  7502. 1
  7503. 1
  7504. 1
  7505. 1
  7506. 1
  7507. 1
  7508. 1
  7509. 1
  7510. 1
  7511. 1
  7512. 1
  7513. 1
  7514. 1
  7515. 1
  7516. 1
  7517. 1
  7518. 1
  7519. 1
  7520. 1
  7521. 1
  7522. 1
  7523. 1
  7524. 1
  7525. 1
  7526. 1
  7527. 1
  7528. 1
  7529. 1
  7530. 1
  7531. 1
  7532. 1
  7533. 1
  7534. 1
  7535. 1
  7536. 1
  7537. 1
  7538. 1
  7539. 1
  7540. 1
  7541. 1
  7542. 1
  7543. 1
  7544. 1
  7545. 1
  7546. 1
  7547. 1
  7548. 1
  7549. 1
  7550. 1
  7551. 1
  7552. 1
  7553. 1
  7554. 1
  7555. 1
  7556. 1
  7557. 1
  7558. 1
  7559. 1
  7560. 1
  7561. 1
  7562. 1
  7563. 1
  7564. 1
  7565. 1
  7566. 1
  7567. 1
  7568. 1
  7569. 1
  7570. 1
  7571. 1
  7572. 1
  7573. 1
  7574. 1
  7575. 1
  7576. 1
  7577. 1
  7578. 1
  7579. 1
  7580. 1
  7581. 1
  7582. 1
  7583. 1
  7584. 1
  7585. 1
  7586. 1
  7587. 1
  7588. 1
  7589. 1
  7590. 1
  7591. 1
  7592. 1
  7593. 1
  7594.  @JohnBarron-s4c  Do you know what's even more despicable? Supporting the idea that we MUST affirm a child's identity claims and allow them puberty blockers, drugs and surgeries on their say so. This is the only place in medicine where the patient, who can be minors, are the ones diagnosing their own mental health. As long as they support the genital mutilation of minors, I will NEVER vote Democrat. As long as they support affirmative action, which cheated Americans of Asian heritage of placements in our top universities in the name of DEI, I will NEVER vote Democrat. As long as they pit race, gender, ethnicity, religions and other identities against one another, I will NEVER vote Democrat. Trump may be a little uncouth but he never support the amputation of healthy breasts off of a 15 year old girl and he NEVER say that hundreds of riots which killed over 25 people, injured thousands more and caused billions in property damage, are just "peaceful" protests. Also, he does NOT support what's happening in the Democrat supporting cities of America. The homelessness, the open drug abuse and deaths by overdose and the deterioration of once great cities like San Francisco and New York. Kamala is the ONE??? She tried to put the mother of a girl with sickle cell anaemia in jail because her daughter missed school due to hospitalisations and much needed blood transfusions to save her life. It took her 2 YEARS to finally have the charge dismissed, even though the mother had all the medical proof to back her up. That woman is a monster.
    1
  7595. 1
  7596. 1
  7597. 1
  7598. 1
  7599. 1
  7600. 1
  7601. 1
  7602. 1
  7603. 1
  7604. 1
  7605. 1
  7606. 1
  7607. 1
  7608. 1
  7609. 1
  7610. 1
  7611.  @ponytoast1231  Yet, when the 13 Colonies fought for independence from the British, a mere 14 years after Quebec was ceded to the British, the Quebec colony wanted to remain with the British. Life for the average person in Quebec was BETTER under the British than it was under the French and they didn't want things to change. What in the world does De Gaulle have to do with Canada backstabbing Quebec, anyway. Quebec hadn't been a part of France for 204 years when he said "Vive le Quebec libre". They didn't back-stab De Gaulle. It was Canadian soldiers that died so that ingrate could come back to France and become it's ruler. It was none of his business. Worse, there were terrorist groups setting off letter bombs and 3 years later the FLQ, one of these terrorist groups, kidnapped a British diplomat and a Quebecois politician, Pierre Laporte, and murdering him. I suppose that you think that was deserving as well. Quebecois terrorists killing a fellow Quebecois. British imperialism....that's how you describe WW2. The Nazis invaded Poland, then Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belguim and FRANCE. De Gaulle had to flee to the hated imperialist Britain so he could rule France in absentia. Of all the convoluted logic I've ever heard, this takes the cake. The imperialist British, gave De Gaulle refuge and then helped him to get his country back so he could be the president of France....IN FRANCE. That's the stupidest imperialism that I've ever heard of. And guess who didn't want to help De Gaulle get his country back. The Quebecois. They could care less if France ever got from under the Nazi yoke. As far as they were concerned, De Gaulle could rot, hiding in England. It was the rest of Canada that was willing to fight to defeat the Nazis, not Quebec, and without the help of the Canadians, British, Americans and others, France would have remained under the thumb of the Nazi dominated Vichy government. The French would have really loved that. They were still smarting from the way the Franco/Prussian war ended that unified all the German states. Your entire comment is whacked.
    1
  7612. 1
  7613. 1
  7614. 1
  7615. 1
  7616. 1
  7617. 1
  7618. 1
  7619. 1
  7620. 1
  7621. 1
  7622. 1
  7623. 1
  7624. 1
  7625. 1
  7626. 1
  7627. 1
  7628. 1
  7629. 1
  7630. 1
  7631. 1
  7632. 1
  7633. 1
  7634. 1
  7635. 1
  7636. 1
  7637. 1
  7638. 1
  7639. 1
  7640. 1
  7641. 1
  7642. 1
  7643. 1
  7644. 1
  7645. 1
  7646. 1
  7647. 1
  7648. 1
  7649. 1
  7650. 1
  7651. 1
  7652. 1
  7653. 1
  7654. 1
  7655. 1
  7656. 1
  7657. 1
  7658. 1
  7659. 1
  7660. 1
  7661. 1
  7662. 1
  7663.  @hanshansen3885  If it's happening in one school, you go and see if it's happening in your local school. If they're reluctant to tell you what's going on in their school, THEN you insist that they tell you. If they're open and above board, you can trust them. If they're reluctant or put you off, I wouldn't trust them. If an incoming Supreme Court Justice can't tell you what a woman is, then we know that this ideology has reached the highest levels of government. When our president fills positions based on group identity, it only confirms it. Why would our state funded and operated schools be any different? All I want is to be able to see what's being taught. "I am pretty sure that everything the students are taught is on the schools webpage and in the curriculum." Pretty sure isn't good enough. Every day I see videos where teachers go on TikTok and tell us the most outrageous things. Drag queens brought into school. Kindergarten kids participating in mini Pride Parades. LGTQ flags hanging all over the classroom. Telling us how they discuss their private lives with the student. All you have to do is look it up. Kali Fontanilla, a teacher, has a YouTube channel and she talks about it all the time and she's FAR from the only one. If you're comfortable with being pretty sure...well that's up to you. However, there's one thing I've learned. When you trust something or someone implicitly, you leave yourself open to be fooled explicitly. Do more than just doubt it. Find out for sure. One thing is sure and that is that war, genocide, slavery even a lot of famines and mass starvation are the result of governments. Why a government or those in power, would suddenly stop at using schools to further their cause is illogical. It's why the American Constitution is so strong on giving power to the people and taking it away from the state. Our schools are state operated and that should always mean that they should be open to inspection.
    1
  7664. 1
  7665. 1
  7666. 1
  7667. 1
  7668. 1
  7669. 1
  7670. 1
  7671. 1
  7672. 1
  7673. 1
  7674. 1
  7675. 1
  7676.  @patacleus6803  Your point is illustrated by the fact that Lowndes County is losing population every year and has been for years. The county seat lost 200 people in 10 years, a lot when the population is already only around 1000. That means that the cost per unit for sewage is getting even MORE expensive. You're not talking 15 to 20 thousand a hookup. This is getting close to 100,000 a hookup, maybe more. Therefore they almost have to remain with some sort of septic system. University students found it easy to spot the problem but a solution wasn't coming, not one anyone could afford, anyway. The homeless of San Francisco aren't looking for opportunities. Not the one that are causing the need for a Poop App, anyway. They have serious drug and mental issues and the local governments seem paralysed in coming up with any solution. In fact they make it worse for the average citizen. For one thing, police are told to not even bother investigating a crime under 800 dollars in value so theft is out of sight. Discarded needles are everywhere and 1/3 of them are needles that the city is handing out in their needle exchange program. You can't take your kids to the park, not with all the needles laying around. But all the politicians and local activists can say is that you can't arrest someone for being homeless and the problem continues. Housing is crippled by unbelievable red tape and all kinds of restrictions. It cost a fortune just to get all the permits and you haven't even turn a shovel of soil yet to lay the foundations. These blue states have issues and it's not economic issues. It has more to do with idealism and maybe even corruption. Money keeps being poured into the issue and none seems to ending at the point where it's needed. Where is it going? At least, in Alabama, they're not losing the money. They're not getting it, because it's too difficult to justify the cost of fixing it, especially when they're already in a economically depressed area. That's NOT the problem in San Francisco.
    1
  7677.  @patacleus6803  It's government policy when the person is pooping in broad daylight and nothing is done about it. It's government policy when they're living in tents and there's garbage everywhere and no one cleans it up. It's government policy when businesses have people sleeping in their entrances and their complaints fall on deaf ears. The money is there, in San Francisco, after all, the area is home to Silicon valley. They're just not using it to help these people. It's not like Alabama, where there is no Silicon Valley, and no huge income to get the money in taxes to get the job done. If there's no money to help the homeless in downtown San Francisco, how are ever going to get the money in Alabama to put in a good sewage system? Money doesn't grow on trees. Alabama has to have a source for the cash they need and they don't. San Francisco has the source of income to tax and they can't get it done. In fact, California has some of the highest taxes in the US and still things get steadily worse. At least they have a home and they're not living in tents. Also, I've seen the homeless, not in California but in Detroit, Toronto and Buffalo and most of them have serious mental and drug issues. I've seen them in the small town that I live in and it's the same. There are those that are temporarily homeless but they generally find away out, either through finding a job or government assistance. It's the druggies and the mentally disabled that can be a problem and they have to find a solution that's better than just ignoring them.
    1
  7678. 1
  7679.  @patacleus6803  What this dialogue has shown is that both states have problems that are unique to their positions. Right now, California has some of the highest taxes in the US and still has problems getting things done, as an example, the high speed rail line. California has reached as place of bureaucratic complacency, what happens when a society reaches an overt state of affluence. Alabama is just the opposite. They've always been poor and are finding it difficult to get out from under it. Texas is in the middle. It's a high growth state, taxes are low, bureaucracy is still minimal and it's flourishing. A lot of middle class people are leaving California and are shocked at how low state and municipal taxes are in Texas in comparison to California. It won't last. Once the affluence becomes generational, the complacency will settle in and the bureaucracy will grow. It's an inevitable cycle. Alabama may see the same thing in the future. “Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” It seems to be a cycle that has been seen over and over in history. California won't be spared as long as it adheres to a philosophy that doesn't include personal responsibility, hard work and common sense. California has these homeless problems, not due to lack of money or a lack of a desire to fix it. They're mired in a bureaucratic maze of their own making. Those people shouldn't be living in the streets that way that they are. Not with all the money that's available to those in power. There's something deeper going on.
    1
  7680. 1
  7681. 1
  7682. 1
  7683. 1
  7684. 1
  7685. 1
  7686. 1
  7687. 1
  7688. 1
  7689. 1
  7690. 1
  7691. 1
  7692. 1
  7693. "Similar jobs at different companies" Here comes the anecdotal evidence. Well.....I've got some too. I worked at a factory for 7 years, making a decent wage. I worked alongside women and we made the exact same wage per hour. Over the year, a person COULD make more, if that person worked overtime. I retired and 4 months after I retired, our major competitor, started operations in an empty factory across the street. Get that? Across the street and they were making the exact same product we were. They also paid 4 dollars an hour more, TO START, than what we were getting paid. Some of the guys moved across the street, including a few of the women. They ALL started at that same rate and were now making 4 dollars an hour more. You see, Glamour magazine, when you work for a different company, you've just entered a new variable. In our case, the competitor was a much larger corporation, with deeper pockets. They paid 20 percent more for doing the EXACT same job because of an ability to pay more. It's a failed comparison. Not once, EVER, have I seen anyone make a valid case for gender wage disparity. They always leave something out or neglect important variables. They have to because if you work for the same company at the same job description or level as described in the company policy of job descriptions, it is against the law to pay one person more than another. Against the law. You don't have to go to Glamour magazine to validate unfair practises. You need to get a lawyer and present your case before a judge. They won't in this case because she works for a different company who have their own reasons for paying their employees the rates they do and that is perfectly legal and ethical.
    1
  7694. 1
  7695. 1
  7696. 1
  7697. 1
  7698. 1
  7699. 1
  7700. 1
  7701. 1
  7702. 1
  7703.  @amberpoole-kieniewicz735  Now, it's all about race and gender. Actually, it's boomers who give the most to charity. Since you insist that whites have all the money and minorities are poor, it would seem that it's those rich white boomers are the ones doing the most to help. Also, I lost everything to a divorce and my reaction to the death of my son which happened within months of each other. I started drinking heavily and got to the point where I couldn't hold down a job. After about 10 years of this, I straightened myself out but by then I had put myself in a position where a good paying job was out of reach. I worked at jobs that didn't pay much more than minimum wage. So, I adjusted my approach to money and saving it. I stayed away from owning a car. WAY to expensive to buy, insure, keep fuelled and maintain. I started to do the small things to save. I didn't spend my spare change. It was rolled up and put into a savings account. I got a deal so that every time I used my debit card, the card would round my payment to the nearest 5 dollar amount and the difference between the price and the payment went into a savings account. Every time I walked to do my shopping, I put 10 bucks into a savings account. If the clerk would tell me that I saved 3 bucks on my shopping bill, that 3 bucks went into a savings account. At the end of every month, I would pay my rent, go shopping and the rest would go into a savings account, usually somewhere between 100 and 200 bucks. When I got to $10,000 bucks, I invested 7000 of it into investment plans recommended by my banker. I nickled and dimed my way into a 6 figure savings account. Does that make me morally superior? Hardly, but it sure meant that I was determined to do better for myself and my daughter. Oh yeah, through all that time, I would put about 10 bucks worth of groceries into the food bank bin at our local grocery store. Not the same thing as taking in children, which is an extremely laudable thing to do but this moderately rich white old man did try to help.
    1
  7704. 1
  7705. 1
  7706. 1
  7707. 1
  7708. 1
  7709. 1
  7710. 1
  7711. 1
  7712. 1
  7713. 1
  7714. 1
  7715. 1
  7716. 1
  7717. 1
  7718. 1
  7719. 1
  7720. 1
  7721. 1
  7722. 1
  7723. 1
  7724. 1
  7725. 1
  7726. 1
  7727. 1
  7728. 1
  7729. 1
  7730. 1
  7731. 1
  7732. 1
  7733. 1
  7734. 1
  7735. 1
  7736. 1
  7737. 1
  7738. There's been months of peaceful protests in which buildings were burned, stores were looted, people were killed (David Dorn a prime example) bottles, Molotov cocktails, and high grade fireworks are thrown and thousands of police have had all degrees of injuries. There are COUNTLESS videos that document the violence. A BLM supporter, shot and killed a 9 year old girl, because her mother mistakenly turned into the Wendy's that had been burned to the ground a few night earlier. Anyone that wants to see the videos, of the violence, can do so by doing a simple google search. Hell, the CNN studio, itself, was attacked and vandalised by rioters. If you go out to protest and it ends in violence, you leave, quickly and abruptly. Staying gives the rioters cover by providing numbers for them to do their dirty deeds. If you go out a second night, and it ends in the same manner, realise that looters are going to use you to hide behind, to add legitimacy to their violence so they can continue to loot and destroy. If you keep going out to these protests and they continue to end in violence, you're becoming complicit in that violence, whether you like to admit it or not. If you, like the CNN media pundit, Chris Cuomo, asks where it says that protests can't be violent, then you're justifying mob violence. No one says that you can't protest. However, as per the Constitution, that assembly must be peaceful. When the first brick is thrown, the assembly is no longer peaceful and you should divest yourself of that assembly if you want to remain guilt free. That's the law and that's common sense.
    1
  7739. 1
  7740. 1
  7741. 1
  7742. 1
  7743. 1
  7744. 1
  7745. 1
  7746. 1
  7747. 1
  7748. 1
  7749. 1
  7750. 1
  7751. 1
  7752. 1
  7753. 1
  7754. 1
  7755. 1
  7756. 1
  7757. 1
  7758. 1
  7759. 1
  7760. 1
  7761. 1
  7762. 1
  7763. 1
  7764. 1
  7765.  @ShawnPatton-rm2hv  We all know about racism in the US. I learned about slavery WAY back in the sixties, in school. You can't talk about the Civil War and not talk about slavery. We've all been taught about it but now it's been distorted. It's portrayed as a unique American and European phenomenon which is absolute nonsense. It's used by radical socialist to divide us instead of bring us together. “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” – Martin Luther King, Jr. This is NOT what being taught in schools these days. In fact, it's SO bad that California wanted to eliminate their state Civil Rights Act in the 2020 elections....the very act that Dr. King fought so hard for in the sixties. There are schools with Black's only dormitories, graduations and events. I've even heard people criticising mixed marriages by radical left wing activists. They're calling the people in mixed marriages "race traitors" something that the KKK used to say all the time. Larry Elder, a black American, was called the "black face of white supremacy" by his political opponents on the left. This is where the type of teaching has led us. Race relations are WORSE now then they were in the eighties and nineties and it's ALL because of this obsession with race. I know that you're a troll and I'm wasting my time but if you want division, keep teaching about race the way that they are now. It will tear this country apart and that's EXACTLY what the radical left wants. Revolution by any means necessary.
    1
  7766. 1
  7767. 1
  7768. 1
  7769. 1
  7770. 1
  7771. 1
  7772. 1
  7773.  @chrisfuller2069  It's like YOU are the one who didn't read MY post. I told you about the company that I worked for, which is one of the highest paying companies in town. They couldn't get employees. I told you that. There is another factory who pays more than than the one that I work at and THEY have trouble getting workers. The highest paying factory in our town. I don't know where else I'd go to find better. The stories I hear are all the same. It's too hot. They don't like shift work. They find it boring. The boss is an a-hole. It hurts my back. My head hurts. It goes on and on. One guy said he thought that I was in the mafia or something because, although we were paid the same, I was buying a house and he couldn't even save enough for a down payment. I did it but he couldn't...but he took days off all the time. I told him to take out a savings plan that was available and the company would match it but he wouldn't. I'm now retired for 4 years, living a great life and he's still there, complaining about everything, taking days off and still just as broke and he can't figure out why. This didn't happen to my parent's generation. They would work 2 jobs, pinch pennies until the Lincoln screamed "OUCH" and made wise decisions. The work was just as hot, the shifts were just as long and round the clock, the bosses were just as big an a-holes, the work was still boring but they did it and did their best. Not like the ones that you're talking about....doing shitty work and blowing off. When you do that, you'll end up nowhere.
    1
  7774. 1
  7775. 1
  7776. 1
  7777. 1
  7778. 1
  7779. 1
  7780. 1
  7781. 1
  7782. 1
  7783. 1
  7784. 1
  7785. 1
  7786. 1
  7787. 1
  7788. 1
  7789. 1
  7790. 1
  7791. 1
  7792. 1
  7793. 1
  7794. 1
  7795. 1
  7796. 1
  7797.  @AndrewFishman  Existential fear. A fear that our existence, today, would threaten our existence sometime in the future. Like climate change. 13 years ago, Al Gore released his movie. In it, he predicted that sections of Manhattan would be underwater, including the base of the Twin Towers. Instead, ocean levels have only risen 3 millimetres. 3 millimetres. I don't even know how you'd measure that on the scale of an ocean. Now, it's the 12 year till doomsday prophecy. It might be 11 years now, since it's been almost a year since AOC's dire prediction. Of course, there's truth to this climate change issue. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and it does affect temperatures, but using timelines to predict the end is counter productive. Already, people are doubting because of Gore's movie and his water level predictions. The "scare them to death" tactic isn't the way to go about pollution problems and I'm afraid it might backfire on us. Reacting out of panic is never a great idea. Worse, it takes control out of the hands of ordinary people and places it directly in the hands of politicians. They'll tell us what to do and if you don't listen, you will pay the price. I'm afraid that if we allow the government to take control, we could destroy our country in our efforts to save it. It will become the never ending battle, the government our eternal saviour, but we must always be on guard against those who would do environmental harm. Sort of like the Orwellian enemies against the free state of Oceania in 1984. If we don't do as the government says, environmental disaster will overcome us all. It is rather Orwellian.
    1
  7798. 1
  7799. 1
  7800. 1
  7801. 1
  7802. 1
  7803. 1
  7804. 1
  7805. 1
  7806. 1
  7807. 1
  7808. 1
  7809. 1
  7810. 1
  7811. 1
  7812. 1
  7813. 1
  7814. 1
  7815. 1
  7816. 1
  7817. 1
  7818. 1
  7819. 1
  7820. 1
  7821. 1
  7822. 1
  7823. 1
  7824. 1
  7825. 1
  7826. 1
  7827. 1
  7828. 1
  7829. 1
  7830. 1
  7831. 1
  7832. 1
  7833. 1
  7834. 1
  7835. 1
  7836. 1
  7837. 1
  7838. 1
  7839. 1
  7840. 1
  7841. 1
  7842. 1
  7843. 1
  7844. 1
  7845. 1
  7846. 1
  7847. 1
  7848. 1
  7849. 1
  7850. 1
  7851. 1
  7852. 1
  7853. 1
  7854. 1
  7855. 1
  7856. 1
  7857. 1
  7858. 1
  7859. 1
  7860. 1
  7861. 1
  7862. 1
  7863. 1
  7864. 1
  7865. 1
  7866. 1
  7867. 1
  7868. 1
  7869. 1
  7870. 1
  7871. 1
  7872. 1
  7873. 1
  7874. 1
  7875. 1
  7876. 1
  7877. 1
  7878. 1
  7879. 1
  7880. 1
  7881. 1
  7882. 1
  7883. 1
  7884. 1
  7885. 1
  7886. @Dillon Duncan It isn't Palestinian territory and they've never had that territory. The Ottoman Turks controlled the area for almost 400 years and they got it through military dominance. During that time, the area was populated by Muslims, Jews and various Christian sects. Then the Turks lost WW1 and the British took over. The British were the ones that suggested the 2 state option. Why? Because the land that they controlled, the Levant, was populated by these various groups. This has NEVER been Palestinian land, exclusively. Also, it isn't about ethnicity. It's about religion and if every Jew in Israel converted to Islam, the conflict would be over. In fact, Gaza is an Islamic state and Islam is the official religion. It is guided by Islamic law and it is a separate entity and self governing. Israel is not encroaching on Gaza. It's accused of building settlements on the West Bank, also never a part of Palestine. The West Bank was taken from Jordan in the 6 Day War and has been controlled by Israel ever since. If anything, that area should be returned to Jordan, just as the Golan Heights, also taken from Syria in the 6 Day War, would be returned to Syria. The West Bank is where Israel has been building settlements.....no territory taken from Jordan. It's NEVER been Palestine, either. Also, this thing about the Jews and financial success is the same logic SJWs use against white people and colonial success. It's bigotry disguised as righteous grievance against historical events and progress.
    1
  7887. 1
  7888. 1
  7889. 1
  7890. 1
  7891. 1
  7892. 1
  7893. 1
  7894. 1
  7895. 1
  7896. 1
  7897. 1
  7898. 1
  7899. 1
  7900. 1
  7901. 1
  7902. 1
  7903. 1
  7904. 1
  7905. 1
  7906. 1
  7907. 1
  7908. 1
  7909. 1
  7910. 1
  7911. 1
  7912. 1
  7913. 1
  7914. 1
  7915. 1
  7916. 1
  7917. 1
  7918. 1
  7919. 1
  7920. 1
  7921. 1
  7922. 1
  7923. 1
  7924. 1
  7925. 1
  7926. 1
  7927. 1
  7928. 1
  7929. 1
  7930. 1
  7931. 1
  7932. 1
  7933. 1
  7934. 1
  7935. 1
  7936. 1
  7937. 1
  7938. 1
  7939. 1
  7940. 1
  7941. 1
  7942. 1
  7943. 1
  7944. 1
  7945. 1
  7946. 1
  7947. 1
  7948. 1
  7949. 1
  7950. 1
  7951. 1
  7952. 1
  7953. 1
  7954. 1
  7955. 1
  7956. 1
  7957. 1
  7958. 1
  7959. 1
  7960. 1
  7961. 1
  7962. 1
  7963. 1
  7964. 1
  7965. 1
  7966. 1
  7967. 1
  7968. 1
  7969. 1
  7970.  @drill6739  Socialism definition...... a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. Read that part where it says that describes how the means of production should be owned or regulated by the community, again. That means that your vaunted owners, owned companies that were regulated by the "community", which always means the Party. Even the name "Nazi" means, in German, that you're a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. You'd have been a Nationalist, specifically a German Nationalist, and a Socialist, led by the German workers, to form the community that controlled the politics, social and economic life of that country. No company was to have a union. Why would they? They had the Nazi Party and Party officials took the place of Union officials in the larger factories. They'd even hold regular meetings with all the workers, management included, to go over production figures and how dedicated individuals were to the Party. The same thing happened in the Soviet Union. Don't need no stinking unions, the workers are in control now. You're delusional if you think that Mao was some kind of victim of the zealousness of his followers. He knew what was going on and he could have voiced his displeasure while it was going on. In fact, Mao was an ideologue and even his policies, like the killing of song birds and the confiscation of metal tools, killed millions. That's what happens when you leave the complete control of a country to a handful of people. They will make decisions on things they know nothing about and it will invariably end in disaster. I'm appalled that there are still people that would defend the horrific murders, disease and famines that Mao was directly responsible for. The Chinese people had gone through hell, in the past and a political saviour would have instigated a system that gave the people the means to individual responsibility and freedom instead of another version of the autocracies of the Chinese past.
    1
  7971. 1
  7972. 1
  7973. 1
  7974. 1
  7975. 1
  7976. 1
  7977. 1
  7978. 1
  7979. 1
  7980. 1
  7981. 1
  7982. 1
  7983. 1
  7984. 1
  7985. 1
  7986. 1
  7987. 1
  7988. 1
  7989. 1
  7990. 1
  7991. 1
  7992. 1
  7993. 1
  7994. 1
  7995. 1
  7996. 1
  7997. 1
  7998. 1
  7999. 1
  8000. 1
  8001. 1
  8002. 1
  8003. 1
  8004. 1
  8005. 1
  8006. 1
  8007. 1
  8008. 1
  8009. 1
  8010. 1
  8011. 1
  8012. 1
  8013. 1
  8014. 1
  8015. 1
  8016. 1
  8017. 1
  8018. 1
  8019. 1
  8020. 1
  8021. 1
  8022. 1
  8023. 1
  8024. 1
  8025. 1
  8026. 1
  8027. 1
  8028. 1
  8029. 1
  8030. 1
  8031. 1
  8032. 1
  8033. 1
  8034. 1
  8035. 1
  8036. 1
  8037.  @tbest29  Apparently, allowing a "criminal" president to sit in office and have the power of an acting president is the wrong time, then. There isn't enough evidence to indict Trump when the time is right. Those Democrats who won't let it go are now hanging their hopes on the "you can't charge a sitting president" trope. They're still haven't set the impeachment process into motion. Why won't they deal with that? They were so SURE that the Mueller Report would be the end of Trump but now that it's here, he's still the president and no impeachment in sight. "No recommendations". That's what the report said. They're no closer than they were 3 years ago. Now they're having more hearings and Mueller's appearance didn't help their cause, either. In fact, left leaning MSM have pundits that are calling Mueller's testimony as a disaster. If the Democrats keep on with this, they'll lose the next elections and they'll lose big. People are getting tired of it and not just that. They're tired of the eternal racist charges, the actions of Antifa, the attacks on free speech, the fear that right wing students have to endure on campus, the violence against people for wearing MAGA hats, the hypocrisy of their border security positions, the incessant virtue signalling and on and on. The left is absolutely filled with rage and hate and have gotten to the point that they can't see beyond that hate. It's hate that is feeding this "HOPE" of charging Trump with something.....ANYTHING. They refuse to work on the real things that need to be solved. And I've been a Democrat supporter all my life. After the Covington Kids debacle, I started to think that the Democrats have moved into a position that makes them WORSE than Trump. I never thought I'd see that day but it's here.
    1
  8038. 1
  8039. 1
  8040.  @tbest29  That could happen. That's why they have elections and that's why the US is a democratic Republic and not a Fascist state. The people still have a say in government policy. However, don't be too sure. Hillary was going to win in '16 and it was a positive. All the "smart" people were laughing at even the idea of Trump being president and when he won, they just couldn't believe it. At the time, I predicted a Trump win based on Hillary's rhetoric and I told anyone that would listen that she would be the cause of the Democrat demise. I'd supported Obama in the 2 previous elections but became disillusioned with him at the end of his 2nd term. Weren't the Dems upset....crying, wailing, throwing things and then the claims that he must have cheated, somehow. That's what brought us the next 3 years of collusion claims and the aftermaths. They just refused to accept that maybe they had played it all wrong. In fact, the people that voted for Obama, in Middle America, voted for Trump. That's who the Dems have to win over and they're not doing a good job of it. They "white privilege" rhetoric is still being spouted and with 65 percent of the population being white, that's not exactly pandering to the biggest block of the voting public. But, you never know. I don't think that the Dems will win, but the world is an unpredictable place. The difference between you and I is this. I recognise the fickleness of the voting public. You're so filled with Trump hate, you see nothing but that hate and can't understand why everyone doesn't think as you do.
    1
  8041.  @tbest29  I don't see how he has done anything to democracy. There was a midterm election and the Republicans lost the House. He accepted it. When he tried to get money from the Pentagon, a court ruled that it wasn't legal, he stopped and took it back to the courts and he won that case just recently. There will be an election next year. On top of that, if you're going to say that he colluded with the Russians, Mueller flat out said that he could not make a determination that. He's an investigator, who reported that he, basically came to no conclusion on guilt. That's innocence in every court in the country. He's a blowhard and a braggart. That's for sure but as for normalising lying, I'm going to have to be a bit cynical here. Honestly, is Trump the first time that you've ever heard of a lying politician? You must be awfully young. Lawyers, politicians and used car salesman are known as the biggest liars in existence. As for the charges, not unless they get more evidence. Already Nadler and Schiff are talking about another round of investigations. Why would they do that if they already have the damning evidence? Schiff said a long time ago that he had irrefutable evidence of collusion. He said it on network television. Yet, I've never heard him say what that evidence was. If he has that strong evidence, why doesn't he give it. At first, I really thought Trump was in trouble with the collusion, but after hearing the "walls are closing in", "bombshell revelations", the "tick, tick, tick" on the treason clock and nothing ever materialising, I started to think that it was a case built more on wishful thinking than reality. Also, it seems that the MSM were using it as a ratings booster and now that it's been fizzling out, CNN and MSNBC ratings have plummeted. MSM was vested in keeping this story on the forefront and the Democrats were quite happy to have it there in the belief that it would sway people to their side in the elections and it did in the midterms. However, they may be riding that horse too long and it may backfire, especially after the Mueller hearings. It didn't have the results that they had hoped for.
    1
  8042. 1
  8043. 1
  8044. 1
  8045. 1
  8046. 1
  8047. 1
  8048. 1
  8049.  @LifeLifemoreAbundantly  McCarthy went after people who attended Socialist meetings when they were in college back in the thirties, just out of curiosities. Just to be questioned was enough to get you fired and blacklisted. Anyone who was in the merchant marine or who was unloading ships could be investigated and over 3000 longshoremen and seamen lost their jobs due to his unlawful investigations. People were imprisoned and later released because their rights had been infringed and evidence was proved either false of manipulated. The man operated in the same manner as Joseph Stalin. The reason we oppose Communism is partly because of the idea of centralised government and that if you question the edicts of the state, you must be the enemy. In Communism there is only one way to think or believe. Our free system resists that idea and as long as we don't infringe upon the rights of others, we can act and believe as we please, even if we find it repugnant and potentially damaging. We should NEVER have arrests made on flimsy charges and our tactics should NEVER be comparable to the tactics of Stalin. If we're going to act like him, we may as well BE communists. We have a system of law that places the individual as the sovereign entity....NOT the state. McCarthy took the power as the representative of the state and ignored the sovereignty of the individual. That's the communist and authoritarian way. It's NOT what we value in the west. That doesn't mean we shouldn't fight against Communism because we should. We should fight it because we want to be better than they are. McCarthy wasn't that. He was the flip side of Stalin. Just as ruthless and he could care less about the rights of the individual.
    1
  8050. 1
  8051. 1
  8052. 1
  8053. 1
  8054. 1
  8055. 1
  8056. 1
  8057. 1
  8058. 1
  8059. 1
  8060. 1
  8061. 1
  8062. 1
  8063. 1
  8064. 1
  8065. 1
  8066. 1
  8067. 1
  8068. 1
  8069. 1
  8070.  @justinkirschenman2232  First of all, that war is over. Obama pulled out all the troops in 2011 and there was a big press conference is Washington about it. The next day, the VERY NEXT DAY, the Iraqi president flies home and starts arresting Sunni leaders. That's not the fault of anyone but that president, Nouri al-Maliki. He didn't have to do that but the hatred the Shia and Sunni have for one another is what started the conflict in both Syria and Iraq right now. ISIS, Sunni Muslims, are fighting against the Shia president, Assad, because they believe that the Shias are heretics and they've felt that way for a thousand years. Then Obama got them right back into it and ISIS has been behaving horrifically ever since. Would you seriously expect Trump to get out, right away, when ISIS was there murdering innocent people? He had to finish them off. Now, they're pretty well defeated and their leader is gone. Trump said it again when he announced his death. He want's the troops out. It doesn't happen overnight and thank God that it didn't. That murderous ISIS leader would still be torturing and killing innocents, like the Mueller girl, who was kidnapped in front of refugee hospital and horrifically abused by ISIS. She was there to help refugees and those butchers did that to her and all you can do is dredge up something that happened 17 years ago...the WMD lead to that earlier war. You're too angry and bitter to assess this rationally. If the troops are out in 6 months, are you going to come back to this thread and admit that maybe you were wrong? I'd be surprised if you do. I don't know if it will happen but if Trump says he wants to do it, then I'll support that intention. He says that he's ready to do it now and we'll see what happens. I'm not about to lose my mind over it because of the way things happened. In fact, his earlier announcement about leaving, might have induced Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to think that he was safe and wasn't as careful as he had been. Lighten up a little.
    1
  8071.  @justinkirschenman2232  The war was essentially over in 2011. Here is that announcement when Obama was preparing to pull the last of the troops out of Iraq, some 5000 troops, way down from the some 150,000 a few years earlier. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/22/world/middleeast/president-obama-announces-end-of-war-in-iraq.html https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40682.pdf However, that's when the Iraqi president amped up his assault on Sunni and it looked as if Al Qaeda was going to resurface and ISIS started to form. That war in Iraq was over and Obama even stated that the US would be leaving a stable country. He didn't screw it up. The Iraqis did that themselves. Now Trump is going to leave but he wasn't just going to dump and run before the job was done. Also, your statement on how the US was helping ISIS, against Russia, makes no sense. How is killing their leader helping ISIS? That's as illogical as it come. The situation in Iraq and Syria is complex with Al Qaeda, Al-Nusra, Syrian rebels, Syrian loyalists to Assad, Kurds, Turks, Shia Iraqis, ISIS all fighting one another. I'm sure I missed a few. The original invasion was a mistake but to leave when Obama wanted would have been a mistake as well. The Iraqis could have settled into making a stable country back then, but they didn't want to. Sunni and Shia hate each other. That's what's behind the war in Syria, Yemen and Iraq. It's behind all the posturing between Iran and Saudi Arabia as well. It looks as if ISIS is defeated and now is the time to get out. Not in 2011, not in 2016, but now when ISIS is gone. The fact is, if the fighting continues in those countries, it won't be because that's what Trump wants. It'll be because of Shia/Sunni hatred of one another.....a hatred that's been there for over 1000 years. Shia have pilgrimaged to Karbala for all that time, some 10 million a year and rivals Mecca as a holy site. This is the shrine that ISIS had vowed to destroy because they see it as a sacrilege. Karbala was the site of a huge battle between Shia and Sunni in 680. That's how long they've been at each other. Please understand the hatred these people have for one another. Shia even believe that the final battle will be between those 2 factions and it will be the defeat of the Sunni and the beginning of their Caliphate. That's how deep this rivalry runs.
    1
  8072. 1
  8073. 1
  8074. 1
  8075. 1
  8076. 1
  8077. 1
  8078. 1
  8079. 1
  8080. 1
  8081. 1
  8082. 1
  8083. 1
  8084. 1
  8085. 1
  8086. 1
  8087. 1
  8088. 1
  8089. 1
  8090. 1
  8091. 1
  8092. 1
  8093. 1
  8094. 1
  8095. 1
  8096. 1
  8097. 1
  8098. 1
  8099. 1
  8100. 1
  8101. 1
  8102. 1
  8103. 1
  8104. 1
  8105. 1
  8106. 1
  8107. 1
  8108. 1
  8109. 1
  8110. 1
  8111. 1
  8112. 1
  8113.  @georgemilford5632  I think Obama handled it better due to his background as a lawyer and career politician. Trump is more bombastic and behaves like an average guy whose behaviour isn't restrained by his training. He reacts without thinking and as a businessman, he's used to people deferring to him. He reminds me of a lot of people I've worked with and for. Unsophisticated and will blurt out whatever happens to be on their mind. Fox news is bad and Tucker Carlson can make me cringe at some of the dumb things he says. However, CNN and MSNBC is no better. There are a lot of left wing media that seem to be bent on vilifying Trump. That's where that fake media charge comes in. As an example, the NY Times headline reads "Trump calls immigrants animals" Sounds horrible right? It is.....if that's what he said. It isn't. It turns out at a town hall type meeting in California, a woman mentioned MS13 and how violent and frightening they were. Trump said that they've been working hard to rid the US of this street gang and that there were a lot of them that have been deported and finished with "they're animals". He was talking about a violent street gang, not immigrants at all. Trump calls fake news and then a major news outlet does that. Trump just smiles and shrugs his shoulders and people can make of it what they will. His point has been made and it happens over and over again. This frustrates me to no end. Why fall into his trap? Trump is supposed to be unintelligent and they're being out witted by the dumb one. Anyway, have a good weekend. We just got 6 inches of snow and I'm here staring out my window. Looks nice though.
    1
  8114. 1
  8115. 1
  8116. 1
  8117. 1
  8118. 1
  8119. 1
  8120. 1
  8121. 1
  8122. 1
  8123.  @roderickmills5398  "Time to recreate a genuine federalist system and that means local hierarchies." That still leaves us with a basic question. How do you settle on the local hierarchy. Who gets to be at the top of the hierarchy, the ones who actually make the decisions that are the best for your local entity. Should it be a monarchy type system? That was a disaster. Maybe something like what the Chinese have now, a system that grew out of the Politburo system of Stalin and Mao? A miniaturised sized version that would suit a local government. That hasn't been that great, either and the people in China don't have near the freedoms that we have in the west and we have no reason to believe that it wouldn't become a city state system where a few get to run their vassals below them. We're still may be back to a localised democracy, where the individual gets to vote on who gets to enact policy on a limited time basis. That's still a democracy. All I'm hearing is a plea for greater state rights, something the left would hate. It has also been the biggest struggle of American politics. In fact, it was State's rights that was the big issue of the Civil War.....not slavery, as many would make it. It's also state's rights that have made Oregon such a leftist paradise. They've actually relaxed laws to an extent that aren't there of a Federal level. Sanctuary cities and states are another example. It's the loony left that using state and municipal laws in an effort to get federal control. It's why these states hate Trump. He stands in their way of seizing complete control, the control that allows them to break Federal immigration laws. Yet, in California, a sanctuary state, they have municipalities that have opted out of this state legislated sanctuary status. They did it because local politics, the people, voiced their opinion, through the power of localised democratic process. The same corruption that you see on a federal level can and does happen on the local level. Citizens in Seattle went to their town council, democrats all, and complained about the homeless and crime issues in that city, and they were basically laughed at. I guarantee that had they went to the Whitehouse, Trump wouldn't have laughed at them.
    1
  8124. 1
  8125.  @roderickmills5398  The US is a amalgamation of states which all adhere to the Constitution of the whole. The right to vote is a central part of that Constitution and if a state abandons the right to vote for all its citizens, it has contravened the Constitution, the very ideals of the entire country. In essence, it's a step to secession. From your comments, it would seem that your problem isn't with democracy or the right to vote, it's with the size of government. That the further away a person gets from a localised government, the value of that individual person's voice carries less weight. Now, that's an excellent point and I would say that there is a very important discussion to be had on that topic. Take, as an example, what is happening in the EU. Too many Europeans feel as if they've given away control of their lives and countries to an overblown association of European nations who pass edicts without any consideration to the lives of those in different regions. A huge central government that is incredibly distant from the ordinary person who feels they've lost any voice in the country they live in. That's a travesty and that, in a lot of ways, is what I'm hearing from you. I'm saying this because you've yet to respond to the question of a better way to build a government, even on a localised level. All you talk about is federal over reach and that's a different topic. It's one of the reasons why Trump won. Those people living in the fly over states feel helpless as the big states, the populated areas, dictate how those in the rural landscape should live. That is something that I could agree with you on but I can't agree with a state or local process that doesn't include the power of the individual as participants in government decisions. That means a vote, a say in how it should be done. They're not always going to be the right decisions because people are notorious for making mistakes but it's still the best for everyone.
    1
  8126. 1
  8127. 1
  8128. 1
  8129. 1
  8130. 1
  8131. 1
  8132. 1
  8133. 1
  8134. 1
  8135. 1
  8136. 1
  8137. 1
  8138. 1
  8139. 1
  8140. 1
  8141. 1
  8142. 1
  8143. 1
  8144. 1
  8145. 1
  8146. 1
  8147. 1
  8148. 1
  8149. 1
  8150. 1
  8151. 1
  8152. 1
  8153. 1
  8154. 1
  8155. 1
  8156. 1
  8157. 1
  8158. 1
  8159. 1
  8160. 1
  8161. 1
  8162. 1
  8163. 1
  8164. 1
  8165. 1
  8166. 1
  8167. 1
  8168. 1
  8169. 1
  8170. 1
  8171. 1
  8172. 1
  8173. 1
  8174. 1
  8175. 1
  8176. 1
  8177. 1
  8178. 1
  8179. 1
  8180. 1
  8181. 1
  8182. 1
  8183. 1
  8184.  @spindoctor6385  Do you really believe that a company, once it has grown extremely large, will use their market and financial power for goodness and niceness? Really? Maybe you should look into the history of monopolies. Once a company corners a market, they will do anything to undermine any competition. Just as an example, they'll undercut prices so their competition can't compete price wise. They'll offer increased prices for raw materials so their competition can't afford to buy the things that they need. They'll invest in the companies that supply raw materials and control who can buy and who can't. They'll get exclusive rights to machinery and technology so the competition is squeezed out that way. Throughout history, when any group, be it political, ideological, religious or financial, gets too much power, they'll wield it against the people to ensure and increase that power. It's human nature. It's why the American Constitution has attempted to put checks and balances on how it governs. It's also why it's enshrined religious freedoms AND restrictions, such as "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust" They even require that elected officials to give up any business connections so as to not give favour to their own business interests. I don't believe, for one minute, that any large corporation will freely and cheerfully allow competition to exist. Look at the new Parler platform. It was a conservative platform and the Amazon computer server division, kicked them off their servers as soon as it appeared to have too much influence. A great way to manipulate the last election. Speaking of which, have you read the Time magazine article which outlines how Big Tech, the MSM, large corporations and the Democrats worked to "fortify the election to ensure a proper outcome". That's what happens when there's too much power in the hands of too few. Give big tech the freedom and you'll NEVER have competition. They'll make it impossible for the little guy to operate. Don't trust them for a minute. Actually, I'm astounded that anyone would trust corporations as big as the Big Tech 5.
    1
  8185.  @spindoctor6385  You're still not getting it. Facebook already owns 72 internet companies including Instagram, Oculus and Whatsapp. Twitter is one of the most prominent sites in the world. Amazon is huge and Alphabet, one of the most valuable companies in the world, owns Google, of which YouTube is a subsidiary. These companies make money selling their data and it is next to impossible for companies to make money through only advertising and membership fees. Advertisers will want to target their audiences so they'll insist on data collection, so that just leaves the fees to make money on. These companies will just grow and grow, leaving those little companies to operate in obscurity or go bankrupt. WORSE, they'll become part of the political process as they grow. The Democrats LOVE that these big companies will run propaganda for them and won't allow them to lose their influence and will enact policies that will help the big ones and suppress the little ones. It's happening in Canada right now. The Canadian communications regulatory body, the CRTC, is trying to enact policies that favour Canadian media and squelch the little guys. The CRTC head was once an employee of Bell Canada, the the biggest communications corporation in the country. The Democrats will do the same for their big tech companies. They're WAY ahead of the Republicans in this. Yet, you want to give these guys, including Facebook, the power to grow until nothing can touch them. Why would you want to do that? If you don't have regulations, they'll take advantage of their position to gain more power. It's how every monopoly has ever operated yet, for some reason you believe that Facebook will be good. They're censoring discussion now if it doesn't meet their political stance. EVERY one of those tech giants support the Democrats and censored stories that might help the Republicans. All I can think is that you approved of all the censorship and allowing big corporations to become even bigger than the government. Once private companies can pick and choose the political leaders, we're living in an autocratic society. It will be the new age Feudal system.
    1
  8186.  @spindoctor6385  I just explained it to you. Facebook has gotten so big that advertisers will cater to the advantages of data collections. They'll insist on it with new and smaller platforms and refuse advertising dollars unless those smaller platforms comply with data collecting policies. So, without advertising dollars, they can only rely on membership fees and as other small platforms acquiesce to the big advertisers, they'll lose out because they just can't compete with all the little extras that the other platforms can afford to provide with all the extra revenue. Then there's the pressure of conformity, especially among the young. How do you tell your 15 year old that you won't allow Facebook in your home because you have moral and ethical qualms about data collecting. All their friends have it and they don't see the danger or problems involved. That will only create pressures to give in because most kids can't fend off peer pressure. These are the kinds of things that Facebook and advertisers depend on and encourage. On top of all that, data collections has hidden traps for unsuspecting users. It can be used for political purposes, like I've already said. That's what happened in the last election. I've given you ALL kinds of reasons why it's wrong and why it shouldn't be allowed and, go back to the first paragraph. That answers your question on why it's harder for new players. It gives Big Tech an advantage that new players will find difficult to compete with. The playing field will never be equal. I'll add one more thing. Facebook understands that their type of platform is useless in small markets. It depends on being able to reach the biggest market possible. Why join a platform where you don't have any friends or relatives? How does a new player break into that market when Facebook has a lock on it? People will agree to data collections just because they want to be a part of an internet community that reaches everyone, not just a couple of people. Everything about the industry favours Facebook and the other big tech corporations and puts new players at a HUGE disadvantage. In other words, you'll end up on a platform that will collect data or you don't have a viable platform to join. It's either them or nothing.
    1
  8187. 1
  8188. 1
  8189. 1
  8190. 1
  8191. 1
  8192. 1
  8193. 1
  8194. 1
  8195. 1
  8196. 1
  8197. 1
  8198. 1
  8199. 1
  8200. 1
  8201. 1
  8202. 1
  8203. 1
  8204. 1
  8205. 1
  8206. 1
  8207. 1
  8208. 1
  8209. 1
  8210. 1
  8211. 1
  8212. 1
  8213. 1
  8214. 1
  8215. 1
  8216. 1
  8217. 1
  8218. 1
  8219. 1
  8220. 1
  8221. 1
  8222. 1
  8223. 1
  8224. 1
  8225. 1
  8226. 1
  8227. 1
  8228. 1
  8229. 1
  8230. 1
  8231. 1
  8232. 1
  8233. 1
  8234. 1
  8235. 1
  8236.  @mochithepooh5368  I get what you're saying about the science. It's just that I've seen people who say "follow the science" and all they're doing is regurgitating political talking points without actually looking at the data. That was my point. I realise that celebrities don't impose laws but they influence people to think that there's only one way to view an issue. If you view it any other way, like the celebrities who influence them, they start to feel that this gives them the right to impose their views on others. It's a cultural thing that's become quite normal, these days. I may not give a damn what a celebrity says but that's me. Others do and use them as a life guide on how to live. Foolish....very foolish. It's not just the celebrity types either. It's the melding of celebrities, media types and politicians, who feel superior to the rest of us, who are influencing the populace. One of my closest friends is completely saturated with this idea. He thought that Kyle Rittenhouse had to be guilty because he's white and he had a gun. He's allowing the identity politics of those elites to influence how he looks at things. A snapshot of a white guy with a gun inspires a pre-written response. He'd be outraged if I said the same about an American with African heritage. It's all about the narrative that Hollywood, the news media and politicians have planted in their heads. It's why they supported the violence of the BLM riots. It was the popular thing to do...and they don't realise that they're allowing these influencers to control the way that they think.
    1
  8237. 1
  8238. 1
  8239. 1
  8240. 1
  8241. 1
  8242. 1
  8243. 1
  8244. 1
  8245. 1
  8246. 1
  8247. 1
  8248. 1
  8249. 1
  8250. 1
  8251. 1
  8252. 1
  8253. 1
  8254. 1
  8255. 1
  8256. 1
  8257. 1
  8258. 1
  8259. 1
  8260. 1
  8261. 1
  8262. 1
  8263. 1
  8264. 1
  8265. 1
  8266.  @synnical77  It's true that people want a filter but the media shouldn't acquiesce to that sort of bias. The media should be unbiased and report the facts as best they could. I can't say much about FOX but I know the rest of the news media has been outright lying for years, especially since Trump was elected. The BS on the Covington kids....that was an outright lie. It took me 10 minutes to find the original video and it was clear that they ALL lied. I'm a retired man, living in a one room basement apartment with a computer that my son-in-law cobbled together for me and I could find the facts on the matter. There's not a DOUBT that they all lied. LIED!!! That's different than being biased or providing a filter. They LIED!!! It was the same with the BLM "peaceful protests". I seen a reporter, with buildings completely engulfed in flames behind him, saying that it was basically a very peaceful protest. It was a LIE. Cities were being burned, stores were being looted, people were being attacked, a couple of dozen were even killed....and that's PEACEFUL??? They lied. Now we're finding out that the leaders of BLM extorted money out of the organisation. The media lied for them and then provided cover when things went bad. They even lied about stupid things. They went all ridiculous when Trump dumped the remainder of his fish food into the coy pond. The LIARS cut out the part where the Japanese PM dumped his food into the pond first. They edited the video and then told us that Trump had insulted the Japanese people. It was a LIE!!!! A lie isn't a filter. It's a lie and they did it intentionally, redundant but it has to be said that they KNEW what they were doing. I could go on all day, fill a book with the blatant falsehoods from the MSM, but I think you get my point. There's a difference between endorsing someone and lying for them and I cannot stand by any media that would do that or any political party that would smugly allow them to lie for them.
    1
  8267. 1
  8268. 1
  8269. 1
  8270. 1
  8271. 1
  8272. 1
  8273. 1
  8274. 1
  8275. 1
  8276. 1
  8277. 1
  8278. 1
  8279. 1
  8280. 1
  8281. 1
  8282. 1
  8283. 1
  8284. 1
  8285. 1
  8286. 1
  8287. 1
  8288. 1
  8289. 1
  8290. 1
  8291. 1
  8292. 1
  8293. 1
  8294. 1
  8295. 1
  8296. 1
  8297. 1
  8298. 1
  8299. 1
  8300. 1
  8301. 1
  8302. 1
  8303. 1
  8304. 1
  8305. 1
  8306. 1
  8307. 1
  8308. 1
  8309. 1
  8310. 1
  8311. 1
  8312. 1
  8313. 1
  8314. 1
  8315. 1
  8316. 1
  8317. 1
  8318. 1
  8319. 1
  8320. 1
  8321. 1
  8322. 1
  8323. 1
  8324. 1
  8325. 1
  8326. 1
  8327. 1
  8328. 1
  8329. 1
  8330. 1
  8331. 1
  8332. 1
  8333. 1
  8334. 1
  8335. 1
  8336. 1
  8337. 1
  8338. 1
  8339. 1
  8340. 1
  8341. 1
  8342. 1
  8343. 1
  8344. 1
  8345. 1
  8346. 1
  8347. 1
  8348. 1
  8349. 1
  8350. 1
  8351. 1
  8352. 1
  8353. 1
  8354. 1
  8355. 1
  8356. 1
  8357. 1
  8358. 1
  8359. 1
  8360. 1
  8361. 1
  8362. 1
  8363. 1
  8364. 1
  8365. 1
  8366. 1
  8367. 1
  8368. 1
  8369. 1
  8370. 1
  8371. 1
  8372. 1
  8373. 1
  8374. 1
  8375. 1
  8376. 1
  8377. 1
  8378. 1
  8379. 1
  8380. 1
  8381. 1
  8382. 1
  8383. 1
  8384. 1
  8385. 1
  8386. 1
  8387. 1
  8388. 1
  8389. 1
  8390. 1
  8391. 1
  8392. 1
  8393. 1
  8394. 1
  8395. 1
  8396. 1
  8397. 1
  8398. 1
  8399. 1
  8400. 1
  8401. 1
  8402. 1
  8403. 1
  8404. 1
  8405. 1
  8406. 1
  8407. 1
  8408. 1
  8409. 1
  8410. 1
  8411. 1
  8412. 1
  8413. 1
  8414. 1
  8415. 1
  8416. 1
  8417. 1
  8418. 1
  8419. 1
  8420. 1
  8421. 1
  8422. 1
  8423. 1
  8424. 1
  8425. 1
  8426. 1
  8427. 1
  8428. 1
  8429. 1
  8430. 1
  8431. 1
  8432. 1
  8433. 1
  8434. 1
  8435.  @MaggiesNight  If Trump hadn't cleared the path, we still wouldn't have the vaccine approved and 150 million people would NOT be vaccinated. The FDA would still be following the old protocols and might still be on phase 1 or 2 of the testing procedures. I never said that others weren't working. In fact, for Trump to clear the path, they have to be working. It was against the law for them to go against the old procedures and would have left them open to lawsuits if something did go wrong. However, Trump felt that some of the procedures could be done at the same time instead of one at a time. Surely, you're smart enough to see how this is a time saver. Trump deserves credit for his role in making this time saving protocol available. NOT Biden. He had nothing to do with it. He inherited it and he can't take credit for new FDA protocols that Trump put into place. It's not that difficult a concept. The only reason that you can't see it is due to your lack of emotional control. You're letting your hatred of Trump rule your brain and it's not allowing you to understand it. I don't understand how anyone would allow someone else control their logic and thoughts. I wouldn't allow it. Not EVER. I don't care who it is. I don't judge based on emotion. I judge on facts and logic. If Trump cleared the path....YOUR words....that enabled others to do their job in a more efficient and time saving manner, he deserves credit for it. I don't think he deserves credit for putting the country into such overwhelming debt. That is scary and could have terrible consequences in the future. See how that works? Trump helped to put the country into a serious debt situation. I don't like that. Trump cleared the path for the FDA to more efficiently move along the testing procedure for a new vaccine. I DO like that. I can like and dislike different things that Trump has done. That's different than liking or disliking those things because of a precondition of emotions that forces me to judge based on my "feelings". Not like you do. You judge base of your "feeling" of hatred and it's forcing you to think illogically.
    1
  8436. 1
  8437. 1
  8438. 1
  8439. 1
  8440.  @MegaBanne  "There will be no need for hard work. Just the necessary work." That's the most ridiculous thing that I've ever heard. If I have a natural ability to play hockey, just showing up to play won't make me among the best in the world. I have to work my butt off, exercise, watch my weight, develop skills...the harder I work at it, the more likely I will attain my dreams. Musicians are the same. They play that guitar, violin or piano at every opportunity possible. They study and play, play and study. If they don't work hard at it, they'll never excel at it. That goes the same for being a carpenter, shoe maker, engineer or doctor. Hard work drives success. Getting by on what one deems necessary won't get you anywhere. There's a reason why Asians have the highest household incomes in America. It's the LACK of laziness. They work long, hard hours and will NOT compromise with "doing only what's necessary". That clip I outlined is the most profound statement of a commitment to mediocrity. YOU are living in a dreamland. Then you say "Everyone will have to do their basic work." So the overlord will tell what to do and when to do it. It's not up to the individual. it's up to whatever vague figure or body of people decides what their basic work should be. More dreamland stuff. It all sounds really great yet it's the capitalist west that has spawned the richest nations in world history. It's produced affluence for the average person that has NEVER been seen before. The only ones who fail are those who won't get off their butts, put down the video game controller and cell phone and go to work. They're living off the avails of those of us work 50 to 60 work weeks and then complain that they don't have enough. Once again, you're living in a dreamland. Show me ONE nation that has a socialist style governance that has ever the affluence that these capitalist nations have. They don't exist. Capitalism is the freedom to make your own life. It's up to the individual. It's the "spread the wealth" types that destroy the initiative and the pride of a hard days work and the feeling of achievement that goes with it. There's no such thing as "doing what's necessary". That's just spinning your wheels and eventually you give up because you're going nowhere.
    1
  8441. 1
  8442. 1
  8443. 1
  8444. 1
  8445. 1
  8446. 1
  8447. 1
  8448. 1
  8449. 1
  8450. 1
  8451. 1
  8452. 1
  8453. 1
  8454. 1
  8455. 1
  8456. 1
  8457. 1
  8458. 1
  8459. 1
  8460. 1
  8461. 1
  8462. 1
  8463. 1
  8464. 1
  8465. 1
  8466. 1
  8467. 1
  8468. 1
  8469. 1
  8470. 1
  8471. 1
  8472. 1
  8473. 1
  8474. 1
  8475. 1
  8476. 1
  8477. 1
  8478. 1
  8479. 1
  8480. 1
  8481. 1
  8482. 1
  8483. 1
  8484. 1
  8485.  @Spiritof_76  I don't have to take stock in Taibbi. All I have to do is look at what he showed us in the Twitter files concerning the Hunter Biden laptop. When you have evidence, the person with the evidence is irrelevant. It's the evidence that counts. Metaphorically shooting the messenger, in this case Taibbi, doesn't change the message. Twitter banned any mention of the Hunter laptop story, even the links to the New York post article that exposed the laptop. They went so far as to prevent sharing of this story through private messaging, a measure that was only reserved in the sharing of child pornography. The NY post is the oldest daily newspaper in the US and the 4th largest in the US. Taibbi, Bari Weiss and Michael Shellenberger all said the same thing about the laptop. They said that there was communication between the FBI and Twitter through a special one-way channel that had been setup between these 2 entities. It's also telling that one time FBI special counsel was working for Twitter at this time as well as other former FBI personnel. If the suppression, of a major news story, that the FBI KNEW was true doesn't bother you, I have to wonder what you're agenda is. Is it to support your party or to support the truth? I'm about the facts and truth and I find it appalling that Twitter would suppress, what is known as "censorship" news that might be damaging to one specific party and be helpful to another. That's not just the news of the laptop but also and dissension concerning government Covid policies and mandates. It's a violation of the 1st Amendment and if allowed to stand, that could impact X, now that it's owned by Musk, who could just censor or suppress stories that might damage Trump. I would bet that you'd find that quite upsetting.....yet we weren't even allowed to send a link to that laptop article through Twitter's private messaging service. Clearly a political move.
    1
  8486. 1
  8487. 1
  8488. 1
  8489. 1
  8490. 1
  8491. 1
  8492. 1
  8493. 1
  8494. 1
  8495. 1
  8496. 1
  8497. 1
  8498. 1
  8499.  @csmidt2885  Homelessness has been a problem, forever. However, it has increased in population and in percentage of the population over the last 10 years. California is in the top five in homelessness, percentage of homelessness, and in the increase of the homeless in the US. Also, California has mandated that any theft under 900 dollars is now considered a misdemeanour, which is NOT a felony and means that it's NOT a crime. A cute way to reduce crime on paper but not in reality. So many stores have closed due to crime and businesses have left the state for that same reason, also citing high taxes, high energy costs, high rents, recurring brownouts and too much red tape. You may not want to face these facts but a simple google search will validate those problems. Also, state populations do NOT go down, even a little bit, if things are going well. You may not like it but that's the facts. Migrants aren't flocking to the border because their home countries are great places to live. Californians aren't leaving for Arizona, Texas, Florida and Tennessee because they love California. They're having issues in their home state and see a better future in those growing states. This has been the way of human migration throughout history. That doesn't mean that California is the worst place ever. It means that they're facing severe problems which should be examined and solved before it really gets out of hand. Your head-in-the-sand approach isn't going to solve those problems. You have to face them, no matter how big or small, to find ways to improve. Things never improve by doing nothing.
    1
  8500. 1
  8501. 1
  8502. 1
  8503. 1
  8504. 1
  8505. 1
  8506. 1
  8507. 1
  8508. 1
  8509. 1
  8510. 1
  8511. 1
  8512. 1
  8513. 1
  8514. 1
  8515. 1
  8516. 1
  8517. 1
  8518. 1
  8519. 1
  8520. 1
  8521. 1
  8522. 1
  8523. 1
  8524. 1
  8525. 1
  8526. 1
  8527. 1
  8528. 1
  8529. 1
  8530. 1
  8531. 1
  8532. 1
  8533. 1
  8534. 1
  8535. 1
  8536. 1
  8537. 1
  8538. 1
  8539. 1
  8540. 1
  8541. 1
  8542. 1
  8543. 1
  8544. 1
  8545. 1
  8546. 1
  8547.  Kenny Bugh  Explain to us why the MSM refused to follow up on the Hunter Biden laptop story or why Big Tech companies would strike down any reference to the NY Post article. This HEAVILY implicated Joe Biden in crooked business deals, deals that would have been HUGE news had it been the Trump family, blanketing the news 24/7. Why was Steven Crowder given a YouTube strike for pointing out irregularities in addresses in Las Vegas? Why were mail in ballots allowed, for the FIRST time in American history, by executive command, bypassing the legislative process as demanded by law? Why wasn't the arrest of Rachel Rodriguez for election fraud, illegal voting, unlawfully assisting people voting by mail, and unlawfully possessing an official ballot a part of the MSM news cycle, proving that mail in voting could be manipulated? Why did the Democrats and the MSM do everything possible to refute and denigrate the Project Veritas revelation of mail in voter fraud in Minneapolis? Why isn't the Time magazine article about how the Democrats, Rinos, big tech, multinational corporations and the MSM worked together to "fortify" the elections a bigger story? This is unprecedented in American election history. All you keep doing is repeating the same thing about recounts and ignoring all the other weirdness surrounding the elections. And WHAT THE HELL IS THIS RACIST NONSENSE ABOUT BLACKS BEING SO INEPT AS NOT BEING ABLE TO GET IDS ABOUT? Do you really think that blacks Americans are that incapable?
    1
  8548. 1
  8549. 1
  8550. 1
  8551. 1
  8552. 1
  8553. 1
  8554. 1
  8555. 1
  8556. 1
  8557. 1
  8558.  @SkageXL5  Ok....here we go. S Kage first comment. "LOL, go cry about it!" My reply "LOL. They CRIED about those who they claim were in power, who laughed and exerted power over them for years. Now they're in power, just as the comment stated, and now they're crying because the pride movement is leaving them behind and the NEW power is mocking them. You're either totally self unaware or you ARE aware and you just don't care." S Kage "@Jack Haveman You're the second person who's made the error of assuming I know what "they's" you're talking about. Reading your response to me you use "They" or "them" 6 times, and appear to switch who "they" are at least once. This is clearly a Transphobe/Bigot problem and speaks to the type of person that holds those positions Can you rewrite what you're trying to say so it makes sense and defines who you're talking about at any point so I can consider a response? I assume you'll either not respond, or respond with some vague imagined personal attacks and other things to cast yourself as a victim, because that's all you people ever do. Either way, thanks in advance!" My reply. "First, you told the original commentor, King Arthur" to cry about it. I would assume that you're were mocking him and his take on the modern Pride movement. When I was using the "they" and "them" pronouns, I was referring to those in the Pride movement, the collective, as "they" or "them" because they are a group. That's been a staple of the English language for hundreds of years. It should be quite obvious who I'm referring to if you have any basic knowledge of the English language. 30 years ago, gays and lesbians claimed to be marginalised and victimised and started the Pride movement. Now the Pride symbol is everywhere and try to criticise anything about the movement. It could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Now YOU, the singular, to help you with the English language, are mocking those who are feeling marginalised, who are afraid to say what they think, by mocking King Arthur, the singular, as a representative of the group, the "they" and "them" that's used to signify group members. It's really rather easy if you know the English language." Then you say... " LOL, you left a trail of dust when you ran away :D" So I reply.... "I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away??" So you say this.... "Just gonna put a copy of your lie here, because you're probably going to delete it and to try and hide your failure. "Jack Haveman Jack Haveman 20 minutes ago @S Kage I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away?? " That's a little perplexing but you respond.... "Here goes @Jack Haveman again, just running away, shouting lies over their shoulder. LOL" So I finish up with this... "Never mind. An adult discussion is beyond your capabilities. Rather sad, really. When you grow up, we'll talk like adults. Until then, eat your veggies." I don't know what's going on but this is what I see in my comment section. If you're not seeing this, I don't know what to tell you. I've responded every time.
    1
  8559. 1
  8560. 1
  8561.  @tabbyreed8925  You missed the point entirely. Trump was putting tariffs on the products made in China. That evened up the price difference and it was working. The steel industry was coming back, among others. That's why the economy was doing so well, before Covid. China HATED what Trump was doing and so did a lot of the big multinationals. What with the bad wages, bad environmental, quality and labour standards and the opportunity for graft for multinational executives, Washington bureaucrats and politicians, it's no wonder they HATE Trump. They've got the major news networks on board because they're ALSO owned by big multinationals. The minute Trump announced his bid for presidency, the racism allegations started. They HAD to beat him. If he was successful at bringing the trade deficit to a positive state for the US, they would lose their gravy train. The elimination of tariffs is what started the trade deficit in the first place. Now, the big companies could produce offshore and sell here, until the country was bled dry, but the elites would be just fine. They don't care about you and me. Trump has been against it for YEARS now. 25 years ago, he was complaining about it. The reason why he does it is simple. He's in the hotel and casino business and was doing a national TV show. He's not dependent on cheap labour like the multinationals are. The elites have done a great job convincing everyone that they're socialists and that they care for us. They don't. They want money, power and control and Trump, even though he's a class jerk, is spoiling their plans. Worse, he now trying to get troops out of the Middle East and brokering peace deals there. That's a big hit for the military industrial complex. Another reason to hate him. The Democrats were hating on Bush when he went into Iraq but as soon as they got into power, they supported the Arab Spring and the Middle East conflicts really expanded. Right now they're opposing withdrawal. The same party, the same PEOPLE, that called the Bush Iraq war illegal, now want to stay there. There are American soldiers in Afghanistan that weren't even born yet on 9/11, yet the Democrats want to stay on. They're pulling the wool over your eyes, over all our eyes and too many are letting them do it.
    1
  8562. 1
  8563. 1
  8564. 1
  8565. 1
  8566. 1
  8567. 1
  8568. 1
  8569. 1
  8570. 1
  8571. 1
  8572. 1
  8573. 1
  8574. 1
  8575. 1
  8576. 1
  8577. 1
  8578. 1
  8579. 1
  8580. 1
  8581. 1
  8582. 1
  8583. 1
  8584. 1
  8585. 1
  8586. 1
  8587. 1
  8588. 1
  8589. 1
  8590. 1
  8591. 1
  8592. 1
  8593. 1
  8594. 1
  8595. 1
  8596. 1
  8597. 1
  8598. 1
  8599.  @peterstafford4426  If Trump's team was contacting Twitter, we should find out what was going on. If they were just complaining about material being censored, that's not a problem. If they were TELLING Twitter what to censor, that's wrong and goes against the Constitution of the United States. However, none of this has been brought to light to the release of the Twitter files. The pipeline to the FBI has been and its shown that it ALWAYS seemed to favour the Democrats. The NY Post's website WAS always there. That's not the issue. The issue was that if I wanted to post the specific NY Post article, revealing the Hunter Biden laptop, it was suppressed and the post was quite often taken down. THAT'S the issue. It was a new story that Twitter and Facebook suppressed, so the story would have limited public access. It wasn't an active attempt to ban it across the internet from all platforms, just the suppression of the story on the more popular ones, like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. Also, a lot of us are upset about how the last elections were held. Ballots sent out to everyone, with no chain of possession possible. My dad has dementia and received a ballot. I could have filled it in for him and voted for Trump. Is that a good idea? Who would have known? Homeless shelters were getting dozens of ballots, addressed to homeless individuals, who had listed the shelter as their home because they slept there for a couple of nights and were never seen again. The opportunities for election fraud is wide open. The insistence that forcing IDs to be shown, for voting purposes, is racist is another idea that will bring up suspicions. Until the Democrats commit themselves to solving these issues, like the new elections act in Georgia, elections will be questioned and stuff like what Trump was doing will happen again. The elections were questioned in 2004 and 2016 by Democrats and then again in 2020 by Republicans. It's now being challenged again in Arizona by Republicans. We have to fix this but the Democrats refuse to cooperate. Questioning the elections isn't just a GOP phenomena. It's being done on both sides and only a biased individual would insist otherwise.
    1
  8600. 1
  8601. 1
  8602. 1
  8603. 1
  8604. 1
  8605. 1
  8606. 1
  8607. 1
  8608. 1
  8609. 1
  8610. 1
  8611. 1
  8612. 1
  8613. 1
  8614. 1
  8615. 1
  8616. 1
  8617. 1
  8618. 1
  8619. 1
  8620. 1
  8621. 1
  8622. 1
  8623. 1
  8624. 1
  8625. 1
  8626. 1
  8627. 1
  8628. 1
  8629. 1
  8630.  @ten_tego_teges  The vast majority of people that came out of the feudal system were still of agricultural background. When the aristocrats lost their power and the peasants took over the land, they drew on their knowledge, as peasants who'd always worked the land, to become successful. The Kulaks in the Ukraine were a prime example. They knew what they were doing and had attained moderate success within a generation of taking over their farms. However, if you look to Zimbabwe, the people that took over the farms weren't farmers. This idea that all you have to do is give the people land and they will produce is a fallacy. The land needs good caretakers, people who have the background and dedication to do the tough, backbreaking work necessary to make it a success. That didn't happen in Zimbabwe. In fact, those who one might say were comparable to the peasants, the labourers, didn't take over the land at all. Many left with the white landowners and helped them to establish new farms in neighbouring Malawi. The "peasants" of Zimbabwe were not the ones that lent their expertise to make it a smooth transition. It was a disaster......and it will be a disaster in South Africa, too. The land in medieval Europe was taken over by those who'd always worked it. The land in South Africa will be given to those who support the government and want the land due to ideological reasons, anger and envy. Those aren't the qualities needed to run a successful agricultural community. In reality, you're comparing apples and oranges. One that was a social system that was in a natural state of transition and the one that is now in South Africa that is a forced transition. The transition should come due to social conditions as they are today and never for ideological reasons.
    1
  8631. American By Birth Patriot By Choice A living wage is enough for me to get food and shelter. Everything after that is a bonus. Most restaurants or bars pay a minimal wage. It's a tough wage for the average person to live on and it's tough for the owner to pay more. Not always. Some places do really well and the owner gets rich and good on them. However, people think that the serving business is easy. Although there is a minimum training involved, there is a great deal of skill and anyone that's worked in the business can spot the good from the bad almost right away. It takes a certain personality type to do the job effectively. Right now, where I work, they need a new bartender. You'd think that would be easy but, in spite of all the resumes, no one is working out. In fact, most serving staff in our town have run the gamut of taverns in town. That's because it's not as simple as it sounds. That's where the tips makes things better for both the owner and the server. The owner can run a viable business, even though it is small and the employee, the really good one, is rewarded to the point that the owner will retain the services of the best available. What's more, the customer doesn't have to tip. It's an option. If you can't afford to throw down 2 bucks over a 15 dollar meal, you shouldn't have gone out to eat in the first place because you can't afford it. Having said that the motto for the server is this. "Gratuities not expected but always appreciated." It keeps businesses open and provides options for the customer. It works for everyone. Like I said. If you don't wan to tip......don't. Basically, any business that adds tips to the bill is being lazy and doesn't want to deal with the idea that some servers are better than others. The loss of meritocracy in the workplace and the lazy server gets the same as the hard worker.
    1
  8632. 1
  8633. 1
  8634. 1
  8635. 1
  8636. 1
  8637. 1
  8638. 1
  8639. 1
  8640. 1
  8641. 1
  8642. 1
  8643. 1
  8644. 1
  8645. 1
  8646. 1
  8647. 1
  8648. 1
  8649. 1
  8650. 1
  8651. 1
  8652. 1
  8653. 1
  8654. 1
  8655. 1
  8656. 1
  8657. 1
  8658. 1
  8659. 1
  8660. 1
  8661. 1
  8662. 1
  8663. 1
  8664. 1
  8665. 1
  8666. 1
  8667. 1
  8668. 1
  8669. 1
  8670. 1
  8671. 1
  8672. 1
  8673. 1
  8674. 1
  8675. 1
  8676. 1
  8677. 1
  8678. 1
  8679. 1
  8680. 1
  8681. 1
  8682. 1
  8683. 1
  8684. 1
  8685. 1
  8686. 1
  8687. 1
  8688.  @jamesclaypoint5465  Not being able to practice Christianity is only a part of our problem. The REAL problem is her unbridled hatred towards others that belong to a certain demographic. What else would she do if she could convince the majority that her hatred is justified? The Holocaust didn't start with the elimination of Jews in death camps. It started with heated rhetoric, expressing hatred against the Jews and how something had to be done about it. This woman has already expressed her hatred and is on her way to doing something about it. Getting rid of the Christmas tree might seem trivial and, in and of itself it is, but the reasoning and the vitriol that went with it, most definitely isn't. She then accused another lady of placing people "in a LOT of danger". She called them all "pieces of trash" and said the she hated "everyone of you". I mean.....WOW. All this because someone liked having the Christmas tree in the library. All over a "f---ing tree", to put in her own words. What do you do when threatened with "extreme danger"? You protect yourself and this woman is setting the rationale in place to use extreme force to counter the extreme danger that she perceives to be in. It's quite frightening, especially to someone who has lived and heard this kind of rhetoric before and seen the results of this deep hatred. You don't have to be a Christian if you don't want to be but to use such horrific language should be called out by all of us. History has shown that those who employ such vitriol can set into motion horrific actions. This is at the heart of why we should object.
    1
  8689. 1
  8690. 1
  8691. 1
  8692. 1
  8693. 1
  8694. 1
  8695. 1
  8696. 1
  8697. 1
  8698. 1
  8699. 1
  8700. 1
  8701. 1
  8702. 1
  8703. 1
  8704. 1
  8705. 1
  8706.  @onewildandcrazyguy9213  This is the definition of the word "socialism" "a political and economic theory of social organisation which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." Socialism pertains to the means of production or the acquisition of wealth and how a society engages in that goal. It says the state should be in control of production and decide what the market wants. Capitalism says that production should be in the control of the producers and decided on what the market wants. In other words the freedom of the individual to decide what he wants and the supplier decides on whether he will supply it or not. A fire department or a public water system is not socialism. It's an expense of living, the exact opposite of production. As a society, we've made a tacit agreement to share in the cost of life's expenses and we call them social programs. Therefore we build roads, schools, police departments, a military and the infrastructure that a community needs and we all chip in to build and maintain it. Without a strong economy, there is no wealth attained by the private citizens and we can't chip in to aid in the cost of expenses. We call that money we chip in "taxes". If no one is producing, there is no money being made and no taxes paid. This is the reason socialism is doomed to failure. In Venezuela, as an example, the nationalised oil industry financed the social programs. Those seeking office would promise the electorate the world because the oil revenue was the cash cow that would financially fulfil all their promises. The oil industry had no money left over for maintenance, research and development, hiring the top people and training. Eventually it had to collapse. It's why the Soviet Union failed and why China changed it's strategy allowing for free enterprise while remaining in control of the larger sectors of business.
    1
  8707. 1
  8708. 1
  8709. 1
  8710. 1
  8711.  @snarkloaf  He was referring to "Crowdstrike" when he asked about the favour. Crowdstrike is the name of a server that might have been relevant in the last election. So, if a person, an American politician to be specific, goes to another country and uses taxpayer money, 1 billion dollars, to stave off an investigation, he can declare that he's running for president and he's now beyond reproach or investigation? Really? He can do as he likes in a foreign country and no one is allowed to find out about it? Joe Biden did something shady. He's not in an election, not yet. The Democrats are deciding on who is going to run in the election and Biden is one of the candidates. This process isn't an election. This is a process of the Democrat party not the election of a new president. If a candidate for the leader of a political party breaks the law, he can't hide behind his position and say I'm in my safe space and you can't investigate. That would mean that you couldn't ask the Ukraine or Russian government to give evidence against Trump either. He's also up for the next election. Also, what if the Ukraine investigation shows that Biden did nothing wrong? How does that help Trump? The Democrats were looking to impeach the day that Trump was inaugurated. He hadn't even done anything officially as a president and they had already decided they were going to get him out and it's been one impeachment motion after another. An investigation looking for a crime. They think they've found the crime and now they're spinning it the way they want to public to hear it. And I don't even like Trump and I can see that this isn't about anything he's done wrong. It's about Democrat hatred towards Trump and a determination, to use a current expression, to cancel him.
    1
  8712. 1
  8713. 1
  8714. 1
  8715. 1
  8716. 1
  8717. 1
  8718. 1
  8719. 1
  8720. 1
  8721. 1
  8722. 1
  8723. 1
  8724. 1
  8725. 1
  8726. 1
  8727. 1
  8728. 1
  8729. 1
  8730. 1
  8731. 1
  8732. 1
  8733. 1
  8734. 1
  8735. 1
  8736. 1
  8737. 1
  8738. 1
  8739. 1
  8740. 1
  8741. 1
  8742. 1
  8743. 1
  8744. 1
  8745. 1
  8746.  @gerrywhelan5761  Yes, things were on a downturn from the early seventies. A gas crisis, over 20 percent interest rates, free trade, they all contributed to a downturn in manufacturing. I'm not arguing about that. What I'm saying, and I'm repeating myself, is that things have turned for the average blue collar worker. For the last 3 or 4 years, the economy has gotten better for the lower end worker. I never ONCE said things were perfect. In fact, they weren't perfect in the sixties, either. Life sucked for a lot of people in the US, especially blacks and other minorities. Things are better for them now then they were back then. Right NOW, in the US, the economy is better than it has been over the last 50 years, back to those glory years of the sixties. I'm not talking about 10 years ago, or 15, or 20. I'm talking about the last 3 years. All you have to do is look at employment records, wage increases across the board, the stock market and the lack of skilled workers to fill specific manufacturing jobs. All this is good for the average Joe. This happened over the last 3 years. It's known by everyone. Bill Maher hoped for a recession because he's afraid that if the economy keeps improving, as it has over the last 3 years, Trump will be re-elected. If you expand the parameters, you will reach a point where your claim is true but Trump or any president, has no control over what happened in 1980. He can control, somewhat, what happened during his own presidency and those are the parameters that are important right now. Things are better now than they've been since the early seventies. This IMPLIES that things did get worse but are now getting better and have been for the LAST THREE YEARS. Please, understand that I'm NOT talking about the eighties and nineties. I'm talking about the LAST THREE YEARS. There has been a definite improvement since 2015 and the economic numbers are better than they have been in a long time. It's a trend, one that you'd be smart to appreciate, instead of denigrating it as if it doesn't exist at all. You really didn't expect it to jump, overnight, to what it was back in the sixties. It took years for it to get to the point that it was in the late sixties. We're on a positive trend that might see it happening again but you don't even want to acknowledge the trend. If it doesn't jump there, RIGHT NOW, today, it's a failure. That's a losing attitude and things will never get better for anyone who thinks that way.
    1
  8747. 1
  8748. 1
  8749. 1
  8750. 1
  8751. 1
  8752. 1
  8753. 1
  8754. 1
  8755. 1
  8756. 1
  8757. 1
  8758. 1
  8759. 1
  8760. 1
  8761. 1
  8762. 1
  8763. 1
  8764. 1
  8765. 1
  8766. 1
  8767. 1
  8768. 1
  8769. 1
  8770. 1
  8771.  @atticuswalker8970  That didn't make a difference. The members of that response team spent years waiting for a new pandemic, doing nothing but waiting. Trump didn't fire them. He had them placed in real productive areas where their expertise was also needed. Then, even before the pandemic came to the US, but was hitting the news, he had a team put together, including members of that team. It was the Democrats who criticised him for putting together that team. They used that old race card.....calling the team nothing but a bunch of old white men, basically mocking them. Trump even offered to send members of that team to China to help them out but the Chinese refused. Then, when Trump curtailed travel between China and the US, the Democrats called him xenophobic. When Trump held up travel between Europe and the US, they said that it just wouldn't work and it was pointless. This was all done at the suggestion of the team that he put together. How much would you want to bet had Trump kept that original Obama team together and followed their suggestions, they STILL would have criticised his response, which was no different than the responses of most other countries? Look how quickly Trump got the respirators manufactured and ready for distribution or outfitted 2 hospital ships for NY and LA. The media said it couldn't be done and it was complete only a few days past Trump's target, which was said to be impossible. Then the leaders in NY refused to use the hospital ship sitting in their harbour. Instead, they put Covid patients in nursing homes....one of the worst things that they could have done, killing hundreds of the elderly. The big problem was that they used Covid as a political tool. The "I'd never get a Trump vaccine" went to "You'd better get a vaccine or lose your job" in a few short months. This political posturing is destroying the US and keeping those kids masked and out of school for 2 years had nothing to do with the early response team. This was a policy of state Democrats, NOT the Federal government or Trump.
    1
  8772. 1
  8773. 1
  8774. 1
  8775. 1
  8776.  @syav4467  But we weren't talking about that. The video was about something that happened LAST NIGHT and it was reprehensible behaviour. But you come along and deflect the conversation away from topic at hand and start your own pet conversation. I didn't see ONE comment about Hunter, Benghazi, Hilary's deleted servers or even the BLM riots until people, LIKE YOU, changed the subject and deflected to Jan. 6th. Also, why did you say "you guys". How do YOU know who I support? I'm saying you're making assumptions because I pushed back on the way you attempted to deflect the conversation. I will say one thing, though. That lack of action is rather weak. The riots lasted about 3 hours and then the bozos just WENT HOME. All on their own. No police coming after them. No big gun battles. No one arrested in the building. No perp walks out, handcuffed with their heads down. None of that. They just went home. What should Trump have done? Would they have gone home an hour earlier if Trump had asked them to....if that was even possible. You can't hold Trump for not doing something. That's not against the law. That would be like holding Trump responsible for the BLM riots because he did nothing to stop them. Doing nothing isn't against the law. Also, why, when there were almost 100,000 Trump supporters out there and everyone knew that they were coming, wasn't there more security in place? I find that totally perplexing. ALL those people and no added security. It doesn't make sense. Also, only a few hundred forced their way in. Others were waved in by security. Had the doors held open for them and everything and only a few hundred out of a 100,000 people. It was the lamest insurrection that I've ever heard of.
    1
  8777. 1
  8778. 1
  8779. 1
  8780. 1
  8781. 1
  8782. @Julie B Yup. Look at the mess that's New York right now. First, De blasio tells everyone that there's no problem, everything is fine, take the subway, go out for a night on the town, go to the big parade.....no sweat. Trump's a racist for his China ban. Wow....his own staff had to threaten to resign if he didn't stop it. Then, the Governor puts Covid patients in nursing homes. Now that's brilliant. He tells everyone they don't have enough respirators and the Feds tell him that they should have lots. Then they find them.....Where? In New Jersey, in a warehouse that the state rents out because the rent there is cheaper. Smart bunch. Then the protests starts. What social distancing? Lets fill the streets with hundreds of thousands of protesters. That'll be fine. But of course.....lets cut the city police budget by 1 billion bucks. They're racist....right? Crime goes up 250% over last year but it's a minor detail. People are under lockdown but they still manage to get out to commit serious crimes. OH...here's another smart idea. Let's let a whack of prisoners out of jail. Don't want them dying of Covid. So here they are, out in the streets, "Peacefully" relieving people of the property, and smashing a couple of windows, during the protests. Less police on the streets and MORE criminals. What could go wrong? Here's another brilliant idea. Why not put the homeless in hotels at $175 a night. The really fancy ones on the upper West Side. 10,000 of them. Now, they're urinating, masturbating, doing drugs, passing out and intimidating regular folk......doing all this out on the streets. This is a program that supposed to on through October. Man is that going to cost. Speaking of cost, they figure on a 40 billion dollar budget short fall this year. I wonder why that is. Maybe 1/2 a million, you know, 500,000 people, the richest people too, have left the city and took their tax money with them. De Blasio knows how to fix that though. He's going to tax the rich even more....duh...that should work. Maybe that's why he's put checkpoints at the exits of New York. Lock em in. That's one Democrat state. Do you want me to do another? Trump is a long way from perfect, but do you really want the New York style of government in the White House? The US will be like Venezuela in 5 years.
    1
  8783. 1
  8784. 1
  8785. 1
  8786. 1
  8787. 1
  8788. 1
  8789. 1
  8790. 1
  8791. 1
  8792. 1
  8793. 1
  8794. 1
  8795. 1
  8796. 1
  8797. 1
  8798. Protesters are like members of a deck of cards. Each protester has the Constitutional right to peacefully assemble to bring their grievances to bear. However, when someone, who is a part of that assembly, throws a brick at a window, your assembly is no longer peaceful. Like the 5 of Clubs. It's a part of a deck of cards that's useful in a game of poker. However, if 1 or 2 of the cards have a big "X" painted on the back, that deck of cards is no longer useful. It doesn't matter that the 5 of Clubs wasn't marked, the deck has been rendered useless. It's the same with a peaceful assembly. Once violence is used, your assembly is no longer peaceful. Your personal intentions are irrelevant to the assembly's peacefulness just like the 5 of Clubs is now irrelevant to the usefulness of the deck of cards. The mature person realises that the assembly is no longer peaceful and goes home to show their objection to the use of force in a good cause. The leaders of the protests do the same and then tell everyone that these assemblies were no longer peaceful and they don't approve of the violence. They announce that they will go out again the following day and anyone, who wants to peacefully protest, is welcome to join. However, if you start trouble, all peaceful protesters will, once again, go home and leave you to deal with the authorities by yourself. That's how these "peaceful" assemblies should be organised. Until they are, they're NOT peaceful assemblies. They're just a marked deck of cards.
    1
  8799. 1
  8800. 1
  8801. 1
  8802. 1
  8803. 1
  8804. 1
  8805. 1
  8806. 1
  8807. 1
  8808. 1
  8809. 1
  8810. 1
  8811. 1
  8812. 1
  8813. 1
  8814. 1
  8815. 1
  8816. 1
  8817. 1
  8818. 1
  8819. 1
  8820.  @wonderwonderful5351  It means that I'm referring to those people who have nothing constructive to say or add to the conversation or situation. Those who complain, place blame and continuously do nothing but point fingers, as if that's going to help anyone. I mean people who are NOT like those who make proposals, devise plans and work towards making those plans work and don't quit until they succeed. Two different types of people. Now it's the WAY he says black that's a problem. ALWAYS SOMETHING to whine about. He's referring to the black Americans because he's there to help solve problems that are uniquely help them. Just like those "peaceful" protesters, who are shouting about problems that are unique to black Americans. One is talking to any black leaders who will listen to see what can be done to solve the issues. The other stands in the streets and chants and makes demands of others to solve it for them. Trump is not excluding anyone. They're sitting at that table with him and any black leader who wants to accomplish something is welcome to join. Your just looking for any reason to lay more blame and not do a thing. I put my money on the guy that reaches out, not the complainers or the ones who find fault with everything. I hated working with that kind of person because it was so difficult getting things done because they always had that "What's the use" attitude. Do it and quit complaining about it. Like Trump's doing in this meeting. Everyone built America that put in the hours to do the work. The US had slavery for 80 years and it was ONLY the slave states. They were without slavery for 157 years. Are you seriously saying that ONLY Black Americans worked in all those years? Even you can't be THAT obtuse. You're seeing only the negative.....AGAIN. Americans built America....including Americans of African heritage. Now some of them, NOT of any specific heritage, but of a specific ideology, aren't appreciative of the hard work that went into it. Only the lazy and the complainers would to that.
    1
  8821. 1
  8822. 1
  8823.  @DM-dk7js  Did you even watch the video? Maybe you should. They're a loosely organised group with cells all over North America and Europe. They originated in the early thirties, in Germany, as the German Communist Party's answer to the Nazi Brown Shirts. They dispersed after Hitler took power, going underground or leaving the country. Antifa is short for the German “Antifascistischer" which is Antifascist in English. In fact, East Germany called the Berlin Wall the “Antifascistischer Schutzwall,” or “antifascist bulwark,” meaning that they believed everyone on the other side of that wall is a fascist. That was in 1961, over thirty years after Antifascistischer was formed. Read, Antifa member's Mark Bray's, book "Antifa. The Antifa Handbook". They're a Marxist revolutionary group, cleverly hiding behind their name by claiming that their against Fascists and white supremacists yet they're one of the most violent groups in America, attacking ordinary citizens, setting fires to buildings and vehicles, throwing Molotov Cocktails and even killing people. They've openly declared their aim to destroy the system and begin a new Marxist type order. They were behind over 120 consecutive days of demonstrations, firebombings, attacks on citizens and police and even killings in Portland Oregon in 2020. They're definitely a domestic terrorist group. It's just that they have the protection of the Democrat Party, even though Antifa has rejected the Democrat party as a viable way to power. That's how they've been able to carry on their violent antics. The Democrats are using them as pawns and they don't mind because they know if the Democrats turned on them, most would be in jail.
    1
  8824. 1
  8825. 1
  8826. 1
  8827. 1
  8828. 1
  8829. 1
  8830. 1
  8831. 1
  8832. 1
  8833. 1
  8834. 1
  8835. 1
  8836. 1
  8837. 1
  8838. 1
  8839. 1
  8840. 1
  8841. 1
  8842. 1
  8843. 1
  8844. 1
  8845. 1
  8846. 1
  8847. 1
  8848. 1
  8849. 1
  8850. 1
  8851. 1
  8852. 1
  8853. 1
  8854. 1
  8855. 1
  8856. 1
  8857. 1
  8858. 1
  8859. 1
  8860. 1
  8861. 1
  8862. 1
  8863. 1
  8864. 1
  8865. 1
  8866.  @Havanorange  What do you need an outline for if you know what you're talking about? Of course he blows up at the stupid questions of reporters. He's trying to organise help for the tens of thousands of people who need it after the hurricane and the idiot reporters want to talk about climate change. How does that get fresh water, food, medical help and electricity to those who need it? How does that get information for what to do to get help? It would piss me off too when reporters are only caring about their own political agenda. It's the same when the reporter asked about the "Don't say gay" bill. It doesn't say that ANYWHERE in the bill and he called that reporter out on it. The MSM were determined to carry that message and it was a baldfaced lie. That the media would intentionally lie about a bill that wants for keep teachers from talking about sexually explicit topics to kids between the ages of 5 and 8, straight or gay but the media just wanted to cloud the issue with their lies. That would piss anyone off. Even you if they intentionally lied about something that you said. When I studied public speaking in college, I never used notes either. I would study my topic thoroughly so when I was asked question during the question period, I could answer them quickly and succinctly. That meant that I was organised enough to know that material and didn't NEED notes to refer to and I got an A as a final mark. You're the one that said that he was unorganised and that's why he doesn't use notes. I beg to differ. He doesn't use notes because he knows his stuff and that takes a great deal of hard work and organisation.
    1
  8867. 1
  8868. 1
  8869. 1
  8870. 1
  8871. 1
  8872. 1
  8873. 1
  8874. 1
  8875. 1
  8876. 1
  8877. 1
  8878. 1
  8879. 1
  8880. 1
  8881. 1
  8882. 1
  8883. 1
  8884. 1
  8885. 1
  8886. 1
  8887. 1
  8888. 1
  8889. 1
  8890. 1
  8891. 1
  8892. 1
  8893. 1
  8894. 1
  8895. 1
  8896. 1
  8897. 1
  8898. 1
  8899. 1
  8900. 1
  8901. 1
  8902.  @joecasey7415  Of course, you want to blame Marx as the sole "inventor" of communism, along with his sidekick, Engels. However, he wasn't the first to even use the word. It was first used in France, in the lead up to the French Revolution in 1785. Victor d'Hupay referred to himself as a communist author in a letter he sent in that year. Marx wouldn't be born until 33 years AFTER that letter was written. d'Hupay's friend, Nicolas Restif de la Bretonne, first used the word "communism" to describe a government system based on egalitarianism and the common ownership of property in 1793, also LONG before Marx was born. Restif used that word numerous times in his writings to describe that system of government. He was NOT Jewish and neither was d'Hupay. There were countless socialist intellectuals, all advocating for an egalitarian society and abolishing the ownership of property. Marx became the most influential of these socialists but it was already quite established as an ideology during his time. Although he was born to Jewish parents, he was baptised into Christianity when he was 6 years old. He never practised Judaism and became an atheist when he grew up. He said atheism was the opiate of the masses which included Judaism. Also, a look at the leaders of the Russian revolution shows that there were Jews in their ranks but a lot of Russian intellectuals as well. Lenin had Jewish roots but he never even knew about it and was raised in the Russian Orthodox church. His sister revealed that Lenin did have Jewish roots but had never been told about it. You're allowing bigotry to cloud your world view. There are a LOT of Jews who absolutely HATE communism. Instead of attacking an ethnicity, attack the ideology, which would have endured without the work of Marx. There are tens of millions of communists around the world and very few of them are communist and are represented no more or less than any other nationality. While you're off fighting Jews, American communists are threatening to destroy this country and almost ALL have no Jewish roots. Fight them ALL, not a just a small fraction of them.
    1
  8903. 1
  8904. 1
  8905. 1
  8906. 1
  8907. 1
  8908. 1
  8909. 1
  8910. 1
  8911. 1
  8912. 1
  8913. 1
  8914. 1
  8915. 1
  8916. 1
  8917. 1
  8918. 1
  8919. 1
  8920. 1
  8921. 1
  8922. 1
  8923.  @atticuswalker8970  So do I. I value the rights of female athletes to compete on a level playing field. I don't think that a man, Leah Thomas as an example, should be allowed, with full MALE "bits", to compete with women. All world athletic records show that men outperform women by 10% or more. That may not seem a lot if you don't know much about sports but in sports it's immense. It shows that there's a reason why there are mens and womens categories in sports. It isn't as if we're telling Thomas he isn't allowed to be in sports anymore. He spent 3 years competing in men's swimming. He can continue to do so.....but that means no medals and sports records as he wasn't any thing special as a national class swimmer. Then there's the freedom for women to have their own spaces. There's a reason for that, which includes the sexual dynamics between women and men. Men are an existential threat to women under some circumstances and a women's locker room is one of those places and circumstances If I look too long at a woman in my workplace, I could be accused of the male gaze and lose my job. The entire MeToo movement was adamant of this point. Yet, Thomas can walk into a women's locker room, all "bits" intact and it's the girls, in that locker room, who were gaslit by being told that there were mental health experts that would help them through their fears, as if there was something wrong with THEM. I'm not even sure what freedom that you're talking about. Transgenders can still compete in athletics. We just think that they should compete in the gender that were assigned at birth and verified through a DNA test. No loss of freedom. They can still be transgender and compete. Not ONE of those transgenders, who have or had their "bits" cut off, will EVER get pregnant. NEVER. That's how we know that they're biologically different than women. They'd be men with their "bits" cut off. That's the freedom that I care about. Why should YOUR caring supersede mine? That's not very democratic at all.
    1
  8924. 1
  8925. 1
  8926. 1
  8927.  @bluejay9235  People, like you, just don't get it. You go after the symptom, NOT the problem. The cop arrests a rioter and 3 hours later, he's right back on the street, throwing bricks. You arrest him AGAIN and he's back out again the following night. How many times are you going to risk injury, to arrest someone, who's going to be let out by the Democrat establishment. YOU would even say "eff them if they're not going to prosecute". The rioter is applauded and the cop is vilified for doing his job....that's the way its handled on the MSM. ONE thing goes wrong and you're charged, your face is all over the news, you're vilified, your family is harassed, you lose EVERYTHING that you own, might see jail time and have to go into hiding to protect yourself and your family. THAT'S why these officers are doing as instructed. It's pointless. You take a brick to the side of your face and the guy that does it gets off scot-free. See how "noble" you'd be after experiencing that or watching your fellow officers do the same. The REAL problem are the left leaning politicians, their judges and District Attorneys. They're the generals in this phenomena, to use an analogy. You're going after the grunt instead of the general who's giving the orders. You ask the police to maintain order and then beat them submission when they do. It's no wonder that morale in the police departments are so low. No wonder so many are quitting and moving to places like Florida where they get the support they need to do their jobs. If your bosses treated you that way, you'd quit too, or go to a work to rule attitude because it's just not worth doing your best. It's human nature. You're treating them the same way that the left wing over seers and the media treats them. If I were a cop I'd tell you to get lost when surrounded by a group of armed rioters. YOU got a gun...figure it out for yourself. You think that I'm a jerk anyway. Why would I help someone who feels that way?
    1
  8928. 1
  8929. 1
  8930. 1
  8931. 1
  8932. 1
  8933. 1
  8934. 1
  8935. 1
  8936. 1
  8937. 1
  8938.  @rogermetzger7335  I'm going to say that you could apply a bit of all those methods of interpretation. However, a big influence was my upbringing in the Christian Reformed Church which is a Calvinist branch of Christianity. However, I'm looking at it now as an outsider and applying my own subsequent reading on the subject, as well. From everything that I've been able to understand, as an objective outsider, is that Christianity sees the return of Jesus as a Kingdom that stands outside of the world as we know it. A complete transformation from the world of Satan to the world of God. This implies that perfection will not and cannot be achieved without God and his transformation. I will say that the early church is different than the church that it became. They early Christians believed that the return of Jesus and the Kingdom of Heaven was imminent, coming at any moment. That didn't turn out to be the case and Christians had to revise the timeline of his return, which would increase the importance of how one should live their life. Instead of being here when Jesus returns, Christians have been forced to feel that it will happen AFTER they die. That has a 2 pronged effect on how they see their faith. The importance of faith becomes more nebulous as they can't claim to know someone who's grandfather had a cousin who knew Saint Peter, who was a disciple of Jesus. Their faith has to come more from within than through evidence, although that is discussed in Hebrew 11:1. Second, it means that the day to day activities of a lifetime have greater relevance as a part of how one finds redemption. Your faith must manifest itself in your works, to a certain degree, to use a religious concept. I guess maybe I looked at your comment as an argument rather than a discussion and that may not have been the best way to approach it. However, in my defence, there is a lot of negativity on the internet and I probably responded ready to do battle. I'm sorry about that.
    1
  8939. 1
  8940. 1
  8941. 1
  8942. 1
  8943. 1
  8944. 1
  8945. 1
  8946. 1
  8947. 1
  8948. 1
  8949. 1
  8950. 1
  8951. 1
  8952. 1
  8953. 1
  8954. 1
  8955. 1
  8956. 1
  8957. 1
  8958. 1
  8959. 1
  8960. 1
  8961. 1
  8962. 1
  8963. 1
  8964. 1
  8965. 1
  8966.  @kv1293  They didn't take it away. They all agreed to not have an election till the proper time. Canadian elections aren't like American elections. American elections are rigid...every 4 years. In Canada, it's every 5 years but there are conditions under which it could happen earlier. Everyone voted to not have an early election and it was almost unanimous. It's up to the minority party of the coalition that makes up a minority government. In every minority government, that minority party makes the decision whether or not to have an election. If they decide that they like the status quo....there is NO election and it happens all the time. They have basically decided not to have an early election, just like so many other minority parties have over 100 years of politics. Trudeau couldn't form a government in 2019 because his party didn't win enough seats. He had to get the Bloc Quebecois and the NDP to agree to form the government with him so he would have enough votes to hold a government. Do you get that? THEY AGREED TO FORM A GOVERNMENT. All they did was agree to continue to form that government until the 5 year term was up or Covid wasn't as big an issue. They did the same thing during WW1 and 2. As long as the agreeing parties agree not to have a vote of non-confidence, you don't have an election. In fact, had Trudeau not been able to form a coalition to form a government in 2019, there would have been another election back then....before Covid. Enough parties agreed to not do that and to form the government. You're just not getting how Canadian elections work. The odds were that there wasn't going to be an election anyway till 2024. They're too afraid that there's a growing conservative movement and that they'd lose their power. Saying it was for Covid allows them to say that the conservative movement doesn't scare them and that they're good people because they don't want to kill grandma with Covid. It's just political rhetoric.
    1
  8967. 1
  8968. 1
  8969. 1
  8970. 1
  8971. 1
  8972. 1
  8973. 1
  8974. 1
  8975. 1
  8976. 1
  8977. 1
  8978. 1
  8979. 1
  8980. 1
  8981. 1
  8982. 1
  8983. 1
  8984. 1
  8985. 1
  8986. 1
  8987. 1
  8988. 1
  8989. 1
  8990. 1
  8991. 1
  8992. 1
  8993. 1
  8994. 1
  8995. 1
  8996. 1
  8997. 1
  8998. 1
  8999. 1
  9000. 1
  9001. 1
  9002. 1
  9003. 1
  9004. 1
  9005. 1
  9006. 1
  9007. 1
  9008. 1
  9009. 1
  9010. 1
  9011. 1
  9012.  @mikehardy2712  What did you expect to happen when Trump took over? Did you expect that within 2 years that we'd ALL have yachts and private jets? Or just the opposite? What he did was open the economy so everyone had a chance to improve their lives. Giving people money is useless. It devalues what you have. Your wealth only has value if it's built on creating it. For me, as a relatively poor person if compared to the "oligarchs, to be able to create wealth, I need the opportunity and freedom to work and create a life that brings value and it has to apply to everyone. My dad came to this country with nothing, no job and unable to speak the language. Now, he's a millionaire. It didn't happen overnight. It took hard work, being smart with what he had and having the freedom to do, financially, the things that brought him that success. He's not an oligarch, but he's a success. I'm doing the same. I don't think I'll be as successful as my dad was, but I'm not as driven as he was, either. That's MY doing. I don't care if someone is rich. What I care about is having the freedom, which gives me the opportunity, to make my own fortune, even if it doesn't compare with the fortune an oligarch might have. The minute I start looking at the piles of others with envy, that's the day my own success stops. That's why the commandment "thou shalt not covet" is so important to personal and social success. Be concerned with freedom.....that's it. Everything else will fall into place, if you have the freedom to make your own way in life. That's what Trump is trying to bring to the table. The government doesn't DO FOR the working class. It ensures that every worker has the freedom to make the decision that can bring personal and financial success their way. My dad did it working as a labourer in a shoe factory while operating a small farm. A worker. It wasn't easy but looking back, he'd have it no other way.
    1
  9013. 1
  9014. 1
  9015. 1
  9016. 1
  9017. 1
  9018. 1
  9019. 1
  9020. 1
  9021. 1
  9022. 1
  9023. 1
  9024. 1
  9025. 1
  9026. 1
  9027. 1
  9028. 1
  9029. 1
  9030. 1
  9031. 1
  9032. 1
  9033. 1
  9034. 1
  9035. 1
  9036. 1
  9037. 1
  9038. 1
  9039. 1
  9040. 1
  9041. 1
  9042. 1
  9043. 1
  9044. 1
  9045. 1
  9046. 1
  9047. 1
  9048. 1
  9049. 1
  9050. 1
  9051. 1
  9052. 1
  9053. 1
  9054. 1
  9055. 1
  9056. 1
  9057. 1
  9058. 1
  9059. 1
  9060. 1
  9061. 1
  9062. 1
  9063. 1
  9064. 1
  9065. 1
  9066. 1
  9067. 1
  9068. 1
  9069. 1
  9070. 1
  9071. 1
  9072. 1
  9073.  @thelastcommenter7154  I never ONCE said CRT is fake. What I asked was why would the party, that fought against slavery and Jim Crow, want to cover up the details of slavery. That's the claim that proponents of CRT are claiming. "They are suppressing CRT because they want to hide the reality of slavery". Why would a party, that formed with the mandate of abolishing slavery, want to hide that slavery existed? It's illogical. Also, you never corrected anything. Not one fact or detail was given that could be used as a correcting point. People bog themselves down in details and forget the big picture. Also, I didn't google it. I guessed that year because I'd heard of the 1619 Project. I used common sense NOT Google. It seems rather disingenuous to claim that slavery and CRT could only be applied to America, when slave trades have been in existence for centuries. The African slave trade also took place in the Caribbean, South America, Europe and in the Middle East. Yet, you're only going to apply it to the US? Strange thing is, the US is the ONLY country that fought a Civil war, that killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of it's own citizens and which brought to an end slavery in that country. That's also a part of history. The ones that brought the African slave trade (native Americans practised slavery too) to America, did so because of a history of slavery that went back thousands of years. In other words, it was nothing new OR unique to America. Also, it still doesn't answer why the Republicans would want to cover up their part in ending the African slave trade.
    1
  9074. 1
  9075. 1
  9076. 1
  9077. 1
  9078. 1
  9079. 1
  9080. 1
  9081. 1
  9082. 1
  9083. 1
  9084.  @snowflake1958  You really don't get economics, do you. The rich aren't getting these loans. It's corporations that are in trouble. Do you know who owns corporations? Shareholders, that's who. Shareholders aren't just rich Wall Street Tycoons. It's almost everyone. If you have a pension at work, you have money invested in corporations. If you have money in the bank, it's being invested in corporations. Your 401 money is invested. If they go bankrupt, all those things are affected, negatively. If too many go bankrupt, it's the entire economy that goes belly up and we'll be like Venezuelans....eating out pets. Corporations work on a very small profit margin. It's calculated on percentages of money invested. It may sound like a lot of money to you and I but when it's a percentage, it's relative to the size of the investment. A 1 million dollar profit, over a year on 1 billion dollars invested is terrible. I'd love to have 1 million bucks but as a profit on 1 billion dollars, a corporation is cutting it awful fine. A corporation needs, at least, a 5% annual profit margin...at the least. If it gets lower than that, it's starting to bleed and the longer it lasts the more trouble it's in. In fact, a corporation operates in the same way a household does. It's in larger sums but, just like a household, it NEEDS to make money to pay off it's creditors and suppliers. Some are doing quite well, but there are lots of them running month to month just like the average guy working paycheck to paycheck. They deal in bigger sums of money but it's exactly the same. If you let them go bankrupt, we're all in big trouble and they do go bankrupt. Obama bailed out GM because it was done. They paid back their loan and are now starting to make face masks to fight the virus. 1.3 TRILLION to the average guy, small businesses and the fight against the virus. Please....we ALL need this money. You're hatred of the rich is going to cripple us. Worse....If the people think that it's the Democrats that are the ones holding up this money, Trump WILL WIN THE NEXT ELECTION. They will blame the Democrats. I don't care if Diamond Jim might finagle some money out of this. I want to see help for the average Joe and it's in there. Even the Democrats acknowledge that it's there. Please, encourage your congressman to let us have it.
    1
  9085. 1
  9086. 1
  9087. 1
  9088. 1
  9089. 1
  9090.  @harrisonsturm857  All he did was congratulate the new president of Ukraine. He encouraged him to combat the corruption in his country and asked about an e-mail server and a vague reference to Biden. In fact, Adam Schiff got up, in Congress, and invented, out of his head, the entire phone call. Trump, freely released, the tapes of that phone call and even the president of Ukraine said that there was no pressure or quid pro quo, as far as he knew. You're hearing what you want to hear. It's the same way that the MSM tried to push the nonsense about the Covington Kids, Jussie Smollett, the "all immigrants are animals" manipulation, the pretending that the BLM violence didn't happen, that Antifa was a myth, the "good people on both sides" distortion, that he called Covid a hoax......I can go on and on. Everyone of those lies and manipulations playing into the heads of those who "want to believe". Had this been Joe Biden holding money to get something done by a foreign government leader, it would have been ignored. Oh wait, he did do that and it was ignored. And then the Hunter Biden laptop information was ignored and people talking about it on social media were censored and even had their accounts purged. Time Magazine wrote an article, not as an expose, but to show how the Democrats, Rinos, the media, big tech and large corporations worked together to "fortify the election to ensure the proper outcome." The Democrats are trying to form a one Party state and people, like you, are helping them. They've lied, manipulated and encouraged violence and last summer over 30 lives were lost and over 2 billion dollars in damages reported in riots, yet you'd still ignore it all. Enjoy your censorship when they come after you when you happen to disagree with one thing that they want you to believe. I'm astounded that you can't see what the Democrats and the multinationals are doing. You will but it may be too late when it does.
    1
  9091. 1
  9092. 1
  9093. 1
  9094. 1
  9095. 1
  9096. 1
  9097. 1
  9098. 1
  9099. 1
  9100. 1
  9101. 1
  9102. 1
  9103. 1
  9104. 1
  9105. 1
  9106. 1
  9107. 1
  9108. 1
  9109. 1
  9110. 1
  9111. 1
  9112. 1
  9113. 1
  9114. 1
  9115. 1
  9116. 1
  9117. 1
  9118. 1
  9119. 1
  9120. 1
  9121. 1
  9122. 1
  9123. 1
  9124.  @jiveturkey2875  Tim does reference Newsguard, frequently but he's also said that they may not always correct in their assessments. Tim covers a variety of topics every day and I would imagine it takes long hours to find something of interest, read it, find other sources, assess everything he's read and then give a conclusion. The problem with MSM is that they've allowed their "news" to become opinion pieces. "60 Minutes" type programming, the cutting edge stuff of 40 years ago, doesn't exist anymore. Tim will give alternative insights to what they're saying and gives you a way to check for yourself if you're so inclined and you should be. Never, trust one source. That's been something I've believed for years but these days, it's a put down if you questioned the left leaning MSM news. "Sounds like Fox" or "Breitbart news....PFFFT" and their ears turn off. It doesn't matter that your information may have come from elsewhere. I've had people call me a "Trumpster" and then dismiss everything I say based on their slur, even though I'm not a supporter of Trump. That's the battle we're fighting these days and it's causing a horrible divide in society. Tim is fighting it as well, the best he can. He's growing but he started as a single person, no money or real influence. He's done well because he offers something the big guys don't, including Fox, in case that's an issue. He trying to show objectivity and that you don't have to regurgitate what you're being told. He's telling us to figure it out for ourselves. Is he right all the time on specific issues? Of course not. Who is? However, the tools to find out the facts should always remain the same. A healthy scepticism is indispensable to a free society. Without it, we become bots.
    1
  9125. 1
  9126. 1
  9127. 1
  9128. 1
  9129. 1
  9130. 1
  9131. 1
  9132. 1
  9133. 1
  9134. 1
  9135. 1
  9136. 1
  9137. 1
  9138. 1
  9139. 1
  9140. 1
  9141. 1
  9142. 1
  9143. 1
  9144. 1
  9145. 1
  9146. 1
  9147. 1
  9148. 1
  9149. 1
  9150. 1
  9151. 1
  9152. 1
  9153.  @nono-hp5kx  I never said he was perfect. He was a product of his times and those times included the enslavement of those who couldn't defend themselves. It was a way of life. Had you lived back then, you may well have been a slave owner yourself. People owned slaves throughout our written history. It wasn't until a few hundred years ago that the anti-slavery movement started in earnest. The entire idea of individual rights for all is a new concept, that developed slowly when the printing press was invented and Bibles were written in the languages of the average person. The idea of individual salvation in heaven slowly morphed into the individual rights and freedom here on earth, eventually settling into an idea that was separate from religious thought and applied to everyone on earth, no matter what religion or ethnicity. However, it was a slow evolution. It's so easy to sit here, on our computers, to rag on people who lived in a different time, under different circumstances and life pressures. Almost every person in antiquity was a monster by our standards. That's a reality and it's arrogance to believe that we would have behaved any differently than they did. All of that has no bearing on what Columbus achieved. When he returned to Spain and told everyone of what happened on that journey, human history changed. It was one of the biggest moments in our history. It has affected almost every human living on earth today. Columbus was not this big leader that invented slavery. Read the story of Spartacus and how prevalent slavery was during the Roman Empire. Columbus was just acting as normal people did in those times. We learned about Columbus is schools but it was just the main events. The year, what islands he discovered, the names of his ships and how many voyages he led. There is so much that has to be taught that only the superficial is covered of almost every topic. We learn the nuances of our own accord and interests. Ultimately, we learn the things we do, not just as a tool for survival, but as a mirror to hold up to ourselves. We're learning about ourselves. How we got to where we are today. Why we think and act as we do. How vulnerable and corrupt we can be, yet deeply caring as well. If you can't learn that from a good education, it's wasted on you and worse, it becomes a weapon to use on others. That's when the conflicts begin, today. Self professed morality fighting the evil others.
    1
  9154. 1
  9155. 1
  9156. 1
  9157. 1
  9158. 1
  9159. 1
  9160. 1
  9161. 1
  9162. 1
  9163.  @ionutbalta6607  The right is pissing on the Constitution? It's the left that is trying to suppress free speech. The left is trying to control what we read and listen to. "Baby, it's cold outside" is being banned not by the right but by the left, who've become more prudish than a Victorian grandmother. If it wasn't for the Constitution the left would have outlawed such films like "The Red Pill". If they don't like it, they want it banned. Don't like what a person says, fire him, dox him, protest him, mob them in restaurants when they're with their families. It's the left that want to do away with the right to bear arms, which is in the Constitution. You've said that Republicans piss on the Constitution but you haven't said how or given an example of it. As for the David Pakman thing, here he is in an interview with Dave Rubin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EipJoOJrqgU He appears quite willing to engage in a discussion in that video. He didn't say that he was left, either. He says that he has never changed the things he believed and that these were once the same as the left. It's the left that has changed and the right that has become more accepting and has moved to the same positions that he has always had. Rubin claims that he's never changed any of his core beliefs but his left friends have become more radicalised to the left and many refuse to even talk to him anymore. Also, there is a new surge in Socialism in the Democratic Party and it has had a profound affect on how they form policies and ideas. That cannot be denied. A man like Bernie Sanders would never have been considered to run for the presidency by the Democrats in the sixties and seventies. He is too far left and has embraced many Marxist ideas. As for the European socialism, those countries still embrace a capitalist economy. Business is privately owned and market driven. They have social safety nets but it is paid for by the taxes paid by the citizens who are getting their money through a capitalist economic system. The US does the same and has for decades now. The US has a capitalist system but there is welfare, rent control, subsidised housing, Medicare, social security and more. That isn't part of the capitalist economy. I don't know how Trump being the laughing stock that he is makes Rubin a liar. That's illogical. Trump is a bit of a jackass but he isn't completely incompetent, either. North Korea was launching unarmed missiles over South Korea and Japan, setting of air raid alarms and scaring the crap out of people there. Trump comes along and brokers a deal with the "dear leader" and no more missile launches. The people in that region aren't laughing. Most are quite happy that it isn't happening anymore. Trump signs an executive order, identifying depressed areas as opportunity zones so those poor neighbourhoods have a chance to improve and the people there to rise out of poverty. Who cares how stupid Trump is if he's enacting people to rise out of poverty. He also set in motion policies that will encourage the poor to not cash in their retirement packages and 401ks so when retirement comes, they won't live in abject poverty. Who cares that a stupid man is responsible for the elderly living a better life than they do now? I know I don't. Also, the radical left is more dangerous than the right. There are right wing nutjobs that have done terrorist acts, but the radical left want to to tear down the entire system and build a Marxist state. Now that's dangerous. They already are so powerful in the universities that a lot of students are afraid to say what they think due to harassment by the left wing students and professors. Berkeley has just lost a court case where that have to stop harassing student Republican groups and allow right wing guest speaker on campus. They've also been told that their free speech zone is unconstitutional. Free speech should never be zoned or cordoned off. It should be open to everyone, no matter where they are.
    1
  9164. 1
  9165. 1
  9166. 1
  9167. 1
  9168. 1
  9169. 1
  9170. 1
  9171. 1
  9172. 1
  9173. 1
  9174. 1
  9175. 1
  9176. 1
  9177. 1
  9178. 1
  9179. 1
  9180. 1
  9181. 1
  9182. 1
  9183. 1
  9184. 1
  9185. 1
  9186. 1
  9187. 1
  9188. 1
  9189. 1
  9190. 1
  9191. 1
  9192. 1
  9193. 1
  9194. 1
  9195. 1
  9196. 1
  9197. 1
  9198. 1
  9199. 1
  9200. 1
  9201. 1
  9202. 1
  9203.  @johnpeterson2391  Don't tell me about Hitler. He invaded the Netherlands, even though they declared neutrality and ground the Dutch under the Nazi boot. My mother almost starved to death because of that bastard and my uncle spent 3 years in a Nazi POW camp. What Candace said was that if his only concern was to make Germany great, that wouldn't have been a problem. Becoming great doesn't mean you must kill people, at all. It means becoming the best that one could be. Killing people isn't great and YOU know damn well Candace wasn't saying that he had to kill people to make Germany great. She made it quite clear that his desire to expand and force everything to subjugate to the Germans, in essence to become German, was the problem. German expansion couldn't happen without killing. German superiority was all about killing. She's basically saying that Hitler distorted the meaning of the word "Great". She made it quite clear that there was a problem with Hitler's version of "great". No one was talking about Americans of the past. That's what YOU introduced to the conversation. We're talking about today and what Candace meant when she was talking about Hitler. Her intent was quite obviously distorted and YOU know it. Why would a black woman endorse white supremacy. It's ridiculous. This is the same left wing attitude that calls Ben Shapiro and Dave Ruben Nazis. It's illogical and ridiculous. One doesn't have to become dishonest to call out white supremacy. That's what Lieu was doing and it's a disgrace.
    1
  9204. 1
  9205. 1
  9206. 1
  9207. 1
  9208. 1
  9209. 1
  9210. 1
  9211. 1
  9212. 1
  9213. 1
  9214. 1
  9215. 1
  9216. 1
  9217. 1
  9218. 1
  9219. 1
  9220. 1
  9221. 1
  9222. 1
  9223. 1
  9224. 1
  9225. 1
  9226. 1
  9227. 1
  9228. 1
  9229. 1
  9230. 1
  9231. 1
  9232. 1
  9233. 1
  9234. 1
  9235. 1
  9236. 1
  9237. 1
  9238. 1
  9239. 1
  9240. 1
  9241. 1
  9242. 1
  9243. 1
  9244. 1
  9245. 1
  9246. 1
  9247. 1
  9248. 1
  9249. 1
  9250. 1
  9251. 1
  9252. 1
  9253. 1
  9254. 1
  9255. 1
  9256. 1
  9257. 1
  9258.  @JhutaNabi  So you live in a culture that eats it's own young in religious ceremonies. Everyone that you know does it. You've been going to these ritual events since you were a small child and it's important to everyone that you know, that these rites are adhered to. Are you evil? By our standards...yes you are. However, you don't see how. This is important or the gods will be displeased and the balance of life will be thrown into chaos and it might destroy everything that you know. You've been told this since birth and you can't even imagine being different. You don't want to destroy the world. So, what do you do? Save the world or the child being sacrificed. Those are the dilemmas that our ancestors faced. We came from nothing and its been a learning curve since then. Our beliefs are handed down to us from our past and changing those beliefs are fraught with dangers and disruptions of the social norm. We have to acknowledge that those ideas were wrong but understand the position that these people were born into. Slavery wasn't being challenged 900 years ago. Everyone did it. The idea that it could be wrong was almost bizarre in the context of your world. Would YOU be the one that would bring to light that maybe this is wrong? I doubt it very much. You're a product of your environment as much as your individuality, probably more so. Almost all of us would have supported slavery back then. We may not like to believe that but it's just the way it is. Someday, our descendants will be looking back on us and shaking their heads at how evil we were.
    1
  9259. 1
  9260. 1
  9261. 1
  9262. 1
  9263. 1
  9264. 1
  9265. 1
  9266. 1
  9267. 1
  9268. 1
  9269. 1
  9270. 1
  9271. 1
  9272. 1
  9273. 1
  9274. 1
  9275. 1
  9276. 1
  9277. 1
  9278. 1
  9279. 1
  9280. 1
  9281. 1
  9282. 1
  9283. 1
  9284. 1
  9285. 1
  9286. 1
  9287. 1
  9288. 1
  9289. 1
  9290. 1
  9291. Jim Taylor The most radiation that the astronauts went through during the Apollo missions was 11.4 rads. That's well below the standards set for workers in nuclear plants. 100 rads can have health affects and over 1000 rads is likely to be fatal. The Apollo flights went through the VA belts at the pole where the belts are not as thick. Thus, they avoided the wider parts and spent shorter times in the belts. The VA belts are an area of the magnetic field which store radiation from the sun and protects the earth from the sustained effects of radiation. Sometimes there are major solar events that get through and still effect the earth. In 1859, there was a major solar storm that hit the earth called the Carrington Event. The effects of this storm knocked out telegraphs all over Europe and North America and even gave electrical shocks to telegraph operators. Yet, no one died from the effects of the radiation from that storm. However, in space beyond the VA belts, it could have been a problem for astronauts. If such an event were to happen again, it would be disastrous for electronic equipment on earth. It might take years in some areas to restore electrical power and it would cost in the trillions to bring back the power levels to what they are now. Moon mission hoaxers do a lot of talking about the VA belts but they don't have the numbers or stats to back it up. This was not the first time I seen the film you recommended and all it has ever said is that it would be dangerous to electrical components in any modern spacecraft. Dangerous, just like the Carrington Event, in which telegraphs were damaged but people were not. That is the danger. Hoaxers just extrapolate the danger to people to satisfy their own suspicious agenda. It won't be long before you'll have new agencies to call liars. NASA won't be the only ones any more. The Chinese are planning manned missions as well. When they do, they'll be the new liars. Conspiracy types won't run out of stuff to be suspicious of for a long time. Moon hoaxers will have a field day in the future.
    1
  9292. 1
  9293. 1
  9294. 1
  9295. 1
  9296. 1
  9297. 1
  9298. 1
  9299. 1
  9300. 1
  9301. 1
  9302. 1
  9303. 1
  9304. 1
  9305. 1
  9306. 1
  9307. 1
  9308. 1
  9309. 1
  9310. 1
  9311. 1
  9312. 1
  9313. 1
  9314. 1
  9315. 1
  9316. 1
  9317. 1
  9318. 1
  9319. 1
  9320. 1
  9321. 1
  9322. 1
  9323. 1
  9324. 1
  9325. 1
  9326.  @PvtFlowers  Yes, I have. It was called "The Children of God" at the time although they've re-invented themselves many times over the years. This was in Daytona Beach in 1972. They tried to recruit me and when I resisted, using the Bible as evidence against their claims they stopped the conversation, instantly. They all took on a very stubborn and angry expression, gathered their stuff and left. As the weeks went by, they were on the beach and boardwalk, looking for new recruits all the time. However, if I approached the group, because I knew the person that they were talking to, they would automatically gather their stuff and leave. I found out later, from a guy who they did recruit but left, that they were all instructed NOT to talk to me. I thought it was hilarious at the time....I was only 19.....the cult phenomenon was just starting to hit the news at the time, culminating in the Jimmy Jones killings and I wasn't familiar with it at the time. The one thing in common with "The Children of God" and guys like the one shown in the video, is their anger and the impossibility of discussing disagreements with them. Both groups refuse to discuss, investigate or fact check. If someone proves them wrong, they get angry and leave and will refuse to accept the evidence that shows their errors. The next time you hear from them, they'll still be using the same arguments that were proven wrong. I've found the same thing with flat earthers, birthers, chemtrail believers, truthers and more. They don't care about the facts. All they know is their fear, their hatred and their loyalty to their cause. If that's not a cult, then it's as close to being one as it can get.
    1
  9327. 1
  9328. 1
  9329. 1
  9330. 1
  9331. 1
  9332. 1
  9333. 1
  9334. 1
  9335. 1
  9336. 1
  9337. 1
  9338. 1
  9339. 1
  9340. 1
  9341. 1
  9342. 1
  9343. 1
  9344. 1
  9345. 1
  9346. 1
  9347. 1
  9348. 1
  9349. 1
  9350. 1
  9351. 1
  9352.  @OliverDePlace  So, his proposal is going to funnel money to Trump Towers or something like that? No one would want that. Not even Tucker Carlson would be good with it. That money is for businesses that are in trouble and lots of them are facing serious financial setbacks, possible ruin. The "for his own benefit" is a reading between the lines exercise that Trump haters engage in. Don't make decisions based on emotion and don't hate big business because they have more money than you. If a huge corporation goes under, due to the economic effects of the virus and the lockdowns, no one will benefit and the hardest hit won't be the executives. It'll be the bottom workers, the cleaners, assembly line workers, people who will come out of this with their finances depleted and no job to go to. Worse they'll be fighting other workers, for jobs, who lost them because the big corporation, that you hate, have also gone bankrupt and these big companies DO GO BANKRUPT. This isn't about FOX and I hardly ever go on Facebook and when I do, more people dislike Trump, in my circle, than do. Your entire premise starts out with "I hate Trump" and it expands from there to validate your hate. If there is 500 billion to help businesses, then there is OVER 500 billion to help others....the ordinary people. Also, are you seriously trying to say that tax cuts to wind and solar use, racial profile posting of corporate boards, aircraft emissions and this stuff is what we NEED right now? Hatred is an insidious drug. Get off it. It has destroyed more lives in history than any other single human endeavour.
    1
  9353. 1
  9354. 1
  9355. 1
  9356. 1
  9357. 1
  9358. 1
  9359. 1
  9360. 1
  9361. 1
  9362. 1
  9363. 1
  9364. 1
  9365. 1
  9366. 1
  9367. 1
  9368. 1
  9369. 1
  9370. 1
  9371. 1
  9372. 1
  9373. 1
  9374. 1
  9375. 1
  9376. 1
  9377. 1
  9378. 1
  9379. 1
  9380. 1
  9381. 1
  9382. 1
  9383. 1
  9384. 1
  9385. 1
  9386. 1
  9387. 1
  9388. 1
  9389. 1
  9390. 1
  9391. 1
  9392. 1
  9393. 1
  9394. 1
  9395. 1
  9396. 1
  9397. 1
  9398. 1
  9399. 1
  9400. 1
  9401. 1
  9402. 1
  9403. 1
  9404. 1
  9405. 1
  9406. 1
  9407. 1
  9408. 1
  9409. 1
  9410. 1
  9411. 1
  9412. 1
  9413. 1
  9414. 1
  9415. 1
  9416. 1
  9417. 1
  9418. 1
  9419. 1
  9420. 1
  9421. 1
  9422. 1
  9423. 1
  9424. 1
  9425. 1
  9426. 1
  9427. 1
  9428. 1
  9429. 1
  9430. 1
  9431. 1
  9432. 1
  9433. 1
  9434. 1
  9435. 1
  9436. 1
  9437. 1
  9438. 1
  9439. 1
  9440. 1
  9441. 1
  9442. 1
  9443. 1
  9444. 1
  9445. 1
  9446. 1
  9447. 1
  9448. 1
  9449. 1
  9450. 1
  9451. 1
  9452. 1
  9453. 1
  9454. 1
  9455. 1
  9456. 1
  9457. 1
  9458. 1
  9459. 1
  9460. 1
  9461. 1
  9462. 1
  9463. 1
  9464. 1
  9465. 1
  9466. 1
  9467. 1
  9468. 1
  9469. 1
  9470. 1
  9471. 1
  9472. 1
  9473. 1
  9474. 1
  9475. 1
  9476. 1
  9477. 1
  9478. 1
  9479. 1
  9480. 1
  9481. 1
  9482. 1
  9483. 1
  9484. 1
  9485. 1
  9486. 1
  9487. 1
  9488. 1
  9489. 1
  9490. 1
  9491. 1
  9492. 1
  9493. 1
  9494. 1
  9495. 1
  9496. 1
  9497. 1
  9498. 1
  9499. 1
  9500. 1
  9501. 1
  9502. 1
  9503. 1
  9504. 1
  9505. 1
  9506. 1
  9507. 1
  9508. 1
  9509. 1
  9510. 1
  9511. 1
  9512. 1
  9513. 1
  9514. 1
  9515.  @Yves_Ka  First, the United States wasn't even close to being the last nation to abolish slavery. Many held onto it until well into the 20th century. Saudi Arabia and Yemen didn't abolish slavery until 1962. That's 100 YEARS after the US. Also, the southern United States was conducive, due to climate, the nature of the soil and the geography, to the type of agricultures that were labour intensive enough that made slavery advantageous, especially the growth or cotton and tobacco. The north didn't have that type of agriculture and Canada especially didn't have those types of industries. It's easy to abolish slavery when you don't have a big slave system and then so smug to pat yourself on the back for it. Slavery was also a HUGE part of the system in the Caribbean and in certain countries of South America. Brazil didn't end slavery till 1888, 25 years AFTER the United States did. When was the last time you heard people blasting Brazil over their history with slavery? I'm really puzzled by the myopic approach or vision, of such a complex cultural issue, of slavery. It's as if the United States invented it, upheld it and we see it nowhere else. Yet we KNOW that this isn't true. So why just vilify THEM for it? And choosing to question those, in the US who stand for freedom now, because their ancestors may or may not have had slaves, is illogical. It smacks of MORE identity politics. You can tell, just by looking at them, whether their ancestors had or supported slaves or not. So how does that account for the large support from Hispanics in Florida, who believe in the same thing? Did THEIR ancestors support slavery? Slavery has been a part of the human condition for thousands of years and was prevalent all over the planet. Even the natives had slaves before the Europeans arrived in the Americas. It's time to look at slavery as it was, not through the lens of retribution, personal arrogance and hatred. It happened EVERYWHERE....yet you zero in on one country and that's it. It's self serving and arrogant.
    1
  9516. 1
  9517. 1
  9518. 1
  9519. 1
  9520. 1
  9521. 1
  9522. 1
  9523. 1
  9524. 1
  9525. 1
  9526. 1
  9527.  @TheBelegur  The Fascist system in Italy was different than the one in Spain, which was different than the one in Nazi Germany. Just because it doesn't EXACTLY match the one in China, doesn't mean that it's not a form of Fascism. If the CCP has half interest in business, that it implies that the other half is privately owned. That goes against everything that Marxism or communism stands for. communism definition: a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. If part ownership of a business is allowed, then it's NOT communism. Fascism definition: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism. The Party and particularly, Xi Jinping, is the leader or dictator, as it were. He's officially the Paramount Leader, the Communist Party Leader, the Head of State and the Commander in Chief. He has a firm hand on his power. China is also VERY nationalistic. Look at the Uighur camps, in which they are being re-educated into learning Chinese, getting away from Islam and then integrating them around China so they can be assimilated into the Chinese culture. Not quite as aggressive as Nazi Germany but definitely leaning that way. From this, I'd say that China is closer to be a Fascist country than a communist one. Marx would NOT approve of what is going on in China, right now.
    1
  9528. 1
  9529. 1
  9530. 1
  9531. 1
  9532. 1
  9533. 1
  9534. 1
  9535. 1
  9536. 1
  9537. 1
  9538. 1
  9539.  @JoeSmith-mp2fn  We were talking about Chicago and you made a statement that crime was everywhere. I used Toronto to show that, in spite of the fact that crime IS everywhere, it doesn't have to be as bad as Chicago. Second, YOU'RE the one that made the assertion that conservatives are liars. All I did was show you that Chicago had mayors and administrations for 90 years, who are NOT conservative and violent crime is horrific. The people have elected the SAME group of politicians for 90 years and the awful crime rates has remained the same, right along with it. They keep sticking their hand in the same trap and wonder why things don't improve. Hey.....but at least those lying conservatives are in charge. Do you know who else is lying? YOU are.....to yourself. Go ahead, keep sticking your hand in the same bear trap. Eventually your hand will get that strong and build an immunity to the pain. Also, I know that there have been liberal mayors in Toronto. That's not my point. My point it that it doesn't matter the ideology of the administrations...liberal or conservative. What matters is the pattern of success. Toronto is one of the fastest growing, vibrant and crime free cities in North America. That's a success that we want to perpetuate. Chicago is a city in decline, with horrific violent crime rates. If you want to perpetuate that record, vote for the same people, that brand of Democrat that have been there all along. If they've failed all along, what makes you think that they'll succeed in the future? I know....at least they're not conservatives. LOL. You sure have a twisted sense of logic.
    1
  9540. 1
  9541. 1
  9542. 1
  9543. 1
  9544. 1
  9545. 1
  9546. 1
  9547. 1
  9548. 1
  9549. 1
  9550. 1
  9551. 1
  9552. 1
  9553. 1
  9554. 1
  9555. 1
  9556. 1
  9557. 1
  9558. 1
  9559. 1
  9560. 1
  9561. 1
  9562. 1
  9563. 1
  9564. 1
  9565. 1
  9566. 1
  9567. 1
  9568. 1
  9569. 1
  9570. 1
  9571. 1
  9572. 1
  9573. 1
  9574. 1
  9575. 1
  9576. 1
  9577. 1
  9578. 1
  9579. 1
  9580. 1
  9581. 1
  9582. 1
  9583. 1
  9584. 1
  9585. 1
  9586. 1
  9587. 1
  9588.  @scottfarner5100  She crossed 6 years ago and was a Canadian citizen. She went to live with an American in hopes of marriage that she met when he was in Canada. However, none of that matters. Refugee status has to do with those who come from a nation embroiled in wars and are displaced citizens due to the effects of that war. Asylum seekers are those who are faced with imminent threats of torture of persecution in their home countries. There is no WAY that everyone coming across the southern or northern borders, including my sister, meet or met those requirements. They're coming because they're having economic difficulties (they're poor) at home and they know that the current US administration won't question or enforce those asylum requirements. Also, separating children from the adults that are accompanying them, has NOTHING to do with asylum or refugee status. Having a child with you isn't an automatic indication of lawful refugee or asylum status and has NOTHING to do with those immigration laws. They're either running from wars, torture or persecution at home. If they can't show that they're facing such dangers at home, they can't seek asylum as refugees. That's the law. You can't show up with a child and say that you're a refugee and then say that this proves that you're a refugee or seeking asylum. It's an illogical claim. It's NOT the questions that determine refugee or asylum status. It's the answers. Can they show the requisite determination for legal immigration status as refugees or asylum seekers or not. That's the question. Rubber stamping requests and letting them come in to disappear into the country is a TERRIBLE policy. Also, if you're from Nicaragua, and you're being persecuted, you go to the nearest country (Honduras) to seek asylum. If they don't allow your case, you go to the next country, Guatemala and do the same. If refused, go to Mexico. There is NO evidence that this is happening. People are coming from all over the world, going to Mexico (not Canada) and then seeking asylum at the US border. They're doing it because the US is seen as a rich country and that's why they want to go there. It's also why, they're not going to Canada and heading south. Canada is already seen as a rich country and no one would come from there to seek asylum, which is why my sister was sent home and threatened with jail if she ever returned. You don't just claim to be a refugee. You have to prove it and this isn't happening at the southern border.
    1
  9589. 1
  9590. 1
  9591. 1
  9592. 1
  9593. 1
  9594. 1
  9595. 1
  9596.  Wayne Gambill  He tries to stop the press from speaking about him? Really? Like how? Arrests? A knock on the door in the middle of the night? Journalists disappearing and never heard from again? That's how true dictators do it. This is one vague allegation. The press hasn't stopped talking about him, especially the MSM, which has been quite open in their hatred of him. They've out and out lied about things he's said. Example....It was claimed he called immigrants animals, when it was clear he was talking about an extremely violent street gang. They had to have known but they didn't care. They knew that a lot of people only read the headlines and that's all that will stick in their memories. Even you'd be upset at that kind of reporting if it was about you. And so what if Fox has supported him? They've also criticised him and Trump called them out, too. A dictator doesn't hold mid-term elections. He doesn't allow impeachment processes. He does what Assad did in Syria. He calls out his army and starts arresting his opponents. Next year there will be an election with an opposing party and everything. What kind of failure of a dictator will allow that? Dictators don't have elections. Also, it hasn't been fully established yet that he withheld funds in lieu of an investigation. That's what these hearings are about. A conclusion before the hearings are complete would make this a kangaroo court with Trump as the victim. So that entire statement is bogus until all evidence has been presented. As for the mob rule claim. They didn't attempt to STOP the proceedings. They felt that they should be included. Mob rule would have insisted that the investigation stop. Cease and desist under threat of retaliation. They just wanted it to be known that they felt it unfair that only one side was allowed to see and hear what was going on and that only selected news was allowed to get out. Besides, wasn't it Maxine Waters would urged her followers to confront Republican legislators? Where was the backlash from the DNC for that? He didn't lose the last election, either. He won the electoral vote and that makes him the president, whether you like it or not. US elections have always been that way. They tried for 2 years to get him on collusion and they had NOTHING. He trashed NATO? NO. He said that NATO should pay its fair share in that treaty. They seem to want all the benefits of being protected from the Russians but didn't want to pay. An overwhelming majority of NATO countries weren't paying what was agreed upon. Why wouldn't the leader of the country that was paying say something about it. I get that you don't like Trump. Your diatribe of "lying, perverted, vile, vulgar and hateful SOB" makes it quite clear how much you HATE the guy. However, it would appear that this hate is forcing you to literally see red at the mere mention of his name. Making assessments through the lens of hate puts you in a state of mind where only the hate shines through and any logic or reason is put to the side. You don't have to like the guy but you shouldn't allow your hate to be the only venue of reason when discussing issues around his presidency.
    1
  9597. 1
  9598.  @debbieassini8934  No, he said the "peacefully and patriotically" phrase shortly after 12:00. He finished his speech at 1:10 just as the rioters started throwing metal poles at security. At 1:45, the rioters surged past security. At 3:13 Trump tweeted asking people to remain peaceful. Trump was at the Ellipse, close to the White House, when he gave that speech. That's a 1.8 mile walk to the Capitol Building. The "peaceful and patriotic march" would have taken around 40 minutes according to Google Maps and that's on a normal day, not when there were tens of thousands marching. Trump was in the limo "grabbing the steering wheel away from the driver" a nonsensical claim. Everyone knew that there was going to be a large protest long before that day. Why was there more security in place? People asked for it. Even Trump did. Another thing, why wasn't there the outrage when BLM rioters threw Molotov cocktail and other projectiles at the White House and security? They even tried to set fire to the Church of the presidents, at the edge of the White House lawn. Trump and family had to go to a secure bunker for their safety. That's sure sounds like an insurrection where the president had to hide from a mob for his own safety. Yet, the media mocked and called him "Bunker Boy". There were fires all over Washington that day. I suppose that's a good insurrection as opposed to the bad one on J6. I say that BOTH were bad but there's no evidence that Trump planned the riot. It was supposed to be a protest and that's legal in the United States. According to Democrat supporters, burning, looting and attacking police is okay, depending on who does it. Violence should be called out, EVERY time, not just when it done by people that you don't like.
    1
  9599. 1
  9600. 1
  9601. 1
  9602. 1
  9603. 1
  9604. 1
  9605. 1
  9606. 1
  9607. 1
  9608. 1
  9609. 1
  9610. 1
  9611. 1
  9612. 1
  9613. 1
  9614. 1
  9615. 1
  9616. 1
  9617. 1
  9618. 1
  9619. 1
  9620. 1
  9621. 1
  9622. 1
  9623. 1
  9624. 1
  9625. 1
  9626. 1
  9627. 1
  9628. 1
  9629. 1
  9630. 1
  9631. 1
  9632. 1
  9633. 1
  9634. 1
  9635. 1
  9636. 1
  9637. 1
  9638. 1
  9639. 1
  9640. 1
  9641. 1
  9642. 1
  9643.  @diomedes7971  Had I landed on the beaches of Normandy, there would have been nothing fearless about it. I would have been terrified. However, I'm not conflating any sacrifices that I might have made with those landing at Normandy. What I'm saying is that if those guys could sacrifice their lives and body parts, I should be able to sacrifice a paltry scholarship or anything else that isn't life threatening. Those soldiers set the benchmark, paid the ultimate sacrifice, so we could have the right to stand for our rights in other and more mundane matters. If anything, it's disrespectful to the memory of those lost lives, if you're too afraid of losing a job or a scholarship for standing up for what's right. That's true disrespect. It's like saying that their sacrifice doesn't matter. You're going to bend the knee to authoritarianism, anyway, so eff their sacrifice. The female athletes have 2 choices. Either stand up and say that this isn't fair and they won't take it......OR.....keep their mouth shut, do what they're told and, in the process, ruin women's college and high school sports. And if they lose their scholarship because the coach is filling his team with trans athletes, it's their own doing. Most scholarships are on a yearly basis and they could be kicked off the team and out of school the following year anyway. Keeping our mouths shut is how we got into this mess in the first place and this is only the start. Authoritarians will force you to do their bidding because that's what they do. If you don't stand up for yourself, no one else will and you'll reap exactly what you've sown.
    1
  9644. 1
  9645. 1
  9646. 1
  9647. 1
  9648. 1
  9649. 1
  9650. 1
  9651. 1
  9652. 1
  9653. 1
  9654. 1
  9655. 1
  9656. 1
  9657. 1
  9658. 1
  9659. 1
  9660. 1
  9661. 1
  9662. 1
  9663. 1
  9664. 1
  9665. 1
  9666. 1
  9667. 1
  9668. 1
  9669. 1
  9670. @Fred Freddy The strange thing is I was prepared for the lockdown because of the things that Trump was saying and doing. He put together a task force to deal with in mid-January 2020. Soon after, in instituted travel restrictions to China. He offered to send a team to Wuhan, from the CDC, to assist China which the Chinese government flatly refused. He talked about it in the State of the Union Address saying they were trying to cooperate with China to fight this thing if necessary. He then restricted travel to Europe. And what did the Democrats do. They called his task force a club of old white men. They said the travel ban to China was xenophobic, Pelosi went hugging people and inviting them to Chinatown to prove how un-xenophobic she was. Cuomo and De Blasio told everyone to live like normal and don't forget to go the Chinese New Year's Day parade, to prove how un-xenophobic THEY were. Pelosi ripped up the State of the Union Address saying it was ALL lies and then Bided told everyone that travel bans didn't work. Trump did say that this thing could just go away and he was wrong about that but he was speculating about the future. So I thought that he might be saying that but he's doing things that says he's been aware that there could be a problem. So I stocked up enough for at least 3 months and when the big toilet paper panic hit, I was sitting comfy. People are so filled with Trump hate that they weren't paying attention and they got caught and then they blamed everyone else for their own lack of preparedness. You have to take responsibility for yourself too and quit waiting for people to tell you what to do after the crisis hits. Its too late, then.
    1
  9671. 1
  9672. 1
  9673. 1
  9674. 1
  9675. 1
  9676. 1
  9677. 1
  9678. 1
  9679. 1
  9680. 1
  9681. 1
  9682. 1
  9683. 1
  9684. 1
  9685. 1
  9686. 1
  9687. 1
  9688. 1
  9689. 1
  9690. 1
  9691. 1
  9692. 1
  9693. 1
  9694. 1
  9695. 1
  9696. 1
  9697. 1
  9698. 1
  9699. 1
  9700. 1
  9701. 1
  9702. 1
  9703. 1
  9704. 1
  9705. 1
  9706. 1
  9707. 1
  9708. 1
  9709. 1
  9710. 1
  9711. 1
  9712. 1
  9713. 1
  9714. 1
  9715. 1
  9716.  @carsonchan5102  I just gave an example of the government destroying the dairy industry. My dad started his farm with nothing. The government mandated Milk Marketing Board ruined it with too many rules for the small farmer to survive. No young person, except a multimillionaire, could do what my dad did in the early fifties. The milk quota, which the amount that a farmer is allowed to produce, costs millions. Try to ship too much and you're monetarily penalised. Farmers pour their milk onto the ground to prevent that. Then they need to buy the land and equipment which is millions more. That's what killed the dairy farm dream. You can metaphorically water and fertilise that dream all you want, you will go bankrupt before you succeed. I know a young woman who is trying to start a small bakeshop. She rented a small store, did all kinds of renovations and installed the equipment needed to be a success. She's now sitting in limbo because the local and provincial government has so much red tape and she's not allowed to sell as much as a butter tart or she'd be fined and and will never get the licenses needed to start operations. She's been "watering and fertilising" until she's at the point of either drowning those metaphorical plants or scorching them with too much fertiliser. She may go under before she can even legally sell her first birthday cake. Your metaphor sounds great if you're left to do that job, but the government shackles you. The biggest hurdle is overcoming the roadblocks that the state sets in front of you.
    1
  9717. 1
  9718. 1
  9719. 1
  9720. 1
  9721.  @maxpayne7419  Seat belts and helmets.....you're just being a jerk, now. This is now a country that, if you use the wrong pronouns, you could find yourself in big trouble. They make it up and YOU have to follow. We have the internet but now, our government, wants to control the content. Our esteemed PM, was worried that maybe the guys working on a pipeline might be too overly zealous towards young women in the small towns that they're working through. That this should be considered when deciding if such a project is worth the trauma for these young women. This isn't just in Canada. The farmers in the Netherlands, France, Germany and Ireland are now facing restrictions and land appropriations because it's said that farmers are a threat to the environment and our esteemed PM has implied that this might be a good idea. Home prices have sky rocketed and rents are insane....yet the PM wants to bring in MORE immigrants, which means home prices will keep going up, far beyond the capabilities of the young....but that's alright. You're GOT your little kingdom. Who cares about the people that have been here for generations. As far as I can see, you're just being a troll. You've not made any kind of case. All you've kept saying is that you're 55 and that everything is great. Do you know what? It is. But if you can't see that we're heading in the wrong direction, you're not seeing. When the young have no hope of owning their own home, things are wrong. If you can't see that, you are the proverbial ostrich.
    1
  9722. 1
  9723. 1
  9724. 1
  9725. 1
  9726.  @erenjaeger1738  "why can you admit there's never such a good thing as "christian nation" Why can't you admit that there's no such thing as a GOOD nation. The only things that separate the Christians from others is the scale of their evil side. The only difference between the, for the example that we've been using, is that the Spanish had a greater population, more advanced weaponry and a degree of immunity to diseases that the Aztecs didn't possess. Had the advantages been the other way around, do you really think that the Aztecs would be no less brutal than the Spanish. It's a matter of scale. I'm NOT Christian. I want you to understand that. I'm looking at this from the outside. There's one thing that Christians are supposed to do and that is to "love they neighbour". Not your Spanish neighbour or your Aztec neighbour, or Dutch, Bantu or Libyan neighbour. You're to love your neighbour, no matter what. "Love thine enemy", "Turn the other cheek", "Bless those who curse you". If someone, who calls themselves Christian, kills for personal gain, to appease his God or out of national interests, he's not following the tenets of the faith as it is written in the Christian Bible. So why do they do those crimes anyway? Because they're human. Humans will destroy what they touch and Christianity makes that very clear with the words "Man is born in sin". It's the only religion that carries it that far. That's why we can call out both Cortes along wit his men and Montezuma and his nation of Aztecs. Both groups are human and as such they are failures in doing the right thing. However, the tenets of Christianity does offer an understanding of human good and evil. It's why the abolition of slavery was initiated by those who were Christian. It was their Holy book that made them realise that slavery was an affront to human dignity. That doesn't mean that a Christian nation is going to be good because that's impossible. It will not happen. All we can hope for is to try to do better and to STOP pointing at others as the evil ones. That in itself is evil.
    1
  9727. 1
  9728. 1
  9729. 1
  9730. 1
  9731. 1
  9732. 1
  9733. 1
  9734. 1
  9735. 1
  9736. 1
  9737. 1
  9738. 1
  9739. 1
  9740. 1
  9741. 1
  9742. 1
  9743. 1
  9744. 1
  9745. 1
  9746. 1
  9747. 1
  9748. 1
  9749. 1
  9750. 1
  9751. 1
  9752. 1
  9753. 1
  9754. 1
  9755. 1
  9756. 1
  9757. 1
  9758. 1
  9759. 1
  9760. 1
  9761. 1
  9762. 1
  9763. 1
  9764. 1
  9765. 1
  9766. 1
  9767. 1
  9768. 1
  9769. 1
  9770. 1
  9771. 1
  9772. 1
  9773. 1
  9774. 1
  9775. 1
  9776. 1
  9777. 1
  9778. 1
  9779. 1
  9780. 1
  9781. 1
  9782. 1
  9783. 1
  9784. 1
  9785. 1
  9786. 1
  9787. 1
  9788. 1
  9789. 1
  9790. 1
  9791. 1
  9792. 1
  9793. 1
  9794. 1
  9795. 1
  9796. 1
  9797. 1
  9798. 1
  9799. 1
  9800. 1
  9801. 1
  9802. 1
  9803. 1
  9804. 1
  9805. 1
  9806. 1
  9807. 1
  9808. 1
  9809. 1
  9810. 1
  9811. 1
  9812. 1
  9813. 1
  9814. 1
  9815. 1
  9816. 1
  9817. 1
  9818. 1
  9819. 1
  9820. 1
  9821. JuliaJustBeauty That doesn't fly, especially now. These girls will get support from those, like you, who take the stance that there is no way a girl would make up an allegation like this. There could be psychological rewards in making these accusations as well, a sort of Munchausen syndrome, where the attention is the priority over the reality. There are segments of society that laud the courage and bravery of those who stand up and tell their story. Manipulative individuals can use this to their advantage to coerce women to make allegations that aren't true with a promise of social approval from that segment of society. Why do people, with the full realisation that they'd be open to ridicule, start to advocate for a flat earth? There are facets of the human psyche that don't fall under the norm and those things have to be considered when claims of any kind are made. In this interview, thus far, Brown has been quite convincing and unless he's bluffing outrageously, he's going to come out vindicated. If a woman has been physically assaulted, by all means, come out and confront the accuser. However, if Brown is vindicated, then the witch hunt allegations will also be vindicated and the women will legitimate complaints will be in no better position than they were 30 years ago. No reasonable person should want that. That CTV reporter, I can't remember her name, should have made sure those sources were impeccable and beyond reproach. If Brown has witnesses that she has used in her story that contradict her story, then her career is in trouble. I'm not sure she did her due diligence at best and might even be guilty of orchestrating a scandal that didn't exist, at worst.
    1
  9822. 1
  9823. 1
  9824. 1
  9825. 1
  9826. 1
  9827. 1
  9828. 1
  9829. 1
  9830. 1
  9831. 1
  9832. 1
  9833. 1
  9834. 1
  9835. 1
  9836. 1
  9837. 1
  9838. 1
  9839. 1
  9840. 1
  9841. 1
  9842. 1
  9843. 1
  9844. 1
  9845. 1
  9846. 1
  9847. 1
  9848. 1
  9849. 1
  9850. 1
  9851. 1
  9852. 1
  9853. 1
  9854. 1
  9855. 1
  9856.  @grahamyates2490  Columbus set into motion a defining moment in human history.....arguably one of the most defining moments in history. The fact the he went through all the work, the pleading of his case to different governments, the privations and enemies he made in Europe, his dogged determination to go to eastern Asia by sailing west was a momentous undertaking. That he even got the ships to do what he was proposing was quite a feat. When he found the islands in the Caribbean, that was the beginning of a new era for all mankind. Everyone of us has been affected by what was set in motion that day. We can quibble about his motives but the fact that he had the courage, determination and fore sight to accomplish this is why he is being elevated to a hero's status. However, he was human, as well. That means that he had faults, like you, like me, like everyone else on this planet. He had to fight the inner demons just like the rest of us do. In spite of that, he was still one of the most important people that has ever lived. I can't speak for the young guy's motives, either, but what I do know is that his questioning is always the first step to vilification. It's not the questions in themselves but the tone of those questions. He clearly doesn't see Columbus as a hero and can't understand why we'd honour his great accomplishment.....because it IS a great accomplishment. When describing Columbus to someone who has never heard of him before, it's that accomplishment that you describe. You don't start off by talking about his faults. He's remembered by his great discovery. The rest is details that describes the humanity that was in him. If you ignore the discovery, you're erasing this aspect of history because without his voyages, Columbus would just be another forgotten individual, like the rest of us.
    1
  9857.  @grahamyates2490  John Cabot acted in response to what Columbus had done. It was Columbus that had formulated the idea the one could get to Eastern Asia by sailing West. He was the one that went looking for sponsors and finally convinced the Spanish to back him up. The entire trip was the brainchild of Columbus and no one else. Without that, there would have been no Cabot or Henry Hudson or any of the other men who sailed west. It was the vision of Columbus that set everything in motion and changed the world. It's not just the courage. A suicide bomber doesn't change the direction of history. Every single man that landed in Normandy on D-Day is a hero due to their courage but we don't honour each individual soldier because individually they didn't change WW2 but they did collectively. Columbus changed the course of history due to his vision and courage and determination. Not ONE sailor on those 3 ships would have sailed had it not been for Columbus. That's what makes him unique. This was his voyage, his plan, his battle to fund the voyage, his determination to get support and then to see the entire enterprise to its fruition. That's the type of fortitude that very few people display in life and is the hallmark of success. Was he a saint? Of course not. No more than those men that landed in Normandy. I'll wager some them were deplorable human beings but they faced something horrible and did it. Columbus opened up to the rest of Europe to fantastic new opportunities. Cabot was just one on many that responded to what Columbus had shown possible.
    1
  9858. 1
  9859. 1
  9860. 1
  9861. 1
  9862. 1
  9863. 1
  9864. 1
  9865. 1
  9866. 1
  9867. 1
  9868. 1
  9869. 1
  9870. 1
  9871. 1
  9872. 1
  9873. 1
  9874. 1
  9875. 1
  9876. 1
  9877. 1
  9878. 1
  9879. 1
  9880. 1
  9881. 1
  9882. 1
  9883. 1
  9884. 1
  9885. 1
  9886. 1
  9887. 1
  9888. 1
  9889. 1
  9890. 1
  9891. 1
  9892. 1
  9893. 1
  9894. 1
  9895. 1
  9896. 1
  9897. 1
  9898. 1
  9899. 1
  9900. 1
  9901. 1
  9902. 1
  9903. 1
  9904. 1
  9905. 1
  9906. 1
  9907. 1
  9908. 1
  9909. 1
  9910. 1
  9911. 1
  9912. 1
  9913. 1
  9914. 1
  9915. 1
  9916. 1
  9917. 1
  9918. 1
  9919. 1
  9920. 1
  9921. 1
  9922. 1
  9923. 1
  9924. 1
  9925. 1
  9926. 1
  9927. 1
  9928. 1
  9929.  @perihelion7798  As an ordinary guy, it sometimes seems as if there's not a lot that I can do. However, what I feel I can do, in my small way, is to do 2 things. /First.....stay informed. That means listening to ALL the information that's offered and not the stuff I like. I can't refute something that I don't know about so it's important to know what they're thinking, saying and doing. Nothing they hate more than facts but it will sway the guy who sits in the centre.....like I used to. Second.....vote. Vote local. This may be the most important of them all. The leftist Marxists are infiltrating our municipal governments and our schools. We have to take back our cities. The biggest reason for the BLM riots is that the left is controlling big city politics and they set the policies that allowed for the conditions to blow up. It has to stop. Vote state for the same reason. There was a lot of chicanery going on in the last Federal election. We have to make the politicians feel that it's in their own best interest to ensure election integrity by voting against ANYONE that isn't firm on secure elections. Vote federal. Know who your candidates are and hold them to account. Vote Federal for the obvious reasons. The establishment hates it when the people stand up for themselves. You can see it by the reaction to the angry parents at school board meetings. Domestic terrorists...indeed. They just want them to go away so they can go on with their socialist agendas. That's what this is all about so....don't go away. The main thing is to insist that our representatives live up to the standards set by the Constitution. If they don't, let them know that they're putting their political career in real jeopardy. It seems simplistic but once the people stand up for themselves, the establishment is in real trouble...and they know it.
    1
  9930.  @perihelion7798  It might work for the indigenous but they don't carry a lot of weight as far as economics and power goes. They can still control them because they're so small. However, I doubt they're going to allow the rest of us to form our own autonomous zones. Like you've already implied, they own the military. The foot soldiers may not be aware of it but that's who's giving them their orders. They're already going through their private social media to see if they're supporting the right people and if they're not, they have dismissed some of them. It would be great if the constitutional zones worked but I'm afraid that it might be the tool that they want to finally take full power over the country. In fact, it might well what they've been working towards. That's why the school board fiasco is such a help to stop the authoritarians. Suddenly, the average person is actually running into that brick wall called the establishment. That a soccer mom could be labelled a domestic terrorist, because she doesn't like the sexually graphic material in her kid's school library, has to be opening a few eyes. This is the type of thing that will defeat them. Most people don't know the depth of what is happening to our institutions. They're busy trying to make a living and it all sounds a little crazy to them....until they run into it first hand. It won't be easy and it will frustrating but it's the best way to reverse the coarse and not destroy the country, completely. At least, that's my opinion, anyway. All I do know is that Civil war is a destroyer and the results might take decades or longer to fix....if ever.
    1
  9931. 1
  9932. 1
  9933. 1
  9934. 1
  9935. 1
  9936. 1
  9937. 1
  9938. 1
  9939. 1
  9940. 1
  9941. 1
  9942. 1
  9943. 1
  9944. 1
  9945. 1
  9946. 1
  9947. 1
  9948. 1
  9949. irishque halim The entire population of Gaza is Muslim at 98 percent of the population with no Jews present. The religious affiliation of the Israeli population as of 2011 was 75.4% Jewish, 16.9% Muslim, 2.1% Christian, and 1.7% Druze. The population of the West Bank is 80–85% Muslim (mostly Sunni) and 12–14% Jewish. The remainder are Christian (mostly Greek Orthodox) and others. I'm going to assume that the entirety or darn close to the entirety of the Jewish population will not be identified as Palestinian by the Muslim Palestinians. I doubt any one identifying himself as a Jew would feel safe living in Gaza. The Palestinians that do not identify as Jews or Muslims are a very small segment of the population and I would think that their loyalties are divided on this issue. Therefore, it is almost an exclusive issue about Muslims not wanting Jews in the Levant. Not all Muslims. That's too general a statement but the PLO was a Muslim organisation and so is Hamas. They recognise Islam as their driving force and is central to their constitution. They have been the organisations at the forefront fighting the state of Israel and they strongly identify as Muslims and maintain the Islam is the very core of their struggle. It is all about Islam. If all Jews would submit to the authority or Islam, problem solved. No more fighting in the Levant. Islam does not compel one to become a Muslim but they do insist that one submits to its authority. The Jews will never do that so the Palestinian Muslims will continue to fight them.
    1
  9950. 1
  9951. 1
  9952. 1
  9953. 1
  9954. 1
  9955. 1
  9956. 1
  9957. 1
  9958. 1
  9959. 1
  9960. 1
  9961. 1
  9962. I don't see any point in dwelling on the mistakes of the past. I'd rather make plans on what I'm going to do in the future. I can't change the past but I can change the future. I always have extra supplies on hand. Not prepper, years of stuff type of supplies, but enough to last at least 4 to 6 weeks. When it looked as if this COULD be serious, the first week of February or so, I started to buy extra stuff every time I went shopping. Not bags and bags of it, but a couple of cans of beans, a couple bags of pasta or rice, cans of soup and tomatoes, dried soup mix and other sundries. Just 5 or 6 items extra every time I was at the store. Didn't take long and my larder had plenty, enough to last well into a 3rd month. Now, all I do is replace what I've eaten or used. No panic buying, no fighting in the stores, no worrying, because I've prepared myself and I took it seriously enough to see the possibility of a crisis. That's what a doer does. The complainer whines about the past, blames others, waits until the last minute and then is in a panic because he/she is doing what they've always done. NOTHING......and then they gaze into the past to look for someone to blame and complain about. They don't realise that their attitude is the problem, not politicians, whether they be liberals or conservatives, but their own shortsightedness. I can't imagine being in a panic over toilet paper. It's the dumbest thing that I've heard.....yet it's real and the ones in a panic are supposed to be adults.
    1
  9963. 1
  9964. 1
  9965. 1
  9966. 1
  9967. 1
  9968. 1
  9969. 1
  9970. 1
  9971. 1
  9972. 1
  9973. 1
  9974. 1
  9975. 1
  9976. 1
  9977. 1
  9978. 1
  9979. 1
  9980. 1
  9981.  @spencerchudyk3390  Maybe he should have asked why there has been poor people in all of human history. Why the overwhelming majority of people were dirt poor, for thousands of years. It's that old conundrum. Why aren't things perfect? If only things could always be EXACTLY as we want them to be. When you look and expect perfection, you're going to be disappointed....very disappointed. The poorest American, right now, has access to better health care than royalty did 200 years ago. As imperfect as the American health system, royalty of those times couldn't even begin to get the kind of medical attention that the poor, of America, get today. In 1935, Americans were living on bread lines and in shanty towns. Poverty didn't just exist, it was the norm for most Americans.....in fact around the world. My parents grew up without electricity or running water as did everyone of their neighbours, in the 20s and 30s. Did he really expect that within 25, every person in America would be affluent? The rise in the standard of living, in Canada and the United States, after the war, was the biggest gain in life styles, for the common man, in human history, up to that point. Some people only dwell on the failures and refuse to see the successes. My parents, the same people without electricity or running water, in 1945, without a nickel in their pocket and not a square inch of property, managed to buy and pay off a small farm by 1967. My dad raised cash crops during the day, worked as a labourer, in a shoe factory, from 4:30 in the afternoon till 1:00 the next morning, 5 days a week. On weekends, he would play in local pubs and dance halls, as a musician. He worked his butt off and now he's in his nineties and has had a great retirement. Why? Because the capitalist system allowed him the opportunity to make something of himself. He didn't cry that "Joe" down the road had more than him. He put his head down and went for it. Now, he's got young folk, that are wailing that he's got white privilege and that he should share the wealth. They refuse to see that he worked 60 to 80 hours a week to find his success. They're too lazy and feel entitled to what he had to work so hard for. So spare me the negative platitudes about capitalism. When I hear that negativity, I hear the ramblings of one that doesn't want to do what has to be done, that has no pride or self esteem. If you want it bad enough, in America, it's there for you if you're willing to sacrifice and work hard for it. If you wait for the state to do it for you, for that's what socialism is, you'll wait a lifetime.
    1
  9982.  @spencerchudyk3390  It was capitalism that built the US in the 50s and 60s and into the 70s. It was international socialism that slowly destroyed it ever since. Then came the free trade deals and the beginnings of the world economy, a sort of international socialism. Suddenly, the rule of law, that governed the capitalist system here, no longer applied. Any autocratic country, which exploited workers, and they did, was allowed to dump their products in our country, wiping out our manufacturing facilities. Countries that allowed child labour, near slave labour with no labour laws, environmental standards or quality control requirements popped up all over the 3rd world. Workers, locked up in sweat shops with suicide nets around the buildings, allowed us to buy cheap products and those products filled our stores and we happily and greedily allowed it. Unscrupulous nations, some even communist like China, cajoled and bribed multinational executives, lobbyists and our state bureaucrats, to encourage them to shut down factories here and rebuild them in their nations, promising cheap labour and non-existent manufacturing standards. Our oligarchs grabbed that cash with both hands. It's not Capitalism that eroded the middle class. It's the exploitation of the elites, who circumvented the rule of law, an implicit requirement of capitalism, that did it. The elites were forced to follow the rule of law, in this country, so they went elsewhere, where it no longer was an essential part of the system. That's not capitalism at all. Capitalism requires a free market, FREE being the operative word. A free market system has one basic requirement. It requires that all within that system be free and that means a rule of law that is equally applied. When you allow child labour and lock workers in the place of employment, you're not applying the rule of law and freedom is thrown into the waste basket. You may think the it's capitalism that did it, but it was actually the cooperation of state and the multinationals that did it, an evolved form of Fascism.
    1
  9983. 1
  9984. 1
  9985. 1
  9986. 1
  9987. 1
  9988. 1
  9989. 1
  9990. 1
  9991. 1
  9992. 1
  9993. 1
  9994. 1
  9995. 1
  9996. 1
  9997. 1
  9998. 1
  9999. 1
  10000. 1
  10001. 1
  10002. 1
  10003. 1
  10004. 1
  10005. 1
  10006. 1
  10007. 1
  10008. 1
  10009. 1
  10010. 1
  10011. 1
  10012. 1
  10013. 1
  10014. 1
  10015. 1
  10016. 1
  10017. 1
  10018. 1
  10019. 1
  10020. 1
  10021. 1
  10022. 1
  10023. 1
  10024. 1
  10025. 1
  10026. 1
  10027. 1
  10028. 1
  10029. 1
  10030. 1
  10031. 1
  10032. 1
  10033. 1
  10034. 1
  10035. 1
  10036. 1
  10037. 1
  10038. 1
  10039. 1
  10040. 1
  10041. 1
  10042.  @wheniwasyourage4418  I'm giving to believe that you don't even know any Republicans, happy, sad or otherwise. I watched a video, the other day, about people entering a stadium for a Trump rally. Across the street were a large group of protesters. They were screaming profanities and insults continuously, especially at any American of Africa descent, who was going to listen to Trump speak. Not ONE person, going into the Trump rally, paid them any mind. They just talked to one another and ignored the blue in the face, screaming protesters. Finally, a media commentator went over to the protesters to talk with them. That didn't go well. They didn't want to talk to her. They snubbed her, walked away and emoted snide remarks in her direction. Finally, an African American protester started to talk to her. He was adamant that those Trumpsters were racist and that he would be physically and verbally attacked if he went into the stadium. She talked him into going over and talking to some of those waiting in line. He told them that he wouldn't be safe inside that stadium and every one of them assured him that he'd have no problem, including some African Americans, who told him that this wasn't their first Trump rally. People hugged him, shook his hand, invited him in as their personal guest but there was NO way he was going in. He finally went back across the street with the media person and he was in for a shock. He was yelled at, insulted and jeered and finally someone poured a drink over him and the girl with the mike. They treated him FAR worse than any Trump supporter did. So, who do you think would be the happier? The ones that smiled, shook your hand, hugged you and extended a personal invitation....OR......the ones that insulted, made jeering remarks and poured a drink over you? Like I said....you don't know any Republicans. You've a narrative and that narrative tells you what to think.
    1
  10043. 1
  10044. 1
  10045. 1
  10046. 1
  10047. 1
  10048. 1
  10049. 1
  10050. 1
  10051. 1
  10052. 1
  10053. 1
  10054.  @odenpetersen6028  Actually, I'm not sure that we can ever share a truth. Empirical truth is demonstrable and is fact, no matter who is assessing that fact. I have 2 tomatoes on my fridge. That's an empirical fact or truth. This isn't open to opinion and a group of individuals can never, correctly, share a truth that says there are 3 tomatoes on my fridge. It's not a truth to say it and it's demonstrably false. Coban uses this politically sensitive issue because it has become so contentious. Gender has always been expressed in 2 ways. Male and female. DNA has confirmed that this is consistently true. A male ALWAYS has a y chromosome. Even those with the rare xxy chromosome are seen as male due to the y chromosome present. If one takes and tests the piece of skin for gender, it will always show that it will be purely xx or xy with a rare extra x thrown in. That's empirical data, yet to say that it is an empirical truth, that would be deemed heretical. One has either male, with a y chromosome or female, without the y chromosome. There is no variation. To say that this is the truth puts you exactly where Winston found himself, trying to defend the empirical 2 plus 2 equals 4. That's not to say that people don't have gender dysphoria. I know for a fact that they do. However to ignore certain facts about gender, limits discussion and study into how and why it exists in the first place. The academic has the metaphorical cage of rats tied to his face to force him to discard the heresy of this truth and forced to adopt the new "shared" truth. Young children are undergoing radical treatment due to an acceptance of the idea of relative truth. I fear for these children because the stages of growth and sexual development in humans has been in place for millions of years. This could end quite badly in the future and it's all due to an acceptance that truth is fluid and empirical truth doesn't exist as fact. 2 plus 2 does equal 5 in this realm....but does it really. Are we really going to deny the evolutionary reality of human growth over an ideological vision of what is truth? I'm not sure that this is such a good idea and it would seem that Copan feels the same.
    1
  10055. 1
  10056. 1
  10057. 1
  10058. 1
  10059. 1
  10060. 1
  10061.  @silvergriffin2585  I will admit that I did assume that you were a socialist and the reason that I did was because I've heard that same claim that Orwell was a Socialist, before and it was always from strident socialists. While I agree that there shouldn't be corporate bailouts, there are a lot of conservatives in the US that agree with you. It was Obama, the Democrat and a firm socialist, that bailed out the banks and General Motors and Bush, who said that he was a conservative but wasn't. It was also Obama that bailed out certain banks and Wall St. due to the unethical practices of many of the lending institutions. Canadian banks came out unscathed due to regulations that outlawed the wild west practises that was characteristic of American banking. Trump is bailing out farmers who are suffering because of the trade war with China. He's bankrolling it with the funds raised by tariffs and he feels that the farmers shouldn't be the casualties of a trade war meant to force China to stop it's unfair trading practises. These are unusual circumstances and those bailouts have their merits. Now, I'm not saying that I agree with those bailouts but they helped more than the rich. Thousands upon thousands of blue collar workers kept well paying jobs due those bailouts and lots of peripheral businesses remained open due to the money that these auto workers were able to spend on a daily basis. The bailouts weren't just about the rich. I know people that benefited from the bailouts and they were ordinary line workers. I was a bartender and these guys were my customers because they were still working and could afford the beer and my tips. So I even benefited from the bailouts.
    1
  10062. 1
  10063. 1
  10064.  @odenpetersen6028  However, is "are trans women real women" a problem of semantics? What if that is at the very heart of the problem that causes a high suicide rate? That statement alone differentiates them from "real" women. They'll never feel what a woman feels during menstruation or deal with the unique issues that a "real" woman deals with at that time of the month. They'll never experience an orgasm the way a "real" woman experiences it. She'll never feel what it is to be pregnant, to feel the dread for their future while waiting for the pregnancy test to give its results or the joy of seeing the result that one is wishing for. Never feel a baby's kick in their stomach, never endure the pain of child birth or the closeness of holding that baby to her breast to feed. How many "real" women are devastated when they find out that they are unable to have their own children, yet a trans woman KNOWS that this will never be a consideration for them....never feel the devastation or loss when realising their own sterility. They may feel like a woman, dress like one, talk like one, detach body parts and add new ones, but that basic aspect of female identification will never be reached. Gender is the primary force behind human survival, not just human but for all advanced life. Without that primal need that each gender has, we will die off as a species. It's a path to biological extinction if those primal urges and needs aren't met and is a major element of human psychology. Yet.....we are not to speak of it. We're not to explore the psychological aspects of it. It's easier to lay blame and a lot more satisfying to reach a conclusion of moral superiority when we can point to those who we deem to be at fault for the complexities of that issue. The devil is in the details and you're saying that we can't point out that specific devil or detail.
    1
  10065.  @mnguardianfan7128  The prosecution must have consulted with the Deutsche Bank, the business that was alleged victim of the fraud, then. The bank did show up at his sentencing trial. It seems that the loan, in question, was quite acceptable to the bank and they even said that they'd do business with Trump again. My sister was a real estate appraiser for 30 plus years. The banks were one of her major employers. A person would put up property as collateral for a personal or business loan, claiming that their property was worth X amount of dollars. The bank would contact my sister to appraise the property in question, at the borrower's expense and she would submit an official appraisal which is bound by strict guidelines. If the borrower's claim of X value of his property is too high, they don't call the police. They tell the borrower what the property is actually worth and they either reject the loan application or reduce the amount allowed based on that property value. Once again, they do NOT call the police. My sister has been stopped on the street by irate borrowers who angrily claim that she undervalued the property and that her assessment is ruining their lives. However, she has no choice. There is a formula in deciding the value of real estate and she could lose her licence if she didn't follow the assessment rules. If you have money in a bank that would allow a loan, without following protocols, get that money out right now, if possible. Your money isn't safe there and you're risking another situation like the one in 2008. Giving out loans without any real knowledge of the value of collateral is piss poor banking. This is entirely bogus and is politically motivated.
    1
  10066. 1
  10067. 1
  10068. 1
  10069. 1
  10070. 1
  10071. 1
  10072. 1
  10073. 1
  10074. 1
  10075. 1
  10076. 1
  10077. 1
  10078. 1
  10079. 1
  10080. 1
  10081. 1
  10082. 1
  10083. 1
  10084. 1
  10085. 1
  10086. 1
  10087. 1
  10088. 1
  10089. 1
  10090. 1
  10091. 1
  10092. 1
  10093. 1
  10094. 1
  10095. 1
  10096. 1
  10097. 1
  10098. 1
  10099. 1
  10100. 1
  10101. 1
  10102. 1
  10103. 1
  10104. 1
  10105. 1
  10106. 1
  10107. 1
  10108. 1
  10109. 1
  10110. 1
  10111. 1
  10112. 1
  10113. 1
  10114. 1
  10115. 1
  10116. 1
  10117. 1
  10118. 1
  10119. 1
  10120. 1
  10121. 1
  10122. 1
  10123. 1
  10124. 1
  10125. 1
  10126. 1
  10127. 1
  10128. 1
  10129.  @TeamFillip  I would bet that you'd be singing another tune if YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon were telling Democrat supporting uploaders to kick rocks. Youtube invites, as its business platform, people to upload their videos on their platforms, EXCEPT those whose political views differ from theirs. What's next. Muslim Imams have to go because they Islam believes that homosexuality is a sin? The other 4 big tech companies do the same. When people say that there's only one political view point allowed on social media, they say "Start your own". So someone started Parler and guess what....Amazon won't let them use their server until recently. The left, to the everlasting joy and approval of the Democrats, control social media and the MSM. There is only ONE major conservative news network and NO big tech conservative platforms. It's a near monopoly. This is EXACTLY how authoritarians take over a government. They control the media and then guys, like YOU, hide behind dubious interpretations of business laws to squelch all dissenting voices. YouTube calls itself a platform, a bulletin board, but it's colluding, just like Time Magazine said, with other big tech companies, big corporations, the Democrats and the MSM to make sure that ONLY their voice is heard...and you're good with that because it lines up with your voice. YouTube is NOT the voice. It's customers and uploaders are. Their standards are that you don't break the law and that's all it should be. Having conservative views is NOT illegal. Just be grateful that they weren't all lining up to squelch left wing voices. Then YOU'D be the one complaining. It's easy to applaud when you're in the choir.
    1
  10130. 1
  10131. 1
  10132. 1
  10133. 1
  10134. 1
  10135. 1
  10136. 1
  10137. 1
  10138. 1
  10139. 1
  10140. 1
  10141. 1
  10142. 1
  10143. 1
  10144. 1
  10145. 1
  10146. 1
  10147. 1
  10148. 1
  10149.  @alondramojico6838  That's true and Florida had a much greater case per million count, as well. However, New York had EXACTLY the same death rate as Florida and a HIGHER case per million count than Florida. New York had just as strict a mandates as California. This means that there are more at play here than just mandates. That strict mandates are not the only factor in the spread and death rates. It also means that we can play with statistics any way that we want so they end up to suit what we want to see. One thing that has happened since Covid started is that for the first time in Californian history, its population went DOWN. People are leaving California and New York state is going through the same thing. Florida, however, is seeing an upsurge in population. The economy is growing. People are so happy with the situation that they voted, overwhelmingly, for the current administration, in the last election, an election that they barely won in the previous election. People, in Florida, are experiencing greater life satisfaction in Florida than in either California or New York. Isn't that the point in life? Instead of living in perpetual fear, for the future, they live with an atmosphere of optimism and real personal and economic growth. That's what makes life worth living. Living to be safe is mere existence. Grabbing life by both horns and facing it with courage and determination is what makes life worth living. Hiding in your homes and viewing those around you as threats to your life is an awful way to live. I've had Covid, in spite of 3 vaccines and living in a place where mandates were strict. It was no fun and I'm over 70 years old and should be afraid....but I'm not. I'd never want to go back to the mandates. It was a miserable time and Covid rates in my area are the highest, now, that they've ever been. I still go out, mask free, where ever and whenever I want and I am enjoying my life much more now than 2 years ago. If I catch it again, so be it. I'll deal with it but I refuse to live my life as in fear.....especially in fear of the people around me. I will NOT treat people that way.
    1
  10150. 1
  10151. 1
  10152. 1
  10153. 1
  10154. 1
  10155. 1
  10156. 1
  10157. 1
  10158. 1
  10159. 1
  10160. 1
  10161. 1
  10162. 1
  10163. 1
  10164. 1
  10165. 1
  10166. 1
  10167. 1
  10168. 1
  10169. 1
  10170. 1
  10171. 1
  10172. 1
  10173. 1
  10174. 1
  10175. 1
  10176. 1
  10177. 1
  10178. 1
  10179. 1
  10180. 1
  10181. 1
  10182. 1
  10183. 1
  10184. 1
  10185. 1
  10186. 1
  10187.  @outermarker5801  I never defended Trump ONCE. I said not to trust politicians. You say that Trump is corrupt....you bet but what about Joe Biden? The entire Democrat party, the Washington Bureaucracy and the media covered up the laptop story. They said stuff about Russian disinformation, THE NEXT DAY, that was their big investigation and then big tech platforms wouldn't even allow you to share the NY Post articles about it. Talk about collusion to rig an election. Joe Biden bragged about withholding 1 Billion dollars, in aid to Ukraine, unless they fired a special prosecutor and they ignore it completely. It's on VIDEO, ffs, and not a word about it, yet when Trump just asks about it, just asked about it, no money mentioned, they impeach him. I've showed people the video of Biden bragging about it and they get mad at ME....as if I something did some kind of video editing wizardry to make the video. Half the friggen scandals about Trump were just made up. He was supposed to have called immigrants "animals". Made up. He sent "stormtroopers" to Portland to protect a Federal Office...made up. He defended white supremacists in Charlottesville....also made up. So corruption runs both ways. It's not that you have to trust the politicians you vote for, at all. They're all corrupt. What you do is vote for the one that you can trust the most of the 2 bad ones. If you have an entire machine dedicated to the overthrow of one person and that's ALL they offer....I'm not voting for them. Biden didn't even campaign. We had no idea what he stood for except we gotta get rid of Trump. What kind of platform is that? Now look at the mess we're in. A huge deficit, inflation especially high food prices and shortages, banks going bankrupt, a war in Ukraine, a botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, an energy sector that's down almost 20% in production. I could go on and on and I'm not even counting the scandals surrounding his son and brother. Over 100 questionable bank transactions reported but not investigated. If you or I had 2 or 3 of them reported we'd have the FBI, the DHS, the DEA and the IRS down our necks but not Biden. So get over this idea that you can trust politicians. You can't. You make a trade-off hoping, that the one that you vote for, will do better for the country than the other while they're lining their pockets. That's the reality of politics.
    1
  10188. 1
  10189. 1
  10190. 1
  10191. 1
  10192. 1
  10193. 1
  10194. 1
  10195. 1
  10196. 1
  10197. 1
  10198. 1
  10199. 1
  10200. 1
  10201. 1
  10202. 1
  10203. 1
  10204. 1
  10205. 1
  10206. 1
  10207. 1
  10208. 1
  10209. 1
  10210.  @b0hd3n  Trump's divisive tactics? Wear a MAGA hat on campus. Let's see what that gets you. Look at those Covington kids. They didn't do a thing. Black Israelites started yelling racial and homophobic slurs their way but it was the left and left wing media that vilified them, saying that THEY surrounded the native guy and started taunting them. They had to shut their school down for a week because of the threats and vitriol thrown at them. Democrat and left wing speakers can go where ever they like and you never see these protesters screaming and threatening them. They don't stand and chant inane slogans to drown out speakers but let a right wing speaker try to have a live engagement. The left wing loses their minds. You have professors in college saying all kinds of racist rhetoric against whites and it's acceptable including threats of genocide and that white's breeding is morally unacceptable. Obama puts up fences and barriers along the Mexican border and crickets. He makes speeches saying we have to control our southern border and that's just fine. Republicans agree with him. Suddenly Trump says it and it's immoral and he's a racist. They lied when he said immigrants were animals. They glossed right over when those pictures of children in cages were proven to have taken during Obama's presidency and tried everything to say that this was all Trump's fault. Antifa threatens everyone and you NEVER hear the Dems or left wing media say a thing about them or condemn their violence. Antifa actually beat up 2 marines of Hispanic heritage, calling them all kinds of Latino slurs and it didn't even make the news. Kathy Griffin holds up a severed head of Trump but that's just a joke. Madonna says that she dreams of blowing up the White House but not biggie. A 12 year old kid is picked on by his teacher and class mates because of his hat but...you know, the little brat had it coming to him. Just this week, an immigrant from Togo, in Washington DC, was attacked by 2 guys, while on a walk because he was wearing a MAGA hat. I could go on and on. Trump says a lot of ridiculous things but don't go pretending that this is ALL his fault. The Dems and the left wing media have been relentless in their hatred of Trump and they either look the other way when Democrat supporters commit violent acts or actually condone it. I mean, doesn't Nicholas Sandmann have a punchable face? That's your peaceful and tolerant Democrats and the left. Every word of what I said is true.....and you know it. Your hatred of Trump will either excuse it or condone it or you'll turn it into that childish argument of "He started it". If Trump is causing division it's only because the left and the Democrats are allowing it.
    1
  10211. 1
  10212. 1
  10213. 1
  10214. 1
  10215. 1
  10216. 1
  10217. 1
  10218. 1
  10219. 1
  10220. 1
  10221. 1
  10222. 1
  10223. 1
  10224. 1
  10225. 1
  10226. 1
  10227. 1
  10228. 1
  10229. 1
  10230. 1
  10231. 1
  10232. 1
  10233. 1
  10234. 1
  10235. 1
  10236. 1
  10237. 1
  10238. 1
  10239. 1
  10240. 1
  10241. 1
  10242. 1
  10243. 1
  10244. 1
  10245. 1
  10246. 1
  10247. 1
  10248. 1
  10249. 1
  10250. 1
  10251. 1
  10252. 1
  10253. 1
  10254. 1
  10255. 1
  10256. 1
  10257. 1
  10258. 1
  10259. 1
  10260. 1
  10261. 1
  10262. 1
  10263. 1
  10264. 1
  10265. 1
  10266. 1