Youtube comments of Jack Haveman (@JackHaveman52).
-
3000
-
2100
-
1300
-
1200
-
1000
-
832
-
783
-
677
-
667
-
I'm in my late sixties. I'm from the generation that this video is talking about where men are supposed to be strong. Yet, I have friends, close friends, a couple that have been friends since my early teens. We know when we're hurt but we don't talk about it unless the hurt person wants to. We're just there for each other. We sit, watch a hockey game, have a beer, talk about work, make fun of each other and we know, deep down, that what we're doing is what we need. It cures the loneliness.
I can't talk my problems away. I have to live them away. All I ask from my friends is for them to be there...nothing more. When I had tough times in my life, they were there, not talking about the tough times, but just there and I appreciate that they were there, more than they could know. I try to do the same for them. Sometimes it feels as if I'm failing but every once in awhile, they do the little things that let you know that they appreciate what you, too.
545
-
533
-
I live at what the government says is below the poverty line, retired and living on a fixed income. Strangely though, I probably have a more comfortable life than that rich woman who wrote that travel journal in the early 18th century. Couldn't even imagine what it would have been like for the poor people of her time.
She travelled, on horseback, which must have been tough on the back, battling the weather and bugs. A rich woman. Here I am, a poor retired guy, and last year I flew to the Caribbean and then a couple of months later, to Europe. I complained about having to wait around the airport and how slow the lines were moving. 21st century complaints. Going to Cancun in January. I'm a poor guy, worked in construction, factories and tended bar all my life. I'm sitting here comfortably, just finishing a grilled cheese sandwich and watching the end of Monday Night Football on my 42 inch, flat screen TV.
I'm one lucky guy when you compare me to those that were living 200 years ago.
523
-
472
-
460
-
426
-
411
-
402
-
Having grown up on a farm, I know, for a fact, pigs do NOT like to lay in their own excrement. My brother and I used to clean the pens and the pigs would sleep in one spot and poop in another. We would clean the pens and put the straw bedding in their "bathroom". Every pig, in that pen, would immediately push the straw, with their noses, over to their sleep area. Once they have a designated bathroom, they will refuse to sleep there. We tested it out multiple times.
Cows, on the other hand, will do their thing and lay right down in it. They have no designated sleep area, nor do they construct a comfy bed like pigs do with the straw.
I know this from first hand experience.
375
-
370
-
290
-
245
-
242
-
218
-
205
-
202
-
200
-
195
-
194
-
180
-
179
-
174
-
165
-
160
-
158
-
151
-
147
-
131
-
When this clears, Trump might take all 50 states....even California and Oregon. I don't think the average American fully grasps what's going on in their country. The Democrats, obsessed with their hatred of Trump, has turned to the Devil for help, to use an analogy. They've turned to extremist groups like BLM and Antifa who don't care about American politics, at all. They want to institute, in America, a system without politics, of complete control and they'll destroy everything that you own to get it. If you don't vote for Trump, as flawed an individual as he is, you're going to get WORSE than him. BLM and Antifa aren't going to stop just because the Democrats are in power. In fact, that's just another step in their process to power.
129
-
128
-
127
-
126
-
124
-
123
-
121
-
118
-
116
-
108
-
108
-
107
-
107
-
102
-
100
-
100
-
93
-
92
-
87
-
82
-
80
-
79
-
@sandyh5873
The assertion, that you made about Joan of Arc, isn't true. She was arrested for heresy, claiming that she heard voices from Archangel Michael, Saint Margaret and Saint Catherine. The English dominated tribunal, the English were the ENEMY, claimed that this was heretical and burned her at the stake. Why would the French rally around her when she was wearing men's clothing? It didn't seem to matter then. It was only when the English got involved that her life was in jeopardy and the reason is obvious. The English didn't want her to inspire the French into strengthening their resolve against the English.
Also, you treat the Indigenous people of the Americas as one big monolith, all believing the same thing. "Acceptance varied from tribe to tribe, however; while some gender-variant individuals were culturally integrated and held roles that contributed to their communities, others were rejected and ostracized." Encyclopedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/berdache
In fact, I find the idea that ALL native Americans were all the same to be rather offensive. They had different beliefs, customs, languages and even HATED each other. The Iroquois committed genocide against the Huron of southern Ontario in 1649. Don't lump them all into one group. It takes away from the richness of their separate cultures and heritage.
77
-
77
-
76
-
75
-
74
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
asia
Aztecs lived in Mexico. They have NO claim to land in the United States. Just because you're a native of Mexico, that doesn't mean you can walk into Michigan and claim this as your homeland. They couldn't do that 600 years ago. The natives, of Michigan, living 600 years ago, would have called you an invader and would likely have you killed. Those who are coming from El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala and others are NOT from Mexico and have no ancient tribal claim to land in the United States.
Also, the times have changed. The people of the United States have a distinct nationality now. That's all of them, no matter their ethnicity. This is recognised around the world and even by Mexico. It's the reality of today. The citizens of the United States have the right to limit the number of people coming into their country, just like EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. Try it. Get on a plane and try to enter another country without a passport. It's NOT going to happen.
To top it all off, they're not being told that they can't come in. They're being told that there's a process and that they have to follow that process. That process has still allowed Mexico to be the number one source of new immigrants.....BY FAR.
Grow up.
67
-
66
-
66
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
@ricanraikage4297
A bunch of activists came into the town, where they lived and worked, burned, looted and destroyed the place for THREE days and NO ONE did a thing about it. All because the police shot a man, who was wanted for sexual assault, who resisted arrest, who had a knife and was about to leave the scene with 3 small kids in a car that didn't belong to him. 25 businesses, completely destroyed, and others damaged and the very people who were elected to protect that community did NOTHING. So some of the citizens stood up and said "ENOUGH!!!!" and stood up to these thugs and bullies.
Yes, they're heroes. A bigger hero than you'd ever be, cowering in your home, waiting for someone else to protect your community unless you're one of those thugs. Then there's not much I can say to you.
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
LeJon Brames
NO!!!! He was a man that was a product of his times. Our ancestors did terrible things because of the realities of life as they had to live it. Not just Columbus but YOUR ancestors as well. It's not written down in history books because your ancestors, like mine, didn't do anything extraordinary, never changed the course of history in great leaps like Columbus did. However, if we were to get into some kind of time machine to examine what our ancestors have done or believed, we'd be amazed to find out just how horrible they were at times.
This young man hasn't even began to live his life, yet he sits in judgement over those that he doesn't fully understand, that none of us will fully understand. What he's doing is exactly what some of the worst of moralists have done. He's dismissing people as evil when he has no right to do that. Also, he's taken the first step in dismissing that individual, Columbus as an example, and wanting to erase that person from history. That is the intermediary step to the one where we erase those, who are living today, that we feel might share similar views and lives to the one we've vilified in history. That's how the horrors start. It is the attempt to eradicate the evil around us when the evil that we should be eradicating is the evil that lies within us. Recognise that and you recognise the lessons of history.
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
@davidclark573
I find it difficult to laugh at homelessness, high inflation, high taxes, increased crime stats, open borders, increasing addiction problems and the way we're educating our young, especially those who live in the inner cities of America. It's weird how you laugh at those who show concern for those problems because, in reality, those problems aren't funny at all.
Do actually like the high taxes, high energy costs, high housing and food costs and the crime and homelessness of states like California? I find that hard to believe.
The only conclusion, that makes any sense, is that you're a troll.
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
@tookiejones9765
A pop psychologist that has B.A. in political science, a B.A. in psychology, a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology at McGill University, one of the most prestigious Universities in the world and then went on to teach at Harvard, another world class University, as an Associate Professor and took part in clinical research. He then gain a full tenured position as a Professor at the University of Toronto, while maintaining a clinical practise. On top of this, he's read most of the greatest writers of philosophy, religion, science and literature ever written.
Yeah......pop psychology.
Instead of attacking him, why don't you try to discuss the topics that interest him. You know, use the intellect that you're supposed to have been born with. Doesn't take much intellectual thought to attack people and call them names. I did that in the school yard when I was 8.
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
@happytwolaffs6454
The insurrection....LOL. This is the right, the supporters of the 2nd Amendment and open carry, who had an insurrection and NO ONE thought to bring their "sacred" guns with them. NOT one gun was brought into the Capitol Building during this "rebellion against democracy". It's been 6 months and there still has been no leadership or chain of command revealed, no real "battle" plan or methodology of a takeover....nothing at all. But they did find a lot of selfies and have arrested a lot of people, including little old ladies who were walking around, inside the building, honouring the velvet ropes that are there for tourists.
The current administration has used, the stupidity of a bunch of hotheads, to further whittle away the rights of people by increased surveillance of those who may have tweeted things or made Facebook comments which might indicate right wing or conservative support. Political surveillance to keep a lookout for political dissenters, including the police and the military, ostensibly to ensure loyalty to the party in the armed forces.
This was the lamest insurrection in history. To put it bluntly, the administration and the MSM used the actions of a bunch of upset and stupid people to spin a narrative to further their own agenda and YOU'RE falling for it.
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
I strongly believe that you mean well but this isn't about women's rights or feminism. It's about human rights. It's wrong to do that to another human being, no matter their gender, race, religious affiliation or sexual preference. They have a right as humans, to be themselves without interference. When you make it about group identity, events like Oct 7th, will be the result. You've fallen to the hierarchy of oppression, in which horrific action against one identity takes precedence over action against another identity. In this case, they have weigh perceived oppressions and have decided that oppression against Palestinians outweighs oppression against women. Facts won't even matter. It's about the group.
Actions must be weighed on an individual level not on group identity. It's either wrong or it's not. The group, that the participants claim as their own, is irrelevant. In this case, Islamophobia is worse than misogyny. The hierarchy of oppression has spoken. Do NOT question it.
31
-
31
-
I used to watch the NFL regularly. Then, when Colin refused to stand for the anthem, I quit watching. It felt like a purity test to me and I didn't like the implication or the divisiveness. As for the NBA, I find it astounding that a guy like LeBron James, net worth, 450 Million dollars, babbling on about how life isn't fair because he's black and then showing support for the Chinese, who treat their minorities, as part of the law of the country, like dirt. The man, and the league are a bunch of hypocrites. These pro athletes are the most fortunate people in the world and they act like that.
Hockey is my favourite sport and they've been rather quiet about this woke stuff although it pissed me off when Don Cherry was fired. If they go overtly woke, that's 60 years of loyalty to the NHL and the Toronto Maple Leafs that will no longer mean a thing.
I watch sports to relax. If I wanted to be told that I'm an evil person, I'd call the ex-wife. I'll let you guess how many times a year I call her.
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
@johnnyfavorite1194
If you're vulnerable, like I am, 70 years old, somewhat overweight and diabetic, STAY HOME. I don't expect you to protect me, although it's nice if you do, because I can do what's necessary, and recommended, to protect myself. I sit outdoors, in my backyard, to maximise my intake of vitamin D. I'm eating better and exercise to lose some weight. I'm self isolating and I've fully vaccinated.
I've done everything possible to protect myself from Covid. I've done that so the rest of you can go about your lives as normally as possible. Go to work, support your families, enjoy the life that is so fleeting and precious and don't rob our young of their youth. It'll only happen once and the fact that I'm elderly and facing my demise....as we all will, doesn't mean that YOUR life is over as well.
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
@bernardjameswilson
He didn't just wake up and said "This country now sucks". This was a process that started about 30 years, or so, ago. Where, at one time, life was free and you could work and reap the rewards, more and more restrictions were placed on our lives. It became harder and harder to get good medical care, in spite of the advances in medicine. Laws and more laws became the norm. Insurance and government regulations became more and more intrusive. People expected more and more from the government and that meant more taxes and more laws. If you didn't live the change, you can't understand it.
As an example. We live in a small town of 1800 people. We had 3 doctors and they were all available at any time of day. Now there's none. 7 service stations. Now there's 1. He operated a small farm and he did maintenance on his own equipment. Now it's impossible because it's all electronics and you could lose your warranty if you even tried to work on it. We had a landing at the back door, made of cement that replaced a wooden landing back in 1966. 7 years ago, his insurance company told him that he would no longer be covered if he didn't put a railing on it, so my brother and I did it. This rule was mandated by a government agency.
We didn't lose our freedom to a marching army, like he saw from invading Nazis. Instead it was a slow encroachment of government controls, regulations and mandates and EVERY time it was an assault on his wallet and freedom. He's now 92 and it doesn't matter as much to him because he's at the end of his days but he's not blind, either. We're losing our freedoms, one law and regulation at a time and the slow relentless of it doesn't hit like tsunami. We're more like frogs in boiling water.
I've seen it because I'm 70 years old. My daughter hasn't seen the change but she knows something is wrong. The way things are going, my grandchildren will never be able to afford their own homes. I feel so bad for their futures....even their present but the regulations keep coming, tying our hands in a tighter and tighter grip. They will never live the lives that my dad or even I've had. That freedom has slowly evaporated away. It isn't that we had it so good. It's that the good that we had is being lost and the ability to work hard that allowed to build good lives from nothing, has been taken away from those who have to live today.
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
@sthubbins4038
I saw the videos.....all of them. I saw them fighting with security and then busting in. I saw Ashli Babbitt being shot by a Capital officer. I seen the footage of security opening doors for the "insurrectionists" and then watched them wander around the building, taking selfies.
What I didn't see were fires and wanton destruction all over Washington. I didn't see the National Guard or troops go in and arrest the "insurrectionists" and clear the Capitol Building. In fact, most were arrested AFTER the "insurrection" was over.
Your "MAGA" supporters have ONE bad incident. That's 1, one more than ZERO, and that's all that people, like you, talk about. Portland had 131 days, IN A ROW, of rioting. That's just one city!!!!!! There were riots in Minneapolis, Seattle, Los Angeles, Provost, Chicago, Detroit, Louisville, St. Louis, Dallas, Atlanta, Washington DC, New York, Buffalo, Rochester, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Bakersfield, Boston, Columbus, Denver, Des Moines......do I have to go on??? There's LOTS more and all in one night!!!!
"Yeah but..but....insurrection". You're delusional.
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
@jberrocalucf
He's NOT intersex. He has XY chromosomes, which means that he's male. He may have a condition in which his genitals don't appear like it should. However, the rest of his body is a male body.
Also, testosterone isn't the only difference. The genetics of having XY chromosomes would give that person greater bone density. Their stance would be different due to a woman's need to have a pelvic region that would safely accommodate child birth. That would add extra leverage to throw a punch. The shoulders are different as well which means 50% greater shoulder strength to the male, according to the National Institute of Health. This has been programmed into the very genetic differences between men and women. The testosterone may add muscle strength but the physicality of the male, denser bones, pelvic and shoulder differences, greater lung capacity, bigger hearts.....all add to the advantages of one that is born with XY chromosomes.
To add, Ali had greater boxing skills than Foreman but Ali also had the advantage of having the bone density, the shoulder strength to counter punch, the leverage of his male stance, male lung capacity and the strength of his larger male heart to offset the muscle size of Foreman. The Italian boxer doesn't have any of those advantages over her XY opponent to offset the testosterone advantage.
Genetics is exceptionally important and as for the outrage? I have 2 grand daughters who play rugby. This scares me and I have every right to be afraid and outraged if this happened to the girls that I love.
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
@ShadowKatt
And you WON'T debate it. YOU'RE correct and should never be questioned, challenged or disagreed with.
People are still individuals, EVEN your children. They will think, do and say what they will as part of their struggle to assert their newfound maturity. I know of a family where 6, out of 7, of the kids are all hard working, some a little religious and have raised wonderful kids. One daughter, the second child of the 7, has had drug and alcohol issues, been in and out of jail, worked as a hooker, has been in religious cults, and the rest of the family looks on in complete confusion and dismay. I know that they had good parents because those parents are my parents and that sister is MY sister.
One of the cruelest things that you can do when parents are going through hell, with their children, is to tell them that it's ALL their fault. It's a blanket assumption and doesn't look at individual situations.
It's so easy to sit in judgement of others, even when you don't know them.
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
@1i11ies8
She said "LOCKER ROOM". In a locker room, people are changing from street clothes into athletic wear and part of the ritual, after the sporting event, is to shower off the sweat and grime. If they're naked, you will know.
Your argument lacks logic. It's like saying that if someone hides a camera in a locker room or bathroom stall, it's just fine because you won't even know that it's there. It's okay for a trans person to make teenage girls uncomfortable and frightened, because you won't even know that they're there.
If a male goes into a locker room where my daughter is showering and changing, I WILL go after him. I don't care if he "claims" to be transgender or not. As far as I'm concerned, he's no different than the sexual predator who's pretending to be a Catholic priest. I protect FIRST. Everything else is secondary, including the "feelings" of someone who may, or may not, be hiding behind a transgender mask to satisfy a sexual urge.
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
@erichufnagel3474
They didn't go broke. They are being FORCED to stop farming. The Netherlands was one of the most productive farming nations in the world and farmers were prospering and were 2nd, in terms of finances, in food exports. It's ideology that shutting those farms down.
Also, for the rest of the farms to remain profitable, food prices will have to go up, affecting the poorest people of the nation. As this "food" ideology spreads around the world, food production will go down and prices will go up. It's basic economics. That will have a HUGE impact on the 3rd world. Sri Lanka tried the same thing as the Netherlands are now and their food production went down around 30%. That's devastating for a poor nation. Inflation went from around 5% to over 130% in 2 years.
You're doing what you're doing on your own choice and at your own pace. If it doesn't work, you can slow it down or reverse those choices where it hurt you, financially, the most. Dutch farmers aren't given that option.
As a world wide practice, this could spark outright starvation. The Covid epidemic lockdowns have forced over 250 million people BACK into abject poverty. Abject poverty is earning less than $1.90 A DAY, American. Not an hour....A DAY. They make LESS in a week than the minimum wage per hour in California or where I live, in Ontario, Canada. If you force food production down...how many MORE people are going to be facing that kind of oppressive poverty and starvation. These are UN numbers.
All this to appease the idea of "responsible eating" as described by Klaus Schwab of the WEF.....a millionaire elitist who believes that he knows how to "reset" the world in his own image. He's convinced all his fellow elitists and industrialists that this is the way to go and it's going to destroy the most prosperous economies this planet has ever seen. The prospects are horrific.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
@abrasionequation4632
Or are the agents of chaos those who, in their Socialist zeal, saw Trump as their enemy and they CREATED the chaos to get rid of him. One of his major objectives was to loosen China's grip on the American economy. That wasn't going to sit well with the big corporate executives or with bureaucrats. The tariffs that he imposed, the trade war with China, hurt them all in their big offshore bank accounts. So every time figures came out that this was helping the blue collar worker, the corporate media, the Democrats and the Rinos went all in to dispel that news as a fabrication. "What about the farmers" they'd cry.
It was the same with all the BLM and Antifa riots. "Mostly peaceful protests" they'd say. "Antifa is a myth, an idea". It was a coordinated attack against a populist movement, the "deplorables" of middle America.
If he was the agent of chaos, the Democrats were his "Number One", the ones pulling his strings.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
@alostsoul68
If we looked up every person in history, we'll find out that every one of them had issues. It's not so much that historical figures, modern ones too, were flawed, it's the journey that took us to where we are today that has to be remembered. Not just the saints, because in reality that perfection doesn't exist, but especially, ESPECIALLY, the flawed saints. We have to remember them because that's who we are. Flawed human beings.
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for own own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." -C.S. Lewis
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
@gabepizza
The media is, by proxy, slamming all those who are fighting the virus. Jim Acosta, going on about lack of PPE's and masks and that he heard if from "un-named" administrators is slamming FEMA and Army Corps of Engineers, all the top medical people like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Brix. It's not only asking why Trump didn't act sooner. It's asking why the good Doctors didn't use their influence and expertise to expose the lack of caring from Trump.
Why didn't Acosta frame his questions differently. He could have NAMED an administrator that was having problems getting needed material and asked what this guy should do to help in acquiring things that is needed. Challenge the president to offer solutions. Trump said that they had the needed equipment. Have him show the chain of procurement and how it works. Ask the president, POLITELY, what department this administrator should contact. Instead, he leaves the impression that he never did talk to any administrator and this entire dialogue was engineered by Jim Acosta as vehicle of denigration, bereft of facts and unfounded allegations. If Trump would have come through, Acosta would have done a good turn by helping people in dire need. If Trump had failed in any capacity, Acosta would have shown where Trump was failing. No conjecture. No vague allegations but a real time line of events.
However, Acosta would NEVER do that because if Trump came through, THAT would counter the news picture that Acosta was trying to paint. It's not about the news or the facts, it's political theatre and that has nothing to do with being a Trump supporter or not. Acosta is a journalist...not the opposition party.
You can apply that same weakness to almost all the MSM.
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
@andrewbolingo
The Reimers were uneducated blue collar workers, just like my parents were at that time. Good hard working people but I had more education when I was in grade 8 than what either one of my parents would EVER have. They depended on the abilities and knowledge of doctors because they had no access to information like we would today. Even reading was a problem for them.
Now, YOU sit in judgement of people, who lived in a time, where learning these things were near impossible unless you went into post secondary education. That's NOT guilt.
That's the reality of life before the eighties for most adults. If you had asked my parents to define the term "critical thinking" back in 1965, they would have given you a blank look and shrugged their shoulders. It just wasn't something that the average person would know in those times. It would be like asking a Viking to define "airplane". It was way beyond them.
That doctor took advantage of naive, uneducated and desperate parents, with little to no recourse but to go to someone that had the credentials to help them. Unfortunately, the man, who was being touted as a genius in academic circles and on TV, was no better than Dr. Mengele.
The blame rests ENTIRELY on the shoulders of Dr. Money, no one else. He was an ideologue, eschewing scientific processes to find fame and glory. Someday, he will be remembered as a Mengele clone.
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
@shawnski001
When people find out that you're watching Rebel Media, they lose their minds. I don't agree with everything they say, on principle, but they show me things that I need to hear to get a full perspective. The regular media, in Canada, might be worse than the American media and it's awful. When a retired bartender, living in a basement apartment, in another country, can find the real clip of the Covington kids in ten minutes, proving that CNN and their ilk are lying.....NOT WRONG, but lying, that proves that the media, in both countries, are completely corrupt.
Thank God for sites like this and Rebel Media.
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
@Fact Checker
Are you saying that, in another 8 weeks, it will be 40 million dead? That's the logical and mathematical conclusion of exponential growth.
There will be more deaths, but it won't be exponential. It's impossible. Pandemics run a course. It always has throughout history. Once enough people, a percentage of the population, have been exposed to the disease, in a given area, the new infected cases decrease dramatically.
The flattening of the curve is designed, not to decrease overall exposure, but to spread that exposure over a longer period of time so hospitals aren't driven to over capacity. That's what would have caused higher death rates. So far, the US has been very successful at keeping cases below the capacity line and flattening the curve.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
Italy, France, Spain, Germany and Great Britain have a combined population that's smaller than the United States. Yet they have 23,000 more deaths combined. GET THAT 23,000 MORE than the United States. In fact, Germany only had 10,000 deaths so that means that those 4 countries with almost 100,000,000 fewer people STILL has 13,000 more deaths.
New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California.....ALL DEMOCRAT STATES....put Covid patients in nursing homes. IN NURSING HOMES. The most susceptible to dying from Covid. The Commissioner of Health in Pennsylvania issued this order and then took her own mother out of a nursing home and put her up in a hotel.
You'll ignore all this because...hey.....ORANGE MAN BAD.
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
@ViralVenom
I graduated high school in 1970 and then went to college and graduated in 1989. We actually learned stuff like Math, English, History, Geography, Science....you know stuff that you can use and helps you to think logically. They weren't about self loathing back then or blame.
They'll never get me to hate my own grandchildren, no matter how many of them come along. I accept life as it happens, fix what I can and don't sweat the rest. Although I'm not Christian, I really like this prayer.
"God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
courage to change the things I can,
and wisdom to know the difference."
I wish that more people would live their lives by this.
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
"I don't want there to be a panic"
When the lockdown came.....there was a panic. Not me, though. I watched Trump issue a travel advisory, offer a CDC virology team to China....which was refused, initiate a task force to fight the virus, issue the travel ban to China, talked about the virus in the State of the Union Address....the one that Pelosi ripped up, issue travel restriction to Europe, yet allegedly downplayed the virus.
I thought that there was a contradiction here. It didn't take long for me to figure out that Trump knew that this had the potential to be bad and he was trying to prevent the "toilet paper" panic from becoming a reality, just in case the outbreak didn't happen.
I thought to myself that he was being optimistic, hoping for the best while preparing for the worst. I decided to do the same. When the "toilet paper panic" did occur, I stayed home, smug in the realisation that I didn't allow my dislike of Trump to rule my perception of reality.
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
@igen vagy nem
When I was going to school, starting in the fifties and ending in the early seventies, parents paid little attention to what was going on in our schools. My parents hardly knew my teacher and would visit once maybe twice in a school year. I think my generation, I know that I did, acted in the same way. We thought that they were being taught, like we were, the basics, math, English, history and the rest and that, in our public schools, there was no such thing as indoctrination. There wasn't when I was in school and started when my kids were there but it wasn't that prevalent, yet. Participation awards seemed stupid but harmless. It was at the turn of the century that it really started. These are the ones in primary school, then, that are now in their twenties and are the hotheads in universities now.
It wasn't that their parents didn't care. I don't think a lot of them didn't realise that this kind of thing was even possible. There's been no precedence in American schools of this type of thing. We were ALL naive in how dangerous this could become. It was way beyond our comprehension where this could lead to. If you tried to tell me, in 1984, that this was going to happening today, I wouldn't have believed you. I mean, hundreds of genders.....that's crazy, and everyone alive back then would have said the same thing. We under estimated how stupid people could actually be.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
Jack Richardson
You're just unbelievable. Beyond it. How is it possible that a person could be that intentionally obtuse as to call Andy Ngo a Fascist. You don't even know what it is.
Antifa stages riots, in Portland, for over 120 days in a row....that's FOUR MONTHS of continuous rioting. Patriot Prayer shows up for one day and it's the end of the world for people. You really don't have a clue.
Now, before you accuse ME of being Fascist, I'm not a big fan of either Patriot Prayer or the Proud Boys. They're playing silly games. However to equate them with Antifa and their violence is so stupid that you have to be lying about it. I have to add that REAL Fascists nearly starved my mother to death during WW2 and put my uncle in a Jewish detention camp, until they found out he wasn't Jewish and put him in a POW camp until the war ended. I have no love for Fascists.
Also, do you know what the East German government called the Berlin Wall? They called it the "Antifaschistischer Schutzwall" which translate to English as the "Anti-Fascist Protection Rampart". Antifa is short for "Anti-Fascist". The East Germans would stand on that "Rampart" and shoot to kill any East German that tried to leave East Germany. You see, they thought that EVERYONE in the west was a Fascist, exactly what the members of Antifa in the US believe. Everyone, that's not them or doesn't believe in their Marxist agenda, is a Fascist. That's almost EVERY American.
You're either a Marxist or you're as delusional as they get.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
Boris B
Your reference to Feynman was an appeal to authority. He's a very high profile scientific figure and his opinions carry weight. It's not as if you used Joe Blow down at the hardware store. You went to a Nobel Prize physicist who gave an opinion, then you placed Peterson into the category that this physicist talked about. That's the very definition of an appeal to authority.
"I've thought about this for many years, and, though it's very hard to explain, I really believe it's true"
What's this? A professor is NEVER allowed to give an opinion? He even implies that it's an idea that he's formulated. "I really believe it's true." That's not declaring it as fact. That's admitting that it's only him that believes it to be true.
He does use statistics but he uses them as they should be. He has used them to show how personality trends differ in men and women. For example, he talked about asking, about a random woman and random man, which of the two would be the more aggressive and if you picked the man, you'd be correct 60 percent of the time. Then he added that 40 percent of the time, you'd be wrong. Why? Because that aligns with the statistical data. He didn't definitely say that men are more aggressive, period and end of story. He said that an assertion could only be applied correctly, 60 percent of the time. He then uses it to say that it means that the outliers of aggressiveness would tend to be overwhelmingly male and says that the facts do bear this out, for example, the predominance of the male population in prison.
Peterson has declared himself to be a nominal Christian but he doesn't use those Christian beliefs as absolutes in his lectures. He uses them to show religious archetypes and tries to show how archetypes are developed in literature and religion to reflect and explain how humans have developed emotionally. He uses Christianity the most because that's what he's most familiar with, but he also uses other religious idea in his attempt to understand human psychological development. He presents it in such a way that a belief in a specific religion is necessary to understand how religious thought was a big part of human evolution of cognitive thought. Religious beliefs are not necessary to understand his ideas of archetypes in religion and it's not an exact science because he does use the phrase "I've thought about it a long time" continuously in his lectures. Psychology is a work in progress at all times and those in the field are trying to grapple with things that are difficult to nail down. Peterson is grappling with the psychology of religion and morality. There are no "Eureka!!!" moments in these disciplines. No definitive test tube results. There are indicators, like the Miller-Urey experiments that show that certain processes in the formation of life CAN happen naturally. It may not be the correct process but it does show the possibility to be true.
You still haven't shown me an example of his preaching. Just because he became emotional when remembered some of the horrific cases that he's dealt with from his clinical practice, doesn't mean he's a preacher. It could just mean that he's human and has typical human emotions. It's an assertion that you have no way of proving but you like it because you've decided that you don't like the guy. Understandable maybe, but not exactly a valid assertion. A real example of his preaching.
I like Michael Shermer and his ideas, a lot, but you're not showing me how they apply to Peterson. You see, that's where an actual example of what you're claiming would come in. That's how you show that you have something that might indicate what you say has a least some merit. It may not eliminate ALL that he's said but then again, no one is correct 100 percent of the time. One incorrect idea doesn't NOT invalidate everything a person says. We'd have to dismiss every assertion made using that as a criteria. Even Einstein made mistakes and offered claims that proved to be incorrect.
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
Connor Barnes
As what was mentioned earlier, by your comment you have shown that you do NOT understand the meaning of the word "theory" as it is used in science. In science, a theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world which is substantiated by a set of numerous facts from different areas of science. All these facts are examined and a logical model is created that explains why a phenomenon, such as speciation, is being observed. From there, new tests are devised to test certain aspects of the theory to see if that theory will continue to stand.
Thus far, for over 150 years, tests from numerous disciplines of science have shown the theory of evolution to still be a viable explanation. These are tests involving chemistry, biology, physics, genetics, geology, embryology and more and after all the tests that have been completed, there still are no tests that have shown the theory of evolution to be a false explanation. This video is just a part of the tests and experiments that have been done.
You say that this is your opinion. That is not how science works....at all. Science works on a body of evidence. If all the evidence supports a theory, the theory will stand as a viable explanation. Until tests or experiments are done that arrive at conclusions that would show that evolution to be impossible, then that theory will fall. It hasn't happened yet, in spite of what some hardcore creationists like to claim.
There are still aspects of the evolutionary process that are still not understood. That doesn't make evolution wrong. It just means it's not understood. 30 years ago, science had no idea if the genetic code would support evolution. The code had not been mapped yet. Since then, it has been mapped and everything that they predicted that must be true in genetics for it prove evolution to be correct has turned out to validate evolution. They'll keep searching, just like they have for 150 years, to understand it better and if history is to be an indication of what to expect, the search will continue to validate evolution.
I know you won't change your mind. You've decided that your OPINION is the arbiter of science. I'm afraid it's not. No one's opinion is.
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@shak9558
My experience tells me that they only lay in their own excrement if they absolutely must. I would suppose that would also mean to cool themselves, as overheating might be a death sentence. That would mean it's a survival tactic NOT a preferred choice. It's like a human drinking urine. They don't normally do it but will, if they must, to survive.
If given a choice, a pig will not sleep in its own excrement. 20 years of cleaning pig stalls has validated this. In fact, my brother and I would amuse ourselves, when we were 10 to 12 by watching them move the bedding from their "bathroom" to the sleep area. They would do it EVERY time. Pigs also like to sleep right next to one another. I would assume that would be for warmth at night and they grow up as part of a litter. Another thing, if you throw some of their food, like whole stalks of corn, into their excrement, they will eat it but they'll only do so when all other food is gone. It's a last resort, which would be a strong indication that they don't like it but will if forced to.
You can always go to the rule of exception but exception are not the rule and that rule of exception doesn't explain the behaviour that I've witnessed all my life.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Drake Doragon
Yes.....all those negative things are still happening but that's not the point. You're applying individual narratives and then applying it universally. Pinker's point, and he has data to back it up, is that things have been getting better over history and particularly over the last 50 years. He didn't say that things are now PERFECT. He is saying that for the overall planet, things are getting better. As bad as the Korean War was, it's still not nearly as devastating, for the entire planet, than WW2. It's a matter of scale.
Hopefully, those things continue to improve over the next 10 years so that the number of people being bombed, tortured, abused or whatever else is LESS than what it is, today. That would be a good thing. Just as it is that the number of people being bombed, tortured, abused or whatever is less than it was 50 years ago is also a good thing.
Only the most abject pessimist would say that it's not a good thing and only the most abject optimist would say that things are perfect. Both are seeing thing though a lens of their own making and are refusing to deal with reality.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@holthogan5562
Yes it was an emergency. How the media reacted though was appalling. Florida, with the largest elderly population in the US, didn't have the casualties that New York did. Why? Because the governor of Florida understood who was the most vulnerable and then made a concerted effort to protect that demographic. And it worked.
Not New York though. First, it told everyone that this was nothing, go out, have a good time, go to the Chinese New Year's Parade, because the Chinese travel ban was racist. Then, when everything went south, they panicked and locked EVERYTHING up, but refused help from a religious group, told Trump they didn't have ventilators, hardly used the facilities set up or the medic ship and then put Covid patients in nursing homes. All this and the media pretended that Cuomo might be a good candidate for the presidency. Then, only 5 days after calling people insane for going to a pool, they called the BLM protesters, good Americans, even after it led to tens of millions of dollars damage, destroyed lives and businesses, people ended up dead and injured and buildings burned to the ground.
Hey, but those protesters, that "stormed" the Michigan legislature were thugs and white supremacists and just plain detestable people even though not one punch was thrown, one shot was fired, no windows smashed, no stores looted, no buildings burned and they cleaned up the legislature before they left.
Like one store owner said. There were thousands of protesters walking shoulder to shoulder past his store but he wasn't allowed to sell anyone of them a t-shirt because the Covid threat was too dangerous.
That's what we're upset about. The insanity of how it was dealt with. "Shame and blame" just like Chris Cuomo said. That's what you got from the media and the left and he was proud of it.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@skknireeker9073
And that's the logic that's can't be argued against. I say that the transgender has biological advantages and you say "But they're women".
I say that they weren't women a year ago so their bodies still have male qualities that give them advantages and you say "But they're women".
I point out that it's telling that a transgender absolutely SMASHES the women's weightlifting record in their first year of eligibility and you say "But he's a woman".
I say 2 transgenders, who couldn't make the boy's high school track team last year, break the girl's state high school track records and you say "But they're women".
They're are no facts, no anomalies, no sudden amount of women's records being broken by transgender athletes that will ever make you stop and think about the implications. All you'll keep repeating, like a demented parrot, is...."BUT THEY'RE WOMEN"
This is unbelievably lacking in intellectual discourse or logic or any consideration for fairness. No human being, with even a modicum of integrity, would EVER claim bragging rights, by wearing an Olympic medal, when they've went form a category of sports where they were mediocre at best, to one where they're now the superstar. Integrity would demand that this should be a source of shame.
We have weight classes in sports for a reason. We don't just say "But they're all women" and call that a reason to do away with weight classes. Calling them women does not negate the fact that they're also transgenders, something that a lot of the women's athletes cannot claim.
To your mind, all transwomen are women. You'll never admit that not all women are transwomen and that this could be where the REAL problem lies. You only want to examine YOUR side of the coin.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@makeytgreatagain6256
Do I have to show you the definition of "chattel" AGAIN.
Here you go. I'll make it as it pertain to slavery. From the Merriam-Webster dictionary: an enslaved person held as the legal property of another.
If you SELL someone, as a slave, they're chattel. It's what the word means. There's NO such thing as NICE slavery. You're either a slave or you're NOT as slave, free to leave or FORCED to stay.
When Bulgarians sold Slavic captives to the Turks, they were chattel. The Turks, in turn, sold them all over the Middle East...as chattel. It wasn't nice. It wasn't friendly and NOT ONE SLAV went willingly. Slavery was legal, in some Middle Eastern countries till very recently. In fact, the slave trade was held quite open in Constantinople until 1908. It was then that the trade of Zanj women, who came from the coast of Eastern Africa, and the Circassian women, from north of the Caucasus, was abolished. These women were forced to travel thousands of miles to be sold.
Oman abolished slavery in 1970. In MY lifetime. I remember it being in the news. Slavery in Saudi Arabia and Yemen was abolished in 1962, due to pressure from the British government. Not "nice" slavery, either. REAL slavery. In China, it was finally abolished in 1910 after thousands of years of legality. You think that somehow being FORCED to work in the salt mines of Mali was much better than picking cotton in Alabama. Both were awful.
While I think that slavery is appalling no matter where it is, YOU seem to think only certain types of slavery should be demonised. If you're held against your will, forced to labour with no pay or used for sex against your will....YOU are a slave. It doesn't matter if you're the only one in town or if there are hundreds of slaves there, it's appalling when the state or ruling class allows it under the law and that has happened all over the world for thousands of years.
You want to use the slave trade, of the past, as a rationalisation for your hatred. I want to use that history to show that we're ALL human, given to the excesses that is a part of all humanity.
Also, my family originated in Poland. We weren't known for engaging in the trans-Atlantic slave trade although we were likely to trade our fellow citizens to the Turks and other middle easterners. A terrible time in our past but there it is. It was a terrible time in human history....unless you find it important to hate certain demographics. Then we'll just keep pointing fingers at one another till we finally destroy each other.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@1133saginaw
I'm afraid that politics has been added a long time ago. Almost every question that certain media types are asking are designed to GET the president. They never ask questions designed to help the situation, only as talking political points against the president.
Example....Jim Acosta saying "Doctors and hospital administrators say they don't have the necessary equipment. What do you say to that?" It's not a question at all. It's a jab.
If he was smart, he would have offered the name of an administrator and where he was from and then asked if there was someone, within the task force, that this specific administrator could get in touch with to resolve his problems. He could do this in and earnest manner. That would have challenged Trump. He would have shown the task force for what it was, honestly and openly, whether it be good, bad or a complete sham. He could have exposed it.....but he's not smart enough. Instead, he offers the same old "un-named sources", nothing specific at all. It exposes nothing and only invites anger from both sides of the political spectrum.
He's a horrible journalist and the rest aren't much better. The old correspondents, of fifty years ago, would been embarrassed to what happened to their profession.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@biancawilloughby9980
But would it have been the wisest decision to make? Could there no be consequences, to your physical health, when your body, acting in an evolutionary framework, is trying to do one thing and you're forcing it to do another by blocking its natural course? That's a question that has never been resolved.
Whether you like it or not, all the advance creatures on the planet go through a maturation process. Cats, dogs, butterflies, mosquitoes, lobsters and humans all have an inherited process that guide their bodies through maturity. It's been there for millions upon millions of years. It's a basic part of life. Now you're going to change it all by trying to stop the process that has been embedded into our genetic make-up for tens of millions of years.
We've been struggling with the affects of chemicals now, in our food and water and the very air we breathe. Now you want to inject MORE chemicals to change the very heart of your genetic blueprint. That sounds like an awful risky proposal to me. I would NEVER recommend it to a 13 year old.
You can wish your life away if that's how you really want to spend the only life you have. That also seems like a waste of the only life that you'll ever have.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
Sophie Blessed
I don't praise myself for it either. But would you get me some credit for quitting? Besides, Peterson took the drug as a prescription, on advice of a doctor. He didn't go downtown, to a back alley, to find a drug dealer. His situation was much different than mine.
Alcoholism kind of sneaks up on you. You don't realise it until you're in the throes of it. I still want a drink but I don't go for it because I don't want to go back down that route, again.
One of the worst parts of dealing with addiction or mental health is having to deal with the self righteous and judgemental. They're always SO smart, SO willing to cut you down, to look down their noses at you.
So many people have declared that Peterson has had a positive influence on their lives but all, people like you, do is cut him down. You won't accept that he has a message, a message that not easy to follow, but one that can be so very helpful to people. You'd rather see them suffer than allow them to get their lives together. It's almost as if you pleasure in their troubles and that it's how you validate your own lives. It gives you a sense of superiority....that your better than they are.
You have no idea just how mean you sound.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@pavango3812
I know that this is going to sound redundant but.....a BIG BUT......you need ID to work. You need a social security number. If you don't have one, you can't file your income taxes. You could have thousands of dollars owing to you and you can't get it because YOU DON'T HAVE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER. What kind of an idiot would do that? If you're working and you don't have a SS#, you're working illegally. You can't pay taxes. A drug dealer or a pimp doesn't need an SS#. A clerk at a 7/11 has one.
If you want a drink, just one, you need ID. You need it to buy cigarettes. You need ID to open a bank account. To pick up a package at the Post Office, YOU NEED ID.
If, for some weird reason, like you've never worked, had a bank account, have never smoked or drank alcohol, never travelled so you don't have a passport, don't have a driver's licence, never had a student card, never applied for welfare, have never needed to see a doctor, never had a Credit Card, never used food stamps or have NEVER, in your life, had to prove who you are....you can STILL get an ID, FREE of charge, from the Georgia government. If you can't get a FREE ID before the 2022 election, then I'm sorry to accuse you of not wanting to vote all that badly.
This idea that needing to show ID suppresses voting is the most spurious argument that I've heard in a long time and deep down you know it. This is all about tribal politics. In fact, the claim that showing ID to vote is the real racist claim. Black people aren't little children. They do the same things that everyone else does. They're cops, doctors, teachers, mailmen, nurses, store clerks, government workers, carpenters and accountants.....JUST LIKE WHITE PEOPLE. They're adults. Quit treating them like children.
13
-
@11kravitzn
You are sorely misinformed about the histories of the Democrat and Republican parties. The Republican Party formed in 1854 to fight against slavery, specifically the Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854. The act was to create the territories of Kansas and Nebraska and would repeal the Missouri Compromise, allowing slavery to part of those 2 territories. This act was drafted by Stephan Douglas, a Democrat Senator. This started a series of conflicts against that act and the idea of allowing slaves in the new territories. The Republican Party was formed to fight against that act that allowed slavery.
When the Civil War started, there was no Republican representation in the Southern states. None. After the Civil war, segregation was enforced by the Klu Klux Klan, an arm of the Democrat party. It was a Democrat, George Wallace, that delivered the famous line "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" in 1963. Wallace ran, in the presidential primaries, through the 70s, as a Democrat and as a staunch supporter of segregation. He fought against Civil Rights and against the integration of blacks and whites students in public schools.
I don't know where you got your information but a simple google search will confirm everything that I told you. Blacks started to vote Democrat in the 1930s because of Roosevelt's "New Deal", for the first time in American history. Before that, they'd always voted Republican and the Republican Party had grown in the south after the Civil War because of the Black Republicans. The New Deal was the big shift in black politics, yet it was mostly Democrats that fought against the repealing of the Jim Crow laws thirty years later.
Don't believe me. Learn about American political history. These are facts that Democrats like to keep hidden and one can hardly blame them for that. It might be time to stop pointing fingers and to take responsibility for ourselves as individual human beings instead of aligning ourselves into groups who will say anything to malign their opposition.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@randylachance
Trump was being sarcastic when he wished her well. He was saying that she didn't end up like Epstein. Dark humour. That's why Fox didn't report on it. It's not newsworthy. If Trump was as corrupt as you say, you'd think he'd get the Feds, Bill Barr and company, to back off Maxwell. Instead, it's full steam ahead and now there's even more Clinton involvement.
If the Democrats were so concerned with the Covid crisis, you'd think they'd discourage tens of thousands of people, in every city across the US, from marching arm in arm for weeks on end. Instead, they encourage it and then tell others they can't open their small businesses. You can march, throw bottles and bricks, fight with police officers, but go to the gym....that's dangerous.
The biggest problem concerning Covid is the absolute refusal to work together. That's not the fault of Trump. It's the Democrats who take the opposite stance no matter what. They brag about their border barrier in 2015 and when Trump says he want to build a wall, that's racist. It's how they approach everything concerning Trump. He bans travel to China, that's xenophobic. He puts together a task force....they're just old white men. He mentions it in the State of the Union Address, Pelosi tears it up. He restricts travel to Europe.....that's not going to work. He says the HCQ might be useful in fighting Covid, it's now poison and some governors tried to outlaw it. The media even made a big deal of a couple that took fish tank cleaner because it had a form of HCQ in it. Fish tank cleaner ffs. Trump calls for a lockdown and New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California lock down Covid patients in nursing homes. The Commissioner of Health for Pennsylvania made that decision and promptly took her 95 year old mother OUT of a nursing home and put her up in a hotel. If the Democrats weren't so busy hating on Trump and would just sit down with him to find a solution, the country wouldn't be in the mess it is in now.....but they refuse. No matter what Trump does, they do the opposite. On everything.
I'm not saying that Trump made good moves all the time but with a pandemic raging, you'd think the Democrats would reach out to try and solve this crisis together. NOT A CHANCE IN HELL. They'll fight him no matter what he does.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@Henry James
It was an example. Don't be intentionally obtuse. It's NOT a good look.
When someone is allowed to speak, without interruption, that person is setting out his case, unfettered so their ideas are completely exposed, to all of us, in the best way that they know how. That is also an exchange of ideas. Ideas, born in their brain, verbally expressed, so I can allow it to enter into my brain. That's an exchange of ideas, too.
If I wanted to hear two people yelling over each other, and even see people stomping off in anger, I'll watch MSM where you hear nothing but anger and the only thing that enters your brain is a cacophony of noise. Not for me. I want the ideas to be expressed articulately, without interruption and rancour, just like this video was. I don't even have to agree with them but at least I know what I'm disagreeing with.
12
-
12
-
@MrKGatl
It was the company that Biden's son was working for that was being investigated. Specifically the founder of the company, Mykola Zlochevsky, who had fled the company in 2014 and was living in London. He was Hunter Biden's boss. This guy had 23 MILLION dollars frozen, in lieu of the results of investigations into his activities. Strangely, shortly after this prosecutor was fired, that 23 millions dollars was released. The following year Zlockevsky was cleared of all charges and he returned to the Ukraine. Next thing you know, he was accused of graft, the result of telephone conversations he had with the current president of the Ukraine at the time. He was also accused of giving out bogus licenses to his own companies when he was Ecology Minister back in 2012. He's left the country again and is now living in Monaco.
You have to ask yourself why Hunter Biden was working for an energy company in the Ukraine. He had zero experience in energy, was drummed out of the American military for testing positive for drugs, he couldn't speak the language and his boss benefited from the firing of the prosecutor by his father. That final point might be the only reason he was worth the 63,000 dollars he was making a month as an executive there.
Even Marie Yovanovitch was briefed on the poor image of Hunter Biden working for a man who was suspected of corruption. That was revealed in her testimony. It was also mentioned by George Kent in his testimony and was reported on by Politico 3 years ago. The Obama administration wasn't comfortable about this situation, at all, so why wouldn't Trump want to look into it. Especially, with the video available where Joe Biden brags about telling the Ukraines that he was taking his money home with him if they didn't fire this specific prosecutor.
Maybe it WAS all innocent but if it had been Donald Trump Jr. working for Burisma and a corrupt owner, would you be so forgiving? I doubt it.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@Reezys-f2q
Watch the film of Biden bragging about threatening to keep $1,000,000,000, that's BILLION, dollars unless a special prosecutor was fired. The prosecutor was fired and shortly after, Hunter Biden's boss had 23 million bucks that had been frozen, released. 6 months later, all charges were dropped against the guy.
If you don't find that disturbing, I don't how much money used to threaten and bribe foreign would bother you. A TRILLION bucks?
If we're going to drain the swamp, let's drain the entire swamp, not just the ones we don't like.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@elchapoalv650
Why should they? They're here illegally. I was in the Netherlands a few years back. I paid all kinds of sales taxes. Does that mean I can now apply for pension benefits, subsidised housing, free education, get to vote and the rest?
Of course not.....and I was there legally, as a tourist.
When you're live in a country, with a work visa, you pay taxes. If you're in that country, with the idea of earning full citizenship status, you pay taxes towards a future that will be to your benefit in the future. If you're in that country, illegally, they have no idea what you're intentions are. Maybe you're there for a short time to make some quick cash, maybe you're there hoping you'll never go home but think it's better than the place you left, maybe you're there and you're a criminal, but you're there illegally. Until you attain legal status, you're not a part of that country. At best, you're homeless.
Go home and apply for legal status that will put you on a road to full citizenship. Millions have no problem doing it the right way. Illegals think only of themselves and have no respect for those who did things the right way or for the country that they're sneaking into.
12
-
12
-
@lordzallen
At this moment, in the US, the Christian fundamentalists are NOT rigging the court system. The possibility might be there but it's not happening these days. The threat, RIGHT NOW, is the leftist, Socialist ideology, that doesn't believe in evidence or a fair trial. In fact, our judicial system, came from a Christian heritage, of personal responsibility and accountability.
You're inventing a threat that doesn't exist to rationalise a threat that does. It's as if you're deflecting as a way to somehow support leftist views. This is the result of a law, Title 9, that the left supports and the conservative, largely religious right, abhors.
Stick to the problem and quit trying to accuse others of what a certain group is doing.
12
-
@bobshuwab1988
All those things you cited, medical care, schools, libraries.....are not part of the economy. The economy has to do with the means of production. If I go to a financial counsellor and we asses my financial position, he will never ask my health or education or whether I have a library card. That has nothing to do with economics or how wealth is created or distributed. That's where you're making your mistake. You have to have a strong and free economy in order to support strong social programs. As soon as you take away the ability for the individual to build their own economic portfolio, you take away innovation and advancement. You force the individual to adhere to someone else's vision of how their economic situation should develop and stunt their growth and innovation. Without that strong and innovative economy, you have no social contract, either. You take the freedom of the individual to buy and sell at their own behest and leave it to a centralised body who tells you what it is you want or produce. It is the economy of permission, of the bureaucrat who tells you what it is should have. That's why the first Soviet athletes that travelled to the west were astounded by the incredible array of products in our stores available to the average person. Each product produced by and through the desires and decisions of the individual. Each product taxed so that tax money could be used to support medical care, education, roads and so forth. That's why the capitalist countries were the richest and the socialist countries the poorest.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@shaneclarke329
Of course we care. However, it's a pandemic. Over a million have died all over the world. In fact, if Democrat governors, in a least 5 states, didn't put Covid patients in nursing homes, there'd likely be 30,000 less dead. However, in the end, it's no one's fault. People get sick. It's the way of life since people started walking on this planet.
The strong at heart don't dwell on it. They keep on going because if they don't, the entire system will collapse. As it is, WHO and the UN has stated that world poverty will soon double due to the lockdowns. That means starvation, social unrest, maybe even civil wars. You don't want the cure to be worse than the disease.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@youtriggeredbtch7845
Not yet. Are you seriously saying that one should wait until you're hurt, when you're being stopped by a mob, before you leave?
They're surrounding her car, yelling at her, stopping from letting her go anywhere and she should sit there and take it and hope that they don't attack her. Smash out her window or drag her out of her car....is THAT when she should get out.
I'll bet that's what you'd do...right? Sit there calmly and think, "They're nice people. Pay no attention to the threats, to the person banging on my car, the one standing in front, trying to stop me from leaving. They actually like me.
You're one naive person is you think like that.
I make it a rule of thumb. If a car is approaching, I don't stand in front of it. It's bigger than I am and I'm not going to get into shoving match with it. These BLM protesters think that they can do whatever they want and when someone objects, they outraged. Don't stand in front of a moving car and don't look down the barrel of a gun.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@Mordalo
So what if the story of the Exodus isn't true? The story's setting was around 1250 BC. The Jews were known to be in Judah around 500 BC. It's known that exiled Jews were allowed to return to their homeland by the Persian King, Cyrus the great, in 538 BC. That implies that Cyrus KNEW that this was the Jewish homeland for quite awhile BEFORE that. Split the time of the Exodus, which may not be true to the time of the return from Persia and we're looking at a time of at least 900 BC in which the Jews lived in what is now known as Israel. After the Babylonian exile, the Jews were there from the time of Cyrus, 538 BC, to the Jewish diaspora that took place during Roman rule, from 70 to 135 AD.
Also, the modern Palestinian problem is ALL about religion. If the Jews all converted to Islam, the problem would be solved. All the other religions in the area, the Christians, the Druze and the Jews are all good with the state of Israel. It's only the Muslims that have a problem with it. That's how the lines of conflict are drawn.
You've skipped a HUGE part of their history.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@LikeGod_ButBetterLooking
So, when Obama and Hillary Clinton claimed that there was election fraud, back in 2005, they were either Nazis or enablers of Nazis? When the Democrats claimed that the Russians and Trump, committed election fraud, they were being Nazis and Nazi enablers?
You can't have it both ways. By your logic, Obama is, at best, a Nazi enabler as is Hillary, Adam Schiff, Pelosi and Donald Trump. In fact, the majority of our government are all Nazis. A poorly thought out argument.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@John-gx2ry
It seems like such a wise thing to say but in reality things don't work that way. First, you're making this about the English. This is bigger than that and his comment reflects that. You're interjecting a bias into what he was saying. Also, using Nigeria as an example, the Igbo and Yoruba tribes, who were the impoverished groups during slavery, went after the education, to learn all they could about math, science and literature. They quickly became the most prosperous in Nigeria. The Fulani rejected that education and, to this day, are the most impoverished people of Nigeria.
You can make the choice to accept or reject the values of hard work and an education. That's the choice of any individual. However, if you do nothing, don't expect good things to come of it.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@noklarok
That's fair but as one, who has gone through the procedure, I can tell you that's it's not that big a deal and to say that I'm "mutilated" is a HUGE exaggeration. AND....to compare this to cutting the entire thing off, inverting it and then putting it into a gash so it's supposed to be a vagina, is ridiculous. It changes nothing over the life of a circumcised child and it's NOTHING compared to what a trans surgery, a major procedure, forces a child to go through for the rest of their lives. The dilation, the drugs, the infections, the loss of sexual function......it's not even close.
I repeat, it's like comparing the act of removing a hang nail to chopping off the entire finger. A tempest in a teacup.
11
-
11
-
@coop-nr6nm
That's where I disagree. They were extremely to the left as far as economics go. Not so much as communists but the Party would mandate in what direction the economy would operate. The owner of any company was at the command of the Party and all aspects of business was handed down from the Party. What to produce, how much, where to get raw materials, who to hire and the owner and his management staff answered to the Party officials who were put in place in lieu of union officials. If the owner of a company failed at his duty to the Party, the company would be confiscated. It was all about Party control. Economically, China uses almost the exact same methods as Nazi Germany did. The only reason that people think right wing, when talking about Fascism is because Germany was Fascist and they were also obsessed with nationalism. Italy was fascist as well but their nationalism wasn't as strident as it was in Germany.
Nazi Germany did NOT have a free market system, which means it wasn't a capitalist country, like the US. A centralised economy is socialist, a lot more socialist than Sweden or Denmark, which practise a free market economy. Socialism is left wing and Germany's Party called themselves the National Socialist German Workers' Party. They even double down on the Socialist label by adding "Workers".
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@Arctc-zh6rg
Dave Rubin, Blaire White, black Republicans are right wing but they're NOT extremists. They believe in conservative principles, which is a set of ideas which has nothing to do with skin colour or identity. They believe in personal responsibility, hard work, individual sovereignty and a winning attitude in life.
To suggest that they can't have a set of beliefs, due to their group identity, you're the one assigning agency upon a person and taking away their ability to think, believe and act as individuals. That's the very think that we hate. We're individuals and we judge one another on the content of our character. Group identity means nothing. It's the left that would call someone, like Candace Owens, a porch m.....y, an Oreo, an Uncle Tom and worse. I find that despicable and it's not coming from the right. It's racist to deny individual agency and to malign those who would exercise their right to their own thoughts. Their not robots. They're human beings.
11
-
msc14111990
You're now resorting to gossip, huh. Well, this historian you speak of, Niall Ferguson, separated from his wife in 2010. He then started dating Ali. One year later, they got married and they have a son that was born in December of 2011, long after Ferguson had split up with his wife. If you're a Muslim, divorce is perfectly acceptable and allowed as well as getting remarried. So, all you're doing is engaging in gossip, the activity of the small and mean minded.
As for being a coward. She spent years under threat of murder from Muslim radicals. She had to go into hiding and still has to be careful about making her whereabouts known to the general public. If she ever went back to Somalia, she'd be killed and YOU know it. That's not being a coward. That's being smart.
As for helping people, she's wrote books showing that a religion, culture, skin colour and gender shouldn't stop a person from becoming their own person, an individual with freedom of thought and expression. When she took an aptitude test in the Netherlands to see what she was best suited to work at, she was told that she should become an office worker. She didn't want that and said that she wanted to study political science. She was told that she would only get funding if she studied secretarial type jobs and if she wanted to study political science, she'd have to pay for it herself. So she did just that. She worked and studied and attained a degree in Political Science. Then she became a member of parliament in the Dutch government.
Your problem is rather obvious to see through. You're a Muslim and you're one of those who think that any criticism of Islam is blasphemy and should be punished, even killed. If not a Muslim, one of the extreme liberal left, who isn't much different. The kind that thinks that anyone who doesn't agree with them 100 percent is a despicable person and shouldn't be allowed to speak and you'll use any means possible to denigrate including childish gossip.
10
-
10
-
10
-
@alexjoneswasright11
Except George was already complaining that he couldn't breathe, LONG before he was forced down. He told the police that he was claustrophobic and that he couldn't breathe. One officer assured him that they'd open the windows a bit and turn on the AC. When he went into the back seat of the police car, he started kicking and swinging, causing the police to back off. George sat up, feet on the street, and then said that he needed to lay down and that's what he did. That's when the police tried to cuff him and he resisted and he was held down and and started repeating that he couldn't breathe, something that he'd already SAID when he was still standing. The autopsy showed that he had over the lethal limits of Fentanyl in his system and that he died of hypoxia. The number one cause of death, in a Fentanyl overdose, is hypoxia.
The police could be accused of not recognising that George was having severe drug reaction, something that they're trained to spot and respond to but they didn't until it was too late...but they didn't murder him. In fact, George may well have died without any physical reaction with the police. There's even more to this story that shows that George was the architect of his own demise but I'm sure that you don't want to hear it.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@kulturfreund6631
"Well, spend a thought on the fact that the wealth/gains on one side are the poverty /losses on the other side."
No...it's not. In fact, the reality is just the opposite. The US has more millionaires than all of Africa and South America combined and I can guarantee you one thing. There are no American refugees heading to those 2 continents looking for a better life. Refugees are all going the other way. I can also guarantee you that most people don't want to live the way they do in those 2 continents and their dream is to live as we do in the industrialised west.
The statement you just made highlights one huge fallacy. It's the fallacy that suggests that there is a big pile of money that's available and we're all in a game of "grab the cash" that's sitting in the middle of the table. It's not how accruing wealth works. Wealth is accrued through the creation of end products of value, from raw materials that have no initial value. This is converted into a cash value, a system that makes exchange a much simpler way of distributing the wealth that has been created. The more produce that one can create that has value to others, the more wealth that he can accrue, but he has to be able to sell it.
People have to want it. That makes is a free exchange. The customer looking for a product and a producer providing him with the product that he wants. A free and open market. From that system, some will do better than others and some will fail but those that fail, miserably, those drug addicts and mentally challenged street people of LA, as an example, have removed themselves from that open market. Not through any fault of their own, but they're no longer contributing to society and they're not reaping the rewards that the others do. Even the simplest cave dweller has to go out to hunt in order to eat. It's a reality of life.
10
-
10
-
@daled8894
Funny how didn't mention the entire Russian collusion fiasco. What do you think that was all about. It was the Democrat claim that Trump had somehow committed election fraud. They spent 2 years and almost 35 million dollars, in their quest to prove it, and came out empty. Yet, Hillary, Schiff and others STILL hold onto that claim.
In fact, Hillary, Obama and other Democrats, claimed fraud in the the 2004 elections. They tried to discredit the voting machines. Sound familiar?
More to the point, Raquel Rodriques was just arrested, in Texas, using the mail-in voting system fraudulently, in the exact manner that Trump, and others, had said was possible under the mail-in voting system.
So don't pretend that this is a uniquely Trump thing. This has been going on for awhile and it's the Democrats that don't seem to be interested in improving the integrity of the election process. The rest of the free world is astounded at the idea of not using identification as a aid to maintain election integrity. In fact, I hold it to be condescending and arrogant to assume that minorities don't have access to obtaining an ID and it's racist to ask them to produce it. They're not children. They shouldn't be treated as such.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@yankee5572
Previous president would't let this happen? Are you on glue? What about Ferguson riots on a made up "hands up, don't shoot" narrative? What about the riots in Baltimore, New York, Minneapolis, Milwaukee and Dallas? What about the police executions, egged on by BLM, including that of a 32 black female officer, shot in the back of the head while sitting in her squad car by a man who admits being inspired by BLM and the "Pigs in a blanket" slogans.
The economy way going great until covid struck and Democrat led states have insisted on total lock downs lasting months. It's in these states that people are facing eviction. They don't have jobs. As for the numbers dead, there are 10 countries that have higher per capita death rates than the US. That means that if they had the same populations as the US, those countries would have MORE deaths that what the US has now. i can prove this, too.
The racial justice is another left wing tactic. It's so vague that you can't show it, you can't only give vague references and then it's on to the "racist" accusations. I expect it to be used on me right now just for my opinions.
10
-
10
-
10
-
@mantistoboggan5171
You just watched a video, hosted by a gay Jew and who is married to a man. He believes in abortion rights and equality and yet he's friends with many people who are Christian and Conservative, like Mike Huckabee. He's even been to his place for dinner, with his husband. Huckabee....a very conservative Christian.
Yet Dave Rubin isn't the only one. Charlie Kirk, another Conservative Christian, who said that his religion tells him that homosexual behaviour is wrong, yet he still loves and respects Dave Rubin as a human being.
Then there's Blair White, who's a trans Conservative. Broadcaster and lesbian, Tammy Bruce.....another Conservative and gets no flack for being a lesbian.
That's the big problem with people like you. You can't distinguish between an act and a person. I can believe that drinking, to excess, is wrong without hating someone who does just that. You're of the opinion that I have to hate the person and that there is no separation between the person and the act.
You do EXACTLY what James Lindsey said. You make assumptions based on what others have told and never have sat down and tried to have a conversation with those who you paint as demons. It's as if the left fears being contaminated with conservative words. Yet, all through human history, people have honoured the past and their ancestors. Now all we hear is how evil they are.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@hsuyaarchives2526
There were all kinds of wars in ancient India. There's the Battle of the Ten Kings (c. 14th century BCE). The Kurukshetra War which is the foundation of Bhagavad Gita. The Kosala-Kashi war
(c. 650 BCE). The Kosala conquest of Gaṇasaṅgha (c. 600 to 550 BCE). Gandhāra-Avanti war
(c. 575 BCE). Magadha-Anga war (c. 535 BCE. There's lots more and this is LONG before Christianity or Islam. Then there was the horrific caste system that was alive until the British tried to outlaw it but its remnants still remain. Then there was Sati, the ritualistic burning of widows whether they liked it or not.....something else the British succeeded in outlawing. The Sanskrit Laws of Manu of the 1st century bce describes slavery and slaves were the lowest of the low, right beside the untouchables.
My point is that the people of India are people just like people anywhere else in the world. They loved, killed, built and destroyed, just like any other group of people. That's the legacy of humanity.
Viewing history should't be a contest, to see who's the worst and conversely, who's the best....sort of like an Olympic sport where we hand out gold, silver and bronze medals. The bronze medal winners in warring is no better than the gold medal winners. They wanted to win just as much as the gold medal winners, but for some reason, they just weren't as successful. That doesn't make them any better. It makes them human.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@MarkLewis-l3f
What business is it of mine? Maybe because it's happening here as well but not to the same degree....but it could start. It could happen in your neighbourhood as well.
Also, they ARE crossing the southern border. Remember when border guards were supposed to be whipping Haitians, from horseback, at the southern border? They were Haitians. Haitians have been encountered 53,900 times in 2022 and 76,100 times last year with no numbers this year available. So, YES they are crossing the border. Why would they do that? It's because they're NOT legal immigrants. They arrived at the border, from Mexico and declared that they were coming in, just like the millions who've came in the last 4 years.
Even if you fly or sail into the United States, you're still crossing the border. We need better immigration policies. What we have now will tear this country apart. It's pitting Americans against each other, against the immigrants and even immigrants against one another. Look what it's doing in Britain. It's going to come here. Why would ANYONE want this.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@almosthuman1398
I've never had a problem posting a link and when I make a claim, I will always try to give references to back it up. No one has to beg me for proof. I don't make claims if I can't prove it and I never, EVER, ask anyone to prove my claim for me. It's MY claim and if I'm going to make it, I'd better be able to back it up. I believe that it's an obligation to do so. For some reason, and I can't figure out why, some people think that making a claim is proof enough. I'm proud to be able to back up a claim. I'm lost on why others don't feel the same way.
So I went to find out about this Beattie guy and lo and behold....he was born FEMALE. He underwent a double mastectomy but retained his reproductive organs but called himself a man. However, biologically he's NOT a man. He was STILL a woman. In fact, if you did a DNA analysis of the guy, the DNA would show him to be a woman.
This "assigned" at birth stuff is just playing at silly Orwellian word games, changing meanings to fit an ideology. Beattie was born a woman, with all the parts that make him a woman. He (I'm calling him that out of courtesy) can call himself anything he wants, convince others to call him that but when the rubber hits the pavement, he's still a woman. Word games don't change reality.
It's no wonder you didn't want to give me a link. I'll do it for you, though. It's not that difficult to do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Beatie
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
As a person, I think Trump is a loudmouth and a braggart. As a president, I find little fault in the job he's done. As for Biden, he's been around too long, he seems to be degenerating, he has no policies except he hates Trump, he's associated with the movement to defund the police, that is obsessed with race, that makes excuses for rioting, is more about cosmetics (political correctness) than with real substance, wants to change long standing practices like the electoral college and the voting system, has no real stance on extended wars, seems to support globalism, specifically unbalanced trade with China, increased taxes, and have a whishy whashy immigration stance.
So, the choice seems easy to me. Biden, and the Democrats, just aren't fit for the job. They need to retool the party membership and rethink their political position and ideologies before I'd even consider voting for them. My vote goes to the loudmouth and braggart.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Ed Silmon
Rotherham, Telford, Leeds, Newcastle, Birmingham, Oxford, Bradford, Manchester, Rochdale, West Yorkshire, Oldham, Peterborough, Aylesbury, Keighley, Bristol.....is that enough? I can name more if you like.
Incredibly, almost all members of these gangs were all of Pakistani origin. Some have even said that if the victims of grooming had been from good Muslim families, they would not have been abused because Muslims would not allow their women to run wild like non-Muslims do and therefore would not be in a position to be abused.
The police and social services allowed some of the gangs to operate for 30 years, knowing that it was happening but were too afraid of being called racist for exposing the fact that they were Pakistani and Muslim. A Times reporter broke the story using boxes and boxes of official documents that showed just how long it was known. Worse, the media insists on calling them "Asian" gangs, painting all Asians with the same brush.
These are all facts. A google search will get you all kinds of information on it. The rapes themselves were not racially motivated buy the bigotry and racist attitudes of these Pakistanis are on full display.
There is no excuse for any of this or for pretending that this isn't happening.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Cyden One
As was pointed out, he was not the one that asked the customer to leave. Also, we have no idea what the customer said, if she threatened him or how serious the threats were. We have no idea of how much experience this manager has and whether this was his first confrontation of this type. You're basing an assessment on a very, VERY short video clip.
Since, you're engaging in personal experience as a call to authority, I'll do the same. I worked for 14 years as a bartender and though I'm in my late sixties and retired, I still get requests for my services on a part time level. This would indicate that my abilities, as a bartender, are respected. I'll tell you one thing, though. I hope that there's no video clip of my first confrontation with an irate customer. I know that it wasn't all that flattering on my part. I got over it and not all people do. It was a new experience in my professional life and it's not easy. That doesn't mean that your unease can't be overcome. I guarantee you that if you watched a clip of my first encounter and decided that this indicated a pushover, you'd be sorely mistaken. I mean that in both a figurative and physical manner. I've even had a customer claim that I had declined service because he was black. He didn't get far with that claim.
Even if that manager isn't suited for that job, and that's quite possible, that doesn't have a thing to do with the behaviour of the customer and how this is being turned into a racial incident. No dispute should be settled using the colour of a person's skin as the deciding factor, alone. The facts are the issue here and that's all that counts. Worse, I'd hate to think that a business should ALWAYS acquiesce to a customer's demands. That sounds like a recipe for fraud without consequence to me.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@manifesting.inner.g
True history, huh? l learned all about slavery in school. About Jim Crow, the drinking fountains, the Poll Tax, Dredd Scott, the KKK....learned it all in school. That's history and it's true history. I learned it in the sixties. I also learned about the abolitionist movement, Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War that finally abolished slavery and I know the Civil Rights movement and Dr. Martin Luther King are also taught in school. So your comment is all just plain nonsense.
Also, it's DEMOCRATS that are supporting CRT and Republicans that are against it. Why would Republicans be against "true history". The Republican Party was formed specifically to end slavery. Abraham Lincoln was a Republican and Jefferson Davis was a Democrat. It was Democrat president, Andrew Johnson, that ended Reconstruction after the Civil War and the first black Americans elected to office, were also Republicans. Democrats fought to save slavery, voted against allowing blacks to become American citizens, didn't want blacks to vote and when blacks were able to vote, the Democrats were the beneficiaries of the thugish behaviour of the KKK who used fear to discourage the blacks from voting. The Democrats initiated Jim Crow, the Poll Tax and fought against the Civil Rights Movement. In fact, LAST YEAR, California Democrats wanted to repeal the California Civil Rights Act. Democrats did this.
If anyone wants "true history" betrayed, it would be the Republicans. Yet they oppose CRT. Do you know why? Because, what the Democrats want taught and what CRT teaches, works to minimise the Democrats negative contributions to the history of black Americans. In other words, CRT is NOT "true history". It's an ideology, that's borne out of Marxism, that teaches perpetual division and it leads to the hatred and vitriol of the guy that's threatening that audience with a 1000 man army. That would seek to divide the family, of that woman, into racial camps....THAT'S your CRT.
We don't want that division. That's why Republicans are against CRT.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@gevansmd1
Then FIX the political system that seemingly REFUSES to improve the quality of education of the inner city schools. Don't discriminate against those, the Asians as an example, who are not at fault for the discriminating attitudes of those who are in charge of education. Your plan is to fix discrimination, based on race, is to discriminate based on race.
Asians are wealthier because they study and work harder and make wise life decisions. Japanese Americans lost everything, during WW2, yet they worked their way back to success within a generation, even though other Americans hated them because of what Japan did. Now, people, like you, are chastising them for working hard for success. American students of Nigerian and Ghanaian heritage are doing extremely well. Should Harvard discriminate against them, too?
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Fknmando !
Wow. Since you obviously have trouble comprehending the situation, I'll repeat it for you.
There was a drive by shooting. That's where a citizen drives by in a car and shoots people on the street or in their front yard. Apparently, this is against the law. This time 2 people were shot.
Salvas's friend, the police officer, was called to the scene and was involved in a police chase involving the alleged car that took part in the shooting. The occupant of that car, a person strongly implicated in that ILLEGAL drive by shooting, tried to get away and was shot. You see, the police officer was pretty sure the guy had a gun in his possession. It's difficult to commit a drive by shooting without a gun....maybe even impossible so I'd say it was a pretty safe assumption. If the person was willing to shoot people on the street, he would likely be willing to shoot a police officer, as well. I don't know that for sure, of course, but....you know. I'd still go with it for safety reasons.
Salvas knew the police officer and knew him as an honourable guy. He may not be but when you couple that with the circumstances of the shooting, I'd say he has a right to feel that way and to express how he feels.
So....lets tie that in with the standing for the flag. I'm sure you've heard of Colin Kaepernick and the big kerfuffle over kneeling for the flag. This had to do with the police shooting of black youths and the belief in systemic racism in the legal system. Salvas said that he made that statement a year earlier, when this was big headlines. Now, I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. One year after saying that he stands for the flag, Salvas defends a police officer, a family friend, who was involved in a police shooting of an man allegedly resisting arrest. Maybe his Democrat "friends" might have let him off the hook for defending his friend but I don't know. However, his saying that he stands for the flag, might indicate that he sides with police officers in a police shooting. Defending the police officer in a real shooting validates his stance of police shooting. That is what prompted the "that's insensitive" criticism.
I've tied this up in a neat little package for you so you can fully understand what is happening here. Sorry if I'm seeming a little sarcastic (a lot, actually) but I have a feeling that you're being intentionally obtuse about the whole thing. You've implied that the alleged shooter in the drive by deserves to be declared innocent until proven guilty but the police officer shouldn't be given that right, given your statement that you don't know what a person is capable of when referring to the police officer. I'd say that's correct, to a degree. That police officer didn't know what that alleged shooter was capable of but he definitely had reason to believe that he could be extremely dangerous and that his own life was at stake. I guess the only way to know just how bad this guy actually was is to allow him to shoot the cop. Then we'd know for sure he was a bad guy. Makes being a cop rather hazardous though, don't you think?
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Strawberry 93
It's a "huge problem" because there may be over 60 cities across England affected by Pakistani grooming gangs. In the city of Rotherham, alone, there are up to 1400 girls that have been abused by a Pakistani gang in the last 25 years. The "huge problem" is that it is almost exclusively Muslim Pakistani and the authorities looked the other way due to a fear that they would be accused of racism and that they were centring on Muslims. It was the fear of the backlash from the left wing that protected the grooming gangs.
I'll give you an example just how biased the left media has been concerning Muslims. In Toronto, a young girl claimed a man tried to pull off her hijab on the way to school, one morning. By noon, all the press were at the school. It was the leading story on TV news and on the front page of the daily newspapers. By 2 o'clock, the Prime Minister publicly said that "racism is alive and well in Canada". Now, compare this with Rotherham. 1400 underage girls were sexually abused by Pakistani men and for 25 years NO ONE said a word. NOT A DAMN WORD!!!!! Now it's out in the open, more and more cities have been found with these gangs, almost exclusively Muslim with victims that were exclusively white and Sikh. Telford has almost 1000 cases......AND IT HAD BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE AND SOCIAL SERVICES IN MOST OF THOSE CITIES. Thousands of young girls sexually abused for years and there are still people accusing those who are outraged by it of being racist. Yet, one girl, ONE MUSLIM GIRL, says someone tried to take her hijab and it's news across the country......and do you know what. SHE MADE IT UP!!!!!! It wasn't true.
Hollywood stars are crying about MeToo and the trauma they had to live through to make millions but do you hear them speaking out about those poor white and Sikh girls in England? I'll bet you every cent I've ever made that if 10 members of the EDL had raped a couple of Muslim girls over a weekend, it would have been headlines everywhere and I say this with confidence. Remember the little girl in Toronto. That's how I know that the left wing are only being selectively compassionate.
It's disgusting.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@djpickle68
They're forcing you to do it California....sweetie. No new gas powered vehicles allowed to be sold by 2035. That includes lawn mowers. Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon,Rhode Island and Washington have also initiated similar bans of gas powered vehicles. So, SWEETIE, if the government bans them, they're forcing you to buy what they want you to buy or go without.
If they're such a big advantage, they shouldn't have to pass laws to get the public to buy them, would they, sweetie.
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@christopherreichle6670
Anyone who thinks that someone else is going to make them happy, be it the government, their employer, or even the people around them, are going to spend their lives very sadly and end up disappointed. It's up to me to find meaning and satisfaction in my life. Besides, being happy is the end of an Utopian rainbow. It doesn't exist. The way to a good life is in the ability to freely pursue that good life.
Blaming others for what's going on in your head will get you nowhere. We are living in the most affluent times, for the average person, especially in the west, in human history. Yet, we still complain. I'll send you back 300 years. You'll be crying to come back to 2022 within the week.
Furthermore, do you really think that if you dismantle capitalism, that working in a factory will become somehow....exhilarating? That it will lead to life of deep happiness? Good luck with that. Someone's still gotta make your shoes. There will still be a boss and he'll still expect you to get the job done, except now you'd be an enemy of the people if you don't show the expected enthusiasm. You're looking for happiness in all the wrong places.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@warrior-xd2xn
I should refer you to a previous comment that I made. Instead, I'll just copy and paste it so you won't have to search for it.
"There was a guy, who phoned reporters from the Washington Post, disguising his voice so they called him "Deep Throat", that brought down a president. Why? Because those reporters thought that IF Deep Throat's allegations were true, this would be a HUGE scandal and they went full bore into investigating the veracity of those allegations from this mysterious source. That scandal was Watergate.
Now, there's a laptop filled with videos and e-mails, a group of whistleblowers, a business partner, around 150 reports of suspicious bank transactions from 11 different banks, a video of Biden bragging how he threatened to withhold 1 billion dollars from Ukraine if they didn't fire a prosecutor, a guilty plea of tax evasion and a gun charge, a gun charge that resulted from that information from that laptop.......and the SAME newspaper that broke the Watergate Scandal, won't investigate ANY of this stuff.
THEY WON'T EVEN INVESTIGATE!!!! The entire MSM is ignoring all this stuff."
And YOU'RE talking about Republican logic? What about the "head in the sand" tactics that Democrats are using. They won't even investigate. I think that we BOTH know why.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@kulturfreund6631
You can't destabilise a country if that country hasn't the mindset that allows destabilisation. The hatred has to be in them to be used against each other. It's a weakness of the nations that you say are prey to the destabilisation and all it does is lay blame upon blame upon blame and it's ALWAYS the other guys fault.
For once, it would be nice if one of those countries would just say that they're not going to fall for these machinations. Just say that they're responsible for their own actions and not everything is someone else's fault. Until they look within themselves and say "We can change our future" they will always be prey to dictators and outside interference. It's like an abused child. It's the fault of the abuser that he's abused but it's his own doing if he can't rise above it as an adult.
Also, the Middle East was held for only a short time by European interests. It was the Ottoman Empire that controlled the area for almost 400 years until they lost WW1 in 1918. Most of the area was held for only 30 years by Europe before they all became independent. That includes Iraq.
Also, if corrupt governments allow corporate interests to break the law, that's not the fault of Capitalism. It's the fault of corruption and the lack of respect for the rule of law. The US is NOT a fascist state. Fascist states are rooted in nationalist socialist ideas and a one party system, ruled by dictators and supported by his henchmen. That's NOT the US. There are problems but there's not a nation yet conceived that hasn't had it's issues. It's a problem of humanity.
Overall, the people living in the Capitalist west, the US, Canada, western Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and Hong Kong have the best living standards in human history. A standard that is the envy of the world and we should be encouraging other nations to follow the same work ethic and ideas of free markets and the rule of law. It's NOT perfect but nothing ever will be. It's the best that we've ever had, though and the only way to improve on it is to encourage the respect for the law and hard work that brought us the living standard that we have now.
Isn't it strange that the only country in Central America, where things are half decent, is a country that has had stable government and there is a strong commitment to the law and free enterprise. That's Costa Rica and they're very proud of how they've avoided the pitfalls of the countries around them. Like I said, you don't have to fall prey to corrupt corporations and politicians if there is a social mindset that rejects it. It only flourishes when you allow others to tell you who they should blame.
8
-
8
-
8
-
@bigglyguy8429
It would take one generation. In 1960, the pill came onto the market. The generation, that were the parents at the time, had large families. However, their children, who were already born and later became adults, they had much smaller families. In fact, were it not for immigrants, most of those countries would be seeing their populations go down.
As long as those poor starving people remain poor and starving, they won't have access to the information or the tools to make the choices to have small families. We have to raise their standard of living, out of abject poverty, which is 1.90 American per day. When that's done, their children will have smaller families and the impact will be felt when those, who were once starving, become senior citizens. In other words, it will happen in their lifetime.
Instead, Covid, according to UN numbers, has seen people go back into abject poverty. Over 250,000,000 of them. Bill Gates supported the lock downs, which was the reason for this surge in poverty, yet he knows that this poverty will increase birth rates in 3rd world countries. For a smart guy, its amazing how he doesn't see the contradiction here.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@Alex-pt5no
Yet, Grosskreutz carried a weapon, in a riot, that he was in support of. He approached Kyle, with that weapon drawn, and pointed it at Kyle. That's when Grosskreutz was shot....ONLY then. Also, Kyle was NOT a vigilante. He was there to PROTECT businesses and to offer medical aid to ANYONE that needed it. He put out a fire and this brought on the ire of the rioters, particularly Rosenbaum, who said he would kill Kyle if he caught him alone. He was on his way to help put out another fire when Rosenbaum chased him down and tried to grab his gun. A man, who threatened to kill him, was grabbing at his gun. What would any reasonable person assume would happen if Rosenbaum had actually succeeded taking that gun away from him? Any reasonable person would assume that Rosenbaum would use that gun to carry out his previous threats.
Kyle, among others, should not have had to be there that night, but their town was being burned by rioters and looters and the elected officials were doing NOTHING to protect the community. So, what do you do when criminals are destroying everything that you own and the people that you've elected to protect you, turn their backs on you? Do you turn tail and run? That's exactly what the German people did when the Brownshirts smashed windows, set fires and threatened people. Their government did nothing and they acquiesced to one of the most murderous groups of ideologues in human history. In Kenosha, they smashed windows, set fires and threatened people. The local governments, city, state and even Federal governments did NOTHING and you want the people of the Kenosha area to back down and let the rioters destroy their town. That strategy worked really well in Germany. (deep sarcasm) Had only the people of Germany stood against the Brownshirts....but they were cowards. Their cowardice ended in over 50 million deaths before that ideological base was finished.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@jillionairess
I'm NOT talking about ALL teachers. It's like crime. I'm not talking about all citizens when I say that there should be laws against crime. This law is put into place to protect against that small percentage that are abusing their positions. MORE than that, it codifies when it is age appropriate to begin sex education as part of the curriculum. That's it. Most parents are uncomfortable with strangers talking about sex to their 5 and 6 year old. This assures them that this can't happen until the time is right. Now they know.
The NEC, America's top teacher's union, voted to keep teaching CRT, even if it's against the law to teach it. First they deny that it's being taught. Then they vote to continue teaching it. If you want to understand the perils of CRT, listen to James Lindsay's "New Discourses" lectures on YouTube.
More so, if you want to hear about how far left ideas have permeated into schools, watch Karlyn Borysenko here on Youtube. It will introduce you to some of the things that this law is supposed to cover.
I doubt very much that you'll bother though. You prefer your happy cosy little world where ALL teachers are wonderful.
Don't, for one minute, think that I'm against teachers. That's being hyperbolic and intentionally blind. My brother and his wife are teachers and some of my teachers have been absolutely wonderful. However, there has been an influx of far left ideologues into our schools, media and governments that no one should ignore. If you want to ignore what could be happening...that's up to you but don't expect the rest of us to put our heads in the sand with you. The information is out there and if you're not lazy you can find it. I've given you 3 sources to start with but it takes work and a curiosity to find out what it is that we're concerned with.
I can lead a horse to water but I can't make it drink. You have to be thirsty enough to find out what the concern is. You don't want to find out the hard way.
8
-
8
-
8
-
@garethjordan840
Fortunately, "peaceful" protests are the new vaccine.
It's a good thing that DeBlasio told NY citizens that they should go out on the town, that the subways were safe and they should ALL go to the big Parade in the middle of February, AFTER we all knew that Covid was so contagious. He kept this rhetoric up until the middle of March, when his own staff told him they'd resign if he didn't stop.
Good thing that New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in nursing homes. That kept the most vulnerable safe, didn't it?
It was really a good thing that the Democrats were telling us how racist Trump was when he restricted travel to China. Kinda of strongly suggested that the travel ban was stupid and that Covid was wasn't much of a threat.
Then, on Feb. 4th, in the State of the Union Address, Trump told us how they were attempting to work with the Chinese government in studying this new virus, Pelosi did the only thing that could help the new threat. She tore up the speech, telling everyone that everything that Trump had said, in that speech, was a lie.....which would INCLUDE the part about the coronavirus.
When the virus was raging in Europe, it was a smart move for Biden to tell us all how a travel ban to Europe wasn't going to work. That sure made it seem that social distancing was important. What better social distancing than the Atlantic Ocean, huh. It sure kept the Indigenous people of the Americas safe from European diseases like smallpox for thousands of years. Not for Biden and all the Dem supporters though. They said it was dumb. Funny how the Europeans don't think it's dumb now.
See how easy the blame game is? I can keep it up if you want. I have LOTS more. Like how it would take the total populations of Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, the UK, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden and Norway to equal the population of the United States YET....they have a total of 164,166 deaths.....23,000 MORE than the US.
SAME POPULATIONS.....23,000 MORE DEATHS THAN THE US.
Wow....numbers can sure be used to make a case can't they? Just about for anything you want to prove.
8
-
8
-
8
-
You do realise that not everyone has that innate ability to get an education that the rest of us take for granted. They have perception difficulties that makes it almost impossible to learn to read and write. My brother in law is one of those people. Yet, he built his own roofing business. Then the government got involved. They kept setting up requirements that he was forced to take part in. He was fortunate. By the time, they started on him, he was getting older and he decided to retire early.
There will be no more young people, with his learning afflictions, that will follow in his footsteps and still succeed, in spite of these problems....and it's people, like you, who are taking it away from them.
They're shoeing horses. Let them feel the pride and earn their dignity without the government leaning over their shoulders, monitoring EVERY DAMN THING they do. Just a little common sense would be enough.
I'm sure they'll all thank you, every month, when they get their welfare cheque.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
"I've been involved in academia, and I've been involved in theatre, and know the character of academics, professors and actors." An appeal to authority, which is a common logical fallacy. Your professional status or world experience does NOT guarantee that your position gives merit to an argument made. You then, quite effectively, make the argument that the appeal to authority is fallible when referring to Sowell's work. It would appear that you feel that your credibility is validated through your credentials while Sowell's is not and you do this in quite adeptly. So what is it? Are credentials of value, when giving an opinion, or not??
Then out come the accusations....without any evidence, mind you. You basically called him a puppet and a slave and you have nothing to back up that claim. At least not any points to anyone who would use critical thinking as their guide.
You've not touched on the topic of the video or any other thing that Sowell might have said in the past. It's all a smear on his character, his credentials and his intelligence.
"Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people". Since you haven't discussed ONE idea or event, it leaves us with one conclusion.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@CANADIAN REBEL
Even if you do that, there's no infrastructure, no strong chain of command, no weapons and no money. They control the banks, the communications, transportation, the industrial complex, everything needed for any kind of conflict. At best, they'll be a guerilla militia, forever in hiding and being betrayed by a Canadian public who don't want a civil war and who just want to live in peace. The protesters are in no position to even consider that kind of confrontation.
Which leaves us with one option. We have to be smarter than them. We have to expose the foolishness of their propaganda. We have to show their thirst for power for what it is. We have to force them to be the fascists that they are because, deep down, most Canadians don't trust them. We have to show the Canadian people that their mistrust is valid. They can easily defeat that small crowd in Ottawa if that crowd wants to fight. They can't defeat the majority of Canadians, who may not want to fight, but will if the government oversteps their bounds. That's how we defeat them. We expose them. It's the only way.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
You've completely distorted what Peterson means by equality of outcome. He's talking about the Marxist principle that does not allow one to have more, as a reward for hard work and ability, than a fellow citizen. He's saying that we don't know where that line is drawn where we will say that you're going to far and your forcing your country to the point that the Soviet Union, Mao's China, Pol Pot's Cambodia or present day Venezuela reached.
Peterson is Canadian and he comes from a country that has a state funded medical program. He doesn't disapprove of that at all and has never said that. Same as making sure no citizen starves. You're making an argument that was never made by Peterson and is definitely not what he means at all. One equality of outcome that he has spoken against is the idea that people must be categorised in the specific groups and that it is imperative that the demographics of any social entity must reflect, equally, the demographics of the public at large. As an example, a company must have 50 percent female mechanical engineers because that is the demographic of society. He believes, and he's right, that this deflates the value of merit and ability and it would hurt the future success of a business. It takes the right of a business to set its own standards of excellence and may force them to accept, as employees, those who may not have the ability they need or want. Not all people are equal in ability and he thinks that employees should be judged as individuals and NOT on their belonging to a demographic.
That is inequality of outcome. Not your claim that he doesn't like feeding the hungry or providing health care for all citizens. That is being so intentionally obtuse that it would almost seem intentional.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Wait Whet
I'll say it again. Greta, intentionally, went to the US, made a big deal on how she got there, stood up at the United Nations and made broad sweeping allegations and put herself on the world stage. Nicholas Sandman did NO SUCH THING. He went on a school trip and was randomly approached by that native who beat a drum in his face. Ten minutes earlier, Sandman had no idea that he was about to be thrust onto the world stage. It was NOT his choice to be vilified or praised or be put into the position. Greta MADE that choice. She got up, in front of the world, said her piece, made her accusations and then, according to you, no one is to say anything about it, unless it's praise and adulation.
You're comparing apples to oranges.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
No one is saying NOT to defend yourself. That's a lot different than burning, looting, smashing random heads because you're angry. If you want to DO something, talk to your local politicians, tell them that you won't vote for them if they don't strongly object to what's happening. In the case of the nursing homes, it doesn't matter if you live in Nebraska or New York, get the information on it and TELL everyone you know about it. Hand of leaflets in front of political offices, colleges campuses, shopping malls and street corners. You go at it with a shotgun, they'll send the militias with machine guns. Use your brain NOT you muscle because, in the end, it will be the smartest that wins and they're winning right now because they're using their brains through relentless propaganda. Do it better than they do.
Acting like a meathead will only be fodder for their propaganda and you will LOSE. WE WILL LOSE.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Molari
So....taking a man from Africa, and selling him/her in the slave markets of the Middle East is "nice" slavery. WAY different than taking him/her to the Americas and selling them in the slave markets there. I can't see the preference but maybe I would after being castrated in Egypt or Yemen. Those slaves, that had their hearts ripped out in religious ceremonies in the Aztec Empire, sure had it good. I'm sure that we'd both prefer that over picking sugar cane in Jamaica.
You're turning it into a contest, a totally unproductive exercise. The truth is that Mauritania was the last country to abolish slavery, in 1981. An African country. However, they didn't pass a law to prosecute slave owners until 2007. I'm sure it was the "nice" slavery that you're alluding to, though. (big time sarcasm)
Most debt slaves involved people from the same group or nationality. Slaves of Roman citizenry could be debt slaves and would have rules in which they could work their way out of slavery. Captured slaves, from northern Europe and Africa were not accorded that privilege. That was common with almost ALL slaves within countries or Kingdoms. Maybe you should check out the timeline of slavery, around the world, on Wikepedia. Even the Hawaiians had a slave culture, known as the ancient Hawaiian kapu.
This isn't a contest to see which one is the worst. Be grateful to those who sacrificed to end slavery and quit the blame game. All it does is beget resentment, anger and retribution. It, not only doesn't solve anything, it tears us apart.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@davids.2703
Who is forever talking about racism? Who supports identity politics? Who supports employment based on skin colour, sexuality, claimed gender and other equity based criteria? It's not Trump.
These are programs that separate, segregate and make your identity a defining principle on who you are, whether a job is open to you, takes away educational programs if you don't have the correct racial or identity appearance and may even decide who your political candidate should be, once again based on their preferred identity. Could even tell you where you must live. Must have even representation in all neighbourhoods so if your identity group is under represented in a poor neighbourhood, you may be the one chosen to provide identity equity, whether you like it or not.
School choice? Not if you're poor. Trump doesn't think that being poor should take away your choice but Biden, and his supporters, don't want you to have a choice. You go where they tell you and if the school is violent, the teachers are incompetent and your child is bullied and unhappy, too bad for them. That should make the poor feel a division between haves and have-nots, shouldn't it?
I have never, in all my seventy years, heard so much about race and other identity group profiling and it's all from the left and hardly any from Trump. His "Garden of Heroes" include people like Harriet Tubman, Rosa Parks, Booker T. Washington, Frederick Douglas, Susan B. Anthony and Jackie Robinson. Sounds real divisive doesn't it? As divisive as tearing down the statue of Frederick Douglas in Rochester NY. It's Democrats that support tearing down statues so tearing down the statue of a great American statesman like a man, who was once a slave, must be Trump's fault. But why would he want that same man, Frederick Douglas, in his "Garden of Heroes"?
Your logic is baffling.
7
-
7
-
7
-
That's the plea of the childish at heart. "How come Johnny has a bigger one than me?".
We live in an era where people are falling over one another to prove how oppressed they are. The oppressed are the heroes....not the strong, fearless and determined. Just prove your oppression and then insist that you need help.
It's time to grow up and grow a backbone. If you don't make enough an hour, work longer hours, cut back on expenses, plan a budget, DON'T DO DRUGS. There are ways to get out of it. The poorest people alive today are richer than more than 95% of the people that lived 150 years ago. They have better healthcare, better and more abundant food, even better shelter. What am I talking about. I have better healthcare, better and more abundant food and shelter and I make below the poverty level on a senior pension and that's it.
We're happier complaining than we are working towards solutions. Until we change that, as a society, things will get progressively worse. That's how progressivism works.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@viktorkc1154
He supported democratic socialism and at the time there was no real example on how that would actually fare if applied. What history has shown is that if the economy is controlled by the state in a democracy, political candidates will use the revenue garnered by the state run enterprises as a carrot to get votes. Businesses need that revenue to maintain equipment, train employees, invest in research and innovation. Without it, they stagnate and the economy runs into difficulty and eventually the state will be forced into tyranny in their attempt to stop the bleeding or their economy. No true socialist state has avoided it and when reading Orwell, the signs that this is inevitable are all there and that's how Peterson came to his conclusions on Socialism. Orwell showed him, inadvertently, that it couldn't work. Orwell said he was a democratic socialist but his books told a different story. In fact, he was a great supporter of British traditions and those traditions don't reflect socialism, either.
Yes....the owner or CEO of a company can move his business elsewhere and dismiss his employees if he chooses. It's his company. It's my choice, as an individual to work for him and I can leave if I want, as well. That's freedom of the economy. If I force him to hire me and tell him that he can never fire me, I'm placing my authority over his. The owner of a business's first priority is to the survival of his business. If he doesn't do that, he's given up his responsibility to the company, his buyers, suppliers and his employees.
If I build a better mousetrap, I have every right to profit from that mousetrap. It was my idea, my effort, my money and my risk to go into business. Any employee I hire, doesn't take the risks that I did and he has no right to the things that I purchased with my money in order to produce my product. There is no way that anyone would allow a person to walk in off the street and then claim that property as his own and that the owner is now subservient to him. That's theft and if you'd ever owned a business, you'd see that right away.
What entrepreneur, in his right mind, would ever start a business under those conditions. A healthy economy depends on the freedom of it's entrepreneurs to have full autonomy of their own enterprise. If not, I might as well walk into your house right now and take what I want. You've just claimed that ownership is irrelevant and you have no right to ownership of anything.
That takes us to the authority of the law. That's NOT authoritarianism. That's a societal agreement that we will abide by certain rules and laws which are limited by a Constitution which specifically lay out the rights of all citizens as individual, autonomous beings. You either stop me from taking your stuff, by force or authority, or we devise a civilised way to handle it through a system of laws and protection. The rule of anarchy will only result in the rule of the guy with the biggest fist, club or gun. It's still authority driven but rather uncivilised.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I just came from a news....I don't know what to call it, really.....from MSM, where Candace Owens, Michael Dyson and a moderator, spent eleven minutes yelling over each other's voices and interrupting one another.
I lasted about 3 minutes. It was insane and pointless to watch.
That's why people like Dave Rubin. He brings the people on and you get to hear them talk. There's no shock, no "gotcha" moments or debunking going on. He lets the guest talk so you know exactly what they're about. You can listen and understand what it is they're trying to say. You don't have to agree with them but once you understand what it is they're saying, you can make an informed and coherent case for how you think. It's learning. True knowledge isn't just about things you agree with. It's about all ideas, good and bad.
Dave Rubin gets it. The Young Turks don't. They want to make a contest of it. Competition is great, in some cases, but when knowledge becomes dogma, the indoctrinated are highly tempted to cheat. That can't end well.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@OneNewHope
Jim Crow has been over since 1964. Jim Crow was the brainchild of the Democrats and was ended by an 80% of the Republicans. George Wallace, the Democrat governor of Alabama, was the one, and I remember it clearly, who shouted from the podium "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation FOREVER!!!" He was cheered on by Democrats, some of them who were in the KKK, a group that was formed by Democrats to stop the black voters for voting for Black Republican candidates. So don't give me this Jim Crow is a Republican creation. It's a well known fact that it came from the Democrats.
If I go to a doctor with a problem and for 50 YEARS and that problem never goes away, WHY would I go back to that doctor for 51 years. That doesn't make sense. The inner cities haven't improved since I was a kid, back when Jim Crow was real. We called them the ghettos back then. If NOTHING changes in 50 years, you really think that if you vote for the same party in year 51, things are going to change? That's the definition of insanity....doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome.
It's like flipping a double headed coin and expecting it to somehow come up tails. Like turning the ignition to start your car, when the battery is dead, 50 times and thinking that the 51st time you'll get the miracle.
Talk about critical thinking!!!!!! LOL. When you do something for 50 years and nothing ever changes, maybe it's time to try something else.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@ldjman1
I don't know whether each story is true or not. I have to do some fact checking. If it ends up that there are things being said that aren't true, THAT'S when I make my decision on THAT story. I don't go in calling it a lie. That would negate the need for fact checking, first of all, and it also assumes that everything they say is false, which means if a story is true, I'd be going around thinking the opposite, on some kind of illogical principle and assumptions.
I only call a story untrue when I have the evidence that backs me up. Otherwise, I remain SILENT. If there's something in this story that you disagree with, let's talk about it. Specifics....that's what's important, not your "fake news" allegations.
And why would you assume only "domestic" news sources tell the truth. I've heard our own national news network, the CBC, tell some amazing whoppers. I know that they are whoppers for one reason. FACT CHECKING. I didn't assume it to be false. I fact checked and the facts told me that they were either wrong or worse....lying. That's the logical and honest way of deciding on the veracity of news stories.
7
-
7
-
@jillionairess
My 10 year old granddaughter announced that she was bisexual. Her 7 year old sister teased her by calling her trans. She became indignant and said that she was proud of being a woman.
Indoctrinate.....I don't know. Bizarre....without a doubt.
They were taught this in school. A year later, there was a controversy about teaching Indigenous Studies in school. I asked her what 8X7 was. She didn't know and said that she didn't like math. I told her that maybe she should learn basic mathematics before she went onto such a specific area of study. Once again, she got all indignant. She asked me if I knew that they put Indigenous kids into schools and beat them. White people did that. I told her a friend of mine attended one of those schools. Apparently, her teacher told her class all about that too. I asked her if she knew about Indigenous religions, the foods that they developed, the wars and how the Iroquois completely wiped out the Huron nation. Did she know that the American founding fathers borrowed ideas of forming a union from the Iroquois Federation and that the Iroquois outlawed cannibalism after they formed their union. Apparently, these were never discussed. I told her that what she was talking about was known as "Grievance Studies" Of course, she had no idea what that meant. She was only 11 at the time.
Indoctrinated....I still don't know. However, this is stuff that is rather inappropriate in a primary school setting, being taught by a person that her parents barely knew. None of this was taught to my kids when they were in school but that was in the 80s and 90s.
I'm not going to say that your experiences didn't happen but just because it hasn't been your experience, it doesn't happen at all. I've never been sexually abused but I'm willing to bet it happens.
By the way, my granddaughter is now 16, she's shaved her head bald and wears the most bizarre makeup in some kind of androgynous display of self identity. Was it because she was indoctrinated in school? I can't say but I know her older brother just shakes his head and rolls her eyes at her and says that this specific teacher, that he also had, is a kook. Does that ever set her off.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@pavango3812
The topic is Georgia's new voting laws. Also, my ex-wife didn't have ID because she never worked. However, when we got married she had to dig up a birth certificate to prove who she was when we applied for a marriage licence. I'm sure that there are 3 million Americans that have never worked but if you are working, you must have a Social Security Number because you MUST pay income tax. It's the law. You can't pay income tax without that SS# or you can't fill out your income taxes. That's against the law as well. You have to file for income tax, if you work, or face legal repercussions.
There are reasons that a person might not have an ID but, and a BIG BUT, if you can't get an ID, something that would be useful anyway, before the next election, almost 2 years away, voting isn't all that important to you. If fact, you've probably spent more time arguing with me than the time it would take to apply for a valid ID in Georgia.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
So....for thirty years, Jorge didn't break the law.....except for that illegal immigrant thing. He didn't break the law. So what? That's what you're supposed to do. You don't get brownie points for doing what is required of you. You do it because it is the right thing to do and is how we all create a civilised society.
When he filled out the forms, incorrectly, he should have gotten another lawyer, did what was asked of him, and he could have been an American citizen, right now. Instead, he ignored procedure (would that be breaking the law?) and basically procrastinated, until the law and fate finally caught up with him. Suddenly, it's Trump's fault that he didn't follow procedure. Maybe he should take a good look at himself. Had he done the right thing when he reached adulthood, none of this would be happening. He'd be happily blowing leaves and plowing snow in Michigan right now.
Sorry, Jorge. All you have to do is follow procedure. There are 45 million people in the US that were born in other countries, living legally in the US, right now. If 45 million people can follow those procedures, so can you. You created your own problems.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Alfonso Padron
What are those other guys doing looting, burning, threatening people with bodily harm and destroying people's businesses and homes? A small town with around 25 businesses completely destroyed and the mayor and state governor do NOTHING. Kyle worked in Kenosha, volunteered to clean graffiti that the rioters painted on walls, offered medical aid to rioters, protected the businesses that were left unprotected and even put out fires.
He would have stayed home had the political leaders, that were elected by the people of Kenosha, done their job. He was protecting the town. The people, that attacked him, were gleefully destroying it. Once again, if the people that you elect refuse to protect their community, should we all just allow thugs and criminals burn it down? You're the lamb who willingly walks to the slaughter.
7
-
@DM-dk7js
You don't get it? I'll explain it to you. The Capitol Building is HUGE. People can't even SEE the people on the other side of the building. So, the violence took place on ONE side and the people on the other side didn't KNOW that it was happening. For some reason, the security on the other side of the building of the violence, opened doors and let people in. They just LET THEM IN. Other people, like Ray Epps, were telling to attack the building and was THERE when it started. For some reason, he was not arrested, even though he spent one day on the FBI wanted list. However, Alex Jones, who was never went into the building and was telling people to not go in, was arrested. One video showed a cop saying that he didn't approve but supported their right to protest.
One person's charges were dropped because video evidence showed that a police officer opened the door for him. If security allows you into a building, you can't be charged with trespassing.
Anyone that took part in actual violence or was inciting violence, they should be charged. I repeat....anyone who took part in violence or incited violence, they should, most definitely, be charged. If they just walked in, through doors that were opened by security and no violence evident, they should be dismissed on a case by case basis.
Those doors should never have been opened by security and why they would open them is truly mystifying.
I'll agree with you on this. If those cops did what is alleged, they should be charged. We also have to find out why they did this. Did they do it because they agreed with the protesters or did they get orders TELLING them to open the doors. If so, who was it that told them to do that and what was their intent. No matter whether your Republican or Democrat, we have to know what went on, FULLY and not just to punish or exonerate people.
If this was a partial set up by a group who were supposed to be in charge of security, we must find out about it.....because next time, it could be YOU that is arrested for something you didn't do at the machinations of a corrupt government.
7
-
7
-
7
-
@LovingPrinceTamayuki
Let me try this again, seeing as that you seem to relish in being as thick as you are.
Collectivism is about being of one mind, that we operate as metaphorical drones in a beehive. That our group identity defines who we are, how we think and what we believe.
People, like Haslam, are not collectivists. They believe in individual agency, that we CHOOSE to cooperate or even to opt out, as we choose as individuals. That our group identity is NOT who we are and it does NOT define us. We define ourselves. We work together, as individuals of our own free will, each one having the freedom to decide the depth of our cooperation or even to freely opt out, without recrimination BECAUSE we are individuals and not forced into being a part of the hive. The individual is the priority. In collectivism, the group supersedes the individual....ALWAYS.
7
-
7
-
@mbnall
In 2005, Obama, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats, claimed that there were problems with the voting machines, helping the Republicans to the 2004 win. In 2016, Hillary and the Democrats claimed that Trump colluded with the Russians to get HIM the win, invoking the compromised computerised voting machines, again.
Now, with mail in voting and the lack of confidence is the voting machines not addressed, we have a large majority of Republicans claiming election fraud concerning those SAME voting machines and the enhanced mail-in voting process.
Now, we have the Democrats wanting to add Puerto Rico and Washington DC to count of the states in election and possibly doing away with the electoral college, something that has been in place since the beginning of the US. This isn't gerrymandering? Worse, the Democrats don't want voters to produce their IDs to vote, saying that it's racist. The entire free world is laughing at that nutty idea.
I'd say fix the entire system, including any appearance of gerrymandering, mail-in voting, the vote counting machines and the way votes are verified. If almost every election has claims of fraud, then have a thorough investigation those claims and propose ways to regain confidence in the system. The way it's being done now is ridiculous.
7
-
7
-
@ponygirl1624
There will ALWAYS be problems, no matter where you go. That's life. What's important is the overall picture. Best economy, best education, people flocking to live there. People are flooding across the Mexican border, into the US, because of the scope of problems in their home countries. People in the United States are leaving their home states and going to other states for the same reason. Populations in California, New York, New Jersey and a few others are going down because of people and businesses leaving. Populations in Florida, Texas, Tennessee, Idaho and others are going up. Logic says it's because the problems are worse in some states than in others. You figure out why that would be.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
I'm going to argue against Tim on his claim that social media is the cause of the woke culture. Socialism has been growing for decades in our universities. Those academic socialists didn't call themselves woke, of course. However, they cultivated a culture that would lead to what we now call progressive woke. The socialist academics would only appoint those to academic posts who were avowed radical socialists. They would recommend them to educational positions in primary schools, who in turn, when they got the power, would only hire fellow socialists to teach or become part of the administration. That's when they had the ability to shape the minds of the young into their socialist philosophy. It's how Hitler shaped the minds of the youth of Germany. Get them when they're young so when they become adults, they become fervent foot soldiers for the cause.
Who are the most constant and influential users of social media? The young. They're on it all the time and when they use social media, they're drawn to those who share the values that they've been taught in school. The same ones that were taught by these socialist academics for over a generation. The academics know that to control the populace they have to control the media. They've done it in the legacy media, in Hollywood and in the personnel departments of our large businesses, changing the name to "Human Resources" It all started in the hallowed halls of higher education. Had these people not existed, there would be no woke culture. Social media is there new propaganda tool and it's been very effective.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@davidhowell1415
That applies to the band "Rage against the Machine", too. In the nineties, they were all about fighting the status quo. Now, they are the status quo, carrying water for the swamp. Weird how that happens. I saw the same thing happening to the hippies of the sixties. A lot of them came from upper class families, railing against the establishment, peace, love, drop out and tune in. In the eighties, a lot of them became the establishment, making big money working for the very corporations that they hated 15 years earlier. The Clintons are a great example of this shift. Activists in the sixties, while at college, bit in the swamp by the nineties.
6
-
@jimmcloughlin
Estimates for the deaths of the famine, brought on by collectivisation in China, put in motion by Mao, run as high as 55 million. That's in the fifties, NOT WW2. Then there was the cultural revolution that started in the mid sixties and lasted 10 years. Add that to the famines, and it may be as high as 70 million. These are deaths, not due to wars, but to the disastrous policies of the Chairman Mao and his associates. Then there were the disasters of Stalin and Lenin. Once again, not due to WW2, but to the famines caused by collectivisation of farms and the horrors of their police state. These are deaths brought down on their OWN people.
Then the famines of the Soviet Union, brought on by the same communist policies under Lenin and Stalin. Around 5 million in 1923 and maybe as many as 7 million in 1933, including around 3.5 million Ukrainians. Then another 1.7 in the Gulags.
Who knows how many millions have died in North Korea in the 20th century. Another 2 million in the killing fields of Cambodia by the communists there. Around 1 in 4 Cambodians died because of Pol Pots great agrarian society.
These are just the numbers from the main communist powers. We have no idea on the numbers in the Iron Curtain countries of those times, or Cuba, Zimbabwe and other socialist regimes. These are all deaths NOT through foreign invasions or wars. These are deaths caused directly from the policies of the communist governments.
I have references for all of it. All you gotta do is ask.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@jerrybumstead2654
Drugs for kids, when I was in school was unheard of. They just didn't exist. As for the authority part, culturally, life was so much different back then.
Right from early childhood, we were exposed to a much stricter set of rules and a more regimented lifestyle. This was the norm, no matter where you went. Prayer before and after each meal. If you're sitting in a highchair, mom reached over and held your hands down while the prayer was being said. This was expected. Everyone did it. The little ones were actually proud to do the things that the older ones were doing. At evening meal, there was also a Bible reading and you were expected to sit still, quietly and listen. This wasn't just at my home, either. It happened everywhere I went. By the time a kid went to school, sitting still and standing in line was nothing. Our classes were quiet. If you stepped out of line, you got the strap. I got it lots of times. No big deal.
In spite of this strictness, we had way more freedom that kids do now. We were out, at the neighbours, riding bikes, we never told our parents what we were up to. No helicoptering parents. We played hockey, soccer and baseball with no supervision. Fishing and swimming, building forts...but be home in time for meals or you didn't eat. I remember being blocks away and hearing my mother yelling my name to come home at 7 and 8 years old. You had the freedom but don't screw up. You got in trouble with the a neighbouring adult and he cuffed you across the head, you don't tell your dad. He'd cuff you a couple more times and tell you to stop being a troublemaker.
I was talking about this with my siblings a couple of weeks ago. We all agreed that life was a LOT more fun for us than for kids these days. Not even a close comparison.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@briana.g.7412
It's so easy to judge the lives of those who lived almost 250 years ago. You can sit there on your moral high horse because there's no way that you'd ever be put in that position where your immediate family would ever have slaves.
It's like my dad. He grew up 20 miles west of the German border. When he was 8 years old, he hid in a ditch, along with his brother, and watched in terror as thousands of Nazi troops marched by singing battle hymns, in their invasion of the Netherlands. He's now 89 and still says the it was the scariest day of his life.
But what if he had been born 20 mile EAST of the German border, on the same road that the Germans used to march into the Netherlands. Would he have play marched alongside those soldiers, goose stepping along, dreaming of the day that he too, would be marching off to fight for the Fuehrer and the Fatherland.
That imaginary line was all that defined whether he was a bad guy, a goose stepping Hitler youth, and a good guy, the kid that would eventually see the Canadian soldiers, sleeping in his barn as his teenage idols.
You just don't know where and what life hands you. Except for you, of course. You'd be that 9 year old Berliner that would refuse to join the Hitler youth and be a hero, today. Don't be so morally self righteous.
6
-
6
-
@xenocide1307
It's not that there aren't good teachers who want to teach. It's that the schools won't hire them. This is an ideology that has been building for years....generation after generation, starting in the universities. Those university students, who enthusiastically support this ideology, are recommended for positions in education, the media, politics and Human resources departments. In education, it doesn't matter what the specialty is, like math or literature. What matters is that it's taught through their radical socialist lens. It took years, DECADES, for this to come to fruition, slowly expanding outwards until it was everywhere.
We're now seeing the results in Critical Race, Gender, Queer and Feminist theories although Feminist theory is being abandoned. It's Marxism through Praxis or practice.
It has to be stopped before we fall to their Marxist plans and we lose the country that we grew up in.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@christopherparks4342
It's wrong when the Ukraine prosecutor that he wanted fired had investigated his son's boss. If that was his motivation, it should be looked into. Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner and founder of Burisma Holdings, had been investigated and had 23 million dollars in assets frozen. He left Ukraine in 2014. Shortly after, Hunter Biden was hired by Burisma Holdings. Less than 2 years later, Biden threatens to withhold 1 billion dollars unless the prosecutor was fired. Zlochevsky, not only got his 23 million dollars released, he returned to Ukraine shortly afterwards. It wasn't long before he was being investigated for something else, namely granting drilling licenses for subsidiary companies that he owned while he was the Minister of Ecology. This was the guy that Hunter Biden worked for.
Maybe it's all innocent.....maybe not, but it sure could be helpful to have the son of the Vice President of the most powerful country as a member of your staff, now wouldn't it. Especially if you're as corrupt as the Zlochevsky appears to be. I'd say that it warrants a look see into what's going on here especially since Zlochevsky has once again left Ukraine and no one is sure where he is, although some reports say he might be in Monaco.
But, apparently an investigation would be wrong because it might help Trump. In other words, it doesn't matter if Biden did wrong or not. Ethics isn't the question. It's politics.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@kayakuprising5914
When I was growing up, EVERY parent would have been "irresponsible". EVERY one of them. We walked to school, to the store, went fishing, bike riding, built forts in the woods, played soccer, baseball and hockey without a parent in sight when we were that age. We looked after each other and woe betide the child that caused enough trouble that their parent heard about it.
I feel sorry for those kids that never have a moment to be human beings, to have every action, word or decision be supervised from overbearing parents and adults. One day, they graduate from high school and are suddenly thrust into an adult world, either to work or college and they need their hands held at every moment. You're stunting their growth as strong, independent human beings and shame on you for doing that.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Years ago, my wife and I were out shopping or something. When we got home, there was a envelope in our mailbox, naming those eligible to vote in our household. It named me, my wife and our dog, George. George Haveman....our DOG. Come voting day, we went to our designated voting station and sure enough, on the voter's list, there he was, George Haveman....our dog.
Fortunately, we live in Canada and we have to show ID when we vote. Since there is no George Haveman, and our dog can't vote, George Haveman didn't vote. It wasn't tallied. However, if you didn't have to show ID, anyone could walk in, claim he was George Haveman and vote for his favourite candidate.
I have to say, even though I'm Canadian and I've no say in it, Democrats are either foolishly naive or they want the ability to cheat in the elections. It's not a stretch to assume that they're not naive.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@michaelpalmieri7335
When Obama was first elected, I did think that this was a turning point for race relations in the US. Was I right but not in the way I thought.
Obama was in the unique position of being the one person who could have brought some sense to the discord after the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson. Instead, he basically said nothing and let that city burn, even though it was found that the "hands up, don't shoot" was false. By the time it was done not only Ferguson was burning, so were parts of Milwaukee, Baltimore, Minneapolis and Dallas. People were marching in the streets, some even calling for the killing of ordinary and random police officers and 5 officers in Dallas and 2 in New York were brutally murdered in response to the anti-police rhetoric of the press and certain leaders. One was a young black officer, mother of 2, who was waiting in her police vehicle and was executed with a bullet to the back of the head. Obama did nothing and the reason for that was simple. There was an election coming and he didn't want to upset the black voters. Race relations have been at their worst since the sixties. That was Obama's legacy and not one that he should be proud of.
I would agree that Trump should never have praised Gianforte for body slamming that reporter however he did NOT mock that reporter for his handicap. The media gave the impression that the reporter Serge Kovaleski had cerebral palsy, a disease in which the sufferer loses body control. Kovaleski does NOT have cerebral palsy so he does NOT suffer from the lose of body control that one would see if he were afflicted by that disease. He speaks quite normally. Trump was mocking his fluster at being caught in an awkward stance on a claim he made. This is Kovaleski and how he normally talks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ45EsD2Gc0
These are examples of how Trump mocks people who get caught in a lie and acting flustered. He has done it many times in the past. No one is going to claim the Ted Cruz is handicapped or even himself, years before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AedzsWd-ME
Maybe Trump could have handled it better when he did find out the guy did have a bad arm but he wasn't mocking him for that. He was mocking him for getting caught in saying something that wasn't true by using exaggerated antics that a flustered person might use. To say that he was mocking his handicap is being disingenuous, at best, dishonest at worst.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Dick Toles
You really don't get it, do you? They're all Americans and she is an individual, a single entity that happens to be an Asian woman, just as you're a single entity that happens to be a white male. Affirmative action says that an Asian individual shouldn't have the same opportunity as another group of individuals and has assigned an hierarchy of opportunity based on group identity. It may be fair to the group (maybe) but definitely not fair for the individual.
Her argument INCLUDES you because you, as a white man, are also at the bottom of the opportunity hierarchy. If she proves that Affirmative Action is discriminatory, she is also speaking for you, because it is also discriminates AGAINST YOU. She is advocating against this type of discrimination and that we should be judged as individuals, not as Asian woman or white male. It's like two people trying out for a baseball team. Do you take the one who's the best baseball player or do you take the black guy because there are already too many white guys on the team.
I take the best ball player because I want the team to be the best it can be. When you apply for university, you take the application that shows the strongest potential, that manifests itself in previous achievements of scholarship and effort. You do that to prepare for the future of your society in the best possible manner. That the top minds are the ones doing the most complex tasks that are needed for a functioning society. I don't care what ethnicity my surgeon is, so long as he's the best, not because he's Latino and there isn't enough Latino surgeons. That's not only colossally stupid, it's just plain crazy.
6
-
6
-
@hughgasey9666
I'm sure that you're correct. I'll state it differently then. If I OWNED CNN, I'd fire everyone of those clowns and keep only those I felt could be objective in their reporting. No more "gotcha" questions, no more twisting words and events to suit the narrative. The facts, backed up with hard journalism, not this "pretty studio" crap we're seeing from them now.
That's how you win respect. If Trump screws up, show it and explain why with facts that are true and as irrefutable, as possible. If he does something good, show that the same way. No more opinions on the news. No more personal causes, right or left. Let the information, the news, speak for itself.
Is that better? LOL.
6
-
Dylan L
The United States has a population of 335 million people and have 72,000 deaths. Italy, France, Spain, Germany and the UK have a combined population of 322 million people, 13 million LESS than the US and have over 115,000 deaths, almost 45,000 MORE than the US.
So, the US isn't doing more poorly than others. In fact, per capita, the US is doing better in the death count than the next five countries, other than Germany, which is way down.
Things aren't as simple as you make them out to be.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@minkman99
I'm afraid that you're not following this very well. The SJW stuff, the safe spaces and such, has been around for quite a few years. It was in the universities and any student who said things that establishment deemed inappropriate was called onto the carpet. It always seemed to be conservatives that were being censored and belittled. They weren't allowed to have their own speakers or their own conservative clubs. There were protests, sometimes even violent, directed against anyone that would say anything that went against the leftist dogma. This was going on before Trump became president. Books were beginning to be cancelled but they couldn't outright ban them. Not yet anyway, but some would love to do it. The rhetoric was always about race, gender, sexual preference and accusations were becoming more and more rampant. Every dissenting conversation ended with "You're racist" or "You're homophobic" or something to that effect.
Now, it's in the media. Critical race theory is the new thing. People, in the work place, are called to meetings and white employees have been required to "acknowledge their white privilege". Kids, starting schools, are taught that they may belong to the race that represents racism, colonialism and sexism, that there's something inherently evil in them. Everything has become racist. Mathematics, getting up on time, working hard, street lights, milk, camping, skiing, the list goes on and on and on. University professors have longed for the demise of the white race and done so publicly, without any sanctions from the MSM. BLM have rioted, burned, looted, injured and even killed people but the MSM says their protests are "mostly peaceful". Antifa, in Portland, rioted for over 120 days in a row, last summer, all chronicled by Andy Ngo, but to Nadler, a Democrat Congressman, it's all a myth and Biden says Antifa is an idea. You should google "Evergreen College" and read about the craziness there, a few years ago. Strangely, completely ignored by the MSM. Had a bunch of conservative students done this, they'd still be talking about it.
If you haven't noticed any of this, you really haven't been paying attention. The left have been taken over by a bunch of overt Marxists. A woman, who wore Chairman Mao's picture on her clothing almost won the election to become Mayor of Portland recently. You really have to start finding out what is going on with the left and how they're infiltrating the education system, the media, human resources of big corporations and the Democrat party. They will completely destroy the western world as we know it and we'll be left with a place where we won't have to worry about illegal immigrants or refugees. They won't want to come here.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@OneNewHope
LOL.....That's hilarious. Have you not seen the conditions in the inner cities. All Democrat run. Rampant homelessness, needles everywhere, so much human waste that San Francisco has need of a poop app, horrific school results, high crime rates, high rents, over whelming and stifling bureaucracies.....you call that benefiting the cities??? Some of these cities have had Democrats at the helm for over 50 years, some for 100 years and the locals keep voting the same bunch back in.
Isn't it strange that the only real progress in New York City was when Rudy Guliani was the mayor. "No window left broken"....that's not something that you hear now. When Scott Presler went to Baltimore and started to clean up the streets, on his own time, it wasn't Democrat supporters that encouraged him. Not a chance. Democrats roundly criticised him. If it was up to them, the garbage stays on the streets.
Your logical processor isn't working as it should.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@babajaiy8246
The Muslims can practise their faith any way they wish. They have complete religious freedom. In fact, even though the Jews believe that Solomon's Temple, a very sacred Jewish site, stood where the Dome of the Rock is now, they allow Muslims to still use that site as a Mosque. The Israelis still allow it to be a place for Muslims. That's a concession that has been allowed Israeli Muslims. However, in Gaza, there is not ONE Jew....not a one and there's good reason for that. If someone didn't kill them, their life would be pure hell. Jews can't live in Gaza.
Why would they want to live as they did before? That area was extremely poor until the Jews came and started to turn it into an oasis in the desert. It was nothing but dirt and rock 100 years ago. If Hamas cared so much for the people of Gaza, maybe they'd do the same thing there....but they won't. Hamas is too filled with hatred for Israel to care about their own people.
You're asking me to explain the mind of those filled with hate? Why did Hitler want to kill all the Jews? Hatred....that's why. Why did Rome kill everyone in Carthage and then sow the fields with salt? Hatred...blind hatred. Why did the Hutu try to kill all the Tutsi in Rwanda? Same thing.
Why would Hamas, the leadership of the Palestinians, want to drive the Israelis into the sea? Because they refuse to live with them. They hate them because they're not Muslim.
"The Jews will fight against you and you will gain victory over them, till the stone says: ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.’” 2 This Hadith was reported by Ahmad and Al-Tirmidhy who said that it is a Hasan, Sahih Hadith.
This is a part of the Muslim faith. Islam says that they are a religion of peace but no one who values peace would attack innocent unarmed civilians. They defend themselves when attacked but they don't start shooting at people at a music festival and they would NEVER parade the naked body of a girl, that they killed and desecrated, so the people could spit on her. That's NOT the way of peace. If anything, those Palestinians are going against the will of Allah is Islam is indeed the religion of peace.
Hamas could take the money, that they've received over the last 70 years, and use it to make life better for the Palestinians. They could do that but they don't. They use it to buy guns and rockets so they could kill as many Jews as possible.
There is NO excuse for what just happened and you can't spin it to make it sound justified. It's not.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
billythedog
Peterson did not lie about that law. The law was Bill C-16 and it was to follow the guidelines set in the Ontario Human Rights Act. This was to be a guide, not a law, and as such was open to interpretation. There was wording in that Act that could have been interpreted in such a way that a refusal to use gender based pronoun could be interpreted as discriminatory against transgender people. Peterson said that the wording of the legislation was against a person right to not use speech that they didn't want to and if, IF, in capital letters, anyone tried to force him to use any speech, he would refuse. He then said that they could try to force him to use compelled speech by citing this law and the Ontario Human Rights Act by saying that refusal to use that speech was an act of discrimination. If, the word "if" is important here, this was used against him, he would refuse to pay any fines levied against him if that law was interpreted against him.
Hundreds signed petitions against him. He never said he wouldn't use them if negotiated on a one to one basis, but he would refuse if compelled using any legislation but in particular, this one. That was enough to spark the outrage of the masses. One year later, Lindsey Shepherd was told she may have broken a law just showing a clip of a debate Peterson was involved with on an Ontario public TV station. They actually believed that was against the law. Where did they get this idea? From the very legislation that Peterson had argued was wrong.
So, then......who DID lie? Obviously, it wasn't Peterson. If he lied, then why would someone think that Shepherd had broken the law by just showing a debate on gender based pronouns? It was because the Ontario Human Rights Act suggested that she was being discriminatory by even suggesting that it may be a human rights problem to compel speech. It was being interpreted in that way.
He didn't lie at all and if you're really interested, I will even find the sections that deal with it and show them to you.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@diannasalva3116
Yeah, he had the Ukraine government fire the prosecutor, who was investigating his son's boss, threatening to with hold a billion dollars from the Ukraine government if they didn't. He flew that same son of Air Force 2, an official government plane, to China to arrange equity deals in his name. He complained about school desegregation, took part in the biggest deportation program in American history, never campaigned and was STILL elected. A top Chinese official, in a speech, just said that the Chinese government could't control the outgoing president and that he was hurting all the influence that the Chinese had in the American government and bureaucracy. Not like the previous administrations, of which our new president is a part of. Imagine, a president, in bed with a government, that has over a million people in slave labour concentration camps because they don't approve of their religion. A president who said, when all travel to and from China was basically stopped, due to Covid concerns, that these restrictions were xenophobic, meaning "racist".
The corruption has always been bad but now, with a Chinese approved president in place, the American financial bleeding to the Chinese government is going to resume. Oh, well.....still better than a president with orange hair.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@randylachance
Yeah....the dog whistle. Only you and the woke and insightful can hear it and understand it, and Maxwell, of course.
How the hell is he going to let her off? He may not even win the election this fall. There goes that power to let her off. Even if he wins, it's all over in 2024. She'll barely have started her prison term by then.
You're living in a world where every news item is somehow leading back to Trump and is spun into another reason to HATE.
Once you let hate, emotions really, control your life, all logic and reason disappear. Everything becomes about that emotion, in your case, hatred. No objectivity, no chance for redemption for those you hate, no forgiveness or understanding. Hate and more HATE, until rationalising for the violence we've seen the last 2 months becomes logical and reasonable.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Roger King
First of all, it's NOT my country. The world doesn't revolve around the US. Neither did the Atlantic slave trade. More Africans were brought to the Caribbean, Central America, Brazil, Venezuela, and other Southern Nations than the US. So, your 70 million does not apply to the country that you so mistakenly call "my country". It applies to the entire New World. The US is only a part of the New World. Everyone was involved in the slave trade. Europeans, Africans, even Arabs were involved. European mostly traded for slaves but it was the Africans that went into the interior, raided villages and captured slaves for the Atlantic slave trade. So there was fighting but I was not referring to that specific trade when I made that statement. Countries have gone to war for thousands of years and quite often the losers were carried away as slaves. The Romans did this for centuries when they went to northern Europe and after defeating people there, captured them to sell off as slaves back in Rome, some going into the gladiator pits. Even in the Americas, indigenous people would do the same, the most famous being the Aztecs, who would use the slaves for ritualistic human sacrifices.
America became independent in 1783. Before that it was a British colony. 20 years later, the Atlantic slave trade to the US was stopped, in 1807, to be specific. The slave trade was slowly dying in the US, with strong abolitionist movements in the North and the Republican Party was a very strong Abolitionist party formed to fight slavery. It was a slow progression but it DID happen, yet you refuse to give any credit to the hundreds of thousands of European Americans that worked hard and sacrificed it all to end slavery, and 600,000 people did die in that Civil War. It was white American Abolitionists that drew the ire of the south and caused the Civil War, a war that ended slavery. No kudos from you, though for the sacrifice of the Abolitionists or the Government of the US for supporting them.
You'd rather draw the line in the sand and keep up the hate.
Over 90 percent of the slaves went to the Caribbean, Brazil and Latin America. Only 6 percent went to British North America. Plantations in the Caribbean were huge compared to American plantations and death rates were much higher due for the slaves there than it was in the US. Like it or not, "my country" was not the main recipient of the African slave trade.
https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-now/historical-context-facts-about-slave-trade-and-slavery
Read this and read it all. It gives a rounded description of the African slave trade, without the emotionalism and anger that people like you want to inject into the conversation. Also the numbers weren't 70 million slaves brought to the New World. It was closer to 10 to 12 million and 600,000 of those went to the US.
https://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/how-many-slaves-landed-in-the-us/
Read this. It confirms the numbers given in the other reference I've given.
Slavery didn't start with the African slave trade but it was the greatest in numbers and scope. Slavery had been in existence for thousands of years even mentioned in the Bible. That was long before the European settling of the Americas and even any kind of real knowledge of Northern Europe.
I'm not defending slavery either. Another fallacy people like you want to make in your attempt to show moral superiority and maintain the hate in your hearts. I'm saying that slavery is a part of HUMAN history and has been for thousands of years. Pointing fingers and laying blame solves nothing. Anger and hate solves nothing. You'd think that someone who would quote the Bible would know that. "Love the neighbour". It doesn't say to "Love the neighbour except for those who's ancestors might have had slaves." There is no qualification in that admonishment.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Stefan S
Another person that completely misrepresents what he is saying. He's saying that when you're young, like university students are, or you're having deep problems, it's crazy to think that you can fix the world right off the bat. You start by fixing yourself, the individual, and that you're not much good to anyone if you're no good to yourself. "Clean your room" is as much a metaphor as it is a practical way to express the idea that you start small and from there you work your way out to help your immediate family and from there you slowly work your way out into the world.
I don't even know what you mean by "deep shit" trouble we're in or how lone wolfism is how we got here. The west is the richest, most successful, society in human history. Extremely low child mortality rates, high life expectancy, best health care, education and economic opportunities in history and it is all predicated on the idea that each individual is allowed the freedom to express themselves as individuals and to set a course for themselves that maximises their talents as humans in a community.
You have the attitude of one that sees negativity in everything. Life is difficult and is for every living creature on the planet and it has always been that way. Most of us, in the west, live a live style unprecedented in history and so many of us have no appreciation on how good we have it.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@nestorgonzalez6078
If you truly believe that Mexico would pay for a wall just on Trump's say so, you're fooling yourself. Only the most ill informed, uneducated hillbilly, Trump supporter actually believed that. Most of his supporters knew that it was just electioneering posturing. Surely you're not one of those hillbillies that thought this was a legit campaign promise? Would you get real.
That entire argument is irrelevant and you're basing it on an intense dislike of Trump. However, the wall and whether it is necessary or not has nothing to do with Trump. The question is this. Are there criminals and drugs entering the US where the borders are wide open and should the American government do all it can to stop this.
Apparently, the Democrats believe a wall would help. They approved the construction of a wall only 5 short years ago. Shumer even bragged about its construction back then. Why does he oppose it now? What has changed? I can tell you and, deep down, you know exactly what that change is. It's the fact that Donald Trump is the president and they HATE, with a passion, anything that he would suggest or do. It won't matter what it is. If he saves a puppy from drowning, they'd find fault with it. You oppose it because Trump supports it and if you had any sense of integrity, you'd admit it. Your entire comment screams that out.
You don't care whether the wall is good for America or not. You don't want Trump to take credit for it. That's it and nothing else.
6
-
6
-
@bobshenix
If only you could actually speak about any of those issues in a thoughtful and logical manner. However, that seems completely beyond anything that your capable of.
He's discussing ideas, sometimes ideas that appear contradictory and he's trying to see them from all angles. You want opinions and you want ONLY those that you can agree with. You refuse to discuss ideas.
Also, the simplistic "clean your room" analogy has been a great help to a lot of people who've never heard it before. If you don't find it helpful, good for you, but YOU are not the arbiter of all things intelligent or simplistic. Be glad for those who've used that idea to make their lives worth living. However, I don't see that EVER happening. You're too bitter, yet arrogant, and you'd rather tear those people down than allow someone to do something, to help people, in ways that you can't.
You've not said ONE thing that's not been rooted in a bitter heart. I can do nothing buy pity you and you'll never understand why I would do that. If anyone needs to "clean their room" it's you but you'll never understand what I mean by that, either.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@clogs4956
My 12 year old son ran into the same problem with bullies, back in the eighties. He was in grade 6 and a grade 8 student was bullying him almost every day. One day he fought back and punched the bully square in the nose, causing a severe nose bleed. Apparently, he punched the bully and then ran, like a rabbit, to get away. The bully went to a teacher because he couldn't get the bleeding to stop.
My son was called to the principle's office and I was called at work. They were going to suspend my son for a week. My son claimed that this kid had been bullying him and had done so for over a month. When he complained, they told him to avoid the bully, as if that's possible. The school acknowledged that he'd told them but retaliation was still wrong. So now, the bully is the victim and my son was the bad guy and was the ONLY one to getting suspended. That's when I saw the kid that my son punched. Not only was he 3 years older, he must have been a foot taller and our weighed him by at least 30 pounds, a big deal when you're 12. Yet they wanted me to believe that my son was going out of his way to bully the big kid. My son's friends confirmed that this kid was a bully and had went after them on different occasions, as well. Then I found out who the kid's father was. Let's just say that this kid never bullied my son again.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Gary Miller
Why would Americans vote against a president who is at the helm of the best economic climate in decades? That doesn't even make sense. He negotiated a stop to nuclear and missile testing in North Korea. That's great news. He initiated prison reform and the first step program. Something that's been needed for a long time. He instituted an economic plan for depressed zones and it's been great for those who'd take advantage of it. Black unemployment, right now, is at its lowest in history. IN HISTORY!!! Also, the gap between white and black unemployment is at its lowest in history. He's the first president that has taken on the Chinese juggernaut, who've been flooding western stores with cheap products using production methods which include worker abuse, no quality control, no pollution standards, theft of intellectual property and just plain bullying of vulnerable markets. Finally, some one has had the man parts to do something about it.
So the man isn't the most sophisticated man around. He's boorish and a braggart and has a penchant for saying the wrong things but he's getting things done. If only the Democrats would try to cooperate, even a little bit, the US would be even be in a better position economically and socially. Trump's biggest hurdle has been his fellow Americans, the Democrats, the far left and the MSM. They've fought him every step of the way and it's the worst treatment of a sitting president in history.
And you're not helping. Get rid of the Democrats and convince them that they'd better reform and become a party that cares for the citizens of the US and their country.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@Arctc-zh6rg
Almost everyone of those black schools are in the inner city and in cities that have been controlled by a Democrat governments for YEARS. It's the Republicans, the right wing, that are advocating for school choice and the left, the Democrats that are solidly against school choice. They're telling those black parents that they MUST go to the school that has been built for them, no matter how bad that school could be. So it's Democrats that are telling those parents to shut up and do as you're told.
Also, have you listened to Candace Owens? She's a bad role model, for the black community, of someone who's supposed to shut up. Beside, that's not what she's saying. You're putting words in her mouth that aren't there. She's saying to quit thinking like a victim. Quit being silent and demanding things from others because the record shows that they're NOT GOING TO GIVE IT TO YOU. Most of the impoverished inner city have been Democrat run for decades.....the party that supposed to help them and nothing ever changes. The reason is simple. NO ONE is going to help you. You have to help yourself. The capability is there. What's needed is the desire and the left keeps sucking that desire out of the black community with their promises of "hope and change". It's a false promise.
I've already said it. Asians have the most affluent demographic house hold wealth. They do it through hard work. It can be done. Black doctors, nurses, truck drives, tradesmen, lawyers, lab techs, writers, police officers are doing it all the time. They work hard and they make a good life for themselves. They don't feel sorry for themselves about how much harder it is for them. They're going to do it in SPITE of the difficulty. One thing is certain, it's not going to happen, waiting in front of TV set for the government to do it for you. It didn't work 50 years ago, or 40 years ago or 25 years ago and it's not going to work today.
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@newshound2521
The Nazis are left wing Socialists. Hitler, himself, said it countless times. In fact, he was a foot soldier for the Bavarian Soviet Republic, in 1918-9 which was supported by Lenin and his Bolsheviks. When that fell apart, he joined the new Fascist party, a radical socialist party, called the Nazi party. When you read the works and the speeches of Hitler and Mussolini, there's no doubt that this is fact. It was the Marxist intelligentsia, who didn't want to be linked to Fascism after WW2, who peddled the idea that the Nazis were right wing. Read into it. The book "Killing History" by L. K. Samuels is a good start. Thousands of references to written works by prominent Fascists of that era that will back this up.
In fact, the closest government to a Fascist regime, right now, is China, which is no longer a true communist country. It's Fascist, replete with concentration camps and everything.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@johanvanderpants9363
He isn't justifying an innocent man being killed. He's saying that this wasn't a case of the police just going in and killing an innocent man for no reason. This guy was SO concerned for his safety, that he felt he had to sleep with a gun under the blankets with him. Who feels that way? Only one who knows what's going on and the dangers of being where he is.
Tatum is decrying the automated response of those who would cause violence and destruction in protests. It's like I said, you want guarantees in the handling of serious criminals, that nothing would ever go wrong. It's some kind of Utopian vision of perfection and if things don't go perfectly, then you get angry. That guy had better realise that if he doesn't want to be on the wrong side of a police altercation, he'd be advised not to hang out with those who are actively committing serious crimes. Only the most naive or ideological possessed would believe that this guy didn't know what his cousins were up to. He knew and that was why he was up and, in spite of only being partially awake, had a gun in his hand within seconds.
It's too bad that it happened but you either respect the law, which he clearly did not, and be careful who you associate with, or you increase the risk of finding yourself in a bad situation manifold.
If you live by the sword you will die by the sword.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@troyhenry6111
That's the big out. "It's happening in colleges". You have the shows, invite people of ALL ages, and then tell everyone that it's NOT happening IN the schools. Just like the time they took kids to a drag show, parents and teachers, and there was a sign there that said "It's not going to lick itself". Primary school age children were in attendance along with teachers and parents. It didn't happen at school.
Why are these drag queens asked to read, anyway? In all the years that I went to school, I've NEVER had outsiders come to class and read to us. It didn't happen with my kids, either. So why drag queens? Why not mailmen, accountants, police officers or carpenters? There's a reason why they're bringing in drag queens to read. Its an introduction to a lifestyle that they would NEVER be exposed to otherwise.....what some would call "grooming". You start small and you build on it. It's incremental. They're not bringing in burlesque performers to read, in full regalia. There's a reason why it's drag queens.
Even the possibility should make you recoil in horror and support the laws prohibiting it. However, I hear TOO many people fighting those laws with "It's NOT happening". All that does is allow some ideologues, in schools, to be able to do those things and then saying that there's no law against it.
It's just NOT necessary. PERIOD.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@queent3343
Haven't you seen any of the school board meetings where parents were reading from books that were recommended reading for primary school children. Some of it so explicit that the school board members told the parents that it was too offensive to read at this meeting, yet those books were in the classroom and school library. Maybe you should see the TikTok videos about the teachers of kindergarten to grade 3, talking about their sexuality, holding pride parades for the little tykes, drag queen story time and more.
Besides, even if none of this was true (which it isn't), why not make sure that teachers don't talk about sexually explicit material to little kids whether it be LGBTQ or STRAIGHT. It's just not necessary.
What's really strange is that Dave Rubin and his husband have been guests of Desantis and he even congratulated them on the adoption of their little babies. Why would a man, who supposedly hates gays, do that? You're the one that so filled with hate that you won't dig deeper into the topic. You WANT the divide. It makes you feel superior somehow that you're better than those "bigots".
Watch "The Quartering" here on YouTube. He's got all kinds of videos showing teachers who brag about how they've come out to their students of a very young age and how good it makes them feel. What kind of narcissism, must a person have, to find validation from 6 year olds? Why would a teacher even talk about their personal life let alone their sexual preferences to little kids? It's just plain weird.
5
-
5
-
@emmawillard1832
Years ago, my dog made onto the voting list. Don't ask me how. My wife had painted his name on his doghouse and that's the only way anyone could have gotten his name. It was weird. Fortunately, we live in a small town and when I went to vote, one of the poll workers asked me who "George" was. I knew most of them and apparently they'd already been asking who George was when my dad came in to vote. He had no idea. I told them that my dog was named "George" and as we were the only family with our last name in that VERY small town, it was easy for the poll workers to spot. Of course, my dog didn't vote. It was a stupid mistake made by election workers under a bad system.
The American voting system is shot. Why don't we fix it so these things don't happen. NO WAY. We'd rather argue over the ridiculous things than just fix it so it doesn't happen. Foreigners on voting lists in Virginia. Problems in Lancaster, Penn. Likely charges in Colorado and Arizona. Allegations of ballot harvesting in Detroit. A man torching a drop box. Another trying to steal a drop box. None of this should be happening but let's not fix it. It's racist to show ID to vote.
Accusations of fraud in 2000, 2004, 2016, 2020 and now it's already starting in 2024....but we don't need to fix it. Let's just keep it so our elections are disputed, FOREVER. Other countries are laughing at us. They don't have those problems. In a lot of countries you get a voting registration card that's specific to you, like a bank card. No card.....no vote. However, people would start crying in America because that's too difficult for some people.
It's a joke.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
John Toas
Yet, Inuit have eaten almost exclusively meat for over one thousand years. So, it would seem that their bodies have evolved to, not only live on that diet, but to thrive on it, in an extremely harsh environment. It would also seem that humans lived on meat, in northern Europe and Asia for 30,000 years. Over the harsh winters of the Ice Age, meat would have been the only food source for long periods of time. They were able to live on it because their ancestors, coming from Africa, had also lived on meat, through hunting and scavenging. This has been going on for millions of years. No matter how you spin it, we've adapted to living on a omnivorous diet and it has become a legacy that goes back into the deepest recesses of human history. As a matter of fact, there is a lot of evidence to suggest that human tool building started as a method to more easily access bone marrow and developed to more easily cut meat away from the bone. Also, had humans not used the skins of their prey, they'd never have settled in the northerly regions of the planet. It's a direct result of hunting animals for food and adapting the skins of the carcasses for warmth.
If eating meat is bad for you, we'd have died off, as a species, a long time ago.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@shaniajackson7864
You can't even tell which brand of Christianity is the correct one. Is it the Roman Catholic Church? The Presbyterian Church? How about Calvinism or the Amish? Millions died and were persecuted trying to sort that out. Furthermore, it's the belief in God that matters, not the ideology. Ideology is the man made construct and Christianity has splintered into all kinds of factions. We, as humans, don't have the wisdom to distinguish each facet of the teachings of the Bible and 2 people could read the same passage in their Bible and come to different conclusions to its meaning.
That's was a major reason why the founding fathers of the US allowed freedoms. They wanted to avoid the endless wars and deaths that plagued Europe for centuries. Freedom of speech, of religion, of assembly, all the basic principles of the Constitution, that will allow us all our own path to live our life the way that God granted us. The Apostles never once advocated that Christians force anyone to believe in Jesus. The only thing important was faith and that was something that was lost in the Middle Ages and was slowly brought back, starting with the Reformation and culminating in the American Constitution.
Also, the Kingdom of Heaven will never be attained on earth. Jesus told us that, explicitly. Any attempt to force it or say that Christianity is the only way, negates the fact that we're still human and as such we will pervert his way. That's a guarantee. The realisation will come with the Kingdom of Heaven, not by the Evangelicals, who believe that they have the right to tell me how to believe or what to believe.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@23wtb
I have a time machine. I call him "Dad". He's now 89 and both my parents grew up in war time Holland. They know what a real Nazi is and Dad talks about their reprehensible behaviour all the time. My mother, as she didn't have a father, nearly starved to death, near the end of the war, because Nazis confiscated as much food as they could get their hands on. 25,000 of the most poor, starved to death, and if hadn't been for the Allies air dropping food, the total would have been much worse.
When a political party enacts draconian measures, for an insurrection in which tens of thousands of people showed up, without guns....mind you and then go home....you're using a tactic that would make Hitler envious. Purging the military and other American services of dissenting voices is also autocratic and something that a Hitler would have done.
So....spare us the sarcasm.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@kulturfreund6631
Boyle, a left wing, anti-semitic conspiracy guy. He's one of those guys who crop up at every crisis like this and starts on about how this is all part of some nefarious plot by the powers that rule the world, invariably all Zionists.
He has some points that are worth listening to, especially concerning the war in Lebanon but this video is a mishmash of "may haves" and "it would appears". If this were true, why isn't the information in the papers that he showed the highlights from, available to all and to the media at large? I'm not even close to convinced and no matter what, the plague started in Wuhan, China and spread from there.
I just don't have enough information to know whether this is the only such lab in China or whether there are many more. If more, than no matter what happens, there would likely be a lab close by that would validate his theories. He just hasn't involved any other real solid voices to lend credence to anything he's saying.
We need a lot more evidence than what he's presented. I don't like to engage in gossip. My neighbour, when I was growing up, was a gossip and I didn't like her one bit.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
If I change my name, it's up to me to change my ID if that's how I want to be legally known. If I don't, then I can't vote using my new name. That's NOT a trans issue. It's just common sense.
I'm called Jack and everyone in my small town calls me that. If someone is looking for me around town and uses my real name, Jacob, they've made it extremely difficult to find me. When I go to vote, I use the name that no one uses because that's what's on my driver's licence, personal ID, my credit cards and my passport. There's a legal process that could change my name from Jacob to my nickname, Jack, and if I want to be legally known as Jack, I have to use that process.
What a bizarre way of looking at a voter ID mandates. If your new identity and name means so little to you, that you won't even take the time to change it legally, then you're creating your own problem. Also, no one cares about gender when voting, anymore. It's irrelevant to the voting process.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@matthewcurry3565
Ok. Here it goes
30 years ago, I found out my wife was having an affair. It devastated me and I left her for obvious reasons. 7 months later, my son was killed in an accident and my mother was diagnosed with terminal cancer 2 months later. I was a mess. I quit working, drank too much and was heading down a terrible road. After 3 years, I started a job at a scrap yard, which may seem like something but it wasn't that big a deal at the time. In reality, it was a place to go and drink. There was beer in the fridge at all times and if I took a day or week off, no big deal. They weren't going to fire me and they said so. I even got paid for days I took off.
However, I slowly started to go to work when I was there. I got out of the office and started to do things that had to be done, much to the chagrin of my alcoholic boss. It was then that the yard was sold and things changed. I started to do the work that I was expected and supposed to do. It fell right into the pattern that I'd been slowly immersing myself into. They fired everyone, except me, and I worked alone for 2 years, rebuilding a clientele that had been lost when the old owner had it. It was a long struggle, a lot of days, in the beginning, where I never saw a soul, but it was the best thing in the world for me. I was showing up every day. I stayed later when needed. I was metaphorically cleaning my room. The drinking slowed down. I was finding peace in my life and all it took was doing the things that I should be doing.
When I heard him explain his "Clean your room" trope, it spoke to me. I was lucky, though. I came from a farming background where the virtues of hard work were extolled as a virtue. It was something that I had been accustomed to. However, if a person had grown up in suburbia and the toughest thing that they did growing up was take out the garbage once a week, that idea would never occur to them, UNLESS it was outlined by someone who had the power to communicate ideas in a powerful manner and Peterson is just that. A lot of young people would never have worked their way out of severe depression because they'd have never, metaphorically cleaned their room.
I reconnected with my daughter, have 3 wonderful grandchildren. I have a closer relationship with my ageing father than what I've ever had my entire life. Things aren't perfect, that's a life's impossibility but I'm contented. All it took was for me to take care of business, slowly at first, just like his "clean your room" suggested but I made my life worth living. That translated into making things better for those around me.
It's small. It's simple. It's trite but it's real.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
geezusispan
You've never lived in a country that's been occupied by a foreign power, have you? You've never seen foreign soldiers marching down your streets, entering your homes, taking everything made of metal, food, books, magazines, radios or arresting people with no charges. Never watched your countrymen, including women and children hungry and even starving due to the brutal callousness of a foreign government.
If you had, you'd start to appreciate those soldiers, who you have the temerity to call "pawns", and put their lives on the line so you can live without the spectre of horror an invading army can impose on you.
It's a sad part of reality that we do need soldiers to defend our country, but what's sadder is your lack of respect for their efforts.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@middlegroundparty9436
Yeah.....you're right. We want the guy hiding in his basement. We want the guy that's been in politics for 47 years and still has no platform. We want the guy that Pelosi doesn't want to get involved in a presidential debate. We want the guy that's represents the party that said that Jacob Blake was breaking up a fight, trying everything in their power to start racial tension.....and they succeeded. A small city, burned and looted, people killed....WHY? Because the party of the guy, hiding in his basement, didn't care to wait for the truth. That Jacob Blake was wanted for sexual assault, had a restraining order against him and was in violation on that order. Who took a woman's keys and then resisted arrest. Millions of dollars in damages, lives ruined, that's that guy we want for president. We want the guy, that represents the party, that said that the riots and looting were a myth. Riots in Portland, Seattle, Oakland, New York, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Richmond, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Austen, Louisville, Chicago, Rochester......must I go on and that party ignores it or calls it all a myth. People killed...at least 30 of them in those riots or "peaceful protests" as the Democrats and their media likes to call them. You want the guy that wants to raise taxes, denies inner city people the right to school choice while they send their own children to the best private schools in the country. The party of Mayor Lightfoot, who wouldn't send the police to quell the looting in downtown Chicago but then threatened to arrest any "protesters" peaceful or not, around her house. You want the party that put Covid patients in nursing homes. Democrat governors from New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California.
Yeah......you sure want the good ones, don't you. TDS is a serious ailment. You may want to get it looked after.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@bipslone8880
Isn't it weird when the woke needs safe spaces because "words are violence", they're not crybabies but when banking information is passed to authorities, without warrants, people lose their jobs because of words, have their businesses burned and destroyed, they're the crybabies.
I'm not allowed to disagree with the woke culture, in any aspect, or the corporate media will censor you, and I'm the crybaby. My little sister used to running to mommy when I said bad words, too. I used to call her a crybaby. Funny how the world hasn't really changed. I still have that metaphoric little sister crying over my use of words and the ideas that they don't like.
Are you going to have me doxxed, now?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@nandy1256
He does. He set up a task force on Jan. 27th. Democrats and the media criticised him, saying it was filled with old white men. He stopped travel to China on the 31st, along with Italy, the first 2 countries to do so. Biden called him xenophobic and, if you watched the video, so did NY politicians and told their constituents to go on as normal and suggested if you didn't, you were racist. He expanded the task force and put his vice president at the helm so the task force would be close to him. He's on TV everyday, talking about the crisis. He's had conversations with every governor of the US....all 50 of them. Sure, he said, in Mid Feb. that it wasn't serious yet, and it wasn't yet, it had the potential at that time, but he sure didn't do what those politicians in NY did, and as late as March 11th. That's why NY was hit so hard.
The same thing happened in Italy. They closed the borders and the following day, Mayor Nardello, of Florence, said it was racist and the good Italians should show the Chinese citizens and tourists that they weren't blaming them. That, in spite of the fact that the first 2 cases in Italy were Chinese tourists from Wuhan. The next few days people were going around hugging Chinese tourist. I don't have to tell you what happened there.
The New York pandemic didn't come from China directly. It got there through Italy and both Italy and New York were cursed with stupid politicians.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@musashi939
I know. We should do NOTHING. If reports from France say that they've had success with those drugs, why listen? That would be stupid. Even the good doctor, standing with him, has said that it's worth looking into but pay no attention to the guy. DO NOTHING. Don't see if there's something to it. Just dismiss it because.....you know....reasons.
I don't know if it works or not but tell you what, if I were sick and that's ALL there was, I'm taking it and hope for the best. You can grouse all you want, in the sick bed beside me, but I'm still going for it. When there's nothing yesterday, a glimmer of hope today is better than what I had yesterday. If you can't see that, I really have to question why that would be. Are you always that pessimistic about everything or is this your own personal gripe about Trump? Easy to do when you're not sick, though, isn't it?
5
-
@abcxyz2927
I grew up with an neighbour with gender dysphoria. Not 10 years ago, or even 20. I met the guy in 1958, when i was 6 years old and he was 4. He looked like a boy, had the bowl cut all of boys had, wore boys clothes and everything, but he acted like a girl. The way that he talked and walked, the way that he moved, everything about him was girlish. He really freaked us out. His brother told me that he was always like that. His parents were embarrassed with the way he was. When he was 16, he took off to the big city and started to live as a cross dresser.
Why was he like that? It wasn't his parents who dressed him as a boy and gave him a boy's name and haircut and were at a loss on what to do with him. There were no activist teachers or doctors trying to convince him that he was a girl. We were country folk, many of us religious, including his family. He did it all on his own, right from the time that he started to walk and talk. How could a 3 year old dream all this up and then keep it up his entire life?
It's a mental condition, just like Tourette's and any other mental affliction. It's been well studied and it's been a part of humanity for thousands of years. It's NOTHING like the stuff that's going on now. Not even close. From what I can see, Buck Angel is the same and he's speaking out against the insanity that's going on now.
If we can't even be reasonable and admit that this could be a medical problem and that the cutting and pasting of body parts isn't going to solve anything, we'll be ruining the lives of children for years....all at the behest of socialist activists. Their role is to disrupt the concept of reality and they're using children to do it. That's what socialists do. They take a real problem, that's extremely rare, and distort it to their own ends. If you don't understand it, you're falling right into their hands.
Don't let them do that. You're a sucker if you do.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Network Search
Unfortunately, it's not just Biden. It's the entire Democrat Party. Look at the devastation in Minneapolis. The Democrats have been in power for decades and yet they haven't done anything to improve their own city police force. However, worse than that, Democrat Ellison had possession of the body cam that showed that the police officers weren't being at all too harsh on George Floyd and refused to show it. Now they want to abolish that police force but that Democrat city council did vote themselves a personal security detail. Wow.
Then the fiasco in Portland. 74 nights in a row....IN A ROW, of violence and destruction. The Democrat mayor stood right next to rioters as the shot high grade fireworks at the court house and watched them try to tear down the barrier that was put up around that building. Yet, somehow that's Trump's fault. Then, Nadler just blithely says that it's all a myth. New York, now there's another mess. Almost 500,000 people have left. They're talking a 30 billion dollar shortfall this year. 13,000 homeless people put up in high end hotels at 175 bucks a pop at the Upper East Side. Now they have people passing out on the streets, urinating and masturbating in public, yelling at people walking by. They're not wearing masks like everyone else in New York is supposed to. Crime is up in the area by almost 250% with murders more than double in the City over last year. Louisville, Kentucky city council wants to name racism as a public health threat. At the same time BLM reps are going from store to store demanding hiring quotas and forcing businesses to buy from black owned businesses or else give BLM 1.5% of the business revenue. Legalised extortion....but the Democrat leaders don't do a thing. I could go on about this for hours....non stop.
So no, it isn't just Biden. Biden just represents the incredible blindness of the entire Democrat party.
It's like Trump hired the entire bunch of them to make him look good and that's not an easy thing to do.
5
-
@AllAboutMusicMovies
I never ONCE wrote a narrative. I said that this person could have made a good point and he MAY have, that's not a narrative, just a possibility, said this because it was a concern. He may have been screaming at people about it or he MAY have said something along the lines of "I've said this lots of time but I think...." I DON'T KNOW.....but apparently you know enough about this person to call him and extremist. I'm saying that you don't have enough information to do that.
Also, you've assumed that this person is American. It doesn't state where this person is from. You just assumed it for no real reason. Another narrative that you've wrote for yourself.
Then I said that I don't like to live in fear and then, somehow and incomprehensibly, you asked me if I was afraid and then made an assumption that I was American. Now 2 of us are American...or even possibly 3 of us and you did this without knowing any of us.
The commenter was responding to an original point about the psychological effects being worse than the disease. She says that she has a friend that says the same thing and this friend has said it multiple times. Then you come up with how afraid Americans are and how Sweden didn't have those crazy lockdowns, which kind of validates what she was talking about. That this fear CAN be psychologically worse than the disease like it is in the US. I didn't say that, YOU did. It seems as if you agree with him but I don't know. However, your statement does suggest that.
Then you go on about Trump letting it spread. So I asked a rhetorical question. Does Trump rule the world......meaning does he have that much influence that the entire world is gripped with Covid and it's all his fault? The disease was spreading in Italy before it started to spread in the US...like I've mentioned and I'm sure that Trump wasn't responsible for that. Also, you're the one that brought up Sweden and Europe and there's been some severe lockdowns in Europe and some awful riots in protest in England, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany. So the US isn't the only place that's living in fear. As a matter of fact, we are here in Canada, too.
Now the economy is hurting. I know people that have lost their businesses. The US is in even worse shape. Another area of our lives where the fear of Covid might have consequences that may make things worse than the disease. The point made is not exactly without merit.
I've not wrote any narrative about anyone else. I've laid out possibilities by using myself as an example. A possibility is NOT a narrative. It's laying out an idea. Yet, that prompted you to suggest that I must be an extremist as well. Nice leap of logic there.
I'm not the one that started calling people names. That's all I can say about the subject.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@bruvlord1133
And every a-hole in the city keeps voting Democrat. Every time....for 50 or 60 years, sometimes over 100 years. What do the Democrats care? They just keep doing what they've always done.
Do you think the Republicans would be any better? Who knows? The corrupt Democrats, in all those cities, have never been challenged....EVER. If they were, maybe they'd have to clean up their act, but that's not going to happen because the Democrats have them convinced that, under the Republicans, it will be worse. Like...WHAT!!!! How can it get worse in the inner city?
I'm not a big fan of Trump but, my God, what do you have to lose? If you have nothing, you can't lose anything.
5
-
@OneNewHope
I don't own a Confederate flag and don't want one. I'm NOT Republican but I know ONE thing. If I live in a voting district, where life for certain demographics, NEVER improves, I'm not voting for the group that has been in power for decades in the hopes that they'll fix it. I'd vote for anyone else.
But, go ahead, keep voting for the Democrat politicians, in those cities. Decades, in which there's been no change, is a sure sign that they'll change in the future. LOL.
It's telling that you're attacking me, instead of addressing the issues that I've brought up. Homelessness, garbage, human feces, needles, high rent, a bloated bureaucracy, high crime rates, and, like this video pointed out, corruption.....you don't want to discuss that. No way. You want to talk about my hypothetical Confederate flag and the supposed lack of education. You use one of the basic logical fallacies. Engaging in personal attacks instead of centering on the real problem called ad hominem attacks.
Well done.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@rgsand01
Because Mayor De Blasio and Governor Cuomo are telling them not to get involved. Let the rioters loot and burn. They're not supporting the police, the businesses or the public....AT ALL. The police can't act on its own, no more than the military can. A Navy captain of a battleship can't just sail into a foreign city and start blasting away without orders from the top. Police officers can't start arresting people when their superiors tell them not to, superiors who are getting their orders from the Mayor. If they went against their bosses and arrested rioters, the rioters would just be let go and the police officers involved would be reprimanded or let go.
Mayor De Blasio won't use force to stop the rioting criminals but he's just fine with those criminals destroying the lives and property of innocent people. He'll do that till they're at his front door. Then, just like that idiot Chris Palmer, the sports announcer, who cheered on the rioters, until they showed up at his neighbourhood, he'll call in the police and National Guard and call the rioters criminals. When it hurts him, THEN you'll see him act.
The worst mayor in the US, although the mayor in Minneapolis is running a close second.
5
-
@wickedwood04
Where did I say "election fraud". I mentioned an article about Hunter Biden's laptop in which his father, who is on the ticket, was implicated in some crooked dealings in China and Ukraine. That does have implications in an election. And do you really want Big Tech to curtail that information. To have the government, like Jen Psaki said, to work with Facebook to flag "misinformation"? Do we now have a governmental department called the "Ministry of Truth"? Since when is it up to anyone to tell me what is true or not? I'm not like you. I don't want to be TOLD what's true. I want to see the evidence, good and bad, even fake, so I can assess it for myself, like a free thinking adult.
Also, how is asking for ID making it harder to vote? Every western country requires ID to vote. Even a corrupt country like Mexico does. I know that Canada, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Japan....I could go on and on, require voter ID when voting. It's so people can't jump from voting precinct to voting precinct to vote repeatedly. Funny how voter ID is racist but vaccine passports, that require ID isn't. Are we going to exempt certain people from showing vaccine passports because it's racist? Also, anyone can request a mail in ballot. That would give that ballot a chain of possession which is completely different than sending ballots, en masse, through the mail.
If you can explain how the Republicans are making voting harder, with EVIDENCE, I'll look at it but I have to warn you. I read the entire Georgia voting bill, the "Jim Crow 2.0" bill and found nothing. That entire claim was bogus.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I've always said that socialists are transgressing one of the Ten Commandments, the Big Ten, as I like to call them. It took me years to understand the significance of this commandment but it's when I began to study economic ideologies that I began to understand. Coveting inspires resentment, than anger, then rage and finally retaliation. It doesn't build, it takes from those that their rage is directed at. I'm not religious at all, but it amazes me that people, living well over 2000 years ago, understood this basic principle of the human condition. Yet, in spite of numerous examples, of the relationship between coveting and socialism, people still don't get it, today.
5
-
5
-
@elenawilliams32
My dad grew up during WW2, in the Netherlands. He watched Nazi soldiers march past the family farm when they entered his country. Yet, he never saw ONE Jew being arrested or murdered. NOT a one.
Does that mean that the holocaust never happened? Of course not. Just because you've never seen these things happen in your school, that doesn't mean that it doesn't happen or hasn't happened. The world doesn't exist around your personal experiences. Also, NO one is blaming ALL teachers. They're blaming the system for allowing it, sometimes endorsing it and forcing teachers to go along with it if just ONE teacher, in your school district, does do it.
I can give you a list of 500 FEMALE teachers, who have sexually molested students, all across the United States. I've never met one, so does that negate the veracity of that list? Of course not.
You've offered a very poor argument.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@trh-bee4383
I WORK in a bar. I can't do that from home. My boss is afraid that her business won't survive another lockdown. Before that, I worked in a factory. My old co-workers can't make paper from home, either.
It's great for all the big corporate chains. They run the small guys out of business, because they can absorb the losses, and those chains just GROW and GROW.
Did you know that, since the pandemic started, that this is the first time in almost 30 years that abject poverty, around the world, has gone UP? That poverty rates have been going down, at unbelievable rates, until Covid? That our supply chain is in serious jeopardy? Inflation is on the rise, getting back to what it was in in 1980, when mortgage rates were over 20%. What happens if those days return and they will if we keep locking everything down. The tax base is eroding, yet we need more money to support people who are told to STAY HOME. We are in a spiral and we're so afraid of the Covid monster that we can't see anything else. If we have a world economic collapse, similar to the Great Depression, tens of millions could starve to death, around the world, and Covid would STILL be with us.
Already the consequences are starting to rear their ugly heads and those ugly heads will get uglier and meaner if we keep stopping our economy. But at least YOU won't get Covid. LOL. As if we'll be able to control Covid if the collapse does come.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@toddhellyar4167
That's a issue with me. I'm rather agnostic about a God, but I see no evidence of his existence. So, I'm always on the side of the atheist in a discussion.
However, I think that the discussion should go deeper than that. I've often wondered why it is that, no matter what time in history or where in the world you go, everyone had religious beliefs. Everyone. Why is that? They can't ALL be delusional. There has to be something about human psychology that almost makes a belief system important to who we are. Even the left wingers, who swear that they don't believe in God, still have their ideology that can't be challenged. They even have their own swear words that you can't say or off to the metaphorical Gulag you go.
So, while I'm extremely dubious of the existence of God, I'm thinking that the belief in what our Gods represent has been important to our society, existence and even survival. I will say though that some ideologies are better than others. That's for certain. There is almost no ideology as bad as radical socialism.....except maybe one and the radical socialists seem to like the radicals of that religion for some unfathomable reason.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@ShnoogleMan
There is only one issue that I have with your argument. There are a lot of people that didn't think that the statue of Lee should have been removed. Not Nazis, not white supremacists, but ordinary people who believe that ALL aspects of our history should be honoured and remembered, even the negative. It should be remembered because it highlights that we are all human and the fight for human rights took hundreds, thousands of years and is still ongoing.
Are you seriously saying that because Nazis have their own reasons for letting that statue remain, these ordinary citizens can't have their own, separate opinions on the subject? The US is still a free country and people can believe as they want and not be pigeonholed into categories by those who would use it against them. They had every right to voice their opinion and they have every right to oppose Nazism and white supremacy, as well.
You painted a lot of people with a wide brush and not only is it unfair, it's dogmatic in nature. Like that woman, described in the NY Times, who went there and was NOT a part of the "Unite the Right" rallies, she has EVERY right to feel that the statue should remain. To call her a de facto Nazi is nothing but an attempt to silence an argument that might have merit.
4
-
@ShnoogleMan
There were NO peaceful conservatives at the events at Charlottesville? You know this how? All those who were in favour of keeping the statue of Lee standing were all violent Nazis. That's quite an assumption and you have no way of proving that.
Statues can bring about conversations and spark an interest in the time or the statue and the struggles involved. Not everyone is a reader and I've spent hours, in museums, staring at paintings and sculptures of people and events of the past, some of which I hadn't heard of before and I'm an avid reader. It brings into context history, human frailty, struggle and pain. It also helps to bring understanding instead of a pervasive atmosphere of fault and blame. History, the world and humans are complex and we need to see it from ALL angles, not just the preferred narratives of those with agendas. It's why freedom is so important.
Lastly, Trump explicitly denounced Nazism and white supremacy. Whether there were good people on both sides are irrelevant if he believed that not all people on the 2 sides were there for violence and hatred. Basically saying that just because you believe that the statue must go or stay, doesn't automatically make you an evil person.
Then you bring up the Nazi statue argument. My family suffered greatly under the heel of Nazi occupation. My mother nearly starved to death over the winter of 45, eating only pencil sized eel for days at a time. I went, with my uncle, to the Jewish detention camp at Westerbork, a camp he was imprisoned in for almost 6 weeks and he told me of the horrors that he endured and witnessed. He wasn't Jewish so he went to a POW camp and was forced to work in the kitchens for 2 years. However, I had to work with a man who was in the SS as did others who were wounded fighting the Nazis and lost family to them. Was it our duty to hate this guy until the day he died? The war was over and we had to lay down our arms, in reality and metaphorically. We had to work together, sit together and talk to one another and try to understand why it all had to happen. Either that or we become the executioners, open our own death camps and or maybe just stew in our hate till the day we die. The victims of those times chose to forgive and live on. Of course not all of them but the large percentage of them did. What's really ironic is that those who were the direct victims of Nazi actions are more willing to forgive than those who've never had a Nazi hand raised to them.
Also, it isn't as if America invented slavery. Slavery has been an accepted part of humanity for thousands of years and endured through that millennia. The 19th century saw the end to slavery as being culturally and socially accepted. It was a terrible struggle, not just in the US, but in many other places. It might be more advantageous to offer an olive branch towards one another instead of fighting that war into eternity. Let's try to remember those that lived in those times with understanding, instead of hatred and anger. Not one of us lived their lives or experienced those times and have no right to judge them as our inferiors.
Do I like Nazi ideology? No, emphatically.....NO. However, I would never show up at a Nazi rally, today, armed with clubs, mace and or any weapons, ready to fight. I might decry what they're trying to accomplish, but, right now, we're not a war and I would hope that we, as civilised humans, have progressed enough to fight them with logic and reason and not with brute strength. Reserve that as the last option. Antifa tactics are not the way to defeat ideology and I stand against them as strongly as I do Nazism.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
That's funny. I had a guy tell me that Trump is a liar. He lies about everything, he said. "A politician that lies" I said, in return "Say it ain't so!!".
In spite of the rough edges, I sure wish Trump was back. I never felt this uncomfortable when he was president, even during the year of Covid. Now it's inflation, high gas prices, war ramping up, illegals flocking in, trouble on the border with Canada with trucking, supply chain issues, and SPENDING. INSANE SPENDING. Biden has got to go as soon as possible.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
l8nightboy
So...you'd rather vote for those who're being supported by the establishment Wall St. cronies. The ones that want to maintain the sweet Chinese gravy train. If I were part of swamp, I'd vote blue, myself. No more big deposits, into offshore accounts, by big Chinese interests. No more sweet contracts in a country that has few, if any, environmental laws, quality control, worker's rights or safety standards. Those executives at the multinationals love you for voting for them to continue eating at the Democrat and Chinese trough. Voting for censorship? Why not? We don't need to know about potential corruption of the Biden family. Only if it was Trump doing it. And group identity politics....isn't that great stuff. I know I love it. Each on of us judged by our skin colour and if you dare to step outside your designated place in society, you know get uppity like this "nodding" woman, we'll set you straight. And pretending that the riots are happening. I love it. Burn down someone's business because you're enraged, "Day of Rage", what a concept, is good if you support the Democrats or at least the left.
I don't blame you though. Trump says stupid things. That's WAY worse than stuff I'm talking about.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Leo Weisberger
Socialism definition:
"a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."
An economy owned or regulated by the community. That's socialism. What I described was a social program. No nation can exist without social programs. The military, transportation, a court system and more, are programs that are not best to the whims of powerful individuals but as the purview of elected officials, chosen by people as their representatives.
However, the economy, should be at the direction of those same people, based on the will of a free market and those who would answer the needs of those individuals, in the market, who choose how those needs are met. Socialism, as stated in the definition that I copied from a dictionary, does not meet the standards that I just set.
When Bernie Sanders said the he wanted to change the US into a socialist state, similar to that of the Scandinavian countries, the Prime Minister of Denmark informed him that Denmark was NOT a socialist country. He said it was a free market system with strong social safety nets.
In Canada, we have a social medical system, as it is felt that our health has no market value. I cannot use my health as collateral to get a loan and a country does not assess its financial status using the health of its citizens as a financial asset. Assets are judged on production of market goods. If the market is controlled by the people, ostensibly, by the government as their representative, it is a socialist system. If it's a free market system, beholden only to the market itself and the rule of law, then it is NOT socialism.
I advocate for a free market economy. I also acknowledge that a community must also pool together to support the areas that cannot be at the whims of a free market, the areas not involved in the production of goods that accrue wealth.
I paid into my pension. It's mine, NOT the government's. I'm owed it because I paid into it, just like any other pension.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@eoin8450
A lot of this is semantics. If the definition of socialism is control of the economy by the state, then fascism is a form of socialism. It's all a matter of control of the economy. Capitalism is free market, no control, except rule of law, the law which even the state must adhere to. State capitalism would be an oxymoron. It's freedom with control by the state by decree of the state with the law put down by the state. You can't have both, a free market and a state run economy.
To me, it's the left/right culture description that doesn't make sense. I see freedom, in it's purest form, on the far right, total anarchy. However, that kind of freedom imposes a tyranny of its own. So, we introduce the rule of law, overseen by the state but a state subject to that rule of law. As you move further left, the rule of law loses its power and the state gathers more power and starts to control the economy, gathering each corporate board under its power until power is completely gained under a state run economy. The journey finally ends in total macro and micro control of the economy and society and we're at a communist state. To me, that makes more sense than the state in control at both ends of the left/right paradigm. No control at one end and total control at the other.
4
-
4
-
@jasminelindros8923
Funny how, at the time of Shokin's firing, Burisma's owner and founder, Mykola Zlochevsky and Hunter Bidens's boss, was hiding in London and had 23 million dollars in bank assets, frozen by the Ukraine government, for suspected corruption. I repeat, Zlochevsky was Hunter Biden's boss. A few months AFTER Shokin was fired, the charges against Zlochevsky were dropped, the 23 million bucks were released and Zlochevsky returned to Ukraine. It didn't take long and he was under suspicion of another corrupt act and he's out of the country again, avoiding the Ukraine feds.
I guess asking about the circumstances is deeper meddling in foreign politics than insisting on firing senior politicians or lose money. Party loyalty sure makes for strange logic.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@JoseRobles-fv9zm
The US has a population of 330,000,000 people. It would take the populations of Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the UK and Sweden, and they'd still be a little short, to match that population. Funny thing is that they have 40,000 MORE deaths than the US.
Less people.......40,000 more deaths. The EU isn't all that good at this either, it would appear. It could be all Trump's fault, though. He has been to France and the UK.
You've got a bad argument there.
4
-
4
-
4
-
@shanecorning5222
Now you're just spouting talking points. They just didn't come in and start killing and raping. That would have been impossible as they were vastly outnumbered. What did happen was that tribes made alliances with the Europeans to help them in their wars with each other. For example, Cortez would never have defeated the Aztecs if it hadn't been for the help of their Tlaxcaltec allies. Many tribes hated the Aztec because they were the local powerhouse. It's the same in North America. Champlain encountered the Huron and upon seeing the French weapons, the Huron thought that they should try them out on their arch enemies, the Iroquois. This set the tone for the history of North East America for 150 years.
Also, the blanket thing is also a myth. There is only one verifiable time that it was used and that was at Fort Pitt, now Pittsburgh and they're not even sure if it worked or not as there was a smallpox outbreak already among the local settlers. If smallpox was already there, Natives could have gotten it from the settlers NOT from the blankets.
These are just points of contention that modern day identity politics play. It's not just with the natives either. Everything is about finding grievance and being offended. I have a good friend, who is native and he was taken, as a 6 year old, an placed in a government school. However, his family lived in a remote area and they were living in extreme poverty. As bad as this practise seemed, he may not have survived had they not taken him out of the area due to the changing environment. He also told me that his great great grandparents were cannibals and not too well liked by the other tribes in the area.
You see, the natives are people, just like us. No better and no worse. When you demonise a group of people, you engender hatred and that NEVER leads to anything good.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@mauriciomarchena9111
De Niro said "f--k Trump" and got huge laughs and applause. Actually said it. Griffin held a likeness of Trump's severed head like a trophy. Madonna said, in a public speech, that she dreams of blowing up the White House, referring to Trump being the president. She also received applause for saying it.
All this guy said was "Let's go Brandon". We know what that means but really.....he's now an insurrectionist? He, an average American citizen, should have his business destroyed, lose everything that he owns, for saying something that isn't even close to what some of the suggestions around Trump were about. Leave the poor guy alone, media and your acolytes. It was a joke, maybe in poor taste, but that's all it was.
4
-
4
-
4
-
My adopted niece spent 2 years in a hospital, waiting for a kidney transplant. Her kidney problems are the result of abuse from her drug addicted mother, who neared starved her to death when she was 3 years old. She finally got her kidney when she was 15.
However, she's had rejection issues and it's been a struggle ever since, but that didn't stop her. She's now in her mid twenties, married and a mother, even though the doctors told her that child birth might kill her. Her little boy is now one year old and my niece refused to let her husband get up and tend to the baby in the middle of the night, in spite of her health issues. She gets up cheerfully, smiling and singing softly to her little one, saying that her husband works 50 to 60 hours a week and needs the rest.
When I hear a full grown man, who has the world by its privates, carry on about hard times, I can't help but grit my teeth. He couldn't spend a day in my niece's shoes. No respect for people like him.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Science Revolution
God is the humanising of Truth. People have had a tendency to think in terms of anthropomorphism, taking inanimate objects or ideas and given them a human face. They felt that there was a truth that lay beyond our perceptions of truth and, being human, they had to give that truth a personality, a supreme figure and each culture had their own name and narrative for that being.
When you think of it in those terms, it explains why every culture, all over the globe, had some kind of religious narrative to explain the deeper reaches of understanding. Some people are still stuck in that way of thinking. When Nietzsche said that God is dead, he didn't mean it in the literal sense. He meant that God, as the ruling arbiter of truth, has given way to science as the method to finding the truth. Religious modes of thinking might have been an evolutionary necessity in our ability to survive conscious thought.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@estherc.536
My point wasn't so much about election day. My point was that it was even rigged before that due to the propaganda tactics by and for the Democrats and against Trump. Part of that propaganda was to inculcate a voting public that believes EVERYTHING that they were told by the various media sources so when or if, the election itself, vote flipping as an example, a huge part of the population will automatically believe what the media sources are telling them.
In other words, they have the answers BEFORE the question is even raised. That's what I was talking about. They rigged the election by creating conditions where asking questions is pointless because the they're already answered. That's why, within the hour of the announcement of the discovery of Hunter Biden's laptop, the answer was already in place. Russian disinformation.
If we can bring back an honest media, all those other problems, including any real election fraud, will go away. The media, of today, is no different than Goebbels' media of Nazi Germany and the Democrats may be better at it than Goebbels It's a tool for the Democrats and that's why they are going to get away with any fraud. Democrat propaganda is the key. Any fraud is just a symptom of their controlled use of the media and propaganda.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Kenny Bugh
How did Trump fail us? This was a new disease that no one had ever dealt with before. He called on the CDC, even formed a medical task force to deal with it. They were supposed to be the experts and these "experts" were all over the place with their recommendations and ideas. How could Trump make medical recommendations. He's NOT a doctor.
Had the CDC and Fauci been more forthright and explained things as they knew them instead of playing games with the facts, we'd be better off. They were too proud to stand up and say that, in spite of being experts, they had no clue. That's why they failed us. They taught us not to trust them....the worst thing a doctor could do to their patients.
It was Trump that initiated Project Warp Speed, got ventilators built that were never used, sent hospital ships to LA and NY which were never used and it wasn't Trump that put Covid patients in old folks homes. Trump restricted travel, first from China which resulted in being called xenophobic and then from Europe which Biden, himself criticized, saying travel bans don't work. It was Pelosi and Mayor De Blasio that kept telling people to go to their favourite restaurants, take the subways and go to parades. Pelosi went to Chinatown and was hugging everyone urging people to come on down and it was Pelosi that ripped up the SOTU address, in which Trump talked about trying to work with China to fight this new disease.
Do you know what else failed us? China and their Gain of Function research....that's who and those in the American medical establishment that helped fund it....like Dr. Fauci.
4
-
4
-
4
-
@greghenchin17
Where did I say that? I said that the majority, by far, of illegals are Hispanic. Completely different. In fact, illegal Hispanics account for almost 2 percent of the American population. That's 1 of every 50 people in the US is an illegal Hispanic. That's an incredibly high demographic number. 17 percent of the population have Hispanic roots, which means the 1 in 8 Hispanics in the US is an illegal. So if you ask 8 Hispanics if they're here legally, at least one of them will say no. That's pretty good odds for a betting man and it does affect the actions of those who are commissioned to find illegals. You'd do the very same if your job centred around finding illegals. It's human nature.
There are certain areas where the illegal population is very high, like in Hispanic neighbourhoods. Many illegals tend to depend on the help of each other so they maintain close cultural ties with one another. Also, 2nd generation Hispanics are more likely to speak English fluently and participate in a job market requiring advanced training. So even if they look Hispanic, these individuals will be ruled out, almost automatically, as illegals. It's the uneducated that have low paying jobs and speak English poorly that will be targeted and even if they're in the country legally, they'll be more apt to be asked to show their right to be here.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Mr. Indelible
Incredibly, the best tippers do not come from those who make the best money. It's the regular Joes, like other serving staff, cab drivers, factory workers and construction workers who tip the best. We used to say "The size of the tip is inversely proportional to the increased value of their clothes". In other words , the better they dressed, the worse the tip.
And no....it's not a terrible system, except for those who are always watching every dime in their pocket. I worked for 15 years as a server and I would never have been able to get by except for this "terrible system". It's quite apparent that you've never worked in this type of industry and you're one of those you love to abuse their server, and do they ever exist and they NEVER tip. Self entitled jerks who complain about everything from "My potatoes are too hot" to "My corn is touching my mashed potatoes" and "Why do I have so much food?". The world revolves around them and complain so they can feel justified about not leaving a tip.
Self righteous do gooders like Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin. Is that who you mean. "God...protect us from those with good intentions". That's what I say. If you tip me just to feel good about yourself, keep it. I don't need your alms that bad. Tip because I've done a good job, otherwise keep it.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@gunnart1305
Yes, but he's said that IF he was Italian, he would have followed him. However, he wasn't Italian so he never did follow him.
My dad grew up in war time Holland about 20 miles from the German border. That made him one of the good guys. He's told me of how he and his brother, hid in a ditch, in fear and awe, at the back of the family farm and watched German troops file past for a couple of hours. They hid because they were afraid. My dad is certain that had he been born 20 miles to the east of the German border, in Germany, he would have patted the backs of the German soldiers on their way to invade Holland, goose stepping alongside of them and dreaming of the day that he, too could be marching with them.
That artificial line on the map made a huge difference on how he saw the world at the time. That's what Churchill was talking about. Most people don't realise that they would likely have been Nazis had they been born in Germany and were alive during the Nazi era. We like to think that we're that intrinsically good that we'd have resisted the lure of Hitler but if we believe that, we're fooling ourselves.
4
-
4
-
4
-
Leonard Chornomaz
The copyright already exists. They used to ask for a copy of the material being copyrighted when one was applying. You're under no obligation, under the law, to apply for a copyright for anything you publish.
Also, if it is true, as he claims, that no other publisher has ever heard of this law, then it would seem that this guy is being targeted for some egregious reason that we're not privy to.
He's claiming that this law hasn't been applied in years, decades. If you can show that this is a part of every day procedure in the publishing business, TODAY, then you'd have a case. If he is correct, then this is just the actions of an arbitrary and autocratic bureaucrat and really doesn't serve the interests of anyone but that specific bureaucrat.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@gjc7993
Nothing wrong with being rich. It's when you believe that you're socially and intellectually superior when you give yourself permission to treat the others like inferiors. That those inferiors lack the capacity to lead productive and "safe" lives. That's when they become dangerous.
Leftist elites showed that disdain in the 2016 elections with the way they looked down their noses at those living in "flyover" USA. The deplorables, hillbillies that can barely read or write....racists, homophobes, sexist troglodytes who must be led and not left to their own devices. "White people have to learn "this". White people have to do "that". Dirty little Walmart shoppers.
That's NOT a Republican attitude. Bill Maher summed it up when he said that Middle Americans are jealous of people like him and want to be like those like him.....the elitist left wing. No conservative is included in those ranks. They're ridiculed and laughed at and when they do become rich, they're called greedy and ruthless, unlike the rich left, the woke elitists of the big cities and Hollywood. Forever preaching at the rest of America, telling them how to speak, think, act and denigrating everything that the "deplorables" value. Things like individual freedom, hard work, respect, and the value of family.
I was once a left wing liberal, but I've found that something has changed. I can't treat others the way that they do. I don't think ordinary people are deplorables and I refuse to treat them that way.
4
-
@MeMeWeWeWe
You've not been following the news, have you. People, who come up to you, get into your face, telling you to quit doing something, when all you're doing is your job, you'd have every reason to be afraid of what he's going to do next. Crime is a huge problem in the US and delivery drivers are quite often targeted by thieves. How are you to know if these guys weren't going to mug you and punch you in the face or worse?
If you're going to act the idiot, intimidating ordinary people, be prepared for the consequences. Someone will panic, maybe because of past experience, and defends himself. The poor guy was just doing his job.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@supervastgut1568
He really was. He was arrested under suspicion of being in the Dutch underground. They sent him to Westerbork because it was only a few miles from where he lived and it was convenient. They started to round up prisoners to load the train and he was among them. A guard recognised him and took him out of the line. He was sent to the POW camp, in Texel, a week later and spent the rest of the war, imprisoned there. There's a big story around that camp, too. My brother went with him, years later, for his first trip back to Texel. While there, he met another ex-POW, who just happened to be revisiting for his first time. The guy recognised my uncle and apparently they had quite a long talk about their time there.
My family has a lot of war stories and everyone, concerning the Nazis, were bad ones. The Nazis were hated with a passion and still are in Holland.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@carlaneal6532
Merit. Only the BEST players, in the world, get to play in the NFL.
YOU HAVE TO BE GOOD!!!!
Nothing else counts. Not your race. Not your sex, religion, home town......NOTHING ELSE....and they get paid millions to do it. Players, who call themselves minorities, will make more in 6 months work, than you will in your entire life.
We are now living in a time where there guilt is always assumed. No matter what, it's "that doesn't mean it's not a racists league". Guilt, always, continuous and no possible way to prove innocence. You don't have to show racism. All you have to do is accuse. The accusation is the proof.
It's become insane.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Mark Lanzarotta
First of all, Republicans and Democrats are American citizens, so you can't deport them. Second, what kind of traitor wants to protect the border of his own country? What kind of logic is that?
Have you ever travelled to another country? Unless you present a valid passport, you don't stand a chance of entering any other country on the planet. Try it. They won't let you in. Yet, for some reason, Democrats think that people should be allowed to enter the US, no passport, no questions asked, just come on in. Come on in by the millions and give them free healthcare, welfare, education, a driver's licence and then let them work for depressed wages at the those famous jobs that "Americans refuse to do". "Who's going to clean your toilets?" Well....them foreigners, of course.
Lefties want to call Republican racists but they're the real racists, hiding behind a cloak of virtue but, in reality, exhibiting hate towards anyone that disagrees with them.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Prophet seven
I'd say, by reading your comment, that you've never worked in the service industry for a living. I have 14 years in and I'm still there, right now and I'm leaving for my bartending job in 20 minutes. I guarantee you that everyone that I've ever worked with will tell you the same. Leave the system alone. We're doing very well with it the way it is.
Notice how it's multi-millionaires, Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin, that are speaking on our behalf. I never asked them to and I don't want it, either. I work in a small pub and if the owners had to pay me what I make now in wages and tips, they'd be forced to, either lay me off, or shut it down. There's no way they could afford it. I'm no idiot. I see the ring offs at the end of the day and I know, approximately how much they make and they just couldn't do it. All you're doing is shutting down another business and it helps no one.
4
-
4
-
4
-
@guaporichard
The unfortunate ones, the largest in the United States, live in a Blue state, who are supposed all about looking after the downtrodden. Yet, California has, by far, the largest homeless population in the country. Many aren't because they've fell on hard times. They're suffering from mental issues and severe addictions and the politicians aren't doing a thing about it.
Even if you've managed to get by as a blue collar guy, there are a lot of people who're handicapped (mental illness is a handicap) who can't get by and the state of California won't help them or provide housing or mental health care.
The fact is, California is losing population and there's a reason for that. There's no place on the planet that's perfect and there never has been, but for a beautiful state, there should be no way that people are leaving. Especially a state that's run by a party that claims to care about those who are in dire straits. It might be good for you but there's obviously a lot of people that are unhappy.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@GeorgeMonet
He wants, as I do, for the local governments, to do their job. Call in the National guard, arrest the rioters and prosecute them. THAT'S the way to end this violence. When you're doing 5 to 10, you're not out rioting, are you?
He's railed against the local DAs releasing the rioters non-stop. That's our problem, right now. Democrat District Attorneys, Mayors, Governors and MSM, who have been sympathetic to the rioting, is what has to change. It's one of the reasons that Tim is voting Republican for the first time in his life.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@trh-bee4383
If I go to work and MAKE money to pay my taxes, as opposed to sitting at home, not paying a cent and living off the social teat, I expect those taxes to pay for my illness, just like any other medical issue.
If that were the case, people who smoke and get lung cancer, are on their own. Cirrhosis of the liver has to exclude, all those who drink, from socialised medicine. No assistance for the diabetics who are morbidly obese. If you play hockey and break your leg.....tough. You should have stayed home and watched TV, instead. If you catch your hand in a machine at work, through an error, get your brother-in-law to do the amputation.
It's tough enough to get a family doctor, in Canada, so we can get health referrals and now YOU want medical tribunals to decide whether one deserves medical help from the only source of medicine that we're allowed to have. Socialised medicine sure is compassionate, isn't it?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@runtoth3abyss
Are you serious? Have you ever heard of the Russian Collusion election fiasco? The Democrats spent years calling Trump an illegitimate president, that he colluded with the Russians to steal the election. They spent 35 million on the Mueller Report and when it turned up nothing, they had this hearing where they called Mueller in to grill him on how he conducted his investigation and STILL nothing. Yet, Adam Schiff and Hilary were still going on about collusion after all this. The Dems and the media wouldn't shut up about it.
Strangely, when the Democrats were accused of election fraud, the media said that was crazy, even saying that it was the most secure election in history.
It would appear that the left can make those accusations and it's all okay but when the right does it.....conspiracy nuts.
By the way, did you see what happened in the elections in NY City? Eric Adams, an ex-cop, who'd be a guy that the left automatically hates, noticed a problem with the numbers in the votes and the media started calling him a Trumpian conspiracy theorist. They didn't even bother to investigate. Turned out he was correct and the media just slunk away without a word.
The media doesn't do journalism anymore. They're a left wing propaganda machine and people don't have the inclination or intelligence to even question them.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@himothydiedforthis
First of all, a nation doesn't flourish because someone gave it to them. The people have to work for it and work hard. Instead, the people of Gaza, which is an independent state, used all available cash to dig hundreds of miles of tunnels and bought all the military gear that their money could buy. Explain to me how that helps ANYONE in Gaza, other than the leaders of Hamas and arms dealers from other countries.
Gaza, Pol Pot's Cambodia, Cuba, the Soviet Union, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, they're all examples of countries that expect success through the largess of others, instead of getting it for themselves. Envy is a powerful drug and it's completely destroyed the people of Palestine.
4
-
4
-
@savemoney5111
Israel has offered a 2 state solution, numerous times. They had maps drawn and even offered the Palestinians, the Muslims actually, more land than to Israel. However, the Muslims turned them down EVERY time. Now, since 2006, Gaza has been the homeland for Palestinians. Israel has assumed NO control over this strip. Gaza is now run by Hamas and they weren't elected. They've controlled Gaza ever since 2006.
The Muslim leadership should have accepted the first 2 state offer the very first time, back in 1947. They would have had more land and the "freedom" that they're wailing about.....although I doubt very much that they'd have been happy with that freedom. Hamas are ruled and supported by religious fanatics and they see the Middle East as their land. They won't compel you to become Muslim, through force of law, but they will compel them to submit to Islamic law, under the Dhimmi Laws. The meaning of the word "Islam" means submission (to Allah) and we must all submit to Allah, either to their laws or as a Muslim. Even if you're Christian, Hindu or Rastafari, you must still submit to Islamic laws. That's the Islamic way.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@avery5415
In some ways, we all are. However, I was a strange little kid. By the time I was 10, I'd read every one of the Encyclopedia Americana, at the back of my class, cover to cover, multiple times. I went to a Christian primary school, so I had learned early that there were conflicting ideas in the world so I had to reconcile between what I was being taught and what I was learning on my own. Incredibly, those Christian teachers encouraged my reading and even allowed me to leave the schoolyard twice a week to go to our local library to check out books. Most people didn't have that voracious appetite to learn things like I did and I think that it has a lot to do with wanting to know all the information available before arriving at any decisions on a topic. I found it frustrating, back then, that my friends and siblings, didn't care to do the same and would support ideas without any real knowledge of the topic that they were talking about.
Still, I do find that I can get stuck in a rut about some things, so I guess it's understandable that others would as well. No one likes to hear that they may be wrong and some will never admit it, no matter what the evidence.
Once you realise how information should be processed, as it appears that you have, it's difficult to turn back. Human weakness does get in the way, I know. That's the one thing the left will not realise. It's not the weakness in others that should be your prime concern....It's the weaknesses that lie within you.
4
-
@moestietabarnak
Where did I say that an unlawful shooting by a police officer isn't a problem? I never said that once. I can object to it but that does NOT give me the right to burn down YOUR business of home, steal YOUR stuff, because that's what looting is, or shoot your 9 year old daughter, like what happened in Atlanta. Why can't I be outraged about those things? That was a little black girl in Atlanta. I was in tears when I heard about that and it was a BLM supporter who shot her.
As long as there are criminals, committing major crimes in the world, and specifically in the US, and we want the police to stop them, there will be deaths. It's inevitable. In other words, you will always have reason to burn, loot and kill. It'll NEVER go away. It will be a perpetuating rage.
Also, if you really thought that HUNDREDS of riots, over 3 months, being justified by the media and certain politicians, wasn't going to finally get some pushback out of fear and frustration, you're still delusional.
Also, if you can't see that burning and looting is wrong, always and is NEVER justified, then you have no moral centre to guide you.
Also, I made it perfectly clear that I DID NOT ENDORSE what happened in Washington. It was wrong and they should be prosecuted. Also, the looters should be prosecuted and we shouldn't have politicians, like Kamala Harris, donating to a fund for their legal fees. That a politician, that would do that, is going to become the Vice President, scares people and they will be angry that this is happening.
If you can't see that then YOU are the problem. You don't want a middle ground nor would you accept an olive branch. You want YOUR ground and will take it by any means necessary.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@spltndddpairofaces680
Answer a question with a question, huh. Nice dodge. If the teachers didn't do it, they didn't do it. No problem. However, my question goes to the point of guilt. Do you think that, if those teachers are found guilty, that they do something that was reprehensible or not?
Should teachers keep secrets, from parents about their kids, to satisfy a personal ideology? Should there even be sexually oriented clubs, in schools, for minors?
This is what is at the heart of this entire video. I expect you to dodge the issue, just as you've done all along.
4
-
4
-
4
-
@thisislaflaretv5250
I'm NOT a Christian so stop sticking me into YOUR pigeon holes. Also, YOU live in American society, as well, so by that criteria, you're as much a conformist as I am.
Of course I pay my grocery bill. It's an agreement that I have with those who own the food that I need. No different than if you own something. I can't just take it if I want it. If you want to trade for it, we make a deal, either for cash or for like, in kind. If no one paid for their groceries, the entire system would break down and that would be the end of the society that we live in. Mass starvation for all.
I don't know why infant mortality rates for blacks are so high. Maybe that's something that you should ask your government representative instead of some guy on the internet. I don't know why the inner city have such horrific education records, either. Something else you could ask your local politician. Could it be that people keep voting for the same people, year after year, yet, expecting different outcomes and improvements? Could it be that your representative FORCES you to go to the school of THEIR choice and refuses to allow you the same ability to choose that they have? Why would you vote for such a representative?
Maybe you're NOT voting for them but the black community is definitely voting for the people that won't give you those choices. Sometimes you have to look inwards to fix your problems instead of waiting for someone else to fix it for you.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I can see how they did that. Years ago, I didn't like Trump but I didn't really pay a lot of attention to him. He was easy not to like. Then, he ran for president and I had to pay attention. He's still has that same air about him, but he's ok. The thing is, those that didn't like him, back then, won't EVER accept that they might have been wrong about him. The more he proves them wrong, the more they dig in their heels.
Not what I'd call mature behaviour. His opposition have become just plain insane in their hatred. Most of the time, it's not that I'm defending Trump, I'm ragging on Democrat stupidity. Of course, their hatred won't let them see that. So, all I can say is......TRUMP 2020!! There's no way I want those lunatics to win now.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
***** I did give a different reasons why he would post such a thing. He's a nut or a shill or what is also plausible, he's venting.
I'm responding to a veiled suggestion that he's lying and the reason he's not answering is because he really doesn't want the nutbars to show up. I really don't know. I'm projecting, as someone who would know, the reason if I was in a person's shoes who lost someone in those shootings, why I might not answer.
Be honest. If you lost someone in your family, and there was this group, who claimed that that someone didn't die, never existed and is all part of an elaborate hoax, would you tell these people who you were. I wouldn't, even though I'd love to meet one and break his jaw. I'd do it because I have family members who do not need that kind of grief.
But.....in reality, I don't know about this commenter. He could just be some kind of internet weirdo.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@alexs1640
No one, but NO ONE, is required to show their taxes unless subpoenaed by a judge. That includes YOU. If a police officer knocked on your door and said he wanted all your tax information for the last 20 years, without an official document giving him that right, would YOU hand it over? I'm betting you'd say no. Of course, that would make you guilty of some kind of tax fraud, wouldn't it?
There has to be probable cause and since the IRS hasn't provided any information that would give probable cause, his tax information will remain private, as it should be. As yours should be.
If someone makes a claim and then recants....THAT'S transparency. If Trump says that his claim about sanctuary cities IS true....he just revealed that what he said in the first place was false. That's being transparent. I'm not sure it even happened that way but your using this as an example is illogical.
I'm not saying that Trump has never lied but he turned over every document that asked for. EVERY ONE. Also, a person has the right to not take a stand and be put into a position in which he might incriminate himself. That's the law. Any lawyer will strongly advise their client to not, voluntarily take the stand. Criminal law 101.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The kids were found alone so they put them in cages? Wasn't that enlightened of them. Are you REALLY justifying that?
I suppose you've not heard of child trafficking, have you. Or that some of those attempting to get into the country, illegally, were using random kids as props to elicit sympathy to get into the country. Kids that they had snatched from the arms of their REAL parents, doing so in the hopes that border agents might not search them for contraband.
I'll bet you've never heard of actual American citizens, who, after being caught engaging in illegal activities, had THEIR children snatched from their parents arms when they were arrested by agents sent by child protection services. Strange how crossing a border, illegally, with children, isn't grounds for temporary separation but punching your neighbour might see your children snatched and placed in a foster home, complete strangers to those children. Those parents know the risks of taking their children across the border, illegally, and they decided to risk it anyway.
You're reacting emotionally, based only on a hatred for an individual. That allows you to justify the loving care shown by Obama when caging children and reviling the horrors of snatching children when it happens in Trump's term in office. It has nothing to do with the truth or reality of the situation. It has EVERYTHING to do with your lack of emotional control.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
MICHAEL DAMATO
I'm afraid that you're interpretation is way off from how I took it. It's about how a person allows fear to possess their minds to the point of losing control. The use of children is used as a metaphor to how adults have acted when fear has taken over their very being. The fear of witches, of Jews, of the ruling class....etc. They're no stronger or better than children, no matter how sophisticated they are and history verifies this. "Lord of the Flies" means Beelzebub, another word for Satan. It's an admonition against letting fear or its anthropomorphic character, Satan, take over your thoughts and behaviour.
Fear gripped those children, in that book. The fear of the injured pilot, who went to the signal fire, and terrorised them and their horrific reactions to that fear. They were too young to use logic or reason to understand it and we see the same, all too often, in adults. "Fear is the mind killer". Like Jung said, one of the most destructive forces there is, right now.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@garyjackson3531
Transgenderism is a mental condition. That's what a runaway social contagion is. It's the minds of children, going through mental issues, being manipulated. There are some forms of it, due to genetic conditions but this is quite rare. Like my neighbour. His female characteristics started at about a year old. This was in the late fifties. It was so weird to see the kid. He dressed like a boy, his parents insisted on it, and he had a boy's haircut and in 1960 that meant a real short haircut. But when I first saw him, I thought that this was one strange guy. He acted too much like a girl...even more of a girl than my 3 sisters. There was something going on here that was more than just a mental disorder. How did he know to act like a girl at 2? No one did that back then.
This type of dysphoria does happen but it's extremely rare. Like I said, what's happening now is a social contagion, an "interpersonal process, such as imitation, conformity, universality, and mimicry." APA Dictionary of Psychology
That's exactly what's happening. They're introduced to it at a young age, in the schools, and then it's spread through social media. They form a bond that includes imitation and conformity. I don't see why you think that this is some kind of junk science. If it wasn't for the schools, woke parents and social media, no one would even think about this stuff. It's something that was rarely encountered in real life but the socialists have grabbed onto it for their own agenda.
My 16 year old granddaughter claims to be transgender. I looked into it. I've yet to see one woke transgender advocate who isn't a socialist.....not one. They're the ones spreading the contagion so that it's a 4000% increase in England over the last 10 years. That means that if there was 1, just ONE, new transgender sufferer in 2010, there would be 4000 new ones this year. That's impossibly ridiculous even if it was just a singular mental condition. It's MORE than that. It's the spread of an ideology using the strength of social contagions to push them in that direction. These socialists want to break the system down, to destroy it and to do that they need good socialist soldiers. They're doing it by creating a transgender class, CREATING it, as a part of the androgynous class the radical socialists have talked about for over a century. Radical socialism was all creating an androgynous society but they just couldn't get it implemented. This is just another shot at it by the radical socialists.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@jimmcloughlin
First of all, Lysenko had no influence on the 1923 famine that killed millions. That happened because government forces took all the crops, including the seeds for next years crops, to feed the army and people living in the cities. So, those millions came as a result of authoritarian over reach and the idea that all products belonged to the state.
Lysenko was starting to gain influence in the early thirties but that had very little to do with Holodomor. This was caused by the collectivisation policies, in which the farms were taken away from the farmers and farm collectives were organised. People were put to work on these farms who had no idea on how to farm. Many others were angry about losing their farms and basically refused to work. Many farmers were displaced and had nowhere to go and nothing to eat. They starved to death because the Socialist government insisted on farming collectives.
Lysenko only made things worse. Yes, it was bad science but no farmer would have followed his ideas because they would know that it didn't work. It was the socialist government that forced it on the collective farms, which caused the crop failures. In fact, anyone that spoke out against Lysenko, would be arrested and sent to the Gulag or worse. It was bad science forced on the people by socialist politicians. Farmers, in a free country, would never have followed his ideas. The only reason that they were followed in the Soviet Union and China is due to the political might of the communist governments.
...and yes, China tried the same methods and those methods were FORCED on those who were supposed to grow the crops. They had no choice and the crops failed miserably. No sensible Chinese farmer would have used the Lysenko methods but the small farms were all gone, replaced by the collectives. The collectives were run by the government who mandated that the collective farms used the Lysenko farming methods.
So, I'll say it again. It was bad science and that bad science was forced on the people by the communist governments. Politics forced it. That's where you've got it all backwards....and wrong.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@talldavid30
The Capitol was NOT in ruins. A couple of barriers were torn down, a few doors were wrecked but the building was being used the following day. Also, those Americans that are dead, all died of natural causes, except for one Trump supporter, who was shot.
There were over 50 thousand Trump supporters in Washington that day. Yet only a few hundred entered the building. Also, being strong doesn't mean that you have to be violent. That's YOUR interpretation of what was said. Not being weak can also mean just sticking to your ideals and not giving up. As for being conned, did you really believe the Brian Sicknick was killed in the line of duty? Did that phony funeral for the fallen hero, killed by rioters, really fool you? He died of a stroke the following day or hasn't anyone told you yet. Did you really fall for that staged event? Who's the fool, here?
3
-
3
-
3
-
Obama brought change....oh yeah, he sure did. By the time he was done as president, racial tensions hadn't been this strained since the Rodney King events, almost 25 years before he left office. Riots in Ferguson, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Dallas and police officers were being executed, including a young black woman, a mother and police officer, was shot in the head while sitting in her squad car. Why? Because the shooter was angry after listening BLM speakers.
Oh yeah, he brought change, alright. This country was on its way to being more divided than at any other time since the Civil war.
Thanks Obama.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@lrod8692
Mnuchin has already agreed to oversight in dispensing that 500 billion dollars. If a company doesn't need it, they won't get it. It's a loan and they're expected to pay it back. Also, it's against the law to give government money to a company owned by a politician. AGAINST THE LAW. Trump couldn't do it even if he wanted to.
Your 1200 bucks is a give away. You don't have to pay it back. Millions work for these bit corporations. What a great idea to let some of them go bankrupt because you don't think that they should get a loan. I'm astounded that you don't want free money, on top of unemployment insurance because you're worried that someone might get more than you. Head shakingly stupid.
Also, tell me something. Do you really think it's important, right now, in the worst pandemic and economic threat in our lives, to make sure that corporations have the right amount of women on their boards? Is THAT your priority right now? "I don't want that money unless women are guaranteed a seat on the board of some unnamed corporation". Genius move, that.
The Democrats are using you and every other American to get through all their top SJW ideas. They're turning the government into universities and colleges with safe spaces and equity departments.
What's even worse, from your perspective, you've just supported a democrat move that will give Trump the next election with a landslide. Then he'll do all the stuff that you're so afraid of. Families are sitting at home praying for the money to get them through until their UI is straightened out. Do you really think that they're going to vote for the party that said NO. No money until we get tax cuts for solar panels. The stupidest political move in American history.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@alexocasio-gomez5267
I don't know about the US but here in Canada, immigrants come to this country after applying to allowed to live and work here. After a time and if they fulfil certain obligations, they can apply for citizenship. Almost EVERY immigrant eventually will take this step and become a citizen. Once a citizen, you're no longer an immigrant. You have the same rights as every other Canadian that was born in the country. My parents were immigrants and became citizens. I was born here. I was NEVER an immigrant. I was born in Canada and am a citizen by virtue of being born here.
I have a friend, who was born in France, of parents, who were Canadian and were serving in the Canadian military at the time. The birth took place in a French hospital. He's having a hell of a time getting a passport because he wasn't born in Canada and hasn't been able to prove where he was born. In fact, if he broke the law in any overt way, he could be deported back to France. I know of an incident of a guy, who was born in Germany, under the same circumstances. His parents returned to Canada, after completing a tour at the Canadian Forces base at Lahr, Germany when he was 2 years old. Years later, he was charged multiple times with criminal offences and was deported to Germany as a result and died there a few years later. Germany had to accept him as he was born in a German hospital, even though his parents were Canadian, on assignment with the Canadian military.
An immigrant and a citizen are 2 different entities under the law, at least here in Canada and I'd warrant it's the same in the Us.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@talldavid30
Your side looked the other way, last year, when BLM and Antifa, rioted, burned and looted to over 2 billion dollars in damage, over 25 dead and thousands injured. They stood behind the call to defund the police and now violent crime, in minority areas of the big cities, has skyrocketed due to less police protection. Also, they rioted all across the US when Trump was elected and even tried to break into the Supreme Court when Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed. Hundreds were arrested because of that riot.
For the first time in California history, population numbers are on the way down due to over taxation, high housing costs, homelessness, blackouts, expensive energy costs, poor fire management, crime in the streets (Poop patrols????),....yet, you want people to vote for the establishment that allowed these things to happen.
3
-
@sthubbins4038
Of course he wanted to "find" those votes. If they existed, he wanted to find them. Who wouldn't? Even you'd want to find them....if you thought that they existed, especially if those votes would help your cause.
Isn't it strange that when Trump questions the irregularities of the election, it shakes the entire foundation of the Republic. Yet, when Obama did it in 2005 and Hillary did it in 2016.....that's legit and no problem. Especially when there was absolutely NO proof of collusion, yet Hillary STILL carries on about it and Adam Schiff, even though he claimed that he has irrefutable proof, never presented the proof and STILL claims that there was Russian collusion. The riots in 2016, against Trump, was no big deal and only righteous but the riots on Jan 6th.....horrific. The inconsistency is remarkable. And before you tell me that I'm being a hypocrite, I think that the rioters were wrong in BOTH cases and should be prosecuted. Rioting is WRONG and I don't care who does it. We live in a land that is supposed to live by the rule of law. Everyone should honour that, at all times, not only when it suits their own agenda.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I dug out my trusty calculator and started ciphering. Given that the average truck is 50 feet in length, 50,000 trucks would stretch, bumper to bumper with no space in between them, from New York City to 60 miles short of Columbus Ohio. For us Canadians, that's from Windsor Ontario to just short of Cornwall. That 50,000 number is ridiculous.
However, the Trudeau and the press went with the "fringe group" rhetoric and people believed it. Then when they found out that it was MORE than a "fringe group", they got all upset and the stories of how someone died because ER workers couldn't get to the hospital on time, started up on Facebook. In other words, they downplayed it and didn't prepare for it. Had this been an BLM rally, they would have been gloating over the size of it. Trudeau wouldn't have airlifted out and he'd be standing on the podium, beneficently smiling at the crowds who obviously (sarcasm) love him.
Also, it was between 15 and 20 degrees below 0, in the Fahrenheit scale, in Ottawa. It's quite the turnout in that kind of cold.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@asherif3893
Venezuela is worse. Does that automatically mean that Cuba has a good system? I rather doubt it. It's nice that they can all read but if the material that they're ALLOWED to read is limited, of what use is it? Reading has value only if you have the freedom to follow that gift where ever it might take you, to develop your interests and passions to enhance the quality of your life.
If Cuba is SO wonderful, how come there aren't there hundreds of makeshift boats, overcrowded with "dreamers" heading TOWARDS Cuba, instead of leaving it? Why are there 1.5 million Cubans living in Florida and hardly, if any, American living in Cuba? Why aren't Venezuelans leaving the horrors of their country and flocking to Cuba? It's because they all know that there are lots of places where the freedom and quality of life is much higher in other, democratic and capitalist countries.
That's the one thing that socialist apologists will not respond to. Why is the tide of immigrants always flowing towards the Capitalist countries and NOT the other way around? Socialists are always saying how horrible capitalists countries are but they're not migrating, in droves or by the millions, towards these socialist countries. That, in itself, has to show that maybe socialism isn't as great as claimed. That those who live under the safety net of capitalism, will only complain about capitalism but aren't passionate enough to actually go to their "Utopian" promised land. I think it's the complaining that drives them. Pessimistic people who bitch about everything but know, deep down, that they're not going to change even if they went to the socialist paradise.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@WhyNotTruth
Yet, all the riots across the country....the burning, looting, violence, throwing bottles, fireworks, Molotov Cocktails and the call to overthrow the government is ignored in this article and by YOU. Riots in LA, Oakland, Portland, Seattle, Las Vegas, Provost, Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Kenosha, St. Louis, Austen, Dallas, Louisville, Chicago, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Pittsburgh, Lancaster, Philadelphia, Rochester, Buffalo, Washington, Atlanta..... I'm getting tired because there's lots more. That's THIS YEAR. They bully people in restaurants, they walk down suburban streets, yelling at people in their homes, they block traffic, beat on the cars of ordinary people.
You sir are a bald faced ideological liar and you could care less about the end of violence. You just want the violence directed at your favourite target.
3
-
@WhyNotTruth
So, you're denying all the left wing violence in ALL the cities that I just mentioned? Are you denying the 100 nights, in a row, in Portland Oregon, the total destruction of city blocks in Minneapolis, the 25 businesses that were totally destroyed in Kenosha, the bulling of people in restaurants, the tearing down of statues, the thousands of injuries to police officers, the wanton murder of David Dorn during looting, the killing of 8 year old Secoriea Turner, in Atlanta by rioters, the execution style murder attempt of 2 police officers in LA, all in the last 3 months? I could write a book just relating all the incidents that were violent over that time.
Are you seriously going to tell me that right wing violence has outpaced this over the last 3 months? It's happening RIGHT NOW, and over the last 3 months and you're posting things that are going back into the 1990s. I'm talking about today.
Do you acknowledge that this violence is happening, RIGHT NOW, and it's being done by the left?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Sylvertaco
They wrote the Constitution under their understanding of society of that time. An understanding that was the norm for a couple of thousand years. Many of the founding fathers were already anti-slavery but to mount a good defence against the British, they had to compromise to the states that wanted slavery. It was a bone of contention right from the get go. 20 years after independence, the Atlantic slave trade was abolished and it was a step by step progression towards the end of slavery which was finally achieved. It wasn't easy and yet, any reading of the Constitution, as it is written, had to acknowledge the rights of all humans. Those who supported slavery and were against women's suffrage, didn't go by what the Constitution actually said but by tradition and their belief on what the founding fathers meant. In other words, they didn't want to accept that Africans were men and that went against both fact and the Bible, in fact, the belief that even Africans had a soul. If they have a soul they had to except that they were also men.
I'm not saying this out of a Christian belief system. I'm saying this from what is taught in the Bible and the idea that all men are created equal before God. They had to face the fact that if there was only one way to interpret the Constitution and to dispute it, they would have to accept the idea that Africans were not humans or subject to the grace of God.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Josh White
The goal of equal outcome is that terrible and has been demonstrated amply over history to be terrible.
Equality of outcome destroys the concept of excellence. It's telling us that we no longer accept ability as the criteria for accomplishment. We allow ourselves to devolve into mediocrity. In fact, we discourage competence in favour of everyone being homogeneous in our accomplishments.
How do we keep the competent from excelling? As long as they have the freedom to work as they please they will excel. That is inevitable. The only way to prevent them from rising above others is to take away their freedom to excel and they will not take that lightly. In the end, they will be disciplined for their refusal to allow the mediocre to climb the lofty heights with them and that discipline has been done quite harshly in the past. The competent don't mind if others, who are competent, excel with them but they know that for the mediocre to be equal to them they have to keep their own competence in check.
That's isn't good for anyone. For humans to advance, as a group, we must allow the best of us to work at their peak level. Denying someone a place, due to demographics, hurts everyone, not just that individual, but everyone. That person will spend a lifetime being held back and that goes against a person's natural instinct and will rot him/her from the inside out.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TheRed02151
I'm NOT a Trump fanatic so there goes THAT assumption. If you made that assumption about me, then what assumptions have you made about Sorbo. Now, YOU'RE the one being careless.
I don't care for Obama, either. His "hope and change" slogan happened all right. By the end of his presidency, major cities were being burnt in a wave of racial strife. I had sincerely thought that his presidency would improve race issues but it made it even worse...by far. However, as much as I don't like Obama, the immigrant thing is ridiculous. You see, I can separate people from ideas....something that you can't seem to do. I don't like Trump but I agreed with quite a few of his programs. NOT ALL OF THEM!!!! Get that straight. Some I didn't like at all but most of all I didn't like his personality.
You see, I can separate the person from ideas and I don't judge a person on single issues. Life is much more complex than that. I didn't support the Democrats in the last election but I fervently wished that it had been someone else, besides Trump, running for president. You see ....ONCE AGAIN.... I can separate people from ideas and one wrong idea doesn't say everything about a person. People are too complex to do that and only the most simplistic of people judge a person on a single issue.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@QuietRefl4378
Is being viable the beginning of that life? Every one starts as a one-celled being. If dead, that's how it ends...a one-celled being. However, if alive, it grows and grows, until it reaches the point of being "viable". Viable is the point when it can live OUTSIDE the womb and that can even be less than 24 weeks however it's chances aren't as good.
At conception, the new life is a one-celled individual with it's own DNA that determines if it's male or female, blue eyed or brown, blonde or brunette. If analysed in a lab, that one cell will be recognised as a human cell. That human cell will grow and grow, unless something causes it to die. One of those "things" that would cause it to die is an abortion. This is scientific fact.
So....why is it religious morality that decides whether ending that life is right or wrong? Why can't an atheist come to the same conclusion, that it's immoral to end that life? Just as immoral as it is to end the life of a 6 year old child.
If you can answer that question, you'll have come a long way towards convincing people that abortion isn't immoral. Now...try to convince me that the one-celled being isn't alive.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@J C
First of all, Trump didn't dump this on the states. The Constitution did that. He was following the dictates of the Constitution, the law of the land. If you think the Constitution shouldn't be followed, you should say that but every President has taken an oath of office to uphold the Constitution. The articles of the Constitution are interpretive and this was the way that it was interpreted. Had Trump enforced a mandate on the states, he would have faced stiff resistance from the states, especially the Democrat states. Leaving it up to the states is the best way to seek cooperation and it worked to a degree. Cuomo and Newsom, both Democrat governors, have been supportive and praised Federal action.
The reopening guidelines are just that.....GUIDELINES. Guidelines are not laws and cannot be enforced, legally. If Georgia doesn't want to follow the guidelines, it's their right. If it's smart to not follow the guidelines, that's another question.
The guidelines are a list of suggestions for the states to follow. Trump thinks that they're a good idea. If Georgia, or any other state, doesn't follow them, there will be people that disagree with them, including Trump. In fact, if you think that Georgia is opening too quickly, then YOU'RE agreeing with Trump. If you think that Trump should FORCE Georgia to comply, then you oppose state rights, something that the Confederates fought FOR in the Civil War.
Are you beginning to see how complex this is? No matter what Trump did or how he handled the enforcement of the guidelines, he would be wrong and you'd have grounds to criticise. It's a win/win scenario for the chronic critics and I'm going to assume that you're a chronic critic of Donald Trump.
3
-
3
-
@dishachatterjee6084
Till the 1800s, slavery was considered normal and there's was nothing wrong with it. Mauritania was the last country to ban slavery and that was in 1981, only 43 years ago. Morocco, South Yemen, Oman, Saudi Arabia, North Yemen, Oman and others all banned slavery in my lifetime, many because of pressure from western countries.
Like the consent laws, people started to view such institutions and practices as an affront to the rights of the individual. Just because the law says it's okay, doesn't mean that it's ethical or moral. I'd call those age of consent laws to be no more than another form of slavery.
3
-
3
-
@shanecorning5222
They have MORE, in many cases. There is Mohawk land about 30 miles from where I live and the natives there are quite prosperous. The things that the individual Mohawks have today, would boggle the minds of the Mohawks of 600 years ago.
Now if you're talking about power, no. At least not the political power they had after they joined the Iroquois Confederation. Then they were the most powerful influence of this area. If that kind of power is important to you, then you're correct. However, times change, just as it has for all of us around the world. 600 years ago, my ancestors were living as peasants, in the Netherlands, subservient to the nobility that was the way of life in Europe, of that time. They couldn't move, take part in trade or do anything that we can now, as free people.
Racial identity and its importance has changed. Now, we're more about nations as political units and we try to include all ethnicities as part of the nation state. That's life in the US and Canada, in spite of some of issues involved. A kid, growing up in squalor, can become a multi-millionaire overnight. It happens all the time. People become quite affluent through hard work and dedication and race isn't the determining factor. I've worked with Native construction workers, who have nice homes, drive big fancy trucks and have a good life. It's all relevant to where the native lives and what he/she wants in life.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ouimetco
Immigration is good for the country if the country is in a strong economic boom. This isn't the case at the moment. Canada is letting in more immigrants than there are housing starts. That's means that we have a lot of buyers and renters competing for fewer vacancies. One can say to increase building starts but we also have a shortage of skilled builders to handle the demand. Canada also demands that immigrants bring the means to support themselves if they come. That means that either they have high skills which will bring high incomes or they have the money to support themselves. Since most immigrants come from poorer countries, the immigrants that are let in are the wealthiest that those nations can offer. They go straight to the major cities and use their wealth to buy real estate at premium prices. Since market availability is low, the competition drives up the price. Canadians, who are retiring, in those big cities like Toronto, Ottawa and Vancouver, get a top dollar for their homes and then move to the rural areas and will buy for much less. They sell for 1.2 million and then buy their rural home for 3 to 4 hundred thousand, putting almost a million in their pockets. That competition is now transferred to those rural areas and those trying to buy their first homes are forced out of the market because they can't afford to compete with those coming in from the city. Rents are then forced up, as well.
If we could get our immigration numbers down to under housing starts, that would go along way to reducing the cost of buying homes. However, it doesn't appear that our government is willing to do that. It benefits those who've bought homes over 15 years ago and they like the increasing equity of their property.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@MaverickCadaverick
Quit deflecting. I underwent circumcision, due to infection, when I was 6 years old. It's such a trivial operation and, for me, a welcome relief from the pain of infection. A few days later I inspected the area, noticed that it now looked a LITTLE differently, shrugged my shoulders and thought nothing more of it......UNTIL I ran into people like you wailing
"You've been mutilated!!!!! How horrible!!!!!" Thanks for being offended for me but it has been such a non-issue that you actually make me laugh.
Circumcision is WAY different than life altering drugs, some of which may need to be taken for the rest of your life and the amputation of breasts, genitals, ovaries to be replaced by weird reconstruction procedures which also include consequences that may last a lifetime.
60 years later, I can confidently say that my circumcision has had NO negative consequences, and I mean none, zip and zero, since a couple of days after the operation. That is except for the people, like YOU, who keep telling me that I'm grotesque. I'm not.
So lets get back to the REAL issue here and quit trying to change the subject.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@jussayinmipeece1069
No....his tirade, if that's what you want to call it, is based on the idea that if an idea offends someone, you should never, EVER, be allowed to say it. Like that kid who was offended by the Biblical verses about love. What was his point? Was it that maybe those verses should never be discussed again because it might hurt his feelings?
In other words, he and all those easily offended, only want their views discussed and encouraged. They're no different than the religious zealots of the past, the ones that forced Galileo to recant his heliocentric model. That's the "four legs good, two legs bad" slogan. They're the new ideology, the "four legs", that is so good, and the old guard, the "two legs", that's so the bad. Remember, the animals revolted against the farmer, the four legs that revolted against the two legged overlord. Also remember, that book ended with the pigs walking on two legs and the slogan was adjusted to fit that change. In other words "Meet the new boss, Same as the old boss".
The American way is to allow each person the freedom to believe what they want and the right to express it without reservation and overt repercussions. That's NOT what the new SJW culture is all about. They are doing EXACTLY what the religious masters of old Europe were doing. They have their own ideology and don't you DARE say anything that might question it. The claim of offence is their weapon to shut you up.
3
-
3
-
3
-
Thomas Daley
I'd say that it takes a lot of guts for someone to stand up, in front of their own community, and say that maybe they've been looking at their situation in a false manner. She stands up to the vitriol that people fire at her, that she's a race traitor, a sell out, a grifter and the rest. That takes guts and I don't care who you are.
Why don't you try this for a change. Instead of attacking her, try assessing her message. When I was young, a long time ago, the worst thing a parent or adult figures could tell someone is that they're losers, that they'll never amount to anything. That's the message that's been thrown at the black community for years, from white liberals and blacks, themselves. She's saying that it doesn't have to be that way and you can do good for yourself if you work hard, make good decisions and persevere. I will add that all one has to do is look to the Americans of Asian heritage. They work their talebones off and have a higher income, per family unit, than white Americans. It can be done but it will never happen if you don't believe in yourself first.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@anneanne9009
Yes, it is like a war effort but it's not the same thing. Also, neither Trump or Fox has ever advocated against State's rights or the Constitution. In fact, Trump has said, numerous times, that he will allow the states to define their own response to the virus, as is outlined in the Constitution. He has said that he disagrees with Georgia, opening too quickly, but he can't force them to abide by his guidelines, no more than he can enforce the draconian rules that the State of Michigan has implemented an he disagrees with. He cannot do a thing, except withhold funding from the Federal government, which may or may not be a good idea, given the need to help the sick, or he can wait until it goes before the Supreme Court and a decision has been made that the State of Michigan has overstepped their bounds. That's the law of the United States and the procedures that MUST be followed.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Sarah Langford
Oh really. Wasn't it Biden that said that Trump was being xenophobic when he imposed travel restrictions to China. Then he compounded it by saying that travel bans didn't work when Trump expanded the restrictions to Europe. Didn't the Governors of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in nursing homes when it was common knowledge that Coved was deadly to senior citizens. Trump sent hospital ships that were NEVER used to New York and Los Angeles. The Javits Centre was turned into a makeshift hospital, by the Trump administration, that sat empty. The Mayor of New York kept telling people to get out and enjoy themselves until some of his staff threatened to resign. Pelosi went to Chinatown, hugging and shaking hands, saying all was well and to come on down. She tore up the SOTU address, in which Trump said that they were trying to work with China over the Covid outbreak.
Strange thing is, I listened to Trump as well and I decided that I'd better be prepared for this outbreak. When the great toilet paper panic struck, I was sitting pretty because I bought a extra groceries, every week, leading up to the lockdown to flatten the curve. I didn't just listen to Trump. I watched what he did and I was ready.
This wasn't a failure of Trump. It's a failure of people, like yourself, who didn't get ready for what was to come. However, you'll never own your failure to act. You'd rather blame someone else.
3
-
3
-
@thunderstruck1078
I AM an individual who is a product of my ancestral heritage and my culture. However, I'm an individual first....one who is in control of my own destiny. If they want to be collectivists first, that's their own business and it's a sad way to live. I'm not good to my family, friends, community or my culture unless I'm good for for myself, first. I can't change the world, for the better, but I can change my little corner of it. If my corner touches the corner of another who's looking after his corner, that better expands. That's how the west, especially in the US and Canada, grew into such prosperity. Individuals, working as such, cooperating and becoming the majority, building their tiny personal "kingdoms" into one, and uniting to become a society and a nation.
That's what took us into becoming the greatest societies in history.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ericzahn9336
I live in the country, born and raised a farm boy, and I have no problem with gender reveal parties. A bit dumb but if that's your thing....go for it. However, no "hick" would EVER start a fire, in the country, burning down everything they own or worked for, even putting their own lives at risk. These are town folk, who don't understand the danger their actions could cause and who have a skewed vision of the country and the "hicks" that live there. Town folk, who go to a country park, for their silly ritual, and then set the land ablaze, threatening the lives and property of the "hicks" that live there.
3
-
3
-
@lumendelsol
Social media was only parroting what the MSM was feeding them. It's the MSM that's the problem. I know lots of people that don't know a thing about the facts about Rittenhouse and they got that information from MSNBC, CNN and others. When you call them on it, that's their defence. "I saw it on the news last night." Then they'll tell you that you've been watching FOX or QANON types and then they go on social media and tell the world what the Washington Post has printed or what Don Lemon is saying. They actually believe this stuff because they just can't believe that these sources would lie.
Ana Kasparian, of the Young Turks, is a prime example. She thought that Kyle crossed state lines with a gun. She thought that Kyle was chasing Rosenbaum. She didn't even know that Kyle was being attacked by a guy with a skateboard. WHY? Because the MSM told her these things. Now she's watching the trial and is surprised that the MSM has ignored what the rest of us....ON SOCIAL MEDIA, as well, have known all along and how little she actually knew about the events surrounding that day.
I will say that the Big Tech companies are complicit as well, in the obfuscation and censorship of the facts. However, there are sources, if you're interested in the truth, all over social media and the internet. That's the rub. It's whether you're driven to know facts, that's how one finds the truth. It's the commitment to integrity that counts. MSM and Big Tech do not have that commitment.
3
-
If you have a racist purity test which amounts to a witch trial, of course Trump is racist. So are you. So am I. There's no way anyone will pass that test. It's designed so that everyone tested will fail.
I'm not sure what your problem with herd immunity is all about. If we become immune once exposed to it, eventually, we'll all be immune. Pure logic.
What some people just don't get is that no matter what we do, there will be surges in the cases. It's highly contagious and it's the nature of the disease. If we lockdown until it's completely gone, we'll be locked down for good....for the rest of your life. Not a pleasant prospect.
What's important is the death rate in relationship to the case rate. At the end of April, the case rate was around 30,000 new cases per day. The death rate was around 2000 cases a day.
Now, the case rate is close to 70,000 new cases per day, yet the death rate is under 800 per day. Almost 2 1/2 cases more and yet a 60% DROP in deaths. That says that we're learning how to treat it and I'm going to assume that we'll get better at it in the future. Already, we have plenty respirators and fewer and fewer cases end up in the hospital in relationship to the number of cases.
Even now, the new case load per day seems to be a the peak. That means, we should start to see another dropping off in the next couple of weeks. Not a guarantee but that's the pattern of all infectious diseases. The south didn't peak back in April like NY York did. Now it's their turn. That'll be the pattern in most populated areas. You can't stop it. It will happen.
All you can do is try to protect the most vulnerable. I'm 68, considered to vulnerable. I take precautions. My dad is 88. I haven't seen him since late February.....to keep him safe. That should be the priority....everywhere and It seems as if we get it now. At least they're not putting Covid patients in nursing homes, anymore......a ridiculous move no matter how you look at it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@47f0
Did you EVER validate my point. You said EXACTLY what a person, who wasn't objective, would say. First, you deflected the conversation and then you flog the "business disasters" rhetoric, that's just plain false and demonstrably so. Trump net worth is 2.5 billion dollars. That's 2.5 with EIGHT zeros behind it. Over 99% of all the businessmen on the planet wish that their enterprises were that disastrous. We're all failures beside that number and business success is judged on their numbers. Also, I thought that his show was a joke and I never took Trump seriously, mainly because of that show.
Worse, you never answered my basic question. Would the media and Big Tech have covered that story had it been Don Trump juniors laptop, with all the implications of wrong doing, by the father, on that laptop, which were evident on Hunter's laptop? You never even ATTEMPTED to say yes or no to that. You went off on your own little tangent.
Incredibly, you don't even have the self awareness to see how you validated my point.
3
-
@JohnSmith-sm7ez
FOX is the ONLY TV news channel that might have any appeal to a conservative. EVERY other one supports the Democrats. CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, PBS....they ALL support the Democrats. One channel against ALL THE OTHER CHANNELS. Even FOX has been losing viewers because they're not as biased as you'd think. FOX news personality, Chris Wallace, at the presidential debates, asked Trump if would denounce white supremacy. He asked him the SAME question 4 years ago at the presidential debates and he didn't ask Biden that question. Biden, the guy who once came out in support of school segregation gets a pass on that. Why would he do that? Was it because he's part of the Trump propaganda machine? FOX didn't cover the laptop scandal like they should have either. It's a BIG reason why many viewers are critical of FOX. I'll bet you NEVER watch FOX, either. You're just repeating what you're hearing on CNN.
Why would anyone even trust those other channels. It took me ten minutes to find the full video, on the internet, of the Covington kids story. Every one of them, except FOX blasted those kids and everyone of them WERE WRONG. 10 minutes to find it and I'm just a retired bartender, living in a 1 room basement apartment. They couldn't do it? Is it because Nick Sandman was wearing a MAGA hat.
I don't know what you're talking about when you say that Saudis are shooting US soldiers. You'll have to enlighten more on that one.
3
-
3
-
3
-
none of your damn business
Then you may as well say that you're a slave of life. Money is a convenient means to trade or negotiate for the things that we need to sustain us, like food, water, clothing and shelter, the very basics of life. Every high end species needs some of these things and our fragility demands that we need more.
In reality, we in the west, live a life of comparative ease. The poorest of us live better than even the richest did 500 years ago. We live longer, have better health, live in homes that keep us dry when it's wet, warm when it's cold and cool when it's hot. We live in a luxury that would make people like Henry VIII and Elizabeth I gasp in amazement and envy. I'm a retired, almost 70 year old man, living way below the poverty standard for my country, yet I never worry about the basic essentials of life. In fact, I'm leaving for Cancun for 10 days in a 5 Star resort this weekend and last year, I was in the Netherlands and the Dominican Republic. I'm living a life that wasn't even a dream in medieval Europe.
You want to wallow in misery and envy, that's your choice. I prefer to appreciate just how lucky I am and enjoy the only life that I'll ever have. It's not always easy and the work was hard at times, but I am fully cognisant of the special times we live in. Times that so many many so cavalierly complain about and want to destroy. They have no idea what they might lead themselves into.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
spacedog101
No substance? Are you saying that only because she's a conservative or because you know her personally or have went through the rigorous process of learning what she's about? I'd say that it's because she's running as a Republican and that's ALL you need to know. The divisiveness that she was alluding to lives in your comment. You'll have nothing good to say about her or to do with her for only one reason and no other reason. That's true divisiveness. In fact, that's the very definition of bigotry.
You don't even have the self awareness to realise that you're contradicting yourself. Trump is the first president to fight the "Made in China" only products in our stores. Yet, she's a strong Trump supporter. So, is she wrong to wear "Made in China" spandex or is Trump wrong to take on the Chinese and work out a new deal so the "Made in China" label isn't on almost every product in our stores?
That entire weather map thing was a tempest in a teapot. CNN made a much bigger thing of this than what it warranted. They weren't even smart enough to see what really happened.
"Hey...look at this map. Big hurricane in Alabama". Meanwhile, while everyone is obsessing over this stupid map, Trump appropriates more money, from another source, to finance the building of the wall. MSM is as much a clown show as Trump. Worse, because he's using those clown world antics against the DNC and the media and they're too obsessed with their hatred for him to not fall for it.
Stop hating so much and start using your brain. That hatred lost the last election and will, quite likely, lose the next election as well.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@LucasCanDrum
I've been following a YouTuber name Patricia Dickson. She grew up in an all Black neighbourhood, I think in Tennessee and knew very few white folk. She did alright in high school but didn't know what to do after graduating. She announced to her family that she was joining the Air Force. Did that drive them crazy. They told her that white folk hated blacks and that they'd torment and discriminate against her. That they'd make her life SO miserable that she'd come crawling home first chance she got.
She didn't listen and joined anyway. After that, every time she went home for a visit, they'd grill her and she'd tell them she really like it. They called her a liar. When her nephew started asking her about life in the military, her sister told her to quit lying to him before she ruined the nephew's life. She finally decided not to talk about her life in the Air Force at home anymore.
She took classes and when she finally got out of the service, she went to college on a GI Bill. She found a good job and eventually went to England for a year to work because she loved English history and wanted to see it firsthand. She then moved to California until she got sick of the politics and went to Texas and she's made a good life for herself. Nothing spectacular but something to be proud of.
You see, she didn't buy into the "everyone hates us" mentality. Even they did, that wouldn't have stopped her because she believed in herself. Yet, her own family and friends fought her every step of the way. How many of them stayed right where they were because of this same pressure. "Oreo" and "Uncle Tom" aren't just insults. They're a way to excuse your own failures and to blame it on others.
There's a reason that Asian families have the highest household earnings in the US. It's their culture and work ethic and determination, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the imagined "inequality" that you're talking about. They do it and those who treat them badly can get lost.
You can't do anything about what others feel about you. However, you can do something about how you feel about yourself. Don't let the naysayers hold you down. If you do.....that's YOUR fault.
3
-
@godzillamegatron3590
Nothing is a guarantee....EVER. Your life isn't a guarantee. We've been spoiled into believing that it all has to be there FOR us, whenever we want it and we shouldn't be expected to set standards of excellence.
If you expect nothing but the best from yourself, and that applies to all the things that you've listed, skills, knowledge and experience, others will recognise that desire in you and it will eventually pay off. Not right away, maybe it never will in the way the you'd like it to, but no one finds success in waiting for it. You have to go for it and expect nothing but the best effort, in everything that you do. It's YOU that sets the standard, no one else.
It took me a long time to learn that and when I finally got it, it opened all kinds of doors for me that I never expected.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@thebladeofchaos
In April the caseload was just close to 30 thousand per day, with a death rate of just over 2000 deaths. NOW, the case load is 70 thousand per day with just over 800 deaths per day. That's over 2 times the cases with less than 1/2 the deaths. So the danger, when the disease was new and unknown was almost 3 times as dangerous as it is now, yet many are still in a panic.
WHO and the UN has stated, repeatedly, that lockdowns may cause the deaths of tens of millions due to starvation. That abject poverty levels, around the world, has doubled since March and will continue to increase if lockdowns are strictly enforced. That means even MORE starvation, causing deaths and life altering physical damage, especially for children, who may never recover from the ill effects of severe malnutrition.
People think that the economy is only important to the rich. It's important to everyone. People die from the effects of a bad economy.
The cure, I'm referring to lockdowns, is worse than the disease.
3
-
If you've ever raised children, you'd know that children are filled with rage. The 2 year old will scream, hold his breath, try to beat you, whatever's necessary to get their way. Parents that try to placate that rage, raise those children to continue to use rage as their weapon to achieve their goals, usually but not always. Parents who refuse to capitulate to that rage, will raise those children, usually and not always, to realise that achievements are earned and not given by demand.
If temper tantrums work as an 18 month child, it will continue to be used until that strategy fails or the child rages to the point of over the top violence. We're getting to that point now.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@wwjccsd
No one said that children aren't smart. Of course they are. For one thing, they lack life experience. They can't speak of things that they haven't experienced in life. Secondly, they should should show respect to their elders, especially their parents, due to this experience and the adults bear the brunt of taking care of their child's needs. If a child wishes to speak to an adult, they should wait until the adults are done speaking and then speak, asking their question or giving their opinion as desired. That's when the adult should treat them as human beings, explaining things as best they can what's appropriate.
This is an ongoing process, starting when the child is very small so they know the protocols right from early childhood. Adulthood isn't just the passage to time. It's a ritual that's completed and a stage of life that's earned. That's why people have had the rites of passage, that the young go through, to show that they're ready to take on adult responsibilities. This has been the norm for tens of thousands of years. Letting children interrupt and blurt out whatever's on their mind is detrimental to their development. Humility is very important to human development and to living a life of contentment with courage. The "I'm important" view is only encouraging narcissistic behaviour and that undermines future relationships.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@donfregin8668
You could be right on that but the fact is that the worst places for homelessness is big, Democrat run cities and have been for decades. LA, San Francisco, Seattle, New York and I can go on and on.
That's an observation and is easily proven to be accurate.
So, if I lived in those cities, why would I vote for those same politicians? That's all I'm asking. If every time I stick a finger in a small hole, it gets chopped off, how many times would I stick my finger in that whole? If I did it more than once, I'd be one stupid SOB......but people keep voting for the same people that do nothing about the homeless problem.
If every voter, in those cities, insist that their politicians do something about it or they will refuse to vote for them and MEANT it, things would improve. Either that or the elections ARE rigged and the threats to vote them out doesn't bother them.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Dillon Duncan
Way to go with the demonisation of one side. Just to emphasise how "horrible" the Israelis are, you throw in the "murder children" phrase, insinuating that killing Palestinian children is an Israeli tactic. Hyperbole like that should really help negotiations and understanding.
Israel isn't going deeper into Palestine at all. They fought a war against outsiders, Jordan, Egypt and Syria with help from various other Arab countries and eventually took this land over. Israel actually gave Egypt back the Sinai Peninsula and voluntarily allowed the Gaza strip to become solely under the control of Palestinians. Did they take advantage of it? NO. Instead, the Palestinians there, Hamas and the PLO, took money, given from outside sources, and bought military goods with it and lined the pockets of top Palestinian leaders. If you would EVER get into all the times that the Palestinians were offered an independent state of their own, you'd know that they refused EVERY time. Yet, they don't need to have it.
There are nearly 2,000,000 Muslims, called Palestinians, living in Israel proper. Not in Gaza or the West Bank, but in Israel. They have full citizenship, able to vote, have sat in the Knesset, joined that Israeli military and police, own land and businesses. They have every right that an Jewish Israeli has. However, the Palestinians don't want that. They want to RULE the Levant and have said so repeatedly. In other words, the Dimmi state, where Muslim rule supreme and others live there under conditions set by the Muslim leaders, the clerics.
There has NEVER been an independent Palestinian state in the Levant. It has always been controlled from outside. The British, the Ottoman Empire, the Egyptian Mamluks, the Mongols, the Kurds, the Crusaders, the Arabs, the Byzantines, the Romans. The last time the area was independent was under the rule of the Maccabees, over 2000 years ago. They led a Jewish rebellion against a Greek ruler, Antiochus IV. The inhabitants of the Levant have always been diverse, including local Muslims, Jews, Christians and pilgrims from various religious orders. The Jews didn't start to dominate till after they migrated there due to persecution in Europe and other countries, starting when the Ottomans controlled the region and growing when the British had it for a short time. Under the British, the local Muslims, were offered a homeland, TWICE, but the Muslims turned the offers down both times. In spite of the fact that Jews and Christians had always lived there, the Muslims wanted complete control for themselves.
This is history and the facts.
Also, it seems that you've conveniently forgotten all the rocket attacks by Palestinians. Forgotten the 25,000 dollars, American, the Saddam Hussein, would give to the families of suicide bombers, who would strap bombs to themselves and blow themselves up in busy shopping malls and markets. None of that counts for you or you've ignored it.
I don't think that Israel should be expanding into the West Bank. They should have done with that area the same as they did the Gaza strip and allowed the Palestinians to live there, independently. However, that was a decision they made after Palestinian leaders REJECTED the offer of a Palestinian state in the region. So what do the Israelis do now? Leave the area in limbo or every Jew in Israel, all 6 million plus, get out because that's the only thing that would satisfy Palestinian leadership.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Orcinus1967
The Nazis serve as the ultimate example of how NOT to behave as a group or nation. That's why it's discussed ad nauseum. Other examples are the communists of the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia and today, the socialists of Venezuela.
Germany has moved on, as has those of us who lived under the shadow of the Nazis but we can't forget it. We can't forget it because we can't let it happen in our countries because that danger is just as real, today, in the rest of the world, as it was to the Germans 90 years ago.
When we use the Nazis as an example, it's not just an indictment of them, it's also an indictment of the potential in all of us to be exactly the same. The problem is that the "woke" generation refuse to believe it of themselves. They think themselves immune to the lure of social superiority. We try to show them, through Nazi Germany, that no one is immune.
It's not an indictment of Germans alone. It's an indictment of humanity.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
READ my posts, would you. I, specifically, said that regulations are necessary. Capitalism works when it operates within the law. However, when you OVER regulate, you add costs, stifle creative spirit and hand cuff the entrepreneurial spirit. When a regulation serves no purpose, why would one insist on having it?
Why do you insist that it has to one of the other and only the most extreme examples? Either regulate EVERYTHING or NOTHING. Is there no room for common sense?
Since the topic on who's paying hasn't been brought up, why would I comment on it? Also, what does it matter who pays? If a person can shoe a horse without a high school diploma, why insist on it? All it does is give a job(s) to another government employee(s) and inflate the tax bill for all.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@kathycoleman4648
I work as a bartender, Kathy. You just don't say anything, out loud, that might even SOUND that you might approve of something that Trump has done. Someone will go completely off the rails and the anger and bitterness is frightening. I'm Canadian as well and I don't get it. He's not even our president.
This guy drove up and down the streets, in our town, with NY plates, flying a Trump flag, and you wouldn't believe the horrific vitriol. "If he comes in here, I'll show him what's up." Some of the guys said they'd beat him to a pulp and the women said they'd scratch his eyes out. It was incredible....and scary. Some of us just looked at each other and shook our heads, quietly, in dismay. In Canada. I thought we were tolerant people. Maybe we're not as wonderful as we like to think we are.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Fennerex V
Check all the athletic record holders in both men's and women's sports around the world. Men's records are consistently higher than women's records by 10% and higher. Almost EVERY one of them. Also, and this is quite telling, why are no transgender women trying to get into men's teams to compete? If they're THAT good, they should be playing professional baseball, soccer, hockey, football and basketball on the men's team. That's where the money is. Yet no women are trying out for those professional leagues. I can only think of one woman, who tried out for the NHL's Tampa Bay Lightning and played parts of 2 exhibition games. One woman tried out, as a place kicker, and was injured in her tryouts. That goes for the NBA as well. No women has ever played Major league baseball although some have been drafted but played in the minors.
It's not as if a top notch athlete wouldn't be allowed to play, if they were scoring 30 plus goals in the NHL. There have none that have even look good enough to play at that level. You can wish it into existence all you want but it doesn't line up with reality.
3
-
@Fennerex V
How is ANYONE going to learn all the pronouns? It's impossible, especially when dealing with the gender fluid. The use of pronouns has be the norm for hundreds of years. Then, just recently, a certain demographic just changes the rules and if you don't go along, they will FORCE you to change. Tell you what you MUST believe. If you're Muslim, you MUST adapt Your belief system because our Islamophobia is not as bad as your transphobia. We must ALL believe the same or we're ALL bigots and as such must be dealt with.....and you hide behind the guise of harassment. This IS how the Fascists gained and held onto power. It's how Stalin did it and Mao through the cultural revolution. You don't want to believe it because YOU are the fascist who wants to tell me what to believe.
As for Schuyler Bailar, being in the top 15%.... YES...that's entirely plausible. If you look at the athletic record holders for men and women, you'll find that men's records are consistently more than 10 percent higher than the women's records. It's exactly what you'd expect. It ALSO demonstrates why it's unfair for men to compete with women as equals. Men will beat them by 10% or MORE. It's a specious argument.
Most of us aren't mad at trans people. We're angry that it's being used to influence vulnerable children and may coerce them into doing things that they will regret for the rest of their lives. It's how Christianity spread.
"Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it." (Prov. 22:6.)
This is why Christianity isn't integrated into the public school curriculum. It's because it may influence the children for the rest of their lives and it's NOT the job of the state to teach ideology or beliefs on pain of legal repercussions. Repercussions to the demand of if you don't say the Lord's Prayer, you could be suspended from school. That's what you're advocating for. You're no different than the Christian or Maoist who is SO certain that they're correct, that they will legislate against your right to believe as you will.
You're just too deeply ingrained into your belief system that you're blind to it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@zwicker5585
Where did I say "all the time"? I never said that ONCE. You've created a strawman argument.
Changing your name and insisting that people use a whole new set of pronouns is a big deal. It could mean puberty blockers is next, and hormone drugs and maybe even surgeries. That's serious stuff. I know a person who died from complications of an tonsillectomy. This is a lot more serious. If my child throws up in class, they'd have called me. In fact, when my grand daughter became ill and threw up in the hall, they called me because they couldn't get in touch with my daughter or her husband. They do it already.....but for some reason, they can't do it when the child wants to secretly keep girls clothes at school, purchased by someone other than the parent, and wear those clothes. That's insane.
Another thing, quite often depression isn't always about relationships. It's also a medical condition and if a child decides that the reason they're depressed is due to gender issues, that's a self diagnosis. Since when do patients diagnose themselves? And if the teacher is telling her that this is the answer, the teacher is practising medicine. That's unlawful AND irresponsibly reckless.
To finish, all it takes is a phone call. If they can call me, as they have my emergency number, when my grand daughter threw up, they can inform the family about her new pronoun preferences. The implications are too serious to ignore.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@july6949
Really? Neo-liberal capitalism did that? You do realise that this capitalism that you're speaking of is an idea, don't you. Ideas don't build bombs. People do. So....what you're saying is that some people, who believe in the idea of capitalism, ideologists, killed him in the name of Capitalism? That's seem hard to believe.
Was this bomb blast in a western capitalist country? A country that respects the rule of law? If it did, it wasn't capitalism that killed him, it was people protecting their own self interest and they committed a crime and should face the consequences of that crime.
However, I don't know the specifics of this incident because you're claim is too broad to truly assess what the motives were. Had you given the details, like location, the motive of the perpetrators and why they'd set off a bomb, we could all see how true that claim of yours truly is. Without it, I'd say it's just hyperbolic nonsense, prompted by an ideological mindset.
3
-
@july6949
I'm truly sorry for your loss but I strongly disagree with your assessment of capitalism and how it killed your friend.
Capitalism is an economic system. It's a means of production, a way to create value through labour and creativity by allowing the individual the freedom to operate their economy within bounds. Those bounds being the rule of law. Capitalism is implemented by people and those people are bound by that rule of law. It doesn't matter under what system of production that is being used. If you do something that contravenes that law, you are now acting outside the acceptable behaviour of your political entity as enshrined in your legal code.
Columbia is a western country but when I used that term, I was referring to the first world countries that pattern themselves after the type of government the US has. This would be Canada, Britain, Japan, South Korea, western Europe, etc....
Columbia is NOT included in this group. They are a developing country with a mid range economy at best.
You may ask why I stress the importance of the rule of law and the reason is this. Capitalism, indeed any society, will only reach success if their set of laws are fully respected, understood and implemented. That clearly didn't happen in the case of your friend. Every person is bound by the legal code of their country. The central theme being that everyone has the right to their personal freedom as long as it doesn't impose on the freedom of others. That has NOTHING to do with capitalism, except the freedom to conduct personal economy as one sees fit.....as long as it doesn't contravene the law and principles of human rights. Owning my own company does NOT release me from any obligation to the law or the freedom of others.
Your friend died, not because of capitalism, but because there were those who believed themselves free of the obligations of the law or the preservation of human rights. They killed him for personal interests, no different than had I entered my neighbour's home and killed him to obtain his property. If the government, in effect, those who are a part of the government, allows it to happen, indeed sanctions my actions, then they too are violating the personal right of my neighbour to own his property, legally attained and to his life.
If the Columbian government, the individuals the run that government, allowed and sanctioned the murder of your friend, they violated his human rights. They did it for self interest. That's not capitalism. It wouldn't matter what economic system they believed in. They broke the law. Had they been socialist, they still broke the law. Had it been a huge company that sanctioned it, the law is still broken. Had they been a religious faction, Catholics, Muslims, Zoroastrians or whatever, they broke the law.
This is why, in the United States, an incoming president swears to uphold the Constitution. It is vital to the freedom of individual rights. He doesn't swear to protect capitalism because capitalism is an expression of those individual rights, the freedom of the individual to create value. If the president acts against that Constitution, he breaks the law.
We have laws because we understand that humans are flawed and will act in their own self interest, even if it means violating the self interests of others. Everyone, operating in a capitalist economy, is still bound by those laws. The economy doesn't rule. It is still subservient to a Constitution and the guidelines that allow human rights for all.
To finish, Capitalism did not kill your friend. People, working outside the law with no regard for human rights, killed your friend.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@gabepizza
I'm 71 years old. I've watched that show and have been aware of it all my life. We only had 2 TV stations when I was growing up and my dad watched it all the time.
When you have a program, whose platform is interviewing people, you can still cater those interviews so that they play to the biases of the host and writers. Any claims made, by the person being interviewed, or by how the host frames their questions, should be verified by the viewer, NOT by the host, who may or may not have their own ideas and allow the interview to reflect those ideas, and especially not by the person being interviewed.
I can't believe that you'd blindly trust a host of ANY program. Listen to interview and then verify. Don't take what you've just heard as fact even if the host might imply that it is.
Having said that, Meet the Press isn't that bad a show but to believe that the host can't manipulate an interview, to suit their agenda, is naive.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@galiyam1
Do you know what's hurting his presidency? The Democrat hatred of him and their reaction to losing the last election. The country was doing great until Covid hit and, true to form, the worst hit places were Democrat run states, both by the disease and economically. Texas and Florida have 30 million MORE people, combined, than New York, yet have over 10,000 more deaths. This is the state where Covid patients were put in nursing homes and Cuomo refuses to talk about it when asked. NY City has checkpoints at city exits. 500,000 people have left, most of them for good, eroding the tax base and it would appear that NY will have a 30 billion dollar shortfall this year. Mayor DeBlasio has threatened to increase taxes on those who remain, ensuring even more people leaving and is now talking about wealth redistribution. They've had riots, excuse me, "peaceful protests" where stores were looted and property damaged. The streets are empty, businesses boarded up and covered in graffiti. The Mayor took the homeless, out of shelters and have put them up in high end hotels at 175 bucks a night....13,000 of them. These addicts and mentally impaired people are wandering the streets, threatening people, urinating in public, passing out where ever they happen to be, even though they have rooms that you and I can't afford to live in. 1 billion dollars in funding have been taken away from the police force and even though 1/2 billion people have left the city, violent crime has doubled. Even so, the mayor has seen fit to assign 27 police officers to protect a BLM street painting, which he had commissioned at tax payer expense.
......and Trump is a bad president? Democrat city Portland has had 100 days of continuous riots. LA and San Francisco are in a dystopian mess, with homelessness, exorbitant rents and taxes, electrical blackouts and have even talked about taxing people that have left the state for ten years, AFTER they've left. They've just voted to repeal the state Civil Right's Act, their state version of the Federal Act that Martin Luther King worked so hard to put in place. Downtown Minneapolis has been destroyed. Their Democrat city council has voted to abolish the police force and then hired a private security firm to protect themselves. Kenosha has 3 days of intense riots, refusing help, from Trump, until people were killed. Chicago has had ongoing riots. Louisville has had BLM extorting money from small businesses demanding they buy 1/3 of their supplies from Black owned businesses or pay them 1.5% of their revenue.
Do you know what the common thread here is? They're ALL Democrat led cities....yet Trump is a bad president. I can go on if you like. These aren't the only cities in a dystopian nightmare but you're going to vote for the Democrats and expand this chaos to a national level. GREAT THINKING!!!!!!!
3
-
3
-
3
-
@trh-bee4383
You just said that if I go to work and catch Covid, I shouldn't be allowed medical assistance. What would be the penalty for the guy, who had a mild case of Covid, and went to work and passed it on to me and I became seriously ill? Do we penalise him, too?
I was under the impression that the noble field of medicine was to care for all who were in need. Doctors even cared for Nazi soldiers who tried to kill our soldiers. Nazis, whose intent was to kill as many as possible, still deserved care when hurt in battle, but not Covid patients who step out of line. Even guys, like Paul Bernardo or Russell Williams, serial rapists and murderers, get treated for illnesses, but NOT me, because I want to work.
One strange sense of compassion you have there.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Almighty Black'Man
BS. My sister was escorted back to Canada and told NOT to come back. She was there illegally, just like those that are coming through the southern border. She's white as white can get, red hair and blue eyes. As a matter of fact, of the top 10 countries where legal immigrants come from, not one is a predominately white country. Mexico, China, India, the Philippines, Cuba, The Dominican Republic, Haiti, Vietnam, El Salvador and Jamaica make up the top ten sources of legal immigrants. Over recent years, European make up less than 10 percent of all legal immigrants.
If you weren't so lazy, you'd do a little research before you make such stupid claims. It's easy. Just google "top demographics of American immigrants".
Any noob can do it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@E_Ten
Which brings me to this point. Covid was a brand new disease. No vaccine. No treatment. Nothing was known about it. A couple of studies said that HCQ worked, most known the study in France. One question I have is this. Why would anyone just pick HCQ out of a hat to use as a treatment for Covid? Why that particular drug? Was there something in the symptoms and pathology of Covid that suggested that it was a logical drug to investigate? I'd say there must have been. A doctor just wouldn't choose it over so many other drugs to choose from. There had to be a reason.
Which brings me to the safety question. It's been used for over 50 years as a treatment for malaria. It's known that malaria causes respiratory distress and I'd say that this was the connection that prompted doctors to try it on Covid. With over 200 million cases a year, the dangers of HCQ would be reliably documented.
It would seem to me that in April, when nothing was known about the disease and I mean nothing, why wouldn't you prescribe it? It's been quite safely used and like any other drug, you don't prescribe it to those who have conditions that are known to react badly with it. There are all kinds of drugs like that. We can get aspirin over the counter, yet I know people with allergies that this aspirin will kill. I can buy peanuts at the 7/11, which is deadly for some people, but, for some reason, when you have a deadly disease, you're not even allowed to try HCQ. I find the logic baffling. At the time there was no known treatment but, if contracted, a doctor isn't allowed to even try it, in some places, just wait it out and hope that it doesn't get worse. Yet, if you had rheumatoid arthritis, a terrible disease but not nearly as immediately deadly as Covid, not a problem.
Maybe it wasn't going to work but it seems that a drug that has such widespread use shouldn't be as controversial as it has been. That, to me, is baffling. It's like it was better to do nothing, than to use a drug who's side effects are well known. Then we'd have data, REAL data, instead of a political football.
3
-
@E_Ten
When there's 140,000 dead, we KNOW what the harmful effects of Covid is. In January, 6 months ago, we didn't know. HCQ was deemed safe for use, just like aspirin and aspirin has killed people in allergic reactions, yet I can take aspirin for Covid, but not HCQ.
Of course it hasn't been tested on Covid before. How could it have been? I find it rather ironic that if I have rheumatoid arthritis and I have HCQ in my medicine cabinet, I could take it if I'm diagnosed with it. I try it too. I'm 68 and it could kill me within a week, and I'm not ready to go yet and if I've used it all along, I'll use it now. However, my neighbour doesn't even have the opportunity to try it, if he can't find a doctor who will prescribed it, off label, or like in Michigan where the governor refused to allow its use. In fact, there was a politician, in Michigan who was quite ill with Covid and had taken HCQ for Lyme disease, in the past, got her doctor to prescribe it because he felt it perfectly safe. She was vilified by the state governor when she said it helped her almost immediately.
I realise that it may be coincidental that she recovered but the point is, why is aspirin, with it's record ok but HCQ not ok. That's what is baffling to me and why it's become political. Had people been allowed to use it, since its safety is understood, we'd know by now whether it would be a waste of time or not. But we won't know because the politics of it clouds everything. It's beyond ridiculous, to the point of being a tragedy more than anything. Worse, the media has conflated untested for Covid with untested for safety which is being quite disingenuous.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@A_Jeff
You're contradicting yourself. If Canada needed the pipeline to get their products to a better port, they've lost out. The pipeline, to a better port, doesn't exist, Biden stopped it. That means that they're not drilling for more because they can't get it to markets. Thousands of oil workers, in Alberta and Saskatchewan, are now sitting at home because the Keystone project was scrapped. These are workers that would have had high paying jobs but no pipeline so no point in drilling for oil. That also impacts all the peripheral workers. Truck drivers to get products to drilling sites. Secondary manufacturing to build the trucks and products needed to drill for the oil. Service industries lose high paying oil riggers as customers. This is a huge industry in western Canada.
Then there's the oil refineries in Louisiana which would directly employ hundreds of people of high paying jobs. Then the dock workers who load the oil tankards and all those who service the refineries and docks. The pipeline will also need servicing which will keep more skilled workers in jobs.
The oil industry is a labour intensive business which needs highly skilled workers who make great money. This isn't like a guy whittling whistles to sell at a fair. This is a big industry. There's a reason why the Arab states are so rich. We, in Canada and the US, could grab a piece of their pie but Biden and company don't want it. They just decide that they don't want it and with a stroke of the pen, thousands are out of work. It doesn't cost Biden or the Democrats one red cent but the ordinary worker, as usual, pays the price. That's what blows me away. The Democrats just don't care about the little guy.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@harambe1580
I was thinking that you were probably quite young. I remember having those feelings, at that age, myself.
I'm 68 and, although the Covid thing wasn't around when I was your age, there was still that tendency to feel a little helpless about life.
I don't blame you for not wanting to work behind a desk. I went to college and studied office systems and when I graduated, I realised that I hated it. I got into construction and machine maintenance and I was quite happy with that as a career.
The only advice I can give you is to remain patient. Things work out, in the end, if you follow your instincts, do what feels right and work hard at it. As for women, there's nothing I can say that will help you there. I love them but they're crazy. LOL.
I'm in Canada and I like it here. Fortunately, I never lived in the city. I'd love to visit Portugal, some day. People say that it's a beautiful country. Maybe after this Covid thing is over.
Anyway, good luck to you.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@moestietabarnak
Why is it that there were HUNDREDS of riots, all summer, and the MSM was either silent, or justifying the looting and burning? Almost 140 riots, in a row in Portland alone. 4 riots since Jan. 1st of this year. People killed, businesses burned to the ground. people losing their life savings.....and NO ONE in the MSM called out the violence. Why was that?
Also, if you seriously think that about 200 people, crashing through a door, in Washington, were going to take down the American government, you're delusional. Were these rioters in the wrong? You bet they were, but SO WAS EVERY ONE THAT RIOTED AND LOOTED LAST SUMMER. This "good cause" rhetoric is just that. Propaganda dressed up as rhetoric....and you're falling for it.
You want 2 sets of rules and you can't have it that way. Not if you want to live in a civilised country.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@leolabustro8531
Thanks. Margret Thatcher once gave a speech in which she pointed out that the richest country in the world, in natural resources, was the Soviet Union. It had everything. Rich soil, oil and gas, lumber, abundant water, gold, raw iron...it had it all. Yet, the people of the Soviet Union, had starved to death, they stood in line-ups for basic needs and it was all due to government policies. Venezuela is going through the exact same problems. They're the same policies that Trudeau is forcing on our country.
THAT is what I'm talking about. Over regulation and government interference in our lives. A lot of people don't want to accept that. I appreciate you're support and your ability to understand how governments are slowly destroying the dreams of the individual in western society. Thank you for your response.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Roman49837
I consider myself a Liberal. I will listen to new ideas, respect the freedom that allows others to have ideas different than my own and most importantly, the ability to accept or reject ideas based on the merits of those ideas. For some reason, Liberals, these days, think that I must accept and respect all ideas that are presented to me or I'm a bigot, a hateful person. Anyone who would force me to do that is NO Liberal. They're narcissistic authoritarians, using bullying tactics to either censor or, as in many places, literally erase me from the planet.
I've listened to those lefties in NYC and I reject their ideas based on their merit. Their ideas lack in logic, based on misplaced sympathy, are unworkable and the evidence is how their ideas are destroying that city. It's quite obvious but those, who support those ideas, aren't Liberal enough to reconsider their stance or to listen to anyone who might offer new ideas. To me, that's not liberal. It's bullheaded, narcissistic and they're using their ideas as proof of their virtue and it doesn't matter to them how their ideas are hurting everyone, especially the ones that they claim to care about.
They're NOT Liberal. They're bullies, forcing their beliefs on others through threats of violence, which they'll use, quite gleefully in rampages, destroying the neighbourhoods of those they they claim they're helping. Nothing liberal about that.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I know a 68 year old man who runs a small farm, does contract work for other farmers, works continental shifts at a paper mill and will take on all the overtime that he can get. Yet the farm is paid off, he's got all kinds of money and his wife is pissed that he won't slow down, let alone stop. Why does he do it? He loves to work. I worked with him for years and he's said to me, more than once, what a great day for working.
People have different motivations in life. I'd never work like this guy, especially if I had his money, and I liked working, but to each his own. It's sad if they have to work but that's as much the fault of the new dynamics of family life. At one time, the elderly would be looked after by their family. Now, we expect it from the government and they don't care about the individual, not like a family member would or should.
3
-
@lordbread2083
I can't speak to that because I can't see into the future. Also, what's the difference between Trump's wall, Bush's fence and Obama's barrier? Nothing, except the size and scope of it.
EVERY country in the world demands a passport for entry. Britain, France, Japan, Brazil, Canada, Egypt, Iran, Kenya.....EVERY ONE OF THEM. Yet for some inexplicable reason, we have these people that believe that the US is racist if they insist that you have a passport if you want to enter at the southern border.
The ONLY reason that the wall may never get built is due to the same people that believe that ONLY the US should not be allowed to ask for a passport for entry and to control their own borders. That's the only reason.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I've been following this stuff for a couple of years. Listen to Jordan Peterson and the mess with Lindsay Shepherd, the craziness at Evergreen College, but I still I had no idea how bad it was. They are so filled with anger and hate and they don't see it of themselves.
Imagine, telling a Jewish gay man, whose lost family in the Holocaust that he doesn't understand, it just boggles the mind at the logic. That girl at the end saying that she might be shot because she was black, YES, it could happen, but the statistics says that she would be more likely to be shot by a black person. I'm not sure which one she'd prefer to shoot her, but I'd prefer not to be shot by anyone of them.
Dave....I don't know how you do it, but I'm grateful that you do. Kudos to you. You're a special person.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@SCAR16L
I've been looking for almost an hour and all I got were the same points, written mostly on blogs. Not what I would call great evidence.
Apparently, you have the evidence, from the way that you're talking. If it is being scrubbed, like you're claiming, all that's left is the bad stuff that I've already found. If you want us to believe it, you'll have to show us the evidence that YOU have. I don't make claims unless I have the proof to back up those claims. So far, all I see is no better than gossip. I'd never present this stuff, except with a disclaimer.
Prove it. Don't expect me to prove your point. If there's no evidence, I'll just give up, eventually and that's proves nothing.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@scottwasson
What? We are in the midst of an bad economy due to a pandemic. These people have NO jobs prospects, no skills, no money, many can't speak the language and some even HAVE Covid. We have to provide them with housing, food, water, health care, education and transportation and THAT doesn't cost money? YOUR money, Scott. Our schools are closed so we won't even be able to teach them how to speak English, an important skill if you want to, eventually, get a job. There will even be some that are criminals, fleeing justice in their own countries.
It's thinking like that that has turned California into the mess it's in right now. Not one bit of common sense and absolutely no idea on how to run a viable budget.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
stardude692001 Yes, they did kill more people. This isn't a contest, though. Even when he was pulling Germany out of that economic quagmire, he was brutalizing the Jews and anyone that opposed him. Not one leader, gets by without support. They do it through ideology and perks for the supporters. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, all committed terrible atrocities but someone had to be the poster boy. Hitler was the obvious choice because more nations were involved in his wars than the others. In that way it affected more people. As bad as Mao was, it was only the Chinese that suffered. Not to make light of their suffering, it was terrible, but it was reduced to only that part of the world. Same could be said of the other butchers.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
StigmataBob2 I'm not American, so I can't really say what your medical people say. Here in Canada, cancer is a terrible disease and I've lost my mother and friends to it. Our survival rate is a little better than the United States, but believe me, the word cancer carries with it a real sense of dread here, as it does all over the world. Right now there is no definitive cure. Some cancers, pancreatic and brain cancer, are a near death sentence. Others, testicular and skin cancer have very good survival rates. There are lifestyle habits that can stave off the disease, smoking, alcohol abuse, diet for example, but the idea that there is something out there that will cure all cancer, all the time, is a myth.
When I was young, a person with heart problems had a death sentence hanging over them. A person that had undergone heart surgery was looked on as one of the walking dead, waiting for the ticker to quit. Now, quadruple bypass is routine. People are living normal lives after surgery, for years. Unheard of, when I was young. The strides made in heart care have been fantastic. Unfortunately, it hasn't been the same for cancer. Cancer attacks all parts of the body and attacks them all differently. They have different causes, different pathologies, even different cures. What works for testicular cancer doesn't seem to matter with pancreatic cancer. Yes, there are those who get rich treating cancer. There are those who get rich treating heart problems. Why can the heart patients live normal healthy lives after treatment but cancer patients have so many more problems. Are heart doctors more competent, more compassionate than the cancer doctors? Why would that be?
Anyone, no matter who he is or where he lives, that can cure cancer, every time will become a billionaire and there is no way the pharmaceutical companies can stop it, even if they wanted to. You see, even drug company executives get cancer, they die from it, lose loved ones to it, are afraid of it...just like we are. There is a surface logic to the idea that people get rich off cancer but dig underneath and you'll find the same frightened people in the pharma boardrooms that you find on the street.
2
-
2
-
2
-
From personal experience, I can tell you that your emotions run the gamut in the days following the loss. Anger, laughter, tears, regret, melancholy run through in turns, changing from one minute to the next. I even felt resentment towards those who gave condolences and then felt guilty for feeling that way immediately after.
Anyone, who bases their opinion on this guy giving a little laugh, has never lost a child and has no realization that everyone reacts differently.
A stupid, unfeeling and selfish argument. If you want to prove a conspiracy, this is not the way to do it. You'll never convince anyone of anything other than your own heartlessness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@billpracells8876
I've watched this video before. This doesn't prove that Trump supports the alt-right at all. It's trying to prove that PragerU is mistaken about how the MSM didn't report Trump's condemnation of Neo-Nazis and advance the insinuation that everyone that went there to protest the removal of the statue had to be alt-right and Nazi sympathisers.
You've already been shown that General Lee did NOT support slavery. So why did he fight on the Confederate side? He did it because he was loyal to the state of North Carolina and because the Civil War was more than a fight over slavery. It was a fight over state's rights, as well. In fact, the slaves weren't set free until AFTER the war had started, almost 2 years later and Lee opposed the war but reluctantly joined because he felt a loyalty to his home and his state.
People fought for the south for various reasons, NOT just to fight for slavery. In fact, most Confederate soldiers never owned a slave. Why would they fight and die for something that they would never have? Why would Lee fight for a cause that he had openly opposed for years?
That's why that statue shouldn't be removed. People, like you, want everything to be simple. "He's evil and he's good" and there's always that implication that you're good, as well, because you support the "good" guy. The world is more complex than that and so are people. That's the discussion that we should be having. We should be trying to understand the world of the time and the motivations of all the combatants, on both sides, and not turn it into a proxy war today of "good vs evil". That's a childish view of the world. Worse.....it implies that you'd never be on the side of evil...EVER.
Nietzsche once wrote "Whoever fights with monsters should see to it that he does not become a monster in the process. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." You could become that monster in a zealous rage.
That's why the statue shouldn't be torn down. It's to remind us that this conflict was more complex than we can know and that we have to discuss the frailty of the human heart. It's to prevent us from vilifying one another through full understanding.
The protests about the statue had been ongoing. The neo-Nazis and white supremacists went there to advance their own agenda and because of a disagreement, over that statue, that was already in progress and had been for a long time.
I know this is a long comment but life and people are more complex than. "They're EVIL!!!!". That simplistic AND dangerous.
2
-
@billpracells8876
I never ONCE said that I supported slavery. What I said is that history and the people that lived it are complex and we should try to understand them, instead of categorising them into good and evil. It's how we understand ourselves.
In fact, that's what you're doing to me, right now. You're not making any points on the complexities of history. You're just trying to win an argument by vilifying me. It's not a discussion, it's just more accusations.
My father grew up 30 miles east of the German border, in the Netherlands, during the war. How much different his life would have been had he been born, 35 miles east of where he grew up. He's have been in Germany. Why did that line on the map destine him to be one of the good guys, yet his counterpart, 35 miles away, was marching with the Hitler youth? Would YOU, living in central Germany, in 1935, refused to join the Hitler youth? Would you have been that special that you would have went against your family, your friends, teachers, neighbours and community and defied them all by tacitly rejecting the Nazis?
I doubt it. I'd like to think that I would and so do you, but the reality is that we'd have both been proudly goose stepping beside one another, proudly carrying the Nazi flag in our Hitler youth uniforms. To not admit that, is a refusal to understand yourself and how the human mind works and it's a discussion we should all have about ourselves and human history. Also, you don't know what your feelings would have been about slavery had you not the luxury of 20/20 hindsight. It's easy to be virtuous when you don't have to live it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mycryptodance4353
Who said that there wasn't racism? We all know that it exists. However, this accusation, has become an obsession. The search to expose is relentless. We've all become "Joe McCarthy's" searching out the racists and denouncing them on the flimsiest of evidence....no evidence much of the time. Standards have been set that no one could pass and those who fail those test, and they undoubtedly will, are denounced, humiliated, lose their jobs, friends and alienated from their family. Those tests are no different than the witch tests of the past. If she drowns...she's innocent. If she lives...she's guilty and must be burned at the stake. That's the purity test.
And we ALL fail that test. Everyone of us. It's only the one that holds the power that can escape the wrath of the mob. Just hope that you can maintain that power because all it will take is for someone, anyone, that doesn't like you, to denounce you as a racist....the enemy of the people, as they used to say in Stalinist Soviet Union.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kateofone
It took YEARS for you to go through this. YEARS. Do you actually believe that every person, going through puberty and having difficulties with it, are going through gender dysphoria? There are countless examples where this has become a social contagion, that the solution for their discomfort with puberty has only ONE solution. Tavistock, a gender clinic in England, reported that there has been a 4000% increase of gender dysphoria referrals over 10 years. What's worse, most of it has been girls when throughout history, it's been a male problem The entire thing is beyond plausible. They also have close to a thousand lawsuits against them for treatments that they've done.
I'm NOT disputing that dysphoria exists or that it even helped you. What I'm disputing is that there is only ONE solution to feeling uncomfortable in one's body and that there may be other psychological issues at play here. I'm disputing that if a person, who's experiencing emotional difficulties, may have the capacity to understand that this could be a multi-faceted problem and that the "you must have gender dysphoria" is the ONLY solution possible. That we MUST affirm the diagnoses of the patient and no other exploration into the psyche is necessary.
Chloe Cole went through the drug therapies at 13. At 15, she had her breasts removed. At 17, she realised that this was all a mistake and she has the evidence, the paperwork to PROVE that the entire transformation process was pushed and rubber stamped by a medical profession whose only interest was in making money.
That there is NO way that this could be open to abuse, just because it was good for you, is appalling. EVERYTHING is open to abuse. I have friends who are DEAD because the medical establishment prescribed opioids to ease pain and they became addicted. It KILLED them and it went on until we finally forced them to stop.
I'm glad it worked out for you but this isn't just all about YOU. Everyone of those kids are individuals, with different psychologies, environmental factors, health issues and social pressures. To pretend that this doesn't exist because of YOUR experience implies that they are ALL the same and that underlying condition can't exist isn't only myopic...it's as narcissistic as it gets.
2
-
2
-
@aleisterbroley900
Individual responsibility....that's what every person should believe in. To know and understand oneself, to learn all he can and try to do the right thing. No one should ever think that he knows it all and that self reflection is never necessary.
What got us into this mess is the human propensity to envy. It's the socialist mantra. "If he has it and I don't, then he doesn't deserve it". Every child believes that. "How come Johnny can have one and I can't". They never look to themselves to improve their life. It's always someone else's responsibility. Envy is one of the seven deadly sins for a reason and the call against coveting is one of the Ten Commandments, one of the Big Ten. It's that serious.
My willingness to look at all the facts, led me that conclusion, even though I'm not a Christian. Had I not been a classical liberal, I wouldn't look at all facts and ideas and I'd be one of the left wing ideologues who refuses to listen and wants to shut the mouths of those who disagree with them. If I wasn't a liberal, I'd never understand that it's my responsibility to see that I do more than assert my rights because I'd never have taken the time to think these things through. I'd accept what I was told by a world that obsessed with equity. Also, I make sure that I deserve those rights by trying to be honest, hard working and responsible and always ready to improve myself by honest self introspection.
Most people, these days, try to change the world by some crusade against the evil in others. I try to change the world by realising that the evil is within me and that I have to be in a continuous battle for self improvement. If you think that's wrong, so be it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@garyjackson3531
I don't even like the term "transgender". It implies choice. Men are born with XY chromosomes and women with XX chromosomes. However there are, and it's rare, people that are born with a different chromosome structure. There are X chromosomes and XXY and XYY and XXXY chromosomes. They are what's called intersex and it's an aberration. Some seem to be normal but have both mental issues (the dysphoria) and physical problems. These are the legitimate gender problems but it's extremely rare. What we're seeing today is no more than a social contagion. I've seen them all my life of different kinds. Some are quite benign, like Beatlemania but others can be quite destructive, like the Satanic pre-school scares, of the eighties, and the modern transgender contagion of today. Transgender clinics in England have reported a 4000% increase in the last 10 years, most of them teenage girls. That's an impossible statistic.
Real dysphoria, which comes from a genetic disorder is very rare and almost always was a male issue. Somehow, they've managed to convince people that this new phenomena has always been with us. It's ideological and has nothing to do with biology. Not like my 4 year old neighbour, who was behaving like a girl, even though just to look at him, you knew that he was a boy. That poor kid had real biological issues. He couldn't help it. He's nothing like these phoneys we see today on TikToc.
2
-
@garyjackson3531
I know that they're all genetic conditions. However, sometimes they don't manifest themselves so you'd know right away that there's a problem. That's when the dysphoria can surface and in this case it might be real. I repeat....that's when the dysphoria CAN surface, not WILL surface.
However, dysphoria can also be a mental condition that can be quite serious. The reasons for TRUE dysphoria are unknown. But what does that have to do with what's happening, now? I went through great pains to explain how this was likely a social contagion, brought on by social media, our education system and the medical establishment. That STRONGLY implies that it's induced from the outside and NOT a dysphoria from within. Vulnerable children are told, by their teachers and social media, that they're problems are caused by gender confusion and the way to good mental health is to find out what their REAL gender is. So that's what they do and the pressure placed on them pushes them in the direction towards declaring themselves a different gender. "Oh, look at how brave little Susie is. She even wants to be called Joshua now. Everyone clap for Joshua." And the kid LOVES it. She's finally the centre of attention in a good way. What kid would't fall for it. In fact, it'll encourage other kids to do the same. They want to be brave, too.
I agree that it is a socialist agenda. Mengele was a National Socialist, the ideology of the Nazis. Margaret Sanger was a socialist as well, although she'd never admit to be a National Socialist. Planned Parenthood started long before National Socialism became a thing. National Socialism is just another form of Marxism trimmed down to include only one of the same ethnicity but it's still socialism. In fact, the China of today is the closest thing that we have presently to Nazi Germany and they devolved down from full Marxism down to National Socialism. Guess where a lot of this transgender stuff is being spread among the young? That Chinese media company app called TikTok.
This is a lot deeper than people would think.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bLackmarketRadio
The 2 people I know, had the virus. They had all the symptoms, exactly as described. As for how much is written down, mistakenly as the virus, we don't know and neither you or I can ever say what the number is.
What I can tell you is that every epidemic in history runs it course. Even the really bad ones, like the Black Death, Smallpox, Malaria, typhoid, the Spanish flu and others, they all fizzled out. They have to or the human race would have been wiped out by now. That's always been the standard course of an epidemic. If you can control the number of cases so the hospitals aren't overwhelmed, you can save a lot of lives. We've done that and that phase of fighting the disease is done. Now we have to get back to normal, understanding that there will be more cases. What's happening now, is pure politics where one side wants to open and the other is using the crisis for their own ideological agenda. That's what we have to fight, we meaning, the average person.
Advancing conspiracy theories, that can never be proven, doesn't help a thing. This isn't even an overly dangerous disease when compared to the great epidemics of history. The media is just pushing bad news for ratings. They just love a good crisis. If they don't have one, they'll make it up. Don't let them do it because they're the ones that are the problem, not the big conspiracies. Media loves ratings and a crisis gets that for them.
2
-
2
-
@bLackmarketRadio
Of course they're paying me. Now you're starting to sound exactly like the flat earthers that I've talked to online.
I never ONCE said that they weren't including non Covids as Covids. I said that we have NO idea how prevalent that it is. There is no way for you or me to know this. This might work just great in a country like the US, where hospitals are private and run like businesses and they see an opportunity to get government funds. However, in the countries that have socialised health care, like EVERY country in Europe, it makes no difference. They already get that money from the government because it's government owned and run and no one makes a profit off it. Yet, their numbers, per capita, are HIGHER than the US numbers. Italy, France, Spain and the UK are all in that category.
So, to say that this is a big factor, worldwide, is looking at it through a myopic American lens. There are also countries where healthcare is poor and people don't have access to medical care. How many of them are getting the disease and can't get to a doctor and never get counted. What about countries that deflate the numbers to look good? The US situation is just one facet of this crisis.
The disease exists. Instead of going off on a suspicion that you can't prove in a substantial way, start pressuring your local politician to start easing off on the restrictions. Don't go all squirrelly with accusations and overt threats. Just let it be known that if they don't start to ease off, you won't vote for them come election time. Politicians want votes, especially Democrats. Saying that some guy on the internet is getting paid to say things puts you in the category of people to laugh at. Don't be that guy.
We're on the same side. I WANT the restrictions eased. I want it badly. I just don't go off all half cocked with theories. I see it as a political ploy by Democrats, in an attempt to make Republicans look like greedy capitalists and they'd love nothing more than a total economic collapse and a huge death count so to pin the blame on Republicans.
I repeat. I WANT TO END THE LOCKDOWN. It's what I've been saying all along. The curve has been flattened. Let's acknowledge it and let's GET BACK TO WORK.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@raulcantu9142
Look at the "Yellow Vest" protests in France. It's directly due to a carbon tax that raised fuel prices, dramatically. Suddenly, the reality of it hit the average person. Rich people in France, they can pay it but what about the average person. How are they going to heat their homes, get to work. They can't afford the fuel. That's the reality of it. The rich, the elite, they have the money. Most people don't.
And it even goes deeper than that. More people have been raised from abject poverty, over the last 20 years, than at any time in history. The major reason for that is fairly cheap energy. Now, they're driving first world poorer people down the poverty pipe. What's going to happen to these newly developing countries? It will devastate them. These added taxes may well cause more turmoil and migration than the climate change does. Their solution might be worse than the problem they're trying to solve....but the media, Hollywood types, academicians, politicians and upper middle class keep telling the ordinary person that he's the problem and he's the one that going to suffer most from their solutions.
If we don't allow ourselves to be able to talk honestly about the problem, we're in for a bad time of it, but it's like a religion to them. Question their dogma and you're a heretic. Go to any university, in the first world, and start questioning the politics of climate change. They'll shut you up and quick.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Everyone did. When Trump announced the travel ban, at the end of January, the media was the one that vilified Trump for it, saying the flu kills more than the virus does and that he was racist and xenophobic. De Blasio telling people to get out, don't worry and both him and Pelosi told people to go to the Chinese New Year's Parades in their respective cities. Also, Tucker Carlson and Greg Gutfield spoke about the virus in January, one of the earliest.
This crisis is unprecedented. No one, on Feb 1st, could have predicted, with certainty, that we'd be where we are now. You don't have to like Trump or Fox News but you should be honest in how you gather information and how it's assessed and don't allow a bias to rule your thought processes.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@d.h.jefferies2191
That's why we need an investigation. We need it to validate or refute its contents. Until we do, we'll never know for sure.
Like I said, if its important to you to solve last year's problems, go to it. I'd think it more important to tackle a problem that we could be facing RIGHT NOW. No point in my going on about my tonsils that were taken out years ago. I want to solve the issues that I have with my sinuses, TODAY.
No different with the presidency. Trump, like my tonsils, is gone. Biden, like my sinuses, are the issue right now. I didn't go to my doctor and complain about my tonsils only to be told, upon inspection that my tonsils are gone. I talked about the pain in my sinuses.
You keep talking about my tonsils when it's my sinuses that are in pain. That's a metaphor. This has nothing to do with being in a cult. Trump can't lead this country into prosperity or disaster, right now. He's NOT the guy in charge. Biden is. Solving last years problems might give you satisfaction but it doesn't solve what could be happening NOW.
You're living in the past. Time to start living in the present.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Terry Tater
Being a country guy, I can tell you how frustrating it is to see these city folk move into our neighbourhoods. They come in and are surprised that the country isn't what they expected and then try to change it to the image they have in their heads....meaning, they try to change us.
Yes, I'm conservative. I'm about self reliance, personal responsibility, individual rights and sovereignty, hard work, and judging others on their character and integrity. I don't decry the actions of others when I'm guilty of those things myself.
I try to say what I mean and conversely, mean what I say. It's how people of integrity should try to live their lives. I don't always succeed, in fact, I'm a failure a good part of the time but I recognise the weaknesses the reside in me. That's why I take umbrage in the defensive stance of this woman. She won't take responsibility for her part in what she sees as a problem. She wants it to be about everyone else BUT her. Had she admitted her role in this perceived problem and how difficult it will be to change the mindset of the average person, the conversation could have went in a more positive direction. But she wouldn't do that. All she wanted to do was identify the bad guy and then exert control.
My ego isn't so grand that I think I can change the world but I do know that I can try to control my own actions. Worse, I don't have the right to control them anyway. Change, positive change, comes through a cultural renaissance, led by consciences of individuals, acting on their own free will. It's no different that the cultural change that the internet brought about. Individual decisions to use the new technology, no one being forced into it but a silent, yet overwhelming force of personal choices.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mchristine2007
You see, I didn't know anything about this cop's past so all I did was take in his message. I'm sure the vast majority of those who saw his video, feel the same. To me, this is exactly how I felt about how frustrating it must be have this deal with today's attitudes towards the police. Now, I have to think about the person and the message is lost. In other words, you've just told everyone, intentionally or not, to not to listen to this message, not because it's true or not, but because the messenger has faults. This will harm any future police voice in the future, whether the guy has faults or not, on this topic.
You've made this about the person, not about the message. THAT'S my objection. 2+2=4, no matter who says it. You're confusing truth with personality and it's done more harm than good and it could only add to the animosity that so many people already feel about the police. I'm sure that wasn't your intention but that is the outcome.
2
-
@ericlazenby5984
You want them to show BEFORE the crime? Are you seriously that foolish? And they don't ALL laugh in your face, either. That's your own bigotry coming through which says all people, in a specific group, are exactly the same. Identity politics....the bane of modern society.
My ex-wife, and my kids, went away for the evening and while she was gone, someone broke in and robbed them. Not only her stuff, but the kids bicycles, laptops, cameras and other valuable. The police didn't laugh at them. They went to pawnshops in all the surrounding towns and even got some of the stuff back and a person was arrested.
I worked as a bartender for years. Every time I needed the police because of violent patrons, they were always helpful. They even had a police car parked outside a waitresses home because an extremely violent patron threatened her. They didn't laugh.
Years later my son was killed in a tragic accident. 2 officers came to my door to inform me of the tragedy and one of them stayed with me and talked for almost 2 hours until I was ready to meet with family and friends. Then he gave me a ride to where I had to go. They didn't laugh. They showed nothing but sympathy and understanding.
You're making broad statements to suit your own bitterness and hatred. It's unfair and shows a weak mind. If there are cops who do behave inappropriately, complain about them so they either forced to change their ways or are fired. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. They're defunding police in big cities all over the US and violent crime has increased by leaps and bounds. Over 200% in New York alone. Violent crime has been on the way down until this new police hatred started. Now it's returning.
Everyone one of those 200% more, in New York, thank you for making that violent altercation possible by your lack of support of the police.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sthubbins4038
NO ONE invalidated this election. He was just as sure that there was fraud as Hillary was and he told that crowd to march "peacefully and patriotically", HIS words, to let the members of Congress know how he felt. He then told the audience to GO HOME and "primary" those Republicans that didn't question the integrity of the election. "Primary them"...that means for them to get ready for the NEXT election. It means to get Republican candidates that will support the president, no matter who it is. Does that REALLY sound like "storm the Capital Building" to you? Also, Trump was over a mile away, when he gave that speech. It was impossible for him to "watch" them storm the building. That's pure hyperbole on your part.
I gave TWO examples of VERY questionable events around this election...TWO examples that should have been investigated and ONE WAS and the person was charged. This woman bragged that she had control of over 7 thousand mail in ballots. MAIL IN BALLOTS....the very thing that Trump was worried about all along and this woman was charged for doing it. Hillary had NO evidence....AT ALL. The Mueller report turned up nothing and it cost the American taxpayers MILLIONS to do it. YOUR taxpayer money. Now the Democrats are spending even more. Thousands of troops around the Capital. Barbed wire fencing. Investigating military personnel for questionable tweets and reassigning them. Investigating government offices and purging all Republican supporters by going through their internet accounts.
Do you know who else did that? Who did it right after the "Night of the Long Knives"? They have NO right to investigate people that weren't even there or to question the loyalty of military personnel because a few jerks, out of tens of thousands that were in Washington that day, acted foolishly. Security even LET some of them in, if they promised not to damage anything. Then the Democrats had a state funeral for officer Sicknick, claiming he was killed fighting rioters, when he died the following day from a stroke which had nothing to do with the riots. Now they have some of them in solitary confinement, even though it was months ago. Yet, when Antifa barricaded the doors of a Federal Courthouse, in Portland, and tried to burn the place down with people inside it, they just let them go. Over 120 nights in a row of rioting in Portland and they're STILL rioting. They had violent protests AGAIN last night and over 2 dozen gunshots at the one year Memorial for George Floyd at the "autonomous" zone in Minneapolis. In the middle of the day, caught on video.
It's all political theatre and it's 2 sets of rules.
And to top it all off....I've already said that those who broke in should be arrested and charged. They're a bunch of idiots. The difference is....I want to apply the law equally to rioters. YOU only want to apply it to those you don't like.
2
-
COkeefe Jones
So you're comparing the American society of 200 years ago to the society of today. The US went through a Civil War, where tens of thousands of white people, were killed and maimed, which resulted in the END of slavery. Have you never heard of the Emancipation Proclamation? The US spent 82 years with slavery in the southern states and 156, since then, where slavery is illegal, but all you see any of that. You're still living in the early 19th century and you can't get past it.
They even showed you, in this video, the statistics that show that Nigerian Americans, people who actually came from Africa, with the darkest skins there is, are doing better than white folk....and you still call things trash.
You're a whiner. A guy who complains about everything.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Bartleby Oregon
How does it benefit the team to share the ball with me if I refuse to develop my individual skills to be of any help to the teams. A team of individuals who do not hone their individual skills will be a losing team, no matter how much they're willing to share the ball. I am of no use to the basketball team if I do not, first and foremost, develop my ability to play the game. The team is only as good as the total of the abilities of each individual.
Peterson is not telling you not to share. He is saying that if you're of little value to yourself, you'll never be of value to anyone else or society in general.
When one builds a house, quite often that person brings in a team of people with specialised skills to complete the job. An architect, concrete finishers, block layers and brick layers, carpenters, electricians, drywallers, roofers and decorators. They each use their skills to form a team that will complete the building of the house. However, if the block layer lacks the skill and the foundation that he builds starts to crack and the foundation is in danger of crumbling, the best carpenters and electricians in the world cannot prevent the house from deteriorating long before its time. To build a decent house, each individual must be develop their personal skills to do their part in the construction. A poor tradesman drags down the entire team of builders.
That's the emphasis on the individual that Peterson is advocating. A socially and poorly developed individual is a handicap, not an asset, to society as a whole.
2
-
@roddawg2847
Baloney. Cuba "traded" with the Soviet Union until it collapsed. That spelled the end of the near free oil that the Soviets were providing for them. Now they're getting oil from Venezuela but the collapse of the Soviet Union was incredibly difficult for the Cuban people.
I'm Canadian. 1,100,000 Canadians went to Cuba, as tourists, in 2018. The US didn't stop the tourism trade. On top of that, tourists came from Europe and even Russia. The US didn't stop them either.
Also, Cuba trades with all kinds of countries....once again, Canada being its largest trading partner. Other partners are China, Spain, The Netherlands, France.....
https://www.worldstopexports.com/cubas-top-10-exports/
No embargoes on those countries. The only trade embargo is with the US where American companies are not to do business in Cuba. That's it.
It might surprise you to know that the United States is NOT the centre of the universe. The biggest problem with the economy and the poverty of the Cuban people is that it's a command economy, where the state runs everything. It's the most inefficient way there is to run a country. Free the people and let them start their own enterprises and create wealth that the rest of the world will want and trade for. That's how you create wealth and a decent standard of life.
2
-
2
-
@madmisobroth1361
I see all the people slaughtered EVERY year by drunk drivers. Yet, we still allow the sale of alcohol. Broken families, abuse, bankruptcies, fetal alcohol syndrome, homelessness.....and they still sell the poison. I don't get it.
You see....you can apply your logic to everything. I started shooting when I was 14 years old. I'm 69 today and I still go hunting for duck, deer, rabbit, partridge and more. I'm involved in different environmental groups and gun safety programs. I've never known ANYONE who ever went of a shooting spree.
I grew up in the country, miles from any police station. It would take at least half an hour for any police officer to arrive in case of an emergency. What were we to do, my neighbours included, if we were faced with a crazed individual who wanted to do us harm? Are we to just wait for help from the police, through no fault of their own, who may not get there for 40 minutes or longer? We have to rely on ourselves and now YOU want to take that away from us. And now, with the defund the police initiatives and some even wanting to abolish the police, who's going to protect YOU. Time for YOU to step up and take care of yourself, if it's necessary....or would you rather die than protect yourself.
Our guns are our tools, for protection and recreation. Don't lump me with those nutbars that lose their minds. It's no different than those who destroy and kill others due to irresponsible alcohol use. In fact, MORE people have their lives destroyed by alcohol. We accept that it's the fault of the individual when he kills someone driving while intoxicated, yet for some reason, when it's a gun, it's the fault of the collective. You can't have it both ways.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@QUALITY KHANTENT
Yet, blacks had always voted Republican until the 1930s. Always!!!!! The Democrats were the party that fought to keep slavery, started the KKK and created and supported the Jim Crow laws. Then FDR came along and Blacks, reluctantly, voted Democrat because his New Deal which really helped them. However, even into the late sixties, many Democrats were still pro segregation. "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" was uttered by Democrat Governor, George Wallace in the early sixties, in my lifetime. That was supported, NOT by the Republicans, but by top Democrats. It was LBJ's war on poverty that got the blacks to fully support the Democrats, in spite of the southern Democrats like Wallace and others, called the Dixiecrats.
Things change and if the economy starts to favour Black and Hispanic communities, many will vote with their wallets, not through tradition. It's what prompted them to leave the Republicans in the first place and it could bring them back again, as well.
"Trump will NEVER be president". They were all SO sure. Like my mother said....NEVER say never.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Your story is what social assistance is there for. I don't mind paying taxes to help a guy that has medical problems, still tries his best and feels bad about his situation. You don't sound as if you expect the help but accept it because you're stuck in a bad place that's out of your control.
What most of us resent is the lazy and the demanding types, the ones that can't hold down a job because they have to get up too early, it's too far away, they don't want to work nights, the boss is a jerk (they always are), it's too hot, too cold, too wet and the hours are too long. They don't want to work for "the MAN" to quote a lazy nephew who's never had a full time job in his entire adult life. They refuse to contribute and then criticise the rest of us for being that selfish with our money that we don't want to subsidise their life of video games, smoking weed and afternoon naps.
Keep doing the best you can and if you're being honest about it, we're only to happy to help you out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JosephusCheveuxBoucles
Watch the video. It shows just how proactive he's been. They were on top of the situation right from the beginning and when Trump restricted travel to China, Biden called him a xenophobe. When he organised a task force, detractors said it was too white and male. NEVER offering help, just complaining, ostensibly no different than you are doing right now.
Yesterday, Trump had a press conference in the morning and signed a bill for 8.3 billion in funds to fight the coronavirus. Then he flew to Nashville to talk to the victims of those tornados. Then off to Atlanta, to the CDC to bring attention to what was being done about the coronavirus.
You're another one that's so vested in your hate for Trump, you find it impossible to even look at something that might put him in a good light. You're too blind with hate to realise that it's that very attitude, from the left, that's going to win the election for Trump, making the same mistake they made in the last election.
2
-
2
-
@ElleDavi
Work hard for 10 years, supporting your family, helping her get through college, just to see her get a good job and start cheating on you, not once or twice, but multiple times. That she started to do this within months of getting her high paying job. 9 months later, I'm moving out with her saying that this isn't what she wanted and that she loves me and please don't go. A couple of years later, start dating another woman, just to find out that she cheated on her husband and then her last 2 boyfriends. After a few experience like that, why would I want to go through it again? Only an idiot would stick their hand in the fire multiple times , each time hoping that THIS time is the time that he's not going to get burnt.
Women are doing it to themselves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@coreyham3753
Listen to you. An immigrant, who came to the US legally, works hard to establish a business, is sitting in JAIL for going to work and YOU babble about Tucker.
Why is so hard, for people like you, to understand that work is survival. That the people, who live in 3rd world countries that are starving, are the countries with no economy. Countries that are run by corrupt oligarchs that will only allow people to work for them and NOT for themselves, are the countries that have starving children. Now, Michigan is doing the EXACT SAME THING, deciding who works and why and you can't understand how this is the road to the same hell as those 3rd World Countries.
You're like a 4 year old child who thinks that hamburgers magically pop into existence at MacDonald's.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@eoin8450
Socialism has never been owned by the workers. It's something they say but every socialist system has been a top down system. The state, who CLAIM that they represent the workers, or that they are in fact the workers (never true, though) controls it all.
The only difference, I've said it before, between the communist state and the fascist state is that communism tries to manage it all, from the macro to the micro. Fascism controls the macro, each industry and lets them deal with the micro management, the day to day stuff. Fascism realises that the details are too complex to deal with it all so they give a little more freedom to make the micro decisions but they still control it all, in the name of the state, which is the people. That's why it's National Socialism, state Socialism or, as in Germany, National Socialist German Workers' Party. They still claim to be representing the Workers. The workers are the backbone of the Fascist state. Unions are disbanded and replaced by party representatives who monitor productivity, loyalty and worker grievances. No one, from the owners, top management to the guy pushing a broom is safe from that Party rep.
It's the same in the Soviet state, except their is no ownership, just top management, but they are just as much beholden to the Party reps as their counterparts, the ownership and management, as Fascist workplaces. Fascist owners are allowed more leeway in market place markets, as long as it doesn't interfere with national goals.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Orga777
First, I'm 68 years old and my fight is reduced to being a cheerleader and one that dispenses solid information. Second, I live in Canada, where we have a leftist problems but they're nothing to what they have in the US. Third, I live in a small town, a real small town, in a rural area, and our biggest complaint is about big city, Covid infected interlopers coming to our town to get services denied to them in the big city. I know a couple of our small town business owners who demand ID and if they're not locals, get out.
Almost everyone I know is either on the fence on BLM and Antifa or think that they're out of their minds.
So the only way I can fight is election time and to support the Americans that appear to be on the front lines right now.
If they come to our area, and they won't, because small town folk won't let it happen, I'll be there, in spite of my infirmities and old age.
2
-
@Ethan Hobigant Roche
Chris Cuomo....."Since when to protests have to be peaceful?"
A rather poor attitude. Especially when the very first Amendment of the Constitution says that we have the right to peacefully assemble to bring our grievances to bear.
If a protest is called, I'm going to assume it's going to be peaceful. It would be a peaceful assembly and it would be lawful. I'm an individual but so is the assembly. A group making a singularity, just like the Jack of Clubs is one card of the singularity called a Deck of Cards. Lose that Jack of Clubs and the Deck of Cards becomes unusable.
When someone in that assembly throws a brick, that singularity, called an assembly, is no longer peaceful. As an individual, protesting, I have 2 choices. I can stay, and quite likely watch that assembly escalate the violence or go home, thereby tacitly expressing my disapproval for how that peaceful assembly did NOT hold up to its promise. I go home and tell anyone, who asks why I left, that I left because the assembly was no longer peaceful.
When the union, at a company that I worked at, went on strike, I stood on the picket lines with my fellow union members. When they started throwing rocks and smashing car windows, I went home. The strike, like those who assembled to protest, was peaceful and I took part. The moment it became violent, I left because that strike was no longer peaceful. Many people stayed and claimed that they didn't throw anything or didn't approve of the violence. I say that the inflated numbers by the presence the peaceful strikers gave the violent ones the courage to do their foul deeds. I say the same thing about the "peaceful" protesters. When the violence starts, go home. The protest is no longer peaceful.
"could be white supremacists"? A rather weak statement. Sounds more hopeful that factual.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@georgemurphy2579
I'd like to think I'm not biased, but, being human, I suppose I might be. Who knows what evil resides in the deepest recesses of my heart. Having said that, I'd rather judge a person as an individual. I'd say that we're all unique and that to me is TRUE diversity and not the phoney "I can see your oppression" diversity that seems to be so pop these days. It's a choice I make.
You're right about one thing, though. I don't like stupidity. I don't mind people that are wrong and are mistaken in their beliefs. To me, stupidity is when you persist in those beliefs, in spite of all evidence to the contrary. That's why AOC is stupid as far as I'm concerned. Morally right over factually correct. How stupid is that? Morality based on inaccurate facts isn't morality. It's judgement gleaned from gossip and BS.
As for Candace, she's sharp. She cuts through BS like the sharpest sword ever forged. I can't help but admire that, even if I am racist (I'm white, you know). There's an honesty about that I wish I could say I possess. She's a special individual.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@spaceknight793
I was born in the fifties, EARLY fifties, and of course there's been talk of race but if you can't recognise how much worse it's been in the last 5 or 6 years, you've not been paying attention. Identity politics is the centrepiece of everything now. A study done on words and phrases, like racism and white supremacy, has skyrocketed in the media over the last 10 years. It has just double or tripled but almost 10 times that is was in 2010. Voting, going to the store, in schools, at workplaces.....everything is about race, these days and we're reverting back to forced segregation. There are universities that have segregated dorms and affinity groups for coloured folk and whites where, out of race folk aren't allowed. That would have considered appalling 15 years ago. Yet, Malcolm Nance, or NBC, was on Bill Maher and defended it. Had that been a network figure in 2005, he'd have been fired. Not now.
You're not paying attention. That's all I can say to you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Asghaad
Actually, the US has the highest numbers because it is the 3rd most populated country in the world. We can't trust the numbers from China and India is difficult to gauge due to extreme poverty in many locations and the lack of medical facilities to those poor, although I'd say that they still don't seem to be doing that badly....yet.
The best metric to use would be by per capita. If you did that, the US is 10th in cases and 11th in deaths. Simply put there are 10 countries, had they the same population as the US, that would have a higher death rate, some over 50% higher, or at about the 240,000 death mark. You can't compare Belgium, pop. 11,460,000 to the US with a population of 331,000,000 and say that the US has more deaths therefore it is worse than Belgium. Belgium has about 300 more deaths per million than the US.
In fact, you'd have to total the populations of almost 10 European nations to equal that of the US and then you'd find that those countries have a higher total than the US.
Using only the totals of each country, as a metric, is highly misleading.
2
-
For most of my 71 years, on any form that asked for "gender" and that's what the category was for sex as the terms were interchangeable, people would mark "male" of "female"....nothing else. Then, out of the blue, less than 10 years ago, they separated the 2 terms, giving each word a new definition. My 1985 Webster's dictionary describes both words as meaning the same thing. Why SHOULD we separate bodily function from gender? Bodily functions has always been what defined your gender or sex. There has never been a child, born with a penis, that has ever given birth. There has never been a woman that has become pregnant from anything other than a man, who had a penis.... unless you count the Virgin Mary and I'll bet you don't want to go there. A woman needs a man, with a penis, to get pregnant. That's has always been the defining measure in determining both sex and gender.
To separate them is to artificially change the meaning of both words and then calling anyone, who doesn't want to do that, a bigot. It's as Orwellian as it gets.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@wekurtz72
I'll give you an example. When Brett Kavanaugh was accused, with little to no evidence, of sexual assault, the Hollywood community was all about MeToo and women's rights. Alyssa Milano sat behind Christine Ford at the confirmation hearings to lend her support.
When Tara Reade accuse Joe Biden, with a lot more evidence, of sexual assault, Hollywood was strangely silent on it. The same people that went after Harvey Weinstein, never said a word about Biden. Selective MeToo beliefs. Alyssa Milano even endorsed Biden, in spite of the sexual assault.
These people don't care about sexual assault or the victims. They self serving, narcissistic hypocrites, spouting off whatever makes them look good or feel good at the time. Integrity isn't a word that you hear often coming out of Hollywood.
2
-
2
-
@homewall744
It's as if you've never heard of the recent opioid scandal, brought to us by the drug companies and dispensed by the very doctors that you laud as being the ones to listen to. Untold lives were destroyed and lost but it's all good. They were doctors and they know best. Same as the lobotomy scandal, something that happened in my lifetime. That was a giant success (extreme sarcasm). Then the Thalidomide issues. I know people that were directly and physically affected by that great medical leap forward. Doctors are humans and because of that they're just as prone to greed, ideological and social pressures and corruption.
Also, it's been known for years, that gender dysphoria was largely a male phenomena. Yet, it's dominated now by teenage girls and that referrals, in Britain, have spiked by nearly 4000% in 10 years. Strangely, that hasn't been the case in 3rd world countries. One has to wonder why. In my 15 years of school, I knew of only ONE person that I would call gender dysphoric and not ONE kid in my school committed suicide that I'd ever heard of. Yet, if we are to believe the supporters of trans medical procedures, there should have been all kinds of suicides due to their inability to get medical treatments. It just didn't happen.
In other words, most of transgender claims are bogus and are used by a specific ideology to distort reality and that is another discussion.
2
-
Salvatore Eze
The longer we can put that recession off, the better it will be for all of us. If you invest wisely, be conservative with your spending, when the times are good, the better off you'll be when a recession does hit. Therefore, this wishing for a recession before the next election, just to get rid of Trump, is nuts. Only those, the elites, the ones with the money already in their pockets, will benefit from it. The rest of us will suffer. Peoples lives will be destroyed, savings will disappear, suicides will increase and homelessness will increase. This isn't something that a caring individual wishes for. This is something that a caring and responsible person wants to postpone as long as possible.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It won't do any good to protest. In fact, it'll likely do more harm. If one thing happens, one fire, one broken nose, one police line breached, one fight with BLM, the MSM will spin it, 24/7, into a white supremacist insurrection. They'll invoke Trump, maybe have a fake funeral for a guy who died of a stroke, and blow it so out of proportion that ordinary folk will be horrified and condemn those who did protest.
The left are winning the propaganda war. I don't know how to turn it into our favour but I know that protests will only hurt us. The good news is that a lot of people have been red-pilled over this. This is how we win. One step at a time.
If he's acquitted and cities burn, those who've changed their minds and believe he's innocent now, will condemn them. That will be another step towards ending this horrific ideology that's behind it all.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lilbarry1212
What you don't get is that those weapons have been within reach of Russia for decades. France and Britain have them. Germany, Italy and Turkey have American nukes installed in case of war. Turkey is only about 500 miles from Russia. How long do you think it would take to put nukes in Latvia or Estonia, NATO nations that are right on the border of Russia. It would be nothing for a nuclear armed sub to leave a German or Turkish port and approach Russia.
Besides, who said that they wanted to put nukes in Ukraine, anyway? Where did you get that? Ukraine isn't even a part of NATO yet and you're already putting nukes there. You're getting way ahead of yourself.
Weird that you don't think all of Europe isn't upset that Russia has nukes that could be pointed at them. That's where NATO is. Russia should be terrified but the European NATO nations aren't allowed to be? Kind of a double standard isn't it.
This nuclear rhetoric is just a rationalisation to justify the carnage in Ukraine. No one is putting nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine had the 3rd largest nuclear arsenal in the world after they were independent. They destroyed them. That was only 30 years ago. They did this after a 90% affirmative vote for independence. I wonder how much that loss sticks in the craw of Putin, a one time communist and KGB agent. Putin, at 69 years of age, spent more time as a Soviet citizen than he has a Russian. That has to influence his attitude and his paranoia.
So, who should be more afraid of the other. Ukraine, the smaller country with NO nukes or Russia, a MUCH larger country with all kinds of nukes and a leader who was a part of the very aggressively expansive USSR. Remember Putin was in his thirties when Russia was trying to hold onto Afghanistan. Old habits die hard.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@manderson7173
Really? I don't know how old you are but I remember a time when the products that we bought in our stores were made in our country. Not all of them but the great majority of them. I watched our manufacturing base dwindle to nothing, factory after factory closing down, now sitting empty and people losing their jobs. Cities rotting from the inside out, even the small ones. Everything, in our stores, were labelled "Made in China". All the political slogans calling to "Buy American" proved futile because there was nothing made in America.
Why? Because of the REAL cronyism in the political bureaucracy. Allowing corporations to move manufacturing out of the country, to China especially, who have no labour or environmental laws, so the corporations could rake in big profits at the expense of the average American citizen. Corporate lobbyists, for decades, working politicians and established bureaucrats, establishing Draconian laws and red tape, to the point that it became impossible for manufacturers to operate in the US anymore.
Trump has been talking about this for decades and has started to bring back some of those manufacturing jobs to the US. Why would you ignore this? As a matter of fact, why don't you give an example of the cronyism that Trump has been a part of? That might be interesting to examine.
However, I don't expect a word from you. You're just a troll.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
food
Before he said those things, he restricted all trips to China. I heard what he said and at the time, the virus had NOT been that serious, YET. He was right about that. He did say it would be over by spring, but no one could EVER know that, so I took it as wishful thinking and optimism. However, he did stop travel to China.
So, I invoked one of the maxims I like to use in times like that. I not only listened to what he said, I payed attention to what he did. I figured that he had more information on the situation than most people. He had shut down travel to China. He offered members of the CDC to China to help them study this new virus. He even mentioned it during that speech. The only conclusion that I could come to was this. He was being very optimistic but he wasn't taking any chances and was hedging his bets. To use another maxim "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst". Biden called him a xenophobe but he did it anyway and didn't retract.
So, I thought to myself, if Trump isn't hedging his bets, I'm not going to either. Normally, I keep a well stocked pantry, enough to last a couple of months, but I'm not a fanatic about it. I did a quick inventory, made a note of the things I needed and, over the next couple of weeks, I bought the few extra items I needed when I did my regular shopping. No panic, no rush. I was good long before March came around and when the shut down came and everyone was panic buying, I was sitting on my couch watching movies.
So, who was the smarter? Me, all ready in case of the worst because I was prepared or all those crazy people, fighting and buying in a big panic.
Instead of screeching about what he said, try to interpret it using logic and reason. All the information was there, just by listening carefully to what Trump was saying. Your problem was your intense hatred for Trump only allowed you to hear the negatives that you wanted to hear. I heard what was actually there because I didn't allow my emotions to control me. Logic and reason trumps (play on words) hatred and emotion every time.
I'm not saying that you have to like Trump or vote for him but don't let your hatred rule you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@morecomplex5233
This isn't a contest of who/what had the biggest numbers. The flu is a different disease than Covid-19. It's pathology is completely different. In fact, Trump, you or I has no idea if the outcome would have been different had the cupboard been full because, except for the testing, almost all needs were being met within a few weeks. Trump was right. The cupboard was bare and Obama should have replenished it. However, he should have done the same....but this is all politics and has no impact on how the country proceeds from here. Continuous blame, from both sides, doesn't solve the problem at hand. If you're going to criticise Trump, you have to criticise his detractors because they're doing the same thing. If it's wrong for Trump, it's wrong for you and I, the media and the Democrat party.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Caitgreenham
This was all new to her. She had nowhere to turn. The school was against her. Her team mate, who went crying to administrators, suddenly changed her mind. They gaslit her by telling them all that if they couldn't accept it, they could go for counselling, insinuating that SHE was the crazy one. That caused her to question herself, wondering is she was, INDEED, the one with the problem.
In fact, this is why the radical left are so active in schools. They're conditioning the most vulnerable to accept this stuff. I'm seeing it in my own grandchildren and even my 20 year old is still in a maturing stage of life.
Just like I said, you should support her and the only reason that I can come up with why you're so insistent on smearing her, is too shut her up....to gaslight her into thinking that she's too weak to keep the up the struggle against this insanity.
If you REALLY believe that this is wrong, get behind and support her. This is prevalent in a lot of schools and we have to show support for those who can break away from their propaganda and overt bullying. Instead, you're just throwing hate at her. That's why I don't trust your motives. NO one is going to understand our point of view if they think that we're only going to treat her the way that you're doing.
To end the insanity, we will start small and build up our numbers from those that we can show how terrible this is. We're not going to that by smearing them and calling them weak. You're HURTING our cause more than your helping. That's why I think that you're just as bad as those who like this aberration and could even be one of them. You're not doing ONE thing to help them. NOT ONE THING.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@joepublic3933
Right now, the Voter Integrity Fund is presenting official records of 40,000 instances of people voting twice. 40,000 cases. Should we ignore that? Maybe next election, it'll be 80,000 cases of double voting or 200,000 cases. What is the magic number that will convince you that we SHOULD investigate? Of do we only do it when your personal favourite candidate is the target of this type of fraud.
If they don't straighten this out, the American elections will be nothing more than a show. No better than having a vote in North Korea. The outcome will eventually become predetermined. Is this really what you want?
Remember, these are actual records that show double voting. Wrestler Nahshon Garrett, left Arizona, 5 months ago to train in Tennessee. Official records, in Arizona, show that he received a ballot, in the mail, and that he voted. However, he insists he didn't vote in Arizona and that he voted in Tennessee. The records show that he did vote in Tennessee but they also show that he voted in Arizona. Is he lying? If he's telling the truth, then someone voted for him. No matter how you slice it, this is a fraud by someone and there are 40,000 more JUST LIKE IT. The FBI is looking at those records right now.
.....but YOU think we should move on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
CHIEF TAHCHAWWICKAH
I don't even know what you're right about. I know that it was wrong to force a group of people onto a reservation. I'll concede that. However, I know that they don't have to stay there. I know that for a fact.
So, now that this has been settled, why would a continuous harangue of white folk, well over 100 years ago, make things better today? It would no different than me, yelling at Germans, because the Nazi soldiers near starved my mother to death. THE WAR IS OVER!!!! It serves nothing to hate them over it. In fact, I've worked with guys who were in the SS. We both acknowledged what happened and how horrible it was and it's OVER NOW.
Time to get over the bitterness, anger and resentment. It helps no one. Not the Comanche, in your case, or my relatives on my mother's side, in my case. It just prolongs the angst. Unless this is what you want...I guess go for it but don't expect people to take it because they won't.
But, I'm sure that I'm right about you. You have NO idea what I'm talking about. You're just angry and you don't want to let go of it. Why a person would want to live like that is beyond me.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@scurra1163
175 countries, out of 195 countries in the world, have cases of the coronavirus. If Trump is incompetent, so it EVERYONE else. Europe has a MUCH higher per capita rate than the US and didn't shut down travel to China until a lot later than the US did.
Trump's mistake was the he didn't pay more attention to Europe. He should have restricted travel to Europe, weeks before he did. It's how the virus hit the east coast of the US. However, the media would have lost their minds had he done that. Hell...Biden called Trump xenophobic when the travel ban to China was implemented.
This isn't the time to be looking back and pointing fingers, anyway. Screaming into the wind helps no one. It's time now to work together, without rancour, and encourage each other through this. United we stand, divided we fall. When this is over, THAT'S when we'll have the luxury of belly achin about what went wrong. Right now, do what's necessary to beat this thing and encourage others to do the same. Anger and bitterness makes isolation that much harder to live through.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Chris Russo
I SAID that if she was my kid, I'd have to deal with her and her responsibility for her behaviour. I can't do anything to influence those police officers but I can about the way that she behaves.
She would be MY responsibility. I have to show her how that her behaviour can have bad consequences, even if the other person oversteps their bounds. The next time, it could be a boyfriend who could beat her senseless or worse. She has to know that there are bad folk out there, including these specific officers and that they could lose control, just as she did, and hurt her badly. I can't go down to the police station and start lecturing them on how to behave but I can show my child that they have to maintain some kind of control over their actions.
That's MY responsibility to her. That doesn't mean the police did the right thing. It means that if you want your child to do well in their future, they have to think about how what could happen to them. Don't trust the other person to act properly when you act as if you're out of control. Depend on yourself, NOT others, for your own well being. You don't start that learning curve when they're adults. That starts from the moment that you can communicate with them. That's MY job, what I owe her, as a parent.
Once again. I'm talking about MY responsibility to my child, what I have to do to teach my child how to behave in such situations. Someone has let her down....big time.
2
-
2
-
2
-
GOPareTerrorists
When you have the media, Big Tech, large corporations, the Rinos, public sector unions, the bureaucratic monster and the Democrats aligned against you, that doesn't mean that you're weak. It means that they're stronger. WW2 Germany wasn't weak. They took on too many enemies, at once and put themselves into an impossible situation....fortunately, I would add. Trump was in the same position. His opposition was too big and were well organised. Trump and the Republicans made errors but they had an impossible hill to climb.
Besides, in a Democracy, it's never over, There will be mid terms this fall. You keep fighting and you can turn it around at the polls. The type of defeat that you're talking about only happens in totalitarian government and unless you believe that the Democrats are a party of despots, Trump and the Democrats, can turn it around this year.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CJ-wh3zy
She made it quite clear why she was leaving. We all kinda laughed, shrugged our shoulders and went on with what we were doing.
I assume that it's an admonishment for many reasons. My past experience with vegetarians and vegans and the manner in which the statement was made, as if the conclusion should be obvious to all. It's the spirit in which the comment was presented. It's as if I'm hearing directly out of my cousin's mouth, a comment brimming with contempt.
If you and I are in a discussion about a topic, I have no problem with differing opinions. It's how a person learns. However, when it becomes insistent, dripping with sarcasm, out of context and injected into every topic, all the time, you get tired of it. It doesn't matter whether it's politics, religion, food preferences or any other pet issue one might have, one dimensional conversations become increasing tiresome and irritating. I don't like to have an enjoyable day ruined by someone who will always be on their evangelical pulpit. Most people that I know are the same way.
I'll get back to you on your comments. I'm making shepherd's pie and it needs my attention.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@motoxray
There is no such thing as a Nirvana. Not in this universe, anyway. Nothing is perfect and every system is due to failure as it inevitably leads to stagnation, tyranny and failure. This idea that capitalism is harmful to the average person just isn't true. Every TRUE capitalist state that is based on the rule of law has the most affluent citizens on the planet. The US, Canada, western Europe, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand.....these are the countries that the people of 3rd world, and even developing countries, aspire to migrate to. There has NEVER been a more affluent average citizen in the history of the humanity, than those who live in those Capitalist countries. NEVER.
These are the countries that practise a capitalist economy and have strong social programs. That doesn't make them socialist. Social programs are the result of a strong economy and the revenue gathered through tax programs pay for health, education, the military and police protection, transportation and safety nets for the more vulnerable of the citizens. It is an expense of human survival and the more wealth that a nation accrues as a whole, the better the social programs. It's why I, as a retired person and living below the poverty line, as set for my Capitalist country, has still been able to travel to the Dominican Republic, Mexico, the Netherlands and am planning a trip to Costa Rica in a couple of months over the last 2 years and still have more money in the bank than I did 2 years ago. All the countries that I've mentioned all have economies that are overwhelmingly driven through market forces and the private sector. It's why these countries are the primary destinations for migrants and asylum seekers.
Hardly any other country has huge issues with people trying to enter legally and illegally...especially 3rd world countries. All of their governments are corrupt and led by tyrannical leaders who keep power by enforcement of the military. The people there live a dystopian life, deep in REAL poverty, where the basics of life, food, clean water and shelter are basic struggle to find every day. That isn't capitalism.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kurtlauer2005
I'll say it again. A Republic, without Democracy is tyranny. When the government, like the one in the USSR, tells you who can or cannot be voted for, that's NOT a Democracy. It's tyranny. That's why the Constitution is so important. It defines our freedoms, including our democratic rights to choose our representatives, whoever that may be.
It's not a buzzword. Our Democratic rights are clearly defined and it does NOT mean the rule of the majority as defined in the Constitution. It does mean that we are free to choose our reps, using the Democratic process as defined in the Constitution and it says that the majority cannot vote away those rights. Take away the Democratic process and we might as well go back to the Monarchy or one person rule. Taking away our Democracy is no different than our right to free speech. We are a country of free speech, which has no defining word, just as we are a country that has the right to vote where we do have a defining word, that word being Democracy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Your Worst Nightmare - Facts
Aren't you the pessimist. I'm not seeing any revolution or even signs of it. I'm seeing a few crazies in the west, embracing some kind of socialist anarchy but they're far from mainstream. Actually, military conflicts and human violence, as the human condition, has been on the decline since the last world war. Not saying that it will end but that trend is there. Also, more people have been pulled out of abject poverty, over the last 20 years, than at any time in human history. Poverty is the great indicator of high birth rates. The affluent west has a negative birth rate and our populations would actually go down if it wasn't for immigration.
But, maybe revolution it is. Some seem to want the nightmare. I think it's insanity but unfortunately, insanity does exist. In fact, it seems to be encouraged in the west.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Joe Steel
Advocating liberalism just for the sake of liberalism is short sighted and possibly dangerous. Liberalism implies the willingness to consider new ideas and balance against ideas in place. It does NOT imply that every new idea should be accepted because all conservative ideas are bad and harmful.
Conservatism holds, as the highest principle, the autonomy of the individual. That includes the freedom to choose to live, belief and work as the individual wishes, as long as those choices do not inhibit the choices and freedoms of others. That's at the root of conservative thought and it's non-negotiable, no matter how liberal or progressive one believes that they are.
Does that mean that conservatives will always be correct on specific issues? Of course not not more than a liberal would be. You take each issue and you examine the details and let the facts stand for themselves. From there, you come to a conclusion and you don't wait to see on which side the liberal or the conservative might fall on. That's not thought or self determination.
No conservative or liberal will tell me what conclusion I must draw on any issue, be it gun control, health care, taxes, climate change, racial issues or any other issue that happens to be under consideration and I refuse to be labelled left or right due to my stand on any specific issue. I value my life and my autonomy too much to allow myself to be boxed by anyone, liberal or conservative.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
He's giving Biden credit for the vaccine roll-out??? The drug company had a product that they wanted to sell and they're the ones that produced it and got it to market. It was Trump who cut the red tape for FDA approval. In fact, before the 2020 elections, there were Democrats who were insistent that they'd NEVER take a Trump vaccine...including the current vice-president. Also, it was the Democrat led states that had the strictest lockdown policies, NOT the Republican states and that's because Trump allowed each state to handle their own policies on it as per the Constitution. Democrats are still wailing at DeSantis for the way he handled it.
As for the virus getting here...yes it did come from China. However, in the east, it got here from China via Europe, Italy specifically, and Democrats, just like they did when Trump closed travel with China, lambasted Trump for closing travel with Europe, as well.
Hahn is grasping at straws.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dirtyburtysgraffcafe5030
This was the sixties and we lived in the country. This type of thing wasn't even on the radar at the time. I do know that he left home in his late teens and moved to the city. I later heard that he was living as a woman, not as a drag queen, but dressing and acting as a woman. He had it rough, even as a very small child, not just through disapproval of his mannerisms but he was even a very unhappy baby, according to his brother, crying for hours on end, concerning both the parents and his doctor. I'd say that he was the rarity, nothing like the legions of trans kids in school today who are caught up in an ideology, not a physical reality the he was stuck in. In fact, I believe that the trans ideologues are doing this kid, and those like him, a grave injustice, using their rare and unique issues to further and force their own ideological agenda on society at the expense of the ones suffering from true dysphoria.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sir.lancelot8338
That's absolute nonsense and the numbers prove me right. Italy, the UK, Belgium, Czechia and Hungary have MORE deaths per million than the US and Spain, Portugal, Mexico and Bulgaria are right behind them.
This is a disease. People get it and unfortunately people die. The outrage is over a policy which INTENTIONALLY put people, with Covid, in the same place as the elderly.....ON PURPOSE. Would you allow me, if I had Covid, to go live with YOUR parents? If I did and they died, would you not be upset about it?
Or is your hatred for Trump that deep that you be mad at him instead of me? That's twisted....and I don't even like Trump.
Party politics is disgusting and you exemplify why that's true and you do it perfectly.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Punani Surprise
What an idiotic thing to say. First of all, the haircut thing was in response to the Chicago mayor, who had all these businesses locked down and then went to her OWN hair stylist to get her hair done. Second, this was about people wanting to go back to work, to their businesses, so they could once again be productive and earn a living. Did you notice that there wasn't ONE broken window, not ONE looted building, not ONE person beaten or killed, not ONE building set on fire, not ONE car smashed, not ONE landmark defaced? Not a one, during those protests.
I'm not even going to ask you to compare that to the protests of the last 2 weeks.
People have the right to protest, even if it's about something that you might disagree with.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Capneon
Apparently, they ARE allowing crime to happen in the poorer neighbourhoods because of the social pressure to defund the police AND the consequences to officers if they run into dangerous situations. That's NOT progress. That's correct. However, if those same officers concentrate MORE on suburban areas and arrests, for petty crimes, go up and violent crimes go down, that's NOT progress either. Why? Because it comes at the expense of poor neighbourhoods, mostly minorities, who now don't have the coverage that they deserve and what the suburbanites are getting.
You might call that progress but it's not when one segment of the population isn't being served so that another gets extra service. It doesn't say whether petty crimes has increased but it does say that arrests have and you can attribute that to officers, who still want to do their jobs, but can't where it counts the most. I don't see that as progress. Also, if petty crime is up, in the suburbs, that's not progress, either.
No matter how you slice it, the new ideas of policing has not helped at all.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jonathanp1884
I find that both FOX and CNN, actually all the big ones, interpret the news. They don't inform, they manage the information. The most egregious example is when they reported on the Covington Kids. I watched it on CNN and then went on a search for more information. It took me about 15 minutes to find the extended video that was condensed into the one on CNN. It showed that what I'd seen on CNN was total BS.
Think of it. I'm a guy, who lives in a one bedroom apartment, ALONE, in a different country, with no connections or staff and and an average cobbled together computer that my son-in-law built for me and I had this information before CNN, with all the resources that they have. Oh yeah...I'm a boomer too. You know...the generation that doesn't know much about computers or social media.
How was that possible? Either CNN and the rest of the MSM is totally incompetent or they lied. Everyone of them reported the same thing. Yet, one hour after the first news report, I was on Facebook arguing that it was all BS. Their response? How would I know. Do I think that I'm smarter than the press and media? Funny thing was....I was found to be correct.
You are correct about CNN not always being wrong. If it fits the narrative that they want, they'll be as honest as a Sunday school teacher. I double check everything and the internet has made that possible. The truth is quite obvious. Too many of us are too vested in our beliefs to allow them to be challenged. We won't even challenge ourselves even if it's in private. I find it a struggle myself.
It's what the biased media depends on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ana Kasparian, of the Young Turks, decided to watch the Kyle Rittenhouse trial. She was shocked when it was revealed, in court, that all the people that were shot, weren't black. She had always been under the impression that Kyle had randomly shot Black Americans because the MSM had allowed people to believe that. Then, she was surprised to learn that Kyle did NOT carry a weapon across state lines. She'd heard, once again on the MSM, that Kyle broke the law by doing this. Another misconception that was the MSM refused to counter. She didn't know that the people shot, were chasing Kyle, threatening to kill him the first chance they could. She didn't know that Kyle did NOT fire the first shot and that there were 3 guns involved in this event, NOT just the one carried by young Rittenhouse. She didn't know that the first person shot had been in an institution for crimes committed and had been let out that day and travelled over 100 miles to take part in the riots in Kenosha and that he had threatened to kill Kyle and was trying to take his rifle away from him and that Kyle had every right to believe that he would shoot him if he won that battle. All because the media failed to fully inform the public.
Our media is a major part of why things are going so wrong in this country.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@patacleus6803
This isn't an Alabama sewage crisis. It has to do with Lowndes County, a rural area, where the county seat, Hayneville only has a population of 931 people, as of the 2010 census. The logistics of running a city style sewage system is prohibitively costly because there are only a little over 11,000 people spread out over 725 square miles. To compare, Manhattan has 1.6 million people living on 23 square miles. There is no work and money available is quite limited. San Francisco has a land area of under 50 square miles with 882,000 residents. Can you see the financial issues of putting a sewage system in a 725 square mile area now? How are the 11,000 people going to pay for it?
Worse, Lowndes County sits on a clay base which is notoriously bad for disposal using septic tank systems. This causes even more difficulties.
You're comparing an issue that is would cost more to install than all the sewage systems of Manhattan and has to be paid for by 11,000 people. Maybe you should try to get a deeper understanding of the problem instead of just reacting in a knee jerk fashion.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AndrewFishman
I loved the 70s and 80s and I was an adult. I loved the 60s, too, but it was a lot scarier. Nuclear war was the big scare, especially during the Cuban missile crisis. However, we didn't have our TVs on or weren't on social media 24/7. I do remember, as a kid, on hearing a booming explosive sound, off in the distance, being afraid that it (the nuclear war) had started. That it was all over and I wouldn't be here in a few minutes.
That was scary. It wasn't some vague, 12 years from now, threat. It was right now, at any second. I may not see morning, that was a real fear. I remember that clip that Sydney showed about the little girl and the flower. That was only a part of it. By the 70s, a lot of that fear had dissipated, thankfully.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Masson H
No one has said that Trump is a perfect human being. However, he's doing a good job as president, whether you like it or not. You're engaging in hate politics, not a good look and you refuse to look any issue objectively and without the bias of hate that seems to fill every comment you make. Emotions make for weak logic, at best and at worst, ignores logic altogether.
In fact, your rhetoric is hurting your cause. Democrats aren't going to win over hard line Republicans. They have to win over moderates, those who sit in the middle. Calling someone, who weighs all the arguments and evidence of an issue on an unbiased scale, a cultist, will expose hard line Democrats as intolerant, name calling elitists and that attitude will turn people away from your party and towards those you don't like.
It's why the Dems lost the last election and why they're going to lose the next one. I know that you won't believe it but you have to face reality sometime. Don't call people names if you want them to vote for your side. It's bad politics. "Hey, brain dead cultist.....VOTE for me" is as stupid a strategy as it gets.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lindajohanson9131
He didn't say that he fired the locals unless they weren't doing their jobs. Also, we don't know if the Haitians are getting lower wages or not. What he DID say is that they show up everyday and they do their job. They're productive. The company makes NOTHING if their worker doesn't show. It's why the company that I worked at payed higher wages. They hoped that they could attract the best in town that way and it worked, somewhat. It also caused a lot of workers to take time off because they now could afford to take it off because they could make enough in 4 days to get by.
Do you know how one gets people to listen to you? STOP complaining. People don't take complainers seriously. The only reaction you'll get is a big eye-roll and a "here we go again" response. If you're not known as a complainer and a hard worker, who shows up everyday and on time, they will listen because you DO have something to say. That you're just not whining because that's what you do. I used to hear them complaining everyday. Besides, you don't get respect just because you exist. You earn it by your actions and attitude.
I can't speak to what's going on in Iowa but if immigration is a problem, then talk to your political reps. If you don't hear what you want to hear, TELL them that you'll not vote for them next election. They listen to that, every time.
I hate the mass immigration, that we're seeing now and it's hurting us in ways that we can't even imagine. But, to whine that the company isn't giving you stuff, you'd better realise that it's as much your own fault as it is theirs. I've worked in factories since the early seventies and the people that I worked with back then, the men and women from my parent's generation, didn't complain like everyone does today. They showed up, didn't shirk and many worked 2 jobs because they saw a chance to get ahead and took it. That's what the Mexicans are doing and they're getting the jobs that the locals complain about.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No.....you explain to me, why anyone should learn a trade, that has been in existence for 1000 years, why he, SUDDENLY, needs to have a high school diploma. It wasn't necessary 50 years ago, but now it is. THAT'S what he was talking about.
You're taking away from the guy who wants to learn, because you don't like the guy who's teaching him because you think that he might be a crook. That's a wonderful way to judge a person. Guilty....until proven innocent.
If he is a crook, investigate HIM. Don't penalise the guy who wants to learn. That's what this regulation is doing. You've taken away any chance that he might have to learn from a reputable teacher because the rules state that he's not capable of learning. He's not allowed to even try, because he doesn't fit the criteria that they've set, NOT because the teacher might be a crook.
Thank you, STATE. I thought you were there to help the average citizen, not put up roadblocks.
2
-
2
-
NoneOfTheAbove
My parents were immigrants. As a matter of fact, I was conceived in the old country and born here. I spoke Dutch till I was around 4 and a mixture of Dutch and English till I went to school. It was a little more difficult for us because we lived on a farm and only had one neighbour who didn't like foreigners. Dad still lives there and has been there 64 years and that same neighbour does, too, except it's the kid that I grew up with and they still don't get along that well. Ironically, that kid was the one that, initially, taught me how to speak English. My mom had only a grade 6 education in Holland and never worked except on the farm and she taught herself to read and write in English.
You can throw water in my face all you want. Come to this country and become a part of the fabric of society. Your heritage is a part of who you are and can't be taken from you but when you immigrate, you've accepted that you're carving a new heritage for yourself as well, one that includes the old and that's melded with the new. I've seen what maintaining a position of isolation due to culture and religion can do, firsthand, from other Dutch immigrants, who looked at the local Canadians with disdain. It's not pretty. Fortunately, their children have blended in very well and that attitude has gone. We're still known as the Dutch because it's a small town but we're accepted as a part of the community because we have eventually integrated. That's important. Of all the Dutch people that immigrated to this area, only one was forced to go back, and that was for insurance fraud.
Become a part of the greater community. The only reason one would refuse is due to a sense of superiority. It happened in the Dutch community that I grew up in and it was not right what some of those people said and did.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jefftaylor2547
It's difficult to get the picture of what's going on from my couch but I don't deny the possibility of the organisation of this violence. I can relate something that I am familiar with to use as an example.
In Canada, in the sixties, there was a French separatist group known as the FLQ. They were communist sympathisers and wanted Quebec to separate from Canada and form a new socialist nation. What's important here is how they were organised. They formed small cells of 5 to 8 people and they only knew the fellow sympathisers that were in their own group. Only one person, within the group, would be in contact with another group, would be the contact with a third group. It made it extremely difficult, for the Canadian authorities to get any information on them or their objectives.
That's how, it would seem, that Antifa is organised. Not quite as secretive, but no formal apparent structure or chain of command. However, I'd say that it was a facade. I'd say that every group has a leader that acts as a liaison to other groups and that the average Antifa member is unaware of this loose association or is out of the loop. That's why, as you say, it's difficult to pin them down.
This guy, that you say is getting paid, knows that there's something going on within the organisation but I'm sure he has no idea where the money is coming from or how. He's out of the loop. He has his handler, that pays him but where that handler got the money, he couldn't tell you.
It's how these socialists underground groups operate.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@georgemilford5632
You've changed the entire context and meaning of my comment. It's the left that has been using the terms of "micro-aggression", "hate speech", "uninvited physical contact" , "safe spaces" and how men are always using physical force to intimidate women. They've been crying about these things for years now.
Now, when a left wing journalist, uses physical force to prevent a woman from doing her job, it becomes "misdirect", as if that makes it better. Acosta used his strength, as a man and as a prestigious journalist, to block her from taking the microphone, her job.
Had that been Trump "misdirecting", you'd never hear the end of it from the left. However, since it was just one of the "deplorables" as many Democrats have called them, it doesn't matter so much. She's obviously a Republican, so a little "misdirecting" is just fine.
Acosta was being rude and assertive and using baited questions to which no rational person would have responded to. His question was why did he (Trump) demonise migrants, implying that Trump was racist (an insult) to asking if he were worried about the Mueller investigation, again implying Trump's guilt, hoping that if Trump did respond it would prove his guilt in the whole matter. Trump wasn't having any of it and neither would you have, in his position, unless you're that irrational that you can't see the traps that Acosta was setting. Trump saw them and he wasn't stepping into them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@douglemay7989
Charm.....that should make for a good governor. I know the best people that I work with ALL have charm. Not much food for anything else but they can charm a toad out it's warts. That's SO important.
All I know is that the population is Florida is going up. That doesn't happen when a state is run in a proper manner. They're doing a lot better than California, New York, Oregon, New Jersey.....all of which are losing people. A lot of people are sick of the high prices, taxes, crime, homelessness and the over regulation in those states, especially California. People leave places that they don't like and move to places that they do. That's being demonstrated by the huge influx of illegal immigrants crossing the southern border. They're leaving their homes in search of a better life and that's no different than people leaving the states, that I mentioned, and going to states who offer a better future.
So, who cares if DeSantis isn't Mr. Personality. It's the job that he's doing that counts.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Frank71
Read the Georgia bill. This is where ALL the controversy is taking place. The baseball All-Star game is leaving Georgia because of this new bill and it's going to another state that has stricter voting laws than the ones that Georgia will use in the next election. Remember again, that they're calling Georgia's new voting laws oppressive.....NOT American voting laws.
It has provisions in it that says that if a precinct, a voting region, has more then 1 hour wait times, they are to increase the number of voting booths or machines and increase polling workers. If the voter's list, in that precinct, goes over 2000 voters, voting precincts will be changed to bring that number back down to 2000 voters. There must be 1 voting booth or machine for every 250 voters plus one extra for the remainder. That means that if there are 1100 voters in that precinct, there will be 5 booths.....4 for the 1000 and another for the remaining 100, equaling 5 booths. There will also be 1 mail-in drop box for every precinct. There will be 17 early election days which will include Saturdays and Sundays and anyone can request a mail-in vote and will NOT required to give a reason for that request. Mail in drop boxes are a new thing in Georgia, only used last year because of the pandemic. Now it's coded into law. This cap on voters, per precinct, isn't based on how many actually vote but on how many eligible voters that there are in a precinct.
The reason that you have IDs is so if you do share the same name as someone else, your ID number will identify you, NOT the name. That only makes sense.
You're confusing the concept of American voting laws with state laws. Georgia is a state and each state decides its own voting procedures. The big reason that there's an outcry against the bill is that there are those that don't want ANY IDs required at ANY time during the voting process. They say it's racist. In Europe, according to you use your national ID card. That's an ID. In some countries, like Belgium, the law says that you MUST vote. Not so in the US and specifically Georgia. They want you to register, so they can determine your status and the precinct size and number of polling stations needed and then when you vote, they want to see that same ID to prove, just like your wife does with her national card, that you're the person that is registered to vote.
I've read the bill....all 97 pages of it. The controversy is fabricated and there is no voter suppression intended in Georgia by the initiating this bill. It's pure politics.
The controversy is voter ID. You just told me that they need it in Europe. Why is it so bad when Georgia requires you to show ID, then? I don't get it. Is it because "conservatives" are asking for it? That's seems like a very poor reason to me, especially since you seem to think that it's just fine in Europe.
2
-
@Frank71
So, the Republicans of Georgia, pass a bill, that requires ID to vote, in an effort to lesson the suspicions in a close race, and you object. You don't even have to get special ID. Your Social Security Card will do and all those who have ever worked have it. You need it to pay income tax and when you file your yearly taxes, you have to give that Social Security Number that is on your card. You have to file income taxes. It's the LAW. If you don't do it, you may face tax evasion charges and you have to have a Social Security Card and number to file your annual income taxes. If you've ever worked....YOU ALREADY HAVE ID. You have the ID that will allow you to vote. All you have to do is make sure that you're registered to vote. You can do that online or go to the local precinct and see if you're on the voter's list.
If you don't have a Social Security Number, which means that you've never worked, you can use your driver's licence. Once again, you don't have to do anything. You've got the ID already. If you're on welfare, you had to show ID to get it. Same as food stamps so those people already have the ID. See how I'm narrowing down the numbers of people that are being inconvenienced. If you open a bank account, you need ID. If you want to buy smokes....ID. If you want to buy beer....ID. Buy a gun....ID for the background check. A credit card....ID to prevent identity theft and fraud. Almost everyone already has the ID that they need to vote. The very few that don't have any ID, will get it FREE in Georgia. Yet, the Democrats are still complaining.
All you have to do is register. Once registered, unless you move, you can vote. If you're unsure of your voting status, you go online and see if you're registered. Almost everyone has a cell phone so it's easy. if you don't have a cell phone, get a friend to see for you. It's not that hard. You can register at any time. You don't have to wait for an election. Register today, RIGHT NOW, so you can vote in mid terms in November 2022. You've got lots of time
Just take the ID, that you used to register, and take it to the polling station, when election day comes.
It's NOT rocket science.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Frank71
There are lots of people on welfare here, too. If you don't have the money, there's Medicaid, a government financed medical system. You can get food stamps, a way to get free food, financed by the government and subsidised housing.
The problem is that there are lots of people who don't want to work. I've watched them come and go where I work and there's no reason why they can't hold the job but they're too lazy. I don't begrudge anyone, that's having some problems, some help, but to make a life long career out of collecting welfare, you're playing the ones that work hard, everyday, for suckers. It's theft and that's not humane at all.
I'd gladly help anyone but there comes a time that they have to grow up and help themselves. We have too much of it here.
I'm originally from the Netherlands and they have the same type of social system there as they do in Scandinavia. However, they work and they work hard. They don't ask for money to sit at home and do nothing. America has always been a country of people that are self reliant and we've become the richest country in the world by following a life of hard work and smart decisions. Now, our young don't want that anymore and it's killing our country.
2
-
@eddypdeb
And it's STILL and ID system. You just don't show up and say "I'm here to vote. Give me a ballot". You have a national ID card. I don't have one for your country. I can't show up on election day, in your town and vote. Why? I don't have a national ID card for YOUR country. Do you really want every foreign tourist, in your country, on voting day, to head down to the polls and to vote in YOUR elections?
The American registration system might be different but all they're saying is show ID when you vote. They don't want every foreigner, who happens to be in the US, on voting day, to vote in their elections.
The Georgia law, the voting laws for THAT state, requires that you show ID when you vote. So does your country. You just said as much. You have a National ID card. I don't. You can vote in your country and I can't.
As for the purges, if you move to Canada and become a Canadian citizen, are you still allowed to vote in the country that you came from? I'm saying that you won't be. Maybe I'm wrong but I'll bet that you won't be. Also, the US sends a regional representative to the Congress. If you move from Georgia to Montana, you should vote for the representative from Montana NOT the one in Georgia, thousands of miles away. That's why they purge the voting records in Georgia. They don't want your name in Georgia and in Montana on their voting register. That's also why you need to show ID, so that someone can't show up and pretend to be someone that's on the register who happens to be living in Montana.
The election system is completely different in the US because the US is organised differently than YOUR country. Each state has its own election laws because each state sends its own representatives to Congress. In a way it's like the EU, each country has its own representatives that is sent to Brussels. Would you want someone, living in a different country, voting in YOUR election? The US is the same. The people of Texas don't want the people of Michigan voting for their representatives.
All the law in Georgia is asking for is to show ID. ID.....just like your national ID. If you lose your ID card, you get another one. If a person in Georgia doesn't have ID, he can get one, from the government of Georgia, FREE. How is that different than your country? I'm NOT getting it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@justinkirschenman2232
Automation is near the threat that many think it is. 150 years ago, almost everyone worked in agriculture in one capacity or another. When the industrial age started, people were going on about automation then as well. In England, the Luddites were going around protesting and even destroying mills because they believed that they were taking away their jobs and way of life. Automation will change things but they don't have to hurt us, no more than the industrial revolution hurt the people of the 19th Century.
The lockdown has become political and it's the Democrats that are doing everything they can to keep us locked down as long as they can. It's the Republicans that are opening up the Red states and Trump has said, over and over, that we have to get back to work. The best way to get back to work is to let your politicians, especially the Democrats, know that you can guarantee that you won't vote for them come election time, if they don't start to ease restrictions. Another is to let everyone you know that the curve has been flattened and explain about the natural progressions of epidemics and avoid the conspiracy theories. Just facts. It's all about appearing sensible.
As for vaccinations, you don't have to get one if you don't want to. There will be enough with acquired immunity through having it, natural immunity and those who do get vaccinated, for the herd immunity to have a positive effect. The more that get vaccinated, the better, though.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Free Thinker
Because the investigation into Burisma was carried out by the Ukraine government. That was the same prosecutor that Biden wanted fired. It would seem the best way to find out, EXACTLY, what happened here and to see whether Biden made a corrupt move or not, is to ask those DIRECTLY involved.
Besides, no matter who Trump asked to investigate into the Biden's alleged corruption, the response would still be that Trump was trying to get dirt on a political rival. The only problem was, in this case, Biden used American taxpayer money, to fire a prosecutor, in another country, who may or may not have been looking into his son, for some kind of wrong doing. That SOUNDS corrupt to me. It should sound corrupt to anyone. If he's innocent.....great. In the end, though, the investigation will always lead back to Ukraine, where the bulk of the information of corruption, or lack of it, lies. That's just plain common sense. I'm sure no one, including you, would never say that it's okay for a politician to be a crook in another country, using American taxpayer money as leverage to get what he wants. It does seem that Biden did just that. If he didn't, then why did he brag about it?
2
-
2
-
@spindoctor6385
The last election really exposed the media and big tech for what they are. They've become agents for for the political party that controls the government, not just elected officials but the bureaucracy as well. It's the bureaucrats that need the right party in power and they used the media and especially big tech to their advantage.
My dad is 89 years old and living on a fixed income. He's too proud to accept help from his kids. Over the last 10 years, all his friends are gone, except a few that live miles away. Phone costs are prohibitive, to keep in touch, so he joined Facebook, for free, and is now able to talk to his friends, some who live thousands of miles away, for nothing. This is how they control us. They lure us in with great deals and then use their platforms to control information. I've had to show him things, news items, that facebook won't allow him to see and the MSM won't cover.
When a monopoly becomes the government, they'll create conditions under which we feel forced to use them. Once they have that in place, they can advance their own agendas for financial gain and power. They go hand in hand. What we'll have, and it's happening quite rapidly, a political system run by corporate autocrats instead of elected representatives. They'll do it through the guise of a free market that's NOT free at all but controlled by a powerful few.
It's like religion. We took away the power of religious groups by limiting their influence on government. We have to do the same with the corporations or any other political group.
2
-
2
-
@paulmitcheson2905
He didn't say to try injecting disinfectant. He asked if there was any research involving disinfectant and he asked 2 doctors. Only an idiot would actually think that he said that we should try it or someone so consumed with TDS that he can't think rationally.
The "Mexico will pay for it" was, foremost, a political slogan but he also threatened Mexico with tariffs if they didn't do something about illegals at the border. Those tariffs would have helped to pay for it. So, Mexico started a program of helping to detect illegals on their side of the border. So, in a way, they're helping to pay for border security, freeing money to pay for the wall. Anyone, who actually thought that he was going to get the president of Mexico to write Trump a check to pay for the wall is either delusional or so consumed with TDS that he can't think rationally.
You know why there is 10% unemployment? It's because Democrat controlled states have had such Draconian lockdowns that jobless rates were over 20%. Michigan actually reached 31%, at one time. Before Covid, the jobless rates were the best in US history. Can he get 10 million jobs back in the next 4 years? I don't know but I'm glad that he's setting goals for the country. Even if he gets half of that, it would be amazing. I hope he succeeds but, of course, that's not going to be good for the TDS. His failure to reach that goal would stroke that obsession in a satisfying way, though, wouldn't it?
While he was hoping that Covid would go away, he'd already stopped travel to China and Europe. He'd formed a task force to fight the disease and even offered to send a team of virology experts to China, which they refused. He talked about it in the State of the Union Address, as well....the one that Pelosi tore up and not one Democrat mentioned that it was in that address. I realised that Trump was an optimist but I also saw that he was doing those things so I thought that it might be a good idea to prepare myself, in case of the worst did happen. When the toilet paper scare did come, I had enough to eat and wipe my butt for at least 3 months. You see, I didn't have TDS and that allowed me to think rationally.
In spite of the numbers, the US is not the worst in cases or deaths per capita. In cases per million, the US ranks 9th. In deaths per million, the US ranks 10th. That means that there are 9 countries that if they had the same population as the US, they'd have more than 184,000 deaths. It surely didn't help matters when Democrat states like New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in nursing homes. Republican states Florida and Texas have 30 million people MORE than New York but NY has over 10 thousand MORE deaths. Those are facts that you probably don't want to hear but I can back this up. TDS has a way of not liking facts.
Sort of like the fact that there are Democrats that like to hold to the narrative of "peaceful protests" as buildings are burning. What kind of TDS delusional thinking does one need to have to think that the ordinary voter is going to believe that to be true. I'll bet the voters in Kenosha are all talking about how "peaceful" the "protests" were in their small city.
You don't have to like Trump or even vote for him but at least be rational about it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kalburgy2114
I wasn't too upset about it 50 years ago and, to be honest, I kinda pooh-poohed the idea that this was a gateway to increased sexual obsessions is schools. Man....was I wrong. We had a couple of classes of sex-ed in high school in the sixties but it was so basic and mechanical and, being in a farming community, it was stuff we all knew anyway. It was just applied to humans and, like I said, was rather innocuous. Now it's a cause, with flags, demonstrations, drag shows, class pride parades and even a month dedicated to sexual activities which should remain personal. Children, as young as 5 and 6 years old, are being exposed to the LGBTQ whatever stuff now.
I'm sorry to anyone, that I snickered at, who warned us about it ending this way.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@andyluamarta
I'm 72 years old and I grew up on a farm. I was 7 or 8 years old and going out to pump water out of the well to drink. When I was 11, I used to milk the old Jersey cow so we'd have milk on the table. The damn thing kicked me, stepped on my toes and kept whacking me on the side of my head with its tail as I was milking. I had 4 sisters and 2 brothers and we had no money. A nickel was a big deal. My parents grew up in the Netherlands during the depression and WW2. No electricity, no running water, no food at times. My dad came from a family of 16. He's now 93 and the idea of abortion angers him deeply. He said that life was tough, my grandfather was a gruff old man but that was life and he appreciates all the sacrifices that his parents made to raise him and his siblings. He did the same for us, at times working 3 jobs....at a shoe factory at night, on the farm during the day and as a musician on the weekends. He used to tell me to be grateful that we were Christian folk because it was up to him, he'd make me work on Sundays, too.
I know how tough life was. Kids here in North America have it damn easy, today. I think that I had it easy compared to my parents, grandparents and all those before that. We've become a bunch of crybabies, with no gratitude for what our ancestors went through so we could finally have the easy life......but all we do is whine. What a way to spend the only life that we have. I don't feel silly at all. I'm grateful.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@overthenonsense4171
That's why I said, business owners have to start opening their businesses and we have to support them by frequenting their establishments. If most of them open up and we give them our business, they can't get us all. We don't have to burn down the very businesses that we're trying to save and destroy the jobs that produce the wealth that our country needs. However, we do have to stand up to them, not as a destructive force, but a united one, that, like Ghandi and Dr. King did what they believed to be the right thing to do. We must do it as a united front.
I'm not in a full lockdown but I do go to the local taverns to eat, at least twice a week and would continue to do it if the state ordered the them closed and they refused to listen. If every establishment, each restaurant, bowling alley, tavern and fitness club refused and we supported them, they'd be up against a wall and we don't have to destroy a thing. Ghandi showed us that passive resistance works and we don't have to destroy our country to succeed.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Thebobbyman
Yes, there is. The wall that is being proposed is also bringing with it a road, so border patrol agents can monitor activity more effectively. Way better than having to walk through miles of desert to monitor the borders.
It's set up a line, which isn't easy to cross, that any potential illegal can see and understand that this isn't to be breached. If you're on your own side of the wall, you're good. If you're on the other side, you're in violation of a law that forbids illegal entry into another country. EVERY country in the world has these laws. That's why you need a passport to travel.
It also makes it easier to set up surveillance equipment, so agents can be used in a more effective way. It's a clear cut guide for aerial surveillance, so they can monitor activity on both sides of the wall and then the roads, built while building this large, comprehensive wall, can transport the trucks and agents quickly to any problem areas.
That's only a start. There is definitely a point to the wall. The point is only lost if you're politically motivated and allowing that to cloud your perception.
2
-
@alexanderduck8743
What a lot of hockey pucks. Every country in the world has the right to control immigration to their country. I can't go to Mexico without showing my passport and if I don't have it, I'm NOT allowed to go there. The Mexican government and their border security will stop me. Yet, for some unknown reason, the United States is expected to allow people to come in, without passports, IDs, a formal request and unvaccinated.
Right now, the US allows in more immigrants from Mexico than any other country.....LEGAL immigrants, to be precise. Are those legal immigrants the "other" as well? The top 10 source countries for LEGAL immigrants, in 2018 are as follows.
Mexico - 161,858
Cuba - 76,486
China - 65,214
India - 59,821
Dominican Republic - 57,413
Philippines - 47,238
Vietnam - 33,834
El Salvador - 28,326
Haiti - 21,360
Jamaica - 20,347
Not ONE of those countries are predominantly "white" countries. Remember, these are LEGAL immigrants, immigrants that the American government has WELCOMED into the United States, who will be allowed to work towards becoming American citizens.
Your "other" characterization is bogus.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lindag4878
I heard Trump say that it was still under control and it was at the time. Very few cases, then. He also said that, it would be like the flu and be gone by spring. It sounded like a hope to me.
BUT....he had also started up a task force on Jan 27th to look into the virus. He and the president of Italy were the first to limit travel to China. He offered to send a team from the CDC to China to help but China turned him down. That was ALL before he said the things about the flu.
Instead of the constant screaming in my head of "LIAR....LIAR...LIAR.", like you're doing now, I used my head for what it was meant for. I thought "This guy is being optimistic but he's hedging his bets. Maybe I'd better do that, too". When the time came, I was ready to last out a 2 month plague and quarantine. I saw it coming and I took my cue from Trump.
If you weren't so infused with hate, you'd have got that same message, but emotions, run amuck, ALWAYS clouds the thinking process.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jayv5093
He BEGGED for instructions and no one answered him. He was in charge of the officers, around the Capitol building, that day and when he called out for new instructions because of what was happening, NO ONE answered. So he took it onto himself to bring the members of Congress to safety. Wait for instructions? From who? The person who refused to answer him? Those officers were abandoned. Everyone knew that there were going to be protests and knew it for weeks in advance. Yet, when it turned ugly, there was no plan to help those officers out. THEN, the politicians made a big deal, later and lied about how Officer Sicknick died. They USED those officers as political pawns. Sicknick died of a stroke and heart failure, long after the riot and Biden even claimed, much later that he was killed by protesters. THAT'S A LIE.
This is NOT about Tucker Carlson. This is about why those in power didn't take the precautions that should have been taken. That should bother EVERY American but for some reason, you'd be quite comfortable with being abandoned, like these officers were, had YOU been a security officer that day.
2
-
2
-
@arenam79
When you see crime statistics, you're seeing felonies NOT misdemeanours. That means that shoplifting, under a set number, is not a felony and therefore not a crime. When police are understaffed, they have to pick and choose what crimes to investigate and misdemeanours just aren't as important as felonies. Eventually, businesses just don't bother reporting crimes because they know that the police won't show up and if they do, the perp will be set free. The higher that set number, the lower the crime stats for obvious reasons. The crime may have happened but if they're not reporting it or it doesn't meet the standards of a felony, then it's not reported as a crime and politicians can brag that crime is down.
That's the logic of it. Both store staff and police officers have been saying the same thing. No point in reporting the crime because nothing gets done or, from the police standpoint, no point in arresting someone because they just get released. Why risk their safety, their livelihood and their savings when the powers over them do nothing to protect them or the citizens? That's the logic that you're refusing to see.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@venicebeachsportsnetwork6677
Some of the poorest people, in the US, are women who are raising kids alone. They have a difficult time finding meaningful work because of the constraints of child rearing and end up living on welfare, government handouts that don't pay well at all.
Those who wait until marriage, or have a committed relationship, to have children, are those who take their responsibilities seriously. That includes a sexual life that isn't haphazard or off the cuff.
Children, who grow up without a father, are more likely to not finish high school, go on welfare, become addicts and end up in prison....BY FAR. The best gift that you can give your children is to provide them with a stable and dependable home life which increases both financially and emotionally, in a 2 parent home.
So, spare me your condescending attitude. The statistics support my contention.
Also, the idea that everyone will be making 10 bucks an hour is nonsense. 1 in 17 people, in the US, is a millionaire, right now. I can't give you the numbers of Americans that have a net worth between 100,000 and 1 million but there's a lot of them.
So spare me the intellectual angst and fears of a futuristic dystopia that doesn't exist and that you're creating in your mind. Get off your butt, get a job and then use the finances that you've made to your best advantage to create a future and stop your crying. Crybabies aren't doers and they accomplish very little.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@steffansmith3601
I've worked as a bartender for years. I've had to tell people that they've had enough and they've lost it. I've had beer bottles, ash trays, chairs and glasses thrown at me. I've been sucker punched, had my eye gouged, been spit on and pushed. People have threatened to shoot me, blow me up, have their friends beat me up and have ME charged. Why? Because I've told them that they've had enough and it's time to go home.
Do you really think that people like this are going to behave like adults when approached by a police officer? You have a "blue" bigotry where the citizen is always in the right and the cop is wrong.
I wouldn't want that job for nothing. Not only do they have to deal with the worst of society, they have to listen to people like you who, in a knee jerk response, malign them continuously. Just pure hate. There are cops who are jerks. There are cops that are great guys. Judge each one as individuals because no matter what, cops, some kind of security, is here to stay. Either learn to live with them or spend your life bitching about it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MegaBanne
I didn't say that you don't value hard work. I'm saying that the system, that you're recommending, encourages those who do NOT value hard work, to do what they really want to do and that's is nothing. They want the hard work that I do and maybe even you, to benefit them. It encourages envy and resentment and discourages those who would normally want to be the best and see some reward for their efforts but all they get is a pat on the head and thanks for what can be taken from them.
Also, Karl Marx didn't invent socialism, only his own brand of that ideology. There's been different iterations of it and EVERY one of them has failed. Why? Because it looks for the failures, the victims of the systems and then uses more and more of the over all resources to fill the needs of those who either can't or refuse to fill their own needs.
My neighbour was born with enormous physical difficulties. Yet he never let that keep him down. I know who can do a lot more work than what he can in a day the do SQUAT, yet my neighbour worked everyday at a supermarket doing odd jobs that needed to be done. One arm was shorter than the other, his hand was all twisted and nearly useless except as a stabilizer. He had a severe limp that he was born with and his parents were told, when he was born, that he'd be better off in a home, that he'd never be able to look after himself. Yet, I'd see him when I went shopping struggling with the shopping carts, never complaining, or trying to sweep up the mess on aisle 3 even though it was really difficult to hold a broom. Yet, this guy REFUSED handouts. He had children, bought a home and refused to allow himself to be treated as a victim. To me, he's one of the toughest guys that I've ever known.
Yet, there are fully grown men, who couldn't hold down a job to save their lives. They're always looking for ways to beat the system and there are more and more of them everyday because the system tells them that they can't get ahead because of bigotry, or unfairness or high prices or something. They rob from all of us who value hard work, even from handicapped men, like my neighbour who has a REAL work ethic, to placate their own lack of motivation or ambition.
This is why socialism doesn't work. It rewards those with little to no integrity. It robs from those who do and gives to those who don't. It's a recipe for failure and will only result in more and more people giving up and trying to find the same loopholes so they can do little or nothing as well.
It's a race to the bottom.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gamera3d324
After you do your taxes, do you take the tax returns down to the local pub, church or to all your friends, neighbours, work associates and family and show them what you did? If I asked you, would you send a copy to me? I'm betting that you wouldn't.
Your tax returns are private. If your accountant posted your returns in the local papers and on the internet, you'd sue him and he'd lose his licence as an accountant. Why? BECAUSE IT'S PRIVATE!!!!!!
That's the law. Why does a sitting President lose his rights? Is he no longer a citizen?
Over 30 years ago, he was losing money and he didn't have to pay taxes. Since then, he's been doing a lot better and guess what? He has been paying taxes. A lot of taxes. His employees have been taxes as well.
You see, there's a reason that you're allowed to write business losses off. Businesses go through ups and downs over their existence. The government allows you those exemptions to allow you to recover from the downturn in a business and they do happen to every business. It's not illegal. It's not unethical. It's an agreement between the government and a business, a set of rules that, not only help the rich, but also the small privately owned business. The roofing company, the small bake shop, a machine shop, a shoe company, everyone benefits from those tax breaks. Why? Because, in the end, allowing downturns to happen you're giving the owner a chance to recover and that benefits everyone......including you. Almost every business suffers loses, especially starting out. If you didn't give those tax breaks, who, in their right mind, would even start a business? That would cripple the economy and we'd all languish in abject poverty.
If Trump had never paid taxes in his entire life and he's worth billions, you'd have a point. However, during those times, he wasn't worth billions. In fact he was billions in dept. His assets, when counted, were less than zero dollars. Now, he is worth billions. His assets are in the multi-billions and he's paying taxes. That's how it works. It works for Trump and it works for you as well.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@LetsReinharder
" Who said I advocated for giving up?"
YOU did.
"If you still believe that America is worth saving, you yourself are equally lost."
You're telling me that the Titanic is sinking and it's time to abandon ship and stop rearranging deck chairs.
Do you know who else thinks that the US is lost? Antifa, BLM, the "intellectuals" in our universities.....that's who. They want to burn the entire nation down and build their Utopia from our ashes.
The answer is simple. STOP VOTING FOR THE SAME LAMEBRAINS THAT YOU'VE ALWAYS VOTED FOR!!! That includes both Democrats and Republicans. If they don't ascribe to the things that made the country great, tell them you're not voting for them and the DON'T VOTE FOR THEM.
In my lifetime, I've watched the US go from a strong nation, that fought for equal rights for its citizens to a nation, that allowed Marxist ideologues take over our schools and media....basically our entire culture, even our churches. It's time to take BACK that culture. If they can do it....so can we. We can beat them at their own game and we can do it through determination, hard work and strong moral courage. Strong moral beliefs are the one thing that the left doesn't have. If we want to beat them, we have to stick by our convictions and advocate for truth and individual rights, as outlined in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If they were worth fighting for 50 years ago, they're still worth fighting for today.
All you're doing is advocating for more chaos and we don't need that...AT ALL.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@obviousmaths4368
I'm thinking that he's talking about physically harder. Construction, forestry, mining is a lot harder, PHYSICALLY, than marketing or teaching. The latter can be very stressful but that has nothing to do with physical strength and endurance. A lot of men can't do those jobs and they don't because they're fully cognitive of that fact. So, if they become teachers instead, that doesn't mean that they should make EXACTLY the same as a lumberjack or roofer. That's comparing apples and oranges. However, women teachers make the same as men if all things considered, like length of tenure, are equal. In fact, it's against the law. Strangely, our courts aren't over run by cases where this is the case. The ambulance chasing lawyer types aren't chasing women clients who claim that their being paid less than men for the same job. If this was such a pervasive problem, this would be a perfect opportunity for those lawyers to fill their pockets and they're not doing that.
It's all a strawman argument.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@SkageXL5
First, you told the original commentor, King Arthur" to cry about it. I would assume that you're were mocking him and his take on the modern Pride movement. When I was using the "they" and "them" pronouns, I was referring to those in the Pride movement, the collective, as "they" or "them" because they are a group. That's been a staple of the English language for hundreds of years. It should be quite obvious who I'm referring to if you have any basic knowledge of the English language. 30 years ago, gays and lesbians claimed to be marginalised and victimised and started the Pride movement. Now the Pride symbol is everywhere and try to criticise anything about the movement. It could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Now YOU, the singular, to help you with the English language, are mocking those who are feeling marginalised, who are afraid to say what they think, by mocking King Arthur, the singular, as a representative of the group, the "they" and "them" that's used to signify group members.
It's really rather easy if you know the English language.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tabbyreed8925
Think about this. Trump has taken on China and wants the manufacturing to come back to the US. China has hardly ANY environmental laws. Their air is among the worst in the world. There are no labour laws, quality control is near non-existent and human rights are horrific, think Muslim re-education camps.
What would be better? Making all our goods in a country that has NO real environmental standards or in the US, where we have them and can control them. If Trump loses, the manufacturing will go back to China and there goes the environment, especially the air quality. Also, in spite of pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord, the US has made the best progress in emissions of all industrial countries over the last 2 years. He may have ended some of the EPA rules but most companies, that operate in the US are still doing their best to do it right because it is good marketing strategy and good for business.
He's and anti-immigrant that's married to an immigrant. A little contradictory. Also, the US is STILL the number one destination for legal immigrants. He has no problem with it but he does want a better control system so not just anyone can come and it's nowhere NEAR as stringent as immigration laws in countries like Japan or South Korea and you NEVER hear complaints about those 2 countries.
Funny how Trump isn't a good man because he cheats on his wife but Biden is just fine even though he's cheated on his wife, even been accused of forcible sexual assault. They kind of cancel each other out on that metric, if you ask me.
The only thing that I don't like about him is his tendency to be a loudmouth and a braggart but we all can't be perfect.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@evansmith2766
What it does is allow the person, that has personal problems, a way to avoid confronting them. It directs the solution away from solving their own addictions, depressions and doubts and foisting them onto something that is WAY beyond their control. This can only exacerbate the issues that are actually troubling them. Viktor Frankl didn't survive the Nazi camps by pursuing systemic change. Given his situation, that would have been an impossible endeavour. He did it by pursuing change within himself. Shame can be a big part of that. There is shame in being an addict, homeless and locked in a static state of oppression. There's no escaping it. I know that for a fact. As long as the world was in a hopeless state, in my mind, I was in a hopeless state and I was ashamed of who I was and what I was doing. I had to look inside, find what was worthwhile and coddle it back into something that I could use. Incredibly, it made things better and strangely enough, the world got better as well. At least it made it better to deal with in a more pragmatic and personal level. That made things so much better for those around me.
You don't fix the system. You fix yourself and the system changes when enough of us manage to fix ourselves.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@richardthomas1531
This is one of those comments that shows a complete lack of understanding of history and the human psyche. At the time of the writing of the American Constitution, all 13 colonies had slavery. Slavery had been a part of the human condition for thousands of years but people like you think that it was going to end in one day. It's not. It was a long process of education, thought, debate, in-fighting and more debate.
Right after the Revolutionary war was over, some of the Northern States started to end slavery. 20 years after that war, all the Northern States abolished it and the non-slave states was about half the number of states. By the time of the Civil War, more than half the states were free states and it had come to a head. Over 600,000 people died in that war to end slavery, but you and people like you won't even give the American government and the people the credit of officially ending slavery in the United States. It was the US government that ended it and it was that American Constitution, that was behind the ideals that ended slavery.
The US has been slave free for most of its existence and it was the US government and its citizens that fought HARD to end it.
They wrote that ALL MEN were created equal with the understanding that this was AND IS a work in progress. Instead, it's become of work of hate....of self righteous hypocrites pointing fingers and laying blame. That's not what the Constitution was meant to be. It's a document that was supposed to be a method of working our differences out without violence and hate.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gerrywhelan5761
You're still obsessed with other people's money. It's their money and it belongs to them. Worry about your own position and try to enhance your own life and future. If you give up because of "rich people" you'll never get anywhere.
Back in seventies, when I was a young man, I didn't care about how rich my boss was and he was super rich. I agreed to work for him and earn a wage. I bought a house from those wages and over the next 20 years, I paid for it, like millions of others did with their wages. This is was when, as you've confirmed, the economy was on a downturn. Now it's improving. Now's the time to take stock in your own situation, financially and career wise. Figure out how you're spending your money and if you're wasting some of it. The simplest of things can start you on a road to financial stability. I use my debit card to save money. Every time I use it, the total rounds up to the nearest 5. For example $21.95 rounds up to $25.00 and the $3.05 goes to a special savings account. Doesn't seem like a lot but you'll be amazed how much is there after 2 years. Spare change always goes into a jar and it's rolled up and cashed in when the jar is full. That change goes into that savings account. Just small things. Quit smoking and the money that was once used for that should go into that account. Get a savings deduction plan at work. 10 bucks a week, gets you 500 in a year.
I know that you're going to say that this is all small potatoes and it is but that's how ordinary people reach financial success. It doesn't happen over night. It's a life long journey and incredibly satisfying as you go through that journey and watch things slowly grow and seem to grow faster as you get older. However, if you never start, you'll never get anywhere and that's the big problem with obsessing with the money of others. It's a sign that you give up. Surrender guarantees defeat and failure. In fact, it's the very definition of losing.
2
-
@Atrid
Money doesn't belong to everybody. It's not as if there's a big pile of cash somewhere and we're all deserving of an equal bite of the cash pie. Money is representative of wealth and is worth nothing without the things of value that we create.
I have a big maple tree in my back yard. As it sits, it has no real monetary value. However, if I cut it down, run it through a saw and make planks, it now has value as long as there are people that want it and are willing to exchange something of value for it. If that something of value is cash, it becomes MY cash, not your's, nor the neighbour's or anyone else's. It's mine. It was my time and effort that bought the tree and my time and effort that cut it down and made something of value of it. YOU have no right to the proceeds of my effort. That's how wealth in a country is created. It isn't just money in a bank. It's the cumulative value of the domestic product created. Without those products, money is worthless. That's why Venezuela went belly up. No idea of economics. Eventually, they started printing money even though they didn't have the goods of value to back it up. The money became worthless.
Also, you seem to have a skewed view of equality. There is, in reality, no such thing. What we try to do, in a capitalist and democratic nation, is give everyone an equal opportunity to do as they wish in life, including financial gain. That doesn't include the guarantee of success or the equality of outcome. That's up to the individual and the choices that he makes along with some luck. The more you keep looking at the piles of others, you more you neglect your own pile and the less success financially and professionally you will have.
Every nation that has tried the financial equality ideology, the one that says money belongs to us all equally, has failed miserable. There's not one that has brought it to any kind of success unless they accepted the idea that we need to allow people to seek their own kind of success. China is a prime example of that. As a communist country, they starved. When they allowed greater economic freedom, people started to prosper, each one at their own individual pace. That's because there is no such thing as true equality. It's an impossibility.
2
-
@gerrywhelan5761
In reality, more people have been lifted from abject poverty, around the world, over the last 20 years, than at any time in human history.
https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty
There have always been the super rich. Rockefeller, Carnegie, the Vanderbilts have always been a part of the social fabric of America. In fact, a greater percentage of Americans were living in real abject poverty 150 years ago than they do today. They lived on the brink of starvation all the time and there were no safety nets like there are today. In the west, we live better lives than at any time in human history. The poorest of us have better health care than the richest person did 500 years ago.
The problem that you're exhibiting isn't that your life is terrible. It's the fact that you have a resentment against the rich, and yes, there are corrupt people in Washington. They aren't just the rich. He was talking about a complacent corrupt bureaucracy that support each other by corrupt means. That's been a reality of life forever. It isn't much different today and the fight against human nature has been ongoing all through our history. If it hadn't been a reality in history, the Bible would never had been written. Also, you don't have to rich to be greedy. I know of a lot of drug dealers and thieves that like to make the easy money without the effort and they don't have any money. I call that greed.
Again, there is no such thing as a piece of the pie. There's no pile of cash sitting somewhere that we all have access to and that some are hoarding. Wealth is created. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. The wealthy have created their own wealth through the creation of products that they can sell. We all do it. You do it through investments in pension funds, savings accounts and investment plans at your bank.
I live below the proscribed poverty line in my country. Yet, over the last 4 years, I've been to the Dominican Republic, Mexico and the Netherlands and I've just paid for a vacation to Costa Rica. Yet, if I told you how much I make a month, you'd think it was impossible. My dad came to this country penniless, yet today, after hard work (working 3 jobs at times) and making smart decisions, he's worth at least 1/2 a million dollars
Anyone can make life work for them financially. All it takes is determination and using your head. I've said it before, if you dwell on what others have instead and complaining about disparities, you'll be the one with nothing in life. It's your attitude NOT the lack of opportunity. Pessimism is the worst enemy of so many people, not the rich or the corrupt. It's themselves. If you don't enter a race, you'll never ever finish it or even compete.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CoolPapaJMagik
By hiring the best, they're targeting you? Seriously? What you've just told me is that you can't be the best based on your skin colour. You may not have meant it that way, but that's what it boils down to. I will NOT accept that. If you're the best, you SHOULD be hired. If you're not hired, based only on the colour of your skin, they've broken the law of our nation and the laws of humanity.
Fortunately for us sports fans, the NBA, NFL, MLB and the NHL don't see things the way that you do. They get the best and that's how they win. Even Congress has all kinds of diversity, not because it's required but because the people voted them there. You're living in paranoia, thinking that you're unilaterally hated due to the colour of your skin. It can only lead to living a life of resentment.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
So, you're saying that in a road rage situation, the guy will find a way to kill the guy he's angry at no matter what? He won't react in a fit a rage by shooting the guy.....ever? You seriously believe that if he doesn't have a gun, he'll not stop until the guy is dead, that his fists will have the same result on a guy's head that 6 bullets will on that same head?
You've never heard of a person, in a drunken row, shooting an adversary in a fight? Never heard of gangs, inadvertently running into one another and start blasting away?
You're talking about pre-meditated murder. I'm talking about pulling a gun out of your pocket for a perceived slight, out of anger or fear and shooting someone as a reaction.
I'd say that you're making that up. Not all killings are pre-meditated and people have and do shoot each other in a fit of rage over something stupid all the time. That big reason that it happens is that the gun is right there, in his pocket, on the dresser and the blind rage is happening right now and it's all due to the availability of the weapon and the ease of use of the gun.
What's even more telling is that there is only one real use for a hand gun. That is to shoot human beings. To be able to carry it or store for ease of use to kill someone else. Even you know that this is true.
It explains the huge disparity in numbers for gun violence between the US and Canada. The number one reason is the availability and the attitude that comes with that availability that we don't see in Canada or any other Western country. Murder rates and gun violence is through the roof if you compare it to any other western country and most of it is due to the ease of acquiring a handgun.
2
-
2
-
@2011super
They're not just protesting. 15 people have been killed. Buildings have been burned down, businesses looted, property destroyed, public monuments defaced, people terrorised, homes even burned and WHY????
BECAUSE AMERICA IS AN EVIL RACIST COUNTRY....THAT'S WHY.
This is what they're saying. What kind of whack job lives in a country that they hate? They hate everything about it. The history, the constitution, the economy, the flag.....you name it, they hate it.
Those of us that don't like the violence, are seeing these people destroy this country. We don't hate it. It's our home. We don't burn what others build, we don't chant anti-US slogans. THEY DO!!!!!
Why would you live in an evil, racist, greedy, war mongering country. Go where people are good, tolerant, generous and would never hurt anyone. That's what I'd do if I hated where I lived. I'd leave. Goodbye and good riddance.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Harris is supposed to be in charge of the border. If she had any spine, she'd at that border, every chance possible, talking to border agents, drug enforcement personnel, local citizens, migrants, migrant children, local politicians....anyone that's concerned with the border. She should be going out with border agents, seeing what they're seeing, going into migrant camps and on and on. If she did that and handled the problem effectively, she might well be a presidential candidate.
She's not done any of that. She's a failure at that and she'd be an even bigger failure as president.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Alex-pt5no
He worked in that state. In fact, Kyle worked in Kenosha THAT day. He was asked to help protect a business that had been severely damaged in rioting the night before. He was 17, old enough to join the military and handle a gun. So, if there was an illegal procurement of a gun, it's a minor offence at best.
He offered medical aid to rioters, who were suffering from a tear gas attack. He put out a fire, set by rioters, and one of the rioters threatened to kill him if he had the chance. He later chased Kyle, and after a gunshot went off, Rosenbaum, the guy that had threatened to kill him, yelled out "F..... you" and lunged for and tried to grab the gun. Kyle, assumed that Rosenbaum was going to follow through with the threat to kill him, shot him. Anyone would do the same, including YOU.
Also, if Kyle shouldn't have been there, neither should have those rioters. Riots are unsafe by nature of their existence. So the argument that he shouldn't be there doesn't wash. Not one of those figures should have been there, by that logic. They ALL placed themselves in a dangerous situation but only some of them threatened to kill someone and that was NOT Kyle Rittenhouse.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheVideomaker2341
Trump disdain for the Constitution? He's allowed the states to handle pandemic issues because the Constitution says that it's a state issue. He's not sent troops to stop rioting because, once again, it's a state issue. He did send agents to protect a Federal Courthouse, but a Federal building is Federal jurisdiction, as provided by the Constitution. Saying that he has disdain for the Constitution is easy to say but the Constitution says that Americans have the right to PEACEFUL assembly and it's the Democrats are the ones defending the rioting, looting and arson.
Also, the radical left are going on and on about colonialism and when Trump wants to end the occupation of foreign soil by American troops, guys like him say that it's good to do that. Really? If it's wrong, you don't do it. Trump isn't a fan of warmongering and never has been. He's hasn't started a new conflict in his tenure as president, not like Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Reagan. He's stated for decades that the US should get out of these continuous conflicts and now he's trying to do it. We're sick of continuous fighting. Now we have to fight Americans in the street.
The only ones who seem to support non-violence is Trump and his supporters.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@trh-bee4383
If inflation starts to rise out of control, to the point that our money is worthless, people aren't going to sit at home, terrified of Covid. Hunger will scare them more than Covid ever could and it doesn't matter who you are. YOU will leave your home to look for food or the means to earn the money to buy it. Why? Because hunger, TRUE hunger, is exponentially WORSE than Covid. People will get out and guess what. They'll STILL be spreading Covid AND they'll be malnourished. It'll increase death rates for Covid AND for other issues involving malnutrition.
If you want to know how best to handle Covid. Look to Florida. Even though their 7 day case count average is over 2500 new cases a day, their daily death count average is about 3 per day. They're wide open, wear a mask if you want, getting vaccinated if you want (a good idea), no work restrictions or lockdowns and they have the 3rd highest case count in the US. And that's perfect because they're the 3rd most populous state in the US. So...they're EXACTLY where they should be...and so is New York State. 4th most populous state in the US, and fourth in Covid cases. New York has had some of the strictest lockdowns in the US and Florida only had them for a short time and then they lifted them......and the results are the same. NO DIFFERENCE......and Florida is filled with seniors.
If New York locks down hard and Florida doesn't and they have similar results, what's the point?
2
-
@trh-bee4383
This thing started out when you said that a person would be refused medical aid if they didn't follow the guidelines set out by the government. I laid out a case against it. I'll say one more thing.
Since when is the government the arbiter of all things right and wrong? Every war, genocide, forced labour, overt bigoted actions and suppression of freedom has been initiated, sanctioned or violently supported by governments. It's the main theme of human history. How did they do it? They did it by promising special benefits to certain segments of their societies. A little more land. Better food allotments, better access to fuel, little things, seemingly but essential for the survival of the average citizen. Men would join the militias just to get regular meals. YOU, are supporting the same kind of government pressure. "Do as I say or face the consequences." Loss of job. Loss of social contact through social marginalisation. Loss of medical assistance.
Where's it coming from? Our government. With the history of abuse and human misery left by governments, throughout history, I'm astounded that anyone would still support their edicts. Yet they do. They do it through fear. "Do as we say or you shall surely die". That's the very heart of your argument. FEAR....so total that you'll allow them to do as they will and threaten us by any means necessary.
I'm a grown man. I'd rather leave my safety in my own hands than is some strangers, who lives on a hill, in a distant capital city.
I'm either their equal or I'm not and when they FORCE me to do things, against my will, I'm NOT their equal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
AUmapathi1
I don't want to lesson the impact the loss of the Arawak people or others had on them or even begin to suggest that it's a good thing. However, as an impact on world history, it's not that big a deal. Peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years and they include in the Americas. These are people that were already gone when the Europeans arrived there and whose existence will likely be forever lost in human memory. This has happened all over the earth. Their extinction had a huge impact on them at the time, but to us it's barely a footnote if anything at all. It's just a continuous pattern of human existence which ends with us.
Columbus was one of those rare men who really changed the course of history. There are very few of those. Mohammed, Jesus (if he existed) or those that wrote the Gospels, Confucius, Guttenberg, Pasteur and Newton are others. They all had impacts on human life that had lasting effects and whose life's work will always have the distinction of changing the world.
That doesn't mean that they were always good people. They weren't, just like the rest of us. The capacity for good and evil lies within us all. That's a given, like it or not and Columbus is no different. One of the biggest lessons we learn from men like that is not just the big contributions that they made but also in the realisation that they are ordinary men who did things that were out of the ordinary and that potential is in all of us, just like the potential to commit horrendous acts. Too many people want to vilify instead of learn. It's as if they're really saying how good they believe themselves to be and that is one of the biggest mistakes any person can make.
2
-
@typhoon2827
One of the reasons I was a bartender was because I was a roofer in the summer. I live in the north and you don't roof in the winter or during inclement weather. So, I supplemented my income by bartending on weekends and in the off season. It can be a very stressful job and lots of people aren't up to it. I have yet to hear someone tell me that roofing isn't a tough job, either. I know what tough work is.
I will say that it depends on the situation. A Friday night can be extremely tough. Loud and drunken patrons, complaining and spoiling for a fight. I've been sucker punched, had beer bottles and ashtrays thrown at me...even a bar stool and had my eye gouged by enraged patron that I refused service to. People have threatened to shoot me, blow up my house, take a bat to me when I wasn't expecting it....all because I refused them service. All a patron has to do, if he leaves and drives under the influence and hurts someone, is blame you and you're responsible and could be facing lawsuits that could affect you for years. You could be fined if he's just walking home under the influence and he says that you were the one that served him to that point and, even if it's not true, you're guilty.
If you're in a busy bar, not a restaurant or tavern, but an actual drinking establishment, it's tough. Anyone that says that it's not hasn't worked in that type of establishment.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@FriendlyCroock
One could see it that way, but she has been vilified by the left and she has been told, not just by blacks, but by white leftists, that she is acting against her own best interests. This implies that they believe that her endorsement of the Republicans is one that is, in fact, endorsing the white supremacist party. That's their accusation against her and in fact, that has been at the heart of the entire campaign against the Republicans, especially Trump, for the last few years. There has been a huge fixation on the left on white privilege, the white patriarchy and even Hillary said, during her presidential campaign, that white women only voted for Republicans because of their husbands as if they don't have minds of their own.
How would you think Candace would respond to continuous claims that she's supporting a racist party and president when she doesn't experience racism from the right but it's the left that use racism to denigrate her conservative views. Is she not allowed to point out that it's the left that is using racism to try to cajole and shame her to rethink her politics? It's what is happening to her and it's not from the right. It's from the left.
The Republicans welcome her into their fold and race is NOT an issue. The left use racism to get her back and it is an issue. Maybe she's just sick and tired of the relentless racist comments and shaming.
Strange how a white "racist a-hole" (me), is defending a black woman (Candace). I gotta say the definition of racism has sure expanded over the last while. Actually, that's just another left wing tactic, one that Candace has been criticising. That tactic being, if you don't agree with someone, call them a racist and now you've just won your point. What a shallow position.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mmhmm9271
Actually, I wasn't upset that you called me unintelligent. I feel that name calling and insults is an extremely poor way to have a discussion or present an argument. (argument not being understood in the negative sense) I question my own intelligence all the time and that doesn't upset me. It challenges me to try to learn more. If I can't up my intelligence, at least I can up my information levels.
I grew up on a farm and there was a symbiosis that involved both the keeping of animals and the raising of plant crops that's reflects what happens in nature. Humans have transformed our environment that disrupts the normally symbiosis between plants and animals and solid farming practices tries to mimic that relationship, which includes the predator/prey bond. Both are essential to the other in nature. Take away the predator and the prey, over the long run, will suffer and vice versa. We can't fully duplicate that bond in our agricultural practices but we can do the best that we can. We become the predator, in this new humanised world, displacing the role of the other large predators, and we allow the livestock to take on the roles, in nature, that the prey takes on. It's FAR from perfect and it's a progression of trial and error and we're starting to see that the factory method of farming, the specialisation methods, may not be the best way to raise our food. However, with a world population approaching 8 billion, we're forced into this new way of feeding ourselves, whether we like it or not.
By the way the one thing that we learned, on the farm, is that flies can be a severe health hazard, to humans and to animals, although they are important to the environment. There is a balance in nature that you can't ignore. Maoist China found that out the hard way with their 4 pest program. It ended in crop failures.
This is a very complex topic and I can't even begin to comment on it fully or give it justice. It would be best to allow us to live our lives the best that we can, as individuals, as long as we're not being overtly destructive. We should be willing to see each other viewpoints as part of the way we're trying to cope with the world and our place in it.
I appreciate that you've responded in a conciliatory manner and didn't take on a defensive stance. I don't like the idea of sitting on opposite hills taking potshots at each other. Walking down the hill so we can speak civilly is a great deal more productive.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JRG2733
First....NO evidence that the Russians helped Trump. NONE. I thought that it might have been true at one time but I wanted to see the evidence. There has been NONE shown. Innocent until proven guilty. Guilt is proven with evidence. No evidence....no guilt. So that part of your argument is getting to be just plain dumb.
Second.....Trump won through the electoral college vote. The electoral college was put in place over 200 years ago and the reason for it was quite simply why the United States rebelled against Britain in the first place. Taxation without representation. The 13 colonies were being taxed, without any input from the colonies, by the more powerful British government. The forefathers believed that each region should have a say in how they are governed and devised a system of regional representation. They didn't want the more populous regions to dictate to the more rural and distant regions. Why would states like Alaska, Hawaii, Montana and others like it even bother to stay in the union if New York, California, Texas and Illinois control the votes and the country. They'd separate from the US, just like the 13 colonies did from Britain.
A simple civics course would have helped Hillary, immensely. They she would have realised that fly over America was important and wouldn't have had the arrogance to not bother to campaign in those states. She lost because of her arrogance and disdain for a certain demographic of America. The very demographic that voted for Obama, voted for Trump. Calling them a basket of deplorables may well have been part of the worst campaign strategy in American history. It showcased an elitist attitude that a lot of Americans hated.
Actually, a civics course might do YOU some good as well.
2
-
2
-
@loudharley6926
They didn't even go through with impeachment proceedings after the Mueller report.
Hillary lost because she didn't bother going to the swing states to campaign. She derided middle America, calling them a basket of deplorables and the Walmart shoppers. She told everyone that white people have to learn how to behave, that they have to accept their privilege and racist tendencies. Smart thinking that was. White people make up 65% of the population so she insults them and then expects them to vote for her. In the end, the VERY states that voted for Obama, voted for Trump.
At the time, I didn't support Trump but I kept telling everyone that Hillary was losing her bid due to her arrogance and that she had to change her strategy and attitude. They called me Trumpster. You're doing the same thing that they're doing and worse, what the Democrats are doing. When you fail at something, don't blame others. Figure out what you did wrong, what you missed and don't do it again next time. But guys like you and the entire Democrat party won't learn. They keep on saying the same thing over and over and keep losing. If they lose again, what then? Are they going to be like Schiff and suggest it was because Trump offered Putin Alaska.
I repeat....the VERY states that voted for Obama, voted for Trump. If the Democrats don't fix that, they'll lose again and mail in ballots and not requiring ID isn't going to help them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JhutaNabi
Of course Columbus was controversial in his time. He was an Italian, getting exclusive licences to operate in the New World, in Spain. The members of the Spanish Court were envious of a foreigner getting these potentially lucrative deals. Also, Columbus was bull headed and ambitious and that would add to the bad feelings about him. Another factor was the tendency for other Europeans to vilify the Spaniards, including Columbus as he worked for the Spanish crown, in a movement known as the "Black Legend". This was a strong bigotry against anything that was Spanish.
I think that it's laughable when I say that the anti-slavery movement started in the late 1700s and then you prove it with your reference to a paper wrote in 1836, when the abolitionist movement was starting to gain traction in the US. It uses new interpretations of the Bible to refute slavery. That's what the Reformation was all about....new interpretations of the Bible that forced people to question the dogma of the church and it all started AFTER Columbus died.
I will give you another short example. My father was born 10 miles west of the German border, in the Netherlands. He was 8 years old when the Nazis invaded and him and his brother hid in a ditch, terrified, as the German army marched passed them. Yet, had he been born 20 miles to the east of where he had hidden, he'd be German and marching proudly, pretending that he was off to fight for the fatherland and dreaming of the day that he would be one of those soldiers. He's told me that many times. The difference between him hating the Nazis and being a good guy and loving them and being thought of as a monster, was defined by a line on a map. That's it. He knows that he'd have been just as susceptible to the lure of Hitler that all his school mates had been.
What's really strange is that you hardly ever hear about the atrocities of the Aztecs and how they'd capture slaves to sacrifice to their Gods. These were blood baths and Cortez and his men were horrified at the carnage. Why aren't we talking about that?
All people are doing is congratulating themselves on how moral they are by comparing themselves to those of the past who we now see as taking part in things that we feel are now wrong. Telling ourselves that we're better than they are when in reality we're not. We just live in a time and place in which we were taught to vilify these things because our ancestors started to question their beliefs....a product of our times. We're like my dad was, born on the right side of boundary that was set by others.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sylvertaco
Because you can't have an Einstein day and an Aristotle day, Darwin day, Pasteur day, Newton day, Copernicus day, Martin Luther King day (ok, you can have that one), Aquinas Day, Thomas Payne day, Adam Smith day and on and on, because it is unworkable. Columbus was one of the biggest and for some reason, through a kind of social evolution, people thought his accomplishment was bit enough to remember. It became a tradition. Suddenly, some people think traditions aren't worth having or they've decided that this person isn't perfect so that day should be eliminated. As a matter of fact, that's exactly why some KKK members fought the idea of a Martin Luther King day. They pointed out that he made mistakes and that eliminates his ideas as worthy.
I wasn't around when Columbus Day was celebrated. People had their traditions back then. We still celebrate those traditions today. It's the same with Christmas. They are the result of tradition and heritage. They don't just pop out of the air like someone waved a magic wand. It's a remembrance of something worth remembering.
You're making too big a deal out of it. You're telling people that their traditions are bogus because you don't get it. The answer is this. YOU don't celebrate it. Let others do as they will. I have no more right to tell others what is important to them than anyone else has to tell me what is important to me. If people want to celebrate Columbus, have at er. Now, I'm going to celebrate Thanksgiving....another day some people are now criticising. Also, a day that took place because a group of people heard about a land that lay to the west, across the ocean, and decided to got there. A land discovered by Columbus. See how that works.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Explain to me why it is only certain speakers that aren't allowed to speak at universities? If I have the nerve to suggest, in some blogs, that BLM may not be the correct way to go to solve racial difficulties, I get creamed for it. If I say Serena Williams acted like a spoiled child at that tennis match, even though I also McEnroe also behaved like a spoiled brat in his time, I'm a racist and sexist. This is the group that has infiltrated the Democratic party and allowed Hillary to say that white people have to learn (fill in the blank) and that white men have to do (again, fill in the blank) and the party that suggested that the right are nothing but a bunch of bigoted hillbillies.
I've always supported left wing ideas, until the end of the Obama era. It was then the left started to support violence, doxing commenters on social media, vilifying the male patriarchy, protesting speakers and smashing private property and threatening people they don't like. Wear a MAGA hat on campus at many colleges and you risk being attacked. Show a small segment of a debate on public TV, like Lindsey Shepherd did, and be reprimanded before a tribunal and told that you may have broken the law. Comedians don't even do colleges anymore because of the reactions of left wing students who shut up anyone that displeases them.
I'm now a centrist, hoping that someone starts a movement of a group that allows freedom of expression and won't tell me that I have no right to free speech and doesn't carry the victim mentality that has permeated left wing thinking.
I'm not even sure what strawman points I've made. Maybe you should be a little specific when you make those accusations.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sylvertaco
Would the theory of evolution always be a mystery had Darwin not put it out as a theory. I doubt that very much....but he was the one that did it. Similarly, I'm sure eventually someone else would have crossed the ocean and discovered the new lands.....but that didn't happen. We're not talking about the hypothetical here. We're talking about what DID happen.
I've shown you all kinds of sources of why people don't want to celebrate Columbus or have a day for him, all of which are ideological. This is the source of these changes. Now, maybe you have another reason, like thinking that celebrating the life of a non-American is weird. I don't know but that would seem a little shallow and elitist, as if to say non-Americans should have nothing to offer Americans and should not be celebrated. I can't help but wonder though that it is an attempt to cover up the ideological and try to impress with reasons outside of the ideological to prove that it has no effect on you.
I'm also putting out the idea that things don't happen in a vacuum and that if the only argument was that it's weird, you wouldn't be so deeply vested in getting rid of this holiday. It's like the feminist who's trying to say that we should get rid of father's day and then saying it has nothing to do with her ideology but more to do with some other vague reason.....like, it's weird.
My issues with the left is that it has become ideological and rigid and that if you don't meet their standards of perfection, you must be vilified. That standard is completely arbitrary and anyone could be victims of its application. Find the flaw in the individual and then attack him/her for it. If you can't find the flaw, go to the one sure way to tear him down. Accuse him of a sex crime which must be believed. The flaws of Columbus were easy. The flaws of others might be a little harder to find but we still have the MeToo thing. You can always defeat the enemy that way.
The new left has adopted a method to ensure compliance with their ways. The Columbus Day debate is only a small manifestation of how they think. Dare to step out of line and they will destroy you. It's a type of authoritarian rule that is based on group identity (celebrating the life of a non-American is weird, as an example) that is so powerful that there is no one immune to it's far reaching tentacles, including the most ardent left leaning ideologue. Just say the wrong thing and you could be their next victim.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Sylvertaco
Wow...that is about the most smug and arrogant thing I've read in a long time. This whole thing came from a time when the average person had very little education and what they had was very limited. They learned the big moments of the past from the dozens of books, if they were lucky, that they had, and you have the absolute, unmitigated gall to call them "dumb".
This was how, most of whom didn't get past a grade 5 type education, learned and appreciated the things of their history.....but they were "dumb". I suppose it was similar to my mom and dad, who back in the thirties, didn't get past grade 6 in school, dumb people.... or my grandparents, one of which left school when he was nine to go to work......what a dumb ass.
It a simpler time. You are applying your.....OUR world view onto people who lived completely different lives than we do, but they're "dumb".
My God. What absolute and complete arrogance. No respect for the past or for the lives they had to live. Just your own complacence and belief that you know how "dumb" the people of those times were. Wow....just Wow.
Maybe, for just one moment, you could realise what life was like for those "dumb" people, you'd feel a little empathy for them and the lives that they had to endure. But no....they're just a bunch of "dumb" hillbillies. How arrogant.
2
-
@Razorokc
My point is that because THEY consider theft, which we all think of as a crime, under $1000 bucks a misdemeanour, statistically no longer a crime. That's not ME saying that. It's a word game that they're playing. A misdemeanour is not considered a crime. So....when politicians do this, those crimes are no longer part of the crime statistics. That means, when compiling crime statistics, those thefts are no longer in those stats. They then claim that crime is going down. It's a sleight of hand, so to speak.
Read my comment, AGAIN. I NEVER said that theft under $950 was a crime I SAID, and I want you to understand that, that in California.....CALIFORNIA, not me, that theft under $950 is a misdemeanour which is NOT a crime. They've solved their crime problem by LYING, using word games. "Crime is going down. Look at the statistics" It becomes difficult to prove them wrong because THEY control how crime stats are being compiled. To show how ridiculous it is. NY governor Hochul claims that crime is down but has placed the National Guard in the subways to keep people safe. This has never been done before.
The Democrats are destroying this country through BS. THAT is my point.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@MariaMartinez-researcher
Do you know what's rude. Claiming that you're a minority so you can get ahead professionally. That's not just rude.....that's racist. Trump mocking her might be crude but she has it coming to her. She pulled a dirty stunt. Seemingly giving approval to affirmative action so she could use it to her own advantage.
For almost 70 years, North Korea has been threatening the US, South Korea and Japan. Japan has had air raid sirens go off due to Kim's missile tests. All the former presidents did was add more sanctions which only hurt the regular North Korean but it didn't affect Kim one bit. Trump thought he'd try a different approach. Communication....this was once prized as a way of settling differences. Instead of amplifying differences, try to find common ground and it has shown some results. There's still a long way to go but at least the tensions have eased over what it was. That's good, unless you want to be locked into perpetual sabre rattling. Then you'd support the lack of communications strategy.
Anyone that thought that Mexico was going to give the US 5 billion dollars on Trump's say so, is either delusional or just using it as political fodder. Most Trump supporters knew what he was doing when he said it. Use your head....a little bit, anyway.
Also, the Greenland thing was an offer. There was nothing forcible about it. I could offer you money for your car. That doesn't mean I'm forcing you to take it. It was an idea, that's all.
I know Trump is brash and abrasive but you have to try to understand what it is he's trying to do. He's doing what no other president has ever tried. He's listening to the average American, no matter who they are. That's why he is the populist president. As long as the Democrats refuse to understand him, he's going to beat them. "Know your enemy" an abridged quote from the great Sun Tzu, would be exceedingly helpful for Democratic supporters. Instead, they just attack without ever getting into his head. It's why Trump won the last election and why he has a good chance of winning the next one.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It's not often I disagree with Mr. Sowell but I have to disagree with one thing he said. The media isn't misinformed. They know the facts. They choose to ignore them to present their own version of the facts.
To wit.....When CNN first covered the story of the Covington kids, they ran that shortened clip that was designed and edited to give the narrative that these MAGA hat wearing kids were doing something despicable. They knew it wasn't true and it didn't matter to them. What makes me say that they didn't know? I'm a guy, not even American, sitting in my basement apartment, and it took me 10 minutes to find the original clip and it showed a completely different story. If some guy, living in a different country, could find this clip, I'm positive they knew of its existence before I did.
So, I'm sorry to say, Mr. Sowell, I think that the media, by and large, is flat out lying to us.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@teeanahera8949
Yet, every civilisation, every tribe, in every part of the world had their version of the "sky fairy". Why is that? Can you explain it? Can ANYONE fully explain it.
Also, it's very easy to claim that religion caused most of the world's conflicts. Every tribe, group, country, what have you, had religious beliefs. If they went to war, they called on their gods to help them. Does that mean that the belief in those gods was the cause of the war? Or is it just human conflict, the need for better hunting, fishing or agricultural lands because they're starving. Maybe they wanted the riches of their opponents. Maybe they wanted women because they'd just been decimated by disease or hunger and they had to rebuild their numbers.
Primatologist, Jane Goodall, was shocked to be a witness to a group of chimpanzees crossing their boundary into the land of another troupe of chimps and slaughtering every one of them. Was that religion, too? Chimps aren't even capable of that kind of thought, yet they acted just like humans, invading the lands of others, slaughtering them and assuming control of that land. How is that even possible?
People go to war and give all kinds of reasons but what is the real reason behind it? I think that "religion caused it" is a very weak argument to explain the human condition. It's also another way to assign a moral superiority to oneself. "I'm the advanced one. Better than THOSE guys" We have to look deeper into why we behave the way that we do.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
When a child reaches puberty, of course they're going to feel uncomfortable with their body. I used to have a great singing voice, the voice of an angelic choir boy. I sang everywhere, won awards, everyone telling me how talented I was. Then, just after my 12th birthday, my voice cracked. Try as I might, I couldn't hold a tune, anymore. My choir boy voice, a BIG part of my identity, was gone. I was devastated. Hair started growing in places that never had hair before and my privates were doing things that were quite troubling.
This couldn't be my body doing these things. Yet, it was doing them and I had to realise that my body is going through changes that every human has to go through. It's natural and normal. I can now hold a tune but my voice just doesn't move people like it used to. I miss those days but life has given other blessings so I'm not complaining about it. Thankfully, I didn't live in a time where puberty blockers would have seemed like a solution to a normal life process that I didn't like happening.
I was a kid. What did I know about life and the changes that I was destined to go through? It's not the wrong body. It's the wrong way of thinking.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@scottfarner5100
My sister crossed into the United States, illegally and when caught she was summarily kicked out of the US and sent back to Canada. She's white, red hair and blue eyes, so this had NOTHING to do with racism. She was told that if she EVER enters the US again, she will not be deported right away but will be sent to jail first. Is this legal? She crossed the border, from Canada and was deported. If this is the policy and doesn't break the law, why aren't they detaining the illegals at the southern border and deporting them back to their own country of origin? Can my sister SUE the American government for preferential treatment?
There are immigration laws the must be followed and crying refugee, without evidence, from countries that are NOT in a war, civil or otherwise, do not fill the requirements for refugee status. If they're not at war or being persecuted by their governments, they don't fill the refugee status. Yet, the government is still allowing them in and by the millions.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
faultroy
My grandfather? You act as if you know me. My one grandfather died when I was a year old. He didn't get to teach me a lot. My other grandfather suffered a severe stroke when he was 29 years old. He wasn't found for almost 5 hours and had severe brain trauma from which he never recovered. He spent his entire life in an institution unable to even feed himself. He lived in Europe and although I never met him, he wouldn't have been able to say anything to me, anyway.
So, there goes you theory about me being that moronic that I wouldn't even listen to my grandfather. You're a rather presumptuous jerk, do you know that?
Also, I wasn't talking about a work ethic. I grew up on a farm and I know all about working hard. My dad used to tell me and my brother to be grateful that we were Christian folk because it were up to him, we'd work Sundays, too.
Another example of you being a presumptuous jerk.
Also, when I was young, I did enjoy reading a lot but my dad didn't see much worth to it and quite actively discouraged me from it....and I mean actively. I still read but I didn't do it so people knew that I was deeply involved so I never was able to encounter anyone that could inspire me in the way that others were. I had work to do and I rather enjoyed working anyway. However, I wish I had developed that side of my personality as well. I did when I was in public school but ran into that brick wall called dad and responsibility when I was older.
Another example of you being a presumptuous jerk.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sjoerdvelzen8255
So, it depends on the disease. I can ask about some diseases but not others. Do you know what? If you're THAT terrified of the disease, get vaccinated. It's supposed to protect you, isn't it? Stay home, wear a mask all the time, have your groceries delivered, quit your job. You won't die but I wouldn't call that living, either.
When fear rules your life, whether it be fear of another race, gender, the dark, bugs or disease, you start to make ridiculous demands and decisions.
I'll repeat what this guy just said. My health information is MY health information and between my doctor, my family and close friends and my doctor. It's of no concern of anyone else. If I scare you, stay away from me, the same way a person would stay away from snakes if they were terrified of them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@biggusdickus7611
I watched the entire video, AGAIN, just to be sure I didn't miss anything.
He didn't say that he allows CNN influence all his decisions. He said that he had his doubts about Ivermectin and he didn't want people to use him to claim that he took horse dewormer and he was pretty sure that they would. Then he said, LOUD AND CLEAR, that he took Ivermectin. He didn't allow CNN to influence him. HE TOOK IT.
He took it and he told the world that he did. Now the world can claim anything they want because he's told the entire world that he took Ivermectin, the "horse dewormer". He made a derogatory joke about Don Lemon, too. He's heard all the negative stuff, evaluated it, told us all about his doubts, said screw it and HE TOOK IT, ANYWAY. Then he told us that he did.
You're just being contrary. If you still want to carry on the way you are, you'll now have to give me a timestamp, from this video to back up your claim because I'm not watching it a third time to please you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@marvin60000
Always assume that they person that you talk to knows something that you don't. That includes everyone. Also, assume that everyone can be wrong at any given moment on any given subject. THAT includes everyone. You learn, not just from someone's or your own successes. You learn, as much or more, from the mistakes that you and others make over a lifetime. If you'll only take advice from those who've never erred in their entire life, you'll not take advice from anyone because that person does NOT exist.....anywhere. You've just dismissed the entire human race.
Another thing that Peterson has taught you is that the smartest of people, like Peterson (you've said that he was) can screw up, then anyone can and will screw up. Also, you now know, from Peterson's experience, which he's been quite open about, that if a doctor ever prescribes that drug for you, DO NOT TAKE IT. That would be Peterson's advice and I know that you'd take that piece of advice, gladly. So, in a way, you've contradicted yourself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@waynegabler6570
Are you trying to say that if I vote against Trudeau, I'm against clean water? Why is this even a racial question? Shouldn't we all have clean water? If our government is getting us clean water, and there's a community, within the perview of that government, that doesn't have access to clean water, it's not living up to its mandate.
In other words, those communities, that don't have clean water, have been without under the current government for years. So, I'm really not understanding the question. Is the question whether I will continue to support a government that has allowed communities to go without clean water or not? If it is, no. I will not support a government that has allowed a community to go without clean water for years.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
irishque halim
It was never a Palestinian state, either. In 1516, the Ottoman Turks conquered the region and it belonged the Ottoman Empire until the end of WW1. It was overtaken by Egypt in 1832 and land was given to Egyptian Arabs and soldiers in what is now coastal Gaza and Israel, the first of many migrations into the area including Jews. In 1840, Britain intervened and gave the land back to the Turks.
The late 19th century saw the immigration of many Arabs and Jews into the region. The Arabs didn't mind if the immigrants were Muslim but they didn't want Jewish immigrants, but they came anyway. That is the crux of this entire problem. It's the religious problem. If the Jews would embrace Islam, there would be no issues in that region.
After the WW1, Britain took over the region and held it for almost thirty years. That's when they offered the 2 state solution. Many of the citizens of the area had only had a history in the region for less than 100 years, yet the Arab immigrants were considered to be full Palestinians while Jews were not. That's why the 2 state solution was rejected by the Arabs, including Arabs from Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Syria, who really have no interest in the area except their rejection of anything Jewish. Once again, only Muslims were wanted by the local Arabs.
What's troubling is that the same people that support Muslim immigration to Western countries, particularly Europe, reject Jewish immigration to the Levant. I'm seeing a double standard here. If there has never been a country in the area, ran by the locals, how could one segment of the locals feel that they only have the right to rule the area and to set immigration policies.
Right now there are 1.8 million Muslims in what we now call Israel. They have been offered full citizenship and many have accepted the offer. They can vote, hold office, own land and businesses, have even joined the Israeli army and been elected to the Israeli Knesset. They enjoy a better life standard than the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and what's even more perplexing is that the Palestinian leadership, Hamas, has received huge amounts of cash from oil rich Muslim countries, yet these countries have never even offered to take in Palestinians to live in their country. Strangely, places like the US has allowed them into their country. Activist, Linda Sarcour is Palestinian and living in New York. Where are the Palestinians that could be in Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Egypt, Jordan and other Muslim countries?
This has everything to do with the religion of Islam and nothing to do with cooperation or understanding. The Muslims of the region must win. Calling them Palestinians is a red herring. It has nothing to do with Palestinians. It's about Islam....that's all.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nandy1256
If you dislike DeSantis because you dislike Gaetz, then yes, you are being juvenile. It's like the 2016 furor over alleged white supremacist Richard Spencer endorsing Trump. This, to many, proved that Trump was also a white supremacist and it was bit news. 6 months after the election, Spencer withdrew his support, extremely disappointed in how Trump wasn't endorsing policies that Spencer wanted. That was largely ignored. When Spencer endorsed Biden for President, that didn't mean a thing, not to the press anyway. Funny how that happened.
The point being, DeSantis can no more help who supports him than Biden can. It's illogical and juvenile to think otherwise unless you actually believe that Biden is a white supremacist and that Spencer's withdrawal of support from Trump proves that Spencer admits that he was WRONG about Trump being a white supremacist.
Do you see the quagmire that this type of reasoning leads to, now?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Control_alt_delete
I don't have to talk to your 70 year old grandmother. I'm 71 and I've lost a lot of friends, relatives and work associates. Just because people die that doesn't mean that every death is now an innocent demise and we're not to question it.
"PBD most likely sold the interview in such a manner then surprised him with nut job stuff." Yeah.....most likely....or most likely not. You don't get points for a "most likely".
So, PBD passed on a bunch of questions. That's his choice. It's his show. He can ask or NOT ask whatever he wants. Surely he didn't expect questions like "What's your favourite colour?" or "Do you like ice hockey?". Weiner was in politics. Politicians should be ready for the tough questions especially when he has the record that Weiner has.
Then you want to bet that Trump Jr. would react in the same way and used a conspiracy, a well worn out conspiracy about Trump to illustrate your point. Placing a wager isn't evidence either. It's conjecture and means nothing. Besides, this isn't about Trump. It's about the Clintons.
Finally, you missed my point, entirely. Weiner's reaction will only lead to a deeper entrenchment of that conspiracy theory. Read all the comments on how people think that he reacted in an hysterical manner which they'll interpret as being highly suspicious. That was my point and those comments lends credence to that point.
He should have answered in a calm and rational manner. He could have answered by saying, calmly and rationally, that he feels that this conspiracy is no different than the ones that he didn't ask about. He should have said, in a matter of fact tone, that people die and it doesn't prove or disprove any accusations made. It's an accusation...that's all. Then he should have asked if PBD can show a direct link between those deaths and any real action that the Clintons took that would have caused those deaths, besides knowing the deceased. Knowing the deceased in not evidence of Clinton responsibility for those deaths. Instead, he reacts in anger, so as to intimidate PBD into abandoning this line of questioning, even suggesting that there are questions that shouldn't be asked. Wouldn't politicians love that. Don't ask any tough questions. Make it all a big love fest.
You wouldn't want interviewers to treat Trump that way but boy don't you DARE do that to a Democrat.
If a person wants to be taken seriously, don't act so totally unhinged. It only validates what people already think.
2
-
@Control_alt_delete
You're STILL not getting it. I never said that his emotional state was evidence. Never said that at all. I never said that he should start laughed it off, either. I said that he should have replied calmly and rationally. I even listed points that he could have made but you ignore it all.
People are going to believe as they believe. He shouldn't give them ammunition by losing his temper, interrupting and shouting the way that he did. Weiner already has credibility issues with his criminal record. It didn't help his argument one bit to behave so irrationally, in fact it hurt him.
The bottom line is that I was trying to help him with his credibility issues but you won't have it. If he'd have kept his cool, he would have given the perception that he had he was familiar with topic and had points that he'd thought through to the point that he could articulate those thoughts carefully and in a lucid manner.
Critical thinkers don't shout and interrupt and that's why he damaged his credibility. For better or worse, people believe that when you have right on your side, you don't have to lose your temper. You let logic and a sense of purpose give you an air of confidence and believability. Any lawyer, in a court of law, knows better than to rant uncontrollably, especially in front of a jury. Perception can be just as important as facts, at times. It may not be right but it's human nature. Weiner didn't offer any facts, logical argument and didn't exactly leave an image of a person who has it together.
He who shouts the loudest isn't correct.
2
-
@dejuanrobert
You've just put on display EXACTLY why Trump has been doing so well. You're full of hate. You can't even mention his name without losing control of all emotion and going into a vitriolic tirade against him and anyone associated with him. The left and Democrats are always the ones going on about hate and "isms" but, in the end, they're just as much the haters, maybe more, than anyone else.
Ask about the US ecomomy? People like you will go negative and then call Trump names. Ask about N. Korea and nuclear testing. More negativity, even though the testing has stopped (WOW) and then some more calling Trump names. This is the pattern, no matter the topic. You can't accept that things are going well in the US because you're hatred clouds everything you see and hear. LIke Bill Maher who wanted to see a recession just so Trump wouldn't be re-elected. It didn't matter to him that it meant the loss of jobs for millions of ordinary blue collar Americans so long as his hate was vented and the object of his hate defeated.
Just once, I'd like to hear one of you Trump haters admit that, in spite of your dislike of Trump as a person, you approve of the fact that he halted the testing by North Korea, for the last 2 years.
I knew that Trump was going to win when she turned her nose up and called his supporters a basket of deplorables. The smelling "Walmart" crowds that live in "flyover America". It's that disdain and hatred for ordinary people, and the president that has helped them, that will win him the next election and the Democrats are too filled with their own venom to get it.
You're exactly that type of Democrat. You've already shown you disdain for Trump and billionaires. I'm sure you feel the same for his supporters, as well.....and you wonder why this is turning off so many American voters.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@SeraphsWitness
"That's CCP style tyranny." That's from my comment. Which means that I recognise that China has issues with tyranny but it's hypocritical to call them out when we're doing the same thing. People use it as a deflection like children do. "Well, Johnnie's doing it too." As if that makes it all okay. THAT'S my point. Don't call out China when you won't even admit that you're just as guilty or worse, pretend that your tyranny is justified, somehow. If you're willing to admit, that's the log, and are fighting like mad to fix it, it's not hypocritical to call out someone else who doing the same thing. That Biblical injunction goes hand in hand with hypocrisy.
You've recognised the severe issues with our hate speech laws. You're working, I hope through your voting practices anyway, to fix it and that means that metaphorically you ARE taking the mote of your own eye. You recognise the mote or beam and because of it, you CAN mention that someone else might also have problems. It's when you're actively doing it, you can't recognise the mote to even honestly criticise others. That's what I'm trying to say.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@A_Jeff
He's not allowed to talk about his own case. If he does, he's in trouble with the judge. Think about that. If the judge is corrupt, or doesn't care, and judges can be corrupt, Trump isn't allowed to say a thing in his defence. In this country, we're allowed a fair trial, to defend ourselves as we see fit and if there are issues with the way the court is being handled, any defendant should be able to point it out. That would include YOU.
Your angle has NOTHING to do with fair. It's all about your hatred of one person. If it was happening to you, you'd be whining just like Trump is now. However, like I just said. You don't care about rights or being fair. You hate Trump and that's what makes it alright. It's how every corrupt, authoritarian government has operated. They pick a target, convince the people that this target must be stopped using ANY means necessary. Once the people have been properly indoctrinated, they'll gladly give up those rights, thinking that this will never be applied to them. Say hello to Fascism....and you're TOO blind to see it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Gerry Swaim
"trump's a LYING CHEATING STEALING NARCISSISTIC BRAGGING BLOWHARD BULLY of a president. Anyone that treats people the way he does is capable of anything."
This is exactly the problem. You don't start from there, capable of anything, and then start to go looking for that anything to make the name calling justified. The accusation of collusion has been investigated, scrutinised and combed over and there has been no solid evidence provided. If there had been, he would have been impeached already and these Ukraine hearings wouldn't be taking place as they would be redundant. No evidence and the law, American law, has to declare him innocent of those charges. That's how you treat gossip about people you don't like, as well. You don't spread rumours and innuendo until you have the evidence to prove those rumours correct. They didn't do that with collusion.
THAT'S BASIC AMERICAN LAW AND BASIC HUMAN DECENCY.
All the bankruptcies? Trump is worth close to 3 billion dollars. That's his net worth. Rachel Maddow showed his income return for 2006 and he made 156 MILLION dollars that year and paid 36 million in taxes. He's doing very well for a bankrupt business man. He's had some of his businesses go bankrupt, like his Atlanta casino, but he own's all kinds of businesses. Moguls like that always have some failures. That's par for the course when you have multiple business ventures. You've just show how little you understand business or economics.
So far there is no evidence of any wrong doing with Trump and Ukraine. "Do me a favour" isn't bribery. There was no caveat at the end of that phrase. No "or we'll do that to you" to follow. It's "Do me a favour". That's all. Anything else is reading into it what you want to read into it. The Ukraine president has said, repeatedly, that there was no pressure. He's the victim of this. The victim of bribery or extortion or pressure....whatever you want to call it and he's saying there was none. Not only him but members of his government are saying the same. Taylor just testified today that the first 2 times that he talked to Velensky, the guy never even knew that money was being with held. What kind of extortion is that?
HE DIDN'T KNOW THE MONEY WAS BEING WITH HELD.
That was after he talked to Trump. That's quite the extortion attempt by the American president. Extortion with no information or ultimatum.
Then Taylor says that one of his staff members heard a conversation on a phone. What? That's hearsay. Why didn't Schiff have the staff member giving testimony? That's the first hand information. That's what could really sink Trump.
You're hating too much and letting that make decisions for you. Me....I'm waiting till I see ALL the information, then I'll tell you if Trump extorted Ukraine or not. So far, Schiff has shown next to nothing. That's being fair. That's how you asses information in a judicious manner. You don't root for an outcome and then dismiss what doesn't give you the outcome you wish for.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"They all left and went home"
Exactly. No one was dragged out in handcuffs, the National Guard or the Marines didn't surround the Capitol building, no standoff or big shootout, hardly any weapons (if any) were to be seen, no tear gas.....nothing. The insurrectionists walked around the building and went home. They went home all on their own, believing that they had defeated the mightiest military the world has ever seen. LMAO. Some people are so delusional.
I have to wonder why nothing was done. Were they waiting for things to escalate? Waiting for the "traitors" to start burning down the Capital building and then fan out from there, by the tens of thousands, to "peacefully" burn the city of Washington down? Sort of like their favourite rioters, BLM, did? If that's what they were hoping for, they must have been severely disappointed.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ryanyeager1797
The very first comment that you made is a back handed insult, implying that you believe that he doesn't know history and that YOU do. The second was one where you deride someone for their lack of ability to communicate to your standards. As if he was below you in intelligence and therefore didn't deserve a response that befitted a fellow and equal human being. Both responses said nothing that could be taken as a positive or that had anything to add to the conversation or the topic. They were snide and derogatory, implying that you felt that you were dealing with uneducated rubes.
I never said I didn't care, in a general sense, that is. I said, and read my comment carefully, that I could care less what you thought of my punctuation or my ability to communicate. In other words, if your opinion, of me, is that of some backwoods hillbilly, I don't care. My self worth isn't predicated on the arrogance of some YouTube commenter that I've never met.
Do you get it now? Or do I have to hire a professional writer to make myself clear?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sleazyneezy
I see you didn't ask for the data. Not surprised.
You're cherry picking data, just like I did and I did it for a reason. You can make data work for you anyway you want.
I said that there may be other factors that you're not looking at. Like this one.
Could it be that because the Japanese aren't obsessed with racial virtue signaling that when they closed the border, no one was calling their government xenophobic? Could it be that they didn't have mayors like DeBlasio telling everyone, in February, to go out, have a good time, ride the subway and to go to the Chinese New's Years Parade to prove they weren't racist against the Chinese. Could that be why New York was the US hot spot? Could it be that the governors of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients in Nursing homes, putting the most vulnerable people in the US in danger? Could it be because Biden said it was xenophobic to restrict travel to and from China? Could it be because Japan doesn't have this element of political hate that automatically rebels against anything the president says? If this was such a concern, why didn't the Democrats forego impeachment and concentrate on the virus and sit down with the president and come up with a plan, TOGETHER, to fight this thing? Could it be the hate they felt towards the president? Trump even talked about the virus it in the State of the Union address, the one the Pelosi ripped up, because she said it was ALL lies. Not one Democrat mentioned that this was one item that they should be concerned with.
And if you don't think hate is involved, don't YOU hate Donald Trump?
I don't like Donald Trump, either, but I don't HATE him to the point of trying to blame him for everything. It's too simplistic and it solves nothing.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gloriaf6971
You did the things that you had to do to get out of your situation. You were fortunate enough that you lived in a country that allowed you to do that. 200 years ago, it would have been impossible.
You were even MORE fortunate to enjoy the burden and the feelings of accomplishment when you succeeded. Metaphorically speaking, you went to the gym, on purpose, to lift weights and place demands on your body to improve it. Slaves lifted weights too on the demand of overseers and they didn't enjoy it. Both are burdens but one is done freely with the consequences of the burden rewarding those who do take on the burden with enthusiasm and love. If you hated every moment of it, you'd likely have never graduated.
That's what Peterson is talking about. He may have come from a different background but he knew that he had to take on a burden to make his life better, not only financially but emotionally. Without that task in life, one becomes nihilistic, and nothing gets accomplished. He found his burden, and obviously enjoyed doing it, just like you did, and succeeded. You have more in common than you think you do.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
efc toffee I'll use a bar room brawl to illustrate how alliances are made in a war. Buddy has too much to drink and starts becoming abusive. He is asked to leave. Someone makes a snide remark. Buddy reacts and punches him in the mouth. The doorman grabs the guy and tries to throw him out but the guy is too strong. Another patron, a friend of the guy who was punched, helps him out and together they get the guy out. The doorman thanks the guy for his help. This guy feels good about his role in establishing order in the joint. Later, that night, the doorman goes home, gets into a fight with his girlfriend and puts her in the hospital. Should the guy still have helped the doorman? The doorman's obviously a douche and of course the answer is yes. It was under the circumstances. Hitler posed the greater threat to the allies. They had to deal with the bigger threat, first and the circumstances of the moment, just like the bar brawl I just described.
As for the dropping of the two bombs on Japan, one has to take into consideration what was happening at that moment. The allies had been involved in six years of the most devastating war in history. They had to fight Hitler until they were a couple of blocks from his bunker. It was a fight to the bitter end. Japan was showing that they were going to do the same. Kamikaze fighters was a strong indication of their determination. The allies had no idea on how long a ground war in Japan would take and how many lives would be lost. A war weary world wanted it over with and almost everyone in the allied world reacted with joy when those bombs prompted Japan's surrender. Had you been a part of the allies at the time, you'd quite likely, have felt the great relief that the vast majority felt. Was it right? War never is. It did, however, prompt the Japanese emperor to over ride his generals and declare a surrender. It is arrogant and unfair to judge what they did when you didn't live in the times they had to live through.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Are you really that thick that you can't understand the difference between a perfect sphere and one that's just a little imperfect? 42 miles difference out of 25,000 miles. That's 0.168 percent of the size. Not a big deal. That's all they're saying. It's not quite a perfect sphere. So to demonstrate the imperfection they sometimes have an exaggerated illustration to show where that imperfection lies. However, when looking at a composite image of the earth, that slight difference is undetectable. They're making a statement of accuracy. Wow....how can this seem so baffling?
Once again, I'm going to have to explain this to you. The satellites, in spite of being in space, are too close to take a full shot of the earth. Remember my example of taking a single complete picture of a house standing 5 feet away from it? Have you even tried to visualize what this entails? It cannot be done because you're to close to the house. A satellite in space cannot take a full picture of the earth because the earth is too close. The only way they can show a picture is a composite, a CGI. You're being deliberately obtuse in repeating this "how come it's a CGI image?" question. There is no satellite far enough away to take a full picture of the earth. You don't have to believe it but at least quit pretending that you don't get this simple concept.
No one was around to see how the moon was formed. Maybe God did create it. Who really knows? However, they have designed computer simulations and found a scenario that works and can explain how it could have happened. Science knows that it may not be that way but thus far, it has been the most likely scenario to explain its existence. They will leave this as the most likely explanation unless someone can show, using math and science, a more likely explanation. Once again, you don't have to believe it but your incredulity isn't enough to refute it and you must be intelligent enough to understand how and why this theory is being presented.
They have observed all the planets in our solar system along with their moons and they're all basically spherical. They have discovered 715 exoplanets, planets outside our solar system, and they're also round. Yet, for some inexplicable reason, earth, isn't a sphere. It's flat. Every other celestial body observed is a sphere but not earth. Well, isn't that odd.
A flat earth doesn't explain gravity or any of its properties. It doesn't explain why all those moons keep going around Saturn, Jupiter, Mars Neptune or Uranus. You don't have to believe that it happens but a half decent telescope in your back yard and you can watch it happen for yourself. But of course, the natural rules of nature don't apply to earth, just everything else cause the earth is so special.
Of course, the government and NASA and the Illuminati and the elite don't want us to know that the earth is flat because if we knew that we'd all revolt and worship God and quit our jobs and refuse to pay our bills and....I'm not really sure why it's so important that we believe the earth to be round. It's all some kind of ruse for some nefarious purpose. Satan has to be behind it all.
Another question I have is about my TV satellite dish. Why is it I have to make sure it's pointed to an exact location in the sky to pick up a TV image? My neighbour has to have his pointed at the exact same location. One of those imaginary satellites that NASA is lying about putting up there? Is that what I'm trying to locate when I'm zeroing in on that exact spot in the sky?
I'm going to have to reiterate my explanation of why all images from NASA, the European space agency, the Russian space program, the Chinese,Indian and Japanese space satellites can't show a complete picture of the earth. All those satellites, from all those countries are too close to the earth to take a full picture of the earth. The only way they can show the entire planet is to form a composite picture, a CGI. It's either that or every country that has a satellite and every university in the world, every book, science magazine in every library have all conspired to fool us because they all worship Satan or the lizard people or something. All pilots and co-pilots, shipping companies, surveyors....all in on it. And you, the smart guy that you are, can spot how they are lying.
I'm still not sure why they would do all this lying. Perhaps you could explain it to me. How is it to their advantage that some dumb factory worker, like me, believes that the earth is round? How does that benefit anyone? If nothing else, explain that to me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A contrail is a man made cloud, inadvertently forming from the exhaust of carbon fired plane engines. If clouds can fill the sky, why can't the clouds that form around the exhaust of planes fill the sky?
Clouds form when water vapour condenses and freezes around particulates in the air. Dust, smoke, pollen....tiny particulates that are blown into the atmosphere. Clouds cannot form unless those particulates are present. There are days that those particulates aren't there. This means that the water vapour has nothing to condense around and clouds will not form. A plane comes along, burning fuel and ejecting gases and particulates out of its exhaust. Just like a car does. Your car exhaust ejects all kinds of pollutants. The difference being that a plane ejects its exhaust into a much colder atmosphere, where air pressure is much lower. This concentrated source of particulates now give the water vapour, that is present, something to condense around. The result is a contrail. Sometimes it dissipates within minutes. Sometimes it will last for hours. It all depends on how much water vapour is present up there. That's the same way with clouds. Sometimes they will dissipate and the skies will remain clear. However, when there is a lot of water vapour present, clouds will continue to form and grow until it falls as rain.
There is no way a plane has the payload capacity to leave a trail that would stretch for hundreds of miles across the sky. It's physically impossible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+veganath
When, in all of human history, in all of the history of every living thing, has anyone or thing escaped the inevitability of their death? Ever. I can't think of one
The one thing doctors and pharma companies know for a fact is that there will always be lots of customers. Cure them of one thing, they'll be back for another reason. If you don't cure them and they die, they're not coming back. They've lost a customer. If you live, you'll be back. There's no escape.
I've got nothing against people smoking pot. However, what does this Rick Simpson have to lose with his claims. He's not forced to do any tests, has no requirements that he must meet, no meetings with the FDA or drug administrations in other countries, has no set dosage requirements, has no idea what component of marijuana is the deciding factor in curing cancer, no idea of the pathology of specific cancers and how that agent acts on it. He's got nothing except some anecdotes about how buddy got cancer and started a pot treatment and is now cured. I've got mine, too. A good friend has been smoking pot for over 30 years now and he's dying....dying of cancer. How is it going to cure what it even couldn't prevent?
I'm not saying that pot isn't useful in alleviating the horrible symptoms of cancer which could have a positive effect on stopping its progress. I'm pretty sure it does. However, to advise some one to not see his doctor and follow Simpson's "cure" is irresponsible and self serving. Use yourself as a guinea pig if you want but don't sacrifice others because of a personal opinion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
BS....Whoopi. Those rioters were NOT taking care of the people in their towns. They were damaging private property, looting stores, burning down buildings, physically attacking people with over 25 dead and thousands injured. A lot of them didn't even LIVE in those cities. When it was over, the people that lived in those cities had lost their businesses, their homes, jobs, had their cars smashed and burned, the places where they shopped were empty and gone, and a lot more. No one stopped what those rioters did to those towns or helped rebuild after the riots were over.
What Aldean was talking about was how small town folk wouldn't do that to their towns. They'd go after the person that hurt their neighbours, the ones that assaulted them, burnt their businesses and homes and took their jobs. It doesn't matter who they are that are doing those things. They have to stop and then they'll help their neighbours get back up on their feet.
Those George Floyd riots helped NO ONE. In fact, it destroyed a lot of the neighbourhoods that black Americans lived in and then no one came and helped them to rebuild. All it did was make those cities even more dangerous.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mongoose 1980
You still have to have kids. If no one has ANY kids, the 9 billion people will turn into 0 in a couple of generations.
Procreation is one of the prime motivators in life. It has to be. We can either do as you do, decry having children, or we can still embrace it but with some common sense thrown in. In fact, most areas of the world are seeing a very sharp downturn in birthrates and it's done voluntarily. World population growth has been slowing down and is expected to peak within 30 years. After that, we will see declines for many generations until we reach a point of stability.
Even now, we can support the world's population if we could only rid ourselves of government and corporate corruption. We must do one thing and there is a precedent. We need a full separation of corporation and state, just like we did with the church and state. How that would manifest itself has to be worked out but that marriage, that we're seeing between politicians, bureaucrats and the multinationals, will enslave us all and we're not going to like it when it does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's another fact. Until 1820, Europeans were afraid to spend time in sub-Saharan Africa, other than the very south, because of diseases, especially malaria. Most Europeans would be dead, within a year, in the interior. In 1820, the process to make quinine was perfected and Europeans were able to enter inland off the beaches. Had the African people not captured other Africans to sell for slavery, there would have been no trans-Atlantic slave trade, to speak of. It wasn't till quinine was readily available that the European nations started to conquer these African nations and real colonisation began.
Britain abolished the slave trade, all through its Empire, in 1807. In 1833, they abolished slavery, itself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@harmgregory4560
NO.....we're tired of being told by a bunch of elitists, who've never grown a crop, except as a hobby, telling the farmers how to grow crops so we all have the food that we need. This "experiment" in Sri Lanka, shows just how delusional these elites can be. Sri Lanka stop the use of fertilisers, went to organic farming, and crops reduced by 50 to 60% and people went hungry. So now, you're advocating that we expand this, so we have even MORE starvation in the world. As if the globe trotting elites, who may have a few tomato plants in their back yard, are the experts who will lead us to greater crop yields and the end of hunger in the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TrendyStone
We can't read minds but we can imply what he meant when it's put into context. If he wasn't talking about Nazis and white supremacists, who was he talking about? Who else was there? If no one else was there, he's covering for himself, basically lying. If there were others there, then we can, by implication, conclude that the ones he was talking about, on that specific side, were those people. Not the Nazis but those who were advancing their own beliefs in what was happening that day, specifically, that we shouldn't tear down monuments to history. That's the logical approach.
1
-
1
-
@billpracells8876
“In this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution, is a moral & political evil in any Country,”. - Robert E Lee 1856
I copied and pasted this from a comment made by Trendy Brown which was directed at YOU. You either didn't read it or are wilfully ignoring it. In case you think this was made up, here's the evidence that it is FACT.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/making-sense-of-robert-e-lee-85017563/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-e-lee-was-not-a-proponent-of-slavery/2013/12/12/9fe474c2-626b-11e3-af0d-4bb80d704888_story.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/08/arlington-bobby-lee-and-the-peculiar-institution/61428/
This is a known fact that will be lost when we wilfully erase Lee's real life and feelings,from history, and replace it with vilification and denigration.
Slavery wasn't just an American phenomenon. It's 10,000 years old and has been a part of human history all over the world. To reduce it to a moment of time, to a single era, is reducing it to a childish view of humanity and to a simplistic understanding of the human psyche.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnEusebioToronto
And if you'd have fought for the Confederacy, it might be YOU that would be vilified today. "That General John Eusebio was nothing but a disgusting racist" would be the cry.....but life is much more complex than that. You may have even doubted why you're doing what you're doing but who doesn't do that? What I think is important is not just what you did, but how you got to be in that place to where you ended up at.
History isn't just about knowing how to spot the bad guys and to "learn from history", as they say. It's a mirror that you hold in front of you to see that reflection of all that came before you that made you who you are today. That's both the good and the ugly. Not only are you Lee but you're Grant. You're the man looking for the witch and you're the witch being burnt at the stake. You have to know that the potential to be either one is there within you. If you only view it as "This guy good" and "That guy bad", you learn nothing about yourself and humanity. People are so much more than that and I find the idea of vilification extremely dangerous, just as I find the idea of sanctification of heroes to be dangerous.
That's why I want to remember Lee as a human being, not just as a Confederate General and a racist, white supremacist and just plain awful. People cared about him. He had family, maybe a dog, neighbours that looked up to him and people that couldn't stand him. We NEED to know him as a man....NOT just as that General that was fought for the wrong side.
I learned that from my father who grew up a short distance from the German border during the war. That stupid line in the map, allowed him to be one of the "Good guys". That's it. Had he been born that short distance, to the east of his home town, he would have marched with the Hitler Youth and be forever be stigmatised with the Nazi label. It was that easy.
Please try to understand that history is about people....REAL people, who need to be understood. Those people that are tearing down his statues aren't interested in understanding. They're possessed by a hatred, a sanctimonious hatred that may, in the end, may have more casualties than General Lee ever even thought of. It's the evil of good intentions and it's frightening.
1
-
@JohnEusebioToronto
If you take down the statues and only speak of their evils, you'll never hear about the humanity within them, either. It's the "hate the sin but love the sinner" ideal put forward by some religious leaders.
What I'm seeing is hatred and it's coming from those who are obsessed with racism, white privilege, colonialism, sexism and how THEY are the ones combating evil. I know someone else who thought they were combating evil. They were the Inquisition, who saw evil and were going to fix it and became evil themselves. They were the communists, who saw the Bourgeoisie as the evil oppressors and killed women and children, in their belief that once they were gone, the world would be better. What I see, right now, are self righteous do gooders, knowing deep in their hearts, that if only those evil doers were gone, destroyed and controlled, the world would be a better place and they're tearing the country apart. My nephew, a factory worker, had to go to a meeting, that told him and his co-workers that they were part of an oppressive system and that they had to change who they were to make for a better workplace and world. It reminded me of going to church and the preacher telling us how evil we were and how we must repent to be saved. He told me that a lot of his co-workers were resentful and felt as if this guy had no right to make assumptions about their character or intentions. This is what all this is doing and is about.
"White fragility". How we're all guilty and you'd better follow the rules, say the right things, don't use the intersectional swear words or the "God" of Equity will get you fired or worse. They're fixing the world through vilification and hatred and it's not going to work. In fact, it's killing people as we speak.
1
-
1
-
@JohnEusebioToronto
Both Hitler and Davis were responsible for horrific wars and actions, but alone, they were nothing. Without the help of millions, those wars would never have happened. They embodied the dark entity inside of us all and, even though they led the insanity, they are just another spoke in the wheel. Hitler is the face of it, the man that makes that entity real but he's no different than you or I had we that moment of opportunity, darkness and power. Like it or not, Hitler is still you. It's the demon that can be released at any time. Hating Hitler isn't what saves you in the end. It's knowing that he's not that special a demon and we're no better than he is and we'd better realise that all it takes is the right motivation to release that demon. Hate is what it lives on and hating a man, even one like Hitler, opens that door, just another crack, so that demon escape. Hate what he did, feel pity for the man. He's us.
1
-
@JohnEusebioToronto
The statue for Lee was part of a healing process between 2 factions of one country. It does no good to anyone to continually vilify one side, the south, as if they're not fit to exist, to talk to or acknowledge. It's there to say, to each other that this is over and we need to work TOGETHER, to make this a country of understanding and to put those differences in the past by forgiving. All that you're doing, by taking those statues down is pouring salt on a wound that was healed years ago. Slavery has been over 160 years ago. Time to let the war come to an end. Time to say, to each other that we know that we disagreed on this and now we'll move forward, AS BROTHERS AND COUNTRYMEN, not as winners and losers, saints and murderous animals. That's not healing. That's being spiteful from a victor who thinks himself morally superior and continuously jabbing those who he feels superior to.
It's not saying that you approve of slavery. It's saying that you're ready to move on. Apparently, you're not ready yet. Let it go. THE CIVIL WAR IS OVER. THE SLAVES ARE FREE. No one in America wants to see slavery return. Quit beating a dead horse.
1
-
@JohnEusebioToronto
You really DO want to fight, don't you. All right then. What party supported the KKK. THE DEMOCRATS. They were against the black vote and many of the KKK leadership were also high in the Democrat party. The KKK formed to prevent blacks from voting Republican in the south. Blacks voted Republican because they were the ones that freed them, gave them full citizenship and then gave them the vote. The first 30 plus black Congressman were all Republicans. When Republican Teddy Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington to the White House for supper, it was Democrats who were enraged. The KKK didn't rise in the twenties....they re-emerged. The KKK started after the Civil War. Then, in the fifties in sixties, when blacks were fighting for Civil Rights, it was Democrats that fought against it. It was a Democrat governor that refused to integrate schools in Little Rock, Arkansas. It was Democrat Governor, George Wallace, who cried "Segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" in the sixties. I remember it like it was yesterday. 80% Republicans supported Civil Rights, 70% Democrats opposed it. Guess who wants to repeal the State Civil Right's Act in California? The Democrats. Guess who supports Blacks only graduations at Harvard....the new segregation? The Democrats. Guess who supports blacks only dorms at universities.....the Dems. Who's against school choice for inner city kids....you know who. Yet they send their kids to the best schools in the country.
Who lied about Nick Sandman and ignored the slanders of the Black Jewish Israelites? Who lied about Jussie Smollett and his MAGA country story? Who lied about about "hands up, don't shoot"? Who withheld the body cam footage of George Floyd? Who said that Antifa and the riots are a myth? Who couldn't wait to use the incident in Kenosha to their advantage? Who holds the "deporter-in-chief" to near sainthood? Who refuses to acknowledge the horrific crime rates in the inner city? Who wants to defund the police and then pretends the burgeoning crime rates aren't happening?
You want to see all the negatives and I've held off. I want to see healing...you want to fight, vilify, use hate when it suits you, deflect and ignore when it doesn't. I want to promote healing. You just want to fight some more. The riots, the destruction, the anger, the hate....you want to perpetuate it. You won't reach out in friendship. NOOO. HATE. MORE HATE. "Them deplorables" don't deserve your time.
You're so filled with self righteousness that you can't see the destructive forces that are being unleashed in the name of your hatred. Worse.....you can't see that Trump will be re-elected because the peace relative peace that was descending on the country 20 years ago is being disrupted by left wing rhetoric calling everything that walks racist and white supremacists. Who would even call conservative black people the most vile names. Names that I wouldn't even repeat on this comment thread.
What's happening in the US right now makes me sick to me stomach and you're displaying a symptom of what's causing the violence. I'm almost 70 years old and I've never seen hate like I'm seeing now, as I am from those who act like you do.
Oh yeah.....the Democrat Convention, in 1924, was called the "Klanbake" as KKK supporters fought Catholics and Jews for control of the Democrat party. It all culminated in a cross burning.
You wanted truth....here you go.
1
-
1
-
@Winterhold Guard
This is confusing. She can't answer because it isn't a biology question but biology has nothing to do with gender even though a woman is an adult female.
This, to me, is exactly how the left obscures language and even reality. No one talked like this 30 years ago. I don't even remember it 10 years ago. It's a socially constructed reality where how a person feel becomes the THEIR reality. It's all subjective, dependent on their feelings at the moment and if I don't allow them their reality, I'm a bigot, a horrible person and must be silenced. To question it is violence, but silence is violence also because I'm refusing to validate their personal reality.
It's exactly how I felt when I was a teenager and my pastor was pressuring me to take my "Confession of Faith". Say the words or you're not one of us, he insisted. The members of the church backed him up so I left the church. Now, I have different words that that I have to say. I have to acknowledge my white privilege. I have to change the concept of what a woman is even though it was the concept held by all for most of my life. Gender meant one of 2 options....male or female but now it's basically limitless and, like I said, if I don't believe it, I'm a bigot, a horrible person, right wing and must verbally agree or I will be ostracised, cancelled and yelled at.
This is a free country and if you want to believe something......fine. That's what freedom is about. Just don't TELL me that I have to regurgitate what someone says, whether they want me to say that they're some obscure gender or to repeat the Lord's Prayer. It's my right to question your beliefs without being socially pressured to comply.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The huge rift in the United States was constructed by the media. What happened in Washington, yesterday, was the result of the manipulations of the MSM. If you want to see a movie that is an allegory of this, watch "The Caine Mutiny" and especially pay attention to the officer, played by Fred MacMurray, and how he manipulated the crew members, of the Caine, to mutiny against their captain. He was accused, at the end of the movie, of doing it to fulfill his dreams of becoming a famous writer.
The MSM is doing the same, to fill their need for sensationalist news, and to placate the needs of their corporate overlords.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@istvanglock7445
No other president has EVER sat in a talk with any of the three Kims. Singapore was the very first time that happened. Trump now has sat down in face to fact talks, twice now. Unprecedented, no matter how one wants to look at it. We don't know what the North Koreans will do, but only a war hawk would be against negotiating for a peaceful resolution between North Korea and the US.
Anyone who expected Mexico to sign a check to Trump in order to build a wall is just plain delusional. I just told my wife that I'm buying her a new car and that you, Istvan Glock, is going to pay for it. Does that make you obligated to pay for it? Of course not and neither is Mexico. It was just a nonsensical election campaign game and the only ones who took it seriously were people like you.
It's easy to say that the deal with Canada and Mexico are bad deals for the US. It's another to prove it. I can say the moon is made of cheddar cheese. Claims are useless. Try giving a few facts. Also, there have been huge trade deficits with China for years. Only the most obtuse would say that this is a good thing and nothing should be done about it. The only reason you're saying anything is that you don't like Trump. You wouldn't support any initiative he suggests only for the reason that you don't like him. It doesn't matter how good or bad it is. You deal in the politics of personality......not in the politics of what is helpful to the people. It's not the issues you care about. It's your hatred of Trump.
She was a part of the US participation on that fund. The point being this. Is this a good idea or not? Once again, you're not asking that question. Why? Because, apparently, for you, that's not the issue. You'll criticise it because Ivanka Trump was involved and her husband signed the bill pledging US support. You'd stand against it for one reason only. You hate Trump. The politics of personality being, once again, the driving force.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tracywarren889
Algebra is important, if only at an entry level, but that's not the problem. They're not even learning Algebra, which is a part of basic math. When I was in school, back in the sixties, the more academically inclined, who were looking at university, would take the academic courses and the more hands on types would take vocational stuff. However, the academics would take at least one vocational course per semester and the vocational types would take at least one course per semester in advanced math, science and English. There were also the science and tech programs, which were advanced science, vocational, math and English. This was for the engineering types. Pure vocational courses were set aside for those who were totally unable to deal with any academics, who found it difficult to read or do basic math, no matter how hard they tried.
This allowed me to change from arts and science, a program for academics, to science and technology, a program that suited engineering and vocational interests. High school courses were balanced and most students could find their niche in life. Now, it's all rainbows and gummy bears and really helps no one. Test scores reflect just how bad it has become.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm sure we're going to get the "cops kill blacks for no reason" arguments, somewhere in this comment section. I'm sure that there are corrupt cops, just like there are tall cops and friendly cops and quiet cops and stubborn cops. They're human and like ALL humans, each one is different in temperament and personality.
However, some of us don't want to see them as individuals. They want us to see police officers as carbon copies of one another. Maybe if the MSM wasn't so quick to jump on a police officer shooting a black as a racist crime, we'd have better race relations in this country.....but they don't. When a white guy is shot by an officer, there's hardly a whisper from the MSM but a when it's a black guy, they're all over it, calling everything and everyone in sight a racist and babbling on and on about unconscious bias and systemic racism.
It's MSM that's the problem in this country. They report what they think can cause controversy. Blacks being shot and the ensuing riots is a Godsend to these vultures and they fan the flames in glee. They know that making a big deal out of a police officer being shot won't cause the riots and rhetoric, so they don't mention it, except in passing. MSM has become a danger to the public. They've broken one of the basic rules of journalism. They've become the news and it's turning the people of the US against each other.....and they love it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timothylopez8572
Equal opportunity only means DEI. Affirmative hiring over competency hiring. Then, when the Republican Trump tries to bring back manufacturing to the US, he's called a xenophobic and racist, yet it's the minorities that would benefit most. Also, money doesn't fix the issues of education. People used to study by candlelight in one room schools with only a piece of slate to write on. It produced some of the most brilliant individuals in history. What it takes is a commitment to excellence, to building an education that has a strong foundation of math and literacy ability. That's only achieved through a program of repetition and a sense of accomplishment when the student does achieve a degree of competency. They'll never get that if they graduate high school, in spite of being illiterate and unable to do basic math.
Also, a living wage is fluid. What's as important, maybe even more so, is knowing how to spend the money that you do have. That is another thing that's not being taught in school and in our family life, especially in one parent homes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The first thing I did, when the CNN news story showed up on my facebook page, was to check around for "C-o-n-f-i-r-m-a-t-i-o-n". Something I always do when I hear a news story. It took me 10 minutes to find the long version of the Covington tape and almost 2 hours to watch it.
Then I went back to facebook and posted a link to that site and stated that the CNN story wasn't true. You should have read some of the comments. They didn't have to watch that video. They knew the truth. Others claimed to have watched it but, by their comments, there was no way it was true. One person, who did watch it, said those kids shouldn't have been there in the first place. Another person, sneeringly, suggested that I had that big an ego that I would think that I knew better than professional journalists.
I don't care what CNN says. They saw that long version of events just like I did and likely before I did and, just like the people that I talked to on Facebook, they didn't care. They had the narrative that they liked and wanted to hear and that's what they were going to tell people. They deserve to lose that lawsuit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheCrunchbird
What would you have Israel do? Go home? Wait until the NEXT time, Hamas sends in a couple of thousand soldiers to kill, (g)rape and kidnap ordinary citizens, including small children. They said that they would do just that. I wonder what would have happened had the Allies quit fighting when they hadn't won the war, yet. Just stopped fighting. I gurantee that Hitler would have regrouped and attacked them again.
Hamas started this conflict, hoping that they could use the "genocide" claims to win a propaganda war. All part of their plan. They don't care how many Israelis or Palestinians are killed. It's part of their plan and their religion. Any Jews that are killed are sent straight to hell as infidels and any Palestinians killed with be revered as martyrs and go straight to heaven, the end goal for all Muslims.
Hamas starts a war, begins to lose, which they knew would happen, and then cries "genocide". If you don't want dead Palestinian citizens, don't start a war.....but Hamas wants to showcase their martyrs, the more the better, because that wins them support from people all over the world. It's as cold hearted as it gets.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DickMotorman
It's a comparison. At one time, it was the punks who were reviled, who couldn't get an ordinary job, called all kinds of names. Now, it's the conservatives. Good luck getting a job at a university, if you declare yourself a Republican. Conservative students won't voice their opinions on campus in fear of reprisals, both socially and academically. Wear a MAGA hat in a public space, especially if you're black, you may well be attacked verbally and sometimes even physically.
This doesn't mean that punks and conservatives believe the same things. It's the stigmatisation that punks went through is similar, NOT EXACTLY, is similar to how the punks were treated in their day. Conservatives are the new hippies, too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@illbeyourmonster3591
You've completely misinterpreted what I've said. I'm saying that their personality type is such that they don't even understand how this could be happening. The cows have to be milked, that roof has to be shingled, that customer is looking for a new home, that's what they're doing and thinking about every waking moment. When they get together, they talk about their jobs, their businesses and how one's line of work leads into someone else's line of work. They're surprised and a little disdainful of those who don't look at a productive life the same way they do.
When left wingers get together, the topic will always regress into complaining about the productive people, the conservatives. However, they don't see the products that the conservative types are producing. They see the fruits of their labour, the money that they're earning as a reward. That reward is the source of envy for the leftie. They sit and commiserate with one another and then plot how to fight the right wing, after all, they have the time to do just that, not like the right winger, who's too busy producing to sit around and be envious of others.
It's not that they can't be bothered. It's that they're too busy to fully comprehend the danger until it could be too late. The individualistic drive is their greatest strength but can also be a weakness in that this drive leaves them with no time to see what is going on outside of the immediate problems of everyday life. The left becomes a part of the collective because they're too lazy to be an individual. The individualist is too busy with life to even think about collective ideologies.
It's the nature of the conservative. However, threaten the success of their personal goals and achievements and they'll be quite the formidable opponent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jmswillow5969
Every where I went, they were called migrants. Nowhere have I read that they were undergoing a legal immigration process. They came to the border, according to every report that I've seen, and then claimed refugee status. If you have information to the contrary, present it.
So what did DeSantis do? Did he send his henchmen to Texas and place them under arrest? Did he FORCE them on those 2 planes under threat? If so....that's a major crime and all those involved should be facing charges. SERIOUS charges. I'm just curious on how they rounded them up. Maybe you could fill us in on how exactly it was done.
Of course they're human beings. These same "human beings" were forced to sleep under bridges because there were so many of them, that there was no where else to put them, as they were being processed. That was under the Biden watch. He didn't increase border security even though we were in the midst of a pandemic. A lot of American citizens were forced to stay in their homes, lost their jobs due to mandates, yet these migrants were allowed in because the border is so porous.
The inhabitants of Martha's Vineyard aren't the only ones complaining about bused migrants. Mayor Eric Adams, of New York, has been quite vocal in his dismay that 36,000 migrants have been sent to his city. Let's see....a little of 50 migrants sent to a resort for the elites....BIG ruckus. 36,000 sent to New York....oh well. They have to go somewhere. But then, the officials in New York transport them to northern New York and drop them off so they can use the entry point at Roxham Road to enter into Quebec, Canada. These are "human beings".
50 migrants were found in a trailer, DEAD, because they were locked inside. They were human beings too, yet I've heard more about the 50 migrants that were sent to the playground of our elites than I have these unfortunates who died a horrible death at the hands of those who took their money to get them into the United States. I'm seeing some extremely selective outrage, based more on politics than a true empathy for human suffering.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sbor2020
We did the same to the Nazis and allies in WW2. They started a war, and the Allies destroyed Germany because the leaders, especially Hitler, refused to surrender. On Oct 7/23, you know what happened. Hamas instigated a surprise attack on innocent civilians, killing over 1200 of them and kidnapping more. Women, children and even babies were targeted. Then they scurried back to Gaza to wait for the Israelis to retaliate.
If you start a fight, don't start whining when you start to lose. Hamas and the people of Gaza celebrated the brutality of Oct 7/23 with pride and glee. Israel had no choice to believe that if they did nothing, this type of attack would happen again. It says a lot about those who defend Hamas when they absolutely REFUSE to acknowledge that brutal attack on Oct 7/23. Hamas started it. Gazans chanted "From the river to the sea" Why wouldn't Israelis believe that, if they could, Hamas would do the same to everyone in Israel?
To use YOUR description, the military conquest of the 7th century was driven by religious ideals. The conquered lost their cultures and forced to submit to Islam, not necessarily convert but to accept Islamic rule over them. That is a dramatic shift in culture and it was forced through military strength.
However, in Israel, the 1.7 million Muslims are free to go to Mosque and worship. Even the Dome of the Rock was set aside as an Islamic holy site even though it's also the site of the ancient Temples of the Jews. So how does that suppress the culture of the Israeli Muslims? Gaza, as of 2005, didn't have ONE single Jew living there. The Gazans could have celebrated their culture to their hearts content but it's not enough for them. Israel must submit to Islam and accept Islamic rule or else. Unfortunately for them, they don't have the military might to enforce it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CD-vb9fi
"perhaps that is why one never shows up"
No, that's not why at all. A Saint isn't going to show up because, no such person exists or group of people exists. So I'm not going to wait around, waiting for the impossible to happen. Like I said, I want to deal with the problems, NOW, not until a Saviour comes. That's not only lazy but naive as one can get. It's how losers respond to a life that's unfair. I acknowledge the unfairness, accept it because there has NEVER been a place, country or society that has been perfect. You show the perfect place and leadership and I'll show you to be wrong.
I want the wars in the Middle East to stop NOW!!!!! Not when perfection arrives or Utopia is established in the US. It's NOT going to happen. Till then, I'll do the best that I can, in the moment, and work towards being the best that I can be and part of that is doing what I can, RIGHT NOW, to make things better. I vote to end the wars, to battle the virus in a practical manner, end critical race theories, the pointless riots, to institute a better education system. I'm not going to wait for that "pie in the sky" saint to come along. That's for children. We can still end the wars, even with a corrupt president. I'm not going to insist that one of the conditions to end them is a saint for a president.
I can't believe that someone would even think that way. If the wars could end now, why not end them? It's stupid to wait for Utopia.
1
-
@CD-vb9fi
So the war continues while you wait for the saint to arrive. The riots go on, people starve due to the lockdowns, others are persecuted under the guise of racial equality and on and on.....all because you want me to sit around and wait for this hypothetical saint to reveal himself. Sort of like all those saints that have come to power in all the countries around the world. Funny how you never named one of those saints in one of those Utopian countries I asked you for.
You're living in a dream world, waiting for someone, who may not ever come, while you let the horrors go on because you'll only try to stop the horrors if your president is perfect in every way. If the president isn't perfect, you'll not even try to end the wars, the persecution, the awful things that are happening. You'd rather see them go on and accept the fact that you may have to work with someone who is imperfect. All the victims thank you for your efforts, you self righteous hypocrite.
Once again, name the saint, in any country in history. You can't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brandonsmith9860
Yes....and he's discouraged coal production, essential in the production of steel. The steel that will be needed in that infrastructure plan. Guess where he'll be getting that steel from. China? That's American dollars LEAVING the country and no longer a part of the American economy. In essence, he's giving money to foreign interests, and using taxes, that come from American taxpayers, to pay American taxpayers to build infrastructure.
Guess what else you need to build infrastructure? Oil. Oil to operate the machinery and to transport goods. Oil that will be a part of the asphalt to pave those highways. So what does he do? He nixes the Keystone Pipeline. He discourages American oil production. Once again, he'll have to get that oil from somewhere. I'd say the Middle East, maybe even Venezuela. Once again, money LEAVING the US, American taxpayer dollars to buy oil, on top of the steel products, to add to the tax money to pay American taxpaying workers to build the infrastructure so they can pay taxes to pay themselves to to build infrastructure and buy foreign goods.
Oh he'll cut some great deals with giant multinationals. Won't the rich love that. They'll be getting money to sell products, foreign products, to the American government for their infrastructure plan which they can hide in off shore accounts.
It's a great plan alright, if it didn't help the very rich that you hate so much.
People, like you, don't get it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I understand being angry about this but the cops do not interpret the law. They're there to uphold the law, no matter what. If the law is unconstitutional, then it is up to the person arrested to go to court and bring his case to a judge for trial and a decision on the merits. There is a process to follow. If an officer is given a command that is clearly unlawful, like shooting a jaywalker, then he has the right to refuse. In the case of someone who is violating a law, that has no victim, the police can arrest the person and even advise the person being arrested on how to fight it, if that officer believes the law to be unjust. In this case, a police officer is not the judge. He's a servant of the people, under the mandate of his superiors.
Having said this, I'm going to call this one of the stupidest arrests that I've heard of in awhile. It should be thrown out of court and whoever ordered the arrest should be dealt with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@philalexander7902
It was a hell hole around the WORLD in 2020. I'm not American and I can attest to that. 2020 was a year like no other in my lifetime and I'm in my seventies. There were things that Trump did that I disagreed with but it was the Democrat states that caused the biggest issues. NY, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan and California put Covid patients into nursing homes. Everyone KNEW that the elderly were in the greatest danger from Covid, yet they did it anyway.
Each state has the right to set their own policies on fighting the pandemic. Some of the states handled it horribly. Others did quite well. A lot of Democrat states are seeing people flee to Florida, Tennessee, South Dakota and Texas, all states that didn't take a strict stance on Covid restrictions. California, for the FIRST time in it's history has seen it's population go down.
I repeat....the whole world went through hell in 2020. I'm Canadian and you didn't want to be in Quebec that year. It was awful. The deaths in Europe were terrible, as well. You can't take a year, which was an extreme exception, and then use it to negate the previous 3 years. That's resorting to politics and that was the biggest problem that the United States had in 2020. Political hatred helps no one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thechiefwildhorse4651
I just wondered how land ownership worked. Just owning your own piece of property does wonders for anyone, native or not, especially if you had to work to get it.
I live in Canada and I live between 2 reservations, 25 and 50 miles away respectively. Toronto is about 100 miles to the west and there are smaller cities all around us. The natives on the larger reservation work outside all the time and most are quite prosperous. It's not that way in all reservations in Canada. The more remote locations and, believe me, they are a lot more remote that where you live, don't have it so good. However, I have a close friend who was born in a remote area, attended a government school and moved to the small town that I live in and has done quite well. He came from a remote location in British Columbia and moved thousands of miles and found a better life.
I'm not doubting that the reservation that you live on was designed to keep you restricted to your spot but I can't help but wonder why you'd accept that. You can move if you want. Get a decent job, save your money and move back if you want when you retire but I'll bet that if you did move away, you won't go back.
Sometimes you have to grab life by the balls and do for yourself as best you can. You owe it to yourself to do that.
1
-
@thechiefwildhorse4651
Do you think my buddy had a whack of money when he left the infamous reservation school? Honestly? You've given up before you've even started. You sound like the kind of person my dad used to talk about. He'd say "He sounds like the guy that won't go into the water until he's learned to swim".....meaning that if you don't try, you'll never succeed.
I just offered some advice that I've seen work for lots of people. If you don't want to do the work for it, say so but remember one thing. If you wait for someone else to do it for you, it's not going to happen. My dad, at 19, left his home in the Netherlands, landed in Canada with hardly a cent in his pocket. He took on a job at a dairy farm, milking cows. He worked hard, saved his money and finally bought his own farm. When I was growing up, he worked the farm, worked evenings at a shoe factory and weekends as a musician. He's now an old man and has travelled all over the world and it was all possible because he wanted it and was willing to sacrifice for it.
All it takes is determination.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@topcat4059
If you can't see that it's happening ALL the time, you're wilfully blind. In fact, the most rigid places in the US, during Trump's administration, were the Democrat states, perfectly illustrated during Covid. Yet, Florida, which had the most lax mandates in the US, came in exactly where they should have in the pandemic. The state, that is 3rd in population, is also 3rd in cases and deaths of Covid. The strict mandates changed NOTHING.
Your political views are based on hatred of ONE man, not in logic or facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's because they're NOT feminists. They might think that they are but what they're really being driven by is radical socialism. This a new type of socialism that, instead of class war, it's identity conflicts. Man vs woman, black vs white, Christian vs Muslim, ultimately oppressor vs oppressed. This radical socialism needs conflict in order to attain the revolution that will tear society down, totally and completely, in order to rebuild it as a communist state. Most don't realise that this is what it's all about, not fully, but they do understand the oppressor/oppressed struggle and the elitist feminists need it to rid themselves of the oppressor identity and become one of the oppressed......to become one of the good ones. This is an extension of Max Horkheimer's critical theory, critical feminist theory, which needs to completely eradicate the traditional family, pitting women against the patriarchy. Islam is being used as another iteration of critical theory, even though it appears contradictory to feminism. Muslim are victims of the white patriarchy and capitalism and is another way of creating the chaos that the radical socialists need for their communist revolution. It doesn't matter that they believe that it's a branch of communism, as long as they are a part of the chaos and conflict that will usher in destruction and the new society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@amyh9512
We're concerned that kids are being fooled into becoming part of an ideology that may convince them to take harmful drugs and want to surgeries to be performed that would amputate perfectly healthy body parts. YOUNG kids.....under the age of 16. Tavistock, England's largest gender clinic, reported a 4000% increase in referrals in 10 years. That's a 4 THOUSAND percent increase. That would be an impossible number, especially when the vast majority of them are teenage girls. Transgender girls had been extremely rare before 2010, now the vast majority of them are girls seeking to become male. Tavistock, a publicly financed clinic as been forced to close, by the government, due to almost 1000 lawsuits being filed against them. Sweden is now questioning their own policies when a 15 year transitioner was diagnosed with severe osteoporosis, due to the puberty blockers that she had been prescribed. There are lawsuits now being litigated in the United States. as well. Chloe Cole, who went through the surgery at 15, is now suing, because her teachers and medical advisors, all told her about the benefits of transgender surgery and never ONCE mentioned the side effects. These medical "professionals" even told her parents that she likely commit suicide if they didn't affirm her gender claims....outright emotional blackmail.
I went to a high school that had around 1200 kids. There was no talk of trans kids back then. Yet, I never heard of ONE suicide in all the 4 years I attended that school. NOT ONE. According to the "experts" suicide is a real danger if their gender is affirmed....yet no suicides in my entire school that I attended.
However, people like YOU, don't want to err on the side of caution. Get out the saw and scalpel and hacking away. It'll be fine, they say, while they keep experimenting like some 21st century Mengele. These are children. Leave them be until they're old enough to make decisions on their own. Bigotry isn't the answer to EVERY issue, in spite of what you wish it to be. It's just a cheap way to avoid having a REAL conversation on the issue.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
YouTubeDweller8008
NO.....I grew up in Canada and everyone that I know, who are financially secure, grew up here. I get how growing up in a 3rd world country is going to stop you. I know how radical socialist policies can stifle human creativity and how they HATE anyone who shows success through financial gain.
However, I also know people, in Canada, who have the attitude that it can't be done and I know for a fact that there are Americans that feel that way, too. American inner cities are filled with them. Funny thing is, all those that I know with that attitude have earned no more money than I have, at least not at first. They just gave up, drank and pissed it all away.
I've not inherited a penny. Every cent, that I have, I worked for and saved. America isn't the only country where one can succeed. It can be done in many other countries, too.
When you accept defeat, you no longer fight.
1
-
YouTubeDweller8008
That's exactly it. We have to live in a free country in order to be successful and that's where I'm talking from. This video is from the US and I will bet you that a lot of those who are attacking Ivanka Trump live in the US. That's the myth that they want us to believe....that we can't do it on our own. Our education system is filled with those types and our governments, both here in Canada and the US are ever rapidly taking those freedoms away from us.
That's why I'm so insistent that we can do it in our 2 countries. It's because of the socialist types, and there's a lot of them in both our countries, who deny that it's possible. They want everything to be run by the government and the more that happens, the more our freedoms erode away. Lose that freedom, the freedom that we had through our recent history, the worse it will become for those who want to work for our success. There's one thing that I know. We live in the greatest countries that this planet has ever seen and we're destroying them with our "there outta be a law" mentality and it's all in the name of a false sense of safety and security.
I've been to Cuba. I know how impossible it is for those unfortunate people and there's only one reason for it. It's government control of every aspect of their lives. We will end up that way, just like Venezuela did. The once great state of California is being led down that path by the elites of big tech, celebrities, academics and bureaucrats. It's happening here in Canada, too but we can't give up. It's becoming harder and harder to do but we can still turn it around. However, if we quit working for personal success and insist that our government has to look after us, we will lose it all.
1
-
@Aim54Delta
You make some good points but it doesn't deter from the fact that anyone can become a millionaire. In fact, I think that you've proved it. However, financial success isn't just about a bloated bank account. I'm retired, fairly well off but nowhere near a millionaire. It took hard work and recognising opportunities and making wise decisions. I don't count myself as being anywhere close to being a failure. In fact, I've made bad decisions, lost everything and then built it back up. Had I averted those bad decisions, I might well be a millionaire but that was never important to me.
However, we do have a culture that's conducive to failure. The worst is the victim mentality but there are others. We seem to be in times where success must be instant. The brand new car, the big house, great vacations, a pool in the back yard, all the best toys. Those things didn't matter to me. I bought a small house, used cars, put off those great vacations till I retired, didn't bother with a pool or buy any of the nice toys that so many that I worked with wanted so badly. I stayed away from excess drinking, the drugs, all the vices that people seem to live for. I'm not saint but I know where to draw the line and I would not give up my future for a great time today.
Sacrifice when you're young and the odds are that you won't be a millionaire but you will have a good life. I see those who had the same opportunities that I had and are now senior citizens with not a cent to their names. They're now living for their government pension and spend the last 2 weeks of every month looking forward to pension day. I didn't want to live that way and all it took was the will to not have it happen. Could it happen? Of course. Our economy could collapse but that's out of my hands. I can only do what I can.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jirodyne
IF they did any one of those things, would they admit to it, or would they say that since one aspect of those accusations are false, that makes the entire line of accusations false. The accusations are all tied to one another, in affect making it one accusation in totality. Therefore, if any part of that narrative is false, it renders the entire thing false.
Which brings me back to where I was before. If they did spy on him, they'd NEVER admit it. They'd deny every part of the accusatory narrative hoping to muddy the truth of what really happened. Even admitting to one aspect of it would be a scandalous admission. The only way for them to go is to give a blanket statement and deny the accusation, smugly saying that they weren't trying to get him off the air and avoid the spying aspect altogether.
I once worked with a guy and he had spent years in and out of jail before he straightened his life around. He said the first rule of the guilty was simply to "Deny, deny and then deny again". You start out with a denial and you deny while the penitentiary door is being slammed shut behind you.
If you don't think that they'd play these games, you're as naive as they come.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PamelaByers-on6vt
I'm 72 as well. I've learned that you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar. Also, if you're hesitant to discuss why you believe certain things, my first reaction is that you have no reason to believe as you do. It's easy to sit with your friends and have a big "that's right" party. It's not so easy to sit and discuss ideas and listen to challenges to those beliefs and explain why you believe as you do.
My family suffered greatly under the boot of an invading Nazi military. I spent years trying to understand how people could do the things that the Nazis did. To do that, I read the books by Hitler, his speeches, the works of the top Nazi leaders, the memoirs of ordinary German citizens who were caught up in this thing. These are people who I was diametrically opposed to. It's the only way to understand it.
You have to discuss it, learn about it, to understand it. If you don't, you'll be as blind as the German people were in the Nazi era. I'm NOT calling you a Nazi, but that's how one becomes entrenched in belief systems.....like the organised Church.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@annemurphy9339
A terrible thing. Now, imagine being married to a woman, who's been seeing other men behind your back and when she becomes pregnant, wants YOU to pay child support for a child that's not yours. If you refuse to pay, you go to jail. So you pay, but you don't have a great job, so you live in a one room basement apartment and walk to work because you can't afford a car. Why? Because you're being forced to support TWO households while the mother of the child, who's NOT yours, has remarried and is living on 2 incomes, your money and her new husband's money and maybe even her own income.....a third income, to support one household.
And women wonder why they can't find the "perfect" man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mosaif_mudawi
First of all, Mohammed the Prophet, was a military leader. That doesn't exactly say "peace" as the military is used as a violent arm for many purposes, including imposing peace. Mohammed took his military and used them to spread Islam all through the Arabian Peninsula.
After he died, the new leaders took that army and expanded into the greater Middle East. First the Sassanid Empire, which they defeated and then onto the Byzantine Empire in which they weren't quite as successful. But they turned towards Egypt and then North Africa. When the were done that, they jumped into Spain, winning numerous battles until they controlled the entire Iberian Peninsula. However, that wasn't enough. They crossed the Pyrenees, into France, and were defeated at Tours by Charles Martel and retreated into Spain. They also attacked Malta and Sicily and even sacked Rome. Muslim armies then went into Central Asia, where the nations of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Takikistan and others now exist and headed east into Pakistan. They eventually made it into India, Afghanistan and western China, defeating the rulers there. The Mogul invasion of India was particularly brutal.
Still that wasn't enough. The Ottoman Turks took on the Byzantine Empire and eventually defeated them and transformed the entire region to Islam. However, that wasn't enough. They took on the Austrians and made it all the way into southern Poland and to the gates of Vienna before being turned back.
I doubt that I'm being overly hyperbolic when I say that any religion that depends of wars, to expand their faith, isn't was I would call peaceful. Even today, the Middle East has been a trouble spot for wars, with Islamic nations calling for the destruction of Israel and Islamic factions fighting in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, a proxy war between Shia and Sunni Islamic sects led by Saudi Arabia and Iran. If you think that this is peaceful, I'd hate to see what your definition of warlike would mean.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CreekyGuy
Don't start trying to tell me what prayer is all about. I've spent a lifetime in the church. 8 years in a private Christian school that was sponsored by our very fundamentalist Christian church. 5 years of Catechism. Calvinist Cadets for 5 years. Young People's society for 4 years, as a teenager. Prayer before and after every meal and Bible readings after noon and dinner meals.
I've read the Bible, cover to cover, TWICE and have read the works of many of the Christian thinkers of the last 1500 years. I understand what prayer is about and why it's important.
It's YOU that missing the point. When I said that I can't pray my car to start, when it doesn't, I meant that we can't just leave everything to God. WE have to take action for ourselves, too. God gave us 2 hands and a brain for a reason and it's not just to praise him. It's so we can use our physical assets to better the world around us, the one that He created for us.
Yet, I've read over and over, in this comment thread, that we need prayer or that "I'm praying for this country". You can work on some assumption that maybe God wants the car to start and he quite likely does. Do you know how I know that? He gave me the hands and brain to take action, find out why the car didn't start and then use my brain to fix it. It's a 2 way relationship and a big part of it is to go to work and do the best I can to solve it myself. I've already got the help from God that I need. Part of thanking him is to use the gifts that he's already given me to make things better. The biggest part of thanking anyone is the action of using what that person has given me to solve my problem. I can thank my neighbour profusely and repeatedly for lending me his tools but it's false gratitude if I never use them and sit on my couch watching TV all day. That's the same thing with thanking God. It's lame gratitude if all I do is pray. I have to show my gratitude my DOING something with the gifts that He's given me. If I don't, he might just as well made me a turnip. Prayer without action means nothing.
Now....how do we go about solving the issues that this country is facing. That's our job and we have to use the tools that God gave us to solve it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thetruth401
Wearing a mask is to prevent spreading of the disease. Trump is being tested almost every day. He's not spreading the disease. That doesn't apply to me. I don't get tested everyday so I don't know whether I've been walking around asymptomatic for weeks or not, so I should wear a mask.. Trump, and his doctors, know that he hasn't been infected because of, you know, those tests.
Do you see the difference?
Also, Trump's doctor, HIS DOCTOR, told him it was alright for him to take the drug. HIS DOCTOR. Get medical advice before you take it....like Trump did. My doctor hasn't advised me to take the drug, so, guess what??? I DON'T TAKE IT. No medical advice so I don't take it.
Do you see the difference?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Brian Laurence
All I said, in my original comment, is that Trump can't just send people to a foreign country and start an official investigation. It isn't done. If there was corruption surrounding the Biden's why wouldn't there be an investigation. You'd think that you'd want to see corrupt American politicians exposed, no matter who they are. What delusional about that? Trump asked for a favour. That's all he did and that's all that's shown in the transcript of that phone call. If he did refuse the Ukraines aid or money unless they did him the favour, show me, in THAT transcript, where he said it.
SHOW ME. Don't call me names or imply that I'm delusional. Show me the exact place and shut me up with facts, because if you can't, you're the one that's making up what's actually stated in that transcript. If it's there, it should be a simple thing to do. If it's not there, you've no other recourse but to call me names because the facts don't support you.
1
-
1
-
Yup!!! The reality. The Democrats haven't figured out why Trump has the support that he does. It's the ordinary American, who works in the factories, on the construction sites, who grow our food and mine the metals that we use everyday, that are supporting him. Do you know why? Because the Democrats look down on them. To the Democrats, they're the deplorables. The racists and the gun toting hillbillies with cow manure on their boots. You look at an election map and it's all the big cities that vote blue and the rural and industrial heartland, the country bumpkins, of America who vote red. They're tired of being looked down upon. The same people voted for Obama because they thought that, being a black man, he understood them.....but they were wrong about that.
That's the reality. They could have destroyed Trump, in any election, so badly that he'd never run again, but they didn't even try to win over the "deplorables". They just doubled down and then wondered why, after calling them names and mocking them, the Democrats still wonder why the "rednecks" won't vote for them. A change in strategy might do wonders.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MilkByCow
The US has a population of 330 million. It would take the countries of Italy, France, Spain, Germany and the United Kingdom to match that population. Do you know how many deaths those 5 countries had, in total?
135k. Did you get that? 135,000 deaths to the United States 102,000 deaths. The same populations and those 5 Europeans have over 30,000 more deaths than the US.
So.....NO. I doubt that it would have made any difference had the Democrats been in power. There are factors involved that apply to westernised, mobile societies that weren't manifested in other, poorer countries.
But I suppose, there's a degree of satisfaction in laying blame. Don't want to take the joy of being so smug away from anyone but I thought I'd lay out some facts.
1
-
@GA477
Your short 4 word question demonstrates EXACTLY where you're coming from. It shows a predisposition, a bias and a desire to lay blame on a specific target and you will REFUSE to consider anything that might go against your preconceived claims.
Those figures that I quoted.....don't matter. Spanky is to blame. That he restricted travel....no matter. Spanky is to blame. That it was a virus and situation that hasn't happened, in the memory of any living person on the planet....who cares. Spanky is to blame.
Unless you can prove that "Spanky" knowingly, and with intent, allowed the virus to come to the US and spread, then no, he's NOT to blame. You may be able to show errors in judgement but I can show you all kinds of errors in judgement that had nothing to do with him that cost lives. Do those errors have consequences? Of course they do. However, when you're faced with an unprecedented crisis, errors will be made. It's inevitable. That's why De Blasio saying that the travel ban was racist and that everyone should go to the Chinese New Year's Parade in New York is an error, even stupid, but doesn't mean that De Blasio is to blame, UNLESS he wanted New York to be the epicenter of the pandemic.
I'm sure that you won't get it. You're so driven by hate and bias that you're incapable of making any objective assessments on this or anything. It's the blame that counts. Blame at all costs and to hell with the facts, circumstances or objectivity.
1
-
@inigo4937
What? The first thing that Biden did, after the China travel ban, was call Trump and the ban "xenophobic". Yet, Doctors Fauci and Brix said it was the right thing to do. Mayor De Blasio, backed up by Governor Cuomo, said that there was nothing to worry about and people should go to the Chinese New Year's Parade. That's not being political? The reason that the Democrats and the MSM weren't in full anti-virus mode, on Feb. 1st, was because their focus was exclusively on impeachment. 24/7 coverage on impeachment at the time.
They were being political. In fact, the press should have been all over the virus, at the time, but they were too focused on the political games that they loved so much. A strong opposition should be pointing out potential threats and offering solutions. All they could think about was finding a way to rationalise why they lost in 2016 and that's exactly why they'll lose again in 2020. Stupid political games and a smugness that will not allow them to consider the fact that they could have made a mistake.
1
-
@inigo4937
All I will say is that the coronavirus pandemic, in the way it has manifested itself around the world, is a brand new phenomenon. It's unprecedented in its scope and response. When dealing with the unknown, you're going to see mistakes.
Party politics didn't have to be an issue in the US. Unfortunately, it was the Democrats who started to lay the blame on Trump. "He called it a hoax". "He's xenophobic". That was a Democrat call. Then, when a stimulus package was presented, it was the Democrats that wanted to add items that had NOTHING to do with the virus. Equity in corporate boards? That's going to solve the Covid economic problems? Increased emission standards for airlines? Money for PBS? That's politics and nothing else. Had the Democrats shown more concern for beating the Covid crisis instead of using it as a platform for societal change, maybe they'd have greater support from the people. Instead of yelling "Trump's fault", they stood beside him, offering support and suggestions, they'd have shown themselves to be the advocate of the people, instead of trying to argue every word, phrase and utterance out of the president's mouth.
I've been saying this since 2016. The Democrats are the architects of their own political problems. I don't like it but it's the facts. Anyone, not willing to sit down and ask where they could have gone wrong, will NEVER solve their problems. Admitting that there is a problem is the first step to solving it. The simplest of axioms that the Democrats refuse to face.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@damarmar1001
Of course Trump "wanted" to open this weekend. Who didn't want that 3 weeks ago? He also said he would have to defer to the medical experts before he could do that and before we even reached this weekend, he decided to prolong the crisis policies to the end of April, upon advice from, guess who(?).....the medical experts. At the end of April, this decision will be revisited to see what should be done next. In fact, Trump has said, repeatedly, that saving lives comes first, THEN the economy.
Maybe YOU should listen to EVERYTHING he says instead of only what you WANT to hear. Maybe then YOU'D have a "clue" to what is going on. Also, if a person can't make his mortgage payment, there are provisions that the payment will be deferred to the end of the mortgage contract.
I'm wondering who is truly the idiot here. No one has to say that you have to like Trump or vote for him but at least get your facts straight before commenting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ByXavi.
“Anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” Voltaire.
That's why we worry about this. Years later, Orwell picked the most universally understood fact, 2 plus 2 equals 4, to illustrate how by perverting this fact into 2 plus 2 equals 5, is a sign of what a totalitarian regime aspires to. They want you to believe the absurd, without question, in order to control you. It's that perversion of truth, as an example, that men can become pregnant, that is an indication that we have a force that wants to control what you believe even though all known facts and science says that it's not possible. Objective truth cannot be tolerated in an authoritarian regime. The Soviet Union underwent this same perversion of facts with Lysenkoism, and untold millions starved.
If you stand by and watch our rulers pervert truth, you're contributing to the establishment of a dictatorship. THAT is why we worry about this. Truth is the highest and noblest of all human endeavours. That search must be protected at all costs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alanlampe7031
I'm in Canada, where distances are daunting. Yet, our ruling party has decided to charge us a carbon tax that keeps increasing and is eliminating the ability to travel for the poorest of Canadians. Then we have big city elites telling us rural types, who grow the food, work the mines and cut the timber for the big cities, that we don't need to get to where we're going. If it gets too expensive for us to operate, it will affect the urban centres, negatively until THEY have nothing as well. You want us to live in poverty and do it willingly.
Yes...when I went to school, we travelled by bus. I got on the bus at 7:40, in the morning, and arrived at school at 8:55. That's OUR reality. We had a small dairy and grew cash crops....food that people in the cities need and get from people like us. Now, you're telling us that we don't need to travel to get our work done. You're going to be for the shock of your life when your standard of living goes back to what it was 150 years ago because you refuse to allow us cheap energy. Cheap energy is the key to economic stability and growth and you want to kill it. You have no idea what it is you're advocating for or what the consequences will be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@garylivingston9052
My point is that the recovery from a world wide shutdown of the economy, rebounded 10X faster, while the shut down was on, than it did from the news of the election of Biden. Essential jobs and companies were still operating well, under the lockdowns and good investors knew how to manage it. However, when Biden was elected, those lockdowns were still in place but what really hurt the economy was the policies that Biden put into place, using executive orders, that impacted energy and the industries that relied on those energy jobs. That took away a lot of investment opportunities and it took over 3 years for investors to maneuver their way through it so we could make money.
I agree that things are a lot better than they were when Biden came to office but it's only because, after a downturn, things will get better. However, with record debt and the inflation that goes with it, things aren't as good as it seems. Until we start to control the debt, we're going to be in for a hard time. When a government prints money to cover spending, it's like they're chasing their tail. It accomplishes nothing but more and more debt. It has to catch up to us someday.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't like Trump all that much, either. That's a personality thing. Would I vote for him. Not a problem. My personal opinion of him has nothing to do with how well he's doing his job.
I worked with a guy who had the personality of scorpion. I didn't like being around him but he was the best at his job that I ever worked with. When everything was tallied up, the good and the bad, I would still pick him to work with. I wished he wasn't such a low life, at times, but overall, I endorsed him as a co-worker.
That's where I am about Trump. He has bad points, like everyone else, but the good things he's done, as president, FAR outweigh those bad points.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sleepisthecousinofdeath7395
I've never stated my stance on abortion so you shouldn't be assigning my position for me without having any indication on where I stand. I didn't realise that I was supposed to give my position. I just thought that you're playing word games in an attempt to baffle brains with BS.
Pro life advocates place a high value on life, even in the womb. They stand for life, except in extreme circumstances, killing only when necessary, like in a war, for self protection or in the womb when extreme circumstances threatens the life of the mother. It doesn't mean that they're "pro killing" in those extreme circumstances. It, especially, means that they strongly disapprove of abortion as a means of contraception or so the mother can rid themselves of an inconvenient child. Pro life doesn't see a child as inconvenient or unwanted....EVER. Only pro abortion advocates see a child in that manner
Now, you can assume that I'm anti abortion. I refuse to kill anyone out of convenience, to maintain a lifestyle, for financial gain or a hatred of others, including a child who's still residing in the womb because I don't like children. If one is responsible for their actions, they will accept what comes their way and make the best of it. If you don't like to take responsibility for your actions, you do whatever's necessary to rid yourself of the results of irresponsible actions and then tell yourself that you did nothing wrong.
One loves their neighbour or their child. The other feels that this neighbour, this life growing in their womb, will never feel any love from their mother...that they're incapable of sacrificing to express love of their own child. It's an admission that unconditional love is NOT a part of their lives and they will not allow that child to live if it gets in their way. If they hate their own progeny that much, who else could they rationalise their hate against.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There doesn't need to be an other. "Leah" Thomas swam men's collegiate for 3 years. If he decides, at that time, that he's coming out as transgender......fine. Let him. However, he still swims on the men's team, just like he always has.
Where are all the biological women, who claim to be males, that are clamoring to compete in men's sports. They don't seem to exist. Why? Because they're still competing against biological women. To make it worse, they now have to race against men, who claim to be women.
If you're born female, you compete in women's sports. If you were born male, you compete in men's sports. Period. If Leah doesn't like it, she can get out of the pool.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@madmisobroth1361
Then why should I have rights that you don't? We're all equal. I think that you'd be surprised at just how many of your friends and neighbours have a hand gun, just in case something does happen. It's not something that you'd advertise, considering how some people, in the cities feel but, speaking for me, I'd rather keep a gun, on the quiet, than spend a lifetime regretting that I didn't have it when I needed it the most. I hate that it's needed but I'm not going to let that dislike cloud my common sense or my emotions. That's exactly what those horrific mass shootings do. They affect an emotional response and as important as emotions are, they should never rule you, especially when your life, or the lives of those you care about, could be snuffed out by someone whose emotions are ruled by greed, anger and resentment. That would elicit an emotional response that could really destroy any future that you have.
1
-
1
-
@marklambert7515
A lot of child sexual abuse victims go on to become sexually perverse themselves. The same goes for their abusers. It's a cycle. If they do break the law, charge, convict and send them to prison and then try to get them help for their issues. It's not against the law to hang out with women. It is against the law to abuse them.
Feldman, through his own abuse and drug addictions, initiated by his abuser, could well become the monster that was created and what he claims that he wants to destroy. If so, stop him but we need evidence for it.
However, if you don't acknowledge that someone, like Feldman, was created NOT born, we'll never get to the root of the problem. We've allowed this sick culture to firmly embed itself in Hollywood culture and now we're saying that we didn't know.
We knew. Brian Peck, director and producer, was convicted of sexual abuse of a minor, when he was at Nickelodeon. He went to jail and when he got out, he was hired by Disney to produce children's films.
This is insane. To me, that's reason enough to boycott Disney into bankruptcy.
But.....we don't. We turn a blind eye and then sit, with moral superiority, pretending that "we didn't KNOW". BS.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WhyNotTruth
Actual evidence? Then why aren't you talking about the violence and intimidation in ALL the cities that I mentioned. I'm quite willing to condemn any violence that a right wing group would commit and I do, quite vehemently, but you turn a blind eye to the violence, committed by the left over the last 3 months.
Those are facts that YOU have chosen to ignore. So, it's now up to you. I've condemned right wing violence in the strongest terms possible.
Will you condemn the violence, all the looting, burning, the smashed windows, the throwing of bottles, fireworks, Molotov cocktails, the intimidation of people in restaurants? Do you condemn this or are you just going to slink away and hide?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@one-sidedrationalization1091
Then who's going to get me out of poverty. YOU????? The government???? If I wait for others to do it, it's NOT going to happen. I have to set goals for myself, work my butt off and make wise decisions.
It's how countless immigrants, who come from impoverished countries, do it. My dad came to Canada with no money in his pocket and a pregnant wife, a surefire recipe for self pity and disaster these days.
18 years later, he had 6 kids, owned a 100 acre farm and was starting to make investments under the guidance of a financial planner. To do this he worked 3 jobs....THREE jobs. I never saw the guy. He worked 4 to 1 afternoon shifts at a shoe factory, worked the farm during the day and was a musician, in a band, that played dances and bars every Friday and Saturday night. Every Friday night, he'd leave work, do his musician gig and then return to finish off his 8 1/2 shift.
Cultural amnesia is a crock, an excuse to do nothing. If you work hard, people will see it and want you to work for them but it doesn't happen overnight. Instant success, the Bill Gates/Steve Jobs phenomena is extremely rare. Most of us have to do it the hard way. It's not easy and it may not even work, but going on about complex systems and cultural amnesia accomplishes nothing. No one ever built financial stability by discussing vague and existential topics. Go to work and quit complaining. Complaining doesn't get the dog house built.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beejcarson
I didn't vote for Trump but I did agree with the tax cuts. However, I didn't agree with the tax cuts if you weren't going to dig into the bureaucratic monster that we have, especially in Washington, FIRST. He put the cart before the horse, so to speak. The bureaucracy has become a self feeding monster, creating work for itself that doesn't even exist. It has become, what is known in economics, a sick company. Trump cut taxes and then let a great deal of the bureaucracy remain in place. It's not going to work if your goal is to cut the deficit. However, it did wonders for the economy, which was going great until Covid struck.
All that includes the elected politicians. This isn't a party issue. It's an issue, in BOTH parties, of politicians working for their own best interests, instead of doing what they're supposed to be doing. The biggest reason for this is that the average person just wants to vote on election day and be done with it. They're not interested in politics on the local level, ensuring that the person that they primary to go to Washington is one that has their best interests at heart. They see a familiar name and party and put the X next to it.
Joe Biden has really put the nation on a bad path. Our deficit is spiralling out of control and it's going to spell disaster over the long haul. The only question is....are we going to handle that disaster on our own terms or are we going to let it happen and THEN try to solve it.
1
-
@beejcarson
European nations tried the heavy taxation route in the sixties and seventies. My family is originally from the Netherlands and I remember some of the tax stories that they told me about. Great Britain was in dire financial straits until Margaret Thatcher led with some draconian measures to get it under control.
"I'll tax the street
(If you try to sit, sit) I'll tax your seat
(If you get too cold, cold) I'll tax the heat
(If you take a walk, walk) I'll tax your feet"
It sums up how the public felt about the taxes in Britain at the time.
Also, I reject the idea that because the Republicans don't act responsibly with our tax money, that automatically means that the Democrats will do so. I'm saying that they've BOTH done it and I've said it in my last comment when I said that we have to primary our candidates so we get the ones in place to that we need come election time. That's what I meant when I said that people check the familiar name instead of taking the time to see what they're all about.
It's the overblown bureaucracy and politicians of BOTH stripes are a party to it and taking advantage of it.
California has the highest taxes by far of all the states. Yet, homelessness is a HUGE problem, real estate and rents are skyrocketing, they have rolling brown outs, the public schools are in terrible shape and for the first time in California history, the population has gone down. Their answer? More taxes. Over taxation was a major contributor to the downfall of the Roman Empire. It handcuffs the individual so what little money he does have must go to life basics. Go back and read the words to the ditty I gave in the first paragraph. It's debilitating to the very soul of a nation.
The Democrats aren't solving anything when by increasing spending exponentially they increase taxes the same way. The spending will go the way of spending in California. Nowhere. It'll lines the pockets of bureaucrats, who are the unelected of government and their cronies. California cannot go on like this and the country will face the same problems if they follow their lead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kjkitty777
What's bizarre is that a biological male can claim to be a female and then force HIS way into a female competition, taking away a young teenage females right to compete on an equal footing with her peers.
There is a reason why men and women, as they begin to reach adulthood have been placed into male and female designated sporting events. The male of our species has a physical advantage, which is biologically driven, over the female, in athletics. If this wasn't so, females would be breaking all kinds of sports records even if they weren't competing directly against the males. That's NOT happening.
That's why I'm saying that this is ideological and that when this ends up in a court of law, we have entered Bizzaro world. That has NOTHING to do with normal transgenders. This has to do with reality and the only reason that this is even in court is due to an ideological segment of society that is wilfully distorting reality. There are transgenders who do not adhere to this nonsense, Blaire White just to name one.
I find it appalling that these young teenage girls are being cheated in this way. Any human being in possession of a sense of integrity would feel that way. These young men should be ashamed of themselves....and I say men because, in this case, we are dealing with young men. Their feelings of gender identity does not change the reality of their biology no matter how much they want it to.
1
-
@kjkitty777
In this case it does matter. The entire case depends on acknowledging that these transgender athletes are biologically male. For that judge to tell the lawyers of those girls, I mean the REAL girls (see how easily it can become confusing), to not use the correct biological terms in their gender description, is to tacitly ignore the reality of the biology. Once the biology is ignored, the science ignored, what are you left with. It certainly isn't logic or science. It's an ideology, no different than any other ideology that refuses to accept the reality of demonstrable facts. This isn't about misgendering. That just muddies up the water. We need basic facts and these 2 are biologically male and should, during this trial, be identified as such in deference to biological fact. It's unfortunate that some find that fact offensive but offense doesn't change those facts. If words are to have any meaning, it must be clearly defined in a court of law in ways that is clear to all, both traditionally and in fact.
Also, had you seen the pictures of those two transgender males, while running that race, you'd see why they, most definitely, had the advantage of the other girls. It's no accident that they came in 1/2 in that race and set state records. If you'd watched your daughter lose a chance at a scholarship and see the look of pain on her face because she felt cheated out of that chance, you might see this a little differently.
That any of this is taking up precious court time is ridiculous. It, most definitely, has become Bizarro world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shawnmalloy2919
All vague and nothing substantial. Just like this impeachment sham. He never told anyone to storm the Capitol Building. "March peacefully and patriotically" yet people, like you, pretend that he never said that. His accusers, in the impeachment hearings, just edited that part of his speech out. Unreal....and I'm not even that big a fan of Trump.
When the government manipulates facts and call it the truth, I will no longer support that government. I don't care who the target is. I expect integrity from the leaders in government and RIGHT NOW, that's the Democrat party and they lied to me, AND YOU, by editing that part of his speech out.
What a poor excuse for an insurrection anyway. Over 100,000 Trump supporters, in Washington, and only 200 entered into the Capitol Building. They weren't armed and some were let in by security officers. They even stayed within the velvet ropes after they were let in. BLM and Antifa has better riots on any given night last summer. The whole thing was blown completely out of proportion. Those who broke in should be prosecuted and those guards who let and encouraged others in should be reprimanded. It surely didn't warrant turning Washington into a war zone. Political theatre, that's all it is, by a party that wants the US to become a one Party government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MakerInMotion
I'm sorry. I'm not always on the ball, LOL.
However, standing up to America wasn't the way for him to go. He should have ignored America, worked on improving the oil infrastructure, which was in bad shape, and stop nationalising everything in sight. Instead, he created an outside enemy, America, so to distract the people of Venezuela from figuring out who the REAL enemy was. It was the radical socialists, including Chavez, who were the real enemies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sciencegirl2239
When you plagiarise material in order to get ahead, you didn't get it fairly. If you get caught plagiarising, and people in charge look away, there is a reason and a very good one is DEI. They looked the other way because they felt that they needed more representation from a specific group and Gay was a member of that group, who came from an elitist background. Roland Fryer went on his own, didn't plagiarise from anyone, has reams and reams of data to back his work and has showed success in his educational methods. He didn't copy from anyone. However, it didn't corroborate the leftist assertions of systemic racism so his identity group doesn't apply.
Plagiarising is cheating. Cheating shouldn't be rewarded. There's no double standard here except for those who want race to be the main identifier of a human being.
By the way, Gay plagiarised material from ANOTHER black American, Carol Swain, who has a Ph.D. in political science from the University of North Carolina and a Master of Legal Studies from Yale Law School. This accomplished woman didn't plagiarise her work but she has the wrong political views so she doesn't get the recognition that she deserves.
1
-
1
-
@jamesmccarte1609
You need a photo ID to buy cigarettes, booze, pick up a prescription, get a job, rent an apartment, apply for a loan, get a bank account, travel on a plane, get a package from the post office, apply for welfare and food stamps, get a credit card, see an age restricted movie, ....that's just off the top of my head. Are these all discriminatory practices? Who is this person that can't and isn't doing ANY of these things? Every western country has ID requirements to vote. Google "what is required to vote in (name of country)" and you'll always have an "ID requirement" listed at the top. This is a non-issue and worse, it suggests that minorities don't have the mental capacity to get an official ID. An exceptionally poor complaint and I'd be willing to state that it would be difficult to find someone that doesn't already have it. They Bill even states that you can get help acquiring that ID if you don't know how.
They can keep repeating this claim all they want but it's condescending towards minorities and, frankly, untrue.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@russk8091
A lack of empathy huh? It isn't the Trump supporters who are promising free health care and education, housing and welfare. It isn't Trump supporters that are offering sanctuary cities and states. These are the promises that are luring these migrants to the US, promises made by Trump detractors, all the while knowing that if those people that they've lured to the US get caught, they will be subject to being detained. They know full well that this has been the law and the policy for decades, even under Obama, but they don't care. Offer more promises, more bait to catch them so they can use them to make political points against Trump. If they're lucky, maybe one of them will even die. That's a real coup in their fight against Trump.
Not one of them will ever say to those migrants, please don't make that trip. It's too dangerous for you and especially for the women and children, who are in the greater danger of physical and sexual abuse. Stay home until we can sort out what our new policies will be. Nope, they just increase the bait to lure the migrants to cross the borders and into those detainment camps.
That's what I call lack of empathy. I'd never take my child through the perils of a desert and expose them to potential predators and then confined in detentions centres. I'd never encourage anyone to put their children through that. Not the left though. We'll give you more free stuff and if you get caught, we'll express our outrage against a president we don't like. They'll sacrifice their hardship to score political points.
That's as cold hearted as it gets.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sylvertaco
The enlightenment period took place in the 18th Century, the same century as the writing of the Constitution. It was, in fact, a part of that enlightenment. The enlightenment wasn't a collective slap on the forehead with a "Now, I get it" It was through a long process of which the drafting of the Constitution was a part of. Some might even say the culmination of that enlightenment.
"We the People of the United States" That's the preamble to the Constitution. Either those slaves were people or they were not. Nowhere, in the Bible, could the slavers find that justification that the slaves were primitive and it was all a part of God's plan. That was their own rationalisation. The contradiction was that in that argument, they still acknowledged that the slaves were people and the first sentence in the Constitution does not distinguish the race, religion, ethnicity or gender of the "we the people". Those Amendments were added to ensure that the slaves, women and all were included in that preamble, that all were included when it was said "we the people" and it does give equal footing for all. Those Amendments are an assurance of that very first sentence. In reality, they are redundant if you acknowledge the humanity and equality of all.
The early Constitution doesn't mention slavery at all so it neither legitimises it or condemns it. For many it was the inconvenient truth that slavery contradicted the very essence of the Constitution and when the Amendments against slavery were made, it was to clarify what they had ignored when the Constitution was written. Many of the founding fathers knew that slavery contradicted what the constitution said but were powerless to enforce it because they needed the support of all 13 colonies to succeed in the rebellion against Britain. The Constitution put the wheels of Abolition in motion and was the very first step towards the freedom of the slaves.
Slavery was to old and complex and issue for it to disappear in an afternoon. Ben Franklin wasn't just going to stand up and say. "Slavery is wrong" and all Americans would collectively say "Why hasn't anyone told us this before? It all makes sense now". The seeds were sown in the Constitution and it became more and more apparent from the Constitution and from the religious beliefs of the time that slavery was an affront to the idea of "We the people" or human dignity.
1
-
1
-
@Sylvertaco
You seem so critical of the Constitution yet you haven't cited one thing of the original text that you would heartily criticise. Not what it doesn't say but what it does say. This was the first attempt at a document to set standards of rule to make a better society and you're disappointed that it wasn't perfect yet you have yet to offer ONE thing that is says that is overtly wrong.
Also, most people were illiterate in the year 1500 and the first English Bibles were not in any kind of circulation for over 100 years after that. Before that, the Bibles were in Latin and Greek. Literacy rates were rising as printing presses became more efficient but it still wasn't as if millions of Bibles were being printed every year. It wasn't until 1800 that literate people started to become the majority, in the west and it was at that time slavery was ending, one nation at a time.
Yes, the Roman slaves valued the idea of life after death but if God values their lives that much in heaven, how could anyone, as a man, devalue that life on earth. That was the primary idea behind the abolition of slavery. The dignity of human life in heaven and on earth.
It wasn't just that the majority were illiterate 300 years ago. It was also the fact that transportation put limits on the circulation of new ideas. A letter could take weeks, even months to be delivered. You're taking the conditions of today and wondering why those people couldn't get it right 300 years ago under conditions that you or I can hardly imagine today. We have better health care, you and I, not the elites, but just average guys in the west, than King George the Third of England had when the American colonies revolted. That is just the tip of the iceberg. They had everyday survival concerns that we never think about today.
It's so easy to sit in judgement, lazing on our comfy couch in front of our computer. Maybe a little less moral superiority and a little more humbleness and appreciation of the hardships our ancestors had to live through so we can prattle on about our beloved ideas.
Point out, at least one thing in the first Constitution that is blatantly wrong and I'll discuss it. You haven't done it yet.
1
-
1
-
@Sylvertaco
And yet, you still refuse to mention what was wrong with it without the Amendments. If you took the original Constitution and applied it today, would it legitimise slavery? I say no. The only reason slavery held on was because it existed at the time. Today, that original document has enough to deem slavery unconstitutional. There is nothing in it that allows it. Had slavery not existed in 1776 or ever in American history, no one could institute it today as a new social norm. That original Constitution would be the strongest argument against the idea of creating slavery.
The only reason that slavery endured at that time was because it had existed in human history for thousands of years.....not because that original Constitution allowed it. The only reason that the 13th Amendment was necessary was to reinforce what the preamble had already said but in a more specific manner. It stands alone in it's power but it had enormous pressure not to be followed in the spirit in which it was written.
However, even if I concede that it wasn't complete, you'd have to honour it as the first real attempt to the concept of human rights. Only the most naive would expect such a revolutionary document or ideals to arrive, fully formed, in perfection, right from the beginning. That original document is the foundation of all that came after.
Think of it. Those ideals have never been put to paper in the thousands of years of human civilisation. Thousands of years of human history and you're upset that it took 80 some years to specifically mention slavery. Like I said earlier, so easy to judge from the perspective of today. I'm sure that you wouldn't have been so fully enlightened in those days.
To give an example. My dad grew up in the Netherlands, 30 kilometres west of the German border. He had to live through the Nazi occupation and it wasn't easy for him or my family. Yet, he has wondered what his attitude towards those Nazis would have been had he been born 50 km. east of where he was born. Would he have joined the Hitler youth, raised is arm in salute to the Fuhrer and marched to the glory of the Fatherland? He says he likely would have, just as he hated the Nazis because he was born on the other side of that border. You're judging the founding fathers from a vantage point that they didn't have and then vilifying them for the flawed people that they were. No nuance, no understanding, no appreciation on what it took to write that revolutionary document.
We're not as good as we like to think we are. At least try to admire what they were trying to accomplish and give them and there work the admiration it deserves instead of finding fault with what you perceive as imperfections.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeffreylogiudice823
What if I have a pet amoeba? They split in half to reproduce.
The truth is, in order for advanced forms of life to survive, they need a binary reproductive process. Interbreeding, the joining of near identical genetic material, causes birth defects or inbreeding depression. This greatly inhibits the survivability of advanced species like mammals. Binary sex is at the heart of our ability to survive. Without it, we die.
Worms are NOT an advanced species. Although successful, they haven't advanced, as a species, in over 1/2 a billion years. To advance, as a species, they need to introduce new genetic material every time they reproduce. If they don't do that, they will regress to where they are now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@randym8393
What would the grounds of her lawsuit be? Truck horns were too loud and they scared her? LOL.
If she can get a settlement for this, from protesters that never threw one rock, frozen water bottle or Molotov Cocktail, never broke one window, didn't loot one store, never set one fire, didn't put ONE person in the hospital, let alone kill anyone, what could the victims of BLM protesters get in a lawsuit? Like the family of 8 year old Secoriea Turner, killed by BLM protesters...or the wife of David Dorn shot and killed during BLM riots by a "protester" wanting to rob a store. Man.....they should get a bank load for their losses.
You're outraged by noisy protesters, but I know that your types don't have the nerve to say a word about those RIOTS. I refuse to call them protests for obvious reasons to normal people, but not for the indoctrinated. It quite often seems that violence is acceptable when it's for their cause but making a bunch of noise is considered near fascist genocide when it's something that they disagree with.
I'm expecting one of 2 things from you. Either some weird rationalisation for the BLM riots, and I've heard some doozies, or complete SILENCE, the most common response.
1
-
1
-
@rebjiii
At least I've used actual quotes from Jesus. All you've done is make accusations and demonstrated your own feelings of superiority over another human being. As much as you think differently, we're no better than Trump and no more worthy of heaven or redemption than he is. Get over yourself.
You can realise that specific things that he does might be wrong but you're dismissing anything that he might do that is good for the country. Now I'll give another example from the Bible. King David was chosen, by God, to be the King of Israel. Yet, he arranged to have Uriah, one of his own elite soldiers, killed so he could have his wife Bathsheba. Could you imagine a president doing that? God sent Samuel, the Prophet, to chastise him for it, yet he still allowed David to continue on as the King. Think about it. David murders to get a woman and God still allows him to stay on as the leader of his nation. There has to be a lesson in this.
Donald Trump is a flawed individual and there are things that he does that I would like to believe that I wouldn't do. However, I have to admit that I'm a flawed individual as well. Moreover, if you look a little deeper into the life of Trump, he's done some things that are amazing compassionate. He's a complex individual and, unlike so many of us, he is very outspoken and blunt and allows his faults to lay wide open for all to see. Most of us hide them but they're still there, hidden away.
Instead of your anger and hate towards him, try to show compassion. That's something else Jesus taught. It doesn't say to "love thy neighbour that is perfect or that you like". It says to "love the neighbour" without qualification or distinction. Your last comment isn't one of love but of anger, superiority and intense hatred of someone. Are you sure that this is how you're supposed to love your neighbour. Maybe should love the sinner and hate the sin. A fine distinction but one that is demanded by Jesus.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fish profile?
Yet, every time that they've tried, on a national level, stop or control Capitalism, it has ended in disaster. The Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, North Korea, Germany (the Nazis were National Socialists, just like China is today) and Cuba, have all ended in famine, starvation, prison camps, poverty, authoritarianism and oppression. Not ONE has ended in a better life for the average citizen.
Capitalism does not pit one group against the other. In fact, people have to cooperate in order to make the economy work, on a voluntary level, with agreements that are bound by the rule of law. It's when the economy is overtly controlled, that's when we run into problems. Top down authority, over reaching control on what we buy, sell, trade and how we use the capital we earned through our own efforts has been the worst of all governing methods. It was in the old Monarchy system and it was in every government who tried to socially control its citizens through economic dominance. Show me the Socialist nation that has thrived...just one. The only one that I can think of is China and they've interred over 1 million Uyghurs because of their faith and have persecuted the Falun Gong, Tibetans and others.
The world isn't perfect but your Socialist dream has even been worse. Right now, it's tearing the US apart.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rickmcdonald2233
There was a guy, who phoned reporters from the Washington Post, disguising his voice so they called him "Deep Throat", that brought down a president. Why? Because those reporters thought that IF Deep Throat's allegations were true, this would be a HUGE scandal and they went full bore into investigating the veracity of those allegations from this mysterious source. That scandal was Watergate.
Now, there's a laptop filled with videos and e-mails, a group of whistleblowers, a business partner, around 150 reports of suspicious bank transactions from 11 different banks, a video of Biden bragging how he threatened to withhold 1 billion dollars from Ukraine if they didn't fire a prosecutor, a guilty plea of tax evasion and a gun charge, a gun charge that resulted from that information from that laptop.......and the SAME newspaper that broke the Watergate Scandal, won't investigate ANY of this stuff.
THEY WON'T EVEN INVESTIGATE!!!! The entire MSM is ignoring all this stuff.
Honestly, if anyone has to grow up around here, it has to be YOU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why weren't there any journalists investigating the coronavirus back in January? Where were all the news specials, talking to epidemic specialists, trying to get in touch with sources in Wuhan, asking members of the CDC what a new coronavirus could be capable of?
Do you know what they were reporting on? IMPEACHMENT. MORE IMPEACHMENT, and then when that was all done.....MORE IMPEACHMENT. CNN, MSNBC, all of them, on and on about ONE THING. IMPEACHMENT, over and over and OVER again.
It's a huge failure of our media. When a huge pandemic was threatening the world, they were full focus on their ideological obsessions and their hatred of the president. The media's job is too inform us of world events and they, quite actively, ignored what was happening in China in favour of their of obsession with Donald Trump.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jhlfsc
Where did I say that minorities can't be bigots? I never said that ONCE. In fact, my entire message was that the idea that the original poster can't be black or gay and think this way is BIGOTED. That we're all individuals and that to assign characteristics based on race or minority status is as bigoted as it gets. That's why they had to act as if Larry Elder was the black face of white supremacy. They want to imply that he was bought off to say the things that he did and that, as a black man, he would NEVER believe these things on his own. That is as bigoted as it gets. It's saying that all I have to do is look at you, check off what demographic you belong to and I'll know everything about you.
That's what they did to Larry Elder and it was the LEFT that did that, NOT the right.
Also, Fascists are Socialists. Even that painter from Austria was a socialist.
"We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan"
Adolf Hitler , August 15, 1920, speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus.
" In this respect I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people.” – Adolf Hitler , February 24, 1941, speech on the 21st anniversary of the Nazi Party
That was 21 years AFTER he made that first quote I wrote.
“All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community.” – Adolf Hitler, March 21, 1943, speech for Heroes’ Memorial Day
So don't give me this BS about right wing Fascists. It's complete nonsense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Growing up on a farm in southern Ontario in the sixties, it seemed that there were growths of stinging nettles behind all the out sheds and chicken coups. Every farm seemed to have them. I've gotten into them lots of time and didn't like it. We had them in the woods, too, but they were a different variety and didn't grow as tall.
Eventually, I found out that the ones growing around the buildings were imported from Europe and that peaked my interest. Why would they import something that seemed to be good for nothing except to sting you? It seemed to bring our history closer, when I finally found out.
The farm I grew up on had so many things growing on it. A small apple orchard, pear trees, a plum orchard, currant bushes, raspberries and gooseberries, rhubarb....we were always picking them and my mom canned all summer. We never used the nettles, though, simply because we had no idea that they could be useful. At least it explained why every farm in the area had clusters of them growing around the place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@slipstreammonkey
It's cute but a diversion. They're 2 separate topics. Identity isn't a feeling. It's biological fact and deeply ingrained into our very being, right down to our DNA. It's what compels our maturation as human beings. That's why puberty is so important. It's a biological development, no different than any other stage of our development. It's compelled by everything that we're built from. An adolescent has no idea where the changes of puberty are going to take him/her because it is out of their control, no different than your eye colour or the freckles on your face, except it runs even deeper than that. Our existence depends on the binary that is gender. Without it, we'd be no better than one celled creatures because that binary allows us the genetic diversity to stay alive. There is no other system of procreation in all the so called advanced life forms. It's that vital to our survival. Our "feelings" can't change that.
A dog can hump my leg, but that doesn't mean that it's found a new gender. It's responding to a primal urge that's within all of us, that is beyond our feelings. It's a call to life itself. We accept that a person could be attracted to the same sex but that's a lot different than claiming to be another gender or one that they've just made up. That's a feeling and has nothing to do with biology, no matter what the egghead intellectuals or a Supreme Court Justice says. Claiming to be Jesus Christ or Napoleon doesn't make it so, no matter who much you wish it or feel it. Cutting off body parts and attempting to fashion new ones doesn't change your gender, no different that sticking a sow's ear on a horse won't change that sow into a pony.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VelaiciaCreator
Are you EVER misunderstanding the point that I'm making. I hope that you're not doing this intentionally.
I will try one more time. The claim is that lack of gender affirmation is causing suicides. There was no such thing as gender affirmation 50 years ago. In Britain, transgender cases have skyrocketed, in the last 10 years by 4000 percent and most of them are girls. Intersex cases were almost exclusively boys in the past and now it's girls. If that is the TRUE number of transgender population, how is it that the suicide rates for girls are on the rise, among those who are transgender, when 50 years ago they couldn't even get the affirmation they claim that they so badly need. No affirmation and no chance of surgery, either yet suicide rates are on the rise. Were those girls so much tougher back then?
Also, you're claim that people have is tough today, doesn't past the muster either. 90 years ago there was the great Depression. Ordinary people, even in America, were scrounging for food and living in abject poverty. Then came the WW2. Not exactly a time of wealth for average people and then they had to contend with the new spectre of nuclear war which extended through the Cold War. When I was a kid, in the sixties, every large explosive sound would compel the search for a mushroom cloud on the horizon. Blacks in America were living under Jim Crow. Gays were reviled and transgenders lived an underground existence. The last 30 years were the best in human history, with more people coming out of abject poverty than at any time in history only blunted by the advent of Covid and the world reaction to it. Covid and the Covid response resulted in over 250 million people falling BACK into abject poverty, abject poverty being less than 1.90 in US dollars a day.
So don't give me this "times are tough" nonsense. 95% of all humans lived in abject poverty 150 years ago, no welfare, socialised medicine, retirement pension plans or the means to access affordable food. Being gay is widely accepted and anyone claiming to be trans is being affirmed by their schools, medical practitioners, the law and businesses. The rainbow flag is everywhere. Even the crosswalks in my small town are painted to reflect the acceptance of the LGBTQ+ community.
Your assertions are bogus and the facts don't bear them out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There's no such thing as having it all. This idea is why the radical feminists are so miserable, so ready to do battle at every perceived slight. I'll give you an example.
I dated a girl, years ago, for a short time. We were talking on the phone and I was telling her that I had just made some homemade soup. I then said, as an afterthought, that she may not like it. Before I had a chance to explain why, she lost it on me, ranting on about how men always think women are nothing but complainers.
I calmly told her that she had told me, on our last date, that she didn't like cabbage rolls because she hated cabbage and that I had put cabbage in my soup. I then asked her why she felt it necessary to come out of the gate, both barrels blazing and that all she had to do was quietly ask why I thought that she may not like it. She sniffed and said I suppose so and that was it.
We stopped seeing each other a short time later. Didn't bother me a bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@renaissancestatesman
First of all, look at my comments closely. I never ONCE mentioned the possibility of voter fraud. Why? Because it's pointless now. What we have to concentrate on NOW, is the next election and there are problems if Trump runs again.
First...it's his age. The next election is 4 years away which means that he'll be 8 years older when he's finally done. That'll make him 82. He's healthy right now, but that can change SO quickly. It may not change. My dad is 89 and he's 4 times as sharp as Biden....but that his health could change overnight is a consideration. Trump's age is a factor.
Also, we have to find a way to mitigate the outright hate that so many have for Trump. One way is to find a candidate, who has a similar outlook but is so articulate and presents such strong arguments, without being too combative, and has the charisma to win people over, that it's difficult to hate him. Difficult to hate him in spite of the manipulations of the press.
Third, we have to work on the highly suspect election process. Trump can't be that guy. Too many people will recoil when they here about "stealing the election" from him. We need someone that didn't have an issue in the last election. Someone who they can't claim is still whining about losing last election. We need someone who can lay out the case for reform and can make it appear as if he is standing up for this without bias.
The past is OVER. Accept that we lost and start up with a new strategy.
......And I repeat.....I didn't swallow any hook, line or sinker. I just think that there's no point in crying about the past. We can't change it but we can change the future if we go at it right. Unfortunately, I don't see it happening. Too many Rinos and swamp creatures in the Republican Party.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kimberlywilliams4800
Did you see his car? The driver's side was banged up pretty badly. Who's going to carjack that piece of junk? I, for one, would, most definitely, not going to start shooting to protect that vehicle, especially if the people get out of a vehicle with police lights, have weapons and are wearing jackets that say police on it.
It doesn't matter if he knows why they pulled him over or not. I've been pulled over and had no idea what the reason was. Once, it was because my truck, a rather unusual vehicle, fit the description of a truck owned by a person wanted for assault. I complied with their demands, gave all the necessary paperwork, answered all their questions and they let me go with an explanation and apology.
All he had to do was comply and he'd be alive today. Instead he resisted and started shooting. HE started shooting. If you don't want to get shot, don't drive around with a gun or start shooting when someone, in a police car, pulls you over. In fact, Chicago has the strictest gun laws in the US. He was breaking the law by just having that gun in his possession.
He was the architect of his own demise.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@martingifford5415
I had circumcision surgery done when I was 6 due to an infection. Not that big a deal. In fact it was a relief for the pain of the infection to stop, in spite that it change the appearance somewhat. However, it didn't look any different that it does when it was fully erect before surgery.
Circumcision has been done for thousands of years, all over the world and it seems it was more prevalent in the tropics. Even the Mayas, Incas and Aztecs and other tropical American indigenous nations practiced male circumcision. I'm sure that there have been surgical accidents during the procedure but they'd be quite rare as it's a very minor surgery. Not like amputating full breast, genitalia, and the surgical construction of male and female genitalia. A new vagina includes daily dilation for up to a year because the body is trying to heal, what it sees as a wound.
For me, the discomfort lasted about a week, that I remember and then it was forgotten until people, like yourself, started to tell me that I was mutilated. To me, it wasn't even a scar. I just don't get it, at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reptard6833
The Mensheviks and Bolsheviks were rival Marxists groups in the Soviet Union. They were both communists but still had philosophical differences.
Socialism definition:
"a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."
Fascism allows for private ownership but the owners are under control of the Party. The Party is, who they call the people. Any citizen can join the Party and you can work your way up, even to become supreme leader. In fact, China is now the closest country to a Fascist country there is. An authoritarian government, with privately owned businesses, under the control of their government. Their companies act as arms of the state just like the companies of Nazi Germany did. Germany abolished unions. They were redundant once Party members took the place of union stewards. They'd hold regular meetings with ALL levels of management in attendance, ensuring full loyalty to the Party, even owners and management. Not much different than China. Just look at how Huawei and other companies have been involved in industrial and political espionage. It's a BRAND of socialism, a step down from communism. Mussolini started out as a Marxist and reshaped his thinking into Fascism after he became disillusioned with the ineptness of his fellow Marxists. It's nothing like right wing American thinking or Conservatives. They believe in the Constitution, individual freedom and that all men are created equal and little to no interference in the affairs of private business. Any company tries to follow those principles in China or in Nazi Germany would see it's owners and management system replaced and likely arrested.
Also, I came to this conclusion on my own, after reading extensively on Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. The similarities were striking other than the way they treated private property. When China started to relax their rules on private property, they slowly morphed into a Fascist state, akin to Nazi Germany. A nationalist state that's trying to dominate the world economically and politically. They couldn't be more alike had China used Nazi Germany as a blueprint to economic power. The only difference is that China doesn't emphasise, as a propaganda tool, the glory of the state like Germany did. It's still there but not as overt.
Next time try discussing this topic, instead of reacting in anger and with insults. It makes it seem as if you have an agenda and that you hate to have your agenda challenged, sort of like a religious fanatic.
1
-
@reptard6833
If the American right, represented by the Republican Party, is so similar to Fascists, why do they support limited government, less government control over the lives of the people and a free, market drive economy? Also, why aren't the Republicans sending Party members to our places of businesses to ensure loyalty to the state and maintain the purity of Party values in our corporations and businesses? That's what Fascists did.
Why is there no call to control education. In fact, the right wing Republicans support school vouchers, separate schools and homeschooling. Fascists took over the schools and amalgamated youth groups into Party machines like Hitler youth. In fact, it's the American left that doesn't like school independence and supports the idea that ALL schools be government controlled with no choice for parents or students.
Also you've not mentioned one word on how the definition of socialism doesn't line up with the way the Fascists controlled the economy. Instead you advance the horseshoe model of political systems but you ignore my example how China has changed from a Marxist state into a Fascist state without going through the full Capitalist economy of the west industrialised nations. It seemed to have skipped right over it.
Most of your argument isn't built on the discussion of ideas but on mockery and put downs. This idea isn't new and even if it wasn't that doesn't devalue the efficacy of the idea. Ideas are to be discussed, not sneered at. The search for truth isn't about finding a consensus but an examination of ideas and thoughts through the lens of facts and perspectives. Mussolini must a Marxist, whose ideas devolved into Fascism. The Chinese Marxist government has changed it's ideas to devolve into a Fascist type state. I don't see the horseshoe model here. I see a straight line evolution. Maybe I'm wrong but I'd prefer to be shown how that's wrong instead of your mocking tone. I learn through discussion. All mocking accomplishes is resentment.
1
-
1
-
@reptard6833
Morality is everything to those who are religious. They believe that abortion is wrong and they're afraid that a teacher, an extremely powerful influence on children, would use that influence to teach their children that abortion is an acceptable solution to a problem that, quite often, occurs when who is engaging in another, to them, immoral and irresponsible act of sex before marriage. It's a matter of perspective to them. It matters, to them, if it is taught in a manner of acceptance or whether or a manner of choice and responsibility to their faith, their partner, the child that is an inevitable outcome. It matters to them because they don't want that person of influence to be the arbiter of how the morality of sexual behaviour is taught to their children. They don't like the idea that the state is a "co-parent" to their children. Faceless state reps, labeled as teachers, who come into the children's lives for a semester or 2 and disappear from their lives, forever.
The claim that you've sat on education boards in no more than an appeal to authority, which is a logical fallacy. It means nothing.
If you can't see how sexual behaviour and morality is intricately woven, to people of religious faith, then you don't understand religion, AT ALL.....and it's not just Christianity, either. Muslims are even more concerned with the morality of sexual practices than Christians and Hindus have their own traditions regarding sex and the marriage bond. They don't want it reduced to a "one size fits all" type of ideology. To then sex and the family bond is the cornerstone of society and teaching it as a generic practise is not only wrong but damaging to the young.
I'm saying this as an atheist. I'm saying this as one who believes that parents are the most important factors in a child's life and that the most important ideas of the family should be taught by the family. It's the diversity of thought and lifestyle that parents possess and they believe should be taught to their children....not in school but in the home.
That's the morality of sexual behaviour they believe in and they don't want strangers influencing the morality of sex to their children.
1
-
@reptard6833
Just because abortion is legal, that doesn't mean it's moral or right. I don't need the government to tell me what I should believe or think. Remember, slavery was once legal, too. Legal does NOT mean moral.
Also, it's not that some conservatives don't want their children to know about sex before marriage. It's the context in how sex is portrayed. They don't want 8 year olds to be influenced to view sex as recreational, that it has no consequences and there is no responsibility to your sexual partner or to any consequences that may result from unconsidered sexual behaviour.
Another fallacy is that just because one believes a practise is wrong, that doesn't automatically imply hatred of the person who commits that practise. Which is something else that is a popular belief in popular culture and encouraged in schools. Conservative beliefs are so vilified in the education system that students feel quite comfortable suppressing any ideas expressed that don't line up with their own and will even resort to violence to shut down any ideas that they don't like, behaviour fully supported by the school, itself. Evergreen College is the most egregious example of this type of indoctrination but not nearly the only one.
Also, you're ascribing the behaviour of some conservative types to the ALL conservatives. No nuance, no diversity of thought, all EXACTLY the same. That's the major objection of conservatives. The Westboro Baptist Church is considered a whacked fringe group by almost ALL conservatives, even those that are religious and disapprove of premarital sex, including that of homosexuals. And Chick-fil-A wasn't donating to anti-gay organisations. They were donating to groups that thought that they could change gays into straight people if that's what an individual wanted for their life. A naive idea but not necessarily hateful. In fact, Chick-fil-A has gay employees and has never discriminated against any gay customers. A trans person can go, any time they want, and buy a chicken sandwich.
I'll tell you what's really strange. It's strange that when the conservative is Christian, there is all kinds of vitriol thrown at him but when that person is Muslim and espouses the same ideas, the left make excuses for them. Which brings me to another point. No school should EVER, as an official stance, support left or right causes or ideals. They are there to teach the young how to read, write, understand mathematics and the facts of history, science and the world. If they teach evolution of the species, they should NEVER tell the children that the religious beliefs of their parents is wrong whether they're Christian, Muslim or whatever, although many teachers would never dare to say that to a Muslim child due to the prevalence of identity politics in the education system. That's another ideology that shouldn't be taught in school. Beliefs systems are personal and shouldn't be supported or discouraged by the state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@christopherparks4342
Right after Shoken was fired, Zlochevsky felt that it was now safe to go back to Ukraine. Then he got himself into trouble over a phone call and new investigations started over wrong doing when he was the Minister of Ecology.
Besides, Zlochevsky's corruption was an internal affair. Biden's action wasn't. It involved American taxpayer money. It may well be on the up and up but if it wasn't, it's rather difficult to investigate Biden, when the centre of that corruption took place in Ukraine. This prosecutor, Shokin, was he really that much a kingpin of corruption that it warranted withholding 1 billion dollars in aid? That seems rather excessive. Why wouldn't Biden insist that the Ukraine president, Poroshenko, resign as well? He was known to be corrupt.
Biden might be completely innocent but it does look bad and it would have been prudent for the American president to insist that Biden recluse himself from doing representing the US in a country where his son worked for a man who was known to be corrupt. I'd think that it would nice to know if this was dirty or not. This hasn't anything to do with party politics. This has to do with being transparent and apparently, asking that the facts of the case be uncovered is a terrible thing.
If Biden is found innocent of wrong doing, it doesn't help Trump one bit. If he's found guilty of using American taxpayer money to help his son, it doesn't just help Trump, it helps EVERY American. It's good for the country to root out ALL corruption, not just the corruption of people we don't like.
1
-
Next week, it will have been 47 years since I married, what I thought, was a wonderful woman. After years of being fooled by her nice sounding words, her pretty face, the hollow sounds of endearments, I finally realised that she wasn't what she claimed to be. I could have kept my head in the sand, not acknowledged my mistake but I chose to wake up.....FINALLY.
Now, I'm not happy about the way that a lot of those people voted but I'm not going to rag on them for finally waking up. We need their help to get rid of these establishment despots. We'll have to keep an eye on them, to make sure that they're sincere about their intentions, but for now, we've no choice but to enlist them in our fight against the autocratic establishment. The more that join the fight, the greater our chances of beating them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andreperry7995
We can't change the past, whatever it was. We can't change the future either. We can only change the present. In changing the reality of now, we can, hopefully change our future for the better.
It's like being married to an unfaithful wife. It's traumatic, painful and you lose a large piece of yourself. You can withdraw, refuse any more interactions that would lead you back to a married relationship or you can try again, learning from the first interaction and avoiding the pitfalls that brought you to today.
You're using the past to avoid changing the present. To you, it sounds as if you believe that since the past happened, change is impossible and avoiding pitfalls, even those that aren't your fault, can't be done.
Like I said, if you don't run, you'll never find success in a race. Just because you lost the last race because someone tripped you, you don't quit racing. You run again, aware of the fact that the unfair does happen, and avoiding the unfair as much as possible.
The past is irrelevant because it's out of your control. Don't use it to hobble the now and, by proxy, your future. It can only bring more of the past and you certainly don't want that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fascist dictators take complete control by taking advantage of civil unrest. The Fascist will claim that he must stop the violence and then call his version of Marshall Law. He will then send in troops to quell the protests and claim that he must extend Marshall Law because the enemies are still waiting for any show of weakness.
That's what happened in 2020. The Fascist in power, seeing ALL the riots, over 100 of them across the country, sent in the troops to stop the killing, burning, looting and destruction and then he.......WAIT A MINUTE!!!! Our Fascist didn't do any such thing. He allowed each state to decide how they would handle it, as dictated by the Constitution. He offered to help in Chicago, but the mayor, quite rudely turned him down. So, he shrugged his shoulders and said "Okay. Don't say I didn't offer." or something to that effect.
Trump had the perfect scenario to take over as dictator, just as Hitler did, and didn't do it. Hitler didn't waste that opportunity. He took full of advantage of it. It seems Trump isn't the Hitler that the Dems claim that he is. The Democrats are full of the bovine fertiliser that spread on every farmer's field and there are people eating it up. SMH.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PeacockPoverty
As a person I find Trump a very unlikable guy. However, that's not the point, at all. If fences or barriers have been an integral part of border security, then an even better barrier should be more effective. He made a promise of building an effective wall between the two countries that would stem the number of future illegal immigrants. He's doing everything he can to keep that promise and he's being opposed, tooth and nail, by the Democrats, not because it's a bad idea, but because they don't like the idea of him keeping a big election promise.
Also, the idea that he was going to get the Mexicans to pay for that wall was just election rhetoric and no one took him seriously...at least non of his supporters did. They knew it was just tongue in cheek election banter of a windbag. It's like promising my wife a new car and saying that YOU, PeacockPoverty, was going to pay for it. She'd know that it was nonsense but she'd still expect that car.
The point is this. Would an 15 foot high wall be more effective than the fence that is in place now? Having grown up on a farm and climbed over fences most of my life, I know for a fact that it is. Not even a maybe about it.
The only problem that the Democrats have with it is that it's Trump's election promise. Nothing else. It's why they call the wall immoral, even though they supported a barrier 5 years ago. It's why Pelosi wouldn't meet with the "Angel Moms". That would be an admission that there were criminal elements crossing the wall, as well. It's why Democrats are tacitly supporting sanctuary cities, something that the Obama government would NEVER have accepted 5 years ago. It's all about derailing Trump. It's never been about what's right or effective. They're determined that Trump cannot succeed in the one thing that is obviously concrete and real. His other programs, like the initiative to set up opportunity zones or to help women succeed in business in 3rd world countries are abstract and can be ignored. A wall can be pointed at and its existence could not be denied. That's why they oppose it. A concrete reminder that Trump came good on a promise cannot be allowed....EVER.
1
-
@PeacockPoverty
Trump has already allowed that there are areas which won't need the fence due to natural barriers. He's not even trying for a complete wall from sea to sea.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/13/mexico-border-wall-trump-plan-wont-need-full-border
Hurd is the only Republican, on the border, that has opposed a cross country wall and Trump has already agreed that it's impractical to do it. However, Hurd is still strong on border security but some of the land owners don't want their land appropriated to build a wall and he supports that. However, if a lot of his district is impassable due to terrain, it would also appear that these landowners don't have the hundreds of migrants crossing their land all the time. The natural barrier is stopping them so their argument makes sense, especially since they're the ones that would give up the land to put the unnecessary part of the wall up.
Also, Ted Cruz does support the wall. He said so many times in this interview on Fox.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOEQjQMyOBA
Build that wall. He said it more than once.
Trump has agreed to a limited wall, wants other security measures, more border patrol agents and more judges to process those that seek asylum. Everything that you've just wrote in your comment....yet you still oppose it. Saying that they oppose the wall because they don't like Trump isn't ridiculous spin, either. I know that for the simple reason that the MAGA hats, the ones carrying the Trump election slogan, will set people off in a rage. A bunch of Catholic kids wearing them, invoked the rage of a bunch of Black Israelites and then the nation and that story was spun viciously out of control. Why? It's those hats and their link to Trump. People have even admitted it to be true. When Whoopi Goldberg asked why they would fall prey to these types of stories, Joy Behar replied "because we're so desperate to get rid of Trump".....and she's right. The Democrats, especially the MSM, has been spinning so many stories in an effort to denigrate Trump, that some people aren't trusting them anymore and their ratings have been falling.
Democrat opposition to Trump has become a series of knee jerk reactions. I don't see why the wall issue would be any different.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PeacockPoverty
You've just proved my point again.
How is a fence, designed to keep out "brown people" not racist, but a wall, designed to keep out "brown people" is racist? How is a border agent, who's job it is to keep out "brown people" not racist but a wall, designed to do the same thing, is racist? What is the distinguishing factor here? Answer that question without once bringing up Trump's name or any allusion to his existence. Try that for once.
As for that assertion that the KKK is now cool again, even the SPLC says that it has been in a steady decline.
Richard Spencer is hardly to be found on a google search except for year old news and for the fact that he's now in trouble for domestic abuse. Spencer first supported Trump but once again, the SPLC and said that his white nationalist movement is dissatisfied with Trump's presidency. He no longer supports Trump because he's decided that Trump doesn't follow his white supremacy ideals at all.
As for your claim about the horror Trump has wreaked on "brown" children, the facts show differently. Those famous pictures that showed children sleeping in cages, were taken in 2014, during Obama's administration.
https://qz.com/1291470/photos-immigrant-children-detained-at-the-placement-center-in-2014/
https://www.apnews.com/a98f26f7c9424b44b7fa927ea1acd4d4
Trump was still running a reality TV show back then. In fact, Trump signed an executive order stopping the separation of families last June.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/20/politics/trump-separation-action-immigration/index.html
This is from CNN, a news network that makes no secret of their hatred of Donald Trump. These are facts and easily verifiable.
In fact, your entire tirade really doesn't prove that a wall is racist. Make that argument that the wall is racist without any references to Trump. If a wall is racist, that fact should stand on its own and there should be no need to invoke his name.
To make this argument even more ridiculous, I don't like Trump, either. He's a loud mouthed blowhard, given to bouts of boasting and exaggerations to the point of full out BS. However, that has nothing to do with the wall or the facts. As a matter of fact, I think the distortion of facts around Trump might be a major factor in his being re-elected. The Democrats under estimated him and then alienated the entire centre of the country by calling them deplorables who lived in the "fly over" centre of America. That was a grave mistake and they'd better learn from it or they will lose again.
1
-
@PeacockPoverty
There are only 2 known sightings in the US of jaguars and one was shot last year. Not a big issue as yet. As for the ocelots, that may have an impact although most of the ocelots in Texas are in the Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge on the coast and are too far away to migrate to Mexico. There are other pockets along the border and you're right about those. As for the butterflies, they have a unique capability. They know how to fly. I'm thousands of miles from Mexico and the Monarch is common around here and has to migrate to all the way to Mexico. Apparently they can do it and they have to cross the Mississippi River. It's miles across. A wall would appear to be a puny deterrent to that.
But yes, it would impact some wildlife. How much is hard to say. It's one of those cost benefits analysis that must be made. However, the growth of major cities has had a much greater impact on wildlife that any wall could ever have. Phoenix, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, just to name a few, and all the suburban areas involved have disrupted wildlife habitat exponentially more than a wall would. The diversion of water to California from the Colorado has had a major impact on the environment along that river. Most of the illegal immigrants are going to California, so more water will be needed to supply them. So it takes from one to add to another. Nothing that we do as modern humans doesn't have its cost. Emptying Lake Mead to supply a growing California, partially due to added illegals, is a very high cost as well.
A decent consideration but not a deal breaker. Especially when you include the word "could". "Could" isn't a word used to describe a definitive problem.
1
-
@PeacockPoverty
What a wild-eyed crazed rant that was. You didn't actually read a thing I wrote and neither did you even bother to read the references I gave. You just blathered the same nonsense you did before even though I proved to you that you were wrong. This "fence good" "wall bad" argument is pure nonsense, nothing else. I've given you all kinds of opportunities to offer up a cogent and logical case but all I've seen are head exploding angry rhetoric and repetition.
If you're any indication of what is the best that the Democrats can offer up as a platform, they're screwed. You'll have Trump till 2024.
By the way, I'm not even American. I'm Canadian so Trump is NOT my master. As a matter he's screwed us in the NAFTA deal, although I attribute a good part of the blame to that to Trudeau, the nut who negotiates with a gender's studies adviser. I wanted to see if I could get a reasonable reason why a wall shouldn't be built and all I got was a rant about a wall being a symbol of racism and a lot of nothing. You've done a lot to convince me that us Canadians are going to be stuck negotiating with Trump for the next 6 years instead of 2.
Another thing....my sister was deported from the US and she's a red headed, blue eyed white woman. She jumped the fence into the US because she has a criminal record. You see, the US will not allow the most blond haired, blue eyed, MAGA hat wearing, white Canadian into the US, if they have DUI conviction. That's because it has nothing to do with race....but you're to crazed with anger to be able to digest any information anyway.
Good luck, you lunatic. You're going to need it with Trump as your master for the next 6 years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RichardCranium321
But he DID talk to another doctor and he didn't talk to Joe's doctor. He never said that at all. He talked to another doctor because talking to your doctor is NOT the same as listening to your doctor. Anyone can be hesitant. You're a damn fool if you trust implicitly anything the "expert" says.
I had a friend, who collapsed at home and couldn't get up. His wife rushed him to emergency and the doctors there couldn't find anything wrong even though the guy had no use of his legs. They told him to go home. His wife refused and said she wanted another doctor to see him. A doctor happened to come in, starting his shift, listened to his symptoms and decided that he had Guilain Barre Syndrome and had him taken, immediately, to a facility that could handle his symptoms. He almost died.
Had my friend LISTENED to those doctors, the same type of doctor that told Tim to "sleep it off", he'd be dead, right now. It was due to his wife, refusing to take him home and ANOTHER doctor, that he's still with us today.
Talk to your doctor NOT worship your doctor. Having doubts could save your life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@williamfranz9872
At least the GOP is having these hearings so that WE can know. Just this 5 minute segment was incredibly eye opening.....if people would take the time to listen or watch it. If the people, that's you and me, don't have any interest in taking in this information, nothing CAN be done about it. If the GOP does nothing, WE, the citizens, can threaten to primary them out and put someone in place who will.
The citizens of the United States keep passing the buck for various reasons, laziness, apathy, party and or ideological loyalties. The whole point of the Democratic process is for the citizens to hold our politicians to account. If we don't do our part, corrupt individuals will see an advantage and we will pay for it. Ultimately, we pick our representatives. It's up to us to pick ones that will do their job.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Registered User
I'm completely baffled on why you have to go to a camp to be quarantined when you're ill. Why can't you just quarantine in the comfort of your own home?
Oh, could it be that the government doesn't trust you? That if the government didn't watch over you, day and night, in a facility with locked doors and guards, Australians wouldn't be lost on how to look after themselves? What a wonderful idea. Let's incarcerate people for the crime of getting sick.
You can dress it up with pretty bows and sunshine, but once inside, try to leave without government permission. But, I guess you should be grateful that people, that you don't know, care so deeply about your well being that they'll lock you away from society.....but at least you're safe. "Protect me, oh great leaders. I don't have the brains or dedication to protect myself"
What will be the next reason that you'll need to be "protected". Maybe from "wrongspeak". Can't have people saying things that might upset the good people of Australia. Nothing is sadder than watching people willingly enslave themselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrKGatl
Zlochevsky's corruption went back to 2012, when he was Minister of Ecology. Hunter Biden started at Burisma in 2014, the year Zlochevsky fled the Ukraine and had his money frozen. 2 years later, at the end of 2016, that money was released, after the prosecutor was fired at the urging of Joe Biden and others. Strange and inconvenient that suddenly, everything was all good after this prosecutor was gone and that now, with a new president, who has declared a war on Ukraine corruption, Zlochevsky is once again, out of the country facing the same allegations he was cleared of 2 years prior.
Is Hunter Biden or his father guilty of anything? I don't know but I do know that this doesn't exactly appear to be clean, either. As it stands, the Ukraine has it's aid, and has had it for months, and there is no information from the Ukraine on Hunter corruption of lack of it. Nothing. So they got their aid and did nothing to get it.
All of this information is easy to find but it takes time and you have to sift through a lot of contradictory statements. You have to weigh it up and then check on the veracity of each claim. One thing is indisputable. Joe Biden did brag about getting that prosecutor fired. It's on video and is easily accessed here on YouTube if one wants to see it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@myronschabe
If he supports a party that wants to control our language, wants to suppress "misinformation", calls people who disagree with them "Fascists", racists, misogynists, homophobe....etc, in order to smear them, he's an authoritarian. When he holds up his intellectual prowess as evidence of a higher understanding that should carry more weight than that of a plumber, he's an authoritarian. He may say it in "nuanced" ways but, in the end, he's no different than the party that he supports. They're elitist snobs who think that they know better than the average Joe or Jill, who work serving tables, swinging hammers or other menial jobs. They think they're better because they have "careers" and can't figure out why people would shingle roofs when we should all aspire to be like him. That's why the Democrats lost and he doesn't get it because we should all think like him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sarahxyz2274
She parrots the old left wing trope that black Americans can't succeed without the help of white America. That Rep. Donald is nothing but a "token" black man and refuses to see him for the individual that he is. Why would she, a black woman, do that? Is to defend the idea that maybe SHE is the token black media personality? After all, MSNBC had to fill their diversity quota, the very thing that they espouse continuously. A $21,000,000 net worth might be incentive enough to accept being that token black AND woman employee. The network HAD to hire her to show just how inclusive that they are.
For the racially motivated, there's nothing more infuriating than a black man or woman making it on their own abilities and the merits of their ideas. They NEED America to be racist and they'll smear anyone, like Rep. Donald, Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder or Candace Owens who don't fit into their concept of a black American.....what we call a stereotype. If these black individuals can do it on their own, it negates that stereotype and they can't have that. The irony is, that means that Joy Reid can't do it either, according to their own racialized ideology. That, to me, is "the soft bigotry of low expectations". They'll just give it to them whether they've earned it, through ability, or not. How condescending.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nickgarris2971
And yet, we just saw a news story, covered by an ABC news outlet, that shows kids walking out of class because they're sick of being bullied by these furries. Not FOX but ABC. Are they lying, too? What about those kids? All liars?
I was disbelieving, at first. Recently, I was talking to a woman who told me that her daughter, who was in high school, was complaining about the same thing. I expressed doubt but I wasn't going to call her, or her daughter, a pair of liars either. That's never my default. I remember Bill Maher laughing at and mocking Dennis Prager when he said that they were putting feminine products in men's washrooms. Turns out that was true, as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kingkee1880
This is not even the first time that this has happened. There are numerous cases of schools transitioning kids without telling their parents and keeping it secret from them. That's why people have been calling these teachers and administrators "groomers". Just read the comments. Others have stated that this has happened to kids that they know of or to kids in their family.
Also, kids as they reach puberty, are prone to keeping things from their parents. They like to experiment, start smoking, doing drugs, having sex, sneaking out at night, all kinds of things. It's quite common with kids of that age. Unscrupulous adults take advantage of kids like that, especially those with emotional problems and it would appear that's what happened to this kid. Those teachers played at doctor, something that their not qualified to do and is likely illegal, to appease their own egos and ideologies. It's too late to ask how it happened in this case. It happened and what to do about it is the problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
getawaycar
It's because those who want to tear down the statues are also the ones that want to educate you. They want the ONLY source of information to be the state run educational system. No questions because you've been educated and that statue might cause a question that they don't want you to ask.
What do you think re-education camps are? They're camps to send those who have the audacity to question what they were taught the first time around. It's a do over, a try again. We're seeing them now, in a limited way, in our human resources departments where they're teaching you the dogmas of "inclusivity" and "equity". It's to make sure everyone gets that message and is programmed to believe it without question. If you question it after their "seminars" you're fired.
No individualism. No thoughts of your own. It's the beginning of the Orwellian society. If you didn't see it before, here's that warning again.
'Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.' George Orwell
You might as well read this, as well, from 1984.
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered…History has stopped. Nothing exists except the endless present in which the party is always right”
If you don't see this as the path to become a mindless drone, there's nothing I can say. It's the path to a dystopian future where destruction is seen road to enlightenment and we're all worker bees, obedient to the state, where revolutionaries like Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln are reviled. It's imperative that they are because we can't have revolutionaries or anyone who would believe in the rights of man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@solveigvan808
In 2015, if I'd have told you that, by 2022, there would be members of Congress who were going to claim that men could get pregnant, you'd have told me that I'm nuts. That our president would even name a trans person to his cabinet. That men would claim to be women and insist on going to women's prisons and be allowed into women's sports. That's how quickly this nonsense took over. There was no such thing as affirmative gender care back then. We didn't even know that these TikTok teachers existed.
Remember, this started for Chloe in 2017. Her parents didn't know any of this and the most trusted people in society, our doctors, were telling them that this was SO serious that if the medical establishment did nothing, Chloe would die. They're just ordinary people....probably not even that bright. They believed those doctors....actually BELIEVED them. If a doctor tells you that you have cancer and that you need surgery, you believe them. We ALL know people that have died of cancer so we know how dangerous cancer can be. These doctors told them that their little girl was going to die because of this condition that was "rare" and it was back then. That terrified her parents. Her parents weren't going to ask YOU, some random guy on the internet, what YOU thought. They had nowhere to turn.
The doctors lied to them and they believed them. For that alone, those doctors should pay. They took a confused little girl, convinced her parents that their little girl was going to commit suicide and it would be THEIR fault and then made a fortune off it.
Remember, even though it's foolish for people to fall for the Nigerian Prince scam, that doesn't absolve those crook of their guilt. If her parents can show that they didn't know or understand what was happening and that this wasn't something that they wanted or pushed for, then they were being foolish and didn't act out of malice. Foolish mistakes shouldn't be punished through the courts. Malicious intent however, should be and this was as malicious as it comes by the medical establishment. They made money off of it and lots of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A married couple, in our village about 25 years ago, was showing nudie magazines to grade 6 and 7 kids in their homes. Apparently, they never touched any of the kids, just showed them the mags and asked the kids what they thought about them. People, in our village, were outraged and ran that couple out of town. They were a straight couple, had kids of their own, and they were doing this. I've hated straights ever since. Apparently, our whole village feels the same.
That's the left wing logic. One criticism of the LGBTQ++++ community, like don't show dirty pictures to minors, and that proves that you're a hater, a bigot and a fascist. It's gaslighting 101.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@edwardamos6462
Your experiences have nothing to do with this. I'm talking about evidence that has been brought out in his trial and the police body cam videos. If a person says that he can't breathe while he's lying on his back, in the car, kicking and screaming, and there's no one around him, you tend to think that he's making it up. If he's repeated the same thing, LONG before he's on the ground but standing up and the police are just talking to him, you wonder what he's talking about. He said it 6 or 7 times, maybe even more, before he was on the ground. What made those claims more urgent when he WAS on the ground, the place that he asked to be?
You're not addressing any of those facts.
And if you think anecdotal evidence carries water, here's one for YOU. I worked with a guy who was constantly complaining how he couldn't breathe, every time it got a little hot out. That was 20 years ago. He's still alive.
People say all kinds of things to jerk police officers around. He didn't die in ALL the time he was standing up. In fact, he became extremely violent. The only reason that he could have difficulty breathing, when he was still standing, is that the Fentanyl was starting to impair his breathing and he was already starting to die of a drug overdose. Hypoxia is the primary danger of Fentanyl misuse. The autopsy report says he died of hypoxia. They're police officers, not doctors or even paramedics. They're not as liable to recognise the signs.
By the way, they did call for Emergency Services. I'm thinking they did it just to cover all the bases.
One of the most ridiculous ideas is that Chauvin, intentionally murdered Floyd, in broad daylight, in front of an openly hostile crowd, who were videotaping him. Who would be that stupid. It's like leaving your name and address at a bank robbery. It makes no sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kenbeasy
Desantis didn't put Covid patients into nursing homes, at all and under NO circumstances. That lessened the chances of the disease spreading into nursing homes, considerably. It's because he, and his team, looked at the data and the science, on their own, and targeted the most vulnerable as the focus of their protection policies. That's why Florida has done so much better than New York. One went at it with a plan, in a pragmatic manner and the other just reacted in a knee jerk manner without a plan. You can figure out for yourself which was which.
I'll give you a hint, though. There's a reason why New York put Covid patients in nursing homes, why they claimed they needed 40 thousand ventilators, when they didn't need near that many, why they couldn't find the ventilators that they had until, it was pointed out, by FEMA, that they were stored, in New York state leased warehouses, in New Jersey. Are you getting the hint, yet?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@okay5938
If there is CLEAR evidence, then why isn't Pelosi pushing to impeach? In fact, she's doing the opposite.
There was no obstruction. Neither Mueller, or his team, were ever held up due the actions of the president. The investigations were never stopped, ONCE, because Trump intervened and stopped it. Trump was upset because he felt he was being unfairly targeted and that Mueller and his team were biased against him, but who wouldn't be. He even told some of staff that he wanted Mueller fired, but there was never any attempt to fire the guy or any of his staff. It was inner circle talk. The closest you can get to a legit charge is conspiracy to commit obstruction. That's extremely difficult to prove, especially, especially when there was no action taken.
I'm afraid there is no basis to impeach on obstruction. This is just wishful thinking on the part of those who hate Trump. It was their backup accusation, just in case they couldn't prove collusion.
1
-
@okay5938
They called that interference of the Russians, collusion, because they wanted to show that Trump had a part in it. That's what everyone called it, repeatedly and incessantly. Let's get over the semantics of it, shall we?
Mueller mandate was to find if there was any interference by the Russians. What it found was that there was no evidence to link Trump or his team with that interference and that there was no collusion. The media treated the interference as a forgone conclusion. It was the media (CNN, MSNBC, WaPo and the rest) that wanted it about collusion and a lot of the Democrats hooked their wagon to their claims of collusion. They were all sure that when the report was finished that if would prove that Trump actively helped the Russians to interfere in his favour. It wasn't till Mueller said "NO collusion" that the obstruction stuff started.
Russian interference in the US election does not make Trump guilty of any crime, even if he benefits from that interference. It begins to be a crime, for Trump, if he "colluded" with the Russians to interfere in the elections to his own benefit. Trump is only guilty if he actively sought their help and there is NO evidence that he did.
Trump firing Comey isn't obstruction. Whether Comey was fired or not, he was still obligated, by law, to testify before the Mueller team. In fact, firing Comey would hurt Trump as it would have had the effect of turning Comey against Trump more than he already was against him. Firing Comey did nothing to stop his from testifying. Nothing at all. I can't for the life of me see how firing Comey would stop him from testifying. It's illogical. I don't see how firing Comey would stop him from telling the truth.
Since that's all you have, that's all I can comment on. You've not convinced me of a thing.
1
-
@okay5938
Sorry, I meant to get back to you sooner but I've had some health issues and was kind of laid up and busy with doctor's. Things are better now and I've a little more time.
Comey didn't testify. However, he was the prime investigator into the Clinton e-mail scandal and he decided that there wasn't enough to build a case against her. Then, just before the election, new material was revealed and he re-opened the e-mail case. That upset a lot of Democrats, who felt that this strongly affected the outcome of that election. When Trump was calling for Russia to "find Hillary's e-mails", that's what he was referring to. He was talking about sensitive security material on Hillary's private computer that could easily have been hacked into by anyone, including Russia. In effect, he was asking Russia to admit that they had illegally accessed Hillary's private account and spied on sensitive security material. I don't see how that is obstruction. That's what the entire Comey investigation was about.
However, it was found that Comey had drafted a letter of exoneration long before the that investigation was over. Republicans were now upset. How can anyone draft such a letter before an investigation was complete? This was a major reason why Trump fired Comey. He felt that Comey had a greater interest in his personal politics than doing what was good for the country. If any president feels that way about the head of such an important group, he should fire that person. That had nothing to do with the Mueller investigation which was inevitable, since there was a great interest in the leadership of the FBI to investigate alleged Russian interference.
Interference, by a foreign power of agency in an American election, is illegal. Anyone that is involved in that interference is guilty of a crime. Adam Schiff said, repeatedly, that he had definitive proof that Trump aided and likely influenced Russian interference. That would have been an illegal act as helping a foreign power try to rig an election is illegal. That is what Schiff and others called collusion. The Russians tried to influence the election and Schiff and others were claiming they did so on an agreement they made with Trump. They called that agreement "collusion". They also claimed that this agreement, called collusion, was illegal and it became a major focus of the Mueller investigation. That investigation found no Trump involvement but it did point at Russian agents who are now open to charges in the US which they will never have to face, unless they enter the US.
I still don't see any case for obstruction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@M.J.212
I can't enlighten you. That's because if I tell you about the 600, or so dead migrants, found along the border, you'd not believe me. That there's been around 2 million migrant encounters, where they've been caught trying to cross into the United States by border guards, the highest in US history, you'll just say that you don't see it.
Do you know why? You live in Phoenix, 150 miles away from the border. You don't live on the border. It's a 3 hour drive to get to Mexico. You may as well be in Boise, Idaho. Also, by the sarcastic tone of your comment, you don't want to believe it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@The00Dude
Are you serious? Immigration was a mess when Trump started. He made deals with Mexico and other central American nations and illegal immigration was down when Biden took over. He stopped the building of the wall and rescinded the deals that Trump has made.
Also, Trump had to get a budget, secure funds, get proposals and estimates from contractors and then get the infrastructure in place to even BEGIN building. This isn't a "snap of the fingers" project. A lot has to be done even before construction can begin. Hell, it took 12 years, from first design concepts, in 2002,, to completion in 2014, to rebuild the World Trade Centre. You want a wall that's hundreds of miles long, over all kinds of terrain, to be done in less than FOUR years? You really have no concept of the magnitude of such a huge product.
Trump also had to contend with the RINOs, those Republicans, who made up the majority, and hate Trump and were responsible, in part, for Trump's defeat in 2020.
It's actually quite the accomplishment to get that much done, considering all what had to be done and the opposition to the wall....opposition that ended with shutting down the wall completely.
You sound as if you wanted the wall and you're angry at Trump for not finishing it. It's sounds contradictory.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tanindunn8379
There will be over 2 million illegals entering America this year. Had DeSantis sent them back to their original country, although he may not have the ability to do that, you'd not hear a thing about it. However, by sending them to the cities that declared themselves sanctuary cities, everyone is now talking about it and the Democrats, who created the sanctuary city status, are going to have to deal with the consequences of their own actions. Remember, these are cities, that are a long way from the border, and didn't think that it would affect them.
It's the same thing with the homeless crisis. If they started pitching tents on the lawns and sidewalks of the Democrat elites, watch something get done about it. Having an addict do his business in front of his kids is sure to evoke a response from that "enlightened" governor.
It doesn't solve the migrant crisis, but it brings it to the attention of ALL Americans, so the starry eyed liberals can see what happens when they impose their weird policies on the country. When they start to see real world problems with it that affect them, they might do something about it.
I'd say it was a brilliant ploy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@veradark5066
You're putting words in my mouth. Here's one of the things that I said
"I have no problem with someone discussing their ideas but I will not put up with unwarranted rudeness or bullying and I will tell the bully what I think of them. It's gotten me a fat lip,"
First, I said that I have no problem with discussing Ideas. There goes your "flame thrower at libraries" trope. Why would I burn down a library when I have no problems with ideas? It's illogical and you're only saying this to smear me, in hopes to invalidate what I'm saying. Then I said, quite explicitly, that I will TELL, get that TELL, a bully what I think and that has gotten me a fat lip. I'm getting the fat lip because I'm saying words the the bully doesn't like. YOU have it backwards.
I even said that I would take a beating for defending the bullied, a beating from the guy who I told what I think of him for being a bully. If I have to take a beating for telling him to stop bullying those who can't defend themselves, so be it. A bully deserves to be told just what he is. If that bully becomes angry and takes a swing...THAT'S ON HIM, not me.
If more people would stand up to these bullies, their victims wouldn't have to live with the fear that they're being forced to contend with. However, if you turn a blind eye because you're afraid of how them might react, at least you can comfort yourself with the knowledge that the victim of the bully is taking the abuse, NOT you. Your safety comes first....right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cpataxpro
Then why is it that New York, a Democrat stronghold, is the centre of the virus? Why did Mayor De Blasio tell people to go to the Chinese New Year's Parade and well into March tell people it was okay to go on the subway and even recommended events for them to go to? Why did the head of the Dept. of Health in New York support him on TV? Why did Cuomo support that same message? Why did Pelosi rip up the SOTU address, the same address in which Trump talked about the Coronavirus and yet she, no other Democrat, OR the media mention how he was correct about monitoring the virus in that speech? Why did Pelosi tell people to go down to Chinatown, in late February? Why did the Mayor of New Orleans allow the Mardi Gras to continue and allow over a MILLION tourists to visit that city over the festivities? Why did Joe Biden, repeatedly call the travel ban from China, xenophobic and received no backlash from any of the Democrats?
Are you going to tell me that these were the correct actions? OR....are you going to use your vaunted 20/20 hindsight to select ONLY what you want to see and ignore the rest?
You're using politics and the blame game in an attempt to showcase your delusional moral superiority. People, like you, are the most dangerous of all to human freedoms....the ones who lay blame and then use the guilt of blame to suppress and ultimately oppress those they deem their moral inferiors.
1
-
@DdotRay86
The desire for a secure border isn't racist. Right now, we're going through a crisis, that was brought into the country because of a border that wasn't secure to the point of being able to stop the disease from entering. This is only one reason why any sovereign nation has the right to monitor those who would enter their borders. Until Donald Trump became the president, that was the consensus of most American politicians, including Obama. Why wasn't Obama berated as a racist for HIS stance on illegal immigration? Why only Trump and by proxy, Tucker Carlson? Chuck Schumer bragged about the barrier the Obama administration erected to halt the illegal crossing of the border, yet called Trump's barrier racist. How anyone can't see the political manipulation and fraud in this is absolutely astounding.
To add, this isn't about Mexicans at all. It's about people, illegally crossing the border and it doesn't matter where it is they come from. The truth is that the largest percentage by far, come illegally from Mexico. That's why the focus on that border. It is also fact, that, by far, the greatest number of LEGAL immigrants, come from Mexico. In fact, of the top ten nations, where legal immigrants originate, not ONE is a predominately white nation. Nations like China, Dominican Republic, the Philippines, Vietnam, South Korea, Honduras are in this group. This isn't about racism. This is about ideology.
Big pictures are made up of little pictures, pixels united to make a whole. Without the pixels, there is no whole. That's why we discuss the issues that Tucker is presenting so that the individual, doesn't get lost, in the big picture, so that you and I and everyone has a say, no matter how trivial it may seem.
All you're doing is getting us lost in the big picture so it's impossible to discuss the specifics of our situation. It's a justification for the egregious behaviour that Tucker was talking about because it hasn't impacted you, as yet, and you can feel the power of moral superiority over others when they make the "small" transgression against the "BIG" picture. It's how tyrants rule the insignificant citizen and you've acquiesced, to the state, your position as an individual of significance to the big picture called the state. That's why you don't want to discuss the issues. You're no longer you. You're the BIG PICTURE.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MrKGatl
A few minutes later, he said that he meant that those who believed in the 2nd Amendment would be voting as a block and would vote for him. He claims that is what he meant. It isn't a clear cut call to assassinate anyone unless one wants to believe that narrative and refuses to believe anything else.
Also, it wasn't a member of the media that was sucker punched. It was a protester. How did the guy know that he was a protester? Because the guy was being, in his words, a "loudmouth". In other words he was disrupting the rally. Trump said, when asked about it, that his people were looking into paying his legal fees. Not a good idea but if I went to Democrat rally wearing a MAGA hat, I'd be attacked.
As a matter of fact, there are incidents of people attacking those in MAGA hats almost every week, not the other way around. Chris Cuomo of CNN has even said that Antifa is fighting the good fight. Anyone that thinks that Antifa doesn't use violent tactics isn't paying attention. That's a clear cut call to violence from a journalist. Also, look at the violent rhetoric directed at the Covington kids, basically for wearing MAGA hats. Lots more violence for the opposition to Trump than the other way around. There was even a well known entertainer that wanted to blow up the White House and another one holding up an effigy Trump's severed head.
Those who live in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones.
1
-
@MrKGatl
The vast majority are from the extreme right. Almost all those who lean conservative don't belong with the White Supremacists or Nazis. They're a very law and order crowd. These extreme right winger are more apt to commit the more violent crimes because they generally support gun ownership more than the left. Therefore the more extreme violence comes from the right. Another thing the left does is that anything that appears to be a little off is called violence. "It's ok to be white" signs are hate crimes. A 12 year old kid draws a swastika, on a school yard with chalk, is also deemed a hate crime. The extreme left sees this as violence, which is ridiculous, especially in the case of the sign. Now, even the OK gesture is a hate crime.....more violence.
Yet it's the left, that commit physical attacks that aren't as deadly. Punching those in MAGA hats. Using pepper and bear spray, disrupting traffic and banging on cars, setting fires, stealing property, blocking entry to right wing speaking events and so on.
It's pointless, however, to turn it into a contest. No matter what extremist is doing the violence, right or left, it should be called out. NO exceptions. We both should be calling out that type of political violence and stop turning it into a game of "who's the worst". Most people are left leaning or right leaning and aren't into the violence. It's the extremists that are the problem and they live on both sides of the political spectrum. Even you believe that when you said "most" violence comes from the right. That implies it comes from the left as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bjjboxing
Life definition: the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.
So a fetus is inorganic? That would be weird. It has the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity and continual change and those qualities can be stopped, implying death. So how does that make a fetus inorganic? As long as an entity has those capacities, it is life and alive, and when those capacities begin, that's when life starts. That's science.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, Tim. It's not about the mob. This is the post-modernist ideology, an offshoot of Marxism, that divides society into identity groups based on victim status. Blacks and natives are low on the victim hierarchy and white males are at the top, the despicable oppressors. These kids represent those oppressors perfectly. They're white, fairly affluent, meaning privileged, Christian and they support the top representative of oppression, Donald Trump. This was their crime and this is why they hate them. Post-modernism sees everything through the lens of victimhood where They, whether they realise it or not, are under the spell of post-modernist ideology and they are compelled to react in this manner.
It doesn't matter what the blacks or those natives said or did, it will never be as bad as the existence of those high school kids. Had one of the black Israelites or natives, punched that kid, started kicking him when he was down and put him in the hospital, they would have been justified. For some, it that kid had died.....good. If you think I'm being hyperbolic, look at the threats. Post-modernism, that branch of Marxism, depends on mob mentality and revolution and that's why your fears of a civil war are justified.
1
-
1
-
@eljisprincess1131
I don't have to wait a week to get back to you. I have a sister who, suddenly, starting saying that those trails were chemtrails a few years ago (new boyfriend influence. Happens all the time with her). I knew that they were contrails but I looked into it anyway. I found nothing that would indicate that someone was spraying us. In fact, it didn't make sense.
This kind of project would be one of the biggest industries in the world. Where are the factories making the millions of tons of spray? I've been online and asked till I was blue in the face. No answer. I asked why we never seen the thousands of tankers heading toward airports. No one seems to know how they get the stuff to the airports.
If this were true, you'd know people that were working on this, somewhere in the supply chain. Hundreds of thousands of people, making spray, sprayers, installing them on planes, maintenance crews would be involved, pilots, ground crews, a chain of command in the government, hundreds of millions, likely billions of dollars allocated, weather specialists, scientists studying the soils and waters, people in agriculture, even hobby gardeners, who get their soil tested would end up with weird samples. Nothing from any of them. Just your assertion that they last and look weird.
Of course they last. They're man made clouds. Clouds last. Hell, we had 3 days of cloud last week. If natural clouds last, so will man made clouds. Also, people, around the world, fly a lot more than in the past, especially over the last 20 years. When I was a kid, it was rare to go to the Caribbean or Europe. Now, everyone goes to the Caribbean every winter. Tourism is HUGE down there, now, growing spectacularly over the last few years.
Speaking of Europe, my dad grew up in war time Holland. Towards the end of the war, Allied planes flew overhead everyday loaded up to bomb German targets. Dad told me that the skies were filled with contrails somedays, not always but sometimes they would cloud the sky with their contrails and they would last for hours. The Dutch loved to see them because it meant that the Germans were getting pounded and that the war would soon be over. However, Allied pilots didn't like them. It made their planes visible. The contrails were like huge fingers in the sky, pointing out the planes to German gunners on the ground.
You see.....I've looked into it. It makes no sense and there's no real evidence of it. None. That they look weird sometimes isn't evidence. It's an observation that begs a question to be answered and the most logical way to get an answer is to find the science behind it.
I could go on but, unless you're interested, it's not going to change things much. People tend to believe what they want to believe and ignore what contradicts it. Not a lot of interest in facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@isoakkfgy4462
You single out FOX? Have you ever listened to the other networks? They make up stuff ALL the time.
Why did the other networks completely ignore the Hunter Biden laptop story before the elections? Why would Big Tech, like Facebook and Twitter censor all references to the NY Post story surrounding that laptop? How is it that they ignored Biden, telling Ukraine that they would NOT get one billion dollars if they didn't fire a certain prosecutor? Why did they make up the entire story about the Covington kids? It took me, an old guy, living in a basement apartment, 15 minutes to find out the truth about that story. Billions of dollars worth of property damage, over 25 people dead and hundreds injured in the BLM riots last summer and all the MSM could say was that they were "mostly peaceful". An 8 year old little black girl was shot by BLM supporters and it was "by the way" story for them. Had that little girl been shot by a Republican, it would have news 24/7 on CNN and MSNBC and you know it. A BLM supporter and crickets.
As for Tucker, he obviously thinks getting vaccinated is a good idea or he wouldn't have done it. However, he has the right, no OBLIGATION, to talk about vaccines from all angles, all the information that is available. If he doesn't, if ANY news outlet doesn't, they're lying by omission.
We, as free citizens, have the right to hear all the news, get all the information available and not just what some bureaucrat or corporate news executive thinks we should be allowed to hear. If they tell us something that's not true, then go after the truth. However, when most of the news outlets only relay partisan news then we'll get pablum, their version of what the truth should be because, in their arrogance, they think that we're not mature or smart enough to handle conflicting news stories.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Aaajjjjjjjjj
You take a hostage and tell those who would stop you that you'll do them harm and you will do it if necessary. Then you treat that hostage with kindness, show vulnerability and that you're not REALLY a bad person. Once you've done that, you show the hostage that you trust them, just a little bit...not fully but just enough to show that you're a good guy. The feigned trust, because you don't really trust the hostage, will bring a feeling of comfort to that prisoner and lo and behold, you don't have to watch that hostage as closely because you've convinced him that you'd never hurt him. That eliminates, or at least mitigates, the damage that this hostage could cause if you treat him badly. You've convinced him that you won't hurt him because basically you're good guy but in reality, you have to carry out your threat when your opponents come after you. You WILL harm them when push comes to shove.
And you don't think that's manipulative. Like I said, you're quite naive.
1
-
1
-
@Aaajjjjjjjjj
So you really think that the Italian boxer hadn't heard of this stuff before? That it hadn't been discussed over the last 7 or 8 years as she was working towards this goal? That she hadn't been told that if she didn't go along with it, she'd be a bigot and a transphobe? That doubting it may cause a person to end herself? That this pressure may even have caused her to believe it?
Then, when she does face it personally, it's on the biggest stage of her life. What does she do? Protest, get blasted on the world media and be kicked out of the Olympics? Or go along with it and hope for the best? So she goes along with it and then finds out the reality. There's no way she can beat this man and it breaks her heart.....but that's not all, now the years of manipulation will have it's effect. She gets called onto the carpet, and the implications are everywhere. She is a bigot and transphobe and she may even believe it because if she strongly believes that it wasn't fair, she wouldn't apologise. Everything has cornered her and she admits she's wrong. She is now an adherent of the ideology.
This is the same type of manipulation that one, who ends up Stockholm Syndrome, has gone through. One is manipulation by a hostage taker. The other is manipulation through social and authoritarian pressure that has been ongoing for a number of years. They both end up in the same place and they've both been changed forever. That's the end result for this boxer. There's no name for it, not like the person suffering from Stockholm Syndrome has their condition named. She's a pariah to this segment of the population, just like the other would be if they betrayed the hostage taker. She's been manipulated for years so when she has to deal with it, she responds in the way her manipulators want.
That's the comparison. That's why they're somewhat similar.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The reason that "Uncle Tom" is a slur is because the Democrats, at the time, didn't want the black slaves to have a hero. They kept it up, after emancipation, once again, to vilify a heroic Black slave, who would rather die than give away the whereabouts of 2 runaway slaves. I, for the LIFE of me, can't see how this makes the term "Uncle Tom" an ethnic slur. He stood up against the villainous slave holder, Simon Legree, and was whipped to death for it. The left and the Democrats don't want a hard working, Black man who would give his life for what he believes in.
Uncle Tom was 10 TIMES the hero that George Floyd was by any metric you want to use. The left doesn't want you to know that. Please, any time you hear that term used, in a derogatory manner, please set the guy straight. The left should not be allowed to get away with that kind of lie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@reaper_exd7498
Unbelievable. I went to the correct video and it's YOU that's misinterpreting what he said.
Tim was reading from an article about the charges against Chauvin in which it said that "holding the knee on the neck is inherently dangerous". He called it fake news, later showing how this was part of police training. He said that he believed that the rioting was successful in instilling that false belief on the average American citizen and then, facetiously congratulated them on the success of that tactic. He was worried, however, that this type of pressure and that the protests, that are happening already, might have an effect on the trial, just like the riots, protests and the media portrayals, last summer, have had an effect on public opinion all along. He called it "scary". He was afraid that they'd bend to the violent pressure of BLM and others.
You can't understand context. That's your problem. You used a left wing media tactic. You pointed out a snippet of the video and declared it to be the meat of the message. That's incredibly misleading.
You'd better watch that video again and listen a little more carefully, this time. He wasn't praising BLM riots. He was afraid that the riots might not allow a fair trail because it may frighten people into submission.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@churly9717
You're still not presenting any proof that he did, in fact, meet with a foreign power, under what circumstances and who that power was.
Also, are you seriously saying that Trump can't meet with a foreign power, this summer, because he's running for president? What does that even mean, anyway. No foreigners at all? I would hope not. Not in the international crisis we're going through, right now.
Once again, if this is illegal, which seems rather iffy, why didn't the Mueller report prove this? It didn't prove a thing and every Democrat knew it. That's why they didn't even attempt to impeach him on that.
Give it up. Most people have gotten over it and realise that there just isn't the evidence to prove it. It's time to get over the rancorous rhetoric and start concentrating on the problem at hand. Start a unification effort with ALL our fellow citizens and start doing the things today and tomorrow that will help to end this threat. Whinging about the past won't solve a thing and most assuredly do nothing but disrupt the efforts that all, Democrats and Republicans, are working hard to win.
1
-
@churly9717
Then it can't be illegal, can it? If it was illegal, the Democrats would have impeached him for it, wouldn't they. If they met, you still have no idea what it is they talked about. It's all speculation.
Also, you haven't even commented on whether Trump is no longer allowed to talk to foreigners because of this election cycle we're in. We know that he has. He's said so on TV, today, yesterday, the day before and the day before that.
Also, you're still bucking the only leader that the country has. Forget it until the crisis is over. Work with him because he's all we got, like it or not. When it's all over, then start the division of the country all over again, from scratch. We're fighting a battle. Let's not fight each other, too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SportySP
Look assess it as if it's just an ordinary person, a layman, asking a doctor and a researcher about something. It's not Trump, it's you, asking about something you don't know about. Then, when you find out that it's might be rather naive, people start hounding you over it, telling you how STUPID you are, how ridiculous, telling you to shut-up, that you're an idiot. Do you agree with them? If you do and they keep it up, do you agree with them again? Will there ever be a point where you start to lose your patience and say something to get them OFF your back about it. A simple question and they just NEVER STOP!!!! Would you take it with a smile and a nod, FOREVER?
People are making it about who asked the question, not the context and content of the exchange.
Also, it's too late to question on who the right person is, right now. Trump is the guy. He's what we have to work with. Instead of battling him, EVERY STEP of the way, maybe the press and the Democrat party would be of more service to the people by helping him, giving suggestions, asking questions that would help the American people. Maybe cooperation and working with him, all of us working together and showing a willingness to compromise would be a better way to handle this crisis than continuous sniping and whining about EVERY word the president says. It solves nothing.
Also, it wasn't a Republican or Trump that forced Covid patients into nursing homes, housing them with healthy and susceptible elderly people. It was the Democratic administrations of New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Michigan that did that. If you want to express outrage, do it over that instead of a STUPID and NAIVE question by a person that admitted that he wasn't a doctor and that he DIDN'T KNOW in the context of that question.
1
-
@SportySP
I never once mentioned Obama. Also, that some people of interpreting information in a rational manner doesn't discount what another person might say. I may not understand my doctor's reasoning, at times, but I'll listen because he's the one talking. If I need help understanding, I'll go to someone that does understand and get all the information possible.
My reason for bringing up those Democrat governors is to show you how people, like you, are obsessing over a simple question, when there have been decisions made that have directly impacted lives. Sick people put into nursing homes with susceptible elderly people is a HUGE issue, yet I've YET to hear the outrage over that from the press or those you're forever going on about a simple question. I said it to make a point.
The point it this. Your outrage is centred around politics, NOT reality. No outrage about the decision to put Covid patients into nursing homes because it was a decision made by Democrat governors. Outrage over a dumb question because it was Trump, who asked the question. Trump, a Republican. It's why the press harangues the president about that and why they're NOT haranguing him about putting an end to putting sick patients in with healthy ones in nursing homes. It makes the Democrats look bad.
It's why you've decided to not talk to me anymore. You don't want the politics of this to be exposed so you'd better get the hell out before it is.
1
-
@SportySP
Now it's Russian bots. An allusion to the claim that has NEVER been proven to denigrate people that disagree with you.
Also, the nursing home fiasco is not a tragedy. This was a decision made by the same people that are telling us to stay home, not go outside, to maintain social distancing, close businesses and schools, even threaten to arrest people that don't follow guidelines, because Covid is extremely contagious and then put sick people in nursing homes where the most vulnerable of our populations are gathered in one place. That's NOT a tragedy. That's either stupidity of the grandest scale, or just plain cold hearted. In fact, Pennsylvania's top health official took her elderly mother out of a nursing home and had her stay somewhere else, where it was safer. That we weren't ready for the disease is one thing and even understandable. It's of a scale that no one alive has ever dealt with. That led to this tragedy that we're facing. Putting sick people in the same place as healthy seniors, knowing how contagious it is and how vulnerable the elderly are, is NOT a tragedy. Had Trump done that, it would be the scandal of this century.
That's not a bot speaking. That's reality and deep down you know it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Catherine Jarman
Stalin was NOT a Jew and a large percentage of those who died by communism came under his watch and his direction. No one controlled him. He controlled everyone in the Soviet Union. In fact, during his campaign against the "rootless Cosmopolitan", many Jews were arrested and killed. It culminated in the Doctor's plot, a group of Jewish doctors, accused of plotting to kill Stalin.
You're turning it into a racial issue when it's ideological. Marx was a Jew but his sidekick, a man almost as influential as Marx, was Friedrich Engels, a German and from a, what was called, Bourgeoisie family, rich industrialists. He was no different than the spoiled university students of today.
Fascism seeks to control all aspects of social and economic life. You either capitulate or you suffer the consequences. It's basically "communism light".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@0rionsaint
Yokols......You nailed the reason that Trump is in the Whitehouse right now. The Democrats have went on and on about the "deplorables" or "yokols" as you would call them. It's that arrogance, that aura of elitism, that turned so many Americans off. Instead of looking inwards, a little self examination, over why they lost, they tried to blame everyone else....the Russians, racists, misogynists, homophobes, anyone but themselves for treating a large segment of America like a bunch of uneducated hillbillies. It's why the Dems lose again in 2020 and¸ unless they change their ways, they will lose again in 2024.
Being the party of "revenge" isn't going to win votes. If they want to win elections, they'll have to deal with the issues that people care about....like jobs, immigration, personal freedoms and opportunity. A platform of "Get Trump" does nothing to help a country and so far, it's hurt the country and hurt it a lot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rich’s Pizza Party
People will always break the rules. What we have to determine is which one will be the best for the country and area that we live in. So far, the Republican states are doing better. California and New York, solidly Democrat, have the highest taxes, most rules, biggest homeless and crime problems, highest energy costs and their populations are going down. States like Florida, Tennessee South Dakota and Texas, Republican run, have the lowest taxes, best economic opportunities and their populations are going up. There's a reason for that.
Only a guy like Newsom would lock everyone in their homes and then claim that they're now freer. That's the true Owellian dystopia. "Slavery is freedom".....right out of his book.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johncooper7663
They're using taxpayer money to feed, house, school, provide medical care and transportation to where they want to go, cell phones, clothing and more, for these illegal immigrants. For MILLIONS of them.....and they keep coming. The cost to the taxpayer is in the billions and you're whining about moving 50 migrants on the taxpayer bill??
Are you seriously trying to tell me that a rich neighbourhood, like Martha's Vineyard, can't find jobs for the 30 to 40 migrants who will need them? A place that has a population of almost 18,000 people, who are some of the richest people in the United States? Hell, my small town of 15,000 lost a factory of 150 employees last year and they weren't booted out of town. The little kids don't need jobs before you try to correct me. These rich snobby elites couldn't help them? They're living in mansions, HUGE mansions and they can't help 50 migrants??? Massachusetts calls itself a sanctuary state. Yeah right. Those snobs didn't think that they were coming to their backyards, did they.
They found almost 60 migrants, DEAD, in a shipping container a while ago. I heard more outrage over moving these migrants to Martha's Vineyard, than about the 60 who died that horrible death. Almost 600 dead already this year along the border. This issue is just a pimple on the much bigger problem that the Biden administration has created and is ignoring.
You seem to have extremely selective outrage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@allo-other
"Islamophobia is worse than misogyny."
You've taken that sentence out of context and claimed that this MY belief. It might seem that way if you only read that ONE sentence but if you read the entire comment, you'll see that this is NOT my belief. I was saying that it's the belief of the silent feminists groups and the reason they're not condemning the rape of those Jewish women. THEY believe in the hierarchy of oppression, NOT me. Because they believe in this hierarchy, that Palestinian oppression is worse than the oppression of women, even when they're being raped, they will overlook when Palestinians are ones doing the raping of Jewish women. THEY believe that. NOT me. If the Israelis made a surprise attack into Gaza and were killing and raping innocent civilians, they'd be outraged because they believe that Jews are the oppressors, the lowest on the oppression scale. Therefore the Jews will always be wrong, no matter what, and the Palestinians will always be right, no matter what they do. I don't believe that. The radical left believe it and those feminist groups say nothing critical about the Palestinian action on Oct 7 because they believe it. Once again, the hierarchy of oppression is the reason why the feminist groups aren't criticising the rapes of Oct 7th.
That's why it's out of context.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@serptimis1552
Thor and Odin weren't men. Jesus was supposed to be born to a human woman. That's the difference. Josephus wrote around 50 years after the death of Jesus. That's less time than the time between now and the death of Hitler. In fact, I've known people that fought or lived through that war, including my father, who's still alive. Josephus would have met people who claimed to have known Jesus as a man.
That doesn't mean that Jesus was a god or performed great miracles. It means that he quite likely lived in the time period and like so many people, even in our own history, had legends develop around him. Just because George Washington never chopped down a cherry tree, that doesn't prove that he wasn't a real person. As for the legends, this was a time in which religion was extremely important. Even today, evangelists like Benny Hinn, claim to perform miracles and tens of thousand of people believe it. Why wouldn't people believe the same thing 2000 years ago.
However, the main difference between Thor and Jesus is that Thor was a god and lived in a godly realm. Jesus was supposed to be a man and he lived in the Levant. That would negate your comparison.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eloiseharbeson2483
Because, in the end, it is up to all of us, all of us taxpayers, to decide through our actions and how we spend our money, that will decide on how serious we are about pollution. If we give the government the power to decide for us, you're not going to like what they decide.
First of all, pressure the government to allow us to get off the grid. Don't force us to go to big energy companies. For example, if I install solar panels or a small windmill, don't force me onto the grid. Give me the freedom to act alone. However, they don't allow that which gives many people the impression that this isn't about climate change at all. It's about power and their control over us, the minions of the state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Trump was only mentioned once but that's not Taibbi's fault, or the fault of Shellenberger or Musk. Those Democrat congressmen had EVERY opportunity to ask about Trump's role but they didn't. Why? If I wanted to get Trump, I'd have went after it. I'm going to suggest that it's because they were afraid any questioning would inevitably lead to the FBI's role in trying to censor speech. Trump's attempts validates the possibility that the FBI could do it as well
That one guy, from Texas, just gave a speech, accusing them of wearing tinfoil hats. He never asked ONE question. Shellenberger even ran for California governor....AS A DEMOCRAT.
Also, the data dump doesn't matter. What matters is the content of the emails, whether they're authentic and if they were followed up on to censor legitimate news stories. THAT'S what's important. Those emails are there for every member of Congress to see but the Democrats spent little time asking about them. Instead they went after and tried to smear Taibbi and Shellenberger, who, up until this time, the Democrats had no issue with. Everything you said is a partisan plea to ignore what might be the worst government attempt at censorship in American history. You might as well tell us that Stalin censorship was a good thing because you don't seem to care whether it happened or not....unless you could prove that Trump was the only one guilty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hughmatthias7279
How do YOU know what Trump is hankering for? Can you see his inner thoughts and ambitions? I can't.
However, one thing I do know is that the one over arching similarity between the Soviets, like Lenin and Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro and the Kim family is their original adherence to Marxism. They all had Marxist roots.
Trump is no Marxist. He cut personal and business taxes which will increase personal autonomy, NOT greater ties to the state. Even through all the violence, Trump has hardly interfered or tried to use this as a method to increase a grip onto power. Do you think Stalin would have allowed this lawlessness in his country? Trump has criticised it but what person, in his right mind, likes to see people being killed? BLM matter leaders aren't pleading for the killings, like that of an 8 year old little black girl in Atlanta, to stop. In fact, it was BLM supporters that shot and killed her while demonstrating their support for their cause....BLM.
It isn't Trump who wants to tear down statues like that of Frederick Douglas in Rochester NY. He wants his statue placed in his proposed "Garden of Heroes" along with other great Black luminaries like Jackie Robinson, Rosa Parks, Susan B, Anthony, Booker T. Washington, Martin Luther King, and Harriet Tubman. BLM aren't the ones wanting to honour these great black Americans....Trump is.
Trump wants to include Harriet Beecher Stowe, the writer of Uncle Tom's Cabin, the book that was the single greatest inspiration to the Abolitionist movement of its time. BLM types use the hero of that book as a racial slur. To them, the fictional hero, that inspired millions, to insist of the abolition of slavery, is one to be mocked and ridiculed. It's beyond ridiculous. It's as Orwellian as it gets. In fact, it's the Marxist inspired despots like Stalin and Mao who did everything possible to erase their own history, not Trump who wants to honour the American past, all of it, the good and the bad, so we know that we're not perfect, that we must struggle to improve the wrongs that lie within all of us.
Did you know that the city of Seattle is forcing its white employees to undergo "White fragility" classes. ONLY whites and they MUST attend. There goes Martin Luther Kings contention about the content of ones character over the colour of your skin as criteria of judgement. Skin colour, in Seattle, is proof of guilt. Skin colour, in this entire movement is the definitive essential quality that separates us. Time to tear down Dr. Kings statue and cancel him out of history as well, it would appear.
You can't even see the bigotry in your own heart because you're too busy looking for it in others. Also, I don't expect any response to any point that I've made...only more generic "Trump bad.....Marxist BLM good."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kooh301
There's a guy, in our small town and I've known for 35 years, who's had rumours surrounding him for the last 10 years or so. No one has called him out on it because we have no proof, no victims. The rumours are that he's going to the Caribbean and maybe even the nearest big city and hiring young prostitutes, and I mean 13 and 14 years old. There's no real evidence that he's doing it...just indications. I'll tell you one thing, though. He leaves a really bad taste in my mouth when I see him and I'm not the only one who says that. Before the rumours started, though, everyone liked him and had nothing bad to say about the guy.
However, I'm not about to call him out over gossip, either. I know another guy who was accused of it and it couldn't have been him and it was proved in court. It was an ex who accused him and even gave a specific time and place. He went through pure hell over it, but the timeline given was impossible and after a couple of weeks the step daughter denied the whole thing. The ex fabricated it all.
That's the problem with rumours.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@halbleavy9900
I just explained it to you. Red lining is when you don't approve loans or insurance to keep certain identity groups, like blacks or Hispanics, out of a neighbourhood. There may other methods to keep these "unwanted" minorities away. A simple Google search will explain it to you. Red lining is against the law, just like affirmative action but it's being done, anyway. It was really prevalent around 40 years ago.
Let's see what the law, the Civil Rights Act says.
"The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Provisions of this civil rights act forbade discrimination on the basis of sex, as well as, race in hiring, promoting, and firing."
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/civil-rights-center/statutes/civil-rights-act-of-1964#:~:text=The%20Civil%20Rights%20Act%20of%201964%20prohibits%20discrimination%20on%20the,hiring%2C%20promoting%2C%20and%20firing.
I don't know how anyone could make it any clearer than that.
1
-
@Censored_Truth_Addict
You left out one key element. At the time he couldn't be deported to El Salvador because an active, rival gang would try to kill him. That gang, Barrio-18, no longer exists in El Salvador. They've all been arrested and jailed in a RICO type program that incarcerates all crime gang members. The element that kept Garcia from being sent to El Salvador no longer exists and negates the ruling.
All SCOTUS did, after he was in El Salvador, is say that the US government must facilitate his return, IF the government of El Salvador releases him. The government of El Salvador has said that they're NOT releasing him. Bukele, the elected president of El Salvador, said exactly that in a press briefing in Washington with Donald Trump. He hasn't released Garcia so the US government can't facilitate his return. Even if he was released, they'd help him return to the US and then the US government would arrest him, tell him that he's being deported BACK to El Salvador because there's an outstanding order of deportation and away he'd go.
In other words, it would all be a giant waste of time and money. He's going back to El Salvador.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jaimhaas5170
I don't have a dog in this fight, either but I know hatred when I see it. There are almost 2 million Muslims living in Israel. I'm not talking about Gaza or the West Bank, but Israel itself. They have full citizenship, can vote, run for office, own property and a business. They are police officers and are in the Israeli military. In fact, a Muslim judge sentenced ex-Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, to 6 years in jail for breach of trust and he went to jail. A Muslim man, one of the Palestinians, did this. It doesn't matter in Israel what religion you follow. Most Jews are secular.
However, in Gaza especially, it's ALL about Islam. Had the Jews, that migrated to this region, been Muslims, we wouldn't be having any issue in the Levant. It's because Hamas is a radical Islamist group, that will brook no other religion to be dominant, that's why there's a war going on. Hamas could have turned their country into a thriving community but they chose to prepare for war and crossed the border and did it.
The Levant has been ruled by outside powers for over 2000 years. In that time, people from all races and religions lived in the region. Now, the Israelis are dominating, another race and religion, but they've been willing to settle on a 2 state solution but it's the Palestinians who've turned it down, at least 5 times. They could have their own country, actually they have in Gaza, but they want it all. By that, I'm claiming Palestinianism, is MORE warlike and exclusive of others than Zionism is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mkbxtr44
In January, Trump organised a preliminary task force to look into the threat of the virus. On January the 31st, he announced travel restrictions from China to take effect on Feb 2nd. On Feb 4th, in the State of the Union address, the very one that Pelosi ripped up, he talked about the virus and how they were closely coordinating with China of the progress of the disease. So he was taking it seriously, already back in January. I can prove everyone of my statements if you wish.
Also, he's NOT my president. I'm not an American. I'm Canadian but politics in the US greatly affects what happens here in Canada, more so than any other country in the world. In fact, I took my cue from the way that Trump was talking but also acting. When the Great Toilet Paper Panic struck, I was ready sitting comfortably on my couch. Too many people were hating on Trump instead of listening carefully and understanding what he was saying and doing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheJeffL
Check this out from The Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture. It talks about "whiteness" and the things that indicate white culture. It's one of the most racist things that I've ever seen.
Beer ads? People were upset because a beer company was using an influencer, whose followers average 16 years old, to sell beer. People to young to drink and they even admitted that they were looking for a future customer base. To make it worse, it was an influencer who was encouraging minors to undergo drug treatment and surgery to validate their transgender existence.....pandering to the big pharma medical industrial complex. Actually aiming at kids. Yeah....normal people find this appalling.
Complaining about the president? You've GOTTA be kidding. I've never heard complaining about the president like I did in my 75 years of life, in the years that Trump was president. It was non-stop on EVERY DAMN NETWORK AND NEWSPAPER. He was Hitler, the anti-Christ, a racist, a crook, was going to start WW3, was a broke billionaire, grabbing women by the hoo-hoo and on and on. He threw fish food in the water.....what a disgrace he was. "Good people on both sides" manipulated and lied about that. He call immigrants "animals" another BS story. It was nuts.
Christmas? Who cares. Boohooing about everything? THAT'S YOU. You're here everyday complaining about EVERYTHING that's being said. How can anyone be so self unaware?
You are what you're accusing others of being. You're on multiple comment threads, always bitching about something and you use multiple names, thinking that no one is catching on. You have to be the worst troll on the internet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jsmcguireIII
First of all, I'm Canadian. Second, this isn't about Trump, as much as some of you want it to be. It's about doing what's best for your country.
My sister was deported from the US, too. Why? Because she was there illegally. It had nothing to do with the colour of her skin. She's as white as white can get, with red hair, blue eyes and couldn't get a tan to save her life.
Another thing that you lefties want to do. Everything is about racism. Well, this has nothing to do with racism. It has to do with sovereignty of their borders and it's the same as any other country. I know WHITE Canadians who cannot go to the US for even a visit because they once had an impaired driving charge. The US doesn't want them and they have that right to make that decision. In fact, there are Latinos who immigrate to the US everyday, legally. They are allowed and those WHITE Canadians can't cross over on a shopping trip.
You like to think that you're so virtuous and wonderful but, in reality, you're a pompous self righteous blowhard, no different than a go gooder Christian.
1
-
@jsmcguireIII
If they're asylum seekers, looking for safety, why didn't they accept the asylum offered by Mexico? From there, they could have applied for legal status as immigrants to the US. It's because they're not looking for safety or asylum. They want to live in the US and there has to be reasons why they can't or won't apply for legal status. If they could, they would.
Instead, they're at the border, throwing rocks and bottles at uniformed officials. If I throw a rock or a bottle at you, you'd call the police. Strangely, these people throw rocks at others just doing their job, and you seem to think this is indicative of the kind of citizen that would be a good American.
They're not looking for asylum. The definition of asylum is this. "the protection granted by a nation to someone who has left their native country as a political refugee." They got that from the Mexican government. It's not what they're looking for. They're not refugees, at all.
1
-
1
-
@jsmcguireIII
That's right. We don't know who they are. Maybe they are crisis actors. You have NO IDEA, either. Strange thing is, no one seems to be concerned enough to find out. That's the main issue here.
You started out saying that they're asylum seekers. When that doesn't seem to be that logical a conclusion, you've constructed a conspiracy theory about FOX news. There's nothing there that gives evidence but the one thing you don't seem to wan to hear is that maybe they are exactly what they appear to be. People, trying to cross into the US, anyway they can. However, whoever they are, they're not getting in without proving who they are and why they'd be good American citizens. So far, they've not done that.
Please, forget about your conspiracy theories unless you can back them up. Another thing, demand that your news sources tell the truth. Not just the ones you don't like, FOX as an example but also the ones you do like, because they haven't been all that forthright either.
1
-
1
-
@jake45790
It can't??? Where were you in the "Summer of Love" back in 2020. Almost 30 people dead, thousands needing medical care, billions of dollars of damage....and the press and the Democrats said nothing except call them "peaceful protests". They said it while buildings were engulfed in flames behind them. Some even said that it was ok because they had fire insurance.
Watch some of the videos of conservative speakers at universities. Activists disrupt the events, pulling fire alarms, spray painting, screaming at those who were attending. Say something that someone might disagree with in class, and you'll face the DEI disciplanarian inquisition team. Read up on Evergreen College and what happened there to Brett Weinstein and his wife.
Don't be naive. The left are tearing apart your Constitution. They're even calling for it, saying that it's outdated. Freedoms and rights are NEVER outdated.
Lastly, Canada has does have a Constitution. It's called the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which explicitly outlines what Canadian citizens rights are, just like the American Constitution. Unfortunately, just like in the US, it's being ignored.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richarddefortune1329
You talk about a good investigator, yet you don't seem to know a thing about the corruption of Zlochensky, Hunter Biden's boss. What if Joe Biden pressured to get rid of a prosecutor to take the heat off of his son? Had Donald Sr. done that for Donald Jr. wouldn't that bother you? Or is this just selective outrage?
If this was indeed a corrupt act, shouldn't it be investigated? I'd think so. I know you'd want it investigated if it was Donald Sr. doing it. I know this because you're insisting on his guilt right now for what is basically the same thing except Trump is wondering why a person could use American taxpayer money to pressure a foreign government that might be an advantage to his own son. This investigation wouldn't just help the American people but also the Ukrainian people, with a new president who ran on an anti-corruption platform.
I would also ask you this. Do you really think that we should be giving aid to a country that we know is the most corrupt country in Europe? You'd think you'd be reluctant to do that. It seems that Trump was. However, the aid was given and if you could show me what the Ukrainians did to get it, that would be evidence to prove quid pro quo. As far as I've seen, the Ukraines did nothing. No investigation into Burisma, no information on Crowdstrike. They just got the aid after the American president was sure that the new Ukraine president was sincere in fighting corruption. That was for is own peace of mind. He never even mentioned it to Zelensky.
They didn't even know that the money was being held back. Ambassador Taylor testified to it. How can you have any bribery when the person being bribed doesn't know he's being bribed. You have to tell your victim.
This isn't about being for or against Trump. It's about facts. If Taylor says Zelensky didn't know and Zelensky and his Minister of Foreign Affairs didn't know, how is there bribery or quid pro quo. That's something that you're ignoring. Also the fact that the head of Burisma, at the time Biden withheld money, had fled to London and had 23,000,000 dollars of assets frozen due to an investigation. Hunter Biden's boss was avoiding prosecutors in the Ukraine and he is to this day.
Once again, this isn't about being a Trump supporter. If you can't show whether Zelensky knew he was being bribed or not, you have no crime.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidkramp1829
I think that you're saying that an adult should have the right to transition to the opposite sex if they want to. However, what if I'm a doctor and I believe that my patient may NOT be transgender but suffering from other mental health issues, like autism or emotional issues stemming from sexual or violent trauma? Should I be FORCED to perform the surgery, anyway, or to even affirm that my patient's ONLY problem is his gender identity and that surgery is the ONLY solution? That's what's happening now. If a doctor or medical professional does NOT affirm a patient's self diagnosis or gender dysphoria, he could lose his medical licence and face other disciplinary measures. How is FORCED diagnosis, from a medical board, who hasn't even SEEN the patient, giving doctors the freedom to practise medicine using science and conscience as their guide?
Sometimes the worst person to give medical freedom to is the patient. That's where a doctor of conscience should be able to say, to his/her patient, that they need deeper psychoanalytical therapy.
Transgenderism is the ONLY medical field in which the patient pronounces their own diagnosis. Every other medical requires the relating of symptoms to the doctor, a barrage of medical tests and professional therapy if required. ONLY transgender medicine allows the patient to be the doctor. If I can't diagnosis myself with a brain tumour and demand surgery, how can I diagnosis myself with gender dysphoria and demand surgery. It doesn't make sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mattjacks0n83
I'm not going to make dumb bets. We have a president, who may be corrupt, who brought executive orders that curtailed oil production so the US is no longer energy independent, who seems powerless to stop increasing inflation rates, affecting gas, food and living expenses, has basically reopened the southern borders, has nominated a "woman" for the Supreme Court who can't even define what a woman is, has increased public debt in ways thought unimaginable 20 years ago, and supports some of the whackiest ideas in American history (a man can have a baby). He can't seem to hold a conversation, forgets what he's talking about and is dismissed by foreign leaders, except Trudeau, who's as weird as it gets. This is our leader and all you can talk about is Trump.
Well, Mr. Rip Van Winkle. While you were sleeping, we've elected a new president.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CCPLord
I'm not blaming the kid for the police actions. I'm blaming her for how she behaved, ON THAT DAY. That's doesn't excuse what the police did.
Once again, I'm talking about MY responsibility if that was MY child. MY child. It is my job to teach her how to behave in these circumstances, to teach her to try to maintain self control, no matter what. That she could have represented herself, as a human being, in a much better way. For you to inject murdered family members....and WORSE, things that didn't happen, is illogical.
I have a responsibility to my child, to ensure her well being, her survival even, by teaching her that she must always try to maintain self control, as much as possible. If she believes that this kind of behaviour is normal, then she'll accept it of others and she'll take up with others who lose control and react in horrific ways, to her detriment and it could be a LOT worse than just a little pepper spray.
It's my responsibility to show her that you cannot control how others act, but you can control how you behave. I can't do that with police officers. I can't go down to the local precinct and start teaching the officers how adults should behave. They're not my responsibility, but MY daughter is.
Get this. If she was MY daughter. Not if that was MY police force. Then I have to deal with their behaviour, but I didn't come from that angle. I've said, right from the start, "If that was my daughter". I have a job, as a parent. Someone has failed her, big time, long before this horrific incident happened.
1
-
1
-
@CCPLord
I'm making assumptions? You're the one that brought up about family being killed and worse. Where did you come up with that stuff? It wasn't mentioned in the video. You pulled it out of your.....hat.
I saw a 9 year old girl, screaming her head off, out of control, in the throes of a temper tantrum. I saw a bunch of police officers unsure on how to handle it and took it way too far. All I'm saying is that a good parent, especially with all that's been going on with the police, would have prepared her for such a scenario. Told her that if a police officer approached her, that the best thing to do is to remain calm and do as they say.
That's all I said. Prepare your child for life. There are bad people out there and some of them may not even be bad but stupidly dangerous. Someone didn't do that. She acted in the worst possible way and the cops acted in the worst possible way out of exasperation. For her own safety and her own well being, she should be taught that. What does it matter to her safety AFTER the fact. She has to be ready to handle it before it happens. She has to be prepared. That's the job of a parent.
You're the one making assumptions. Family getting killed....you MADE that up. When you use a made up narrative, in an argument, you're using more than assumptions. It's getting close to a bald faced lie. I'm astounded that you , as an adult, can't see that, that is, if that's what you are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@skyisreallyhigh3333
When you steal, you're assaulting those who own the items stolen, but also the legitimate customers, who must pay higher prices so they can stay in business. They're assaulting ALL of us.
I've been an employee in a retail situation. That means that I represent the company. As a company rep, I will not allow you to steal from US, the company, as well as from the customers who must now pay higher prices.
Also, the insurance providers will be forced to raise their higher premiums, upping the cost to the retailer, who passes it on to YOU....the customer.
It's as if you know nothing about how an economy works and have no sense of right or wrong...no morality. Either that, or you're one of those who are doing the stealing and don't want the gravy train to stop. Either way, you're a detriment to our society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@katon4525
All I know is that when Trump was president, my investments were doing great, even during Covid. When Biden became president, they floundered.....and I'm FAR from a rich man. Taxes were lower, wages were going up. His border policies were starting to work. No new wars....not a one. The Abraham Accords.....not ONE peace agreement since Biden was president. Energy self sufficiency.
I don't have to believe Trump. I believe the facts. Also, you have to vote for SOMEONE because one or the other WILL become the government. I'll give you another example. Look at the differences in responses to a natural crisis. Florida's response to Hurricane Ian and Hawaii's response to the wildfires in Maui. Florida, a Republican state, handled the crisis smoothly, under the circumstances. Hawaii, a Democrat state, turned their crisis into a debacle. The people of Maui are outraged, taken advantage of by both Democrat politician looters and rich looters. Hawaii was a mess.
I'm not saying that the Republicans are perfect. That's impossible because no one is perfect. However, one CAN be better than the other. You either figure out your priorities and find the candidate, Democrat or Republican, that best aligns with those priorities and vote accordingly. You're NOT going to get exactly what you want but it will get you pointed in the right direction. That's all you can ask for. One thing is certain....the US is a mess right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CJ-wh3zy
Thanks. I don't mind talking to honest people, either even if I don't agree with them.
As for that comment from Gabriel, I've heard it many times, or variations of it from my 2 family members. If someone is sick and we ALL get sick, it's "maybe if you'd not eat meat you'd be healthier' and always said with a haughty sniff. One of them, at a barbecue no less, informed us that we're all disgusting and then got into her car and left, hinting that she just couldn't tolerate our company any longer. "I just can't stand this" were her exact words. When a person's first and only reaction to the health problems of someone else is a backhanded admonishment, I don't think their heart is in the right place.
One can believe as they wish. However, when that belief is used to express their own feelings of moral authority, they're stepping over the bounds of common courtesy into rudeness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@babs_babs
The person that he was talking about was ME, when I was 20. I wasn't going to school. I was hardly working.....partying all the time. I was told to get out and make my own way and it was the best thing that they could have done for me. 4 years later, I was married, had a good job and a baby on the way. A year after that, we bought our first home.
I now have a great relationship with my dad, my mom passed away a few years ago, my daughter and grandchildren. Why? Because I grew up. That stupid adolescent doesn't exist anymore. It was okay to be immature when I was 15 but by the time you're 18, you should be looking at becoming an adult. Go to work, no matter how menial it is. Do the best you can. Build a reputation in your community as hard working, responsible and reliable and you'll work your way out the entry level jobs into work that really contributes to your life, your family and your community and QUIT YOUR BELLYACHING. Be grateful for what you have and don't allow resentment of others fester into a pus filled boil, because you're envious of what they have and you don't.
Grow up. You owe it to yourself, your family, your community and to your parents.
1
-
1
-
The Democrats, in California, want to repeal the State Civil Rights Act. That's the act that mimics the Federal Civil Rights Act that Dr. Martin Luther King worked so hard to bring to the United States.
Why would they do that? Simple. There is no affirmative action in California. They can't because the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination against, or preferential for, any specified demographic. To get around this, the Civil Rights Act must go.
A group of Asian students took Harvard to court, claiming discrimination due to Harvard's affirmative action policies. Massachusetts does not have a State Civil Right's Act which means that the Asian students lost their case. Now they have one option left. They must go to the Supreme Court of the United States and they will win. They'll win because the Civil Right's Act will not allow treatment according to demographic, in this case, Asians.
Where does that leave those who support Affirmative Action? They have to get rid of the Federal Civil Right's Act. Which party supports Affirmative Action? Democrats. It will be Democrats who will repeal the Civil Right's Act, if it ever gets repealed any time soon. First, they will have to find a way to vilify Dr. Martin Luther King. I've been waiting for that to happen for a couple of years, now. Ironic, the only politicians to oppose the Civil Right's Act in 1964 were Democrats. Legal discrimination will be allowed if that Act is repealed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blagdomj
Between Italy and Spain, they have a population total of around 100 million people, compared to the US population of just over 300 million. They also have 189,000 cases to the America's 164,000 cases. The US has THREE TIMES the population than those 2 put together, yet MORE cases. WORSE....they have, between the 2 of them, 18,307 deaths compared to the America's 3,184 deaths, THREE TIMES THAT OF THE US.
I can tell EXACTLY why Italy, Spain and the New York area are the hardest hit by the virus, right now, but YOU don't want to hear it, because you won't like what I'm going to tell you.
1
-
1
-
@deweyseymour4268
Do you know why New York is the epicentre of the virus in the US. It's not because of Trump. It's because De Blasio, the genius mayor of New York and his top health official, said there was nothing to worry about, the day after Trump closed travel to China. They said that Trump was racist and to keep going out and enjoying yourselves and not to forget to go to the Chinese New Years Parade on Feb 9.....and Cuomo backed him, at the time. Even on March 11th, after Trump had assembled his updated version of this task force, De Blasio was STILL telling New Yorkers to go out as normal. He stopped because his staff said they were going to quit if he didn't stop it.
That's why New York is the epicenter. It was their Trump Derangement Syndrome, in high gear, that was the cause and the left leaning New York population.
Maybe Trump sounds like a liar to you but I realised, by listening to Trump, HIMSELF, and NOT the MSM's interpretation of what he's saying, that this was going to be bad. I realised it back in Feb. already not just because of what he was saying, but more by what he was doing. When the toilet paper panic happened, I'd already been ready for a couple of weeks.
People like you don't know how to read or understand people. If it isn't laid out in PLAIN English, and sometimes not even then, you just don't get it. Instead, you just spew anger, hatred and insults due to your lack of comprehension of what is ACTUALLY happening.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chickenlover657
One of the things about socialist thinking is that socialism is an evolving phenomenon based on the idea of the dialectic. Marx's brand of socialism is the product of the socialist ideas that came before him. To be socialist does NOT mean that you're Marxist. Socialism comes in various guises. Mussolini was a socialist but had different socialist ideas than Lenin and Lenin, the Bolshevik, had different ideas than the rival socialist Mensheviks. Today's socialist are different again than Marxists, who emphasised class as the great divider of society. American socialists don't do that due to the fact that socialists 50 to 60 years ago concluded that the western workers were not about to foster revolution because things were going to well for them. So they changed their emphasis to identity, namely race, gender or sexuality. Same claims of oppression and inequality but from a different viewpoint.
"We have nothing to lose but our chains" has been a slogan of the radical socialist for over 150 years among others. Orwell spoke about Party slogans in his writings, especially in his books "Animal Farm" and "1984". That was over 70 years ago. They're still using them. In Lenin's time it was the "class struggle", and "workers taking over the means of production". Now it's "white supremacy", "white fragility", "Diversity, equity and inclusion". Different slogans for different times. Thoughtlessly repeated with no need to think about it. The slogan is the truth, until a "new truth" is revealed. No need to talk further than that. The truth, their truth, is self evident until we need a "new truth".
That's the sloganeering. They didn't have the communication apparatus like we do today so they don't have the number of slogans and catch-phrases that we do now. However, it doesn't negate the mindset of the simplistic summation to be explanation enough for complex socialist ideas. It's enough to repeat the slogan. The rest, to their mind, is just window dressing.
1
-
@chickenlover657
You missed my point. They're all versions of Socialism.
Socialism definition: a political and economic theory of social organisation which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Different individuals have different ideas on how it should be manifested but that definition brings it to its basics. As for the Frankfurt School, I've read Marcuse and I also know that the group are Marxist philosophers, who have advanced Marxist thought into different Critical Theories. I've read some of the material and it's based on Socialist and Marxist ideas but advanced, through the dialectic, so to evolve along with societal conditions.
I'm sure that Peterson is no fan of the Frankfurt School for just that reason. In fact, it's how he came to fame. He fought back against Critical Queer Theory at the University of Toronto, specifically the infamous Bill C-16 which had it's roots in Critical Theory and Identity politics, which both came from the Frankfurt School which grew out of Marxism and Socialist thought. That's when he suggested that one could be prosecuted for misgendering and was told that he was being reactionary and bigoted. Turns out, he was correct. He's dead set against the ideas of those from the Frankfurt School as well as the Postmodernists.
1
-
1
-
@chickenlover657
I never said that Marx was the father of Communism. I said that he was the most influential of all the communists. I even mentioned Hegel as an influence on his thinking. Rousseau was as well and so were the socialists of the French Revolution and they all preceded him.
As for the Frankfurt School, they were also highly influenced by Marx and even called themselves "Marxists". However, it would seem that you don't even get my reference to Hegel of the Hegelian dialectic. Hegel said that society leaps ahead in leaps and bounds and Socialists adopted this idea as a part of the evolution of Socialism, including Marx. It's why Mao called his socialist plan "The Great Leap Forward". It was in homage to Hegel. Hegel and Marx both influenced the Bolsheviks, who supported the Frankfort School, who came up with Critical Theory. These groups and individuals, who were all recognised as great Socialist thinkers, influenced the Postmodernists and they were big influences on the modern progressives, like Ibram X. Kendi, Kimberly Crenshaw, Derek Bell, Robin DiAngelo, Michael Dyson and others. It's all a progression.
I would invite you to read their work and then you'll see how this all ties in together. You are right, though. The Frankfurt School are deeply responsible for the mess we're in now but they're not alone. There are a lot of Socialist thinkers who added to this mix and before we beat this thing, I'm sure there will be a lot more.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Leftism makes you indecent". On the surface, that sounds as hateful as what Biden said in his speech, but you have to look at it a little closer. What makes this statement true is the leftist idea that they are striving for that socialist Utopia on earth. This means that anyone that disagrees with that path to Utopia, is striving to prevent that Utopia, probably for personal gain. In effect, their enemies are willing to destroy the planet, to stop their Utopia from ever coming to fruition. Case in point....climate change and environmental catastrophes. Conservatives have a difficult time falling in line with the view that the socialists have on those subjects.
Conservatives believe, for the most part, that Utopia is unachievable, in this life. "My Kingdom is not of this earth" which describes the religious Utopia, that we know as heaven, will never be a part of human existence as we know it. Instead, being the flawed creatures that we are, we are to find redemption, in order to find achieve that Utopia, in the spiritual realm and after we die. We have to hope, through our faith and how we live, that we can find the grace that gets us to that Utopian perfection after our life is over. That makes it a personal journey which smacks of selfishness and greed to the socialist which, to them, negates their socialist Utopia on earth.
We're both striving for the same thing but the socialists have a deeper commitment to a heaven on earth and any deviation from that goal must be met with force and hostility.
Of course it's a lot more complex than that but that's how I see it, anyway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Asher JM Leask
Yet, it's conservative types that travelled to Baltimore and joined with more conservatives in Baltimore to clean up the city. Democrats, the "liberals" are accusing them of....I'm not really sure of what they're accusing them of.
Al Sharpton he travelled to Baltimore, too. However, that Democrat showed up in a 3 piece suit and complained about those who were out there doing the work. If that man really cared, he'd be in coveralls, wearing work gloves and picking up trash. Not him, though. That mess doesn't concern him in the least. Neither does the crime. Try to stop the crime by policing the area and as soon as the first miss step by a police officer, he'll show up complaining about police brutality and guess what? Individual officers are afraid to engage aggressive black criminals because it could mean their job, their reputation, their future and maybe even their safety.
So the crime goes on. The garbage keeps piling up. Property values keep deteriorating and Sharpton goes back to New York and picks out another fancy 3 piece suit.
Causation does equal correlation if you're the one that causes nothing to be done. The end result will be west end Baltimore. One causes the other.
If you don't do the dishes and the dishes will pile up. (This is a metaphor. If you don't know what metaphor means, google it).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You don't know what it's bad in Italy, Tim? Maybe it's because the mayor of Florence said that travel restrictions to China was racist and said people should hug a Chinese tourist if they saw one to show that they loved Asians. That, in spite of the fact that the first 2 cases were a Chinese couple from Wuhan, China. That was Feb 1st.
At the same time, in New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio and his own staff said that New Yorkers should go out and have a good time and go to the Chinese New Year's Parade on Feb 9th. De Blasio kept that kind of talk up until March 11th, until members of his staff threatened to resign if he didn't stop. I wonder how many infected American tourist came back to New York, in the week before that parade, and attended that parade. If 25 was the number, that would have been enough.
That's why, along with those feminists in Spain, the virus took off in Italy, Spain and the New York area. It doesn't take a genius to figure it out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shannontower2176
It's not just my families life story. It's the story of the entire North American continent. I still see the odd person working and living that way today. They're doing just fine. These are people that look for solutions to their problems, not people to blame. In fact, my brother in law, works a 60 to 70 hour week even though he's done well over the last 25 years. His son is following in his footsteps, doing his own thing, started from scratch and at 31 years old, already owns his own home. So don't tell me about life being so "great" in the fifties. People were a lot poorer than they are now. The big difference is their attitude over the attitudes so prevalent today.
Back then, NO ONE, that I knew, went on vacation in the Caribbean in the winter. Now, it seems as if everyone is going. Waitresses, factory workers, cab drivers, just ordinary people. My dad didn't go on a vacation for 17 years when he was young. That's the way people lived back then.
This "do your research" is one of the cheapest and meaningless comments that people throw around these days. It's dismissive, vague and arrogant, as if the person using that admonition is the only one that could possibly know anything about the subject due to their extensive knowledge and education. Instead of accusing and blaming and making vague remarks, try looking for solutions for yourself. I've heard this all before as a bartender. People whining about how their life sucks and how they have nothing, all the while swilling back up to 30 bucks worth of beer nearly every day. They're clueless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Your Worst Nightmare - Facts
In 1960, I was 9 years old. I WAS one of those hippies. I lived through Vietnam, remember the the repeal of Jim Crow and saw the whites only signs that had yet to be taken down in 1969. So don't give me this superior attitude.
Where did you get the idea that I don't believe that global warming isn't man made? I never said that at all. I said that if you force change without thought, that it could be a disaster worse than what climate change could bring. If you take too much of our resources and the wealth that we've created to transform the world overnight, you might find that we'll end up with nothing.....like Venezuela.
Also, you've not even addressed one point that I've made, including the big one about population growth. It's a fact that affluence has brought birth rates down and that most of the Western countries would be experiencing population declines were it not for immigration. That's a fact. Also, outcomes from global warming are still speculative. Global warming is real but there are other factors in play that may be overlooked or even considered.
You're doom and gloom. I'm saying that if we work hard, make the changes as they make sense and don't force it, we will likely stand the best chance of survival.
Have you ever heard of Thomas Malthus? He predicted over 200 years ago that the population will reach a point that we will not be able to feed the world. Well, that hasn't happened. Yes, there are hungry people in the world, but that's not because of an inability to grow enough food. It's political or more to the point, political strife and corruption. These are always the poor countries where corrupt leaders prevent freedom and the economic growth of the average citizen.
There may yet be solutions to those problems of climate change that haven't even occurred to us, just like solutions were found that Malthus, and those that followed, couldn't imagine.
Besides, no matter how much I worry, those things are going to happen, anyway. My worrying isn't going to change a thing except make MY life pessimistic and miserable. I'm not living the last few years I have left unhappy. That doesn't help anyone one bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Joe Steel
Conservatives do change. However that change is measured and change isn't done just for the sake of change itself. Maintain the systems of the past that have worked well until, as long as the issues are fully understood, ideas show that change would be a good thing. I know conservative minded people who are very religious on the one hand and highly innovative in their businesses or workplace. It's not so much that they refuse to change but they believe that change should be slow and only implemented when positive results seem inevitable.
Also, there is no such thing as complete autonomy. We still live within the structures of our family, our workplace, our church or belief system, our circle of friends and the community in general. "No man is an island" is a truism not just a cute saying. The autonomy comes in when we're allowed to choose if we stay within our family, stay at a specific workplace, change our belief system, find new friends or even change the community we live in. It's the freedom to be who we wish to be within the society that we, as a social creature, must live to survive. It is the freedom to change or not change as we see fit as an autonomous human being.
When Thomas Paine said "If I see something that needs change,why should I wait until you see it." I see a support for autonomy. That I, as an individual, have the right to change something, without the approval of anyone else, so long as my actions don't infringe on the rights of others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GoodAvatar-ut5pq
Isn't it strange that you just watched (I'm assuming) a conservative young black lady, who voted Republican, being embraced by conservative Republicans. They don't care that she's black or a woman. They care about her integrity and character. In fact, she's said that the worst racism that she'd ever experience is from the left, who tell her that there's something wrong with a black woman with conservative values. It's the same attitude that left wing activists had with Larry Elder, calling him the black face of white supremacy, implying that he's not thinking as a black man should.
There is no one more hated, on the left, than a person who they see as an apostate and they use race, gender and other superficial stereotypes to validate that hate. It's why they turned of Tulsi Gabbard, a woman of colour who refused to toe the Democrat activist line.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@adriangutierrez848
Oh shut-up!!!! Trump is an A-hole but, right now, he's much better than the Democrats. They're the ones that called the riots in LA, Portland, Seattle, San Francisco, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Chicago, Kenosha, Atlanta, Louisville, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Richmond, Philadelphia, New York, Buffalo, Rochester.....there's dozens more, "peaceful protests". Over 30 people dead in BLM inspired riots, a group that the Democrats endorse, and all you can say is "Trump has done more than God".
You're so blinded by TDS that you've lost all sense of logic and reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@umpire29
I gave you the definition of the word "loan". However, I don't see how that takes away form the fact that we employ the Democratic process. You can, although it's about as cumbersome as it gets, have a direct Democracy in which EVERY issue is voted on by the people, but it's not the ONLY form of a Democracy. I gave you the Dictionary definition of a Democracy and a Republic. That's NOT my belief. Those are the facts. The definitions say that a Republic is governed by the people who commonly elect representatives to govern, by proxy so to speak. Nowhere did it say that a democracy is exclusively governed directly by the people. It explicitly says that it's through the election of representatives by the people.
You don't have to believe it but it's like saying that water isn't wet when all the evidence says that it is. To make it true, you have to change the definition of words which is what you're attempting to do. Go back to the definitions, from the dictionary, that I gave and read them carefully. It's very clear and the fact that you're insisting that democracy is only direct rule from the people shows that you're either not understanding what it says or you're changing what it says to suit what you want it to say. I can't help that. You either accept the definition, as we all understand it or you make up your own definition. Once you do that, there is no such thing as objective truth. It's all about how YOU see it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markbishopiii1577
Actually, it goes even DEEPER that what Donalds was talking about. CRT comes out of Critical Theory, an idea conceived by Max Horkheimer, part of the Frankfurt group, who are self proclaimed Marxists. He came to the US in the early thirties and decided that the traditional Marxism, the class struggle, may not be as effective in the US and other western nations so he came up with the idea that power was at the root of all struggles in history.
Years later, in the 1980s, a group of Marxists gathered together in an old nunnery in Madison Wisconsin, to discuss how race was a big part of this power struggle. A member of that group, Kimberly Crenshaw, proposed the name "Critical Race Theory", paying homage to Max Horkheimer's ideas.....but it doesn't stop there.
There's a guy by the name of Paolo Friere, a Brazilian educator and a Marxist, who believed that social change could be achieved through an integration of education and activist ideas through an proposal called "Praxis" or practical application. He outlined it in his writings, one of which is the book "Education for Critical Consciousness". Notice how the word "critical" is a part of that title, pointing Horkheimer's philosophy. This book is required reading in many education programs for teachers. It's integrating critical thought into the education system in a way that the things being taught are through the lens of this new way of this new look Marxism.
Reid is correct. It's not being taught as subject matter. It's even more insidious than that. It's become a part of how history, geography, literature and even math and science is taught to primary, secondary and university level students. This is done in the same way Christian schools teach religion, integrating it in all subject manner in a covert manner.
The receipts are there. Reid cut Donalds off before he could do any meaningful explanation of what he meant. She didn't want to hear it. In a way it's how the press presents Critical Theory. You might call it "Critical Media Theory".
1
-
@davidluong8370
You may not believe it but I'm not talking about you and those who go after specialised trades or careers. I'm talking about those who go to the top schools and study the humanities, social arts and some of the other specialities, like women's studies, philosophy or social work. They are jobs that have no future and either have little to no demand or command very little pay. They take on the same debt that you did and make a lot less money than what I do.
My statements weren't overall generalities, but you can get degrees in nursing, engineering or computer sciences and do quite well for yourself with little debt.
Also, my entire point isn't about what you spend on education but more about understanding value for your buck. I will lay odds that you're not the one complaining that you'll never be able to pay back your student loans because you're not making much more being a social worker than minimum wage. Why would you go to a prestigious university, spend all that money on a Bachelor's degree, when you could have spend WAY less on a diploma, in the same field, and worked right alongside the person from the fancy university. That's the common sense way of looking at it.
I understand that if you want to be a doctor or lawyer or even a top notch engineering degree, that it'll cost, but they have high potential. Gender studies isn't something that's in high demand.
One other thing, I don't care about how much money you have or what anyone else has. What gets me is that they feel entitled to that big degree in activism and then want me to pay for it. Then when I suggest that there are other ways to get to where you want, people get all defensive and act like I'm showing them up or something.
Also, not everyone can be a lawyer or doctor. You don't want to be like Cuba where there are so many doctors that there are doctors driving cab or growing vegetables to make a living. There's such a thing as realistic goals and finding the best and most efficient ways to get there.
Getting rich isn't the goal. It's more about feeling good about what you do and how it affects the things that matter most....your family for one thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
My parents came to this country with nothing. No bank account, no property.....nothing. They didn't own the cot that they slept on, the table they had breakfast on, even the plates they ate off didn't belong to them. They lived in a one room shack with no running water.
They worked hard, my dad working 3 jobs at the same time and my mom raising 7 kids and worked a large garden and small orchard so we'd have inexpensive but decent food. Now, my dad has some money and he's enjoying the fruits of his hard work.
Anyone of those blacks could have done that and many did just that. Larry Elder talks about how hard his father worked and Candace Owens talks about her grandparents and their work ethic. The left and those who want handouts HATE them. They hate them because they have pride and a strong sense of ethics. The ones that want reparations have no pride or work ethic and reparations won't help them one bit. They don't know how to live responsibly and many will end up in bankruptcy.
What really galls me is that my dad, who's now 89, will have his tax money paying 25 year old children who've never worked a day in their pathetic lives. I'll never forget my dad's reaction when told, for religious reasons, to quit a job and if he had financial problems, they'd help him out. My dad told him that, as long as he was able bodied, he'd eat the grass out on the lawn before he'd take a handout. These parasites would NEVER understand that.
I suppose this comment will be deleted but I had to get this off my chest.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yedolf
There is no proof other than having one of the worst voting systems in the world. Voter ID is racist. Sending out ballots, through the mail, to everyone. Changing voting procedures without going through state legislators, which is against the law. All I gotta do is find out who never votes, call down my relatives from Canada, and let them vote Republican. They don't have to show ID. That's racist. All I need is one person, some crackhead from the Bay area, give him 20 bucks per vote and drive him from one precinct to another to vote.
It's insane and it's no wonder people call our voting process a sham. Yet, when Georgia tried to fix their election process so it was more secure, it was Jim Crow 2.0. The last election was the 3rd election in this century, that's been disputed. Bush's narrow win was called a fraudulent election win. Trump's win was fraudulent with many Democrats calling him a fake president and the last one was disputed by Trump. That's 2 claims by Democrats and one by Republicans. That's HALF the elections this century.
Fix the damned election process so it we won't have this mess.....but we can't because it's raycist or some other stupid claim. Every other country can do it but the US can't.
Of course, none of this will sink through that thick skull of yours.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm going to tell you something about being Canadian and having the most powerful country, the world juggernaut, as your only neighbour, Tim. Everything that happens, in the US, affects us. The president, the Congress, the economy......everything. We're HUGE trading partners, in the summer, we're overrun by American tourists. In the winter, we go to the US to get away from the snow. If you thrive, we thrive. If you go down the toilet, we're right behind you. When the fires were burning in California and Oregon, we were advised to stay indoors due to the horrific air quality.
So....YES, we are concerned with American politics.....and that bozo, from the University of Waterloo, is just that.... a BOZO. Only the most insane and corrupt individual would wish that kind of harm on a neighbour and as a Canadian, I'm calling the man a disgrace.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@settame1
For sure. These hospitals that are supposedly not treating vaccinated people are being hypocritical. They still treat drug overdoses and gunshot wounds, even if the victim is in a gang. These are all the result of personal decisions. If you're husband fell ill with Covid and was refused treatment, I'm thinking a lawsuit would be in order.
I'd prefer it if everyone was vaccinated but it's not up to me, you OR the government. It's up to each one of us.
As for your kids, as of Sept 14th, only 412 kids, under 18, have died of Covid. Out of 680,000 Covid deaths in the US, only 412 children have died. During that same time, about 1500 kids, 14 and under, have been killed in car accidents. In other words, your kids are in greater danger on a short drive to the store than they are from Covid. Yet, I'll bet hardly any on these vaccine "mandaters" give a second thought to that danger to their kids as they're strapping them into their car seat.
Vaccinate your kids when it makes sense.
That's my advice for what it's worth. I don't see the sense in it now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@paulsweeney2959
When teachers, or specifically, the public education system, feel that it is their duty to teach morality, they've overstepped their mandate. Our education system was built to teach our young the technical life skills or reading and mathematics, NOT on what the children should believe.
When a teacher sits up all night with a sick student, when he/she spends their lives crying over the death on MY child....then they are co-parents.....MAYBE. They are public servants, no more. My brother, who is a teacher and a strong Christian, who taught in the public school system, would NEVER and HAS never imposed his personal beliefs on his students. That's not his job. A teacher can give a helping hand, if needed, but to assume the role of the parent is more than presumptive. It's an arrogance that should never be the accepted policy of our education system.
1
-
1
-
@Robbie S
You've misunderstood EVERY word I've said. Of course, the man living on an island doesn't become rich by himself. We're social creatures and it's how a person operates as a part of that society. You contribute as an individual, doing the things that benefit yourself and society as a whole. It's a two way street, a symbiotic relationship.
....and, of course, Jeff Bezos didn't get rich on his own. He needs staff and more importantly, customers. However, I, as an individual, don't have to work for Jeff Bezos if I don't want to. I don't have to buy off him, either. That's my choice as a self determining individual. However, I CAN approach his company and apply to work for him.....if I want. Then, it is up to me to make my way, as an employee of Bezos, in the best way that I can. If it doesn't work out, I can walk. There may be unpleasant consequences, for the time being, anyway, but there are more options than just Jeff Bezos in the world.
In fact, it's a good thing that there are those options, should I need them. I may never have the finances of Bezos, but so what??? I'm not living his life and his property doesn't belong to me. I, Jack Haveman, belong to me and any property, whether in cash, land or products is mine. That's what concerns me. I don't spend my days gazing at the piles of others because that's one sure way to guarantee the neglect of the way I live my life and use my own assets. I will NEVER allow envy to rule my life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SHrepairs
I'm Canadian and we have a socialised healthcare system and we flattened the curve by doing EXACTLY the same things as the Americans did. What we don't have, and that's what the controversy is now in the US, is a polarised political atmosphere where progressive and Democrat controlled state governments are imposing Draconian rules, under threat of arrest, on the average citizen. We don't have snitch lines, we can mow our lawns, buy grass seed and paint and we don't have drones flying around telling us to disperse and go inside. That's what Democrat state governments are doing and Republican state governments are NOT doing. In fact, socialised health care is the dream of Democrats. Also, there are health care worker laid off in areas where the virus hasn't been a big problem due to lockdowns is their state that won't allow medical activity other than extreme emergencies and Covid related cases.
I have friends and relatives in the US and they're the ones telling me this, online.
You're obviously being driven by a hatred of free economies. I don't know where you're from but I will tell you that Canada, in spite of it's socialised health care system has a free economy. I've even ran a small business and have many friends and family members who own their own business and love it. That's capitalism....and it's the freedom to be the person that you want to be instead of being controlled from above. I'm perplexed by anyone that would want control to come from anywhere but within. I don't like a big government, the ultimate corporation, controlling everything that I do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidmays8974
And if you'd sailed with Columbus, you'd have been complicit with Columbus. People LOVE to think that they're SO good but it's damned easy when you don't live in a time or situation where these things were happening.
My parents grew up in Nazi occupied Netherlands. Do you know who the Nazi soldiers were? They were ordinary people, just like you and me. One time farmers, shop keepers, factory workers, living ordinary lives and they found themselves doing some of the most atrocious acts in our recent history. These same ordinary Germans went into my mother's home when she was 11 years old and took ALL their food. They almost starved to death. Had you or I been one of those soldiers, we'd have done the same. We're just not in that situation.
The Spanish had no problem with slavery. No one did at the time. It was a part of life all over the planet. The Aztecs were taking slaves and them brutally murdering them in religious ceremonies and doing it by the hundreds. Funny how NO one calls that brutal. Columbus wrote that the native Tainos had told him about the fierce and warlike Caribs, who used to raid the Tainos for cannibalistic rituals and capture and enslave their women. Once again, I don't hear you complaining about THEIR brutality.
No one is perfect and that includes you. If you think that you wouldn't have been goose stepping in the Nazi ranks had you been born in Germany in 1925, you're only kidding yourself. Any honest person has to admit that they'd have done the same. It's the dishonest ones who puff out their chest and point fingers at everyone else thinking that they're better than others. Once you believe that, and it appears that you do, you'll find that you'd be quite ready and willing to do horrific things to those who you believe are worse than what you are. It's the way of humanity all through history. You haven't learned a thing except to believe that you're superior to "those people" over there.
1
-
@micahlucero8123
That's a great appeal to emotion. My parents grew up in the war in the Netherlands. My grandfather had to be institutionalised due to severe mental illness and left 4 small children alone with my grandmother. They had little to nothing to eat, yet Nazi soldiers would take half of the little food that they had left for the war effort. They would live on eels, caught in the canal across the road, for weeks at a time. She hated fish till the day she died. My mother left home at 12 to work for food and lodging at another couple's home about 30 miles away. If she didn't, she may have starved to death.
Human history sucks. We have to know about it, learn about the mindset that brought it about. Your rant is why people build the resentment that keeps them locked within themselves and when they find the power, to react viciously. My mother experienced the wrath of the German people, who resented those who kept them poor and struggling for centuries. My parents didn't let their experience turn them into resentful and vengeful people. They immigrated to Canada, worked their butts off to provide a good life for me and my siblings. That's how you defeat "oppression".
I know indigenous Canadians who went to those schools. They've done well for themselves. Built their own families, homes, had good careers and aren't railing on about how tough they had it. They talk about the schools.....the good, the friends they made but also the bad. They don't let it define them. They're strong, living their lives in dignity and appropriate pride. Others don't and I see them living lives of resentment and addiction. You can blame others but others aren't going to fix life for you. My parents and my native friends, who've been successful and lived full lives, prove that. Resentment can bring as much misery as any "oppressor"
Don't become your own subjugator. You may find that oppressor the most difficult one to escape from.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cortical1
I did give you facts. I told you they made a big deal about Trump throwing fish food into the coy pond. That actually happened. it was the stupidest news story that I'd ever heard and the media edited footage just to make up the narrative. This was NEWS to them. I told you about Nick Sandman, a kid that was doing nothing and the press went berserk about it. Also with a made up narrative, with edited footage and everything. Trump took an extra scoop of ice cream, and THAT was news to them. A SCOOP OF ICE CREAM!!!!! And they made a big deal of it. Was it illegal? NO. It was a scoop of ice cream.
If you think that the MSM wouldn't have taken a story about Don Jr. lying on a gun application and made it a big story, then YOU'RE delusional. The thing is, they'd have been right to do so. Get that!!!!! I'll repeat it.
Had this been Don Jr., they would have been RIGHT about reporting it as a big story. It would have been the RIGHT THING TO DO!!!! It's shows corruption. Not 2 scoops of ice cream corruption but using the power of the presidency to cover up an illegal act.
Once more, had Don Jr. done this, the media would have been right to report it in a big way. I don't care who it is. If the son of a president, vice president or someone running for the president does something like this, it's BIG news...whether it was Biden, Trump, Obama or even Abraham Lincoln. YOU want to pick and choose based on whether you like them or not. I choose it based on whether the DEED was right or wrong. YOU base it on your feelings.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bean-spiller
First, the wall isn't finished. Biden stopped it. It's like saying that you started building your home, you sadly passed away and you're kids didn't finish it and that's YOUR fault, somehow. Biden stopped construction almost immediately, when he took office and when Trump was metaphorically dead. There are huge sections of the wall that are just lying there, waiting to go up and if Trump had won the election would be up and standing. What I find ironic is that Clinton, Bush and Obama had barriers put up and even bragged about it but when Trump wanted to put up a wall, it suddenly became racist. That's just politics and nothing else.
The part about Mexico paying for it, wasn't about Mexico just cutting a check. It was a warning to Mexico that if they didn't help, he was going to impose trade tariffs. That's how he was going to get Mexico to pay for it. It was a threat, not a promise and most reasonable people knew that.
Right now, illegal immigration is at its highest, ever. That's a fact and pointing the finger at Trump doesn't change that.
The separation of children was happening during the Obama administration as well. Why? Because the cartels are using children for all kinds of reasons. It's as if no one wants to admit that child trafficking exists for all kinds of nefarious reasons. Migrants cross the border, with kids, with no ID but that's just fine? Why would ANYONE allow a man, with a child to cross the border and not expect that man to prove that this child is his? That's as irresponsible as it gets.
I don't know if Trump's policies would be working better than Biden's right now because I can't see the results of something that didn't happen. What I do know is that in the Congressional hearings is that the Democrats are reluctant to admit that there is a problem. If they had any integrity and courage, they'd say, with regret, that the problem is immense and look for ways to mitigate the numbers coming in. They just won't do that. I've not heard any new ideas from the Biden administration and if there is I'd like for you to enlighten me so I can evaluate its effectiveness. Right now, it is a disaster and us babbling about Trump does nothing to improve the situation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In 1970, in Quebec, a group called the FLQ, kidnapped a British diplomat, James Cross and local politician, Pierre Laporte. The FLQ was organised in small cells of 5 and 6 members where only 1 person would know the identity of 1 person of another cell. Pierre Laporte was executed. The Canadian government instituted the War Measures Act, only used twice before, WW1 and 2. In the end, 16 people were found to involved in the kidnappings.
Small cells, that's how they were organised.
To add, the arrests of the FLQ members spelled the end of years of letter bombs in Quebec and the end of the FLQ.
1
-
@dtklamf7457
I'm retired now but I spent 16 years in the bar business, 7 of them in a strip joint. The atmosphere, in a bar, is a lot different than working at a warehouse or factory. Bar fights are a part of the culture and I've been in my share of them.
However, when I worked in other types of businesses, things were different. You don't handle conflicts in the same way. Also, that guy WAS held accountable. He lost his job over it and the other guy was still working there, he didn't have to deal with that jerk anymore, he didn't have to worry about the law and other employees knew that the company wouldn't tolerate that kind of behaviour, so it cut the chances of it happening again, way down.
It was all good for him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sparty1966grad
None of that is Desantis's doing. He's allowed people to make a choice. So if you decide to not get the vaccine, and you get Covid and die, that's not Desantis's fault. That was your own decision and doing. The vaccine is available and you CHOSE not to get it. Same as going out. If I'm afraid that I might get Covid, I stay home. If I'm willing to take the risk, that's also my choice and my doing if I get Covid and it kills me. DeSantis isn't forcing you to go out. That's YOUR decision. Now...if he were a tyrant, he would take the choice away from you and tell you to stay home, wear a mask, get vaccinated but he's not doing that. He's leaving it up to the individual.
He actually thinks that you're a big boy and can make decisions for yourself. If you're afraid of Covid, stay home, where a mask when you go out, wash your hands, try to live a healthy life and get vaccinated. No one is stopping you. Do those things and you should be safe.
1
-
Owen Chang
My daughter got her first vaccine dose. That night she broke into a horrific case of hives. 2 months later, she's STILL getting them, all over her body. This has never happened before. She now wishes that she didn't get the vaccine and her doctor advised against the 2nd one. That's why there are people that don't want the vaccine. I got mine and I don't regret it but I did it on my own choice. NO ONE FORCED ME. I object to being FORCED to do it. I'm a big boy and I can choose to do it or not.
Just because a country has free health care, that doesn't mean that it's a socialist country. It's a social program. It astounds me that people, LIKE YOU, can't understand that. Socialism is where the economy is owned and controlled by the state. GET THAT....the economy. That means production of goods. Those countries that Socialist advocates called socialist, like Denmark and Sweden, are market driven economies. That's CAPITALISM...not socialism. The Danish Prime Minister, Lars Rasmussen, said this, in response to an assertion made by Bernie Sanders. "Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy."
Before you go and make assertions about economic matters, maybe you should learn what it means or what the term "socialist" refers to.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@codycarr4544
Without a doubt. Our school systems find the seeds of discontent, envy, resentment and sexual angst and nurture them, using them as tools to create young activists. They downplay personal responsibility and hard work and encourage collectivism, identity association and rage at the perceived inequities of life.
It can only end in mental anguish, broken families, addictions, poor health, crime, narcissism, feelings of helplessness and nihilism and outbursts of rage and violence. You see it everywhere. We have a generation that's focused on fixing the world and not themselves and neither the world or themselves are benefiting from it.
As Voltaire once wrote....Cultivate your own garden. If we all do that, the world will look after itself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnBarron-s4c
Do you know what's even more despicable? Supporting the idea that we MUST affirm a child's identity claims and allow them puberty blockers, drugs and surgeries on their say so. This is the only place in medicine where the patient, who can be minors, are the ones diagnosing their own mental health.
As long as they support the genital mutilation of minors, I will NEVER vote Democrat. As long as they support affirmative action, which cheated Americans of Asian heritage of placements in our top universities in the name of DEI, I will NEVER vote Democrat. As long as they pit race, gender, ethnicity, religions and other identities against one another, I will NEVER vote Democrat.
Trump may be a little uncouth but he never support the amputation of healthy breasts off of a 15 year old girl and he NEVER say that hundreds of riots which killed over 25 people, injured thousands more and caused billions in property damage, are just "peaceful" protests. Also, he does NOT support what's happening in the Democrat supporting cities of America. The homelessness, the open drug abuse and deaths by overdose and the deterioration of once great cities like San Francisco and New York.
Kamala is the ONE??? She tried to put the mother of a girl with sickle cell anaemia in jail because her daughter missed school due to hospitalisations and much needed blood transfusions to save her life. It took her 2 YEARS to finally have the charge dismissed, even though the mother had all the medical proof to back her up. That woman is a monster.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DahHar117
The California Civil Rights Act is against both discrimination and preferential treatment based on race, etc. That means if you give preference to one race over another, that's against the law in California AND the United States. The Democrats wanted to repeal the Act because they did want to give preferential treatment. The thing is how can you give preferential treatment to one group without discriminating against another? They go hand in hand.
My statement said "would have" supported the Republicans to abolish slavery. I also said that I would have supported the Democrats, WOULD HAVE being the important part, had they wanted to abolish slavery. I was talking about had I been alive BACK THEN. NOT now. At the time of slavery. Then I went on to say that TODAY I can't support those who want to allow drugs and surgeries to transgender minors. I also can't support CRT and DEI. That's TODAY, not at the time of slavery but what's happening right now. Also, I don't mean it as a badge of honour. I meant it as a matter of fact. Yes, Democrats do support segregation in school dormitories and graduations and support affirmative action. It's quite inconsistent. Democrats support segregation at UCLA campuses in LA and Berkeley, Western Washington in Seattle, Roper Hall in Washington DC, MIT and more.
It's sad that you can't understand past and present tense. It would sure help you in understanding what I'm saying.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ponytoast1231
Yet, when the 13 Colonies fought for independence from the British, a mere 14 years after Quebec was ceded to the British, the Quebec colony wanted to remain with the British. Life for the average person in Quebec was BETTER under the British than it was under the French and they didn't want things to change.
What in the world does De Gaulle have to do with Canada backstabbing Quebec, anyway. Quebec hadn't been a part of France for 204 years when he said "Vive le Quebec libre". They didn't back-stab De Gaulle. It was Canadian soldiers that died so that ingrate could come back to France and become it's ruler. It was none of his business. Worse, there were terrorist groups setting off letter bombs and 3 years later the FLQ, one of these terrorist groups, kidnapped a British diplomat and a Quebecois politician, Pierre Laporte, and murdering him. I suppose that you think that was deserving as well. Quebecois terrorists killing a fellow Quebecois.
British imperialism....that's how you describe WW2. The Nazis invaded Poland, then Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belguim and FRANCE. De Gaulle had to flee to the hated imperialist Britain so he could rule France in absentia. Of all the convoluted logic I've ever heard, this takes the cake. The imperialist British, gave De Gaulle refuge and then helped him to get his country back so he could be the president of France....IN FRANCE. That's the stupidest imperialism that I've ever heard of.
And guess who didn't want to help De Gaulle get his country back. The Quebecois. They could care less if France ever got from under the Nazi yoke. As far as they were concerned, De Gaulle could rot, hiding in England. It was the rest of Canada that was willing to fight to defeat the Nazis, not Quebec, and without the help of the Canadians, British, Americans and others, France would have remained under the thumb of the Nazi dominated Vichy government. The French would have really loved that. They were still smarting from the way the Franco/Prussian war ended that unified all the German states.
Your entire comment is whacked.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thebladeofchaos
You forget the exact figures and then throw out these percentages like they should be taken seriously. If you're going to throw out those numbers, which suggests that almost EVERYONE is going to have life long effects from the disease, you'd better back them up. Especially, when you consider that many are asymptomatic or don't even have any symptoms.
I stand by my death numbers and you appear to agree with me. However, I can prove it.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Look at the graphs. Cases in mid April was around 80,000 per day at 8,000 deaths. Yesterday, the case count was over 500,000, or 1/2 million cases around the world and the death rate is down and is just over 7,000 per day.
Worse, you completely ignore the horrific effects of extreme poverty, malnutrition and starvation. This will be worse than the Covid and people are allowing fear to justify what could be the greatest tragedy in human history. But as long as we can stay safe....that's what's important, right? That is, if the lockdowns even have a great effect.
1
-
1
-
@thebladeofchaos
I've always have at least 3 months worth of supplies on hand. You don't need as much as you'd think, either. Once it's there, you replace as you go. Maybe, it's because I grew up and live in Canada, where the winters can be quite harsh. When I was growing up, on a small farm, we ate from our garden and the animals we raised. I remember being snowed in for weeks and we never worried about food or supplies. I kept it up into my adulthood although I live in a small town now. I can't understand why people aren't ready, just in case. When people were fighting for toilet paper, back in March, I had enough to do me till the end of summer and now I have enough to do me till March. It's like a savings account....but I guess a lot of people don't have that either.
I'm 70 years old. I didn't work hard all my life to be afraid to die when I retire. I'm not going to take stupid chances but I'm not going to live in fear either. A little common sense would do the world some good, especially right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jacobvanveit3437
As a citizen of my country, I would NEVER pledge allegiance to any one party or candidate. That leaves me open to being fooled by that party or candidate. Blind loyalty is just that.....BLIND. I always look at the good and bad of every candidate. It would be insane not to. Remember, every conman finds their greatest success to the those he can get to blindly believe him.
I'll not be the receiver of anyone's BS. However, I do support Trump. I thought he did a good job, by and large, in his first term. It wasn't perfect but it was better than most, if not all, of the presidents in my lifetime and I'm 70 years old. I have to remember that he's 76 years old and that if he runs for president, he'll be in his eighties when he's done. I don't want another senile man in the White House, like we have now. He may still be sharp as a tack at 82, my dad's 91 and he's still smarter than most I know, but it's still something to consider.
Another thing, Tim has been quite vocal on the insanity of the Democrats. He'd never vote for them the way that they are now. That doesn't mean that he has to like Trump. That's simplistic thinking. Personally, I'd rather see DeSantis as president but that may not be happening right away.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hanshansen3885
Crap like privilege tests and placing students in "privilege" groups based on skin colour, gender, immigration status, religion and political beliefs. Crap like their obsession about teaching all aspects of sexual activity to children as young as kindergarten age and even trying to diagnose kids with gender dysphoria. Crap like telling students that math, science and history are all racist and that black kids can't understand mathematics because of math is about white supremacy and racist.
Worse, they're not teaching the kids to do math or read of write. American kids, especially in the inner cities, are not meeting grade level standards and are falling far behind, compared to other nations. Yet, they won't allow parents, who want a better education for their children, the freedom to send their kids to another school. If you have the money, NO PROBLEM.....send them to any school that you want but if you're poor and can't afford to do that......eff em. Go to the school that they tell you. There is no second option.
The American education system, in the primary levels, are in terrible shape and designed for the elites. Poor and especially minority kids are victims, according to them, and will never succeed because rich white men hate them. What a horrible way to bring up a generation.
1
-
@hanshansen3885
I think that we all should be treated as individuals with all due courtesy, regardless of what they now call the "identity" group. The identity group is irrelevant to how anyone should be treated and that's the problem. If my child...or yours...is singled out as a victim and is helpless unless the oppressor group gives him a hand up, I'm going to object. If your child or mine, is held up as privileged, over others in the class, I'm going to object. Especially when the kids are being told not to tell their parents about what is being said in class or extra-curricular activities. It happens and how rare it happens is irrelevant. If it's being kept a secret in one school, how do we know if it's not being kept secret in another.
As parents, we have the right to know what is being taught to our kids and why. There are too many school board videos, on YouTube, where parents are upset about what they see and are dismissed.
If someone refuses to be transparent, then you're going to invite suspicion. That's normal human nature. That's all we want. Let us know what is going on in our classrooms. Yet people fight us on this ALL the time. You're even doing it now. If what is being taught is open to parents, the suspicion will have now foundation and this will all go away. For some reason, people are fighting transparency and only the most naive would never stop to wonder why.
People who are trying to hide things usually have something to hide.
1
-
@hanshansen3885
If it's happening in one school, you go and see if it's happening in your local school. If they're reluctant to tell you what's going on in their school, THEN you insist that they tell you. If they're open and above board, you can trust them. If they're reluctant or put you off, I wouldn't trust them.
If an incoming Supreme Court Justice can't tell you what a woman is, then we know that this ideology has reached the highest levels of government. When our president fills positions based on group identity, it only confirms it. Why would our state funded and operated schools be any different? All I want is to be able to see what's being taught.
"I am pretty sure that everything the students are taught is on the schools webpage and in the curriculum." Pretty sure isn't good enough. Every day I see videos where teachers go on TikTok and tell us the most outrageous things. Drag queens brought into school. Kindergarten kids participating in mini Pride Parades. LGTQ flags hanging all over the classroom. Telling us how they discuss their private lives with the student. All you have to do is look it up. Kali Fontanilla, a teacher, has a YouTube channel and she talks about it all the time and she's FAR from the only one.
If you're comfortable with being pretty sure...well that's up to you. However, there's one thing I've learned. When you trust something or someone implicitly, you leave yourself open to be fooled explicitly. Do more than just doubt it. Find out for sure. One thing is sure and that is that war, genocide, slavery even a lot of famines and mass starvation are the result of governments. Why a government or those in power, would suddenly stop at using schools to further their cause is illogical. It's why the American Constitution is so strong on giving power to the people and taking it away from the state. Our schools are state operated and that should always mean that they should be open to inspection.
1
-
1
-
@elsierodgers4874
It took him less than one day. The day that he announced that he was running for president, the Democrats, the media and the left declared war on the Americans who live in fly-over America. Guys, like YOU, can't understand that Trump was a symptom of the rot in Washington, NOT the cause. The Democrats have spent everyday since that announcement, dividing us along lines of race, gender, religion and economic status and they've done a great job. Your ilk did this. This guy, a conservative, the bane of the Democrats and the left, is talking about unity. Blaming another race or gender for your problems is NOT unity. You refuse to understand the Trump phenomena. You just lay blame and will always advocate for disunity as long as we long for unity with all Americans. It's why you cheered when football players refused to stand for the symbol that's supposed to unite us all. You want us angry....and we're not going to give you the satisfaction.
1
-
1
-
@AfterKai48
Mosquitoes have killed more people than Covid has....BY FAR, in human history. Over 1 million people die of malaria every year, most of them under 5 years of age, and 300 to 600 million suffer from the effects of the disease every year, just to name one disease.
Diseases that are spread to people by mosquitoes include Zika virus, West Nile virus, Chikungunya virus, dengue, and malaria.....copied and pasted from CDC.GOV.
Millions have also died of Yellow fever in human history. They had to stop work on the Panama Canal, for a time, because so many were dying.
Now what was that about taste or smell or something?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@patacleus6803
Your point is illustrated by the fact that Lowndes County is losing population every year and has been for years. The county seat lost 200 people in 10 years, a lot when the population is already only around 1000. That means that the cost per unit for sewage is getting even MORE expensive. You're not talking 15 to 20 thousand a hookup. This is getting close to 100,000 a hookup, maybe more. Therefore they almost have to remain with some sort of septic system. University students found it easy to spot the problem but a solution wasn't coming, not one anyone could afford, anyway.
The homeless of San Francisco aren't looking for opportunities. Not the one that are causing the need for a Poop App, anyway. They have serious drug and mental issues and the local governments seem paralysed in coming up with any solution. In fact they make it worse for the average citizen. For one thing, police are told to not even bother investigating a crime under 800 dollars in value so theft is out of sight. Discarded needles are everywhere and 1/3 of them are needles that the city is handing out in their needle exchange program. You can't take your kids to the park, not with all the needles laying around. But all the politicians and local activists can say is that you can't arrest someone for being homeless and the problem continues. Housing is crippled by unbelievable red tape and all kinds of restrictions. It cost a fortune just to get all the permits and you haven't even turn a shovel of soil yet to lay the foundations.
These blue states have issues and it's not economic issues. It has more to do with idealism and maybe even corruption. Money keeps being poured into the issue and none seems to ending at the point where it's needed. Where is it going?
At least, in Alabama, they're not losing the money. They're not getting it, because it's too difficult to justify the cost of fixing it, especially when they're already in a economically depressed area. That's NOT the problem in San Francisco.
1
-
@patacleus6803
It's government policy when the person is pooping in broad daylight and nothing is done about it. It's government policy when they're living in tents and there's garbage everywhere and no one cleans it up. It's government policy when businesses have people sleeping in their entrances and their complaints fall on deaf ears. The money is there, in San Francisco, after all, the area is home to Silicon valley. They're just not using it to help these people. It's not like Alabama, where there is no Silicon Valley, and no huge income to get the money in taxes to get the job done. If there's no money to help the homeless in downtown San Francisco, how are ever going to get the money in Alabama to put in a good sewage system? Money doesn't grow on trees. Alabama has to have a source for the cash they need and they don't. San Francisco has the source of income to tax and they can't get it done. In fact, California has some of the highest taxes in the US and still things get steadily worse.
At least they have a home and they're not living in tents.
Also, I've seen the homeless, not in California but in Detroit, Toronto and Buffalo and most of them have serious mental and drug issues. I've seen them in the small town that I live in and it's the same. There are those that are temporarily homeless but they generally find away out, either through finding a job or government assistance. It's the druggies and the mentally disabled that can be a problem and they have to find a solution that's better than just ignoring them.
1
-
1
-
@patacleus6803
What this dialogue has shown is that both states have problems that are unique to their positions. Right now, California has some of the highest taxes in the US and still has problems getting things done, as an example, the high speed rail line. California has reached as place of bureaucratic complacency, what happens when a society reaches an overt state of affluence. Alabama is just the opposite. They've always been poor and are finding it difficult to get out from under it.
Texas is in the middle. It's a high growth state, taxes are low, bureaucracy is still minimal and it's flourishing. A lot of middle class people are leaving California and are shocked at how low state and municipal taxes are in Texas in comparison to California. It won't last. Once the affluence becomes generational, the complacency will settle in and the bureaucracy will grow. It's an inevitable cycle. Alabama may see the same thing in the future.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
It seems to be a cycle that has been seen over and over in history. California won't be spared as long as it adheres to a philosophy that doesn't include personal responsibility, hard work and common sense. California has these homeless problems, not due to lack of money or a lack of a desire to fix it. They're mired in a bureaucratic maze of their own making. Those people shouldn't be living in the streets that way that they are. Not with all the money that's available to those in power. There's something deeper going on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tim, you're wrong about the Canadian dollar and economy. When I was growing up, both were on par with the United States. From 1952 (the year that I was born) to 1978, our dollars were almost even every year, sometimes a little higher, other times a little lower. In 1978, the Canadian dollar went down to .87 cents to the American dollar in 2 years. After that it went slowly down to almost .70 cents to the American dollar. When I was in my late teens and early twenties, Americans and Canadians were crossing the borders and spending their money on par. We were the 2 most prosperous countries in the world. This all changed, in Canada, due to the policies of another Trudeau. It was a disaster for Canada and the United States. Suddenly, the auto and steel industry fell apart and cities like Detroit, Gary, Pittsburgh in the United States and Windsor, Hamilton, Sudbury and Sydney declined because of free trade which saw both our economies failing in favour of countries like Japan.
Our politicians gave it all away.....both American and Canadian. Trump can remember those times and he's trying to get it back.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Similar jobs at different companies"
Here comes the anecdotal evidence. Well.....I've got some too. I worked at a factory for 7 years, making a decent wage. I worked alongside women and we made the exact same wage per hour. Over the year, a person COULD make more, if that person worked overtime.
I retired and 4 months after I retired, our major competitor, started operations in an empty factory across the street. Get that? Across the street and they were making the exact same product we were. They also paid 4 dollars an hour more, TO START, than what we were getting paid. Some of the guys moved across the street, including a few of the women. They ALL started at that same rate and were now making 4 dollars an hour more.
You see, Glamour magazine, when you work for a different company, you've just entered a new variable. In our case, the competitor was a much larger corporation, with deeper pockets. They paid 20 percent more for doing the EXACT same job because of an ability to pay more. It's a failed comparison.
Not once, EVER, have I seen anyone make a valid case for gender wage disparity. They always leave something out or neglect important variables. They have to because if you work for the same company at the same job description or level as described in the company policy of job descriptions, it is against the law to pay one person more than another. Against the law. You don't have to go to Glamour magazine to validate unfair practises. You need to get a lawyer and present your case before a judge. They won't in this case because she works for a different company who have their own reasons for paying their employees the rates they do and that is perfectly legal and ethical.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@amberpoole-kieniewicz735
Now, it's all about race and gender. Actually, it's boomers who give the most to charity. Since you insist that whites have all the money and minorities are poor, it would seem that it's those rich white boomers are the ones doing the most to help.
Also, I lost everything to a divorce and my reaction to the death of my son which happened within months of each other. I started drinking heavily and got to the point where I couldn't hold down a job. After about 10 years of this, I straightened myself out but by then I had put myself in a position where a good paying job was out of reach. I worked at jobs that didn't pay much more than minimum wage. So, I adjusted my approach to money and saving it. I stayed away from owning a car. WAY to expensive to buy, insure, keep fuelled and maintain. I started to do the small things to save. I didn't spend my spare change. It was rolled up and put into a savings account. I got a deal so that every time I used my debit card, the card would round my payment to the nearest 5 dollar amount and the difference between the price and the payment went into a savings account. Every time I walked to do my shopping, I put 10 bucks into a savings account. If the clerk would tell me that I saved 3 bucks on my shopping bill, that 3 bucks went into a savings account. At the end of every month, I would pay my rent, go shopping and the rest would go into a savings account, usually somewhere between 100 and 200 bucks. When I got to $10,000 bucks, I invested 7000 of it into investment plans recommended by my banker. I nickled and dimed my way into a 6 figure savings account.
Does that make me morally superior? Hardly, but it sure meant that I was determined to do better for myself and my daughter. Oh yeah, through all that time, I would put about 10 bucks worth of groceries into the food bank bin at our local grocery store. Not the same thing as taking in children, which is an extremely laudable thing to do but this moderately rich white old man did try to help.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mrt2this607
I think that if Trump had been more like Florida governor Ron DeSantis, he'd be president right now. DeSantis is just as firm but is a more likeable guy. Even if the Democrats had cheated, it would have been impossible for them to cheat enough to beat a nice guy Trump. I never liked Trump YEARS ago. He rubbed me, as a person, the wrong way. As he started to run for president, my feelings for him didn't change, as a person, but I agreed with most of his positions. So I picked him over Hillary and again over Biden. However, I know lots of people who just couldn't get past that personality flaw. They just couldn't be objective, no matter how right he was.
Right now, DeSantis is going through his smears but he's managing it better because he doesn't have that abrasive personality that Trump does. If Trump runs again, I'd back him but I'd rather see DeSantis run. DeSantis brings likeability to the table that Trump never could. That likeability, or lack of it, was Trump's downfall. The corporate establishment used it to create the narrative of Fascist monster and people believed it. Even my dad, who agrees with all of Trump's policies, if you don't tell him that their Trump's, thinks Trump is like Hitler.....and my dad lived through wartime Holland during WW2. That's how effective using Trump's personality has been for the corporate establishment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
There's been months of peaceful protests in which buildings were burned, stores were looted, people were killed (David Dorn a prime example) bottles, Molotov cocktails, and high grade fireworks are thrown and thousands of police have had all degrees of injuries. There are COUNTLESS videos that document the violence. A BLM supporter, shot and killed a 9 year old girl, because her mother mistakenly turned into the Wendy's that had been burned to the ground a few night earlier. Anyone that wants to see the videos, of the violence, can do so by doing a simple google search.
Hell, the CNN studio, itself, was attacked and vandalised by rioters.
If you go out to protest and it ends in violence, you leave, quickly and abruptly. Staying gives the rioters cover by providing numbers for them to do their dirty deeds. If you go out a second night, and it ends in the same manner, realise that looters are going to use you to hide behind, to add legitimacy to their violence so they can continue to loot and destroy. If you keep going out to these protests and they continue to end in violence, you're becoming complicit in that violence, whether you like to admit it or not. If you, like the CNN media pundit, Chris Cuomo, asks where it says that protests can't be violent, then you're justifying mob violence.
No one says that you can't protest. However, as per the Constitution, that assembly must be peaceful. When the first brick is thrown, the assembly is no longer peaceful and you should divest yourself of that assembly if you want to remain guilt free.
That's the law and that's common sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@west7192
A country cannot be governed by a Constitution alone. There are decisions that must be made, budgets as an example, that just can't be formed through a Constitution. We need representatives to take all the variables into consideration so to decide on how a budget is to be determined. We could have representatives who are permanent and pass on that status to their descendants but history has shown that this is highly susceptible to tyranny. So, we form a voting system, within the rules of the Constitution, to pick our reps. If they do a bad job, we can vote them out. That's how our Republic works. In fact, the fact that the founding forefathers felt that they were being taxed without representation, is why the colonies rebelled against Britain.
It would have been pointless to revolt if we didn't form a system, within the Constitution, if the citizens had no say in choosing who would represent us. So, they formed their own style of democracy that was governed UNDER the Constitution. Without that form of Democracy, our Republic dies because we will once again be taxed without representation. It's an integrated system ruled by the constraints of the Constitution that gives us our freedoms.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bennyandersen742
Maybe I'll have to be simpler in my presentation. I even stated that it doesn't mean that God exists. I said, and I thought it was quite clear, that it was a story of the human condition. A narrative to help to explain human nature.
Our ancestors were not a bunch of dumb, superstitious clods. They were trying to explain their own behaviour through narratives, as metaphors to life. Even the concept of a supreme being is a metaphor to truth and perfection, one to aspire to.
Read my last comment again. I said that Adam reflects the human nature that is in all of us. That inexorable nature to get things wrong even, as in Adam's case, when he had only ONE thing that he was forbidden. If he couldn't do that one thing, how are we ever going to do it with all the things that can go wrong in our lives. That's the lesson of Adam and Eve. They're us. That's what that story is trying to tell us. We should aspire to seek truth and perfection but understanding that it's an impossibility to achieve. When one believes that those attributes have been achieved, that person will feel that they have achieved superiority, which includes all the horrors that go along with the need to impose that superiority on others. Religious people do it all the time, as do academics and politicians and it can be socially devastating.
1
-
1
-
@bennyandersen742
I made a choice, as a teenager, not to do my school work and I quit before I graduated. No sociocultural, physical or psychological conditions forced me to do it. I wanted to have fun. My brother, 2 years younger, was the opposite. We both made choices. Later, I realised that having fun was good but I wanted more. I quit drinking, took on another part time job, finished highschool and went to college. Part way through college, I changed courses because I decided I didn't wasn't as interested in that field as I though. I made a different choice. I worked extremely hard, at times only getting 3 or 4 hours of sleep a day. I didn't have to. I CHOSE to. Those choices were rewarded.
I could have stayed as I was but I chose not to. I chose not to take that easy route, thinking that there were no options, that I had no control of my destiny. That's a self fulfilling attitude and will get you exactly what life doles out to you. In other words, I didn't wait to see what life had in store for me. I made it happen.
1
-
@bennyandersen742
I realise that there are forces that work to form a pattern of life. Almost all the people that I was hanging out with, when I was young, are still doing what they were doing back then. Why did I choose not to continue that pattern? There are lots of reasons. Do you think that I wasn't tempted to take a night off from work and go partying with my friends? Lots of times...but I chose not to. When a buddy called and said that they were going to go camping for the weekend, it would have a great to go but I said no. I was in the same place in life as they were, at one time, but I chose to leave it behind. I still had to do the things that would change my life. I wanted to travel and so did my friends but NONE of them have gone anywhere because they didn't change their lifestyle. That was their decision. Just like I didn't want to become an accountant and changed to a civil engineering course. I could have stuck with what I started with but I chose not to. Now all those original classmates are somewhere in the financial world and I worked in construction and worked outdoors. I knew that I liked the outdoors but had I not chose to change my field, I'd have worked in finance for 30 years.
Choice is still an important aspect of our lives. If it wasn't, I'd still be sitting at home waiting for life to happen, swilling beer, instead of making life work for me, as best as I possibly could.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Like a coward.....you're kidding. For the longest time, he had press briefings, EVERY DAY, for well over an hour. What did the press do with that opportunity? Instead of asking questions that would help all the viewers watching, they just threw "gotcha" type questions at him. Questions that no one in their right minds would answer.
Questions like this. "Don't you think it's irresponsible to tell people that it's okay to go out in the sunshine when people are dying in Florida and Singapore, both hot, humid places?" Paraphrased, of course.
It would have been a good question, great one, in fact, had he asked it in a civilised manner. Instead, he framed it around "irresponsible" instead of framing it around why there were cases in warmer countries. STUPID. REAL STUPID. I wanted to know the why of cases in warmer countries and we didn't get an answer because he was too busy asking questions designed to bash the guy, instead of getting information that could HELP people.
Most of those reporters are disgrace. All they care about is their own careers and making hay out of a serious crisis. If they can bring down Trump, they figure that's a career builder. Self aggrandising, narcissistic jerks.....no different than Trump.
They make my blood boil.
1
-
@orkhepaj
You're assuming that she was forced to do this. You don't know that. My cousin wanted to play guitar. It's all that he ever did, much to his parents dismay. He'd wake up, in the morning, put his feet on the floor, grab his guitar and start playing. He'd play before school, after school, after supper and well into the night. He took every music course possible at school and both guitar and piano lessons on his own free time. His parents were proud of him but they were also worried that he was too driven.
There are people, even children, that are driven to succeed and they don't need to be forced to work hard. Don't make assumptions that you can't possibly know and don't take away from the work that she had put into becoming the best that she could be. You're buying into a stereotype and assuming that's who she is. It isn't fair and it robs her, and others, of the right to follow their dreams.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrisfuller2069
It's like YOU are the one who didn't read MY post. I told you about the company that I worked for, which is one of the highest paying companies in town. They couldn't get employees. I told you that. There is another factory who pays more than than the one that I work at and THEY have trouble getting workers. The highest paying factory in our town. I don't know where else I'd go to find better. The stories I hear are all the same. It's too hot. They don't like shift work. They find it boring. The boss is an a-hole. It hurts my back. My head hurts. It goes on and on. One guy said he thought that I was in the mafia or something because, although we were paid the same, I was buying a house and he couldn't even save enough for a down payment. I did it but he couldn't...but he took days off all the time. I told him to take out a savings plan that was available and the company would match it but he wouldn't. I'm now retired for 4 years, living a great life and he's still there, complaining about everything, taking days off and still just as broke and he can't figure out why.
This didn't happen to my parent's generation. They would work 2 jobs, pinch pennies until the Lincoln screamed "OUCH" and made wise decisions. The work was just as hot, the shifts were just as long and round the clock, the bosses were just as big an a-holes, the work was still boring but they did it and did their best. Not like the ones that you're talking about....doing shitty work and blowing off. When you do that, you'll end up nowhere.
1
-
1
-
@undergrounddojokeyboardcag701
Florida had 99% of their votes counted, by midnight, on election day and they've over 4 times the population to count. Maricopa County, yes a county, took almost a week and that was the initial vote count. They're just counting and it shouldn't take any longer if it's close or not. I've said it before, this type of delay creates election deniers and division in the country. There's no reason, in the world, why the count wasn't completed by morning and we'd be talking about a recount by noon. We're not living in horse and buggy days.
If I were from a 3rd world country, looking around for a good election process, for my nation's first democratic election, Maricopa County....Arizona even......would be the LAST place I'd go. Efficiency inspires confidence and I would have no confidence in what I've seen in Maricopa County. This is just plain common sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AndrewFishman
Maybe in hindsight the Cuban missile crisis was ridiculous but it didn't seem so at the time. It was a direct confrontation and it was on the news all the time. Everyone was talking about it and how destructive hydrogen bombs could be. Khrushchev backed down but it was more than just placing warheads. It was a showdown and the Soviets blinked first. Also, it was the very first real direct staredown with nuclear weapons. It was immediate and a real threat, not just a movie. I remember those movies. "On the Beach" was released in '59, 3 years before the Cuban crisis. It just added to the fear, among other things, that the Crisis brought. By the time "The Day After" was released, we had become desensitised to the danger. The fear was still there but not like it was in the early 60s. I was 11 years old, during that crisis, and all the kids of my time, were afraid that we'd be dead within a week. Our parents lived through WW2 and knew the dangers of war and that only added to the atmosphere of dread that we felt.
One thing about those times was that our parents would try to shield us from those things to a degree. It's impossible now with social media being the way it is. "Go out and play" was the order, so we did and it was a way to forget the danger that was hanging over our heads. Like I said, though, any loud explosive sound, would bring it to the surface. It was frightening.
1
-
@AndrewFishman
I didn't take it negatively. I understand how it was in the 80s but I was only pointing out the difference between the CMC and the eighties. I remember being at the neighbours, watching the Mickey Mouse Club, and the programming was interrupted to tell us of the latest threat from the Russians. Back in those days, regular programming was NEVER stopped for the news unless something serious was happening. Someone, on the news, actually told us to be aware of where the nearest bomb shelter was. We were country folk and there was no bomb shelter within 20 miles. My neighbour and I went outside, scared silly, thinking this was the end. Then my cousin, who as couple of years older, came by and asked if we saw the news and scared us even more by explaining the realities of a nuclear war. We thought it was coming. There was no such threat in the 80s. The possibility was real, VERY real, but there wasn't a showdown, with fingers on the button, so to speak. The news wasn't being interrupted to tell us how close a confrontation was. It was more of repeated scenarios, real but not real. My kids were aware of it, even worried about it somewhat, but were never confronted with a real situation that could have ended it all. That was the difference. It was more like the climate change threat. A real possibility but sometime in the future.
1
-
@AndrewFishman
Existential fear. A fear that our existence, today, would threaten our existence sometime in the future. Like climate change.
13 years ago, Al Gore released his movie. In it, he predicted that sections of Manhattan would be underwater, including the base of the Twin Towers. Instead, ocean levels have only risen 3 millimetres. 3 millimetres. I don't even know how you'd measure that on the scale of an ocean. Now, it's the 12 year till doomsday prophecy. It might be 11 years now, since it's been almost a year since AOC's dire prediction.
Of course, there's truth to this climate change issue. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and it does affect temperatures, but using timelines to predict the end is counter productive. Already, people are doubting because of Gore's movie and his water level predictions. The "scare them to death" tactic isn't the way to go about pollution problems and I'm afraid it might backfire on us. Reacting out of panic is never a great idea. Worse, it takes control out of the hands of ordinary people and places it directly in the hands of politicians. They'll tell us what to do and if you don't listen, you will pay the price. I'm afraid that if we allow the government to take control, we could destroy our country in our efforts to save it. It will become the never ending battle, the government our eternal saviour, but we must always be on guard against those who would do environmental harm. Sort of like the Orwellian enemies against the free state of Oceania in 1984. If we don't do as the government says, environmental disaster will overcome us all. It is rather Orwellian.
1
-
@AndrewFishman
Yes, I did read that. As a country boy, I'm dead set against that idea. In fact, I'm seeing the opposite right now. I live about 100 miles east of Toronto. Home prices are skyrocketing in Toronto. People are selling their Toronto homes for over 1 million dollars and buying here for 1/4 of that for the same house. Building around here is going at a breakneck speed. There are rural areas here that I don't even recognise any more and I've lived here since 52.
Some of the ideas in Agenda 21 aren't really all that bad but I have one major objection to it. It's a top down policy. They tell us and we are to listen. Being a freedom type guy, I don't like that and I believe that these things can happen through the choices of individuals. Like population control. We, in the western industrialised countries, have lowered our birthrate through the choices of the individual, not because it was imposed on us. I believe that if left to our own devices, with only minimal government mandates, we can work it out ourselves.
Which reminds me. Canada's largest military air base is about 10 miles from where I grew up. A major reason for our fear, during the CMC, was that we were sure that this base would be a prime target for a nuclear attack. Our country life didn't insulate us like it might have other places in North America or at least that's what we thought. Just to give some context to why we were so fearful back in 62.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelmulvihill7710
What you don't understand is the long term effects of shutting down the economy and doubling the national debt in less than a year. Or the effects of printing money to cover that debt. What that means that if we do it again, for another year, it's another doubling of the debt and even MORE money in circulation which a recipe for runaway inflation and horrific economic collapse in 3rd world countries. That means starvation, which especially affects the children, who will be affected by the effects of childhood malnutrition for the rest of their lives. My sister adopted a girl who, at 3 years old, nearly starved to death. She's suffered from all kinds of health problems because of it, including a kidney transplant....all because of the effects of starvation.
Right now people, living in 3rd world cities, are out of work and money. They're going into the countryside to forage for food. That means that they're spreading the disease, they're killing wildlife and flora to live and are prey to criminals who will steal what little they have.
The UN has warned that there are at least 10 million at risk of starvation right now, due to the lockdowns, and that lockdowns should only be used in extreme circumstances.
But....go ahead. Be afraid of the long term effects, that you've even admitted that you don't even know if they exist or not. That'll feed the masses in the 3rd world and ease your conscience a bit.
1
-
@gwuengr2
Let's ignore the elephant in the room. People are leaving California in droves. The population has been going down since 2020 and it's the first time in California history. They're taking their money, their skills and their jobs with them. Companies that have left California since 2020.....Chevron, SpaceX, Oracle, Hewlett Packard, Tesla, Neutrogena, Unical Aviation, Kelly-Moore Paints, Boingo Wireless, Hyperion, First Foundation Bank....and that's not even CLOSE to all of them. I'll name even more if you want.
Tens of thousands of jobs...GONE. Billions of dollars.....gone and it's only going to get worse. "He's getting a big pension". That should explain the problems in California. LOL. Get your head out of the sand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tubthump
That was an agreement made in 1933, right after Hitler gained power. Why wouldn't a Jewish group want to leave Germany, after hearing all the anti-Jewish rhetoric that Hitler has been spewing for years. Also, that deal was an agreement to get Jews out of GERMANY, not Europe and it covered 60,000 Jews to leave by 1939. The Jews in the rest of Europe were not included. If I were a Jew, Zionist or not, and living in Germany in 1933, I'd want out too.
Finklestein is one of those guys who thinks that Israel is an apartheid country. Gaza has been independent since 2005. There are no Jews in Gaza, not a one. Isn't that what they wanted? There are 1.8 million Muslims living in Israel....not Gaza or the West Bank, but in Israel. They can own property, start a business, vote, run for public office, join the Israeli police force or military. They have all the rights of an Israeli Jews. In fact, it was a Muslim judge who sentenced ex-Prime Minister of Israel and one time mayor of Jerusalem to 3 years in prison. There were no protests from Israeli Jews, no calls for that judge to lose his job or be arrested. This apartheid nonsense is just that. Nonsense. It's the radical Muslims of Hamas who are causing all the issues in the region.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marcbowen5559
The one thing I will say is that the Democrats have always held themselves up as the party who cares about the unfortunate, who will help those who can't help themselves. The Republicans are the ones who are supposed to care about making money, who have no sympathy for poor and economically deprived. Yet, you can see what's happening in Minneapolis, in a blue city and state. Where's the caring for the little guy?
When you see these homeless encampments in Minneapolis, San Francisco, LA, Portland, Seattle, Oakland, Sacramento, Chicago, NY, Philadelphia, Washington DC.....all blue cities, all run by the self proclaimed champions of the oppressed and underprivileged.
That is the shame of the Democrats. They claim to care but blame others for THEIR lack of action. The oppressed actually mean nothing to those leaders. Tim Walz cheered when Minneapolis was burning in 2020. Nero is held up as heartless tyrant who fiddled when Rome burned but Walz was selected by the Democrats to run for vice-president in spite of his glee when his city was on fire. If you can't see that as a problem for the Democrats, YOU are the reason that Trump won the election.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ali Velshi is Ismaili Muslim of Gujarati Indian descent. The Gujarati were well known for their role in the slave trade in Eastern Africa and India. I'd say that before he starts going after anyone else for historical wrongs, maybe he should be making his own bed. Many Gujarati are Hindu, as well, who were deeply entrenched in the horrific caste system, which the British wanted eliminated and succeeded, for the large part .
My point being is that we all can point to things, in our past, that we're not proud of. That has nothing to do with Queen Elizabeth or HER legacy, what she did or believed as the ruling monarch.
Velshi is a hypocrite, just like anyone else who loves pointing fingers. In fact, I might be one as well but, in my defence, I'm only saying this about Velshi in an attempt to stop his type of rhetoric.....a rhetoric that is too often dividing people these days.
1
-
If you fight back, you just might end up dead, just like Tyre Nichols did. What you do, is go along with the police and if they do something that's excessively violent, you turtle and protect yourself as best you can. Then, when it's all over and you know that you're safe, you call a lawyer and start both a lawsuit and a criminal investigation. Don't EVER fight back against the police because if you do, you're risking your very life.
And YES....I have been in that situation. 2 cops had me bent over the hood of a car. One of them had a pistol to my temple and was pushing down on it as hard as he could. The other kept kicking me in the ankles, telling me to spread my feet apart, even though I couldn't. I still complied, didn't fight back, and they quit. Had I fought back, I don't have any idea what they would have done. I got off lucky, with bruises to my temple and ankles but, to this day, I know it was because I didn't fight back.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Dillon Duncan
It isn't Palestinian territory and they've never had that territory. The Ottoman Turks controlled the area for almost 400 years and they got it through military dominance. During that time, the area was populated by Muslims, Jews and various Christian sects. Then the Turks lost WW1 and the British took over. The British were the ones that suggested the 2 state option. Why? Because the land that they controlled, the Levant, was populated by these various groups. This has NEVER been Palestinian land, exclusively. Also, it isn't about ethnicity. It's about religion and if every Jew in Israel converted to Islam, the conflict would be over. In fact, Gaza is an Islamic state and Islam is the official religion. It is guided by Islamic law and it is a separate entity and self governing. Israel is not encroaching on Gaza. It's accused of building settlements on the West Bank, also never a part of Palestine.
The West Bank was taken from Jordan in the 6 Day War and has been controlled by Israel ever since. If anything, that area should be returned to Jordan, just as the Golan Heights, also taken from Syria in the 6 Day War, would be returned to Syria. The West Bank is where Israel has been building settlements.....no territory taken from Jordan. It's NEVER been Palestine, either.
Also, this thing about the Jews and financial success is the same logic SJWs use against white people and colonial success. It's bigotry disguised as righteous grievance against historical events and progress.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If AOC's message was about how Puerto Ricans had to deal with poor conditions, that's one thing. However, it would appear that AOC did NOTHING to help her own grandmother, the least that she could have done, under the circumstances. She allowed her mother to live, as a victim, and then used her grandmother's victimhood to score political points and then plead the she was only pointing out the travails of OTHER Puerto Ricans.
The first to come to one's aid, during times of trouble, should be family members. AOC, thoughtlessly, used her grandmother's dilemma for a personal agenda. What she should have done is helped her grandmother and then went to other Puerto Ricans, who didn't have the privilege of having family in the Congress of the United States making 174,000 bucks a year, and revealed THEIR plight. Then this controversy would not be in place.
Like I said, she's thoughtless which strongly implies selfishness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
madwtube
It's a law because of drugs, like Thalidomide, that have caused problems in the the past. That set off a slew of legislation designed to not EVER have that happen again, if possible, and that's just fine, to a certain extent. Also, a drug, that's not approved by the FDA, cannot be used or prescribed by a doctor. If a doctor does do it, that's where the litigation starts. The "right to try" is legislation designed to prohibit lawsuits when a drug, that is in testing phase, is applied in desperate situations. That's all it is. It's not a scam....I'm not even sure what the hell that means. It allows drugs, already in the testing phase, to be used as a last hope, without fear of litigation or indictment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@drill6739
Socialism definition......
a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Read that part where it says that describes how the means of production should be owned or regulated by the community, again. That means that your vaunted owners, owned companies that were regulated by the "community", which always means the Party. Even the name "Nazi" means, in German, that you're a member of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. You'd have been a Nationalist, specifically a German Nationalist, and a Socialist, led by the German workers, to form the community that controlled the politics, social and economic life of that country. No company was to have a union. Why would they? They had the Nazi Party and Party officials took the place of Union officials in the larger factories. They'd even hold regular meetings with all the workers, management included, to go over production figures and how dedicated individuals were to the Party. The same thing happened in the Soviet Union. Don't need no stinking unions, the workers are in control now.
You're delusional if you think that Mao was some kind of victim of the zealousness of his followers. He knew what was going on and he could have voiced his displeasure while it was going on. In fact, Mao was an ideologue and even his policies, like the killing of song birds and the confiscation of metal tools, killed millions. That's what happens when you leave the complete control of a country to a handful of people. They will make decisions on things they know nothing about and it will invariably end in disaster.
I'm appalled that there are still people that would defend the horrific murders, disease and famines that Mao was directly responsible for. The Chinese people had gone through hell, in the past and a political saviour would have instigated a system that gave the people the means to individual responsibility and freedom instead of another version of the autocracies of the Chinese past.
1
-
1
-
@ivonned32
Division is good for the politicians who think that way. The ones who want to seize power by using the angry to destroy the things that we cherish. The angry come from every race, gender, sexual preference and religion. You see it in the BLM riots. Just as many whites burning and looting as blacks.
That whites are setting fires, for all kinds of reasons, doesn't take away from the fact that the authorities allow the underbrush to grow, wildly, until a dry summer turns it into a tinderbox. The indigenous people, before Europeans came to the Americas, would burn it off, quite frequently, so the fires were manageable. Now they let everything grow, without management, until, more accurately WHEN, a fire does start, it's a raging fire from hell. Because a fire will start, one way or another.
1
-
1
-
Yanni Ritsarntyios
How do you stop a disease? It isn't like Trump is going door to door, spreading the virus. You're blaming, like so many others and like so many others, you have NO suggestions to halt the spread.
In fact, right now, US cases are on the way down while many countries are seeing MAJOR spikes. Does that mean that Trump has the right ideas on halting the virus and the leaders of those countries are the screw-ups? Of course not. It's a disease and there will be ebbs and flows around the world. Living in a country that has done well (Canada) and where people have been quite smug about it, we're now experiencing a major spike. Does that mean that all the things that we've done, that we felt was SO great, are suddenly all wrong?
I'm going to say no. This is going to happen. I've said it all along. The disease will run its course and, in the end, there's little that can be done about it until someone comes up with a viable vaccine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Psychonaut
Do you really think that every thought in your head is your own? Everything that you know is the result of others teaching you. You were taught to speak, to read, to do math, everything you know is the result of ideas and facts that you've been exposed to.
Peterson talks about more than just psychology. He's putting out ideas for you to think about. Using your own mind to judge the things around you, to understand what others say, their motives, what "quotes" mean and how they might apply to you.
You don't become a better person or accomplished by regressing into your own head and considering nothing outside of it. You look at the world and what's in it, interact with it, think about it and try to understand the wisdom or foolishness of it.
I'm not that egotistical to think that I'm the ONLY one that has a thought worth relaying to others. If I did, why would I even talk to anyone. Whatever they say would be stupid by my standards. It takes one narcissistic person to believe that they're the only person that has anything of worth to say. The world doesn't revolve around me. If someone has something of value to say, I appreciate it. I'm NOT the only "wise" person alive and I rather doubt that you're not that "wise" person either.
"Try thinking for yourself". The justification that a person that can't think beyond his only little thoughts would say. My God....what an ego to think that "yourself" is the ultimate.
1
-
Psychonaut
Right now, I'm sitting in the sunshine, enjoying the fruits of what I did over my life.
Wisdom isn't about never making mistakes, either. Peterson has made them in the past and he's talked about them. Wisdom is gathering all the knowledge that you can, assessing them and then knowing that mistakes are not the only thing that defines you. If that were so, we'd all give up after we'd made the first poor error in judgement in our life. Apparently, we're all not as lucky as you are. Never EVER made an error in judgement in your life.
I'd hate to be one of your kids. Make one life mistake and you're forever saddled with the "loser" label.
Peterson is recovering from his problem. He's made enough money in his life that he could do whatever he wants. He's one of the most successful people, not only in his field, but on the planet, known and admired by millions. Who are you beside that? Some internet hack calling people names. No one has ever heard of you and when you're gone, there goes your influence on the world. You're a nobody, a talking nothing on the internet. No one even knows your name. You didn't even have the courage to identify yourself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When you do, you'll be playing right into their hands. The media will accuse YOU of violence and then say how dangerous conservatives are.
What we have to do is call it out and demand that the law takes care of it. Demand that the media, CNN and MSNBC, start reporting on these incidents and denouncing that violence. If it's a Bernie supporter that's doing the attacking, demand that Bernie denounce it. Tell him, the media and the Democrats, that if they don't do something to stop it, you'll never vote for them again. Turn our individual voices into a chorus of indignation and denunciation of political violence, so loud, that they can't ignore it. Because if we return violence with violence, the media will use it against us. We have to outsmart them and it should be easy. They're NOT THAT SMART.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tbest29
Apparently, allowing a "criminal" president to sit in office and have the power of an acting president is the wrong time, then.
There isn't enough evidence to indict Trump when the time is right. Those Democrats who won't let it go are now hanging their hopes on the "you can't charge a sitting president" trope.
They're still haven't set the impeachment process into motion. Why won't they deal with that? They were so SURE that the Mueller Report would be the end of Trump but now that it's here, he's still the president and no impeachment in sight. "No recommendations". That's what the report said. They're no closer than they were 3 years ago.
Now they're having more hearings and Mueller's appearance didn't help their cause, either. In fact, left leaning MSM have pundits that are calling Mueller's testimony as a disaster.
If the Democrats keep on with this, they'll lose the next elections and they'll lose big. People are getting tired of it and not just that. They're tired of the eternal racist charges, the actions of Antifa, the attacks on free speech, the fear that right wing students have to endure on campus, the violence against people for wearing MAGA hats, the hypocrisy of their border security positions, the incessant virtue signalling and on and on. The left is absolutely filled with rage and hate and have gotten to the point that they can't see beyond that hate. It's hate that is feeding this "HOPE" of charging Trump with something.....ANYTHING. They refuse to work on the real things that need to be solved.
And I've been a Democrat supporter all my life. After the Covington Kids debacle, I started to think that the Democrats have moved into a position that makes them WORSE than Trump. I never thought I'd see that day but it's here.
1
-
@tbest29
Don't fool yourself. If the Dems, specifically Nadler and Schiff, don't give up on this impeachment stuff, that could do it. If the squad, AOC and her henchman, don't stop with their racially motivated rhetoric, that could contribute to their loss in 2020. If the Democrats don't separate themselves from Antifa and the far left socialist activists and all the far out gender, race and feminist ideologies, they could find that another contributing factor. They have to get back to the centre or the ordinary person is, either stay home on election day or vote for Trump.
People are tired of this Russia stuff, of the incessant racist and bigot accusation and just, as an example, the foolishness of men claiming to be women and then competing in women's athletics. Another one is, and it's a biggie, the attack on free speech where a person is physically and verbally attacked for an opinion and could even lose their job over it. That's all from the left and the Democrats are being associated with those ideas and it's killing their hopes.
1
-
1
-
@tbest29
That could happen. That's why they have elections and that's why the US is a democratic Republic and not a Fascist state. The people still have a say in government policy.
However, don't be too sure. Hillary was going to win in '16 and it was a positive. All the "smart" people were laughing at even the idea of Trump being president and when he won, they just couldn't believe it. At the time, I predicted a Trump win based on Hillary's rhetoric and I told anyone that would listen that she would be the cause of the Democrat demise. I'd supported Obama in the 2 previous elections but became disillusioned with him at the end of his 2nd term. Weren't the Dems upset....crying, wailing, throwing things and then the claims that he must have cheated, somehow. That's what brought us the next 3 years of collusion claims and the aftermaths. They just refused to accept that maybe they had played it all wrong. In fact, the people that voted for Obama, in Middle America, voted for Trump. That's who the Dems have to win over and they're not doing a good job of it. They "white privilege" rhetoric is still being spouted and with 65 percent of the population being white, that's not exactly pandering to the biggest block of the voting public.
But, you never know. I don't think that the Dems will win, but the world is an unpredictable place. The difference between you and I is this. I recognise the fickleness of the voting public. You're so filled with Trump hate, you see nothing but that hate and can't understand why everyone doesn't think as you do.
1
-
@tbest29
I don't see how he has done anything to democracy. There was a midterm election and the Republicans lost the House. He accepted it. When he tried to get money from the Pentagon, a court ruled that it wasn't legal, he stopped and took it back to the courts and he won that case just recently. There will be an election next year. On top of that, if you're going to say that he colluded with the Russians, Mueller flat out said that he could not make a determination that. He's an investigator, who reported that he, basically came to no conclusion on guilt. That's innocence in every court in the country.
He's a blowhard and a braggart. That's for sure but as for normalising lying, I'm going to have to be a bit cynical here. Honestly, is Trump the first time that you've ever heard of a lying politician? You must be awfully young. Lawyers, politicians and used car salesman are known as the biggest liars in existence.
As for the charges, not unless they get more evidence. Already Nadler and Schiff are talking about another round of investigations. Why would they do that if they already have the damning evidence? Schiff said a long time ago that he had irrefutable evidence of collusion. He said it on network television. Yet, I've never heard him say what that evidence was. If he has that strong evidence, why doesn't he give it.
At first, I really thought Trump was in trouble with the collusion, but after hearing the "walls are closing in", "bombshell revelations", the "tick, tick, tick" on the treason clock and nothing ever materialising, I started to think that it was a case built more on wishful thinking than reality. Also, it seems that the MSM were using it as a ratings booster and now that it's been fizzling out, CNN and MSNBC ratings have plummeted. MSM was vested in keeping this story on the forefront and the Democrats were quite happy to have it there in the belief that it would sway people to their side in the elections and it did in the midterms. However, they may be riding that horse too long and it may backfire, especially after the Mueller hearings. It didn't have the results that they had hoped for.
1
-
@tbest29
Calling him an idiot kind of shows that you do hate the guy. Also, if there was collusion, why didn't Mueller say so. That was his job or mandate. He was supposed to investigate Russian interference and find any cooperation with the Russians from any campaign sources. If he did find collusion, he was to present it, along with a determination on how good the evidence was. He didn't do that. The same with obstruction. He didn't do that, either. He said it himself. He offered no determination of Trump's guilt. That, in simple English, means that he didn't have the evidence to say he was guilty. That's after all the investigation, with a team of investigators, and they still couldn't determine his guilt. If they could, Mueller would have said so. He didn't.
Therefore, Nadler and Schiff want to start a NEW round of investigations, this time concentrating on his finances and so-called money laundering. The more that they keep changing the angles of investigation, the more people will begin to think that it actually IS a witch hunt.
The Democrats would be better suited in uniting the Party and developing a single, cohesive platform. They might even TRY to give an appearance that they're trying to get something done. That would be refreshing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@clayc8115
These are toys. Toys aren't harmful. They're items that kids play with to amuse themselves. All toys are gender neutral. Why is a toy race car a boy's toy? Don't women drive race cars? Why is a doll a girl's toy? I fed, bathed, changed my kid's diapers as a man. Does that make me a woman? Get a grip.
As for cigarettes and alcohol, they're known to be harmful to the health and growth of impressionable children. Is a toy tractor dangerous because you happen to think of it as a boy's toy? My sister might argue that. She's out in the fields on a tractor all the time as are a lot of women in the farming communities. How do you make a gender neutral tractor, anyway?
This is dividing our children into subgroups. Little boys play with this and little girls play with that, yet the gender neutral kids play with the SAME toys that little boys and girls play with. Now business owners must pay for signs to tell parents what they SHOULD be buying for their kids, as if they're not smart enough to figure it out for themselves.
What next? Mandated toy sections for white kids, black kids, Asian kids, Hispanic kids. Don't conflate the use of abusive, addictive and unhealthy products with children's toys. It's divisive and completely foolish and it's not the business of our government to decide what toys our children should be playing with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've owned a home renovation firm and I've managed a small business for a small company as well. I've had to deal with paperwork, and MORE paperwork, and MORE regulations, until there was so much regulation, that it would take a special consultant to untangle all the requirements.
Apparently, "fuck off" is the official way of telling me that you refuse to answer ANY of my questions.
Great stuff. Through are entire exchange, you've never, once, tried to have an adult conversation and not, once, have you even attempted to answer any of my questions. Then you finish in exactly the way that I expected. "Fuck off". You're quite the intellectual. SMH.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justinkirschenman2232
First of all, that war is over. Obama pulled out all the troops in 2011 and there was a big press conference is Washington about it. The next day, the VERY NEXT DAY, the Iraqi president flies home and starts arresting Sunni leaders. That's not the fault of anyone but that president, Nouri al-Maliki. He didn't have to do that but the hatred the Shia and Sunni have for one another is what started the conflict in both Syria and Iraq right now. ISIS, Sunni Muslims, are fighting against the Shia president, Assad, because they believe that the Shias are heretics and they've felt that way for a thousand years.
Then Obama got them right back into it and ISIS has been behaving horrifically ever since. Would you seriously expect Trump to get out, right away, when ISIS was there murdering innocent people? He had to finish them off. Now, they're pretty well defeated and their leader is gone. Trump said it again when he announced his death. He want's the troops out. It doesn't happen overnight and thank God that it didn't. That murderous ISIS leader would still be torturing and killing innocents, like the Mueller girl, who was kidnapped in front of refugee hospital and horrifically abused by ISIS. She was there to help refugees and those butchers did that to her and all you can do is dredge up something that happened 17 years ago...the WMD lead to that earlier war.
You're too angry and bitter to assess this rationally. If the troops are out in 6 months, are you going to come back to this thread and admit that maybe you were wrong? I'd be surprised if you do.
I don't know if it will happen but if Trump says he wants to do it, then I'll support that intention. He says that he's ready to do it now and we'll see what happens. I'm not about to lose my mind over it because of the way things happened. In fact, his earlier announcement about leaving, might have induced Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to think that he was safe and wasn't as careful as he had been.
Lighten up a little.
1
-
@justinkirschenman2232
The war was essentially over in 2011. Here is that announcement when Obama was preparing to pull the last of the troops out of Iraq, some 5000 troops, way down from the some 150,000 a few years earlier.
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/22/world/middleeast/president-obama-announces-end-of-war-in-iraq.html
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40682.pdf
However, that's when the Iraqi president amped up his assault on Sunni and it looked as if Al Qaeda was going to resurface and ISIS started to form. That war in Iraq was over and Obama even stated that the US would be leaving a stable country. He didn't screw it up. The Iraqis did that themselves.
Now Trump is going to leave but he wasn't just going to dump and run before the job was done. Also, your statement on how the US was helping ISIS, against Russia, makes no sense. How is killing their leader helping ISIS? That's as illogical as it come.
The situation in Iraq and Syria is complex with Al Qaeda, Al-Nusra, Syrian rebels, Syrian loyalists to Assad, Kurds, Turks, Shia Iraqis, ISIS all fighting one another. I'm sure I missed a few. The original invasion was a mistake but to leave when Obama wanted would have been a mistake as well. The Iraqis could have settled into making a stable country back then, but they didn't want to. Sunni and Shia hate each other. That's what's behind the war in Syria, Yemen and Iraq. It's behind all the posturing between Iran and Saudi Arabia as well.
It looks as if ISIS is defeated and now is the time to get out. Not in 2011, not in 2016, but now when ISIS is gone. The fact is, if the fighting continues in those countries, it won't be because that's what Trump wants. It'll be because of Shia/Sunni hatred of one another.....a hatred that's been there for over 1000 years. Shia have pilgrimaged to Karbala for all that time, some 10 million a year and rivals Mecca as a holy site. This is the shrine that ISIS had vowed to destroy because they see it as a sacrilege. Karbala was the site of a huge battle between Shia and Sunni in 680. That's how long they've been at each other.
Please understand the hatred these people have for one another. Shia even believe that the final battle will be between those 2 factions and it will be the defeat of the Sunni and the beginning of their Caliphate. That's how deep this rivalry runs.
1
-
@TheRichie213
He sent strikes to aid in the fight against ISIS. ISIS established a zone that covered Syria and Iraq. This was, in essence, no longer Syria but the new Islamic Caliphate that ISIS had won militarily....a new country. Syria, itself, was fighting ISIS as well.
Also, your "banker" war makes no sense, either. Bankers could make just as much money by lending to build infrastructure around the world.
What difference does it make to a banker if a country borrows to build a new highway, sewer system or to buy a few tanks. You still go into debt.
Why is it that you refuse to acknowledge the enmity between Sunni and Shia that has lasted for over 1000 years? Also, if the banks are the reason for wars, why is it that wars have been fought for thousands of years long before banks even existed. Are you actually claiming that Genghis Khan was sent by the Mongol banks to conquer all of central Asia and China? The most primitive of peoples fought with their neighbours. That's human nature and in fact, we're living in a time where a person is the safest from being a war casualty in our history. We have a bloody past but it's getting better but that doesn't figure into your personal hatred against your own perceived enemy and carrying on your own battle against them.
It's not banks that cause war. It's human nature.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnkladis4266
She does have the right to her opinion and to express what that opinion is. However, if I worked for a company and then posted, online, that I'd never purchase anything that my company produces and I will ALWAYS buy from our business rival....I can expect to be fired, terminated, let go and metaphorically kicked out the front door. I have the right to say it and my company has the right to fire me for what my free speech implies.
That's what this person did. She openly said that she supports a group that has been designated a terror group, an organisation who is supported by a Iran, who has openly stated that they wish to see the death of Israel and the United States. She's shown a strong possibility that she may act, as an ally of that group, known as Hamas, along with Iran and use her position to undermine her own nation and job.
She can say what she wants but that doesn't mean that she can't be fired from a job in which she is obligated to protect the interests of the country that she works for. My tax dollars should not go to a person who could potentially act against our nation. That would be like Roosevelt recruiting Goebbels. It makes no sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@roderickmills5398
Who gets to decide who's an idiot and who isn't? What would be the criteria? Not academics. Look at some of the clowns teaching in our universities right now. Do you go back to the monarchy? That was a terrible idea.
Yes....democracy is slow and cumbersome. I said it myself. However, until someone, that includes you, comes up with a better idea, it's still the best we have. I know this because the best countries in the world to live in for the last 100 years have all been democracies, all with Constitutions to mitigate the actions of mob rule. That's what has protected us, to a certain degree, from the leftist agenda to get rid of the idea of free speech and freedom of the press. That's mob rule in action and the Constitution has, so far, been the check that has held them off. It's a democracy under checks and balances that tries to hold off the negative effects of the mob.
If you can come up with a better system, I'd like to hear it. I've not heard one yet. Constitutions are a way of telling us that our freedoms to choose are still bound by the rule of law and that even the mob is bound by it. Show me the perfect system and I'll adopt that but until you can show me that system, it's the best of all the horrible ideas. The only ones, thus far, that believe in other systems are autocrats, people that want absolute power. They've always been far worse than democracies.
1
-
@roderickmills5398
"Time to recreate a genuine federalist system and that means local hierarchies."
That still leaves us with a basic question. How do you settle on the local hierarchy. Who gets to be at the top of the hierarchy, the ones who actually make the decisions that are the best for your local entity. Should it be a monarchy type system? That was a disaster. Maybe something like what the Chinese have now, a system that grew out of the Politburo system of Stalin and Mao? A miniaturised sized version that would suit a local government. That hasn't been that great, either and the people in China don't have near the freedoms that we have in the west and we have no reason to believe that it wouldn't become a city state system where a few get to run their vassals below them.
We're still may be back to a localised democracy, where the individual gets to vote on who gets to enact policy on a limited time basis.
That's still a democracy.
All I'm hearing is a plea for greater state rights, something the left would hate. It has also been the biggest struggle of American politics. In fact, it was State's rights that was the big issue of the Civil War.....not slavery, as many would make it. It's also state's rights that have made Oregon such a leftist paradise. They've actually relaxed laws to an extent that aren't there of a Federal level. Sanctuary cities and states are another example. It's the loony left that using state and municipal laws in an effort to get federal control. It's why these states hate Trump. He stands in their way of seizing complete control, the control that allows them to break Federal immigration laws. Yet, in California, a sanctuary state, they have municipalities that have opted out of this state legislated sanctuary status. They did it because local politics, the people, voiced their opinion, through the power of localised democratic process.
The same corruption that you see on a federal level can and does happen on the local level. Citizens in Seattle went to their town council, democrats all, and complained about the homeless and crime issues in that city, and they were basically laughed at. I guarantee that had they went to the Whitehouse, Trump wouldn't have laughed at them.
1
-
1
-
@roderickmills5398
The US is a amalgamation of states which all adhere to the Constitution of the whole. The right to vote is a central part of that Constitution and if a state abandons the right to vote for all its citizens, it has contravened the Constitution, the very ideals of the entire country. In essence, it's a step to secession.
From your comments, it would seem that your problem isn't with democracy or the right to vote, it's with the size of government. That the further away a person gets from a localised government, the value of that individual person's voice carries less weight. Now, that's an excellent point and I would say that there is a very important discussion to be had on that topic. Take, as an example, what is happening in the EU. Too many Europeans feel as if they've given away control of their lives and countries to an overblown association of European nations who pass edicts without any consideration to the lives of those in different regions. A huge central government that is incredibly distant from the ordinary person who feels they've lost any voice in the country they live in. That's a travesty and that, in a lot of ways, is what I'm hearing from you. I'm saying this because you've yet to respond to the question of a better way to build a government, even on a localised level. All you talk about is federal over reach and that's a different topic.
It's one of the reasons why Trump won. Those people living in the fly over states feel helpless as the big states, the populated areas, dictate how those in the rural landscape should live. That is something that I could agree with you on but I can't agree with a state or local process that doesn't include the power of the individual as participants in government decisions. That means a vote, a say in how it should be done. They're not always going to be the right decisions because people are notorious for making mistakes but it's still the best for everyone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justinkirschenman2232
First of all, this article doesn't state whether the tainted test kits were discovered in the field or as a part of an in house quality control check. That makes a difference. Also, to say that this is still happening requires proof. It also implies that there is no quality control whatsoever in this industry, even from the new companies that have gotten into new testing kits.
Also, I've watch numerous press conferences. The press was continuously haranguing Trump, at first, for the lack of tests and that initially they weren't that good. Trump has acknowledged it. Then why, when testing is approaching 10 million, aren't the press haranguing him about these test tainted with Covid viruses. I've NEVER heard that and it would be a good one to go after him for.
Why would I trust these people to make the vaccines? Maybe, it's because it's not only these people that are working on the vaccines. There are labs all over the world working on them. Different labs, everywhere. It's just not American suppliers. The US is a big country but it's not the centre of the universe. Also, why would you trust any drug you take that these people make? Why would you trust the food you eat that these people produce? Bad food can kill you, too.
It's a poor argument and you prove it every time you go to the grocery store or drug store.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@greg_austin
Don't be intentionally obtuse. "They" are the arresting officers of Jennifer Heath. "They" are NOT a "they" who are cops in Peoria. We are talking about a specific case. "They", police officers of Broward county, arrested the wrong woman, Jennifer Heath, who is TWICE the age of the Jennifer Heath that they wanted, was a different height and had a different eye colour. Then "they" held her for 3 days even though there was doubt about whether she was the right person wanted. Her drivers licence even showed that "they" had the wrong person. Worse, there was ANOTHER Jennifer Heath on that cruise, who was ALSO the wrong Jennifer Heath. These police officers of Broward County, the "they" that is being talked about, are at fault for arresting the wrong person, NOT for being at fault for everything.
I'm astounded that this has to be explained to you. I doubt that you'd ask such a question if it was YOU that spent 3 days in jail for no fault. In case you're confused on who the "you" is that I'm talking about, I'm talking about "greg_austin".......you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevincoleman-tammen1266
However, declaring, on the internet, that your piety is the reason why God is providing for you, that is a show of pride.
Before you get to full of your own sanctity, there are people, burning and looting cities right now, across the US, who go home to a warm bed with a full stomach, every day. Is their devotion to God the reason for that as well?
Be grateful. That's it. Don't qualify it by telling us that God has deemed it well deserved, due to your devotion to him. Your belly is just as full as the guy that just robbed and looted a store.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@communist_man_of_pesto401
No, it's not. When Jacob worked hard, in the service of God, he was rewarded with larger flocks. The parable of the talents, those who worked hard and increased the talents, left in their charge, were rewarded and the one that hid his talent was heavily chastised.
Money reflects the value of products produced by your hard work. It's the inevitable result of a nation's labour. Without the freedom to grow and prosper, we diminish and wither. Capitalism is a co-operative economy, where people make agreements with one another to trade and grow their enterprises. True socialism is a command economy, where we're told what we need, by the state, and they set the quotas for the people. This leads to stagnation.
An economy either grows and flourishes or it languishes. The status quo can never be maintained. That's why the richest nations, the ones with the best standards of living, are all Capitalist countries.
It's how it was done in Biblical times. Individual freedom to allow one to make his own destiny become reality. In Socialism, there is no personal destiny. It's all bestowed on you by the state. No reward from God.....notice how socialists deny God and no hope to plan for your own financial future.
1
-
@alphapablo3514
There is no evidence that he is in the client list because we've not seen who Epstein's clients are because that list has NEVER been released. Guilt by association does not have legal status in the US.
Also, Matthew Colangelo, who was the 3rd in line to become the DOJ, after Merrick Garland, stepped down to become an assistant prosecutor, in a district in New York, to help go after Trump. That would be like a company manager, quitting his job, to become the night shift foreman in another company. It makes no sense. It smells, BAD, of corruption. Worse, no one knows what the underlying crime was that this hush money was trying to protect. Non-disclosure agreements are legal unless money is passed to cover a crime. Now....tell me what crime was Trump trying to cover up.
That doesn't mean that Trump is a saint but you've allowed hatred to be your guide instead of the facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Free Thinker
Zlochevsky was in London, England, avoiding Ukraine authorities and had 23 million dollars in assets frozen back in the Ukraine. It benefited him greatly, because shortly after that prosecutor was fired, that money was released and 8 months later he returned to the Ukraine. It didn't take long and he was in trouble again, over things he did when he was Minister of Ecology back in 2012 and he's left the country again.
Zlochevsky was an extremely corrupt individual, a businessman and politician in a country named the 3rd most corrupt nation on the planet. Why would his company employ an American, with no fossil fuel exploration experience, couldn't speak the language and didn't even live in Ukraine? Could it be that his father was the vice president of the most powerful country in the world? I don't know.....not for sure, but when his father, that vice president, tells their government that they won't get 1 BILLION dollars unless they fire the guy that investigated his son's boss, I'd like to know what is going on.
I'd think any reasonable American would and I would think that party politics would be irrelevant. Apparently, I would be wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@spindoctor6385
Do you really believe that a company, once it has grown extremely large, will use their market and financial power for goodness and niceness? Really?
Maybe you should look into the history of monopolies. Once a company corners a market, they will do anything to undermine any competition. Just as an example, they'll undercut prices so their competition can't compete price wise. They'll offer increased prices for raw materials so their competition can't afford to buy the things that they need. They'll invest in the companies that supply raw materials and control who can buy and who can't. They'll get exclusive rights to machinery and technology so the competition is squeezed out that way.
Throughout history, when any group, be it political, ideological, religious or financial, gets too much power, they'll wield it against the people to ensure and increase that power. It's human nature. It's why the American Constitution has attempted to put checks and balances on how it governs. It's also why it's enshrined religious freedoms AND restrictions, such as "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust" They even require that elected officials to give up any business connections so as to not give favour to their own business interests.
I don't believe, for one minute, that any large corporation will freely and cheerfully allow competition to exist. Look at the new Parler platform. It was a conservative platform and the Amazon computer server division, kicked them off their servers as soon as it appeared to have too much influence. A great way to manipulate the last election. Speaking of which, have you read the Time magazine article which outlines how Big Tech, the MSM, large corporations and the Democrats worked to "fortify the election to ensure a proper outcome". That's what happens when there's too much power in the hands of too few.
Give big tech the freedom and you'll NEVER have competition. They'll make it impossible for the little guy to operate. Don't trust them for a minute. Actually, I'm astounded that anyone would trust corporations as big as the Big Tech 5.
1
-
@spindoctor6385
You're still not getting it. Facebook already owns 72 internet companies including Instagram, Oculus and Whatsapp. Twitter is one of the most prominent sites in the world. Amazon is huge and Alphabet, one of the most valuable companies in the world, owns Google, of which YouTube is a subsidiary. These companies make money selling their data and it is next to impossible for companies to make money through only advertising and membership fees. Advertisers will want to target their audiences so they'll insist on data collection, so that just leaves the fees to make money on. These companies will just grow and grow, leaving those little companies to operate in obscurity or go bankrupt.
WORSE, they'll become part of the political process as they grow. The Democrats LOVE that these big companies will run propaganda for them and won't allow them to lose their influence and will enact policies that will help the big ones and suppress the little ones. It's happening in Canada right now. The Canadian communications regulatory body, the CRTC, is trying to enact policies that favour Canadian media and squelch the little guys. The CRTC head was once an employee of Bell Canada, the the biggest communications corporation in the country. The Democrats will do the same for their big tech companies. They're WAY ahead of the Republicans in this.
Yet, you want to give these guys, including Facebook, the power to grow until nothing can touch them. Why would you want to do that? If you don't have regulations, they'll take advantage of their position to gain more power. It's how every monopoly has ever operated yet, for some reason you believe that Facebook will be good. They're censoring discussion now if it doesn't meet their political stance. EVERY one of those tech giants support the Democrats and censored stories that might help the Republicans.
All I can think is that you approved of all the censorship and allowing big corporations to become even bigger than the government. Once private companies can pick and choose the political leaders, we're living in an autocratic society. It will be the new age Feudal system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Halcon_Sierreno
The Germans laid the foundation for the nuclear bomb. Funny thing is, they thought that they were doing the right thing in preserving civilisation and that the "other", less sophisticated people, would be the ones to destroy mankind. So, the Nazis set upon a quest to prevent it from happening, by destroying the less viable nations, and creating a 1000 year nation that would bring peace and prosperity. The point to remember is that they felt that this peace and prosperity wouldn't happen without the distraction of those inferior nations.
Sort of like wishing that the "evil" Americans didn't exist. If only they were gone, the world would be saved. No matter how things change, they remain the same. Hatred, and the self aggrandisement that go with it, always seem to rule the hearts of humanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NetiNeti-gm5bz
We are born to discriminate though. When you pick a significant other, you've discriminated against all others who might want to be with you. Survival is impossible without discrimination. When an ancient man watched another die of snake bite, he assumes All snakes are dangerous, just to be on the safe side. That's human nature.
As for hate, that comes out of ideology. Like Nadler, who has such open disdain for Candace that he wasn't even listening to her. He heard the word stupid and then made a decision based on his hatred for Candace and her cause. A completely erroneous decision.
Also, humans aren't pure from the beginning. I've been around the very young all my life. Two year olds are all about their own needs and for the first few years of their lives show very little empathy for others. They'll take, bully, hit or kick anyone that keeps them for the things they want. In fact, good parents discourage those traits right from the beginning so when the capability for empathy begins, they've already been exposed to the idea of sharing. Bad parents indulge their children their every whim. We have colleges and universities full of the products of that parenting. Overgrown children who can't bear to be contradicted or even hear things that they might disagree with. Their basest instincts have never been challenged and it show in their hatred for everyone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@synnical77
It's true that people want a filter but the media shouldn't acquiesce to that sort of bias. The media should be unbiased and report the facts as best they could. I can't say much about FOX but I know the rest of the news media has been outright lying for years, especially since Trump was elected. The BS on the Covington kids....that was an outright lie. It took me 10 minutes to find the original video and it was clear that they ALL lied. I'm a retired man, living in a one room basement apartment with a computer that my son-in-law cobbled together for me and I could find the facts on the matter. There's not a DOUBT that they all lied. LIED!!! That's different than being biased or providing a filter. They LIED!!!
It was the same with the BLM "peaceful protests". I seen a reporter, with buildings completely engulfed in flames behind him, saying that it was basically a very peaceful protest. It was a LIE. Cities were being burned, stores were being looted, people were being attacked, a couple of dozen were even killed....and that's PEACEFUL??? They lied. Now we're finding out that the leaders of BLM extorted money out of the organisation. The media lied for them and then provided cover when things went bad.
They even lied about stupid things. They went all ridiculous when Trump dumped the remainder of his fish food into the coy pond. The LIARS cut out the part where the Japanese PM dumped his food into the pond first. They edited the video and then told us that Trump had insulted the Japanese people. It was a LIE!!!! A lie isn't a filter. It's a lie and they did it intentionally, redundant but it has to be said that they KNEW what they were doing.
I could go on all day, fill a book with the blatant falsehoods from the MSM, but I think you get my point. There's a difference between endorsing someone and lying for them and I cannot stand by any media that would do that or any political party that would smugly allow them to lie for them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Earthdweller1958
NO.....I didn't forget about those people. I don't know ANYONE that thinks that they shouldn't be charged if they took part in violence or property damage. That's YOUR projection onto those of us conservatives who think that political violence isn't okay. One thing that I've noticed is that every time something like this happens, people like you, go to the ONE incident that the conservatives have done. They don't want to talk about the hundreds of riots in 2020, in which over 30 people were killed and billions of dollars in damages, the fires, the looting and on and on. None of the attacks on conservative students in universities, the attacks on people wearing MAGA hats, the things like that CHAZ zone in Seattle, the attacks on people going to see conservative speakers like Ben Shapiro or Michael Knowles, the attempted assassination of Trump and the death of the man standing behind Trump. How many people went on line, ANGRY, because he missed Trump.
When we mention how terrible these things are, we know that you will go. "WHAT ABOUT JAN 6TH!!!!!" and you do it, EVERY time. OVER AND OVER. it's the ONLY thing that you have. Get over it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ST-ks2es
How can you separate your beliefs from your expertise. A credible belief system must be supported by facts and facts are derived from information which is dispensed by experts. If the experts refuse to answer questions then how are we going to formulate any social standards, a social belief system, that can only be arrived at by using all the facts available. We also have to know exactly where the belief systems of the experts, sitting in front of you, ends and the facts begin. In other words, how has the facts, that they choose to offer or not, affect their beliefs. You cannot separate the two.
In fact, that's what the abortion controversy is all about. One side believes that abortion is wrong. The other side believes that there's nothing wrong with getting an abortion for any reason. It becomes an "Is not/is too" screaming match. So we need to hear the facts and we have to know how their beliefs affect how the facts are presented.
In other words....we need honesty. Refusing to answer all questions honestly, to the best of your ability, leaves us exactly where we started. "Is not/tis too" is not how we should settle disputes on matters of science OR belief systems.
1
-
@windycity258
What a childish comment. The riots were propped up by a press that was solidly against the president and supported the political agenda of the Democrats. Trump asked Lightfoot if she wanted help to halt the riots and she, in a very snotty manner, said she didn't need any advice from him....so he did as she asked and didn't send help and the riots continued. Federal agents went to Portland, to protect a Federal courthouse, that's it, and the Democrats, the Press and the mayor of Portland called them "Trump's storm-troopers". The Constitution says that it's up to the state to ask for help and Trump honoured the Constitution and what the state's wanted. Apparently, Oregon, Washington and Washington DC, Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, New York and other states, didn't want Trump's help because not ONE of them asked. All Democrat states and not ONE condemned the "peaceful" protests, the destruction of property, the looting, the violence, the increase in crime due to police defunding and when Trump mentioned it, they ALL cried foul.
And it's ALL irrelevant right now. Maybe you want to solve last year's problems but I'd prefer to tackle the problems that we have NOW and that's up to the current president and the state leaders that are in office, today.....unless you want Trump to step in, but I kinda doubt that's what you're getting at.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@venicebeachsportsnetwork6677
And it wasn't like it was 30 years before that. People, in the west, were pulling themselves out of poverty, because 30 years before that, almost everyone was poor. REALLY poor.....and 30 years before that, when my grandparents were born, they had no electricity, no phones, no running water, no cars, no planes....nothing. What we take for granted today, the richest people, 120 years ago, would see as miracles of affluence.
Your problem is that you, also, don't understand relative poverty. What's poor today, in the west, is affluence beyond measure 200 years ago. You just don't get that....at all. You're consumed with envy and are a living example of why "Thou shalt not covet" is one of the Big Ten of the Commandments. Whoever wrote them understood something that you don't and you'll never have peace of mind until you do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steffansmith3601
I shouldn't have to talk about criminal cops no more than I should have to talk about criminal postal worker, electricians or street cleaners. If a cop commits a criminal act, that cop is a criminal and should be dealt with....like the cop that killed George Floyd. He's facing murder charges. If a jaywalker gets beaten up by a cop, a hypothetical situation, that cop is committing a criminal act, and he should be prosecuted. That's common sense.
However, what you're doing is painting them all with the same brush. When that cop killed Floyd, ALL cops are guilty. Prosecute them all with the indictment of public opinion. Now, when a guy passes out drunk, after driving to a Wendy's, he has the right to resist arrest, steal a weapon from the cop and fire it at them and be let go. That drunk driver, on probation for domestic and physical child abuse, put the lives of average Americans in danger, but the cops that tried to arrest him to discourage that type of behaviour are fired and prosecuted.
That's "blue" bigotry. The Rule of Law applies to everyone.....even cops who will still be cops no matter what you call them or organise them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Skye325
You're describing the specifics of the ideology. It wouldn't work in a lot of the places of the world if you're bent on instituting a socialist regime. For example, in Thailand, they wouldn't go on about white people because the perceived seat of power aren't white. Marxist groups might demonise the central Thai because they're the biggest and most powerful ethnic group. They would use the Thai as their CRT cudgel to enact Socialism, just like the left does to the whites here in North America. Marxism goes after the perceived power group. In the Soviet Union, it was a class war. In the US, a class war wouldn't work, so they adapted Marxism to go after, what they see as the American power base.....white people. That's why so many of the woke are white. It really has nothing to do with being white. It's about identifying a power base and, in the US, white people are the obvious target. However, it can get even more convoluted than that. If a person is black and is standing against them, that person will be perceived as part of the power base and would be seen as being a part of the power structure called "whiteness". You don't have to be white. All you have to do is be seen as being part of those in power. Asians were labeled "white adjacent" due to their economic success. It's a power struggle and they need an enemy. Anyone will do so long as they can rile enough people to cause mayhem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MegaBanne
"There will be no need for hard work.
Just the necessary work."
That's the most ridiculous thing that I've ever heard. If I have a natural ability to play hockey, just showing up to play won't make me among the best in the world. I have to work my butt off, exercise, watch my weight, develop skills...the harder I work at it, the more likely I will attain my dreams. Musicians are the same. They play that guitar, violin or piano at every opportunity possible. They study and play, play and study. If they don't work hard at it, they'll never excel at it.
That goes the same for being a carpenter, shoe maker, engineer or doctor. Hard work drives success. Getting by on what one deems necessary won't get you anywhere.
There's a reason why Asians have the highest household incomes in America. It's the LACK of laziness. They work long, hard hours and will NOT compromise with "doing only what's necessary".
That clip I outlined is the most profound statement of a commitment to mediocrity.
YOU are living in a dreamland.
Then you say "Everyone will have to do their basic work."
So the overlord will tell what to do and when to do it. It's not up to the individual. it's up to whatever vague figure or body of people decides what their basic work should be.
More dreamland stuff.
It all sounds really great yet it's the capitalist west that has spawned the richest nations in world history. It's produced affluence for the average person that has NEVER been seen before. The only ones who fail are those who won't get off their butts, put down the video game controller and cell phone and go to work. They're living off the avails of those of us work 50 to 60 work weeks and then complain that they don't have enough.
Once again, you're living in a dreamland.
Show me ONE nation that has a socialist style governance that has ever the affluence that these capitalist nations have. They don't exist.
Capitalism is the freedom to make your own life. It's up to the individual. It's the "spread the wealth" types that destroy the initiative and the pride of a hard days work and the feeling of achievement that goes with it. There's no such thing as "doing what's necessary". That's just spinning your wheels and eventually you give up because you're going nowhere.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Bjjboxing
My dog was on the voter list. MY DOG....George Haveman. I lived in a town of 1800. If there was a guy named George Haveman in my town, I would have known him. I knew everyone. I did have a dog named George. When I went to vote, the woman handing out the ballots, asked who this George Haveman was, in puzzlement. My family was the only one with that last name in our town and she knew them all.
The point is, if this can happen in a town where everyone KNOWS everyone else, what could be happening in a city of millions? You're dreaming and naive if you think differently.
For 200 years people, who thought it important to vote, would get in their cars, saddle up their horses, hitch up the wagon and vote. Bars were closed, employers were forced to allow their workers time off to vote and it worked. Now suddenly, we add a brand new process that has a huge potential to be subverted. If it's important to you, go to the voting sites and do the way it's always been done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ciarroam
Give it a rest. Those, who would abuse children, find their way into places where children are found. Churches, sports, playgrounds, schools, none of these institutions are free of it. The entertainment industry is no better and maybe the worst of them all because these predators know that there are parents out there who would sacrifice their children for money. They'd turn away as long as the cash was coming in. There's no cash coming from belonging to a church. In fact, it's the other way around. Church members donate to the church. The biggest problem with those other institutions is that parents find it hard to believe it to be true. Like everyone else, I went to school and I didn't see it. Yet, I can show you a list of 500 FEMALE teachers who have been convicted of having intercourse with students, both girls and boys and as young as 12 years old. I even know a guy whose ex-wife was convicted of it as a teacher.
It's not "tell that to the Catholic Church". It's "reveal it where it's happening" and divert from one to another to appease your personal bias.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Spiritof_76
I don't have to take stock in Taibbi. All I have to do is look at what he showed us in the Twitter files concerning the Hunter Biden laptop. When you have evidence, the person with the evidence is irrelevant. It's the evidence that counts. Metaphorically shooting the messenger, in this case Taibbi, doesn't change the message. Twitter banned any mention of the Hunter laptop story, even the links to the New York post article that exposed the laptop. They went so far as to prevent sharing of this story through private messaging, a measure that was only reserved in the sharing of child pornography. The NY post is the oldest daily newspaper in the US and the 4th largest in the US. Taibbi, Bari Weiss and Michael Shellenberger all said the same thing about the laptop. They said that there was communication between the FBI and Twitter through a special one-way channel that had been setup between these 2 entities. It's also telling that one time FBI special counsel was working for Twitter at this time as well as other former FBI personnel.
If the suppression, of a major news story, that the FBI KNEW was true doesn't bother you, I have to wonder what you're agenda is. Is it to support your party or to support the truth? I'm about the facts and truth and I find it appalling that Twitter would suppress, what is known as "censorship" news that might be damaging to one specific party and be helpful to another. That's not just the news of the laptop but also and dissension concerning government Covid policies and mandates.
It's a violation of the 1st Amendment and if allowed to stand, that could impact X, now that it's owned by Musk, who could just censor or suppress stories that might damage Trump. I would bet that you'd find that quite upsetting.....yet we weren't even allowed to send a link to that laptop article through Twitter's private messaging service. Clearly a political move.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joeterzio7175
Is "Joe Terzio" a pseudonym? Is your name really Stacey Plaskett? It might as well be. Taibbi wrote for Rolling Stone. He's won Journalism awards. That's more than some guy with a blog and you KNOW IT.
Also, everyone at that hearing, has the emails that that Taibbi and Shellenberger are referring to. It's not some written article in their personal blogs. It's Twitter e-mails and some of them were attempts by Trump, to affect censorship, but most were from government agencies to Twitter wanting news stories suppressed and in-house emails encouraging it to be done. That includes emails from form FBI lawyer, Jim Baker, who left his job at the FBI and went to work for Twitter, and who wanted Twitter to censor Trump and the suppress the Hunter laptop story.
This is ALL available to every one of those who were taking part at that hearing. So Stacey, or whoever you are, stop with the "misinformation" to use a hack word to justify censorship. We don't believe you because, at best, it makes no sense, and at worst, it's a lie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@csmidt2885
Homelessness has been a problem, forever. However, it has increased in population and in percentage of the population over the last 10 years. California is in the top five in homelessness, percentage of homelessness, and in the increase of the homeless in the US. Also, California has mandated that any theft under 900 dollars is now considered a misdemeanour, which is NOT a felony and means that it's NOT a crime. A cute way to reduce crime on paper but not in reality.
So many stores have closed due to crime and businesses have left the state for that same reason, also citing high taxes, high energy costs, high rents, recurring brownouts and too much red tape. You may not want to face these facts but a simple google search will validate those problems.
Also, state populations do NOT go down, even a little bit, if things are going well. You may not like it but that's the facts. Migrants aren't flocking to the border because their home countries are great places to live. Californians aren't leaving for Arizona, Texas, Florida and Tennessee because they love California. They're having issues in their home state and see a better future in those growing states. This has been the way of human migration throughout history.
That doesn't mean that California is the worst place ever. It means that they're facing severe problems which should be examined and solved before it really gets out of hand. Your head-in-the-sand approach isn't going to solve those problems. You have to face them, no matter how big or small, to find ways to improve. Things never improve by doing nothing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@The1Waiter-gk4sz
Getting those people clean drinking water, even for a year or two, is doing something that YOU'RE not doing. These people were subject to getting and maybe even dying, especially the children from contaminated water, such as typhoid, hepatitis A, cholera, salmonella, e-coli, dysentery and giardia. That's just a few of the horrific parasites that infect people who are forced to ingest and bathe in filthy water. He's saving lives and you're complaining about him.
It's people, like YOU, that are the reason why people suffer in the world. You DO nothing and then whine at those, who take their riches and actually do something with it. So many super rich athletes, actors and business tycoons do nothing. If that woman actually cared about the people she says she's helping, she contact Mr Beast so they could come up with a plan that makes those wells sustainable long into the future.
But, it's better that those people get sick and even die. Better that than Mr Beast receives any credit for it or even has any money. You're not even smart enough to understand that it takes MONEY to do those things and that if he was broke, 1/2 a million people would still be drinking and bathing in filthy, diseased water. You don't care. You hate rich people and that's WAY better than helping the poor.
1
-
@semi13-ec9kx
What should Israel do after the brutal attacks last weekend? They intentionally shot and killed over 250 young people attending a music festival. The Palestinians drove up and opened fire on them and then chased them down and either killed them, captured them and even raped some of the women. They took a 20 year old girl, stripped her naked, put her on the tailgate of a small truck and then paraded her along the streets of Gaza, where people people cheered and spit on her. I couldn't tell, from the video, whether she was dead or alive. What was her crime? She was dancing at a music festival. The Palestinians couldn't even know if she was Israeli or not. It made me sick to my stomach.
So what should Israel have done? Tell all Israelis to remain calm and go home? Assure them that the Palestinians will stop the killing if the Israeli people show how peaceful they are? That's insane. The Jews did that in WW2 and look where that got them.
Hamas KNEW that Israel would retaliate and that Palestinian citizens would be killed. They KNEW it and didn't care. They needed martyrs for their cause and, as far as they're concerned, these citizens were heroically giving their lives for their cause...the Hamas cause.
Now, let's hear you defend what Hamas did....FIRST. If Hamas didn't want a fight, they shouldn't have started it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@syav4467
Republicans hate what California has become. They hate the politics that has brought on the highest taxes in the US, the most homelessness, rolling blackouts, highest property and home prices, the bureaucracy, the highest energy prices, the strict Covid mandates, the garbage and pollution, high crime....and on and on. Most loved the old, free California and are saddened by what has happened to a once beautiful and unshackled state.
Abrams just hates Georgia. She hates the history and the racial diversity, especially what she see as the "good ole white boys".
Republicans just want to change the political atmosphere in California. Abrams will never be happy until all white voices are suppressed, chased out of Georgia or done away with. Until then, she will hate her home as she has always done. I believe this because any white man that would disagree with her on anything, will be called a racist and since that will always be the case, she will hate her home state.
I'm Canadian. I love my country and would prefer to live here over any other. However, I hate what Justin Trudeau and his cronies are doing to my homeland.
Do you get the difference now?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rcmysm9123
Then why is it that Islam, in the 100 years after Mohammed's death, did Islam forcefully expand into the entire Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia and into Spain and Portugal? Why did the invade Sicily, sack Rome TWICE and only stopped expanding into Europe because they were defeated at Tours by Charles Martel, the French monarch? Those Muslim warlords put together an empire that matched the Roman Empire in it's size and scope. Doesn't sound peaceful at all. Could it be that Mohammed was also a warlord, who took part in hundreds of battles and wars and, in ten years, used his armies to take over all of the Arabian Peninsula? That Muslims are encouraged to follow the example of Mohammed and expansionist wars are the example that he set?
You can repeat the "religion of peace" all you want but the proof is in the actions that the followers of Islam took part in right from the very start of that religion. They went to war. I'd say that the belief is that there will be peace when Islam rules the world. Until then, they must fight for Allah or perish trying, in order to enter into Paradise.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kenny Bugh
Explain to us why the MSM refused to follow up on the Hunter Biden laptop story or why Big Tech companies would strike down any reference to the NY Post article. This HEAVILY implicated Joe Biden in crooked business deals, deals that would have been HUGE news had it been the Trump family, blanketing the news 24/7. Why was Steven Crowder given a YouTube strike for pointing out irregularities in addresses in Las Vegas? Why were mail in ballots allowed, for the FIRST time in American history, by executive command, bypassing the legislative process as demanded by law? Why wasn't the arrest of Rachel Rodriguez for election fraud, illegal voting, unlawfully assisting people voting by mail, and unlawfully possessing an official ballot a part of the MSM news cycle, proving that mail in voting could be manipulated? Why did the Democrats and the MSM do everything possible to refute and denigrate the Project Veritas revelation of mail in voter fraud in Minneapolis? Why isn't the Time magazine article about how the Democrats, Rinos, big tech, multinational corporations and the MSM worked together to "fortify" the elections a bigger story? This is unprecedented in American election history.
All you keep doing is repeating the same thing about recounts and ignoring all the other weirdness surrounding the elections. And WHAT THE HELL IS THIS RACIST NONSENSE ABOUT BLACKS BEING SO INEPT AS NOT BEING ABLE TO GET IDS ABOUT? Do you really think that blacks Americans are that incapable?
1
-
1
-
@tsb7911
Then why are people leaving those states? You're not responding to what this video is about, either. For the first time, in California history, it's population went down in 2021.
Could it be that those states were doing great because they weren't as radically socialist in the past. It WAS a great place to do business and the Fortune 500 companies thrived. However, the radical left has taken over the politics of those states. They hate capitalism and want a state run economy. That's bad for business. It's bad for the Fortune 500 companies. It explains why Elon Musk left California and why Oracle, another tech giant, has just announced that they're leaving California for Tennessee.
This is the Roman Empire. They were the richest, most powerful force of their time. Yet, the western Empire collapsed. You're no different than the Roman who, as the collapse is beginning, is maintaining that the Empire is the greatest nation on earth and that the rest of the world would be lost without them.....but it isn't is it.
There's your response. Your infinity lasted one day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SkageXL5
Ok....here we go. S Kage first comment.
"LOL, go cry about it!"
My reply
"LOL. They CRIED about those who they claim were in power, who laughed and exerted power over them for years. Now they're in power, just as the comment stated, and now they're crying because the pride movement is leaving them behind and the NEW power is mocking them. You're either totally self unaware or you ARE aware and you just don't care."
S Kage
"@Jack Haveman You're the second person who's made the error of assuming I know what "they's" you're talking about.
Reading your response to me you use "They" or "them" 6 times, and appear to switch who "they" are at least once.
This is clearly a Transphobe/Bigot problem and speaks to the type of person that holds those positions
Can you rewrite what you're trying to say so it makes sense and defines who you're talking about at any point so I can consider a response?
I assume you'll either not respond, or respond with some vague imagined personal attacks and other things to cast yourself as a victim, because that's all you people ever do.
Either way, thanks in advance!"
My reply.
"First, you told the original commentor, King Arthur" to cry about it. I would assume that you're were mocking him and his take on the modern Pride movement. When I was using the "they" and "them" pronouns, I was referring to those in the Pride movement, the collective, as "they" or "them" because they are a group. That's been a staple of the English language for hundreds of years. It should be quite obvious who I'm referring to if you have any basic knowledge of the English language. 30 years ago, gays and lesbians claimed to be marginalised and victimised and started the Pride movement. Now the Pride symbol is everywhere and try to criticise anything about the movement. It could potentially land you in a lot of trouble. Now YOU, the singular, to help you with the English language, are mocking those who are feeling marginalised, who are afraid to say what they think, by mocking King Arthur, the singular, as a representative of the group, the "they" and "them" that's used to signify group members.
It's really rather easy if you know the English language."
Then you say...
" LOL, you left a trail of dust when you ran away :D"
So I reply....
"I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away??"
So you say this....
"Just gonna put a copy of your lie here, because you're probably going to delete it and to try and hide your failure.
"Jack Haveman
Jack Haveman
20 minutes ago
@S Kage
I ran away???? I responded to your last comment. How is that running away?? "
That's a little perplexing but you respond....
"Here goes @Jack Haveman again, just running away, shouting lies over their shoulder.
LOL"
So I finish up with this...
"Never mind. An adult discussion is beyond your capabilities. Rather sad, really. When you grow up, we'll talk like adults. Until then, eat your veggies."
I don't know what's going on but this is what I see in my comment section. If you're not seeing this, I don't know what to tell you. I've responded every time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tabbyreed8925
You missed the point entirely. Trump was putting tariffs on the products made in China. That evened up the price difference and it was working. The steel industry was coming back, among others. That's why the economy was doing so well, before Covid. China HATED what Trump was doing and so did a lot of the big multinationals. What with the bad wages, bad environmental, quality and labour standards and the opportunity for graft for multinational executives, Washington bureaucrats and politicians, it's no wonder they HATE Trump. They've got the major news networks on board because they're ALSO owned by big multinationals. The minute Trump announced his bid for presidency, the racism allegations started. They HAD to beat him. If he was successful at bringing the trade deficit to a positive state for the US, they would lose their gravy train.
The elimination of tariffs is what started the trade deficit in the first place. Now, the big companies could produce offshore and sell here, until the country was bled dry, but the elites would be just fine. They don't care about you and me. Trump has been against it for YEARS now. 25 years ago, he was complaining about it. The reason why he does it is simple. He's in the hotel and casino business and was doing a national TV show. He's not dependent on cheap labour like the multinationals are.
The elites have done a great job convincing everyone that they're socialists and that they care for us. They don't. They want money, power and control and Trump, even though he's a class jerk, is spoiling their plans. Worse, he now trying to get troops out of the Middle East and brokering peace deals there. That's a big hit for the military industrial complex. Another reason to hate him. The Democrats were hating on Bush when he went into Iraq but as soon as they got into power, they supported the Arab Spring and the Middle East conflicts really expanded. Right now they're opposing withdrawal. The same party, the same PEOPLE, that called the Bush Iraq war illegal, now want to stay there. There are American soldiers in Afghanistan that weren't even born yet on 9/11, yet the Democrats want to stay on.
They're pulling the wool over your eyes, over all our eyes and too many are letting them do it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jaymudd2817
What do mean they didn't have sovereignty? They were independent nations who ruled themselves. That's what sovereignty is.
The Iroquois Confederation were, at one time, 5 different nations who were continuously bickering and at war with one another. They got together, in council meetings, and after extensive negotiations formed one nation, with a capital and rules on which to govern. The United States is loosely based on the model that the Iroquois developed. They had councils, just like they have in Congress and in state and municipal governments, today.
The natives weren't a bunch of clueless troglodytes. They were quite sophisticated and were destroyed by European diseases that they had no immunity against. Before that, they had huge civilisations. The Aztec, Mayans, the Mound Builders, Incas, Mississippians, the Cherokee and lots more. I've seen the ruins of the Mayans. They weren't primitive people. The ruins of Chichen Itza are a true marvel.
1
-
1
-
@jaymudd2817
There is no such term or person known as an Early American. It's a term coined by German mapmaker, Martin Waldseemuller, who named, what we call South America, America, after explorer Amerigo Vespucci. What we now call North America, he named "Terra Ultra Incognita" because he had no idea what lay there. Now, we refer to the United States as America and the people who live there "Americans" when the term should actually refer to all who live in North and South America, not just one country.....but who cares?
We're not even calling India by it's correct name. That's a British and European appellation, that was derived from the Greek historian Herodotus, over 2000 years ago after the Indus River, which is in Pakistan. But really....who cares? Our maps and names for each other are filled with names and identifications that are completely WRONG when we consider the historical facts. It shows just how intertwined our history actually is....and who cares? It just becomes a way to detract people in a conversation, to deflect from the topic when things aren't going well for one of the conversants. We all know what's meant but it's a great method to show moral superiority, thinking that scorn is the same thing as making a solid point.
Who really cares.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@peterstafford4426
If Trump's team was contacting Twitter, we should find out what was going on. If they were just complaining about material being censored, that's not a problem. If they were TELLING Twitter what to censor, that's wrong and goes against the Constitution of the United States.
However, none of this has been brought to light to the release of the Twitter files. The pipeline to the FBI has been and its shown that it ALWAYS seemed to favour the Democrats.
The NY Post's website WAS always there. That's not the issue. The issue was that if I wanted to post the specific NY Post article, revealing the Hunter Biden laptop, it was suppressed and the post was quite often taken down. THAT'S the issue. It was a new story that Twitter and Facebook suppressed, so the story would have limited public access. It wasn't an active attempt to ban it across the internet from all platforms, just the suppression of the story on the more popular ones, like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
Also, a lot of us are upset about how the last elections were held. Ballots sent out to everyone, with no chain of possession possible. My dad has dementia and received a ballot. I could have filled it in for him and voted for Trump. Is that a good idea? Who would have known? Homeless shelters were getting dozens of ballots, addressed to homeless individuals, who had listed the shelter as their home because they slept there for a couple of nights and were never seen again. The opportunities for election fraud is wide open.
The insistence that forcing IDs to be shown, for voting purposes, is racist is another idea that will bring up suspicions. Until the Democrats commit themselves to solving these issues, like the new elections act in Georgia, elections will be questioned and stuff like what Trump was doing will happen again. The elections were questioned in 2004 and 2016 by Democrats and then again in 2020 by Republicans. It's now being challenged again in Arizona by Republicans. We have to fix this but the Democrats refuse to cooperate.
Questioning the elections isn't just a GOP phenomena. It's being done on both sides and only a biased individual would insist otherwise.
1
-
1
-
It was NOT Covid that started this spiral. It was the world reaction to Covid that caused it. I said, right at the beginning, that this was going to lead to terrible consequences if we carried it too far and no one would listen.....but then again, who the hell am I.
This was also predicted by the WEF. However, they predicted it because they supported and orchestrated the reaction to the pandemic. A few months after the pandemic started, Klaus Schwab released his book "Covid-19. The Great Reset". He'd already had the scenario worked out long before the pandemic started. When it became real, it was easy to set the wheels into motion. The printing of money to finance the Covid policies and then the vaunted recovery in Canada and the United States made it worse. Biden's energy policies added to it. Biden campaigned on the Great Reset, lauded by the WEF. Trudeau has been a big supporter of that organisation. Now, the Netherlands is intentionally setting policies that will take land away from farmers to rethink the food system and to re-purpose land use. Sri Lanka already put those same policies in place that the Netherlands are proposing and they had a net loss of 30% of their agricultural production and the nation is in chaos. Mark Rutte, the Dutch PM has even said that these policies are a part of the WEF agenda. I could go on and on about it.
But, we can't force people to listen and we're going to be stuck with it. Hard times ahead people. REAL hard times.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Terralventhe
I will say that the Biden administration did arrest a journalist, named Steve Baker, who entered the Capitol Building on Jan 6th, as a reporter and did make reports on it as a reporter. It took 3 years to finally charge him and he received misdemeanour charges of parading in the Capitol building and trespassing. They actually put him in leg irons and chained the leg irons to his handcuffs even though he surrendered himself at FBI headquarters in Dallas. They chained him like this for misdemeanours, which isn't even a felony. He now works for Blaze as a reporter. This is strange as there were 2 NPR reporters in the Capitol Building that day, as well, and they have NEVER been charged.
CNN correspondent, Manu Raju, was also in the building and not arrested. NBC News’ Frank Thorp was also there and not arrested. There were others there but none were arrested. There is one thing that's different between those reporters and Steve Baker. All the reporters, not arrested, reported on the riot in a similar manner and from approved sources. The Blaze and Steve Baker are conservatives and are not approved.
Let's see if this comment makes it past the censors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ten_tego_teges
The vast majority of people that came out of the feudal system were still of agricultural background. When the aristocrats lost their power and the peasants took over the land, they drew on their knowledge, as peasants who'd always worked the land, to become successful. The Kulaks in the Ukraine were a prime example. They knew what they were doing and had attained moderate success within a generation of taking over their farms. However, if you look to Zimbabwe, the people that took over the farms weren't farmers. This idea that all you have to do is give the people land and they will produce is a fallacy. The land needs good caretakers, people who have the background and dedication to do the tough, backbreaking work necessary to make it a success. That didn't happen in Zimbabwe. In fact, those who one might say were comparable to the peasants, the labourers, didn't take over the land at all. Many left with the white landowners and helped them to establish new farms in neighbouring Malawi. The "peasants" of Zimbabwe were not the ones that lent their expertise to make it a smooth transition. It was a disaster......and it will be a disaster in South Africa, too.
The land in medieval Europe was taken over by those who'd always worked it. The land in South Africa will be given to those who support the government and want the land due to ideological reasons, anger and envy. Those aren't the qualities needed to run a successful agricultural community. In reality, you're comparing apples and oranges. One that was a social system that was in a natural state of transition and the one that is now in South Africa that is a forced transition. The transition should come due to social conditions as they are today and never for ideological reasons.
1
-
American By Birth Patriot By Choice
A living wage is enough for me to get food and shelter. Everything after that is a bonus. Most restaurants or bars pay a minimal wage. It's a tough wage for the average person to live on and it's tough for the owner to pay more. Not always. Some places do really well and the owner gets rich and good on them.
However, people think that the serving business is easy. Although there is a minimum training involved, there is a great deal of skill and anyone that's worked in the business can spot the good from the bad almost right away. It takes a certain personality type to do the job effectively. Right now, where I work, they need a new bartender. You'd think that would be easy but, in spite of all the resumes, no one is working out. In fact, most serving staff in our town have run the gamut of taverns in town. That's because it's not as simple as it sounds.
That's where the tips makes things better for both the owner and the server. The owner can run a viable business, even though it is small and the employee, the really good one, is rewarded to the point that the owner will retain the services of the best available. What's more, the customer doesn't have to tip. It's an option. If you can't afford to throw down 2 bucks over a 15 dollar meal, you shouldn't have gone out to eat in the first place because you can't afford it. Having said that the motto for the server is this. "Gratuities not expected but always appreciated." It keeps businesses open and provides options for the customer.
It works for everyone. Like I said. If you don't wan to tip......don't. Basically, any business that adds tips to the bill is being lazy and doesn't want to deal with the idea that some servers are better than others. The loss of meritocracy in the workplace and the lazy server gets the same as the hard worker.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@evansmith2766
Frankl looked inside to find that stoicism. Had he not looked for the worthwhile, deep within him, he'd have never would have found the strength to sustain that stoic lifestyle.
The one thing that you'll find when you try to fight the system and not deal with your own personal issues, is that the system will fight back. A person that has dug in, like Frankl did, to find their inner strength, will become a slave to the issues that will prevent him from dealing with setbacks in a positive manner. He becomes resentful, may even lash out in anger and that can only end badly, not just for him but for all that come into contact with him.
Frankl found an inner strength and peace. That's the way to deal with the world around you. The world will live on, like it always has, with all it's horrors and corruption, but you'll be gone. At least make your corner of it, a place where people will want to engage with you. You accomplish nothing by constant complaints.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I always use the example of the Oxycontin crisis. That drug was approved by the FDA and AMA and it killed tens of thousands and destroyed the lives and families of hundreds of thousands more. It took YEARS of disaster before Oxycontin was taken off the market. Too late for a couple of people that I knew and I say "knew" because they're gone now, victims of the "wisdom" of the experts of our medical establishment.
However, it wasn't before people made billions of the misery of others.
This time is ideology. A man cannot become a woman and there isn't enough doctors in existence to make that true. No human being, who has XY chromosomes, has EVER given birth. EVER. You can drug, detach, reattach, wear makeup and don a dress and, if you're a man, a being with XY chromosomes, you will never become pregnant. That's the science of it. You can't change it or negotiate with it or wish it different. The science says that it cannot happen. Period.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@3MrNiceGuy15
Another person who equates circumcision with the amputation of breasts and genitals. I was circumcised at 6 years old due to a severe infection. The day after the surgery, I checked it out. A small scab, which fell off in a week, and then nothing. No pain, no difficulties, no nothing. That was 64 years ago. All that I noticed is that, when flaccid, there was no foreskin to cover the head. When erect, it looked no different than is always looked, in the morning. (yes, 6 year olds wake up with an erection, too). I fathered 3 children, have NEVER had any medical issues since the minor operation and have had a VERY vigorous sex life, over the years.
To compare male circumcision to sex change surgery is beyond ridiculous. One is a VERY minor operation that has little to no affect over a lifetime while the other is fraught with a lifetime of drugs, infections, takes away the ability to procreate and affects the body's natural functions.
You're using a tempest in a teapot to covertly validate gender reassignment surgery.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jill3906
I can't even figure out what that means. I'm different than anyone that I know. In fact, no 2 people, that I've ever known, are exactly the same. Diversity is a given fact, no matter who is in that group. When one starts to put people in categories, that's NOT diversity. It's dividing things up. When you're in the US and you're a citizen, you're an American. Nothing else. To start separating us into groups of hair texture, eye shapes, religions, ancestral origins or skin colours, you're dividing us. I could care less about those divisive characteristics. If you're a good person, work hard, mind your own business, you're ok by me. Those other things mean crap if you suck as a human being.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@onewildandcrazyguy9213
This is the definition of the word "socialism"
"a political and economic theory of social organisation which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."
Socialism pertains to the means of production or the acquisition of wealth and how a society engages in that goal. It says the state should be in control of production and decide what the market wants. Capitalism says that production should be in the control of the producers and decided on what the market wants. In other words the freedom of the individual to decide what he wants and the supplier decides on whether he will supply it or not.
A fire department or a public water system is not socialism. It's an expense of living, the exact opposite of production. As a society, we've made a tacit agreement to share in the cost of life's expenses and we call them social programs. Therefore we build roads, schools, police departments, a military and the infrastructure that a community needs and we all chip in to build and maintain it. Without a strong economy, there is no wealth attained by the private citizens and we can't chip in to aid in the cost of expenses. We call that money we chip in "taxes". If no one is producing, there is no money being made and no taxes paid. This is the reason socialism is doomed to failure. In Venezuela, as an example, the nationalised oil industry financed the social programs. Those seeking office would promise the electorate the world because the oil revenue was the cash cow that would financially fulfil all their promises. The oil industry had no money left over for maintenance, research and development, hiring the top people and training. Eventually it had to collapse. It's why the Soviet Union failed and why China changed it's strategy allowing for free enterprise while remaining in control of the larger sectors of business.
1
-
@onewildandcrazyguy9213
Did you not even bother to read the official dictionary definition of socialism I provided? If you did, read it again because it's quite evident that you didn't understand it.
Socialism covers the means of production or the gross national product. Basically what all the produce and investments in a country that gives the country monetary value. It's how rich a nation is. Social security is an expense. It doesn't make the country any richer. It's a social program that costs the nation money but allows for a cohesive and civilised society.
So....NO. Social security is not socialism. It's an expense of running a country and does NOT involve the means of production in any way. Production, in the economic sense, means to produce something of value. You do not produce or manufacture social security. When it is the state or government that controls all or most of production, oil, paper, cars, pencils, toilet paper, potatoes, ladders.....manufactured goods, that's a socialist system.
That's what that definition says. It says nothing about social security, education, highways, the police or all those other government run agencies because the produce nothing. They are an expense of the state and do not incur wealth or value.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sthubbins4038
When they talk about the Mainstream media, they're talking about the bulk of it. CNN, MSNBC, PBS, ABC, CBS, the New York Times, LA Times, Washington Post, the over 80% that are openly against the elected president and make no bones about their position. That's who wouldn't report on something like this. It had to come from neutral or right wing sources. It's ALL negativity. "Those ships will NEVER be ready. Don't believe it". "Hydroxychloroquine is a false hope. Don't believe it"
Nothing works for them. Everything is in vain. Better we make sure that airlines comply with new emissions laws that we need RIGHT now.
I think Trump is a braggart and I have a hard time listening to him but he's has an excellent team behind him and he's been praising everyone that's trying their best, even Cuomo and Gavin Newsom. He even thanked Maddow for her praise for some of the workers. He didn't have to do that but she just spit in his face, anyway.
These people are just getting in the way. If you're not helping, then shut up. If you're criticising EVERYTHING, then you hurting everyone. Fortunately, Trump doesn't listen and is encouraging his team to keep up the good work because I don't see a lot from the MSM that's helping. A lot of complaining.....that's all.
1
-
@snarkloaf
He was referring to "Crowdstrike" when he asked about the favour. Crowdstrike is the name of a server that might have been relevant in the last election.
So, if a person, an American politician to be specific, goes to another country and uses taxpayer money, 1 billion dollars, to stave off an investigation, he can declare that he's running for president and he's now beyond reproach or investigation? Really? He can do as he likes in a foreign country and no one is allowed to find out about it?
Joe Biden did something shady. He's not in an election, not yet. The Democrats are deciding on who is going to run in the election and Biden is one of the candidates. This process isn't an election. This is a process of the Democrat party not the election of a new president. If a candidate for the leader of a political party breaks the law, he can't hide behind his position and say I'm in my safe space and you can't investigate. That would mean that you couldn't ask the Ukraine or Russian government to give evidence against Trump either. He's also up for the next election.
Also, what if the Ukraine investigation shows that Biden did nothing wrong? How does that help Trump? The Democrats were looking to impeach the day that Trump was inaugurated. He hadn't even done anything officially as a president and they had already decided they were going to get him out and it's been one impeachment motion after another. An investigation looking for a crime. They think they've found the crime and now they're spinning it the way they want to public to hear it.
And I don't even like Trump and I can see that this isn't about anything he's done wrong. It's about Democrat hatred towards Trump and a determination, to use a current expression, to cancel him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not sure that I understand your reasoning. Those who oppose abortion believe life begins at conception when a brand new, identifiable entity is created. From that moment on, that entity is a growing living being. They believe that killing that living being, weeks after conception is NO different than killing a five year old, a teenager or a 30 year old woman.
They're upset when a 30 year old woman is killed. They're upset when a 30 week old living human being, in the womb, is killed as well. As upset as when George Floyd was killed last year. Yet, there are no riots, burned out buildings or lootings. The abortion clinic bombings are loudly condemned by all major anti-abortion groups and has NO widespread support.
So, when you stick with the topic of abortions, there are some, you call them the right, that get upset when you kill a living human in the womb, and some, you call them the left, who support the idea of killing a living human in the womb. I'm not seeing how they're the same.
1
-
1
-
@TheJeffL
Which party seems to be doing something about it? Ron DeSantis, a Republican, just signed into law that makes squatting nearly impossible. Why aren't Democrat governors advocating an end to it. I find it difficult to blame Republicans, when it's a Republican governor who's doing something about it, NOT a Democrat. I will blame the party that does NOTHING and I don't care which party that it is. The Democrats are the same party that declared Martha's Vineyard a sanctuary community and then summarily forced illegal migrants off their island.
They're a bunch of phonies, pretending to be virtuous and kind but only when they can get others to be kind by proxy.
As for your think tank theory, YOU are the one that's the predictable one. No matter WHAT the topic, you take the opposite stance....EVERY time. I have yet to hear you agree with anything that's ever been said on one of Tim Pool's videoss. This is why I say that you could care less about the people that own the homes that squatters take over, until it's YOU that comes home and there's someone living in your home. Then, like the hypocrites living in Martha's Vineyard, you'll say that they gotta go.
You're a reactionary troll and a hypocrite.
1
-
Dubjax 28
"The income gap between highest and lowest earners has never been wider in US history."
So what? It's NOT about what someone else has, it's about what I have. That's how you should look at it. Are things better for me now than they were a couple of years ago and does the future look brighter at the moment. You're turning this into an economy of envy. What someone else has doesn't impact me. I can't spend someone else's money on me.
The deficit is a huge problem. However, how are you going to pay it off if the economy is in the tank. You have to start to make money before you can pay off your debts. That's common sense. If this economy continues to improve and the deficit keeps growing in the future, then we should start questioning why this is happening. If I'm going bankrupt and my wages aren't helping, I have to improve my financial position. I'll just keep going deeper into debt until I pare down my life style or improve my wage situation. That's the same with the government. Get all those troops out of the Middle East, just like you promised, Trump, and apply the savings to the deficit. The economy has improved so you can do this. Keep that promise of withdrawing troops.
No matter how you slice it, the economy is doing great. Now, the government in power has to take advantage of it. Let's see if, after the next election, Trump can do as well with the deficit as he has with the economy.
1
-
@michaelshishido8151
LMAO!!! Wow....this cap locks kinda makes you look a little insane. I'm picturing you, all red in the face with spit flying, as you pound out this comment. Relax, man. Calm down. LOL.
It seems that you like Red Tape. You must be a bureaucrat. The guy who insists that forms are signed in triplicate before you move on to the next form, which is signed in duplicate and then sending the client to the next department, 10 miles away, to get Form 3A-6663321-BB signed in triplicate to bring back to you, so you can have him sign another form which he has to send, by mail, to another department, to get authorisation papers which must be signed by the Ministry of Signing Authorisations.
I love those guys. We all love those Bureaucrats who live off Red Tape.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gerrywhelan5761
The upswing in the economy is only a few years old. You really didn't expect it to jump automatically to where it was in the late sixties, did you? You're going back 20 years and using THAT as your metric when a mere 10 years ago, we had one of the worst recessions in the last 70 years.
Economies build. They're not turned off and on with a toggle switch. Right now, this year, the economic numbers are better than they have been in decades, since those halcyon days that you speak of, or the early seventies. I was there, looking for work in the late sixties. I know what it was like and the American economy is on the road back to those times and in the last couple of years, it has been the working class that has benefited the most from an upturned economy.
Anyone who would reject the idea that our economy is thriving today because it isn't as good as it was 50 years ago, isn't being realistic, at all. Worse, if you vote for the Democrat, give away platform, next election, you'll wreck every gain that has been made in the last 4 years.
You're too busy worrying about what's on someone else's plate (the rich) to appreciate what might be on your own plate and the opportunities that exist right now. Envy makes for an extremely poor financial and career planning.
1
-
@gerrywhelan5761
Yes, things were on a downturn from the early seventies. A gas crisis, over 20 percent interest rates, free trade, they all contributed to a downturn in manufacturing. I'm not arguing about that. What I'm saying, and I'm repeating myself, is that things have turned for the average blue collar worker. For the last 3 or 4 years, the economy has gotten better for the lower end worker. I never ONCE said things were perfect. In fact, they weren't perfect in the sixties, either. Life sucked for a lot of people in the US, especially blacks and other minorities. Things are better for them now then they were back then.
Right NOW, in the US, the economy is better than it has been over the last 50 years, back to those glory years of the sixties. I'm not talking about 10 years ago, or 15, or 20. I'm talking about the last 3 years. All you have to do is look at employment records, wage increases across the board, the stock market and the lack of skilled workers to fill specific manufacturing jobs. All this is good for the average Joe. This happened over the last 3 years. It's known by everyone. Bill Maher hoped for a recession because he's afraid that if the economy keeps improving, as it has over the last 3 years, Trump will be re-elected.
If you expand the parameters, you will reach a point where your claim is true but Trump or any president, has no control over what happened in 1980. He can control, somewhat, what happened during his own presidency and those are the parameters that are important right now. Things are better now than they've been since the early seventies. This IMPLIES that things did get worse but are now getting better and have been for the LAST THREE YEARS.
Please, understand that I'm NOT talking about the eighties and nineties. I'm talking about the LAST THREE YEARS. There has been a definite improvement since 2015 and the economic numbers are better than they have been in a long time. It's a trend, one that you'd be smart to appreciate, instead of denigrating it as if it doesn't exist at all. You really didn't expect it to jump, overnight, to what it was back in the sixties. It took years for it to get to the point that it was in the late sixties. We're on a positive trend that might see it happening again but you don't even want to acknowledge the trend. If it doesn't jump there, RIGHT NOW, today, it's a failure. That's a losing attitude and things will never get better for anyone who thinks that way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MSM, Big Tech, the Corporate elite, the bureaucratic swamp and all the lobbyists hate Trump for one reason. He's taking on China. They hate it. They love putting their manufacturing facilities in China, a country that has no environmental laws, poor labour laws, poor safety protocols, poor quality standards and low wages. These elites are making HUGE profits working in China and getting kickbacks which the American investigators can't track. That's money that Chinese officials and companies that can be placed in numbered accounts in any of the countries that allow those bank accounts to exist. They're losing the goose that's laying the golden egg and they hate it.
That's why the minute that Trump announced his bid for the presidency, he became a racist. It's why we have all the twisted stories, intentionally misleading framed narratives, the emphasis on hate and systemic racism. It's all money driven and people can't see that these elites are manipulating the narrative with their social justice tropes. They need to turn people into ideologues. Ideologues don't question what they're being told.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@atticuswalker8970
That didn't make a difference. The members of that response team spent years waiting for a new pandemic, doing nothing but waiting. Trump didn't fire them. He had them placed in real productive areas where their expertise was also needed. Then, even before the pandemic came to the US, but was hitting the news, he had a team put together, including members of that team. It was the Democrats who criticised him for putting together that team. They used that old race card.....calling the team nothing but a bunch of old white men, basically mocking them. Trump even offered to send members of that team to China to help them out but the Chinese refused. Then, when Trump curtailed travel between China and the US, the Democrats called him xenophobic. When Trump held up travel between Europe and the US, they said that it just wouldn't work and it was pointless. This was all done at the suggestion of the team that he put together.
How much would you want to bet had Trump kept that original Obama team together and followed their suggestions, they STILL would have criticised his response, which was no different than the responses of most other countries? Look how quickly Trump got the respirators manufactured and ready for distribution or outfitted 2 hospital ships for NY and LA. The media said it couldn't be done and it was complete only a few days past Trump's target, which was said to be impossible. Then the leaders in NY refused to use the hospital ship sitting in their harbour. Instead, they put Covid patients in nursing homes....one of the worst things that they could have done, killing hundreds of the elderly.
The big problem was that they used Covid as a political tool. The "I'd never get a Trump vaccine" went to "You'd better get a vaccine or lose your job" in a few short months.
This political posturing is destroying the US and keeping those kids masked and out of school for 2 years had nothing to do with the early response team. This was a policy of state Democrats, NOT the Federal government or Trump.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@syav4467
But we weren't talking about that. The video was about something that happened LAST NIGHT and it was reprehensible behaviour. But you come along and deflect the conversation away from topic at hand and start your own pet conversation.
I didn't see ONE comment about Hunter, Benghazi, Hilary's deleted servers or even the BLM riots until people, LIKE YOU, changed the subject and deflected to Jan. 6th.
Also, why did you say "you guys". How do YOU know who I support? I'm saying you're making assumptions because I pushed back on the way you attempted to deflect the conversation.
I will say one thing, though. That lack of action is rather weak. The riots lasted about 3 hours and then the bozos just WENT HOME. All on their own. No police coming after them. No big gun battles. No one arrested in the building. No perp walks out, handcuffed with their heads down. None of that. They just went home. What should Trump have done? Would they have gone home an hour earlier if Trump had asked them to....if that was even possible. You can't hold Trump for not doing something. That's not against the law. That would be like holding Trump responsible for the BLM riots because he did nothing to stop them. Doing nothing isn't against the law.
Also, why, when there were almost 100,000 Trump supporters out there and everyone knew that they were coming, wasn't there more security in place? I find that totally perplexing. ALL those people and no added security. It doesn't make sense. Also, only a few hundred forced their way in. Others were waved in by security. Had the doors held open for them and everything and only a few hundred out of a 100,000 people. It was the lamest insurrection that I've ever heard of.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Those who are crafting the ideology, THEY are the Marxists. The lunatics, that are screaming and defacing property, are the foot soldiers. They believe the orthodoxy from above, 2 plus 2 equals 5, and they MUST support it, no matter what and they get angry when challenged. Of course, the lunatics don't know what they believe, they just do because that's what they've been told to believe by the ideological overlords, who send them out to do their dirty work for them. Create chaos, disruption and finally destruction which their leaders hope will turn into revolution.
That's what Tim doesn't get.
1
-
1
-
@Julie B
Yup. Look at the mess that's New York right now. First, De blasio tells everyone that there's no problem, everything is fine, take the subway, go out for a night on the town, go to the big parade.....no sweat. Trump's a racist for his China ban. Wow....his own staff had to threaten to resign if he didn't stop it. Then, the Governor puts Covid patients in nursing homes. Now that's brilliant. He tells everyone they don't have enough respirators and the Feds tell him that they should have lots. Then they find them.....Where? In New Jersey, in a warehouse that the state rents out because the rent there is cheaper. Smart bunch. Then the protests starts. What social distancing? Lets fill the streets with hundreds of thousands of protesters. That'll be fine. But of course.....lets cut the city police budget by 1 billion bucks. They're racist....right? Crime goes up 250% over last year but it's a minor detail. People are under lockdown but they still manage to get out to commit serious crimes. OH...here's another smart idea. Let's let a whack of prisoners out of jail. Don't want them dying of Covid. So here they are, out in the streets, "Peacefully" relieving people of the property, and smashing a couple of windows, during the protests. Less police on the streets and MORE criminals. What could go wrong? Here's another brilliant idea. Why not put the homeless in hotels at $175 a night. The really fancy ones on the upper West Side. 10,000 of them. Now, they're urinating, masturbating, doing drugs, passing out and intimidating regular folk......doing all this out on the streets. This is a program that supposed to on through October. Man is that going to cost. Speaking of cost, they figure on a 40 billion dollar budget short fall this year. I wonder why that is. Maybe 1/2 a million, you know, 500,000 people, the richest people too, have left the city and took their tax money with them. De Blasio knows how to fix that though. He's going to tax the rich even more....duh...that should work. Maybe that's why he's put checkpoints at the exits of New York. Lock em in.
That's one Democrat state. Do you want me to do another?
Trump is a long way from perfect, but do you really want the New York style of government in the White House? The US will be like Venezuela in 5 years.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Protesters are like members of a deck of cards.
Each protester has the Constitutional right to peacefully assemble to bring their grievances to bear. However, when someone, who is a part of that assembly, throws a brick at a window, your assembly is no longer peaceful. Like the 5 of Clubs. It's a part of a deck of cards that's useful in a game of poker. However, if 1 or 2 of the cards have a big "X" painted on the back, that deck of cards is no longer useful. It doesn't matter that the 5 of Clubs wasn't marked, the deck has been rendered useless.
It's the same with a peaceful assembly. Once violence is used, your assembly is no longer peaceful. Your personal intentions are irrelevant to the assembly's peacefulness just like the 5 of Clubs is now irrelevant to the usefulness of the deck of cards.
The mature person realises that the assembly is no longer peaceful and goes home to show their objection to the use of force in a good cause. The leaders of the protests do the same and then tell everyone that these assemblies were no longer peaceful and they don't approve of the violence. They announce that they will go out again the following day and anyone, who wants to peacefully protest, is welcome to join. However, if you start trouble, all peaceful protesters will, once again, go home and leave you to deal with the authorities by yourself.
That's how these "peaceful" assemblies should be organised. Until they are, they're NOT peaceful assemblies. They're just a marked deck of cards.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnFox-1986
You expected grocery prices to go down on the first day of his presidency? LOL. You really are out of touch. Of course other countries are annoyed with his tariff plans. I'm Canadian and I don't care for it but we're going to have to deal with it and don't, like our Prime Minister, start into a trade war. That's nuts. Also, Gaza could be as successful as Israel but they're too obsessed with their radical Islamic ideology to even begin to make life better for it's citizens. If they did what Trump is suggesting, the place would be a wonderful place but now no one is trying to immigrate there.
Also, and he's said it multiple times, he wants the war to END. He's doesn't want Russia or Ukraine to win. He wants a diplomatic settlement which means that there has to be giving and taking on both sides. That's the problem with this war. Both sides want to win which means that this war could go on for decades. Trump wants it to END. NO MORE WAR. Only warmongers want this to end in a victory for one side or the other. Trump has declared how he wants the killing to stop, dozens of times, but people, like you, refuse to listen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DM-dk7js
Did you even watch the video? Maybe you should. They're a loosely organised group with cells all over North America and Europe. They originated in the early thirties, in Germany, as the German Communist Party's answer to the Nazi Brown Shirts. They dispersed after Hitler took power, going underground or leaving the country. Antifa is short for the German “Antifascistischer" which is Antifascist in English. In fact, East Germany called the Berlin Wall the “Antifascistischer Schutzwall,” or “antifascist bulwark,” meaning that they believed everyone on the other side of that wall is a fascist. That was in 1961, over thirty years after Antifascistischer was formed. Read, Antifa member's Mark Bray's, book "Antifa. The Antifa Handbook".
They're a Marxist revolutionary group, cleverly hiding behind their name by claiming that their against Fascists and white supremacists yet they're one of the most violent groups in America, attacking ordinary citizens, setting fires to buildings and vehicles, throwing Molotov Cocktails and even killing people. They've openly declared their aim to destroy the system and begin a new Marxist type order. They were behind over 120 consecutive days of demonstrations, firebombings, attacks on citizens and police and even killings in Portland Oregon in 2020.
They're definitely a domestic terrorist group. It's just that they have the protection of the Democrat Party, even though Antifa has rejected the Democrat party as a viable way to power. That's how they've been able to carry on their violent antics. The Democrats are using them as pawns and they don't mind because they know if the Democrats turned on them, most would be in jail.
1
-
My nephew is a fairly well known musician in the Northwest. He was on the road and ate at a fairly busy tavern and gave them an excellent review, saying that they were extremely friendly, the place was spotless, the food excellent and the prices were great. The next thing he knew, his website and Facebook page were inundated with posts on how he was a sexist, a misogynist and that no one should ever buy his music or go to his shows. Apparently, there was a dispute between the owner and a female employee, not sure what it was, and she accused the owner of being abusive.
My nephew knew nothing of this. All he saw was a decent meal and a great place to eat, the only time that he'd ever been there. Now, he had to explain himself and then they wanted an apology, which he refused to do.
This is our future folks, unless we do something about it.....right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joecasey7415
Of course, you want to blame Marx as the sole "inventor" of communism, along with his sidekick, Engels. However, he wasn't the first to even use the word. It was first used in France, in the lead up to the French Revolution in 1785. Victor d'Hupay referred to himself as a communist author in a letter he sent in that year. Marx wouldn't be born until 33 years AFTER that letter was written. d'Hupay's friend, Nicolas Restif de la Bretonne, first used the word "communism" to describe a government system based on egalitarianism and the common ownership of property in 1793, also LONG before Marx was born. Restif used that word numerous times in his writings to describe that system of government. He was NOT Jewish and neither was d'Hupay.
There were countless socialist intellectuals, all advocating for an egalitarian society and abolishing the ownership of property. Marx became the most influential of these socialists but it was already quite established as an ideology during his time. Although he was born to Jewish parents, he was baptised into Christianity when he was 6 years old. He never practised Judaism and became an atheist when he grew up. He said atheism was the opiate of the masses which included Judaism.
Also, a look at the leaders of the Russian revolution shows that there were Jews in their ranks but a lot of Russian intellectuals as well. Lenin had Jewish roots but he never even knew about it and was raised in the Russian Orthodox church. His sister revealed that Lenin did have Jewish roots but had never been told about it.
You're allowing bigotry to cloud your world view. There are a LOT of Jews who absolutely HATE communism. Instead of attacking an ethnicity, attack the ideology, which would have endured without the work of Marx. There are tens of millions of communists around the world and very few of them are communist and are represented no more or less than any other nationality. While you're off fighting Jews, American communists are threatening to destroy this country and almost ALL have no Jewish roots. Fight them ALL, not a just a small fraction of them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@atticuswalker8970
So do I. I value the rights of female athletes to compete on a level playing field. I don't think that a man, Leah Thomas as an example, should be allowed, with full MALE "bits", to compete with women. All world athletic records show that men outperform women by 10% or more. That may not seem a lot if you don't know much about sports but in sports it's immense. It shows that there's a reason why there are mens and womens categories in sports. It isn't as if we're telling Thomas he isn't allowed to be in sports anymore. He spent 3 years competing in men's swimming. He can continue to do so.....but that means no medals and sports records as he wasn't any thing special as a national class swimmer.
Then there's the freedom for women to have their own spaces. There's a reason for that, which includes the sexual dynamics between women and men. Men are an existential threat to women under some circumstances and a women's locker room is one of those places and circumstances If I look too long at a woman in my workplace, I could be accused of the male gaze and lose my job. The entire MeToo movement was adamant of this point. Yet, Thomas can walk into a women's locker room, all "bits" intact and it's the girls, in that locker room, who were gaslit by being told that there were mental health experts that would help them through their fears, as if there was something wrong with THEM.
I'm not even sure what freedom that you're talking about. Transgenders can still compete in athletics. We just think that they should compete in the gender that were assigned at birth and verified through a DNA test. No loss of freedom. They can still be transgender and compete. Not ONE of those transgenders, who have or had their "bits" cut off, will EVER get pregnant. NEVER. That's how we know that they're biologically different than women. They'd be men with their "bits" cut off.
That's the freedom that I care about. Why should YOUR caring supersede mine? That's not very democratic at all.
1
-
1
-
@bluejay9235
Do you mean EVERY police officer? There's not a good one in the bunch. There all EXACTLY the same?
A spoiled rich kid, goes out, whining and complaining about his oppressed life, vandalises property and then gets mad, when he gets arrested, and assaults the cop that arrests him......and it's the cops fault??? Are you serious?
I'll bet that if I went to your home and started destroying your property, you'd be mad enough to do something about it. Then when you saw that I'm 6'4" and 255 lbs, what would you do then? I'll bet that you'd call the police.
You're another one that thinks that you should be allowed to do whatever you want and no one should take that away from you. Just a spoiled, entitled little monster that's trapped in an adult body. You're the kid, that was lying on the floor, screaming and kicking his feet in the grocery store, crying because you wanted a box of Fruit Loops.....and then got it.
The result is this grown man, who claims he's a girl, complaining about imaginary things, defacing property and still thinks he's a victim of some kind of oppression. Ridiculous.
1
-
1
-
@bluejay9235
People, like you, just don't get it. You go after the symptom, NOT the problem. The cop arrests a rioter and 3 hours later, he's right back on the street, throwing bricks. You arrest him AGAIN and he's back out again the following night. How many times are you going to risk injury, to arrest someone, who's going to be let out by the Democrat establishment. YOU would even say "eff them if they're not going to prosecute". The rioter is applauded and the cop is vilified for doing his job....that's the way its handled on the MSM. ONE thing goes wrong and you're charged, your face is all over the news, you're vilified, your family is harassed, you lose EVERYTHING that you own, might see jail time and have to go into hiding to protect yourself and your family.
THAT'S why these officers are doing as instructed. It's pointless. You take a brick to the side of your face and the guy that does it gets off scot-free. See how "noble" you'd be after experiencing that or watching your fellow officers do the same.
The REAL problem are the left leaning politicians, their judges and District Attorneys. They're the generals in this phenomena, to use an analogy. You're going after the grunt instead of the general who's giving the orders. You ask the police to maintain order and then beat them submission when they do. It's no wonder that morale in the police departments are so low. No wonder so many are quitting and moving to places like Florida where they get the support they need to do their jobs.
If your bosses treated you that way, you'd quit too, or go to a work to rule attitude because it's just not worth doing your best. It's human nature. You're treating them the same way that the left wing over seers and the media treats them. If I were a cop I'd tell you to get lost when surrounded by a group of armed rioters. YOU got a gun...figure it out for yourself. You think that I'm a jerk anyway. Why would I help someone who feels that way?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"My Kingdom is not of this world" John 18:36. Most Christians know that since God's Kingdom doesn't exist here, it must exist elsewhere, which means that a theocracy is impossible. "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's" Mark 12:17 Another example of how heaven and earth are 2 separate entities. In fact, the biggest part, of the Old Testament relates how the Jewish Theocracy didn't and couldn't work. Humans are too imperfect to allow it to happen effectively over any significant length of time.
That's not to say that Republicans, better yet Christians, don't get overbearing and demanding, but the things that I've just mentioned, are at the heart of their religion.
Before you start calling me a religious kook, I'm not a Christian. However, I do know the faith quite well and have an insight into what Christianity teaches.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rogermetzger7335
I'm going to say that you could apply a bit of all those methods of interpretation. However, a big influence was my upbringing in the Christian Reformed Church which is a Calvinist branch of Christianity. However, I'm looking at it now as an outsider and applying my own subsequent reading on the subject, as well.
From everything that I've been able to understand, as an objective outsider, is that Christianity sees the return of Jesus as a Kingdom that stands outside of the world as we know it. A complete transformation from the world of Satan to the world of God. This implies that perfection will not and cannot be achieved without God and his transformation.
I will say that the early church is different than the church that it became. They early Christians believed that the return of Jesus and the Kingdom of Heaven was imminent, coming at any moment. That didn't turn out to be the case and Christians had to revise the timeline of his return, which would increase the importance of how one should live their life. Instead of being here when Jesus returns, Christians have been forced to feel that it will happen AFTER they die. That has a 2 pronged effect on how they see their faith. The importance of faith becomes more nebulous as they can't claim to know someone who's grandfather had a cousin who knew Saint Peter, who was a disciple of Jesus. Their faith has to come more from within than through evidence, although that is discussed in Hebrew 11:1. Second, it means that the day to day activities of a lifetime have greater relevance as a part of how one finds redemption. Your faith must manifest itself in your works, to a certain degree, to use a religious concept.
I guess maybe I looked at your comment as an argument rather than a discussion and that may not have been the best way to approach it. However, in my defence, there is a lot of negativity on the internet and I probably responded ready to do battle. I'm sorry about that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ArtemisFowl-e4t
It's a descriptive. You have immigrants, who go through the process of applying, getting references, doing things the right way and then, once accepted, come here as legal immigrants or aliens. That is, until then, alien to this country. You have those who sneak across the border, into the United States, and then claim that they're immigrants. Sneaking across a national border is illegal in almost every country in the world. Hence the term "illegal alien". To enter the United States is against the law and if an alien does that he's doing something illegal.....an illegal alien.
Of course, when you don't want to understand, you never will.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@venture_210
I'd say it's unravelling because we've accepted a pernicious ideology, based on Marxist principles, into the nation. This is an ideology that dismissed the massive violence in over 60 cities last year, with Billions of dollars of damage, looting and around 30 dead, all in the name of "justice". Adam Schiff teared up, a great display of political theatre, over what happened on Jan 6th but there was not a word, NOTHING, when 8 year old, Secoriea Turner, was shot by BLM supporters in Atlanta, Georgia. You'd think that an horrific thing like that would give the media and others pause to reflect on the idea that maybe these riots weren't the right way to go and that too many innocent people were getting hurt. But that didn't happen.
They don't care about that little girl's rights or of the rights of all those business owners that lost everything or their employees that lost their livelihood. They didn't care that Jacob Blake sexually assaulted a woman. They didn't care that our current Vice-President visited Blake and told him that she was proud of him. A RAPIST....and she was proud of him. Did Adam Schiff and Congress call her out for that? No....they picked her to be the next vice president and possibly the president.
If you can't see that as a breakdown of society's respect for the Constitution and the Rule of Law....there's not much more I can say to you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JKLZREFAN
You're defending the Nazis and pretending that they're the ones on the right side of history. I'm saying that they're not and providing evidence of a nation that we're not appreciative, one bit, on what the Nazis did to them. That heavily implies that they were NOT such good guys. You don't like to hear it, that's your problem.
Also, if Hitler was only trying to unite all Germans, why did he take over ALL of Czechoslovakia. They're not Germans. The Allies allowed that but were assured that there would be no war. Remember Chamberlain?
Why did the Germans take over as much of Poland as possible? Why not just the areas where the Germans lived? Why arrange to have Poland completely crushed?
Again I ask, if Hitler wasn't an expansionist, why would he invade Denmark, Norway and Holland? 3 countries that he wasn't at war with and he invaded them. There is no way that you can rationalise it.
Just like saying that standing, jam packed in cattle cars, for an 1100 km trip, which would have taken, at least, 15 hours, is normal. You're grasping at straws to hold onto your belief system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikehardy2712
What did you expect to happen when Trump took over? Did you expect that within 2 years that we'd ALL have yachts and private jets? Or just the opposite? What he did was open the economy so everyone had a chance to improve their lives. Giving people money is useless. It devalues what you have. Your wealth only has value if it's built on creating it. For me, as a relatively poor person if compared to the "oligarchs, to be able to create wealth, I need the opportunity and freedom to work and create a life that brings value and it has to apply to everyone.
My dad came to this country with nothing, no job and unable to speak the language. Now, he's a millionaire. It didn't happen overnight. It took hard work, being smart with what he had and having the freedom to do, financially, the things that brought him that success. He's not an oligarch, but he's a success.
I'm doing the same. I don't think I'll be as successful as my dad was, but I'm not as driven as he was, either. That's MY doing. I don't care if someone is rich. What I care about is having the freedom, which gives me the opportunity, to make my own fortune, even if it doesn't compare with the fortune an oligarch might have. The minute I start looking at the piles of others with envy, that's the day my own success stops. That's why the commandment "thou shalt not covet" is so important to personal and social success. Be concerned with freedom.....that's it. Everything else will fall into place, if you have the freedom to make your own way in life. That's what Trump is trying to bring to the table. The government doesn't DO FOR the working class. It ensures that every worker has the freedom to make the decision that can bring personal and financial success their way. My dad did it working as a labourer in a shoe factory while operating a small farm. A worker. It wasn't easy but looking back, he'd have it no other way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jimmie Jay Bohorn
And Sowell was BEING equal by being a professor at a prestigious university, teaching students to make use, through economics, of the freedom that the US was offering. Those Civil Rights mean nothing if you don't work hard and build something concrete, which is what economics does.
That's when Black Americans should have turned to men and women, like Sowell, and did what Asian Americans did. Build something concrete with their lives. Instead, they acted as if getting that Civil Rights Act was going to make life better for them. That Act is USELESS without taking advantage of the new freedoms that Act afforded them. Those leaders, that you mentioned, FAILED Black America by not telling us that freedom means NOTHING without responsibility and hard work. Free people will go just as hungry as oppressed people if they do nothing. That Act was to ensure that ALL Americans could WORK towards a better life. Passing it should have been the beginning for each individual Black American. Instead, those leaders rested on their laurels, trying to win the freedoms that the Civil Rights Act had already given them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thelastcommenter7154
I never ONCE said CRT is fake. What I asked was why would the party, that fought against slavery and Jim Crow, want to cover up the details of slavery. That's the claim that proponents of CRT are claiming. "They are suppressing CRT because they want to hide the reality of slavery". Why would a party, that formed with the mandate of abolishing slavery, want to hide that slavery existed? It's illogical.
Also, you never corrected anything. Not one fact or detail was given that could be used as a correcting point.
People bog themselves down in details and forget the big picture. Also, I didn't google it. I guessed that year because I'd heard of the 1619 Project. I used common sense NOT Google.
It seems rather disingenuous to claim that slavery and CRT could only be applied to America, when slave trades have been in existence for centuries. The African slave trade also took place in the Caribbean, South America, Europe and in the Middle East. Yet, you're only going to apply it to the US? Strange thing is, the US is the ONLY country that fought a Civil war, that killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of it's own citizens and which brought to an end slavery in that country. That's also a part of history. The ones that brought the African slave trade (native Americans practised slavery too) to America, did so because of a history of slavery that went back thousands of years. In other words, it was nothing new OR unique to America.
Also, it still doesn't answer why the Republicans would want to cover up their part in ending the African slave trade.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marisawright2224
They died of a disease. I'm sure you've heard of it. These rioters are destroying on purpose. David Dorn was killed, intentionally, to get a TV.
The US has 330 million people. Italy, France, Spain, Germany and Great Britain have 320 million people. Yet the have over 30,000 MORE deaths. The same amount of people but more deaths. Is that Trump's fault too? Or the fault of the leader of those nations. In fact, if you take away Germany's 83 million people, the remaining 240 million in the other 4 countries would STILL have 20,000 more deaths.
Explain that, why don't you? I can prove these numbers, too but I doubt that I'll have to. I've thrown these stats out before and I've YET to get a response. People don't like to hear facts. They prefer their emotions, especially, it seems, HATE....and you sure do hate, don't you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@snowflake1958
You really don't get economics, do you. The rich aren't getting these loans. It's corporations that are in trouble. Do you know who owns corporations? Shareholders, that's who. Shareholders aren't just rich Wall Street Tycoons. It's almost everyone. If you have a pension at work, you have money invested in corporations. If you have money in the bank, it's being invested in corporations. Your 401 money is invested. If they go bankrupt, all those things are affected, negatively. If too many go bankrupt, it's the entire economy that goes belly up and we'll be like Venezuelans....eating out pets.
Corporations work on a very small profit margin. It's calculated on percentages of money invested. It may sound like a lot of money to you and I but when it's a percentage, it's relative to the size of the investment. A 1 million dollar profit, over a year on 1 billion dollars invested is terrible. I'd love to have 1 million bucks but as a profit on 1 billion dollars, a corporation is cutting it awful fine. A corporation needs, at least, a 5% annual profit margin...at the least. If it gets lower than that, it's starting to bleed and the longer it lasts the more trouble it's in. In fact, a corporation operates in the same way a household does. It's in larger sums but, just like a household, it NEEDS to make money to pay off it's creditors and suppliers. Some are doing quite well, but there are lots of them running month to month just like the average guy working paycheck to paycheck.
They deal in bigger sums of money but it's exactly the same. If you let them go bankrupt, we're all in big trouble and they do go bankrupt. Obama bailed out GM because it was done. They paid back their loan and are now starting to make face masks to fight the virus.
1.3 TRILLION to the average guy, small businesses and the fight against the virus. Please....we ALL need this money. You're hatred of the rich is going to cripple us.
Worse....If the people think that it's the Democrats that are the ones holding up this money, Trump WILL WIN THE NEXT ELECTION. They will blame the Democrats. I don't care if Diamond Jim might finagle some money out of this. I want to see help for the average Joe and it's in there. Even the Democrats acknowledge that it's there. Please, encourage your congressman to let us have it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@harrisonsturm857
All he did was congratulate the new president of Ukraine. He encouraged him to combat the corruption in his country and asked about an e-mail server and a vague reference to Biden. In fact, Adam Schiff got up, in Congress, and invented, out of his head, the entire phone call. Trump, freely released, the tapes of that phone call and even the president of Ukraine said that there was no pressure or quid pro quo, as far as he knew.
You're hearing what you want to hear. It's the same way that the MSM tried to push the nonsense about the Covington Kids, Jussie Smollett, the "all immigrants are animals" manipulation, the pretending that the BLM violence didn't happen, that Antifa was a myth, the "good people on both sides" distortion, that he called Covid a hoax......I can go on and on. Everyone of those lies and manipulations playing into the heads of those who "want to believe".
Had this been Joe Biden holding money to get something done by a foreign government leader, it would have been ignored. Oh wait, he did do that and it was ignored. And then the Hunter Biden laptop information was ignored and people talking about it on social media were censored and even had their accounts purged. Time Magazine wrote an article, not as an expose, but to show how the Democrats, Rinos, the media, big tech and large corporations worked together to "fortify the election to ensure the proper outcome."
The Democrats are trying to form a one Party state and people, like you, are helping them. They've lied, manipulated and encouraged violence and last summer over 30 lives were lost and over 2 billion dollars in damages reported in riots, yet you'd still ignore it all. Enjoy your censorship when they come after you when you happen to disagree with one thing that they want you to believe.
I'm astounded that you can't see what the Democrats and the multinationals are doing. You will but it may be too late when it does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I didn't watch the rally because I can't stand listening to Trump speak. However, there's no way in hell, I'd vote Democrat. Not as long as they keep acting the way that they've been acting. The Democrats have lost it. They're not even an option as far as I'm concerned. It has nothing to do with personality. It's all about what they're supporting, the tearing down of statues, the defunding of police, the support for "peaceful" protests, the erasing of history, the cancel culture, the obsession with racism....the list goes on and on.
Every day, when I watch the news, it's like I'm watching a reenactment of "1984". I hate feeling like Winston Smith.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jiveturkey2875
Tim does reference Newsguard, frequently but he's also said that they may not always correct in their assessments. Tim covers a variety of topics every day and I would imagine it takes long hours to find something of interest, read it, find other sources, assess everything he's read and then give a conclusion. The problem with MSM is that they've allowed their "news" to become opinion pieces. "60 Minutes" type programming, the cutting edge stuff of 40 years ago, doesn't exist anymore. Tim will give alternative insights to what they're saying and gives you a way to check for yourself if you're so inclined and you should be.
Never, trust one source. That's been something I've believed for years but these days, it's a put down if you questioned the left leaning MSM news. "Sounds like Fox" or "Breitbart news....PFFFT" and their ears turn off. It doesn't matter that your information may have come from elsewhere. I've had people call me a "Trumpster" and then dismiss everything I say based on their slur, even though I'm not a supporter of Trump.
That's the battle we're fighting these days and it's causing a horrible divide in society. Tim is fighting it as well, the best he can. He's growing but he started as a single person, no money or real influence. He's done well because he offers something the big guys don't, including Fox, in case that's an issue. He trying to show objectivity and that you don't have to regurgitate what you're being told. He's telling us to figure it out for ourselves. Is he right all the time on specific issues? Of course not. Who is? However, the tools to find out the facts should always remain the same. A healthy scepticism is indispensable to a free society. Without it, we become bots.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He was afraid that he was going to be arrested and put in jail. He wasn't afraid that he was going to be killed and he had no problem with violence. I know that because the cop was down, crawling to get away and this asshole aimed and shot him in the head.
Over 1,00,000 people get stopped for traffic violations every day. What made him think that he was the one that was going to be killed? That 1 in a million? If they wanted to kill him, why didn't they just pull their guns and blast him right off? They didn't want to kill him. In fact, those cops have been doing routine stops all day, all week, ALL YEAR, and they hadn't killed anyone. If cops are so dangerous, how come they haven't got you yet, anyway?
You're making a stupid assertion and I'm being stupid by just talking to someone as full as crap as you are....and you are full of crap.
You're a paranoid delusional nut and you should get some help.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rogerlopez4808
There are several reasons why Africa didn't expand like others did. For one, in spite of the size of that continent, there are very few natural harbours and the few that do exist don't come close to the harbours, for large ships, that other continents are blessed with. Also, much of Africa is situated on large plateaus. This means that the great rivers, unlike other great rivers in the world, are only navigable for a few miles inland. That seriously hampered the ability to set long distance trade routes, essential to economic growth. The Sahara is another major deterrent to establishing major trade routes and sub-Saharan Africa was cut off from the rest of the world for thousands of years. Even when the world started going to them, the navigators wouldn't enter into the country because of the limitations set by unnavigable rivers and the prevalence of diseases, especially malaria. It wasn't until the development of quinine, as an effective treatment for malaria, did European explorers venture inland, and that wasn't until the 1800s. There were some big kingdoms but they just didn't have the natural advantages that countries in Europe, the Middle east, North Africa and the Orient had.
1
-
@davidblasko2159
Schools are funded from grades 1 through 12 because children are required, BY LAW, to go to school. It is good for the children and good for society to have a decently educated young base.
Education is NOT mandated after high school. That is a personal decision. You don't require others to pay for what you choose to do. I want to buy a house, I pay for it. I want an advanced education, I pay for it. It is something I want and choose to do. A 12 year, MUST go to school of some sort. If he doesn't, he'll face truancy charges and eventually his parents will be called to task, by the law.
High tuition rates are another issue. If institutions of higher education are getting government money, they should be called to task for the increasingly high tuition hikes. Also, students might find it in their best interests to find alternative means of career advancement. Nothing holds you back more in your personal growth than high debt, including a huge educational debt which has no solid value as inventory or collateral.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nono-hp5kx
I never said he was perfect. He was a product of his times and those times included the enslavement of those who couldn't defend themselves. It was a way of life. Had you lived back then, you may well have been a slave owner yourself.
People owned slaves throughout our written history. It wasn't until a few hundred years ago that the anti-slavery movement started in earnest. The entire idea of individual rights for all is a new concept, that developed slowly when the printing press was invented and Bibles were written in the languages of the average person. The idea of individual salvation in heaven slowly morphed into the individual rights and freedom here on earth, eventually settling into an idea that was separate from religious thought and applied to everyone on earth, no matter what religion or ethnicity. However, it was a slow evolution. It's so easy to sit here, on our computers, to rag on people who lived in a different time, under different circumstances and life pressures. Almost every person in antiquity was a monster by our standards. That's a reality and it's arrogance to believe that we would have behaved any differently than they did.
All of that has no bearing on what Columbus achieved. When he returned to Spain and told everyone of what happened on that journey, human history changed. It was one of the biggest moments in our history. It has affected almost every human living on earth today. Columbus was not this big leader that invented slavery. Read the story of Spartacus and how prevalent slavery was during the Roman Empire. Columbus was just acting as normal people did in those times.
We learned about Columbus is schools but it was just the main events. The year, what islands he discovered, the names of his ships and how many voyages he led. There is so much that has to be taught that only the superficial is covered of almost every topic. We learn the nuances of our own accord and interests. Ultimately, we learn the things we do, not just as a tool for survival, but as a mirror to hold up to ourselves. We're learning about ourselves. How we got to where we are today. Why we think and act as we do. How vulnerable and corrupt we can be, yet deeply caring as well. If you can't learn that from a good education, it's wasted on you and worse, it becomes a weapon to use on others. That's when the conflicts begin, today. Self professed morality fighting the evil others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Censortubes
You built cars. LOL and another LOL. That's a toughie. I'll bet people assaulted you all the time on the job. LMAO.
Yes it does go farther. I'm responsible for your actions, even after you leave. If you get into a car and run over a kid, I could be sued for over serving and spend the rest of my life in debt. If I cut you off and I see you get into a car and drive, I have to call the police, although I'm still liable if you run over that kid. My settlement may not be as large. If you get angry, I have to deal with you and maybe even call the police. If you see me on the phone, you might conclude, as many have, that I'm calling the police and then threaten me or assault me. It's happened countless times. A lot of servers have quit over this.
LOL. I'm still laughing at you, "no name" the Car builder. I spent years shingling roofs. If I showed your comment to my fellow roofers, any construction guy actually, they break out in laughter with me. You really have no idea.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ionutbalta6607
The right is pissing on the Constitution? It's the left that is trying to suppress free speech. The left is trying to control what we read and listen to. "Baby, it's cold outside" is being banned not by the right but by the left, who've become more prudish than a Victorian grandmother. If it wasn't for the Constitution the left would have outlawed such films like "The Red Pill". If they don't like it, they want it banned. Don't like what a person says, fire him, dox him, protest him, mob them in restaurants when they're with their families.
It's the left that want to do away with the right to bear arms, which is in the Constitution.
You've said that Republicans piss on the Constitution but you haven't said how or given an example of it.
As for the David Pakman thing, here he is in an interview with Dave Rubin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EipJoOJrqgU
He appears quite willing to engage in a discussion in that video.
He didn't say that he was left, either. He says that he has never changed the things he believed and that these were once the same as the left. It's the left that has changed and the right that has become more accepting and has moved to the same positions that he has always had. Rubin claims that he's never changed any of his core beliefs but his left friends have become more radicalised to the left and many refuse to even talk to him anymore.
Also, there is a new surge in Socialism in the Democratic Party and it has had a profound affect on how they form policies and ideas. That cannot be denied. A man like Bernie Sanders would never have been considered to run for the presidency by the Democrats in the sixties and seventies. He is too far left and has embraced many Marxist ideas. As for the European socialism, those countries still embrace a capitalist economy. Business is privately owned and market driven. They have social safety nets but it is paid for by the taxes paid by the citizens who are getting their money through a capitalist economic system. The US does the same and has for decades now. The US has a capitalist system but there is welfare, rent control, subsidised housing, Medicare, social security and more. That isn't part of the capitalist economy.
I don't know how Trump being the laughing stock that he is makes Rubin a liar. That's illogical.
Trump is a bit of a jackass but he isn't completely incompetent, either. North Korea was launching unarmed missiles over South Korea and Japan, setting of air raid alarms and scaring the crap out of people there. Trump comes along and brokers a deal with the "dear leader" and no more missile launches. The people in that region aren't laughing. Most are quite happy that it isn't happening anymore. Trump signs an executive order, identifying depressed areas as opportunity zones so those poor neighbourhoods have a chance to improve and the people there to rise out of poverty. Who cares how stupid Trump is if he's enacting people to rise out of poverty. He also set in motion policies that will encourage the poor to not cash in their retirement packages and 401ks so when retirement comes, they won't live in abject poverty. Who cares that a stupid man is responsible for the elderly living a better life than they do now? I know I don't.
Also, the radical left is more dangerous than the right. There are right wing nutjobs that have done terrorist acts, but the radical left want to to tear down the entire system and build a Marxist state. Now that's dangerous. They already are so powerful in the universities that a lot of students are afraid to say what they think due to harassment by the left wing students and professors. Berkeley has just lost a court case where that have to stop harassing student Republican groups and allow right wing guest speaker on campus. They've also been told that their free speech zone is unconstitutional. Free speech should never be zoned or cordoned off. It should be open to everyone, no matter where they are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@smallfeet4581
Lenin never knew that he had Jewish heritage and Stalin, the most brutal of all the Bolsheviks and Lenin's muscle, was Georgian. When Stalin became the power, in the Soviet Union, Lavrently Beria was the most influential member of the secret police and was eventually named to head the NKVD. Beria was ALSO a Georgian.
Am I to surmise, from this, that maybe the Georgians are behind Marxism as well. Also, China is the largest Communist power in the world. There are only about 2,700 Jews in all of China. Are you seriously trying to tell me that this tiny population is the ruling force of over 1 billion people???
This is a lot of selective fact finding. Yes there were influential Jews who were involved in the Marxist movement. However, they're far from the driving force of Marxism today. Anyone who believes that is engaging in the same identitarian politics as the progressive woke left. In fact, the Marxist left are staunchly anti-Jewish right now. Look at their adamant stance against the Jewish state of Israel and how pro-Palestinian they are.
Definite selective facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree with everything you say but they do come out with nuggets of facts that a conservative network, like Fox, may not think important. I'd never take either one at their word, ESPECIALLY CNN, because they are extremely toxic, but I listen and then do my own fact checking. However, if you only watch CNN and are committed to fact checking and the truth, you're going to be one frustrated human being.
I don't think that Trump should be impeached but he was on FOX this morning and I had to turn it off. Yet, considering the Democrat field of hopefuls, I'd probably vote for Trump. I've always said that if the Democrats could come up with a candidate that was doing the things that Trump was doing and was a likeable person, they'd win in a landslide......but they're too consumed with this new socialist and left progressive agenda to ever even consider that strategy. What's worse, they're too consumed with hate. Hate for Trump, for the white patriarchy and the rich. Hate has never been good for any society, ever, in human history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ephraimwinslow
They THINK that they're being righteous. The socialist causes sound SO nice, so fair....how can it NOT be righteous. They can't understand the old axiom "The road to hell is paved with good intentions". It becomes worse when someone tries to point out the unintended consequences of those good intentions. They take it as a personal affront, as if you're accusing them of being evil, when quite often they're not evil. They're just misinformed and believe that if you don't believe in their just and fair causes, you must be the one responsible for things not working out. That causes them to just dig their heels in harder and it makes things even worse.
They cannot believe that their good intentions, as an example, could be the cause of the homeless problem in San Francisco. How could that be? Their intentions are SO noble. It has to be those who, like me, think that these policies are the problem and who point out, greedy jerks that we are, that throwing our tax money at it, makes things worse, not better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sunny is asking "Where is the compassion?" That's right, Sunny. You're living in the liberal, compassionate, socialist state of New York and this state will NOT take Jordan Neeley in hand, place him where he can get medical and psychiatric care 24/7, give him a warm bed and good food so he can, hopefully, recover from his difficulties. Instead, they turn him loose on the world, where he can do as he will, inevitably, give in to the demons in his brain and end up ending his life. There is no compassion in those people who are claiming to care for Neeley, a minority. They don't care one bit about him, unless he can be used to further their own political agenda. The great socialist state of New York failed Jordan Neeley, the very state that YOU, Sunny Hostin, support.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mikegleghorn5437
I've said this earlier, what you've said about these guys may well have merit, however that doesn't take away from what's being presented in the video. You can't, in any future discussion on what is being talked about, in the video, deride the letter, written by Jefferson, because you first heard about it from Glenn Beck. That letter still exists, with or without Beck, and you have to deal with it, as if Beck doesn't exist.
A refusal to discuss it because of this one man, doesn't disprove or prove, what's being said. The only thing that does that is by using your intellect in a reasoned and logical manner. You're basically doing what an 8 year old does in a school yard. "You're stupid" might work at recess but not between supposedly intelligent adults.
1
-
1
-
@E_Ten
So it takes 50+ years to determine whether it's safe or not? They've used it for malaria, arthritis, Lupus and Lyme disease....millions upon millions of doses around the world and they don't even know if it's safe or what the long term effects are? I'm 68. If I contract Covid, I could die within a week or 2. Do I care about long term effects? Maybe in 15 years, when I'm 83, I'll have breathing problems. Maybe not. I'll never know it Covid kills me, will I.
Covid kills the elderly. My dad is now 88. I haven't seen him in 5 months because of Covid and I'm finally visiting him tomorrow. If he gets Covid, what does he care about long term effects? He's in excellent health but he knows that he's going soon and he treats it with humour. A friend phones him at 9 every morning and he answers "Yup...I'm still alive!!!". However, he doesn't want to die this week, either and if he does get Covid and he feels HCQ is his best option, who cares about long term effects? He doesn't. Long term effects are meaningless when you don't have a long term. I could still have another 20 years but I don't know that. So many of the people that I've known for all my life are gone already. 70 was the lifespan when I was a kid. I'm basically there.
It's the elderly that we're trying to save and you don't want to give them a drug due to long term effects when most don't have a long term ahead of them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@westberryjim
I guess those statistics, that I cited, didn't impress you one bit. You just plain ignored them and went on, in an hysterical panic, insisting that your child is in imminent danger, EVERY day from Covid. Yet, and I'll bet you don't even care, that your daughter is in greater danger of dying of being permanently maimed every time you strap her into a car seat belt. You'd drive around, without a care in the world, even though she's 2.5 times more likely to die in that car than of Covid.
Your fear is irrational and based on media propaganda, not the facts OR SCIENCE. In fact, you're using your daughter as a political prop to support a political ideology. When you ignore the science and still insist on the horrific menace to your daughter's life, that's the only conclusion that I can arrive at.
This isn't about your daughter. This is about your own need to show how much you care about others. You're like the Pharisee, praying out loud so all can hear....." “I am not like other men – robbers, evil-doers and adulterers” and then proceeds to outline all the good things that he has done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PvtFlowers
Yes, I have. It was called "The Children of God" at the time although they've re-invented themselves many times over the years. This was in Daytona Beach in 1972. They tried to recruit me and when I resisted, using the Bible as evidence against their claims they stopped the conversation, instantly. They all took on a very stubborn and angry expression, gathered their stuff and left.
As the weeks went by, they were on the beach and boardwalk, looking for new recruits all the time. However, if I approached the group, because I knew the person that they were talking to, they would automatically gather their stuff and leave. I found out later, from a guy who they did recruit but left, that they were all instructed NOT to talk to me. I thought it was hilarious at the time....I was only 19.....the cult phenomenon was just starting to hit the news at the time, culminating in the Jimmy Jones killings and I wasn't familiar with it at the time.
The one thing in common with "The Children of God" and guys like the one shown in the video, is their anger and the impossibility of discussing disagreements with them. Both groups refuse to discuss, investigate or fact check. If someone proves them wrong, they get angry and leave and will refuse to accept the evidence that shows their errors. The next time you hear from them, they'll still be using the same arguments that were proven wrong. I've found the same thing with flat earthers, birthers, chemtrail believers, truthers and more. They don't care about the facts. All they know is their fear, their hatred and their loyalty to their cause. If that's not a cult, then it's as close to being one as it can get.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@OliverDePlace
So, his proposal is going to funnel money to Trump Towers or something like that? No one would want that. Not even Tucker Carlson would be good with it. That money is for businesses that are in trouble and lots of them are facing serious financial setbacks, possible ruin. The "for his own benefit" is a reading between the lines exercise that Trump haters engage in. Don't make decisions based on emotion and don't hate big business because they have more money than you. If a huge corporation goes under, due to the economic effects of the virus and the lockdowns, no one will benefit and the hardest hit won't be the executives. It'll be the bottom workers, the cleaners, assembly line workers, people who will come out of this with their finances depleted and no job to go to. Worse they'll be fighting other workers, for jobs, who lost them because the big corporation, that you hate, have also gone bankrupt and these big companies DO GO BANKRUPT.
This isn't about FOX and I hardly ever go on Facebook and when I do, more people dislike Trump, in my circle, than do.
Your entire premise starts out with "I hate Trump" and it expands from there to validate your hate. If there is 500 billion to help businesses, then there is OVER 500 billion to help others....the ordinary people.
Also, are you seriously trying to say that tax cuts to wind and solar use, racial profile posting of corporate boards, aircraft emissions and this stuff is what we NEED right now?
Hatred is an insidious drug. Get off it. It has destroyed more lives in history than any other single human endeavour.
1
-
@OliverDePlace
You're ignoring the stupid points of plane emissions, racial makeup reports of board members...etc. What is this doing here? How is this appropriate?
If you're allegation is true about of allocation of funds, that would be an easy issue to settle, if that's all that the Democrats were worried about. It's not and the perception, to the average American is that Democrats are playing politics and using the crisis for their own agenda. I've seen it everywhere, even people that I know that hate Trump are scratching their heads, upset at what Pelosi is doing. It's terrible politics and if the Dems don't stand up and appear as if they're in it for ALL Americans and not just for special identity groups, they'll lose the election this fall and lose drastically.
Most people sat in anticipation of a stimulus package being passed and all they're hearing is that the Democrats are blocking it. Besides, it that Trump, Mnuchin thing is the REAL obstacle, why throw in all these other issues. It only muddies the waters. All they have to do is centre on that. Make it a one issue problem that they're trying to solve. Americans would get that. They don't get what plane emissions have to do with the coronavirus. All the Dems have to do is make a provision to the package that would ensure that neither Trump nor Mnuchin can give their own enterprises money. It would be easy as it's illegal already.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ryooken
FOX may be wrong when they claim that it's the ONLY reason why recruiting numbers are down but it is a factor. A FACTOR. Not the ONLY one but it is a mitigating factor.
If you can't understand that difference, then you don't want do get it. You're ignoring that factor, one of the MANY factors, including the ones that you've listed.
Your report came out in 2014. This was before the LGBT stuff was as prevalent as it is now. Also, this is a Department of Defence report. They're not about to report that they could be at fault for some of the problems. This report places the issue on external factors, absolving them of any responsibility for recruiting problems. That's human nature. No one wants to blame themselves, even if it's only a part of problem. People don't like to criticise themselves.
If only 23% qualify, of those who apply, what about those that don't apply, for any reason, including the new progressive ideology. There's no way to know why they're not applying and people are quitting jobs over progressive policies. I know that if my company demands that I acknowledge my white privilege, I'd refuse. I don't care if they fire me or not. I don't do that. It's the same with pronoun stuff. You can't make me say or do anything that I don't want to say or do. That's no different than my boss telling me that I must become Catholic to work there. I ain't doing it and I would never voluntarily go to any government or business entity that does that per policy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevintewey1157
"I am a fanatical socialist, one who has ever in mind the interests of all his people.” – Adolf Hitler , February 24, 1941, speech on the 21st anniversary of the Nazi Party
I have MORE quotes from Hitler in which he says similar things about his feelings on socialism.
"We are convinced that socialism in the right sense will only be possible in nations and races that are Aryan, and there in the first place we hope for our own people and are convinced that socialism is inseparable from nationalism.”
– Adolf Hitler , August 15, 1920, speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus.
Nazi is short for "National Socialist German Workers' Party." I don't care for socialism...AT ALL. I have even more disdain for National Socialism, a term coined by Mussolini and refined by Hitler. China is now closer to National Socialism than it is to Communism. Mao would be appalled at what's going on in China today with their move towards Capitalism and the "injustices" of accruing wealth on the backs of the common man. China has 607 billionaires at the moment, all business moguls yet they all must defer to the CCP (Chinese Communist Party). I think that they should call themselves "The Chinese National Socialist Party" That would be a lot more accurate.
China is a wonderful place alright, if you like one party rule.....kinda like Hitler did.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@waynecatterton5127
I KNOW what a cult is. I've dealt with the cult known as the "Children of God" and they're NOTHING like most churches. Cults isolate you, take you away to country homes and then put you through a rigorous indoctrination program that includes sleep deprivation and continuous dogmatic repetition. They do not allow any alone time, strip you of all your possessions and try to keep you away from all outside interactions unless one of them is present.
I grew up in the Christian Reformed Church and it was quite conservative. However, when I turned 17, I left the church. They didn't hate me for it. They asked why I left, expressed concern for my soul, prayed for me and then left me to my life. That was it. I still go there for weddings, funerals and baptisms and stop and talk to church members all the time. They have a belief system yet even within that church, that group that I grew up with, there are disagreements about what being a Christian entails. They have a core belief, the power of redemption, through Jesus, and personal responsibility but the details elude complete agreement. In fact, throughout human history, no matter where on the planet, how completely different people are, they ALWAYS had a belief system based on the metaphysical. The entire human race can't ALL be based on cults. That's an extremely narrow viewpoint and only serves the ego of the one making the claim.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Hobbitfeetpics
Another trope. "Stop victim blaming" I'm NOT blaming the victim. He's in a situation that's OBVIOUSLY dangerous to him. Every sign of resistance that he makes, he's giving those bad cops another reason to go at him even harder. Maybe you find some comfort in those cops being charged but I don't. Do you know why? It's because we have a dead victim and I don't want people to make the same mistakes that he made and also end up in a morgue and on the news.
Also, I HAVE been in his position. One cop pressed his pistol into my temple, as hard as he could, while I was bent over the hood of the police car. The other cop kicked my ankles repeatedly, telling me to spread my legs apart further, even though it was impossible. My crime? I was on a country road, at around 9 in the morning, just outside of Daytona, when I had to urinate. I went into the bushes, they pulled up and told me to come out. I didn't know it was the police as I couldn't see them through the leaves. So, I told them to wait a minute while I pulled up my zipper. That's what I did that was so horrible. There's wasn't even a house in sight.
I didn't fight back. I didn't say much except to answer the questions asked of me. I ended up with a nasty bruise on my temple and scrapes and bruises around my ankles....but I was alive. I don't know if Nichols would still be alive if he's complied but I do know that it would have increased his chances. Being right isn't a big comfort when you're dead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@harambe1580
You used the word "eradicate" so I assumed that you meant what you said.
Also, I'm not going to spend my life wishing things were a certain way. I'm going to deal with my life as it is, not as I want it to be.
Also, you don't have to live in a big concrete building, with hundreds of people, if you don't want to. I live in a small town and I go visit the family farm all the time. I pitch a tent at the back of the farm and spend a week or so, at a time, outdoors and enjoying myself. It's great but that's only because I have the safety net of our modern technology. Life in nature is extremely hard and if you spend any time in nature, you'll realise that. Life is cheap, in the wild, and the problems are a lot worse than taxes and money or rent.
Happiness in life doesn't come from the outside. It comes from you, from how you view the world and your existence in it. Instead of complaining about the things that you have no control over, appreciate the good things in life. Your family, friends, a warm sunny day, art, music, a good book, tell a joke, smile at your neighbour, be optimistic about life. Quit whining about stuff that can't change.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hamie7624
Some one should have told the people of Gaza that when crossing into Israel, in the wee hours of the morning, and butchering over 1200 teens and young adults at a music festival, has consequences. That dragging men, women and children out of their beds and slaughtering, s-x abusing and kidnapping them is an outright act of war.
They don't do those things and then expect nothing to happen.
Population of Gaza at the end of 2022 was 2,000,000. At the end of 2024 it was 2,100,000.....and increase of 100,000 people. That's some lousy "jen o siding". In 15 years, at that rate, they would have "jen o sided" up to 3,00,000 people. How are you going to fit them all in?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ConvictedFelonTrump8647
How do you know if Thomas is a woman or not? Are you a biologist? Is Thomas a biologist? Apparently, and this has been stated in Congress, we need the requisite biologists to identify a woman. That has been claimed in Congress and by Supreme Court Justice, Ketanji Brown Jackson. What biologist examined Thomas to see if he met the criteria that would confirm her woman hood?
Thomas did NOT beat Gaines. He tied her. Also, that's NOT the only issue that Gaines has with the Thomas affair. Thomas, when stripped down to the nothings, presents as a fully functioning male. Gaines was subjected to having Thomas stripped naked in front of her with ALL his males parts in full view. I can get fired, from my job, for looking at a woman and making her feel uncomfortable, at the work place even though I'm fully clothed. Thomas entered Gaines's work place, took off all his clothes, and looked at the naked women in that dressing room and is applauded. Why is that better than what I just described in my workplace?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@imaginarymask
It really wasn't much of a tribulation. I did something stupid. I put in my time for it. When I got out, I went looking for a job and got one. There are all kinds of reasons why someone won't hire someone and I, quite stupidly, added another reason to not hire me. Actions have consequences and I found that out.
The big problem is, they don't tell kids that in school. Not ever. It seems that tribulation and oppression is the centre piece of education now. They don't tell you to make the right decisions. Stay in school. Don't get pregnant or cause a pregnancy until you're in a committed relationship. Don't break the law. Work hard and appreciate the opportunities that you do get instead of lamenting over the things that are out of reach. Do those things and you've increased your chances of having a good life. These days that's controversial but in reality, it's just common sense.
So many people, that I know, have had it so much harder than what I did. Some things couldn't be helped. Physical, mental and environmental limitations that are a LOT harder to overcome than my criminal record. In spite of my "tribulations", which kinda makes me chuckle, I've had a good life. However, if I was put in front of a classroom filled with kids, today and they'd find all kinds of reasons to put me down. As far as I'm concerned, when they do that, they're putting themselves down.
1
-
@imaginarymask
The world is full of silly and unfair things. As long as I'm not being ripped off, it's our of my control. I've never felt inferior and the people that I worked with all seemed to like working with me.....except the ones who thought they were being treated unfairly, quite often the lazy, and no one liked working with them.
My point is that we do coddle them now. "it's not their fault. They're oppressed". I'm not oppressed. I have a great life. Since I've retired, I've been to Cuba, Costa Rica, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Nova Scotia and the Netherlands. I'm making plans to go to the Cayman Islands with friends in December and hope to take a tour of Europe in 2025. Life is great. I loved my jobs, working in a shoe factory, scrapyard, construction, bartending and finally at a paper mill. Tough jobs but I got satisfaction from doing it and it's given me the opportunity to have a good retired life.
I appreciate what I have and that's what's wrong with our society today. They appreciate nothing. Everything is oppression and not fair and I deserve. You destroy your own life, feeling that way, MORE than any criminal record ever could. People, who feel that way, are their own worst enemy. We live in a wonderful country and we're destroying it with our never ending whinging and envy. Accept the limitations of life and work around it with dignity and honesty. You only got one shot at life. Don't spend it wishing it away.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Yves_Ka
First, the United States wasn't even close to being the last nation to abolish slavery. Many held onto it until well into the 20th century. Saudi Arabia and Yemen didn't abolish slavery until 1962. That's 100 YEARS after the US.
Also, the southern United States was conducive, due to climate, the nature of the soil and the geography, to the type of agricultures that were labour intensive enough that made slavery advantageous, especially the growth or cotton and tobacco. The north didn't have that type of agriculture and Canada especially didn't have those types of industries. It's easy to abolish slavery when you don't have a big slave system and then so smug to pat yourself on the back for it. Slavery was also a HUGE part of the system in the Caribbean and in certain countries of South America. Brazil didn't end slavery till 1888, 25 years AFTER the United States did. When was the last time you heard people blasting Brazil over their history with slavery?
I'm really puzzled by the myopic approach or vision, of such a complex cultural issue, of slavery. It's as if the United States invented it, upheld it and we see it nowhere else. Yet we KNOW that this isn't true. So why just vilify THEM for it?
And choosing to question those, in the US who stand for freedom now, because their ancestors may or may not have had slaves, is illogical. It smacks of MORE identity politics. You can tell, just by looking at them, whether their ancestors had or supported slaves or not. So how does that account for the large support from Hispanics in Florida, who believe in the same thing? Did THEIR ancestors support slavery?
Slavery has been a part of the human condition for thousands of years and was prevalent all over the planet. Even the natives had slaves before the Europeans arrived in the Americas. It's time to look at slavery as it was, not through the lens of retribution, personal arrogance and hatred. It happened EVERYWHERE....yet you zero in on one country and that's it. It's self serving and arrogant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheBelegur
The Fascist system in Italy was different than the one in Spain, which was different than the one in Nazi Germany. Just because it doesn't EXACTLY match the one in China, doesn't mean that it's not a form of Fascism. If the CCP has half interest in business, that it implies that the other half is privately owned. That goes against everything that Marxism or communism stands for.
communism definition: a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
If part ownership of a business is allowed, then it's NOT communism.
Fascism definition: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
The Party and particularly, Xi Jinping, is the leader or dictator, as it were. He's officially the Paramount Leader, the Communist Party Leader, the Head of State and the Commander in Chief. He has a firm hand on his power. China is also VERY nationalistic. Look at the Uighur camps, in which they are being re-educated into learning Chinese, getting away from Islam and then integrating them around China so they can be assimilated into the Chinese culture. Not quite as aggressive as Nazi Germany but definitely leaning that way. From this, I'd say that China is closer to be a Fascist country than a communist one. Marx would NOT approve of what is going on in China, right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JoeSmith-mp2fn
We were talking about Chicago and you made a statement that crime was everywhere. I used Toronto to show that, in spite of the fact that crime IS everywhere, it doesn't have to be as bad as Chicago. Second, YOU'RE the one that made the assertion that conservatives are liars. All I did was show you that Chicago had mayors and administrations for 90 years, who are NOT conservative and violent crime is horrific.
The people have elected the SAME group of politicians for 90 years and the awful crime rates has remained the same, right along with it. They keep sticking their hand in the same trap and wonder why things don't improve.
Hey.....but at least those lying conservatives are in charge. Do you know who else is lying? YOU are.....to yourself.
Go ahead, keep sticking your hand in the same bear trap. Eventually your hand will get that strong and build an immunity to the pain.
Also, I know that there have been liberal mayors in Toronto. That's not my point. My point it that it doesn't matter the ideology of the administrations...liberal or conservative. What matters is the pattern of success. Toronto is one of the fastest growing, vibrant and crime free cities in North America. That's a success that we want to perpetuate. Chicago is a city in decline, with horrific violent crime rates. If you want to perpetuate that record, vote for the same people, that brand of Democrat that have been there all along. If they've failed all along, what makes you think that they'll succeed in the future? I know....at least they're not conservatives. LOL. You sure have a twisted sense of logic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@corvetteb3075
In a way, so did Walz. You're not risking much if all you do is train and then train others. However, when the war in Iraq seemed imminent, he left the service. He got paid for all those years. Got to travel on the taxpayer's dime but when things got tough, he bailed. Worse, he lied about it. He lied about his rank and about taking part in actual combat. That's a slap in the face to all those who did have to fight, who lost their lives, their health, both mental and physical....those who are still suffering trauma because of those combat experiences.
Trump was eligible for the draft but he, upon the required medical exams, found to have bone spurs in his heels and he got a deferment from service. Was it a legit diagnosis, neither of us knows but one could get a deferment quite easily. I knew a guy who was deferred because he had different coloured eyes. However, we just don't know about Trump. What we do know about Walz is that he LIED about combat. Intentionally, with the intent of using that lie to further his political career.
1
-
1
-
@Randy-md6xl
Being a fetus is just a stage of life of a specific being. A fetus, a baby, a toddler, an adolescent, a teenager, an adult, a senior....all stages of living. I find it weird, that the only stage, in my life that had no value, was when I was a fetus.....and I was a fetus. I was an embryo, too and a fertilised egg. I wasn't all that cute or communicative but that WAS me.
I learned, when I was just a little kid, that if you didn't keep a chicken egg at the right temperature, the little chick inside would DIE. Actually die. A fertilised egg. We had fertilised eggs under a heat lamp and we took extreme steps to care for those eggs because we didn't want those chicks, inside the egg to die. Turning them every few hours and making sure that the temperature didn't vary. Yes.....the fertilised egg, inside that shell would DIE, expire and grow no more.
"Life is the aspect of existence that processes, acts, reacts, evaluates, and evolves through growth (reproduction and metabolism)." Growth and metabolism. From the moment of conception, the new being starts to grow. In your case, it grew until it became the person that you are today. Had that growth been interrupted, at any time, even 2 weeks after conception, you wouldn't be here today.
1
-
1
-
@stevesherman1743
Where did I say that I don't talk about things? Why do you find it necessary to put words in my mouth and then use YOUR words, pretending that they're my words, to refute some kind of argument? That's a straw man fallacy.
I don't want someone, who I barely know, telling my kids about things that are deeply intimate. I don't KNOW them and I don't know their intentions. This idea that if their teachers don't tell them, they'll go through life in some kind of ignorant fog says that you have a very small opinion of the average parent.
People have different opinions about life, social and moral values and how we should conduct themselves. They have that right. No one should be told, by the state, via the school system, what their children must think and believe. The state, governments, have committed the most heinous atrocities in human history. I don't trust the government yet I realise that they're a necessary evil. That doesn't mean that they have the right to undermine our family values or the values of anyone else, no matter what those values are. Teach my child, all children, the academics. Leave the ideological stuff, religion and politics, out of it. Teachers have TOO much influence for me to allow them to impose THEIR values on my children or my family....especially when they're pre-teens.
It makes the entire system open to state indoctrination and I have family members and friends who can tell you first hand how horrific that can become.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nagillim7915
It came long before the fifties. When Europeans first came to America, they settled onto their new homesteads as the nuclear family. They isolated themselves on large farms, as much as 160 acres, sometimes far from the nearest settlement. Their children didn't necessarily inherit the land, meaning that they had to divide it with their siblings. They could go out and claim their own homestead, which meant going to new lands, sometimes far from their parents. Owning land became a dream that had never existed before.
The fifties brought new affluence so women didn't have near the work that their mothers and grandmothers had. Refrigerators, washers and dryers, electric stoves, vacuum cleaners, all the new conveniences that made life so much easier. Kids were gone to school at age five where, at one time, school wasn't required by law and most kids didn't even go to school. No wonder women became bored. Doing laundry by hand might be drudgery but it sure did keep you busy. Now, you throw a load into the washing machine and you go and watch TV until it's done. Then you throw it into the dryer and watch TV until it's dry. Then you fold the laundry in front of the TV set. Life became too easy and one can't blame women for wanting more.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RobertMorgan
Actually, that marriage broke up when I was 36. It sucked, big time but do you know what? It was still better than had I not got married. It didn't seem so at the time but in retrospect, I don't regret it at all. One thing is certain, I'd rather be married at 23, even if it ultimately failed, then be crying because my parents won't let me live at home, anymore. I was building something of value, that would last. I never remarried and I'm happy with that as well and I now have 3 great grandchildren that I'm taking camping on my sister's property on a river. Fishing, swimming, canoeing, sitting around a fire, life couldn't be better.
Don't let life scare you. Take it by the horns and build something, a life that you love. If you're lucky enough to have a decently long life, you'll look back and be glad that you did it that way. I've learned that life isn't about success and failure but how you deal with it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@scottfarner5100
She crossed 6 years ago and was a Canadian citizen. She went to live with an American in hopes of marriage that she met when he was in Canada. However, none of that matters. Refugee status has to do with those who come from a nation embroiled in wars and are displaced citizens due to the effects of that war. Asylum seekers are those who are faced with imminent threats of torture of persecution in their home countries. There is no WAY that everyone coming across the southern or northern borders, including my sister, meet or met those requirements. They're coming because they're having economic difficulties (they're poor) at home and they know that the current US administration won't question or enforce those asylum requirements.
Also, separating children from the adults that are accompanying them, has NOTHING to do with asylum or refugee status. Having a child with you isn't an automatic indication of lawful refugee or asylum status and has NOTHING to do with those immigration laws. They're either running from wars, torture or persecution at home. If they can't show that they're facing such dangers at home, they can't seek asylum as refugees. That's the law. You can't show up with a child and say that you're a refugee and then say that this proves that you're a refugee or seeking asylum. It's an illogical claim.
It's NOT the questions that determine refugee or asylum status. It's the answers. Can they show the requisite determination for legal immigration status as refugees or asylum seekers or not. That's the question. Rubber stamping requests and letting them come in to disappear into the country is a TERRIBLE policy. Also, if you're from Nicaragua, and you're being persecuted, you go to the nearest country (Honduras) to seek asylum. If they don't allow your case, you go to the next country, Guatemala and do the same. If refused, go to Mexico. There is NO evidence that this is happening. People are coming from all over the world, going to Mexico (not Canada) and then seeking asylum at the US border. They're doing it because the US is seen as a rich country and that's why they want to go there. It's also why, they're not going to Canada and heading south. Canada is already seen as a rich country and no one would come from there to seek asylum, which is why my sister was sent home and threatened with jail if she ever returned.
You don't just claim to be a refugee. You have to prove it and this isn't happening at the southern border.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wayne Gambill
He tries to stop the press from speaking about him? Really? Like how? Arrests? A knock on the door in the middle of the night? Journalists disappearing and never heard from again? That's how true dictators do it.
This is one vague allegation. The press hasn't stopped talking about him, especially the MSM, which has been quite open in their hatred of him. They've out and out lied about things he's said. Example....It was claimed he called immigrants animals, when it was clear he was talking about an extremely violent street gang. They had to have known but they didn't care. They knew that a lot of people only read the headlines and that's all that will stick in their memories. Even you'd be upset at that kind of reporting if it was about you. And so what if Fox has supported him? They've also criticised him and Trump called them out, too.
A dictator doesn't hold mid-term elections. He doesn't allow impeachment processes. He does what Assad did in Syria. He calls out his army and starts arresting his opponents. Next year there will be an election with an opposing party and everything. What kind of failure of a dictator will allow that? Dictators don't have elections.
Also, it hasn't been fully established yet that he withheld funds in lieu of an investigation. That's what these hearings are about. A conclusion before the hearings are complete would make this a kangaroo court with Trump as the victim. So that entire statement is bogus until all evidence has been presented.
As for the mob rule claim. They didn't attempt to STOP the proceedings. They felt that they should be included. Mob rule would have insisted that the investigation stop. Cease and desist under threat of retaliation. They just wanted it to be known that they felt it unfair that only one side was allowed to see and hear what was going on and that only selected news was allowed to get out. Besides, wasn't it Maxine Waters would urged her followers to confront Republican legislators? Where was the backlash from the DNC for that?
He didn't lose the last election, either. He won the electoral vote and that makes him the president, whether you like it or not. US elections have always been that way. They tried for 2 years to get him on collusion and they had NOTHING.
He trashed NATO? NO. He said that NATO should pay its fair share in that treaty. They seem to want all the benefits of being protected from the Russians but didn't want to pay. An overwhelming majority of NATO countries weren't paying what was agreed upon. Why wouldn't the leader of the country that was paying say something about it.
I get that you don't like Trump. Your diatribe of "lying, perverted, vile, vulgar and hateful SOB" makes it quite clear how much you HATE the guy. However, it would appear that this hate is forcing you to literally see red at the mere mention of his name. Making assessments through the lens of hate puts you in a state of mind where only the hate shines through and any logic or reason is put to the side. You don't have to like the guy but you shouldn't allow your hate to be the only venue of reason when discussing issues around his presidency.
1
-
1
-
@debbieassini8934
No, he said the "peacefully and patriotically" phrase shortly after 12:00. He finished his speech at 1:10 just as the rioters started throwing metal poles at security. At 1:45, the rioters surged past security. At 3:13 Trump tweeted asking people to remain peaceful.
Trump was at the Ellipse, close to the White House, when he gave that speech. That's a 1.8 mile walk to the Capitol Building. The "peaceful and patriotic march" would have taken around 40 minutes according to Google Maps and that's on a normal day, not when there were tens of thousands marching. Trump was in the limo "grabbing the steering wheel away from the driver" a nonsensical claim.
Everyone knew that there was going to be a large protest long before that day. Why was there more security in place? People asked for it. Even Trump did.
Another thing, why wasn't there the outrage when BLM rioters threw Molotov cocktail and other projectiles at the White House and security? They even tried to set fire to the Church of the presidents, at the edge of the White House lawn. Trump and family had to go to a secure bunker for their safety. That's sure sounds like an insurrection where the president had to hide from a mob for his own safety. Yet, the media mocked and called him "Bunker Boy". There were fires all over Washington that day. I suppose that's a good insurrection as opposed to the bad one on J6.
I say that BOTH were bad but there's no evidence that Trump planned the riot. It was supposed to be a protest and that's legal in the United States. According to Democrat supporters, burning, looting and attacking police is okay, depending on who does it.
Violence should be called out, EVERY time, not just when it done by people that you don't like.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billiebreese2067
You're not understanding ONE word of what I'm trying to say. The voting system is BROKEN. Let's assume that you're correct in what you're saying in the 2000 election and Gore should have been president. Yet, Bush became president. By every metric that I can think of, that would mean that the system is broken. WE AGREE.
Yet you're too interested in blaming the other guys. In 2004, there was talk about the Dominion voting machines being tampered with. Is this possible? in 2016, it was outside interference in the elections...the Russians. In 2020, it was a combination of a comprehensive mail-in ballot system and harvesting, Dominion machines and illegally changing the voting process without going through the state legislature....Pennsylvania for one. Instead of looking to blame each other, why not name a commission for recommendations to ensure that this nonsense stops.
But...NOOOOO. Let's just blame the other party for cheating. That's SO much better.
FIX THE DAMN SYSTEM. Then we won't have things like the 2000 voting controversy. Other nations do it. The United States can do it, too if they have the inclination for it but it appears that, by the tone of your comment, no one wants to do that. Blame is a much better system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@diomedes7971
Had I landed on the beaches of Normandy, there would have been nothing fearless about it. I would have been terrified.
However, I'm not conflating any sacrifices that I might have made with those landing at Normandy. What I'm saying is that if those guys could sacrifice their lives and body parts, I should be able to sacrifice a paltry scholarship or anything else that isn't life threatening. Those soldiers set the benchmark, paid the ultimate sacrifice, so we could have the right to stand for our rights in other and more mundane matters. If anything, it's disrespectful to the memory of those lost lives, if you're too afraid of losing a job or a scholarship for standing up for what's right. That's true disrespect. It's like saying that their sacrifice doesn't matter. You're going to bend the knee to authoritarianism, anyway, so eff their sacrifice.
The female athletes have 2 choices. Either stand up and say that this isn't fair and they won't take it......OR.....keep their mouth shut, do what they're told and, in the process, ruin women's college and high school sports. And if they lose their scholarship because the coach is filling his team with trans athletes, it's their own doing. Most scholarships are on a yearly basis and they could be kicked off the team and out of school the following year anyway.
Keeping our mouths shut is how we got into this mess in the first place and this is only the start. Authoritarians will force you to do their bidding because that's what they do. If you don't stand up for yourself, no one else will and you'll reap exactly what you've sown.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thehellyousay
I didn't say it was terrible. You're missing the point, COMPLETELY. My dad moved thousands of miles from home to a country that was free and growing and he was able to succeed, like ALL the immigrants did, from nothing. No money, no education, no real life skills and only his determination, hard work, willingness to learn to a country that gave him free reign to realise his dreams.
He gave up his relationship's with his parents, his siblings, his friends, all he knew to seek an opportunity and he did because Canada allowed him to. Now his grandchildren and great grandchildren don't have that free reign anymore. That's the failure that he's talking about. Life is still good but the opportunities are eroding away. You can be blase about it until one day YOU will be the one that realises that maybe he was correct.
But, never mind. Don't question a thing. "I'm ok, Jack" A great mantra. The same mantra that Neville Chamberlain said before the world erupted into war in 1939. If you don't acknowledge it, it's not happening.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maxpayne7419
Seat belts and helmets.....you're just being a jerk, now.
This is now a country that, if you use the wrong pronouns, you could find yourself in big trouble. They make it up and YOU have to follow. We have the internet but now, our government, wants to control the content. Our esteemed PM, was worried that maybe the guys working on a pipeline might be too overly zealous towards young women in the small towns that they're working through. That this should be considered when deciding if such a project is worth the trauma for these young women.
This isn't just in Canada. The farmers in the Netherlands, France, Germany and Ireland are now facing restrictions and land appropriations because it's said that farmers are a threat to the environment and our esteemed PM has implied that this might be a good idea. Home prices have sky rocketed and rents are insane....yet the PM wants to bring in MORE immigrants, which means home prices will keep going up, far beyond the capabilities of the young....but that's alright. You're GOT your little kingdom. Who cares about the people that have been here for generations.
As far as I can see, you're just being a troll. You've not made any kind of case. All you've kept saying is that you're 55 and that everything is great. Do you know what? It is. But if you can't see that we're heading in the wrong direction, you're not seeing. When the young have no hope of owning their own home, things are wrong. If you can't see that, you are the proverbial ostrich.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sagchipkwe31
I'm talking about the exact same people that went absolutely insane on Brett Kavanaugh, with no evidence, like Alyssa Milano and are now endorsing Joe Biden, who was accused of the SAME thing, with more credible evidence.
The Republicans are not starting a hashtag movement like #metoo, or #believeallwomen. They're not demonstrating and chanting against Joe Biden, like they did for Kavanaugh. They're not really all that obsessed with it at all, compared to how the Democrat supporters were during the SC hearings.
My comment, which was meant as a joke, was about the hypocrisy of those who screamed at Kavanaugh and are silent and still supportive of Biden. That's it. If you want to throw in your fake outrage over Trump and the lack of outrage towards Biden, jump right in. It just validates what I said in the first comment.
1
-
1
-
@erenjaeger1738
"why can you admit there's never such a good thing as "christian nation"
Why can't you admit that there's no such thing as a GOOD nation. The only things that separate the Christians from others is the scale of their evil side. The only difference between the, for the example that we've been using, is that the Spanish had a greater population, more advanced weaponry and a degree of immunity to diseases that the Aztecs didn't possess. Had the advantages been the other way around, do you really think that the Aztecs would be no less brutal than the Spanish. It's a matter of scale.
I'm NOT Christian. I want you to understand that. I'm looking at this from the outside. There's one thing that Christians are supposed to do and that is to "love they neighbour". Not your Spanish neighbour or your Aztec neighbour, or Dutch, Bantu or Libyan neighbour. You're to love your neighbour, no matter what. "Love thine enemy", "Turn the other cheek", "Bless those who curse you". If someone, who calls themselves Christian, kills for personal gain, to appease his God or out of national interests, he's not following the tenets of the faith as it is written in the Christian Bible.
So why do they do those crimes anyway? Because they're human. Humans will destroy what they touch and Christianity makes that very clear with the words "Man is born in sin". It's the only religion that carries it that far. That's why we can call out both Cortes along wit his men and Montezuma and his nation of Aztecs. Both groups are human and as such they are failures in doing the right thing. However, the tenets of Christianity does offer an understanding of human good and evil. It's why the abolition of slavery was initiated by those who were Christian. It was their Holy book that made them realise that slavery was an affront to human dignity.
That doesn't mean that a Christian nation is going to be good because that's impossible. It will not happen. All we can hope for is to try to do better and to STOP pointing at others as the evil ones. That in itself is evil.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LordDarshdan
It has NEVER been their country. Before it was Israel, Britain controlled it. They took it from the Turks after WW1, who had it for almost 400 years. Before that it was the Mamelukes, from Egypt, who ran it. Before them it was the Mongols, Before that the Kurds and Crusaders fought over it. The Byzantines and the Romans and the Greeks, under Alexander the Great. That region hasn't been independent since before the birth of Jesus and that was when...guess who....the Jews had their Kingdom there. All through those years, for the last 1400 years, the land was shared by Muslims, Coptic Christians and Jews.
That area has been contested for 2000 years and it's still that way. Even Muslims know that this has been the homeland of the Jews but as far as they're concerned, the Jews corrupted the true faith. Had the Jew become Muslims and returned to the Levant, as such, they'd have gladly accepted them. It's all about religion. Muslims don't like the Jews, of any other faith, and the Jews were escaping the pogroms against them that the world inflicted upon them for hundreds of year.....especially after what the Nazis did.
They could live with the Jews, but they want control. They want their religion to rule. That's what is at the heart of the conflict. Islam must rule.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To repeat what's already been said in this comment section. "That would be affirming their delusion". Also, biological women, transitioning into men, wouldn't stand a chance. In reality, it's what's happening now. If a woman is good enough, she can play in the NBA, NHL, MLB or the NFL but it's not happening. All you'd be doing is forming a league which excludes those with XX markers from playing sports. All those women transitioning to males could only compete, fairly, in women's sports and they can't do that. If they did, it's an admission that they're still women.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tucson Jim
"I didn't die from the gash from the chainsaw on my leg. I died of blood poisoning from the wound"
Essentially true but you can't discount the importance of the chainsaw accident. No accident, no blood poisoning and no death. Same as the Covid virus. No virus, no complications and no death. They go hand in hand.
Also, Gelsolin is not a cure or a drug. It is something that they could use to help boost an immune system when a boost would be quite useful. It won't hurt you and it may give you the extra strength to stay alive. Sort of like the research that says chicken soup helps to boost the immune system. Chicken soup isn't a cure but it helps. Gelsolin may not be the cure but it can be part of a regime to recovery since it's already a required protein in your body.
What is wrong with looking into it? I don't get the problem.
Also, I'm defending or condemning the FDA. I'm acknowledging that they exist and why it exists. I'm not saying it's perfect. In fact, I've said that, quite strongly, that it wasn't. The FDA mandate is there for all to see and I've paraphrased that mandate or purpose. Now, we can quibble all day about what's right or wrong about it but the fact that it is there and has a purpose is undeniable. Unless you really want Drug companies to release new drugs, without controls or guidelines, whenever they want without a care for any deadly consequences.
I'm not really sure what the problem is here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@codyray3344
They didn't identify it as a new disease until Jan 7th. Before that all they knew was that a few people were coming down with pneumonia type symptoms. It wasn't until the 7th that they had isolated the virus and confirmed that it was something new. At that time there weren't a lot of victims and the Chinese government was downplaying, actually denying, how bad it was.
Taiwan is one of the few countries that openly dislikes China and they can bring solid measures against the disease without having to listen to internal yelping about racism. As an example, when Trump restricted flights, Biden calling it xenophobic. In Taiwan, they don't care about that nonsense. They, universally, hate socialism, not like here in America, where there is a HUGE socialist movement and they're using racism as a weapon against our traditional freedoms. Taiwan doesn't have the issues with identity politics that we do in the west and it does them well. It's not the millstone around their neck like it is here.
Also, the Taiwanese don't trust the Chinese, AT ALL. They're like Hong Kong, in that they know first hand how deceitful the Chinese government can be. Not like the pie-in-the-sky, ain't socialism wonderful crap we have to listen to in the west.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
JuliaJustBeauty
That doesn't fly, especially now. These girls will get support from those, like you, who take the stance that there is no way a girl would make up an allegation like this. There could be psychological rewards in making these accusations as well, a sort of Munchausen syndrome, where the attention is the priority over the reality. There are segments of society that laud the courage and bravery of those who stand up and tell their story. Manipulative individuals can use this to their advantage to coerce women to make allegations that aren't true with a promise of social approval from that segment of society.
Why do people, with the full realisation that they'd be open to ridicule, start to advocate for a flat earth? There are facets of the human psyche that don't fall under the norm and those things have to be considered when claims of any kind are made.
In this interview, thus far, Brown has been quite convincing and unless he's bluffing outrageously, he's going to come out vindicated. If a woman has been physically assaulted, by all means, come out and confront the accuser. However, if Brown is vindicated, then the witch hunt allegations will also be vindicated and the women will legitimate complaints will be in no better position than they were 30 years ago. No reasonable person should want that. That CTV reporter, I can't remember her name, should have made sure those sources were impeccable and beyond reproach. If Brown has witnesses that she has used in her story that contradict her story, then her career is in trouble. I'm not sure she did her due diligence at best and might even be guilty of orchestrating a scandal that didn't exist, at worst.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WannaKnowAll
The problem are the all the stories that are being revealed on improprieties in the election. 30 years ago, if there were just a couple of these stories, the media would have been all over it, every journalist wanting to be the one to uncover the big story. Now, they dismiss it, without even questioning it. No investigation, nothing. Hundreds, maybe thousands of stories about issues, especially with the mail-in ballots. Why aren't they investigating? Why didn't they show the terrible riots? What is going on with the MSM?
I know that they're owned by big multinational companies. The same companies, whose executives were hurt by Trump's trade war with China. Could that be the issue? Also, if they're not reporting on these things, why would that be? Is there something to hide and the elites won't allow them to talk about it?
I've never, in all my 70 years, seen the media behave this way. They're supposed to report the news, not suppress it or create it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@grahamyates2490
Columbus set into motion a defining moment in human history.....arguably one of the most defining moments in history. The fact the he went through all the work, the pleading of his case to different governments, the privations and enemies he made in Europe, his dogged determination to go to eastern Asia by sailing west was a momentous undertaking. That he even got the ships to do what he was proposing was quite a feat. When he found the islands in the Caribbean, that was the beginning of a new era for all mankind. Everyone of us has been affected by what was set in motion that day. We can quibble about his motives but the fact that he had the courage, determination and fore sight to accomplish this is why he is being elevated to a hero's status.
However, he was human, as well. That means that he had faults, like you, like me, like everyone else on this planet. He had to fight the inner demons just like the rest of us do. In spite of that, he was still one of the most important people that has ever lived.
I can't speak for the young guy's motives, either, but what I do know is that his questioning is always the first step to vilification. It's not the questions in themselves but the tone of those questions. He clearly doesn't see Columbus as a hero and can't understand why we'd honour his great accomplishment.....because it IS a great accomplishment. When describing Columbus to someone who has never heard of him before, it's that accomplishment that you describe. You don't start off by talking about his faults. He's remembered by his great discovery. The rest is details that describes the humanity that was in him. If you ignore the discovery, you're erasing this aspect of history because without his voyages, Columbus would just be another forgotten individual, like the rest of us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Zachary_Setzer
No they're not better. I bought a house in 1977, working as a labourer at a shoe factory which locals said wasn't even a well paying job. My wife didn't work and we 2 kids. We got married in 1974 and had nothing. 3 1/2 years later, I had the down payment for a house and both the wife and I had our own car. In the fall of 73, my radiator in my car, developed a bad leak and I phoned work and told them that I'd be a half hour late. My boss got angry and fired me. Half hour later, my car was repaired, I drove out to look for another job and found one a little over an hour later, at the aforementioned shoe factory. My boss called me that afternoon, apologised and asked me to return the following day. I told him that I'd found another job.
That's the way life was in those days. Now, my daughter and her husband have been together for 14 years. Both have always worked. They have 2 kids but do NOT have a car and believe that they will NEVER be able to buy a home. They don't drink or do drugs. They don't gamble or go out on weekends. When I was 25, when I bought my home, I could pay my mortgage with one weeks pay the same as I could when I was paying rent. It takes the both of them to pay their rent almost 3 weeks of their salary.
You weren't alive then. You have NO idea how things have gotten worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@desnock
"he's as fucked up as the rest of US" NOT "you". That's how you should crafted that sentence. Human beings are fallible. ALL OF US. To insinuate that only a certain group are fucked up, thereby eliminating yourself in that designation, shows just how arrogant and narcissistic you actually are. YOU are as fucked up as anyone else.
Did he have alcohol problems? Yes he did, and he overcame them and became a highly respected academic. I can't tell you all the details of his recent problems but guess what, he's working hard on recovering on that, as well. Meanwhile, he's back to work, trying his best to understand the incomprehensible ways that humans behave. He's not wallowing in self pity. He's working and putting himself right out there, warts and all. He knows people, like you, are going to attack and vilify him, by the millions and he still sticks his neck out and takes it.
You won't even use your own name when making a comment. You have a lot less to lose than he does, yet he stands up and takes it. You hide behind a made up name, because you know FULL WELL, that if people know who you are, they'll point out the fucked up things in your life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Come on, you guys. There are 7,942,645,086 different genders. One for every person on the planet. I'm different than the person beside me, whose different than the person beside them and so on. When it's all said and done, we're all our own unique gender. Next year, at this time, there will be 8,108,605,388 genders.
Isn't it great!!!!!! I just gotta figure out what to call my gender. Maybe "Jack Haveman" is good enough. I'll use Jack/Jack as my pronouns.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@perihelion7798
It might work for the indigenous but they don't carry a lot of weight as far as economics and power goes. They can still control them because they're so small.
However, I doubt they're going to allow the rest of us to form our own autonomous zones. Like you've already implied, they own the military. The foot soldiers may not be aware of it but that's who's giving them their orders. They're already going through their private social media to see if they're supporting the right people and if they're not, they have dismissed some of them. It would be great if the constitutional zones worked but I'm afraid that it might be the tool that they want to finally take full power over the country. In fact, it might well what they've been working towards.
That's why the school board fiasco is such a help to stop the authoritarians. Suddenly, the average person is actually running into that brick wall called the establishment. That a soccer mom could be labelled a domestic terrorist, because she doesn't like the sexually graphic material in her kid's school library, has to be opening a few eyes. This is the type of thing that will defeat them. Most people don't know the depth of what is happening to our institutions. They're busy trying to make a living and it all sounds a little crazy to them....until they run into it first hand.
It won't be easy and it will frustrating but it's the best way to reverse the coarse and not destroy the country, completely. At least, that's my opinion, anyway. All I do know is that Civil war is a destroyer and the results might take decades or longer to fix....if ever.
1
-
@perihelion7798
The left got this way because of the infiltration of socialists into every facet of society, starting at the universities. This started in the 30s. The socialists, in the universities took the socialist students under their wings and slowly placed them into positions where they could indoctrinate the next generation. First it was the schools that were the priority. Then the media and local governments. After that it was into human resources departments and the bureaucrats in governments. They did it all under the radar, cultivating a mindset that would put their ideology under a positive light. They've had a huge head start.
We have to start doing the same thing except show the positives of being a free human being. Actually using science and facts, again, instead of the Orwellian science of the left. It's not going to be easy, like I said but we have to start taking part in the community, especially our schools.
I'm 70 years old and had you told me in 1975 that our own citizens would be cheering on Marxism, I would have laughed at you. That's how insidious their program is.
Assuming that the last election was honest(?), 70 million Americans voted for Trump. You'd have been lucky to get 2 million people to vote for a this version of the Democrats back in '75. We can turn it around but we have to believe in ourselves and in our system. It's not the left that will defeat us. It's us and we'd better start realising it, soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The left WANTS the productivity to crash. It's how they're remaking the country and eventually the world. Make JUST enough to survive on and no more. If you try to manufacture any more, the superfluous that we wish for but don't need, that will add to the climate crisis. We'll become a nation, a world, that is always living on the edge of poverty, waiting for that natural disaster that will kill us. One hurricane, one ice storm, one drought away from disaster. It's necessary, according to the left, to save the planet.
Sri Lanka is a prime example. They went green and the country is now going through pure hell. Empty shelves, food shortages and over 100% inflation. Is the left, in the west, looking at this and rethinking how they approach climate change? Not a chance. The Netherlands has enacted the same green policies and it appears that Trudeau is about to do the same thing in Canada. If people go hungry and starve or freeze in the winter, that's the price that we, the ordinary citizen, has to pay to have a planet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@katydid2877
The people that move around, have decent jobs. If you're at the lower end of the economic scale, you can't afford to move around all the time. You're stuck where you are. 2 months rent, in advance is already a hurdle, most of the economically deprived, can't clear.
The homes are for sale, yes but they're being bought by those who made good choices.....not the ones who studied dance theory and flipping burgers at a fast food joint. What good is it to the poor, that the well off are buying homes at their leisure. It's a two tier system and it's was brought on by extremely poor political decisions and the growth of a bureaucracy that's out of control. There are building codes that cover everything. There in books so thick that you can hardly carry them and they add to the cost of home building.
Also, do you really think that the 5 million illegals, most as poor as they come, are buying and renting all those homes? They get put up for awhile....MAYBE....but they generally end up living in the lowest of possible places to dwell. They're not moving into the new housing developments.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
H Smith
They never said that he'd be locked up by now if he wasn't the president. What they said and Mueller said, was that they went into the investigation with the idea that a sitting president could NOT be prosecuted. That's a subtle difference that people do not want to understand or admit to.
I have repeatedly asked people to show me exactly how he obstructed justice. I have yet to hear or see any definitive evidence given. The closest they've come is conspiracy to obstruct justice and even that would be difficult to prove in court. In fact, Trump allowed the release of over 1 million documents, allowed hundreds of witnesses to testify and never, ONCE, used executive privilege to stop any testimony or block any document to not be examined by the Mueller team.
More than that, why is it that impeachment proceedings haven't been brought up a long time ago. Adam Schiff has stated that he has definitive proof of Russian collusion.....proof that he's never given that I've ever heard.
So, my challenge to you is for you to reference actual proof that show obstruction. The proof that these prosecutors have that would prompt them to write that Trump would be in jail if he wasn't president. You see, until that is done, until he is prosecuted in a court of law, Trump is innocent.....innocent until proven guilty. According to you, that should happen in 2020 or 2024. What are you going to say, then, if it doesn't happen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't see any point in dwelling on the mistakes of the past. I'd rather make plans on what I'm going to do in the future. I can't change the past but I can change the future.
I always have extra supplies on hand. Not prepper, years of stuff type of supplies, but enough to last at least 4 to 6 weeks. When it looked as if this COULD be serious, the first week of February or so, I started to buy extra stuff every time I went shopping. Not bags and bags of it, but a couple of cans of beans, a couple bags of pasta or rice, cans of soup and tomatoes, dried soup mix and other sundries. Just 5 or 6 items extra every time I was at the store. Didn't take long and my larder had plenty, enough to last well into a 3rd month. Now, all I do is replace what I've eaten or used. No panic buying, no fighting in the stores, no worrying, because I've prepared myself and I took it seriously enough to see the possibility of a crisis.
That's what a doer does. The complainer whines about the past, blames others, waits until the last minute and then is in a panic because he/she is doing what they've always done. NOTHING......and then they gaze into the past to look for someone to blame and complain about. They don't realise that their attitude is the problem, not politicians, whether they be liberals or conservatives, but their own shortsightedness. I can't imagine being in a panic over toilet paper. It's the dumbest thing that I've heard.....yet it's real and the ones in a panic are supposed to be adults.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ConvictedFelonTrump8647
Of course. The party of 2A, the gun toting conservatives, had a 3 hour revolution where NO ONE brought their guns. No right wing militias, no chain of command, they break into the building, wander about, take selfies and then they go HOME. Really, REALLY scary. No other place in the entire country saw those MAGA riots or insurrectionists, only at the Capitol building in Washington.
It was nothing like the BLM riots. That was nation wide, in over 100 cities. People were murdered, thousands had to go to hospitals to have injuries treated, Billions of dollars in damages, insurance companies were refusing to pay for those damages. People lost their homes, businesses and their jobs and do you know where the worst of the damages happened. In the black communities that the rioters said that they were protecting by people who openly said that they wanted to tear the country down and said that they HATED America.
So don't give me this BS about ONE FRIGGEN DAY. These revolutionaries are targeting the entire country and they've spent YEARS rioting and destroying almost every major city in the country. Look at the "student" protesters who were just arrested. Over half of them aren't students. They are there on behalf of their agenda. "Death to America" and using the war in Gaza as their excuse to do just that.
You're either one of them or you're as naive as it gets.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@daisysfield5456
Already the NY Times, Wapo and NBC had to make retractions concerning this story. Also, why isn't the media telling us that this part of the laptop is a lie? That Giuliani is lying about the laptop is something that you've concocted, from no evidence, because you don't like Giuliani or the implications of what it might mean if the story is true.
And it hasn't been years. The story came out last summer about the laptop being found. Ever since last summer, most of big tech has been censoring this article from the New York Post so no one could even talk about it, especially Facebook and Twitter. Imagine censoring the story about Nixon and Watergate. That would've been an outrage and rightfully so. This NY Post article, about the laptop, comes out and within days the story is being suppressed by big tech oligarchs. No real curiosity, no intrepid journalist trying to find out the truth of the matter. They all just ignored it.
Also there were more than just the crack pipe. There were also pictures of underage girls on the laptop. Hunter was living the life of an addict, something that he admitted to on national television. Then he lied on a firearms form about BEING an addict and then the gun that he bought, illegally, was disposed of in a public dumpster, another illegal act.
Are you starting to get the picture? Of the two, Giuliani is the more believable, by far....unless you're that dogmatically vested that you wouldn't believe it no matter what.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@spencerchudyk3390
Maybe he should have asked why there has been poor people in all of human history. Why the overwhelming majority of people were dirt poor, for thousands of years.
It's that old conundrum. Why aren't things perfect? If only things could always be EXACTLY as we want them to be.
When you look and expect perfection, you're going to be disappointed....very disappointed.
The poorest American, right now, has access to better health care than royalty did 200 years ago. As imperfect as the American health system, royalty of those times couldn't even begin to get the kind of medical attention that the poor, of America, get today. In 1935, Americans were living on bread lines and in shanty towns. Poverty didn't just exist, it was the norm for most Americans.....in fact around the world. My parents grew up without electricity or running water as did everyone of their neighbours, in the 20s and 30s. Did he really expect that within 25, every person in America would be affluent? The rise in the standard of living, in Canada and the United States, after the war, was the biggest gain in life styles, for the common man, in human history, up to that point.
Some people only dwell on the failures and refuse to see the successes. My parents, the same people without electricity or running water, in 1945, without a nickel in their pocket and not a square inch of property, managed to buy and pay off a small farm by 1967. My dad raised cash crops during the day, worked as a labourer, in a shoe factory, from 4:30 in the afternoon till 1:00 the next morning, 5 days a week. On weekends, he would play in local pubs and dance halls, as a musician. He worked his butt off and now he's in his nineties and has had a great retirement.
Why? Because the capitalist system allowed him the opportunity to make something of himself. He didn't cry that "Joe" down the road had more than him. He put his head down and went for it.
Now, he's got young folk, that are wailing that he's got white privilege and that he should share the wealth. They refuse to see that he worked 60 to 80 hours a week to find his success. They're too lazy and feel entitled to what he had to work so hard for.
So spare me the negative platitudes about capitalism. When I hear that negativity, I hear the ramblings of one that doesn't want to do what has to be done, that has no pride or self esteem. If you want it bad enough, in America, it's there for you if you're willing to sacrifice and work hard for it. If you wait for the state to do it for you, for that's what socialism is, you'll wait a lifetime.
1
-
@spencerchudyk3390
It was capitalism that built the US in the 50s and 60s and into the 70s. It was international socialism that slowly destroyed it ever since. Then came the free trade deals and the beginnings of the world economy, a sort of international socialism. Suddenly, the rule of law, that governed the capitalist system here, no longer applied. Any autocratic country, which exploited workers, and they did, was allowed to dump their products in our country, wiping out our manufacturing facilities. Countries that allowed child labour, near slave labour with no labour laws, environmental standards or quality control requirements popped up all over the 3rd world. Workers, locked up in sweat shops with suicide nets around the buildings, allowed us to buy cheap products and those products filled our stores and we happily and greedily allowed it. Unscrupulous nations, some even communist like China, cajoled and bribed multinational executives, lobbyists and our state bureaucrats, to encourage them to shut down factories here and rebuild them in their nations, promising cheap labour and non-existent manufacturing standards. Our oligarchs grabbed that cash with both hands.
It's not Capitalism that eroded the middle class. It's the exploitation of the elites, who circumvented the rule of law, an implicit requirement of capitalism, that did it. The elites were forced to follow the rule of law, in this country, so they went elsewhere, where it no longer was an essential part of the system.
That's not capitalism at all. Capitalism requires a free market, FREE being the operative word. A free market system has one basic requirement. It requires that all within that system be free and that means a rule of law that is equally applied. When you allow child labour and lock workers in the place of employment, you're not applying the rule of law and freedom is thrown into the waste basket.
You may think the it's capitalism that did it, but it was actually the cooperation of state and the multinationals that did it, an evolved form of Fascism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zacchariaturnbull5322
Science??? Is that how we're able to communicate, almost instantaneously? Sounds like pretty cool stuff.
I'm sure that we will find alternate technologies. However, will that bring other problems? Also, are we going to destroy ourselves is some big rush to get away from fossil fuels before the new techs are even in place. The "Stop Oil Now" advocates seem to be pushing us hard in that direction and it could lead to famine, disease, starvation, war and deaths the like of which we've never experienced in our history. We could destroy ourselves before we have a chance to develop these new techs. I'm Canadian and our Prime Minister has been all in to destroy our oil economy. Germany tried to do the same and now they're in trouble due to the war and are building more coal facilities to make up for the lack of fossil fuels and the dismantling of their nuclear plants.....which brings us to another issue. Are these rabid environmentalists going to try and stop the new techs out of fear and their desire to enact a radical socialist world government?
We're allowing politics to get in the way of innovations as well. Example. Here, in Canada, we must sell any energy we can produce, with home solar panels, to our local electric company. Going off grid turns into a bureaucratic nightmare. Will they do the same with other techs? I have a feeling that they will.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@olrikparlez3152
So, you don't care if the MSM lies to you. You don't care about the truth. You'd rather bow to the cognitive bias that the MSM spews out than vett what they tell you. In fact, you'd rather do that than even SEE that I included Fox in that vetting process. NO WAY. You're all about the tribe. My side vs yours. You realise that when the MSM lies about something, they're lying to YOU. They have that little respect for you and you take it.
Once again. IT'S NOT ABOUT FOX NEWS OR CNN OR MSNBC OR THE WASHINGTON POST. Can you get that??? It's about the truth and you find that on your own and you never, EVER, allow any one person tell you what the truth is, blindly and without question. The truth doesn't take sides. It stands alone.
When you get that.....when the average person gets that, maybe the divide in the country will end. As long as we have people like you, yammering away about how Fox or CNN or whoever, are liars and evil, the United States will be in a mess.
The truth....that's what's important. Nothing else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tim Foster
Gain of function was outlawed in the US. However, China was going to do it anyway. So, certain American agents, sent money to China, in the hopes of staying in the loop, a loop that disappeared the moment something went wrong.
China, the country that puts minorities into concentration camps by the millions, who oppress the religious and are arresting anyone in Hong Kong that advocate staying independent, and you think that they would NEVER engage in gain of function research if it wasn't for American money or support?
The research in Wuhan was NOT the brainchild of the US. It's ALL China and the US was trying to benefit from their work by sending money. The US, including Fauci, are complicit but this was a Chinese project.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's why the progressive activists chased Riley Gaines into a locked room, threatened her, wouldn't allow her to leave and told her that she had to pay to be let out. She was in there for 3 hours, all because those progressives weren't being stupid, small, close minded and cruel like Dave Rubin. (sarcasm) No nuance, no educational discussions.....just violently reactionary and all because Riley doesn't think that it's fair that men, can claim to be women, and then compete in women's sports.
You complain about someone saying things that you don't like but if you say anything against progressive ideas, you can be physically attacked, lose your job and even have your kids taken away from you if you don't sign a consent form for trans surgery on your child. Where's the nuance in that? Go to your local university and wear a sign saying "Men can't get pregnant" as a social experiment. Then you'll see who the cruel ones really are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wheniwasyourage4418
I'm giving to believe that you don't even know any Republicans, happy, sad or otherwise.
I watched a video, the other day, about people entering a stadium for a Trump rally. Across the street were a large group of protesters. They were screaming profanities and insults continuously, especially at any American of Africa descent, who was going to listen to Trump speak. Not ONE person, going into the Trump rally, paid them any mind. They just talked to one another and ignored the blue in the face, screaming protesters.
Finally, a media commentator went over to the protesters to talk with them. That didn't go well. They didn't want to talk to her. They snubbed her, walked away and emoted snide remarks in her direction. Finally, an African American protester started to talk to her. He was adamant that those Trumpsters were racist and that he would be physically and verbally attacked if he went into the stadium. She talked him into going over and talking to some of those waiting in line. He told them that he wouldn't be safe inside that stadium and every one of them assured him that he'd have no problem, including some African Americans, who told him that this wasn't their first Trump rally. People hugged him, shook his hand, invited him in as their personal guest but there was NO way he was going in.
He finally went back across the street with the media person and he was in for a shock. He was yelled at, insulted and jeered and finally someone poured a drink over him and the girl with the mike. They treated him FAR worse than any Trump supporter did.
So, who do you think would be the happier? The ones that smiled, shook your hand, hugged you and extended a personal invitation....OR......the ones that insulted, made jeering remarks and poured a drink over you?
Like I said....you don't know any Republicans. You've a narrative and that narrative tells you what to think.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@odenpetersen6028
Actually, I'm not sure that we can ever share a truth. Empirical truth is demonstrable and is fact, no matter who is assessing that fact. I have 2 tomatoes on my fridge. That's an empirical fact or truth. This isn't open to opinion and a group of individuals can never, correctly, share a truth that says there are 3 tomatoes on my fridge. It's not a truth to say it and it's demonstrably false.
Coban uses this politically sensitive issue because it has become so contentious. Gender has always been expressed in 2 ways. Male and female. DNA has confirmed that this is consistently true. A male ALWAYS has a y chromosome. Even those with the rare xxy chromosome are seen as male due to the y chromosome present. If one takes and tests the piece of skin for gender, it will always show that it will be purely xx or xy with a rare extra x thrown in. That's empirical data, yet to say that it is an empirical truth, that would be deemed heretical.
One has either male, with a y chromosome or female, without the y chromosome. There is no variation. To say that this is the truth puts you exactly where Winston found himself, trying to defend the empirical 2 plus 2 equals 4.
That's not to say that people don't have gender dysphoria. I know for a fact that they do. However to ignore certain facts about gender, limits discussion and study into how and why it exists in the first place. The academic has the metaphorical cage of rats tied to his face to force him to discard the heresy of this truth and forced to adopt the new "shared" truth.
Young children are undergoing radical treatment due to an acceptance of the idea of relative truth. I fear for these children because the stages of growth and sexual development in humans has been in place for millions of years. This could end quite badly in the future and it's all due to an acceptance that truth is fluid and empirical truth doesn't exist as fact. 2 plus 2 does equal 5 in this realm....but does it really. Are we really going to deny the evolutionary reality of human growth over an ideological vision of what is truth? I'm not sure that this is such a good idea and it would seem that Copan feels the same.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@odenpetersen6028
However, is "are trans women real women" a problem of semantics? What if that is at the very heart of the problem that causes a high suicide rate? That statement alone differentiates them from "real" women. They'll never feel what a woman feels during menstruation or deal with the unique issues that a "real" woman deals with at that time of the month. They'll never experience an orgasm the way a "real" woman experiences it. She'll never feel what it is to be pregnant, to feel the dread for their future while waiting for the pregnancy test to give its results or the joy of seeing the result that one is wishing for. Never feel a baby's kick in their stomach, never endure the pain of child birth or the closeness of holding that baby to her breast to feed. How many "real" women are devastated when they find out that they are unable to have their own children, yet a trans woman KNOWS that this will never be a consideration for them....never feel the devastation or loss when realising their own sterility.
They may feel like a woman, dress like one, talk like one, detach body parts and add new ones, but that basic aspect of female identification will never be reached. Gender is the primary force behind human survival, not just human but for all advanced life. Without that primal need that each gender has, we will die off as a species. It's a path to biological extinction if those primal urges and needs aren't met and is a major element of human psychology.
Yet.....we are not to speak of it. We're not to explore the psychological aspects of it. It's easier to lay blame and a lot more satisfying to reach a conclusion of moral superiority when we can point to those who we deem to be at fault for the complexities of that issue. The devil is in the details and you're saying that we can't point out that specific devil or detail.
1
-
@mnguardianfan7128
The prosecution must have consulted with the Deutsche Bank, the business that was alleged victim of the fraud, then. The bank did show up at his sentencing trial. It seems that the loan, in question, was quite acceptable to the bank and they even said that they'd do business with Trump again.
My sister was a real estate appraiser for 30 plus years. The banks were one of her major employers. A person would put up property as collateral for a personal or business loan, claiming that their property was worth X amount of dollars. The bank would contact my sister to appraise the property in question, at the borrower's expense and she would submit an official appraisal which is bound by strict guidelines. If the borrower's claim of X value of his property is too high, they don't call the police. They tell the borrower what the property is actually worth and they either reject the loan application or reduce the amount allowed based on that property value. Once again, they do NOT call the police. My sister has been stopped on the street by irate borrowers who angrily claim that she undervalued the property and that her assessment is ruining their lives. However, she has no choice. There is a formula in deciding the value of real estate and she could lose her licence if she didn't follow the assessment rules.
If you have money in a bank that would allow a loan, without following protocols, get that money out right now, if possible. Your money isn't safe there and you're risking another situation like the one in 2008. Giving out loans without any real knowledge of the value of collateral is piss poor banking.
This is entirely bogus and is politically motivated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fwscfemalewhiteseniorcitiz3711
It depends on what's going on. I've gone to week long Christian encampments, years ago, and the kids had a great time. Also, if you took the time to go to any live feed of the protest, there's really not much going on that kids shouldn't be exposed to. People are outgoing, smiling, extremely helpful to one another and there are even events aimed specifically for children.
It seems to me that people are just trying, desperately, to find issue with this protest, from Trudeau's whacky racists and "phobia" statements, to "I can't sleep" to a newscaster complaining about a plinko game. It's all ridiculous.
If you disagree with their message, just say so and give reasons. The attempts at vilification reeks of desperation. They can't come up with a good reason to continue with the mandates so they just smear people. It's just so tiring.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In Canada, in the sixties, a French separatist group, calling themselves the FLQ, operated in the same manner. They were divided into 5 man cells, with only one of them knowing a member of another cell. They were all fighting for the same cause but they only associated, outside their cell, through one person. That person would be in contact with 2 or 3 cells, who's contact member would be in contact with 2 or 3 other cells, to form a network, which could be called together in an emergency. This was how the October Crisis played out in 1970. The FLQ were known for mailbox bombs and the movement climaxed with the October Crisis in which they kidnapped 2 politicians, one British, and murdering the other one. The arrest of 16 of them, who were involvement directly or peripherally, in the kidnappings and murder, ended the activities of the FLQ.
As a matter of interest, the FLQ was also Marxist in nature. Some of them, when arrested, wanted to be allowed to go to Cuba and they went.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theworld6710
You haven't explained WHY it's ridiculous. Repeating the same thing over and over isn't evidence of why an idea has no merit. You have to back it up.
One thing is evidently ridiculous. Allowing what's going on, in those cities, with NO plan to help them, solves nothing. It doesn't help the homeless, the crime that inevitably comes, or the average citizen who has to navigate the tragedy on those streets. Doing nothing is WORSE than his proposal and that's all that you're offering.
If I throw a plastic straw on the street, I could be charged. These unfortunates aren't just spreading garbage everywhere, they're openly defecating and urinating everywhere. There are discarded needles everywhere, car windows are smashed, stores looted, ordinary people are threatened, businesses are closing and you, just like EVERY politician in those cities have absolutely NOTHING to alleviate the problem. You guys are the problem....more so than those on streets.
All you do is criticise those who offer solutions and then sit on your hands and do *NOTHING*.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TeamFillip
I would bet that you'd be singing another tune if YouTube, Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon were telling Democrat supporting uploaders to kick rocks. Youtube invites, as its business platform, people to upload their videos on their platforms, EXCEPT those whose political views differ from theirs. What's next. Muslim Imams have to go because they Islam believes that homosexuality is a sin? The other 4 big tech companies do the same. When people say that there's only one political view point allowed on social media, they say "Start your own". So someone started Parler and guess what....Amazon won't let them use their server until recently. The left, to the everlasting joy and approval of the Democrats, control social media and the MSM.
There is only ONE major conservative news network and NO big tech conservative platforms. It's a near monopoly. This is EXACTLY how authoritarians take over a government. They control the media and then guys, like YOU, hide behind dubious interpretations of business laws to squelch all dissenting voices. YouTube calls itself a platform, a bulletin board, but it's colluding, just like Time Magazine said, with other big tech companies, big corporations, the Democrats and the MSM to make sure that ONLY their voice is heard...and you're good with that because it lines up with your voice.
YouTube is NOT the voice. It's customers and uploaders are. Their standards are that you don't break the law and that's all it should be. Having conservative views is NOT illegal.
Just be grateful that they weren't all lining up to squelch left wing voices. Then YOU'D be the one complaining.
It's easy to applaud when you're in the choir.
1
-
@TeamFillip
All you have to do is question the election results. Not just any election results. Only the 2020 results. You can complain about the 2016 results ALL you want?
Or maybe you could do what Crowder did to get a temporary ban. Look up addresses on voter lists and go to those addresses and find out that they don't exist. That got him suspended for one week. He looked at a Nevada voting list, went to the address given by voters, showed on video, with a current newspaper, where that certain addresses did NOT exist and for that, he's a piece of shit. HE SHOWED FACTS and that went against their policy and now, according to you, only a piece of shit would show facts that might make the election look bad. It doesn't even show that Trump won and Crowder, most emphatically, said that it didn't.....but he's still a piece of shit for exposing fake addresses.
I call that good journalism and it would have been recognised as such 30 years ago. Now, because it seems to hurt a certain political party, it's considered the work of a piece of shit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alondramojico6838
That's true and Florida had a much greater case per million count, as well.
However, New York had EXACTLY the same death rate as Florida and a HIGHER case per million count than Florida. New York had just as strict a mandates as California.
This means that there are more at play here than just mandates. That strict mandates are not the only factor in the spread and death rates. It also means that we can play with statistics any way that we want so they end up to suit what we want to see.
One thing that has happened since Covid started is that for the first time in Californian history, its population went DOWN. People are leaving California and New York state is going through the same thing. Florida, however, is seeing an upsurge in population. The economy is growing. People are so happy with the situation that they voted, overwhelmingly, for the current administration, in the last election, an election that they barely won in the previous election. People, in Florida, are experiencing greater life satisfaction in Florida than in either California or New York.
Isn't that the point in life? Instead of living in perpetual fear, for the future, they live with an atmosphere of optimism and real personal and economic growth. That's what makes life worth living. Living to be safe is mere existence. Grabbing life by both horns and facing it with courage and determination is what makes life worth living. Hiding in your homes and viewing those around you as threats to your life is an awful way to live.
I've had Covid, in spite of 3 vaccines and living in a place where mandates were strict. It was no fun and I'm over 70 years old and should be afraid....but I'm not. I'd never want to go back to the mandates. It was a miserable time and Covid rates in my area are the highest, now, that they've ever been. I still go out, mask free, where ever and whenever I want and I am enjoying my life much more now than 2 years ago. If I catch it again, so be it. I'll deal with it but I refuse to live my life as in fear.....especially in fear of the people around me. I will NOT treat people that way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No, we don't have a faith in the non existence of God. What we're saying that there is no reason to believe in God and that the default position is the non-existence of God.
When you were born, you didn't know about God. You didn't believe or disbelieve in his existence and it stayed that way until you were informed of his existence. Non belief is the default, just like non belief in Thor or unicorns or leprechauns. All of it, including the belief is the default, how everyone starts their lives. It is the default until one is told and for whatever reason, accept it as fact. Sometimes, a person who began to believe, examines the reasons for belief and finds them wanting and he reverts to the state of unbelief.
One has to have reasons to believe in God. One doesn't need a reason to not believe. If you can't show his existence, like anything else without proof, I don't have to believe it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@outermarker5801
I never defended Trump ONCE. I said not to trust politicians. You say that Trump is corrupt....you bet but what about Joe Biden? The entire Democrat party, the Washington Bureaucracy and the media covered up the laptop story. They said stuff about Russian disinformation, THE NEXT DAY, that was their big investigation and then big tech platforms wouldn't even allow you to share the NY Post articles about it. Talk about collusion to rig an election. Joe Biden bragged about withholding 1 Billion dollars, in aid to Ukraine, unless they fired a special prosecutor and they ignore it completely. It's on VIDEO, ffs, and not a word about it, yet when Trump just asks about it, just asked about it, no money mentioned, they impeach him. I've showed people the video of Biden bragging about it and they get mad at ME....as if I something did some kind of video editing wizardry to make the video. Half the friggen scandals about Trump were just made up. He was supposed to have called immigrants "animals". Made up. He sent "stormtroopers" to Portland to protect a Federal Office...made up. He defended white supremacists in Charlottesville....also made up. So corruption runs both ways.
It's not that you have to trust the politicians you vote for, at all. They're all corrupt. What you do is vote for the one that you can trust the most of the 2 bad ones. If you have an entire machine dedicated to the overthrow of one person and that's ALL they offer....I'm not voting for them. Biden didn't even campaign. We had no idea what he stood for except we gotta get rid of Trump. What kind of platform is that? Now look at the mess we're in. A huge deficit, inflation especially high food prices and shortages, banks going bankrupt, a war in Ukraine, a botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, an energy sector that's down almost 20% in production. I could go on and on and I'm not even counting the scandals surrounding his son and brother. Over 100 questionable bank transactions reported but not investigated. If you or I had 2 or 3 of them reported we'd have the FBI, the DHS, the DEA and the IRS down our necks but not Biden.
So get over this idea that you can trust politicians. You can't. You make a trade-off hoping, that the one that you vote for, will do better for the country than the other while they're lining their pockets. That's the reality of politics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
She's saying it because the Palestinian supports REFUSE to acknowledge that Israeli women had that done to them on Oct. 7th. She saying that if they had that done to them, their attitude would be a lot different. She could have expressed it better but it was in the heat of the moment and that's what happens when emotions take over your mouth.
If Jewish fighters had crossed into Gaza, in a surprise attack and then raped Palestinian women and then paraded them through the streets of Israel, we'd never hear the end of it from feminist groups. However, that WAS done to Israeli women. They were raped and then paraded, some half naked, through Gazan streets, while Palestinians citizens cheered, waved flags and then SPIT on those unfortunate young women. That's why this woman, this writer, was so angry. Palestinian protesters, through their silence on this matter, are tacitly complicit in this horrific action. This writer's tirade is taken out of context.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@b0hd3n
I agree. He does have an obligation to bring the country back together. However, the Democrats will NOT let that happen. They're letting their hatred for Trump get in the way of mounting a good Democratic platform and it's causing them to make some terrible decisions.
I'm saying this as a guy that normally leans centre left politically. As soon as the last election campaign started, I was appalled, not by Trump, but by the attitudes of the Democrats, especially Hillary. I expect MY party to be the party of ethics and high morals. That's why I expect them to make an apology when they're wrong. That's takes personal courage and self awareness but that's not who they are, anymore.
One example of the issues, concerning the Democrats, that I'll never get. Why could Obama build a fence and barriers and make a speech about strong border security and he's applauded. However, when Trump says the same thing, except the fences are a stronger wall, suddenly he and the Republicans are racists. I don't get why Obama and the Dems weren't racist but Trump is over the exact same attitude on an issue, the difference is only the 3 short years between their saying it. The Dems are actually lying now. Bald faced lies and they have to know it but they do it anyway. I expect Trump to behave like Trump but I the Dems are doing the utmost best to be better at being dishonest than Trump. The Dems are going to lose the next elections if they don't smarten up and lose big.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@grantfraser5430
Charging him with fraud, in NY, when there's no victim, everyone made money, no customer complaint against him and a State Attorney, who ran on a platform of "taking him down", her words, and it does give them impression of an harassment campaign. Only the most brainwashed Democrat honestly believes that Mar-a-Lago is only worth 18 million. That's so ridiculous that the only way that charge could stick is if the judge was biased, as well.
Having said this, if Trump is guilty of crimes, he should be prosecuted. However, that fraud charge is so repetitiously bad that it's only serving to recruit supporters for Trump. It's HURTING the Democrats. Don't allow your emotions, your hate, to dictate policy or your political stance. Use the facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sleazyneezy
Italy, France, Spain and the UK have 90 million less people than the US. GET THAT!!!! 90 million LESS people. Yet they have, in total, 138,000 deaths.
Again. 90 million less.......7000 MORE deaths. You'd have to add the populations of the Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, Switzerland, Sweden and Norway and you'd still be short 20 million people in total population. Also, you'd have another 30 thousand MORE deaths.
Could it be that ALL you see is Trump, Trump, TRUUMMPP!!!!!? Could there be other factors involved?
When you look at problems through a single lens, you'll never solve it. In your case, all you do is create anger and division.
OH.....just in case you're wondering, I have the data to back this up. If you want to see it, ask. I don't expect you to ask but I'll put it out there. If you do, you'll be there first in the dozens that I've challenged.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hot Chen
The United States has a population of 335 million people. Italy, Spain, France, Germany and the UK have a combined population of 322 million people. That's 13 million people less.
Yet, the United States has 45 thousand FEWER deaths than these countries COMBINED. Should these leaders also be name responsible for the 116 thousand deaths in their countries?
Of course not!!!!! It's a disease and lots were saying it was like the flu, back in February, including the Democrats. In fact, the Democrats were more concerned with impeachment when Trump formed a task force and limited travel with China. On Feb. 4th, Trump talked about it in the State of the Union address, the one that Pelosi ripped up. Democrats still going on about impeachment and not ONE word about the virus that Trump was saying might be a problem. Debates between Biden and Sanders.....still not a word. On the 24th of Feb., 2 days after Trump asked for 2.5 billion to help fight the virus, Pelosi was in Chinatown, hugging people and telling people it was ok to be out and about.
I could fill a book with MSM and Democrats treating it like the flu....and I don't blame them for those deaths. Why???? Because no one knew this was going to happen. YOU didn't know on Feb. 1st.
Stop playing politics. It's stupid and it's childish and it a great way to show how your heart if filled with hate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1