Comments by "bohemianwriter1" (@bohemianwriter1) on "Jeff Sessions To Drop The Hammer On 'Low Level' Drüg Offenders" video.

  1. Somehow, I doubt that those numbers are correct. You know how many people who had to serve due to FALSE drug charges? Besides, "trafficking", what does that mean in legal terms? If I walk down the street with a bag of weed in my pocket, and gets stopped under the new "stop & frisk" decrees, and was BLACK, I would definitely be frisked and will risk drug charges, and perhaps lose my life in their custody. In other word, the ACT of walking down the street with a bag of weed is a moral scourge to society that you insist on spending other people's hard earned tax dollars to persecute said individual, and maybe cost him his life. And what is your excuse? "Cannabis is so harmful to him and his surroundings that he ultimately deserved to lose his life". Yet you RWers come and accuse lefties for stealing other people's money to "push ther agenda"... Your agenda seems to impose some kind of police state. P.S. How many people do you know personally who smokes a toke? (FBI still needs to fill 2000 IT positions. They can't find 2 000 IT workers in the entire USA NOT smoking a toke to fill them) How many people do you know shares your views? And in what founding father would you find support for your Big Government ideology where pot smokers deserves to lose their freedom and their property??
    8
  2. Sessions! I have one friendly advice for you! STFU while I light my Moroccan shisha with some Pollen hashish...
    6
  3. "State's Rights", "small government" republican comes out swinging on his staunch principles.
    6
  4. So I presume nothing of what Kyle said went through your thick skull? So in what way does a pot smoker who sits with his friends, sharing a joint, watching a movie more harm than the drugs pushed by your big Pharma, oil industry or corrupt republicans who really don't like freedom of choice, but love a Big Government dictatorship where "righteous men" like Jeff Sessions is entitled to spend other people's money (tax payers) to invade their private lives and dictate what they can put in their OWN FUCKING BODIES? You RWers claim to love the "property right" thing, but seem to think that both yours and my body belongs to the likes of Sessions to put in our bodies only what HE allows. And a little factoid for ya. Drug users don't harm other people. Your disgusting, violent prohibition causes harm to other people. Own up to it. Another hilarious factoid for ya. All most known and used drugs was once promoted as medicine. Heroin is just a brand name of the same kinds of opiates that doctors put in their patient's veins before an operation. Or give to their patients for pain after surgery. Cocaine was once used as a "wonder drug" to battle an opiate epidemic after the Civil War, when Morphine was used for the first time. Cannabis is a plant. A plant far more valuable than any fossiel fuel you can find, and can replace countless of drugs pushed by Big Pharma. (Another irony is that GOP wants to deregulate FDA and stop controlling what drug companies push on their customers, and obviously wants to redistribute that money to DEA so they can do military style invasions of some hippie pot smoker, or a black teenager, shoot his dog, and take away his kids and seize his house). So what is so harmful with weed that you not only want to destroy a part of nature, but also want to fuck with people's lives? Thomas Jefferson and George Washington GREW the goddamn plant! They smoked it too. In fact, cannabis was the biggest cash crop until the tobacco mill was invented. So! Tell us! Why should booze and cigarettes be sold with no regulation, but weed be forbidden by Federal law enforced by a racist psych who still live in the 1950's? Cigarettes kills 4 million people world wide annually. booze kills 2.5 million. Legal pharma drugs kills hundreds of thousands. Weed kills as many as 0 human beings on an annual basis. so tell us mr. "Small government Republican"... What is the VALUE of the bullshit you are pushing? How is that consistent with your alleged principles of "limited government"?
    5
  5. So whose going to determine what is harmful to society or not? Would you say that one form of heroin is less harmful than another form of heroin? Why would you want to imprson pot smokers and not drunks? In wehat way are you for freedom when you think that Big government has a right to dictate what you can put in your own body? Cannabis has been legal and in use in humanity for thousands of years. In what way do you think that this PLANT has caused so much harm to society rthat you feel entitled to use Government violence against the users? In what way do you think that a bunch of rich white fellas completely disconnected to society (and takes money from drug companies) who most likely drink alcohol has is entitled to tell the rest of the world what the rest of the world can use? if you knew anything about the unconstitutional drug war at all, you wouldn't come with ass hat arguments for taking other people's freedom away just because you think that pot smokers causes more harm to society than oil companies, money laundering banks, Big Pharma, gun nuts with guns, religious nutcases, and corrupt politicians - republicans in general. I'm a veteran. And FUCK YOU if you think that either you or Sessions have any sort of authority or dictatorship over my body. You RW nitwits are obsessed about gun "rights", and "private property", but seem to think that personal autonomy does not apply t the same principles. You can own as many guns as you want, but the body that owns all those guns, that body are only allowed to use the kinds of drugs forced upon us by you and Sessions. Strange how "freedom lovers" and "free market" fans are not a fan of the free market regarding drugs. Oh, no! There you insist on pushing the most harmful drugs upon humaninty and wages a war on a plant that has been used by humans for thousands of years before authoritarian dictarators like yourself decided it was a problem in the 1930s, and everone involved had to be treated like criminals (while William Randolph Hearst made tons of money on the much more harmful lumber industry who considered the Hemp industry as a threat). If you take a look at who's members of the so called "Partners for a Drug Free America", you see a long list of legal drug pushers who sell their drugs at the detriment of their addicts. The only people on that list are people with vested interests to continue to use brutal force, violence against anyone who dares to think for themselves and use a fucking mushroom or a weed instead of booze and industrialized cigarettes. If you want to criminalize a drug, why don't you criminalize alcohol? Or cigarettes?
    5