Comments by "bohemianwriter1" (@bohemianwriter1) on "Henry Kissinger: Maybe Defeating lSlS Isn't A Good Idea" video.

  1. Drumpf didn't "get help" from Russia. Russia didn't hack into the same voter machines who was used to hand Hillary the primary in states where paper trails are not mandated. Wikileaks and Julian Assange has never given any indication that they got the dirty infortmation from Kremlin. For people like Putin, Wikileaks is cryptonite. Whatever links to Russia Trump has, it's with mobsters and a giant money laundering scheme, where his hotels are being used as base. When Hillary was Sec., of State, she DID push to start a couple of more wars. Does Libya ring a bell? You know the coutry that the Manchester bomber came from. The country whose former leader Hillary said about "we came, we saw, he died". I guess she thought there would be no consequences for her war mongering. And then we have Syria. Another war that Hillary couldn¡t push hard enough for. And now, we have a DNC who have screamed Russia to deflect from the fact that they got caught using the same tactics against the "Berniebros" as republiscammers has done to minority voters, and typical democratic voters for decades. What is ironic, is how Bill Clinton handed GOP that one with his "three strikes" laws, and his welfare "reform" in the 90s. Bill Clinton could have fooled me to believe that he was nothing but a republican in a "3rd way" masquerade. He did marry a Goldwater girl who tried to portray herself as a civil rights champion and marginalize Bernie Sanders with the help of her surrogates CNN and MNBC. Not to mention the super PACs her campaign obviously colluded with in violation of campaign finance laws. And whenever a Clintonite democrat and a republican agrees on something, you will most likely be screwed over. What I find amusing is how partisan democrats and republicans call USA the "greatest democracy in the world" uses tax payer money on police to keep 3rd party candidates out of public debates like they did with Jill Stein, Only corrupt people desperate to clinge on to power, and deny anyone who can expose them for who they are would act this way. USA is neiter a democracy, or a republic. Or a democratic republic. It has been a two party banana republic run by big money for decades. Whomever wins an election, you can bet that oil companies and Wall Street wins either way. That is unless you have third party candidates who does not take corporate money.... Like Bernie Sanders who has now run as a democrat, and did in fact bring in a lot of voters who have felt disenfranchised by the two party hackery of the corp. dems and republiscammers. Hillary never had those votes in the first place. Neither did she earn them.
    2
  2. Instead, USSR destroyed themselves by playing right into the hands of radicals in Afghanistan who were funded by USA who were hellbent on making Afghanistan USSRs Vietnam.
    2
  3. ISIS was created by YOU, And YOU seem to be siding with regimes far worse than Iran just to keep your power structure and profit from the slave labour other countries supplies to your feudal lords The only generation that hasn't had any hardships are the boomers who have now taken away the latter, saying to the generations coming after them to "get their own bootstraps".., As if any boomer ever got a 250k student loan debt. The millenials are the first generation in 60 years who actually suffers hardships while you fatarse boomers are reaping the benefit of your great theft while destroying the future of your kids and grandkids. To put it like this: the boomers are the most vile, self obsessed bunch of twats who brought us the Wall Streeet crash of the 80s and the notion of narcissism as something positive. The only in that generation who ever got things right were the hippies who never lost their visions. The rest turned out to be Gordon Gecko drones. The biggest threat to humanity is the generation that runs your country right now, And YOU voted them in.
    1
  4. See my reply abive for a historical correction on Afghanistan. There are many misconceptions regarding Socialism. As if that is a block ideology. Firstly, there are different kinds of Socialism. All claim links to Marx. And just like ·"free market", it's just an economic model for how resources should be distributefd in a society. RWers, or conservatives as they call themselves have direct lineage to the burgois society which ultumately created it's own feudal lords. Yet even back before the Medicis ran Florence, even such a capitalist system as theirs, where the guilds and bankers mostly ran things understood something after the Plague of 1347-48 regarding a public healthcare system. When pandemoniums strike, a publucly financed system needed to combat them. This is what Ayn Rand enthusiasts do not understand. Economic systems have little or no link to what sort of government one has. This is another misconception that "free market" zombies has, and thinks that money is speech, while protesting money influencing politics is not. Russia, or USSR was never socialist by using Marx as a litmus test. He never condemned open elections. In fact, he promoted it. The same thing with free speech. Conservative socialists, even by its correct term would hold a leash on free speech. These are authoritarians, and just like their conservative counterparts mix up economy with something completely different. Liberal socialists were often writers. Some of my favorite writers were socialists to their core, yet believed in far more freedom than any republican representative or voter. They believe in personal freedom, and that under a socialist economic system, also creative people should thrive under their own terms. Conservative socialists think that art should "serve the cause". What both RWers and Stalinists have in common is not so much the actual content of whatever ideology they claim to be flag bearers of, but the personal cultism. Same thing goes for the Jesus cult where the members claim "special relationship with Jesus, With RWers, you have Duterte, Erdogan, Drumpf, Adolf, King Leopold of Belgium, Mussoloni, Pinochet, Franco and many other unkinowns who would make Castro seem like an angel. Many of them supported by CIA in Latin America. With "commies", you have Marx, Lenin and Stalin. They worship one Leader who once shat on their fist icon through is actual policies. Which were as far a s what Marx promoted as you can get. Even Lenin was aware of him, and wanted Trotskij to take over. Stalin managed to weasle himself close to Power, and managed to out maneuver Trotskij upon Lenin's death. This has little to do with socialism, but an internal power struggle with a deeply distubed indiviual as the victor. The "free healthcare, free education" are core basics, yet still a sugar coating on another beast. They are not commodities to be traded like stocks, a car, or a weekend in Vegas. They are two insitutions which covers everyone, and is necessary for a successful society. Regardless of what economic system government runs. American Rwers like to conflate the two with Adolf so they can label him a Socialist at the same time as neo-nazis hold rallies for Drumpf and the confederate flag. Self awareness seem to be lacking in these twits. They don't care about the fact that Germany already had a public healthcare system, and some form of social security. He just expanded on them. They ignore that Churchill advocated for the same in the early 1900s when he was registered as a liberal democrat as a youngster in Parliament. But as we see time and time again that facts does not matter to a Drumpfbot or republican voter. All they care about is cheap jingoism when they put on a faux poutrage when their sensitivities has been butthurt.
    1