Comments by "Zer0" (@ForeverZer0) on "Brodie Robertson"
channel.
-
111
-
47
-
31
-
Oddly enough, switching between Linux and Mac is relatively easy, as they both adhere more strongly to UNIX principles, file hierarchy, the concept of package managers, etc. I would disagree with your comment about things changing too quickly, that is completely your choice. There are multiple iterations of each major desktop environment, but there is nothing so drastic between them which would make someone not know how to use them from one version to another. For people who like things to stay the same, there is Mate, which is based on Gnome 2, which was released in 2002, and is till going strong as a popular desktop. Windows 7 was released in 2009 and is well past its end-of-life and support cycle.
25
-
20
-
20
-
17
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
I honestly think that for newcomers, it is more important to explain the difference in desktop environments, and worry less so about the distro it is running on. They will learn the differences and experiment on their own in time, but it is not beneficially to overload them with distro names that are all equally meaningless to them. They are going to base their initial experience based on what the DE is, not the nuances of package management, init systems, X11/Wayland, etc, etc., which are foreign concepts to a Windows user anyways.
While I don't neither a DE nor a Debian(-based) distro, my typical approach is to have them look at screens for GNOME and Plasma, decide which they like better purely based on aethestics, and then choose a popular Debian(-based) distro that supports it. They can experiment and distro-hop all they want later, just get them up and running with something that isn't broken, and they enjoy the appearance of.
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5