Youtube comments of Zer0 (@ForeverZer0).
-
836
-
430
-
385
-
233
-
186
-
144
-
115
-
113
-
95
-
54
-
53
-
51
-
47
-
45
-
43
-
42
-
40
-
36
-
34
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
28
-
28
-
25
-
Oddly enough, switching between Linux and Mac is relatively easy, as they both adhere more strongly to UNIX principles, file hierarchy, the concept of package managers, etc. I would disagree with your comment about things changing too quickly, that is completely your choice. There are multiple iterations of each major desktop environment, but there is nothing so drastic between them which would make someone not know how to use them from one version to another. For people who like things to stay the same, there is Mate, which is based on Gnome 2, which was released in 2002, and is till going strong as a popular desktop. Windows 7 was released in 2009 and is well past its end-of-life and support cycle.
25
-
25
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
For me:
Micro for light-editing, config files, small scripts.
VS Code for larger scripts and mix-language projects (i.e. writing C extensions for Ruby)
The suitable JetBrains IDE for large projects and enterprise languages like Rider for C# or IntelliJ for Java (though rarely).
Years ago when I was still using Windows, I was a Visual Studio fan, but would never use it again, even if using Windows, and would definitely stick with a JetBrains product.
EDIT: Although this video is nearly a year old, I had tried Fleet on early-access, and was unimpressed by it personally. It might have its niche uses, but overall, it seems like there is always a better tool to use instead.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@alvarohigino I don't know, I personally cannot name any remotely popular language that has grown near as slow. C17 didn't add any language features. C11 was pretty much just threads. After that we have to go back to C99, which was probably the biggest change in recent history, with revolutionary concepts like stdint.h, booleans, and inline comments. If memory serves it also added variodic/inline functions at that point, which is a rather large change for a language like C, though would only bump a minor revision in any other.
Before that was the Lord's version: Holy C89, so that is over 3 decades where I can list 90% of the of "bloat" in a brief YT comment from memory.
Tooling has increased by leaps and bounds, but that isn't the language, so not really a fair metric.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I honestly think that for newcomers, it is more important to explain the difference in desktop environments, and worry less so about the distro it is running on. They will learn the differences and experiment on their own in time, but it is not beneficially to overload them with distro names that are all equally meaningless to them. They are going to base their initial experience based on what the DE is, not the nuances of package management, init systems, X11/Wayland, etc, etc., which are foreign concepts to a Windows user anyways.
While I don't neither a DE nor a Debian(-based) distro, my typical approach is to have them look at screens for GNOME and Plasma, decide which they like better purely based on aethestics, and then choose a popular Debian(-based) distro that supports it. They can experiment and distro-hop all they want later, just get them up and running with something that isn't broken, and they enjoy the appearance of.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@mgord9518 Punch cards are obsolete because no one uses them, including the hardware that supports them.
C is not obsolete because essentially the entire ecosystem of all programming is built, and still being built upon it, with it and other languages that use it. One does not have to like it, and may wish otherwise, but calling it obsolete is factually and comically false.
Yes, it has tons of legacy cruft, literally no one denies this. Yes, it is easy to shoot yourself in the foot. Yes, there is tons of complexity around the tooling. ...and it will still probably be like that and popular as ever 30 years from now. The recent additions other system languages like Rust, Zig, etc. haven't even put a dent in its popularity, not usage.
I personally dislike JavaScript, but saying it is obsolete because I feel it fundamentally does things wrong would be silly. There are legitimate arguments to be made where you don't have to immediately jump to the realm of silliness. the world isn't going to get re-written in Rust anytime soon.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@fluffy_kitten You can catch a clue to the context in the very beginning, but the video suspiciously tried to omit that part, and also failed to supply it in the description, which is unlike the usual for this channel. The one officer mentioned something about him failing to identify himself, which seems to be where things begin to escalate. Unfortunately, Illinois is a "stop and identify" state, so personal feelings about such laws aside, he would have been required to provide it, even if not operating a vehicle.
I do find it a bit odd that this channel framed this event as "officers just trying to help" and failed to provide this context,. It wasn't their "help" that caused the problem, it seemed to be their using this encounter as a precursor to something more. Does seem to be uncharacteristic for the channel to do this.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Theraceagainstmyhealth Some rules are universal across the country, such as the ability to ask a person out of a car, but you are indeed correct, your state laws should be ones to educate yourself on the best. Most people don't even know if their own jurisdiction is "stop and frisk", "stop and identify" or neither. Knowing this alone would solve quite a few of interactions that go bad.
In either case, when you have a taser/gun drawn on you, it is not the time to plead your case, even if you are correct. Your rights are going to be violated, and it is better to file a civil liberties case after the fact, which you need to be alive in order to do. A live dog is better than a dead lion, and a desire to stay seating in your car isn't worth martyrdom.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@rjawiygvozd I think it is hard to call it great, or even good, as the idea behind it is flawed from the start. It's main primary selling point is that it tests for longer and is supposedly more stable, but then it allows users to install from the AUR, which is intended for Arch and its packages that are already out of testing, causing actual instability that far exceeds anything an extra few weeks of a testing phase would accomplish. If we ignore this, you are left with what is essentially a re-branded Arch with a selection of software somebody else likes installed for you, and a GUI to downgrade the kernel, which is of course only going to cause instability. It is unironically far, far more unstable than a basic Arch install could ever be.
I prefer vanilla Arch, but if I were to recommend a distro based on it, it would not be Manjaro, but something like CachyOS or Endeavor that actually do it well.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Ubuntu/Manjaro hate is just typical gate-keeping BS. They aren't for me, but I couldn't care less what someone else prefers, I hope they feel as satisfied as I do with my own setup that is not them.
As for systemd, it isn't "hate" as the typical gatekeeping thing, it is usually a philosophical criticism. It is far, far more than the advertised "init system", very monolithic, and its dependency spreads throughout a system, totally defying the Unix "do one thing" idea. That said, I have no problem with it, and prefer systems that use it. It works well and stays out of my way. I am not that big of a purist, and the same argument could be made for any largescale project like GTK, x-org, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markstone1619 Thank you, and I agree, it seems that too many people move to the extremes on the issue, whether it be the "ACAB" crowd who think all LE are villains, and the other extreme of "Thin Blue Line" flag wavers who think that police can no wrong.
The way I see it, police are just as fallible as any other person in any other profession, and are merely a necessary function for a civilized society, neither good nor evil by this fact alone. I 100% support the need for LE, and realize that they have been given authority that should and must be respected, but likewise must be held to a greater standard and more critical when mistakes are made, as their mistakes lead to the loss of freedoms and even death in extreme cases. So basically I respect the position and the authority that has been granted to them to wield, but at the cost of being more critical of them than I would of someone who messes up my fast-food order for this reason.
While many are constantly promoting "better training" for LE, I truly feel this is only half the equation, and citizens likewise need to better educate themselves on their rights, and what authority police do legally have. There is indeed a time and place for a citizen to stand up for their own rights and respectfully make it known that they feel they are being violated, but videos like this are poor examples of it when they are incorrect in what those rights are.
I would recommend that people balance out their "PoliceActivity" views with other channels like "Audit the Audit", which do a good job breaking down situations dealing specifically with civil liberties in an unbiased manner. Reading case-law is also great, but obviously not everyone finds that interesting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I spent decades hating Vim and thinking people were crazy for choosing to use such an inferior and un-intuitive editor. Somewhat recently I took a second look at it (specifically Neovim), and spent a few days forcing myself to get familiar with motions, learning how to personalize it, and configuring with LSPs, etc., There is no going back to something like VS Code now. My editor is perfectly configured to something that works optimally for me.
I would recommend that anyone learn Vim motions, even if you dislike Vim itself. They certainty don't seem very intuitive at first, especially with most modern software hacing left-hand-centric common hotkeys that use modifers keys, with right-hand combinations being less common due to mouse use. Spend a couple days forcing yourself to use them while working on a project,, and you won't regret it. I can now move around and edit a document faster than a mouse/touchpad by orders of magnitude, one only needs to learn the muscle-memory of the keys.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have been used Arch for over 10 years, have installed manually dozens of time. I never understood why anyone ever acted like they were superior for doing this, it is just following a step-by-step instruction. I exclusively use archinstall now, for me there is literally no reason not to, I don't require anything it cannot do and/or I can do post the base-install. I love Arch, but I hate the stereotype that we are considered some type of elitists or gatekeepers, I honestly think that mostly comes from newbies who installed it for the first time, and wanted to make a big deal about it, not so much the actual experienced users. I am sure it is a mix of both, but installing Arch, even manually, is not a difficult task that anyone should take pride in, any Linux newcomer can do it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RockTo11 I have seen Jai, and it does look interesting, though without trying it, there isn't much that I am too excited about. I definitly plan on learning it when it does get released. Between Zig and Odin, they are both good. I personally prefer Zig for most applications, but Odin is enjoyable to use, there is just a few design patterns that keep it from being "great" to me. I always recommend it to Go devs who are interested in game-development, it is fills the niche perfectly.
All that said, don't be torn between any of them, learn them all. I understand you have to somewhat commit to one or another for a certain amount of time to become competent with it, but as someone who used to also feel like I had to choose, I can say that it a self-imposed restriction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have been vanilla for too long to change now, but if I were to change, I would probably opt for CachyOS before Artix, though it would be my next choice. Unless you are someone who has strong opinions about systemd and want to learn alternative ways to write services, timers, etc., it doesn't offer much different. CachyOS seems to be one of the few Arch-based distros that is actually doing some different things (custom software, kernel patches, etc), and not just a GUI installer, branding, and someone else's selection of software.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Arch being "difficult" is a meme that needs to die, because so many people actually take it serious, chief among them being people who just installed Arch for the first time and believe themselves to be Linux wizards. These are the people whom give Arch the bad name for being "elitist". I have used Arch for well over a decade, and would be the first to tell you that anyone can install it, it is not difficult, simply a matter of following directions, though now even at that point is moot for years since they have a good TUI installer. Arch was my first ever Linux distro, and while I wouldn't typically recommend it to beginners, but it isn't even bad for that. If you are someone familiar with development,, writing code, using CLI tools, etc, then starting with Arch is very viable.
The one and only requirement for maintaining Arch is the ability and willingness to RTFM, absolutely nothing else. If you like tinkering and customizing, Arch is a good distro. If you just want something pre-configured and are happy with the defaults another team selected, then go with that. There is no wrong answer here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Tim has the angle all wrong, and it is purely purposeful deflection.
Of course there is some anger about his outburst on you, but it merely put the real issue center-stage, which is his behavior. He markets himself as a positive role-model for young men, meanwhile does not denounce this degenerate behavior. He did say they have since "calmed down" with that behavior, but he still sees nothing wrong about it, and acts like it is just a normal kink. This type of behavior needs to be outright condemned on every level, there is nothing manly about it, and it is destructive to the soul.
TLDR: Please not invite him back on the show, he does not deserve to be elevated as a person with meaningful thoughts or opinions, and needs to disappear into obscurity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have absolutely nothing against X11, but it is in a really bad place right now. The project is absolutely huge, there is a not person alive who is familiar with more than a few parts of the API, which is filled to the brim with millions of lines of code of nothing but legacy crud that no one even understand anymore. They are losing developers, and unable to find enough maintainers (or even board members) to keep it up to date, let alone develop new features. Whatever the average user's opinion is of Wayland, there is a legitimate reasons why developers are moving towards it, and it is not because of some petty flame-war or conspiracy against X11. The project deserves full credit for serving us well and getting us this far over the past decades, but Wayland taking over and becoming the new "norm" is likely not more than a year or two away. If you are someone reading this and resisting it for flame-war stuff or because it had bugs last time you attempted it 2 years ago, is not helping anyone, least of all you. I couldn't care less what anyone else uses, but it is only damaging to Linux users to keep spreading outdated information that is no longer even applicable.
It should also be noted that the "NVIDIA bad" stuff is a bit outdated. NVIDIA is never without some problems on Linux, regardless of X11/Wayland, but the major esync issue has been fixed and will be hitting the repos of most distros very soon. This was the final major hurdle preventing widespread adoption on Wayland, and pretty much every other problem with NVIDIA is fixable with configuration.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PedanticAnswerSeeker It is rather general-purpose, but does have some features that make it great for backend web-development, which was one of its original design goals and reason for its popularity.
I personally chose to make an application that created the output for my i3 statusbar, which is kinda of a niche thing, so not the best advice. This provided experience with socket programming, command-line parsing, JSON marshaling, basic IO, executing other applications, go routines, etc.. Choosing something that is well-rounded and works with various technologies is a good way to get familiar with the standard library.
1
-
1
-
@iMatti00 There is a lot of truth to that statement. Cops obviously want to assert themselves as the dominant in an interaction, but many do so by being overly aggressive to the point of being hostile. There are many ways to exert your authority while remaining civil and understanding, but many police simply don't have this ability. It is essentially the same difference that you see in a good leader/boss versus a bad one. One can can command from a position of respect, while the other commands with an iron fist and a "I will punish you for disobedience" attitude.
All that said, it is important for civilians to learn what their rights are, what orders are lawful, and what are not. I don't personally agree with the specific law, but they are permitted to order someone out of a car with a simple excuse. Resisting that on the side of the road is not going to help the situation, whether it is a good police officer or not. Even if the initial detainment was not lawful, resisting that isn't going help anyone, and will simply open the door to more serious things.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rjawiygvozd I personally don't see the relevance of whether a delay is "random" or "curated", it is a distinction without a difference in the context of introducing instability with AUR packages. The wrong dependency version is still the wrong version, whether it is because some arbitrary time limit has not yet been reached, or because a skill group of fine artisans are honing their craft as software testers and cannot be rushed. Dismissing this as the fault of a user for using "crazy nonsense" packages based on your limited anecdotal experience doesn't make less stable for the countless times it has, and will to continue to happen.
The irony I mentioned is that a practice intended to provide stability over Arch has resulted in it being more unstable than Arch.
You allude to these "manual interventions" and how it saves its users from this common problem, and I would direct you attention to the Arch news site where they are listed. In all of 2024, there was a single manual intervention required, a basic chown command. How many AUR packages do you think broke exclusively for Manjaro users in the same amount of time? Tens? Hundreds? Thousands? If even only for a week or so, I am confident it was an aggravation, the point being that one does not have to concern themselves with using "crazy nonsense" packages, they are free to use mesa-git if they want without fear of their distro breaking it beyond its already inherent instability.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@boredstudent9468 ...and obviously some part of it was freshly not setup correctly. There is no "default" install, you obviously selected options on how it should install, so not sure what relevance "fresh" is in this context. It didn't install itself in a vacuum without your input.
If it is bricking, it is likely some issue with your partitioning and/or boot-loader setup, Could even be UEFI/BIOS or GPT/MBR mismatches, but you didn't mention what specific update is causing it to happen, so no way to say. You also claimed it was an update, but now indicating it is the installation process, and not an update. If you are using grub, try systemd-boot, it is more straightforward for a single OS system, and is less prone to mis-configuration with less moving parts.
You can also just use the `archinstall` utility in the ISO, it will take care of avoiding many foot-guns.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I couldn't care less what people wish to use. I was one of those "don't see the point of the Wayland" people for years, but gave it another chance a while back, and ended up sticking with it, as it "fixed" an issue I was having with a particular game on X11. Having been with it for a while and now on Hyprland, I don't personally have any reason to switch back to X11. It isn't that I dislike X11 or anything, it did me good for many years, but Wayland is simply a better fit for me now. For my use-case, it has finally gotten to a place where it is stable and works well, but for those it doesn't, just use X11.
I don't see the point of people taking such strong opinions in either camp, or trying to turn this into a flame-war. If I don't like a piece of software, I simply don't use it. I don't care how popular it is or "what everyone else is using". I am not an X11 or Wayland developer, I have no personal stake in either, and will never understand people getting in heated arguments over "which is better".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zizlog_sound I was not very clear, I am saying that your point of thousands of distros as "not working together" has an incorrect premise. I personally don't see any use for all the distros either, but there is very little work going into one that can't be shared with all others. With the exception of package managers, nearly everything is universal and can be "shared". It may not be accurate to call it "working together", but it surely isn't "working against each other".
A perfect example is Cosmic Desktop. It is being developed for PopOS, but the entire Linux ecosystem can use it and will benefit from it. This is the same with nearly all software. The differences between distros is remarkably small from a development point-of-view. No one develops "for Ubuntu" or "for Arch", they simply target Linux, and it works for all of them. Again, package management is the only notable exception to this.
I very much agree that the huge number of distros isn't very useful, no argument here, but who am I to tell someone what hobby project they choose to develop?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1