Comments by "James Adams" (@ExPwner) on "David Lin " channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. Michael Mappin is a lying Marxist shill who spams propaganda for a living. He's so dumb that he thinks that all wealth is produced by labor. He literally blamed capitalism for the Great Leap Forward under communist China. He's been spamming this comments section and practically every other Richard Wolff video comment section for years with outright lies and propaganda, and he does not care about truth. He'll likely be spamming the same lies today in reply to top level comments here within hours. He's also responded to this comment with insults and fabricated quotes I did not say (not any actual argument) and hasn't even attempted to read the sources listed or provide any of his own because he knows he's lying. Plus he admitted that he doesn't care about the data. Here are a list of just some of his other lies: 1. He claimed that production has increased more than incomes. He has been repeatedly shown that this is wrong. (source 1 see "debunking the productivity-pay gap") (source 2 see "Heritage productivity and compensation") (source 3 see Reddit thread on bad economics titled "in EPI we trust") 2. He claimed that wages haven't kept up with inflation. This is in his copy pasted shill paragraph claiming that "capitalism erodes purchasing power" which was shown and explained to him numerous times to be wrong. This too has been cited numerous times and he keeps lying even after being given the source proving him wrong. (source 4 see "Econlib real wage myth") (source 5 see "FRED real compensation") 3. He claimed that people are working more hours over time. That was debunked and he kept claiming it with the source right in front of him. The facts show that people are working fewer hours over time as well. He's still refusing to acknowledge how this benefit has been passed along to workers and claiming that workers don't see any benefits from labor saving technology, which is outright false on its face. (source 6 see Wikipedia article on "working hours" particularly in the US) (source 7 see Our World in Data article on working hours) 4. He claimed that the Nazis weren't socialists. (source 8 see Eric July (Youngrippa59) video on YT for "Nazis were socialists" (source 9 see Mises article on "yes the Nazis were socialists") (source 10 see TIK video on YT for Hiter's socialism) 5. He claimed that Joe Biden was on the right wing. (source 11 see wikipedia article on "political positions of Joe Biden") (source 12 see executive orders from Joe Biden) 6. He claims that workers aren't paid the "full value of their labor." (source 13 see wikipedia article on "exploitation of labor" in the "critique and rejection" section which lists multiple economic references showing how the field rejects the labor theory of value) Now he's also engaged in lying about what others say and post to try to smear them. Instead of actually bringing an argument based on factual information, he just insults and smears. This is what Marxists do. They constantly lie and project because they know that their entire worldview is garbage. This is a grown man that acts like a child. He is not capable of a good faith debate. Please report him for spam.
    2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23.  @michaelmappin1830 ”not dealing with what I said” That is another lie. what you are doing is called an equivocation fallacy. You start by talking about wealth produced by labor, then change to all of the wealth produced by a company and pretend like they are the same thing. No they are not. You are intentionally being dishonest yet again. We went over this. You are leaving out wealth produced by capital. Quit being an idiot and address the argument. ​ there is no “not getting the full value of their labor” because all value is subjective. You cannot have a less than full amount of something that is subjective. ​ “It is simply not true that goods derive their value from the total labor used in their production. Böhm-Bawerk advances several arguments to demonstrate this, but the labor (or more generally, cost) theory of value has been exploded in other articles and I will not spend more time on it here.” “The completely just proposition that the worker is to receive the entire value of his product can be reasonably interpreted to mean either that he is to receive the full present value of his product now or that he is to get the entire future value in the future. But Rodbertus and the socialists interpret it to mean that the worker is to receive the entire future value of his product now.” So yet again, for the hundredth time since you are so stupid that I have to explain it again, the amount of wealth produced by a company is not the same as wealth produced by labor. Are you going to address the argument or not?
    2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2