Comments by "LoC28C" (@LoC28C) on "Fugitive Hong Kong activist Nathan Law granted political asylum in UK" video.

  1.  @davebull9600  incidentally the protesters in Hong Kong are treated a lot more humanely than the ones in London now and the Black Lives Matters movement both in the US, UK and Europe. And No, Scotland has already voted for Independence a few years ago and they still have not independence. Northern Ireland too has been asking for Independence for decades too what happened to them ? Tell me how the British Intelligence treated the freedom fighters of Northern Ireland and compare it to those of Hong Kong.
    6
  2.  @a.a.6969  being a black guy in China is definitely much better then being a black guy in the US or UK for sure.
    5
  3.  @davebull9600  he has been destroying the democracy and freedom of the people of Hong Kong. He has no right to talk about freedom ! ! ! He is also one of those instrumental to the destruction of the One Country Two System for Hong Kong as a criminal he should be put behind bars! ! !
    4
  4.  @davebull9600  who in this world told you that they are not allowed to protest in Hong Kong? That person told you a lie ! ! ! They are still allowed to protest in Hong Kong it is their basic right. Those protest leaders are not in jail for protesting like what you have been made to believe by the western media. They are in jail for holding an illegal primary election, some of them are in jail for destroying their legislative council, some of them are in jail for beating up ordinary citizens and some of them are in jail for having possession of dangerous firearms like bombs live bullets and guns. If you didn’t know having guns in China is a crime.
    3
  5.  @davebull9600  why would the referendum in Catalonia be considered illegal when the primary elections in Hong Kong be considered legitimate ? Both has been held by people who just wanted to hold them and bring the people against the legitimately elected Government of the day. Why are you showing us your double standards?
    2
  6.  @davebull9600  You may have been fed too much fake news about the National Security law in Hong Kong that is why you seem to say what you did as you are merely parroting what the western media as they have an agenda against China. This National Security Law actually brought back law and order, peace and security to the people of Hong Kong. With this law the people of Hong Kong is again allowed the freedom of expression and dissent. These so called peaceful protesters that you and the western media and western Government has been supporting has been beating people in to submission so that they will protest alongside with them. If you do not agree with these protesters you will be beaten up no matter you are 8 years old or 92 years old, it also doesn’t matter if you are a man or a woman you MUST Protest alongside with them or else you will be beaten or even killed. You tell me is that considered freedom or democracy? Now the people of Hong Kong can have the freedom to agree or disagree with what the Government is doing. They can voice their views and say what they like, isn’t this better than only having to agree to the agenda of the so called peaceful protesters and you cannot even say you don’t have a view against the Government. When you look at the treasonous laws in Britain they punish people for doing things these so called protesters are doing. Why is it allowed to have such laws in Britain and not in China ? What is your agenda ? What is your motive ? Just look at this link https://uk.news.yahoo.com/10-crimes-that-are-still-considered-treason-in-the-145300595.html it list out the crimes that are even punishable by death when the death penalty was still allowed in Britain. Although the death penalty is not longer there in Britain, but these laws still stand, and if these so called peaceful protesters were to do the same thing in Britain, they would have also been considered criminals too ! ! ! So tell me why are these actions that they did considered a crime both in Britain and the USA but must be supported in China ! ! What is you Agenda ! ! !
    2
  7.  @twopercentflat4766  I'm not referring to the abolishment of the monarchy. I'm referring to the part of helping the enemy and also calling for foreigners to attack Britain. These people in Hong Kong keep asking Britain and the USA to attack China and Hong Kong, would you not considered that a crime ? They also receive millions of USD annually to find anti-china propaganda in Hong Kong. They also have strategic meetings with the USA Government on how to break Hong Kong from China. Would you think any country in the world would accept these people as national hero's? Do you think any British or US Governments will treat anyone a hero if they were to work with the Russians or Chinese to take London or New York out of Britain or USA?
    2
  8.  @twopercentflat4766  that's where you have to refer to the basic Law again. It says matters of national security will be decided upon by the National Government and that would refer to Beijing. I know that the western media has been trying to emphasise that this is wrong but logically, Hong Kong is a city of China. When national security is supposed to be decided by the National Government doesn't it mean that the People's Congress in Beijing have to decide this issue ?
    1