Comments by "LoC28C" (@LoC28C) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1. 471
  2. 20
  3. 12
  4. 11
  5. 10
  6. 9
  7. 8
  8. 8
  9. 7
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. @redeyexxx1841 you are only partially correct. Yes the whole country was in chaos that doesn't mean that different parts of the country was a separate country. That's just the Indian spin. No you are not correct about the Chinese Government using the military to suppress the people of Tibet. The Chinese went in to Tibet to liberate the people of Tibet. Why do I say liberate ? more than 95% of the population of Tibet were Serves and the Elite Land owning class were living in luxury whilst the bulk of the population were not even entitled to basic necessity as food, water, clothing and a roof over their heads. Their Children will also not be eligible to food, water, clothing and a roof over their heads too. The Communists went in to negotiate with the Dalai Lama and asked him to come back to the fold. The Dalai Lama was represented in the People's Council too for some time until he left. The main reason is because according to the Communist ideology everyone in the country is equal and slave ownership is illegal. The Communists had to send in the PLA to ensure that everyone of the serves were given their citizenship rights and papers. That is your so called Military Suppression. These are facts of what actually happened in Tibet. If you are so inhumane to support the suppression and ownership of another human being and all their descendants then it is your Karma. I cannot accept the fact that a man can be skinned alive for stealing food for his baby, and he will be left to die a gruesome death. I cannot accept the fact that a man has no right to clothing in temperature below zero. It is horrible. I also cannot accept that a human being can only eat what is fed to livestock as he is just a slave. It's too inhumane. Ask yourself do you support such treatment of human beings ? If you continue to support the Independence of Tibet you are such a horrible person. Go tell the Dalai Lama that I said that.
    2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. 2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. How come every other country can have a national security law, China is not allowed to have one ? What is the motive of the western media here ? Secondly, this panel is very lopsided. Listening to this surely gives me the feeling of Mr Rong is the sheep being led to the pack of Wolfe’s being Mr To and Andreas together with Kamal Santa Maria too. Clearly Mr To and Andreas are very Anti-China by what they do and their history. This legislation is supposed to be passed in to law by the LegCo in Hong Kong. They have taken 23 years and has not been successful in passing this law because Mr To’s party has been opposing to it without giving any solution. Similarly, Mr To and his colleagues in the opposition in Hong Kong has also protested and blocked many legislation and initiatives that is required to provide the people of Hong Kong a decent living without offering any solution. It does seem that they have been opposing for the sake of opposing. Some of these examples are : 1. Land reform to enable more land to be available for public housing and also to provide affordable housing to the ordinary citizens of Hong Kong. 2. Education reform to ensure that the text books and syllabus taught in schools will stop teaching students the altered history of Hong Kong and China. The Hong Kong LegCo also tried to stop the teaching of Anti-China syllabus in the schools in Hong Kong too but this too has been opposed and prevented from taken effect by Mr To’s party. 3. Redesignation of the northern part of Hong Kong into a Silicon Valley and electronics hub to encourage innovation and growth in these two sectors of the economy for the whole of China. Mr To’s party has refused to allow such to happen in Hong Kong therefore the companies like Tencent, Huawei, DJI and so on have been forced to settle in Shenzhen instead of Hong Kong. Therefore also depriving brilliant Hong Kong Talent from securing jobs writing Hong Kong itself. Andreas also lost his credibility by not showing any understanding about the Sino-British joint Declaration. He is only pushing his own biased agenda of western styled human rights and democracy and possibility the cessation of Hong Kong and Taiwan. The spirit of the Sino-British Joint Declaration is to have a 50 years transitional period for the people of Hong Kong to learn and adapt to the mainstream Chinese society and hence be integrated in to the rest of the country. This can only be done on a gradual basis and not over night. What Andreas seem to be promoting is that there will be no change in the society in Hong Kong for 50 years and thereafter the whole of the 1.4 billion people on Mainland China adapt to the lifestyle and culture of the Hong Kong people or to be more westernized. To think like this he is either delusional, stupid, crazy or an idiot with no knowledge of human management or human behavior.
    1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. ⁠@staceevanya Sorry it is not true that the National Security law in Hong Kong is crated to facilitate the CCP to control over Hong Kong. If you look at the Article 23 the crimes stated and defined there is exactly how it is described in most countries around the world but the difference is that the punishment prescribed by the Hong Kong’s Article 23 is very minimal as compared to most places around the world. For many of these crimes described in Article 23 it would be life in prison or death penalty in all countries in Europe or America however it is a mere few years jail in Hong Kong. The only difference is that in Hong Kong there are many organisations funded by foreign Governments trying to subvert the day to day running of Hong Kong and China whilst there are not so many of these organisations in many other countries or territories around the world. In India they outright banned some of these organisations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International and these organisations just left India about a decade or so ago. This Article 23 was a requirement to be set up by the Hong Kong Government according to the agreement for the return of Hong Kong to the mainland. However, the UK and the USA has been lobbying through their sponsored politicians and other organisations like the churches controlled by the CIA in Hong Kong to stop the implementation of this law. The reason for it is that when this law is implemented these organisations and churches funded by the UK and USA in Hong Kong will be breaking these laws.
    1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120.  @katemakeup  kindly refer to the Hong Kong Basic Law before releasing the load of rubbish that is currently being promoted by anti-china media round the world. It is a requirement of the Hong Kong Basic Law that this act is enacted in Hong Kong, the so called pro-democracy legislators have been blocking this for 23 years as they are just prone to block anything that is proposed for Hong Kong regardless whether it is good or bad for Hong Kong. The sorry state of affairs in Hong Kong is also due to their nature o just opposing for the sake of opposing. Jimmy Lai is not a journalist he and his media is funded by the US as a propaganda tool to instigate the breaking up of Hong Kong and China. The media that they run only tell part truths and twist facts to encourage people to go against the Government. They really do deserve to be put behind bars for a long long time. Like this National Security Law, it is a requirement of the basic Law of Hong Kong. The media and those aligned to Jimmy Lai will not report that it is a requirement, but will report that the Chinese Government imposed this draconian Law onto Hong Kong. The truth is, this is an act required by their constitution. The local legislative council failed to enact this, then the central Government passed the law where the details are to be discussed and implemented solely by the Hong Kong legislative council. This facts are not reported so that it can paint a bad light on the central government to say that they are bad. It's a pity that you have fallen prey to their facts twisting.
    1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168.  Paddy le Blanc  first of all Taiwan had been part of China for hundreds of years. It was briefly ruled by Japan for approximately 50 years and they at that time brainwashed the population into believing that they are Japanese. Therefore they were conscripted and sent to fight the war in South East Asia as the first wave. This is the result of the unimaginable brutality that was inflicted on the local communities of Chinese origin. This is because it was psychological for them to escape their own ethnicity. Secondly, when Taiwan was regarded to represent the whole of China it's territory includes the whole of the Taiwanese island, the whole of the Chinese mainland including Tibet, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Hong Kong , Macau and THE 9 DASHED LINE AND ALL ISLANDS WITHIN IT. In 1979, the world switched recognition of China towards Beijing and Taiwan is part of this including all of its territory and the 9 dashed line. China didn't claim Taiwan in 1979 as said in the video. These islands withing the 9 dashed lines were always recognised as part of China until recently. The so called Tribunal set up to rule that China's Claims is not valid is a newly set up Tribunal by the US and has nothing to do with the United Nations. It has no legal jurisdictions Nor legal effects. The only thing is that it is located in the same building of the ICJ in the Hague. The claims by the Philippines in this Tribunal was only represented by some NGO from the Philippines probably funded by the US too. Taiwan is being run separately over the years is due to the US interference in China's internal matter when the US sent warships to fight alongside the KMT to ward off the Communist Party of China. It's time for the US to let go of this hegemony and stop the bullying of China by selling over priced defective and obsolete weapons to Taiwan to fight for independence and it's separatist movements.
    1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1