Comments by "LoC28C" (@LoC28C) on "Where are Hong Kong’s protesters now? | The Take" video.

  1. No there are no countries in this world that doesn’t have a national security law as far as I know. The most draconian national security law that I know of is the one in the USA they are so strong and some parts of it doesn’t allow anyone who is charged under that law to have any defence, it is 100% guaranteed conviction .
    10
  2. If you really study the meaning of democracy then you will know that the western style democracy is only one form of democracy. Only if the people in Hong Kong understand the meaning of democracy then they will understand that the form of democracy practiced in Mainland China is more transparent than the democracy that they are asking for.
    4
  3. Wow the rioters on 6th January was barred from taking flights, they are all arrested and jailed by now. You will not be able to find any news about them because the USA is not transparent about how they treat these people, so that the USA will still project a very good image to the world.
    1
  4. ⁠@staceevanya Sorry it is not true that the National Security law in Hong Kong is crated to facilitate the CCP to control over Hong Kong. If you look at the Article 23 the crimes stated and defined there is exactly how it is described in most countries around the world but the difference is that the punishment prescribed by the Hong Kong’s Article 23 is very minimal as compared to most places around the world. For many of these crimes described in Article 23 it would be life in prison or death penalty in all countries in Europe or America however it is a mere few years jail in Hong Kong. The only difference is that in Hong Kong there are many organisations funded by foreign Governments trying to subvert the day to day running of Hong Kong and China whilst there are not so many of these organisations in many other countries or territories around the world. In India they outright banned some of these organisations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International and these organisations just left India about a decade or so ago. This Article 23 was a requirement to be set up by the Hong Kong Government according to the agreement for the return of Hong Kong to the mainland. However, the UK and the USA has been lobbying through their sponsored politicians and other organisations like the churches controlled by the CIA in Hong Kong to stop the implementation of this law. The reason for it is that when this law is implemented these organisations and churches funded by the UK and USA in Hong Kong will be breaking these laws.
    1
  5. ⁠@fakyuw Every country in this world is entitled to protect themselves against foreign interference. This is an International law that is enshrined in the United Nations. The country that is the champion in breaking this law around the world by interfering in other countries internal affairs is the USA. They will decide who can and who cannot be the leader of a country, if they do not like the leader elected by the people the USA will go an appoint another president or Prime Minister in that country like Venezuela or Ukraine. Luckily the people in Venezuela is smart and strong enough to resist this and retained their President. Another way is like Myanmar where they appointed a staff of the Australian High Commission to be the advisor to Aungsang Syukii, then the military leaders of the country can no longer stop what they are doing in a legal way they staged a military coup. Now the British, Australian and the USA has activated the underground resistant army that they have been training in Myanmar for decades to go against the Military Government in Myanmar. There are many more examples that you can see around the world.
    1
  6. ⁠@lolakapp Yes, Macau is also different as Macau doesn’t have so many foreign funded organisations to subvert the Government there. The media in Macau too is also not controlled by foreign funded organisations too unlike in Hong Kong.
    1
  7. Because Hong Kong is a part of China and the USA will not allow Hong Kong and China to have national security so that the USA can destabilise and break China in to several smaller countries. In that way the USA can remain the world dominant power for a longer time.
    1
  8. @ArmslikeAngel Well at least in Hong Kong this so called oppression is what was required in the agreement between Britain and China for the handing back of Hong Kong to the China. This Oppression is also only on foreign funded organisations and foreign funded churches to disrupt the peaceful co-existence of the people in Hong Kong. These kind of organisations were BANNED in countries like India or the USA but not in China or Hong Kong.
    1
  9. Don’t be silly. The CIA will never loose interest if Hong Kong can be a destabilising factor for China.
    1
  10. @olgadeweger3805 I agree with you too. The only thing is those who are anti-China will accuse you of telling lies or said that you are paid to spread propaganda if you tell them things that are happening in China that is not favourable to their thinking. This is most unfortunate.
    1