Comments by "LoC28C" (@LoC28C) on "How much of a headache is Hong Kong to China? | Inside Story" video.

  1. How come every other country can have a national security law, China is not allowed to have one ? What is the motive of the western media here ? Secondly, this panel is very lopsided. Listening to this surely gives me the feeling of Mr Rong is the sheep being led to the pack of Wolfe’s being Mr To and Andreas together with Kamal Santa Maria too. Clearly Mr To and Andreas are very Anti-China by what they do and their history. This legislation is supposed to be passed in to law by the LegCo in Hong Kong. They have taken 23 years and has not been successful in passing this law because Mr To’s party has been opposing to it without giving any solution. Similarly, Mr To and his colleagues in the opposition in Hong Kong has also protested and blocked many legislation and initiatives that is required to provide the people of Hong Kong a decent living without offering any solution. It does seem that they have been opposing for the sake of opposing. Some of these examples are : 1. Land reform to enable more land to be available for public housing and also to provide affordable housing to the ordinary citizens of Hong Kong. 2. Education reform to ensure that the text books and syllabus taught in schools will stop teaching students the altered history of Hong Kong and China. The Hong Kong LegCo also tried to stop the teaching of Anti-China syllabus in the schools in Hong Kong too but this too has been opposed and prevented from taken effect by Mr To’s party. 3. Redesignation of the northern part of Hong Kong into a Silicon Valley and electronics hub to encourage innovation and growth in these two sectors of the economy for the whole of China. Mr To’s party has refused to allow such to happen in Hong Kong therefore the companies like Tencent, Huawei, DJI and so on have been forced to settle in Shenzhen instead of Hong Kong. Therefore also depriving brilliant Hong Kong Talent from securing jobs writing Hong Kong itself. Andreas also lost his credibility by not showing any understanding about the Sino-British joint Declaration. He is only pushing his own biased agenda of western styled human rights and democracy and possibility the cessation of Hong Kong and Taiwan. The spirit of the Sino-British Joint Declaration is to have a 50 years transitional period for the people of Hong Kong to learn and adapt to the mainstream Chinese society and hence be integrated in to the rest of the country. This can only be done on a gradual basis and not over night. What Andreas seem to be promoting is that there will be no change in the society in Hong Kong for 50 years and thereafter the whole of the 1.4 billion people on Mainland China adapt to the lifestyle and culture of the Hong Kong people or to be more westernized. To think like this he is either delusional, stupid, crazy or an idiot with no knowledge of human management or human behavior.
    1