General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Ming Muyiyang
China Observer
comments

Comments by "Ming Muyiyang" (@mingmuyiyang8615) on "China Observer" channel.

Previous
14
Next
...
All

@sumeettanwar1608 Olympic athletes from different countries not only represent their country in the Olympic Games. They also represent the dignity, culture, spiritual outlook and moral character of the country. We know what Indian athletes represent. Don't we?
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Finally, let me tell you that there are 56 ethnic groups in the Chinese family. They are all and of course Chinese. The 56 ethnic groups in China are closely united and together paint a magnificent picture of the Chinese nation.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 China also values English, and it is very important. But we will not make it an official language. Now countries all over the world are learning Chinese. But few people are learning Hindi or Sanskrit. At the weekly press conference of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, reporters from all over the world communicate with our diplomats in Chinese.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 The great Marx's summary and evaluation of Indian history is accurate and to the point. Your rebuttal is futile and empty.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 1962? What review do you want to know? I suspect you haven't read every review I've made here carefully.
1
@b4u40 It doesn't matter what you think. I only talk about history and facts.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 US support: - Political statements: American newspapers constantly advocated and instigated India to go to war with China. US officials also publicly expressed sympathy and support for India, emphasizing that the United States supports India. For example, The Washington Post once published an article saying that "the long border between China and India is an important area of action, and India must be defended"; The New York World Telegraph and the Sun also emphasized that the US position is to support India in dealing with China. This political statement gave India confidence and courage to a certain extent. - Economic aid: From 1959 to July 1962, the United States provided India with economic aid of 4.1 billion US dollars. In November 1962, the United States increased its economic aid to India and airlifted a large amount of military equipment and weapons to India, which played an important role in India's material supply and equipment replenishment in the war. - Military aid: The United States provided India with a military advisory group to help India formulate and command military strategies. In the later stages of the war, the Kennedy administration even sent an aircraft carrier battle group directly to the Bay of Bengal to carry out military deterrence against China. Although the United States did not directly participate in the war, this gesture of military support was an important psychological support for India.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Support from the United Kingdom: - Weapons and equipment support: As the initiator of the Sino-Indian border dispute, the United Kingdom has always had the ambition to invade China's Tibet, so it actively intervened in the Sino-Indian border dispute. The British government publicly stated that it would do its best to meet India's weapons and equipment needs on the battlefield, and sent two "Britannia" class warships to deliver a large amount of aid materials to India. - Public opinion support: Some British media published reports that distorted the facts, discredited China, and defended India's aggressive behavior. For example, the British "Sunday Times" once wrote: "The Chinese want to occupy more Indian border territories before winter comes." This false statement has caused certain pressure on China in international public opinion.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 US support: - Political statements: US newspapers have been constantly advocating and instigating India to go to war with China. US officials have also publicly expressed sympathy and support for India, emphasizing that the United States supports India. For example, the Washington Post once published an article saying that "the long border between China and India is an important area of action, and India must be defended"; the New York World Telegraph and the Sun also emphasized that the US position is to support India in dealing with China. This political statement has given India confidence and courage to a certain extent.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Economic aid: From 1959 to July 1962, the United States provided India with $4.1 billion in economic aid. In November 1962, the United States increased its economic aid to India and airlifted a large amount of military equipment and weapons to India, which played an important role in India's material supply and equipment replenishment during the war.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Military assistance: The United States provided India with a military advisory group to help India formulate and command military strategies.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 The specific implementation of India's "Forward Policy" in 1962 was manifested in the following aspects: 1. Advancement and establishment of outposts: - In the eastern section: the Indian army crossed the traditional customary line and established outposts along the "McMahon Line". By June 1962, the Indian army had established 24 new outposts in the eastern section, and even established new outposts in Chedong, north of the line. This was a serious violation of China's territorial sovereignty. They tried to gradually erode Chinese territory in this way and continuously advance their actual control into Chinese territory. - In the western section: the Indian army had invaded many times before June 1962 and continuously eroded Chinese territory. By June of this year, the Indian army had established 43 outposts in the areas in the western section that had been under the jurisdiction and control of China. The establishment of these outposts seriously threatened the security and stability of China's border.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 2. Patrols and flag-raising: India has sent patrols to frequently patrol the disputed areas and raised the Indian flag wherever they go, attempting to assert its so-called "sovereignty". This behavior is a blatant provocation to China's territorial sovereignty and a specific implementation of India's "Forward Policy".
1
@sumeettanwar1608 3. Cutting off China’s supply lines: India attempts to cut off China’s supply lines in border areas by establishing outposts, strongholds and patrols, thereby creating difficulties for the logistical support of the Chinese border guards and forcing them to withdraw from these areas.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 4. Military deployment and troop concentration: India has continuously increased the deployment of military forces in border areas and has assembled a large number of troops. In mid-October 1962, the Indian army assembled about 22,000 troops in the eastern section of the Sino-Indian border, and was also equipped with certain weapons and equipment, including aircraft, to provide military support for its "forward policy". The aircraft also repeatedly invaded the Chinese border area for reconnaissance and other activities, constantly provoking China's bottom line.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 1. Advancement and establishment of outposts: - In the eastern section: Indian troops crossed the traditional customary line and established outposts along the "McMahon Line". By June 1962, the Indian troops had established 24 new outposts in the eastern section, and even established new outposts in Chedong, north of the line. This is a serious violation of China's territorial sovereignty. They are trying to gradually erode Chinese territory in this way and continuously advance their actual control into Chinese territory.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 In the western section: Indian troops had invaded China several times before June 1962, constantly encroaching on Chinese territory. By June of that year, the Indian troops had established 43 outposts in the western section that had been under Chinese jurisdiction and control, which seriously threatened the security and stability of the Chinese border.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 India's "Forward Policy" is a completely unilateral act of infringement on China's territorial sovereignty. The Chinese government has always maintained restraint and tolerance, but the Indian side has been making further demands, which eventually led to the outbreak of a self-defense counterattack conflict on the Sino-Indian border.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Do you have any doubts about India's "Forward Policy" and the support of the United States and the United Kingdom for India?
1
@sumeettanwar1608 I see you only complaining and making baseless comments. I feel your frustration. Because today I let you review history and let you know the truth.
1
@ilovewritingessays2017 Are you an American? You don't have many good days left, so enjoy the present.
1
@vikvik7092 You didn't read every one of my comments carefully.
1
@User-qo7hq It takes a process to accept reality, whether it is history or anything that happens today. The Olympics, 1.5 billion people, 0 gold medals. It is enough to prove everything.
1
@Alpha-junior There are over 100 comments here, how many have you read? If you have read them all, you won't be confused about 1962.
1
@Alpha-junior We Chinese only talk about history and facts. India's independence was indeed easily achieved through "non-violent non-cooperation". In 1947, Britain became weak and India easily gained independence. If India's "non-violent non-cooperation" movement was placed in any period before 1947, India would not have succeeded, and the facts proved to be so. In 1857, India once rebelled against Britain. . But the rebellion in India in 1857 was fueled by resentment caused by different ideas, including aggressive British-style social reforms, harsh land taxes, easy treatment of some wealthy landlords and princes, and suspicion of progress brought about by British rule. Many Indians rose up against the British. However, these rebellions were not for national independence or national dignity. These rebellions were entirely for the uneven distribution of benefits among the various tribes in India at that time. These rebellions did not show any patriotic characteristics. Moreover, many Indians in 1857 also fought for Britain, and most Indians seemed to still obey British rule.
1
@Alpha-junior Satellite imagery? I have no idea what you're talking about.
1
@ilovewritingessays2017 This is a discussion based on history and facts, not a quarrel. If you can learn something from it, I will feel very happy. After all, you have been living in false information...
1
@abhijitguha5835 There are more than 100 replies and comments here. How many have you read?
1
@biondisubbaiah Throughout Indian history, no so-called "war" lasted more than 18 months. The most "tragic" war had 250,000 casualties. This is what Indians themselves think of as war. These are not wars.
1
@biondisubbaiah There are more than 100 replies and comments here. How many have you read?
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Sorry, I didn't know there was a conflict between China and India in 2019. As for Doklam, I heard about it, but I didn't pay attention to it.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 2020 conflict, why did China delay releasing information? I can answer you.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Because we (China and India) have different strategic heights.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 First, in order to maintain the overall situation of the relations between the two countries and the two militaries and promote the cooling and easing of the situation, China has maintained a high degree of restraint, which reflects China's magnanimity as a responsible major country. Our army lost 4 people and seriously injured 1 person, but the Indian army died 20 people, with a total of more than 100 people injured and seriously injured, and 10 Indian soldiers were captured. The total number of casualties is thirty times ours. Such a heavy loss, if announced immediately at the time, would inevitably cause a fierce backlash in Indian public opinion. You should all remember that when the Kalwan Valley conflict was exposed, the national mood in India was almost out of control.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 If China had announced the casualty figures at that time, the thirty-fold difference in the war loss ratio would definitely make the Indians lose their minds, and your Prime Minister would have to bite the bullet and go to war with China, and the beneficiary would be the United States. After the Sino-Indian border confrontation, the United States began various operations to try its best to win over India to confront China. Once a hot war breaks out between China and India, the US President (T) will definitely take advantage of the issue: On the one hand, he can take the opportunity to reap political capital and pave the way for the general election, and may even be re-elected; On the other hand, he can use local wars to slow down China's recovery from the epidemic. Therefore, the United States is undoubtedly the biggest winner in the Sino-Indian struggle. Therefore, we have been highly restrained and have been trying our best to endure it, which is also a last resort.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 In China, even ordinary Chinese can guess why the news was released late. But in India? The analysis of so-called Indian experts is nonsense. The gap between China and India is too big.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 China is not like India. We do not allow rumors to exist, especially on major issues. It is cruel and heartbreaking to talk about the casualties of both sides. I remember that China announced that four PLA soldiers died heroically. But the number of casualties of the PLA announced by the Indian media is several times or even dozens of times this number. I just hope that Indians with a little bit of rationality will believe that the reports of the Indian media are exaggerated. Putting aside the casualties of both sides. Let's look at the prisoners. No one of the Chinese People's Liberation Army was captured by the Indian army. But many Indian soldiers were captured by the Chinese People's Liberation Army, including two Indian officers. It is clear who is stronger and who is weaker between the Chinese and Indian armies. If you use your brain, you will know that if the Indian army caused heavy casualties to the PLA, would our PLA let the Indian prisoners return to India alive? No, we will hand over the bodies of the Indian soldiers to the Indian government. This once again proves that ordinary Indians have been living in false information. In 1962, if India had a little understanding of the Chinese people and the combat effectiveness of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, it would not be shocked when India failed.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Respect for the military?
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Is China's delay in publishing the list of PLA soldiers who died in the 2020 Sino-Indian conflict disrespectful to the soldiers? This view once again proves the narrowness of your understanding of the incident.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 I want to emphasize to you again and again that the founding of New China was built on the basis of blood and fire. The respect that Chinese people have for Chinese soldiers is beyond your imagination, and the love that Chinese people have for soldiers is proved with their lives.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Allow me to give you an example…
1
@sumeettanwar1608 In November 1942, the Japanese army carried out a "net-sweeping" campaign against the Jiaodong Anti-Japanese Base Area. One of the anti-Japanese soldiers hid in the village with a mission to deliver important intelligence. The villagers moved him to the mountains to hide. The Japanese army surrounded the entire village and gathered all the villagers.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 They tried to force the villagers to hand over the anti-Japanese soldiers. Otherwise, they would give them a chance every three minutes, 10 people at a time. Starting with the youngest child, there were more than 400 people in the village, and no one was left alive. Moreover, in order to save bullets, they used knives throughout the process. No villagers leaked any information to the Japanese army.
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Why is the Chinese flag red? The history of a country determines the character of the country and its people. The respect and care that Chinese people have for soldiers is beyond your imagination. When we Chinese were still children and could not read, we already understood the weight of the word "soldier".
1
@sumeettanwar1608 My...
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Short video...
1
@sumeettanwar1608 mine……
1
@sumeettanwar1608 You go watch...
1
@sumeettanwar1608 我的空间
1
@sumeettanwar1608 Now, let’s talk about 2020
1

Previous
14
Next
...
All