Comments by "Ming Muyiyang" (@mingmuyiyang8615) on "India’s Hypersonic Missile: A Punch in China’s Face" video.

@rajdeeproy9741 Western perspective: Battle of Shangganling. The United States deployed 10 infantry regiments and 2 battalions, 1 airborne regiment, 1 training division, and 4 new recruits' regiments, totaling 62000 personnel, consuming 19 million rounds of bombs and 2.3 million aerial bombs. The total death toll of the Chinese army in the entire campaign was 7100, with 8500 people injured or disabled; 11300 American soldiers died and 13600 were injured. The casualty ratio is 1:1.6. In a narrow area of only 2700 meters long and 1000 meters wide, more than 100000 people from both sides fought fiercely. In 42 days, a total of 40600 soldiers fell on this 2.7 square kilometer land, in the Battle of Shangganling Meat Grinder!
2
The history of India is the history of conquest. India was first conquered by the Aryans, who established many states in northern India, while the indigenous Indians were forced to live in the southern region. Since then, they have been conquered by Persia, Macedonia, Bactrian Greeks, Sakas, Parthians, Yuezhi, White Huns, and Turks. If Macedonia and Persia are too powerful, Yuezhi and Turks are ethnic groups that were driven away by ancient Chinese dynasties. They are not numerous, but they have established powerful empires on Indian soil. Yuezhi established the Kushan Empire, Turks established the Mughal Empire, and the last empire established by Indians was the Gupta Dynasty from 320 AD to 540 AD. The Maurya Dynasty did not unify the Indian continent either. Contemporary India was formed in 1947 by a combination of 500 princely states. How can such a country be compared with China?
1
The great man Marx's evaluation of India's history made me see things clearly. -----India is not one of the ancient civilizations, nor does it have its own complete history. On July 22, 1853, the great revolutionary mentor Marx published "The Future Results of British Rule in India" in Britain, in which he wrote: "If the entire history of India is really history, India is actually a history of being conquered by foreign nations and foreign countries again and again. India itself has no history, or India has no history known to the world. And we are just looking at the history of one invader after another. India is a country built on this endless negative foundation, and such a country is doomed to have no future."
1
I hope Indians will read it carefully and experience it with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India is destined to be the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of the two countries and you will understand. India was colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined greatly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India took the opportunity to gain independence through "non-violent non-cooperation". In other words, India's independence has not experienced the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country has no cohesion and willpower, and no national identity.
1
@SubhamNayak-c5g 1967: After the conflict ended, the four-day "67 conflict" soon caused controversy in India because India failed again this time. However, in order to appease the Indian people, the Indian government actually beautified this conflict into a "great victory", exaggerated the number of Chinese casualties, and promoted it domestically. Because the Chinese side did not enter the Indian territory near New Delhi this time, the Indians did not know how the battle was fought, so they believed the government's lies. Anyway, the Congress Party achieved its goal of using the conflict to strengthen its position. Behind the scenes, the Indian army has since become more aware of the depth of China's strength. In the 20 years since this time, the Indian army has never taken the initiative to provoke on a large scale on the border again.
1