Comments by "Ming Muyiyang" (@mingmuyiyang8615) on "XI Backs Down, Compromising With India; Territory Ceded Equals 2.5 Times Taiwan’s Size?" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hyper-pronab In 1962, the Chinese army, with its powerful military strength, almost completely annihilated three brigades of the Indian Army, and also frustrated the 5th Brigade, the 67th Brigade, the 114th Brigade, and the 129th Brigade. Among them, the casualties of the 62nd Brigade of the Indian Army were 4,885, including 1,383 deaths, 1,696 missing, 1,122 captured, and 684 captured. 80% of the 62nd Brigade of the Indian Army were Sikhs.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 From 1931 to 1945, China was extremely short of weapons and had to set up a "machete team". The popular war song in China at that time, with the lyrics "There are no guns, no cannons, the enemy makes them for us", is a true portrayal of the hardships of China at that time. The tenacious will of the Chinese soldiers never backed down. The Chinese soldiers used cold weapons to fight against the machine guns and cannons of the Japanese army, and used machetes to seize various weapons from the Japanese army. Often more than ten people were sacrificed to seize a machine gun. The difficulties in China at that time were ten times more difficult than those in Palestine today. Remembering history, being grateful to ancestors, and revitalizing China, the Chinese spirit completely defeated the Bushido spirit of Japan, forcing Japan to use the "high-tech weapons" of the time - biological weapons and chemical weapons - without scruples on the battlefield.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 What is a real war? The "Battle of Shanghai" took place from August 13, 1937 to November 26, 1937. China had 180 aircraft, 40 tanks, and 0 warships. The Japanese army had 500 aircraft, 300 tanks, and 130 warships. The Battle of Shanghai (also known as the Battle of August 13, the Second Battle of Shanghai, and the Second Shanghai Incident in Japan) was the first large-scale battle between China and Japan in the War of Resistance against Japan, and it was also the largest and most brutal battle in the entire Sino-Japanese War.
In the Battle of Shanghai, a total of about 1 million troops from China and Japan were involved in the battle. The battle itself lasted for three months. The Japanese army deployed 9 divisions and 220,000 troops, with more than 90,000 casualties; the Chinese army deployed 73 divisions and more than 700,000 troops, with more than 250,000 casualties.
The Battle of Shanghai forced the Japanese army to shift its strategic main attack direction and shattered Japan's plan to "destroy China in three months."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If China had announced the casualty figures at that time, the thirty-fold difference in the war loss ratio would definitely make the Indians lose their minds, and your prime minister would have to bite the bullet and go to war with China, and the beneficiary would be the United States.
After the Sino-Indian border confrontation, the United States began various operations to try its best to win over India to confront China. Once a hot war broke out between China and India, the then US President (T) would definitely take advantage of the issue:
On the one hand, he would take the opportunity to reap political capital and pave the way for the election, and he might even be re-elected;
On the other hand, he could use local wars to slow down China's recovery from the epidemic.
Therefore, the United States is undoubtedly the biggest winner in the Sino-Indian struggle. Therefore, we have been highly restrained and have been trying our best to endure it, which is also a last resort.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 I hope Indians will read it carefully and experience it with their hearts. The huge difference in the founding of China and India is destined to be the biggest difference between India and China. Just look at the modern history of the two countries and you will understand. India was colonized by Britain for more than 200 years. In 1947, Britain experienced World War II, its strength declined greatly, and its status was replaced by the United States. India took the opportunity to gain independence through "non-violent non-cooperation". In other words, India's independence has not experienced the test of blood and fire. Such an independent country has no cohesion and willpower, and no national identity. Now let's talk about China. Since 1840, the Chinese people have been living in dire straits. Various disasters and wars have followed one after another. At that time, China was very poor and backward, and suffered all kinds of humiliation. Including the cession of Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan became a Japanese colony, the burning of the Old Summer Palace by the Eight-Power Allied Forces, and the subsequent comprehensive and brutal invasion of China by Japan. In 1931, Japan launched a full-scale invasion war against China. From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese army and civilians rose up to resist, fought bloody battles for 14 years, and suffered 30 million casualties, but finally won. Do you know why China suffered so many casualties? There are hundreds of reasons. I will only give an example of one phenomenon: when the Chinese troops encountered the Japanese army, it was often the case that if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war was 100, the Chinese soldiers only had 20 to 30 guns. The remaining soldiers would not give up resistance or surrender. They used machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks to bravely fight against the machine guns and cannons in the hands of the Japanese army until they died. This spirit of facing death and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen to India? For India, it is zero casualties, because India's knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 From 1931 to 1945, the war lasted for 14 years. The Chinese army and civilians rose up to resist, fought bloody battles for 14 years, and suffered 30 million casualties, but finally won. Do you know why China's casualties were so high? There are hundreds of reasons. I will only give an example of one phenomenon: when the Chinese troops encountered the Japanese army, it was often the case that if the number of Chinese soldiers participating in the war was 100, the Chinese soldiers only had 20 to 30 guns. The remaining soldiers would not give up resistance or surrender. They used machetes, steel forks, and wooden sticks to bravely fight against the machine guns and cannons in the hands of the Japanese army until they died. This spirit of seeing death as home and never retreating is the Chinese spirit. 30 million casualties! Do you think this can happen in India? For India, it is zero casualties, because India's knees are soft. India will soon give up resistance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 From 1945 to 1949, the Chinese Civil War, the Kuomintang fled to Taiwan. Originally, the Chinese people thought they could live a long-awaited peaceful life, but in 1950, the Korean War broke out and lasted for three years. The Chinese People's Volunteer Army successfully resisted the US route to the north without air superiority, sea superiority, backward army equipment, and extremely poor logistics, but our price was the loss of hundreds of thousands of brave PLA soldiers. In 1962, in the eyes of us Chinese, it was not a war at all. First of all, the time was only 32 days, and secondly, from 1959 to 1961, China experienced the most difficult three years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, and many people starved to death in China during these three years. In 1962, India's economy far exceeded that of China. The United States, the Soviet Union, and Britain all supported India. At that time, India implemented the "Forward Policy" and attacked China with elite troops. We Chinese really don't want to fight. The Chinese troops that fought with India in 1962 were ordinary border defense troops, not regular PLA.
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 In China, soldiers are called "the cutest people". There is a Chinese proverb: Without a country, there is no home. Soldiers are the backbone of the country. Thanks to our brave People's Liberation Army soldiers, who are always ready to defend the borders of the motherland. No matter how India's military develops, it will never surpass China. Whether in the past, present or future, China can always defeat India. This is determined by the history and culture of the two countries. The Chinese people pay attention to the spirit of dedication and sacrifice. Do not surrender, do not yield, fight to the death, and see death as home on the battlefield. It is a huge shame for Chinese soldiers to surrender on the battlefield. The spirit of dying rather than surrendering is deeply engraved in the bones of every Chinese. These are what Indians do not have. Therefore, even now or in the future, India will never be able to defeat China. Now, do you think India can stand in the world like China? Absolutely not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 The history of India is the history of the conquest. India was first conquered by the Aryans and established many states in northern India, while Aboriginal people were forced to live in the southern region. Since then, they have been successively conquered by Persia, Macedonia, Great Xia Greeks, the Sai people, the Anxiites, the Dayue people, the White Huns, and the Turks. If Macedonia and Persia are too strong, Da Yuezhi and Turks are people who were beaten by ancient Chinese dynasties. They are not large, but they have established a powerful empire on Indian land. Da Yuezhi established the Guishuang Empire, the Turks established the Mughal Empire, and the last empire established by the Indians was the Gupta dynasty from 320 AD to 540 AD. The Peacock Dynasty also did not unify the Indian continent. Contemporary India was composed of 500 princes in 1947. How can such a country be compared with China?
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 Small summary: India has no history and India's independence by begging for Britain, which is doomed that Indians have no cohesion, willpower and no people. The sense of clan identity (India has continued various terrorist attacks since 1947, various bloody religious conflicts, and various bloody ethnic conflicts are proofs). And the army established by countries like India is destined to have no combat effectiveness. In contrast, China, the history of China and the establishment of New China are doomed to the cohesion, willpower, and national identity of the Chinese people. These three elements give the Chinese People's Liberation Army a selfless dedication spirit, self-sacrifice spirit, and a fearless spirit to complete the task. These three spirits make the soldiers of the Chinese People's Liberation Army have the will of steel, and shaping the unparalleled and powerful combat effectiveness of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. And all this is something India will never have.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 We Chinese believe that the only criterion for judging whether a government is qualified is whether it always puts the interests of the people first. In China, all children study in school, and there is no child who is out of school. In China, women are respected and women are "half the sky". In China, everyone is equal, and everyone has the opportunity to be promoted through their own efforts. In contrast, India is politically chaotic and turbulent, with many social contradictions, extremely poor public security, prevalent terrorism, and a very low status for women. Groups of out-of-school children are begging on the streets. India's hunger index ranks at the bottom of the world. Because of the oppression of the caste system, India has lost countless talents. India's freedom and democracy are just a facade. It is a tool for high Indians to rule low Indians. China completely surpasses India in all aspects, whether it is politics, economy, education, science and technology, environmental sanitation, military, sports, people's quality, and everything else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fadzilhashim.0910 We Chinese believe that the only criterion for judging whether a government is qualified is whether it always puts the interests of the people first. In China, all children study in school, and there is no child who is out of school. In China, women are respected and women are "half the sky". In China, everyone is equal, and everyone has the opportunity to be promoted through their own efforts. In contrast, India is politically chaotic and turbulent, with many social contradictions, extremely poor public security, prevalent terrorism, and a very low status for women. Groups of out-of-school children are begging on the streets. India's hunger index ranks at the bottom of the world. Because of the oppression of the caste system, India has lost countless talents. India's freedom and democracy are just a facade. It is a tool for high Indians to rule low Indians. China completely surpasses India in all aspects, whether it is politics, economy, education, science and technology, environmental sanitation, military, sports, people's quality, and so on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@God-is-my-protector Since the Yuan Dynasty, the central government has always exercised effective jurisdiction over Xizang. The Tibetan people are an important member of the big family of the Chinese nation. Xizang was called "Tubo" in the Tang and Song Dynasties, "Uszang" in the Yuan and Ming Dynasties, and "Tanggute" and "Tubot" in the Qing Dynasty. It has been called "Xizang" since the reign of Kangxi in the Qing Dynasty. On May 23, 1951, Xizang was peacefully liberated. On September 9, 1965, the Xizang Autonomous Region was officially established. On December 23, 2019, absolute poverty was basically eliminated in Xizang, and the whole region was lifted out of poverty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1