Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Is the Shroud of Turin Real?" video.

When did the shroud first appear in public. When was the height of fake religious artefacts. What is the estimated age of the shroud. Everybody knows it’s a fake.
3
@beverlyhurd8556 No literally everyone on the planet knows its a fake. I mean Christianity can't even prove beyond reasonable doubt a historical jesus character even existed let alone some fake religious relic from a time the Catholic hierarchy was freaking out because every other church claimed to have a piece of the cross and an audit found there was enough wood for 100 crosses. Give me a break.
3
@beverlyhurd8556 Straight to the strawman argument. I never said he was a myth only there is little evidence he existed. Certainly no physical evidence. Cite the scientific paper that proves the shroud is real. I cite the 1988 radio carbon dating study that confirms its origin in the Middle Ages and despite attempts has never been debunked. Your reply is illogical fallacious nonsense. I have absolutely no need for any belief in a Christian god.
3
@beverlyhurd8556 I was going to ignore it but you argument is so absurd I can’t help myself. To seriously argue that because someone has been written about they must have existed I cite the case of the millions of books printed about a certain fella named Harry Potter, now he must be real for sure. See how ludicrously stupid that argument is.
3
@beverlyhurd8556 Rogers disproved nothing. The sample of the shroud that was taken was explicitly taken away from any stitching or patching and was completely destroyed. Rogers 2005 article has been throughly and completely debunked. He was totally unable to explain the DNA evidence or the weave of the cloth. Rogers attempt to defend the shroud completely failed on every level. Harry Potter though is real I read the book.
2