Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "We Need To Talk About This New Evidence For The Shroud of Turin" video.

It is a 14th century forgery at a time when forgeries of religious artefacts was common. There is no historical evidence of it existing before the 14th century. It uses a weave common for the 14th century and has been dated by three independent teams as 14 th century. Job done, move on. Three independent universities all concluded after testing the cloth that the Shroud dates to the 14th century CE. The methods they used are widely accepted in the scientific community. The process to create the weave wasn't even invented until the 5th century CE. There is no historical evidence whatsoever of the shrouds existence prior to its first historical claims by a priest that it is a forgery in the 14th century. Not a single claim by jeffreyerwin3665 is true.
2
Universally accepted radiocarbon dating by three independent universities has determined the date of the cloth to be 14th century. The process to create the weave used in the cloth wasn’t invented till the 6th century. There is no repeat no historical evidence of the Shroud of Turin existing before the 14th century. Jeffreyerwin3665 is factually incorrect in his entire claim.
2
@jeffreyerwin3665 You are just factually wrong. Radiocarbon dating is virtually universally accepted as an accurate measure of dating organic material by the scientific world. You are just wrong about your claim. There is no historical evidence whatsoever of the Shroud of Turin prior to the 14th century, and the first writings about it declare it to be a forgery. The process used to create the weave of the shroud were not invented till 500 years after the alleged death of the Jesus character. Again you are just factually wrong.
1