Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "‘Yes’ campaign launches ‘patently untrue’ advertisement: Liz Storer" video.

Lizzie argument is complete nonsense. Not a true word came out of her mouth
2
@daniellebcooper7160 nope it was originally written specifically to exclude indigenous people. That’s what section 51(xxvi) the race power was. Yes the 67 referendum allowed a amendment, but the idea our constitution was written for all Australians is ludicrously stupid. Section 51(xxvi) was in Edmund Barton’s own words required so as to allow the Commonwealth to “regulate the affairs of the people of coloured or inferior races who are in the Commonwealth “ That our first PM was clearly a racist is obvious. You are factually wrong.
2
@daniellebcooper7160 No it doesn’t and I provided clear and demonstrative proof it doesn’t. So lacking in indigenous recognition that the conservative government of John Howard acknowledged this as fact and attempted to have a preamble inserted into the constitution. Just mindlessly saying the constitution covers all Australians means nothing. Prove it. Provide the reference or cite the section of the constitution that recognises Aboriginals. I’m waiting.
1
@daniellebcooper7160 Not real good at argumentation are you. I have provided two pieces of evidence it doesn't and a quote by our first PM as further proof it was explicitly written to not recognise indigenous people. You have provided no evidence and merely attempted to shift the burden of proof. I provided evidence for my claims you have provided shit.
1
@PJRayment Yes I have dealt with your racist diatribes on many occasions. On numerous occasions I have cited the explicit racist language and attitude of our constitution writers. Section 127 explicitly made native aboriginals non citizens, denied many voting rights and was explicitly racist. The racist constitution enabled the 1901 immigration restriction act. Legislation that was explicitly racist. It was called the white Australia policy. Just the most minor understanding of our colonial history, the language of our political leaders in Hansard and the notes of our federation debates all show clearly the racist nature of many of our leaders. You are a racist grub who because of your Christian fundamentalist creationist beliefs wish to deny reality. F#$K OFF.
1
the Constitution as finally adopted contained a clear power for the Commonwealth Parliament to legislate in a manner that discriminated on the basis of race, both as to immigrants coming into Australia, as well as to people (whether British subjects or otherwise) of a particular race already in Australia. There was an expectation that the new Commonwealth would use these wide powers to implement the ‘White Australia’ policy, which it proceeded to do. That Constitution contained, and still contains, a direct constitutional requirement to discriminate on the basis of race in certain voting matters. There was no contrary constitutional limitation in the nature of an equal protection clause or a non-discrimination clause on the basis of race or the like, either at the Commonwealth or the State level. And the Constitution left Aboriginal people entirely under the control of the States and their Parliaments, with freedom to enact State laws that discriminated against them or otherwise. A number of discriminatory laws on the basis of Aboriginal race were thereafter enacted by the States, followed later, when the Northern Territory became a territory of the Commonwealth in 1911, by similar Territory laws. Such a summary must, it is submitted, lead to the conclusion that the Constitution was designed to promote a race-based legal and social system in Australia.
1
@PJRayment @$&# OFF you ignorant racist lowlife grub
1
How many species of humans do you think currently exist?
1
@jackturpin7828 Nice avoidance with a gobblegook answer of the highest order.
1
@jackturpin7828 There is no distinct aboriginal genome, it doesn’t exist. Genealogy, identification, and acceptance is what is required legally to be classed as an indigenous Australian and an original inhabitant of the land. It has literally nothing to do with race.
1
@jackturpin7828 Yeah Nah, I have, it doesn't exsist.
1
@jackturpin7828 You made the false claim pulling an obvious lie out of your lower colon. Your burden of proof. I can’t provide evidence of something that only exists in your mind.
1
@PJRayment yes the concept of race has been around for a long time, but it is a social construct. There is only one species of humans existing. There were others in the past and yes we intermingled throughout our shared evolution with Neanderthals and Denisovans. So what?
1
@PJRayment Jack is mistaking the different bits and pieces of DNA of the different genealogy of our ancestors depending on who intermingled and how much with Neanderthal and Denisovans. For instance Aboriginals have more Denisovans in them than me. I have more Neanderthal. It means shit we are both homo sapien. We have significantly different cultural backgrounds I’ll grant you that, but that’s about it.
1
@PJRayment I have no idea why you bothered to respond with your ignorant racist claptrap. F$&K OFF.
1