Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Morrison asked if he will apologise for 'mistakes made' as PM" video.

@grannyannie6744 Isn’t that a little bit extreme?
2
@merciajean6959 Just to clear for me, which crime or crimes are you claiming he has committed, because you will have to provide the evidence he raped somebody or ordered the forced abortion of anyone, and I’m not sure he enslaved or murdered anyone, unless of course you have the evidence.
2
@waznik1 That's better. Yes NDIS does fund medical aids like a wheelchair or as you said equipment for the visually impaired. My daughter receives NDIS assistance and I can be a narky when I read incorrect information about it. Thankyou for your quick and honest reply.
2
Technically speaking nowhere in our constitution is freedom of health or freedom of speech mentioned or granted as a right. Freedom of religion is specifically mentioned as a right, however during the pandemic and the controls placed on us at what stage do you feel your freedom of religion rights were taken away, other than obviously for periods of time we weren’t allowed to gather in large groups, and religious organisations were given some exceptions to these.
2
@alexs7671 There is no specific right to human sovereignty under English common law and Australia has no Bill of rights so you are just factually wrong. If you are appealing to some other authority you will have to be more specific. As well under English common law employers are allowed to place conditions on employment and businesses conditions on who they provide services to. This has all been decided by our courts. What don't you "get" ?
2
We have not implicit right to free speech or privacy in our constitution. He took nothing away.
2
That’s funny. When you search for “idiot” Donald Trump pops up.
1
@brentcook2261 Well I won't be pissing in your ear if your brain is on fire as clearly what ever is on fire it wasn't a brain. It was obviously a joke. The two couldn't be further apart.
1
@grannyannie6744 Provide evidence for your accusation.
1
@merciajean6959 You don't have a clue what a crime against humanity is do you. You are just parroting something you saw on tik tok or something some vapid influencer peddled you on instagram or a friend on Facebook. Your comment is utterly worthless and vacuous. If only you could back it up with the tiniest crum of fact.
1
@Jaxi A Too be fair you did state he had made upwards of $50 million and again to be fair you should atleast provide some reference to your claim as I too have researched your claim and can find nothing. I'm not saying it doesn't exist just I can't find it.
1
@Jaxi A I'm sorry but you have made a fool of yourself. Your information about Scott Morrison's personal wealth comes from a fake story about him being the CFO of Ball investments. You have been totally hoodwinked. Scott Morrison had a career in Marketing as policy and research with the property council of Australia and then ending with Tourism Australia before moving into politics. It is you who really needs to do thier research properly. I'm a little bit embarrassed for you.
1
@Jaxi A So now I have checked his parliamentary declaration certificate and he has a superannuation account, a Commbank account, a mortgage account for his Dolan ave home, and a dormant family trust. He has been a salaried worker his entire life with an estimated net wealth of between $1 to $5 million. You can access this information on the register of members interest- 46th parliament. Once again please provide your reference to your information or I can only assume it is something in your imagination.
1
@darrenhill2326 Jaxi A and Mercia Jean went suddenly very quiet, once they were called on to provide evidence.
1
That is factually incorrect, the NDIS do not pay medical bills. Disability pensioners either use the public system of pay for private health insurance. Be very careful how you respond as I have a detailed knowledge of this subject. Just admit you were wrong.
1
You do understand that our constitution states we are a federation, not a centralised republic
1
@blairdenholm4167 Fair enough, but if he overstepped then the High court would set aside any unconstitutional legislation. He would have received advice from the AG about what he could get away with. Is there something specific you think he should have done. Speaking harshly to Premiers will only get you so far.
1
Bob Shingles Your not actually advocating for violent action to be taken against an individual on a semi public forum are you?
1
Bob Shingles Just to be clear you do understand that the Victorian people will have the chance at the next state election in the voting booth to effect any change. That's how we decide the fate of our politicians.
1
Bob Shingles And that's why we had a gun buy back and firearm restrictions, just to make sure nutjobs didn't have access to them. The use of the word "tyrant" in a state that has a fixed term and free elections is illogical and nonsensical, and I am by no means a Dan Andrews fan or defend his record.
1
Bob Shingles That's it , that's the best you got. Jeez well I'm off to surrender and bow down to the alter of democracy
1
@grannyannie6744 Did you just pray for someone’s death? or what do you think is meant by the ultimate price?
1
@grannyannie6744 Oh in that case OK. If that's all I'm fine with that, my concern was you were advocating for something in the real world.
1
@grannyannie6744 just on a side note are their any particular crimes against humanity he should be convicted of or do you mean the lot?
1
@grannyannie6744 There are 12 specific crimes relating to crimes against humanity or as I suspect you are talking without any real knowledge of the subject?
1
@grannyannie6744 You have made the claim he has committed murder on a semi public platform, provide the explicit evidence of this outrageous accusation. If I was the PM I would be seeking your details to take action for slander.
1
@grannyannie6744 As I thought an immediate backdown. Provide the explicit evidence of the PM direct involvement in a single death. That is put up or shut up. You said crimes against humanity back that claim up. Being in government and making decisions always carries the risk of death and injury. You simply haven't got a clue what you're talking about. Your opinion is worthless.
1
@grannyannie6744 Right, so now I know what you're on about. It was your extremist language that got the better of you. I am not in any way going to defend the performance of the LNP government or the PM. If for instance you had merely stated the government needed to held accountable at the polls at the next Federal election then I wouldn't have blinked an eye. I have no problem with the call for a Royal Commission into the handling of the Covid response by all governments state and federal. You're however lacking a understanding of our Constitution. It is perfectly legal to institute a health order and for businesses and states to order mandates, this has already been to the High court, they can. There is nothing in the 1689 English bill of rights that prevents health orders or mandates and there is nothing in our constitution either. If you think there is then quote the clause and paragraph, otherwise stop making things up. I totally agree with you some people are furious, then take that fury to the ballot box. You are also incorrect about crimes committed during WWII both Germans and Japanese leaders were trialed and convicted under then current legislation regarding crimes against humanity. Attempting to draw parallels with Nazis to decisions made by Greg Hunt is ridiculously extremist and invalididates some of your legitimate concerns. Stop bringing Nazis and crimes against humanity it makes you sound like a nutjob.
1
@grannyannie6744 Yes it is annoying when that happens. I never get abusive and yet stuff I write just vanishes. You have to understand this isn't really a public forum and the private owners can pretty much do what they want.
1
Point to note Grannie Annie was unable to support a single claim and backed down.
1
@heidijoyce6601 I will address your reply point by point. There is no provision for Human rights under our constitution. We have no Bill of rights. Your comment in this regard is invalid. This is something in your imagination. No religious freedom was taken away. Perfectly legal health orders were put in place. The courts ruled on this. Again this is something you have made up in your imagination. The requirement for vaccination certificates was a decision taken by individual religious organisations to attend their places of worship. This again is something you have made up in your imagination. For a time Bunnings to was preventing customers who could not provide vaccination certificates which they were perfectly legally able to do. The courts ruled on this as well. I see no evidence of segregation and unrest other than a requirement for some people to isolate during quarantine or infection which again is perfectly legal under health orders once again confirmed by the courts. See all your concerns completely eased, you can now move on with your life.
1
@grannyannie6744 Quote specifically the clause and paragraph in the constitution relating to mandating experimental medical procedures including vaccines. The vaccines used in Australia have all been passed by the TGA. The idea they are still experimental is in your imagination. Religious exceptions were granted in Australia, this again is something you have made up in your imagination. There is no specific right of political communication in the Australian constitution. You have made this up otherwise quote the clause and paragraph. Quote one freedom under the 1689 English bill of rights that has been denied to you
1
When he reaches that point he will realise that’s where everybody else has been, and he may then show some empathy for everyone else
1
I think the expression is “piss in his ear if his brain was on fire”
1
Once you use Nazis in a discussion, you have tipped over into extreme ranting, but you do get your followers as evidenced.
1