Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Government ‘in bed’ with corporations to use climate change ‘to your detriment’" video.

@tonypepperoni3679 Ah the arrogance of the ruling elite RWNJs, it’s so refreshing to hear your honest opinion on the Australian public
6
Then vote them out!!!!
5
Good to see the shape shifting reptilian conspiracy theorists have joined the discussion.
2
No hyperbole there.
2
No hyperbolic language here, just reasoned discussion. NOT.
2
@grannyannie2948 The entirety of its system and structure. They are not even remotely the same. It’s like saying a football is the same as a cricket ball because they are both round. It’s true, but nonsensical.
2
@grannyannie2948 fascism, a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government. Socialism is an economic and political system in which the workers or the government own the buildings and tools that make goods and services like farms and factories. This can be achieved through decentralized and direct worker-ownership, or through centralized state-ownership of the means of production
2
@dfor50 Well I'll wait for the coward to respond himself, but yes you are spot on.
2
Yeah right, blame a possum getting fried in the local sub station on energy policy.
2
@chris muir Keep up with the lingo, for many years now someone who denies anthropogenic climate change has been described as a climate change denier. Nobody denies the climate changes that has been proven beyond reasonable doubt.
2
@stevelozevski8151 Ah the old WEF conspiracy theory. Tell me which political party isn't under the grasp of the evil globalist Klaus? Keep it pithy.
1
@johngeier8692 Ridiculous. What happens is our economic system is prone to cycles, nothing more or less. All you have provided is unsubstantiated opinion and then a ludicrously wild statement of unbelievable arrogance that only people who agree with your opinion should be allowed to vote.
1
So annual concrete production is about 4 billion tonnes why would anyone be worried about a couple of million poured onto the seabed?
1
@brianterence3211 I have no issues with that, my point was to the idiotic suggestion that wind turbines are more of a polluting factor than the concrete used in building fossil fuel infrastructure and the subsequent CO2 emissions. You need to read between the lines of these anthropogenic climate change denying dimwits.
1
@stevelozevski8151 Global average sea level rise in the last 140 years has been 21-24 cm, with half that in the last 30 years. The projected rise by 2100 is another 1.3 metres. This personally won’t effect me directly but rising sea levels will directly effect geopolitics.
1
@stevelozevski8151 Please cite for me the scientific paper that suggested coast lines would be flooded by 2012. Also provide the scientific paper that predicted an ice age. Hint you can’t. The overwhelming scientific opinion since the late 60s has been one of global warming. A Time magazine article in the 70s declared an Ice Age but surely you wouldn’t be stupid enough to believe that.
1
@stevelozevski8151 Well in words you can understand, because it has been observed. It is fine to be sceptical but in your case your mind seems to be so open parts of your brain have leaked out.
1
@stevelozevski8151 On a side note what you are asking for is an anecdotal opinion which is just fallacious nonsense. I'm not a climate scientist and suggesting I personally prove the sea level has risen is an argument that is the height of idiotic nonsense, but you are particularly good at it.
1
@stevelozevski8151 I don’t need to prove anything it is not my claim. The overwhelming body of scientific evidence supports my comment. I have provided that scientific evidence by citing multiple references that prove the sea level has risen. You on the other hand have provided nothing but vacuous replies of “prove it”. It is the equivalent of a child not liking to be told something and stamping its feet in ignorant defiance. Once again though you are entertaining.
1
@stevelozevski8151 No you are the poster boy for ignorance. The sheer stupidity in suggesting because I haven’t personally taken the measurements is ludicrous. This is because experiments are not required to measure and observe sea levels. Your illogical argument is a anecdotal fallacy. It is sheer idiocy. It’s like asking someone to prove Alice Springs exists because I’ve never been there. Seriously you are hilariously funny. Your entire argument is based on personal experience.
1
@stevelozevski8151 on a side note it is not my claim it is the claim of the overwhelming scientific evidence. I’m not sure you quite understand argumentation. In fact I’m not sure you even exist. Can you prove you exist?
1
@stevelozevski8151 This simple extract from an article on global sea level proves my point. It is not my personal claim and the suggestion it was is further proof of your ignorance of the issue. I’m concerned you have no knowledge of the matter at all. Global average sea level has risen 8–9 inches (21–24 centimeters) since 1880. In 2021, global sea level set a new record high—97 mm (3.8 inches) above 1993 levels. The rate of global sea level rise is accelerating: it has more than doubled from 0.06 inches (1.4 millimeters) per year throughout most of the twentieth century to 0.14 inches (3.6 millimeters) per year from 2006–2015.
1
@stevelozevski8151 I have done exactly that by the dictionary meaning of the word "prove". If you are unable to read a scientific paper or understand a graph that's not my problem. I have also demonstrated the utter fallacious nature of your anecdotal argument.
1
@stevelozevski8151 I have. It’s just you are unable to understand it. Your new argument is literally one of ignorance. It to is a logical fallacy. You don’t understand the data or the evidence so it must not be true. You have so far racked up an anecdotal fallacy and an argument from ignorance fallacy in an attempt to deny scientific data. What else have you got? This is hysterical.
1
@chrismckell5353 Exactly. Fascist states were notorious for this. So HTF could you in all seriousness compare Nazi Germany of the late 30s with modern day Australian democracy. I mean would have to be a total dimwit.
1
@grannyannie2948 I completely fail to see the link between stakeholder capitalism which is merely the concept corporations consider more than just shareholder profits, which personally I don’t think is such a bad thing, and fascism. I see no conclusive data either that western capitalist economies are regressing to neo feudalism.
1
Can you explain exactly what “take out the culprits” means.
1
@tonypepperoni3679 Typical RWNJ snowflake, no sense of humour.
1
What mess everything is working fine. RWNJ snowflakes need to harden up and not be such doomsday pansies.
1