Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "‘How can anyone defend the horrific Hamas terror attack?’: Bernardi" video.

  1. Personally I think it is quite easy to distinguish between Hamas terrorists and Palestinians. A two state solution and being pro Palestinian doesn’t mean you agree with Hamas terrorism.
    18
  2.  @birgittavanblitterswijk6998  It is very easy to show support for Palestinians without having to agree universally with all their objectives. Nice try at a black and white fallacy. It is a shame you clearly had no intention of a serious discussion, all you did was spew fallacious nonsense.
    2
  3.  @ararune3734  That is an over simplification of the terms offered the Palestinians for independence.
    1
  4.  @Agent_Chieftain  Exactly the same comment can be said about the Israeli government.
    1
  5.  @TheMarijuanaTrench  Correlation and causation fallacy. You can vote for a government and not agree with all its actions.
    1
  6.  @JonsCardVault  Popularity doesn’t mean universal agreement.
    1
  7.  @WILDONE065  To a certain extent, however claiming a group responsible for certain individual actions is legally unsound.
    1
  8.  @calmmind3160  Thankyou for your most profound and particularly razor like monosyllabic reply. Your comment has provided much insight into a particularly troubling political issue.
    1
  9.  @rustshoo5068  And you don’t see any intimidation by the Israeli government?
    1
  10.  @sw.7519  That is an over simplification of the terms offered to the Palestinians for a two state solution.
    1
  11.  @WILDONE065  Actually you are factually wrong. Israel is a signatory to the Geneva Conventions. So yes by law it required to specifically make distinctions between civilians and terrorists. Your comment is fallacious nonsense.
    1
  12.  @sw.7519  You clearly can’t let go either. This is blatantly obvious from your reply. You made several bigoted/borderline racist statements. I haven’t got a clue what a mythical Jesus biblical character has to do in a conversation about modern Middle East politics either. Can you possibly stick to a factual statement. Thankyou.
    1
  13.  @WILDONE065  unfortunately you are just factually wrong again. Just a basic reading of history shows humans to be very co-operative in designing rules for our behaviour. Your suggestion that we abandon them flies in the face of 10000 years of human history. You even signed an agreement with YouTube to comment here.
    1
  14.  @Agent_Chieftain  You are confusing decisions and agreements with the Arab leagues, and decisions made by Jordan and Egypt to relinquish territories and then including your own biased opinion on what you think is good for Palestinians.
    1
  15.  @sw.7519  There is little if any evidence of an historical Jesus character ever existing so again I have no clue as to the relevance in this discussion. Individual poor behaviour can not be the basis for informed decision making. Your inability to distance your emotional response to support for abhorrent acts of terrorism is understandable, believing in a historical Jesus character, I can’t understand that.
    1