Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "‘Real damage to their reputation’: CSIRO release GenCost Report" video.

  1. Exactly what is the evidence for your unsubstantiated claim?
    2
  2. What is the evidence of your claim? Because as I see it you just don’t like the advice it has provided so in an unsubstantiated claim you suggest it has an agenda. Well it does have an agenda, it provides the government with independent scientific data, something you seem incapable of understanding.
    2
  3. The French nuclear is in debt to the tune of $83 billion. It is cheap because the government subsidies it.
    2
  4. Why, because you got a job there?
    1
  5.  @mickoz9389  The CEO is a molecular biologist and has only been in the job since September this year. Can you provide any evidence whatsoever of your claim he is an activist? Otherwise your comment is just nonsensical fallacious idiocy.
    1
  6. @jimlofts5433  WTF he is a white middle aged male with Anglo British heritage. I assume you were being sarcastic.
    1
  7.  @christinebell37  I’ll bet $ you haven’t even read the report. A formula is used to calculate LCOE. Now I understand you haven’t got a clue what LCOE is, but look it up and not only does the Gencost report from the CSIRO show renewables are significantly cheaper multiple other studies around the world show this as well. Try a little education.
    1
  8.  @superdavies5548  Thankyou for your most thoughtful and constructive response. Your detailed analysis really has confirmed for me the arguments supporting the independence of the CSIRO.
    1
  9. @superdavies5548  And again, your witheringly insightful argument is so convincing. You have forced me to have to change my mind. I have decided to renounce the scientific data and instead believe your unsubstantiated dimwit opinion. Congrats, you are just too clever for me.
    1
  10.  @superdavies5548  Such wise words, and can only assume you found them somewhere in the upper reaches of your digestive system where your head seems permanently stuck.
    1
  11. @guido1866  My most profound apologies for using polysyllabic words, so in my response to you I'll try and keep my comments down to one syllable so you can understand it. 31 countries currently run some Nuclear to generate electricity of those 31, 20 signed an agreement to triple their nuclear output. No new countries signed up to start a nuclear industry, although 118 countries did sign a pledge to triple the world's renewable energy. So your comment is factually incorrect. I suspect you are deliberately trying to misinform, but it could be just pure ignorance, hard to tell.
    1
  12.  @superdavies5548  I simply ask for evidence of a claim and all you are fixated on is the impudence of the request. Interesting.
    1
  13.  @superdavies5548  WTF are you talking about? My first comment was to ask for evidence of their claim.
    1
  14.  @superdavies5548  That’s right I asked for evidence of their claim, you couldn’t provide evidence your head was up your arse.
    1
  15.  @superdavies5548  Yes you are digging your head out of your arse, I get it.
    1
  16.  @saltyaussie7702  Could you please provide the details of the particular SMR that was built in 4 years. Thankyou.
    1