Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Wieambilla property could be turned into ‘permanent memorial’ for slain police officers" video.

Let’s count the conspiracy theory nutters who comment here.
4
@axle.australian.patriot No I just call them nutjobs, but they are amusing to engage with. You managed to keep a straight face when discussing with nutjob Elizabeth her unsubstantiated nutjob claims about who killed who. String them along for as long as you can.
1
So far I only count 16 out 178 of all the comments. Not too bad.
1
@axle.australian.patriot lighten up they are conspiracy nutjobs, its not as if you could have a fact based serious discussion with them.
1
@katb945 throw one at me and I’ll see
1
@axle.australian.patriot Nah I super conservative mainstream, I've got nothing to worry about. It couldn't get any better.
1
@d d Well on a serious note whoever the property is left to in the will. If there is no will, then I’m not sure of the legal term but it’s something like “intestate” then after a period of time those people who think they have a claim can apply to the courts for a share of the property. Whoever eventually is the owner may decide the don’t won’t to sell.
1
@cletusjnrthethird Nope no such thing exists otherwise provide a explicit reference.
1
@cletusjnrthethird About property law? I doubt it.
1
@cletusjnrthethird provide the specific reference and or evidence of a pipeline approval through the trains property.
1
@cletusjnrthethird That stat has already been debunked the data is incomplete as there is a time lag in collecting the data.
1
@cletusjnrthethird once again provide the evidence not a vague reference to nothing.
1
@cletusjnrthethird You dimwit. I just read the Ruby spur pipeline construction document. It is an underground pipeline with no forced or planned freehold property purchases and the land will be returned to the original state. It would have had nil effect on the trains property. But if your a conspiracy nutter then who the $*@# knows.
1
@cletusjnrthethird No it has been completely debunked. in September, the Australian Bureau of Statistics published provisional mortality data for the year to June 2022. It includes death counts which the ABS has compared to four-year historical averages (2017-19 and 2021) to provide an "initial indication" of whether deaths are tracking higher than expected. The results show that there were roughly 17 per cent (13,526) more deaths than the baseline average in the first six months of 2022. But on the question of whether that says anything about vaccine safety, the Australian Actuaries Institute's Karen Cutter told CheckMate: "The simple answer is no." She explained that the provisional data only provides counts for a handful of major causes of death, and "does not show anything at all that attributes death to vaccines or not". Tim Adair, a principal research fellow with Melbourne University's School of Population and Global Health, similarly said the numbers "don't shed any light" on vaccine-related deaths. And in a statement to CheckMate, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, which regulates vaccines in Australia, warned that despite a rise in deaths this year, it was "false and unscientific to automatically conclude that vaccines caused these deaths". "There is no credible evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines have contributed to excess deaths in Australia or overseas." According to the TGA's October 6 weekly vaccine safety report, only 14 deaths have been directly linked to COVID-19 vaccines in Australia, of which 13 occurred after one dose of Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca). As for the increase, the ABS makes clear that its provisional data "does not provide official estimates of excess mortality". Partly that's because it "does not take into account changes in population size and age-structures of that population, as well as expected improvements in mortality rates over time". Adjusting for this, the Actuaries Institute estimates that excess mortality in the first half of 2022 was closer to 13 per cent (11,200). Roughly half (5,620) of those deaths were "from" COVID-19, it found, meaning non-COVID excess deaths stood at roughly 6.5 per cent. Major contributors to the rise were dementia, cancer, ischaemic heart disease and cerebrovascular diseases. (There were also more deaths from other "unspecified diseases", though the institute notes that "this is a large 'catch-all' category" from which it is difficult to draw conclusions.) But the data does not point to vaccines as a culprit. As Ms Cutter noted, "the vast majority of the excess deaths were in people aged over 75, but we have a huge population over the age of 16 that has been vaccinated". "So, the age statistics would indicate that it's not vaccine-related, otherwise we'd be seeing a lot more excess deaths in younger people." More likely, she said, was that people were suffering strokes, heart attacks or other fatal conditions several months after recovering from COVID-19 — which was consistent with "multiple studies showing that COVID increases" such risks.
1
@cletusjnrthethird Senator Rennick, fairies, unicorns, and myocarditis have all been debunked as conspiracy nutjob theories.
1
@d d Good question, probably, but as per the film "The Castle" it has to be on just terms. The federal government can, I assume so can as state government but it has to be in the words of the constitution offer a just price.
1
Another conspiracy nutter bites the dust.
1
@cletusjnrthethird 64 million doses, 3100 possible claims, 79 confirmed vaccine injuries. You are the classic definition of a conspiracy nutter. Kerryn Phillips has publicly stated she is an absolute advocate for the Covid vaccines.
1
@cletusjnrthethird Of course a conspiracy theorist is going to accuse anyone of providing facts a liar. That’s there stock in trade. Your nonsense is even further made even more ludicrous by your lack of knowledge about the Covid vaccines. mRNA technology was discovered in the early 60s and developed in the 70s to be able to be delivered into the cells. The technology floundered a bit in the 90s until nanotechnology came along. So the technology was known and ready for use when Covid came along, you conspiracy theorist dimwit. Thanks though for pointing out my spelling error with Phelps surname and in that article she 100% supported the covid19 vaccine.
1
@cletusjnrthethird Since December 21 Services Australia has been running a vaccine claims scheme you dimwit. That’s where the data comes from. The sheer ignorance of your comments is mind boggling.
1