Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Former PM Scott Morrison facing censure motion" video.

That may be well and good in congress however a censure motion in the Australian federal parliament has absolutely no practical effect at all.
2
@ChantalsBackPain Yeah, a fair and accurate point.
2
Honestly you can’t even mock some of the idiotic drivel in the comments.
1
Which specific crime against humanity are you talking about?
1
@grannyannie2948 which specific crime against humanity are you talking about?
1
@grannyannie2948 What medical experiment?
1
@eb2505 For what purpose?
1
@grannyannie2948 All the health orders relating to covid19 in Australia were tested in the Supreme courts. All were found to be perfectly legal. You are factually and demonstratively wrong. No crimes against humanity were committed by any state or federal government during the covid19 pandemic. If you honestly think so engage a lawyer and take your case either through the courts here or to the Haige. Either way it doesn't matter as you will get laughed out of court. You wouldn't even find a lawyer crazy enough to support such a ludicrously stupid suggestion anyway.
1
@grannyannie2948 Brett Weinstein is a biologist. Is this where you normally get your legal advice?
1
@eb2505 Fine. Provide the evidence a single person in Australia was forced to take a vaccination shot. You can't because it didn't happen. People were encouraged and employers put conditions on employment. In certain industries you had to have a vaccination to remain employed, none of those conditions meant anyone was forced to get a vaccination. You are factually wrong.
1
@eb2505 The US has had mandatory vaccinations for atleast the last 50 years. So has the ADF. It is part of your employment contract.
1
@eb2505 The side effects of the mRNA vaccines are widely and well known. In fact they are common public knowledge. I haven't a clue what you ate talking about.
1
@samopalvampirenvonbutlegin8603 All animal trials and human trials were conducted before the vaccine were allowed for use and all side effects of these vaccines are public knowledge.
1
@eb2505 If that’s all you have in a alleged crimes against humanity case the definition of a word and the difference between coercion and forced, then go right ahead engage a law firm and see how far you get.
1
@samopalvampirenvonbutlegin8603 Take that to your law firm as see them choke on the laughter.
1
@eb2505 Once again all the cases against the health orders brought before Australian courts have failed miserably. There is no evidence, there is no case for, and there never will be. Your opinion is so far out there on the fringes it will never be taken seriously. It will just be mocked at and provide amusement for others. Sorry that is just the hard truth.
1
@grannyannie2948 Once again if all you have is the definition of a word, your opinion is so far out there on the fringes of society that nobody is taking it seriously, literally no one. Please provide the evidence of a single instance where a government in Australia be it state or federal is being charged with a crime against humanity, wait on make that anywhere in the world anyone has been charged with a crime against humanity for their response to the pandemic and has been convicted. Please just one.
1
@grannyannie2948 So when cornered you, and the obvious falsehood of your claims is exposed you allege our court system is corrupt. Typical.
1
@eb2505 It will never happen as no crime ever took place. There is no evidence of any crime.
1
@samopalvampirenvonbutlegin8603 Granny Annie did. You just claim they are incompetent. These are fringe opinions nobody takes seriously.
1
@eb2505 Seriously!!! Reiner Fuellmich is a known conspiracy theorist of the highest order. Canadian courts kicked his claims straight out of court. Laughed is more an accurate term. I’m sorry but you have just gone down the wild conspiracy theory rabbit hole, and I can’t follow you. Best we leave it there.
1
@eb2505 In the words of the Ontario Supreme Court “This brief is without merit, it is vexatious, misinformed and a waste of the courts time. All Reiners claims have been fully and completely debunked. He is a lawyer who has nil understanding or knowledge of medicine, immunology, and vaccines. He doesn’t even understand a PCR test is just a clinical tool to aid doctors. His nutjob claims have been proven to be just that. I’m not discounting your claims, but you will need some real evidence.
1
@eb2505 Both Kingston claims and Martins so called evidence have been throughly debunked. Kingston was an employee of Pfizer and left the company well before it’s vaccine was developed. She does not understand vaccine technology and provides no evidence of graphene oxide. It was a claim on a TV show that made its way onto social media and confirmed your bias against the mRNA vaccine. Martin was a part of the same miss information. Neither has produced a scientific paper to back up their scare campaigns. If all you have is social media posts from tictok, Facebook, and instagram im sorry but that not evidence.
1