Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Marcia Langton ‘embarrassed herself’ trying to ‘hose down’ her disaster comments" video.

Why? What evidence do you have for this claim?
1
@infidel202 Just interested as to why the original commentator thinks Langton should/could be a member and even then as per the her own recommendation any position on the Voice committee will be subject to a time limit. So I don’t really even understand any sort of point they are trying to make.
1
@infidel202 As per the reports /recommendations to the previous LNP the structure of the voice begins in the remote communities. This is highlighted in the reports. Have you even read them? The remote community representatives then report up to regional representatives who report to the final 24 representatives. Some of these positions will be elected and some appointed and all of this will have to be legislated and approved by parliament. All will have strict limits on how long appointments and positions are. You claim I’m a Chinese bot but you are the one with a complete lack of understanding about how our Federal government works. Are you Australian?
1
@infidel202 If you a truely serious about discussing this then first read this report. https://voice.gov.au/sites/default/files/resource/download/indigenous-voice-co-design-process-final-report_1.pdf
1
@johnnichol9412 If you are commenting seriously (which I doubt) then I assume you would have read the thread of the conversation and read as well the link I have provided to the Final report to government on the voice. It clearly lays out the suggestions for the voice structure. It is not my fault you are unable to comprehend it or understand how the process of Federal legislation works.
1
@raffisekzenian2746 you are obsessed with one person. Even if I grant you she may seek a position somewhere on the voice, and that the government appointed her or she got elected that position would only be temporary. Why are you so terrified of one woman’s opinion?
1
@johnnichol9412 And in your reply you clearly show an ignorance of how the process of the voice structure will work. The report I referenced (which clearly you didn’t read) suggests various structures. It is not the reports job to tell the government what to do it is merely to provide alternatives. You clearly fail to understand how advice to government works. The government will legislate the structure of the voiceand the Parliament will then reject, pass, of amend it. A subsequent LNP government will then be able to dissolve it, amend it, or provide its own legislation on how its would what a voice structured. Once again you seem to not understand the basic workings of our federal parliament. It is as if you are of the belief that the voice is set in stone.
1
@infidel202 You reply is just fallacious nonsense. Essentially all you said was popularity is correct. That isn’t close to a logical argument. I’m not even suggesting a voice will get up as all the polling says otherwise. And really gaslighting, you don’t even use the term correctly. Presenting facts in a discussion is not gaslighting. You may not like the facts so you attempt to use a term you saw in a movie or somewhere else. I’m sure it will go down well with the other RWNJs. I presented evidence of my opinion you provided shit.
1
@infidel202 sorry I forgot to sign off as the Chinese bot hiding under your bed. Dimwit.
1
@johnnichol9412 Read this report to the previous LNP government. It not only provides the detail it shows Dutton and Price both to be liars, as it was specifically written for them. https://voice.gov.au/sites/default/files/resource/download/indigenous-voice-co-design-process-final-report_1.pdf
1
@essiebl In your total ignorance you fail to understand it was not a government report but a commissioned report for the government, not written by the government. The report was driven by extensive community consultations and details multiple options for the structure of the voice (which will legislated and not set in stone but a voice that can change as required). You don’t even know the actual NIAA budget which is $4.2 billion. Do you actually know any facts regarding this debate / discussion? Obviously not because you have wilfully decided to remain ignorant, by your childish and immature stance “who would be bothered to read a report” what a dimwit.
1