Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "Nationals have 'fired up' Voice to Parliament debate" video.

  1. You still fail miserably to understand the difference between political representation and constitutional recognition.
    2
  2.  @daniellebcooper7160  Everything I have read about the Voice from its designers to indigenous commentators is that it will provide practical benefits and reduce the gap in education, housing, health, and employment outcomes. The indigenous community certainly don't feel it's virtue signalling.
    1
  3.  @daniellebcooper7160  So as planned by the IPA opponents of the voice now have their star "Jacinta Price" who is cited universally as a source of indigenous opinion not just by you but by literally every opponent of the voice. So in response to that, Birney, Dodson, Pearson, Grant, O'Donoghue, Turner, Yunupingu, Goodes, Davis, Anderson, Davis, are all indigenous are all leaders in thier community and all disagree with Prices opinion on the Voice. Constitutional recognition will provide equality and process by which indigenous peoples can take ownership of their situation and remedy what needs to be done to reduce gaps in education, housing, employment, and health. This is what the overwhelming majority of indigenous leaders say they require.
    1
  4.  @daniellebcooper7160  What is more telling is the absolute shambles the National Party is as it position on the voice crumbles even further with another two federal party members coming out today saying they opposed Littleprouds decision. Ken Wyatt the previous Minister for Indigenous affairs called the Nationals decision "lazy".
    1
  5.  @daniellebcooper7160  That's fantastic advice. Remove the moderate elements from your party and lurch further to the right and ensure the National Party a generation in opposition. I can only hope you are in a position to influence National Party policy.
    1
  6.  @daniellebcooper7160  Thankyou for your kind words.
    1