Comments by "" (@pwillis1589) on "‘Moral cudgel’: Yes campaign for Voice to Parliament" video.

What a 1k views and a dozen comments. You really do live in an echo chamber.
2
@cadaeishere8242 No, only years of consultations and debates going back at least 10 years. Two detailed reports to the LNP federal government of the time, which didn’t even comment on them. A Uluṟu statement from the heart that asked for a conversation with the Australian people that was flatly turned down by the Turnbull government who mischievously and dishonestly described an advisory body as a third chamber of government. There has been significant debate you simply have chosen to remain ignorant. I’m sure you will vote no, and the yes case don’t care.
1
@jamesmatheson5115 Factually incorrect and an absolute lie. It is a complete myth that a rent tax has anything to do with the voice. There are rent tax’s around but they are all entirely voluntary. A compulsory rent tax would need to be passed by parliament. An advisory body that has no legislative capacity can not repeat can not implement a rent tax. Either you don’t understand how our system of government works or are deliberately trying to spread misinformation.
1
What are you talking about?
1
@tomorrow6 That exact wording of the referendum question is in the public domain. The exact wording of the constitutional amendment is in the public domain. The reports to government are in the public domain. Continuing commentary about detail is disingenuous at best mischievous at worst, but mostly wilful ignorance.
1
@stevelozevski8151 It means more than a mindlessly repetitive emoji.
1
@stevelozevski8151 Facts before feelings.
1
@stevelozevski8151 Yep 2.3k views and 84 comments is all the facts needed to show the good work is really getting around.
1